Você está na página 1de 11

Horsens, 14 December 2010

Her Majesty Margrethe II


Amaliegade 18
PO Box 2143
1015 Copenhagen

Your Majesty

m
Discrimination, police brutality and questionable legal rights. - Has my country turned me the back...?

co
In your Majesty's New Year's speech in 2007 You said the following: "This New Year's Eve, I would like to
extend a greeting to all the many who through the past lifetime have settled in Denmark. I wish for all of
them that every New Year they are here among us, despite all the difficulties, that it will take them further so
that they can see themselves and their descendants as part of Danish society. "

u.
You and I both want that for everyone who settles in Denmark. You of course especially want this for the
members of Your own family who have come here out of love and to create a family.

yo
Likewise, I strongly want this for my foreign spouse; but since Mario came into my life I have seen that
Denmark has made strong efforts to scare him away - and that my own country also has turned me the back...

My name is Gitte Toldsted. I am a 49-year old Danish woman. I'm in the sixth year married to Mario
Herrera-Padron. My spouse has now lived in Denmark for five years. He is originally Cuban - and later
or
became an American citizen after coming to U.S. as a political refugee. For different reasons we chose to live
in Denmark, where I have lived my whole life. We are family reunificated, and now live in a house in
Horsens.
sf
I am writing to you because my husband and I have been, and are still, up against powerful forces in our
attempts to create a normal, healthy and good family life in Denmark. For six years we have spent all our
energy in trying to secure my husband's (and my) legal rights and basic human rights, and it feels so much as
ht

an unequal struggle in which politicians and authorities protect themselves and others at the expense of
citizens' welfare. It has gradually taken health, hunger for life and belief in a future together in Denmark
from us both, and I therefore ask your majesty to help to ensure my spouse - and me too – his rights in the
country that You reigns.
ig

In short, my husband over the last six years has been subjected to repeated discrimination, police violence /
torture, violation of legal rights, surveillance and more. We have through all these years addressed (also in
or

writing) a large number of authorities, institutions, organizations and politicians in Denmark for help.

We have addressed to:


• The American Embassy, both former Ambassador James P. Cain, former Consul Marilynn W.
.n

Rowdybush and current Ambassador Laurie S. Fulton


• Lene Espersen, as then-Justice Minister
• Anders Fogh Rasmussen as then-Prime Minister
w

• MP Anne Baastrup
• MP Naser Khader
• MP Anders Samuelsen
w

• The Complaint Committee for Ethnic Equality


• The Documentation Centre for Racial Discrimination
• KRIM
w

1/11


Horsens, 14 December 2010

• Institute for Human Rights


• Amnesty International
• The Parliamentary Ombudsman
• The Police
• The district attorney / state attorney
• The Danish Attorney General
• The European Court of Human Rights

m
• IRCT (International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims)
• RCT (Rehabilitation and Research Centre for Torture Victims)

It sounds nice with democracy, human rights and legislation against discrimination, but in reality it is our

co
experience that we are not being listened to, that our rights are violated again and again and that this largely
stems from the fact that my spouse is not Danish. My husband has long had the experience that he is not
welcome, that we will "harass" him out of the country, if you will.

u.
Mario also find that I let him in the lurch, though I do what I can to resolve the situations he / we gets into, -
but I can not change the whole system. - And I am now even left completely in the lurch by the country in
which I, until there was foreign blood in my family, thought was safe and filled with possibilities. Also I am
coming to the conclusion that our only opportunity to get ahead in life is to move away from Denmark.

yo
This request to You from me is a cry for help. You are the last option I can see for to get help to obtain justice
for my husband and to get a dignified life in this country for both him and me.
or
The Police case – torture and kidnapping
1st November Unclear for what reason, that day Mario was attacked, treated brutally and
sf
2006 humiliating by police in Copenhagen. It is the two police officers Nicolai Cederskjold
and Anders Bitch who makes the unlawful arrest on Hulgaard Square at noon, when my
husband is on his way home from the dentist.
ht

After the violent arrest, where Mario’s shoulder was destroyed, Mario was thrown into a
cell at the police station, where he was stripped and searched, while 5-6 policemen were
present and stood around him and made humiliating remarks and laughed at him.
ig

Mario asked repeatedly for access to his embassy of the United States of America, a doctor,
a lawyer and me, without the police complying with this. It is inconsistent not only with
or

Danish law but also with the Vienna Convention of 1963 on Consular Relations (Section
36a, b and c). Both Denmark and the United States of America has ratified this
international agreement, so this is the very same right all Danish people enjoy and are
protected under, if we live or go to the United States of America or another country.
.n

Both my spouse and I the complained against the police. My husband's complaint (attached
as Appendix 1) which is dated 9 November 2006, provides a detailed insight into the
actual incident.
w

The police then accused my spouse for - after being arrested - to have threatened two
serving police officers with violence; and we went to the City Court on 25 June 2007. The
w

indictment is dated 22 November 2006, meaning after my husband's complaint.


w

2/11


Horsens, 14 December 2010

25th June 2007 The court meeting was a travesty from beginning to end. From the very start of the
meeting the Judge, Niels Foldberg, spoke to my husband in an unnecessary
humiliating and self-righteous manner, as if Mario had already been convicted (or
rather as if he were a rebellious animal to be put in its place). The same Judge did not give
enough time for interpretation, he talked over the interpretation and after the court meeting,
we learned that there were several things Mario had not understood. Among other things,
the reading and translation of the ruling was done so fast that Mario only when we got

m
home, found out that he really should not be in prison but that the sentence was suspended.

The Judge, Niels Foldberg, also interrupted Mario several times. So there was not room
for that Mario could have the opportunity to express himself in the way that is his / his

co
cultures - no respect for a different way than the Danish ... The defense lawyer, Hanne
Rahbek, complained to the Judge, telling him that his treatment of the accused were not in
order and that Mario already felt treated very badly.

I will call all this discrimination - in line with what the Documentation and Advisory

u.
Centre on Racial Discrimination's study on discrimination in criminal justice in 2006
concludes:

yo
"This is quite hard to interpret otherwise than that the enforcement authorities takes
tougher actions against certain ethnic minorities compared to other groups in society
(http://www.drcenter.dk/html/presse/konklusion_retspl.pdf) .

Also the anthropological report, Equal justice under the law - A pilot study of treatment of
or
ethnic minorities in criminal cases - from 2007 is indicating that there are problems with
equality in the Danish legal system.
(http://www.icj.dk/Publications/Reports/ICJ%20rapport%20om%20diskrimination.pdf).
sf
A representative from the American Embassy was observing the Court Meeting, and by
request from the Danish defense lawyer, Hanne Rahbek, the American Embassy also sent
an official complaint about Judge, Niels Foldberg. Though they never followed up on the
ht

complaint, so it had no effect. At the same time there is a big contradiction, because the
American Embassy protested about this discrimination act from judge, Niels Foldberg, but
at the same time they never protested to the Danish authorities why Mario was in this court
ig

case. That means, they never protested about the illegal arrest, torture and not allowing
Mario to contact the American Embassy; the latter being a clear violation of the Vienna
Convention on Consular Relations of 1963 (Article 36a, b and c).
or

As a fact one of the laymen judges fell asleep several times during the court meeting too.

The two policemen who were summoned as witnesses gave conflicting evidence on
several issues (even contradictory in relation to the explanation which each of them had
.n

signed on November 1), and they could not explain the reason for the arrest of Mario.

During the procedure the prosecutor's only evidence was the testimonies of the two police
w

officers, while Mario’s defense lawyer could present real evidence, for example on the
injuries Mario had suffered, on the contradictory statements of the two police witnesses
and the conflicts between what is written in the police report and the indictment held up
w

against, what is in the police's written explanation to the American Embassy.


In this court the Jens Rasmussen document was hidden to Judge, lay men judges and
lawyers, which can only be with the intention to declare Mario guilty. Question: Who was
w

3/11


Horsens, 14 December 2010

the hand(s) inside the Danish prosecuting system to hide this document??? The person(s)
who did this is acting on behalf of the Danish Government and the Danish Queen.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38171420/English-translation-from-Danish-prosecutor-
Jens-Rasmussen-Document

Yet Mario was convicted; - of course, one is tempted to say! - 10 days suspended
imprisonment.

m
Mario immediately appealed the case to the High Court, after which the police also
immediately appealed for a stricter sentence.

co
12th October The court session in the Country Court was just another discriminatory performance.
2007 This time it was the prosecutor who used Mario’s way of expressing himself in court as an
argument that Mario should have done as said in the charges. He believed that Mario in
court just proved that he has "temperament".

u.
The fact is that my husband is from the Caribbean - not from Scandinavia, and he will
never have the body language and facial expressions and tone of voice as a Scandinavian.

yo
Even that he can still be respectful, as he is.

This time I had to testify in court, and therefore I had to sit outside the courtroom most of
the time. While I sat there, I was joined by the two involved officers who also had to
testify. They sat around one meter and a half from me and said that now he sits there and
or
drivel along and it is total waste of time. They were obviously not aware that they were
sitting beside 'his' wife, even as they sat and talked together about what to say when they
were called in ... It was a really unpleasant experience, and at the same time I was
sf
witnessing how they agreed how they would lie. And what can I do about it? Nothing!!!

Although Mario’s defense attorney presented new evidence supporting Mario’s version of
the case, the ruling was upheld. We were told that now the case could not be appealed
ht

again unless there would come up new evidence in the complaint case.

Then again for the second time the Jens Rasmussen document was hidden to both Judge,
ig

Laymen judges and lawyer. This makes this action to be with premeditated intentions.
Question: Who was the hand(s) inside the Danish prosecutor system to hide this document
again??? The person(s) who did this is acting on behalf of the Danish Government and in
the name of the Danish Queen.
or

http://www.scribd.com/doc/38171420/English-translation-from-Danish-prosecutor-
Jens-Rasmussen-Document
.n

It is part of the narrative that the State Attorney postponed the handling of Mario's complaint against the
police until after the case against Mario, despite the fact that Mario had complained about the police
BEFORE they accused him.
w

After the decision in Country Court Mario and me, therefore, together with attorney Claus Bonnez looks
into Mario’s complaint, where Claus Bonnez has now received the file. There, we saw an undated
document written by police lawyer Jens Rasmussen
w

(http://www.norightsforyou.com/jensrasmussendocument.htm), Jens Rasmussen among other things


argues for acquittal or criminal forfeiture in the criminal case against Mario due to that the police officers
w

4/11


Horsens, 14 December 2010

involved may be deemed to have used excessive force and because that there seems to be no objective reason
for the arrest at all.

Mario of course asks his defense lawyers if they have known about this document, which they both of them
deny in writing. They have therefore not seen the Jens Rasmussen document during the trial against Mario.

HOW does such a document suddenly appear AFTER the trial? Who has held it back during the trial

m
itself and then suddenly puts it into Mario's file when the case is settled?
http://www.norightsforyou.com/jensrasmussendocument.htm

co
If Mario's defense lawyers had known about this document, Mario would most likely have won the criminal
case, and his life situation had looked quite different.

It is obviously impossible that any of the two involved police officers, Nicolai Cederskjold and Anders
Bitch, have had access to the documents. But who is it, who has had an interest in and ability to put the Jens

u.
Rasmussen document aside during the trial and then put it back into the case file when the conviction was
handed down?

yo
It so much looks like FRAUD and ABUSE OF POWER - and testifies about a legal system not to trust; and
this legal system acts in Your name Your Majesty.

6th November Not until 2 years after the unlawful arrest of Mario there was a reply from the State
2008
or
General on Mario’s complaint against the police, and the State Attorney of course
dismissed the complaint.

After 2 years the State Attorney write that now so much time has gone that it makes no
sf
sense to do further investigations in the case, while he assume that no one can remember
anything from the day of the event. And at the same time he states - on the basis of one and
a half to two years old medical documentation - that my husband did not suffer any injuries
in connection with the episode.
ht

So first the State Attorney postpone the handling of the complaint, only to later use
the time that has passed to justify not investigating the matter. This can only be a
ig

violation of my spouse's rights, abuse of own power and fraud.

In the reply the Police Complaint Board notes that the handling of Mario's complaint
should not have been suspended to await the criminal proceedings against him.
or

My spouse of course appeals the decision to the Danish Attorney General.


.n

6th April 2009 Barely two and a half years after the arrest Mario has a response to his complaint
from the Attorney General, who is, as just as expected, backing up the State
Attorney's rejection of the complaint.
w

In his letter the Attorney General writes however, that he is backing up the Police
Complaint Board in relation to that the handling of Mario's complaint should not have
w

been postponed until after the case against him; so this was a mistake. At the same
time that he is stating this he uses the ruling in the criminal proceedings - that Mario was
convicted of threatening the police officers - as an argument to reject the complaint.
w

5/11


Horsens, 14 December 2010

This way of handling people's legal rights can only be abuse of power and fraud.

The decision of the Attorney General can not be appealed, so the European Court of
Human Rights is the next legal step in Europe, on the path to justice.

Mario sent his complaint to the European Court of Human Rights, 5 October 2009.

m
The case, Herrera Padron versus Denmark, has case number: 55481/09. Mario - and I
- awaits response.

While my husband has spent inhuman forces to defend and restore his rights here in Denmark, he has of

co
course also appealed to the authorities, lawyers and politicians in the U.S. where he is a national. He has
among others written his USA President, Barack Hussein Obama and the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton
without even to get an answer; and so did I.

u.
At one point, Mario creates an American website www.norightsforyou.com to facilitate communication
across the Atlantic. On the website Mario documents his case and expresses his opinion about it, such as the
freedom of expression entitles him to. Among other things Mario is documenting his case by publishing a
picture of one of the two arresting police officers, Nicolai Cederskjold.

yo
In the autumn of 2009 Mario receives a letter from the Data Protection Agency, because Nicolai
Cederskjold has seen the picture of himself and has complained to his employer, the Copenhagen Police.
The Copenhagen Police have however denied that there would be any reason to bring a criminal case
or
forward and has referred the case to the Data Protection Agency.

The Data Protection Agency is asking my husband for an explanation about the published photo of the
policeman. Mario of course explains the situation, also referring to his rights as per the freedom of
sf
expression.

Anyway the Data Protection Agency ordered Mario to remove the image from the website; otherwise they
ht

would report the matter to the police.


Mario is holding onto his rights and still let the image be a part of the documentation of his case, directed to
his American contacts.
ig

12th May 2010 Mario is summoned to attend a meeting at the police station in Horsens for questioning in
the case, where the Data Protection Agency has now reported him for violating the
Personal Data Protection Act, by having put Nicolai Cederskjold's picture on his U.S.
or

website.

6th July 2010 With only one week's notice - in the middle of the summer holiday period - Mario has
.n

In the night delivered a summon to go to court on 14 July 2010, where he will stand trial for the
publication of Nicolai Cederskjold's picture on his U.S. website.

The notice is dated 21 June 2010 and somebody was at home on our address in that
w

period, so it is incomprehensible to us why it was delivered with such short notice, if it


was not on purpose.
w

Against all odds, we managed to find a lawyer who was not on holiday and who would
take the case and try to grasp it in less than a week.
w

6/11


Horsens, 14 December 2010

14th July 2010 Court meeting in Horsens Municipal Court in the case against my husband about
violation of Personal Data Protection Act.

The female prosecutor, Anette Wolf Pedersen, read the charges aloud and the informed
Mario on his right not to answer her questions. She asks her first question, and Mario says
he does not want to answer; - that he has already written what he will say in his

m
correspondence with the Data Protection Agency.

Now the prosecutor simply does not know what to do. The judge asks if she has not
prepared for how she will forward the matter in case the accused does not wish to answer.

co
And she has not.

The Judge – H.S. Kristoffersen – then decides that all written documentation shall be
read out loud and translated to English so that the accused can understand.

u.
While my husband only knows a bit of Danish, an interpreter has been called in for the
court hearing. He will interpret into English. The Judge, H.S. Kristoffersen, after a
relatively short time considers that the interpreter's English is insufficient, and the

yo
Judge stops the Court Meeting. This was a UNILATERAL decision made by the Judge.
My husband was never asked if he understood the English translation, and he never
approved of this action.
or
Anette Wolf Pedersen's lack of preparation and subsequently the interpreter’s faulty
interpretation is then used to delay the proceedings (to November, it turns out). At the
same time the Judge ask my husband - through his counsel - to prepare a written response,
which must be submitted to the court by 20 August 2010.
sf
In that way the prosecution, who have already had 7 months to prepare, while my husband
was announced with only one week, gets almost four additional months to investigate. And
ht

after 20 August they will even have the written material from my husband, and have time
to investigate and find counter-arguments against. The judge also suggests that the
prosecutor may ask that a witness from the Data Protection Agency can be summoned.
ig

That is NOT JUSTICE; that is DISCRIMINASTION and violation of my spouse's


legal rights.
or

Even though Mario had requested it in due time, the American Embassy was not present in
court. This can only be interpreted in the way that the embassy intentionally did not want
to ensure my husband's rights of a fair and just court trial. And for sure he did not get that.
.n

As it is the Court and the prosecutor that has not done their preliminary work properly, it
should be in favor of the accused and not vice versa as it gets in this case.

At this point in time the case should have been rejected!


w

9th November Second court hearing in the Municipal Court in Horsens.


w

2010
Up until the hearing, Mario's defense attorney, Martin Lind Gräs has repeatedly
approached the prosecutor to inquire whether there is new evidence to the case from their
w

7/11


Horsens, 14 December 2010

side, which his is told that there is not.

On 8 November in the evening I receive however an email from Mario's defense


lawyer that he has just received a letter with further evidence from the prosecution.
This is less than 24 hours before the court hearing - and after office hours. This is nothing
else that SABOTAGE and DISCRIMINATION indeed. The defense has no chance to
prepare properly - and even less does Mario have any chance to understand the new

m
evidence, while he can not read Danish.

When we come to the court hearing, there is both a new interpreter and a new prosecutor -
Jens Dissing. The prosecution then, besides having had time for an even more thorough

co
preparation, also had the opportunity to change the staffing, to a far more experienced
prosecutor.

Since Mario, like at the first hearing, did not want to speak to the prosecutor, they start to
read and translate the written documentation. This translation is far from accurate and

u.
complete, and sometimes the translator’s interpretation is actually wrong. At one point,
Mario says - given that he is told that this letter he has seen previously and that is has been
translated to him – that there is no reason to translate a specific document for him.

yo
However, it is FALSE that Mario has ever had this document (which was Annex 4 in the
case) translated. Furthermore, the Judge and the prosecutor speaks over the translations, so
it is very difficult to hear what is being said, and when Mario at end of the court meeting is
allowed to speak, he is repeatedly interrupted and not allowed to finish. This is
DISCRIMINATION of my spouse, based on his foreign ancestry and language.
or
I was of course present at both hearings, which I in general experienced as a theatrical
performance with an already written ending. It was nonetheless a surprise to me when I
sf
had to listen to the following:

Jens Dissing: “So in this situation it is the prosecution's view that the considerations of
the freedom of speech must give way to the considerations of the protection of the
ht

police man's privacy. So in this basis and with these comments, it's prosecutor's opinion
that the accused is guilty ...”
Interpreter: “Can you just try to say it again. We must have this one with the two different
ig

angles again ...”


Jens Dissing: “I can say it very brief. In this case, the prosecutor find, that freedom of
expression must give way to the protection of the officer's privacy.”
Interpreter: “I think this is really difficult”
or

Judge, H.S Kristoffersen: “I think it's easier if you turn it around and says that the need to
protect the police officer against disclosure of personal information must outweigh
the considerations of the freedom of speech."
.n

It has not been a part of the case to investigate or take an interest in what's happened
before my husband made his website. And just above it shows very clearly that it is the
opinion of the Court that it is more important to protect a police officer's privacy, than
w

it is that the truth about what illegal activities the officer is doing when he is on duty,
comes to public attention.
w

16th November On this date my husband is sentenced as if he was a criminal, when the only thing he has
2010 done it to exercise his right to freedom of expression and presenting the truth on his
w

8/11


Horsens, 14 December 2010

webpage.

The sentence is a fine of DKK 5,000 and another DKK 1,000 every month, until he stops
using his freedom of expression and remove the picture of Nicolai Cederskjold from his
webpage. And then he is also sentenced to pay the case costs.

Mario says he will not take down the picture and he will not pay the fine; he will go to

m
prison and do a hunger strike instead. And then maybe at last someone will find it
interesting to tell the truth about the discrimination, fraud and injustice going on in
Denmark. As he says: he did not leave family and his home country and become a political
refugee just to give up fighting for his legal and human rights in a foreign country.

co
You would think that we lived in a Police State - not in a Monarchy and Democracy.

At any case, the legal system has outplayed its role. There is not any kind of justice in what my spouse has

u.
been subjected to in the name of the law. One can not rely on the Danish legal system, when it in this way
only protects and cover up its own people, - in this case, two criminal police officers, Nicolai Cederskjold
and Anders Bitch.

yo
In Denmark you are allowed to mock on others' religious beliefs under the guise of the free speech -
but you may not express opinions about the illegalities and fraud committed by Denmark's own
authorities.
or
Two deceptive and discriminatory lawsuits and an equally fraudulent handling of my husband's complaint
against the police; the Danish legal system's handling of my spouse cases has therefore now lead to that there
is a case against Denmark in the European Court of Human Rights.
sf
In addition, Mario is working for to open a case in the U.S., where he among other things will try to get the
two police officers - Nicolai Cederskjold and Anders Bitch – extradited for to face trial, like it happened to
the Danish woman Camilla Broe.
ht

We simply have no right in the way that we are acting here in Denmark.
ig

Two policemen and the Danish legal system have crippled my husband.
Since 1 November 2006, my husband has been a sick man. Examinations of his injuries have been going on
or

ever since. In the autumn of 2008 Mario had to undergo a surgery in his left shoulder, which the police
officers destroyed as they twisted his arm around onto his back and lifted him up in it, in that position.

Mario still has attacks of pain in the shoulder and neck and is partially disabled in the left arm and neck in
.n

general. As a consequence, he had to undergo surgery for a spring finger in his left hand and he has had
countless treatments by physiotherapists and chiropractors. According to Dr. Bo Gynning, Mario will
probably never be able to perform arduous physical work again; which both influences Mario's
opportunities to earn a living as for example a professional driver (which he did in the U.S.) and Mario's
w

opportunities to contribute to the maintenance of our house and garden.

After seeking medical attention countless times, after two failed attempts to come under the care of
w

Rehabilitation Centre for Torture Victims (RCT) and seeking psychological help under our own expense,
Mario in January 2010 succeeded to get a referral to the psychiatrists at the hospital in Horsens. Here it was
found that my spouse is suffering from PSTD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) responding to the
w

9/11


Horsens, 14 December 2010

incident the first November 2006.

Despite the fact that it would probably be the most effective treatment they could not help my husband to
treatment at the RCT, because they only deal with refugees and torture victims; well torture victims who
were tortured ABROAD that is!
As an alternative he was offered sessions with a psychologist in the hospital. My spouse of course accepted
the offer, but after a few conversations the psychologist said to him that if he did not pull himself together
and put the matter behind him, she could not help him. And not being able to do that is exactly one of your

m
symptoms when you have PSTD!

Ergo, I have a spouse who besides being violated on all his fundamental rights, has been permanently injured

co
on his body and psyche - and who has now been reported sick for more than a year.

I think pretty much every day about what it was that got the two police officers to believe they had the right
to treat my husband as they did. Is it because he has black hair and brown eyes and do not speak Danish? As
Mario used to say: “I do not understand - I'm here to be with my family, study and become integrated in-the

u.
Danish society. I'm not a terrorist or drug dealer or delinquent in any way...”
When we contacted KRIM, one of the first things the lawyer there said - before we had told any details of the
case: “You have black hair and brown eyes - so I am totally sure that you were declared guilty”.

yo
I ask for Your help for a dignified future for my husband - and to bring justice to the right track
I am ashamed of my country and I really have a hard time looking Mario in the eyes...
or
As I see it, today the police, the legal system and different institutions has the opportunity to discriminate and
violate human rights in general, without consequences; and both You and I can only have an interest in
change that.
sf
I am obviously at Mario's side as much as I can bee, and at the same time it is difficult as an ethnic Dane to
grasp what it is, he actually is going through. He originally comes from a dictatorial regime and believed that
ht

now he had come to a more humane society. But ... "You are exceedingly ugly," said the wild ducks, "but
it can be all the same to us, as long as you do not marry into our family,"

Both my husband and I have known Hans Christian Andersen, since we were small. Now we understand that
ig

"The Ugly Duckling" is not only a fascinating adventure for children, but also a scary portrait of Denmark,
which is more topical now than ever before.
or

My husband left his country and his family to have freedom to decide over his own life and to create a good
and dignified family life. Now, he just finds himself in a new country, where other means of power and
discrimination are used to hold people down.
.n

"I think I'll go out into the wide world," said the duckling, when Hans Christian Andersen's story was
published on 11 November 1843. Now, 167 years later, it is my husband and me who are considering leaving
the Danish 'duck farm'.
w

But first and foremost my husband must have justice. As I have documented in this letter, my husband has no
more reasons to trust in the Danish judicial system after all discriminating and cheating processes he has
w

already been through. I have been a constant witness to all this and I will testify to every detail in whatsoever
courtroom in the World: “Something is rotten in the State of Denmark”.
w

10/11


Horsens, 14 December 2010

As a Danish citizen I ask Your Majesty to exert your influence and help my husband to regain his freedom of
expression. Besides to be a human right and a basic Danish virtue, the freedom of expression is also to be
found in the First Amendment in The United State of America's Constitution.

And please help my husband to bring Nicolai Cederskjold, Anders Bitsch and Jens Rasmussen to face
justice in front of an American judicial court as it is the right thing to do, when the legal system in Denmark
is failing.

m
Your Majesty, under the Sixth Amendment of USA Constitution my husband is guarantied to confront his
accusers, the Danish policemen mentioned above. And already on 29 March 2010 my husband wrote the
American Attorney General Eric Holder, the Attorney General of Florida Bill McCollum and Senator John

co
McCain from Arizona to request extradition of Nicolai Cederskjold, Anders Bitch and Jens Rasmussen to
the USA, for the crime of torture against an American citizen. This based on the Mutual Legal Assistance
and Extradition Agreement between Denmark and The United States of America.

Your Majesty, you have all the power in the world to stop fraud, torture and violations of the freedom of

u.
expression in Your own country; collectively to stop human rights violations.

My husband has never blamed the Danish government or the Danish people in general for what has

yo
happened to him here, NEVER. My husband is only requesting that those involved, in this racist behavior
and fraud will face justice. Only those who violated Danish and International laws and rights have to pay the
consequences of their actions.

Your Majesty, as a Danish citizen, for once in my life I ask You for help, and I will be looking forward to
or
hearing from You.

Respectfully
sf

Gitte Toldsted
ht

CPR-nr. 111061-1176
ig
or
.n
w
w
w

11/11



Você também pode gostar