No.

____________
_____________________________________________________________

In the

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

LEON R. KOZIOL, individually and as natural parent of

Child A and Child B, and on behalf of parents and children
similarly situated,
Petitioners,
vs

MARTHA WALSH-HOOD, Acting Judge of the

State of New York, MICHAEL DALEY, Acting Family
Court Judge of the State of New York, WILLIAM KOSLOSKY,
Attorney for the child, KELLY HAWSE-KOZIOL, Custodial
Parent of the State of New York, the UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM
of the State of NewYork and the STATE OF NEW YORK,

Respondents.

_________________________

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the

New York Court of Appeals
_________________________

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

___________________________________________________________________

LEON R. KOZIOL, pro se

Office of Leon R. Koziol, J.D.
1518 Genesee Street
Utica, New York 13502
(315) 796-4000
 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Petitioner, Leon R. Koziol, respectfully urges that a writ of certiorari be granted to

remedy constitutional violations of monumental impact to parents and children across the

country. He asks that the sua sponte order of the New York Court of Appeals which dismissed a

mandamus and prohibition action be reviewed because state courts have abused their parens

patriae powers to a point of rendering meaningless our most basic human right to a parent-child

relationship. This right has been overrun with impunity through insulated domestic relations laws

and processes which force parents to fight over their own children in order to secure “custody”

and “support” awards. These awards are mandated through a statutory “child support” formula in

every parenting case, even where, as here, both parents were found to be sufficiently self

sustaining. Increasingly they are being exploited as a pretext for supporting third party entities

and government itself. By the time these abusive, biased and recurring “custody” and “support”

processes complete their course, Petitioner’s children, aged two and three at the time when an

uncontested divorce action was commenced five years ago, will have reached maturity without

any meaningful participation of their wholly fit natural father in their respective lives. The very

foundation of our family structure and the productivity of an entire nation are being jeopardized

by the broad sweep of these laws, processes and attendant privacy violations.

OPINIONS BELOW

The sua sponte order of dismissal by the New York Court of Appeals was entered on

September 21, 2010. It is reproduced in its entirety in the Appendix

(1)