Aleksandra Kanevce, Ljupco Kocarev

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies,

University Ss. Cyril & Methodius Skopje,
Republic of Macedonia
y Introduction
y The electric power system of Macedonia
y The model of the electric power system of Macedonia
y Typical examples
y Conclusion
 Introduction
y Classification of energy models
y The model analyses energy production and is based upon technical aspects
of the energy system and is concerned with meeting the requirements for
equilibrium between energy supply and demand
y The users have to make assumptions about the values of the parameters
y The engineering approach of bottom up is used
y The model can be classified as optimization and simulation model
y The linear programming technique is applied
y Geographical coverage is national
y The model is intended for the analysis of energy production and
consumption in regions of Macedonia
y Time period: short term
y Input data: electricity demand and electricity generation and transmission
capacities and prices.
y Our approach is based on the work: A. Quelhas, E. Gil, J. D.
McCalley and S. M. Ryan, "A Multiperiod Generalized
Network Flow Model of the U.S. Integrated Energy System:
Part I—Model Description", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON
POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 22, NO. 2, MAY 2007
y In this paper the authors presented the bottom-up model
that addresses a medium term operational horizon (several
months to 2–3 years) and follows an optimization
methodology that captures the physical and environmental
restriction of the coal, natural gas, and electricity flows.
y We have modified and extended this work in several
directions to include short-term (on daily basis) analysis of
the Macedonian power system.
The electric power system of Macedonia
y The electric power system of Macedonia is operated
by four entities, namely:
y AD ЕLEM, company for generation and supply of
electricity,
y AD MEPSO – Skopje, company for transmission of
electricity and management with the electric power
system of Macedonia,
y The distribution company EVN Macedonia AD and
y AD TPP Negotino, company for electricity generation.
 Electricity generation
TPP Pmin Pmax Fuel type
[MW] [MW]
y Basic parameters
Bitola I 160 225 Lignite of TPPs
Bitola II 160 225 Lignite
Bitola III 160 225 Lignite
Oslomej 90 125 Lignite
Negotino I 70 105 Heavy fuel oil
Negotino II 70 105 Heavy fuel oil
Total 710 1010

HPP Catch- Number Qinst/unit Hgross Volume Pinst

y Basic ment of units [m3/s] [m] [106 m3] [MW]
parameters Vrutok Mavrovo 4 9 574 277 172
Tikvesh Crna Reka 4 36 100 272 116
of HPPs Globocica Crn Drim 2 27 110,9 228 42
Shpilje Crn Drim 3 36 95 212 84
Kozjak Treska 2 50 102 260 88
Raven Mavrovo 3 10,6 66 0 21,6
Vrben Mavrovo 2 4,6 193 0 12,8
Total 536
 Generation and transmission of
electricity
Small HPPs Pinst [MW]
Sapunchica 2,9 y Basic parameters
Kalimanci
Zrnovci
13,8
1,4
of small HPPs in
MAK ROT program Doshnica
Pesochani
4,1
2,7
the network of
Matka 9,6 EVN Macedonia
Pena 2,5
Babuna 0,7
Belica 0,3
Other EVN
Turija 2,2
Popova Shapka 4,8
Strezhevo 3,4
Other companies
Komunalec 1,2

TOTAL 49,6

y Basic parameters of Voltage [kV] Length [km]

400 594
high voltage power 220 103

lines 110 1480

 UNMIK SERBIA
Nish
Chervena Mogila

(Radomir)
Kosovo B

Kosovo A MACEDONIAN
Skakavica
ELECTRICITY

SYSTEM

OPERATOR
K.Palanka BULGARIA
Tearce
Kumanovo 1
Electric and power system of the
Skopje 1 220
M.Kamenica Republic of Macedonia
Tetovo 2
Skopje 1 110
Planned situation with connection of
Jugohrom Kumanovo 2
Kratovo Probishtip future HPPs
Tetovo 1
Substations
Skopje 2
Rafinery Delchevo

HPP Kochani
Polog Sv.Petka Skopje 3 Vinica

Skopje 4 400
O.Pole
Skopje 4 110 Petrovec [tip 1 400

Gostivar [tip 1 110

Vrutok 220
HPP Kozjak Veles

smelter
Vrutok 110 [tip 2

Veles 2 Berovo
Samokov
HPP Vrutok Centralna
Radovish
SS 400/110 kV/kV
Buchim

Zgropolci

HPP B. Most SS 220/110 kV/kV

HPP Shpilje Dubrovo 400 TPP Negotino SS 110/x kV/kV
TPP Oslomej
Kichevo Kavadarci Sushica
Petrich

Prilep 2 TPP Negotino

Prilep 3
Power lines
HEC Globocica HPP Tikvesh Feni

400 kV
Negotino
Prilep 1 Valandovo

Sopotnica HPP Galishte Planned

400 kV
interconnection
HPP Chebren

Struga

220 kV
Ohrid 1 Bitola 1 Mariovo400 Gevgelija
110 kV
Elbasan
Resen
Bitola2 400
Mariovo 110
Planned
Ohrid 2
TPP Bitola 110 kV PL
Bitola 2 110
Bitola 4

Bitola 3
Brod-Gneotino

Power plants
Suvodol
Thesaloniki

Hydro PP
GREECE Thermal PP
Florina
ALBANIA June 2008
Generation and transmission price
y Average electricity generation price
Power plant €/MWh
Lignite TPP 40
Heavy fuel oil TPP 60
Natural gas CHP (234 MW) 45
Natural gas CHP (30 MW) 48
HPP 50
Import 60

y Electricity transmission price (1-9 € per MWh )

Network diagram of the model
TPP BT2 HPP
225 MW
2
586 MW CHP WP TPP NG
5 9 13 S HPP S HPP
30 MW 30 MW 210 MW
1 10 MW 9 MW

TPP BT1 3 TPP BT3 CHP 11 15 TPP OS 19

7 S HPP 80
225 MW 3225 MW 234 MW 125 MW 17
40 48 FTV 8 MW
60
5 MW
50 0 82 0
21 45 0 40
40 40
0 0
Import
16 18 20
83 81
14
12
60
4 6 8 10

22 361396660 133396930 1 0 0 693696360

133396930
699361230 366136910
699136910 0

3 2 4 5 8 9 12 3 0

ST
100 MW
58 Export
SK KU ТЕ and GV GE and SR BT OH 59
500 MW 200 MW 200 MW FENI 200 MW 200 MW 200 MW 1
20 MW
51 52 53 55 56 57
54
Radovish
71
20 MW
Mathematical model of the electric
power system of Macedonia
Mathematical model of the electric
power system of Macedonia
y Adding new consumer - Radovish
58’ x 4,58 + x6,58 + x8,58 + x10 ,58 + x14 ,58 + x18,58 + x 20 ,58 + x 22 ,58 − x58, 71 = 80
71 x58, 71 = 20
y Adding small hydropower plant – Ohrid
80 x80 ,81 ≤ 9
81 x81,57 − x80 ,81 = 0
57’ x 4,57 + x 6,57 + x8,57 + x10 ,57 + x14,57 + x18,57 + x 20,57 + x 22 ,57 + x12,57 + x81,57 = 200
y The model solution

Program for winter day

Typical examples
y Winter day
y Winter day 2, very high electricity consumption
y Winter night
y Summer day
y Summer night
Consumption in a winter day
Electricity production in a winter day
Link flow in a winter day
TPP BT 2 HPP
2 CHP WP S HPP S HPP TPP NG
225 MW 586 MW 5 9 13
1 30 MW 30 MW 10 MW 9 MW 210 MW

TPP BT 1 3 TPP BT 3 CHP 11 15 TPP OS 19

7 S HPP 80
225 MW 225 MW 234 MW 125 MW 17
30 FTV 8 MW
225 140
5 MW
30 10 82
21 384 9 125
225 234
225
5 8
Import
16 18 20
83 81
14
12
4 6 8 10

22 125
5 30
10 73
20 11
8
19 67

104
259
73

9
160

100
125 93
212 146
ST
58 Export
80 MW
SK KU TE and GE and BT OH
520 MW 180 MW GV FENI SR 220 MW 160 MW 20 59
260 MW 20 MW 190 MW
51 52 53 55 56 57
54 Radovish
71
20 MW
Consumption in a winter day 2
Electricity production in a winter day 2
Consumption in a winter night
Electricity production in a winter night
Consumption in a summer day
Electricity production in a summer day
Consumption in a summer night
Electricity production in a summer night
Link flow in a summer night
TPP BT HPP
2 CHP WPP S HPP S HPP TPP NG
225 MW 586 MW 5 9 13
1
30 MW 30 MW 10 MW 9 MW 210 MW

TPP BT 3 TPP BT CHP 11 15 TPP OS 19

7 S HPP 80
225 MW 225 MW 234 MW 125 MW 17
FTV 8 MW
160
5 MW
160 30 82
21
180
Import
16 18 20
83 81
14
12
4 6 8 10

22

60 5 30

40
70 55 117
45 25
18

65

ST
20 MW
58 Export
SK KU TE and GV GE and BT OH
130 MW 45 MW 65 MW FENI SR 55 MW 40 MW 5 59
5 MW 48 MW
51 52 53 55 56 57
54 Radovish 71
5 MW
Conclusion
y An original model for solving a multidisciplinary
problem of Macedonian electric power system is
developed that can optimize and analyze every (real)
state of the system.
y Future works include
y More detail analysis of the power system of Macedonia
y Extending the model to larger regions and/or EU power
grid
y Extending the model to E3 class of models (energy,
ecology, economy)