Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
FIRETUBE HEAT TRANSFER can result in a 250 F reduction of the stack gas FUEL SAVINGS
A typical firetube is constructed in a temperature. Fuel savings exceeding 15% are
‘U’ shape to be inserted in the lower half of a possible on oil and gas field applications.
heater shell. The shell is filled with a bath TURBUATOR APPLICATION Several factors including increased turbulence
fluid such as water, water/glycol mixture, To function properly, the Turbulator will contribute to the overall fuel reduction.
glycol or eutectic salts. The burner side of the is sized specifically for the BTU input and These additional benefits include reduced
firetube transfers up to 40 % of the heat firetube size. The heat transfer is maximized excess air caused by the slight pressure drop
released by the burner into the surrounding with minimum pressure drop through the use across the turbulator and the lower stack gas
bath while the stack side of the firetube only of appropriate metal width, impingement temperature, longer residence time for the flue
transfers 25 % of the heat released. As much angle and turbulence length. It is designed to gas caused by lower heat release rates and
as 35% of the available heat remains in the be inserted into the stack side of the tube efficient response to changing process
flue gases and exits the stack. This heat (and where exhaust temperatures are usually 1000° conditions.
fuel) is wasted because of the poor transfer F. or less and there is no flame impingement At an average gas price of $5 per
coefficient within the firetube. on the turbulator. therm, the turbulator will save enough fuel to
The poor heat transfer on the stack NATCO Turbulators will improve the pay for itself in 3 to 6 months. For example, a
side of the firetube is caused by the slower, life of firetubes by reducing local temperature 1 MM Btu/hr seasonal heater operating 5000
less turbulent flue gas and the stratification of differences that cause thermal stress. When hours per year has an annual fuel cost without
the warmer and cooler gases within the tube. properly applied the NATCO Turbulator will a turbulator of about $38,461. With a
By design the NATCO Turbulator creates last 5 years without cleaning or replacement turbulator installed and the burner readjusted
turbulence within the flue gases creating a necessary. After installation the burner to maximize the firetube efficiency, the annual
balanced heat distribution around the entire system should be properly adjusted so there fuel cost will be reduced to $35,714. The
360° of the tube at a minimum pressure drop. will be no “burn out”, carbon deposit, annual cost savings will be $2,747.
oxidation or any other problem arising from
TURBULATOR DESIGN the use of the turbulator. NATCO Turbulators TURBULATOR SIZING
The Turbulator is designed with improve combustion by causing fuel to burn For proper turbulator sizing, NATCO requires
multiple faces, angles, and metal widths to more completely forming less soot. Firetube the firetube diameter (D) and the firetube
obtain maximum turbulence of the flue gases cleaning may be significantly reduced. length (L). The turbulator diameter is
through the tube. The scrubbing action against Typically, when all other factors such approximately 70% of the firetube diameter
the tube raises the heat transfer coefficient as weather, temperatures, bath temperature, (D). The turbulator length (T) is determined
significantly to increase the heat transfer to the wind speed, etc. are constant, the Turbulator by multiplying (L) by the factor (F) below.
bath and reduce the fuel usage. The additional will reduce the cost of heating by 5 to 15% a. Atmospheric burner below 4000’:
turbulence created in the stack side of the F = 0.75
firetube can increase the heat transfer rate b. Atmospheric burner above 4000’:
from 25% to 30%. This increased transfer rate F = 0.55