United States District Court

District of New Hampshire (Concord)

USA, Ex Rel et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 1:10-cv-00321-JL

USA et al., FILED MON 12/27/2010

15:37
Defendants.
_______________________________________________________________/

NOTICE OF PLAINTIFFS’ ENTITLEMENT TO & COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER OF

“ADDITIONAL TIME”

DEMAND FOR FBI’S NECESSARY RETURN OF RAIDED FILES & COMPLAINT

“12/13/2010” “ORDER OF ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE COMPLAINT”[DOC. # 15]

1. The Hon. Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty had ordered:

12/13/2010 15 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion for for judicial
notice of FBI file. The motion is granted in part, to the extent that
plaintiffs shall have additional time to serve the complaint. The motion
is denied in all other respects. The Clerks Office is directed to provide
plaintiffs with the necessary blank summonses and waivers. Signed by
Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (cmp) (Entered: 12/13/2010)

FBI NEEDS TO RETURN NECESSARY COMPUTER FILES AND COMPLAINT

2. Here, ‘plaintiffs shall have additional time to serve the complaint’, and the FBI needs to

return the absolutely necessary files and Complaint so that the Plaintiff whistleblowers can

actually “serve the Complaint”. Otherwise, Government Officials will continue to obstruct

justice, court access, and any ‘service of the Complaint’.

 FBI OBSTRUCTED & INTERFERED WITH ‘SERVICE OF COMPLAINT’

3. After Plaintiffs had repeatedly and directly complained to the FBI and then filed their

Government racketeering Complaint on 07/29/2010, Doc. # 1, the FBI proximately and

directly obstructed and interfered with the “service of Complaint”. Here, “additional time”

alone cannot possibly cure the FBI’s obstruction, and Plaintiffs have no control over the FBI.

4. Maliciously misconstruing the rightful and privileged prosecution of Defendant corrupt

Judges and Officials since 2006 as “stalking” was on its very face

a. Unlawful and/or criminal;

b. Without any basis and/or merit;

ENTITLEMENT TO MEANINGFUL ‘ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE COMPLAINT’

5. Pursuant to the Rules, Plaintiffs are entitled to “serve the Complaint [Doc. # 1]” of publicly

recorded Government racketeering and corruption upon the crooked Government

Defendants. Here however, said corrupt Defendants agreed with the Federal Bureau of

Investigation in Tampa, FL, U.S.A., to raid Plaintiffs’ files, public corruption evidence,

and computer equipment for unlawful and/or criminal purposes of obstructing proper

prosecution and justice and coercing the pro se Plaintiff to refrain from any further

prosecution.

F.B.I. FILE 316A-TP-73337 – ILLEGAL SEIZURE OF COMPLAINT & CRIME PROOF

6. Here, the Governmental raid, F.B.I. file 316A-TP-73337, and illegal seizure of tools

essential to litigation were for facially unlawful purposes of, e.g.:

a. Intimidation of the Plaintiff Government corruption victims;

b. Racketeering and extortion of, e.g., Plaintiffs’ Gulf-front lands and easements, Lot 15A;
c. Extortion of more than $5,000 under false pretenses of “frivolity” and a purported non-
existent “judgment”;
d. Retaliation and oppression of the pro se Plaintiff whistleblowers.

CIVIL RICO ENTITLED PLAINTIFFS TO COMPLAIN ABOUT CRIMINAL ACTS

2
7. Here expressly, civil RICO had invoked jurisdiction over Defendant crooked Officials’

racketeering and criminal acts. Here under color of a “criminal investigation”, Defendant

corrupt Officials have been extending their record crimes, concealment, and cover-up.

RECORDED EXTORTION OF LAND (LOT 15A) AND MONEY; CONSPIRACY

8. Under fraudulent pretenses of, e.g., purported “frivolity”, and “criminality” of Plaintiffs’

multi-year litigation, Defendants conspired to extort Plaintiff’s Gulf-front Lot 15A, Parcel #

12-44-20-01-00015.015A, Lee County, FL, and more than $5,000.00 without any

justification. Here frivolously and illegally, Lee County had “claimed” private Gulf-front

easements and lands in the private “Cayo Costa” Subdivision on Cayo Costa Island, Lee

County, FL, under color of publicly recorded fraud and extortion scheme “O.R. 569/875”.

See attached fraud & racketeering scheme “O.R. 569/875”; www.leeclerk.org.

CHARADE OF COURT ACCESS AFTER FBI RAID:

A CONFISCATED COMPLAINT CANNOT POSSIBLY BE “SERVED”

9. Here after Plaintiff whistleblowers had filed their Government racketeering Complaint,

Tampa FBI Officials physically confiscated and conspired with other Officials to

confiscate Plaintiffs’ Complaint files and public corruption evidence, because a

confiscated Complaint can simply not be “served”. Under the law, Plaintiffs have been

entitled to meaningful prosecution, and access to the Court(s) and their computer files and

Complaint. Here, said confiscation turned Plaintiffs’ fundamental Constitutionally protected

rights into a charade.

PLAINTIFFS FEAR FOR THEIR LIVES - RECKLESS GOVERNMENT RETALIATION

10. Because over 40 (forty) Cases since 2006 had exposed an entire judicial system to be

corrupted, Defendant Government Officials and Judges resorted to retaliation, multi-year

3
 threats, coercion, and further racketeering acts against the Plaintiff whistle-blowers.

However here, the publicly recorded proof of cover-up and concealment of facially

fabricated land parcels “lot A” and “block 1” exposed ever-increasing screaming fraud on

the Court(s). See, e.g., Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912) and attached fake “parcels”

a. 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and

b. 07-44-21-01-00001.0000. See published fraud at www.leepa.gov.

JUDICIAL LIES & PUBLIC CORRUPTION ON THE RECORD

11. Here, said 1912 “Cayo Costa” Plat of Survey did not lie but corrupt Judges and Officials

lied. Only public corruption can explain WHY in more than 40 Cases since 2006 judge

after judge and official after official “dismissed” and concealed public corruption

Complaints and the fabrications and forgeries of said fake land parcels.

CONCEALMENT OF JUDICIAL LIES & PERVERSIONS OF A “resolution”

FRAUD & RACKETEERING SCHEME “O.R. 569/875”

12. Here, Defendant Government Officials conspired to conceal on the public record that, e.g.:

a. No lawmaker could possibly involuntarily divest private land owners without a court

order and/or judicial proceedings;

b. No legislator could possibly “transfer” Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record title to Lot 15A

against their will by illegal means of a “legislative act” or “resolution O.R. 569/875”;

c. No Official had any authority to fabricate fake “lot A” and “block 1”, which had never

appeared on the public “Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat in Lee County PB 3 PG 25 (1912).

RETALIATION & “RUSE” – NO probable cause

13. Here under false pretenses of a “criminal investigation” and without any probable cause,

Government Officials had engaged in an admitted “ruse” when they deceptively “reported”

4
 a fictitious break-in into Plaintiff(s)’ real estate. Upon Plaintiff’s arrival at the property,

armed FBI agents appeared with crowbars and demanded Plaintiffs’ prosecution materials

and computing gear. However, Plaintiff(s) asserted that they had fundamental rights and

privileges under, e.g., the 1st, 4th, 14th, 7th, and 5th U.S. Constitutional Amendments. Here

under both the Florida and Federal Constitutions, Plaintiffs have fundamental rights to, e.g.:

a. Sue corrupt Government Officials;

b. Serve their Complaint despite unlawful FBI obstruction & interference;
c. Redress Government grievances and racketeering & public corruption, Doc. # 1;
d. Own property;
e. Exclude Government from private property;
f. Defend against illegal seizure and invasion of privacy without any probable cause;
g. Defend against malicious criminalization of privileged activities and prosecution.

CRIMINALIZATION OF RIGHTFUL PROSECUTION OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION

14. By unlawfully criminalizing rightful prosecution of public corruption and Constitutionally

protected and privileged activities in the absence of any “credible threat” and probable

cause, Government Officials steamrolled and flattened the Plaintiffs just like bloody tanks

of Government oppression rolled over dissidents and whistleblowers in dictatorial regimes.

See Plaintiffs’ publications worldwide; e.g., www.youtube.com; www.scribd.com;

www.google.com.

ABSOLUTE AND INDISPUTABLE “GROUNDS” – FRAUD ON THE COURT(S)

15. Here, it has been indisputable that said FBI raid deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of said

fundamental rights and kept them away from the Court(s). Here because of said massive

fraud on the Court(s), the Plaintiffs were given “additional time” to pursue prosecution and

justice and reclaim their files and Complaint from the FBI.

5
 HISTORY OF JUDICIAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE & PROPER PROSECUTION

16. Under the Florida and Federal Constitutions, the FBI is not authorized to hold up prosecution

in State and Federal Courts by threatening the Plaintiffs and illegally seizing their litigation

materials. Here, e.g., corrupt Judges John Edwin Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell had

themselves removed Plaintiffs’ Case from Florida to Federal Court. See Plaintiffs’

prosecution of, e.g., Judges Steele and Polster Chappell in Florida State Court Case # 2006-

CA-003185, BUSSE et al. v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al.

“ADDITIONAL TIME” FOR FBI’S RETURN OF COMPLAINT & EVIDENCE FILES

17. Here so far, the FBI in Tampa has not yet returned Plaintiffs’ seized computer evidence and

files, which are absolutely essential to the Plaintiff Government corruption victims for their

privileged and Constitutionally protected prosecution of Defendant crooked Government

Officials. Rightfully prosecuting said Government crooks and “serving the complaint” upon

them are privileged and Constitutionally protected activities.

FBI’S PHYSICAL REMOVAL OF COMPLAINT FILES TO KEEP PLAINTIFFS AWAY

18. Here, the FBI agreed to physically remove Plaintiffs’ Complaint files and incapacitate the

Plaintiffs for criminal and/or unlawful purposes of e.g.:

a. Coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from any further prosecution after more than 40 Cases;
b. Keeping the Plaintiffs away from Court;
c. Concealing and covering up for crooked Judges and Officials in over 40 Cases.
d. Perpetrating fraud upon the Court;
e. Obstructing justice and rightful prosecution of Defendant Government crooks;
f. Expanding record Government racketeering and corruption.

If corrupt Government Defendants can simply agree and/or conspire with the FBI to

unlawfully confiscate pro se Plaintiffs’ prosecution materials and files, the floodgates of

Government corruption in the United States will only open further and wider:

g. WHAT more “grounds” is and could the Court possibly be looking for?

6
 h. WHAT better and latest “new grounds” could the Court possibly desire?
i. WHAT further conclusive proof and grounds could the Court possibly ask for?

MORE THAN 40 (FORTY) CASES HAD PROVEN GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION:

PRIMA FACIE ILLEGALITY & NULLITY OF FAKE “land parcels”

19. In more than 40 (forty) Cases of record, the Plaintiffs had indisputably evidenced the

fabrications of land parcels, cover-up, and concealment of Government corruption in the

United States. Here, no reasonable person, juror, and/or judge could possibly believe that the

“dismissals” in over 40 Cases have been any coincidence but premeditated acts of

concealing and conspiring to conceal the prima facie illegality and nullity of fabricated

land parcels and “legal descriptions” such as, e.g., 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-

01-00001.0000. See attachments.

JUDICIAL AND OFFICIAL CONCEALMENT OF BOGUS “legal descriptions”

20. No reasonable juror, judge, and/or person could possibly not determine the fake “legal

descriptions” of fake “lot A” and fake “block 1” to be facially fraudulent and forged:

“ALL UN-NUMBERED + UNDESIGNATED LOTS IN CAYO COSTA…”

“CAYO COSTA PB 3 PG 25 ALL UNNUMBERED AND ACCRETED LANDS”

NO probable cause – STEAMROLLING PLAINTIFF WHISTLE BLOWERS

21. Here, one brief review of the 1912 “Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee County

Plat Book 3, Page 25 evidenced the brazen concealment of said Government fabrications

and racketeering.

7
 ENDEMIC CORRUPTION EVIDENCE – 2007 COURT TRANSCRIPT

22. Here as early as 2007, the Transcript of Corrupted Judicial Proceedings, November 7, 2007,

before Crooked Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell proved the endemic judicial corruption

in Florida’s Middle District. See attachments.

HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF READERS OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION EVIDENCE

23. After hundreds of thousands of readers and listeners had taken notice of the published

Government corruption evidence, the FBI illegally interfered and seized the published

litigation materials. Here, the very Government retaliation and steamrolling the Plaintiffs

had predicted in their worldwide publications actually took place.

FEARFUL PLAINTIFFS HAVE CONTINUED THEIR LITIGATION FROM ABROAD

24. Following said retaliatory FBI seizure of Plaintiffs’ evidence and files, the Plaintiffs have

been in, e.g., Europe, Dubai, Australia, and Australasia because they must credibly fear

further retaliation by corrupt U.S. Officials.

CORRUPT JUDGES/OFFICIALS COVER UP FOR CORRUPT JUDGES IN FLORIDA

25. Here, said “search warrant [Case No. 8:10-mj-1416 (AEP)]” improperly:

a. Originated in said corrupt Court/Government system (Middle District of Florida);

b. Was signed by a partial “judicial officer” and/or judge (U.S. Magistrate Anthony E.

Porcelli, Tampa, FL, U.S.A.), who had been presiding over Plaintiffs’ prosecution of

Defendant fellow Judges for fraud in said corrupt Court system;

c. Was yet another fraud upon the Court and deliberately deprived the pro se Plaintiffs

of their fundamental Federal and Florida Constitutional rights to defend against

Government, corruption, oppression, and fraud.

8
26. Here corruptly and conveniently, Defendant Tampa Prosecutor A. Brian Albritton and

Presiding Tampa Magistrate Anthony E. Porcelli agreed to criminalize Plaintiffs’ exercise of

their fundamental Constitutional rights. Here, piecemeal litigation and compartmentalization

will not be accepted as unlawful means to further conceal these Government crimes.

FRAUDULENT AFFIDAVIT(S) FOR RACKETEERING & EXTORTION PURPOSES

27. Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Lee County Property Appraiser, conspired with other

Defendants and Officials to conceal the prima facie nullity and illegality of, e.g., fake “lot

A” and “block 1”. See said 1912 “Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat, PB 3 PG 25.

28. Here by means of fraudulent “INSTRUMENT # 2009000309382”, Lee County, FL,

Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson concocted a fake “July 29, 2009” judgment for unlawful

purposes of, e.g., extorting and/or forcing the illegal sale of Plaintiffs’ Lot 15A. See

attachment.

PLAINTIFFS’ ENTITLEMENT TO SUE & REDRESS THEIR RECORD GRIEVANCES

29. Under the Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff racketeering victims are entitled to

redress their Government grievances under, e.g., the 1st, 4th, and 14th U.S. Constitutional

Amendments:

a. Without Government intimidation and threats;

b. Without fear of Government retaliation and racketeering;
c. With the use of their illegally seized computer equipment and evidence against the
Defendant Officials.

PLEADINGS BY INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIED MAIL TO THIS COURT

30. Pleadings to this Hon. Court were sent by, e.g., International Certified Mail:

• RR813156286DE 82062664 6501 231110 1719

• RF634919363DE 82061648 9530 221110 1644
• RF634918924DE 82061648 8855 161120 1644
• RF634918884DE 82061648 8733 151110 1716

9
 • RF634918765DE 82061648 8507 121110 1659
• RR813144861DE 82061322 6808 091110 1141

Plaintiffs’ objections and demands were mailed by international certified priority mail.

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff victims of Government corruption and fraud respectfully request

1. An Order declaring Plaintiffs’ fundamental entitlement to sue Defendant Government

Officials and have access to the files and Complaint illegally seized by the Tampa FBI

during litigation;

2. An Order declaring Plaintiffs’ fundamental Constitutionally protected rights to redress

Government grievances and have access to the Court as well as their files and Complaint,

Doc. # 1, after said illegal FBI raid;

3. An Order mandating the Government’s return of Plaintiffs’ computer files and Complaint

in order to protect Plaintiffs’ said privileges and rights under both the Florida and Federal

Constitutions during the “additional time” granted in said Order;

4. An Order declaring Plaintiffs’ fundamental rights to defend against the unlawful

criminalization of rightful litigation by criminal and/or unlawful means of confiscating

prosecution materials during said FBI raid;

5. An Order declaring the self-serving agreement between Defendant Tampa Prosecutor A.

Brian Albritton, Presiding Tampa Magistrate Anthony E. Porcelli, and other Defendant

Officials to criminalize Plaintiffs’ exercise of their fundamental Constitutional rights

outright unlawful and violative of the separation-of-powers doctrine;

6. An order declaring unlawful and/or criminal the conspiracy to extort and force the sale of

said Lot 15A under false pretenses of, e.g., “frivolity”, “criminality” and/or “stalking”;

10
7. An Order taking judicial notice of the absolute impossibility of proceeding with this and

other rightful litigation unless Plaintiffs have access to the files and Complaint unlawfully

seized by the FBI, file # 316A-TP-73337;

8. An order enjoining any further racketeering / corruption in said Middle District of Florida,

which interferes with and obstructs this litigation, and in particular, said extortion of

a. Lot 15A, PID 12-44-20-01-00015.015A; and

b. more than $5,000 without any court order;

9. An Order declaring unlawful the act of misconstruing rightful litigation as “stalking” for

illegal purposes of obstructing justice and interfering with the “service of complaint” in this

Case;

10. An order declaring Plaintiffs’ perfected record ownership of said Lot 15A, PB 3 PG 25

(1912), Parcel 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, and fundamental rights to defend said ownership

against Government racketeering by ‘serving the Complaint’ created on Plaintiffs’ seized

computers;

11. An order declaring prima facie fake Government “claim” “O.R. 569/875” facially unlawful

and facially violative of both the Federal and Florida Constitutions.

/s/Dr. Jorg Busse, Private Attorney General;

Victim of Government and judicial corruption in Florida, U.S.A.

/s/Jennifer Franklin Prescott, Private Attorney General;

Victim of judicial and Government corruption in Florida, U.S.A.

ATTACHMENTS
• Government fraud and racketeering evidence
• Transcript of Corrupted Judicial Proceedings, November 7, 2007, before Crooked Magistrate
Judge Sheri Polster Chappell
• Fraudulent “affidavit”, “instrument # 2009000309382, Lee County, FL, U.S.A.

11
• Lot 15A, PB 3 PG 25 (1912 Plat), Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, Lee County, Florida
• Rule 65, Fed. R. Civ. P.
• 2004 Fax cover, Lee County Dept. of Community Development (Minimum Use Provisions)

BY INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIED DELIVERY & MAIL

To:
United States District Court
District of New Hampshire
55 Pleasant Street, Clerk’s Office
Concord, NH 03301, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
T: 001.603.225.1423; F: 001.603.225.1481
U.S. Attorney
55 Pleasant Street
Concord, NH 03301, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
T: 001.603.225.1552; F: 001.603.225.1470

From:
Jennifer Franklin Prescott and
Dr. Jorg Busse
c/o P.O. Box 1140
Naples, FL 34106-1140
United States of America

12
12/25/2010 Lee County Property Appraiser - Onlin…

Tax Year 2010

Lee County Property Appraiser
Next Lower Parcel Number Next Higher Parcel Number Tax Estimator Tax Bills Print

Property Data for Parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0

Owner Of Record [ Viewer ] Tax Map [ Print ]
LEE COUNTY
PO BOX 398
FORT MYERS FL 33902

Site Address
GOVT LOT
CAPTIVA FL 33924

Legal Description
CAYO COSTA PB 3 PG 25
ALL UNNUMBERED AND
ACCRETED LANDS

Classification / DOR Code

COUNTIES - OTHER / 86 [ Pictometry Aerial Viewer ]

Property Values (2010 Tax Roll) Exemptions Attributes

Homestead 0 Land Units of Measure AC

Just 1,074,100
Additional Homestead 0 Total Number of Land Units 107.41
Assessed 1,074,100
Widow 0 Frontage 0
Portability Applied 0
Widower 0 Depth 0
Assessed SOH 1,074,100
Disability 0 Total Number of Buildings 0
Taxable 0
Wholly 1,074,100 Total Bedrooms 0
Building 0
Senior 0 Total Bathrooms 0
Building Features Incl. in bldg value
Agriculture 0 Total Buildings Sq Ft 0
Land 1,074,100 1st Year Building on Tax Roll 0

Land Features Incl. in land value Historic District No

SOH Difference 0

Taxing Authorities

Sales / Transactions

Solid Waste (Garbage) Roll Data

Elevation Information

Appraisal Details
TRIM (proposed tax) Notices are available for the following tax years
[ 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ]

Next Lower Parcel Number Next Higher Parcel Number New Query Search Results Home

leepa.org/Display/DisplayParcel.aspx?… 1/1
12/25/2010 Lee County Property Appraiser - Onlin…

Tax Year 2010

Lee County Property Appraiser
Next Lower Parcel Number Next Higher Parcel Number Tax Estimator Tax Bills Print

Property Data for Parcel 07-44-21-01-00001.0000

Owner Of Record [ Viewer ] Tax Map [ Print ]
LEE COUNTY
PO BOX 398
FORT MYERS FL 33902

Site Address
CAYO COSTA
CAPTIVA FL 33924

Legal Description
ALL UN-NUMBERED + UN-
DESIGNATED LOTS IN CAYO
COSTA + LT K BLK 32

Classification / DOR Code

COUNTIES - OTHER / 86 [ Pictometry Aerial Viewer ]

Property Values (2010 Tax Roll) Exemptions Attributes

Homestead 0 Land Units of Measure AC

Just 91,700
Additional Homestead 0 Total Number of Land Units 9.17
Assessed 91,700
Widow 0 Frontage 0
Portability Applied 0
Widower 0 Depth 0
Assessed SOH 91,700
Disability 0 Total Number of Buildings 0
Taxable 0
Wholly 91,700 Total Bedrooms 0
Building 0
Senior 0 Total Bathrooms 0
Building Features Incl. in bldg value
Agriculture 0 Total Buildings Sq Ft 0
Land 91,700 1st Year Building on Tax Roll 0

Land Features Incl. in land value Historic District No

SOH Difference 0

Taxing Authorities

Sales / Transactions

Parcel Numbering History

Solid Waste (Garbage) Roll Data

Elevation Information

Appraisal Details
TRIM (proposed tax) Notices are available for the following tax years
[ 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ]

Next Lower Parcel Number Next Higher Parcel Number New Query Search Results Home

leepa.org/Display/DisplayParcel.aspx?… 1/1
12/18/2010 2010 TRIM Notice

DO NOT PAY - THIS IS NOT A BILL

NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES
TAX INFORMATION
BUSSE JORG + 274010 TH The taxing authorities which levy property taxes against
PO BOX 7651 Parcel ID:12-44-20-01-00015.015A your property will soon hold PUBLIC HEARINGS to adopt
NAPLES, FL 34101 CAYO COSTA budgets and tax rates for the next year.
PB 3 PG 25
LOT 15A The purpose of these PUBLIC HEARINGS is to receive
opinions from the general public and to answer questions on
ACCESS UNDETERMINED the proposed tax change and budget PRIOR TO TAKING
FINAL ACTION. Each taxing authority may AMEND OR
ALTER its proposals at the hearing.
TAXING AUTHORITY COLUMN 1* COLUMN 2* COLUMN 3*
YOUR TAX
RATE THIS THIS YEAR’S
LAST YEAR’S YOUR TAXES THIS YOUR TAXES IF
YOUR PROPERTY YEAR IF NO PROPOSED
050 ACTUAL TAX YEAR IF NO PROPOSED
TAXES LAST YEAR BUDGET TAX RATE
COUNTY / NO FIRE DISTRICT RATE 2009 BUDGET CHANGE BUDGET CHANGE
2009 CHANGE IS 2010
(MILLAGE) IS ADOPTED IS ADOPTED 2010
ADOPTED (MILLAGE)
(MILLAGE)
County:
LEE COUNTY CAPITAL IMP 0.5000 $16.00 0.5887 $14.72 0.5000 $12.50
LEE COUNTY GENERAL REVENUE 3.6506 $116.82 4.2835 $107.09 4.2835 $107.09
LEE COUNTY LIBRARY FUND 0.2844 $9.10 0.3383 $8.46 0.3383 $8.46
School:
PUBLIC SCHOOL - BY LOCAL BOARD 2.2480 $71.94 2.6311 $65.78 2.2480 $56.20
PUBLIC SCHOOL - BY STATE LAW 5.2600 $168.32 6.1563 $153.91 5.7670 $144.18
Municipality or MSTU:
LEE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED - MSTU 0.8398 $26.87 0.9906 $24.77 0.8398 $21.00
LEE COUNTY ALL HAZARDS - MSTU 0.0693 $2.22 0.0820 $2.05 0.0693 $1.73
Water Management District:
SFL WATER MGMT-EVERGLADE CONST 0.0894 $2.86 0.1013 $2.53 0.0894 $2.24
SFL WATER MGMT-DISTRICT LEVY 0.2549 $8.16 0.2892 $7.23 0.2549 $6.37
SFL WATER MGMT-OKEECHOBEE LEVY 0.2797 $8.95 0.3170 $7.93 0.2797 $6.99
Independent Special Districts:
LEE COUNTY HYACINTH CONTROL 0.0277 $0.89 0.0322 $0.81 0.0310 $0.78
LEE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL 0.2132 $6.82 0.2485 $6.21 0.2388 $5.97
WEST COAST INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT 0.0394 $1.26 0.0464 $1.16 0.0394 $0.99
TOTAL TAX RATES: 13.7564 16.1051 14.9791
TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES: $440.21 $402.65 $374.50
COLUMN 1* COLUMN 2* COLUMN 3*
NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES EXPLANATION (Section 200.069, Florida Statutes)
*COLUMN 1—"YOUR PROPERTY TAXES LAST YEAR" - This *COLUMN 2—"YOUR TAXES IF NO BUDGET CHANGE IS *COLUMN 3—"YOUR TAXES IF PROPOSED BUDGET
column shows the taxes that applied last year to your ADOPTED" - This column shows what your taxes will be this CHANGE IS ADOPTED" - This column shows what your taxes
property. These amounts were based on budgets adopted year IF EACH TAXING AUTHORITY DOES NOT CHANGE ITS will be this year under the BUDGET ACTUALLY PROPOSED by
last year and your property’s previous taxable value. PROPERTY TAX LEVY. These amounts are based on last each local taxing authority. The proposal is NOT final and
year’s budgets and your current assessment. may be amended at the public hearings shown on this
notice. The difference between Columns 2 and 3 is the tax
change proposed by each local taxing authority and is NOT
the result of higher assessments.

NOTE: Amounts shown on this form do NOT reflect early payment discounts you may have received or may be eligible to receive. (Discounts are a maximum of 4 percent of the amounts
shown on this form.)

NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS: Your final tax bill may contain Non-Ad Valorem assessments which may not be reflected on this notice such as assessments for roads, fire, garbage,
lighting, drainage, water, sewer, or other governmental services and facilities which may be levied by your county, city, or any special district

A Public Hearing on the Proposed Taxes and Budget Will Be Held:

COUNTY/MSTU: 09/08/10 5:05pm Lee County Commission Chambers 2120 Main St. Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone 239-533-2221
SCHOOL: 09/14/10 5:05pm Lee County Public Education Ctr. 2855 Colonial Blvd. Fort Myers, FL 33966 Phone 239-337-8215
WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: 09/08/10 5:15pm SFWMD Auditorium Bldg. B-1 3301 Gun Club Rd. West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Phone 561-686-8800
LEE COUNTY HYACINTH AND MOSQUITO CONTROL: 09/09/10 5:15pm District Offices 15191 Homestead Rd. Lehigh Acres, FL 33971 Phone 239-694-2174
WEST COAST INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT: 09/10/10 5:01pm Venice City Hall 401 W. Venice Ave. Venice, FL 34285 Phone 941-485-9402

leepa.org/TrimDetail/WebTrim.aspx?F… 1/5
12/18/2010 2010 TRIM Notice

PROPERTY VALUATION

Last Year 2009 This Year 2010

If you feel the assessment of your property does not
MARKET VALUE reflect fair market value, or if you are entitled to an
$32,000.00 $25,000.00 exemption or classification that is not reflected on this
Market value (also called “Just value”) is the most probable sales price for your property in a competitive, open market. It is form, please contact:
based on a willing buyer and a willing seller. Lee County Property Appraiser’s Office 2480 Thompson
Street, 4th Floor, Fort Myers or P.O. Box 1546, Ft.
Myers, FL 33902 Phone: (239) 533-6100

VALUE CALCULATIONS
ASSESSED VALUE* EXEMPTIONS TAXABLE VALUE**
TAXING AUTHORITY
LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR
County:
LEE COUNTY CAPITAL IMP $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
LEE COUNTY GENERAL REVENUE $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
LEE COUNTY LIBRARY FUND $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
School:
PUBLIC SCHOOL - BY LOCAL BOARD $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
PUBLIC SCHOOL - BY STATE LAW $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
Municipality or MSTU:
LEE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED - MSTU $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
LEE COUNTY ALL HAZARDS - MSTU $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
Water Management District:
SFL WATER MGMT-EVERGLADE CONST $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
SFL WATER MGMT-DISTRICT LEVY $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
SFL WATER MGMT-OKEECHOBEE LEVY $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
Independent Special Districts:
LEE COUNTY HYACINTH CONTROL $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
LEE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00
WEST COAST INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

*Assessed Value is the market value of your property minus any assessment reductions. The assessed value may be different for levies made by different taxing authorities.

**Taxable Value is the value used to calculate the tax due on your property. Taxable value is the assessed value minus the value of your exemptions.

ASSESSMENT REDUCTIONS APPLIES TO VALUE EXEMPTIONS APPLIES TO VALUE

Properties can receive an assessment reduction for a number of reasons.

There are limits on how much the assessment of your property can increase
each year. For example, the Save Our Homes program and the limitation for
non-homestead property are two types of reductions. Certain types of
property, such as agricultural land and land used for conservation, are
valued on their current use rather than market value. Some reductions
lower the assessed value only for levies of certain taxing authorities. If
your assessed value is lower than your market value because limits on
increases apply to your property or because your property is valued based
on its current use, the amount of the difference and the reason for the
difference are listed in the Assessment Reduction section above.
Any exemption that applies to your property is listed in this section along
with its corresponding exemption value. Specific dollar or percentage
reductions in assessed value may be applicable to a property based upon
certain qualifications of the property owner. In some cases, an exemption’s
value may vary depending on the taxing authority. The tax impact of an
exemption may also vary for the same taxing authority, depending on the
levy (e.g., operating millage vs. debt service millage.)

You may file a petition for an adjustment with the Value Adjustment Board. It is not mandatory to contact the Property Appraiser prior to doing so.
Petition forms are available from the Lee County Property Appraiser’s Office and also at www.leepa.org.
Online filing is now available at www.leeclerk.org.
All petitions must be filed with the Clerk of Courts Office ON OR BEFORE
SEPTEMBER 14th, 2010

leepa.org/TrimDetail/WebTrim.aspx?F… 2/5
12/18/2010 2010 TRIM Notice

UNDERSTANDING YOUR NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES

In 2009, the Florida Legislature substantially revised the requirements for the Notice of Proposed Property Taxes. One
major change you will notice is that the Tax Information portion is separated from the Property Valuation portion. For
additional information please visit our website at www.leepa.org.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Dear Lee County,
Homestead Exemption and “Save Our Homes”
Property Owner:
Homestead Exemption is a constitutional benefit that
As you can see the Notice of exempts up to $50,000 from the assessed value of your
Proposed Property Taxes property. After the base year of the qualified
has a new format. Due to Homestead Exemption application, the assessed value
changes in the Florida cannot increase more than 3% per year because of the
Statutes, the opportunity “Save Our Homes” (SOH) benefit. This constitutional
presented itself for this office to review and revise this benefit that Mr. Wilkinson authored in 1992 was enacted
form to meet the new requirements and save money. The to prevent homestead property owners from being taxed
new format that we designed is expected to save at least out of their homes in the face of a rapidly increasing
$25,000. market. For property with Homestead Exemption, SOH
limits or “caps” the increases to your assessed value (not
Your property values are important to me, especially in your taxes). That capped value is the SOH assessed
these difficult economic times. It is our duty to provide value. From the SOH assessed value, exemptions are
you, the taxpayer, with sound, reliable, and equitable subtracted to arrive at the taxable value.
assessments.
10% Non-Homestead Limitation
Enacted as a part of Amendment 1 in 2008, a 10%
assessment increase limitation applies to eligible non-
homestead property that did not change ownership
or control in the previous year. This limitation has the
same premise as the Save Our Homes assessment
reduction. Once a base year is established (2008 is
the base year or the year the property was
purchased thereafter) the assessed value of the
property cannot increase more than 10%. Any new
construction or improvements to the property that
were not previously assessed, will be added to the
“limitation amount” and will be included the following
year. There is no application necessary to receive
the 10% Non-Homestead Limitation.

Your Notice provides your “Proposed Taxes” for 2010 and

What is “Recapture”?
the “Property Valuation” of your property as of January 1,
2010. If your market value decreased and your assessed value increased without any new construction, you may be feeling
the effects of “Recapture”. Recapture means that any property that has an assessed value less than market value,
If you agree that the fair market of your property, based shall be increased. For Homestead properties: The “Recapture Rule” requires Property Appraisers to raise the
on 2009 sales, is at least as much as shown in the Notice, assessed value by the maximum of 3% or the annual Consumer Price Index (C.P.I.) change, whichever is less, as
you do not have to do anything. However, if you have any long as the assessed value is lower than market value in any given year. For Non-Homestead properties: Florida
questions about this value, assessment reductions or Statute 193.1555(3) states “Property subject to the 10% cap shall be reassessed annually with the increase in
exemptions, we encourage you to contact this office. assessment not to exceed 10%”. This increase should occur whether or not the just value increases, as long as
The Property Appraiser does not determine the amount of assessed value does not exceed just value (regardless of the C.P.I.).
tax you pay. Taxing Authorities determine the tax rate
based on money needed to fund their budgets. Should you Calculating Ad Valorem Taxes
have any questions regarding the amount of taxes you are
paying, please contact the respective authorities listed on Total Taxable Value of
Taxing Authority Tax Rate
the front page of your Notice.
Budget ÷ all property in = (%)
jurisdiction
It is my goal as your elected Property Appraiser to provide
fair assessments for all property. Feel free to contact us.
Tax Rate Your Taxable Value for Taxes Paid to Each
Our door is always open.
(%) x each Taxing Authority = Authority ($)
Respectfully,
Sum of all Taxes Paid Your Ad Valorem
Kenneth M. Wilkinson, CFA
to Each Authority ($) = Taxes
Lee County Property Appraiser

Additional Homestead Exemption Senior’s Exemption

Lee County Property Appraiser’s Office
Physical Address: 2480 Thompson St.,
4th Floor
Fort Myers, FL 33901
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1546
Fort Myers, FL 33902
Office Hours: Monday - Friday
8:30am to 5:00pm
Directions: Downtown Fort Myers at the corner of Dr.
Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. & Fowler Street (4th Floor
Constitutional Complex)
If you currently receive a homestead exemption and your
property value exceeds $50,000, you will automatically receive
the additional homestead exemption. No application or other
action is necessary to receive this benefit. Effective January 1,
2008, the additional exemption of up to $25,000 will apply to all
levies except those by school districts and other assessments
for special benefits. This additional exemption of $25,000
applies to assessed values between $50,000 and $75,000. If
your property value is less than $75,000, the exemption
amount will be less than $25,000.
All Lee County residents who are 65 or older
(as of January 1st ) who qualify for and
receive the homestead exemption and whose
2009 annual gross adjusted household income
does not exceed $25,873, are eligible to
receive the exemption. Although you must
make an initial application (January 1st -
March 1st), an annual re-application is not
required as long as your income does not
exceed the annually adjusted limitation.
Tangible Personal Property

Real Property Hotline TAX BILLS ARE MAILED Effective for the 2008 tax year, all Tangible
(239) 533-6100 Fax (239) 533-6160 Personal Property Accounts, such as
NOVEMBER 1 businesses and rentals will receive a $25,000
Tangible Personal Property Hotline exemption. A DR-405, Tangible Personal
(239) 533-6140 Fax (239) 533-6289 Property Tax Return, must be filed with this
office in the initial year of application to be
Outside of 239 Area Code (866) 673-2868 eligible.
Lee County Clerk of Court (239) 533-2328 (V.A.B.)
Lee County Tax Collector (239) 533-6000 (Tax Bill)

leepa.org/TrimDetail/WebTrim.aspx?F… 3/5
12/18/2010 2010 TRIM Notice
Lee County Taxing Authorities
P.O. Box 1270
Fort Myers, FL 33902-1270
2010 NOTICE OF PROPOSED REAL PROPERTY TAXES
DO NOT PAY THIS IS
NOT A BILL
Portability
Portability means that you can transfer some or all of your previous home's "Save Our Homes"
benefit to your new home in an amount up to $500,000. The "Save Our Homes" benefit is the
difference between the assessed value and market value of a homestead property.
What if I do not agree with my ‘Values’?
If you believe that your assessment does not represent the fair market value of the property,
you may file a petition with the Clerk of Court for a hearing before the Value Adjustment Board
(V.A.B.). This Board is created by State Law and is comprised of five members. The Board
appoints Special Magistrates who are qualified appraisers or attorneys, independent of the
Property Appraiser’s Office, to conduct valuation hearings. The Special Magistrates are
appointed only to determine whether the appraised value of the property is fair market value
as of January 1st. Petitions to the Board and further details concerning this process can be
obtained by visiting the Property Appraiser’s Office or our website at www.leepa.org. Petitions
must be received (not merely postmarked) by the Clerk of Court before the date that appears
on the T.R.I.M. Notice. The petition must be accompanied with a $15.00 per parcel filing fee.
Submission with the petition of all requested information ensures proper review of your
request. MAKING A CASE: You can prevail at V.A.B. by presenting evidence and testimony
that your property’s assessed value is not market value. The fact that your assessed value
increased or decreased from last year is not a basis to alter this year’s assessment.
leepa.org/TrimDetail/WebTrim.aspx?F…
BUSSE JORG +
PO BOX 7651
NAPLES, FL 34101
Agricultural Classification
An Agricultural Classification is the designation of land by the Property
Appraiser pursuant to F.S. 193.461. The assessment is based on an
agricultural use value. HOW DO I QUALIFY? To qualify for Agricultural
Classification, a return must be filed with the Property Appraiser between
January 1st and March 1st of the tax year. Only lands which are used for bona
fide agricultural purposes shall be classified agricultural. “Bona fide agricultural
purposes” means good faith commercial agricultural use of the land. The
Property Appraiser, prior to classifying such lands, may require the taxpayer or
the taxpayer’s representative to furnish such information as may reasonably
be required to establish such lands are actually used for a bona fide agricultural
purpose. For more information please contact our Agricultural Department at
(239) 533-6172.
Problems common to the neighborhood are already considered in the sales of
properties sold. Also, you cannot base your case on personal hardship, such as
living on a fixed income or an inability to pay taxes. You may, however, be
eligible for the Tax Deferral Plan or Installment Payments offered through the
Tax Collector’s Office. Information regarding these plans is available at the Tax
Collector’s website (www.leetc.com). THE V.A.B. HEARING: Value Adjustment
Board hearings begin in the fall. While an attorney is not required, one may
represent you. Both the Property Appraiser and Taxpayer present evidence
and testimony to a Special Magistrate. After the Special Magistrate hearing,
the V.A.B. will notify you in writing of their decision. If you accept the decision,
do nothing further. If you disagree with the V.A.B. decision, you may file a
Circuit Court civil action pursuant to Florida Statute 194.171. Additional
information can be obtained from our office, or you may contact the Lee
County Clerk of Court’s Office at (239) 533-2328 regarding the filing process.
4/5
12/26/2010 Civil - Small Claims Detail

Civil / Small Claims Detail Information

* All case information on this website was last updated 12/26/2010 6:00:00 PM

BUSSE, JORG ETAL PLAINTIFF VS STATE OF FLORIDA ETAL DEFENDANT

Case Number: 06-CA-003185

Uniform Case Number: 362006CA0031850001CH
Case Type: CA Declaratory Judgment
Sub Case Type:
Judge: Gerald, Lynn, Jr.
Filed Date: 7/31/2006
Disposition: Other
Disposition Date: 12/5/2008

Plaintiffs

Busse, Jorg Attorney: Jorg Busse

Roesch Family Attorney: Roesch Family

Ruzicka, Gerald E Attorney: Gerald E Ruzicka

Carroll Family Attorney: Carroll Family

Lay, Janet Attorney: Janet Lay

Defendants

State of Florida Attorney: Linda Kathryn Funchess

State of Florida Attorney: Reagan Kathleen Russell

Bush, John Ellis Attorney:

Armstrong, Eva Attorney:

apps.leeclerk.org/Civil_Detail.asp?CsN… 1/21
11/30/2010 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Rule…

Search Law School Search Cornell

LII / Legal Information Institute

hom e se arch find a lawye r donate

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

m ain pa ge se arch | civil proce dure ove rvie w

VIII. PROVISIONA L A ND FINA L REMEDIES > Rule 65. Prev | Next

Rule 65. Injunctions and Restraining Orders

Donations cover only

(a) Preliminary Injunction. Notes
20% of our costs. (1) Notice.
Law About ... Civil
The court may issue a preliminary injunction only on notice to the adverse Procedure

Eurail Global party.

Passes Attorneys: reach
Buy directly from (2) Consolidating the Hearing with the Trial on the Merits.
interested clients by
Eurail website.
Special Student Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, sponsoring an LII page
Discounts! the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the
www.eurail.com/Glob…
hearing. Even when consolidation is not ordered, evidence that is received
on the motion and that would be admissible at trial becomes part of the trial
record and need not be repeated at trial. But the court must preserve any
party's right to a jury trial.

(b) Temporary Restraining Order.

(1) Issuing Without Notice.

The court may issue a temporary restraining order without written or oral
notice to the adverse party or its attorney only if:

(A) specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint clearly show that

immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant
before the adverse party can be heard in opposition; and

(B) the movant's attorney certifies in writing any efforts made to give
notice and the reasons why it should not be required.

(2) Contents; Expiration.

Every temporary restraining order issued without notice must state the date
and hour it was issued; describe the injury and state why it is irreparable;
state why the order was issued without notice; and be promptly filed in the
clerk's office and entered in the record. The order expires at the time after
entry — not to exceed 14 days — that the court sets, unless before that
time the court, for good cause, extends it for a like period or the adverse
party consents to a longer extension. The reasons for an extension must be
entered in the record.

(3) Expediting the Preliminary-Injunction Hearing.

If the order is issued without notice, the motion for a preliminary injunction
must be set for hearing at the earliest possible time, taking precedence over
all other matters except hearings on older matters of the same character. At
the hearing, the party who obtained the order must proceed with the
motion; if the party does not, the court must dissolve the order.

(4) Motion to Dissolve.

On 2 days' notice to the party who obtained the order without notice — or
on shorter notice set by the court — the adverse party may appear and
move to dissolve or modify the order. The court must then hear and decide
the motion as promptly as justice requires.

www.law.cornell.edu/…/Rule65.htm 1/2
11/30/2010 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Rule…
(c) Security.
The court may issue a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order
only if the movant gives security in an amount that the court considers proper
to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been
wrongfully enjoined or restrained. The United States, its officers, and its
agencies are not required to give security.

(d) Contents and Scope of Every Injunction and Restraining

Order.
(1) Contents.

Every order granting an injunction and every restraining order must:

(A) state the reasons why it issued;

(B) state its terms specifically; and

(C) describe in reasonable detail — and not by referring to the complaint or

other document — the act or acts restrained or required.

(2) Persons Bound.

The order binds only the following who receive actual notice of it by
personal service or otherwise:

(A) the parties;

(B) the parties' officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and

(C) other persons who are in active concert or participation with anyone
described in Rule 65(d)(2)(A) or (B).

(e) Other Laws Not Modified.

(1) any federal statute relating to temporary restraining orders or preliminary
injunctions in actions affecting employer and employee;

(2) 28 U.S.C. § 2361, which relates to preliminary injunctions in actions of

interpleader or in the nature of interpleader; or

(3) 28 U.S.C. § 2284, which relates to actions that must be heard and
decided by a three-judge district court.

(f) Copyright Impoundment.

This rule applies to copyright-impoundment proceedings.

Prev | Next

about us help terms of use friend us follow us contact us

www.law.cornell.edu/…/Rule65.htm 2/2
11/29/2010 CM/ECF - U.S. District Court:nhd
MAG

U.S. District Court

District of New Hampshire (Concord)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv-00321-JL

USA, Ex Rel et al v. USA et al Date Filed: 07/29/2010

Assigned to: Judge Joseph N. Laplante
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty
Case in other court: USDC-FL, Middle (Ft. Myers), 2:07-00228-
JES-SPC
Cause: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Plaintiff
USA, Ex Rel

Plaintiff
Jorg Busse represented by Jorg Busse
10 Benning St, #135
West Lebanon, NH 03784-3402
PRO SE

Plaintiff
Jennifer Franklin Prescott represented by Jennifer Franklin Prescott
10 Benning St, #135
West Lebanon, NH 03784-3402
561 400-3295
PRO SE

V.
Defendant
USA

Defendant
US Courts

Defendant
US Custom & Immigration Service

Defendant
Tony West

Defendant
ecf.nhd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl… 1/5
11/8/2010 Lee County Property Appraiser - Onlin…

Tax Year 2010

Lee County Property Appraiser
Next Lower Parcel Number Next Higher Parcel Number Tax Estimator Tax Bills Print

Property Data for Parcel 12-44-20-01-00015.015A

Owner Of Record [ Viewer ] Tax Map [ Print ]
BUSSE JORG +
PRESCOTT JENNIFER F
PO BOX 7651
NAPLES FL 34101

Site Address
ACCESS UNDETERMINED
CAPTIVA FL 33924

Legal Description
CAYO COSTA
PB 3 PG 25
LOT 15A

Classification / DOR Code [ Pictometry Aerial Viewer ]

VACANT RESIDENTIAL / 00

Property Values (2010 Tax Roll) Exemptions Attributes

Homestead 0 Land Units of Measure LT

Just 25,000
Additional Homestead 0 Total Number of Land Units 1.00
Assessed 25,000
Widow 0 Frontage 50
Portability Applied 0
Widower 0 Depth 135
Assessed SOH 25,000
Disability 0 Total Number of Buildings 0
Taxable 25,000
Wholly 0 Total Bedrooms 0
Building 0
Senior 0 Total Bathrooms 0
Building Features Incl. in bldg value
Agriculture 0 Total Buildings Sq Ft 0

Land 25,000 1st Year Building on Tax Roll 0

Land Features Incl. in land value Historic District No

SOH Difference 0

Taxing Authorities

Sales / Transactions

Parcel Numbering History

Solid Waste (Garbage) Roll Data

Elevation Information

Appraisal Details
TRIM (proposed tax) Notices are available for the following tax years
[ 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ]

Next Lower Parcel Number Next Higher Parcel Number New Query Search Results Home

leepa.org/Display/DisplayParcel.aspx?… 1/1
11/30/2010 Presseschau: Kritik an den USA und W…

Presseschau zu WikiLeaks

"Massenvernichtungswaffe gegen das

Vertrauen"
Die Kom m entatoren der deutschen T ageszeitungen sehen durch die Veröffentlichung
T ausender diplom atischer Dokum ente v or allem die US-Außenpolitik beschädigt. Aber auch
WikiLeaks wird kritisiert: Die Motiv e für die Enthüllungen seien wenig transparent. Zudem
werde Vertrauen v ernichtet.

Dazu heißt es in der "Süddeutschen Zeitung": "Nach der V eröffentlichung der gestohlenen Depeschen,
Analy sen, Handlungsanweisungen und Kommentare drängt sich nun die Frage auf, wie lange die USA noch die
Früchte ihres diplomatischen Dienstes genießen können. Die v on der Internet-Organisation Wikileaks
v erbreitete Beute eines Datendiebes zerstört nämlich das Bindegewebe, das die unter Staaten betriebene
Kommunikation ausmacht: die V ertraulichkeit. Ohne V ertraulichkeit keine Information, kein Geben und
Nehmen, kein Zugang. Ohne Information aber auch keine Kenntnis, keine Urteilskraft, keine richtigen
Entscheidungen. Wikileaks hat sich als Massenv ernichtungswaffe für das letzte Quäntchen V ertrauen
erwiesen."

"An den neuen Enthüllungen ist wenig sensationell", findet die "Mitteldeutsche Zeitung": "Zumal die
Aufgabe jedes diplomatischen Dienstes v or allem darin besteht, die Heimatregierung mit zutreffenden und
ungeschminkten Einsichten über die jeweiligen Gastländer zu v ersorgen. Dennoch sind alle Beteiligten
bloßgestellt. Und das wird allen Beteuerungen zum Trotz Einfluss haben auf die künftigen Beziehungen. Die
USA haben ihr Gesicht v erloren, weil sie das erste Gebot diplomatischer Arbeit gebrochen haben: Diskretion.
Dieses V ertrauen wieder herzustellen, wird schwer sein. Anders als die Berichte v on Wikileaks über
Kriegsv erbrechen oder Folter nützen diese Enthüllungen deshalb niemandem."

"Lunte ans Pulverfass legen"

"Eine riesige Blamage für die amerikanische Diplomatie sind nicht die Inhalte", betont die "Neue
Westfälische", "sondern die Tatsache, dass sie an die Öffentlichkeit gelangt sind. Mit wie v iel kindlichem
Glauben an V orschriftenhörigkeit, Wohlv erhalten und V erschlüsselungstechnik muss man ausgestattet sein,
wenn man im Jahr 201 0 glaubt, über das Internet v erbreitete Daten geheim halten zu können? Muss man das
State Department für so ausgesprochen tumb halten? Man muss wohl, und das ist der eigentliche Skandal."

Die "Landeszeitung" aus Lüneburg sieht es ähnlich: "Die tiefen Einblicke in die Welt hinter der US-
diplomatischen Fassade sind für westliche Gemüter eher harmlos. Peinlich ist der Umgang mit Daten in den
tagesschau.de/…/wikileakspressescha… 1/3
11/30/2010 Presseschau: Kritik an den USA und W…
USA selbst. Wenn hunderttausende Mitarbeiter in US-Behörden Zugriff auf die Daten in internen Netzen
haben, muss man sich darüber wundern, dass es nicht schon v orher Lecks gegeben hat. Der v ermeintliche
Spaß über Wikileaks-Enthüllungen endet aber dort, wo A ussagen v eröffentlicht werden v on US-Diplomaten,
wonach einige arabische Herrscher nichts gegen eine Militärinterv ention der USA zur Zerstörung des
iranischen Atomprogrammes hätten. Denn so wird fahrlässig Lunte ans Pulv erfass Nahost gelegt."

"Vertrauen wird zerstört"

Die Zeitung "Die Welt" kritisiert: "Was Wikileaks nun zerstört hat, ist die Freiheit des v ertraulichen
diplomatischen Gesprächs. Denn was für Priv atpersonen gilt, gilt auch für den V erkehr zwischen Staaten:
Offenheit im beiderseitigen Umgang ist nur möglich, wenn man darauf v ertrauen kann, dass das Gesagte nicht
morgen in der ganzen Welt nachlesbar ist. Und noch etwas sollte zu denken geben: Bisher gingen Wikileaks-
Enthüllungen fast ausschließlich zu Lasten v on demokratischen Staaten, die ohnehin ein v ergleichsweise
hohes Maß an Transparenz aufweisen. Die inneren V orgänge der echten schwarzen Löcher dieser Erde -
Diktaturen wie Iran und Nordkorea - hat Wikileaks aber bisher nicht ans Licht der Öffentlichkeit gezerrt. Diese
Freiheitsfeinde sind es aber, die die 250.000 US-Depeschen am akribischsten studieren und den größten
Nutzen daraus ziehen werden."

Auch der "Weser-Kurier" kann den Enthüllungen nichts abgewinnen: "Die Motiv e v on Julian Assange und
seinen Mitstreitern sind längst nicht v on der Transparenz, für die sie angeblich kämpfen. Zumindest fällt auf,
dass sie ihre beeindruckenden Fähigkeiten nahezu ausschließlich dazu einsetzen, die US-Regierung zu
schwächen. Nun muss man mit einer Supermacht kein Mitleid haben, die durch eigene Unfähigkeit
v erwundbar geworden ist. Aber die Frage ist erlaubt, wem eine so v orgeführte und geschwächte US-Regierung
nützt - und ob uns das nicht am Ende sehr schadet."

"Wenig originell"
"Warum die Aufregung?", fragt die "Frankfurter Allgem eine Zeitung" mit Blick auf die deutsche Politik
und führt weiter aus: "Was Wikileaks aus amerikanischen A rchiv en ins Internet gepumpt hat, pfeifen, so es die
deutsche Politik angeht, in Berlin die Spatzen v om Dach. Die Beschreibungen deutscher Politiker in den
angeblichen Botschaftsberichten sind, was für ihre A uthentizität spricht, wenig originell. 'Mutti' risikoscheu,
Westerwelle kein Außenpolitiker: derartige Befunde hat man schon aus v ielen ranghohen Mündern und mit
mancher Ergänzung gehört. So schreibt nicht nur die amerikanische Diplomatie über deutsches
Führungspersonal - so denkt und spricht deutsches Führungspersonal übereinander."

"Es ist wunderbar, dass wir diese Akten lesen können", schwärmt die "Frankfurter Rundschau". "Sie zeigen
uns, wie menschlich-allzumenschlich es auch in der Diplomatie zugeht. Dieser FDP-Mann zum Beispiel, der in
den Koalitionsv erhandlungen sitzt und sein Protokoll gleich der US-Botschaft weitergibt - das hat doch etwas
Rührendes. Nur v on ihm möchte ich nicht hören, dass Wikileaks eine Räuberbande ist. Wenn Wikileaks so
weitermacht, wird die Internetplattform nicht nur den Regierenden das Regieren erschweren, sondern auch
uns das Regiertwerden. Wir Bürger werden immer weniger uns darauf hinausreden können, wir hätten nichts
gewusst. Wir werden genau wissen, und wir werden darum auch v iel stärker einbezogen werden in das, was
getan werden muss. Das Leben wird unbequemer werden. Wir werden uns öfter engagieren müssen. Es gilt
wieder: Mehr Demokratie wagen!"

Quelle: Deutschlandradio (http://ww w.dradio.de/presseschau/)

Pro und Contra WikiLeaks: Transparenz gegen V ertrauen? (/ausland/wikileaks2 1 4.htm l)

Wie US-Diplomaten über internationale Politiker lästern [bilder]
tagesschau.de/…/wikileakspressescha… 2/3