arc @ rem FEMA P-58 Training e New Tools and Guidance for Performance-Based Seismic Design Hosted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and ‘Applied Technology Council (ATC) June 25, 2018 8:00am - 12:00pm San Gabriel Room (Lower Level) Westin Bonaventure Hotel Los Angeles, California Training Objective: FEMA P-58 series of reports, initially published in 2012, presented a methodology and an implementation tool for seismic performance assessment of buildings. ‘The follow-on project, ATC-58-2 has developed guidance on performance of code-conforming buildings and seismic design of new buildings, as well as improvements to existing tools, incorporating environmental considerations related to seismic performance of buildings. This training seminar will provide an overview of the newly available tools and guidance. Training Materials: Pre-release drafts of selected FEMA P-58 Second Edition materials are available for download here: https://cloud.atcouncil org/index. php/s/eXtmZQekr99ESL.¢. Please note there is no wifi connectivity in the meeting room. Time Subject Leader 8:00 am | Introductory Remarks and Overview of ATC-58 Jon Heintz Project Series @:15am_| Overview of FEMA P-58 Methodology Ron Hamburger 9:00 am | Updates to the FEMA P-58 Methodology and John Hooper Performance Assessment Calculation Tool (PACT) 9:30 am | Break 9:45 am_| FEMA P-58 Performance of Code-Conforming Jon Heintz Buildings 70:05 am | Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design __| Ron Hamburger 11.00 am | Demonstration of Performance Estimation Tool (PET) | Vesna Terzic 17:45 am | Stakeholder Guidance Products Jon Heintz. Closing Remarks 12:00 pm | AdjournATC-58 / ATC-138 Project Series FEMA P-58 Training: New Tools and Guidance for Performance-Based Seismic Design Los Angeles, California June 25, 2018 Welcome! Training Agenda " Objective: presentation of major new (and revised) elements of the FEMA P-58 Methodology and Implementation * Plan: explain technical basis, present new design guidance, and illustrate with some examplesTraining | Agenda ira Ravan and Ovenion TRTCZE ‘roe Sees ‘ca | Usd te FEWA PHB dog and rr ee oT FEMA PS WaT | Pesermance Assessment Calcuaton Yea (PACT) aan es TPS ET TSPET} a T2008 ‘Sarena Guaares PORE Clcing Romans OverviewProject Context = Next-Generation Performance-Based Seismic Design = Present-generation procedures — FEMA 273 (1997) - ASCE 41-17 (2017) FEMA began planning program for enhanced procedures (1998) FEMA initiated the ATC-58 Project Series in 2001 O° < g N So 3 Q 3 Ss a € BD 3 oS » Q 3 a o more than 20 teams + Project Management * Sttuctural Performance Commitee Products + Project Steering Nonstructural Performance Commitee Products + Performance Products * Risk Management Team Products ‘Products Update Team + Validation Verification Team ‘Stakeholder Products * Fragility Review Panel Team + Fragity Devetopment + Performance Working Consultants Group + Environmental Products Working Group 13ATC-58-1 Project = FEMA P-58 Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings (2012) — Volume 1 - Methodology — Volume 2 - Implementation Guide — Volume 3 - Electronic Materials — Background Documents yoo aN one, = For the past five years: — Exercising the FEMA P-58 Methodology to enhance and expand it for use in PBSD — Adjusting fragilities — Developing design aids — Assessing expected performance of code- conforming buildings a _ aes Environmental Impacts‘Mike Mahoney Bob Hanson Jon Heinte ATC-58-2 Project Team | ir aa Bill Holmes Chair Ron Hamburger Project Techical Director Jack Moehle Steve Mahin/ Khalid Mosalam Steve Winke! John Gillengerten John Hooper {aura Samant 2013, Stakeholder Workshop on communication 2014, Engineering Workshop on design 2017, Engineering Preview Workshop 2017, Stakeholder Preview WorkshopATC-58-2 Project = FEMA P-58 Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Second Edition (2018) — Volume 1, 2, and 3, Second Editions, — Volume 4 — Environmental Impacts. — Volume 5 — Expected Performance — Volume 6 — Engineering Guidelines — Volume 7 — Stakeholder Guidelines — Background Documents * FEMAP-58, Second Edition, Pre-Release Versions (June 2018) = Volume 1, 2, and 3, Second Editions — Volume 4 — Environmental Impacts = Volume 5 — Expected Performance m= ~ Volume 6 — Engineering Guidelines — Volume 7 — Stakeholder Guidelines — — Background Documents 1-6FEMA P-58 Training Materials = If you haven't already done so... = Download at: https://cloud.atcouncil.org/index,php/s/eXtmZQekr99E5Lc But wait, there’s more...* The ATC-58 Project Series has run its course — Heavy lifting is done — Entering a new phase The ATC-138 Project has been funded to: — Promote, disseminate, conduct training — Technical support, monitoring, enhancement Thank you! 18FEMA P-58 “Next-generation Performance- Based Seismic Design Criteria” The Methodology Ronald burger, SE The PBD Process Select Performance Objectives Perform Preliminary Design Revise 2 Acceptable? Design Yes Construction 24Standard Performance Levels Operational immediate ufe Occupancy collapse Prevention Next-Generation Performance « Probabilistic rather than Deterministic = Consequences of building response to earthquakes, including: — Casualties (deaths & serious injuries) — Direct economic loss (repair and replacement costs) — Indirect economic and social loss (red tags, repair and re-occupancy time) — Environmental Impacts including: embodied energy and carbon 22Assessment Types « Intensity-based — Performance given a specific acceleration response spectrum = Scenario-based — Performance given a specific earthquake scenario, ©.g. repeat of 1857 or 1906 San Andreas events = Time-based ~ Performance over a period of time, considering all possible earthquakes, and their individual probabilities of occurence Performance Prediction 23P{Repait Cost >$M) ekRGSEREES. Repair Cost- $M (Thousands US. Dollars) = 50% probability that repair cost will not exceed $1M. * 90% probability repair costs will not exceed $1.5M = Expected repair cost is $1.1M 24Time-based Assessment acon * 50-year loss $2,000 = 100-year loss $14,000 = 200-year loss $44,000 . a annual loss $540 Performance-prediction Process je Structural Motion Reanonee 25Predicting Performance «| It is impossible to predict performance precisely «= Each step of the process entails many uncertainties _ Ground Motion Uncertainty 26Ground Motion Uncertainty CLW.-T050 DZc-180 ee Modeling Uncertainty Strength of individual members = Compliance of soils beneath foundations Inherent damping Live load present at each column Quality of construction *J Interaction of £4.> Lnonstructural elements_ Damage Uncertainty = Similarity of test specimens to actual component Number of cycles of motion and sequence of application « Boundary conditions ml in test 28‘senblebang ] —[Deinetaaraae] Pefomance ode I THE PROCESS [#2 cot Tabane] [Savene Capa spore ray (Greer) (craters) Gare perorance (chstern | Assemble Building Performance Model ——______(Chapter3) comy_|" Methodical Building Description ~ Structural & Nonstructural Components =e] EEE] = * Quantity a * Damage states * Fragilty relationships + Damage conseugences — Occupancy * People at risk * Locations * Time of day eats 29: Buildit ng Performance Model us Story NS Shear was [—BeSey NS Shea nals {3 Sony NS Cura wal Trew oreo | ase cones 2 E-W Cura wall 2-10Provided Fragility Specifications More than 700 building elements * Stee * Cladding a Partitions + Concrete * Roaling — Moment frame * Plumbing Slender walls * Mechanical/HVAC = santwate aval ——— * Electrical Equipment + Masonry walls : ~ Shear cooled Lighting Feral Cortoted * Contents * Light Framed ~ vee = ors 211[rte Performance Groups * Collections of components that belong to a single Fragility Specification, and = Will be subject to similar demands Example: exterior glazing on the third story at east building wall Engineer must define quantity and type * Common Occupancies — Office — K-12 Education — Healthcare = Residential — Retail — Laboratory — Warehouse — Hospitality Population Models he apausassasad Peak occupancy = 1 person per X00 square feetDefine Earthquake Hazards —____(Chapter4) * Intensity-based Assessment — Any 5% damped elastic response spectum © * Scenario-based Assessment — Median spectrum for a magnitude — distance pair ~ Definition of uncertainty “s" time-based Assessment _ Site Hazard Curve quency of exceedance, 2Analyze Building Response i (Chapter 5) Zeman] [ae * Model structure = Analyze = Nonlinear Response History Analysis = Simplified Linear Analysis (similar to ASCE-41 LSP) * Predict median: — Story drifts — Floor accelerations — Floor velocities — Residual drifts = Dispersions |e eto Develop Collapse Fragility (Chapter 6) * Collapse fragility function = Potential collapse “cee Ee modes a * Fatality and Injury oa ratio's for each mode ‘omer [CCS] 214Collapse Fragility _ Collapse Modes A OAT Zz aA nee ee + Modes that can occur * Probability of each mode * Floor area at each level involved * Casualty rates in collapsed area Ce «| 2.15Collapse Fragilit Development Collapse Fragility Development: — IDA approach similar to FEMA P-695 — Pushover analysis (similar to ASCE 41) & SPOZIDA tool — Judgment-based Calculate Performance _____ (Chapter 7) _ = Monte Carlo Process = Hundreds to thousands of “spins” = For each “spin” termed a “realization” = Unique — Demands — Damage — Consequences 2-16For Each Realization We Compute ___Building Performance It’s all automated! «| 247Performance Assessment Calculation Tool See ae > Repair CostUnsafe Placards Applications = Clarifies that performance is not certain — Reduces designer's risk Cost-benefit studies to evaluate alternative design and retrofit criteria Probable Maximum Loss studies Form the basis for property rating systems Allow evaluation of building practice adequacy without waiting for earthquakes to occur Permit PBD with metrics that decision-makers care about 2-20Questions?