Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
TASK 24, BV
The
Netherlands
Company
Task24, B.V
Antoniustraat 9, Eindhoven
The Netherlands
Company Mentor
Egbert Touw
School Mentor
Author
Safee Hussain
Student-number: 2137177
3
Document History
4
Management Summary
Cost on a system that has not yet been realized and created in real world
completely is always larger than expected; we’re discussing a problem
that could pose threat directly to 15-30 % of total human food production
so benefit; is huge in its natural sense and is a service in its moral sense.
The cost of for the whole system is suggested to be € 880.5.
Conclusively, our effort shows that the solution of tracking bees; through
RFID is really difficult if not “impossible”. This decision is taken after a
vigorous exercise which is elaborated in our report below, it includes a
research and practical implementation of design proposed to be the best
in given conditions and circumstances. The final decision is of course
taken by the judges and reader himself through arguments given.
5
Summary
Our plan was to implement the detection procedure primarily and then
transfer the registered information to a server through GSM modules and
upload the information on a website. Although our antenna design did not
detect the required tag sensed from the reader equipment, but the tag
had clear influence on the magnetic field of antenna in its proximity seen
from the network analyzer. Plus our antenna was able to sense and detect
most common tags in the market. We can only use the passive tags as
bees cannot carry a battery to run the chip on tag.
6
Preface
As the name suggests, the project Bee Tracking System uses RFID for
detection of Bees, use of RFID as technology for solving the problem had
already been suggested in a prototype proposed by John Roodt, a previous
internee on the project. This report demonstrates the practical
implementation and implications that came as results after the pursuit of
problem solution. There is no debate on the choice of technology, but the
report includes a comprehensive debate on physical and practical
exercises made to bring the idea to real world.
Once if the bee is detected and registered correctly, we can send the
information to an internet server using simple GSM modules. Five months
of pursuit doesn’t only include the lab work, but also an internet research
on the selection of right equipment, right frequency of communication and
antenna design research. The frequency was selected to be in the ISM
band 13.56 MHz.
7
Table of Contents
Table of Contents...................................................................................................8
Introduction..........................................................................................................10
1.1 Problem Description....................................................................................10
1.2 Assignment.................................................................................................10
1.3 Resources and Support...............................................................................10
Research..............................................................................................................11
2.1 RFID Technology.........................................................................................11
2.1.1 Merits of RFID .......................................................................................12
2.1.2 Demerits of RFID ..................................................................................12
2.1.3 Inductive Coupling ............................................................................13
2.1.4 Backscatter Coupling............................................................................16
2.2 RFID Antenna Design (Inductively Coupled)................................................18
2.2.1 Current and Magnetic Fields ...............................................................18
2.2.2 Induced Voltage in Antenna Coil...........................................................20
2.2.3 Inductance of various Antenna Coils.....................................................21
2.2.4 Resonance circuits, Quality factor Q and Band width............................25
2.2.5 Antenna Symmetry...............................................................................28
2.2.6 Field Strength and effects of Planes.....................................................29
2.3 Antenna Matching ......................................................................................31
2.3.1 Significance...........................................................................................31
2.3.2 How to Match .......................................................................................33
2.4 Bee Behavior...............................................................................................36
2.4.1 Bees and Magnetic Fields......................................................................36
2.4.2 Bee and Bee Hive..................................................................................38
2.5 System........................................................................................................ 38
2.5.1 The Tag.................................................................................................40
2.5.3 Antenna Switching Mechanism.............................................................43
2.6 Problem Realization in the light of RFID......................................................45
Implementation.................................................................................................... 46
3.1 Antenna Circuit............................................................................................46
3.1.1 Dimensional calculations of Coil............................................................47
3.1.2 Configurations......................................................................................48
8
3.1.3 Measurements.......................................................................................49
3.2 Antenna Matching.......................................................................................51
3.3 Testing with Reader....................................................................................54
3.3.1 Results.................................................................................................. 55
3.4 Observations...............................................................................................56
3.5 Cost Analysis...............................................................................................61
3.6 Problem Faced and Tackled........................................................................62
Conclusions..........................................................................................................63
Recommendations................................................................................................65
References........................................................................................................... 66
Appendix..............................................................................................................67
Glossary................................................................................................................ 68
Annex A-1............................................................................................................. 69
Annex A-2............................................................................................................. 74
9
Introduction
1.1 Problem Description
Colony Collapse Disorder is the name of the problem being faced by
most of the beekeepers all over Europe and America. Male bees
“drones” are vanishing in large numbers; this directly affects the
fruit and vegetable production. To solve the problem we need to
track bees and see what makes them disappear. Initially, we need to
tag them with any identification and follow their movement by
registering them each time they enter or leave any hive. Although
U.S. beekeepers have been hardest hit by CCD, beekeepers in
Europe have reported similar honeybee problems.
1.2 Assignment
Detect and register the tagged bees whenever they enter or leave
the hive.
c) Mr. Piet Van Roij, technically supported each step and mentored
this project from school´s end.
10
Research
2.1 RFID Technology
Radio frequency identification (RFID) is a generic term
that is used to describe a system that transmits the identity (in the form of
a unique serial number) of an object or person wirelessly, using radio
waves. It's grouped under the broad category of automatic identification
technologies.
To retrieve the data stored on an RFID tag, you need a reader. A typical
reader is a device that has one or MORE antennas that emit radio waves
and receive signals back from the tag. The reader then passes the
information in digital form to a computer system
Read range is determined by many factors, but one of the most important
is the method passive tags use to transmit data to the reader. Low- and
high-frequency tags use inductive coupling. Essentially, a coil in the reader
antenna and a coil in the tag antenna form an electromagnetic field. The
tag draws power from the field, uses the power to run the circuitry on the
chip and then changes the electric load on the antenna. The reader
antenna senses the change in the magnetic field and converts these
changes into the ones and zeros that computers understand. Because the
coil in the tag antenna and the coil in the reader antenna must form a
magnetic field, the tag must be fairly close to the reader antenna, which
limits the read range of these systems.
11
2.1.1 Merits of RFID
12
The benefits of this technology are very attractive and technically catchy
enough to overrun any other technology for tracking a mobile commodity.
The management and organizational abilities of RFID make it more reliable
and applicable in different scenario, same is the case with our problem.
But this is not all that we should know about RFID before we want to
implement this system. We should take specific RFID traits to our
consideration; RFID has its own way of operation and posses its own
application hurdles. We include the main RFID topics of technicality as
under.
A small part of the emitted field penetrates the antenna coil of the
transponder, which is some distance away from the coil of the reader. By
induction, a voltage is generated in the transponder's antenna coil. This
voltage is rectified and serves as the power supply for the data carrying
device (microchip). A capacitor is connected in parallel with the reader's
antenna coil, the capacitance of which is selected such that it combines
with the coil inductance of the antenna coil to form a parallel resonant
circuit, with a resonant frequency that corresponds with the transmission
frequency of the reader. Very high currents are generated in the antenna
coil of the reader by resonance step-up in the parallel resonant circuit,
which can be used to generate the required field strengths for the
operation of the remote transponder.
The antenna coil of the transponder and the capacitor to form a resonant
circuit tuned to the transmission frequency of the reader. The voltage at
the transponder coil reaches a maximum due to resonance step-up in the
parallel resonant circuit.
13
Figure 2.1.2(**http://www.rfid-handbook.com)
To reclaim the data in the reader, the voltage measured at the reader's
antenna is rectified. This represents the demodulation of an amplitude
modulated signal. An example circuit is shown in the chapter "Reader –
Low Cost Layout".
14
Figure 2.1.3(**http://www.rfid-handbook.com)
15
Figure2.1.4 (**http://www.rfid-handbook.com)
Figure 2.1.5(**http://www.rfid-handbook.com)
16
for the deactivation or activation of the power saving "power-down" mode.
The diodes used here are low barrier Schottky diodes, which have a
particularly low threshold voltage. The voltage obtained may also be
sufficient to serve as a power supply for short ranges.
The power P2 reflected from the transponder is radiated into free space. A
small proportion of this (free space attenuation) is picked up by the
reader's antenna. The reflected signal therefore travels into the antenna
connection of the reader in the "backwards direction" and can be
decoupled using a directional coupler and transferred to the receiver input
of a reader. The "forward" signal of the transmitter, which is stronger by
powers of ten, is to a large degree suppressed by the directional coupler.
The ratio of power transmitted by the reader and power returning from the
transponder (P1 / P2) can be estimated using the radar equation.
17
2.2 RFID Antenna Design (Inductively Coupled)
In an RFID application, an antenna coil is needed for two main reasons:
Where:
I = current
µ o = 4 π x 10-7 (Henry/meter)
18
a1 = -180° and a2 = 0°, Equation 1 can be rewritten as:
Figure 2.2.1(**)
The magnetic field produced by a circular loop antenna coil with N-turns as
shown in Figure 2 is found by:
⁄
Bz = (µ 0INa2)/ 2(a2 + r2) 3 2
Equation 3
= (µ 0INa2)/2* (1/ r3) for r2>>a2
Where:
• a = radius of loop
Figure 2.2.2(**)
19
Figure 2.2.3(**)
V = - N dΨ/ dt
Equation 4
Where:
The negative sign shows that the induced voltage acts in such a way as to
oppose the magnetic flux producing it. This is known as Lenz’s Law and it
emphasizes the fact that the direction of current flow in the circuit is such that
the induced magnetic field produced by the induced current will oppose the
original magnetic field. The magnetic flux Y in Equation 4 is the total magnetic
field B that is passing through the entire surface of the antenna coil, and found
by:
ψ = ∫ B·dS Equation 5
Where:
20
• S = surface area of the coil
Figure 2.2.4(**)
L= Nψ / I Equation 6
Where:
• N = number of turns
• I = current
• ψ = magnetic flux
21
In a typical RFID antenna coil for 13.56 MHz, the inductance is often
chosen as a few (uH) for a tag and from a few hundred to a few thousand
(mH) for a reader. For a coil antenna with multiple turns, greater
inductance results with closer turns. Therefore, the tag antenna coil that
has to be formed in a limited space often needs a multi-layer winding to
reduce the number of turns. The design of the inductor would seem to be
a relatively simple matter. However, it is almost impossible to construct an
ideal inductor because:
The coil has a finite conductivity that results in loss; the distributed
capacitance exists between turns of a coil and between the conductor and
surrounding objects. The actual inductance is always a combination of
resistance, inductance, and capacitance. The apparent inductance is the
effective inductance at any frequency, i.e. inductive minus the capacitive
effect. Various formulas are available in literatures for the calculation of
inductance for wires and coils. The parameters in the inductor can be
measured. LCR Meter can measure the inductance, resistance, and Q of
the coil.
Where:
• N = number of turns
Figure 2.2.5(**)
22
Inductance of a Circular Loop Antenna Coil with Multilayer
To form a big inductance coil in a limited space, it is more efficient to use
multilayer coils. For this reason, a typical RFID antenna coil is formed in a
planar multi-turn structure. Figure 8 shows a cross section of the coil. The
inductance of a circular ring antenna coil is calculated by an empirical
formula
L = 0.31(aN)2/ 6a+9h+10b
Equation 8
• N = number of turns
• b = winding thickness in cm
• h = winding height in cm
Calculation of Inductance:
With
23
Figure 2.2.6 b(**)
• ao, bo = Overall dimensions of the coil
• aavg, bavg = Average dimensions of the coil
• t= track thickness
• w= track width
• g= gap between tracks
• Na= Number of turns
• d= equivalent diameter of the track
Theory Behind
The inductance for the reader antenna coil is typically in the range of a
few hundred to a few thousand micro- henries (uH) for high frequency
applications. The reader antenna can be made of either a single coil that is
typically forming a series resonant circuit or a double loop (transformer)
antenna coil that forms a parallel resonant circuit.
The series resonant circuit results in minimum impedance at the
resonance frequency. Therefore, it draws a maximum current at the
resonance frequency. On the other hand, the parallel resonant circuit
results in maximum impedance at the resonance frequency. Therefore,
the current becomes minimized at the resonance frequency.
24
Since the voltage can be stepped up by forming a double loop (parallel)
coil, the parallel resonant circuit is often used for a system where a higher
voltage signal is required. (Figure 2.2.7) shows an example of the
transformer loop antenna. The main loop (secondary) is formed with
several turns of wire on a large frame, with a tuning capacitor to resonate
it to the resonance frequency (13.56 MHz). The other loop is called a
coupling loop (primary), and it is formed with less than two or three turns
of coil. This loop is placed in a very close proximity to the main loop,
usually (but not necessarily) on the inside edge and not more than a
couple of centimeters away from the main loop. The purpose of this loop is
to couple signals induced from the main loop to the reader (or vice versa)
at more reasonable matching impedance.
The coupling (primary) loop provides an impedance match to the
input/output impedance of the reader. The coil is connected to the
input/output signal driver in the reader electronics. The main loop
(secondary) must be tuned to resonate at the resonance frequency and is
not physically connected to the reader electronics. The coupling loop is
usually unturned, but in some designs, a tuning capacitor C2 is placed in
series with the coupling loop. Because there are far fewer turns on the
coupling loop than the main loop, its inductance is considerably smaller.
As a result, the capacitance to resonate is usually much larger.
Figure 2.2.7(**)
25
Equation 9
Where:
• C = tuning capacitance
The resonant circuit can be formed either series or parallel. The series
resonant circuit has minimum impedance at the resonance frequency. As a
result, maximum current is available in the circuit. This series resonant
circuit is typically used for the reader antenna. On the other hand, the
parallel resonant circuit has maximum impedance at the resonance
frequency. It offers minimum current and maximum voltage at the
resonance frequency. This parallel resonant circuit is used for the tag
antenna.
Figure 2.2.8 shows a simple parallel resonant circuit. The total impedance
of the circuit is given by:
Where:
• R = load resistor
w2LC = 1 Equation 11
Equation 12
Z=R Equation 13
26
Figure 2.2.8(**)
B = 1/ 2π RC
Equation 14
The quality factor, Q, is defined by various ways such as:
Q = Energy Stored in the System per One Cycle/ Energy Dissipated in the
System per One Cycle
Q = fo/B Equation 15
Where:
• fo = resonant frequency
• B = bandwidth
Q=R Equation 16
Vo = 2*pi*foNQSBo * cos a
Equation 17
The above equation indicates that the induced voltage in the tag coil is
inversely proportional to the square root of the coil inductance, but
proportional to the number of turns and surface area of the coil. The
parallel resonant circuit can be used in the transformer loop antenna for a
long-range reader as discussed in "Reader Antenna Coil" (Figure 2.2.7).
27
The voltage in the secondary loop is proportional to the turn ratio (n2/n1)
of the transformer loop. However, this high voltage signal can corrupt the
receiving signals. For this reason, a separate antenna is needed for
receiving the signal. This receiving antenna circuit should be tuned to the
modulating signal of the tag and detuned to the carrier signal frequency
for maximum read range.
Figure 2.2.9
Figure 2.2.10
28
2.2.6 Field Strength and effects of Planes
The benefit of a ferrite is to shield an antenna against the influence of
metal. A metal plane could be part of the housing of the NFC device or a
ground plane of the NFC device PCB itself, which has to be connected very
near to the antenna. If metal is placed very near to antenna the
alternating magnetic field generates eddy currents in the metal. These
eddy currents absorbed power, and lead to detuning of the antenna due to
a decreased inductance and quality factor. Therefore, for operation of an
antenna in close metallic environment, it is necessary to shield the
antenna with ferrite.
Example:
For easy simulation a circular antenna has been used in every case. A
circular antenna is rotation symmetric to the x-axis. Therefore the
simulation can be reduced to a two dimensional mathematical problem.
The simulation shows on the one hand the field distribution of a non-
distributed antenna. Common for all examples: Radius of the antenna 7.5
cm, 1 turn, wire width 1mm copper.
Figure 2.2.11 shows the 2D field of the circular antenna. The right part
shows the field distribution. The highest field strength is generated in the
area of the coil.The left part shows the magnitude of the field strength H
over a distance d. The line of a minimal field strength of Hmin = 1.5 A/m is
marked.
Figure 2.2.11
29
Figure 2.2.12 shows the field distribution of the same antenna with a
metal plane and a ferrite plane near to the antenna.
Figure 2.2.12
30
2.3 Antenna Matching
Antennas are matched for maximum power transfer from the transmitter
to the antenna. Most of the antennas are matched on 50 ohms and 75
ohms. In our exercise we pursued 50 ohms matching.
The first question arising to one’s mind is that why do we need antenna to
be matched. The answer is simple if an antenna is matched to 50 ohms it
means the total impedance of antenna resonating circuit and matching
circuitry is 50 ohms, this is just a standard one can have different
impedance for matching but the impedance is chosen in such a manner
that the impedance of the whole transmitter equals the impedance of
antenna circuitry, so that half of the power from source is dissipated in the
transmitter circuit and half of it is dissipated in antenna circuit. This is the
only way to supply maximum energy to antenna. In this way we can
achieve VSWR=1 and reflection coefficient to be zero.
2.3.1 Significance
This has to be clarified that why do we want to match or tune our antenna with
previous reader equipment including reader IC, encoder, modulator and EMC
filter etc , this because we want maximum power to be delivered into the air to
achieve better coupling factor among two coils. So, the idea is that half of the
power is dissipated in the circuitry before antenna and half to be delivered to the
antenna and if both are matched, and no RF power is reflected back to the
transmitter then we transmit maximum power into the air, of course this power
that we want to see in the air is also limited by regulatory authorities, we give
brief table later related to allowed energy levels. The diagrams below show how
important it is to tune the antenna to a resistance equal to the resistance of
previous transmitter circuitry. In the graphs shown below the matching
impedance is 30 Ohms.
31
The Current Vis-à-vis Matching Resistance
The following figure 2.3.1(**) shows three curves at different voltages.
Figure 2.3.1(**)
Figure 2.3.2(**)
32
The Power Added Efficiency Vis-à-vis Matching Resistance and
Collective Analysis
Figure 2.3.3(**)
We can clearly ponder in the figure above that power added efficiency is the
greatest with minimum power applied to antenna at 30 ohms.
Smith Chart
Smith chart is a normalized impedance plot chart, a classic
convention of plotting impedance of an antenna with reference to 50 ohms.
There´s a method widely used to match a circuit using smith chart, which
abstains the addition of a resistor to the circuit, one can achieve a matched
network by adding lumped elements in the light of movements shown in
Figure^……. Let´s just get familiar with the basic smith chart with both
admittance and impedance plot. As can be seen from the diagram below, red
lines represent admittance plot and black lines illustrate the impedance plot.
33
Figure 2.3.4(**)
• Y=G+jB-------------Admittance
Figure 2.3.5(**)
34
1. Identify the impedance on smith chart
2. Draw an SWR circle on the impedance placing the compass needle in the
middle of the chart.
4. Plot the unit circle, also called as normalized impedance plot of Z= 1+jx.
6. A). Follow the jX line to unit circle from the impedance plot, in case of
impedance part. Or
B). Follow the jB line to auxiliary circle from the admittance plot, in case of
admittance part.
It can be seen from the figure above that if we follow part A we add the
element in series and if we follow part B we add the lumped element in
parallel.
7. Now follow the unit circle or auxiliary circle to reach the centre of plot.
Figure 2.3.6(**)
35
2.4 Bee Behavior
In this type of detections where the animal has to carry the tag with it, we
need take the behavior of the animal to our account.
36
7. In the honeybee, the NO-system in the antenna lobes is
implicated in chemosensory processing and in memory
formation. Disturbance of the NO-system through
electromagnetic fields with low and high frequency is
proved today only in mammals, but it is expected to work in
the same manner also in insects. In this case, olfactory
function and the memory of bees are fading.
37
2.4.2 Bee and Bee Hive
• Honeybees are able to carry up to 70 mg
• After when the wooden slab is placed in the entrance, the total
height to enter remains to be 8mm.
Figure 2.4.1(**)
2.5 System
Skimming the research of Mr. Roodt, it was found that Microsensys a German
company is the only company offering solutions through RFID for bee tracking
worldwide. The equipment they offer is not applicable, which was quite
understood between them and us while we communicated about the solution.
According to Mr. Sylvo Jeager Marketing Manager of the company, it was possible
to detect the pico Mic 3 Tag from iID Maja Reader or iID Mini Pen reader, but a
new system was required to be launched in May 2009 which would give an
applicable and complete solution. We were able to convince them that we are
seriously following the problem and we need their help. Upon a sponsor letter to
Mr. Jeager, the company replied us with good news of handing us over the
prototype of their upcoming product for a technical feedback and maybe some
help on it. This product was a direct solution of bee detection.
Things could not go as smoothly as planned for, and we took the tag from
microsensys and decided to make a reader antenna that fit our problem and use
an efficient reader from the market to derive our own designed antennas.
38
The tag and the readers we searched out and found to be relevant to the
situation are shown below. Some of the specifications are mentioned here, while
for the rest one should refer to the annex and references.
39
2.5.1 The Tag
The suggested Microsensys tag is shown below with its dimensions
Figure 2.5.1(**)
40
2.5.2 The Reader
SkyeModule M2
Microsensys Handheld antenna
ISO 15693
13.56MHz ISO/IEC15693
compliant Small size Reader
module From ZIXSYS
Microsensys ISO 15693
USB 2.0 Interface
41
iID Mini Pen / USB Interface
42
2.5.3 Antenna Switching Mechanism
If one antenna is able to detect a tag then we can build a whole array of
40 antennas covering the whole entrance, we can use either switch IC or
some interface with microcontroller to switch between the antennas and
scan the whole entrance in micro-seconds to make sure that we do not
miss any tagged bee entering or leaving the facility.
NJG1519KC1
SP4T SWITCH GaAs MMIC
44
2.6 Problem Realization in the light of RFID
If we just take a look on the information provided above, we can sort the
problem in simple words. That is to say that, we have to design such an
antenna which is able to detect this microsensys tag (small size/pico tag)
from the range of 3mm at least. The tag is bearable by the bee as it can
carry weight up to 70mg (not 24/7) and weight of the tag is only 2.5mg, so
that bee can carry it and perform its normal functions. Now consider a
situation that around 50 bees are tagged in a hive and around 7 tagged
bees enter the hive at the same time, to detect these tags the size of the
antenna is already to small that it cannot provide multi-detection because
of its size. This means antenna design must have more than one antenna.
But before we design the antenna we need to see what reader should be
attached to it.
45
Implementation
3.1 Antenna Circuit
We proposed three ideas of building reader antenna in our research. By now we
had to decide which design should be implemented, building a rectangular
antenna and a single coil antenna was not advisable because they require a lot
bigger space, if we increase the size of reader antenna the transponder can’t
couple with it(reader antenna) magnetically thus we won’t be detecting anything
in that cases. So we decided to go for multilayered antenna coil built just like an
inductor but carefully calculated number of turns and its diameter. Using the
equation 9 from section 2.2.4, we made a table and a set of capacitors and
inductors to be used in such a manner that circuit resonates on the target
frequency i.e. 13.56 MHz. The table is as under
Use in parallel
Use in parallel
Use in parallel
Use in parallel
46
Use in parallel
Use in parallel
Use in parallel
Formula used:
Putting values:
• Turns = 15
• radius = 0.25 cm
• length = 1cm
47
• depth = 0.01 cm
Using these calculations above we constructed the coil and found the
inductances of different coils to fall in the region of 1 , so that we
just get the idea that how many turns in actual practice we require to fall
in the target region of 13.56 MHz.
3.1.2 Configurations
It is easy to establish the fact that size and range of the antenna in our
case are very small the dimensions of transponder are such small that if
there are two bees passing very close through the entrance of the hive
and going in opposite directions, then bigger or normal patch and micro
strip antennas cannot detect their direction and may not be able to detect
them simultaneously.
Moreover since the size and range of the antennas are really small, we
decided to build an array of antennas, and a switching mechanism to
activate each antenna at high frequency.
48
Parallel resonant circuit
Using SWR bridge
As we had no idea that how the antenna circuit of the Microsensys tags
was made, so we had to have these configurations to find by hit and trial
that what type of configuration would work with the tag.
3.1.3 Measurements
Figure 3.1.1 Figure 3.1.2
Seen from the spectrum analyzer these circuits gave us some useful responses,
we had made an antenna resonating on frequencies that are nearby the required
frequency of 13.56 MHz. Figure to the left shows a paralell reonant circuit and to
the right demonstrates a series resonant circuit.
Next problem was to bring these antennas to precisely to 13.56 MHz to get the
best magnetic coupling of the antenna and tags brought in proximity. It is not
possible to change your capacitance as we didn’t have the variable capacitors
available, we could only change the inductance of the coil to increase or
decrease the resonant frequency. As the frequency of resonance is inversely
49
proportional to the inductance, we observed that increasing the number of turns
on the coil would increase the inductance and thus would decrease the
resonance frequency and vice-versa.
Now the question arises, that where exactly should this dip lie, the first
answer that comes to our minds is 13.56 MHz both the tag and reader
antennas should be resonating at this frequency, but practically the dip
should come a little before the resonating frequency, in such a manner
that 13.56 MHz falls at the start of second half of dip.
The reason behind this strange claim is that when the tag is brought close
to the reader antenna, due to mutual inductance the inductance of the
reader antenna increases. And we know that increasing the inductance
would cause the dip to shift left. If we want to bring an optimum change in
voltage (in case of parallel circuit), then we can’t place the resonant
frequency (13.56 MHz) to the left of the dip. We have to place the target
frequency slightly to the right of the dip to get maximum change of
voltage. Maximum change in voltage means maximum sensitivity of the
antenna. The microsensys tag is very small it won’t be able to cause huge
factor of magnetic coupling thus we need a better Q factor from the
antenna as well.
Next problem was to increase the Q factor and chose the configuration
that works the best in our case. We have a comparison of series and
parallel circuit response from the Network Analyzer, according these
results shown below; we decided to go for a parallel circuit. To increase
the quality factor we had to use SMD components. The reason for choosing
the parallel circuit was:
50
c. Mostly RFID circuits are implemented in this manner.
The figure to left shows two circuits, one in series (yellow) and one in parallel
(blue). The figure at the right hand side shows both of these circuits when
brought to close to each other. We can clearly examine that the circuit with
parallel configuration gives better(higher) quality factor.
measurements.
Figure 3.2.1
51
The response was over whelming, we fell close to the required impedance. But it
wasn’t exactly up to the mark of 50 Ohms, we can observe the impedance to be
ZL = 51.774 – j1.5524.
We have explained the method of matching in the research section 2.3. The
impedance that has to be plotted in the first step of matching as explained in
sub-section 2.3.2 is ZL found here in the measurement above. Using the smith
chart and exactly following the steps we can match the circuit we had from the
configurations we followed above.
As told above in the theory research (section 2.3), we have to reach the centre of
the smith chart. And we have two solutions to reach the centre. The distance
travelled on the chart is measured in terms of λ. A semi circular travel is 0.5λ.
Figure 3.2.2
The values of C1 and L2 are calculated from the amount of distance that was
travelled on the imaginary curve to cut the unit circle, and then from there to the
centre of the graph gives the value of L2.
Along with that we need to know the reflection coefficient at the place where the
current reaches antenna itself.
ZL = 51.774 – j1.5524
Zo = 50 Ohms
52
So,
We have to get rid of this reflection coefficient, it is already too low but to
completely put it to zero we need to move from the point of admittance on the
smith chart to the auxiliary, and from there we can follow the auxiliary circle to
the centre of the smith chart.
53
3.3 Testing with Reader
It was about time that we would have had the reader equipment to
connect these circuits above for testing. On 28th May we received the
reader equipment, next day we switched the external antenna to ENA, this
external antenna was accompanying the reader equipment. Comparison of
the antenna made by skyetech and the antennas are show below
Figure 3.3.1 shows, the external antenna from skyetek to the left and the
antenna to the right is the one made in Fontys.
Figure 3.3.1
When a Tag :- I-code SL1,SL2 1K-bit was brought close to the antennas we
Figure 3.3.2
When our antenna was tested with skyetek reader, it was able to detect
almost all common RFID tags available in the market including these
54
• Mifare-1k DAC
• Mifare Desfire
In the similar fashion, we tested every tag with both of the antennas first
on the network analyzer to see whether the tag causes any change to
antennas’ log-magnitude response. Then the antenna was attached to the
skyetek reader to see the tag detection on the PC. The reader equipment
has an interface for PC USB or Serial port, and software with the name
skyware needs to be installed on the corresponding machine.
It should be noted here that the external antenna from skyetek was unable to
show any response to the microsensys tag and the antenna we built in the lab
detects the tag on the Network Analyzer’s log-magnitude graphical view but it
doesn’t detect if used with skyetek reader.
3.3.1 Results
Finally after testing and making all possible changes to circuit that could be make
in the terms of attaching SMD components and decreasing the size of the
antenna, we can say that if it is not really impossible to track the animal through
RFID, then it is really difficult. One has to put more time and resources to make it
possible. Microsensys are solving the same problem on a commercial scale; they
should have had a feasibility to put finances into this project. The design they
have proposed for reader antenna resembles our antenna design, in terms of
using multiple RFID small sized antenna.
55
3.4 Observations
Antenna
RR =31200*[A/lambda2]2
In our case, this yields RR=130 milliohms and we probably have used 4
meters of wire to construct the loop, assuming a square shape… So, if we
do not radiate energy, how do we transfer it to the tag we intend to
communicate with ? The answer is magnetic coupling. Some people refer
to RFID base stations as “couplers”. This terminology is certainly quite
appropriate in our case. We have indeed to consider the RFID system,
antenna plus tag, as a loosely coupled transformer, with the base station
antenna acting as the primary of this transformer. This concept is of
paramount importance for the system designer. One must always
remember it. The tag AND the base station “antenna” constitute THE
system, and cannot be studied separately.
The other point to remember is that if we feed five Watts to a loop RFID
“antenna”, these five watts, being NOT radiated, will have to be
dissipated somewhere…
In our case we have no idea about what the inductance of the tag
antenna, how it is coupled with our antenna. When should the tag give
best quality factor? All what we knew about the tag was that it follows ISO
15693 protocol. Through research we came to know that the this protocol
has sub carrier along at 423 KHz, possibly ON/OFF keyed if we use the
single sub carrier modulation at a data rate of 27 kBits/sec. To cater these
side bands and, not to clip them from top more than 3db we have to keep
56
the quality factor in the middle. If we make it too large we’ll completely
lose information and if we let it go we won’t be able to sense anything
(sensitvity).
57
The coupling factor (k) & the quality factor (Q)
Within the given circumstances we have another thing to worry about.
This was something totally unexpected, we consider that if RFID uses
inductive coupling, just like a transformer, then the better these inductors
are coupled the better connection we have the better data rate can be
achieved and maybe better range too. But, the case is a little different this
came to my attention when I saw the reader antenna from skyetek giving
following responses:
Figure 3.4.1
Figure 3.4.2
The graph is expected to shift left, yes it does but along with that shift we
see as the we bring them close the unexpected reverse dip goes even
deeper.
58
Figure 3.4.3
Yes if the coupling factor is too high then we have two resonant
frequencies, to reduce this effect engineers use RF amplifiers (reader
equipment) and improve the quality factor to reduce this effect but it is
almost in evitable. We can also see a response from our own antennas
reaching to this kind of response in figures above. But, we don’t see any
kind of extra dip or even a hint of it when microsensys tag is brought to
proximity. Do we have a required coupling factor with microsensys tag
who knows, we have no information about its inductance to calculate
using following criteria
The nice thing is that the coupling factor depends only on geometrical
parameters. The inductance values, the coils number of turns, are not
involved. Let us consider the following oversimplified representation of a
base station antenna coil and a tag antenna coil:
Figure 3.4.4
On the left, we have the base station antenna coil, with a diameter d1=2 x
r1. On the right, we have the tag antenna coil, with a diameter d2=2 x r2,
tilted along the axis by an angle a. The coupling factor can be expressed
as:
59
Of course, this equation is valid only for circular coils, but the design
guidelines we are going to infer from it are valid whatever the shape. From
the equation above, it is obvious that the coupling factor will be maximum
when r1 = r2.
From more sources we came to know that geometry requirements are not
the only one to be met before we calculate the coupling factor it also
requires more information.
Note: This coupling factor and quality factor conflict or clash, suggests
clearly that we cannot consider reader or tag separately, we have to thing
them as a system.
60
3.5 Cost Analysis
Before we calculate the total cost, we have to consider following quantities
as requirements per system (one system/hive).
61
3.6 Problem Faced and Tackled
Although at every step and every level of this project, the report explains
the hurdles we faced and the solutions we chose to solve the
corresponding problems, we picked the most time taking and important
problems and described them as under:
62
Conclusions
After four and a half months of experience we are around the end of
project time, under the given circumstances the main goals of project
were not achieved. Mic3 microsensys tag was not detected by our antenna
design. But it was made clear the proposed designed does work with RFID
and has the capability to detect other renowned tags. There might be
several hundred reasons for failure but to my sheer understanding I have
following conclusions.
• We can even say that right reader was not selected if it is unable to
sense the tag. But the situation in which reader was ordered and the
time that was given to work with the reader was not enough to be 3
weeks only.
• Antenna design and then testing requires at least two months for a
graduation trainee student I believe, while I had to perform same duty
in one month.
• We cannot take reader and tag separately, together they make up the
whole system, and we need to know the inductance and quality factor
of tag antenna. This has been one of the biggest pull back. There was
no information given on the tag other than it follows a protocol ISO
15693.
63
• The quality factor selection, coupling factor and size of antenna are the
most crucial aspect of this project, they should never be neglected.
64
Recommendations
For students, looking to take this project forward after me, have to work in
following fields
• The antenna size should be decreased to such an extent that size of this
reader antenna should become comparable to tag, keeping the fact in mind
that the antenna should be able to have least insertion loss and could be
compatible with the reader circuit in terms input power.
• Before someone else takes on to microsensys tag, he/she should have more
information about the tag, for instance the inductance of tag antenna, and
how could we increase its inductive coupling with reader antenna?
• They should also investigate about the protocol ISO15693, and see its power
distributions in the air on different antenna designs and implement the best
one.
65
References
Most of the references are given at the spot in this report but still there is
a lot of work that has been banked and helped by following search results,
my research mainly comes from these web-links and books
• http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7258822.stm
• http://networks.silicon.com/mobile/0,39024665,39170213,00.htm
• http://rfid-handbook.com
• http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/B/BeeDances.html
• http://www.enigmatic-
consulting.com/Communications_articles/RFID/Link_budgets.html
• http://www.electrocom.com.au/rfid_uhf.htm
• http://www.fuzing.com/qrx/rfid-uhf
• Radio Basics for UHF RFID from the Book, The RF in RFID: Passive UHF
RFID in Practice by Daniel M. Dobkin.
• http://www.rfid-in-action.eu/rfid-referencemodel
66
Appendix
Below are the links for the readers from the internet, respectively from the
report.
• http://nl.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?
method=getProduct&R=0182278
• http://nl.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?
method=getProduct&R=0182206
• http://fnjudy.en.busytrade.com/products/info/864488/Hf_Rfid_Middle_Ra
nge_Reader_With_External_Antenna.html
• http://www.rfidglobal.org/product/2007_12/15693_rfid_long_range_read
er_writer_with_multiple_external_antenna.html
• http://www.skyetex.com/ProductsServices/EmbeddedRFIDReaders/Skye
ModuleM2/tabid/207/Default.aspx
• http://www.zixsys.com/en/products_zrw.html
• http://www.amanogawa.com/archive/LMatch/LMatch.html
• http://www.amanogawa.com/archive/transmissionA.html
• http://www.dxzone.com/cgi-bin/dir/jump2.cgi?ID=18635
• http://parts.digikey.com/1/parts/638134-ic-sw-sp4t-4-1-refl-mux-
20lfcsp-adg904bcp-r-reel.html
• http://www.datasheetcatalog.com/datasheets_pdf/N/J/G/1/NJG1519KC1.
shtml
• http://www.spectrummicrowave.com/xref.asp?xn=anzac
67
Glossary
• Drones : Male Bees
• RF : Radio Frequency
• IC : Integrated Circuit
• Acoustic : Audible
• SA : Spectrum Analyzer
• TG : Tracking Generator
68
Annex A-1
Project BEE Tracking
Plan of Approach
Proposed plan of design and implementation of the communication system for
bee tracking is created after keen ponder and analysis of the problem, plan
states itself as follows:
Contents
• Project Phases
• Background Information
• Formulation of objectives or definition of the problem
• Project Scope
• Scheduling
• Risk Analysis
• Drawing up a project pictorial plan
Phases
The project has been divided into following phases
Background Information
Only for the sake of background information and complete understanding of the
project, the whole topic of RFID was studied during past six weeks. The research
along with meeting with Mentors concluded many fruitful results. The emphasis
of research lies on following agendas
2. RFID components.
69
7. Bee behavior and natural traits
70
Formulation of objectives or definition of the problem
The objective is that whenever a bee enters or leaves the facility (HIVE), it is
registered. The goal is to track the bees through a proposed communication
system of RFID and GSM. The problem statement mainly comprises of finding out
a way to tag the bees and to detect their entrance through a detection system of
antenna and reader module. Moreover problem continues to emphasize on
communication system that includes a GSM system which enables the data of
incoming and outgoing bees to be transferred to a main server station.
Project Scope
Scope of the project stays within the circle of communication system and
antenna design
Scheduling
Exactly corresponding to project phases a tentative schedule has been
established as under
71
Task Purpose Time span
Reporting and To put all the work on 1 week ( starting on 9th
Presentation record and in black and June)
white.
Note: The schedule starts from 16th March 2009 and last till 9th June
2009.
Risk Analysis
Each step and each phase has its own risks and loop holes, risks can never be
abolished completely but their probability can be minimized through efficient
approach of solution. Corresponding to each step and phase, hunch and risk are
stated as under:
Establishment of
both RFID and GSM system may be easier but here these system not only
communicate independently but also that they communicate with each-other,
this is one of the blind corners of project till now and needs to be looked down
upon during the whole process.
72
Drawing up the project pictorial plan
73
Annex A-2
74
Data Sheets
75
76
77
78