Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
“After a silence, Babaji added, ‘Repeat to each of your disciples this majestic promise
from the Bhagavad Gita: “Swalpamasya dharmasya, trayata mahato bhoyat”-“Even a
little bit of the practice of this religion will save you from dire fears and colossal
sufferings.”’(8)
Your “broadcasting station” is situated in the Christ center between the eyebrows. It
is from this center that your will broadcasts into the universe your thoughts and
ideas.
Once you feel an answer in the heart, call to the guru deeply, “Introduce me to
God.”
—Paramhansa Yogananda
What a true teacher can do for you is help you to develop your own magnetism. He
will not impose on you his own.
There is a deeper aspect, however, to this magnetic exchange with a true guru.
Yogananda often quoted the scriptural statement, “All of Krishna’s soldiers were like
Krishna.” There is something too subtle to be defined, and much deeper than any
personality trait, that the disciple does indeed take on by attuning himself to a guru.
I have likened this special gift of the guru to a ray of the divine light. The clearer this
ray, and the less mingled with other rays, the stronger the magnetism conveyed,
and received. It is like a strong river that draws into itself every sluggish eddy,
making the entire flow of consciousness pure and powerful.
—Swami Kriyananda
Kriya has been taught in an unbroken link of spiritual succession to this day.
Paramhansa Yogananda personally authorized his disciple, Swami Kriyananda
(founder of Ananda) to initiate qualified people into Kriya.
Learn more about the origin of Kriya by reading this selection from Autobiography of
a Yogi, or the entire book online.
These words were Swami Kebalananda’s preamble to a wondrous tale. The first time
he recounted it I was literally spellbound. On many other occasions I coaxed my
gentle Sanskrit tutor to repeat the story, which was later told me in substantially the
same words by Sri Yukteswar. Both these Lahiri Mahasaya disciples had heard the
awesome tale direct from the lips of their guru.
“My first meeting with Babaji took place in my thirty-third year,” Lahiri Mahasaya
had said. “In the autumn of 1861 I was stationed in Danapur as a government
accountant in the Military Engineering Department. One morning the office manager
summoned me.
“‘Lahiri,’ he said, ‘a telegram has just come from our main office. You are to be
transferred to Ranikhet, where an army post(1) is now being established.’
“With one servant, I set out on the 500-mile trip. Traveling by horse and buggy, we
arrived in thirty days at the Himalayan site of Ranikhet.(2)
“My office duties were not onerous; I was able to spend many hours roaming in the
magnificent hills. A rumor reached me that great saints blessed the region with their
presence; I felt a strong desire to see them. During a ramble one early afternoon, I
was astounded to hear a distant voice calling my name. I continued my vigorous
upward climb on Drongiri Mountain. A slight uneasiness beset me at the thought that
I might not be able to retrace my steps before darkness had descended over the
jungle.
“I finally reached a small clearing whose sides were dotted with caves. On one of the
rocky ledges stood a smiling young man, extending his hand in welcome. I noticed
with astonishment that, except for his copper-colored hair, he bore a remarkable
resemblance to myself.
“‘Lahiri, you have come!’ The saint addressed me affectionately in Hindi. ‘Rest here
in this cave. It was I who called you.’
“I entered a neat little grotto which contained several woolen blankets and a few
kamandulus (begging bowls).
“‘Lahiri, do you remember that seat?’ The yogi pointed to a folded blanket in one
corner.
“The mysterious saint replied in English, ‘The office was brought for you, and not
you for the office.’
“I was dumbfounded that this forest ascetic should not only speak English but also
paraphrase the words of Christ.(3)
“‘I see my telegram took effect.’ The yogi’s remark was incomprehensible to me; I
inquired his meaning.
“‘I refer to the telegram that summoned you to these isolated parts. It was I who
silently suggested to the mind of your superior officer that you be transferred to
Ranikhet. When one feels his unity with mankind, all minds become
transmitting stations through which he can work at will.’ He added gently,
‘Lahiri, surely this cave seems familiar to you?’
“As I maintained a bewildered silence, the saint approached and struck me gently on
the forehead. At his magnetic touch, a wondrous current swept through my brain,
releasing the sweet seed-memories of my previous life.
“‘I remember!’ My voice was half-choked with joyous sobs. ‘You are my guru Babaji,
who has belonged to me always! Scenes of the past arise vividly in my mind; here in
this cave I spent many years of my last incarnation!’ As ineffable recollections
overwhelmed me, I tearfully embraced my master’s feet.
“‘For more than three decades I have waited for you here-waited for you to return to
me!’ Babaji’s voice rang with celestial love. ‘You slipped away and vanished into the
tumultuous waves of the life beyond death. The magic wand of your karma touched
you, and you were gone! Though you lost sight of me, never did I lose sight of you! I
pursued you over the luminescent astral sea where the glorious angels sail. Through
gloom, storm, upheaval, and light I followed you, like a mother bird guarding her
young. As you lived out your human term of womb-life, and emerged a babe, my
eye was ever on you. When you covered your tiny form in the lotus posture under
the Nadia sands in your childhood, I was invisibly present! Patiently, month after
month, year after year, I have watched over you, waiting for this perfect day. Now
you are with me! Lo, here is your cave, loved of yore! I have kept it ever clean and
ready for you. Here is your hallowed asana-blanket, where you daily sat to fill your
expanding heart with God! Behold there your bowl, from which you often drank the
nectar prepared by me! See how I have kept the brass cup brightly polished, that
you might drink again therefrom! My own, do you now understand?’
“‘My guru, what can I say?’ I murmured brokenly. ‘Where has one ever heard of such
deathless love?’ I gazed long and ecstatically on my eternal treasure, my guru in life
and death.
“‘Lahiri, you need purification. Drink the oil in this bowl and lie down by the river.’
Babaji’s practical wisdom, I reflected with a quick, reminiscent smile, was ever to the
fore.
“I obeyed his directions. Though the icy Himalayan night was descending, a
comforting warmth, an inner radiation, began to pulsate in every cell of my body. I
marveled. Was the unknown oil endued with a cosmical heat?
“Bitter winds whipped around me in the darkness, shrieking a fierce challenge. The
chill wavelets of the Gogash River lapped now and then over my body, outstretched
on the rocky bank. Tigers howled near-by, but my heart was free of fear; the radiant
force newly generated within me conveyed an assurance of unassailable protection.
Several hours passed swiftly; faded memories of another life wove themselves into
the present brilliant pattern of reunion with my divine guru.
“My solitary musings were interrupted by the sound of approaching footsteps. In the
darkness, a man’s hand gently helped me to my feet, and gave me some dry
clothing.
“He led the way through the forest. The somber night was suddenly lit by a steady
luminosity in the distance.
“‘Can that be the sunrise?’ I inquired. ‘Surely the whole night has not passed?’
“‘The hour is midnight.’ My guide laughed softly. ‘Yonder light is the glow of a golden
palace, materialized here tonight by the peerless Babaji. In the dim past, you once
expressed a desire to enjoy the beauties of a palace. Our master is now satisfying
your wish, thus freeing you from the bonds of karma.’(4) He added, ‘The magnificent
palace will be the scene of your initiation tonight into Kriya Yoga. All your brothers
here join in a paean of welcome, rejoicing at the end of your long exile. Behold!’
“A vast palace of dazzling gold stood before us. Studded with countless jewels, and
set amidst landscaped gardens, it presented a spectacle of unparalleled grandeur.
Saints of angelic countenance were stationed by resplendent gates, half-reddened by
the glitter of rubies. Diamonds, pearls, sapphires, and emeralds of great size and
luster were imbedded in the decorative arches.
“I followed my companion into a spacious reception hall. The odor of incense and of
roses wafted through the air; dim lamps shed a multicolored glow. Small groups of
devotees, some fair, some dark-skinned, chanted musically, or sat in the meditative
posture, immersed in an inner peace. A vibrant joy pervaded the atmosphere.
“‘Feast your eyes; enjoy the artistic splendors of this palace, for it has been brought
into being solely in your honor.’ My guide smiled sympathetically as I uttered a few
ejaculations of wonderment.
“‘Brother,’ I said, ‘the beauty of this structure surpasses the bounds of human
imagination. Please tell me the mystery of its origin.’
“‘I will gladly enlighten you.’ My companion‘s dark eyes sparkled with wisdom. ’In
reality there is nothing inexplicable about this materialization. The whole cosmos is a
materialized thought of the Creator. This heavy, earthly clod, floating in space, is a
dream of God. He made all things out of His consciousness, even as man in his
dream consciousness reproduces and vivifies a creation with its creatures.
“‘God first created the earth as an idea. Then He quickened it; energy atoms came
into being. He coordinated the atoms into this solid sphere. All its molecules are held
together by the will of God. When He withdraws His will, the earth again will
disintegrate into energy. Energy will dissolve into consciousness; the earth-idea will
disappear from objectivity.
“‘Being one with the infinite all-accomplishing Will, Babaji can summon the elemental
atoms to combine and manifest themselves in any form. This golden palace,
instantaneously created, is real, even as this earth is real. Babaji created this palatial
mansion out of his mind and is holding its atoms together by the power of his will,
even as God created this earth and is maintaining it intact.’ He added, ‘When this
structure has served its purpose, Babaji will dematerialize it.’
“As I remained silent in awe, my guide made a sweeping gesture. ‘This shimmering
palace, superbly embellished with jewels, has not been built by human effort or with
laboriously mined gold and gems. It stands solidly, a monumental challenge to man.
(5) Whoever realizes himself as a son of God, even as Babaji has done, can reach
any goal by the infinite powers hidden within him. A common stone locks within itself
the secret of stupendous atomic energy;(6) even so, a mortal is yet a powerhouse of
divinity.’
“The sage picked up from a near-by table a graceful vase whose handle was blazing
with diamonds. ‘Our great guru created this palace by solidifying myriads of free
cosmic rays,’ he went on. ‘Touch this vase and its diamonds; they will satisfy all the
tests of sensory experience.’
“I examined the vase, and passed my hand over the smooth room-walls, thick with
glistening gold. Each of the jewels scattered lavishly about was worthy of a king’s
collection. Deep satisfaction spread over my mind. A submerged desire, hidden in my
subconsciousness from lives now gone, seemed simultaneously gratified and
extinguished.
“My stately companion led me through ornate arches and corridors into a series of
chambers richly furnished in the style of an emperor’s palace. We entered an
immense hall. In the center stood a golden throne, encrusted with jewels shedding a
dazzling medley of colors. There, in lotus posture, sat the supreme Babaji. I knelt on
the shining floor at his feet.
“‘Lahiri, are you still feasting on your dream desires for a golden palace?’ My guru’s
eyes were twinkling like his own sapphires. ‘Wake! All your earthly thirsts are about
to be quenched forever.’ He murmured some mystic words of blessing. ‘My son,
arise. Receive your initiation into the kingdom of God through Kriya Yoga.’
“Babaji stretched out his hand; a homa (sacrificial) fire appeared, surrounded by
fruits and flowers. I received the liberating yogic technique before this flaming altar.
“The rites were completed in the early dawn. I felt no need for sleep in my ecstatic
state, and wandered around the palace, filled on all sides with treasures and
priceless objets d’art. Descending to the gorgeous gardens, I noticed, near-by, the
same caves and barren mountain ledges which yesterday had boasted no adjacency
to palace or flowered terrace.
“Reentering the palace, fabulously glistening in the cold Himalayan sunlight, I sought
the presence of my master. He was still enthroned, surrounded by many quiet
disciples.
“When I reopened them, the enchanting palace and its picturesque gardens had
disappeared. My own body and the forms of Babaji and the cluster of chelas were all
now seated on the bare ground at the exact site of the vanished palace, not far from
the sunlit entrances of the rocky grottos. I recalled that my guide had remarked that
the palace would be dematerialized, its captive atoms released into the thought-
essence from which it had sprung. Although stunned, I looked trustingly at my guru.
I knew not what to expect next on this day of miracles.
“‘The purpose for which the palace was created has now been served,’ Babaji
explained. He lifted an earthen vessel from the ground. ‘Put your hand there and
receive whatever food you desire.’
“As soon as I touched the broad, empty bowl, it became heaped with hot butter-fried
luchis, curry, and rare sweetmeats. I helped myself, observing that the vessel was
ever-filled. At the end of my meal I looked around for water. My guru pointed to the
bowl before me. Lo! the food had vanished; in its place was water, clear as from a
mountain stream.
“‘Few mortals know that the kingdom of God includes the kingdom of mundane
fulfillments,’ Babaji observed. ‘The divine realm extends to the earthly, but the
latter, being illusory, cannot include the essence of reality.’
“‘Beloved guru, last night you demonstrated for me the link of beauty in heaven and
earth!’ I smiled at memories of the vanished palace; surely no simple yogi had ever
received initiation into the august mysteries of Spirit amidst surroundings of more
impressive luxury! I gazed tranquilly at the stark contrast of the present scene. The
gaunt ground, the skyey roof, the caves offering primitive shelter-all seemed a
gracious natural setting for the seraphic saints around me.
“‘My son,’ Babaji said, embracing me, ‘your role in this incarnation must be played
on an outward stage. Prenatally blessed by many lives of lonely meditation, you
must now mingle in the world of men.
“‘A deep purpose underlay the fact that you did not meet me this time until you were
already a married man, with modest business responsibilities. You must put aside
your thoughts of joining our secret band in the Himalayas; your life lies in the
crowded marts, serving as an example of the ideal yogi-householder.
“‘The cries of many bewildered worldly men and women have not fallen unheard on
the ears of the Great Ones,’ he went on. 'You have been chosen to bring spiritual
solace through Kriya Yoga to numerous earnest seekers. The millions who are
encumbered by family ties and heavy worldly duties will take new heart from you, a
householder like themselves. You must guide them to see that the highest yogic
attainments are not barred to the family man. Even in the world, the yogi who
faithfully discharges his responsibilities, without personal motive or attachment,
treads the sure path of enlightenment.
“‘No necessity compels you to leave the world, for inwardly you have already
sundered its every karmic tie. Not of this world, you must yet be in it. Many years
still remain during which you must conscientiously fulfill your family, business, civic,
and spiritual duties. A sweet new breath of divine hope will penetrate the arid hearts
of worldly men. From your balanced life, they will understand that liberation is
dependent on inner, rather than outer, renunciations.’
“How remote seemed my family, the office, the world, as I listened to my guru in the
high Himalayan solitudes. Yet adamantine truth rang in his words; I submissively
agreed to leave this blessed haven of peace. Babaji instructed me in the ancient rigid
rules which govern the transmission of the yogic art from guru to disciple.
“‘Bestow the Kriya key only on qualified chelas,’ Babaji said. ‘He who vows to
sacrifice all in the quest of the Divine is fit to unravel the final mysteries of life
through the science of meditation.’
“‘Angelic guru, as you have already favored mankind by resurrecting the lost Kriya
art, will you not increase that benefit by relaxing the strict requirements for
discipleship?’ I gazed beseechingly at Babaji. ‘I pray that you permit me to
communicate Kriya to all seekers, even though at first they cannot vow themselves
to complete inner renunciation. The tortured men and women of the world, pursued
by the threefold suffering,(7) need special encouragement. They may never attempt
the road to freedom if Kriya initiation be withheld from them.’
“‘Be it so. The divine wish has been expressed through you.’ With these simple
words, the merciful guru banished the rigorous safeguards that for ages had hidden
Kriya from the world. ‘Give Kriya freely to all who humbly ask for help.’
“After a silence, Babaji added, ‘Repeat to each of your disciples this majestic promise
from the Bhagavad Gita: “Swalpamasya dharmasya, trayata mahato bhoyat”-“Even a
little bit of the practice of this religion will save you from dire fears and colossal
sufferings.”’(8)
“As I knelt the next morning at my guru’s feet for his farewell blessing, he sensed
my deep reluctance to leave him.
“Consoled by his wondrous promise, and rich with the newly found gold of God-
wisdom, I wended my way down the mountain. At the office I was welcomed by my
fellow employees, who for ten days had thought me lost in the Himalayan jungles. A
letter soon arrived from the head office.
“‘Lahiri should return to the Danapur(9) office,’ it read. ‘His transfer to Ranikhet
occurred by error. Another man should have been sent to assume the Ranikhet
duties.’
“I smiled, reflecting on the hidden crosscurrents in the events which had led me to
this furthermost spot of India.
“‘Babu,’ I protested warmly, ‘of course there are still great masters in this land!’
“‘Lahiri,’ one man said soothingly, ‘your mind has been under a strain in those
rarefied mountain airs. This is some daydream you have recounted.’
“Burning with the enthusiasm of truth, I spoke without due thought. ‘If I call him, my
guru will appear right in this house.’
“Interest gleamed in every eye; it was no wonder that the group was eager to behold
a saint materialized in such a strange way. Half-reluctantly, I asked for a quiet room
and two new woolen blankets.
“‘The master will materialize from the ether,’ I said. ‘Remain silently outside the
door; I shall soon call you.’
“I sank into the meditative state, humbly summoning my guru. The darkened room
soon filled with a dim aural moonlight; the luminous figure of Babaji emerged.
“‘Lahiri, do you call me for a trifle?’ The master’s gaze was stern. ‘Truth is for earnest
seekers, not for those of idle curiosity. It is easy to believe when one sees; there is
nothing then to deny. Supersensual truth is deserved and discovered by those who
overcome their natural materialistic skepticism.’ He added gravely, ‘Let me go!’
“I fell entreatingly at his feet. ‘Holy guru, I realize my serious error; I humbly ask
pardon. It was to create faith in these spiritually blinded minds that I ventured to call
you. Because you have graciously appeared at my prayer, please do not depart
without bestowing a blessing on my friends. Unbelievers though they be, at least
they were willing to investigate the truth of my strange assertions.’
“‘Very well; I will stay awhile. I do not wish your word discredited before your
friends.’ Babaji’s face had softened, but he added gently, ‘Henceforth, my son, I shall
come when you need me, and not always when you call me.’(10)
“Tense silence reigned in the little group when I opened the door. As if mistrusting
their senses, my friends stared at the lustrous figure on the blanket seat.
“‘This is mass-hypnotism!’ One man laughed blatantly. ‘No one could possibly have
entered this room without our knowledge!’
“Babaji advanced smilingly and motioned to each one to touch the warm, solid flesh
of his body. Doubts dispelled, my friends prostrated themselves on the floor in awed
repentance.
“‘Let halua(11) be prepared.’ Babaji made this request, I knew, to further assure the
group of his physical reality. While the porridge was boiling, the divine guru chatted
affably. Great was the metamorphosis of these doubting Thomases into devout St.
Pauls. After we had eaten, Babaji blessed each of us in turn. There was a sudden
flash; we witnessed the instantaneous dechemicalization of the electronic elements
of Babaji’s body into a spreading vaporous light. The God-tuned will power of the
master had loosened its grasp of the ether atoms held together as his body;
forthwith the trillions of tiny lifetronic sparks faded into the infinite reservoir.
“‘With my own eyes I have seen the conqueror of death.’ Maitra,(12) one of the
group, spoke reverently. His face was transfigured with the joy of his recent
awakening. ‘The supreme guru played with time and space, as a child plays with
bubbles. I have beheld one with the keys of heaven and earth.’
“I soon returned to Danapur. Firmly anchored in the Spirit, again I assumed the
manifold business and family obligations of a householder.”
Lahiri Mahasaya also related to Swami Kebalananda and Sri Yukteswar the story of
another meeting with Babaji, under circumstances which recalled the guru’s promise:
“I shall come whenever you need me.”
“The scene was a Kumbha Mela at Allahabad,” Lahiri Mahasaya told his disciples. “I
had gone there during a short vacation from my office duties. As I wandered amidst
the throng of monks and sadhus who had come from great distances to attend the
holy festival, I noticed an ash-smeared ascetic who was holding a begging bowl. The
thought arose in my mind that the man was hypocritical, wearing the outward
symbols of renunciation without a corresponding inward grace.
“No sooner had I passed the ascetic than my astounded eye fell on Babaji. He was
kneeling in front of a matted-haired anchorite.
“‘Guruji!’ I hastened to his side. ‘Sir, what are you doing here?’
“‘I am washing the feet of this renunciate, and then I shall clean his cooking
utensils.’ Babaji smiled at me like a little child; I knew he was intimating that he
wanted me to criticize no one, but to see the Lord as residing equally in all body-
temples, whether of superior or inferior men. The great guru added, ‘By serving wise
and ignorant sadhus, I am learning the greatest of virtues, pleasing to God above all
others-humility.’”
Footnotes
1. Now a military sanatorium. By 1861 the British Government had already
established certain telegraphic communciations.
Back to text
2. Ranikhet, in the Almora district of United Provinces, is situated at the foot of
Nanda Devi, the highest Himalayan peak (25,661 feet) in British India.
Back to text
3. “The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath.” —Mark 2:27.
Back to text
4. The karmic law requires that every human wish find ultimate fulfillment.
Desire is thus the chain which binds man to the reincarnational wheel.
Back to text
5. “What is a miracle?—’Tis a reproach,
’Tis an implicit satire on mankind.”
-Edward Young, in Night Thoughts.
Back to text
6. The theory of the atomic structure of matter was expounded in the ancient
Indian Vaisesika and Nyaya treatises. “There are vast worlds all placed away
within the hollows of each atom, multifarious as the motes in a sunbeam.” —
Yoga Vasishtha.
Back to text
7. Physical, mental, and spiritual suffering; manifested, respectively, in disease,
in psychological inadequacies or “complexes,” and in soul-ignorance.
Back to text
8. Chapter II:40.
Back to text
9. A town near Benares.
Back to text
10. In the path to the Infinite, even illumined masters like Lahiri Mahasaya may
suffer from an excess of zeal, and be subject to discipline. In the Bhagavad
Gita, we read many passages where the divine guru Krishna gives
chastisement to the prince of devotees, Arjuna.
Back to text
11. A porridge made of cream of wheat fried in butter, and boiled with milk.
Back to text
12. The man, Maitra, to whom Lahiri Mahasaya is here referring, afterward
became highly advanced in self-realization. I met Maitra shortly after my
graduation from high school; he visited the Mahamandal hermitage in
Benares while I was a resident. He told me then of Babaji's materialization
before the group in Moradabad. “As a result of the miracle,” Maitra explained
to me, “I became a lifelong disciple of Lahiri Mahasaya.”
Back to text
MANDUKYA UPANISHAD
English version by Sanderson Beck
KENA UPANISHAD
English version by Sanderson Beck
1
By whom directed does the mind project to its objects?
By whom commanded does the first life breath move?
By whom impelled are these words spoken?
What god is behind the eye and ear?
There the eye does not go, nor speech, nor the mind.
We do not know, we do not understand how one can teach this.
Different, indeed, is it from the known,
and also it is above the unknown.
Thus have we heard from the ancients who explained it to us.
2
If you think you know it well,
only slightly do you know the form of God.
What refers to you and what refers to the gods
then is to be investigated by you.
I think it is known.
I do not think that I know it well,
nor do I think that I do not know it.
Those of us who know this know it,
and not those of us who think they do not know it.
The one who has not thought it out has the thought of it.
The one who has thought it out does not know it.
It is not understood by those who understand it;
it is understood by those who do not understand it.
3
God won a victory for the gods,
and in this victory the gods were proud,
saying, "Ours is the victory, ours the greatness."
It knew this and appeared before them,
and they did not know what this spirit was.
"So be it."
He hurried toward it, and it asked him, "Who are you?"
"So be it."
"So be it."
He hurried toward it. It disappeared from before him.
In the same region of the sky,
he came across a very beautiful woman,
Uma, the daughter of the snowy mountains.
He asked her, "What is this spirit?"
4
She replied, "This is God,
and in the victory of God you glory."
Then he knew it was God.
ISHA UPANISHAD
English version by Sanderson Beck
By the Lord is enveloped
all that moves in the moving world.
By renouncing this, find your enjoyment.
Do not covet the possessions of others.
Working here one may wish to live for a hundred years.
Thus it is up to you---there is no other way than this---
the work does not adhere to you.
Demonic are those worlds named, covered in blinding darkness;
there after death go those people who kill the soul.
MUNDAKA UPANISHAD
English version by Sanderson Beck
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here. This text is also available as spoken by Sanderson Beck on CD.
1
God originated before the gods,
the creator of all, the protector of the world.
It taught the knowledge of God, the basis of all knowledge,
to Atharvan the eldest son.
What God taught to Atharvan, the knowledge of God,
Atharvan in the ancient times told to Angir.
He taught it to Bharadvaja Satyavaha,
and Bharadvaja to Angiras---both the higher and the lower.
"When the flame moves after the fire has been kindled,
then between the two pourings of melted butter
one should throw with faith the offering.
If one's altar fires are empty of the offerings
for the new moon, the full moon, the rains, the harvest,
or without guests or offerings or ceremonies to the gods
or contrary to rule, one loses hope of all the seven worlds.
The black, the terrible, the swift as thought,
the blood-red, the smoke-colored,
the spark-scattering, the all-shaped goddess,
are the seven flickering tongues of fire.
"Whoever performs sacrifices,
making offerings at the proper time when these are shining,
these as rays of the sun lead one
to where the one Lord of the gods lives.
Saying, 'Come, come,' the radiant offerings
carry the sacrificer by the rays of the sun,
praising and honoring one with pleasant words:
'This is your holy world of God attained by good works.'
2
"This is the truth:
as from a blazing fire
thousands of flaming sparks come forth,
so from the imperishable, my friend,
various beings come forth and return there also.
Divine and formless is the Spirit,
which is outside and inside, unborn, not breath, not mind,
pure, higher than the high imperishable.
3
"Two birds, close companions, cling to the same tree.
Of these two, one eats the sweet fruit,
and the other looks on without eating.
The soul is the one sitting immersed on the same tree,
deluded and sad because helpless.
But seeing the other who is the Lord and beloved,
it realizes its greatness and overcomes the sadness.
PRASHNA UPANISHAD
English version by Sanderson Beck
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here. This text is also available as spoken by Sanderson Beck on CD.
First Question: Creatures
Second Question: Angels
Third Question: Life-breath
Fourth Question: Sleep
Fifth Question: Meditation
Sixth Question: Spirit
First Question
Second Question
Third Question
Fourth Question
Fifth Question
Sixth Question
SHVETASHVATARA UPANISHAD
English version by Sanderson Beck
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here. This text is also available as spoken by Sanderson Beck on CD.
1. The Soul
2. Practicing Union
3. Knowing God
4. Prayer to God
5. God Rules
6. Greatness of God
1
Lovers of God ask, "What is the cause? God?
Where do we come from? By what power do we live?
On what are we established?
Who rules over our various pains and pleasures, God-knowers?
There are two unborn ones: the wise and the unwise,
the powerful and the powerless.
She too is unborn who is connected
with the enjoyer and objects of enjoyment.
By meditating on this,
there is a third stage at the dissolution of the body,
universal lordship;
being absolute, one's desire is satisfied.
That eternal should be known as present in the soul.
Nothing higher than that can be known.
2
Savitri, first controlling the mind and thought for truth,
discerned the light of fire and brought it out of the earth.
With mind controlled, we are inspired by the god Savitri,
for heaven and strength.
With mind having controlled the powers
that go into heaven through thought,
may Savitri inspire them to become great light!
3
The one spreader of the net, who rules with power,
who rules all the worlds with power,
the one who stands alone
in their rising and continuing existence---
those who know that one become immortal.
4
The one who is without color,
diversified by its union power,
distributes many colors in its hidden purpose,
and into this, its end and beginning, the universe dissolves.
It is divine.
May it endow us with clear intellect.
It is fire; it is the sun; it is air, and it is the moon.
It is the seed; it is God;
it is the waters; it is the creator.
6
Some seers say it is self-existence,
others time; they are deluded.
It is the greatness of God in the world
by which this wheel of God revolves.
It envelopes the whole universe, is intelligent,
the creator of time, possessing the qualities, omniscient.
There the sun does not shine, nor the moon and stars;
lightning does not shine, much less this fire.
As it shines, so does everything else shine.
This whole world is illuminated by its light.
KATHA UPANISHAD
English version by Sanderson Beck
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here. This text is also available as spoken by Sanderson Beck on CD.
1
Zealously Vajashrava gave away all his possessions.
He had a son named Nachiketas.
As the gifts were being offered,
faith entered him, although he was merely a boy.
He thought, "Their water drunk, their grass eaten,
their milk milked, their organs worn out---
joyless surely are the worlds to which he goes
who gives such."
3
"There are two who drink of justice
in the world of good works.
Both are lodged in the secret place and in the highest plane.
Knowers of God speak of them as light and shade,
as do those who maintain the five sacrificial fires,
as those also who perform the triple Nachiketas fire.
That bridge for those who sacrifice,
and which is the highest imperishable God
for those who wish to cross over
to the fearless farther shore,
that Nachiketas fire may we master.
"Arise! Awake!
Having attained your gifts, understand them.
Sharp as the edge of a razor and hard to cross,
difficult is this path, say the sages.
What has no sound nor touch nor form nor decay,
likewise is tasteless, eternal, odorless,
without beginning or end, beyond the great, stable,
by discerning that, one is liberated from the mouth of death.
4
"The self-existent pierced the openings outward;
therefore one looks outward, not inside the soul.
A certain wise person, however, seeking immortality,
looking within saw the soul.
"She who arises with life, infinity, the soul of the gods,
who stands having entered into the secret place,
who was born with the beings.
This truly is that.
5
"By ruling over the city of eleven gates,
the unborn who is not devious-minded does not grieve,
but when set free is truly free.
This truly is that.
"This is it.
Thus they recognize the ineffable supreme happiness.
How then may I understand this?
Does it shine or does it reflect?
The sun does not shine there, nor the moon and the stars;
lightning does not shine there, much less this fire.
After that shines does everything else shine.
The whole world is illuminated by its light.
6
"Its root is above, its branches below -
this eternal fig tree.
That is the bright one. That is God.
That is called immortal.
On it all the worlds rest,
and no one ever goes beyond it.
This truly is that.
Harappan Civilization
Rig Veda
Sama Veda
Yajur Veda
Atharva Veda
Brahmanas
Aranyakas
Early Upanishads
Kena, Katha, Isha, and Mundaka
Later Upanishads
This chapter has been published in the book INDIA & Southeast Asia to 1800.
For ordering information, please click here.
Harappan Civilization
Although they did use some writing with pictographic symbols at Mohenjo-daro, they
were not extensive nor alphabetic nor have they been deciphered yet, and the Indo-
European Sanskrit which did develop in India is probably quite different. Nevertheless
the Harappan civilization of the Indus Valley in what is now Pakistan did borrow many
ideas from Mesopotamia and is considered the third civilization to develop. Two seals of
the Mohenjo-daro type were discovered at Elam and Mesopotamia, and a cuneiform
inscription was unearthed at Mohenjo-daro.
The pastoral villages that spread out east of Elam through Iran and Baluchistan prepared
the way for the cities that were to develop around the Indus River, particularly at Harappa
and Mohenjo-daro. By about 3000 BC they were building mud-brick houses; burials in
the houses included funereal objects; and pottery had fine designs and the potters' marks.
After 2500 BC farmers moved out into the alluvial plain of the Indus River valley and
achieved full-sized villages using copper and bronze pins, knives, and axes; figurines of
women and cattle indicate probable religious attitudes.
The urban phase began about 2300 BC and lasted for about six hundred years with
elaborate cities like Mohenjo-daro (called locally Mound of the Dead), which was
excavated in the 1920s. This city and others not yet excavated had about 40,000
inhabitants congregated in well built houses with private showers and toilets that drained
into municipal sewer lines. Suffering from occasional flooding by the Indus, Mohenjo-
daro was rebuilt seven times. The largest structures were the elevated granary and the
great bath or swimming pool which was 12 by 7 meters. Around the pool were dressing
rooms and private baths.
The people of the Harappan culture did not seem to be very warlike, although they hunted
wild game and domesticated cattle, sheep, and goats. Wheat and barley were the main
food supplemented by peas, sesame, and other vegetables and fruits, beef, mutton, pork,
eggs, fish, and milk. Compared to other ancient civilizations, the houses were of nearly
equal size, indicating a more egalitarian social structure. The potter's wheel and carts
were used; children played with miniature toy carts. Cotton, perhaps first used here, and
wool were made into clothing. A bronze figurine was found of an expressive dancing girl
with her hand on her hip, naked except for jewelry. The numerous figurines of the
Mother Goddess indicate a likely source for what later became the Shakti worship of the
feminine power in India. A male god in a yoga posture, depicted with three faces and two
horns, has been identified with Shiva, another important figure in later Indian religion.
Phallic lingams, also associated with Shiva, have been found. A civilization that endured
dangerous flooding for six hundred years very likely had a strong religion to help hold
people together.
With no written histories the decline of this civilization is subject to much speculation.
The traditional theory is that the Aryans invaded from the northwest. Although this is
likely, the decline of Harappan culture was quite gradual and indicates problems beyond
foreign conquest. One theory is deforestation, because of all the wood needed for the
kilns to make the bricks used to keep out the flood waters that gradually brought about
salinization of the soil, as it had to Sumer over centuries, so that the Harappan culture had
greatly declined by 1900 BC.
The traditional theory, well documented by the ancient hymns of the Vedas, is that a
people calling themselves Aryans conquered the native peoples of India and destroyed
their forts. Because of language similarities these Aryans are associated particularly with
the Iranians and even further back with the origins of the Indo-European language group.
The general consensus seems to be that this culture must have begun somewhere in the
Russian steppes and Central Asia about 2000 BC, though some have put their origin in
Lithuania because of similarity to that language. The branch of these speakers, who came
to India under the name Aryans, which means "noble ones," is the Indo-Iranian group. In
fact "Iran" derives from the Persian cognate of the word for Aryan. Other branches spread
into Greece and western Asia as Hittites, Kassites, and Mitanni. A rock inscription found
at Boghaz Koi dated about 1400 BC, commemorating a treaty between the Mitanni and
Hittites, invokes the Aryan gods Indra, Varuna, Mitra, and the twins Nasatya (Asvins).
The ancient writings of the Persian Avesta and the Hindu Vedas share many gods and
beliefs. Eventually they must have split, causing later authors to demonize the divinities
of their adversaries. In early Hindu writings the asuras were respected gods, but later
they became the demons most hated, while Ahura Mazda became the chief god of the
Zoroastrians. (Persian often uses an h where Sanskrit uses an s, such as haoma for soma.)
On the other hand the Hindu term for divinities, devas, was used by Zoroastrians to
describe the devils from which even our English word is derived. Some scholars have
concluded that the ancient Hindus did not want to admit that they came from Iran, and
therefore the origin of the Aryans is never mentioned in the ancient texts, although they
frankly boast of their conquest over the indigenous Dasas or Dasyus in India.
The word Veda means knowledge, and the Vedas are considered the most sacred scripture
of Hinduism referred to as sruti, meaning what was heard by or revealed to the rishis or
seers. The most holy hymns and mantras put together into four collections called the Rig,
Sama, Yajur, and Atharva Vedas are difficult to date, because they were passed on orally
for about a thousand years before they were written down. More recent categories of
Vedas include the Brahmanas or manuals for ritual and prayer, the Aranyakas or forest
texts for religious hermits, and the Upanishads or mystical discourses.
Rig Veda
The hymns of the Rig Veda are considered the oldest and most important of the Vedas,
having been composed between 1500 BC and the time of the great Bharata war about 900
BC. More than a thousand hymns are organized into ten mandalas or circles of which the
second through the seventh are the oldest and the tenth is the most recent. The Hindu
tradition is that even the Vedas were gradually reduced from much more extensive and
ancient divine revelations but were perverted in the recent dark age of Kaliyuga. As the
only writings from this ancient period of India, they are considered the best source of
knowledge we have; but the ethical doctrines seem to have improved from the ancient
hymns to the mystical Upanishads.
Essentially the Rig Veda is dominated by hymns praising the Aryan gods for giving them
victories and wealth plundered from the local Dasas through warfare. The Aryans
apparently used their advances in weaponry and skill in fighting to conquer the
agricultural and tribal peoples of the fading Harappan culture. Numerous hymns refer to
the use of horses and chariots with spokes which must have given their warriors a
tremendous advantage. Spears, bows, arrows, and iron weapons are also mentioned. As a
nomadic and pastoral culture glorifying war, they established a new social structure of
patriarchal families dominated by warriors and, eventually with the power of the Vedas
themselves, by priests also.
The Rig Veda does mention assemblies, but these were probably of the warrior elite,
which may have had some controlling influence on the kings and the tribal priest called a
purohita. The gods worshiped resemble the Indo-European gods and were headed by the
powerful Indra, who is often credited with destroying ninety forts. Also popular was
Agni, the fire-god considered a messenger of the gods. Varuna and Mitra, the gods of the
night and day sky, have been identified with the Greek Uranos and the Persian Mithras
respectively. Dyaus, who is not mentioned nearly as often, has been correlated with the
Greek Zeus. Surya the sun-god is referred to as the eye of Varuna and the son of Dyaus
and rides through the sky on his chariot led by his twin sons, the Asvins who represent
his rays; Ushas the dawn is his wife or daughter. Maruts are storm-gods shaped by Rudra,
who may have been one of the few indigenous deities adopted by the Aryans. Like the
Iranian Avesta, the Rig Veda refers to the thirty-three gods.
Generally the hymns of the Rig Veda praise the gods and ask them for worldly benefits
such as wealth, health, long life, protection, and victory over the Dasa peoples.
They call upon Brihaspati or Brahmanaspati, who has been related to a Hittite thunder-
god, to avenge the sinner and protect them from the deceitful and wicked man. The
Aryans did have a concept of eternal law called rita, which the immortal Agni in serving
the gods is said to never break (Rig Veda III:3:1).
In Rig Veda III:34:9 Indra killed the Dasyus and "gave protection to the Aryan color."
Not only did the Aryans shamelessly pray for booty in war, but they based their militarily
won supremacy on the lightness of their skin color compared to the dark colors of the
native Dasyus. They arrogantly proclaimed, "Let those who have no weapons suffer
sorrow." (Rig Veda IV:5:14.)
Only occasionally did the authors of these hymns look to their own sins.
A hymn to the frogs compares the repetitions of the priests around the soma bowl to the
croaking of the frogs around a pond after the rains come. (Rig Veda VII:103)
The basic belief of the prayers and sacrifices is that they will help them to gain their
desires and overcome their enemies, as in Rig Veda VIII:31:15: "The man who,
sacrificing, strives to win the heart of deities will conquer those who worship not." Some
awareness of a higher law seems to be dawning in the eighth book in hymn 75: "The holy
law hath quelled even mighty men of war. Break ye not off our friendship, come and set
me free." However, the enemies are now identified with the Asuras and still are
intimidated by greater weapons: "Weaponless are the Asuras, the godless: scatter them
with thy wheel, impetuous hero." (Rig Veda VIII:85:9)
Many of the hymns refer to the intoxicating soma juice, which is squeezed from the
mysterious soma plant and drank. All of the hymns of the ninth book of the Rig Veda are
dedicated to the purifying soma, which is even credited with making them feel immortal,
probably because of its psychedelic influence. The first hymn in this book refers to the
"iron-fashioned home" of the Aryans.
In the first book of the Rig Veda the worshipers recognize Agni as the guard of eternal
law (I:1:8) and Mitra and Varuna as lovers and cherishers of law who gained their mighty
power through law (I:2:8). In the 24th hymn they pray to Varuna, the wise Asura, to
loosen the bonds of their sins. However, the prayers for riches continue, and Indra is
thanked for winning wealth in horses, cattle, and gold by his chariot. Agni helps to slay
the many in war by the hands of the few, "preserving our wealthy patrons with thy
succors, and ourselves." (Rig Veda I:31:6, 42) Indra helped win the Aryan victory:
He, much invoked, hath slain Dasyus and Simyus,
after his wont, and laid them low with arrows.
The mighty thunderer with his fair-complexioned friends
won the land, the sunlight, and the waters.4
Control of the waters was essential for agricultural wealth. Indra is praised for crushing
the godless races and breaking down their forts. (Rig Veda I:174)
In the tenth and last book of the Rig Veda some new themes are explored, but the Dasyus
are still condemned for being "riteless, void of sense, inhuman, keeping alien laws," and
Indra still urges the heroes to slay the enemies; his "hand is prompt to rend and burn, O
hero thunder-armed: as thou with thy companions didst destroy the whole of Sushna's
brood." (Rig Veda X:22)
One unusual hymn is on the subject of gambling with dice. The speaker regrets alienating
his wife, wandering homeless in constant fear and debt, envying others' well-ordered
homes. He finally warns the listener not to play with dice but recommends cultivating his
land. (Rig Veda X:34) Hymn 50 of this most recent last book urges Indra to win riches
with valor "in the war for water on their fields." Now the prayer is that "we Gods may
quell our Asura foemen." (Rig Veda X:53:4) A wedding ceremony is indicated in a hymn
of Surya's bridal, the daughter of the sun. (Rig Veda X:85)
The first indication of the caste system is outlined in the hymn to Purusha, the embodied
human spirit, who is one-fourth creature and three-fourths eternal life in heaven.
The Brahmin caste was to be the priests and teachers; the Rajanya represents the king,
head of the warrior or Kshatriya caste; Vaishyas are the merchants, craftsmen, and
farmers; and the Sudras are the workers. In hymn 109 the brahmachari or student is
mentioned as engaged in duty as a member of God's own body.
Yet later we realize that the priests are asking for liberality to support their own services,
for the "plowing makes the food that feeds us," and thus a speaking (or paid) Brahmin is
better than a silent one.
The power of speech is honored in two hymns.
In hymn 125 of the tenth mandala Vak or speech claims to have penetrated earth and
heaven, holding together all existence.
A philosophical hymn of creation is found in Rig Veda X:129. Beginning from non-being
when nothing existed, not even water nor death, that One breathless breathed by itself. At
first this All was concealed by darkness and formless chaos, but by heat (tapas) that One
came into existence. Thus arose desire, the primal seed and germ of Spirit. Sages
searching in their hearts discovered kinship with the non-existent. A ray of light extended
across the darkness, but what was known above or below? Creative fertility was there
with energy and action, but who really knows where this creation came from? For the
gods came after the world's creation. Who could know the source of this creation and
how it was produced? The one seeing it in the highest heaven only knows, or maybe it
does not.
Sama Veda
The Sama Veda contains the melodies or music for the chants used from the Rig Veda for
the sacrifices; almost all of its written verses are traceable to the Rig Veda, mostly the
eighth and ninth books and most to Indra, Agni, or Soma. These are considered the origin
of Indian music and probably stimulated great artistry to make the sacrifices worthwhile
to their patrons who supported the priests. The Sama Veda helped to train the musicians
and functioned as a hymnal for the religious rites.
The animal sacrifices did not use the Sama chants, but they were used extensively in
agricultural rites and in the soma rituals for which the plant with inebriating and
hallucinogenic qualities was imported from the mountains to the heartland of India. By
this time the priests were specializing in different parts of the sacrifices as professional
musicians and singers increased. The singing was like the strophe, antistrophe, and epode
of the Greek chorus and used the seven tones of the European scale. By the tenth century
BC the Aryans had invaded most of northern India, and once again trade resumed with
Babylon and others in the near east. As the sacrifices became more complex, the priestly
class used them to enhance their role in the society. Many considered this musical portion
the most important of the Vedas.
Yajur Veda
Though also following many of the hymns of the Rig Veda, the Yajur Veda deviates more
from the original text in its collection of the ritual formulas for the priests to use in the
sacrifices, which is what yaja means. It explains how to construct the altars for new and
full-moon sacrifices and other ceremonies. The Yajur Veda has two collections or
samhitas called White and Black, the latter being more obscure in its meanings.
By this time (10th century BC and after) the Aryan conquest has proceeded from the
northwest and Punjab to cover northern India, especially the Ganges valley. The caste
system was in place, and as the warriors settled down to ruling over an agricultural
society, the role of the priests and their ceremonies gained influence and justified the
Aryan ways to the native workers, who labored for the farmers, merchants, craftsmen,
who in turn were governed by their kings and priests. Land and wealth were accumulated
in the hands of a few ruling families, and with food scarce the indigenous people were
enslaved or had to sell their labor cheap to the ruling classes.
By instituting more elaborate sacrifices for their wealthy patrons, the priests could grow
both in numbers and wealth as well. The famous horse sacrifice was not celebrated often
but was used by a king to show his lordship over potential adversaries, who were invited
to acknowledge this overlordship in the ritual. The parts of the horse symbolize different
aspects of the universe so that tremendous power is invoked. The complicated and
obscure rituals were presided over by the priests - the three symbols of the lotus leaf, the
frog (for rain), and the golden man (for the sun) representing the Aryan dominance over
the land and waters of India and the natural powers that sustain agriculture.
The soma sacrifice was the most important and could last up to twelve years. Since the
soma plant was imported from distant mountains, it had to be purchased. A ritual drama
re-enacted this business and aggressive Aryan history by showing the buyer snatching
back the calf, which was paid for the soma plant, after the transaction occurs. The soma
plant was then placed in a cart and welcomed as an honored guest and king at the
sacrifice. Animals were slain and cut up in the rites before their meat was eaten. After
various offerings and other ceremonies the soma juice is poured and toasted to different
gods, and finally the text lists the sacrificial fees, usually goats, cows, gold, clothes, and
food.
Coronation ceremonies supported the inauguration of kings. The priests tried to keep
themselves above the warrior caste though by praising soma as king of the Brahmins.
Waters were drawn from various rivers to sprinkle on the king and indicate the area of his
kingdom, and he strode in each direction to signify his sovereignty. The king was
anointed by the royal priest, giving some water to his son, the designated prince, and
ritually enacting a raid against a kinsman's cattle, once again affirming their history of
conquest. The booty was taken and divided into three parts for the priest, those who
drank, and the original owner. A ritual dice game was played, which the king was
allowed to win. The king then rode out in his chariot and was publicly worshiped as a
divine ruler.
Agricultural rites were common and regular, and chariot races were no doubt popular at
some of the festivals. The Purusha (person) sacrifice symbolized human sacrifice, which
may refer back to the time when a hunting and pastoral people did not allow their
enemies to live because of the shortage of food. However, in an agricultural society more
labor was needed and could produce surplus food. The Purusha sacrifice recognized 184
professional crafts and guilds.
Finally the highest sacrifice was considered to be the Sarvamedha in which the sacrificer
offered all of his possessions as the fee at the end of the ceremony. The last chapter of the
Yajur Veda is actually the Isha Upanishad, expressing the mystical view that the supreme
spirit pervades everything.
This society was highly patriarchal, and the status of women declined, especially as men
often married non-Aryan women. Women did not attend public assemblies and could not
inherit property on their own. Polyandry was discouraged, but polygamy, adultery, and
prostitution were generally accepted except during certain rituals. A sacrificer was not
allowed to seek a prostitute on the first day of the sacrificial fire, nor the wife of another
on the second day, nor his own wife on the third day.
The priests placed themselves at the top of the caste system as they supervised a religion
most of the people could not understand without them. After the Atharva Veda was
accepted, each sacrifice required at least four priests, one on each side of the fire using
the Rig, Sama, Yajur, and Atharva Vedas, plus their assistants. After the wars of conquest
were completed and the warrior caste settled down to rule, the priests were needed to
sustain social stability. Yet in these times the caste system was much more flexible, as it
is indicated that one should not ask about the caste of a learned man. The Brahmins, as
the priest caste was called, had three obligations or debts to pay back in life: they paid
back the seers by studying the Vedas, the gods by offering sacrifices, and their fathers by
raising a family.
Like their European ancestors, the Aryan warriors considered themselves above laboring
for food and so organized society that food would be provided for them. One ethical duty
later found in the epics was that of taking care of refugees, probably because as
marauding raiders they had often been refugees themselves. The priests assured their
livelihood by making sure that penance through religious ritual was a prime social value.
Atharva Veda
The latest and fourth Veda is in a different category. For a long time many referred to
only three Vedas, by which complete ceremonies could be conducted with the Rig hotr
reciting, the Sama udgatri singing, and the Yajur adhvaryu performing the ritual. Even
later the Atharvan Brahmin's part was often performed unaccompanied by the other three
priests. Also much of it draws from the customs and beliefs of pre-Aryan or pre-Vedic
India. The Atharva Veda is much longer than the Sama and Yajur and only about a sixth
of it is from the Rig Veda.
The Atharva Veda is primarily magical spells and incantations. The line between prayer
and magic and between white and black magic is usually drawn by ethical considerations.
The bheshajani are for healing and cures using herbs to treat fever, leprosy, jaundice,
dropsy, and other diseases. The Aryans looked down on doctors and medicine, probably
because the natives were more skilled in these than they. Other more positive spells were
for successful childbirth, romance, fecundity, virility, etc.
The negative or bewitching spells were called abhichara and attempted to cause diseases
or harm to enemies; often they were aimed at serpents and demons. The sorcery is
ascribed to one of the authors, Angiras, whose name is related to Agni (Latin ignis), the
divine messenger and possibly a distant cognate of the Greek word for messenger, angel.
Another author, Atharvan, derives from the old Iranian root, atar, meaning fire. The third
author, Bhrigu, was the name of a tribe which opposed Sudas in the battle of ten kings in
the Rig Veda, and his name has also been related to a Greek word for fire. The fourth
author is Brahmin, the name which was given to the Atharvan priest, which eventually
became so sacred that it was used as a name not only for the priestly caste but even for
God the Creator.
In addition to physicians the Vedic Aryans also held in contempt Atharvan astrologers as
well as magic, but from this came not only astrology but also the beginning of Ayurvedic
medicine. Like most ancient peoples, they also believed that the main cause of disease
was evil spirits, possession, or what we would call psychological factors. The magical
elements, particularly the abhicara, and the subjects of healing, herbs, and cooking,
which were mostly in the woman's domain, made the Atharva Veda obnoxious to many
Vedic priests. However, these rituals were very popular, and the Brahmin priest's share of
the fees soon became equal to the other three priests' combined. Eventually this shamanic
tradition had to be incorporated into the Vedic religion, especially later when it faced the
new challenges of Jainism and Buddhism.
The Brahmin caste became even stronger, and their wealth can be seen by the belief that
the cow by right belonged exclusively to them. Taxes were collected probably by the
warrior Kshatriya caste from the Vaisya artisans, farmers, and merchants. The Sudra
workers were too poor to be taxed, and the Brahmins were exempt. One verse (Atharva
Veda 3:29:3) describes heaven as "where a tax is not paid by a weak man for a stronger."
According to the Atharva Veda (5:17:8-9), a Brahmin could take a wife from the husband
of any other caste simply by seizing her hand. Book 18 contains only funeral verses.
There are coronation rites for kings, though the prayer is that the people will choose the
king, usually already selected by heredity or the council. Philosophy and abstraction are
creeping in, as there are two hymns to the deity of time, and kama (love, desire, pleasure)
is praised as "the first seed of the mind" that generated heaven. (Atharva Veda 19:52)
Let us conclude this section on the Atharva Veda with some selections from its beautiful
hymn to the Earth as a sample of the more positive expression of the Vedas:
She carries in her lap the foolish and also the wise.
She bears the death of the wicked as well as the good.
She lives in friendly collaboration with the boar,
offering herself as sanctuary to the wild pig....
Brahmanas
Between about 900 and 700 BC the Brahmanas were written in prose as sacerdotal
commentaries on the four Vedas to guide the practices of the sacrifices and give
explanations often mythical and fanciful for these customs. However, their limited focus
of justifying the priestly actions in the sacrifices restricted the themes of these first
attempts at imaginative literature. Nevertheless they do give us information about the
social customs of this period and serve as a transition from the Vedas to the Aranyakas
and the mystical Upanishads.
The caste system based on color (varna) was now established, though not as rigidly as it
became later. The essential difference was between the light-skinned Aryans, who made
up the top three castes of the priestly Brahmins, warrior Kshatriyas, and artisan Vaishyas,
and the dark-skinned Dasas, who were the servant Sudras. Sudras, like women, could not
own property, and only rarely did they rise above service positions. The Vaishyas were
the basis of the economic system of trade, crafts, and farming. The Vaishyas were
considered inferior by the Brahmins and Kshatriyas, and a female was generally not
allowed to marry below her caste, though it was common for a male to do so. Even a
Brahmin's daughter was not supposed to marry a Kshatriya.
The rivalry for prestige and power was between the Brahmins and the Kshatriyas or
rajanyas. Brahmins often held debates on Brahman and other religious issues. Janaka, a
rajanya gained knowledge and defeated some Brahmins in discussion. So some Brahmins
suggested a symposium on Brahman to prove who was superior, but since Brahmins were
expected to be superior on these issues, Yajnavalkya prudently replied, "We are
Brahmins; he is a rajanya. If we win, whom shall we say that we have defeated? But if he
defeats us, they will say a rajanya has defeated Brahmins; so let us not convene this
symposium."10
Kings were consecrated by Vedic rites and ruled with the help of the assembly (sabha)
that met in a hall to administer justice; women were excluded. Ordeals were used, such as
making a suspected thief touch a hot ax to see if his hand burned, which might be the
origin of the saying, "being caught red-handed." Politics and legislation took place in a
larger council (samiti). Taxes were collected to support these institutions and the army.
Each village was administered by a Gramani, a Vaisya who functioned like a mayor with
civil rather than military authority. The Gramani and the royal charioteer (Suta) were
considered the kingmakers. This latter privileged position was not merely the driver of
the king but also his chief advisor and perhaps storyteller as well. The royal priest or
Purohito was also supposed to advise the king in peace and protect him in war. The
season of dew after the monsoons ended was considered the time for "sacking cities," as
ambitious kings came into conflict with each other in wars.
Wendy O'Flaherty has translated some stories from the Jaiminiya Brahmana, illustrating
how they dealt with the fears of death, God, the father, wives, and demonic women;
many of these stories are sexually explicit, indicating that these people were not afraid of
discussing their sexuality. However, since the usual way of handling these fears was to
use a sacrificial ritual, the solutions probably had only limited social and psychological
value.
The most famous of these stories, and the best in my opinion, is the tale of Bhrigu's
journey in the other world. Bhrigu was the son of Varuna and devoted to learning, and he
thought that he was better than the other Brahmins and even better than the gods and his
own father. So Varuna decided to teach him something by stopping his life breaths,
causing Bhrigu to enter the world beyond, where he saw someone cut another man to
pieces and eat him, a second man eating another who was screaming, a third eating a man
who was silently screaming, another world where two women were guarding a treasure, a
fifth where a stream of blood was guarded by a naked black man with a club and a stream
of butter provided all the desires of golden men in golden bowls, and a sixth world where
flowed five rivers of blue and white lotuses and flowing honey with wonderful music,
celestial nymphs dancing and singing, and a fragrant odor.
When Bhrigu returned, his father Varuna explained to him that the first man represented
people who in ignorance destroy trees, which in turn eat them; the second are those who
cook animals that cry out and in the other world are eaten by them in return; the third are
those who ignorantly cook rice and barley, which scream silently and also eat them in
return; the two women are Faith and non-Faith; the river of blood represents those who
squeeze the blood out of a Brahmin, and the naked black man guarding is Anger; but the
true sacrificers are the golden men, who get the river of butter and the paradise of the five
rivers.
To me this myth is a clear warning against the harmful actions of deforestation and meat-
eating, and even the eating of living vegetables is to be done in silent respect. It shows an
intuitive understanding of the principle of karma or the consequences of action as well as
the growing importance of the concept of faith in addition to the usual theme of the
sacrifice.
The power of the word is increasing, as the sacrifices were glorified and given power
even over the Vedic gods. Japa or the practice of chanting a mantram like Aum practiced
ascetically with the sacrifices was believed to produce all one's desires. At the same time
knowledge was beginning to be valued. In one exchange mind says that speech merely
imitates it, but speech emphasizes the importance of expression and communication;
however, Prajapati decides that mind is more important even than the word.
This new god, Prajapati, is said to have given birth to both the gods and the demons. The
ethical principle of truth appears as the gods are described as being truthful and the
demons as being false. However, realizing the ways of the world, many complain that the
demons grew strong and rich, just as cattle like salty soil; but by performing the sacrifice
the gods attained the whole truth and triumph, as, analogically I might add, people will
eventually realize that cattle as well as salt ruins the land.
Prajapati not only was the first to sacrifice but was considered the sacrifice itself. He
practiced tapas to create by the heat of his own effort, and this heat was also related to
cosmic fire and light as well as the warmth of the body and breath. Another concept of
energy associated with the breath was prana; it also was identified with goodness, as the
texts imply that as the life force it cannot be impure or bad. Prajapati not only created but
entered into things as form and name, giving them order. Eventually Prajapati would be
replaced by Brahman, who was identified with truth and would become the Creator God
in the trinity that would include Vishnu, a sun-god who becomes the Preserver, and
Shiva, who is derived from the indigenous Rudra, the Destroyer. With all the mental
activity going on analyzing the rites and their explanation, abstractions were increasing in
the religion.
A judgment after death using a scale to weigh good against evil is described in the
Satapatha Brahmana, an idea which may have been transported from Egypt by
merchants. This text recommends that the one who knows this will balance one's deeds in
this world so that in the next the good deeds will rise, not the evil ones. Belief in repeated
lives through reincarnation is indicated in several passages in the Brahmanas. A beef-
eater is punished by being born into a strange and sinful creature. As knowledge rivaled
the value of ritual, this new problem of how to escape from an endless cycle of rebirth
presented itself.
Aranyakas
The larger body of Vedic literature is divided into two parts with the four Rig, Sama,
Yajur, and Atharva Samhitas and their Brahmanas making up the Karmakanda on the
work of the sacrifices and the Aranyakas and the Upanishads the section on knowledge
called the Jnanakanda. The Aranyakas and the Upanishads were tacked on to the end of
Brahmanas, and the only three Aranyakas extant share the names of the Brahmanas they
followed and the Upanishads they preceded: Aitareya, Kausitaki, and the Taittiriya; the
first two are associated with the Rig Veda, the last with the Yajur Veda.
The Aranyakas are called the forest texts, because ascetics retreated into the forest to
study the spiritual doctrines with their students, leading to less emphasis on the sacrificial
rites that were still performed in the towns. They were transitional between the
Brahmanas and the Upanishads in that they still discuss rites and have magical content,
dull lists of formulas and some hymns from the Vedas as well as the early speculations
and intellectual discussions that flowered in the Upanishads. The sages who took in
students in their forest hermitages were not as wealthy as the Brahmins in the towns who
served royalty and other wealthy patrons.
The Taittiriya Aranyaka tells how when the Vataramsa sages were first approached by
other sages, they retreated; but when the sages came back with faith and tapas (ardor),
they instructed them how to expiate the sin of abortion. Prayers were offered for pregnant
women whether they were married or not, even if the father was unknown because of
promiscuity. Yet the double standard against women for unchastity was in effect, unless a
student seduced the teacher's wife. Truth was the highest value; through truth the right to
heaven was retained. Debtors were in fear of punishment in hell, probably because the
social punishments in this world were severe---torture and perhaps even death.
The emphasis now was on knowledge, even on wisdom, as they prayed for intelligence.
The concept of prana as the life energy of the breath is exalted as that which establishes
the entire soul. Prana is found in trees, animals, and people in ascending order. Human
immortality is identified with the soul (atman), not the body. Hell is still feared, but by
practicing austerity (tapas) to gain knowledge individuals hope to be born into a better
world after death or be liberated from rebirth. Non-attachment (vairagya) also purifies
the body and overcomes death.
The essence of the Vedic person was considered Brahman, and the knower or inner
person was known as the soul (atman). The guardians of the spiritual treasures of the
community were called Brahmavadins (those who discuss Brahman). A son approached
his father and asked what was supreme. The father replied, "Truth, tapas, self-control,
charity, dharma (duty), and progeny."11
Early Upanishads
The term Upanishad means literally "those who sit near" and implies listening closely to
the secret doctrines of a spiritual teacher. Although there are over two hundred
Upanishads, only fifteen are mentioned by the philosophic commentator Shankara (788-
820 CE). These fifteen and the Maitri are considered Vedic and the principal
Upanishads; the rest were written later and are related to the Puranic worship of Shiva,
Shakti, and Vishnu. The oldest and longest of the Upanishads are the Brihad-Aranyaka
and the Chandogya from about the seventh century BC.
The Brihad-Aranyaka has three Aranyaka chapters followed by six Upanishad chapters.
The first chapter of the Brihad-Aranyaka Upanishad describes the world as represented
by the horse-sacrifice. The primordial battle between the gods and the devils accounts for
the evil found in the senses, mind, and speech, but by striking off the evil the divinities
were carried beyond death. The priest chants for profound aspiration, one of the most
famous verses from the Upanishads:
The primary message of the Upanishads is that this can be done by meditating with the
awareness that one's soul (atman) is one with all things. Thus whoever knows that one is
Brahman (God) becomes this all; even the gods cannot prevent this, since that one
becomes their soul (atman). Therefore whoever worships another divinity, thinking it is
other than oneself, does not know.
Out of God (Brahman) came the Brahmin caste of priests and teachers and the Kshatriyas
to rule, development through the Vaishyas and the Sudras. However, a principle was
created as justice (dharma), than which nothing is higher, so that a weak person may
control one stronger, as if by a king. They say that those who speak the truth speak justice
and vice versa, because they are the same. By meditating on the soul (atman) alone, one
does not perish and can create whatever one wants. Whatever suffering occurs remains
with the creatures; only the good goes to the soul, because evil does not go to the gods.
The soul is identified with the real, the immortal, and the life-breath (prana), which is
veiled by name and form (individuality). By restraining the senses and the mind, one may
rest in the space within the heart and become a great Brahmin and like a king may move
around within one's body as one pleases. The world of name and form is real, but the soul
is the truth or reality of the real. Immortality cannot be obtained through wealth, and all
persons and things in the world are dear not for love of them (husband, wife, sons,
wealth, gods, etc.); but for the love of the soul, all these are dear. The soul is the overlord
of all things, as the spokes of the wheel are held together by the hub.
The principle of action (karma) is explained as "one becomes good by good action, bad
by bad action."13 How can one get beyond the duality of seeing, smelling, hearing,
speaking to, thinking of, and understanding another? Can one see the seer, smell the
smeller, hear the hearer, think the thinker, and understand the understander? It is the soul
which is in all things; everything else is wretched. By passing beyond hunger and thirst,
sorrow and delusion, old age and death, by overcoming desire for sons, wealth, and
worlds, let a Brahmin become disgusted with learning and live as a child; disgusted with
that, let one become an ascetic until one transcends both the non-ascetic and the ascetic
states. Thus is indicated a spiritual path of learning and discipline that ultimately
transcends even learning and discipline in the soul, the inner controller, the immortal, the
one dwelling in the mind, whom the mind does not know, who controls the mind from
within.
The one departing this world without knowing the imperishable is pitiable, but the one
knowing it is a Brahmin. The following refrain is repeated often:
The soul is considered intelligent, dear, true, endless, blissful, and stable. As a king
prepares a chariot or ship when going on a journey, one should prepare one's soul with
the mystic doctrines of the Upanishads. The knowledge that is the light in the heart
enables one to transcend this world and death while appearing asleep. The evils that are
obtained with a body at birth are left behind upon departing at death. One dreams by
projecting from oneself, not by sensing actual objects. In sleep the immortal may leave
one's nest and go wherever one pleases. In addition to being free from desire the ethical
admonition of being without crookedness or sin is also indicated. At death the soul goes
out first, then the life, and finally the breaths go out.
The soul is made of everything; as one acts, one becomes. The doer of good becomes
good; the doer of evil becomes evil. As is one's desire, such is one's resolve; as is the
resolve, such is the action, which one attains for oneself. When one's mind is attached,
the inner self goes into the action. Obtaining the consequences of one's actions, whatever
one does in this world comes again from the other world to this world of action (karma).
By releasing the desires in one's heart, one may be liberated in immortality, reaching
Brahman (God). One is the creator of all, one with the world. Whoever knows this
becomes immortal, but others go only to sorrow. The knowing is sought through the
spiritual practices of repeating the Vedas, sacrifices, offerings, penance, and fasting.
Eventually one sees everything, as the soul overcomes both the thoughts of having done
wrong and having done right. The evil does not burn one; rather one burns the evil. In the
soul's being the world-all is known. The student should practice self-restraint, giving, and
compassion.
The Chandogya Upanishad belongs to the Sama Veda and is the last eight chapters of the
ten-chapter Chandogya Brahmana. The first two chapters of the Brahmana discuss
sacrifices and other forms of worship. As part of the Sama Veda, which is the chants, the
Chandogya Upanishad emphasizes the importance of chanting the sacred Aum. The
chanting of Aum is associated with the life breath (prana), which is so powerful that
when the devils struck it, they fell to pieces.
The religious life recommended in the Chandogya Upanishad has three parts. The first is
sacrifice, study of the Vedas, and giving alms; the second is austerity; and the third is
studying the sacred knowledge while living in the house of a teacher. One liberal giver,
who had many rest-houses built and provided with food, said, "Everywhere people will
be eating of my food."15
The soul in the heart is identified with Brahman (God), and it is the same as the light
which shines higher than in heaven. Knowing and reverencing the sacrificial fire is
believed to repel evil-doing from oneself. To the one who knows the soul, evil action
does not adhere, just as water does not adhere to the leaf of the lotus flower. To know the
soul as divine is called the "Loveliness-uniter" because all lovely things come to such.
At death the voice goes into the mind, the mind into the breath, the breath into heat, and
heat into the highest divinity, the finest essence of truth and soul. Speaking to Svetaketu,
the teacher explains that a tree may be struck at the root, the middle, or the top, but it will
continue to live if pervaded by the living soul. Yet if the life leaves one branch of it, it
dries up; and if it leaves the whole of it, the whole dries up. Then the teacher explains
how the soul is the essence of life and does not die, concluding with the repeated refrain
that his student thus ought to identify with the soul.
Then the teacher placed salt in water and asked his student to taste different parts of the
water. Just so is Being hidden in all of reality, but it is not always perceived. Just as the
thief burns his hand on the hot ax when tested, the one who did not steal and is true does
not burn his hand, so the whole world has that truth in its soul.
Speech is to be valued, because it makes known right and wrong, true and false, good and
bad, pleasant and unpleasant. Mind is revered, because it enables one to do sacred works.
Will is valued, because heaven and earth and all things were formed by being willed.
Thought is important, because it is better not to be thoughtless. Meditation is revered,
because one attains greatness by meditating. Understanding is valued, because by it we
can understand everything. Strength maintains everything. Food, water, heat, and space
each have their values. Finally also memory, hope, and life (prana) are to be revered.
Those, who take delight in the soul, have intercourse with it and find pleasure and bliss in
it and freedom; but those, who do not, have perishable worlds and no freedom. The seer
does not find death nor sickness nor any distress but sees the all and obtains the all
entirely. The soul is free of evil, ageless, deathless, sorrowless, hungerless, and thirstless.
For those, who go from here having found the soul here, there is freedom in all worlds.
No evil can go into the Brahma-world.
The chaste life of the student of sacred knowledge is the essence of austerity, fasting, and
the hermit life, for in that way one finds the reality of the soul. The soul must be searched
out and understood. The Chandogya Upanishad concludes with the advice that one
should learn the Veda from the family of a teacher while working for the teacher, then
study in one's own home producing sons and pupils, concentrate one's senses upon the
soul, be harmless toward all living things except in the sacrifices (The religion has not yet
purified itself of animal sacrifices.), so that one may attain the Brahma-world and not
return here again. The implication is that one may become free of the cycle of
reincarnation.
The Taittiriya and Aitareya Upanishads were associated with Aranyakas of the same
name. In the Taittiriya Upanishad once again Aum is emphasized, as is peace of soul.
Prayers often end with Aum and the chanting of peace (shanti) three times. This may be
preceded by the noble sentiment, "May we never hate."17 One teacher says truth is first,
another austerity, and a third claims that study and teaching of the Veda is first, because it
includes austerity and discipline.
The highest goal is to know Brahman, for that is truth, knowledge, infinite and found
hidden in the heart of being and in the highest heaven, where one may abide with the
eternal and intelligent Spirit (Brahman). Words turn away from it, and the mind is baffled
by the delight of the eternal; the one who knows this shall not fear anything now or
hereafter. Creation becomes a thing of bliss, for who could labor to draw in breath or
have the strength to breathe it out if there were not this bliss in the heaven of one's heart?
The Aitareya Upanishad begins with the one Spirit creating the universe out of its being.
As guardians for the worlds, Spirit made the Purusha (person). Out of the cosmic egg
came speech, breath, eyes and sight, ears and hearing, skin, hair, and herbs; from the
navel and outbreath came death, and from the organ of pleasure seed and waters were
born.
In the concluding chapter of this short Upanishad the author asked who is this Spirit by
whom one sees and hears and smells and speaks and knows? The answer is the following:
All things are guided by and based on this intelligence of Spirit (Brahman). Ascending
from this world with the intelligent soul, one obtains all desires in the heavenly world,
even immortality.
A ceremony is described whereby a dying father bequeaths all he has to his son. If he
recovers, it is recommended that he live under the lordship of his son or wander as a
religious mendicant. This practice of spiritual seeking as a beggar became one of the
distinctive characteristics of Indian culture.
A story is told of Pratardana, who by fighting and virility arrives at the beloved home of
Indra, who grants him a gift. Pratardana asks Indra to choose for him what would be most
beneficial to humanity, but Indra replies that a superior does not choose for an inferior.
Pratardana responds that then it is not a gift. After bragging of many violent deeds and
saying that anyone who understands him is not injured even after committing the worst
crimes such as murdering a parent, Indra identifies himself with the breathing spirit
(prana) of the intelligent soul (prajnatman). This breathing spirit is the essence of life
and thus immortal. It is by intelligence (prajna) that one is able to master all of the senses
and faculties of the soul. All these faculties are fixed in the intelligence, which is fixed in
the breathing spirit, which is in truth the blissful, ageless, immortal soul.
One does not become greater by good action nor less by bad action. One's own self
(atman) causes one to lead up from these worlds by good action or is led downward by
bad action. The soul itself (atman) is the world-protector and the sovereign of the world.
Thus ultimately the soul is responsible for everything it experiences.
The Kena Upanishad consists of an older prose section and some more recent verse with
which it begins. The word Kena means "by whom" and is the first word in a series of
questions asking by whom is the mind projected, by whom does breathing go forth, by
whom is speech impelled? What god is behind the eye and ear? The answer to these
questions points to a mystical self that is beyond the mind and senses but is that God by
which the mind and senses operate.
Those, who think they know it well, know it only slightly. What relates to oneself and the
gods needs to be investigated. Beyond thought it is not known by those who think they
know it. Beyond understanding it is not known by those who think they understand it, but
by those who realize they do not understand it. It is correctly known by an awakening, for
the one who knows it finds immortality. It can only be known by the soul. If one does not
know it, it is a great loss. The wise see it in all beings and upon leaving this world
become immortal.
In the prose section this mystical Spirit (Brahman) is shown to transcend the Vedic gods
of fire (Agni), wind (Vayu), and even powerful Indra, who being above the other gods at
least came nearest to it, realizing that it was Brahman. In summary the Kena Upanishad
concludes that austerity, restraint, and work are the foundation of the mystical doctrine;
the Vedas are its limbs, and truth is its home. The one who knows it strikes off evil and
becomes established in the most excellent, infinite, heavenly world.
The Katha Upanishad utilizes an ancient story from the Rig Veda about a father who
gives his son Nachiketas to death (Yama) but brings in some of the highest teachings of
mystical spirituality, helping us to realize why the Upanishads are referred to as the "end
of the Vedas" in the double sense of completing the Vedic scripture and in explaining the
ultimate goals.
When Vajashrava was sacrificing all his possessions, faith entered into Nachiketas, his
son, who asked his father three times to whom would he give him. Losing patience with
these pestering questions, the father finally said, "I give you to Death (Yama)."
Nachiketas knew that he was not the first to go to death, nor would he be the last, and like
grain one is born again anyway.
When he arrived at the house of Death, Yama was not there and only returned after three
days. Because Nachiketas had not received the traditional hospitality for three days,
Yama granted him three gifts. His first request was that his father would greet him
cheerfully when he returned. The second was that he be taught about the sacrificial fire.
These were easily granted.
The third request of Nachiketas was that the mystery of what death is be explained to
him, for even the gods have had doubts about this. Death tries to make him ask for
something else, such as wealth or long life with many pleasures, but Nachiketas firmly
insists on his original request, knowing that these other gifts will soon pass away.
So Death begins by explaining that the good is much better than the pleasant, which
Nachiketas has just proved that he understands. He wisely wants knowledge not
ignorance, and Death describes how those, who think themselves learned but who are
ignorant, run around deluded and are like the blind leading the blind. Those, who think
this world is the only one, continually come under the control of Death. Death explains
that this knowledge cannot be known by reasoning or thought, but it must be declared by
another. I interpret this to mean that it must be learned by direct experience or from one
who has had the experience.
Death tells how the truth is hard to see, but one must enter into the hidden, secret place in
the depth of the heart. By considering this as God, one through yoga (union) wisely
leaves joy and sorrow behind. One must transcend what is right and not right, what has
been done and will be done. The sacred word Aum is declared to be the imperishable
Spirit (Brahman). The wise realize that they are not born nor die but are unborn, constant,
eternal, primeval; this is not slain when the body is slain.
Smaller than the small, greater than the great, the soul is in the heart of every creature
here. The one who is not impulsive sees it and is free of sorrow. Through the grace of the
creator one sees the greatness of the soul. While sitting one may travel far; while lying
down one may go everywhere. Who else but oneself can know the god of joy and sorrow,
who is bodiless among bodies and stable among the unstable?
This soul is not obtained by instruction nor by intellect nor by much learning, but is
obtained by the one chosen by this; to such the soul reveals itself. However, it is not
revealed to those who have not ceased from bad conduct nor to those who are not
peaceful. Those, who drink of justice, enter the secret place in the highest heaven. Thus
correct ethics is a requirement, and one must also become peaceful.
Psychology is explained in the Katha Upanishad by using the analogy of a chariot. The
soul is the lord of the chariot, which is the body. The intuition (buddhi) is the chariot-
driver, the mind the reins, the senses the horses, and the objects of the senses the paths.
Those, who do not understand and whose minds are undisciplined with senses out of
control, are like the wild horses of a chariot that never reaches its goals; these go on to
reincarnate. The wise reach their goal with Vishnu and are not born again. The hierarchy,
starting from the bottom, consists of the objects of sense, the senses, the mind, the
intuition, the soul, the unmanifest, and the person (Purusha).
Though hidden, the soul may be seen by subtle seers with superior intellect. The
intelligent restrain speech with the mind, the mind with the knowing soul, the knowing
soul with the intuitive soul, and the intuitive soul with the peaceful soul. Yet the spiritual
path is as difficult as crossing on the sharpened edge of a razor. By discerning what has
no sound nor touch nor form nor decay nor taste nor beginning nor end, one is liberated
from the mouth of death.
A wise person, seeking immortality, looked within and saw the soul. The childish go after
outward pleasures and walk into the net of widespread death. The wise do not seek
stability among the unstable things here. Knowing the experiencer, the living soul is the
lord of what has been and what will be. This is the ancient one born from discipline
standing in the secret place. This is the truth that all things are one, but those, who see a
difference here, go from death to death like water runs to waste among the hills. The soul
goes into embodiment according to its actions and according to its knowledge.
The inner soul is in all things yet outside also; it is the one controller which when
perceived gives eternal happiness and peace. Its light is greater than the sun, moon, stars,
lightning, and fire which do not shine in the world illuminated by this presence. The
metaphor of an upside down tree is used to show that heaven is the true root of all life.
The senses may be controlled by the mind, and the mind by the greater self. Through
yoga the senses are held back so that one becomes undistracted even by the stirring of the
intuition. Thus is found the origin and the end. When all the desires of the heart are cut
like knots, then a mortal becomes immortal. There is a channel from the heart to the
crown of the head by which one goes up into immortality, but the other channels go in
various directions. One should draw out from one's body the inner soul, like an arrow
from a reed, to know the pure, the immortal. The Katha Upanishad concludes that with
this knowledge learned from Death with the entire rule of yoga, Nachiketas attained
Brahman and became free from passion and death, and so may any other who knows this
concerning the soul.
Greatly respected, the short Isha Upanishad is often put at the beginning of the
Upanishads. Isha means "Lord" and marks the trend toward monotheism in the
Upanishads. The Lord encloses all that moves in the world. The author recommends that
enjoyment be found by renouncing the world and not coveting the possessions of others.
The One pervades and transcends everything in the world.
The Mundaka Upanishad declares Brahman the first of the gods, the creator of all and the
protector of the world. Connected to the Atharva Veda the Mundaka Upanishad has
Brahman teaching his eldest son Atharvan. Yet the lower knowledge of the four Vedas
and the six Vedangas (phonetics, ritual, grammar, definition, metrics, and astrology) is
differentiated from the higher knowledge of the imperishable source of all things. The
ceremonial sacrifices are to be observed; but they are now considered "unsafe boats," and
fools, who approve them as better, go again to old age and death.
Like the Katha, the Mundaka Upanishad warns against the ignorance of thinking oneself
learned and going around deluded like the blind leading the blind. Those, who work
(karma) without understanding because of attachment, when their rewards are exhausted,
sink down wretched. "Thinking sacrifices and works of merit are most important, the
deluded know nothing better."20 After enjoying the results of their good works, they
enter this world again or even a lower one. The Mundaka Upanishad recommends a more
mystical path:
To gain this knowledge the seeker is to go with fuel in hand to a teacher who is learned in
the scriptures and established in God. Approaching properly, calming the mind and
attaining peace, the knowledge of God may be taught in the truth of reality by which one
knows the imperishable Spirit.
The formless that is higher than the imperishable and is the source and goal of all beings
may be found in the secret of the heart. The reality of immortal life may be known by
using the weapons of the Upanishads as a bow, placing an arrow on it sharpened by
meditation, stretching it with thought directed to that, and knowing the imperishable as
the target. Aum is the bow; the soul is the arrow; and God is the target. Thus meditating
on the soul and finding peace in the heart, the wise perceive the light of blissful
immortality. The knot of the heart is loosened, all doubts vanish, and one's works
(karma) cease when it is seen. Radiant is the light of lights that illuminates the whole
world. God truly is this immortal, in front, behind, to the right and left, below and above;
God is all this great universe.
By seeing the brilliant creator, the God-source, being a knower, the seer shakes off good
and evil, reaching the supreme identity of life that shines in all beings. Enjoying the soul,
doing holy works, such is the best knower of God. The soul can be attained by truth,
discipline, correct knowledge, and by studying God. Truth conquers and opens the path to
the gods by which sages, whose desires are satisfied, ascend to the supreme home. Vast,
divine, subtler than the subtle, it shines out far and close by, resting in the secret place
seen by those with vision. It is not grasped by sight nor speech nor angels nor austerity
nor work but by the grace of wisdom and the mental purity of meditation which sees the
indivisible.
Whatever world a person of pure heart holds clearly in mind is obtained. Yet whoever
entertains desires, dwelling on them, is born here and there on account of those desires;
but for the one whose desire is satisfied, whose soul is perfected, all desires here on earth
vanish away. This soul is not attained by instruction nor intellect nor much learning but
by the one whom it chooses, who enters into the all itself. Ascetics with natures purified
by renunciation enter the God-worlds and transcend death. As rivers flow into the ocean,
the liberated knower reaches the divine Spirit. Whoever knows that supreme God
becomes God.
Later Upanishads
These Upanishads are being discussed in this chapter in their estimated chronological
order. The previous group is from about the sixth century BC, and thus some of them are
probably contemporary with the life of the Buddha (563-483 BC). This next group is
almost certainly after the time of the Buddha, but it is difficult to tell how old they are.
The Prashna Upanishad is also associated with the Atharva Veda and discusses six
questions; Prashna means question. Six men approached the teacher Pippalada with
sacrificial fuel in hands and questions in their minds. Pippalada agreed to answer their
questions if they would live with him another year in austerity, chastity, and faith.
The first question is, "From where are all these creatures born?"22 The answer is that the
Creator (Prajapati) wanted them, but two paths are indicated that lead to reincarnation
and immortality. The second question is how many angels support and illumine a creature
and which is supreme? The answer is space, air, fire, water, earth, speech, mind, sight,
and hearing, but the life-breath (prana) is supreme. The third question seeks to know the
relationship between this life-breath and the soul. The short answer is, "This life is born
from the soul (atman)."23
The fourth question concerns sleep, waking, and dreams. During sleep the mind re-
experiences what it has seen and heard, felt and thought and known. When one is
overcome by light, the god dreams no longer; then all the elements return to the soul in
happiness. The fifth question asks about the result of meditating on the word Aum. When
someone meditates on all three letters, then the supreme may be attained. The sixth
question asks about the Spirit with sixteen parts. The sixteen parts of the Spirit are life,
faith, space, air, light, water, earth, senses, mind, food, virility, discipline, affirmations
(mantra), action, world, and naming (individuality). All the parts are like spokes of a
wheel, the hub of which is the Spirit.
In the Shvetashvatara Upanishad monotheism takes the form of worshipping Rudra
(Shiva). The later quality of this Upanishad is also indicated by its use of terms from the
Samkhya school of philosophy. The person (Purusha) is distinguished from nature
(Prakriti), which is conceived of as illusion (maya). The method of devotion (bhakti) is
presented, and the refrain "By knowing God one is released from all fetters" is often
repeated. Nevertheless the Upanishadic methods of discipline and meditation are
recommended to realize the soul by controlling the mind and thoughts. Breathing
techniques are also mentioned as is yoga. The qualities (gunas) that come with action
(karma) and its consequences are to be transcended. Liberation is still found in the unity
of God (Brahman) by discrimination (samkhya) and union (yoga). By the highest
devotion (bhakti) for God and the spiritual teacher (guru) all this may be manifested to
the great soul (mahatma).
The short Mandukya Upanishad is associated with the Atharva Veda and delineates four
levels of consciousness: waking, dreaming, deep sleep, and a fourth mystical state of
being one with the soul. These are associated with the three elements of the sacred chant
Aum (a, u, and m) and the silence at its cessation. Thus this sacred chant may be used to
experience the soul itself.
The thirteenth and last of what are considered the principal Upanishads is the Maitri
Upanishad. It begins by recommending meditation upon the soul and life (prana). It tells
of a king, Brihadratha, who established his son as king and, realizing that his body is not
eternal, became detached from the world and went into the forest to practice austerity.
After a thousand days Shakayanya, a knower of the soul, appeared to teach him. The king
sought liberation from reincarnating existence. The teacher assures him that he will
become a knower of the soul. The serene one, who rising up out of the body reaches the
highest light in one's own form, is the soul, immortal and fearless.
The body is like a cart without intelligence, but it is driven by a supersensuous, intelligent
being, who is pure, clean, void, tranquil, breathless, selfless, endless, undecaying,
steadfast, eternal, unborn, and independent. The reins are the five organs of perception;
the steeds are the organs of action; and the charioteer is the mind. The soul is unmanifest,
subtle, imperceptible, incomprehensible, selfless, pure, steadfast, stainless, unagitated,
desireless, fixed like a spectator, and self-abiding.
How then does the soul, overcome by the bright and dark fruits of action (karma), enter
good or evil wombs? The elemental self is overcome by these actions and pairs of
opposites, the qualities (gunas) of nature (prakriti) and does not see the blessed one, who
causes action standing within oneself. Bewildered, full of desire, distracted, this self-
conceit binds oneself by thinking "This is I," and "That is mine." So as a bird is caught in
a snare, it enters into a good or evil womb.
Yet the cause of these actions is the inner person. The elemental self is overcome by its
attachment to qualities. The characteristics of the dark quality (tamas) are delusion, fear,
despondency, sleepiness, weariness, neglect, old age, sorrow, hunger, thirst,
wretchedness, anger, atheism, ignorance, jealousy, cruelty, stupidity, shamelessness,
meanness, and rashness. The characteristics of the passionate quality (rajas) are desire,
affection, emotion, coveting, malice, lust, hatred, secretiveness, envy, greed, fickleness,
distraction, ambition, favoritism, pride, aversion, attachment, and gluttony.
How then may this elemental self on leaving this body come into complete union with the
soul? Like the waves of great rivers or the ocean tide, it is hard to keep back the
consequences of one's actions or the approach of death. Like the lame bound with the
fetters made of the fruit of good and evil, like the prisoner lacking independence, like the
dead beset by fear, the intoxicated by delusions, like one rushing around are those
possessed by an evil spirit; like one bitten by a snake are those bitten by objects of sense;
like the gross darkness of passion, the juggling of illusion, like a falsely apparent dream,
like an actor in temporary dress or a painted scene falsely delighting the mind, all these
attachments prevent the self from remembering the highest place.
The antidote is to study the Veda, to pursue one's duty in each stage of the religious life,
and to practice the proper discipline, which results in the pure qualities (sattva) that lead
to understanding and the soul. By knowledge, discipline, and meditation God is
apprehended, and one attains undecaying and immeasurable happiness in complete union
with the soul. The soul is identical with the various gods and powers.
The means of attaining the unity of the One is the sixfold yoga of breath control
(pranayama), withdrawal of the senses (pratyahara), attention (dhyana), concentration
(dharana), contemplation (tarka), and meditation (samadhi).
When the mind is suppressed, one sees the brilliant soul, which is more subtle than the
subtle; having seen the soul oneself, one becomes selfless and is regarded as
immeasurable, without origin - the mark of liberation (moksha). By serenity of thought
one destroys good and evil action (karma). In selflessness one attains absolute unity.
The sound Aum may be used. Meditation is directed to the highest principle within and
also outer objects, qualifying the unqualified understanding; but when the mind has been
dissolved, there is the bliss witnessed by the soul that is the pure and immortal Spirit. But
if one is borne along by the stream of the qualities, unsteady, wavering, bewildered, full
of desire, and distracted one goes into self-conceit. Standing free from dependence,
conception, and self-conceit is the mark of liberation.
The influence of Buddhism can be seen in the description of liberation from one's own
thoughts. As fire destitute of fuel goes out, so thought losing activity becomes extinct in
its source. What is one's thought, that one becomes; this is the eternal mystery. By the
serenity of thought one destroys good and bad karma; focused on the soul, one enjoys
eternal delight. The mind is the means of bondage and release. Though the sacrificial fire
is still important, meditation has become the primary means of liberation.
The Mahanarayana Upanishad is a long hymn to various forms of God with prayers for
everything from wealth to liberation. At one point the author identifies with the divine
light:
The Jabala Upanishad, which is quoted by Shankara, gives a description of the four
stages of religious life for a pious Hindu. Yajnavalkya suggests that after completing the
life of a student, a householder, and a forest dweller, let one renounce, though one may
renounce while a student or householder if one has the spirit of renunciation. Suicide
apparently was not forbidden, for to the one who is weary of the world but is not yet fit to
become a recluse, Yajnavalkya recommends a hero's death (in battle), fasting to death,
throwing oneself into water or fire, or taking a final journey (to exhaustion). The
wandering ascetic though wearing an orange robe, with a shaven head, practicing non-
possession, purity, nonviolence, and living on charity obtains the state of Brahman.
The Vajrasuchika Upanishad claims to blast ignorance and exalts those endowed with
knowledge. It raises the question who is of the Brahmin class. Is it the individual soul, the
body, based on birth, knowledge, work, or performing the rites? It is not the individual
soul (jiva), because the same soul passes through many bodies. It is not the body, because
all bodies are composed of the same elements even though Brahmins tend to be white,
Kshatriyas red, Vaishyas tawny, and Sudras dark in complexion. It is not birth, because
many sages are of diverse origin. It is not knowledge, because many Kshatriyas have
attained wisdom and seen the highest reality. It is not work, because good men perform
works based on their past karma. It is not performing the rites, because many Kshatriyas
and others have given away gold as an act of religious duty.
The true Brahmin directly perceives the soul, which functions as the indwelling spirit of
all beings, blissful, indivisible, immeasurable, realizable only through one's experience.
Manifesting oneself directly through the fulfillment of nature becomes rid of the faults of
desire, attachment, spite, greed, expectation, bewilderment, ostentation, and so on and is
endowed with tranquillity. Only one possessed of these qualities is a Brahmin. This
flexible viewpoint indicates that the caste system may not yet have been as rigid as it was
later to become.
Although as the major teachings passed down orally from the century before the Buddha,
the Upanishads don't tell us too much about the worldly society of India, they do express
a widespread mysticism and spiritual life-style that was to prepare the way for the new
religions of Jainism and Buddhism as well as the deepened spirituality and mystical
philosophies of Hinduism. The values of the teachers and ascetics of this culture that has
been likened to the New Thought movement of the recent New Age philosophy were
spiritual and other worldly, but if they did not do much to improve the whole society, at
least they did not do the harm of the conquering Aryans.
A personal educational system of spiritual tutoring for adults developed, and individuals
were encouraged to improve themselves spiritually as they gave and received charity.
(When renouncing they gave to charity; then they accepted charity for basic sustenance.)
The rituals of animal sacrifices were de-emphasized, and knowledge became greatly
valued, especially self-knowledge. The doctrine of reincarnation made the sacrifices for a
better life now or in the future eventually give way to the higher spiritual goal of
liberation from the entire cycle of rebirth. Thus austerity and meditation became the
primary methods of spiritual realization.
The greatest classical text from the yoga school of Indian philosophy is the YOGA
SUTRAS by Patanjali, thought to have been written in the second century BC. These
"threads" on yoga or union are extremely terse, stating concisely and often precisely
essential points. The text may be explained and interpreted by commentaries or a teacher.
Yoga practice is considered complementary to the Sankhya philosophy, the goal being
the realization of freedom in Spirit from the world of Nature.
This psychological method of liberation is called raja or royal yoga or the yoga of the
eight steps, which may be listed as follows:
1. Restraint: nonviolence, not lying, not stealing, not lusting, and not possessing;
2. Observances: cleanliness, contentment, discipline, self-study, and surrender to the
Lord;
3. Posture or physical exercises;
4. Breath control;
5. Sublimation or withdrawal from the senses;
6. Attention;
7. Concentration;
8. Meditation.
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here. This text is also available as spoken by Sanderson Beck on CD.
YOGA SUTRAS
UNION THREADS
by Patanjali
English version by Sanderson Beck
1. Meditation
2. Practice
3. Powers
4. Freedom
1. Meditation
Without discrimination
the undisturbed flow of the oversoul is blessed.
There wisdom is identical with direct truth.
Verbal inferences are different in essence
from these specific objects of truth.
The impression arising from this
prevents all other impressions.
Control of even that
controls everything in seedless meditation.
2. Practice
Nonviolence confirmed,
in that presence hostility is relinquished.
Not lying confirmed, work and its fruits submit.
Not stealing confirmed, all riches approach.
Not lusting confirmed, vigor is gained.
Not possessing established,
there occurs knowledge of the birth process.
3. Powers
4. Freedom
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here.This text is also available as spoken by Sanderson Beck on CD.
BECK index
WISDOM OF CHINA AND INDIA Contents
The DHAMMAPADA is also from the SUTTA PITAKA but in the KHUDDAKA-NIKAYA.
The author of these verses is unknown, although they are believed to be the teachings of
the Buddha himself. The text of the DHAMMAPADA was established by the time of the
great Buddhist Emperor Ashoka in the third century BC. Frequent references are made to
Mara, the one who tempted the Buddha.
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here. This text is also available as spoken by Sanderson Beck on CD.
DHAMMAPADA
PATH OF TRUTH
English version by Sanderson Beck
1. The Twin Verses 14. The Awakened
2. Awareness 15. Joy
3. Thought 16. Pleasure
4. Flowers 17. Anger
5. The Fool 18. Impurity
6. The Wise 19. The Just
7. The Saint 20. The Path
8. The Thousands 21. Miscellaneous
9. Good and Bad 22. The Downward
10. Punishment Course
11. Old Age 23. The Elephant
12. Self 24. Craving
13. The World 25. The Mendicant
26. The Holy One
1. The Twin-Verses
2. Awareness
3. Thought
4. Flowers
5. The Fool
A wrong action, like newly drawn milk, does not turn soon;
smoldering, like fire covered by ashes, it follows the fool.
When the wrong action, after it has become known,
turns to sorrow for the fool,
then it destroys one's brightness and splits the head.
6. The Wise
7. The Saint
8. The Thousands
10. Punishment
12. Self
Even the gods emulate those who are awakened and aware,
who are given to meditation, who are wise,
and who find joy in the peace of renunciation.
15. Joy
16. Pleasure
17. Anger
The wise who hurt no one, who always control their body,
go to the unchangeable place,
where, once they have gone, they suffer no more.
Those who are always aware, who study day and night,
who aspire for nirvana, their passions will come to an end.
18. Impurity
21. Miscellaneous
A person of faith,
who is virtuous, well-known, and successful,
is respected wherever one may be.
Good people shine from far away, like the Himalaya mountains,
but the bad are not seen, like arrows shot at night.
24. Craving
Cut off the five; get rid of the five; master the five.
A mendicant who has freed oneself from the five chains
is called "one who has crossed the flood."
BECK index
WISDOM OF CHINA AND INDIA Contents
Siddartha Gautama (563-480 BC) was born as a prince in a small state in northern India
in what is now Nepal. According to legend, several soothsayers predicted that if he stayed
home he would become a universal king, but if he left he would become a Buddha. His
mother died after one week, and Siddartha was brought up by her sister. His father
surrounded him with every luxury. At the age of 16 Siddartha married Yasodhara, his
cousin of the same age, and spent his time in the pleasure gardens of the palace.
When Gautama was 29 he saw the four signs which led to his renunciation of the world---
first, an old person, then a sick person, then a corpse being carried to a funeral, and
finally a begging monk in a yellow robe. Gautama began to contemplate the meaning of
life with its inevitable decay, suffering, and death; like the monk he too must find a
solution to these problems. Therefore he decided to renounce everything, and he left the
palace immediately after the birth of his first son.
For a while he sought enlightenment by mortifying the flesh; fasting and eating only one
seed a day, he became so thin that his bones stuck out. Weak from hunger, he fainted and
almost died. Then he decided that this was not the way to enlightenment. He began to beg
for food and concentrated on meditation. When he gave up the austerities, his five
companions in spiritual aspiration left him in disgust.
One day when he was 35 he sat under a banyan tree with the resolve not to get up until he
was enlightened. Perceiving that Siddartha wanted to pass beyond his control, the tempter
Mara and his armies attacked him in various ways, but each time Gautama concentrated
on the ten perfections (charity, morality, renunciation, wisdom, effort, patience, truth,
determination, universal love, and equanimity) and received divine protection. Mara tried
to persuade him to give up his struggle and live. However, Gautama identified the ten
armies of Mara as follows: lust, dislike for the spiritual, hunger and thirst, craving,
laziness, cowardice, doubt, inflexibility, glamour, and finally exalting oneself while
despising others. Gautama said that by conquering these one could attain bliss and that he
would rather die than be defeated. Mara retired, and Gautama went into deeper
meditation, realizing his former lifetimes, becoming clairvoyant, and intuiting the
psychological insights that became his principal teachings.
At first people did not know what to call him and asked him if he was a god, a devil, an
angel, a person or what. Gautama replied simply, "I am awake." Thus he became known
as the Buddha, which means the awakened one or the enlightened one.
The first sermon included here are the words of the Buddha when he spoke in the deer
park at Benares as recorded in the SAMYUTTA-NIKAYA V:420, one of the collections of
the SUTTA PITAKA, the largest of the "three baskets" of early Buddhist texts. Hearing
this brief discourse, the five previous companions, who were at first skeptical of Buddha's
new claims, were convinced and became the first five "perfected ones" in his order.
The order of monks or disciples grew, and soon the Buddha was sending out 60 of them
in different directions to spread the teachings. The Buddha fulfilled his promise to return
to talk with King Bimbisara after his enlightenment, and he was converted also. Although
his father, King Suddhodana, did not like the idea of the Buddha begging for food, he
accepted it; many of his relatives became followers also. Some of the wealthy built
monasteries for the order.
Ananda, the Buddha's cousin and closest disciple, pleaded that women be allowed to join
the order, and finally the order of nuns was established. Another cousin, Devadatta,
wanted to become the Buddha's successor; but when he was rejected, he tried three times
to kill Gautama but failed. Then Devadatta tried to split the order. However, two of the
greatest disciples, Sariputta and Moggallana, were able to persuade those who had
followed him to return to the Buddha. Devadatta became ill; but as he was dying, the
Buddha forgave him.
When he was about 80 years old, the Buddha became seriously ill himself but felt that he
should not die until he had prepared the order for his departure. Thus he fought off the
illness. Ananda asked for instructions, but the Buddha said that he had not presented "the
closed fist of the teacher." In other words, he had not held back any of the teachings. Not
even Sariputta nor Moggallana were to be his successor; rather everything was to be
decided by majority vote. He suggested that they take refuge in the teachings, but they
might abolish minor rules if they wished.
Finally the Buddha instructed a friend named Cunda to prepare him a meal, which was
either pork or mushrooms trodden by pigs; the leftovers were to be buried, and the other
monks were to be given something else. Soon after eating this meal, the Buddha became
very sick with violent pains. The Buddha declared that Cunda was to be honored as equal
to the one who had given him the last meal before his enlightenment. Finally he asked the
monks three times if they had any questions, but none of them spoke. Then the Buddha
said his last words, "Transient are all conditioned things. Work out your salvation with
diligence." The body of Gautama was cremated a week later, and an argument over the
relics of the Buddha was settled peacefully by dividing them into eight portions.
Avoiding these two extremes the one who has thus come
has gained the enlightenment of the middle path,
which produces insight and knowledge,
and leads to peace, wisdom, enlightenment, and nirvana.
The MAHABHARATA tells the story of a civil war in ancient India between the sons of
Kuru (Kauruvas) and the sons of Pandu (Pandavas) over a kingdom the Pandavas believe
was stolen from them by the cheating of the Kauruvas. Every attempt by the Pandava
brothers to regain their kingdom without war has failed.
In the GITA Krishna, who is the uncle and friend of the Pandavas, gives Arjuna teachings
on yoga, which means union and implies union with God. Krishna is considered by
Hindus to be an incarnation of the god Vishnu, the preserver.
In the first chapter of the GITA, some of the heroes of the two armies are mentioned by
King Duryodhana, the oldest Kaurava brother, first the Pandavas: the son of Drupada,
Bhima, Arjuna, Yuyudhana, Virata, Drupada, Dhrishtaketu, Chekitana, the King of
Kashi, Purujit, Kuntibhoja, Shaibya, Yudhamanyu, Uttamauja, the son of Subhadra, and
the sons of Draupadi; then the Kauravas: Bhishma, Karna, Kripa, Ashvatthaman,
Vikarna, Saumadatti, and Drona. When they blow their conch-horns, Arjuna's brothers
are named: Bhima, Yudhishthira, Nakula, and Sahadeva.
Throughout the text various epithets or nicknames are used for Krishna and Arjuna.
Krishna is called: Madhava (descendant of Madhu), Hrishikesha (bristling-haired),
Keshava (handsome-haired), Govinda (chief of herdsmen), slayer of Madhu (a demon),
Janardana (agitator of humans), Varshneya (clansman of the Vrishnis), Vasudeva (son of
Vasudeva), Hari, and slayer of Keshin (a demon). Arjuna is called: son of Pandu,
Gudakesha (thick-haired), Partha (son of Pritha, Kunti's original name), Kaunteya (son of
Kunti), Bharata (ancient name of India, used for other characters as well), Bharata bull,
wealth winner, foe scorcher, great-armed one, blameless one, tiger spirit, and Kuru's joy
or best of Kurus (Kuru being a common ancestor of both the Pandavas and the Kauravas).
Gandiva is the name of Arjuna's bow.
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here. This text is also available as spoken by Sanderson Beck on CD.
BHAGAVAD-GITA
THE LORD'S SONG
English version by Sanderson Beck
1
Dhritarashtra said,
"In the field of duty in the field of Kuru,
gathered together to fight,
what did mine and Pandu's sons do, Sanjaya?"
Sanjaya said,
"Seeing the Pandava army arrayed,
King Duryodhana then approaching his teacher
said this speech:
'Look, master, at the Pandava's great army
arrayed by the son of Drupada, your intelligent student.
Here are heroes, great archers
equal in battle to Bhima and Arjuna;
Yuyudhana and Virata and Drupada of the great chariot;
Dhrishtaketu, Chekitana and the valiant King of Kashi,
Purujit and Kuntibhoja and Shaibya, a human bull;
bold Yudhamanyu and valiant Uttamauja;
the son of Subhadra and the sons of Draupadi;
all having great chariots.
2
Sanjaya said,
"To him thus overcome by pity,
whose eyes were filled with tears and downcast, despairing,
the slayer of Madhu said this speech:
"Arjuna said,
'How shall I in battle, slayer of Madhu,
with arrows fight against Bhishma and Drona,
the two venerable enemies, slayer of foes?
Instead of killing noble gurus
it is better to live by begging in this world;
having killed gurus desiring gain here on earth
I should enjoy pleasures smeared with blood.
Nor do we know which of these two is more important for us,
whether we should conquer or if they should conquer us,
those standing before us, the sons of Dhritarashtra,
whom having killed, we should not want to live.
Sanjaya said,
"Thus having spoken to Hrishikesha,
Gudakesha, foe scorcher, saying,
'I shall not fight' to Govinda, became silent.
"Arjuna said,
'What is the definition of one who is
steady in wisdom, steady in meditation, Keshava?
How should one steady in thought speak?
How should one sit? How should one move?'
3
"Arjuna said,
'If your intuition idea is better than action, Janardana,
then why do you urge me into this terrible action, Keshava?
With equivocal speech you confuse my intuition.
This one thing tell me without doubt:
by which I should attain what is better.'
"Arjuna said,
'Then by what compulsion does a person commit harm,
even unwillingly, Varshneya,
as if commanded by force?'
4
"The blessed Lord said,
'This imperishable yoga I declared to Vivasvat.
Vivasvat communicated it to Manu,
and Manu told it to Ikshvaku.
Thus received by royal succession,
the royal sages knew this.
In the long time here this yoga was lost, foe scorcher.
This same ancient yoga is declared by me to you today,
since you are my devoted friend.
This is the supreme mystery.'
"Arjuna said,
'Later was your birth, earlier the birth of Vivasvat.
How should I understand
that you declared this so in the beginning?'
5
"Arjuna said,
'Krishna, you praise renunciation of actions and also yoga.
Which one of these two is better?
Tell me this definitely.'
6
"The blessed Lord said,
'Not depending on the fruit of action to be done
whoever performs action is the renouncer and yogi,
not the one without the fire and without action.
Thus what they call renunciation
know this to be yoga, son of Pandu.
Without renouncing motive, no one becomes a yogi.
"Arjuna said,
'This yoga which is explained by you with equanimity,
slayer of Madhu, I do not see standing steady
because of instability.
Unstable is the mind, Krishna, impetuous, strong, rigid;
I think holding it back, like the wind, is difficult.'
"Arjuna said,
'The uncontrolled one, endowed with faith,
the mind straying from union, not attaining perfect union,
walks what road, Krishna?
Failing both is one not lost like a disappearing cloud,
unsupported, great-armed one, confused on the path of God?
Krishna, you can resolve entirely this doubt of mine;
other than you there exists no solver of this doubt.'
7
"The blessed Lord said,
'The mind absorbed in me, Partha,
practicing union relying on me,
without doubt how you shall know me completely: hear that.
I shall tell you without omission
this knowledge with discrimination, which having understood
nothing more remains here to be known.
Of thousands of people hardly anyone strives for perfection;
of those striving, even of the perfected,
hardly anyone knows me truly.
8
"Arjuna said,
'What is this God? What is this oversoul?
What is action, best person?
And what is Lord of being declared to be?
What is divine Lord said to be?
How and who is the Lord of sacrifice
here in this body, slayer of Madhu?
And how at the time of death
are you known by the self-controlled?'
9
"The blessed Lord said,
'Now I shall explain the greatest secret
to you, the uncomplaining: knowledge combined with wisdom,
knowing which you will be liberated from evil.
Ruling knowledge, a ruling secret is this highest purifier,
directly intelligible, correct,
easy to practice, imperishable.
Persons without faith in this doctrine, scorcher of foes,
not attaining me are born again
into the path of death and reincarnation.
"'Kaunteya, be aware.
No devotee of mine is lost.
Relying on me, Partha, even if they should be
women of evil wombs, merchants, even servants,
they also reach the supreme goal.
How much more then holy teachers, devoted ruling seers!
Having obtained this impermanent unhappy world, love me.
With the mind on me, be devoted to me;
sacrificing to me, honor me;
thus uniting the soul with me as the supreme aim
you will come to me.'
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here. This text is also available as spoken by Sanderson Beck on CD.
10. The Yoga of Manifestation
11. Vision of the Universal Form
12. The Yoga of Devotion
13. Distinguishing the Field and the Knower
14. Distinguishing the Three Qualities
15. The Yoga of the Highest Spirit
16. Distinguishing the Divine and the Demonic
17. Distinguishing Three Kinds of Faith
18. The Yoga of Liberation by Renunciation
BECK index
WISDOM OF CHINA AND INDIA Contents
BHAGAVAD-GITA
THE LORD'S SONG
English version by Sanderson Beck
(Continued)
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here. This text is also available as spoken by Sanderson Beck on CD.
10
"The blessed Lord said,
'Again, great-armed one, hear my supreme word,
which I shall tell to you, the beloved,
with desire for your welfare.
Neither the many gods nor the great seers know my origin,
for I am the source of the divine ones
and the great seers in every way.
Whoever knows me, unborn and without beginning,
the great Lord of the world,
this one undeluded among mortals is released from all evils.
"Arjuna said,
'Supreme God, supreme domain, purifier supreme, Lord,
eternal divine Spirit, primal God, unborn, omnipresent,
thus all seers call you,
the divine seer Narada, Asita Devala, Vyasa,
and yourself, you tell me.
I think all this is right which you say to me, Keshava,
for neither the gods nor the demons
know your manifestation, blessed one.
You know the soul by your soul alone, highest Spirit,
essence of being, Lord of beings,
God of gods, ruler of the universe.
You can tell completely the divine soul manifestations
by which manifestation you stay pervading these worlds.
11
"Arjuna said,
'As a favor to me, the word has been spoken by you
which is the supreme secret known as the oversoul.
By this my delusion has departed,
for the origin and dissolution of beings
have been heard in detail by me from you,
lotus-petal-eyed, and also imperishable greatness.
So this, as you say, is the soul, supreme Lord.
I wish to see your lordly form, highest Spirit.
If you think that it is possible for me to see this, Lord,
then, yoga Lord, reveal to me your imperishable soul.'
Sanjaya said,
"Saying this then, king, the great yoga Lord, Hari,
revealed to Partha the supreme majestic form,
many faces, many marvelous aspects,
many divine ornaments, many raised divine weapons,
wearing divine garlands and garments,
divine perfumed ointment, made of all marvels,
the divine, infinite, omniscient.
If there should be in the sky a thousand suns risen at once,
such brightness as this
would be like the brilliance of this great soul.
There standing as one the whole universe,
divided in many ways,
the son of Pandu then was seeing
in the body of the god of gods.
Then the amazed wealth winner, his hair standing on end,
bowing with the head to the god reverently, spoke.
"Arjuna said,
'I see divinities in your body, divine one,
also all kinds of beings assembled,
the Lord God on the lotus seat
and all seers and divine serpents,
many arms, bellies, faces, eyes;
I see you everywhere, infinite form;
not the end nor the middle nor yet the beginning of you
do I see, cosmic Lord, cosmic form.
With crown, mace, and disk,
a massive radiance shining everywhere I see you,
though it is hard to look completely at
the blazing fire of shining sun immeasurable.
Sanjaya said,
"Hearing this speech of Keshava,
the crowned one, trembling reverently, bowing again,
spoke to Krishna falteringly, bowing low, frightened.
"Arjuna said,
'Properly, Hrishikesha, the universe rejoices
and is delighted by your fame.
Frightened demons flee in all directions,
and companies of perfected ones will give homage.
And why should they not give homage to you, great soul?
to the original creator, a greater teacher even than God,
the infinite divine Lord, universal home,
you, the imperishable, being, nonbeing, which is beyond that.
You are the ancient primal divine Spirit,
supreme heaven of this universe;
you are the knower to be known and the supreme state.
The universe is pervaded by you, infinite form.
You are Vayu, Yama, Agni, Varuna, the moon,
the Lord of creatures, and the great grandfather.
Sanjaya said,
"Saying this to Arjuna,
Vasudeva thus revealed his own form once more
and consoled this frightened one,
becoming again the gentle, handsome great soul.
"Arjuna said,
'Seeing this human form of yours, gentle Janardana,
now I am composed with thoughts returned to normal.'
12
"Arjuna said,
'Of the constantly united who worship you with love
and those with the imperishable unmanifest,
which has the best knowledge of union?'
"'Keep the mind on me; let the intuition enter into me;
then no doubt you will live in me hereafter.
If you are not able to keep consciousness steadily on me,
then by yoga practice seek to attain me, wealth winner.
If you are unable even in practice,
become intent on my work;
doing actions for my sake also, you will attain perfection.
If you are even unable to do this,
then resorting to my union,
renouncing all the fruits of action, act self-restrained.
For knowledge is better than practice;
meditation is superior to knowledge;
renunciation of the fruit of action
is better than meditation;
from renunciation peace follows.
13
"Arjuna said,
'Nature and Spirit, the field and the knower of the field,
this I wish to know: knowledge and what is known, Keshava.'
14
"The blessed Lord said,
'I shall explain the supreme knowledge,
best of the sciences, knowing which
all the sages have gone from here to supreme perfection.
Having recourse to this knowledge,
arrived at my state of identity,
even at creation they are not born
and at dissolution they do not tremble.
"Arjuna said,
'By what characteristics does the one transcending
these three qualities come to be, Lord?
What is the conduct?
And how does one transcend these three qualities?'
15
"The blessed Lord said,
'High the root, low the branch,
they say the ashvattha tree is eternal;
its leaves are sacred hymns.
Whoever knows this is a Veda knower.
Below and above its branches spread,
nourished by qualities sprouting sense objects,
and below the roots stretch forth
engendering action in the human world.
Its form is not perceived here in this way
nor the end nor the beginning nor the maintenance.
This ashvattha tree with fully grown root
being cut down by the strong ax of detachment,
then that place is to be sought,
having gone to which they do not return again;
and I take refuge in that primal Spirit
from where ancient progress flowed.
17
"Arjuna said,
'Those who, discarding scriptural knowledge,
sacrifice filled with faith,
what is their position, Krishna?
Is it goodness, emotion, or darkness?'
18
"Arjuna said,
'Great-armed one, I wish to know the truth
of renunciation and of relinquishment, Hrishikesha,
individually, slayer of Keshin.
"'There is nothing,
either on earth or even in heaven among the gods,
no being, which can be freed
by these three qualities born of nature.
"'Conscious of me,
you will transcend all difficulties through my grace;
but if through egotism you will not listen, you will perish.
If, relying on egotism, you think, "I will not fight,"
vain is this resolve; your nature will compel you.
Bound by your own essential karma, Kaunteya,
what you do not wish to do out of confusion
you will perform that even against your will.
"Arjuna said,
'Delusion is lost, recognition gained,
through your grace by me, unchanging one.
I stand with doubt dispelled.
I shall do your word.'"
Sanjaya said,
"Thus from Vasudeva and Partha, the great soul,
I heard this marvelous dialog,
causing my hair to stand on end.
Through the grace of Vyasa
I heard this secret supreme yoga
from the Lord of yoga, Krishna,
speaking himself before my eyes.
BECK index
WISDOM BIBLE
From Ancient China, India
Greece, the Middle East, and Rome
Introduction
by Sanderson Beck
Everyone would like more wisdom and could benefit from becoming wiser, which is
supposed to come with age and experience. Yet we can enhance and awaken our inner
spiritual wisdom by studying and learning from the wisdom of others. In fact the wise are
able to avoid mistakes and find a more direct path to enlightenment by learning from the
experiences of others as well as their own. Only fools burn their fingers on a hot stove
after having been warned.
Today there seems to be less understanding of wisdom than in the ancient times and with
all our modern complexities an even greater need for it. T. S. Eliot lamented, "Where is
the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in
information?"
Wisdom transcends the knowledge of science, because it concerns not only knowledge
but also spiritual and human values. Knowledge and science alone cannot tell us what to
do but only how to do something. All our choices are based on values; our values are
what we love. We may conceptualize these as good and bad, loving what we consider
good and avoiding what we consider bad. Wisdom helps us to understand what is truly
good, giving us the ability to love well.
Ancient philosophy often placed great importance on knowing what is good and how we
can learn to choose what is good. The ancients endeavored to discover and realize human
virtues in order to avoid the pain and misery which come from vices. They also sought
the higher spiritual truths found in the enlightenment which comes from experiencing the
divine or the soul or the source of truth and goodness. In many of these texts realization
of eternal spiritual reality obviates the fear of death.
The Wisdom Bible combines together some of the greatest wisdom ever put in literary
form from the great philosophical and religious traditions of ancient China, India, Greece,
the Middle East, and Rome. Having examined the recorded history of human civilization
I would say that five great philosophical traditions stand out for the depth, power, and
spirituality of their knowledge: from the ancient times China, India, Greco-Roman, and
the Middle East, and in recent centuries Europe and America.
This collection brings together under one cover the greatest texts of spiritual wisdom
from the four ancient traditions so that their lasting value can contribute to our modern
world. They are drawn from the richest period of philosophy and extend from the eighth
century BC to 632 CE. Their influence and ideas have continued to this day.
These texts are some of the best writings from Daoism (Taoism), Confucianism,
Hinduism, Buddhism, Platonism, Epicureanism, Judaism, Christianity, Stoicism, and
Islam. They contain wisdom from such great philosophers and spiritual teachers as Lao-
zi, Confucius, Krishna, Buddha, Socrates, Epicurus, Solomon, Jesus, Epictetus, Boethius,
and Muhammad.
In most cases I have included whole texts. I have selected the brief portion by Confucius
from the Da Xue, usually titled The Great Learning and which I call Higher Education,
and have not included the bulk of the text which is a commentary on the words of
Confucius by Zeng-zi. Included complete are seven of the shorter principal Upanishads. I
did select the first sermon of the Buddha, because I think it encapsulates his main
teachings. The selections from Epicurus focus on his ethical teachings. I have taken
selections from the Qur'an, because it is very long and repetitive.
The main exception is what I call The Good Message of Jesus the Christ. This is a
synthesis of the four traditional Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John, with some
highlights from the recently discovered Gnostic Gospel of Thomas. Of course the four
Gospels have been widely available for a long time in the New Testament. However, this
synthesis combines together the various elements from the four different versions into
one continuous narrative so that readers can get the whole story as we have it from these
sources in a unified comprehensive account. I hope this will make the life and teachings
of Jesus as presented in the Gospels even more available to people who seek this wisdom
in a single, clear and readable narrative.
The Wisdm Bible is not an attempt to replace the Holy Bible of the Judeo-Christian
tradition, but I do hope that it will supplement that collection of ancient texts with a wider
collection of the spiritual wisdom of humanity. The Wisdom Bible does not duplicate the
Bible, because The Good Message of Jesus the Christ synthesis is a new contribution
beyond the four Gospels, and the one text from the tradition of Judaism, the Wisdom of
Solomon, is taken from the Old Testament Apocrypha, which is not included in most
Bibles.
The Wisdom Bible also supplements the Great Books of the Western World which were
gathered together and published in 1952. In 1976 I asked Mortimer Adler when they were
going to put out a collection of the Great Books of the Eastern World, but he said that it
was very far off in the future. The Wisdom Bible gathers a few of the greatest texts from
Eastern civilization along with some of the best spiritual wisdom of Western culture. The
only overlap with the Great Books of the Western World is in Plato. I have included
Defense of Socrates (Apology), Crito, and Phaedo because of their great importance and
concise wisdom. In addition I have selected the first Alcibiades, which is not included in
the Great Books edition of Plato, because I believe it offers a marvelous introduction to
Socratic method and wisdom on the important theme of self-knowledge.
As we move into a global age in which we encounter many more peoples and cultures
than ever before, I believe that a good liberal education will expose individuals to a wide
variety of spiritual teachings such as are contained in this book. As our understanding
evolves and our spiritual wisdom awakens we will begin to see the universal principles of
human life which can be found in various traditions.
I believe the age of parochial religion will be passing away as we grow and expand our
awareness of universal truths and delight in the diverse cultural history of our world
civilization. Instead of the closed and dogmatic attitude that "my religion" is the only one
that is any good, we can learn from many different philosophies and wise teachers who
have lived and shared their insights. This does not mean that we must give up our own
tradition, whether it is the religion we were born into and brought up in by our family or
whether it is the set of teachings we have chosen to follow as our personal path of
enlightenment or salvation. Nevertheless we can gain knowledge and insight into other
cultures and wisdom for our own lives through the study of great teachings.
I believe that in the future more people will be searching for the truth anywhere they can
find it. Tolerance of ideas and beliefs different from our own is essential to understanding
and respecting the people of other cultures. Without this tolerance misunderstanding and
conflict can cause much human misery that might be avoided. It seems to me that as we
become more aware and enlightened we become more universal in our interests and
knowledge.
Having studied the great world religions and philosophies for many years, I am offering
here what I consider to be the most helpful of ancient texts in the development of
wisdom. It is difficult for one person to be an expert in everything, yet after many
lifetimes of spiritual endeavor and thirty-five years of spiritual searching, work, teaching
and writing in this life, I believe that I can bring an intuitive understanding to the
concepts expressed in these various texts. Thus these English versions are in some
respects unified by my consciousness. I have attempted to select the best modern English
words to describe the original spiritual meaning of the texts so that similar concepts from
the different books can be understood more easily.
Nevertheless I must admit to my limitations. I have translated the Plato, Epicurus, the
Wisdom of Solomon, the Gospels, and Epictetus from the Greek originals, and I translated
Boethius from the Latin. In the case of the Bhagavad-Gita, the edition annotated by
Winthrop Sargeant is so detailed in giving the grammatical form and various meanings of
every word that by using this I could almost call my English version a translation. The
above translations make up about 80% of this collection.
In regard to the other texts originally written in ancient Chinese, Sanskrit and Pali, I
compared several English translations and used my intuition to select what I considered
to be the most spiritually accurate words after having read the various choices of other
translators. Having studied and taught the philosophies of China and India I know many
of the terms and concepts. On the Chinese texts I have been assisted by the useful advice
of Ken Tsang, who compared my English versions to the original Chinese and made
useful suggestions. With the Upanishads, Patanjali's Yoga Sutras, the Buddha's first
sermon, the Dhammapada, and the Qur'an I cannot call my work translations but only
English versions.
In all the translations and English versions in this collection I have attempted to be as
accurate to the original as I could be, trying to find the comparable or nearest English
expressions. I often found that other translations rather freely paraphrased or summarized
what is in the original. I have avoided doing this even at the risk of making the text seem
a little more difficult or awkward, although I have avoided awkwardness as much as I
could. I want the readers to have the best chance they can to understand what was
originally written even though it might be a slightly different way of saying something
than we would today.
I often found that if I gave myself enough time to understand the author's use of words
that suddenly, as though a light had come on, the sentence began to make sense as it was
written in a different way than it had been translated by others. I could only do this, of
course, in the translations. Since this is the first edition of this book, I would be grateful
for any corrections or suggestions individuals might like to offer for improving these
versions and the translations.
I have attempted to avoid sexist language as much as possible but not so much as to
change the original meaning of the texts. Some translators have used sexist language
when it is unnecessary to do so. In referring to God or Spirit I might use the impersonal
pronoun "it" unless the male pronoun was more clearly indicated in the original. For
example, Jesus often refers to God as Father and himself as the son; I left these this way.
Instead of putting "kingdom" I have used "sovereignty." In some cases in referring to the
earth or other personifications the female pronoun was used, and of course I translated
them that way. Often in the Chinese texts there is no indication in the original of gender,
number, or even the tense of verbs. Thus problems could be avoided by using the plural,
for example.
Perhaps another major contribution of this collection of this Wisdom Bible is the way the
words are phrased line by line like free verse so that they are easier to read and
understand. Ancient texts were often written and copied in this manner, but the only one I
found to be entirely in this form is the Wisdom of Solomon. In the case of that text almost
every line of my translation matches a line of the original. The other example of this is
with the poetry in Boethius' Consolation of Philosophy. I do believe that by putting all of
these English versions in "phrase-form," as I call it, the readers will find them much
easier to read and understand. It also makes them easier to read aloud to a congregation.
Almost every text is broken up into numbered divisions. The only texts that included
titles to these sections within the texts themselves are the Yoga Sutras, the Dhammapada,
and the Qur'an. I have included those titles in the text also. However, to help readers find
different subjects in the various texts I have given topical titles to each of the numbered
sections in the Contents of Topics at the beginning of this book. Other than the very
shortest of these texts the only one that did not have any numbered divisions in the
original is Plato's Alcibiades; I have made numbered divisions for this text myself. Also I
have divided The Good Message of Jesus the Christ into one hundred chapters.
Each text contains a brief introduction to the historical background and gives
biographical facts for contextual understanding. At the end of these introductions I have
provided a few notes to clarify some of the references in the text by using the chapter
numbers, but there are no footnotes nor any detailed scholarly apparatus.
Perhaps the main purpose of this book is to popularize the ancient wisdom teachings by
making them more available to people in a single, easy-to-read edition. I believe that the
universality of these teachings can be understood by anyone who cares to study them. I
hope that someday the Wisdom Bible might be found on almost everyone's bedside table
if not in every motel room. I feel that churches and other religious and social groups
could benefit by reading aloud and studying these texts. Of course could also be used as a
sourcebook for high school or college courses in the humanities or philosophy or world
religions.
My greatest hope is that more people will apply these teachings of wisdom, love, and
justice in their actions so that we can all live more in freedom, harmony and peace with
each other on this planet. I trust that the readers will be able to find their own personal
and spiritual interpretations of the meaning of these writings for themselves and that they
will be inspired by them to live a better life for the benefit of everyone.
Copyright 2001 by Sanderson Beck
BECK index
WISDOM OF CHINA AND INDIA Contents
Introduction to Lao-zi
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here.
Very little is known about the author of the DAO DE JING, which is attributed to Lao-zi.
According to the historian Sima Qian who wrote about 100 BC, Lao-zi lived during the
sixth century BC in the state of Chu in China and in the imperial capital Luoyang held the
office of shi which in ancient China meant a keeper of the archives and sacred books who
also may have been skilled in astrology and divination.
Sima Qian wrote how Lao-zi once met with Confucius, whom he criticized for pride and
ambition. However, Confucius told his disciples, "I know how birds can fly, how fish can
swim, how animals can run. Yet the runner may be trapped; the swimmer may be
hooked; and the flyer may be shot by an arrow. But who knows how dragons ride on
winds through clouds into heaven? Today I have seen Lao-zi and can compare him only
to a dragon."
According to legend, when in old age Lao-zi was leaving Chu he was stopped by the
guardian of the pass into the state of Ch'in and asked to write down his wisdom. After
three days he produced the book of about 5,250 characters known as the DAO DE JING.
DAO DE JING
WAY POWER BOOK
by Lao-zi
English version by Sanderson Beck
This text is included in the WISDOM BIBLE, the greatest collection of
wisdom ever published.
Click here to learn more about the WISDOM BIBLE and how
you may purchase it. This text is also available as spoken by
Sanderson Beck on CD.
1. The Mystical Way 28. The Valley of the World 55. Know Harmon
2. Relativity and Not 29. Do Not Tamper with 56. Mystica
Interfering the World 57. Love Pe
3. Simplicity 30. Force of Arms 58. Results
4. The Infinite Way 31. War and Peace 59. Be Frug
5. Emptiness and the 32. The Natural Way 60. Spirits
Center 33. Inner Power 61. Large an
6. The Mystical Female 34. The Great Way Countries
7. Enduring 35. The Inexhaustible Way 62. The Wa
8. The Best Are Like 36. The Mystic Light 63. The Wis
Water 37. The Way Never Strive
9. Moderation Interferes 64. Do Not G
10. Mystical Power 38. The Superior 65. Know th
11. Use What Does Not 39. Oneness Standard
Exist 40. Movement of the Way 66. Leading
12. Satisfy the Inner Self 41. What the Way is Like Behind
13. Selflessness 42. All Things 67. Three T
14. The Formless Way 43. The Value of Non- 68. The Pow
15. The Wise action Striving
16. Know the Eternal 44. How to Endure 69. The Kin
17. Leaders 45. Skill Seems Awkward 70. My Idea
18. When the Way is 46. Contentment 71. A Diseas
Forgotten 47. Understanding 72. Do Not S
19. What People Need 48. Doing Less 73. The Wa
20. Drawing Sustenance 49. The Power of Goodness 74. Death
21. Within the Elusive 50. Those Who Preserve 75. Valuing
Way Life 76. Life Is T
22. Yielding for Unity 51. Mystical Power 77. Taking a
23. Nature 52. Practicing the Eternal 78. The Soft
24. Avoid Excess 53. Leaders in Robbery 79. Stay wit
25. The Supreme 54. Power 80. Home Is
26. Self-mastery Comfortabl
27. Using the Light 81. True W
1
The Way that can be described is not the absolute Way;
the name that can be given is not the absolute name.
Nameless it is the source of heaven and earth;
named it is the mother of all things.
2
When the people of the world all know beauty as beauty,
there arises the recognition of ugliness.
When they all know the good as good,
there arises the recognition of bad.
All things rise, and they do not turn away from them.
They give them life, but do not take possession of them.
They act, but do not rely on their own ability.
They accomplish, but claim no credit.
Because they claim no credit,
their accomplishment remains with them.
3
Do not exalt the worthy,
so that people will not compete.
Do not value rare treasure,
so that people will not steal.
Do not display objects of desire,
so that people's hearts will not be disturbed.
4
The Way is infinite; its use is never exhausted.
It is bottomless, like the fountainhead of all things.
It smoothes its roughness; it unties its tangles.
It softens its light; it calms its turmoil.
Deep and still, ever present.
I do not know its source.
It seems to have existed before the Lord.
5
Nature is not humane.
It treats all things like straw dogs.
The wise are not humane.
They regard people like straw dogs.
6
The spirit of the valley never dies.
It is called the mystical female.
The door of the mystical female
is the root of heaven and earth.
It seems to be continuously within us.
Use it, and it will never be exhausted.
7
Heaven is eternal, and the earth is very old.
They can be eternal and long lasting,
because they do not exist for themselves,
and for this reason can long endure.
8
The best are like water.
Water benefits all things and does not compete with them.
It flows to the lowest level that people disdain.
In this it comes near to the Way.
9
Stretch a bow to the very full,
and you will wish you had stopped in time.
Temper a sword-edge to its very sharpest,
and the edge will not last long.
10
Can you embrace the One with your soul,
and never depart from the Way?
Can you concentrate your vital force
to achieve the gentleness of a new-born baby?
Can you cleanse and purify your mystic vision
until it is clear?
Can you love the people and govern the state
without interfering?
Can you play the role of the female
in opening and closing the doors of heaven?
Can you understand all and penetrate all
without using the mind?
11
Thirty spokes are united around the hub of a wheel,
but the usefulness of the wheel
depends on the space where nothing exists.
Clay is molded into a vessel,
but the usefulness of the vessel
depends on the space where nothing exists.
Doors and windows are cut out of the walls of a house,
and the usefulness of the house
depends on the space where nothing exists.
12
The five colors blind the eyes;
the five musical tones deafen the ears;
the five flavors dull the taste.
Racing and hunting madden the mind.
Precious goods keep their owners on guard.
13
Good fortune and misfortune cause apprehension.
Regard great trouble as you regard your self.
What is meant by
"Good fortune and misfortune cause apprehension?"
Those with good fortune are apprehensive of their gain.
Those with misfortune are apprehensive of their loss.
What is meant by
"Regard great trouble as you regard your self?"
Great trouble comes from being selfish.
Being selfless, what trouble is there?
15
The wise have ancient mystic wisdom
and profound understanding, too deep to comprehend.
Because they can not be comprehended,
they can only be described by analogy:
cautious, like crossing a stream in winter;
alert, like one aware of danger on all sides;
courteous, like a visiting guest;
self-effacing, like ice beginning to melt;
genuine, like a piece of uncarved wood;
open and receptive, like a valley;
freely mixing, like muddy water.
16
Empty yourself of everything.
Maintain a steady serenity.
All things take shape and become active,
but I see them return to their source,
like vegetation that grows and flourishes,
but returns to the root from which it springs.
17
The best leaders the people barely know.
The next best they love and praise.
The next they fear.
And the next they hate.
18
When the great Way is forgotten,
the doctrines of humanity and morality arise.
When knowledge and cleverness appear,
there emerges great hypocrisy.
When family relationships are not in harmony,
filial piety and parental love are advocated.
When a country falls into chaos and disorder,
there is praise of loyal patriots.
19
Abandon wisdom and discard cleverness,
and people will benefit a hundredfold.
Abandon humanity and discard morality,
and people will rediscover love and duty.
Abandon skill and discard profit,
and there will be no thieves or robbers.
These three things relate to externals and are inadequate.
People need what they can depend on:
reveal simplicity; embrace the natural;
control selfishness; reduce desires.
20
Abandon memorizing, and vexations end.
How much difference is there between yes and no?
How much difference is there between good and evil?
Is what people fear really to be feared?
How very remote the actual occurrence!
21
All-embracing power proceeds only through the Way.
What is called the Way is elusive and intangible.
Intangible and elusive, yet within it are thought-images.
Elusive and intangible, yet within it are objects.
Deep and obscure, yet within it is the life-force.
The life-force is very real, and within it is certainty.
22
To yield is to preserve unity.
To bend is to become straight.
To empty oneself is to become full.
To wear oneself out is to be renewed.
To have little is to be content.
To have abundance is to be troubled.
23
Nature says few words.
A whirlwind does not last all morning,
nor does a rainstorm last a whole day.
What causes them? Nature.
Those who follow the Way are one with the Way.
Those who follow power are one with power.
Those who abandon it are one with abandonment.
24
Those who stand on tiptoe are not steady.
Those who strain their strides cannot long keep up the pace.
Those who display themselves do not illuminate.
Those who justify themselves are not distinguished.
Those who make claims are not given credit.
Those who seek glory are not leaders.
According to the Way these are like extra food and waste,
which all creatures detest.
Therefore followers of the Way avoid them.
25
There is something mysterious and whole
which existed before heaven and earth,
silent, formless, complete, and never changing.
Living eternally everywhere in perfection,
it is the mother of all things.
26
Gravity is the foundation of levity.
Serenity masters hastiness.
Therefore the wise travel all day
without leaving their baggage.
In the midst of honor and glory
they remain leisurely and calm,
27
A good traveler leaves no trace.
A good speaker makes no slips.
A good accountant uses no devices.
A good door needs no bolts to remain shut.
A good fastener needs no rope to hold its bond.
28
Know the male and keep to the female.
Become the valley of the world.
Being the valley of the world is eternal power
and returning to the innocence of a baby.
29
Those who take over the world and act upon it,
I notice, do not succeed.
The world is a sacred vessel, not to be tampered with.
Those who tamper with it, spoil it.
Those who seize it, lose it.
30
Whoever advises a leader according to the Way
opposes conquest by force of arms.
The use of force tends to rebound.
Where armies march, thorns and brambles grow.
Whenever a great army is formed, scarcity and famine follow.
31
Weapons are tools of destruction hated by people.
Therefore followers of the Way never use them.
In peace leaders favor the creative left.
In war they favor the destructive right.
32
The Way is absolute and undefined.
Like natural uncarved wood in simplicity,
even though it is insignificant,
none in the world can overcome it.
If leaders would hold to it,
the whole world would serve them spontaneously.
33
Those who know others are wise.
Those who know themselves are enlightened.
Those who overcome others require force.
Those who overcome themselves need strength.
Those who are content are wealthy.
Those who persevere have will power.
Those who do not lose their center endure.
Those who die but maintain their power live eternally.
34
The great Way flows everywhere, both left and right.
All things derive their life from it,
and it does not turn away from them.
It accomplishes its work, but does not take possession.
It provides for and nourishes everything,
but does not control them.
35
Hold to the great form, and all the world follows,
following without meeting harm,
in health, peace, and happiness.
Music and delicacies to eat induce travelers to stay.
But the Way is mild to the taste.
Looked at, it is invisible.
Listened to, it is inaudible.
Applied, it is inexhaustible.
36
In order to contract, it is necessary first to expand.
In order to weaken, it is necessary first to strengthen.
In order to reduce, it is necessary first to build up.
In order to receive, it is necessary first to give.
This is called the mystic Light.
The soft and gentle overcome the hard and strong.
As fish stay in the deep water,
so sharp weapons of the state should not be displayed.
37
The Way never interferes,
yet through it everything is done.
If leaders would follow the Way,
the world would be reformed of its own accord.
When reformed and desiring to act,
let them be restrained by what is simply natural.
Undefined simplicity is free of desires.
Being free of desires, it is serene;
and the world finds peace of its own accord.
38
Superior power does not emphasize its power,
and thus is powerful.
Inferior power never forgets its power,
and thus is powerless.
Superior power never interferes nor has an ulterior motive.
Inferior power interferes and has an ulterior motive.
Superior humanity takes action but has no ulterior motive.
Superior morality takes action and has an ulterior motive.
Superior custom takes action, and finding no response,
stretches out arms to force it on them.
40
Returning is the movement of the Way.
Gentleness is the method of the Way.
All things in the world come from being,
and being comes from non-being.
41
When the wise hear the Way, they practice it diligently.
When the mediocre hear of the Way, they doubt it.
When the foolish hear of the Way, they laugh out loud.
If it were not laughed at, it would not be the Way.
Therefore it is said,
"The enlightenment of the Way seems like dullness;
progression in the Way seem like regression;
the even path of the Way seems to go up and down."
42
The Way produced the One;
the One produced two;
two produced three;
and three produced all things.
43
The softest things in the world overcome the hardest.
Non-being penetrates even where there is no space.
Through this I know the value of non-action.
Teaching without words and the value of non-action
are understood by few in the world.
44
Fame or your life, which do you love more?
Life or material wealth, which is more valuable?
Loss or gain, which is worse?
Therefore those who desire most spend most.
Those who hoard most lose most.
Those who are contented are not disappointed.
Those who know when to stop prevent danger.
Thus they can long endure.
45
The greatest perfection seems incomplete,
but its utility is never impaired.
The greatest fullness seems empty,
but its use cannot be exhausted.
What is most direct seems devious.
The greatest skill seems awkward.
The greatest eloquence seems like stuttering.
46
When the world lives in accord with the Way,
horses work on farms.
When the world does not live in accord with the Way,
the cavalry practices on battlefields.
47
One can know the world without going outside.
One can see the Way of heaven
without looking out the window.
The further one goes the less one knows.
Therefore the wise know without going about,
understand without seeing,
and accomplish without acting.
48
The pursuit of learning is to increase day by day.
The practice of the Way is to decrease day by day.
Less and less is done until one reaches non-action.
When nothing is done, nothing is left undone.
The world is led by not interfering.
Those who interfere cannot lead the world.
49
The wise have no mind-set.
They regard the people's minds as their own.
They are good to people who are good.
They are also good to people who are not good.
This is the power of goodness.
They are honest to those who are honest.
They are also honest to those who are dishonest.
This is the power of honesty.
The wise live in the world peacefully and harmoniously.
The people share a common heart,
and the wise treat them as their own children.
50
Coming into life and going out at death,
three out of ten people live long;
three out of ten people die early;
and three out of ten people who could live long
die early, because they have chosen the path of death.
51
The Way produces all things.
Power nourishes them.
Matter gives them physical form.
Environment shapes their abilities.
Therefore all things respect the Way and honor power.
The Way is respected, and power is honored
without anyone's order and always naturally.
53
Those with even a scrap of sense
walk on the main way and fear only straying from the path.
The main way is smooth and easy,
but people like to be side-tracked.
54
What is well established cannot be uprooted.
What is firmly held cannot slip away.
The power of sacrifice continues on
from generation to generation.
55
Those filled with power are like new-born children.
Poisonous insects will not sting them;
ferocious beasts will not pounce upon them;
predatory birds will not swoop down on them.
Their bones are pliable, their muscles tender,
but their grip is firm.
They have never known the union of man and woman,
but the organ is fully formed,
meaning that the vital essence is strong.
They may cry all day without getting hoarse,
meaning that the harmony is perfect.
To know harmony is to be in accord with the eternal.
To know the eternal is to be enlightened.
56
Those who know do not speak.
Those who speak do not know.
Close the mouth; shut the doors.
Smooth the sharpness; untie the tangles.
Dim the glare; calm the turmoil.
This is mystical unity.
Those achieving it are detached from friends and enemies,
from benefit and harm, from honor and disgrace.
Therefore they are the most valuable people in the world.
57
States are governed by justice.
Wars are waged by violations.
The world is mastered by nonintervention.
How do I know this? By this:
the more restrictions there are, the poorer the people;
the more sharp weapons, the more trouble in the state;
the more clever cunning, the more contrivances;
the more rules and regulations, the more thieves and robbers.
Therefore the wise say,
"Do not interfere, and people transform themselves.
Love peace, and people do what is right.
Do not intervene, and people prosper.
Have no desires, and people live simply."
58
When the government is relaxed, people are happy.
When the government is strict, people are anxious.
Good fortune leans on bad fortune;
bad fortune hides behind good fortune.
Who knows the results of process?
Is there no justice?
When the just become unjust, goodness becomes evil.
People have been deluded for a long time.
Therefore the wise are square but not cornered,
sharp but not cutting, straight but not strained,
brilliant but not dazzling.
59
In leading people and serving heaven
it is best to be frugal.
Being frugal is to be prepared from the start.
Being prepared from the start is to build up power.
By building up power nothing is impossible.
If nothing is impossible, then there are no limits.
Those without limits are capable of leading a country.
Those with maternal leadership can long endure.
This is to be deeply rooted in a firm foundation,
the way of long life and eternal vision.
60
Leading a large country is like cooking a small fish.
When the world is led in accord with the Way,
spirits lose their powers.
It is not that they lose their powers,
but that their powers no longer harm people.
Not only do the spirits not harm people,
but the wise also do not harm people.
Not harming each other, spiritual power grows.
61
A large country is like low land where rivers flow,
a place where everything comes together, the female of all.
The female overcomes the male with tranquillity.
Tranquillity is underneath.
A large country wins over a small country
by placing itself below the small country.
A small country wins over a large country
by placing itself below the large country.
62
The Way is sacred to all things.
It is treasure for the good and sanctuary for the bad.
Fine words can buy honor.
Good deeds can gain respect.
Though there be bad people, why reject them?
63
Act without interfering.
Work without doing.
Taste the tasteless.
Large or small, many or few, repay injury with goodness.
To act is to fail.
To grab is to lose.
Therefore the wise do not act and do not fail.
They do not grab and do not lose.
In handling things people usually fail
when they are about to succeed.
Be as careful at the end as at the beginning,
and there will be no failure.
65
The ancients who ruled skillfully
did not try to enlighten people but kept them in the dark.
People are hard to lead when they are too clever.
Those who lead with cleverness rob the country.
Those who lead without cleverness bless the country.
Understanding these two is to know the eternal standard.
Knowing the eternal standard is mystical power.
Mystical power is deep and far-reaching,
leading all things to return to perfect harmony.
66
Great rivers and seas are lords of all mountain streams,
because they are good at staying below them.
Therefore they are lords of the streams.
Thus the wise in watching over the people
speak humbly from below the people,
and in leading the people get behind them.
In this way the wise watch over the people
but do not oppress them;
they lead the people but do not block them.
Thus everyone happily goes along without getting tired.
Because they do not compete,
the world cannot compete with them.
67
Everyone says the Way is great and beyond comparison.
Because it is great, it cannot be compared.
If it were compared, it already would have seemed small.
68
The best soldier is not violent.
The best fighter is not angry.
The best winner is not contentious.
The best employer is humble.
This is known as the power of not striving,
as ability in human relations,
and as being in accord with heaven.
69
The strategists say,
"Do not be the aggressor but the defender.
Do not advance an inch, but retreat a foot instead."
This is movement without moving,
stretching the arm without showing it,
confronting enemies with the idea there is no enemy,
holding in the hand no weapons.
No disaster is greater than underestimating the enemy.
Underestimating the enemy will destroy my treasures.
Thus when the battle is joined,
it is the kind who will win.
70
My ideas are easy to understand and easy to practice.
Yet no one understands them or practices them.
My ideas have a source; my actions have a master.
Because people do not understand this, they do not know me.
Since few know me, I am very precious.
Therefore the wise wear coarse clothes
and keep the jewel inside.
71
To know that you do not know is the best.
To think you know when you do not is a disease.
Recognizing this disease as a disease is to be free of it.
The wise are free of disease,
because they recognize the disease as a disease.
Therefore they are free of disease.
72
When people lack a sense of awe,
then something awful will happen.
Do not constrict people's living space.
Do not suppress their livelihoods.
If you do not harass them, they will not harass you.
73
Those brave in killing will be killed.
Those brave in not killing will live.
Of these two, one is beneficial, and one is harmful.
Some are not favored by heaven. Who knows why?
Even the wise consider it a difficult question.
74
If people are not afraid to die,
then why threaten them with death?
If people were afraid of death,
and lawbreakers could be caught and put to death,
who would dare to do so?
There is the Lord of Death who executes.
Trying to do his job
is like trying to cut wood for the Master Carpenter.
Those who try to cut wood for the Master Carpenter
rarely escape injuring their own hands.
75
People are hungry,
because rulers eat too much tax-grain.
That is why people are starving.
76
When people are born, they are tender and supple.
At death they are stiff and hard.
All things, like plants and trees,
are tender and pliant while alive.
At death they are dried and withered.
Therefore the stiff and hard are companions of death.
The tender and supple are companions of life.
Thus strong arms do not win.
A stiff tree will break.
The hard and strong will fall.
The tender and supple will rise.
77
The Way of heaven is like bending a bow.
The high is lowered; the low is raised.
The excessive is reduced; the deficient is increased.
The Way of heaven takes from those who have too much
and gives to those who do not have enough.
78
Nothing in the world is softer and weaker than water.
Yet nothing is better at attacking the hard and strong.
There is no substitute for it.
The weak overcomes the strong; the soft overcomes the hard.
Everyone knows this, but no one puts it into practice.
79
Compromising with great hatred surely leaves some hatred.
How can this be considered good?
Therefore the wise keep their part of an agreement
and do not blame the other party.
The good fulfill their obligations;
the bad exact obligations from others.
The Way of heaven is impartial.
It always stays with the good.
80
In a small country with few people
machines that can work ten or a hundred times faster
are not needed.
People who care about death do not travel far.
Even if there are ships and carriages, no one takes them.
Even if there are armor and weapons, no one displays them.
People return to knotted rope for records.
Food is tasty; clothes are beautiful;
home is comfortable; customs are delightful.
Though neighboring communities see each other
and hear each other's cocks crowing and dogs barking,
they may grow old and die without going there.
81
True words are not beautiful.
Beautiful words are not truthful.
The good do not argue.
Those who argue are not good.
Those who know are not scholarly.
The scholarly do not know.
Note to:
50: The thirteen organs of life may refer to the nine openings in the body and the four
limbs.
Copyright 1996, 2002 by Sanderson Beck
This has been published in the WISDOM BIBLE as a book. For ordering information,
please click here.
This text is also available as spoken by Sanderson Beck on CD.
BECK index
Daoism and Mo-zi
Lao-zi
Mo-zi
Teachings of Mo-zi
Moism
Zhuang-zi
Lie-zi
Songs of Chu
Huainan-zi
This chapter has been published in the book CHINA, KOREA & JAPAN to 1800. For
ordering information please click here.
From the sixth to the third century BC the chaotic times of conflicts and wars somehow
produced a golden age of philosophy in China comparable to what was going on India
and Greece. This period of a "hundred contending schools" began with Confucius and an
obscure philosopher named Lao-zi, who left a short book that has had an immense
influence on China and the world called the Dao De Jing and which became the basis for
the Daoist philosophy and religion. A century later Mo-zi founded an original philosophy
which was prominent for two centuries.
Lao-zi
The historian Sima Qian tells us that Lao-zi lived during the sixth century BC in the state
of Chu and was the keeper of the archives in the imperial capital at Luoyang. Those who
held this position were usually skilled in divination and astrology. The historian also
relates that Lao-zi met Confucius once and criticized him for his pride and ambition, but
Confucius could only compare Lao-zi to the powerful symbol of a dragon. Little else is
known of the life of Lao-zi except the legend that when in old age he was leaving Chu, he
was stopped by the guardian of the pass into the state of Qin and asked to write down his
wisdom. In three days he produced a book of 5,250 characters known as the Dao De Jing,
which means the "classic of the way and its virtue (power)" or simply Way Power Book.
Some scholars place Lao-zi in the fourth century BC, because he is not mentioned by
anyone else until then.
It is often difficult to accept the ethics of Lao-zi without first understanding the mystical
ideas in his philosophy, which is based on an all-pervading unity he called the way (dao).
This way is the source of heaven and earth and the mother of all things. Its essence can be
seen by the desireless; those who desire see its manifestations. From this unity comes the
duality of relative opposites (yin-yang) such as beauty and ugliness, good and bad, being
and non-being, difficult and easy, long and short, high and low, male and female,
beginning and end, and so on. In a patriarchal and male-dominated age, Lao-zi saw the
value of relying on the female aspect of the universe by being receptive, sensitive,
nourishing, etc. Thus he believed the wise give life but do not take possession, act but do
not rely on their own ability, accomplish but claim no credit.
Lao-zi saw a way of not competing by not exalting the worthy nor valuing rare treasure
nor displaying objects of desire so that people's hearts will not be disturbed. The wise
keep their hearts pure, their bellies full, their ambitions weak, and their bones strong.
They act without interfering with the natural flow so that all may live in peace. The way
is eternally present and infinitely useful as the fountainhead of all things; it came before
any personified concept of God. This transcendental nature is beyond morality and
therefore not humane. Mystically it is empty yet inexhaustible; the more it is used the
more it produces. Yet much talk can be exhausting; it is better to keep to the center.
Lao-zi revered the spirit of the valley as the mystic female that never dies and is the root
of heaven and earth. The wise are humble like water, which flows to the lowest level; yet
they come near the way.
Moderation is taught, as extremes of wealth and honor cannot be kept safe or lead to a
downfall. Heaven's way is to withdraw as soon as one's work is done. Lao-zi asked if one
can concentrate one's vital force to be gentle like a baby, attain mystic clarity, love people
and govern the state without interfering, play the female in opening the doors of heaven,
and understand all without using the mind. Mystical virtue gives birth and nourishes
without taking possession, acts without obligation, and leads without dominating. The
usefulness of things is found in the freedom of their empty spaces. The way is invisible,
inaudible, and intangible. The wise go beyond the senses and satisfy the inner self.
Troubles come from being selfish. Those who value the world as themselves may be
entrusted to care for the world.
The way to make sense of a muddy world is to let it be still until it becomes clear. Those
who are calm and do not overextend themselves can come back to life through activity,
but not wearing out they are not replaced. In serenity one can see everything return to its
source like vegetation that grows and flourishes. Returning to the source is to know the
eternal and be enlightened, impartial, universal, and in accord with heaven and the way.
Not to know the eternal is to act blindly and court disaster.
The worst leaders are those who are hated; the next worst are feared; the next are loved
and praised; but the best are those the people barely know, such that they say, "We did it
ourselves." When the way is forgotten, the doctrines of humanity and morality arise.
Knowledge and cleverness lead to hypocrisy. When family relationships are not
harmonious, filial piety is advocated. When a country falls into chaos, loyal patriots are
praised. Lao-zi suggested abandoning religion and cleverness, humanity and morality,
skill and profit, and recommended instead simplicity, the natural, controlling selfishness,
and reducing desires. Yielding can preserve unity; bending can straighten; emptying
oneself can be fulfilling; wearing oneself out leads to renewal; having little is to be
content, while having abundance is troubling. Because the wise do not compete, no one
can compete with them.
Lao-zi observed that those standing on tiptoe are not steady; those straining their strides
cannot keep up; those displaying themselves do not illuminate; those justifying
themselves are not distinguished; those making claims are not given credit; and those
seeking glory are not leaders. Frivolous and hasty leaders lose their foundation and self-
mastery. The wise are good at helping people so that no one is rejected, and they are good
at saving things so that nothing is wasted. Thus the good can teach the bad, who are the
lessons for the good.
Those who try to take over the world do not succeed; tampering with it spoils it, and
seizing it loses it. Lao-zi opposed conquest by force of arms, because it rebounds. When
armies march, scarcity and famine follow. The skillful achieve their purposes and stop
without relying on violence, which is contrary to the way. Whatever is contrary to the
way will soon perish. Weapons are tools of destruction hated by the people, and followers
of the way never use them. Peaceful leaders favor the creative left; war favors the
destructive right. When the use of weapons cannot be avoided, the best policy is calm
restraint. Victory is not glorious, and those who celebrate it delight in slaughter; such
killing should be mourned. Sharp weapons of the state should not be displayed. Lao-zi
taught what many taught before him - that the violent die a violent death. This he made
primary in his teaching.
Virtue does not emphasize its power, and thus is powerful. The inferior never forget their
power, and thus are powerless. The best virtue does not interfere nor have an ulterior
motive. Lesser virtue interferes with an ulterior motive. Humanity takes action without an
ulterior motive, while morality takes action with an ulterior motive. Rules of propriety
take action, and finding no response, force it on them. Thus when the way is lost, things
degenerate from virtue to humanity to morality to the rules of propriety, which is the
superficial expression of loyalty and faithfulness and the beginning of disorder. By
attaining oneness heaven becomes clear, earth stable, spirits divine, valleys fertile,
creatures alive and growing, and kings leaders.
When people live in accord with the way, horses work on farms; but when they do not,
the cavalry practices in the parks. The greatest temptation to crime is desire; the greatest
curse is discontent; the greatest calamity is greed. The wise have no fixed mind-set but
regard the people's minds as their own. They are good to the good and bad, honest to the
honest and dishonest, living peacefully and harmoniously sharing a common heart and
treating the people as their own children. The mystical virtue nourishes, cares for,
develops, shelters, comforts, nurtures, and protects, producing without possessing,
helping without obligating, and guiding without controlling. When the fields are full of
weeds and the granaries are empty, while some wear fancy clothes, carry sharp swords,
over-indulge in food and drink, having more possessions than they can use, the leaders
are robbers; this is not the way.
States are governed by justice, and wars are waged by violations. Yet the world can be
mastered by non-intervention.
When government is relaxed, people are happy; but when it is strict, they are anxious.
When those responsible for justice become unjust, what seems good becomes evil. Lao-zi
recommended frugality to be prepared from the start and in order to build up inner power.
Those with maternal leadership can long endure. Governing a large country is like
cooking a small fish; one must be careful not to overdo it. As the female overcomes the
male with tranquillity, a country can win over a small or large country by placing itself
below. The difficult can be handled while it is still easy. Great accomplishments begin
with what is small. The wise always confront difficulties before they get too large.
Handle them before they appear. Organize before there is confusion. Be as careful at the
end as at the beginning, and there will be no failure.
The wise in watching over people speak humbly from below them and in leading them
get behind them. Thus they do not oppress them nor block them, but everyone happily
goes along without getting tired. From Lao-zi's three treasures of love, frugality, and not
pushing oneself ahead of others come courage, generosity, and leadership. Love wins all
battles and is the strongest defense, heaven giving it to save and protect. The best soldier
is nonviolent; the best fighter is not angry; the best employer is humble. Strategy says not
to be the aggressor but the defender; instead of advancing, retreat. This paradoxically is
movement without moving, stretching the arm without showing it, confronting enemies
with the idea there is no enemy, while holding in the hand no weapons. No disaster is
worse than underestimating the enemy; but when the battle is joined, the kind will win.
Those brave in killing will be killed, while those brave in not killing will live. The way of
heaven does not strive; yet it wins easily.
Like Confucius, Lao-zi found that the best knowledge is to know that you do not know,
and like Socrates he found that thinking you know when you do not is a disease. By
recognizing this disease, the wise are free of it. Since people are not afraid to die, why
threaten them with it? Those who try to do the work of the Lord of Death by executing
rarely escape injuring their own hands. Only those who do not interfere with living are
best at valuing life. The way of heaven takes from those who have too much and gives to
those who do not have enough, but the human way is just the opposite. Only the person
of the way has enough to give to the world. The wise do not hoard; but the more they
give, the more they have. Those who bear the humiliation of the people can minister to
them, and those who take on the sins of the society can lead the world. Lao-zi envisioned
a simple society in which food is tasty, clothes are beautiful, home is comfortable, and
customs are delightful so that people feel no need to travel. The way of heaven sharpens
but does not harm and accomplishes without striving.
Mo-zi
Confucius died in 479 BC, and about ten years later Mo-zi was born in the same state of
Lu; he probably died about twenty years before Mencius was born in 371 BC. According
to the Huainan-zi in the second century BC, Mo-zi had the same kind of traditional
education in the six classics as Confucius but was critical of some Confucian ideas such
as elaborate funerals and therefore rejected Zhou traditions in favor of the older Xia.
Judging by the wagon-load of books Mo-zi took with him when he went to Wei as an
envoy, he was quite a scholar. Since the purpose of his learning was to practice justice
and teach others to do so also, Mo-zi became a minister in the state of Song and also
traveled to different states to advise rulers on how they could apply his teachings. The
Huainan-zi stated that Mo-zi never stayed anywhere long enough to make the seat warm.
It goes on to say that for sages no mountains are too high and no rivers too wide; they
bear shame and humiliation to advise rulers, not for wealth or position but merely to
benefit the world and eliminate human catastrophes. Mo-zi was such a man.
Mo-zi sent his writing to King Hui (ruled Chu 488-432 BC), who called it an excellent
work but felt he was too old to receive him. Mu Ho, who was assigned to receive him,
asked Mo-zi why his great Lord should employ the ideas of a humble man. Mo-zi
explained that even the emperor takes the roots of herbs if their medicine is applicable.
Once when asked by a rustic in Lu why Mo-zi used so much verbosity, since justice was
just a word, he explained that justice has the power to serve people and produce wealth.
Mo-zi thought of being a farmer to feed people or a weaver to clothe people or a soldier
to defend people; but he decided that if he could persuade rulers to adopt his principles of
justice, then states would be orderly, and the benefit would be greater than by plowing or
weaving. A friend said he was foolish for persisting in the struggle for justice, since he
was almost alone. Mo-zi replied that like the farmer who had only one son out of ten
actually working, his efforts should be encouraged even more.
Gong Shu-zi invented grappling hooks and rams for Chu and asked Mo-zi if he had any
device as good in his justice. Mo-zi said that he pulled with love and pushed with respect,
because without love there is no intimacy and without respect there is rapid desecration,
which without intimacy leads to separation. Thus mutual love and respect bring mutual
benefit, but to pull in order to stop retreat and to push to stop an advance is nothing but
mutual injury.
Mo-zi already had three hundred disciples when Gong Shu Ban of Chu completed his
preparations for attacking Song. Hearing of it, Mo-zi walked ten days and nights from Qi,
having to tear off pieces of clothing to wrap up his feet. He saw Gong Shu Ban in the Chu
capital at Ying, telling him that someone had humiliated him; Mo-zi wanted him to
murder the man for him and offered him a reward. Gong Shu-zi declared that his
principles were against murdering people. So Mo-zi bowed and asked him why he was
preparing to attack Song. The state of Chu is large and has plenty, while innocent Song is
small in territory with few people. It does not seem wise to destroy what is scarce in order
to strive for what is already plentiful. Nor does a principle that allows the killing of many
but not a few seem consistent. Gong Shu Ban was convinced by these arguments but said
that he could not stop it, because he had promised his Lord.
So Mo-zi saw the Lord and used similar analogies about a man who has much taking
from those with little; for Chu to attack Song would be violating justice for no advantage.
The Lord turned to Gong Shu Ban, who had already constructed the scaling ladders. So
Mo-zi untied his belt, laid out a city on the floor, and defended it nine times against nine
different machines using his stick as a weapon. Mo-zi knew that he could be put down if
he were murdered; but he warned them that his three hundred disciples were already
armed with implements of defense on the walls of Song. Thus the Lord of Chu decided
not to attack Song after all. Several of Mo-zi's writings are on the subjects of
fortifications and defense against attacks from an elevation, with ladders, a sally,
tunneling, and an ant-rush. On his way back home through Song, Mo-zi was refused
shelter from the rain by a guard at a mountain pass, but he took it philosophically, saying
that a man who cultivates himself spiritually is not recognized by the multitude.
Gong Shang Guo, after talking with Mo-zi, recommended him to the Lord of Yueh, who
sent fifty wagons to Lu to induce Mo-zi to come and instruct him, promising also a large
piece of land in the former state of Wu. Yet Mo-zi only asked for the food and clothing
necessary for his body; but if the Lord of Yueh was not going to listen to his words, he
did not need to go outside of the empire to sell his justice. When Lu's master of sacrifice
offered one pig and asked for a hundred blessings, Mo-zi said that to give little but expect
much from others would make them afraid of gifts.
When the Lord of Lu was afraid that Qi was going to attack him, he asked Mo-zi if there
was any remedy. Mo-zi suggested that he revere heaven and the spirits above while
loving and benefiting the people below; he should humble his speech, befriend the
neighboring lords, and lead his state in serving Qi. Mo-zi also advised the general of Qi
that to attack Lu was wrong, and he gave examples from history how large states had
attacked small states and been defeated by the vengeance of the feudal lords. He asked
the Grand Lord of Qi who would be cursed for capturing a state, ruining an army, and
destroying the people, and after deliberation the Lord realized that it would be himself.
In Wei as an envoy Mo-zi cautioned Gong Liang Huan-zi that a small state like Wei
between Qi and Jin is like a poor family in the midst of rich families; the poor family that
imitates the rich in extravagance will be ruined. If the money spent on luxuries was
devoted to self-defense in this emergency, the state would be more secure. Sima Qian's
Historical Records mention that Mo-zi was imprisoned in Song on the advice of Zi Han,
who in 404 BC murdered Duke Zhao of Song. The historian also credited Mo-zi with
being skilled at defense and practicing frugality.
Mo-zi had recommended Cao Gong-zi to the state of Song, and after three years he
returned complaining of the frugal food and clothing in Mo-zi's school; now several
members of his family have died, six animals have not bred, and he himself has suffered
ailments. Mo-zi replied that he was not fair, because the man did not give up his position
to the virtuous, did not share his wealth with the poor, and then merely served the spirits
by sacrificing to them. This was like shutting one of a hundred gates and then wondering
how the thieves entered.
In 393 BC Prince Wen of Lu Yang was planning to attack Zheng. Mo-zi went to stop him
and asked him what he would do if his large cities attacked his small cities, killing the
people and taking their goods. Prince Wen replied that he would punish them severely, to
which Mo-zi asked whether heaven would punish him if he attacked Zheng. Prince Wen,
however, felt that it was the will of heaven, because they had murdered their lords for
three generations and had already suffered three hard years of heaven's punishment. Mo-
zi posed the case of a father, who was punishing his son when the neighbor's father struck
his son, saying it is in accord with the father's will. If a lord attacks neighboring states,
kills their people, takes away their goods, and then writes down how powerful he is, is
that any better than a common man who does the same thing to his neighbors? Prince
Wen then realized that what the world takes for granted may not be right after all. Mo-zi
said that gentlemen of the world know only trifles, not what is important. If a man steals
a pig, they call him wrong; but if a state is stolen, they call it just. Finally Prince Wen
referred to the barbarians who practice cannibalism; but Mo-zi complained that in the
civilized world, instead of killing the father to reward the son, they kill the sons (in war)
to reward the fathers.
Mo-zi had a school and recommended several of his disciples for political positions in
Chu, Wei, and Song. He sent Sheng Zhuo to serve Xiang-zi Niu, who invaded Lu three
times accompanied by Sheng Zhuo. So Mo-zi sent Gao Sun-zi to call him back, saying
that he sent Zhuo there to cure pride and regulate insolence; but Zhuo was drawing a
large salary and flattering his master. For Mo-zi, to preach justice and not do it is an
intentional wrong. He thought Zhuo knew better, but his justice had been overcome by
the emolument.
Mo-zi praised his disciple Gao Shi-zi for leaving the Lord of Wei after his counsels were
ignored three times, because when the way is not being observed in the world, a superior
person does not stay in a position of plenty. However, when Gao-zi said that he could
administer a country, Mo-zi replied that to govern is to carry out what one teaches. As the
students of Mo-zi already knew, Gao-zi did not behave according to what he taught,
which means he himself was in revolt. Being unable to govern himself, how could he
govern a country?
Teachings of Mo-zi
Mo-zi felt that one should not criticize others without having an alternative to offer them.
He suggested universal love instead of partiality. How can this be done? If people were to
regard other states as they regard their own, they would not attack one another; for it
would be like attacking one's own state.
The universal person regards one's friend the same as oneself and the father of one's
friend as one's father. Only the person who does this can be considered a truly superior
person. Such a person will feed people when they are hungry, clothe them when they are
cold, nourish them when they are sick, and bury them when they die. The selfish person
will not. To which type of person will one trust the support of one's parents? To the
universal person or the selfish one? Even if one does not believe in universal love, that
person would trust his or her family to the universal person. Thus people criticize
universal love in words but adopt it in practice. Also if people had to choose between
these two types of rulers, which would they follow?
If we want other people to love and benefit our parents, then we must make it a point first
to love and benefit others' parents. Thus Mo-zi showed how universal love and mutual
benefit can be profitable and easy, but the only trouble is that no ruler delights in them. If
rulers did adopt them, Mo-zi predicted that the people would turn to universal love and
mutual benefit as naturally as fire turns upward and water flows downward. This is the
way of the ancient sage kings to bring about safety for the rulers and officials and to
assure ample food and clothing for the people. If this is put into practice, rulers will be
generous, subjects loyal, fathers kind, sons filial, older brothers friendly, and younger
brothers respectful.
In his "Honoring the Worthy" Mo-zi acknowledged that rulers and officials all want their
states to be wealthy, their populations numerous, and their administrations well ordered,
but he found that they are poor, few, and chaotic. Mo-zi recommended that those
governing honor the worthy and employ the capable so that government will be more
effective and the people prosperous. Also those without ability must be demoted in order
to do away with private likes and dislikes. Mo-zi taught that when the wise rule, there
will be order; but when the stupid rule over the wise, there will be chaos. Thus the
ancient sage kings honored the worthy and employed the capable without showing any
special consideration for their own kin, no partiality for the eminent and rich, and no
favoritism for the good-looking. Thus the people were encouraged by these rewards to
become more capable, and the sage kings listened to the worthy, watched their actions,
observed their abilities, and assigned them to the proper office.
To accomplish this three principles must be followed: first, the positions of the worthy
must be exalted enough so that the people will respect them; second, the salaries must be
generous so that people will have confidence in them; and third, their orders must be
enforced so that people will be in awe of them. According to Mo-zi in the ancient times
worthy men who accomplished anything gave the credit to the ruler, while all grudges
and complaints were directed against subordinates so that the ruler always had peace and
joy, while the ministers handled the cares and sorrows. The ruler, however, must be
willing to delegate responsibility and pay out stipends. The unworthy steal and plunder in
government and, if assigned a city, betray their trust or rebel. They do not know to
employ the capable but instead hire their relatives and those who happen to be eminent or
attractive.
In "Identifying with One's Superior" Mo-zi speculated that at first people lived in chaos,
because each person had their own views; this resulted in conflict. Eventually people
chose the most capable as leaders so that government could be unified and under
intelligent direction. The son of heaven (emperor) then appointed high ministers, who
helped regulate the feudal lords and chiefs, who in turn chose the worthy and able to act
as officials. Then the son of heaven proclaimed the principle that anyone hearing of good
or evil must report it to one's superior. The judgments of the superior are to be respected;
but if a superior commits a fault, the subordinates are to remonstrate. Those who do good
are to be rewarded and those who do evil punished, and the greatest care must be taken
that these are just.
However, Mo-zi also believed that the people should not only identify with the son of
heaven but with heaven itself, or else there will be no end to calamities, which are
punishments from heaven. Someone asked Mo-zi why then was there such disorder in the
empire. Mo-zi used the example of the barbarian Miao to explain that punishments must
be applied with instruction and admonition or else they become mere tortures. Originally
government intended to benefit people and eliminate adversity, to help the poor, increase
the few, bring safety where there was danger, and restore order where there was
confusion. At the present, however, administration is carried on by court flattery, and
fathers and brothers and other relatives and friends are appointed rulers of the people.
Since people realize that they have not been appointed for the welfare of the people, they
do not respect them nor identify with them. Thus the purposes of government are not
unified; rewards do not encourage people to do good; and punishments do not restrain
them from doing evil.
The ancient sage kings had many to help them see and hear, because they could trust their
staff in administering. Virtuous people, even far away, were found and rewarded, while
the wicked were also punished; thieves and robbers could not find refuge anywhere. Mo-
zi believed that whoever asks the people to identify with their superiors must love them
dearly, or else they will not trust the ruler and obey orders. People can be led with the
rewards of wealth and honor ahead of them and pushed from behind with just
punishments.
Mo-zi wrote most vehemently against offensive warfare. Everyone condemns stealing
and violence against others on an individual level. Yet when it comes to the greater
injustice of offensive warfare against other states, gentlemen do not know enough to
condemn it; instead they praise it and call it just. To kill one person is a capital crime; but
when states kill hundreds, they praise it and write down the record for posterity. Mo-zi
complained that the feudal lords of his day continued to attack and annex their
neighboring states, claiming they were honoring justice.
The ancient sage kings strove to unite the world in harmony to bring people together.
Contemporary rulers examine the relative merits of their soldiers and weapons and then
set off to attack some innocent state, where they cut down the crops, fell trees, raze walls,
fill in moats and ponds, slaughter animals, burn temples, and massacre the people,
carrying away their treasures. The soldiers are urged on with the idea that to die is the
highest honor, and the penalty for running away is death. Does this benefit heaven? It is
attacking the people of heaven. Does this benefit humans? Mo-zi ironically wrote, "But
murdering men is a paltry way to benefit them indeed, and when we calculate the
expenditures for such warfare we find that they have crippled the basis of the nation's
livelihood and exhausted the resources of the people to an incalculable degree."5
Mo-zi recounted how many hundreds of officials and how many thousands of soldiers
were required for these expeditions that might last several years. Meanwhile officials
must neglect government, farmers their crops, and women their weaving. If one-fifth of
the supplies and weapons are salvaged afterwards, it is considered fortunate. Countless
men will desert or die of starvation, cold, and sickness. He asked if it is not perverse that
rulers and officials delight in the injury and extermination of the people of the world.
Usually it is the larger states like Qi, Jin, Chu, and Yue that attack the smaller ones,
which is like destroying what one does not have enough of for the sake of what one
already has in excess. In this way many states have been made extinct, while hardly more
than these four powerful states remain. The world has become as weary as a little boy
who has spent the day playing horse.
Mo-zi wished there were someone, who would conduct diplomacy in good faith and think
first of how to benefit others, who would feel concerned with others when a large state
commits an unjust act, who when a large state attacked a small one would with others
help rescue the small state, who would help small states repair their defenses and get
supplies of cloth and grain and funds; then the smaller states would be pleased. If others
struggle while one is at ease, and if one is merciful and generous, the people will be won
over. If one substitutes good government for offensive warfare and spends less on the
army, one will gain rich benefits. If one acts according to justice and sets an example for
others, then one will have no enemies and bring incalculable benefit to the world.
Mo-zi believed that heaven knows of the crimes people commit. Heaven loves justice and
hates injustice. If we lead the people to devote themselves to justice, then we are doing
what heaven wants. How does one know heaven wants justice? In the world where there
is justice there is life, wealth, and order, and where there is no justice there is death,
poverty, and disorder. Since heaven desires life, wealth, and order, it follows that it
desires justice. Whoever obeys the will of heaven by loving all people universally and
working for their benefit will be rewarded. Those who disobey the will of heaven by
showing partiality and hatred and in injuring others will surely incur punishment. The
former regard justice as right, but the latter believe force is right.
Heaven desires that those who have strength work for others, those with wealth share
with others, those above attend diligently to government, and those below diligently carry
out their tasks so that the state will be well ordered. When the state avoids armed clashes
on its borders, when it devotes its efforts to feeding the hungry, giving rest to the weary,
and taking care of its subjects, then human relations will be good. Mo-zi believed that
heaven loves the world universally and seeks mutual benefit for all creatures. There is not
even the tip of a hair that is not the work of heaven. For Mo-zi the will of heaven was like
the compass to the wheelwright or a square to a carpenter; it is the standard to measure
government as well as words and actions. The sage kings devoted themselves to
universality and shunned partiality, but the feudal lords regard might as right.
Mo-zi also believed in spiritual beings and the spirits of the ancestors. As evidence he
cited that countless people in the world have seen or heard such beings. He was critical of
those who believed in fate, because he felt they lacked benevolence. Mo-zi had three tests
to judge the validity of any theory. First, what is the origin of the theory and how does it
compare to the ancient sage kings? Second, how does it compare to the evidence of
people's eyes and ears? Third, when it is put into practice, does it bring benefit to people?
On the first, the sage kings never declared that good fortune cannot be sought nor bad
fortune avoided nor that being reverent will not help you nor doing evil not harm you.
Fatalism would overthrow justice in the world and replace it with fate. However, when
the just are in authority, the world will be better. Thus the ancient sage kings provided for
rewards and punishments in order to encourage good and prevent evil. Secondly then,
people are loving to their parents and friendly to their neighbors, because they know from
their own experience that their actions can affect their destinies. Thirdly, if fatalism was
accepted, those above would not attend to the affairs of state and those below would not
pursue their tasks, resulting in disorder and poverty.
Mo-zi's three tests of validity can be considered an examination of the past, present, and
future. The basis of a doctrine is found in the past history of the early kings; it can be
verified by present-day experience; and the pragmatic test applies the theory to see how it
works.
Mo-zi also wrote against his rival school of the Confucians, but many of his arguments
seem to be exaggerated and unfair to actual Confucian philosophy and practices. Mo-zi
accused them of considering heaven unintelligent and spirits inanimate. He railed against
their elaborate funerals with weeping lasting three years, and he felt their music, singing,
and dancing were ruining the empire. Mo-zi criticized Confucians for supporting wars
and having enemies and accused several individuals of participating in revolts. Mo-zi
also accused the Confucians of fatalism. When a Confucian disciple complained that his
accusations were false and too extreme, Mo-zi denied it. However, the truth was surely
clear to intelligent people, and this bitter rivalry on Mo-zi's part may have been one of the
main factors in discrediting the credibility of his own school.
Moism
For about two centuries the school of Mo was the main rival of the Confucians.
According to Han Fei-zi (d. 233 BC), after Mo-zi's death his school split into three
branches, which could explain why most of his treatises were preserved in three versions.
Zhuang-zi explained that these schools quibbled over logical questions and called each
other heretics, but they all respected the writings of Mo-zi and the "Elder Master."
The first Elder Master named Fu Dun in the state of Qin refused to suspend the capital
punishment of his son for murder because of his devotion to justice. Meng Sheng, the
second Elder Master, was given land by the prince of Yang Cheng. When the king of Jing
died, the ministers rose against Wu Qi, and the prince of Yang Cheng had to flee. The
state of Jing demanded Meng Sheng's land, but he had promised not to give it up without
the matching tally (representing the contract). Meng Sheng chose death as the only
honorable solution. His disciple Xu Ro tried to talk him out of it, but failing cut off his
own head to prepare the way for his master. After he passed the Elder Mastership on to
Tian Xiang-zi of Song, Meng Sheng and also 183 of his followers committed suicide.
These accounts are from essays on the Spring and Autumn of Lu, but a contradiction
arises when we discover that the scholar Sun Yi Rang listed these three Elder Masters
and Meng Sheng's disciple Xu Ro as the fourth Elder Master. The author of the essays
also listed several followers of Mo who had been convicted criminals.
Xun-zi recorded how a follower of Mo-zi named Song-zi explained how realizing that to
be insulted is not a dishonor can prevent struggles. People fight because they feel they are
dishonored by an insult. When they discover that it is not a dishonor to be insulted, they
will struggle no more. Yet in the Period of Warring States Moism had to face the
criticism of realists like Guan-zi, who warned that if agitation for disarmament
triumphed, strategic points would no longer be guarded; and if the doctrine of universal
love prevailed, soldiers would no longer fight. Moism was also criticized for its frugality
in regard to funerals and music by Mencius, who also complained that love without
difference of degree was unrealistic when the manifestation of love must begin with our
parents.
Xun-zi also criticized Mo-zi for worrying unnecessarily about insufficiency and accused
him of causing poverty in the empire by condemning music and economizing too much
on expenditures. He felt Mo-zi's recommendations of coarse clothing and poor food
undiluted by amusement were too stringent and caused anxiety.
Although Zhuang-zi considered Mo-zi "one of the greatest souls in the world," he
likewise criticized him for being too strict in economizing on funerals and music. Mo-zi
himself and some of his followers might be able to follow this extreme asceticism, but it
made most people uncomfortable and unhappy and thus was difficult to practice. Zhuang-
zi felt that people will express joy in singing and grief in wailing, and so he questioned
whether condemning these expressions was in accordance with human nature.
Both Confucianism and Moism were persecuted by the Qin empire, but according to the
Huainan-zi both teachings were revived and systematized. However, Moism soon passed
out of fashion and was neglected by Chinese culture, though fortunately his writings were
passed on by scholars, and his philosophy could be studied.
Zhuang-zi
Zhuang-zi lived in the state of Song through most of the fourth century BC, probably
dying shortly after 300 BC. According to the historian Sima Qian he preferred to please
himself and turned down an offer to be prime minister of Chu from King Wei, who ruled
from 339 to 329 BC. Zhuang-zi wrote that he would rather drag his tail in the mud like a
living turtle than be sacrificed like a sacred tortoise in the Great Temple. The book of a
hundred thousand characters named after him was probably added to by later disciples in
his imaginative and mystical style. Though he did not call himself a Daoist, Zhuang-zi
respected Lao-zi more than any other philosopher, and the way and its power or virtue is
certainly central in his philosophy.
In the first and last chapters the Zhuang-zi refers to Song Keng, a philosopher Mencius
met going to Chu to try to persuade the king not to fight with Qin using the argument that
war is unprofitable, an idea Mencius criticized. Xun-zi described Song Keng as teaching
that human desires are little, although everyone supposes their own passions are great.
Xun-zi believed that Song Keng could not see that desires are many and felt he did not
know the value of virtue. Xun-zi credited Song Keng for showing clearly that it is no
disgrace to receive an insult and that when people realize this, they will not fight.
According to Xun-zi, Song Keng worked to check aggression and proposed disarmament,
and so he considered him a Moist; he felt Song did too much for others and not enough
for himself. Zhuang-zi likewise considered the checking of aggression and disarmament
proposals were the external achievement, while desiring few things was the inner
cultivation of Song Keng and Yin Wen. The legalist Han Fei-zi wrote that Song Keng
preached not fighting, not making enemies, not feeling shame for being in prison nor
disgrace for being insulted, and he was honored by the rulers of the world for being
liberal-minded.
In the first chapter "Free and Easy Wandering" Zhuang-zi wrote that Song Keng would
burst out laughing at a man who had enough wisdom to fill one office, good conduct to
impress one community, virtue to please one ruler, and talent enough to serve one state.
Such was Song Keng's equanimity that he would not exert himself if the whole world
praised him nor would he mope if the whole world condemned him, for he drew a clear
line between the internal and external, recognizing the boundaries of true glory and
disgrace. In the last chapter the Zhuang-zi discusses philosophers and says that Song
Keng and Yin Wen designed caps flat like Mount Hua to symbolize equality and peace.
They preached liberality of mind to bring people together in harmony and assure concord.
They walked everywhere to persuade those above them and teach those below them to
end human strife, outlaw aggression, and abolish the use of arms in order to rescue the
world from warfare. Asking for only five pints of rice, Zhuang-zi was afraid these
teachers did not get their fill. Even though their disciples were hungry, they never forgot
the rest of the world, being determined that everyone should live; even though the world
refused to listen, they never stopped asking to be seen, working for the external goal of
outlawing aggression and weapons and for the internal goal of lessening desires.
Zhuang-zi also described how Shen Dao and others heard of the views of the ancients and
discarded knowledge and any distinction between right and wrong, but he decided that
this was not the true way. He observed that the logician Hui Shih could not seem to find
any peace for himself but went on separating and analyzing everything without achieving
anything. Zhuang-zi liked the views of Lao-zi best - knowing the male but clinging to the
female and becoming the valley of the world. In the end the Zhuang-zi refers to the
writings of Zhuang Zhou as a string of queer beads and baubles with outlandish terms
and bombastic language but which do not look at things from one angle only or with
partisanship; yet they do no one any harm.
Zhuang-zi pitied humans fixed in their bodily forms, pathetically clashing with things,
laboring to the end of their days and never knowing where to look for rest. "Are humans
not muddled?" he asked. When the way relies on little accomplishments and vain show,
then we have the rights and wrongs of the Confucians and the Moists, but they call each
others' rights wrongs; the best thing is clarity. There is always a this and a that, but the
wise see that they both have right and wrong in them. The consciousness which no longer
finds their opposites is the hinge of the way, seeing both the right and wrong as a single
infinity.
A road is made by people walking on it; things are so, because they are called so. Only
the person of far-reaching vision is able to make them into one. The wise harmonize both
right and wrong and rest in heaven the equalizer. Zhuang-zi called this walking two
roads. The one who can understand discriminations that are not spoken and the way that
is not a way may be called the reservoir of heaven, which poured into is never full and
dipped from never runs dry; yet one does not know the source of its supply. This Zhuang-
zi called the hidden Light. When Yao sat on his throne and found his mind nagging him
to attack other rulers, Shun replied that long ago ten thousand suns came out all at once
and illuminated all things, and yet virtue is greater than those suns!
Zhuang-zi asked how one knows that loving life is not a delusion or hating death is not
like a person who has left home and forgotten the way back. Suppose two people have an
argument. Is the one who beats the other necessarily right and the other necessarily
wrong? If the two cannot agree, should they get someone else to decide what is right? But
they can only get someone who agrees with one or the other or none or both; so how can
anyone else decide for them? Rather Zhuang-zi suggested that we harmonize them with
the heavenly equality, leave them to their endless changes, and so live out our years. Leap
into the boundless and make it your home! Zhuang-zi dreamed he was a butterfly; but
when he awoke, he thought he might be a butterfly dreaming he was Zhuang Zhou. This
he called the transformation of things.
Zhuang-zi often satirized a caricature of Confucius for trying to teach virtue, goodness,
and justice. He observed that when the world has the way, the wise succeed; but when the
world does not have the way, the wise survive; in times like the present he found they did
well to escape penalty. He suggested leaving off this teaching of virtue. Everyone knows
the value of the useful, but no one knows the value of the useless. Many people excuse
their faults and claim they do not deserve to be punished, but few admit their faults. Only
a person of virtue knows what one cannot do anything about and is content with it.
Zhuang-zi suggested that one not allow likes or dislikes to get in and do harm. Just let
things be the way they are and don't try to help life along. We go around telling each
other, I do this or that; but how do we know that this I really exists? When we dream we
are something else, how do we know whether we are awake or dreaming? Running
around accusing others is not as good as laughing, which is not as good as going along
with things. By forgetting about change, one can enter the mysterious oneness of heaven.
Zhuang-zi suggested that we not embody fame or store up schemes or undertake projects
or sell wisdom but rather embody to the fullest what has no end and wander where there
is no trail. Hold on to what you receive from heaven, but don't think you have got
anything. Be empty and use the mind like a mirror. Go after nothing; respond but do not
store. Thus one can win out over things and not hurt oneself.
Zhuang-zi lamented that the way and its virtue have been cast aside in the call for
goodness and justice. If the inborn nature had not been abandoned there would be no
need for rites and music. He blamed the sages for destroying the way and its virtue in
order to create goodness and justice. What the ordinary world calls perfect wisdom he
described as piling things up for the benefit of a great thief. He pointed out that several
famous persuaders were destroyed or forced to commit suicide by their rulers, who also
came to violent deaths as the result of their wickedness. He observed that whoever steals
a belt buckle pays with his life, but whoever steals a state gets to be a feudal lord; yet
everyone knows that goodness and justice are found at the gates of the feudal lords.
Everyone knows enough to search for what they don't know, but no one knows enough to
search for what they already know. Everyone knows enough to condemn what they take
to be no good, but no one knows enough to condemn what they have already taken to be
good.
Zhuang-zi suggested that by resting in inaction things will transform themselves. Forget
you are a thing and join in great unity with the deep and boundless. Undo the mind,
slough off spirit, be blank and soulless, and everything will return to the root and not
know why. But if you try to know it, you have already departed from it. Do not ask its
name or try to observe its form. Let things live naturally of themselves. A great one
teaches like a shadow that follows form, an echo that follows sound, only answering
when questioned and pouring out thoughts like a companion of the world. Such a one
blended with the great unity is selfless. The "gentleman" of ancient times fixed his eyes
on possession, but the one who fixes on nothingness is the true friend of heaven and
earth.
The sage is not still because of taking stillness as good, but because the myriad of things
are insufficient to distract the sage's mind. The mind of the sage in stillness is the mirror
of heaven and earth. Some of the later writings of the Zhuang-zi have goodness, justice,
loyalty, music, and rites coming out of the way and its virtue. But if all the emphasis is
placed on the rites and music, then the world falls into disorder. In the ancient times
people did not use knowledge to trouble the world but kept to their inborn nature. Instead
of trying to rectify others, they rectified themselves and in complete joy found the
fulfillment of ambition.
In the "Autumn Floods" the god of the north sea explains to the lord of the river that right
and wrong are points of view based on preference. Everything can have some right to it,
and anything can have something wrong with it. If you try to make right your master and
do away with wrong or make order your master and do away with disorder, you have not
understood the principle of heaven and earth or the nature of things. It would be like
making heaven your master and doing away with earth or making yin (feminine) your
master and doing away with yang (masculine). Obviously this is impossible.
Zhuang-zi questioned whether perfect happiness is found in what the world honors:
wealth, eminence, long life, and a good name or in what the world enjoys: a life of ease,
rich food, fine clothes, beautiful sights, and sweet sounds. Yet people who cannot get
these things fret a great deal, which is a stupid way to treat the body, while others wear
themselves out rushing around on business to pile up more wealth than they can ever use,
which is a superficial way to treat the body. Ambitious people scheme day and night
wondering if they are doing right, which is a shoddy way to treat the body, while others
spend their lives worrying, which is a callous way to treat the body. Zhuang-zi simply
took inaction to be happiness.
After Zhuang-zi's mother died, a friend came and found him singing and pounding on a
tub. When asked why he was not mourning, Zhuang-zi explained that at first he grieved;
but then he looked back at the time before she was born and before she had a body or
even a spirit, realizing that now she was merely undergoing another change. Zhuang-zi
once slept on a skull using it as a pillow and dreamed that the dead person told him the
dead are very happy, because they have no rulers above nor subjects below and no
seasonal chores. Having more happiness than a king on his throne why would he want to
come back to the troubles of a human being?
Once Zhuang-zi went to see the king of Wei who, seeing his coarse and patched clothes,
thought he was in distress. Zhuang-zi explained that he was poor but not in distress. If a
person had the way and its virtue but could not put them into practice, that would be
distress. Zhuang-zi learned from master Geng-sang that if he wanted to preserve his body
and life, he must think only of how to hide himself away no matter how remote or
secluded the spot. Promoting people of worth began with Yao and Shun and led to people
trampling over each other and stealing from each other. People have become more
diligent in pursuing gain so that sons kill fathers, ministers kill their lords, and men filch
at mid-day. Rather one should cling fast to life and keep the body whole, not falling prey
to fidgeting and fussy thoughts and scheming.
If one does not first perceive the sincerity within oneself before trying to act, each move
will be a mistake. If outer concerns enter and are not expelled, each move will only add
failure to failure. Action has its consequences. Whoever does what is not good in clear
and open view will be seized and punished by people. Whoever does what is not good in
the shadow of darkness will be seized and punished by spirits. Only the one who clearly
understands both people and spirits can walk alone. Whoever concentrates on the internal
and does deeds that bring no fame will have light, but whoever concentrates on the
external hoarding of goods is a mere merchant. The inner protects us from the outer; but
if one bets too much in an archery contest, too much emphasis on the outer makes the
inner clumsy.
Zhuang-zi suggested how to wipe out delusions of the will, undo the snares of the heart,
rid oneself of the entanglements to virtue, and open up the roadblocks in the way. The six
delusions of the will are eminence, wealth, recognition, authority, fame, and profit. The
six snares of the heart are appearances, carriage, complexion, features, temperament, and
attitude. The six entanglements to virtue are loathing, desire, joy, anger, grief, and
happiness. The six roadblocks in the way are rejecting, accepting, taking, giving,
knowledge, and ability. When these no longer seethe within, one may achieve
uprightness, stillness, enlightenment, and the emptiness, which results in doing nothing;
yet there is nothing that is not done. Action which has become artificial is lost. Action
which is done because one cannot do otherwise is virtuous. If the one who launches into
action is not really acting, then the action is a launching into inaction. Whoever wishes to
be still must calm one's energies. Whoever wishes to be spiritual must compose one's
mind. Whoever wishes to succeed must go along with what cannot be avoided.
Yet the wise look at the inevitable and decide that it is not inevitable, thus not having
recourse to arms. People usually look at what is not inevitable and decide that it is
inevitable, thus having frequent recourse to arms. Whoever turns to arms is always
seeking something, and whoever trusts in arms is lost.
Zhuang-zi admired the simpler times, before even the ancient emperors Yao and Shun,
when the legendary Yellow Emperor ruled. Once the Yellow Emperor came upon a boy
herding horses who advised him on ruling the empire by saying that it is not much
different from herding horses - simply get rid of what is harmful to the horses; that's all.
Here we find the same universal principle of not harming that in India is called ahimsa.
Not everyone is suited to the reclusive life. A prince of Wei told the Daoist adept Zhan-zi
that his body was beside the rivers and seas, but his mind was still back at the court of
Wei. Zhan-zi suggested that he emphasize life more than material gain. The prince
complained that he knew he should do that, but it went against his inclinations. Zhan-zi
recommended that if he could not overcome his inclinations, he should follow them; for
if he tried to force himself, he would do double injury to himself. Those who do double
injury to themselves do not live long. Zhuang-zi concluded that although the prince of
Wei was not able to follow the way, at least he had the will to do so.
The petty person will die for riches; the better person will die for reputation. Yet they are
both willing to throw away what is theirs for what is not theirs. Crooked or straight, it is
better to follow the heaven within. Right or wrong, it is better to hold to the center upon
which everything turns. In solitude bring your will to completion and ramble in the
company of the way. Do not strive for consistency or try to perfect justice, or you will
lose what you already have. Do not race after riches nor risk your life for success, or
heaven will slip away from you.
In Zhuang-zi an old fisherman teaches Confucius the eight faults and four evils. The
faults are officiousness (doing what is not your business), obsequiousness (rushing
forward when no one has nodded in your direction), sycophancy (echoing others'
opinions and trying to draw them out), flattery (speaking without regard for what is right
or wrong), calumny (delighting in talking about others' faults), maliciousness (breaking
up friendships and family relations), wickedness (praising falsely so as to cause injury),
and treachery (two-facedly stealing another party's wishes). The four evils are avidity
(altering accepted ways hoping to enhance your merit and fame), avarice (insisting you
know it all and that everything be done your way, snatching things from others for your
own use), obstinacy (refusing to change recognized errors, listening to remonstrance and
behaving worse than before), and bigotry (commending those who agree with you and
refusing to see any good in those who do not agree with you).
For this strange fisherman truth means purity and sincerity in the highest degree and is
received from heaven, while rites are created by the vulgar people of the world. The wise
pattern themselves on heaven, value truth, and do not allow themselves to be cramped by
the vulgar. Those who do not depart from the pure and true are heavenly, holy, and
perfect. The wise make heaven the source, virtue the root, and the way the gate, revealing
oneself through change and transformation. This is contrasted to the gentleman, who
makes goodness the standard of kindness, justice the model of reason, ritual the guide of
conduct, and music the source of harmony.
Lie-zi
The Daoist Lie-zi is mentioned by Zhuang-zi and is therefore supposed to have lived in
the fifth or fourth centuries BC in the state of Cheng for at least forty years as a common
person. Little else is known about him except from the stories in the Zhuang-zi and the
Lie-zi, a book which is supposed to have been written over several centuries and
formalized with a commentary in the fourth century CE. Lie-zi was also a recluse, who
never accepted political appointment, and his stories are similar to those of Zhuang-zi.
His reclusive life is indicated in a story of Lie-zi and his teacher Hu-zi in the Zhuang-zi.
Lie-zi found a shaman, who could predict the future including when people would die.
Lie-zi thought he had found a higher teaching; so Hu-zi told him to bring the shaman to
meet him. The first time he predicted that Hu-zi would die within the week; the second
time he predicted he would get better; the third time the shaman said the master was
never the same and asked him to steady himself; but the fourth time the shaman ran away
and could not be found. This fourth time Hu-zi had appeared to him not yet emerged
from the source. Lie-zi realized that he had not yet begun to learn anything. Lie-zi went
home and cooked for his wife and did not go out for the last three years of his life.
In another story from Zhuang-zi the gatekeeper Yin explains to Lie-zi how by guarding
the pure breath one may rest within the bounds that know no excess, hide within the
borders that know no source, wander where everything has its end and beginning, unify
one's nature, nourish one's breath, unite one's virtue, and thereby communicate with what
creates all things. Such a person guards what belongs to heaven and keeps it whole.
Lie-zi recounted how he asked Old Shang to be his master and Baigao-zi his friend while
he worked hard to discipline himself. For three years he was afraid to have notions of
right and wrong and did not dare to speak of benefit and harm. Five years later he thought
freely of right and wrong and did speak of benefit and harm. Then seven years after that,
his thoughts came naturally without conceptions of right and wrong, and his words were
natural without intending to please or offend. After another nine years nothing he said
without restraint whatever came to him without knowing whether it was right or wrong,
pleasing or offending, his or another's. By then he did not think of whether Old Shang
was his master or Baigao-zi his friend. The barrier between the inner and outer
disappeared. He perceived with all his senses at once; his mind concentrated, and his
body relaxed. He drifted like the wind.
Wen-zi, who is supposed to have studied under Lao-zi, may have been another of Lie-zi's
teachers. Wen-zi (or Guanyin) told him that if his words are beautiful or ugly, so also is
their echo. Conduct will follow one like a shadow. Thus he is advised to be careful of his
words, for someone may agree with them, and be careful of his conduct, because
someone may imitate it. The wise can know what will go in by seeing what came out, can
know what is coming by observing what has passed. We judge by our own experience
and verify it by the experience of others. If someone loves one, one will surely love that
person; but if someone hates one, one will surely hate that person. The greatest emperors
loved the empire, and the worst hated the empire.
Lie-zi also wrote about Yang Zhu, who lived around 400 BC and was criticized by
Mencius for having such a selfish philosophy that he would not give up one hair off his
body to save the empire. According to the Lie-zi Yang Zhu's philosophy was to preserve
one's own body and enjoy the present. Yang Zhu believed that the ancients correctly
placed no value on reputation or honor. He believed that if people did not try to make
things better, the world would be in order. For Yang Zhu life is temporarily staying in the
world, and death is a temporary departure.
When Lie-zi was poor and starving in Zheng, a friend told the chief minister that Lie-zi
had attained the way but was poor and unrecognized. He asked the minister to send him a
gift. The chief minister sent Lie-zi a gift of grain, but Lie-zi politely refused the gift. His
wife scolded him, complaining that the wives and children of other sages live
comfortably while they were starving. How could he refuse this food? Lie-zi smiled and
explained that if he was honored because of someone else's opinion, then someone else's
opinion could also condemn him. Later the chief minister fell out of popular favor, and
the king swayed by public opinion had him executed.
The Lie-zi tells a story of a king, who was only interested in hiring the strong and brave
as being the best to protect him. Not pleased with those who preach morality, he asked a
visiting philosopher what he could teach him. The philosopher asked him if he would be
interested in a strategy that would guarantee that anyone who attempted to stab him
would miss. The king wanted to hear about it. Yet it would be a better strategy if people
did not dare to strike him at all. The king agreed. An even better strategy than that would
be if people did not even want to harm him. Yet people not wanting to harm him would
still not be as good as getting them to love and benefit him. The king agreed he was
looking for such a strategy, which is three degrees better than strength and courage. The
philosopher then pointed out that Confucius and Mo-zi were respected even though they
were not princes. If the king, who already has political power, were to rule his people
with virtue and integrity, would not his greatness surpass that of Confucius and Mo-zi?
After the philosopher left, the king admitted that he had been completely turned around
by this argument.
Many of Lie-zi's stories show how psychological impressions can alter our perception of
reality. An old and poor farmer heard that the power of Zihua could make a poor man
rich. So he joined the followers of Zihua, who teased him for being a bumpkin. He was
offered rewards for doing extraordinary feats like diving into water and saving goods
from a burning house, which the farmer did in his innocence, because he did not know
how hard they were. Impressed, they asked the farmer how he accomplished these feats.
He explained that he merely believed what they said about how Zihua could make him
rich. His only concern was that he might not believe or act on what they told him. He
forgot about his body and what might benefit or harm him. Now that he realized they
were making fun of him, he thought about the dangers he escaped in the water and fire
and became aware of the worries and fears inside him. The story concludes with
Confucius drawing the moral that if a person has perfect faith, one can move heaven and
earth.
A man tried to steal gold in the market, because he was so carried away by the sight of
the gold that he forgot about the officers, who arrested him. Another man, who lost his
money, thought his neighbor's son had stolen it. He noticed that he had the look and
gestures of a thief. Later he found the money and looking at his neighbor's son saw that
neither his movements nor his gestures were those of a thief.
Lie-zi valued emptiness, because he felt that attachments of recognition, approval, and
disapproval imprison us. It is better not to worry about such things. Rather than be
concerned about taking credit for accomplishments, why not relax and observe the
workings of heaven and earth? In emptiness one can cultivate stillness and peace of mind
so that one will not be drawn into the unnecessary troubles of this crazy world. If you
lose the way, you lose yourself.
Lie-zi also admired the Yellow Emperor for seeing that his people were happy and
retiring to a simple life. First though, he worked hard for fifteen years in governing, but
his physical and mental health both became worse. So he withdrew from courtly life for
three months. During this vacation the Yellow Emperor dreamed he visited a western
paradise, where there were no leaders or teachers, and desires and aversions did not
develop. Believing he was enlightened by the dream, the Yellow Emperor spent the next
twenty years letting his kingdom be as in the dream. When he died and ascended into
heaven, his people mourned the passing of a great ruler.
Songs of Chu
In the southern state of Chu a man named Ju Yuan held a high position under King Huai
(r. 328-299 BC). Sima Qian wrote that he had wide learning and a good memory. Ju
Yuan advised the king and spoke on his behalf to representatives of other states. His
ability and position were resented by a rival, who as Lord High Administrator tried to
steal a law that Ju Yuan was drafting. When Ju Yuan would not let him have it, the High
Administrator slandered him to the king, complaining that he was always boasting of the
laws he made for the king. This alienated Ju Yuan from the king, and he was demoted.
In 313 BC Qin wanted to attack Qi, which was allied with Chu, and King Huiwen of Qin
sent Zhang Yi to Chu with lavish gifts in pretense of forsaking Qin. He said that if Chu
were to break off with Qi, Qin would give them a territory 600 li long. King Huai,
greedily duped by this, broke relations with Qi. However, his envoy to Qin discovered
that Zhang I had lied and that the territory was only 6 li. So King Huai angrily attacked
Qin with his troops; but his forces were crushed; 80,000 heads were cut off, and the Chu
commander was captured. Then King Huai sent out all his troops in the country to strike
deep into Qin. When the state of Wei heard of this, they launched a surprise attack
against Chu. Chu's troops had to retreat from Qin, as Qi was in no mood to rescue Chu.
A year later Qin offered some territory to Chu to make peace, but King Huai said that he
would rather have revenge on Zhang I. When Zhang I heard this, he volunteered to go
again to Chu, where he bribed an influential minister and seduced one of the king's
concubines, who persuaded King Huai to release him. Out of favor, Ju Yuan was in Qi on
an embassy, but he returned to criticize his king's behavior in letting go of Zhang I. The
king regretted his mistake, but it was too late.
In 310 BC the feudal lords combined to crush Chu's army, killing Chu's general. Qin's
king Zhao invited King Huai to Qin, and Ju Yuan warned him not to go, because Qin was
a country of tigers and wolves, not to be trusted. Urged to go by his youngest son, King
Huai was detained. He refused to grant territorial concessions and fled to the state of
Zhao, but they sent him back to Qin, where he eventually died. The eldest son of King
Huai was made king of Chu, and he appointed the youngest son Premier; but the latter
was blamed for the loss of his father and resented the criticism of Ju Yuan and had him
banished. Thus much is history recounted by Sima Qian, who saw this as the turning
point leading to Chu's decline and eventual defeat by Qin.
A poem called "The Fisherman" tells how Ju Yuan wandered by the banks of the Jiang
River, let down his hair (Men usually wore their long hair tied in a bun.) and sang. A
fisherman asks him if he is not the Lord of the Three Wards, and Ju replies that all the
world is muddy, although he is clear. Because everyone is drunk and he is sober, he has
been sent into exile. The fisherman suggests that the wise can move as the world does in
muddy water or enjoy drinking. Why get banished? Ju has heard that after bathing one
should shake out one's clothes. Not wanting to submit to the dirt of others, he would
throw himself into the water and be buried in the bowels of fish rather than hide his light
in a murky world. In the poem the fisherman goes off singing that when the water is clear
he can wash his hat strings, and when it is muddy he can wash his feet. After much
lamenting and composing of songs somewhere along the way, Ju Yuan clasped a large
stone, threw himself into the river, and drowned.
The songs of Ju Yuan and other Chu poets, who wrote on similar themes of his life and
laments, were gathered together as the Songs of Chu. Drawing on traditions of shamanic
spiritual travels and the sadness of his experience, Ju Yuan and his followers created a
poetry expressive of the feelings of frustration and despair in the Period of Warring States
and after.
Ju Yuan began his song on "Encountering Trouble" with his own auspicious birth when
his father named him True Exemplar with the title Divine Balance. He gathered the
flowers of youth and cast out the impure. He glorified his ruler as the Fragrant One and
lamented that the Fair One refused to examine his true feelings but instead listened to
slander. Like Lie-zi he did not mind poverty. "If only my mind can be truly beautiful, it
matters nothing that I often faint for famine."7 Though he may die nine times, he does
not regret it; he only regrets the Fair One's waywardness. He would rather die than
emulate the flatterers.
The fragrant and foul mingle in confusion, but he has kept his inner brightness
undimmed. With the love of beauty as his constant joy he decides to visit the world's
quarters. But how can he tell people to look into his mind? He looks to the wise men of
old for his guidance and cites numerous examples. Examining human outcomes, he asks
where is the unjust person who can be trusted? He grieves for having been born in an
unlucky time. With a team of jade dragons he goes on a fantastic journey. At heaven's
gate he learns to hide beauty out of jealousy. Seeking a mate, he is told to go beyond the
world or to wander the earth, seeking one whose thoughts are of his measure. If his inner
soul is beautiful, he needs no matchmaker. Finally arriving at the western heaven he sees
his home below, and the horses refuse to go further. Feeling that no one understands him
and that there are no true men in the state to work with in making good government, Ju
Yuan decides to go join the ancestral shaman Peng Xian.
The "Nine Songs" celebrate Ju Yuan's shaman journeys in heaven, where he tries to woo
a goddess; but they end praising the heroism of soldiers, who have died in battle. The
"Heavenly Questions" ask for explanations for the many injustices and inconsistencies in
life and tradition. Even though heaven is considered to be too exalted to be questioned, Ju
Yuan nevertheless does just that. He asks about the origin of heaven and earth and who
passed down the story. What is darkness and light, and how did yang and yin come
together? Who accomplished all this? Where are the nine fields of heaven? How do the
sun and moon hold to their courses and the fixed stars keep their places? From heavenly
questions he turns to ancient myths and then to perplexing incidents in history. Why did
Shun's brother not come to harm when he behaved worse than a brute beast toward Shun?
Why did heaven favor Duke Huan of Qi, the first protector, and then later punish him?
Why does the High God confer the mandate of heaven and how is notice given of it?
Why is the mandate of heaven taken away and given to another? The entire song has
nothing but questions for the listeners to ponder.
In "Grieving at the Eddying Wind" Ju Yuan, or another poet inspired by him, lamented
that delicate things by nature are prone to fall. He admired the noble thoughts of Peng
Xian, the shamanic ancestor believed to have been a Shang minister who drowned
himself. His purpose was strong, and the poet asks, who by deceiving can succeed for
long? Only the good person's lasting beauty is preserved through the ages.
He lies in a secret place and broods in his sorrow. He would rather sweetly die. He climbs
a rocky summit and looks into the distance, hears no echo, but his sadness cannot be
dispelled. Even the simplest act became impossible, and inconsolable he rushed toward
the heavens. He would not swerve from his resolution to float down the river until he
entered the ocean, but the last line asks, "But what good did it do to clasp a great stone
and drown?"10
In the second century BC some Daoists put together the Songs of Chu and added their
own compositions like the "Far-off Journey." In melancholy the poet sought to learn from
where the primal spirit comes. In emptiness and silence he found serenity. In peaceful
inaction he gained satisfaction. In his journey he received the following teaching from a
legendary Master Wang:
The Great Diviner threw aside the divining stalks and said that they were unable to help
in this case.
In the "Nine Changes" the poet declared that rather than live by unjust means to be
famous, he would live poor; for he can eat without greed and be full, and he can dress
without luxury and be warm. The shamanic tradition is further seen in the two songs
about summoning the soul that has left the body of the deceased. There also follows more
laments about how the virtuous are rebuffed, while sycophants are always there to bring
them down. Here we have both Confucian martyrs and Daoists who escape by floating
away on clouds. Custom advances the flatterers and promotes the rich, while those who
act honestly are shut out and unnoticed. Thus the wise and good live obscurely and do not
flock with others. The poet complained that the government is selfish and not for the
common good. The flatterer rises into the hall of judgment, while the just withdraw and
escape into hiding. True feelings are submerged and not expressed, because one cannot
reason of higher things with the vulgar crowd.
In the middle of the first century BC the poet Wang Bao added his regrets that the world
is averse to justice, and he realized that he cannot stay in these parts for long. Liu Xian
(77-6 BC) lamented after reading Ju Yuan's "Encountering Trouble" that he had struck
out at slander and righted infamy, but his virtue raised him above the floating clouds.
Huainan-zi
The Daoist collection of 21 essays called the Huainan-zi seems to have been a combined
effort of eight Daoist scholars and several admirers of Ju Yuan under the sponsorship of
Liu An, the king of Huainan, who committed suicide when his planned revolt was
aborted in 122 BC. The Huainan-zi was presented to Emperor Wu in 139 BC. The
resentful attitude, military plans, and planned revolt of the king of Huainan, however, are
in direct contradiction to the teachings of this book, though Liu An was known to have
had literary gifts and may have contributed to the Huainan-zi. The essays amplify and
illustrate the philosophical ideas of Lao-zi, focusing on the way, goodness, and justice; its
alternate title means "greatly enlightening."
The first essay is on the way (dao) which embraces heaven and supports the earth. A
person in the way lives happily without anxiety. The authors pointed out that militarism
breeds militarism, just as fighting fire with fire makes it more violent, and beating a
vicious dog or whipping a kicking horse does not correct them nor enable them to travel
far. Violent measures and strict punishments are not fit instruments for a king. The one
who follows the natural way of heaven and earth finds it easy to manage the whole world
without acting, yet is equal to a sudden crisis, disposes of calamities, and prevents
difficulties. Firmness can be attained and strength overcome by yielding. Military fire
will be extinguished with humble water. Hard things die sooner, just as teeth decay, but
the tongue does not. Finding one's true self results in the highest joy. The inner is always
better than the outer; the heart governs life. When each individual follows the law of
nature, everything identifies with heaven; there is no right or wrong, and everything is as
it should be. The covetous and ambitious desires allured by power distance the spirit from
the body and close off the heart from higher influences, leading to actions contrary to
justice and disasters.
The second essay of the Huainan-zi on beginning and reality reflects on the primeval
paradise when the artificial doctrines of goodness and justice had not arisen yet. When
the senses are closed, ambitions stopped, one may roam in the void, breathe in yin and
breathe out yang in harmony with the virtue of creation. When these overflow, there will
be goodness and justice; but when the Confucians set up goodness and justice as ultimate,
then the way and its virtue are abandoned and lost. The wise cultivate the way within, not
by the outward adornment of goodness and justice. In the original simplicity was unity,
quietness, and no governing authority and divided classes. When purity and simplicity
disappeared, truth was adulterated by opinions, and the spirit of cooperation was lost.
With the decaying of the Zhou dynasty, the philosophies of Confucius, Mo-zi, and Yang
Zhu competed with polemics. Not having power, they were not able to put their ideals
into operation; thus they were never free of anxiety. Yet the soul not clogged with desires
and knowledge meets every perception without bias and in serenity.
The essay on the living soul describes how the person who follows the stillness of the
inner way does not fear death and therefore cannot be made to do wrong. Several
examples are given of rulers whose desires led them to bad ends. Confucianism does not
remove the root of desire from the mind. To try to keep society from theft and burglary
by fear of punishment is not as good as to remove the desire for stealing from the heart.
In discussing natural law the authors described a decadent age when men dug up
mountains for gems, wrought metals, killed animals for skins and furs, cut down forests
for wood or burnt them to drive out game; yet the luxuries and abundance of the rulers
still did not satisfy them. Mountains and streams were divided by boundaries; classes of
people were differentiated; then soldiers and weapons brought about wars and the
untimely deaths of the oppressed people. The harmonious cooperation of heaven and
earth depends on the human spirit. Excess leads to waste, conflict, taxes, despair, and
degeneration. In the ancient times if a ruler oppressed the people, he was removed and
replaced. Now rulers use soldiers unjustly, rob people, and make slaves. Use of the
military should depend on justice.
In the eleventh essay the difference between a disordered country that is full and a well
governed country that is void is explained. "Void" does not mean empty of people but
that everyone guards their duties, while "full" does not mean many people but that they
are involved in inconsequential (branch-tip) matters. Also a preserved country being
insufficient does not mean a lack of goods but that desires are moderated so that
regulations are few, while a ruined country having a surplus does not mean having many
resources but that people are impetuous and have many expenses.
Right and wrong are considered to be relative to each situation. Each generation takes as
right what is right by it and wrong what is wrong by it. Thus each generation is different,
considering themselves right and others wrong. The heart seeks the right and pushes
away the wrong. Goodness depends on timing. On the other hand, sufficiency and surplus
enable one to yield; but insufficiency leads to competition, cruelty, and disorder. When
things are abundant, desire decreases, seeking is sated, and competition stops. Even the
strict laws of the Qin empire could not prohibit disorder, while the wealth of Han dynasty
times led to correctness.
The twelfth essay discusses how actions have their consequences and points out that
frequent wars exhaust the people, and the pride of victories can consume their vitality.
The saying is quoted, "Don't fight for peace. Peace will come naturally."13 This essay
illustrates and quotes many passages from the Dao De Jing.
The thirteenth essay declares that the good of the people is the fundamental and
unvarying law. Legislation must be determined by considering current conditions. During
disturbances it should be swift and severe, but in times of peace easy and tolerant. Most
healthy is a balance of female and male energy. Strict enforcement is harsh and destroys
concord; love is lenient, but too much leniency results in disobedience. Punishment is
cruel, and too much punishment dissipates affection. The wise judge success by the life
of the people; those following the right way are bound to grow, though it may be small at
first. Those who follow ways of death are bound to come to end. A government that
follows a policy of selfish gain will be ruined. The wise adapt to circumstances, bending
and yielding to achieve the end in view. Those who are satisfied with simple needs will
find it easy to be good, but lying, stealing, and murdering are contrary to nature and very
difficult.
Perhaps the most illuminating essay in the Huainan-zi is the fifteenth on "Generalship
and Prevention of Anarchy." The authors believed that the ancients did not use the
military to enlarge territory or from lust for gain, but to preserve a dynasty, pacify rebels,
and eliminate dangers afflicting the people. However, when goods are unequally
distributed, communities contend with the strong oppressing the weak, and the bold
terrorizing the timid. Instead of using teeth and claws, humans make weapons and armor,
enabling the greedy to rob others. The wise attempt to quell this rapacity and bring peace
to disturbed people by defining duty. The wise kings of old employed soldiers to quell
anarchy and discipline the unruly.
No crime is worse than killing the innocent to feed unprincipled rulers or to grab territory
for an ambitious person. The authors point out that if certain individuals, who ruined their
countries, had been arrested early in their evil course, they never could have robbed
violently as they did. One person pandering to vicious desires causes general suffering,
an outrage intolerable to the law of heaven. Kings were established primarily to restrain
violence and punish anarchy, but kings have come to take advantage of their power,
becoming an instrument for burdening the people. The authors asked if it is not justifiable
to exterminate those who play the tiger. Thus troops were put in motion to curtail an
oppressive enemy prince and reprimand his injustice. The army was not allowed to cut
down trees, injure graves, burn crops, destroy property, rob animals, or enslave people.
The prince, who had killed innocent people, was doomed by heaven and hated by people;
the army came to replace him with someone just. Violators of this law were considered
traitors to the people.
Thus when the king does not have the way, his subjects look to invading soldiers as a
parched land looks for rain. When just soldiers come, there is no war. However, in recent
times even when the king does not have the way, his soldiers defend the city; the
invading army attacks for conquest and aggrandizement rather than to curb a wrongdoer.
Thus men are slain in war, because it is "all for self now." The selfish aggressor is left to
his own fate. Whoever has the goodwill of the people will be strong in spite of small
resources, but the powerful monarch who has lost the people's goodwill is certain to
perish. Destruction is the aim of the soldier, but what is better is to have no destruction,
no war. Thus the best soldier in accord with the divine is not harmful. Weapons are not
sharpened; yet no enemy dare attack. The one who fights without leaving the temple is
the emperor; the one whose virtue is felt is the king. The practice of perfect government
leads people to long for such virtue. Victory won without drawing the sword, resulting in
obedience, implies the art of perfect rule, which imitates the way of heaven.
Soldiers of the way never need to send forth the war chariot, because when justice is
advertised to the many and the delinquent are reprimanded for their faults, powerful
states will pay attention and small principalities will bow their heads in obedience to the
wishes of the people who desire peace. The reprimand takes advantage of the people's
strength, for it is in their interest to eliminate wrongs.
The enlightened king uses soldiers in the interests of the community for the elimination
of evil in the land. Everyone participates in the benefit. No enemy can withstand this
when the troops serve all. When soldiers are used for public ends, anything can be
accomplished; when they are used selfishly, little can be done. The essentials of victory
do not lie in the weapons, tools, and supplies, which are the army's capital; what is
essential for the general is intuitive intelligence. When the people are more worthy than
the rulers, there will be estrangement and a weak army. The essentials of victory are
when virtue and justice influence all the people, when means are sufficient to meet
dangers, when officers are selected well, and when measures and plans are made with
knowledge of strengths and weaknesses.
The example of the second Qin emperor is given to show how his personal extravagance
heedless of the people's needs, conscription and taxes amounting to half the nation's
wealth, and harsh punishments led to discontent, suspicion, and a rebellion in which
people started out with no weapons at all. Led by a humble man, the rebel army led all
before it, and the old order was swept away like a fleeting cloud, because the hearts of the
people were full of anger and resentment. Yet those who govern well need never fear an
enemy, and those who follow high moral principles will have no wars to wage. Good
leaders and generals accumulate virtue, and the people will serve loyally. The essay goes
on to describe specific tactics according to Daoist principles, always emphasizing the
higher unity and transcendent way.
Notes
BECK index
Chinese Sages
Lao-zi
Confucius
Mo-zi
Mencius
Those who value the world as themselves
may be entrusted to govern the world.
Those who love the world as themselves
may be entrusted to care for the world.
Lao-zi, Way Power Book (Dao De Jing) 13
The strategists say,
"Do not be the aggressor but the defender.
Do not advance an inch, but retreat a foot instead."
This is movement without moving,
stretching the arm without showing it,
confronting enemies with the idea there is no enemy,
holding in the hand no weapons.
Underestimating the enemy will destroy my treasures.
Thus when the battle is joined, it is the kind who will win.
Lao-zi, Way Power Book (Dao De Jing) 69
Those brave in killing will be killed.
Those brave in not killing will live.
Of these two, one is beneficial, and one is harmful.
Lao-zi, Way Power Book (Dao De Jing) 73
Never do to others
what you would not like them
to do to you.
Confucius, Analects 15:23
If people were to consider the states of others
as they consider their own,
then who would raise up their state
to attack the state of another?
It would be like attacking their own.
Mo-zi, "Universal Love"
When people submit to force,
they do so not willingly
but because they are not strong enough.
When people submit to
the transforming influence of morality,
they do so sincerely with admiration in their hearts.
Mencius 2A:3
In ancient China during the 6th century BC the incessant wars between Jin and Chu led
Heang Seu of Song to go to Jin with a proposal for a comprehensive peace. He said, "War
is destructive to the people, an insect that eats up the resources, and the greatest calamity
of the small states."1 Arguing that if Jin did not accept the proposal, Chu would agree
and draw all the states together, Jin agreed in order to keep the protectorship. Then he
went to Chu, and they agreed also. Qi was reluctant to join but realized that it would
disaffect the people if they refused to sanction the stopping of war. Heang Seu sent word
to Qin, and they agreed. He notified all the smaller states and arranged a meeting at Song
in 545 BC.
Jin and Chu argued about which of them should have precedent but agreed to share the
protectorship although Qin and Qi were formally excepted because of their power and
Chu and Tang because of their weakness. Otherwise all fourteen states agreed to the
covenant of peace. Heang Seu asked for a reward for "arresting the cause of death" and
was given sixty towns. However, Zihan, the minister of Works, declared that it was the
arms of Jin and Chu that kept the smaller states in awe. "Who can do away with the
instruments of war?" he asked. "They have been long in requisition. It is by them that the
lawless are kept in awe, and accomplished virtue is displayed."2 Denouncing the scheme
as a delusion, he cut the document to pieces. Heang Seu consequently refused the towns,
and his family wanted to attack Zihan; but Heang stopped them, saying he had been
saved from ruin by him.
Nevertheless this agreement must have been effective for several years because there
were no wars for the next five years, only a battle with barbarians in the sixth year, and
no wars in the seventh and eighth years. This is by far the most peaceful part of the two
and a half centuries of the Spring and Autumn Era during which there was only one other
time in which there were even two years in a row without a war.
Lao-zi
Lao-zi lived in China in the sixth century BC. Historical records indicate that he was the
keeper of the Archives in the imperial capital at Luoyang. Legend tells us that when he
was old and tired of the corruption of the world, he rode an ox-drawn chariot to the
mountain pass of the western frontier. The keeper of the Pass, having observed omens in
the weather and expecting a sage, begged the old man to write a book before withdrawing
from civilization. So Lao-zi composed the Dao De Jing (Tao Te Ching), consisting of
about 5,25O Chinese characters (words). This concise book is probably one of the
greatest writings in the world and became the scriptural foundation of Daoism. It has
been translated more times than any other book. Dao means the way and implies an
absolute reality, roughly comparable to the Western idea of God; yet it is described not
anthropomorphically but as a dynamic and natural process. De means virtue in the sense
of spiritual power. Jing is the word for book or classic. Thus I translate the title Way
Power Book.
In the Dao De Jing Lao-zi described a simple, natural, and peaceful way of life. Serenity
may be found by returning to the eternal source, by emptying oneself of all desires, and
by flowing like water. The universe has two complementary principles-the male (yang)
and the female (yin). Harmony results from the natural balance of these active and
receptive qualities. Those who are too aggressive meddle in their affairs and cause
unnecessary problems, while those who are too passive lose their center and fail to
maintain a natural order. Since the human tendency is to be too active and interfering,
Lao-zi emphasized the inward process of action through non-action (wu-wei). By being
receptive to this transcendental way, one knows intuitively how much to do and when to
stop. The primary responsibility of each person is to understand and master oneself.
Lao-zi saw a way of not competing by not exalting the worthy nor valuing rare treasure
nor displaying objects of desire so that people's hearts will not be disturbed. The wise
keep their hearts pure, their bellies full, their ambitions weak, and their bones strong.
They act without interfering with the natural flow so that all may live in peace. The way
of spiritual power never interferes or inflicts; yet through it everything is accomplished
because it is the essence of what is. All we need to do is to follow the way things are, and
the world will be reformed of its own accord. The conflict of personal desires is what
obscures the way; but when we free ourselves of desire, then we find peace. The way that
works best for all is a transcendental but dynamic and living reality, which we can easily
follow by understanding our own nature.
Lao-zi also recommended following this transcendental way in political life. The idea
that "the violent die a violent death" had been taught before, and he made it the
foundation of his teaching. Violence opposes the way of living, and whatever opposes
life will soon perish. The use of force tends to rebound; when armies march, the country
is laid to waste. Whenever a large army is raised, scarcity and want follow. The more
weapons the state has, the more trouble there will be. It is better to withdraw than to
attack. One should not under-estimate one's enemy, and it is possible to confront them
and win them over without fighting them. When there is a battle, those who are kind truly
win. A good leader is not violent; a good fighter does not get angry; a good winner is not
vengeful; a good employer is humble. This is the heavenly way of relating with people.
Lao-zi revered the spirit of the valley as the mystic female that never dies and is the root
of heaven and earth. The wise are humble like water, which flows to the lowest level; yet
they come near the way.
Moderation is taught, as extremes of wealth and honor cannot be kept safe or lead to a
downfall. Heaven's way is to withdraw as soon as one's work is done. Lao-zi asked if one
can concentrate one's vital force to be gentle like a baby, attain mystic clarity, love people
and govern the state without interfering, play the female in opening the doors of heaven,
and understand all without using the mind. Mystical virtue gives birth and nourishes
without taking possession, acts without obligation, and leads without dominating. The
usefulness of things is found in the freedom of their empty spaces. The way is invisible,
inaudible, and intangible. The wise go beyond the senses and satisfy the inner self.
Troubles come from being selfish. Those who value the world as themselves may be
entrusted to care for the world.
The way to make sense of a muddy world is to let it be still until it becomes clear. Those
who are calm and do not overextend themselves can come back to life through activity;
but not wearing out, they are not replaced. In serenity one can see everything return to its
source like vegetation that grows and flourishes. Returning to the source is to know the
eternal and be enlightened, impartial, universal, and in accord with heaven and the way.
Not to know the eternal is to act blindly and court disaster.
The worst leaders are those who are hated; the next worst are feared; the next are loved
and praised; but the best are those the people barely know, such that they say, "We did it
ourselves." When the way is forgotten, the doctrines of humanity and morality arise.
Knowledge and cleverness lead to hypocrisy. When family relationships are not
harmonious, filial piety is advocated. When a country falls into chaos, loyal patriots are
praised. Lao-zi suggested abandoning religion and cleverness, humanity and morality,
skill and profit, and recommended instead simplicity, the natural, controlling selfishness,
and reducing desires. Yielding can preserve unity; bending can straighten; emptying
oneself can be fulfilling; wearing oneself out leads to renewal; having little is to be
content, while having abundance is troubling. Because the wise do not compete, no one
can compete with them.
Lao-zi observed that those standing on tiptoe are not steady; those straining their strides
cannot keep up; those displaying themselves do not illuminate; those justifying
themselves are not distinguished; those making claims are not given credit; and those
seeking glory are not leaders. Frivolous and hasty leaders lose their foundation and self-
mastery. The wise are good at helping people so that no one is rejected, and they are good
at saving things so that nothing is wasted. Thus the good can teach the bad, who can be
the lessons for the good.
Those who try to take over the world do not succeed; tampering with it spoils it, and
seizing it loses it. Lao-zi opposed conquest by force of arms, because it rebounds. When
armies march, scarcity and famine follow. The skillful achieve their purposes and stop
without using violence, which is contrary to the way. Whatever is contrary to the way
will soon perish. Weapons are tools of destruction hated by the people, and followers of
the way never use them. Peaceful leaders favor the creative left; war favors the
destructive right. When the use of weapons cannot be avoided, the best policy is calm
restraint. Victory is not glorious, and those who celebrate it delight in slaughter; such
killing should be mourned. Sharp weapons of the state should not be displayed. That the
violent die a violent death Lao-zi made primary in his teaching.
Virtue does not emphasize its power, and thus is powerful. The inferior never forget their
power, and thus are powerless. The best virtue does not interfere nor have an ulterior
motive. Lesser virtue interferes with an ulterior motive. Humanity takes action without an
ulterior motive, while morality takes action with an ulterior motive. Rules of propriety
take action, and finding no response, force it on them. Thus when the way is lost, things
degenerate from virtue to humanity to morality to the rules of propriety, which is the
superficial expression of loyalty and faithfulness and the beginning of disorder. By
attaining oneness heaven becomes clear, earth stable, spirits divine, valleys fertile,
creatures alive and growing, and kings leaders.
When people live in accord with the way, horses work on farms; but when they do not,
the cavalry practices in the parks. The greatest temptation to crime is desire; the greatest
curse is discontent; the greatest calamity is greed. The wise have no fixed mind-set but
regard the people's minds as their own. They are good to the good and bad, honest to the
honest and dishonest, living peacefully and harmoniously sharing a common heart and
treating the people as their own children. The mystical virtue nourishes, cares for,
develops, shelters, comforts, nurtures, and protects, producing without possessing,
helping without obligating, and guiding without controlling. When the fields are full of
weeds and the granaries are empty, while some wear fancy clothes, carry sharp swords,
over-indulge in food and drink, having more possessions than they can use, the leaders
are robbers; this is not the way.
States are governed by justice, and wars are waged by violations. Yet the world can be
mastered by non-intervention.
When government is relaxed, people are happy; but when it is strict, they are anxious.
When those responsible for justice become unjust, what seems good becomes evil. Lao-zi
recommended frugality to be prepared from the start and in order to build up inner power.
Those with maternal leadership can long endure. Governing a large country is like
cooking a small fish; one must be careful not to overdo it. As the female overcomes the
male with tranquility, a country can win over a small or large country by placing itself
below. The difficult can be handled while it is still easy. Great accomplishments begin
with what is small. The wise always confront difficulties before they get too large,
handling them before they appear and organizing before there is confusion. Be as careful
at the end as at the beginning, and there will be no failure.
The wise in watching over people speak humbly from below them and in leading them
get behind them. Thus they do not oppress them nor block them, but everyone happily
goes along without getting tired. From Lao-zi's three treasures of love, frugality, and not
pushing oneself ahead of others come courage, generosity, and leadership. Love wins all
battles and is the strongest defense; heaven gives people the ability to love in order to
save and protect them. The best soldier is nonviolent; the best fighter is not angry; the
best employer is humble. Strategy says not to be the aggressor but the defender; instead
of advancing, retreat. This paradoxically is movement without moving, stretching the arm
without showing it, confronting enemies with the idea there is no enemy, while holding in
the hand no weapons. No disaster is worse than underestimating the enemy; but when the
battle is joined, the kind will win. Those brave in killing will be killed, while those brave
in not killing will live. The way of heaven does not strive; yet it wins easily.
Like Confucius, Lao-zi found that the best knowledge is to know that you do not know,
and like Socrates he found that thinking you know when you do not is a disease. By
recognizing this disease, the wise are free of it. Since people are not afraid to die, why
threaten them with it? How can we judge who is evil and to be killed? Those who try to
do the work of the Lord of Death by executing rarely escape injuring themselves. Only
those who do not interfere with living are best at valuing life. The way of heaven takes
from those who have too much and gives to those who do not have enough, but the
human way is just the opposite. Only the person of the way has enough to give to the
world. The wise do not hoard; but the more they give, the more they have. Those who
bear the humiliation of the people can minister to them, and those who take on the sins of
the society can lead the world. Lao-zi envisioned a simple society in which food is tasty,
clothes are beautiful, home is comfortable, and customs are delightful so that people feel
no need to travel. The way of heaven sharpens but does not harm and accomplishes
without striving.
Loving mercy brings courage and victory; economy brings abundance and generosity;
and humility brings natural leadership. Heaven gives loving mercy to those it would not
see destroyed. Those who know how to preserve life with these qualities will not be
harmed by wild animals nor wounded in battle, because there is no death in them. Those
courageous in fighting may be killed, but those courageous in not fighting will live.
Living things are tender and flexible, but dead things are stiff and rigid; thus an inflexible
government will be defeated. A large country is like the lower part of a river where the
waters converge; it can win over small countries by placing itself below them, and a
small country can win over a large country by serving it.
Confucius
Confucius is the Latinized form of Kong Fu-zi, which means Kong the master. Confucius
was born in the small state of Lu in 551 BC into the lower aristocratic class of the
impoverished knights, and he died in 479 BC. He lived during the last part of the Spring
and Autumn Era and died two years after the beginning of the Period of Warring States.
This was a time of turmoil, political intrigue, and numerous small wars. Assassinations,
bribery, adultery, and other crimes were common even though punishments were severe.
In Lu three families contended for the hereditary rulership, while numerous educated
aristocrats sought positions in the government, and many suffered poverty. The teachings
of Confucius harmonize well with those of Lao-zi. While the approach of Lao-zi was
mystical, Confucius emphasized ethics and social philosophy. Confucius was the first
well-known professional teacher in ancient China, and he served occasionally as a
political advisor to princes. Through the influence of Confucius' teachings it became
possible for men to rise in social position by educating themselves and developing their
abilities.
By the age of fifteen Confucius had decided to concentrate on learning and the
improvement of his character. By the age of fifty he felt that he knew what the will of
heaven was for him. He advised the local ruler on good government. In his late fifties
when he found that his principles were not really being put into practice, he traveled to
other states looking for a ruler who would listen to his advice. When the Duke of Wei
asked his advice on military strategy, Confucius replied that he had not studied warfare;
he left Wei the next day. While he was journeying through Song, Huan Tui, the minister
of war in that state, attempted to assassinate him. Confucius' confidence was not shaken,
for he said, "Heaven produced the virtue that is in me. What do I have to fear from such a
one as Huan Tui?"6 Apparently Confucius did not hold this incident against Huan Tui's
brother Sima Niu, because he accepted Sima Niu as one of his regular students. Although
eager to give political advice, Confucius twice renounced invitations by rulers, because
they were involved in civil wars.
Returning to Wei to advise the ruling minister there, Confucius was asked by the minister
how he might go about attacking a noble who had offended the minister's daughter.
Confucius told him not to attack; but when the minister went ahead with it, Confucius
prepared his chariot to leave. When the minister apologized, Confucius was ready to stay;
but then messengers arrived inviting him to return to his home state of Lu. Confucius
spent his last five years in Lu, and once Ran Qiu was sent by Ji Kang-zi to ask the
master's opinion about raising taxes. Confucius stood with the people against this; when
Ran Qiu collected the increased taxes, Confucius declared that he was no disciple of his.
Although Confucius did advise Duke Ai to support the common people, advance the
upright, and punish a usurper, he was ignored and felt that he never really had a chance to
show what he could do.
In addition to teaching, Confucius is credited with editing the Book of Odes and the
Spring and Autumn Annals, revising the music and ceremonies, and writing
commentaries on the Book of Changes. The best source for his teachings are the Analects
(Lun Yu), which describe his conversations and were apparently written by his students.
From these accounts we can see not only what Confucius taught but how he taught and
what his attitudes and manners were like. He was said to be free of having forgone
conclusions, dogmatism, obstinacy, and egotism. His manner was affable but firm,
commanding but not harsh; he was polite and completely at ease. Zigong said Confucius
could get information in a foreign state by being cordial, frank, courteous, temperate, and
deferential. Zigong added that this was not the way inquiries were usually made.
Confucius had a gentle sense of humor and did not mind being corrected by his own
students.
Confucius cared most about people and was perhaps the first great humanist in history.
When the stables burned down, he asked if any person had been hurt but did not inquire
about the horses. He recognized the free will of every individual, believing that the
commander of three armies could be removed, but the will of even a common person
could not be taken away. He spoke of the way (dao) when he said, "In the morning hear
the way; in the evening die content."7 Yet he believed that it was humans who made the
way great, not the way that made humans great. Confucius believed that he could even
live among the barbarians, because virtue never dwells alone and will always bring good
neighbors. He believed that a gentleman should help the needy, not make the rich richer
still. Confucius criticized Yuan Si for rejecting his salary of nine hundred measures of
grain as governor, because he could have given it to his neighbors.
Confucius never gave up and believed that he was serving by being filial even if he was
not in the government. He never expected to meet a faultless person but hoped that he
might meet someone of fixed principles even though he saw many examples of nothing
pretending to be something. He greatly disliked sham and deceit. He felt he could not
stoop to clever talk, a pretentious manner, and a reverence that was only of the feet. He
could not bear to see high offices filled with men of narrow views, ceremonies performed
without reverence, and mourning forms observed without grief. He hated seeing sharp
mouths overturning states and clans.
Confucius believed that his mission was to spread the culture that had been passed on to
him by King Wen, and trusting that this was the will of heaven he did not even fear an
assassin. He must have believed in prayer, because he said that whoever turns away from
heaven has no one to pray to. He hoped that even if he was not recognized in the world,
he would be known in heaven. When Confucius became ill, some of his students dressed
up as retainers; but the master reprimanded them for this pretense because he knew he
could not deceive heaven. He preferred to die in the arms of his disciples anyway.
Although he believed there were others as honest as himself, Confucius felt that no one
loved learning as much as he did. Any situation could be a lesson. When walking with
others he could emulate the good qualities he saw in others and correct the bad qualities
in himself. Confucius did not believe himself to be a sage or even perfectly virtuous, but
he did claim unwearying effort to learn and unflagging patience in teaching others.
Confucius taught that a person ought to make his own conduct correct before attempting
to correct or rule over others. The ruler is analogous to the parent whose first obligation is
to love the children; therefore, the ruler must love the people. The people are to be loyal
to the ruler; for Confucius this loyalty means admonishing the leaders when they do
wrong. The essence of Confucius' teachings is humanity (ren). Goodness is loving
people, and wisdom is understanding people. The single motto he believed could be
practiced all the time was the golden rule of consideration: do not do to others what you
do not want them to do to you. Stating it thus in the negative leaves one free to do
anything else; whereas enjoining one to do to others what you want them to do to you
places an expectation of your values on them. When the ruler Ji Kang-zi complained
about all the thieves, Confucius said that if he were free of desire, they would not steal
even if he paid them. When asked if injury should be repaid with virtue, Confucius said
that injury should be repaid with justice so that virtue could be repaid with virtue. When
asked about the true gentleman, Confucius said that he cultivates himself carefully so as
to help other people. In government one ought to lead by example and work hard for the
people.
When the bold and daring Zilu asked him whom he would take with him to command an
army, Confucius replied, "Not the man who is ready to 'attack a tiger bare-handed or
swim across a river' not caring whether he lived or died, but I should take someone who
approaches difficulties with due caution, who likes to plan precisely and carry it out."8
When Confucius was asked what is the first measure in administering a government, the
brash Zilu could not believe his answer that it is to correct the language. So Confucius
explained that if what is said is not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot
be carried out to success; propriety and music will not flourish, and punishments will go
astray. When punishments go astray, people do not know how to move hand or foot. The
Analects concludes with the statement by Confucius that a gentleman must understand
the will of heaven, the rules of propriety, and be able to understand words in order to
understand people. He also admired those who humbly refused the sovereignty and
renounced violence despite their sufferings. Confucius credited Guan Zhong for helping
Duke Huan to unite the states' rulers without using war-chariots.
Confucius believed that if the people were led by governmental measures that kept order
by laws and punishments, they would try to avoid them and would lose all self-respect.
Yet if they were led by virtue with order kept by propriety, they would keep their self-
respect and set themselves right. Confucius observed that if one's actions were motivated
by profit, one would have many enemies. Confucius did not like competition and pointed
out that even in an archery match the contenders were gentlemen at the drinking-bout
afterward. He believed that the ancients studied for self-improvement, but that now
people learn in order to impress people.
For Confucius propriety enabled the ancient kings to establish harmony and beauty.
Without propriety courtesy becomes tiresome, caution becomes timidity, daring
insubordination, and straightforwardness rudeness. It is better to be sparing than
extravagant in ceremonies, and funerals are to be observed with deep sorrow, not fear. A
gentleman properly blends substance and refinement, for too much of the first is rude and
of the latter pedantic. Yet Confucius believed that anyone who followed the rules of
propriety completely would be thought a sycophant.
Confucius always kept in mind the practical goals of education. He asked if one could
recite the three hundred Odes but did not know how to act in government or answer
specific questions on a mission, of what use was extensive knowledge? The first step is
for one to correct one's own conduct, then one may assist in governing others. But if one
cannot rectify oneself, how could one ever rectify others? Wisdom may bring one into
power, but goodness is needed to secure that power. Without dignity one will not be
respected by the common people, and the rules of propriety must also be followed. With
sincere faith and the love of learning one should not be afraid to die in pursuing the way.
Dangerous and chaotic states should be avoided. If the way does not prevail, it is better to
hide, and the wealthy and honored ought to be ashamed. When the way does prevail, one
may show oneself and be bold in speech and action.
Like Lao-zi, Confucius believed in following the way. How else could one get out of the
house except through the door or find one's way into the Inner Room? Knowing the way
leads to loving it, and loving it leads to taking delight in it. When Ji Kang-zi asked
Confucius if he should kill those who do not have the way, the master said, "You are
there to rule, not to kill. If you desire what is good, the people will be good."9 In loving
their children and people, parents and rulers must exact some effort from them, and in
being loyal to parents and rulers, children and the people should not refrain from
admonishing the object of their loyalty. In addition to attending strictly to business and
punctually observing promises, Confucius said an administrator is economical in
expenditure, loves the people, and uses the peasants' labor only at the proper seasons of
the year.
The Chinese word for virtue (de) implies power and something that can be built up within
oneself. Confucius said he never found anyone whose desire for virtue was as strong as
the sexual desire for beauty. Virtue can be gained by doing the work first before
considering the reward and by attacking the evil within oneself rather than the evil in
others. One of the great threats Confucius saw to virtue was the confusion of clever talk,
just as small impatiences can ruin great projects. For Confucius the good are never
unhappy, the wise never confused, and the brave never afraid. Courage, however, must
not take priority over justice, or an aristocrat would become an insurgent and a common
person a thief. The higher knowledge of wisdom is to know when one knows something
and when one does not. "Whoever learns but does not think is lost; but whoever thinks
but does not learn is in danger."10
Perhaps the teachings of Confucius regarding inner peace and peaceful society can best
be summarized by the brief portion attributed to him in the Confucian classic Higher
Education (Da Xue).
Mo-zi
Mo-zi was born about ten years after the death of Confucius, and he died about twenty
years before Mencius was born in 371 BC. He studied under the scholars of the growing
Confucian school, but he became an independent religious teacher with several hundred
devoted disciples. Living ascetically and preaching universal love, he criticized the
Confucian philosophy for its excessive use of rituals, elaborate funerals and music, and
what he believed to be its fatalism. Moism challenged Confucianism for prominence in
China for two hundred years until it declined during the era of warring states before the
violent founding of the Qin empire. Chinese Confucians rejected Mo's philosophy mostly
because they believed that they should love their families more than other people; thus
they disagreed with his philosophy of universal love. For most of its history since then
China has been influenced by Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism. Perhaps Mo-zi's
philosophy of universal love without distinction was too idealistic for a culture that was
so loyal to family ties, and his criticism of their rituals went against their social habits.
Mo-zi became a minister in the state of Song but often traveled to different states to
advise rulers on how they could apply his teachings. He believed that justice has the
power to serve people and produce wealth. Mo-zi thought of being a farmer to feed
people or a weaver to clothe people or a soldier to defend people; but he decided that if
he could persuade rulers to adopt his principles of justice, then states would be orderly,
and the benefit would be greater than by plowing or weaving. A friend said he was
foolish for persisting in the struggle for justice, since he was almost alone. Mo-zi replied
that like the farmer who had only one son out of ten actually working, his efforts should
be encouraged even more.
Gong Shu-zi invented grappling hooks and rams for Chu and asked Mo-zi if he had any
device as good in his justice. Mo-zi said that he pulled with love and pushed with respect,
because without love there is no intimacy and without respect there is rapid desecration,
which without intimacy leads to separation. Thus mutual love and respect bring mutual
benefit, but pulling in order to stop retreat and pushing to stop an advance is nothing but
mutual injury.
Mo-zi and his disciples traveled from place to place preaching and attempting to prevent
wars. When Mo-zi heard that Kong Shu Ban had constructed ladders so that he could
attack the small state of Song, he walked ten days and ten nights, tearing off pieces of his
garment to wrap his feet, in order to talk with Kong Shu Ban. Mo-zi began by asking him
to kill someone in the north who had humiliated him, but Kong Shu Ban declared that
murder was against his principles. Then Mo-zi bowed in apology and explained that for a
ruler of a large state to attack a small and innocent state was also against the principle of
killing. When Kong Shu Ban argued that he had already promised his king he would
attack, Mo-zi asked to be presented to the king. He asked the king why one who has so
much would try to steal from one who has little. The king mentioned the ladders, but Mo-
zi laid out a model city and showed how he with only a small stick could defend the city
against Kong Shu Ban's machines. Aware that the king was thinking he could murder
him, Mo-zi declared that three hundred of his disciples were waiting on the city wall of
Song with implements of defense. Even though he might be killed, the city could not be
taken. So the king decided not to attack.
Several of Mo-zi's writings are on the subjects of fortifications and defense against
attacks. Gong Shang Guo, after talking with Mo-zi, recommended him to the Lord of
Yue, who sent fifty wagons to Lu to induce Mo-zi to come and instruct him, promising
also a large piece of land in the former state of Wu. Yet Mo-zi only asked for the food
and clothing necessary for his body; but if the Lord of Yue was not going to listen to his
words, he did not need to go outside of the empire to sell his justice.
When the Lord of Lu was afraid that Qi was going to attack him, he asked Mo-zi if there
was any remedy. Mo-zi suggested that he revere heaven and the spirits above while
loving and benefiting the people below; he should humble his speech, befriend the
neighboring lords, and lead his state in serving Qi. Mo-zi also advised the general of Qi
that to attack Lu was wrong, and he gave examples from history how large states had
attacked small states and been defeated by the vengeance of the feudal lords. He asked
the Grand Lord of Qi who would be cursed for capturing a state, ruining an army, and
destroying the people, and after deliberation the Lord realized that it would be himself.
In Wei as an envoy, Mo-zi cautioned Gong Liang Huan-zi that a small state like Wei
between Qi and Jin is like a poor family in the midst of rich families; the poor family that
imitates the rich in extravagance will be ruined. If the money spent on luxuries was
devoted to self-defense in this emergency, the state would be more secure. Sima Qian's
Historical Records mention that Mo-zi was imprisoned in Song on the advice of Zi Han,
who in 404 BC murdered Duke Zhao of Song. The historian also credited Mo-zi with
being skilled at defense and practicing frugality. Mo-zi had recommended Cao Gong-zi
to the state of Song, and after three years he returned complaining of the frugal food and
clothing in Mo-zi's school; now several members of his family have died, six animals
have not bred, and he himself has suffered ailments. Mo-zi replied that he was not fair,
because the man did not give up his position to the virtuous, did not share his wealth with
the poor, and then merely served the spirits by sacrificing to them. This was like shutting
one of a hundred gates and then wondering how the thieves entered.
In 393 BC Prince Wen of Lu Yang was planning to attack Zheng. Mo-zi went to stop him
and asked him what he would do if his large cities attacked his small cities, killing the
people and taking their goods. Prince Wen replied that he would punish them severely, to
which Mo-zi asked whether heaven would punish him if he attacked Zheng. Prince Wen,
however, felt that it was the will of heaven, because they had murdered their lords for
three generations and had already suffered three hard years of heaven's punishment. Mo-
zi posed the case of a father, who was punishing his son when the neighbor's father struck
his son, saying it is in accord with the father's will. If a lord attacks neighboring states,
kills their people, takes away their goods, and then writes down how powerful he is, is
that any better than a common man who does the same thing to his neighbors? Prince
Wen then realized that what the world takes for granted may not be right after all. Mo-zi
said that gentlemen of the world know only trifles, not what is important. If a man steals
a pig, they call him wrong; but if a state is stolen, they call it just. Finally Prince Wen
referred to the barbarians who practice cannibalism; but Mo-zi complained that in the
civilized world, instead of killing the father to reward the son, they kill the sons (in war)
to reward the fathers.
Mo-zi had a school and recommended several of his disciples for political positions in
Chu, Wei, and Song. He sent Sheng Zhuo to serve Xiang-zi Niu, who invaded Lu three
times accompanied by Sheng Zhuo. So Mo-zi sent Gao Sun-zi to call him back, saying
that he sent Zhuo there to cure pride and regulate insolence; but Zhuo was drawing a
large salary and flattering his master. For Mo-zi, to preach justice and not do it is an
intentional wrong. He thought Zhuo knew better, but his justice had been overcome by
the emolument.
Mo-zi praised his disciple Gao Shi-zi for leaving the Lord of Wei after his counsels were
ignored three times, because when the way is not being observed in the world, a superior
person does not stay in a position of plenty. However, when Gao-zi said that he could
administer a country, Mo-zi replied that to govern is to carry out what one teaches. As the
students of Mo-zi already knew, Gao-zi did not behave according to what he taught,
which means he himself was in revolt. Being unable to govern himself, how could he
govern a country?
One man once challenged Mo-zi that his idea of universal love did not benefit the world
and this man's not loving the world did no harm. Mo-zi posed a parable. If there was a
terrible fire, and one man fetched water to extinguish it and another fuel to reinforce it,
even though neither had yet accomplished anything, which one was more valuable? Thus
the intention to love universally was better than the opposite. Mo-zi exhorted people to be
virtuous for the good that it would do for all. However, too often the rulers honored
relatives, the rich, and the good-looking rather than those with merit. Mo-zi suggested
that people identify with heaven, which is universally beneficial. Those who obey the
will of heaven practice justice; but those who use force are disobeying the will of heaven.
When justice is followed, the strong will not oppress the weak, the eminent will not lord
it over the humble, and the cunning will not deceive the stupid. Mo-zi transcended
political authority when he said that people must go beyond identifying with the son of
heaven (emperor) and identify with heaven itself.
Mo-zi felt that one should not criticize others without having an alternative to offer them.
He suggested universal love instead of partiality. How can this be done? If people were to
regard other states as they regard their own, they would not attack one another; for it
would be like attacking one's own state.
The universal person regards one's friend the same as oneself and the father of one's
friend as one's father. Only the person who does this can be considered a truly superior
person. Such a person will feed people when they are hungry, clothe them when they are
cold, nourish them when they are sick, and bury them when they die. The selfish person
will not. To which type of person will one trust the support of one's parents, to the
universal person or the selfish one? Even if one does not believe in universal love, that
person would trust his or her family to the universal person. Also if people had to choose
between these two types of rulers, who would they follow? Thus people may criticize
universal love in words, but they adopt it in practice.
If we want other people to love and benefit our parents, then we must make it a point first
to love and benefit others' parents. Thus Mo-zi showed how universal love and mutual
benefit can be profitable and easy, but the only trouble is that no ruler delights in them. If
rulers did adopt them, Mo-zi predicted that the people would turn to universal love and
mutual benefit as naturally as fire turns upward and water flows downward. This is the
way of the ancient sage kings to bring about safety for the rulers and officials and to
assure ample food and clothing for the people. If this is put into practice, rulers will be
generous, subjects loyal, fathers kind, sons filial, older brothers friendly, and younger
brothers respectful.
In his "Honoring the Worthy" Mo-zi acknowledged that rulers and officials all want their
states to be wealthy, their populations numerous, and their administrations well ordered,
but he found that they are poor, few, and chaotic. Mo-zi recommended that those
governing honor the worthy and employ the capable so that government will be more
effective and the people prosperous. Also those without ability must be demoted in order
to do away with private likes and dislikes. Mo-zi taught that when the wise rule, there
will be order; but when the stupid rule over the wise, there will be chaos. Thus the
ancient sage kings honored the worthy and employed the capable without showing any
special consideration for their own kin, no partiality for the eminent and rich, and no
favoritism for the good-looking. Thus the people were encouraged by these rewards to
become more capable, and the sage kings listened to the worthy, watched their actions,
observed their abilities, and assigned them to the proper office.
To accomplish this three principles must be followed: first, the positions of the worthy
must be exalted enough so that the people will respect them; second, the salaries must be
generous so that people will have confidence in them; and third, their orders must be
enforced so that people will be in awe of them. According to Mo-zi in the ancient times
worthy men who accomplished anything gave the credit to the ruler, while all grudges
and complaints were directed against subordinates so that the ruler always had peace and
joy, while the ministers handled the cares and sorrows. The ruler, however, must be
willing to delegate responsibility and pay out stipends. The unworthy steal and plunder in
government and, if assigned a city, betray their trust or rebel. They do not know to
employ the capable but instead hire their relatives and those who happen to be eminent or
attractive.
In "Identifying with One's Superior" Mo-zi speculated that at first people lived in chaos,
because each person had their own views; this resulted in conflict. Eventually people
chose the most capable as leaders so that government could be unified and under
intelligent direction. The son of heaven (emperor) then appointed high ministers, who
helped regulate the feudal lords and chiefs, who in turn chose the worthy and able to act
as officials. Then the son of heaven proclaimed the law that anyone hearing of good or
evil must report it to one's superior. The judgments of the superior are to be respected;
but if a superior commits a fault, the subordinates are to remonstrate. Those who do good
are to be rewarded and those who do evil punished, and the greatest care must be taken
that these are just.
However, Mo-zi also believed that the people should not only identify with the son of
heaven but with heaven itself, or else there will be no end to calamities, which are
punishments from heaven. Someone asked Mo-zi why then was there such disorder in the
empire. Mo-zi used the example of the barbarian Miao to explain that punishments must
be applied with instruction and admonition or else they become mere tortures. Originally
government intended to benefit people and eliminate adversity, to help the poor, increase
the few, bring safety where there was danger, and restore order where there was
confusion. At the present, however, administration is carried on by court flattery, and
fathers and brothers and other relatives and friends are appointed rulers of the people.
Since people realize that they have not been appointed for the welfare of the people, they
do not respect them nor identify with them. Thus the purposes of government are not
unified; rewards do not encourage people to do good; and punishments do not restrain
them from doing evil.
The ancient sage kings had many to help them see and hear, because they could trust their
staff in administering. Virtuous people, even far away, were found and rewarded, while
the wicked were also punished; thieves and robbers could not find refuge anywhere. Mo-
zi believed that whoever asks the people to identify with their superiors must love them
dearly; otherwise they would not trust the ruler and obey orders. People can be led with
the rewards of wealth and honor ahead of them and pushed from behind with just
punishments.
Mo-zi wrote most vehemently against offensive warfare. Everyone condemns stealing
and violence against others on an individual level. Yet when it comes to the greater
injustice of offensive warfare against other states, gentlemen do not know enough to
condemn it; instead they praise it and call it just. To kill one person is a capital crime; but
when states kill hundreds, they praise it and write down the record for posterity. Mo-zi
complained that the feudal lords of his day continued to attack and annex their
neighboring states, claiming they were honoring justice.
The ancient sage kings strove to unite the world in harmony in order to bring people
together. Contemporary rulers examine the relative merits of their soldiers and weapons
and then set off to attack some innocent state where they destroy crops, cut down trees,
raze walls, fill in moats and ponds, slaughter animals, burn temples, massacre the people,
and carry away their treasures. The soldiers are urged on with the idea that to die is the
highest honor, and the penalty for running away is death. Does this benefit heaven? It is
attacking the people of heaven. Does this benefit humans? Mo-zi ironically wrote,
Mo-zi recounted how many hundreds of officials and how many thousands of soldiers
were required for these expeditions that might last several years. Meanwhile officials
must neglect government, farmers their crops, and women their weaving. If one-fifth of
the supplies and weapons are salvaged afterwards, it is considered fortunate. Countless
men will desert or die of starvation, cold, and sickness. He asked if it is not perverse that
rulers and officials delight in the injury and extermination of the people of the world.
Usually it is the larger states like Qi, Jin, Chu, and Yue that attack the smaller ones,
which is like destroying what one does not have enough of for the sake of what one
already has in excess. In this way many states have been made extinct, while hardly more
than these four powerful states remain. The world has become as weary as a little boy
who has spent the day playing horse.
Mo-zi wished someone would conduct diplomacy in good faith and think first of how to
benefit others, would feel concerned with others when a large state commits an unjust act,
would with others help rescue the small state that is attacked by a large state, and would
help small states repair their defenses and get supplies of cloth and grain and funds; then
the smaller states would be pleased. If others struggle while one is at ease, and if one is
merciful and generous, the people will be won over. If one substitutes good government
for offensive warfare and spends less on the army, one will gain rich benefits. If one acts
according to justice and sets an example for others, then one will have no enemies and
bring incalculable benefit to the world.
Mo-zi believed that heaven knows of the crimes people commit. Heaven loves justice and
hates injustice. If we lead the people to devote themselves to justice, then we are doing
what heaven wants. How does one know heaven wants justice? In the world where there
is justice there is life, wealth, and order, and where there is no justice there is death,
poverty, and disorder. Since heaven desires life, wealth, and order, it follows that it
desires justice. Whoever obeys the will of heaven by loving all people universally and
working for their benefit will be rewarded. Those who disobey the will of heaven by
showing partiality and hatred in injuring others will surely incur punishment. The former
regard justice as right, but the latter believe force is right.
Heaven desires that those who have strength work for others, those with wealth share
with others, those above attend diligently to government, and those below diligently carry
out their tasks so that the state will be well ordered. When the state avoids armed clashes
on its borders, when it devotes its efforts to feeding the hungry, giving rest to the weary,
and taking care of its subjects, then human relations will be good. Mo-zi believed that
heaven loves the world universally and seeks mutual benefit for all creatures. There is not
even the tip of a hair that is not the work of heaven. For Mo-zi the will of heaven was like
the compass to the wheelwright or a square to a carpenter; it is the standard to measure
government as well as words and actions. The sage kings devoted themselves to
universality and shunned partiality, but the feudal lords regard might as right.
For Mo-zi those with a universal mind love a friend the same as themselves, and their
friend's father the same as their own father. Thus they will feed those who are hungry,
clothe those who are cold, take care of those who are sick, and bury those who die.
Would it be wiser to entrust one's parents to such universally minded people or to those
who are partial? Likewise rulers ought to care for their subjects in the same way as
universally minded people do, and government ought to treat another state the same as its
own state. Such a government would never attack another state. By not threatening other
states they would be left in peace, and by reducing military expenditures prosperity
would result. Mo-zi believed that warfare as mass murder was that much more of a crime
than a single murder, and yet often people praise war and call it just. Murdering people is
hardly the way to benefit them, and the expenditures of warfare cripple the nation's
livelihood and exhaust the resources of the people. During war the affairs of government
are neglected, the farms lie fallow, and many of the best people are lost. Mo-zi concluded
by asking if rulers who glory in injuring and exterminating the people of the world are
not perverse.
Mencius
Mencius (371-289 BC) studied under the pupil of Confucius' grandson, and his writings
became one of the four Confucian classics. Like Confucius and Mo-zi, he was a
professional teacher and a political advisor who traveled from state to state. According to
the historian Sima Qian, Mencius went to Qi to serve King Xuan. He also went to Liang,
where King Hui found his views impractical and remote from reality before he fully
listened to them. Then Mencius retired, and with the help of his disciple Wan Zhang and
others he wrote his philosophy in seven books.
The first book of Mencius begins by describing his visit to King Hui of Liang in Wei; he
ruled from 370 to 319 BC. The aged king assumed that Mencius came a long way
because he believed he could bring profit to his state. Mencius replied that concern for
profit is what imperils a state; all that matters is what is good and right. King Hui said he
had worked hard in governing and asked why his population had not increased. Mencius
told him that he was too fond of war. If he did not interfere with the busy seasons in the
fields, then the people would have more grain to eat. If he did not allow nets with too fine
a mesh to be used in the large ponds, there would be more fish to eat. If the cutting down
of trees with axes was limited, there would be enough timber. By caring for education in
village schools and teaching proper human relationships, humans would respect each
other and their king. But failing to garner surplus food or distribute it when people are
starving, saying it is the fault of the harvest, is like killing a man and blaming it on the
weapon. Good government reduces punishment and taxation, gets the people to plow
deeply and weed promptly, and helps the able to learn.
The king of Liang asked Mencius how the empire could be settled, and he replied that
one who is not fond of killing could unite it; but among the shepherds of people at that
time there was not one doing so. Mencius said that King Hui could become a true king by
bringing peace to the people; but he was failing because he did not practice kindness. It
was not that he lacked the ability, but he had refused to act in the proper way. Mencius
knew that the king wanted to extend his territory, rule over the central kingdoms and
bring peace to the barbarians on the borders; but his way of going about it was like
looking for a fish by climbing a tree. Not only was it unlikely he would find it; but his
way was worse because it would also cause disaster. If he practiced good government, the
office seekers would want to be in his court, the farmer to till his land, the merchants to
use his marketplace, the travelers to go by his roads, and all those who hate their rulers
would come to him with their complaints. Mencius said that only a gentleman can keep a
constant heart; the people tend to lose constancy and go astray, falling into excesses. To
punish them then is like setting a trap for them. A bright ruler makes sure they have what
they need before he drives them toward the good; thus it is easy for them to follow him.
To accomplish this he must go back to the fundamentals of nurturing the people's needs
and providing education.
When King Hui died, his successor seemed to Mencius to lack dignity; so he went to
advise Xuan, who had become king of Qi in 320 BC. Mencius suggested that King Xuan
share his enjoyments with his people, for when a king's park is open to the people they
consider it small; but when they are prohibited from entering it, they naturally think it is
too large. King Xuan asked how he could promote good relations with other states.
Mencius said that by submitting to a state smaller than his one delights in heaven and
enjoys possession of the empire, and in submitting to a larger state one is in awe of
heaven and enjoys the possession of one's own state. Mencius told how Duke Jing
followed wise advice and opened his granaries for the poor; another ruler cared for the
aged and orphans.
Although King Xuan said these things were well spoken, he could not put them into
practice because he loved money and women. When Mencius asked the king what should
be done if someone entrusted his wife and family to the care of a friend, and they were
allowed to suffer cold and hunger, the King said he should break with his friend; if the
marshal of the Guards could not control his guards, he should be replaced. Yet when
Mencius asked what should be done if the whole realm is ill-governed, the King turned to
his attendants and changed the subject. Mencius advised that when the attendants all give
the same recommendation and the counselors and everyone else does also, it still should
be investigated to see if what they say is true. In this way good and wise men may be
appointed, and unsuitable officers may be removed.
King Xuan asked if regicide was permitted since Shang founder Tang banished Jie, and
King Wu marched against the last Shang king; but Mencius responded that these rulers so
mutilated humanity that they should be called outcasts not kings. In 315 BC the king of
Yen abdicated in favor of his prime minister Zizhi, causing a revolt in Yen. Mencius was
asked if it was all right to march on Yen. He said yes, because the king had no right to
give Yen to another; but he explained that he was not encouraging Qi to invade Yen,
because only a heaven-appointed officer had the right to do so. After Qi invaded Yen,
King Xuan asked Mencius if he should annex Yen. Mencius said that if annexing it
would please its people, then it could be done; but if annexing it antagonized its people,
then he should not. Qi annexed Yen, and most of the feudal lords planned to aid Yen.
King Xuan asked Mencius how he should meet the threat. Mencius referred to the
example of Tang, founder of the Shang dynasty and then gave the following advice:
Mencius later explained that he never intended to stay long in Qi; but he was unable to
leave because the war broke out. Duke Mu of Zuou asked Mencius what he should do
after thirty-three of his officers died without the people helping them. Mencius recalled
that in the years of bad harvest nearly a thousand of his people had suffered in spite of
full granaries because his officials had not informed him of what was happening. Zeng-
zi's warning that what you mete out will be paid back to you came to pass. Mencius said
the Duke should not hold a grudge against the people, because if he practices good
government, they will love their superiors and even die for them.
Mencius advised Duke Wen of the small state of Teng to do good and hope that heaven
will grant success. In starting an enterprise a gentleman can only leave behind a tradition
that can be carried on. He cited the case of a leader of Bin, who told his people that the Di
tribes wanted their land, and so rather than bring harm to them he was leaving. The
people of Bin realized that he was a good man and flocked after him as if to market.
Others decided to stay and defend their land. These were the two choices.
Mencius declared that the appearance of a true king was never more overdue than in his
time when the people suffered under such tyrannical governments. He did not just admire
the ancients; he believed that twice as much could be done in his time with half the effort.
Along with the legendary sages, Bo Yi and Yi Yin, he admired Confucius most of all.
They were capable of winning the homage of the feudal lords; but if they had to kill one
innocent person in order to gain the empire, none of them would have consented to do so.
People only submit to force unwillingly because they are not strong enough to resist; but
when they submit to the transforming influence of ethics, they do so sincerely with
admiration in their hearts. Goodness brings honor, but cruelty brings disgrace. When the
good and wise rule, the able are employed; in times of peace the laws can be explained to
the people, but the ruler indulging in pleasures and indolence courts disaster. If the good
and wise are honored and the able are employed, gentlemen will come to the court. If
goods are exempted from taxation in the marketplace and premises are exempted from
land taxes, traders will come. If there is no fee at border stations, travelers will come. If
tillers pay no land tax but help in the public fields, farmers will come.
Mencius believed that no one is devoid of a heart sensitive to the suffering of others and
used the example of a baby about to fall into a well. Anyone will naturally be moved by
compassion to prevent the tragedy, not to get into the good graces of the parents nor to
win praise nor because one dislikes to hear a child cry. Whoever is devoid of a heart of
compassion and shame over right or wrong is not human. From this heart comes
goodness, duty, courtesy, propriety, and wisdom; anyone lacking these is a slave.
Practicing the good is like archery: when one fails to hit the mark, one must correct
oneself. If others do not respond to your love, look into your own humanity. If others fail
to respond to your governing, consider your own wisdom. If others do not return your
courtesy, look at your own respect. Whenever you fail to achieve your purpose, examine
yourself.
The best person, like the great Shun, is not afraid to learn from others, and after doing
good oneself goes on to help others do good. Mencius believed that the good and talented
ought to help those who are less so. Only one who will not do some things is capable of
doing great things. He warned people to think of the consequences before pointing out
the shortcomings of others. Doing what is right was paramount for Mencius, as he
believed that a great person might not always keep one's word or see actions through to
the end, if these were not right. A superior person finds the way in oneself, is at ease with
it, and draws deeply from it, finding its source wherever one turns. Those who follow the
way have many supporters; those who do not have few. At court rank is exalted, and in
the village age is respected; but for assisting the world and governing people virtue is
best. Mencius accused the governor of Ping Lu of refusing to report to duty several times
because he allowed his people to starve during a famine.
Mencius recommended that if farmers help each other to keep watch and nurse each other
in illness, they will live in love and harmony. The way cannot be bent to please others; no
one has ever straightened others by bending oneself. Mencius mentioned that the current
teachings in the empire were those of Yang Zhu and Mo-zi. Yang Zhu taught everyone
for oneself, and Mo-zi advocated love without making any preference for family.
Mencius felt this was no better than beasts. Mencius believed that love of one's parents
was the first step which could lead to peace in the empire. Pleasing one's parents begins
by being true to oneself which depends on understanding goodness. By pleasing one's
parents one can win the trust of friends, the confidence of superiors, and thus govern the
people.
Mencius referred to Confucius criticizing Ran Qiu for agreeing to raise taxes. How much
more would he reject those who wage war on behalf of rulers to gain land and fill the
plains with the dead! Mencius called this showing the land how to devour human flesh.
For Mencius, a great person retains the heart of a child. He felt that even goodness could
not be used to dominate people. One can only succeed by using goodness for the welfare
of the people, and one can never gain the empire without their heart-felt admiration. The
good retain their hearts and love others, and the courteous respect others. Sages may live
in retirement or in the world, but they always keep their integrity intact. The heart of
compassion is good; the heart of shame is dutiful; the heart of respect is appropriate; and
the heart of right and wrong is wise. Mencius said, "Seek and you will find it; let go and
you will lose it."15 People become different because of what ensnares their hearts. The
sage is merely the one who discovers what is right and reasonable in the heart.
Mencius observed that once the trees had been luxuriant on Ox Mountain, but being near
a city they were constantly chopped by axes. With rain and dew new shoots came out; but
then cattle and sheep grazed upon the mountain, leaving it bald. Is this the nature of the
mountain? Similarly humans lose their true hearts, just as the trees were lopped off day
by day. Humans rest at night, but each day dissipates what has been gained. When what
was original is no longer preserved, they become like animals. Anything will grow with
the right nourishment, but without it anything will wither away. Goodness is the heart,
and conscientiousness is the correct road. When the heart strays, people often fail to go
after it; yet when chickens stray, people will retrieve them. For Mencius the sole concern
of learning is to go after this strayed heart. People love all the parts of their person.
However, the petty person harms the more important in seeking what is less valuable,
while the great person nurtures the parts of greater importance. Heaven has given to
humans a heart that can think and tell the difference. However, if one does not think, one
will not find the answer.
Mencius compared goodness to water, which can overcome the cruelty of fire. Some try
to put out a cartload of burning wood with a cup of water and then say water cannot
overcome fire. To do this is to place one on the side of the most cruel; in the end they
perish. The way is like a broad road that is not difficult to find. The problem is that
people simply do not look for it. Those who do look for it will find enough teachers.
Once Mencius met a man, who was going to Chu to persuade them that war was
unprofitable. Mencius commended his purpose but suggested that by putting profit first
ethics may be excluded, and the result will be chaos. By placing the ethics of what is best
for all before people all human relationships can be made mutually beneficial.
Mencius explained how morality had degenerated from the three ancient emperors to the
five protectors of the feudal lords to the current feudal lords and their counselors, each of
which offended against those who came before. The emperor used to inspect the domain,
and the feudal lords reported on their duties; those who needed it were given aid. In the
feudal system lords were rewarded with land. If the land was neglected, the good and
wise overlooked, and grasping men put in power, then the lord was reprimanded. Thus
the emperor punished but did not attack, while the feudal lords attack but do not punish.
The protectors then intimidated the feudal lords to attack other feudal lords.
The most illustrious of the protectors, Duke Huan of Qi, got the feudal lords to agree to a
pledge which included first: not punishing dutiful sons nor putting aside heirs nor
elevating concubines; second: honoring the good and wise and training the capable; third:
respecting the aged and being kind to the young, guests, and travelers; fourth: not making
offices hereditary, nor letting one man hold more than one office nor allowing a feudal
lord to execute a counselor solely on his own authority; and fifth: not allowing diversion
of dikes nor prohibiting the sale of rice. Today, complained Mencius, the feudal lords
violate all of these five injunctions. Yet Mencius concluded that the crime of encouraging
a ruler to evil deeds is small compared to the pandering to his unspoken evil desires. Thus
the counselors of the time offend against the feudal lords.
Mencius held that a good person would not even take from one person to give to another,
let alone seek territory at the cost of human lives. To enrich a ruler, who is neither
attracted to the way nor good to the people, is like enriching a tyrant. When about to
place a great responsibility on a person, heaven may test one with hardship and frustrated
efforts in order to toughen one's nature and correct deficiencies. People usually only
mend their ways after making mistakes. Those whose minds are frustrated learn how to
innovate.
Mencius believed that those who understand their own nature will know heaven; by
retaining the heart and nurturing their nature they serve heaven. He found no greater joy
than finding upon self-examination that he is being true to himself. He taught the golden
rule of trying your best to treat others as you would wish to be treated yourself as the
shortest path to goodness. The best person does not abandon what is right in adversity nor
depart from the way in success. In obscurity one can perfect one's own person; in
prominence one can perfect the whole empire as well. For Mencius good government was
not as important as good education, because the people fear good government; but they
love good education. Good government wins their wealth, but good education wins their
hearts. Mencius believed it contrary to goodness to kill even one person and contrary to
justice to take what one is not entitled to. The wise person knows everything but
considers only what demands attention urgent. The good person loves everyone but
devotes oneself in close association with the good and wise.
Mencius pointed out how Duke Hui of Liang extended his ruthlessness from those he did
not love to those he did by sending to war even the young men he loved, whereas a good
person extends one's love to those one does not love. Mencius could find no just wars in
the Spring and Autumn Era but only peers trying to punish one another by war. He
considered those who thought of themselves as military experts to be grave criminals.
The trouble with people, he thought, was that they leave their own fields to weed others'
fields, being exacting toward others but indulgent toward themselves. Like Confucius,
Mencius rejected high taxes and warfare; he said that those who are skillful in warfare
deserve the severest punishment. The sovereign of a state who loves humanity will have
no enemy in the world. The sage achieves humane government by means of education,
not by means of weapons. Mencius cited the expedition of King Wu. The king told the
people not to fear, because he was bringing peace to them, not war. On hearing this, the
people bowed their heads and prostrated themselves to the ground. The expression "to
battle" should mean "to rectify." If everyone wished to be rectified, what need would
there be for war?
Mencius believed that human nature is innately good and that we need only discover the
heart. He criticized Mo-zi's doctrine of universal love without distinctions, advocating
humanity that discerns the proper distinctions in human relationships. He recommended
humane government and felt that justice is far more important than utility and profit.
Mencius believed that virtue is inherent in everyone's nature and that therefore everyone
is equal to everyone else; also the people are most important in the state, and they have
the right to change their government.
Notes
1. Chun Ts'ew, with the Tso Chuen tr. James Legge, 9:27:2, p. 534.
2. Ibid.
3. Lao-zi, Way Power Book (Dao De Jing) 33 tr. Sanderson Beck in Wisdom Bible, p. 21.
4. Ibid., 8.
5. Ibid., 57.
6. Analects tr. Arthur Waley, 7:22.
7. Ibid., 4:8.
8. Ibid., 7:10.
9. Ibid., 12:19.
10. Ibid., 2:15.
11. Higher Education tr. Sanderson Beck and Ken Tsang in Wisdom Bible, p. 40-41.
12. Basic Writings of Mo Tzu tr. Burton Watson, p. 41.
13. Ibid., p. 54.
14. Mencius tr. D. C. Lau, 1B:11, p. 70.
15. Ibid. 6A:6, p. 163.
Copyright © 2003-2005 by Sanderson Beck
Swami Paramarthananda tells a story about a game he used to play as a child. They
would take a child into a room that was entirely empty and then would place pillows
about the room and stand the child up against one wall. He was told to memorize the
positions of the pillows and then they blindfolded him. He was then told that he had to
cross the room to the other wall without touching any of the pillows. The other children
then watched as he very carefully edged his way forward. Whenever they laughed, he
would retreat and move sideways before trying again. Eventually he reached the other
wall and was allowed to remove the blindfold. He then discovered that all of the pillows
had been removed before he began and that he had been moving across an empty floor
trying to avoid non-existent objects.
And he says that mokSha is like this. As seekers, we make our way through life trying
to avoid all the pitfalls of self-ignorance and arrive at the other wall of Self-knowledge
and enlightenment. But when we attain enlightenment, we realize that there never were
any obstacles to begin with. In a sense, the ignorance was non-existent – tat tvam asi
already.
About Reincarnation
Sri Parthasarathy has a nice story about this. It is about an apparently mad hermit who lives outside of a
village. Each day at sunrise he emerges from his cave and begins to push a huge boulder up the adjacent
hillside. Heavy though it is, he struggles in the growing heat of the day until eventually he manages to
reach the top. As soon as this has been achieved, he turns around, pushes the boulder over the edge and
watches as it rolls all the way back down to the bottom. He laughs out loud at this and then returns to his
cave for the day. He becomes so notorious that people come from miles around to watch this insane
activity and shake their heads in bewilderment. One day, several strangers come to the village explaining
that they are disciples of a famous Sage who deserted them several years ago. They are told about the
hermit but that this cannot be their master since he is clearly quite mad. Nevertheless they go to watch the
next day and after the exhibition, fall on their knees before him – it is their master. Asked about his
strange behavior they explain that all of the hermit’s efforts are to try to illustrate to us our own ludicrous
situation. We have spent probably millions of lives, working our way up from plants and insects to the
pinnacle of evolution where we now stand on the brink of realizing our divine nature. And, for the sake of
a few transient worldly pleasures, we throw all of this away and go back to the beginning.
ADVAITA VEDANTA
Transliteration Key
Introduction -
The advaita philosophy is not easy to explain briefly, and it is not my intention
to repeat in a www home page what takes whole volumes for accomplished
experts. I will content myself with providing a brief synopsis of the various
aspects of advaita vedAnta.
A very important assumption in all vedAnta is that man suffers from bondage
in the course of his life in this world. This is said to be sam.sAra, which
involves being caught in an endless cycle of births and deaths. The quest
therefore is to seek a way out of this bondage, to break the cycle of rebirths and
attain moksha or liberation. The most important issues in vedAnta have to be
understood with respect to what constitutes bondage and what constitutes
liberation. The advaita school is of the view that jnAna (knowledge) of man's
true nature is liberation. Bondage arises from ignorance (avidyA) of man's true
nature, and therefore removal of ignorance roots out this bondage. Liberation is
therefore nothing more or nothing less than man knowing his true nature. This
true nature is his innermost essence, the Atman, which is nothing other than
brahman. He who knows this, not merely as bookish knowledge, but through
his own Experience, is liberated even when living. Such a man is a jIvanmukta,
and he does not return to the cycle of rebirths.
brahman -
It may be noticed that at first glance, advaita's solution to the problem of man's
liberation does not seem to involve God as a Creator or a Savior at all. If all
that is required is to know one's own true nature, what role does God have to
play in this universe? advaita's answer to this issue is buried in the advaitic
conception of brahman. One is the view of the brahmasUtra that brahman is at
once both the instrumental and the material cause of the universe. The
brahmasUtra holds such a view because there is nothing that can be said to
exist independent of brahman. Is brahman then just a name for a universal set -
the superset of all things in this universe? Not so, because brahman has been
described as beyond all change, whereas the perceived universe is full of
change. Still, this universe is said to have brahman as the only cause. At the
same time, to understand brahman truly is to know It to be devoid of parts and
diversity, and beyond all causality/action. Such a conception of brahman
derives from the upanishads, which say sarvam khalvidam brahma - all this is
indeed nothing but brahman - on the one hand, and neha nAnAsti kincana -
there is no diversity here - on the other. Thus, the conception of brahman as a
Creator in advaita is a unique one, and directly relates to the advaita views on
causality.
So much for saguNa and nirguNa brahman. If brahman cannot be held to have
suffered any change because of creation of the universe, then what is the status
of this universe? Since the cause does not undergo any change in the process of
producing the effect, it is held that the cause alone is Real. The universe only
partakes in reality inasmuch as it is to be considered as dependent on brahman.
Therefore the upanishads say, " sarvam. khalvidam. brahma." If the universe is
considered to be independent of brahman, then it has no real Reality, although
the world of human perception can never reveal this truth. This is simply
because brahman Itself is never an object of human perception. It is this
characteristic of dualistic knowledge, derived from perception alone, that
prompts the advaitin to call it mithyAjnAna (false knowledge).
brahman = Atman -
What then of the human self, the jIva? It is here that advaita comes up with the
most radical answer, one that is unacceptable to all other schools of vedAnta.
According to advaita, what is called the universe is in reality not other than
brahman. Similarly, what is called the jIva is in reality, the Atman, which is
also nothing other than brahman Itself. The real jIva is the Atman, which is
unchanging, ever free, and identical with brahman. This is said on the basis of
upanishadic passages where the Atman is explicitly equated with brahman.
This equation of Atman with brahman is also explained by means of
adhyAropa-apavAda. By sublating the superimposition of human shortcomings
and attributes on the Atman, the pure Atman, the substratum, shines forth as
brahman Itself. The mani-fold universe and the individual self, which considers
itself bound, are both superimposed upon that Transcendental Reality which is
brahman. Once the superimposition is understood for what it is, the individual
is no more an individual, the universe is no more the universe - all is brahman.
This doctrine of advaita should not be misinterpreted to mean that the human
self is in and of itself God, without any qualification whatsoever.
SankarAcArya most emphatically asserts that such is not his intention. On the
other hand, he is at great pains to point out that one who is desirous of moksha
needs to overcome his human shortcomings in order to achieve full liberation.
Sankara prescribes rigorous prerequisite qualities for the person who is to study
vedAnta. These form the practical aspect of the effort to rise above and sublate
the characteristics of the human jIva, in order to understand the
Atman/brahman. The non-dual reality of the Atman is revealed to the intense
seeker, as an experience that defies words. One might call it a mystic
experience of brahman, in which to know brahman is to be brahman. Thus,
rather than being atheistic or non- theistic, advaita vedAnta is meta-theistic: it
points to the basic underlying Reality of all, including what humans call God,
what humans call the universe, and what humans call human. This Reality is
the unchangeable brahman.
tattvamasi -
At this juncture, it is instructive to look at the advaitin interpretation of the
chAndogya statement tattvamasi, following SankarAcArya. This is one of the
four statements that have become well- known as the upanishadic
mahAvAkyas, which equate Atman with brahman. The four most important
mahAvAkyas (one from each veda) are:
Note: The standard vedAntic position is that brahman is both the material and
the instrumental cause of the universe. This is a notion shared by advaita,
viSishTAdvaita and the various bhedAbheda schools of vedAnta. The dvaita
school denies that brahman can be the material cause of the universe, and (in
my opinion) goes against the brahmasUtras in the process.
References:
Soul = God.
Moreover, only Brahman is real. The other things in The other things
the universe, like bicycles and umbrellas and our are maya,
illusions
bodies, are maya. Maya is illusory because it seems
to be different from Brahman but it's not. Since
maya misleads us in this way, and because it's
impermanent, Advaita says that maya is unreal.
The most important way that maya fools us is with Maya tricks us
regard to our selves. We think we are our bodies, our with regard to
our selves.
thoughts, our desires, and so forth. But those things
are maya. They seem to be "me" but this is an
illusion. Actually, our awareness (the part that is
really "me") is something else: Brahman.
RECOMMENDED READING