Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
bandwidth kbps
ip bandwidth-percent eigrp AS-num percent
int int-name-type.sub-if-num {point-to-point | multipoint}
Also configure at routers F & G, as shown above for router E. No change to router H.
Page 1 of 8
2010-10-22 Name: ___________________________
2. Consider the topology below along with the partial configurations shown for R4. Notice that R4 is
participating in two separate routing domains, one using OSPF and the other, EIGRP. All addresses in
the OSPF domain are numbered in the 172.16.0.0/16 range, while those in the EIGRP domain are
numbered in the 172.30.0.0/16 range. With all links up, the given configuration provides full
reachability between routing domains as well as the Internet.
__
6
a. Exactly how does the manual summary route configured on s0 affect R4’s own routing table?
Mark
- it will auto-generate a summary discard route for that entire block, with AD=5
allocation:
172.16.0.0/16, egress to null0
2 marks for
each part
b. Briefly explain why the “default-info originate” command in R4 should be changed to
include the “always” option. (i.e. Without it, what problem could occur?)
- without “always”, if connectivity to ISP was lost, the quad-0 route would be removed
and R4 would stop propagating default into the OSPF routing domain
- this would result in loss of reachability from the OSPF domain to the EIGRP domain
c. Provide a different solution (other than adding the “always” option, as suggested above).
- introduce a floating static quad-0 so it satisfies OSPF even if the “real” quad-0 is
removed due to problems at the Internet link; due to its high AD, this route will “float”
and only be placed in the routing table if the actual Internet route to ISP is lost; it will
also explicitly discard Internet-bound traffic while the ISP link is down
Page 2 of 8
2010-10-22 Name: ___________________________
3. Consider the following network topology showing an enterprise running EIGRP (as shown by the
dotted circle), using the class B address space 172.50.0.0/16. Note that this address space is
currently less than half-used. That is, no ip address values have been configured or used from
172.50.128.0 onwards.
___
16
The following configurations have already been applied, and other than what is shown below, no
static routes or summary routes (including auto-summary) exist.
a. On the Sales2 router, only the 2 networks shown have currently been implemented, but a
summary address has been configured (given above) to reserve a portion of the "172.50"
class B network for the Sales group. What range of ip address values is represented by the
given summary address command?
2 Marks 172.50.0.0 to 172.50.31.255
b. Complete the table below to trace the packet at each step as HostA pings 172.50.25.2.
Page 3 of 8
2010-10-22 Name: ___________________________
c. Complete the table below to trace the packet at each step as HostA pings 172.50.205.2.
4. Consider the following hub & spoke topology between the Cisco router at HQ in Ottawa and a
number of small branches in the outlying regions, each of which has a single router. Static routing is
currently in use, but due to rapid growth in the number of remote branches being added, the
customer is seeking a solution with less administrative burden.
Below are the static routes that have been configured on the different routers:
__
6 Ottawa(config)# ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.1
Ottawa(config)# ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2
Ottawa(config)# ip route 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.3
Specify the configuration commands that must be added, changed and deleted in order for you to
implement On Demand Routing for this topology. Also state any assumptions and/or conditions
required for its successful operation.
2 Marks - delete all 6 configuration lines shown above by using the “no” form of the same command
Conditions/Assumptions:
3 Marks - all spoke routers must be Cisco
- all spoke routers must have no routing protocol configured
- all routers must have CDP enabled
Page 4 of 8
2010-10-22 Name: ___________________________
Mark allocation
Page 5 of 8
2010-10-22 Name: ___________________________
6. Your friend Jim who works for ITA has sent you the partial topology diagram below in order to tap
into your OSPF expertise.
He says he has set the router ID of R10 to 255.255.255.255 to ensure it becomes the DR in network
__ 10.2.100.0/24, and also has R11's router ID set to 255.255.255.254 to make it the BDR. However,
8 he has found that R10 has also become the DR in network 10.2.132.0/22, even though he needs R10
to be the BDR there, with R14 being the DR. He would like your advice on his approach and how
he can achieve his goal. What do you tell him?
- [explain why/when RID works] router ID is only used during DR/BDR elections if all interfaces
in a multi-access segment are at equal priority (e.g all are at their default of 1due to no
interface priority having been configured)
4 Marks - in this case that segment’s DR will be chosen as the device having the highest router ID
(and for BDR, the second highest)
- [never count on RID – use i/f priority instead] Jim’s approach is flawed … one should never set
router ID to influence DR elections because that affects the entire device, regardless of the
segments to which it is connected
- [explain why] since DR roles are by network segment, we can precisely (and flexibly) select a
segment’s DR or BDR by boosting the priority of its connected interface accordingly
- [using i/f priority buys you one more thing] we can even ensure that a device never becomes
DR/BDR in a segment by configuring its connected interface priority to zero
- one way to achieve Jim’s goal, is to set interface priorities as follows:
- f0/4 = 10
4 Marks for solution using i/f priority
- f0/3 = 5
(only 1 mark if a solution is provided using RID values)
- f0/1 = 10
- f0/0 = 5 (in case other routers are later added to this segment)
7. Consider the following categories describing aspects of an area within an OSPF routing domain.
Choose one item from each of categories A, B & C above, that together, would characterize an area
that's well suited to be configured as a TSA but NOT as a Stub. a, g, j
Page 6 of 8
2010-10-22 Name: ___________________________
8.
In a recent lab, we dealt with the topology above, where EIGRP auto-summary was enabled on R1
and R4 (but not on R2 and R3). Otherwise, assume that all other issues have been corrected and
EIGRP has fully converged with all links up/up.
__ a. Describe the packet (type, source, dest) that would be generated if we issue the command
“R1# ping 10.1.4.1 source loop0”. ICMP echo request from 10.1.1.1 to 10.1.4.1
2
b. Explain in detail why this ping fails, with direct reference to the various “10” routes in this
topology, how they are advertised and adopted (or not) throughout. (i.e. explain step-by-step
__ what happens, and why it happens)
Page 7 of 8
2010-10-22 Name: ___________________________
c. Assume now we disable auto-summary on R4, but leave it enabled on R1. With the situation
___ changed, explain again (as in part b.) what happens, and why it happens, when we retry the
command “R1# ping 10.1.4.1 source loop0”.
109.
- due to auto-summ being off at R4, it is now eligible to advertise its 10.1.4.0/24 network to
R3 (as it’s no longer advertising 10/8 to R3)
- this 10.1.4.0/24 route is propagated by R3 to R2, eventually reaching R1
- R1 still has its own 10/8 summary, but 10.1.4.0/24 is NOT the same route, so it’s adopted
and entered into R1’s routing table
- now the ping destination of 10.1.4.1 matches this new route, so it’s followed routing the
packet out s0/0/0 to R2
- the echo request packet is then forwarded from R2 to R3, eventually reaching R4
- R1, meanwhile, is still advertising the 10/8 summary to R2 (due to auto-summ) who
propagates it to R3, eventually reaching R4 (now that there’s no competing 10/8 summary
coming from R4, this is a certainty)
- R4 (not having its own 10/8 summary), will adopt this 10/8 route (originated by R1)
- so the only “10” routes in R4 are its own connected 10.1.4.0/24 and R1’s 10/8 summary
- on the echo reply packet destined for 10.1.1.1, R4’s best match is the summary route
- the reply packet is sent to R3, forwarded to R2 and eventually reaches R1, so the ping
succeeds!!
Page 8 of 8