Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The S&P rallied 0.58%, retracing much of last week’s losses, with tech again leading the way. The
21d was held after last week’s bounce and I continue to watch that moving average as the
significant support line where the market is finding a bid. With 1300 resistance less than ten points
ahead, we are nearing a potentially significant trend continuation/reversal time period, and I’m
inclined to be bearish at these levels, especially with prior leaders in cloudtech giving way to new
downtrends. Whether we break through 1300 (with semis likely leading the way) or through the
21d, I will be positioning my portfolio applicably.
Australian Q4 CPI missed expectations of a consecutive 0.7% rise with a slower-than-forecast 0.4%
climb (2.7% YoY vs 3.0% expected vs 2.8% prior), with the RBA’s various non-headline statistical
measures also missing forecasts. This sent AUDUSD immediately selling down 40 pips, with parity
once again rejected. I remain short AUD vs USD JPY & CAD and added a short vs SGD as well today.
AUDUSD is in a trading range between 98c and parity, and whichever way it breaks should lend
near-term directional context.
Tomorrow begins the two-day FOMC meeting and I expect much of the same again this time
around, with no substantive changes. The recent uptick in US data since the last FOMC meeting in
December may see some acknowledgment in the report, but the continued depression of housing
prices should weigh down on any significant optimism. This year, dissenter Thomas Hoenig does
not have voting rights in the FOMC meetings, although Richard Fisher (Dallas) and Charles Plosser
(Philadelphia) do. Both Fisher and Plosser have issued hawkish sentiments about QE2 already this
year, so we may see rising dissent within FOMC voting, particularly as exit strategies come back
into popular debate if the US economy continues improving. If the muni situation and/or rising oil
prices contribute to downside risks on US growth, the vital question of QE3 will, in my opinion,
likely be voted down, considering there are two potentially outright dissenters with voting rights
and the political capital for another iteration of quantitative easing as a whole very low and still
declining. Obama is in re-election mode and I expect a much more centrist (and consequently
muted/status quo) agenda for the next two years on the economic front as he realigns his social
agenda back to his voting constituents.