Page 1

1
2
3 Tom Fitton 5-2-2020
4 Judicial Watch
5 info@judicialwatch.org
6
7 Tom,
8 I as a constitutionalist (Australia) aware that our federal constitution was also in part based
9 upon the USA constitution seek to follow what goes on in the US.
10
11 For example while Nancy Pelosi claims that without witnesses there was no trial, reality is that
12 one can submit to the court “OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION and the court can dismiss the
13 case without hearing from any witnesses if it find it has NO JURISDICTION. In a case I assisted
14 a party I nearly 2 years prior to the trial I wrote to the Prosecutor NO CASE TO ANSWER.
15 Ordinary one does this after the Prosecutor closes his case, however I did this about 2 years
16 earlier and the response of the Prosecutor was to withdraw 2 of the 3 criminal charges. When the
17 case finally was heard upon the Prosecutor closing its case the trail judge then directed the jury
18 to return a verdict NOT GUILTY as the Prosecutor (despite having 5 police officers a clerk of
19 court and a depute clerk of court as witnesses) had failed to prove the charge.
20
21 One may wonder: Why was there no impeachment for (Hot mic) quid pro quo – Russian
22 collusion Obama with asking Russian President Dmitri to wait until after the 2012 election
23 regarding Missile Shield, etc.
24 https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304177104577305182847032866
25 https://www.cfr.org/blog/friday-file-obamas-open-mic-gaffe
26
27 Anyhow, with the Iowa disaster one then has to ask what kind of system, if anything is going on?
28 The constitution as I understand it refers to the rights of “citizens” and as such I view that this
29 relates to those who hold American nationality. It is by holding the citizenship one is an
30 American by nationality.
31
32 As shown below the Commonwealth (USA Republic) doesn’t create its own franchise as citizens
33 are obtained by being a citizen of a State and then Automatically one then can also vote for
34 federal elections.
35 However, in my view, where a person is to vote in a Federal Election then the Commonwealth
36 (US Congress) is entitled to create uniform laws. For example that all states are using the same
37 electoral system and only electors of adult age are entitled to vote in federal elections. Adult age
38 should be determined by the US Congress.
39
40 https://hannity.com/media-room/report-eight-iowa-counties-have-more-registered-voters-than-
41 eligible-voters-18k-extra-names/
42 REPORT: Eight Iowa Counties Have More Registered Voters than ELIGIBLE
43 Voters, 18K+ Extra Names
44
5-2-2020 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 QUOTE
2 A new report from Judicial Watch is raising new questions over voter identification and security just hours
3 before the Iowa Caucus; revealing at least eight counties in the state have more registered voters than eligible
4 voters.
5 “Judicial Watch announced that at least eight Iowa counties have voter registration rolls larger than their
6 voting age population. According to Judicial Watch’s analysis of data released by the U.S. Election
7 Assistance Commission (EAC) this year, these eight counties are on the list of 378 counties nationwide that
8 have more voter registrations than citizens living there who are old enough to vote, i.e., counties where
9 registration rates exceed 100%. These 378 counties combined had about 2.5 million registrations over the
10 100%-registered mark. In Iowa, there are least 18,658 ‘extra names’ on the voting rolls in the eight counties
11 at issue,” writes Judicial Watch.
12 “Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections and Iowa need to undertake a serious effort to address its voting
13 rolls,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
14 END QUOTE
15
16 In my view the US Congress should legislate that for federal election purposes the States cannot
17 discriminate as to electors entitled to vote, being of adult age, having to register as to any
18 political affiliation. As such, when there is a federal election the elector is to be presented by a
19 list of candidates which the elector then can number as to any preferences. (Like they use in
20 Australia).
21 It should be understood that any US state can let any person vote for state elections but that when
22 it comes to the domain of the federal elections then the US Congress is to set the age of adult and
23 restrict voting to those who are “citizens” of the United States (as such has its nationality) and
24 prohibit non citizens from voting in federal elections.
25
26 https://www.catchdesmoines.com/iowa-caucus/iowa-caucus-101/
27 Iowa Caucus 101
28 QUOTE
29 To vote in Iowa, you must be registered to vote. To qualify to register to vote, you must be:
30 • A U.S. citizen,
31 • An Iowa resident, and
32 • At least 17 1/2 years old (must be 18 years old by election day to vote).

33 You cannot:
34 • Be a convicted felon (unless your voting rights have been restored),
35 • Be judged mentally incompetent to vote by a court, or
36 • Claim the right to vote in any other place.
37 END QUOTE
38
39 It should be understood that at least in my view a State can allow a person to become an elector
40 of whatever age it deems appropriate however the US Congress can limit a citizen to vote as to
41 being an “adult” and then the US Congress may from time to time determine what the “adult”
42 age is.
43
44 In my view the US Congress cannot place restrictions upon a state elector (other than “Adult”
45 age upon an elector and as such is limited to “A U.S. citizen” to be of “Adult” age and registered
46 in the particular electoral area of which it obtained state electoral rights. Congress may from time
47 to time alter the age of “Adult” to whatever age is considers appropriate.
48 .
49 What this would mean is that electors will vote for their respective candidate without being
50 required to be registered for any party. This as the registration for a party may be an
51 unconstitutional requirement against their FREEDOM OF SPEECH. It is not the business of a
52 State or for that a Federal Government to know if an elector is or isn’t associated with any

5-2-2020 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1 particular political party. Neither can a State limit an elector for federal elections to vote only as
2 to a registered party association. After all a elector may be a member of a particular political
3 party but may decide to vote for a candidate of another political party as the FREEDOM OF
4 SPEECH entitled that person to do.
5
6 Where a State has in excess of alleged electors voting than what is it entitled to have (based upon
7 Bureau of Statistics details, then the relevant state election must be deemed invalid and a fresh
8 election to be held.
9 What this means that any undocumented person who might in a particular State be allowed to
10 vote in state elections nevertheless lacking to be “citizens” then cannot be allowed to vote in
11 federal elections.
12 As such, the onus is upon each State to ensure that its electoral rolls show if the elector is
13 holding US citizenship or not.
14 In my view where any State official allows a person to vote in federal elections without the
15 elector holding US citizenship then the State official can be punished say with up to 10 years of
16 imprisonment.
17
18 While I understand there has been an issue about “citizenship” the issue is that the States must
19 prove that a person has “US citizenship” by it holding files which include a person’s birth
20 certificate as a US citizen or naturalisation document.
21
22 The aim is to place the onus upon the relevant States to be able to prove a persons eligibility to
23 vote in federal elections.
24
25 The purpose of the Senate is to be a House of review, hence that representation of each state
26 should be equal, this as to avoid any state to overwhelm of the less populated states. The House
27 of Representative is to represent all “citizens” not meaning the total population of undocuments
28 persons but rather those who are legitimately living in each state as US citizens. However, the
29 State may have perhaps 30% or more of its citizens who may not qualify to vote due to not being
30 of an age of “Adult” and/or the State denies the person to be entitled to vote due to being in
31 prison, etc. Where a State prevents a citizen to vote then the person can neither be permitted to
32 vote in any federal election while this disenfranchisement continues. It effectively means that the
33 number of electors actually voting is likely a lot less then the number of US citizens that are
34 living within the relevant state. Still, the number of Representatives of that State to the House of
35 Representatives will be based upon all “US citizens” residing within that state regardless if they
36 are or are not electors.
37
38 While Iowa may restrict a person to vote based upon being an “US citizen” (and in my view
39 correctly) other States may not apply the same and then it should make not one of iota different
40 to the federal elections, this as (again) federal elections must be based upon the criteria’s that the
41 person is holding “US citizenship”, is of “adult” age and resides in the relevant State for which
42 the vote is cast. After all the right to vote in a federal election is created by the State granting
43 franchise.
44
45 QUOTE
46 The First Amendment to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making
47 laws which regulate an establishment of religion, prohibit the free exercise of religion, or
48 abridge the freedom ... Wikipedia
49 END QUOTE
50
51 QUOTE
52 First Amendment - Religion and Expression

5-2-2020 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
2 or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
3 petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
4 END QUOTE
5
6 QUOTE
7 The 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted African American men the right to vote by
8 declaring that the "right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by
9 the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."
10 END QUOTE
11
12 https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/89309/united-states-v-cruikshank/?
13 United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
14 Supreme Court of the United States
15 QUOTE
16 In Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 178, we decided that the Constitution of the United States has not
17 conferred the right of suffrage upon any one, and that the United States have no voters of their own
18 creation in the States. In United States v. Reese et al., supra, p. 214, we hold that the fifteenth amendment
19 has invested the citizens of the United States with a new constitutional right which is, exemption from
20 discrimination in the exercise of the elective franchise on account of race, color, or previous condition of
21 servitude. From this it appears that the right of suffrage is not a necessary attribute of national citizenship; but
22 that exemption from discrimination in the exercise of that right on *556 account of race, &c., is. The right to
23 vote in the States comes from the States; but the right of exemption from the prohibited discrimination comes
24 from the United States. The first has not been granted or secured by the Constitution of the United States; but
25 the last has been.
26 Inasmuch, therefore, as it does not appear in these counts that the intent of the defendants was to prevent
27 these parties from exercising their right to vote on account of their race, &c., it does not appear that it was
28 their intent to interfere with any right granted or secured by the constitution or laws of the United States.
29 END QUOTE
30
31 In my view
32
33 QUOTE
34 SECTION. 1.
35 All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall
36 consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
37 SECTION. 2.
38 The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the
39 People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifi - cations
40 requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.
41 No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years,
42 and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be
43 END QUOTE
44
45 QUOTE
46 The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, [chosen by
47 the Legislature thereof,]* for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.
48 END QUOTE
49
50 QUOTE
51 SECTION. 4.
52 The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be
53 prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make
54 or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
55 END QUOTE
56
57 Again: “the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations”

5-2-2020 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 5

1
2 It is therefore very clear that the Congress can limit the “manner” in which elections are held for
3 Senators and provide for a “uniform” “Manner”.
4
5 It means that the Congress can prescribe that each state shall apply the same “Manner” in how to
6 hold any federal election. Congress could also require that each State conduct its election at a
7 certain date. This then could mean that all States could be required to hold their elections (say) in
8 September of the election year. This would avoid the spread out of elections over an entire year.
9 Also the Congress can require that elections shall be held in the same “Manner” as to being
10 ballot papers which are to be kept (afterwards in case of any dispute arising regarding the
11 validity of an election) for 4 years regarding the House of Representative and/or the Senate.
12
13 QUOTE
14 The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the
15 People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifi - cations
16 requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.
17 END QUOTE
18
19 The reference to “the People” clearly is limited by “and the Electors in each State shall have the
20 Qualifi - cations requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.”
21 And therefore must not be misconceived that somehow undocumented person (as they are
22 referred to) are included in being entitled to vote in federal elections.
23 While I understood that there was a rumour that a State might allow undocumented persons to
24 register if they held a drivers licence for State election purposes, in my view this cannot override
25 the constitution embedded legal principle quoted above, to allow such person to vote in federal
26 elections.
27
28 While there as I understand it there was an uproar against President Trump seeking that
29 “citizenship” is included in any Bureau of Statistic survey, reality is that it is the onus of the
30 State to prove that any person is entitled to vote in federal elections. As such shift the burden
31 upon a State to prove the purported electors to be entitled to vote in federal elections.
32 In my view Iowa proved that the Congress needs to provide better regulations to streamline how
33 federal elections are held and to avoid that undocumented persons or others not entitled to vote
34 in federal elections are nevertheless allowed to vote because a particular State desires to
35 undermine the validity and credibility of a federal election. Hence the need to ensure that severe
36 penalties can be applied to any State electoral officer and perhaps so also a Governor of a State
37 who were to undermine the legal principles embedded in the constitution.
38
39 Perhaps you might just respond to my writings even if you may or may not agree with my set out
40 stated above.
41
42 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to address all issues.
43 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

44 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

45 (Our name is our motto!)

5-2-2020 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati