Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history: Anatase nano-titania (TiO2) powder was prepared by using a sol–gel process mediated in reverse
Received 10 November 2012 microemulsion combined with a solvent thermal technique. The structures of the obtained TiO2 were
Received in revised form 25 April 2013 characterized by TG-DSC, XRD, TEM. The photocatalytic decomposition of methylene blue (MB) on
Accepted 26 April 2013
nano-TiO2 was studied by using an internal air lift circulating photocatalytic reactor. The results
Available online 10 May 2013
show that the anatase structure appears in the calcination temperature range of 400–510 8C, while
the transformation of anatase into rutile takes place above 510 8C. The homogeneous microstructure
Keywords:
of nano-TiO2 particles was obtained with a size of around 10–15 nm. In the photocatalytic
A. Semiconductors
A. Nanostructures
performance, degradation process follows pseudo first order kinetics with different dosages of
A. Oxides photocatalyst and initial MB concentrations and optimal TiO2 dosage is 0.1 g/L with neutral medium.
B. Sol–gel chemistry ß 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
D. Catalytic properties
0025-5408/$ – see front matter ß 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.04.075
H. Xu et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 48 (2013) 3144–3148 3145
o
+
o Rutile-TiO2
+ Anatase-TiO2
CPS
o +
+ oo
++ o
+
o oo +
o
610 C
o
510 C
o
450 C
o
340 C
o
240 C
o
100 C
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
2θ / o
Fig. 4. XRD patterns of TiO2 samples calcined at different temperatures.
obvious peak detected for the sample calcined at less than 340 8C
suggested no crystalline phase formed. The peaks around 25.38,
38.18, 48.18, 54.38, 55.28, 62.38, and 75.28 for the sample calcined at
450 8C revealed the formation of anatase TiO2. The appearance of
the peak at 68.88, 70.68 for the sample calcined at 510 8C indicated
that the gel began to transform the anatase phase into the rutile
phase [15,16]. The results are consistent with those obtained by
TG-DSC. As a photocatalytic material, TiO2 has two crystalline
structures, anatase and rutile. The surface adsorptive capability of
the anatase to organic pollutants is higher than the rutile and the
recombination between electron and hole on the anatase is slower
[17]. These cause that the anatase has a higher photocatalytic
activity than the rutile [18]. Therefore, in this work, the optimal
calcination temperature for preparing anatase TiO2 is about 450 8C.
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of airlift photo-catalytic reactor.
3.3. TEM
The weight loss up to 250 8C was due to the removal of the water The micro morphological structure of the nano-TiO2 particles
and the organic solvent adsorbed on the dried gels. The exothermic was also observed with TEM, as shown in Fig. 5. The TEM images
peak at 338 8C was due to the decomposition of residual surfactant, clearly exhibited the homogeneous microstructure of particles
OH group and alkoxy group. The crystallization of the amorphous with a size of around 10–15 nm. From the TEM images at a higher
phase into the anatase phase took place from 340 to 450 8C. The magnification, it can be found that the TiO2 nano-crystals were
exothermic peak at 510 8C was owed to the transform of the generated and connected together.
anatase phase to the rutile phase.
3.4. Effect of calcined temperature
3.2. XRD analysis
The photo-catalytic activity of nano-TiO2 particles which is
The results were confirmed by the XRD analyses of the samples prepared at different calcined temperature is shown in Fig. 6 with
calcined the TiO2 dried gel at different temperatures (Fig. 4). No 0.1 g/L of TiO2, 5.27 mg/L of MB, 7 of pH value and 40 min of photo-
catalytic time. It is clearly seen that 450 8C is the best calcined
temperature. When the calcined temperature is below 450 8C, the
100 1.00
anatase TiO2 is not completely formed. The calcined temperature is
TG
above 450 8C, the rutile TiO2 is appeared and crystal grain is
80 338.1
increased in higher temperature. So, the photo-activity is lower at
506.6 0.75
DSC / mW/mg
higher temperature.
TG / %
60
0.50 3.5. Effect of TiO2 dosage
40
To avoid excess use of catalyst in the air lift photocatalytic
0.25 reactor, the nano-TiO2 dosage should be optimized. A series of
20
DSC experiments were carried out with varying the loading of TiO2
concentrations from 0 to 0.3 g/L in order to determine the effect of
0 0.00 TiO2 catalyst amounts. MB removal is depicted at different TiO2
100 200 300 400 500 600 700
temperature / C
o concentrations in Fig. 7. From the Fig. 7, there is no any MB removal
without catalyst after 40 min. The MB removal increases with the
Fig. 3. TG-DSC curves of the TiO2 dried gel. addition of TiO2 dosage from 0.03 g/L to 0.1 g/L. But degradation
H. Xu et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 48 (2013) 3144–3148 3147
100
80 0
0.03 g/L
0.05 g/L
60 0.07 g/L
0.10 g/L
R /%
0.10
0.9961 0.15 g/L
0.09
0.9956 0.9952 0.20 g/L
40 0.08
0.30 g/L
k /min
0.9934 0.9965
0.07
0.06
20 0.05 0.9916 0.9800
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
TiO dosage / g/L
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Fig. 5. TEM images of nano-TiO2 particles. Time /min
Fig. 7. Effect of TiO2 catalyst loadings (MB: 5.27 mg/L and pH 7).
100 100
80 80
4.08 mg/L
5.27 mg/L
60 60 6.00 mg/L
R /%
6.73 mg/L
R /%
0.20 0.9938
0.16
40 40
k /min
0.12 0.9961
0.08
0.9980
20 0.04
20 0.9974
0.00
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0
MB dosage / mg/L
0
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0
o 0 10 20 30 40 50
Calcining Temperature / C -1
Time /min
Fig. 6. The photocatalytic activity of nano-TiO2 particles at different calcined
temperatures. Fig. 8. Effect of MB initial concentration (TiO2: 0.1 g/L and pH 7).
3148 H. Xu et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 48 (2013) 3144–3148
60 4. Conclusions
R /%
80 Acknowledgments
References
0
0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40
[1] S.Z. Hu, A.J. Wang, X. Li, H. Lowe, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 71 (2010) 156.
Time /min [2] C. Burda, X.B. Chen, R. Narayanan, Chem. Rev. 105 (2005) 1025.
[3] X.G. Hou, M.D. Huang, X.L. Wu, Chem. Eng. J. 146 (2009) 42.
Fig. 10. Photocatalytic activity of the recycled nano-TiO2 (TiO2: 0.1 g/L, MB: [4] W.P. Chen, Q.A. Zhu, Mater. Lett. 61 (2007) 3378.
5.27 mg/L and pH 7). [5] S. Chavadej, P. Phuaphromyod, E. Gulari, Chem. Eng. J. 137 (2008) 489.
[6] M. Andersson, L. Osterlund, S. Ljungstrom, J. Phys. Chem. B 106 (2002) 10674.
[7] K. Suriye, B. Jongsomjit, C. Satayaprasert, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 (2008) 2759.
[8] B. Gao, C. Peng, G.Z. Chen, G.P. Li, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 85 (2008) 17.
acidic and alkaline medium. The acidic and alkaline substances have [9] C. Pithan, Y. Shiratori, R. Waser, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89 (2006) 2908.
a disadvantage impact in oxidation process. Hydroxyl radical is [10] T. Mishra, Catal. Commun. 9 (2008) 21.
unstable in alkaline medium which leads to lower degradation [11] T. Anukunprasert, C. Saiwan, E. Traversa, J. Mater. Res. 21 (2006) 3001.
[12] M. Li, G. Nakhla, J. Zhu, Chem. Eng. J. 181 (2012) 35.
efficiency. UV-light can excite TiO2 to produce h+ holes and e. The h+ [13] C.F. Roselei, M.S. Mauricio, Bioresour. Technol. 123 (2012) 157.
holes and H2O molecules are reacted to create hydroxyl radical and [14] P. Lestinsky, P. Vayrynen, M. Vecer, K. Wichterle, Proc. Eng. 42 (2012) 974.
H+. In the acidic medium, excessive H+ can prevent the production of [15] K.M. Reddy, C.V.G. Reddy, S.V. Manorama, J. Solid State Chem. 158 (2001) 180.
[16] Y.F. Chen, C.Y. Lee, M.Y. Yeng, H.T. Chiu, J. Cryst. Growth 247 (2003) 363.
hydroxyl radical which decreases photocatalytic efficiency.
[17] Y.Y. Pu, J.Z. Fang, F. Peng, Chin. J. Catal. 28 (2007) 251.
[18] Q.H. Zhang, L. Gao, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 26 (2006) 1535.
3.8. Catalyst recycle test [19] H. Xu, D.X. Zhang, W.G. Xu, Environ. Prog. 27 (2008) 104.
[20] A. Akyol, M. Bayramoglu, J. Hazard. Mater. 124 (2005) 241.
[21] C.M. So, M.Y. Cheng, J.C. Yu, P.K. Wong, Chemosphere 46 (2002) 905.
A recycle test of degradation activity of nano-TiO2 photocatalyst [22] N. Daneshvar, M. Rabbani, N. Modirshahla, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 168
was carried out and presented in Fig. 10. The photocatalytic (2004) 39.