Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
www.euobserver, 10.12.10
By Andrew Rettman
The group in a letter to EU capitals and the leaders of the EU institutions on 6 December seen
by EUobserver says that Israel "like any other state" should be made to feel "the
consequences" and face "a price tag" for breaking international law by building thousands of
new Jewish homes on Palestinian land.
It also asks ministers to set an ultimatum of April 2011 for Israel to fall into line or see the
Union seek an end to the existing US-led peace talks format in favour of a UN solution.
On top of this, the bloc should: officially link its informal freeze on an upgrade in EU-Irsael
diplomatic relations to a settlement freeze; block imports of products made in settlements but
labelled as made in Israel; make Israel pay the lion's share of aid to Palestine; send a high-
level delegation to East Jerusalem to back Palestinian claims; and reclassify EU support for
Palestine as "nation building" instead of "institution building."
The letter warns in a note of urgency that "time is fast running out" because "Israel's
continuation of settlement activity ... poses an existential threat to the prospects of
establishing a sovereign, contiguous and viable Palestinian state."
Criticising existing EU policy, it adds that tough action is "a matter of fundamental
credibility" for the bloc, which risks deterioration in its ties with Arab trade partners. "The EU
needs to act more pro-actively in its relations with the US, Israel and others to promote the
fulfillment of this objective," it says.
The proposals read like a red rag to a bull as far as Israel is concerned.
Israel lobbied last year to stop the EU from saying that East Jerusalem, which Israel considers
part of its "indivisible" capital, should be the centre of a new Palestinian state. It also has a
vested interest in keeping its closest ally, the US, in charge of the peace process instead of
involving hostile Arab countries under the UN umbrella.
EU ministers are set to discuss the Middle East at their 13 December meeting, but the bloc is
currently in wait-and-see mode on US efforts to try to resume peace talks which stalled in
September.
Ms Ashton has over the past year invested plenty of energy in building a relationship with US
Secretary of State Hilary Clinton and Middle East envoy George J. Mitchell on the peace
process. Her policy has been to accept US leadership on big diplomacy, while focusing on
help for Palestinian Authorities to build institutions, such as a normal treasury and judicial
system, so that Jews and Arabs can live side-by-side more easily pending a long-term
solution.
In a letter of response to the former leaders, dated 7 December and also seen by this website,
she indicates that her approach will reman unchanged for the time being.
Ms Ashton says the idea of 1967 borders is "commonly accepted" but does not mention the
thorny issue of how to share East Jerusalem, indicating that its status as a future Palestinian
capital is up for negotiation.
She goes on to support the current format for international Middle East diplomacy and does
not mention any threat to formally freeze the EU-Israel upgrade. While accepting that it is
"important" settlement-origin products do not get preferential EU tariffs, she also ignores the
idea of an EU trade block on 'mislabelled' goods.
Her approach is in line with the US' long-standing vision for the EU's role in the region.
http://euobserver.com/9/31477