Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Presentation to
The Board of Regents, State of Iowa
February 2-3, 2011
1
Agenda
2
Opening Remarks
Jean Robillard, MD
Vice President for Medical Affairs
3
Operating and Financial Performance Update
%
% Variance Variance
Prior Variance Variance to Prior to Prior
Operating Review (YTD) Actual Budget Year to Budget to Budget Year Year
Discharges 12,607 12,442 12,441 165 1.3% 166 1.3%
Average Daily Census 547.90 512.98 502.35 34.92 6.8% 45.55 9.1%
Emergency Treatment Center 23,950 21,927 22,442 2,023 9.2% 1,508 6.7%
Visits
Outpatient Clinic Visits 332,924 331,622 320,942 1,302 0.4% 11,982 3.7%
5
Discharges by Type
July 2010 through November 2010
% Variance %
Prior Variance Variance to to Prior Variance to
Operating Review (YTD) Actual Budget Year to Budget Budget Year Prior Year
Adult Medical 4,296 4,269 4,139 27 0.6% 157 3.8%
Pediatric Critical Care 329 356 346 (27) -7.6% (17) -4.9%
TOTAL w/o Newborn 12,607 12,442 12,441 165 1.3% 166 1.3%
% Variance %
Prior Variance to Variance to to Prior Variance to
Operating Review (YTD) Actual Budget Year Budget Budget Year Prior Year
Pediatric Critical Care 9,423 8,414 7,961 1,009 12.0% 1,462 18.4%
Subtotal – Pediatrics w/o 18,965 17,116 16,056 1,849 10.8% 2,909 18.1%
newborn
TOTAL w/o Newborn 82,057 77,816 75,293 4,241 5.5% 6,764 9.0%
% Variance %
Prior Variance to Variance to to Prior Variance to
Operating Review (YTD) Actual Budget Year Budget Budget Year Prior Year
Pediatric Critical Care 28.64 23.63 23.01 5.01 21.2% 5.63 24.5%
Subtotal – Pediatrics w/o 9.87 9.19 8.10 0.68 7.4% 1.77 21.9%
newborn
TOTAL w/o Newborn 6.51 6.25 6.05 0.26 4.2% 0.46 7.6%
% Variance %
Prior Variance to Variance to to Prior Variance to
Operating Review (YTD) Actual Budget Year Budget Budget Year Prior Year
Cardiothoracic 33 29 32 4 13.8% 1 3.1%
Dentistry 231 234 270 (3) -1.3% (39) -14.4%
Dermatology 21 24 26 (3) -12.5% (5) -19.2%
General Surgery 1,063 888 848 175 19.7% 215 25.4%
Gynecology 314 315 302 (1) -0.3% 12 4.0%
Internal Medicine 2 3 5 (1) -33.3% (3) -60.0%
Neurosurgery 227 188 179 39 20.7% 48 26.8%
Ophthalmology 1,385 1,292 1,329 93 7.2% 56 4.2%
Orthopedics 1,544 1,413 1,412 131 9.3% 132 9.4%
Otolaryngology 951 881 869 70 8.0% 82 9.4%
Pediatrics - 1 2 (1) -100.0% (2) -100.0%
Radiology – Interventional 9 18 24 (9) -50.0% (15) -62.5%
Urology w/ Procedure Ste. 609 494 467 115 23.3% 142 30.4%
Total 6,389 5,780 5,765 609 10.5% 624 10.8%
9
Inpatient Surgeries – by Clinical Department
July 2010 through November 2010
% Variance %
Prior Variance to Variance to to Prior Variance to
Operating Review (YTD) Actual Budget Year Budget Budget Year Prior Year
Cardiothoracic 472 519 499 (47) -9.1% (27) -5.4%
Dentistry 55 55 51 - 0.0% 4 7.8%
General Surgery 1,330 1,202 1,083 128 10.7% 247 22.8%
Gynecology 321 349 369 (28) -8.0% (48) -13.0%
Neurosurgery 687 708 723 (21) -3.0% (36) -5.0%
Ophthalmology 66 54 40 12 22.2% 26 65.0%
Orthopedics 1,219 1,164 1,207 55 4.7% 12 1.0%
Otolaryngology 308 297 287 11 3.7% 21 7.3%
Pediatrics - - - - 0.0% - 0.0%
Radiology – Interventional 41 94 128 (53) -56.4% (87) -68.0%
Urology w/ Procedure Ste. 271 296 281 (25) -8.5% (10) -3.6%
Total 4,770 4,738 4,668 32 0.7% 102 2.2%
10
Emergency Treatment Center
July 2010 through November 2010
% %
Prior Variance to Variance to Variance to Variance to
Operating Review (YTD) Actual Budget Year Budget Budget Prior Year Prior Year
11
Clinic Visits by Clinical Department
July 2010 through November 2010
% %
Prior Variance to Variance to Variance to Variance to
Operating Review (YTD) Actual Budget Year Budget Budget Prior Year Prior Year
Anesthesia 6,506 7,089 6,784 (583) -8.2% (278) -4.1%
CDD 9,323 3,249 3,089 6,074 187.0% 6,234 201.8%
Clinical Research 4,963 4,932 5,716 31 0.6% (753) -13.2%
Dermatology 10,502 11,087 10,686 (585) -5.3% (184) -1.7%
ETC 23,950 22,817 22,442 1,133 5.0% 1,508 6.7%
Employee Health Clinic 7,302 6,451 6,196 851 13.2% 1,106 17.9%
Family Care Center 37,909 41,527 41,375 (3,618) -8.7% (3,466) -8.4%
General Surgery 9,931 10,264 12,065 (333) -3.2% (2,134) -17.7%
Heart and Vascular 15,583 14,602 - 981 6.7% 15,583 100.0%
Hospital Dentistry 5,333 5,351 5,187 (18) -0.3% 146 2.8%
Internal Medicine 43,736 42,694 50,465 1,042 2.4% (6,729) -13.3%
Neurology 7,050 7,894 7,632 (844) -10.7% (582) -7.6%
Neurosurgery 3,845 4,007 4,076 (162) -4.0% (231) -5.7%
Obstetrics/Gynecology 30,863 32,986 31,951 (2,123) -6.4% (1,088) -3.4%
Ophthalmology 27,635 28,073 28,318 (438) -1.6% (683) -2.4%
Orthopedics 25,253 24,827 23,860 426 1.7% 1,393 5.8%
Otolaryngology 11,406 12,240 11,602 (834) -6.8% (196) -1.7%
Pediatrics 18,422 17,632 16,901 790 4.5% 1,521 9.0%
Primary Care Clinic North 9,266 8,065 7,151 1,201 14.9% 2,115 29.6%
Psychiatry 17,410 18,434 17,491 (1,024) -5.6% (81) -0.5%
Thoracic – Cardio Surgery 16 - 1,197 16 100.0% (1,181) -98.7%
Urology 6,454 7,139 6,542 (685) -9.6% (88) -1.4%
Other 266 262 216 4 -1.5% 50 23.2%
Total 332,924 331,622 320,942 1,302 0.4% 11,982 3.7%
Greater than 2.5% Favorable Neutral Greater than 2.5% Unfavorable
12
Case Mix Index
2.2
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
Nov-08 Jan-09 Mar-09 May-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Nov-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 May-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Nov-10
13
UIHC Comparative Financial Results
Fiscal Year-to-Date November 2010
% %
Variance to Variance to Variance to Variance to
NET REVENUES: Actual Budget Prior Year Budget Budget Prior Year Prior Year
Patient Revenue $413,853 $404,739 $375,737 $9,114 2.3% $38,116 10.1%
Other Operating Revenue 20,114 20,223 19,170 (109) -0.5% 944 4.9%
Total Revenue $433,967 $424,962 $394,907 $9,005 2.1% $39,060 9.9%
EXPENSES:
Salaries and Wages $202,782 $209,397 $195,226 ($6,615) -3.2% $7,556 3.9%
Operating Expense before Capital $374,560 $382,151 $352,152 ($7,591) -2.0% $22,408 6.4%
Cash Flow Operating Margin $59,407 $42,811 $42,755 $16,596 38.8% $16,652 39.0%
Capital - Depreciation and Amortization 28,515 30,448 30,828 (1,933) -6.4% (2,313) -7.5%
Total Operating Expense $403,075 $412,599 $382,980 ($9,524) -2.3% $20,095 5.3%
Gain (Loss) on Investments 15,982 6,789 22,048 9,193 135.4% (6,066) -27.5%
14
UIHC Comparative Financial Results
November 2010
% %
Variance to Variance to Variance to Variance to
NET REVENUES: Actual Budget Prior Year Budget Budget Prior Year Prior Year
Patient Revenue $82,205 $78,542 $75,700 $3,663 4.7% $6,505 8.6%
Other Operating Revenue 3,895 4,045 3,603 (150) -3.7% 292 8.1%
Total Revenue $86,100 $82,587 $79,303 $3,513 4.3% $6,797 8.6%
EXPENSES:
Salaries and Wages $41,453 $41,121 $38,682 $332 0.8% $2,771 7.2%
Operating Expense before Capital $76,944 $74,574 $68,695 $2,370 3.2% $8,249 12.0%
Cash Flow Operating Margin $9,156 $8,013 $10,608 $1,143 14.3% ($1,452) -13.7%
Capital - Depreciation and Amortization 5,697 6,089 6,146 (392) -6.4% (449) -7.3%
Total Operating Expense $82,641 $80,663 $74,841 $1,978 2.5% $7,800 10.4%
Gain (Loss) on Investments (2,865) 1,324 5,391 (4,189) -316.4% (8,256) -153.1%
Other Non-Operating (653) (517) (371) (136) -26.3% (282) -76.0%
Net Income ($59) $2,731 $9,482 ($2,790) -102.2% ($9,541) -100.6%
Net Margin % -0.1% 3.3% 11.2% -3.4% -11.3%
15
Comparative Accounts Receivable
November 30, 2010
80
Days of Revenue in Net A/R
70
60
58
54 53
54 55 52
MEDIAN (46) Moody’s Aa2 48
Rating
47 52 54 49 49 49 49
50 53 51 47 47 47
50 49 49 49
48 47 47 47 47 46
46
40
Jun- Jul- Aug- Se p- Oct- Nov- De c- Jan- Fe b- Mar- Apr - M ay- Jun- Jul- Aug- Se p- Oct- Nov- De c- Jan- Fe b- Mar - Apr - M ay- Jun- Jul- Aug- Se p- Oct- Nov-
08 08 08 08 08 08 08 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
$12,500,000
-$5,000,000
J un- J ul - A ug- S e p- Oc t - N ov - Dec- J an- Fe b- Mar- A pr - May- J un- J ul - Au g - S e p- Oc t - N ov - Dec- J a n- Fe b- Mar- A pr - May- J un- J ul - A ug- S e p- Oc t - N ov -
08 08 08 08 08 08 08 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
16
Renewing Our Clinical Facilities
18
Board of Regent Approvals:
To Begin Facilities Planning Process
Regents Approve UI Health Care Request to Proceed with UIHC Strategic Facilities Master Plan Implementation
March 11, 2008
In 2008, the Board of Regents, State of Iowa approved the University of Iowa Health Care's request to proceed with
project planning for:
• New critical care tower, related renovations—including conversion of all inpatient rooms to private rooms –
• Improved access, parking, and traffic flow – planning will begin immediately
The strategic master facilities plan will meet health care needs of 21st century patients and families by:
• Accommodating projected growth in the number of patients, surgeries, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures,
and imaging and laboratory analyses
• Developing single patient rooms that meet the need for privacy, infection control, increased technology, and
space for families to participate in healing
• Building operating suites with more sophisticated electrical, mechanical and information systems
The Board asked that UI Health Care leaders ensure that planning include special attention to improving patient and
family experiences, including access to the main campus, parking, and possibly taking some portion of the ambulatory
care services off the main campus.
19
Strategic Plan
20
Background – Need for New/Upgraded Facilities
• Patient service volumes, both inpatient and outpatient, are growing in all areas and UIHC
is serving an increasingly complex patient population
• Emerging technological advances require more floor space, greater height and more
sophisticated electrical, mechanical and information technology systems
• Consumer expectations are continuing to rise as are requirements for safety, infection control,
patient privacy and family centered care – contemporary private patient rooms
• Intermingled with adult services, facilities for children are currently located in Carver, Colloton,
Pappajohn and Pomerantz Family Pavilions and need to be consolidated into a Children’s
Hospital that is designed to meet the specific needs of pediatric patients
• Corollary requirements for teaching and clinical research space are continuing to expand
• Buildings built in the 1970s and early 1980s have reached or will soon reach 30-35 years of age
and need to be modernized with contemporary codes and expectations
• Roadways to UIHC are currently crowded with large numbers of patients, visitors and staff
coming to the Hospital and need to be decongested by development of an off-site clinic facility
21
Background – Need for New/Upgraded Facilities
• Engaged Kurt Salmon Associates (KSA) and TRG Healthcare LLC, national consulting firms,
to assist with projecting future volumes and developing facility options
• Consultants worked with UIHC planning staff, clinical department heads and faculty, other
medical leaders, UIHC, CCOM and UI Facilities and Operations administrators and many
other staff to complete assessments in three areas:
• Strategic assessment - translated the future vision into work load projections and facility
requirements
• Physical assessment - evaluated the physical condition of current facilities and the
capacity and constraints related to future development
• Information from the assessments and other factors led to the conclusion that UIHC’s future
facility needs could best be met by initially developing a children’s hospital, renovating
existing patient care units and adding future patient towers
22
Strategic Plan – Balanced Priorities
23
Key Findings: Functionality of Clinical and Other Space
Rooms are small – private rooms average 184 nsf; semi-private Private rooms are 275 nsf – 325 nsf
rooms average 225 nsf
Operating rooms are not uniformly sized and small (400 nsf – Large, efficiently configured surgical suite; operating rooms a
527 nsf); many are small resulting in fragmented flow minimum of 600 nsf; clear and coherent flow
Interventional services (surgery, angiography, catheterization, Interventional platform with co-located procedure and related
endoscopy) are dispersed; multiple anesthetizing locations support space
Ambulatory services are in many locations -- difficult way Ambulatory services, integrated, accessible, often in a single
finding. A large patient/family dissatisfier facility
Access from parking not often direct – difficult way finding; Proximate parking, easy way finding
A large patient/family dissatisfier
Faculty offices dispersed throughout medical center Dedicated physician office locations, not co-mingled in clinical
– co-mingled in clinical areas areas
On-stage (public) and off-stage (service) functions intermingled On-stage and off-stage functions separate
Privacy lacking in waiting, reception, prep/recovery areas HIPAA sensitive privacy in all patient areas
24
Contemporary Private Rooms Required
More than half (58%) of our adult medical/surgical floor beds are semi-private. These semi-
private rooms are too crowded to comfortably house patients, equipment, and families, and
are not optimal for infection control and managing patient privacy. This is a tremendous
dissatisfier for patients, families and staff.
25
Contemporary Private Rooms Required
OTTAWA — Each person who shares your hospital room raises your chance of catching a life-threatening infection by
at least 10 percent, new Canadian research shows.
"A private room is more costly to build in a hospital. However, if it saves on infections . . . then clearly it's worth the
expense," said Dr. Dick Zoutman, an infectious disease specialist at Queen's, in Kingston, Ont. "So we decided to look
at whether the number of roommates you have in hospital correlated with the risk of getting the Big Three superbugs.“
He studied records of 17,200 patients admitted to Kingston General Hospital over six months. "What we found
surprised me because of the strength of the relationship" between infection risk and number of roommates. "Your risk of
infection with one of those three superbugs went up 10 percent per roommate for each of the three infections." (In some
cases, it was slightly above 10 per cent. Patients exposed to six roommates during their stay had a risk 77 to 90 percent
higher than those in private rooms.) That means a double room is worse than a single, and a ward of four beds is worse
again. As well, a person who changes roommates has more risk than a person who has one roommate through his or
her hospital stay.
"I'm saying that the best possible decision is that we build our hospitals with private rooms."
Source: http://www.montrealgazette.com/health/Sharing+hospital+rooms+raise+infection+rates+Canadian+study/2415796/story.html
26
Contemporary Private Patient Rooms A Must:
Improved Infection Control, Privacy, Family Centered Care
28
27
Major Facility Projects
to Renew and Upgrade our Clinical Facilities
29
Major Projects Approved for Planning:
Estimated Costs
Group 1 Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit/Heart and Vascular Center Pre/Post Procedure Facility $ 15
Colloton Pavilion mechanical upgrade $ 9
Proton Beam $ 25-40
Kitchen/Dining Room Upgrades $ 13
Total $ 77
Total $ 283
Total $ 271
30
New Projects:
Estimated Costs
Total $ 149
Total $ 400
31
The Need for a New Facility
32
UI Children’s Hospital Has Unique Challenges
34
New University of Iowa Children’s Hospital:
Creating a System of Care for Iowa’s Children
35
New University of Iowa Children’s Hospital:
Creating a System of Care for Iowa’s Children
36
New University of Iowa Children’s Hospital:
Project Absolutes
37
New Children’s Hospital Planning: Progress-to-Date
38
New Children’s Hospital Planning: Site Plan
39
New Children’s Hospital Planning: Site Plan
Carver Pavilion
Colloton Pavilion
40
Renderings
Southwest Street Level View
41
Renderings
North Street Level View
42
Renderings
Southeast Aerial View
43
Renderings
West Aerial View
44
Building Program Highlights
– 100 feet wide by 300 feet long plus renovated space in JPP
– Eleven stories
45
Building Program Highlights (continued)
Radiology
– General radiography, fluoroscopy and ultrasound
Child Life
– Central Child Life facility/decentralized playrooms
– Classroom
Family Support/Amenities
– Parent sleep rooms
– Meditation space
– Family kitchen
– Laundry facilities
Educational
– Resident training program facilities
46
Children’s Beds
Remain in Present
Beds Today New Hospital Hospital Future Total
Medical/Surgical 66 84 0 84
Pediatric Intensive Care 20 28 0 28
Neonatal Intensive Care 78 28 55 83
Total 164 140 55 195
47
New Children’s Hospital Planning: Stacking Diagram
Stacking Diagram
48
New Children’s Hospital – Level 1
49
New Children’s Hospital – Level 2
50
New Children’s Hospital – Level 3
51
New Children’s Hospital – Level 4
53
New Children’s Hospital – Levels 6, 7 and 8
The new NICU bed spaces will provide more privacy and allow for more
control over the environment – sound, light and climate. A private
shower/toilet and family space will be available in each room.
The new patient rooms will have ample space for the patient, family and
clinical staff. The shower/toilet room will be accessible for patients.
Current Medical/Surgical Space New Medical/Surgical Space
178 square feet per bed 295 square feet per bed
43 square feet Toilet Room per bed 55 square feet Toilet Room per bed
(Preliminary Layout)
There are 12 double rooms at 150 square feet
per bed with shared toilet 56
PICU Patient Room Comparison
The new PICU patient rooms will be private and have ample space for
the patient, family and clinical staff. A private patient shower/toilet will
be available in each room.
Current PICU Room New PICU Room
218 square feet per bed 295 square feet per bed
Swivel Toilet Included In Room 55 square feet Toilet Room per bed
(Preliminary Layout)
57
New Children’s Hospital – Lower Level 1
58
New Children’s Hospital – Lower Level 2
59
New Children’s Hospital – Lower Level 3
60
New Children’s Hospital Designed to Integrate
into Future Patient Towers
Tower #4
Parking
Ramp #3
Tower #3
Service/Staff Elevators – Circulation
Visitors/Patients Elevators – Circulation
Tower #2
KINNICK
STADIUM New
Children's
Hospital
61
New Children’s Hospital –
Project Budget with Source of Funds
Construction $181,945,533
Professional Fees $23,334,975
Project Contingencies $18,889,564
Planning and Supervision $8,056,345
Equipment $38,524,000
Total $270,750,417
62
New Children’s Hospital – Benchmark Costs
Year
Construction Cost Comparison Size S.F. S.F. Cost**
Completed
University of Michigan – Mott Children’s and Women’s Hospital 1,100,000 $509 2011
** S.F. costs have been adjusted for location and completion date of project
63
New Children’s Hospital – Project Timeline(*)
Design
Construction
Renovation
Design Ramp #2
West Campus
Construction Transportation Center
Construction Ramp #2
Projection Current
Admissions Growth % (Average) 2.7% 1.5%
Visits Growth % (Average) 2.7% 9.1%
Operating Expense Annual Increase % (Average) 4.6% 4.0%
Length of Stay by 2018 5.60 6.46
Case Mix Index by 2018 1.87 1.79
Days Cash on Hand by 2018 210.0 249.1
65
Multi-Year Projection: Summary Income Statement
Admissions growth 1.0% 3.5% 4.1% 3.0% 2.3% 2.7% 3.6% 3.9%
Patient day growth 4.1% -2.8% -2.6% -0.2% 1.4% 2.5% 3.8% 3.8%
(In M illions)
Net Revenues $ 1,024 $ 1,068 $ 1,117 $ 1,158 $ 1,202 $ 1,244 $ 1,298 $ 1,359
Operating Expenses $ 894 $ 927 $ 963 $ 1,007 $ 1,056 $ 1,108 $ 1,158 $ 1,215
66
Multi-Year Projection: Cash Sources and Uses Summary
(In Millions) FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 Total
Operating Income $59 $69 $77 $71 $64 $38 $37 $36 $451
Depreciation $72 $72 $76 $80 $81 $97 $103 $109 $690
Interest earnings (net of interest expen
(net of interest expense) 23 23 21 23 24 17 16 9 156
Fundraising ‐ ‐ 50 ‐ ‐ 50 ‐ ‐ 100
Children's Hospital Grant ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Proceeds from new bond issue 25 25 100 50 ‐ ‐ 200 ‐ 400
Sources of Cash $120 $120 $247 $153 $105 $164 $319 $118 $1,346
Net (inclusive of Operating Income) $105 $22 $39 $15 ($33) $49 $99 ($107) $189
67
Multi-Year Projection: Key Financial Ratios
Debt to Capitalization
(lower values are better)
UI Health Care 10.4% 11.0% 15.5% 16.7% 15.3% 13.9% 21.1% 20.2%
Moody's AA (2009) 32.1% 32.1% 32.1% 32.1% 32.1% 32.1% 32.1% 32.1%
Moody's A (2009) 38.1% 38.1% 38.1% 38.1% 38.1% 38.1% 38.1% 38.1%
Moody's Baa (2009) 50.6% 50.6% 50.6% 50.6% 50.6% 50.6% 50.6% 50.6%
UI Health Care 17.14 12.36 11.33 6.76 6.31 7.94 5.59 4.65
Moody's AA (2009) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Moody's A (2009) 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30
Moody's Baa (2009) 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80
68
Risks in Multi-Year Projection:
Sensitivity to Key Assumptions
69
Alternative Scenario: Risks of Not Proceeding
70
Children’s Hospital:
Growing Focus for Philanthropy
71
Children’s Hospital:
Growing Focus for Philanthropy
72
Children’s Hospital:
Growing Focus for Philanthropy
73
Conclusion
74