2004 Harford County Masterplan

MAY, 2004
As Amended
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: HARFORD COUNTY MASTER PLAN
The actions necessary for achieving long term goals in Harford County are directed by policies
established in the Master Plan. The Master Plan, along with the Land Use Element Plan,
provides direction for addressing future growth, revitalization, the provision of adequate public
facilities, economic development and the preservation and protection of natural resources,
agricultural lands and historic resources. In addition, the “Visions” of the Maryland Economic
Growth, Resource Protection, and Planning Act of 1992 and the Smart Growth Initiatives are
incorporated as a cornerstone to the policies within this Plan. Public input and understanding is
essential for the successful accomplishment of the Plan's actions.
The Master Plan begins by defining the relationship between the Land Use Element Plan and the
other element plans. A Community Facilities element along with an updated Rural element have
been added to the 2004 Land Use Element Plan. The other element plans will be updated
concurrently, to ensure consistency with the initiatives outlined in the Land Use Element Plan.
This is a first step in developing a consolidated Comprehensive Plan.
The Maryland Economic Growth, Resource Protection, and Planning Act of 1992 combined with
the State’s Smart Growth Initiatives have focused planning efforts toward growth management
and resource protection. Harford County has accepted the State’s challenge and efforts are made
to continue to implement these goals.
The basis for the Master Plan may be summed up in the following Guiding Principles, which will
form the framework for development of the Land Use Element Plan and the other element plans:
Quality-of-Life - Harford County is dedicated to achieving a high quality-of-life by providing

superior educational facilities, an acceptable functioning transportation network, adequate
community and public facilities, safe and sustainable communities, the preservation of our
resources, and an array of recreational and entertainment opportunities.
Stewardship of Our Resources - Harford County recognizes the value of our agricultural,
natural, historical, and cultural resources. The preservation of these resources is important in
nurturing a sense of our uniqueness and solidifying our identity.
Growth Management - Harford County enhances the integrity and vitality of every community.
Inside the Development Envelope, strong support is given for locating appropriate locations for
residential and nonresidential development supported by public utilities. The protection and
integrity of existing communities outside the Development Envelope are strongly supported with
no provision for new public utilities.
Redevelopment and Revitalization – Harford County supports the creative reuse of vacant and
underutilized sites and structures as a means to enhance the vitality of existing communities,
while preserving undeveloped lands.
i
A Sound, Balanced, and Diversified Local Economy – The County actively supports
established industrial, commercial, and agricultural enterprises while seeking to attract other
businesses to broaden its economic base.
Commitment to Communities - Harford County is dedicated to providing a forum for a broad

spectrum of local viewpoints on such matters as land use, zoning, budget decisions, and current
development and for strengthening individual community identities.
Coordination Among Agencies - Harford County actively pursues a policy of cooperation

among agencies, which ultimately results in streamlining government processes, reducing
conflicts, and achieving regulatory consistency.
The State of Maryland requires a system of coordinated planning efforts for all jurisdictions.
Harford County supports proactive interjurisdictional coordination at the local, municipal,
federal, and regional level as a means to create shared visions and reach common goals. In order
to coordinate planning efforts, Harford County Government initiated an Intergovernmental Task
Force on Smart Growth in 2000. The County, along with the three municipalities, created a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that outlined the objectives and tasks each jurisdiction
would observe to coordinate municipal development and policy plans with Harford County’s
efforts.
ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: LAND USE ELEMENT PLAN
The 2004 Land Use Element Plan provides the primary direction for achieving the Master Plan’s
guiding principles. The Plan will set the framework for the County's policies on land use and
related issues. During the preparation of this Land Use Element, the public participation process
provided a means to gain information on an array of issues that make up the Plan. This process
consisted of kickoff meetings to educate and inform the general public and to solicit input on
what citizens believed to be the main issues to be addressed by the Plan. Six topical areas were
identified: Designated Growth Areas, Redevelopment and Revitalization, Community Facilities,
Preservation, Natural Resources, and Economic Development. The results were tabulated and
the top five issues in each category to be addressed in the Plan were identified. Citizens were
later asked to participate in workshops to answer a series of question relating to the top five
issues identified at the kickoff meetings. In addition, participants were asked to offer comments
on the uniqueness and similarities of their communities. These common issues, balanced with
each community’s individuality, have provided guidance for a county-wide vision on land use.
The concept of the Development Envelope as a growth management tool was first introduced in
the 1977 Harford County Master Plan. For this Plan, the Development Envelope was evaluated
to assure consistency with the 1992 Economic Growth, Resource Conservation, and Planning
Act, Smart Growth Initiatives, and interjurisdictional agreements. The Development Envelope
concept is maintained in this Plan. Population projections for the County reflect an expected
increase of 48,250 people between 2005 and 2025. During this time the number of households
Countywide is projected to increase by 26,360 with 74% of the households expected to be
located within the existing Development Envelope. The land use designations and policies put
forth in this Plan are designed to accommodate this projected growth.
Designated Growth Areas are planned to accommodate new development and revitalization.
Harford County’s Designated Growth Areas are defined in accordance with the State’s Smart
Growth Initiative and include the Development Envelope, the three municipalities, nine
designated rural villages, areas designated for economic development, as well as, the HEAT
Center, and Harford Community College.
Redevelopment is an important aspect of the development cycle. For the 2004 Land Use
Element Plan, Harford County has made a commitment to have stable residential and
commercial communities. Protecting and enhancing the character of existing neighborhoods,
providing important community facilities and ensuring pedestrian connections within
developments are some of the key components outlined in this Plan. To achieve a quality living
environment, there must be a commitment to recognizing and protecting existing neighborhoods,
and to allocating public facilities based on community need. These recommendations will help
provide for a stable population base within new and established neighborhoods and will
encourage commitment and involvement by residents in their communities.
iii
The Community Facilities portion of the Land Use Plan is designed to highlight the importance
of providing adequate facilities to support residential, industrial and commercial development in
a manner that does not compromise existing services. Community facilities include water and
sewer systems, transportation, solid waste facilities, schools, libraries, parks and open space, and
sheriff, fire and emergency operations. Establishment of a new revenue source along with
changes to the Zoning Code are among the tools that will be used by the County to provide
needed facilities in a manner consistent with this Plan.
Harford County's heritage has been an important component of the County's land use strategies
for many years. This heritage is based not only on historic sites, structures, and landscapes, but
also on a strong agricultural economy that contributes to the economic health and vitality of the
County. Harford County maintains a strong commitment to retaining a viable agricultural
industry. The County recognizes the importance of preserving its heritage by establishing
policies that are designed to manage growth, while also preserving farmland and historic
resources. Since the beginning of preservation efforts in Harford County over 35,000 acres have
been preserved. The goal for the County is to preserve an additional 20,000 acres by the year
2012. Cluster development, with easements, shall be explored as another means to maximize the
amount of land protected as open space, buffers, or active farmland. The County’s transfer of
development rights (TDR) provisions, in terms of the agriculture zoning classification of the
Zoning Code, will be revisited.
The County recognizes that its unique and plentiful natural resources are a necessity for the
quality of life that is desirable to residents and visitors. From its many streams and rivers
emptying into the Chesapeake Bay, to its mineral resources supplying materials to the economic
development of the region, the County’s natural resources are valuable assets that contribute to
the quality of life of its residents. The County recognizes the importance of protecting its
drinking water supplies. The County will adopt comprehensive wellhead protection regulations
within designated aquifer recharge areas and water supply areas in order to protect the quality
and quantity of these resources.
Harford County’s economic development program promotes business growth and new
investment that generates valuable employment opportunities and supports the development of a
sustainable, dynamic economy over the long-term. Specifically, this effort is aimed at
capitalizing on the County’s strategic mid-Atlantic location within the I-95 corridor and
proximity to regional assets located in the Baltimore metropolitan region. Efforts to encourage
technology development are guided by the Technology Development Strategic Plan. Making the
most of existing infrastructure, strategic location and available tax incentive programs are
producing positive results for the U.S. 40 corridor. Location is key for the economic
development opportunities on the Perryman peninsula. A vision plan has been prepared for this
area that embraces advances in technology, communication, transportation, and environmental
conservation.
To facilitate the location of prime employment opportunities and maximize the value of the I-95
interchanges, the County includes a Mixed Office land use category. This designation will
provide additional employment opportunities at the MD 543 and MD 22 interchanges of I-95 and
iv
will provide a positive step in accommodating quality employment for County residents while
still maintaining the quality of surrounding neighborhoods.
Harford County introduced Community Areas in the 1996 Plan to help ensure that each
community area remains attractive and livable with a strong local identity. This concept is
carried further in this plan. The plan for each community will serve as a guide for the
development of the area, and will serve as a continuing communication link between citizens and
the County government.
The 2004 Land Use Element Plan provides a vision for land use in Harford County.
Implementation necessitates the continuation of cooperative planning initiatives to reinforce the
sense of community so important to Harford County. The implementation section of this plan
identifies which County agency(s) will be primarily responsible for each implementation strategy
and its relative priority.
v
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Master Plan
Introduction/History/Overview………………………………………………….. 1
Element Plans……………………………………………………………………. 4
Maryland Planning Act and Smart Growth Initiatives………………………….. 9
Guiding Principles………………………………………………………………. 18
Interjurisdictional Coordination…………………………………………………. 20
Land Use Element Plan
Introduction: Land Use Element Plan………………………………………….. 23
Demographics and Land Capability
▪ Demographics and Land Capability Review……………………. 25

▪ Development Envelope Residential Land Capacity…………….. 39
▪ Land Use Map: Designations…………………………………… 42
▪ Natural Features Map: Mapping Definitions…………………… 45
Public Participation Process…………………………………………………….. 47
Growth Management and Resource Conservation
▪ Designated Growth Areas……………………………………….. 51

▪ Redevelopment and Revitalization………………………………. 57
▪ Community Facilities……………………………………………. 65
▪ Preservation ……………………………………………………… 95
▪ Natural Resources ………..……………………………………... 110
▪ Economic Development………………………………………….. 121
Community Area Plans
▪ Introduction: Community Areas………………………………… 129

▪ Greater Aberdeen - Greater Havre de Grace…………………….. 133
▪ Abingdon - Riverside - Emmorton………………………………. 141
▪ Greater Bel Air…………………………………………………… 149
▪ Churchville – Creswell…………………………………………… 157
▪ Dublin - Darlington………………………………………………. 163
▪ Edgewood………………………………………………………… 169
▪ Fallston…………………………………………………………… 179
▪ Forest Hill………………………………………………………... 185
▪ Jarrettsville……………………………………………………….. 193
vii
▪ Joppa - Joppatowne………………………………………………. 199
▪ Norrisville………………………………………………………... 209
▪ Whiteford - Cardiff - Pylesville - Street…….…………………… 215
Implementation…………………………………………………………………... 223
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Title Page
1 Development Envelope Map 5

2 Priority Funding Area Map 11
3 Vicinity Map 27
4 Population 29
5 Municipal Population 29
6 Population by Age 30
7 Housing Types 30
8 Household Size 31
9 Households 31
10 Year Householder Moved Into Unit 31
11 Household Income 32
12 Type of Employment 33
13 Residential Permits Issued by Jurisdiction 34
14 Population and Households 35
15 Population Projections by Age 35
16 Population Projections 36
17 Household Projections 37
18 Residential Permits Issued 38
19 Land Use Plan Map Following Page 44
20 Natural Features Map Following Page 46
21 Enterprise Zone 58
22 U.S. 40 Commercial Revitalization District and
Edgewood Neighborhood Overlay District 59
23 Community Facilities Map – Schools 73
24 Historic Enrollment 75
25 Projected School Enrollment 76
26 Population Projections by Library Service Area 78
27 Community Facilities Map – Libraries 81
28 Number of Calls 86
29 Fire/Rescue Calls for Service 87
30 EMS Calls for Service 87
31 Community Facilities Map – Fire Stations 89
32 Farmland 95
33 Preservation Acreage 96
34 Preservation Program/Acreage in Programs 96
35 Agricultural Preservation Map 97
36 Agricultural Production 100
37 Historic Preservation Map 107
38 Water Source Protection Area Map 115
39 Mineral Resource Map 119
40 Community Areas Map 131
ix
Figure Title Page
41 Aberdeen - Havre de Grace Demographic 133

42 Aberdeen - Havre de Grace Community Area 139
43 Abingdon - Riverside - Emmorton Demographics 143
44 Abingdon - Riverside Emmorton Community Area 147
45 Greater Bel Air Demographics 150
46 Bel Air Community Area 155
47 Churchville - Creswell Demographics 159
48 Churchville - Creswell Area 161
49 Dublin - Darlington Demographics 163
50 Dublin - Darlington Community Area 167
51 Edgewood Demographics 170
52 Edgewood Community Plan 175
53 Edgewood Community Area 177
54 Fallston Demographics 179
55 Fallston Community Area 183
56 Forest Hill Demographics 187
57 Forest Hill Community Area 191
58 Jarrettsville Demographics 194
59 Jarrettsville Community Area 197
60 Joppa - Joppatowne Demographics 201
61 Joppa - Joppatowne Community Plan 205
62 Joppa - Joppatowne Community Area 207
63 Norrisville Demographics 210
64 Norrisville Community Area 213
65 Whiteford - Cardiff - Pylesville - Street Demographics 215
66 Whiteford - Cardiff - Pylesville - Street Community Area 221
x
ACRONYMS
APF - Adequate Public Facilities

AMTRAK - American Trail - National Railroad Passenger Corporation
APG - Aberdeen Proving Ground
BNR - Biological Nutrient Reduction
BRTB - Baltimore Regional Transportation Board
CI - Commercial Industrial
CONRAIL - Consolidated Rail Corporation
CRD - Commercial Revitalization District
CSX - Chessie and Seaboard Railroads
DARE - Drug Abuse Resistance Education
DGA - Designated Growth Areas
EDAB - Economic Development Advisory Board
EMS - Emergency Medical Services
ENOD - Edgewood Neighborhood Overlay District
EOC - Emergency Operations Center
FIDS - Forest Interior Dwelling Bird Species
GI - General Industrial
HAZMAT - Hazardous Materials
HCC - Harford Community College
HCTS - Harford County Transportation Services
HEAT - Higher Education and Applied Technology
HCPS - Harford County Public Schools
IDA - Intensely Developed Areas
LDA - Limited Development Areas
LOS - Level of Service
MARC - Maryland Rail Commuter
MDE - Maryland Department of the Environment
MGD - Million Gallons per Day
MO - Mixed Office
MOU - Memorandum of Understanding
MTA - Maryland Transit Authority
NREP - Natural Resources Element Plan
OED - Office of Economic Development
PAL - Police Athletic League
PFA - Priority Funding Areas
POS - Program Open Space
RCA - Resource Conservation Areas
SAIC - Science Applications International Corporation
SSPRA - Sensitive Species Program Review Areas
TDR - Transfer of Development Rights
VB - Village Business
xi
xii
MASTER PLAN
INTRODUCTION/HISTORY/OVERVIEW
The Harford County Master Plan, combined with the Land Use Element Plan, provides direction for
addressing future growth, revitalization, the provision of adequate public facilities, economic
development and the preservation and protection of natural resources, agricultural lands and historic
resources. It also incorporates the “Visions” of the1992 Maryland Planning Act and Smart Growth
initiatives as part of its policy to maintain the high quality of life enjoyed by County residents.
Harford County has prepared several comprehensive plans dealing with land use and population
growth. One of the first plans was prepared by the consulting firm of Harland, Bartholomew and
Associates for the Harford County Planning and Zoning Commission in 1969. This Plan reviewed
issues and provided recommendations on land use, transportation, public schools, parks and open
space, public buildings and facilities, and utilities and public services. Growth opportunities, as
identified in the "General Land Use Plan" section, were provided along the MD Route 152 and 24
corridors, in an area from the Town of Bel Air to the City of Aberdeen, and along the MD Route 155
corridor between Churchville and the City of Havre de Grace. Population was projected to be
204,500 by the year 1985.
The County's second comprehensive plan was prepared in 1977, and marked the beginning of
comprehensive planning under the new charter form of government. Adopted in 1972, the County
Charter required the development of Master Plans. These plans were "to guide public and private
actions affecting a wide range of activities in Harford County." The 1977 Plan, known as "The
Harford County Master Plan,” dealt generally with growth trends and development. The amount of
land available for development in this Plan was scaled back from the 1969 Plan, reflecting the
availability and capacity of public facilities. The Development Envelope concept, which defined a
geographic area for planned development, was introduced in this Plan. This concept allowed the
County to begin staging and directing more intense growth into a specific area, namely the corridors
defined by I-95/U.S.Route 40 and the MD Route 24 corridor north to Bel Air. The County's
population was expected to reach 200,000 by the year 1996. A Citizens' Review Committee
approach encouraged public participation in the 1977 effort. Citizen involvement in developing this
Plan was focused on local planning areas, and citizens groups were encouraged to provide input on
important issues.
The 1988 Harford County Land Use Element Plan reinforced the Development Envelope concept by
maintaining essentially the same boundary as shown in the 1977 Plan, and as modified in the 1982
Comprehensive Zoning Review. The outcome of this process determined that the County contained
sufficient land zoned for development to accommodate projected growth.
The 1988 Plan introduced an alternative approach to a single Master Plan by utilizing the concept of
individual element plans. Thus, the 1988 Land Use Element Plan became the "core plan" upon which
individual element plans were developed. The Land Use Element Plan was supported by the
development of a series of six element plans which included the Water and Sewer Master Plan, the
Solid Waste Management Plan, the Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Program, the Rural Element Plan,
the Land Preservation and Recreation Plan, and the Transportation Element Plan. These plans
presented the framework for providing public services to sustain the Development Envelope concept
1
and the level of growth outlined in the 1988 Plan. Additional implementation tools were added, such
as the Adequate Public Facilities program to help manage growth more effectively in the
Development Envelope.
In 1996, the Master Plan and Land Use Element Plan were combined to strengthen the “core” of the
planning process as proposed in 1988. The 1996 Plan maintained the Development Envelope
concept concluding that there was sufficient capacity within the Envelope to support projected
growth for approximately 18 years. The development of the 1996 Plan was largely based on a
community planning process involving 10 Community Planning Councils. These Councils provided
information on the uniqueness and similarities of Harford County’s communities. Their common
issues, balanced with each community’s individuality, provided guidance for the development of a
countywide vision on land use. Additional element plans were added to supplement the 1996 Plan.
These included the Natural Resources Plan, the Historic Preservation Plan, the Edgewood
Community Plan, and the Joppa/Joppatowne Community Plan.
The 2004 Master Plan and Land Use Element Plan continue the format established in 1988 and
carried forward in 1996. The direction of the Plan is based on community identification of issues that
influence the quality of life in Harford County, combined with implementation of State programs.
The Master Plan begins by defining the relationship between the Land Use Element Plan and the
other element plans. A Community Facilities element along with an updated Rural element have
been added to the 2004 Land Use Element Plan. The other element plans will be updated
concurrently, to ensure consistency with the initiatives outlined in the Land Use Element Plan. This
is a first step in developing a consolidated Comprehensive Plan.
The next section details Harford County’s methods for incorporating the “Visions” of the Maryland
Planning Act and Smart Growth Initiatives. This section identifies the specific components of the
eight “Visions,” as well as the programs included under the Smart Growth legislation. It summarizes
the actions taken by the County to implement these State initiatives, including designation of Priority
Funding Areas and implementation of a Rural Legacy Program. It also highlights programs and
planning efforts that Maryland counties are required to address in their growth management and
resource protection plans and programs. Building on these State programs, Harford County has
developed a series of Guiding Principles. These Guiding Principles form the foundation for the
Land Use Element Plan, and in effect provide Harford County’s vision for growth management and
resource protection.
The final component of the Master Plan addresses interjurisdictional coordination. Because the
Maryland Planning Act and the Smart Growth legislation both call for directing future growth
toward existing population centers, coordination between the County and the municipalities is
essential. This section will identify the steps that have been taken to ensure a consistent approach to
planning in Harford County, while establishing guidelines for developing a regional approach to
growth management and resource conservation.
Implementation of the 2004 Master Plan and Land Use Element Plan will be accomplished through a
series of key actions. A comprehensive review and revision of all element plans will be undertaken
so recommendations are consistent with the 2004 Master Plan and Land Use Element Plan. The
2
Zoning Code will be comprehensively reviewed and revised to properly implement the goals and
objectives of the 2004 Master Plan, and help ensure that comprehensive zoning is completed in a
manner consistent with the policies set forth in this document. Interaction with other agencies will
continue so their programs and capital expenditures are implemented in a manner consistent with the
policies and needs identified in this Plan. In order to monitor the progress of the Plan’s
implementation, the Department of Planning and Zoning will prepare a report every year identifying
accomplishments, issues needing resolution, and recommendations for updating the Plan.
3
ELEMENT PLANS
The Harford County Charter requires the Department of Planning and Zoning to "prepare and
propose Master Plans." This directive further requires the inclusion of a series of elements, or
components, in the Master Plan including a Land Use Element Plan and other supporting elements
which "further advance the purposes" of the Master Plan. In addition, the Charter requires that each
element of the Master Plan "describe how it relates to the other elements" in achieving the overall
goals of the Master Plan.
This Land Use Element Plan is viewed as the core of the Master Plan since it prescribes the basic
strategies that will guide the County in directing the locations and functional form of residential,
commercial, and industrial growth. It identifies those areas suitable for more intensive development.
These include areas already served by public water and sewer facilities and, most specifically, the
Development Envelope (Figure 1). The Development Envelope is an inverted T-shaped area
generally defined as the MD 24/MD 924 corridors north to MD 23, the areas that abut I-95 and US
40, and the U.S. 1 corridor. The other element plans present the framework for providing public
services, matched to the level of growth, as outlined in the Land Use Element Plan.
Over the years, Harford County has developed a number of element plans. The Water and Sewer
Master Plan, the Solid Waste Management Plan, and the Land Preservation and Recreation Plan are
developed by the Department of Public Works and Department of Parks and Recreation,
respectively. These plans are developed to fulfill State requirements in addition to those noted in
Article 66B. Article 66B establishes the guidelines for comprehensive plans that must be followed
by both charter and non-charter counties. To ensure consistency with State requirements, the
remaining element plans are prepared by the Department of Planning and Zoning. These plans build
on the concepts set forth in the Land Use Element Plan and provide more specific guidance for
implementation. The Consolidated Plan, prepared by the Department of Community Services, has
also been adopted in accordance with Federal requirements from HUD. The adopted plans that
support the Land Use Element Plan include The Water and Sewer Master Plan, the Solid Waste
Management Plan, the Rural Element Plan, the Transportation Element Plan, the Chesapeake Bay
Critical Area Program, the Land Preservation and Recreation Plan, the Natural Resources Element
Plan and the Historic Preservation Element Plan. Edgewood and Joppa-Joppatowne have adopted
community-level master plans, both of which are considered elements of the Master Plan.
Each of these element plans has a unique purpose and each is reviewed here in very general terms:
The Water and Sewer Master Plan (enacted by Council Bill 93-19, and amended semi-annually)
sets the foundation for the timing and planning of public water and sewer facilities in appropriately
zoned areas. Providing these services, in a manner consistent with the Land Use Element Plan, it
follows and supports the Development Envelope concept.
4
PENNSYLVANIA
CECIL COUNTY
HAVRE DE GRACE
BEL AIR
ABERDEEN
CHESAPEAKE
BAY
BALTIMORE COUNTY
Harford ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND

(APG)
County
Development APG
Envelope
N
Development Envelope
Source: Harford County Planning & Zoning.

Figure 1
5
6
The Solid Waste Management Plan (enacted by Council Bill 94-81) evaluates the County's solid
waste management operations and establishes a 10-year management program for these operations.
The Rural Element Plan (enacted by Council Bill 92-95) addresses preservation of the County's
rural character and promotion of agriculture as the primary economic enterprise in the rural areas.
The strategies included in the Plan are designed to preserve the County's agricultural land base and
open space by using alternative preservation techniques. The Plan also addresses methods for
protecting the environment and promoting and preserving a sense of community. Key
recommendations of the Plan have already been implemented, including the establishment of a
County Purchase of Development Rights Program and Conservation Development Standards.
The Transportation Element Plan (enacted by Council Bill 93-80, updated by Council Bill 00-8)
explains the relationship between land use and transportation systems. It establishes goals and
objectives for planning and implementing an efficient, safe, and multi-modal transportation system
for the County; a system that includes roads, public transportation, and ridesharing.
The Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Program (updated by Council Bills 95-54, 95-55, 95-56, 97-7,
00-53 and 01-36) is designed to manage land use within 1,000 feet of tidal waters and tidal wetlands.
Its goal is to protect water quality and natural habitat, and to accommodate future growth based on
environmentally sensitive areas.
The Land Preservation and Recreation Plan (enacted by Council Bill 94-5, updated by Council
Bill 99-50) addresses the County's needs for open space and recreational areas, and considers these
areas as part of a larger system of preserved lands. It also explores the relationships between land
used for recreation, in the broader context of preservation, and appropriate use of natural resources.
This plan fulfills the State's Program Open Space (POS) requirements and thereby qualifies the
County for POS funding.
The Natural Resources Element Plan (enacted by Council Bill 98-2) satisfies the requirement of
the Maryland Economic Growth, Resource Protection, and Planning Act of 1992. This Act specifies
that local Master Plans address the protection of sensitive areas. The Plan includes methods for
protecting environmental resources, including streams and their buffers, steep slopes, floodplains,
and the habitats of threatened and endangered species.
The Historic Preservation Element Plan (enacted by Council Bill 98-20, updated by Council Bill
01-29) strengthens the County's historic preservation efforts. It explains how historic structures and
archaeological sites can further an awareness of the importance of the County's heritage among the
citizens. Documented increases in tourism demonstrate that historical sites have the potential to
broaden the County's economic base as well.
Edgewood Community Plan (enacted by Council Bill 00-06) is a comprehensive revitalization

strategy to improve physical, social, and economic conditions within the Edgewood community.
The Plan strives to guide future growth and sustain the community’s character and values.
7
Joppa-Joppatowne Community Plan (enacted by Council Bill 03-13) is a community-level master
plan that serves as a blueprint for the physical development and redevelopment of the community.
The Joppa-Joppatowne community represents portions of the County’s Development Envelope and
low intensity rural areas, and is an example of a diverse group of stakeholders reaching consensus on
matters of mutual concern.
The Consolidated Plan (updated in accordance with Federal requirements from HUD for Fiscal
Years 2003-2007) outlines how the County will use Federal, State, and local funds to address the
housing and community development needs of low to moderate income families in the community.
It is designed to be a collaborative process whereby a community establishes a unified vision for
community development. It offers Harford County the opportunity to shape the various housing and
community development programs into effective, coordinated, neighborhood and community
development strategies.
In order to ensure consistency between the Land Use Element Plan and the other element plans, the
Department of Planning and Zoning will review and revise all element plans within its purview. This
will be done with the goal of establishing a process that will provide for a concurrent review and
update of all element plans as part of the next Master Plan and Land Use Element Plan update.
Toward this end, a Community Facilities section was added to this plan and the Rural Plan was
updated. The other element plans will be updated by the appropriate departments. The Land
Preservation and Recreation Plan is scheduled for updating in 2004, as is the Solid Waste
Management Plan. The Water and Sewer Master Plan is updated every six months.
8
MARYLAND PLANNING ACT
and
SMART GROWTH INITIATIVES
The 1992 Maryland Economic Growth, Resource Protection, and Planning Act combined with the
State’s Smart Growth Initiatives have changed the way citizens of the State of Maryland address
land use planning. These programs focus planning efforts toward growth management and resource
protection. They also place new responsibilities on the State and local jurisdictions to implement
comprehensive land use plans in a fiscally responsible manner.
The Planning Act of 1992 established seven “Visions”, which were first addressed by Harford
County in the 1996 Master Plan and Land Use Element Plan. The State of Maryland has since added
an eighth “Vision” dealing with adequate public facilities and infrastructure. These “Visions”, and
how the County continues to address them, is presented below.
To further implement the Planning Act, the 1997 Maryland General Assembly adopted several
programs that comprise the State’s Smart Growth initiative. This initiative includes land use,
neighborhood revitalization, and preservation policies geared to support locally designated growth
areas while also protecting rural areas. Smart Growth involves using land more efficiently through
compact development and infill. It supports locating residential, commercial, and civic facilities
within walking distance of each other. It encourages providing housing choices for all age and
income groups, supporting alternatives to the automobile, and planning for the efficient use of
existing infrastructure.
The 1997 “Smart Growth” Act also requires all counties to identify and map Priority Funding Areas
that meet the requirements of the legislation. In Harford County, the Priority Funding Areas can
generally be described as the Development Envelope, the municipalities, designated villages, areas
designated for economic development, the HEAT Center and Harford Community College (Figure
2). These areas are locations where the State and Harford County will target their efforts to
encourage and support economic development, new growth and redevelopment. State funding for
projects within these areas will be considered a priority.
Rural Legacy is another part of the Smart Growth package being implemented in Harford County.
This program uses State funds to purchase conservation easements for large tracts of agricultural,
forest and natural areas that are subject to development pressure.
Several other programs that are part of the Smart Growth package are not being used in Harford
County at this time but offer opportunities for the future. These programs include:
Live Near Your Work, which encourages employees to buy homes near their workplace in order to
stabilize neighborhoods through home ownership. Targeting specific communities, this program is
designed to enhance quality of life and spur economic revitalization.
9
10
NE S
AT T
R TU
HE
FO
QU ND
RIS
E OF O U L I VE S A
17 73
R
HARFORD COUNTY
PRIORITY FUNDING
AREA
AREAS REQUIRING STATE REVIEW

ENTERPRISE ZONE
PRIORITY FUNDING AREA
RURAL VILLAGE PRIORITY FUNDING AREAS
NOTE: ANY PROPOSALS FOR PROJECTS IN THE AREA LABELED AS "AREAS REQUIRING STATE REVIEW"
WILL BE REFERRED TO THE SMART GROWTH AND NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION
COORDINATING SUBCOMMITTEE FOR REVIEW.
Planning & Zoning JULY 2001
Figure 2
11
12
The Job Creation Tax Credits Program is also designed to spur economic revitalization in existing
communities. The program encourages mid-sized and smaller businesses to invest in Smart Growth
Areas. By locating in these areas, businesses will be accessible to available labor pools. This
program also encourages a more efficient use of existing infrastructure
The Brownfield Voluntary Cleanup and Revitalization Incentives Program is another effort designed
to spur economic revitalization and enhance quality of life. This program establishes a cooperative
agreement between businesses and the State to expedite remediation and redevelopment of unused or
abandoned sites.
Harford County has moved forward with several Smart Growth initiatives. The designation of Rural
Legacy Areas plus identification of the U.S.Route 40 corridor as the County’s High Tech engine are
both consistent with Smart Growth. Harford County has designated two Rural Legacy Areas – The
Lower Deer Creek Valley and the Manor Area.
Adoption of the Edgewood and Joppa/Joppatowne Community Plans, and visioning efforts for U.S.
Route 40 and U. S.Route 1 are all geared to revitalization of existing communities. All of these
efforts provide specific guidance that supports redevelopment and revitalization of existing
communities. In cooperation with the State, Harford County undertook a visioning program for
Perryman to apply Smart Growth principles to the area. This effort proposes a diverse, vital mixed-
use community that provides transportation options while also conserving much of the area's unique
environmental and cultural features. The County is also working with the rural villages to help
preserve their historic character while encouraging appropriate redevelopment.
Likewise, Harford County accepted the State's challenges by incorporating the "Visions" into the
1996 Master Plan, and these are carried forward into this Plan. The following outline of the
“Visions” of the Planning Act explains how existing and proposed County efforts will continue to
achieve these State-wide goals.
Harford County's “Visions”

Vision 1. Development is concentrated in suitable areas.
The 2004 Land Use Element Plan continues to focus future development within the Development
Envelope, that is, along the MD Route 24/924 and the I-95/U.S.Route 40 corridors. The U.S.Route
40 corridor is also targeted for redevelopment and revitalization. Infill opportunities exist within
underutilized sites in this corridor. Two adopted Community Plans and a series of legislative
changes, including the Edgewood Neighborhood Overlay District and the Commercial Revitalization
District, guide these redevelopment efforts. The County also has two enterprise zone designations in
the Joppatowne – Edgewood area and Aberdeen – Havre de Grace area that supports business
activities.
In response to Smart Growth initiatives, the County has designated Priority Funding Areas
coinciding with the Development Envelope, the County’s three municipalities, the rural villages,
areas designated for commercial development as well as the HEAT Center and Harford Community
13
College. These areas will be given precedence over all other areas to receive State funding for roads,
water and sewer, and other growth-related needs. Since 1995, an average of 82% of new residential
development has occurred within the Development Envelope.
Within these Designated Growth Areas, development is concentrated around existing population
centers where community facilities are provided to meet the needs of the growing population. Public
utilities are planned, funded, and constructed through the County's Capital Improvement Program.
The County's Adequate Public Facilities Program monitors the number and location of new housing
units approved. It also provides an analysis of the current and future capacity of specific public
facilities and services. This includes educational facilities, water and sewer, and roads.
Vision 2. Sensitive Areas are protected.
Harford County has long been committed to the protection and stewardship of environmentally
sensitive lands and features such as non-tidal wetlands, forests, floodplains, steep slopes, and habitat
areas for rare, threatened, and endangered species. The County has also adopted a Chesapeake Bay
Critical Area program and new floodplain regulations, including digital maps.
Dedicated to the Bay’s restoration, Harford County has continued its commitment to this effort
through continued participation on the Upper Western Shore Tributary Team. In cooperation with
the State of Maryland and the Upper Western Shore Tributary Team, the County has taken the lead
in development of the Bush River Watershed Restoration Action Strategy. Sponsored by the Center
for Watershed Protection, the County also participated in the “Builders for the Bay” program to
identify changes to the residential and commercial site development process that would provide
benefits to the natural environment and the community.
The Land Use Element Plan outlines the County's continued commitment to the preservation of
sensitive areas. This is reiterated with specific directives listed in several other element plans. The
County has consolidated its plans and specific protection strategies for these areas in the Natural
Resources Element Plan which was adopted in 1998.
Vision 3. In rural areas, growth is directed to existing population centers and resource
areas are protected.
The Land Use Element Plan supports protection of agricultural lands by encouraging preservation of
land for farming opportunities, and by directing development toward existing Rural Villages. The
Plan provides several strategies to address rural growth: Purchase of Development Rights,
Conservation Development Standards, Transfer of Development Rights, Agricultural Economics,
and focusing growth in Rural Villages. Since their inception, County and State preservation
programs have preserved over 220 properties, totaling over 35,000 acres of active productive
farmland. Harford County ranks eighth, nationally, in agricultural land preservation. The Smart
Growth initiative furthered this effort with its Rural Legacy program. Since 2000, Harford County
has received $4.75 million in Rural Legacy funds to preserve land in the Lower Deer Creek Valley
Rural Legacy Area. This program has preserved 15 properties, totaling 1175 acres. The Manor Area,
which includes portions of Baltimore and Harford Counties, is also a designated Rural Legacy Area
14
and has received $2.5 million for preservation efforts. Through the Manor Area Program, 94 acres
have been preserved in Harford County.
Legislatively, the County has enacted changes to the Zoning Code that address Conservation
Development Standards and Transfer of Development Rights. A comprehensive review of the
Zoning Code will be undertaken to ensure that these techniques support this Vision. This Plan also
recommends that the boundaries of the Rural Villages remain in tact.
The County has also developed an economic policy to help keep farming a viable industry in the
County. A series of economic strategies have been developed, including broadening the uses
allowed on agriculturally zoned lands which supports expansion of agriculturally related economic
activities.
Vision 4. Stewardship of the Chesapeake Bay and the land is a universal ethic.
All of Harford County's planning efforts are, at least in part, directed toward meeting this vision.
The Land Use Element Plan outlines a growth area to limit sprawl and concentrate capital projects
and infrastructure. It also contains specific measures to help preserve agricultural lands and protect
land and water resources in the County. The County’s Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Program also
addresses development within the Critical Area. Harford County has long recognized the importance
of protecting sensitive areas such as non-tidal wetlands, forests, floodplains, and habitat areas for
rare, threatened, and endangered species of flora and fauna. The 2004 Land Use Element Plan is
designed to continue these efforts by addressing specific community-level concerns, as well as
opportunities for heightened local stewardship by County residents.
The Plan places a strong emphasis on the County as a partner in the Chesapeake Bay Tributary
Strategy. The County has signed the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Agreement for Local
Governments, agreeing to work cooperatively with the State to participate on Tributary Teams. As a
member of the Upper Western Shore Tributary Team, the County continues to support efforts to
meet the goals established by the 2000 Chesapeake Bay Agreement. Toward this, the County, in
cooperation with the State of Maryland and the Upper Western Shore Tributary Team, has taken the
lead in development of the Bush River Watershed Restoration Action Strategy. In addition, the
County's wastewater treatment plants at Sod Run and Joppatowne have been upgraded for Biological
Nitrogen Removal (BNR) to improve nutrient reduction.
In 1997, the County was awarded a Silver Status by the Chesapeake Bay Partner Community Award
Program. This award identifies four areas of environmental concern – improving water quality,
promoting sound land use, protecting and restoring living resources and habitat, and engaging the
community. The program then rated the jurisdiction based on the amount of goals achieved. In
2003, the County received an upgrade to a Gold Status, further emphasizing its commitment toward
promoting and restoring the health of the Chesapeake Bay.
Moreover, in the 1990's the County purchased almost 800 acres of bay-front property with
approximately 13,770 feet of shoreline for preservation and appropriate passive use. Harford County
is also the location of the Otter Point Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve, one of three
Chesapeake Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve sites in Maryland. Included in the 690 acre
15
Research Reserve are two land areas connected by water: Leight Park (93 acres), Bosley
Conservancy (336 acres) and State-owned water (261 acres). A visitors' center at Leight Park, on
Otter Point Creek, provides a teaching and learning center for this important resource, critical to the
health of the Bay.
Vision 5. Conservation of resources, including a reduction in resource consumption, is

practiced.
Resources are protected and conserved through the implementation of goals, objectives, and policies
outlined in the element plans. Focusing growth into Designated Growth Areas will ensure that land
will be developed in an efficient manner. Regulations governing the removal of forest lands,
protection of stream corridors, agricultural land preservation, and mineral resource extraction
represent but a few of the County's efforts to conserve natural resources and use them in an efficient
manner to support planned development. The County is also committed to preserving its historic,
architectural, cultural, and archaeological resources to help maintain and enhance the livability of the
County’s communities, villages, and landscapes. These efforts are helped not only by the adoption of
specific element plans but also by the County’s emphasis on redevelopment and revitalization, which
conserves resources by encouraging the reuse of existing or underutilized sites. This not only helps
to improve the quality of life within existing communities, it also lessens impacts to agricultural
lands and other resources. To support this approach, Zoning Code changes have been enacted.
These include the Edgewood Neighborhood Overlay District, which provides incentives and design
standards to encourage redevelopment of underutilized sites consistent with the Edgewood
Community Plan, and the U.S. 40 Commercial Revitalization District, which provides flexibility and
incentives to attract quality redevelopment on underutilized sites.
Vision 6. To assure the achievement of Visions 1 through 5, economic growth is

encouraged and regulatory mechanisms are streamlined.
Harford County Government has initiated an aggressive approach to encouraging economic growth.
This approach links growth management actions through the perspective of economic development,
regulation, and streamlined activities. Aberdeen Proving Ground is a critical anchor to the County’s
economy and is considered a key element in supporting this Vision. Land areas designated for
Industrial/ Employment in the Land Use Element Plan have been designated to supply high tech
employment opportunities. Zoning districts such as the U.S. Route 40 Commercial Revitalization
District, the Edgewood Neighborhood Overlay District, and the Light Industrial District are
established to encourage revitalization of older communities and to better utilize limited land
resources. The Mixed Office designation focuses on two prime interstate interchange locations
where high quality employment will be encouraged. Working together, the Office of Economic
Development and the Department of Planning and Zoning have been given primary responsibility for
implementing these economic growth approaches.
The Office of Economic Development also supports economic growth through a strong, coordinated
private/public sector partnership which involves workforce recruitment and training opportunities
such as the Higher Education and Applied Technology Center (HEAT), implementation of the "Fast
Track" permitting process and Enterprise Zones, focus on agricultural development programs,
coordinated permit tracking, and an accurate inventory of industrial-zoned properties. Battelle has
16
invested $20 million for the development of a state-of-the-art research and development facility at
the HEAT Center. The Office of Economic Development has developed a Technology Development
Strategic Plan to channel the County’s growth of technology enterprises.
Vision 7. Funding mechanisms are addressed to achieve these visions.
Harford County's fiscal policies ensure funding for public services, programs, and facilities by
anticipating future expenditure requirements and revenue sources. Funding mechanisms are
addressed in two forms, namely, the operating and capital budgets through Local, State, Federal and
private/public partnership resources. In order to provide an adequate physical infrastructure, and
improve and maintain services while channeling growth, capital budget expenditures are reviewed in
relation to the County's Land Use Element Plan and other element plans. Specific element plans and
their implementation measures also provide funding direction to achieve these "Visions." Examples
include the funding of capital projects identified to meet the Adequate Public Facility ordinance, and
the Purchase of Development Rights program. Additional funding tools, such as a development
excise tax, impact fees, or transfer taxes, will be researched by County agencies including the Office
of Economic Development, Department of Public Works, Department of Law, and Treasury
Department.
Vision 8. Adequate public facilities and infrastructure under the control of the county or
municipal corporation are available or planned in areas where growth is to
occur.
The Department of Planning and Zoning supports balancing land development and the availability of
public facilities through the Adequate Public Facilities (APF) standards for schools, water and sewer
facilities, and roads. Harford County’s APF regulations were first adopted in 1991 and subsequently
additions were made in following years to include water, sewer and roads. The County has
established an APF Task Force to regularly review the APF standards.
Each year, the Department of Planning and Zoning prepares an Annual Growth Report describing
growth and facility capacity. This document highlights potential deficiencies as well as identified
capital projects associated with the specific facilities included in the Adequate Public Facilities
regulations. Additionally, the Planning Advisory Board, in conjunction with the Department of
Planning and Zoning, reviews the Capital Improvement Program on an annual basis to determine its
consistency with the goals, policies and objectives outlined in the County’s Master Plan and Land
Use Element Plan.
17
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Similar to the "Visions" of the 1992 Maryland Planning Act, Harford County has established the
following guiding principles for the development of the Land Use Element Plan and other element
plans. These principles form the framework for the entire Master Plan.
Quality-of-Life
Enhancement of our living environment is a priority for Harford County Government. Harford
County is dedicated to achieving a high quality-of-life by providing a mix of superior educational
facilities, an acceptable functioning transportation network, adequate public facilities, safe and
sustainable communities, the means for preserving our resources, and an array of recreational and
entertainment opportunities. When we recognize and enhance the strengths of the unique
communities within the County, our overall quality-of-life will be measurably improved.
Stewardship of our Resources
Harford County recognizes the value of our agricultural, natural, historical, and cultural resources.
By working with Federal and State agencies, as well as with local communities, these irreplaceable
sites and features are protected. Preservation of prime agricultural lands, natural systems, the
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, historic sites and architecture, cultural heritage, and local
landmarks are important in nurturing a sense of our uniqueness and solidifying our identity.
Growth Management
Harford County recognizes the importance of enhancing the vitality of our communities, both inside
and outside of the Development Envelope. Our growth management strategy preserves the character
of Harford County by providing sufficient locations, within designated growth areas, for residential
and commercial developments. Directing the majority of growth to these areas protects the integrity
and economic vitality of these areas, and preserves the character of our rural areas. Harford County
further recognizes the relationship between our built and natural environments, and seeks to balance
these entities throughout the County. The County's growth management program shall be designed
to implement Smart Growth policies and the "Visions" of the Planning Act of 1992 within the
unique context of Harford County.
Redevelopment and Revitalization
To further enhance the vitality of communities while preserving undeveloped lands, Harford County
supports the creative reuse of vacant and underutilized sites and structures. Redevelopment and
revitalization of these sites helps to minimize development of land outside of the Development
Envelope and in other areas not designated for growth. Quality design standards are encouraged,
and will strengthen and preserve the “sense of place” within our communities.
18
A Sound, Balanced, and Diversified Local Economy
Harford County is a growing community with a wide range of retail, business, service, and
employment needs. Continual support and coordination with Aberdeen Proving Ground is a key
component to the local economy. The County actively supports established industrial, commercial,
and agricultural enterprises, while seeking to attract other businesses to broaden its economic base.
Harford County supports high-tech businesses as a means for providing additional, high-quality
employment opportunities. Harford County is committed to providing a variety of employment
opportunities for its citizens, which will lessen our residents’ dependence on a small group of
widely-scattered employment centers, and diversify the local economy.
Commitment to Communities
Harford County Government is dedicated to providing a forum for a broad spectrum of local
viewpoints. Through public meetings and hearings, County government gains a better understanding
of citizen's views on matters such as land use, zoning, budget decisions, and current development.
The County is committed to continuing this interaction, as it strengthens the identity of its
communities. The County provides further opportunities for citizen involvement through
Community Councils, the Planning Advisory Board, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, the
Environmental Advisory Board, the Economic Development Advisory Board, and other similar
groups. Harford County maintains partnerships with the State and a host of local non-profit
organizations. The County enlists the aid of these groups in projects protecting important local
resources such as Falling Branch, the Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway, and the Liriodendron,
as well as providing County assistance to private agricultural preservation efforts.
Coordination Among Agencies
Coordination among government agencies, whether they be State, Federal, municipal, or other
County agencies, is of utmost importance in achieving an organized and efficient approach to
meeting community needs. Outreach efforts will continue to coordinate program initiatives with
adjoining counties, the County's three municipalities (Aberdeen, Bel Air, and Havre de Grace),
Aberdeen Proving Ground, the Mason-Dixon Task Force and the Baltimore Metropolitan Council.
Harford County actively pursues a policy of cooperation among agencies, which ultimately results in
streamlining government processes, reducing conflicts, and achieving regulatory consistency.
19
INTERJURISDICTIONAL COORDINATION
The State’s 1992 Planning Act directs local governments to coordinate their planning and
development efforts to achieve the goals listed as the “Visions”. Interjurisdictional Coordination is
the term used to identify the system of coordinated planning required of all Maryland counties and
municipalities. The Act requires that local planning efforts remain consistent with the State’s
Economic Growth, Resource Protection, and overall Planning Policy. Under the Planning Act, local
comprehensive plans must include recommendations for improving planning and development
processes, to encourage economic progress and to direct future growth to appropriate areas.
It is generally agreed that interjurisdictional coordination and regionalism is important and valuable.
However, when real world issues are confronted by jurisdictions with conflicting objectives,
agreement can be difficult to achieve. Issues, when not addressed early in the process, may grow
into disputes that become an impediment to effective coordination. To prevent this, Harford County
has been at the forefront in supporting coordinated efforts at the local, municipal, Federal, and
regional level.
Over the years, Harford County has participated in the Baltimore metropolitan planning
organization, known as the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB). As a member of this
organization, Harford County has attempted to coordinate local planning concerns with region-wide
transportation and environmental issues. These activities have ranged from assistance in the
development of regional long range transportation plans and transportation improvement programs,
to promotion and participation in regional air-and-water quality efforts.
In addition to these efforts, Harford County continues to work with the three incorporated
municipalities to coordinate planning efforts. Quarterly meetings are held, where the jurisdictions’
planning directors discuss issues and development applications of mutual concern. Harford County
initiated an Intergovernmental Task Force on Smart Growth in 2000. The efforts of the task force
resulted in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that outlined the objectives and tasks that each
jurisdiction will observe to coordinate municipal development and policy plans with Harford
County’s efforts. The County will continue to work with the municipalities to maintain this MOU as
part of interjurisdictional coordination efforts.
Provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding continue to be:
· Support rational development patterns which lead to an improved environment, a

better business climate, and higher quality of life.
· Optimize the use of available land resources and public infrastructure.
· Coordinate compatible interjurisdictional goals, objectives and policies to guide

development and resource protection.
· Implement a cost effective and efficient provision of services and facilities.
20
· Establish formal and informal forums to ensure continuing communication for
information sharing.
· Strengthen the traditional town centers and municipalities to assure their long-term
viability.
· Avoid conflict in matters regarding annexation and development actions.
· Share resources to affect common objectives.
The County and the three municipalities face their own challenges in meeting these goals. As the
jurisdictions plan for the future, each will continue to address growth management and the need to
develop land in a manner consistent with all respective Comprehensive Master Plans.
The Town of Bel Air and the County recognize that there are continuing pressures on the
transportation network, water and sewer infrastructure, schools, and park and recreation facilities.
Since most of the area encumbering the Town is essentially built out, County growth has put
increased pressure on many public facilities and strained, to some degree, the Town’s economic
vitality.
One of the major coordination efforts that must be addressed is with the cities of Aberdeen and
Havre de Grace, related to the future of the area between these two cities south of I-95. Over the
past few years, many properties have been annexed into each of these cities. Identification of long
term solutions for both infrastructure and public services in these areas must be addressed. In
addition, ongoing coordination efforts fostering economic development opportunities at the HEAT
Center, in the Perryman area, and at the Ripken Stadium complex, should be maintained.
21
22
LAND USE
ELEMENT PLAN
INTRODUCTION: LAND USE ELEMENT PLAN
The Land Use Element Plan provides the primary direction for achieving the Master Plan's guiding
principles as well as the designation of land use categories throughout the County. It also acts as the
framework for the other element plans which comprise the County's Master Plan. The 2004 Land
Use Element Plan continues to support the use of the Development Envelope concept, which has
been part of all Comprehensive Plans since 1977. The Development Envelope, an area generally
defined by I-95/Route 40 and the Route 24 corridor north to Bel Air and Forest Hill, is a growth
management tool designed to ensure that planned development is located in suitable areas that can be
provided with necessary public services.
This Plan consists of five primary sections dealing with demographics and land development
capability, public participation, growth management and resource conservation, community area
plans, and implementation. The Plan also contains two maps - the Land Use Map and the Natural
Features Map.
Section One, Demographics and Land Capability, provides basic population and land inventory data.
The demographic information presented is based on Census data and includes projections to 2025.
The potential development capacity of land both inside and outside the Development Envelope is
also examined as part of this Plan. This information is used to ensure that there is sufficient vacant
land to accommodate projected growth, and to support the policies set forth in this Plan.
Information is provided for agricultural, residential, commercial, and industrially zoned lands.
Studies indicate that there is sufficient undeveloped residential, commercial, and industrial land
within the Development Envelope to address projected growth for the life of this Plan. Based on past
development trends, there is also sufficient capacity within the rural areas to accommodate
anticipated growth for over 30 years. Detailed information on the procedures used to determine land
use capabilities is provided in the June 2003 "Harford County Residential Vacant Land Inventory”
and “Agricultural Land Inventory”, and in the December 2002 “Harford County Retail Growth
Analysis, and the November 2002 “Harford County Industrial Land Study”.
The land use designations shown on the Land Use Map are discussed in the Plan's text. They are the
guide to understanding the County's policy on appropriate uses for land, as well as the relationships
between and among these uses. The pattern of development and intensity of land use described in the
Land Use Element Plan represents anticipated uses for the next decade. The map reflects the
directions and intentions outlined in the Growth Management and Resource Conservation Section.
The Public Participation section provides information on the planning process in Harford County. It
also describes the public participation method used to develop this Plan.
The Growth Management and Resource Conservation section consists of six elements. Each element
contains a goal, issues, policies, and implementation strategies. Top issues identified by the
community, through a series of public meetings, are included in each element. Each issue identified
in the Plan is presented exactly in the terms as set forth by the public. Implementation strategies
included in this section take into consideration comments received from the public during workshop
23
sessions. This section also establishes the connection between the Land Use Element Plan and other
adopted element plans.
The section begins with a discussion of Designated Growth Areas. This replaces the Development
Envelope chapter of the 1996 Plan. It is followed by Redevelopment and Revitalization, which is
new to the 2004 Plan. Preservation Areas addresses topics previously found in the Rural Area and
Historic Preservation sections. Natural Resources addresses topics previously associated with
Environmental Resources and Mineral Resources. Because Community Facilities deals with a
variety of public services and facilities, this discussion area will address more issues than the other
sections. A special emphasis will be placed on topics particularly relevant to this Plan. The final
topic included in this section is Economic Development.
The Community Areas Plans section provides general descriptions of the 12 areas, and identifies
major land use issues for each community area. These area descriptions and plans will serve as the
basis for guiding future planning activities within these communities.
The Implementation section outlines a work program for completing the initiatives set out in the
Plan. A priority is assigned to each of the items identified. The priorities should be reviewed
annually to evaluate progress and make any needed adjustments to the work program. The section
also identifies the County agency or agencies that will be chiefly responsible for implementation. It
also identifies if any of the recommendations involve capital expenditures.
As required in the Planning Act of 1992, the Master Plan and the Land Use Element Plan will be
reviewed every six years for consistency with the State "Visions." It will also be adjusted to allow
for the consideration of changing factors in land use policies, and to provide for a comprehensive
review of all plan elements in a uniform manner.
24
DEMOGRAPHICS
and
LAND
CAPABILITY
DEMOGRAPHICS AND LAND CAPABILITY REVIEW
COUNTY OVERVIEW
Harford County is located in the north central portion of Maryland at the confluence of the
Susquehanna River and the Chesapeake Bay (Figure 3). It is bounded by Baltimore County on the
west, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on the north, the Susquehanna River on the east, and the
Chesapeake Bay on the south.
The County has a land area of 440 square miles, or 235,676 acres, and is the 11th largest County in
the State of Maryland. Bisecting the County are two physiographic provinces, the Piedmont Plateau
and the Coastal Plain. The terrain ranges from the rolling topography of the Piedmont to the gentle
slopes of the Coastal Plain. The variety of the County's landscape is further enhanced by the number
of major streams and rivers that flow through the area such as the Susquehanna River, Little
Gunpowder River, Bush River, Deer Creek, Winters Run, Bynum Run, and Gasheys Run.
Located in the County are three incorporated municipalities, the County seat in the Town of Bel Air,
and the cities of Aberdeen and Havre de Grace. All of the municipalities have, or are in the process
of, adopting new Comprehensive Plans that address the "Visions" of the 1992 Planning Act.
Another major area in the County is Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), a federal facility created by
Presidential Proclamation in 1917, encompassing over 39,000 acres of land. While there are several
smaller land holdings belonging to APG throughout the County, the majority of the facility is located
on the two peninsulas bordered by the Bush and Gunpowder Rivers and encompassing the majority
of the County's Chesapeake Bay waterfront.
DEMOGRAPHICS
In order to define future needs of the County, some basic demographic data has been compiled. This
information will be used to guide planning efforts for the life of this plan. The social and economic
factors considered include statistical data on population, age distribution, number of households,
average household size, number of years lived in a home, type of employment, and household
income. The information presented is based on the Censuses of 1990 and 2000. Projections through
2025 have been made using this data.
25
26
BALTIMORE CITY
M A R Y L A N D N
PENNSYLVANIA
WASHINGTON D.C.
SU
SQ
CECIL
UE
HA
COUNTY
NN
A
RI
VE
R
Figure 3
27
BALTIMORE
COUNTY
Harford
County
Vicinity
Map
Harford County
28
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE
HARFORD COUNTY POPULATION
250,000
200,000
POPULATION 150,000
100,000
50,000
0
1980 1990 2000
YEAR
Figure 4
Harford County's population increased 20% between the years 1990 and 2000 (Figure 4), as
compared to 25% for the period 1980 to 1990. In 1990 the County's population was 182,132. By
2000 it had increased to 218,590 residents as reported by the U. S. Bureau of the Census, an average
annual growth rate of 2%.
HARFORD COUNTY MUNICIPAL POPULATION
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
POPULATION ABERDEEN
6,000
4,000 BEL AIR
2,000 HAVRE DE GRACE
0
1980 1990 2000
YEAR
Figure 5
Approximately 16% of the County's population resides in the three municipalities (Figure 5). The
largest municipality in the County is Aberdeen with a 2000 population of 13,842. The City of Havre
de Grace and the Town of Bel Air had 2000 populations of 11,331 and 9,722 respectively. However,
between the years of 1990 and 2000 the City of Havre de Grace experienced the largest percentage
amount of growth with a 26% increase in population.
29
AGE STRUCTURE
While those between the ages of 25 and 44 continued to constitute the majority of the population
identified in the censuses of 1990 and 2000, this group experienced only a 6% increase. Increases
occurred in all of the age groups except the 19 to 24 age group, which declined 23%. While
increases are noted in the 0 through 18 age groups, larger changes occurred in the 45 and above age
groups. Both the 45 to 64 and the 65 to 84 age groups increased by 46%. The 85+ age group
increased by 65% ( Figure 6).
HARFORD COUNTY POPULATION BY AGE

70,000
60,000
50,000
PERSONS 40,000 1980

30,000
1990
20,000 2000
10,000
0
0-4 5 - 18 19 - 24 25 - 44 45 - 64 65 - 84 85 & OVER
AGE GROUP
Figure 6
HOUSING
The 2000 Census identified 83,146 housing units in Harford County, an increase of 16,700 units
from 1990 (Figure 7). The largest category, single-family dwellings, contains 51,187 units,
approximately 62% of the total number of units. The Census also showed that the County
experienced a 50% increase in the number of townhouses to 15,107 units, approximately 18% of the
total number of units. In the 1990-2000 time period, the number of owner-occupied units increased
by 33% while the number of renter-occupied units increased by 6%.
HARFORD COUNTY HOUSING TYPES

60,000
50,000
40,000
NUMBER OF UNITS
30,000
20,000 1980
10,000 1990
0 2000
SINGLE TOWNHOUSE 2 TO 4 MULTI - MOBILE
FAMILY UNITS, FAMILY HOME,
ATTACHED OTHER
UNIT TYPE
Figure 7
30
HOUSEHOLD SIZE
Historically, the average household size in
Harford County has been higher than the State 4
average, as is shown in (Figure 8). While this 3.5
3
trend continues, household size has steadily AVERAGE 2.5
declined in the County, falling from 2.83 HOUSEHOLD 2
SIZE 1.5 MARYLAND
persons per household in 1990 to 2.72 persons 1 HARFORD
0.5
per household in 2000. 0
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
YEAR
Figure 8
HARFORD COUNTY HOUSEHOLDS

As identified in (Figure 9), the total number of
80,000 occupied households in the County increased
70,000
60,000
from 63,193 in 1990 to 79,667 in 2000. This
NUMBER OF
50,000 reflects an increase of over 20%. Of the
HOUSEHOLDS
40,000 households that were established by 2000,
30,000
20,000 approximately 44% (or 35,000 households) had
10,000 been living in their present home for less than
0
1980 1990 2000
five years (Figure 10).
YEAR
Figure 9
HARFORD COUNTY
YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT (2000)
1969 or Earlier: Over 30 yr
1970 to 1979: 21-30 yr

TIME PERIOD
1980 to 1989: (to 3/80) 11-20 yr
1990 to 1994: 6-10 yr
1995 to 1998: 16mo.-5 yr
1999 to March 2000: last 15 mo.
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Figure 10
31
INCOME
Between 1990 and 2000, the median household income for Harford County rose 37%, from $41,680
to $57,234. Nearly 25% of the households in the County had an income range between $50,000 to
$74,999 and the number of households with an income over $100,000 increased by 39% during these
years (Figure 11). Overall, income levels in the County have improved since 1990. Based on Census
2000 data, the poverty rate for families considered living at the poverty level is 3.6% as compared to
4.1% in 1990.
HARFORD COUNTY HOUSEHOLD INCOME
$100,000 or More
$75,000 to $99,999
$50,000 to $74,999
INCOME RANGE
$35,000 to $49,999 2000

1990
$25,000 to $34,999 1980
$15,000 to $24,999
$10,000 to $14,999
Less Than $10,000
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Figure 11
OCCUPATION
The occupation of residents in Harford County, based on employed individuals 16 years of age and over,
is shown in (Figure 12). This figure identifies the top three occupations as Professional Specialty
(24,681), Sales (23,553), and Administrative Support, including Clerical (18,111). Aberdeen Proving
Ground remains the single largest employer in the County with approximately 6,900 civilian employees
and approximately 3,900 military personnel.
32
TYPE OF EMPLOYMENT 2000
Handlers, Equip. Cleaners, Helpers/Laborers
Transportation & Material Moving

Mach. Operators, Assemblers & Inspectors
Precision Production, Craft & Repair
TYPE OF EMPLOYMENT
Farming, Forestry & Fishing

Services, Except Protective & Household 2000
Protective Services 1990
Private Household Services 1980
Administrative Support Incl. Clerical
Sales
Technicians & Related Support
Professional Specialty
Executive, Administrative & Managerial
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000

NUMBER OF PERSONS
Figure 12
GROWTH PROJECTIONS
Several factors have contributed to Harford County's position as one of the fastest growing counties
in the State. It is strategically located between Washington, D.C., and New York, it is part of the
Baltimore Metropolitan Region, and several major transportation corridors cross its borders,
including Interstate 95, U.S. Routes 1 and 40, and the CONRAIL, CSX, and AMTRAK rail lines.
Using the 2000 Census as a baseline, estimates have been made for 2005; these estimates were
determined by a number of variables including building permits, average household size, and
household vacancy rates. Projections for the five, 10 and 20-year periods beyond 2005 use the same
information to build an anticipated rate of growth. It is important to note that projections also
consider past trends and land availability.
While the County's residential building permit trends provide an indication of projected growth,
permits vary from year to year depending on economic conditions. By observing trends in permit
activity, improved projections of growth can be made (Figure 13). Using this data and assumptions
about vacancy rates and average household size, population figures and the number of households
were projected through the year 2025.
33
Residential Permits Issued by Jurisdiction Since 1990
Year Total Harford County Aberdeen Bel Air Havre de

Permits Grace
1990 2,498 2,390 41 9 58
1991 2,011 1,901 25 13 72
1992 2,399 1,903 48 234 214
1993 1,756 1,538 32 15 171
1994 1,714 1,569 23 5 117
1995 1,534 1,374 63 4 93
1996 1,856 1,607 73 1 175
1997 1,565 1,447 33 8 77
1998 1,675 1,530 74 8 63
1999 1,830 1,665 49 24 92
2000 1,596 1,503 69 5 19
2001 1,912 1,868 20 5 19
2002 1,916 1,784 71 3 58
TOTAL 24,262 22,079 621 334 1228
Figure 13
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Between 1990 and 2000 the County population increased by 36,458 people to 218,590. Population
projections for the County as shown in (Figure 14) reflect an expected increase of 48,250 people
between 2005 - 2025. During this period, the population distribution among the various age groups
will also change. The largest shift in population is expected in the 65+ age group. This group will
increase by 123%, which is indicative of the aging population of the County. Projections also
indicate, however, that the 5-19 and 25-44 age groups are expected to increase by about by 5%.
(Figure 15).
34
Harford County's Population and Households
1990-2025
YEAR POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS
1990 182,132 63,193

1995 209,130 73,640
2000 218,590 79,667
*2005 234,715 87,540
*2010 254,585 96,090
*2015 268,220 103,215
*2020 276,500 109,150
*2025 282,965 113,900
Figure 14
*Department of Planning and Zoning estimate based on building permit activity and household size estimates.
HARFORD COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY AGE
2000
90,000 2005
NUMBER OF PERSONS
80,000
2010
70,000
2015
60,000
50,000 2020
40,000 2025
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
0-4 5 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 44 45 - 64 65+
AGE GROUP
Figure 15
Source: Maryland Department of Planning & Harford County Planning & Zoning, Feb. 2003.
35
Since 1977, the guiding policy for land use decisions has been the focus of new growth within the
Development Envelope. As Figure 16 demonstrates, over 70% of the County's population will be
located within the Development Envelope by the year 2005. The estimated population of the
Development Envelope in 2005 is 169,961 and this figure is expected to increase to 213,561 in the
year 2025. This increase in population will directly correlate with the demand for new housing units
within the County.
HARFORD COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS

DEVELOPMENT ENVELOPE / RURAL AREA
1990 - 2025
250,000
200,000
POPULATION
150,000
ENVELOPE
RURAL AREA
100,000
50,000
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
YEAR
Figure 16
36
HOUSING PROJECTIONS
Population figures presented in Figure 17 directly reflect the increase in total households anticipated
to occur between 2000 and 2025. For 2000, the number of occupied households within the County
is 79,667 resulting in an overall increase of 20% since 1990. Of these 58,078 households, or 73% of
the total number of households in the County, are located within the Development Envelope.
HARFORD COUNTY HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS

DEVELOPMENT ENVELOPE / RURAL AREA
1990 - 2025
90,000
80,000
70,000 ENVELOPE
60,000 RURAL AREA
HOUSEHOLDS
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
YEAR
Figure 17
Between 2005 and the year 2025, the number of households countywide is projected to increase by
26,360. As identified in Figure 17, 75% (85,464) of the total number of households in 2025 are
expected to be located within the existing Development Envelope. The remainder of the households,
about 25%, will be located outside of the Development Envelope.
37
Development patterns support these projections. Since 1990, an average of 82% of the new
residential development has occurred within the Development Envelope (Figure 18). Based on an
average distribution rate of 80%, a total of 21,088 new households will be located within the
Development Envelope by the year 2025.
Residential Permits Issued Since 1990
TOTAL INSIDE OUTSIDE

% INSIDE % OUTSIDE
YEAR PERMITS ENVELOPE ENVELOPE
1990 2,498 2,069 82.8% 429 17.2%
1991 2,011 1,560 77.6% 451 22.4%
1992 2,399 2,005 83.6% 394 16.4%
1993 1,756 1,381 78.6% 375 20.4%
1994 1,714 1,434 83.6% 280 16.9%
1995 1,534 1,276 83.2% 258 16.8%
1996 1,856 1,575 84.9% 281 15.1%
1997 1,565 1,279 81.7% 286 18.3%
1998 1,675 1,328 79.3% 347 20.7%
1999 1,830 1,477 80.7% 353 19.3%
2000 1,596 1,292 81.0% 304 19.0%
2001 1,912 1,571 82.2% 341 17.8%
2002 1,916 1,572 82.0% 344 18.0%
TOTAL 24,262 19,819 81.7% 4443 18.2%
Figure 18
38
DEVELOPMENT ENVELOPE RESIDENTIAL LAND CAPACITY
A comprehensive residential/vacant land inventory was initially completed in 1995. This inventory
was updated as of July 2003 to determine the residential holding capacity of the Development
Envelope for the 2004 Land Use Element Plan. The update involved compiling data from four
categories: approved preliminary plans with unbuilt units, planned units in process, the potential
capacity of vacant undeveloped land, and municipal vacant land. These categories are defined as
follows:
1. Approved preliminary plans - Subdivisions having preliminary plan approval were reviewed
and the number of unbuilt units identified.
2. Planned units in process – Submitted concept and preliminary plans, that have not obtained
preliminary plan approval status, were reviewed to determine estimated units and unit type
yields.
3. Potential capacity of vacant undeveloped land - Vacant residentially zoned parcels, of two
acres or more, were analyzed for environmental features, such as hydric soils, steep slopes,
and streams/stream buffers, and for serviceability by public water and sewer. To estimate unit
yield on the inventory of generally buildable land, an "average density factor" for each zoning
type was derived from a representative sample of approved subdivisions.
4. Municipal vacant land - Data was obtained from the three municipalities, regarding vacant
undeveloped land and approved plans.
Based on the analysis performed, there is an estimated capacity of approximately 18,672 units in the
Development Envelope. The breakdown of the estimated capacity is as follows:
5,288 Planned unbuilt dwelling units remaining

1,154 Planned units in process
9,275 Undeveloped vacant land capacity (County/Municipal) sewer service area
2,955 Municipal residential land
An assessment of redevelopment/infill capacity throughout the existing envelope has identified an

additional 3,600 units of capacity. This capacity estimate includes parcels that are mixed-use
development opportunities and underutilized parcels. Therefore a total of 22,272 units would be
available in the development envelope.
In addition to these numbers, Aberdeen and Havre de Grace have identified adjacent areas for
possible annexation in their current comprehensive plans. The Cities of Aberdeen and Havre de
Grace are each served by their own water and sewer facilities and the development of the area
between the cities is dependent on sewer service through one of the municipal systems. These
possible annexations could substantially increase the potential residential unit holding capacities in
this area of the County. Based on the most recent plan updates of these cities, a maximum yield of
about 8,000 units is estimated.
39
Based on an anticipated average rate of build-out of approximately 1,300 new units per year, there is
sufficient residential land capacity within the Development Envelope to last approximately 17 years.
For infrastructure planning purposes, it is important to identify the area served by the County's major
wastewater treatment plant, Sod Run. The capacity of the service area is 19,175 units. Thus, the Sod
Run portion of the Envelope is estimated to have sufficient capacity to last about 15 years. The
majority of the remaining units, or 6,550 units are located in the Aberdeen-Havre de Grace area, and
will be serviced by the municipal systems.
AGRICULTURAL LAND – RESIDENTIAL LAND CAPACITY
An inventory of the development potential of land in the rural area of the County was completed in
June 2003. This study included land outside of the Development Envelope that is zoned Agricultural
or Residential (Residential, Village Residential, and Rural Residential). Based on the analysis
performed, there is an estimated capacity of approximately 12,636 units in the rural area of the
County. The breakdown of the estimated capacity is as follows:
5,645 Agricultural land capacity on parcels not subdivided since 1977

1,728 Planned un-built dwelling units remaining
3,824 Remaining rights on subdivided parcels
168 Village residential remaining development potential
1,271 Rural residential remaining development potential
Given these numbers, it is not the intent of this Plan to encourage growth within the rural areas of the
County. The Plan recognizes that some development will continue to occur outside of the
Development Envelope, and this development should, to the degree possible, be directed to the Rural
Villages and Rural Residential areas. Based on the average rate of 320 residential units permitted in
the rural area over the past 10 years, there is sufficient residential land inventory.
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL CAPABILITIES
Commercial
Using the assumptions and methodology of the 1997 Legg Mason retail growth analysis, a study was
completed to determine the estimated retail growth likely to occur in Harford County between 2000 -
2025. Completed in December 2002, the study indicates that there are 13.4 million square feet of
existing commercial space, of which 9.4 million square feet is retail space, and 2,643 acres of vacant
commercial land in the County. Of the commercial land inventoried, 5.7 million square feet (42.7%)
of the overall existing commercial space, and 348.3 acres (13.2%) of the overall vacant commercial
land are located within the municipalities of Aberdeen, Bel Air, and Havre de Grace. Almost half of
the County’s developable commercial land - 1,250 acres or 47.3% is zoned CI.
The amount of retail space that is supportable by an area is based on three factors: growth in the
number of households, spendable income, and that portion of residential expenditures for retail
merchandise that occurs outside of the County. In 2000, Harford County’s 79,667 households
(including Aberdeen Proving Ground) had an aggregate household income of $5.4 billion. The
40
number of households projected for 2025 is expected to increase by 23,082 with an aggregate
household income of $6.9 billion. Retail consumer expenditures for 2000 totaled $1.7 billion. The
projected residential growth will cause Harford County’s retail demand to reach approximately $2.1
billion in the year 2025.
Comparing projected demand and gross land capacity through 2025, Harford County has a sufficient
amount of commercially zoned land to accommodate projected needs. By 2025, it is estimated that
41.1% of the overall retail capacity will be utilized, and there will be a surplus of total retail
supportable space equaling 13.8 million square feet.
Industrial
A balanced tax base is important for Harford County's financial future. It is in the public's interest to
have a sufficient inventory of industrially zoned properties served by public water and sewer and
located in proximity to major transportation networks. To ensure that adequate areas are designated
for these uses, the County updated the 1995 industrial land inventory in 2002. The inventory
contains 862 sites, some of which may be partially or completely developed. These sites encompass
8,874 acres of land currently zoned for industrial use in Harford County.
In the Development Envelope there are a total of 773 industrial sites containing 7,969 acres of land.
Of these, 315 sites (5,314 acres) are partially or completely undeveloped. Outside the Development
Envelope there are 89 industrial sites encompassing 905 acres. Of this total, there are 43 sites (694
acres) that are partially or completely undeveloped.
While the study shows that the County has a variety of different sized parcels available for industrial
use, approximately 5% of the total sites are over 100 acres as compared to almost 10% in 1995. The
percentage of sites less than 10 acres now constitutes 56% of the available sites compared to 27% in
1995. However, the 1996 Plan included the designation of Mixed Office areas at selected
interchanges to provide for additional employment opportunities.
41
LAND USE MAP: DESIGNATIONS
The Land Use Map represents a generalization of planned land use patterns and intensities, as well as
the policies concerning the level and location of development for the next 10 years. Areas beyond
the Development Envelope that do not already have public utilities should remain in agricultural or
rural residential use. The land use categories depicted on the map are explained below. Low,
medium, and high-intensity areas are located in the Development Envelope (Figure 19).
Commercial shopping facilities shown on the map include neighborhood, community, and town
centers within the Development Envelope, and rural villages outside the Development Envelope.
It is important to note that the categories of use on the map are not meant to be exclusive, and it is
not expected that the uses in an area will be limited to a single land use. For instance, while most
commercial activity in the County is expected to be located in and around the centers referred to
above additional isolated commercial activity may occur throughout the low, medium, and high
intensity areas. Such uses should be consistent with the definition of each category and compatible
with adjacent uses. In addition, other land uses not directly related to agriculture may occur in the
County's rural area so long as they do not significantly modify the character of areas outside of the
Development Envelope.
LAND USE: MAPPING DEFINITIONS
Agricultural - Areas where agriculture is the primary land use, but where development rights are
available. Residential development is possible at a density of 1.0 dwelling unit for every 10 acres.
Commercial uses within this area are intended to serve the agriculture industry or residents of the
area while maintaining the character of the surrounding countryside.
Rural Residential - Areas of focused rural development within the agricultural area, which allow
low intensity residential opportunities while maintaining the character of the surrounding
countryside. Water and sewer services are not planned for these areas. Residential density is limited
to 1.0 dwelling unit per 2 acres.
Low Intensity - Areas within the Development Envelope where residential development is the
primary land use. Density ranges from 1.0 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre. Neighborhood
commercial uses such as convenience stores, doctors' offices, and banks are examples of some of the
nonresidential uses associated with this designation.
Medium Intensity - Areas within the Development Envelope where residential development is the
primary land use. Density ranges from 3.5 to 7.0 dwelling units per acre. Grocery stores, variety
stores, and other commercial uses are examples of some of the more intensive uses associated with
this designation.
High Intensity - Areas within the Development Envelope where residential development occurs at a
density greater than 7.0 dwelling units per acre. Major retail commercial centers and highway-
related businesses, such as automobile dealerships and home improvement centers, are examples of
some of the most intensive uses associated with this designation.
42
Rural Villages - Areas of concentrated residential, commercial, and institutional uses located within
the agricultural and rural residential areas that support the character and economy of the surrounding
communities by providing necessary goods and services.
Neighborhood Centers - Areas of limited commercial activities such as convenience stores and
service oriented uses that serve surrounding residences.
Community Centers - Areas combining civic, social, and cultural facilities with more intensive
commercial and service oriented activities. These centers are usually located along major highways.
Town Centers - Areas of commercial activity, government services, office facilities, and cultural
activities located within the County's three incorporated municipalities of Aberdeen, Bel Air, and
Havre de Grace. Areas directly adjacent to the municipal boundaries may include high-intensity
land uses.
Industrial/Employment - Areas of concentrated manufacturing, distribution, technical, research,

office, and other activities generally located along major transportation corridors.
Mixed Office - Areas designed to promote major economic development opportunities such as
corporate offices, research and development facilities, and high-tech services which create
significant job opportunities and investment benefits. This area may also include limited retail uses
to service the employment center. Designated at strategic I-95 interchanges, development will be
subject to specific performance, architectural, and site design standards.
HEAT - Area designated for the Higher Education and Applied Technology Center, a planned
higher education and research and development park. The HEAT initiative brings the finest of
Maryland's institutions of higher education together to offer programs that are in demand by
residents and businesses. The HEAT Center is located in Aberdeen at MD 22 and I-95.
HCC - Harford Community College is a public community college. The College is located on
Thomas Run Road, three miles east of Bel Air. The College provides high quality, accessible and
affordable educational opportunities and services that promote professional competence and
economic development and improve the quality of life in a multicultural community.
APG – Aberdeen Proving Ground was established in 1917 to provide a military facility where
design and testing of weapons could be carried out in close proximity to the nation’s industrial and
shipping centers. Aberdeen Proving Ground occupies more than 39,000 acres and comprises two
principal areas separated by the Bush River, the Aberdeen area and the Edgewood area. APG is a
key element in the nation’s defense, providing testing, laboratory research and military training.
More than 6,900 civilians work at APG making it Harford County’s largest employer. In addition,
3,900 military personnel are assigned to APG and nearly 3,000 contractors and private business
employees work at the Proving Ground.
Chesapeake Bay Critical Area - Areas generally within 1,000 feet of tidal waters and tidal
wetlands, including expansion areas necessary for the protection of identified sensitive natural
features and natural habitat protection areas.
43
State and County Parks - Areas of land generally designated for public open space and recreation.
These areas also include some lands that provide specialized uses such as Stoney Forest
Demonstration Area and Harford Glen Environmental Education Center.
44
NATURAL FEATURES MAP: MAPPING DEFINITIONS
The Natural Features Map (Figure 20) identifies specific resources that affect the usability of the
designations shown on the Land Use Map. The features depicted on the map are representative of
policies and preservation programs currently being implemented by the County. Areas shown on the
map that are related to regulatory programs and policies are subject to specific guidelines for
management and development. Resources shown on the map include:
Chesapeake Bay Critical Area - In addition to the 1,000-foot boundary, the three land use
management areas are shown: Intensely Developed Areas (IDA), Limited Development Areas
(LDA) and Resource Conservation Areas (RCA).
Intensely Developed Areas - Areas where residential, commercial, institutional, and/or industrial
land uses predominate and where relatively little natural habitat occurs. This is where development
will continue to be concentrated.
Limited Development Areas - Areas where land use intensity is moderate and some natural habitat
still occurs. Low and medium intensity development will continue to occur here.
Resource Conservation Areas - Areas where the protection of natural environments and resource
utilization (agriculture, forestry, fishery activities) are the primary use. Any future development
shall minimize impacts on the natural features of this area and will be limited to very low intensity.
Stream Systems – All stream systems in the County are regulated as part of the Natural Resource
District. The streams shown on the Natural Features Map represent only a portion of the overall
County stream system.
Deer Creek Scenic River District - This represents the area included in the State Wild and Scenic
Rivers Program which established 150-foot buffers on both sides of the creek to preserve its natural
beauty.
Habitat Areas - Areas of ecological value that have received local, State, and/or Federal recognition
for their uncommon or unique species. The locations on the map are approximate.
Sensitive Species Project Review Areas – Sensitive Species Project Review Areas (SSPRA)
represents the general locations of documented rare, threatened and endangered species. This data
assists in compliance with the Economic Growth, Resource Protection and Planning Act of 1992 and
aids in streamlining the process of reviewing proposed projects for potential impacts to rare,
threatened and endangered species and other regulated Wildlife and Heritage Service resources.
Preservation Areas – Areas also identified on the Preservation Areas Map (Figure 35) represent
private lands that have voluntarily been placed into programs to conserve valuable natural features or
resources. Uses being planned for areas adjacent to these sites should be compatible and, where
possible, enhance existing preservation areas. The areas shown on the Map include:
45
Agricultural Preservation Areas - These areas represent farms that are protected either as part of
an agricultural district or through agricultural easements. Farms with agricultural easements have
been placed into a protection program that preserves the agricultural use of the land in perpetuity.
Development inconsistent with the easement will not be allowed. Agricultural districts are five year
agreements with landowners not to residentially subdivide their property prior to the five year
commitment.
Maryland Environmental Trust Easements - Private lands that have been placed into a protection
program to preserve their ecological value. Development inconsistent with the easement will not be
allowed.
Rural Legacy - Areas where preservation efforts, through easements or fee simple acquisitions, are
focused to form large contiguous tracts of protected land. Development inconsistent with the
easement will not be allowed.
Maryland Historical Trust Easements - Private lands that have been placed into a protective
program to preserve their historic value.
46
PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION
PROCESS
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS
Introduction/Overview
By nature, the planning process blends many diverse interests into a common vision. Harford
County’s Master Plan, along with the Land Use Element Plan, is intended to set the overall
framework for the County’s policies on land use and related issues. These documents will guide
the direction of the County’s planning efforts during the coming decade. The County’s
comprehensive zoning process is guided by the policies and directions established by these plans.
This process establishes land uses that will be permitted in a given area. Ultimately, the policies
and programs set forth under the Master Plan and Land Use Element Plan are implemented
through the Zoning Code and the Capital Improvement Program.
Public participation is a critical element of long range planning in Harford County. The goal of
the public participation process is to obtain input from citizens in order to build a mutual
consensus. A successful public participation process involves a great deal of preparation. It
begins by establishing a date, time and location that provides the best opportunity for broad-
based attendance. Once the time and venue are determined, extensive efforts are made to notify
residents, civic organizations, businesses, and special interest groups in all communities.
Advertisements and other notifications of opportunities to participate are created and publicized.
The process may include offering presentations to specific groups in order to inform and educate
them regarding issues of special interest to their members. The Internet is another advertising
and educational tool utilized during this process. Ultimately, input is received from the
participants on an array of topics pertaining to the proposed vision or plan. When appropriate,
interactive questionnaires and feedback sheets can be developed and the public’s input may be
displayed on the County’s website.
Public involvement is the part of the planning process where citizens have the opportunity to
help set the direction for future growth and resource management. Since 1999, citizens have
been participating in developing the long-range visions for their neighborhoods by participating
in community “visioning” sessions, or workshops. Harford County has conducted community
workshops in Edgewood, Joppa/Joppatowne, and Fallston – for the U.S. Route 1 corridor area.
Additional workshops were held for the Perryman area, and the U.S. Route 40 corridor. These
sessions helped develop consensus on the physical character, appropriate intensity, and street
design desired by the community, and are integrated into the Master Plan and Land Use Element
Plan.
As part of the Zoning Code update, Harford County intends to provide timelier project
notification thereby improving the opportunity for public participation. In addition, the County
intends to utilize other public participation venues such as the Community Councils, focus
groups, workshops, surveys and other public involvement techniques to enhance opportunities
for participation.
47
Master Plan and Land Use Element Plan Process
The development of the 2004 Master Plan and Land Use Element Plan was predicated on
providing ample opportunities for public input from all sectors of the community. In March and
April of 2003, a series of four kick-off meetings were held in different areas of the County, to
inform the public about the Plan update process and solicit input on what citizens believed were
the main issues to be addressed by the plan. All of the information provided at the meetings was
made available on the Internet along with comment forms.
Citizens were asked to comment on six topical areas: Designated Growth Areas, Redevelopment
and Revitalization, Community Facilities, Preservation, Natural Resources, and Economic
Development. The results of these sessions were then tabulated and the top five issues in each
category were identified.
The next step involved another series of workshops held in May and June of 2003. Once again,
four sessions were held in different areas of the County. At these workshops, the public was
provided with information regarding the topics identified by the attendees of the kick-off
sessions. Maps, data, community plans and visions, strategic plans, policy guides, and other
management tools were displayed so the public could understand what information the County
relies on to address these issues.
Citizens were then asked a series of questions concerning the identified issues. The questions
were designed to establish goals the public would like to see achieved, and what measures
government and business could undertake to address their concerns. Citizens were also asked
what they would be willing to do, themselves, to improve the situation. Participants in these
sessions were also asked to comment on their communities – identifying what they like most and
least, and what ideas or suggestions they had to improve the quality of life in their community.
In addition to the kickoff meetings and workshops, citizens were able to provide input via the
Internet. All of the comments received at meetings, workshops or through the Internet were
posted on the County’s webpage. Information gathered was then used to develop a draft Plan that
clearly identified and addressed the issues citizens had raised.
The Plan includes a series of issues, policies, and implementation strategies. Each element of the
Growth Management and Resource Conservation portion of the plan addresses the top issues
identified during the public participation process. Each issue identified in the Plan is presented
exactly in the terms as submitted by the public. The policies and implementation strategies put
forth in this Plan are based in part on the public’s recommendations. From these meetings it was
determined that there is strong support for improving the programs that protect the County’s
agricultural lands, finding alternative funding mechanisms to address schools, traffic, and open
space needs, and taking measures to protect the County’s natural and historic resources.
A draft plan was released for public review in October 2003. Comments on the draft plan were
solicited in several ways. The first opportunity involved a series of roundtable sessions
conducted in November and December of 2003. The Department of Planning and Zoning, along
with the Planning Advisory Board (PAB), held six roundtable sessions – one in each County
48
Council district. These meetings began with a presentation about the Plan. Participants were
then assigned to smaller work groups where they were given an opportunity to talk one-on-one
with Planners concerning the proposed Plan. These sessions provided citizens with an
opportunity to identify what they thought was best about the Plan and what items were missing
or not sufficiently addressed. All of the information and materials presented at the public
meetings was also available on the County’s website.
Following these sessions, information gathered was synthesized and a final draft Plan was
developed. This Plan was presented to the County Council, and one countywide public hearing
was held to receive citizen's comments on the draft Plan.
49
50
GROWTH
MANAGEMENT
and
RESOURCE
CONSERVATION
DESIGNATED GROWTH AREAS
GOAL: Promote planned, balanced growth within Designated Growth Areas.
Designated Growth Areas are planned to accommodate new development and revitalization. Within
these areas, the County will concentrate efforts to ensure the viability of communities, while
minimizing impacts to agricultural lands and other resources. Harford County’s Designated Growth
Areas are defined in accordance with the State’s Smart Growth initiative. They include: the
Development Envelope, designated along the MD 24/MD 924 corridors and the I-95/U.S. 40
corridors; the three municipalities, and areas designated for economic development as well as the
HEAT Center and Harford Community College. Because these areas are also recognized by the
State as Priority Funding Areas (PFA), they will be given precedence over other areas to receive
State funding for improvements to roads, water and sewer, and other growth related needs. The
State's Smart Growth law carefully states it is not to be used to encourage growth in rural areas. The
nine designated rural villages will retain the prohibitions against public utilities as do all other areas
outside the Development Envelope that do not already have public utilities.
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - No expansion of the Development Envelope
The Maryland Planning Act and Smart Growth initiatives required local jurisdictions to map
specified growth areas. In Harford County, one of these growth areas is the Development Envelope.
The Development Envelope has been diligently studied since the inception of the Smart Growth
Program to ensure its consistency with this initiative. Expansion of the Development Envelope was
considered for the area between Aberdeen and Havre de Grace, the Stoney Forest area, the MD 543
corridor, and the MD 152 corridor. The analysis of these areas indicated that continuing to build out
the Development Envelope should be the first priority, followed by providing for additional growth
in the area between the municipalities. Because there is sufficient inventory to address development
demands during the life of this Plan, the Development Envelope will not be expanded.
DESIGNATED GROWTH AREA POLICY 1 - Ensure that new development is accomplished

in a manner consistent with the Maryland Planning Act, Smart Growth and interjurisdictional
coordination efforts.
Implementation Strategies
1. Work with the municipalities to develop policies that direct future growth to suitable areas and
existing population hubs.
2. Maintain a sufficient inventory of residential land within the Designated Growth Areas to meet
projected needs for the life of this Plan.
3. Provide the essential infrastructure and services that will enrich the quality of life for all
citizens of Harford County.
4. Coordinate Capital Improvement Projects with land use policies to provide needed services.
51
CITIZEN ISSUE 2 – Stop or reduce growth.
Census data indicates that between 1990 and 2000 the County grew at a rate of two percent per year.
However, population projections indicate that the average growth rate will decline between 2000 and
2025 (Figure 14). Realizing that growth cannot be stopped completely, and that some growth is
inevitable, the County is committed to maximizing the quality of life its citizens experience. Harford
County is committed to the application of Smart Growth policies to help ensure that viable and
sustainable communities are being built.
DESIGNATED GROWTH AREA POLICY 2 - Strengthen the viability of communities within

the Designated Growth Areas to help slow growth outside these areas.
1. Protect sensitive areas by steering development away from these areas.
2. Develop pedestrian-friendly communities with adequate open space.
3. Support the development of public/private partnerships to identify and address community

issues and concerns.
CITIZEN ISSUE 3 – Manage growth/better development.
Harford County’s planning efforts are focused on existing and new communities. This helps to
ensure that the County’s built environment is a desirable place for citizens to live and work. It also
supports the concept of maintaining the quality of existing communities so that residents want to stay
in their community rather than move to other areas of the County thus preventing sprawl. Achieving
this requires not only the provision of Adequate Public Facilities (APF) but also a commitment to
better development standards.
Harford County is committed to managing growth through a number of legislative tools. APF
standards, designated growth areas, density provisions, and subdivision standards are among the
legislative measures used. As part of the APF provisions, an Annual Growth Report is published
and updated annually. Information and analysis is provided regarding public schools, water and
sewer systems, and road intersections. Within this report, any facilities operating below the
County’s adopted minimum standards will be identified. Major subdivision development will not be
approved in school districts where the enrollment exceeds, or is expected to exceed, 115% of
capacity. Preliminary plan approvals and building permits in areas served by public water and sewer
systems can be approved only where adequate capacity exists in the water and wastewater treatment
facilities and in distribution and collection lines serving the area. APF Roads provides the
mechanism to require proposed development to make appropriate and reasonable road
improvements, based on the development’s proposed impact to the road.
52
Improving the quality of design is especially important. New uses and redevelopment should be
completed in a manner that blends with the surrounding community character. The County has
adopted flexible design standards and is working on design guidelines. The County has also taken
steps to encourage and support redevelopment and revitalization of its older communities. Initiatives
enacted for the U. S. Route 40 corridor, can serve as models for similar efforts in other areas.
DESIGNATED GROWTH AREA POLICY 3 - Preserve and protect community character

and the environment by providing adequate public facilities and promoting redevelopment
and revitalization.
1. Review and update APF standards to ensure their effectiveness.
2. Maintain, renovate, and enhance existing infrastructure to support redevelopment and

revitalization.
3. Encourage the use of mixed-use and infill developments.
4. Develop Design Standards that will help to attract quality investment and redevelopment while
helping to enhance property values.
5. Focus industrial/commercial development towards the U.S. 40 corridor.
6. Provide transportation services to communities within the Designated Growth Areas to

connect residents to shopping and employment centers.
7. Review and revise the Zoning Code to improve landscaping and forest conservation
requirements within the Designated Growth Areas.
CITIZEN ISSUE 4 – Maintain the character of the Rural Villages.
Preserving the integrity of rural areas is important for building viable agricultural communities. As a
means to retain a sense of place in the rural areas, protecting the character and viability of the rural
villages and hamlets is important. Villages will continue to be the focal areas for social,
employment, and commercial activities in the rural areas. The villages have specific, designated
Priority Funding Area boundaries and each has a unique identity. The heritage of these villages
should be respected and preserved.
DESIGNATED GROWTH AREAS POLICY 4 - Promote the charm and nature of the Rural
Villages.
1. Review and revise the Village Residential and Village Business District as part of the
comprehensive Zoning Code update.
53
2. Develop Village Design Guidelines to ensure that land uses within the Village Centers
compliment and enhance the surrounding rural areas.
3. Encourage infill development in rural villages.
4. Coordinate with the Office of Economic Development to provide small business assistance for
the rural villages.
CITIZEN ISSUE 5 – Affordable Housing
Harford County is committed to offering balanced, sustainable communities. Providing a variety of

housing types, along with a full range of cost options, is one piece of this process. Rental assistance
and homeownership incentives must also be provided. The Department of Community Services
oversees a variety of programs that promote homeownership or assist with the rehabilitation of
homes. Community Services also administers programs that help to provide housing for the elderly
and affordable rental housing. Since demographic trends suggest a growing population base covering
a relatively diverse age and income range in Harford County, it is imperative that a variety of
housing prices and styles be available to meet these growing needs. It is important that the need for
affordable housing for all income levels be met.
DESIGNATED GROWTH AREAS POLICY 5 - Provide a balance and mixture of housing to

meet the needs of all income levels and age groups throughout the County.
1. Coordinate efforts with the Department of Community Services to develop a Housing Element
Plan as part of the Consolidated Plan.
2. Work with the Department of Community Services to promote affordable home ownership as
a means to further stabilize communities.
3. Update the Zoning Code to provide incentives that encourage the construction of affordable
housing.
4. Develop flexible design standards that encourage a mixture of housing types for residents at all
income levels, including the rapidly growing senior population.
SUMMARY
With the passage of the State Smart Growth initiative in 1997, local jurisdictions were required to
identify and map Priority Funding Areas (PFA). Based on the State’s guidelines, Harford County
developed its PFAs, which are recognized as Designated Growth Areas by this Plan. The County’s
growth management strategies are designed to provide balance in terms of land use, type and
intensity. At the forefront of the growth management strategies is the Development Envelope
concept. The Development Envelope is generally defined as an inverted “T” shaped area comprising
54
the I-95/U.S. 40 corridors, the MD 24/MD 924 corridors, and the U.S. 1 corridor through Fallston.
This is the area within the County that is designated to accept development levels requiring public
water and sewer service. This Master Plan and Land Use Element Plan continue the Development
Envelope concept that was established in the 1977 Harford County Master Plan.
For this Plan, the Development Envelope was evaluated to assure consistency with the 1992
Planning Act, Smart Growth initiatives, and interjurisdictional agreements. The possibility of
expanding the Development Envelope has been studied since 1996. In 1998, a task force was
established to look at future growth in Harford County. Several options were explored in
relationship to growth management and the Development Envelope. Concepts included expansion
of the Development Envelope, retaining the 1996 Development Envelope, slowing growth
countywide and no growth at all by imposing a countywide moratorium. Based on the work of the
task force, and land capacity analysis, the Development Envelope boundary, as defined in the 1996
Master Plan and Land Use Element Plan, is retained in this Plan.
No additional Development Envelope expansion or land use intensity change is proposed because
sufficient capacity exists to accommodate projected growth for the life of this Plan, which covers a
10 year period. Therefore, it is the policy of this Plan to direct new growth toward Designated
Growth Areas.
Studies also indicate that the County has more than a sufficient inventory of land zoned for
commercial uses to meet its needs. Any requests for commercial rezoning will be evaluated based
on overall community need and will be subject to a technical analysis to ensure that the proposed
change will not generate adverse impacts in the community. It is recognized that the rezoning of
underutilized properties may be necessary to provide redevelopment opportunities within the
Development Envelope or other Designated Growth Areas.
Essential to achieving managed growth is providing a balanced variety of uses. The effectiveness of
the Development Envelope, and the quality of life within it, is dependent upon providing adequate
land, services, and facilities to support existing residential areas, commercial centers, employment
centers, and future development. Public facilities are provided in a cost effective manner when
growth is managed. Directing growth to areas where infrastructure exists, or is planned, reduces the
strain on public facilities.
The concept of slowing or stopping growth is not an easy task to implement. Stopping growth
would only be a temporary measure to address immediate needs. Managing growth in a way that
avoids a crisis is the more extensive issue. Imperative to addressing a crisis is having in place the
tools necessary to ensure a good quality of life for current and future residents. As a means to
manage growth in Harford County, this Plan encourages redevelopment and revitalization of
underutilized properties along the U.S. 40 corridor and within the other Designated Growth Areas.
Infill development, which offers a mix of uses, can lessen the strain on the County’s infrastructure.
APF standards will continue to be utilized as a method to managing growth in Harford County.
Current APF standards will be reviewed and revised to ensure their effectiveness as a growth
management tool. Regular evaluations will be necessary to ensure that standards are being met.
55
Protecting agricultural areas and the rural character of the County remains a major goal of this Plan.
Designated Rural Villages are also considered Designated Growth Areas. The extent of the villages
is clearly defined by the boundaries established as part of the PFA process. Maintaining these
boundaries helps to retain the distinctiveness of the villages and enhances their charm and character.
The fact that the villages are Designated Growth Areas does not mandate their growth or
development. Rather, this designation acknowledges their role and special status within the rural
community as centers that serve the surrounding rural community.
Village Design Standards should be developed to help maintain the rural character of the villages as
in-fill and redevelopment occurs. The design and scale of uses that provide needed services should
be consistent with surrounding areas. A review and revision of the Village District Standards should
also be undertaken as part of the comprehensive update of the Zoning Code to help preserve the rural
integrity of the villages. This plan also recommends that the Office of Economic Development work
with the village business owners to retain or attract compatible business to the villages.
Offering the residents of Harford County affordable housing options is essential to further the
establishment of viable communities. Homeownership is endorsed because it stabilizes communities
by giving people a stake in where they live. People who work in Harford County should be given
the opportunity to live here. Demographics indicate that there is a rapidly aging population base in
the County. Affordable retirement communities and affordable senior housing in suitable areas is
important and should be developed consistent with the Senior Housing Plan. These communities
should be pedestrian friendly, offer viable transportation options, and present a mix of uses that will
service the needs of the residents. Mixed-use communities foster social interaction and public
safety.
Harford County, the State and the three municipalities recognize the Designated Growth Areas as a
means to promote planned, balanced growth. Strategies are established to foster viable and
sustainable communities within these areas. Implementation of these strategies is imperative in order
to remain consistent with goals established by various County Departments and the State, to remain
compatible with the municipal comprehensive plans, while providing viable communities throughout
Harford County. The County will continue to work to foster identifiable communities as areas of
cultural, social, and economic activity. This Plan supports creating an atmosphere where people will
want to live, shop and work.
56
REDEVELOPMENT AND REVITALIZATION
GOAL: Make revitalization and redevelopment a more viable development option
Over the last 20 years, many suburban jurisdictions like Harford County have experienced rapid
growth. Harford County’s population has grown from approximately 115,378 in 1970 to 218,590 in
2000. As a result of the County’s land use policies, the majority of this growth has been focused in
the designated Development Envelope. This area was first established in the 1977 Master Plan and
identified where the County would prioritize capital funds for growth related projects. From 1990 to
2000, an average of 80% of the growth in Harford County has occurred within the Development
Envelope.
As this growth occurred, County government has concentrated on providing infrastructure needed to
serve current and anticipated residents. Roads were built, water and sewer facilities were expanded,
schools were constructed, and land was acquired for active and passive recreation. Programs such as
Adequate Public Facilities and Agriculture Preservation were implemented to help maintain the
quality of life and reinforce the identified growth boundary.
Concurrent with these growth-related projects, other efforts were initiated to sustain older
neighborhoods and commercial areas. Activities included traditional revitalization/beautification
projects and the designation of two enterprise zones to provide financial incentives in designated
areas along with the development of vacant infill properties (Figure 21). As Harford County
neighborhoods grow older, more emphasis will be placed on the revitalization and redevelopment of
older residential and commercial areas. To strengthen the County’s Land Use Element Plan and
growth management policies, a coordinated program for revitalization and redevelopment of these
areas must be developed.
Redevelopment is an important aspect of the development cycle of a community. A lack of site and
building maintenance often follows when residential and commercial communities fail to retain a
healthy occupancy, affecting the appearance of the community as a whole. Existing commercial and
residential areas that have experienced decline can be redeveloped and revitalized to become viable
and thriving businesses, neighborhoods and mixed use centers. A thorough redevelopment and
revitalization program will also help to assure that all residential and commercial areas in the County
remain healthy and sustainable.
Redevelopment and revitalization reduce the economic pressure on “green” or previously

undeveloped sites outside of the County’s Designated Growth Areas. This reduces sprawl and is
consistent with Smart Growth as it focuses development in areas that have been designated for
growth. By focusing growth in areas that tend to be already served by major public roadways and
public facilities, redevelopment reduces public expenditures for infrastructure. Existing open space,
farmland and other resources are preserved. Redevelopment can also improve existing
environmental problems if a site had contamination from a previous commercial or industrial use.
57
Figure 21
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - Concentrate on U.S. Route 40.
The redevelopment and revitalization opportunities of the U. S. Route 40 Corridor have long been
discussed. This area was identified in the 1969 County Master Plan as the foundation for the
County’s designated growth corridor. The corridor’s present state has essentially resulted from the
20th century development of Aberdeen Proving Ground and Edgewood Arsenal and the advent of the
automobile. Rich in heritage, U. S. Route 40 began as the first overland facility in the colonies (Post
Road) and was later developed as one of America’s first landscaped highways. The corridor was
also home to Harford’s canning industry; at one time the leading canning area in the country.
In order to maintain and improve the quality of life in the U. S. Route 40 Corridor, Harford County
has made redevelopment and revitalization a priority. Recent redevelopment projects include the
U.S. Route 40 streetscape improvements, renovation and addition to the Edgewood Public Library,
Edgewood Farmer’s Market, the revitalization of the Aberdeen MARC Train Station, the
redevelopment of the Bata Shoe Factory (Water’s Edge) and The Village at Lakeside. Planning
efforts include the Washington Court redevelopment project, U. S. Route 40 vision workshop,
creation of the Joppa/Joppatowne and Edgewood Community Plans and adoption of the Commercial
Revitalization Overlay District (CRD) and Edgewood Neighborhood Overlay District (ENOD)
(Figure 22).
58
Figure 22
REDEVELOPMENT AND REVITALIZATION POLICY 1 - Encourage and facilitate the

redevelopment and revitalization of older, existing neighborhoods and commercial areas to
improve the quality of life for residential and business communities.
1. Create guidelines to improve the aesthetic character of properties along U. S. Route 40.
2. Enhance the Enterprise Zone program to help offset the costs associated with the
redevelopment of a vacant structure or previously developed property.
3. Initiate redevelopment and revitalization projects in conjunction with community groups,

private business, property owners and other agencies.
4. Coordinate with the Office of Economic Development (OED) to increase public awareness of
economic initiatives and efforts for redevelopment and revitalization.
5. Establish a program to identify and clean-up brownfield sites.
6. Review and revise the County sign regulations.
59
CITIZEN ISSUE 2 - Provide quality design and quality facilities in Designated Growth Areas.
The appearance of a community can affect property values, civic pride and a community’s identity.
Quality design can strengthen communities and can provide a positive “sense of place”. It is
important for redevelopment and revitalization efforts because it can aid in the marketability of a
site, helping to attract appropriate businesses to an area. Appropriate businesses should complement
the appearance of an existing community, and they should support the local community by providing
necessary retail or service uses.
Adopted after the Edgewood Community Plan, the Commercial Revitalization District (CRD)
encourages revitalization and redevelopment through the development of vacant parcels and the
redevelopment and improvement of existing properties. Flexible land use controls and standards are
provided to improve the appearance of the corridor and ensure that development is compatible with
adjacent residential neighborhoods. The Edgewood Neighborhood Overlay District (ENOD)
implements the Edgewood Community Plan, providing incentives and encouraging quality
redevelopment consistent with the plan. The Dublin-Darlington Community Council is presently
working on Village Business (VB) guidelines to help protect and preserve the character of
Darlington while assuring the viability of existing businesses and attracting additional businesses.
REDEVELOPMENT AND REVITALIZATION POLICY 2 - Provide standards to encourage

revitalization and appropriate redevelopment in older, existing residential and commercial
areas.
1. Develop design/beautification/streetscape alternatives to help create more attractive facades

and street frontages.
2. Update the Zoning Code to enhance the aesthetics and functionality of the major roadways in
the County through the establishment of appropriate standards.
3. Provide a program of design services and assistance to help navigate the governmental review
process for small redevelopment and revitalization projects.
4. Identify opportunities to preserve land of environmental and historic value to provide green
spaces and focal points.
5. Update the Zoning Code to include landscaping and screening requirements for redevelopment
and revitalization projects.
6. Develop design standards/guidelines that are flexible and encourage redevelopment.
60
CITIZEN ISSUE 3 - Encourage revitalization of underutilized sites to keep growth down
outside the Development Envelope.
As Harford County communities age, it will become necessary to emphasize redevelopment and
revitalization. U. S. Routes 40 and 1 are examples of aging commercial corridors. However, it is
important to note that underutilized sites and revitalization efforts are applicable to areas beyond the
County’s Development Envelope. In the past, for example, the rural village of Whiteford had a busy
and vibrant main street.
Redevelopment of existing properties plays a major role in building a sustainable community.

Sustainability requires that a community continue to adapt to a changing economy while preserving
the social, historical and environmental resources that give a community its pride and strength.
With over a million square feet of vacant commercial floor area in the County, it is imperative that
these underutilized properties be redeveloped and their surrounding areas revitalized. Redeveloping
and revitalizing these vacant businesses and properties will help to improve communities around the
County by providing viable, sound and diverse local economies. In order to encourage
redevelopment and revitalization, developers and business owners must be provided with incentives.
These incentives can be in the form of revolving loan funds, tax breaks or credits.
REDEVELOPMENT AND REVITALIZATION POLICY 3 - Balance the development of

vacant properties with redevelopment and revitalization activity.
1. Continue to support intergovernmental cooperation between the municipalities, the County and
Aberdeen Proving Ground to coordinate infrastructure, land use and governmental policy
issues on a regular basis.
2. Establish a program and standards for new growth on vacant infill land to ensure compatibility
with existing communities.
3. Develop a zoning classification to implement the Mixed Office designation and map the
subject properties through the Comprehensive Zoning Review.
4. Establish a process to involve all stakeholders in determining priority projects and programs.
5. Work with community organizations and housing agencies to develop neighborhood

improvement plans.
61
CITIZEN ISSUE 4 - Make it cost effective to revitalize existing sites.
When planning for a new business, business owners and developers are often dissuaded from
redevelopment because of the additional costs that are associated with the redevelopment of an
existing site or building. One of the biggest challenges often associated with redevelopment and
revitalization is building or site demolition and abatement. This can increase a project’ s budget by
up to 35%, as compared to building on green or undeveloped sites.
There are a number of existing programs within the County and State that provide financial as well
as capital assistance and incentives for existing communities. The State of Maryland’s Smart
Growth Program provides opportunities to enhance existing communities through tax credits,
transportation improvements and revitalization projects.
REDEVELOPMENT AND REVITALIZATION POLICY 4 - Identify existing and additional

funding sources, financial incentives and zoning changes to reduce redevelopment costs.
1. Develop a joint program between the Department of Planning and Zoning and the Office of
Economic Development to offer technical support, incentives, and financial assistance to small
businesses for reinvestment and revitalization.
2. Monitor development trends and maintain a proactive response to changes in residential and
commercial development patterns.
3. Develop Zoning Code revisions that are consistent with the State’s Smart Growth initiative.
4. Develop Zoning Code revisions that encourage the consolidation or reconfiguration of lots to
support redevelopment and revitalization.
CITIZEN ISSUE 5 – Walkable/bikeable communities
When redeveloping and revitalizing areas, it is imperative that the existing pedestrian and bicycle
paths be improved. Furthermore, creating connections in and between communities can help to
revitalize them while reducing car trips. The physical and economic improvement of a community
can be complemented by strengthening the connections between the residential and commercial
components of the community.
Streetscape design plays an important role in a community’s image and interaction. A quality public
realm includes a diverse mix of well-maintained public and private buildings that directly front the
street. Streets should have streetscape elements such as sidewalks, furniture, lighting, landscaping
and public art. Selective placement of these elements can be combined to create a safe, pedestrian-
and bicycle-friendly public space.
62
REDEVELOPMENT AND REVITALIZATION POLICY 5 - Implement a network of bicycles
and pedestrian facilities to connect adjacent residential, commercial, employment, recreational
and institutional sites.
1. Implement and coordinate strategies and recommendations identified in the Land Preservation
and Recreation Plan for bicycle and pedestrian activities in the County.
2. Implement and coordinate strategies and recommendations identified in the Transportation

Element Plan for non-motorized transportation options.
3. Establish design guidelines for streetscape elements such as sidewalk materials, light fixtures,
signage, and sitting areas at transit stops to enhance or encourage bicycle and pedestrian
friendly neighborhoods.
SUMMARY
Redevelopment and revitalization are an integral part of the development cycle. The cycle begins
with initial growth or development and is followed by a period of time when optimum growth for the
area is achieved. This period is followed by one of decline as businesses age and compete with
newer businesses or recently developed commercial areas. After an area has declined, it is
customary that a period of redevelopment and revitalization follow.
The participation and cooperation of all stakeholders (municipal, local and State government
agencies, community members and business owners) will be needed to redevelop and revitalize areas
in the County. Making use of these underutilized areas helps reduce growth pressure, traffic,
infrastructure and other related development costs. Redevelopment of vacant properties will help to
revitalize aging community areas by providing a commercial area for community interaction. These
areas in turn will improve the appearance of a community as facilities are updated to accommodate
and attract new business.
The appearance of an area directly affects both the adjoining community and the marketability of
vacant sites. Redeveloped sites should be inviting and attractive. It will be necessary to provide
guidance to developers and business owners, including design guidelines and buffer standards.
Design guidelines are necessary because they provide standards and examples for the prospective
business owner and developer. Guidance should also be provided for existing, non-conforming uses.
The Zoning Code should be revised to provide regulations for parking, screening, buffers, signage
and architectural design that will help to improve the appearance of the site and structure. Screening
should be used to lessen the impacts of uses that might detract from the community’s appearance.
The physical and economic improvement of a community must be complemented with the
strengthening of connections between the residential and commercial components of the community.
When redeveloping and revitalizing areas, it is imperative that the existing pedestrian and bicycle
paths be improved. Sidewalks and bicycle paths can strengthen community interaction and can help
to reduce car trips. They should be used to connect older and new communities and should provide a
63
safe place for walking and bicycling. This can be accomplished by providing on-street parking,
street trees, defined areas for cycling, traffic calming devices and street lights.
Presently, redevelopment efforts are coordinated through the Office of Economic Development
(OED). The OED works closely with the Economic Development Advisory Board (EDAB) and
Maryland Business and Economic Development agency to coordinate redevelopment efforts
countywide. These efforts, combined with the continuing efforts of the Department of Planning and
Zoning are essential for a successful redevelopment and revitalization program.
Over the past few years, these coordinated efforts have been applied in a number of communities
throughout the County. County government, working with local and State government agencies,
community members and business owners held several visioning workshops in order to build a
consensus for the future of the U. S. Route 40 and U. S. Route 1 corridors. The U. S. Route 40
workshop identified first steps, including the development of plans for specific nodes. In 1999,
Harford County initiated a comprehensive revitalization strategy for Edgewood; the goal being the
improvement of physical, social and economic conditions within the community. The Edgewood
Community Plan was completed as a guide for the revitalization efforts in and around Edgewood.
Similarly, the Joppa/Joppatowne Plan was completed to outline the goals and strategies for its future
development and redevelopment.
The Commercial Revitalization District (CRD) and Edgewood Neighborhood Overlay District
(ENOD) are changes made to the Zoning Code after the adoption of the Edgewood Community Plan.
The CRD encourages the revitalization and redevelopment in the U. S. Route 40 corridor through the
development of vacant parcels and the redevelopment and improvement of existing properties.
Flexible land use controls and standards are provided to improve the appearance of the corridor and
ensure that development is compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods. Adopted in 2000,
the ENOD implements the Edgewood Community Plan, providing incentives and encouraging
quality redevelopment consistent with the Plan.
When discussing the redevelopment and revitalization of the County’s commercial corridors in
Aberdeen, Edgewood, and Havre de Grace, it is important to note that more rural areas like Forest
Hill and Whiteford require revitalization as well. As some of Harford County’s earliest settlement
areas, these rural villages continue to support local industries. These areas and their commercial
components, like U. S.Routes 1 and 40, need redevelopment and revitalization in order to remain
viable places to live and work. The Village of Darlington and Harford County Government are
working together to create Village Business (VB) Design Guidelines. These guidelines are being
created to address concerns regarding the protection of Darlington’s physical character and
economic viability. They will also serve as a template for design guidelines that will be developed
for each of the designated village areas.
64
COMMUNITY FACILITIES
As part of the County’s growth management program, it is important to address the provisions for
community facilities. The County must program appropriate expansions and/or upgrades to existing
facilities in order to meet the current and projected needs of its citizens.
For the purposes of this Plan, community facilities include water and sewer systems, transportation,
solid waste disposal facilities, schools (including higher education), libraries, parks and open space,
police and emergency operations (EMS and Fire). As needed facilities are incorporated into
communities, they should be located in a manner which supports good community design and
strengthens the area’s sense of community. Provision of these services will also be completed in a
manner consistent with Smart Growth.
Water and Sewer

GOAL: Protect the health and safety of Harford County residents by providing an adequate
supply of clean water and environmentally responsible treatment of wastewater
discharges.
The majority of all sewage generated within the Development Envelope is conveyed to the Sod Run
Wastewater Treatment Plant (Sod Run). Sod Run serves the portion of the Development Envelope
with additional growth potential. As of December 2002, the average daily flow to Sod Run was 11.4
million gallons per day (mgd). The design capacity (average day) is 20.0 mgd, resulting in a net
reserve capacity of 8.6 mgd.
As of December 2002, the total combined water treatment capacity of Harford County’s three water
treatment plants amounted to 22.7 mgd while the average day demand was 12.3 mgd. These
quantities equate to an average day reserve capacity of 10.4 mgd.
Title 9 Subsection 5 of the Environment Article in the Annotated Code of Maryland requires that
Harford County triennially review, and to the extent the County deems appropriate, comprehensively
review and amend its Master Water and Sewer Plan. The semi annual review process mandated by
County Code must be undertaken in accordance with State law. The following types of revisions are
considered during the semi-annual review process: (1) Changes in capital projects related to the
Annual Capital Program or five year Capital Improvement Program; (2) Changes in other
components of the County Master Plan that may impact the Master Water and Sewer Plan; and (3)
Changes to the service category assigned to a property.
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - Do not expand water and sewer outside the Designated Growth Areas.
The Land Use Element Plan establishes areas that should be designated for public water and sewer
facilities. Development shall not be focused into a defined growth area, unless the proper
infrastructure is designed and planned for the appropriate level of growth. However, even if a
property is within the Designated Growth Area there is no guarantee that public water and sewer
facilities will be extended. Extension of these services beyond the Designated Growth Areas could
65
overburden the system and should be avoided. Therefore, it is critical that the Water and Sewer
Master Plan be consistent with the policies defined in the Land Use Element Plan.
The provision of safe drinking water and adequate wastewater treatment facilities is fundamental to
public health and safety and the quality of life in a community. Within the Designated Growth Area,
these services are provided through systems operated by Harford County, the Cities of Aberdeen and
Havre de Grace, Aberdeen Proving Ground, and the Maryland-American Water Company, as well as
smaller private systems.
WATER AND SEWER POLICY 1 - The extension of public water and sewer services shall
only be provided within Designated Growth Areas.
1. Extend or upgrade public water and sewer services to match expected growth within the
Designated Growth Area.
2. Continue to review the semi-annual update to the Master Water and Sewer Plan to ensure
consistency with the Land Use Element Plan.
3. Provide capital programming for facility expansion and improvement to ensure that service is
available in a timely manner.
CITIZEN ISSUE 2 - Existing water quantity and quality shall be protected.
Over the past few years, there have been concerns regarding the amount of water available to serve
the citizens and businesses of Harford County as well as possible contaminants within the water
supplies. Such issues as pollutants entering the aquifers in the Perryman area to the availability of
water through drought conditions have raised individuals’ concern for better protection of water
quality and quantity.
Therefore, Harford County must plan to ensure that an adequate supply of water is available and
protect ground and surface water sources from pollution and degradation. Generalized public water
source protection areas are illustrated in Figure 38 and also discussed in the Natural Resource section
of this Plan. These areas include the Perryman and Aberdeen area wells, Winters Run Watershed
and Deer Creek Watershed.
WATER AND SEWER POLICY 2 - The County shall pursue the use of alternative water
and/or sewer solutions to correct documented health or pollution problems occurring in
existing areas of development.
66
1. Implement and adopt a comprehensive wellhead protection plan as part of the Zoning Code.
2. Monitor and coordinate land use activities to protect water sources from pollution and
degradation.
SUMMARY
To fulfill the County Master Plan goal of “a sound, balanced and diversified economy,” water and
sewer facilities provided within the Designated Growth Areas must be adequate to support the
projected levels of residential, industrial, and commercial development. Outside the Designated
Growth Area, private systems will be utilized to serve individual properties. The intensity of
development planned for Rural Villages and crossroad commercial areas should be consistent with
the capacity of aquifers in the area to provide water and of the soils to accommodate private septic
systems. The extension of public facilities to serve uses outside the Designated Growth Area will
only be considered to address health issues. This change must be addressed as part of a Land Use
Element Plan review. The establishment of private community water and sewer systems, to support
new development outside the Designated Growth Areas, is contrary to the principles of this Plan.
Transportation
GOAL: Maintain a safe and adequate transportation system to serve existing and future
populations.
There are over 1,400 miles of roadways in Harford County of which 1,005 are maintained by the
County. There are over 5.1 million vehicle miles of travel throughout the County on an average
daily basis. The County also maintains the Harford County Transportation System, which operates
seven fixed bus routes and a demand response system for the elderly and handicapped.
Adequate roadways and transportation alternatives are necessary components of serving the
population and enhancing employment opportunities within Harford County. Coordinating land use
and transportation is necessary for the creation of an effective and efficient transportation system.
Complementing the Land Use Element Plan is the Transportation Element Plan completed in 2000,
which addresses in more detail the County’s policies and priorities for maintaining and developing a
safe and efficient transportation infrastructure.
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - Impact fees.
Impact fees are charges assessed against new development that attempts to recover the cost incurred
by a local government in providing the public facilities required to serve the new development. As
the population increases, additional infrastructure is needed to support the increase in population.
Therefore, additional resources are needed to fund these capital improvements.
67
The County has a number of revenue sources that it uses to address transportation needs. These
include a highway user tax, gasoline tax, as well as State and Federal grants. Each of these resources
is used to fund highway improvements, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and transit. In addition to
these funding mechanisms, the County also has developer contributions to improve roadways
through the Adequate Public Facilities regulations.
TRANSPORTATION POLICY 1 - Create additional funding mechanisms to facilitate on and

off site highway improvements to balance the impact of new development on public resources.
Implementation Strategy
1. Adopt legislation that provides a dedicated new funding mechanism for transportation
improvements.
2. Create a comprehensive and coordinated capital program with the County, the three
municipalities and State officials to address regional transportation needs.
CITIZEN ISSUE 2 - Expand public transportation.
Public transportation is one alternative which increases the efficiency of the existing road network
by relieving congestion on many County and State roads. Providing public bus and rail service
within the County provides opportunities for residents to commute to work, shop or school without
using single occupant vehicles.
The County currently operates seven fixed route bus services which primarily serve the areas from
Joppatowne to Bel Air, and Bel Air to Aberdeen and Havre de Grace. The Maryland Transit
Administration (MTA) operates three express commuter bus routes from within the County into
Downtown Baltimore and the MARC train service with stops in Aberdeen and Edgewood. In
addition to these public transportation services, the County operates a Commuter Assistance
Program that provides rideshare matching service as well as information on all alternative modes of
transportation including bicycling.
TRANSPORTATION POLICY 2 - Continue to support transit opportunities in Harford

County including bus, rail and carpooling alternatives.
1. Work with the State to expand public transit service within the Designated Growth Areas and
to provide service to the Baltimore metropolitan region.
2. Identify a new or additional revenue source to help fund transit alternatives for County
residents.
3. Continue to promote the use of public transportation as an alternative to single occupant

vehicles.
68
CITIZEN ISSUE 3 - Traffic congestion.
Travel in Harford County is mostly accounted for by personal vehicles with only one occupant. The
increase in auto use throughout the region has been due to many factors including population
growth, County residents’ per capita rate of automobile ownership, relatively low gasoline prices and
growth in the labor force. Unavoidably, traffic volumes have increased in Harford County.
Continuing population and employment growth as well as such factors as changes in travel behavior
(for example, more two earner families commuting to work) increasing through traffic (resulting
from regional growth) and limited options for expansion of the highway capacity are some of the
causes.
Level of Service (LOS) is a set of operational conditions describing the ability of a road or
intersection to accommodate traffic. Different scales are used to evaluate the efficiency of vehicular
movement on a transportation facility. The LOS operation of a facility is measured by many factors
including speed, delay, freedom of maneuver, and frequency of traffic flow interruptions.
Increasingly, State and local governments are considering the expansion of highway capacity as just
one strategy in an arsenal of multimodal approaches to resolve traffic congestion issues. Some of the
other strategies include bus, rail, park-and-ride, and congestion management.
TRANSPORTATION POLICY 3 - Continue to carry out the fundamental policies of the

Transportation Plan, which provide a multi-modal approach to maintain facilities in balance
with the County’s growth.
1. Implement Smart Growth land use alternatives that reduce the need for single occupant
vehicles. (i.e. vision concepts for U.S. 1 and Perryman)
2. Continue to promote alternative means of transportation, including pedestrian facilities and

bikeways, to reduce traffic congestion.
3. Monitor the adequacy of roadways by continuously updating the transportation forecasting

model and roadway inventory analysis.
SUMMARY
To achieve the County’s Transportation Element Plan goal of “a complete, safe, and efficient multi-
model transportation system,” the County must continue enhancing all travel modes. Growth in
residential, industrial and commercial development has been focused within the corridors that form
the Development Envelope. These corridors contain a considerable transportation infrastructure,
including local bus service and MTA flyer service to Baltimore and rail service available through the
AMTRAK and MARC (Maryland Rail Commuter) Systems.
To provide the level of roadway and transportation facilities to match planned growth throughout the
County, a specific plan of action is required. The County’s primary plan for transportation facilities
is the Transportation Element Plan. The Transportation Element Plan provides a multi-modal
69
approach to detailed actions necessary to maintain facilities in balance with residential, commercial
and industrial development.
Contained within the Transportation Element Plan are several components supporting development
in the County. Recommended highway improvements are identified to bring roadway systems to the
level required to serve planned development. Pedestrian and bikeway connections are being
promoted as alternative transportation methods. Various forms of transit are also presented to
provide alternatives to using automobiles with emphasis on shared commuting options.
The fundamental polices outlined within this section of the Plan set the tone for transportation
planning in Harford County. Coordinating land use and transportation is necessary to establish an
effective and efficient transportation system. One of the most effective means of coordinating land
use and transportation is the creation of a balanced variety of densities and uses that promote
pedestrian friendly access and transit use.
Solid Waste Disposal Facilities

GOAL: To preserve and protect human health and the environment by providing a cost effective
and self-sufficient solid waste management program.
Harford County provides a quality integrated solid waste management facility for its citizens. The
Division of Environmental Affairs within the Department of Public Works oversees Solid Waste
Management in Harford County. This Division is responsible for the development of the County’s
Solid Waste Management Plan, which helps to ensure that the County maintains an adequate solid
waste disposal capacity for the next decade and beyond. A variety of programs comprise the
integrated waste management system. In addition to the Harford Waste Disposal Center in Street,
there is also a highly successful and extensive recycling program, and the Harford Waste to Energy
Facility in Magnolia that burns most of the municipal solid waste to produce energy that is
purchased by Aberdeen Proving Ground. The County is also actively involved in the remediation
and monitoring of old landfill sites to protect public health and the environment.
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - Ensure that the County maintains sufficient capacity for its solid waste
needs in the most environmentally sound manner.
The Harford County Solid Waste Management Plan presents a strategy to ensure that solid waste in
the County is reduced to the greatest extent possible and disposed of properly. The Harford Waste
Disposal Center on Scarboro Road in the northern portion of the County will handle all of the
County’s landfill needs for the next several decades. This facility, built to state-of-the-art standards,
with liners and monitoring systems in place, was constructed in 1987 to take the place of the filled
Tollgate landfill. In order to lessen the waste flow into the Scarboro facility, thereby extending its
life span, the County established two significant programs: an extensive and highly successful
recycling program and a waste to energy facility that burns municipal trash to produce energy.
70
SOLID WASTE FACILITIES POLICY 1 - Continue to provide environmentally sound solid
waste disposal facilities by promoting waste reduction, recycling, and conservation of the
natural environment while providing a quality living environment.
1. Complete the update of the Solid Waste Management Plan in 2004.
2. Provide adequate solid waste disposal facilities in an environmentally sound manner.
3. Continue to expand recycling efforts and update the Recycling Plan.
SUMMARY
Solid waste management laws and regulations exist at Federal, State and County levels. Overall
regulatory direction and standards for protecting human health and the environment are established
at the Federal level. State regulations specify design criteria and the permitting, construction,
operation, maintenance and monitoring of facilities. County regulations include issues of land use,
zoning, procurement and financing related to solid waste management.
Harford County currently ranks first in the State of Maryland in its recycling efforts. A recycling
rate in excess of 50 percent of the County’s population greatly assists in reducing the flow of waste
into the County’s landfill. Since 1992 there has been a ban on disposing yard waste in the landfill or
incinerator; therefore, lawn and garden trimmings are recycled and processed into compost and
mulch. Over 25,000 tons are processed each year at the nine acre compost facility at the landfill
site. This figure includes Christmas trees that are also processed. In addition to yard waste, the
County offers its citizens opportunities to recycle household hazardous wastes and electronic
equipment at various times throughout the year.
The Harford Waste to Energy Facility, located in Magnolia, processes most of the County’s
municipal solid waste. The Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority, under its revenue bond
financing authority, developed this facility in 1988 for Harford County. It was previously in private
ownership and was recently purchased by the County. On average, at least 115,000 tons of waste is
burned each year to produce energy that is subsequently purchased by Aberdeen Proving Ground.
The County’s Solid Waste Management Plan also addresses remediation and monitoring old landfill
sites (both public and private) in order to protect public health and the environment. Old landfills
were not built to the high environmental standards required by today’s regulations.
The rubble fill needs of the County are currently being handled at the Oak Avenue Rubble Fill.
Sufficient capacity exists to serve the County in the near term, however long term solutions will be
the focus of the update to the Solid Waste Management Plan.
Recycling and solid waste management education are promoted throughout the County and ongoing
environmental education is supported. Presentations are given to schools and organizations and
tours are offered to the public at the Harford Waste Disposal Center and the Harford Waste to
71
Energy Facility. Recycling is part of the fourth grade curriculum for environmental education in all
Harford County schools.
Implementation of the Solid Waste Management Plan is supported by this Plan. Coordination
between the Departments of Public Works and Planning and Zoning must continue to ensure that the
goals of both these plans are achieved in a manner that protects both the environment and the quality
of life for County residents.
Public Education
GOAL: To provide for the opportunity of a quality education for citizens of Harford County.
Harford County Public Schools (HCPS) operates 32 elementary schools, eight middle schools, nine
high schools (including Harford Vocational Technical School) and John Archer for disabled
individuals (Figure 23). Having grown in excess of nineteen percent in the past ten years, Harford
County has seen its student population increase by more than 7,000. The Harford County Public
School system enrolls 40,264 students in 50 schools, employing more than 4,572 people.
With more than 2,647 teachers, the HCPS has a ratio of 15.2 students per teacher and spends
approximately $6,515 a year on each student. The school system has prioritized the bulk of its
funding into classroom and educator salaries. With an average starting salary of $32,961, the HCPS
ranks 13th out of 24 school systems. The system serves the entire County including the incorporated
areas of the municipalities.
In addition, the State operates and regulates Harford Community College (HCC), which provides
higher educational opportunities. HCC was founded in 1957 as a public community college. The
college occupies a 331-acre site on Thomas Run Road, three miles east of Bel Air and has an
enrollment of over 31,000 full-time and part-time students. HCC provides high quality, accessible
and affordable educational opportunities and services including university transfer, career,
developmental and continuing education programs. In addition, HCC is responsible for the Higher
Education and Applied Technology (HEAT) Center. The HEAT Center, in Aberdeen, Maryland, is
located at the juncture of Interstate 95 and MD Rt. 22, adjacent to the Park 'n Ride. HEAT provides
expanded higher education access to the citizens of northeastern Maryland. Baccalaureate and
graduate programs are offered by colleges and universities in support of the educational needs of the
region. The HEAT Center includes the College of Notre Dame, The Johns Hopkins University,
Towson University, University of Maryland College Park, and Villa Julie College.
72
PENNSYLVANIA
E
N
I
RD
L
RD
R
ONI ON RD
RD
T
RD
E
T
RD
R D
O
G
RD
M RD
S T
NO
D
H ITEFO
N
R
O
R
RI
TI O
E W
R
R N
M D
FL
C
KS
I
O
RD
ITU
IS
T
N
K
L
C ONS T
IL
V
R
N
LE
I
PA
AI
G RO VE
E
RD
R
M
D
NE
D
R
RD
R
O
C
CR E
S
IN
A
OL
K
W
RD IL
E R
E
H V L
H A
C ES
A
S
P ROS PECT
å
L
G RAC ETON
Y
RD RD P RD
E
L
R
F AW N
I
A KIN S HARKI S V
H N S
O LD
E
P YL
RD K
AR R
RD
H NS D
LE
I
R
RD P RUN
E
D RD WHI E
O
R
HE
R TEF E
R D
C
OR D
EAPS
K
W
D
E
EN RD RD
G
RE SAIN T MARY S RD D
I
R
RD
P H
G
RD
H
A
RD
R
LEG
D
R
TE
G RAC ETON
BAY
D D
A
R
RD
RD
åå
RD
D RD
N
R E RD
O
I LL
ET
SV
CT
M IL L
L
YL E
T
P
S
R
SP
CA
E APS
C
O
H
D
ES
ONT
A
CECIL COUNTY
R
PR
ST L
T
E
R
RM
D
E
AC
R
D
RD
S TR
ADO NNA
E
O A
R
C LE
T ON
N D
A
RD
IG H
L
RD
H
YS
R
ER L RD
å
J IL CROS S M
WH
LY FEDER AL H O LY OR
RD
E
RD
IT
L
H
D
Y
O R
LETO N
N URS ERY
EF
H
MI
G
RD
J
D
R
AD
O
AU
G EEN OV
CH
RD
R
HARFO D
RD
B
EN C
UR
RD
D RD T
N
CH
A
E
R OSS CT
GL
B R E
CA
C P
R
ILLE D
OS
V HOL DUBLI N R
R
R D
SAIN T
Y GO
IS
D
G RI ER
RD IN
R
R
RD
D P D CONO W OW
R
D
R
I NG O ON
D
R
O
D
R R C
O N
R D
L
R LIN RD
D
RD
R Y HILL UB
N
CR
L
R ER D D
R OCK S
ON
YO
C
L
HI
AI H
R
E
C
D
RK
AME
M A
GO
IN
RY
BR
RD
GH D RD
I
AL
N OW
G
D
U
RD
R E R N
DER
E
A
LE
E B N B O
D
IL
RAD N D SO N TH C
R
V
B L R O
S
LI
O B R
E
0 N U O R
RD
0 D U
R
B
OLE
H
2
A
O S
P
4
SC
M
RD H
S
IL
D U
L
R R
ES
å
V
L I
WH L
L
I
ITE HALL
LE
RY
H
D
R
RD
D D
R
R
A
E
H
C RD
R
R
STAF O RD RD
D
R
LIN
E
F
Y
O
D RD
URC H
PR
G ON
TR
IN RD
T
R
D W GO
IES
R
O
OLD
R D
ROCK S
T
D
N
R
O
RD
C
W LT
FOR
LL
H
M I
NO PP D C
FED
E
K
P
E
P
R R
RD
A
A S K R
R OCK S
C
RD
O
L S T
D
H
R
RO M
O
R
E
RD WAR H
H ILL
MIL
LT D L
HI L
RD
NO E A
R W
L
RI
SV
HIL
SHARO N
RD
RD
RD
I
RD
E H L
E
L
DE AL
C IL
RD NORR ISV ILLE D H
RD
Y
R
R
R G
D
ST
O
S AN
KA
D F HA
R
NUT
L
ER Y H D R
E
M
RC R MO Y HU
IA
S
LE D R U
H N C R
F
SVI L RD R
U
RD C C
H
ETT O N
RK
J AR
HIL
RD
A RR D N
å
O
J I
G L
R
R E
D
Y
Y
D RD N
R
R MO
TTS LL E D
G
HAR
LENV
R
DY
G RIE
VI
KA
A
L L
IL LE
R I
M
H
BA
I
C S
A
D
LDW
K
D
L N UT R PRI NG RD
O ST COO LS
H E
I
N
RD
C
D
MILL
D R
D
R
D
R
R
å
RD
RD OLD
S
RD
MILL
S
ON
R
V D
K
M O
LE
C RU EL N R
N
HOU FF
I NGT
R U
RU
S
EAS S
D
R
G
T I
N
S
W MI
O
ADY
D
A
ES LL RD C L
D ARL
TY
T H O E IA
O
JAR NC D R )
IN
E
R
TH
W
R COO L RA AR MO L
T B LL E OL
ET
B HW RD S SV N
RD
I M T
O
Y E IL O
RD
M (
A
P I
LL LE C
LD
RN G
W JA RRETTS VI RD
RD
RD
KE
W
I
IN
P
E
RD
H OPE WELL
EAST RD L V L
D WES T FOUN E
LE
R
TA RD
K
IN
C
VIL
EAST E VEL
L
O
å
PO
FALLSTO N
MIL
HW Y HWY
TS
C
C
O WES T
O
GR
P RIE STFOR D
V ILLE
C
ET
H
K
AFT
T
RD
R
RD
R
O D
O
L
R
J AR
EN
VE
ON HO
M S
A
E
H
CON
A
RD
G L
L
å åååå å
R
SP
L ES D
O WI N
UT R
RD
RI
D
R
P NA NT
M R
P
P
NG
E L
PARA I SE
EAR
I
O
S TEPNE YR D
RUN
PO
S S SU
GO
H
E
P PE AS
T
RD
LT
G
C EV OM
D
HI
T L H L)
ON
R
Y
SS T L
RD
IO
A TO
HW
GR
R
RD
P CH (
RD
ST
L
BOGG S MIL U
S T
O
E
IA
B Y
L
O HI O S T
E
R
IN
RD
O
N
RD
D
HV L D
M
C
D I A CHA
R
M E
R
RD PEL NTAR IO ST
RD
O
N
RD
L
S RD E OTSEG O ST
R U
åå
RD
Y
E D
D
GR
ååå
H
D
R R
S
E
A LDIN O
AF
S
RD
N
R RD T
JU NIA TA
IN
N
E I LBER
TON
G
S
KE
HAVRE DE GRACE
VIL L
R D
C AR
MOO C H
R HUR
DRD
F
B ELAI R
E S C
D
R
A V
N
D
K
R
MILL
AR Y
H
SHOP
R
M IL L
OO
A V
P RD
O
åå å BELå AIR
MO
INH
IL LE
J
E RD
V
OR
RY
AL L ST
RD
V H IC K O D B REVO LUTIO N
U NI ON
ES
A
LE R RO ST
TV
IL C O
V CH P
SAN
CH SH URC
R
AI
D
N
R HVI L L
IN
U R E
P LEA
O
L DW
CH C
D
RD
E
RD K RD
N
GREE ST S
RD
B A
D
SNAKE N
L
åå
S
CH
ååå
F R U
E Y
N
BO
MAXA
RC
R D
D
OU
HV Y
ILLE W
N
T
S
P H
S
N
D
R
B A
E
H A
IL
IN
A
ST
RD
RD I
Y
LD W
MA
R
LL
A C
P
SK
AR
RD
D
M
RD D RD LA
E
IN
R
G
E
A LDIN O
A L
F
RD
R
S HILL U
P ARAD ISE
C LV
ååå å
PI K
STE
LS I EARD P
IN
E
M
TO B
RRS
A
åå
N
N
E
P
Y
OR
NE
R
MI L
D
R
O
IM
N
A
Y
T
N AB DEE
L
ST
C
U ER
RD
LT
C
RD
FA
R
B A
L
E
N
H
T
HE
RI
M
E
L
A UREL
L Y
AC
S
IL
W
P E T
IN
RD AS S S
Y
å
R
B
H
TV
S
R O
R
B A HA P
N
RD
IL
D
SA
O C SH C P D
OK
D U EL RD V
A
D
R
R B W L
D
RD
E
B
P L
BEL
IA
IR AIR T
D
R
H
A S
åå å
LP
L
AV O
RD
E R P
DE
FA
B L AI
D
LL
L
ABERDEEN
BROO K E
LA
E
UR D R T IA
RY
S
RD
R
CO
TO
A
HI
L S
TO
HEEL
N P
N
W
E
VA
O NNO LLY BE
A
C F
D
Y L
N O
D
R
I NG
HW A IR
EMM
A
R IG
RD H
CR
AV
IAL
F LL
O RT
D
CEDAR N
L R
R D
A
ESW
AKE R O
R S HI T RM I EM
T W M
CHESAPEAKE
D
UN
LL
ON
O R Y
R D
ELL
B
A
BALTIMORE COUNTY
N ED V
S TEPNE Y
ER
L
W R N B
D
N HIA
OR D
C ALVAR YR
LP D
RD
D
KE
IA
DE R
D
R
E
H
S LA
EN
F
P
HI
EC K
N
BAY
L
P DE
H N
RSI
S LA
R D
I
RD A
L H
S WY
JO
C A
PH
R WH EEL O H
U
T
RT
D
R
ESW D
å å å
E
D
U
B R ELL R
L
OL
S C RD WY
D
H H
R
LD PHILA DELPH IA I
R
O
AI
O SK
R
D
F
LA
R
U
BE
HA
RD
Y
W
H
PP A
å
RD RD
O
å
CK Y
E W I D
O
R J H K R
R D
ERS MILL D S
SING ER RD K R RIV LA
RD O ER SID U
O E P
H
D
A
ABIN G K
P
I
M DO N RD WY
R
PH
O
N
U
T
O LD
A R
LA
IN GE
N
IN AB
PH
L
O RTO
S IA
R
IN
GD MO
D
R
E
M Y
ON
E MM
D W
R H
AN
IN GER
Y
S
D
RYM
NNE
E RD
K
P ER
CLAY
RD
K
AS I
TON
L
U
P
OL
N
D
Harford
OH
J
åå
RD
RD
A
EM
I
M
PH
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND

LE
D EL
R
HILA
T
IL P
O
NV
MO
N
NK LI
A
RA O
YM
J
U N
F
PP
R
A R
(APG)
TAIN
ED
RD
PE
GE
WY Y
H
HW
W
Y
NED MEM ORI AL
OOD
County
I
EN
K
K RD
S
IA
A
D PH U L
F
RD
HN PHILA DEL
P
O
R
D
J
MA ED
GN
å åå
G
O
EW
L
IA
åå
O
Community
D
D
R
SO N
AN D
R
H
EMM O
R
T
I
M
B
RD
LE
R
TO
N
åå
E RD
RIM BL
JO P A T R
P
D
A
F D
R
RM
RD
å
Facilities APG
Schools
å SCHOOLS
PARKS
RD
å å
MO
OR
ES
B ELA IR
CH U
MA
NE Y
MIL RC
XA
RD
Y AV
L
H
å
RD
VIL
EP
LE
RD
ST
RD
RD
I
RD
N HICKOR
E SK
EAR
VAL LA
PARADIS E
D S H
IL L RD
PU SU
AL DINO
L TO
R EA
RD
PE S
åå å
LE
B
R IO MA
L
å
MA
R O )
VI TH T O LL
CH AB E RD E E N
IN
(
UR
ST
D
CH
R
TH
ST
ST
ST WY
åå å
T AP RD
OS EL ONT ARIO ST
RD
P
RD
S H CHA P E L OTSEGO ST
O HIO
VD
S
BU RD BL
RD
BO
IA
BE L
ND
AI R T
PH
ååå
AV OS
J UNIA T A
EL
ST
IL RD P
S
åå
HA
AD
åå å
CP
H IL
AV
A
D
MA
R
N P
M
OD
E
IN
BEL
KE
RD
D
NH
åå
AIR
REVOL UT ION ST
PI
OB I R
AV
T
UNION
RY OS
E
O
OR
P
RD
CT LD
IM
D
ST
A
ABE
O
V
F L
HI A B
LT
ST EPNE Y
R
NG
LP RD
DE
BA
A DE HI A
EN
PH I L LP
RI
SS
S DE
LA
PA
E HI SH TH
BY
D OR WY Y
T
D
R Y HW
OL
D HW
å
R SK I
LA I
PU SK
LA
PU
WY
AIR H
L
BE D
R
BEL AIR ABERDEEN HAVRE DE GRACE
Figure 23
73
74
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - School overcrowding and need for new facilities.
In order to maintain and project for the future needs of the County, the HCPS prepares an annual
Master Facilities Plan. This document outlines the conditions of each school, utilization and its
capital improvement priorities. It is the County’s intent to provide facilities balanced with the level
of planned growth. In order to meet this requirement, the Adequate Public Facilities provision of the
Zoning Code establishes standards of adequacy for schools and identifies deficiencies. Figures 24
and 25 provide information on historic enrollment trends and projections for elementary, middle and
high schools for the next seven years.
Over the past 12 years, Harford County has built five new elementary schools and one middle
school, increasing capacity by 3,000 and 1,000 for elementary and middle schools, respectively.
Several renovations and modifications have been built over this same time period including additions
to Bel Air Middle School and Abingdon and Church Creek Elementary Schools. One of the
continuing challenges in addressing school capacities is change to the curriculum, class sizes, and
unfunded State and Federal mandates.
Historic Enrollment
45000
40000
Student Population
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Year
Figure 24
75
Projected School Enrollment
20000
18000
16000
Number of Students
14000
12000
Elementary
10000
Middle
8000 High
6000
4000
2000
0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Enrollment Year
Figure 25
PUBLIC EDUCATION POLICY 1 - The County shall identify and strive to provide schools
that meet the anticipated needs of the community.
1. Construct a new middle/high school at the Patterson Mill Road complex.
2. Identify and prioritize major renovations, as well as future school sites, with the Harford
County Public Schools system.
3. Review and enhance the Adequate Public Facilities regulations as needed.
4. Continue to review the potential for balancing enrollments and utilization of each facility.
76
CITIZEN ISSUE 2 - Impact fees.
Impact fees are charges assessed against new development that attempts to recover the cost incurred
by a local government in providing the public facilities required to serve new development. As
population increases, additional infrastructure is needed. Therefore, additional resources are needed
to fund these capital improvements.
Harford County relies on the State for approximately 65% of the eligible construction costs for any
capital project for public schools. In order to qualify for this annual competitive funding, the County
must meet the State’s standards. The County also uses recordation fees and a portion of the transfer
tax as a funding source for capital projects in the public school system.
PUBLIC EDUCATION POLICY 2 - Create additional funding mechanisms to facilitate public

school improvements to balance the impact of new development on public resources.
1. Adopt legislation that provides a dedicated new funding mechanism for public school
improvements.
2. Create a comprehensive and coordinated capital program with the County and the Board of
Education which prioritizes capacity related capital improvements.
SUMMARY
School overcrowding has been identified as a problem in the County. Harford County computes
school population projections under a State approved methodology. While school projections have
been historically accurate, it is necessary to factor in the impacts that rapid changes in the housing
market have on school population. This can be calculated by researching the number of students
from a particular subdivision or development who are attending their “home” or designated school.
Harford County’s Adequate Public Facilities (APF) legislation presently mandates that schools not
exceed a capacity of 115%. When this capacity is reached, new preliminary plan approvals are
postponed. The purpose of interrupting this approval is to allow school facilities to be expanded or
improved to meet the demand. This is the subject of much debate as County schools use temporary
buildings to provide classroom space for students.
The County has taken steps to address this problem. The APF task force has completed its work and
legislative changes have been made. The Task Force will continue to review the APF regulations on
a regular basis. A new secondary school is planned for the Patterson Mill site, two miles from the
existing Bel Air High School. The new school is planned for completion in school year 2007-8.
77
Libraries
GOAL: Enhance residents’ access to library resources.
In the 50 years since its founding, the Harford County Library system has expanded to include nine
branches and an administration and support services building (Figure 27). In 2001, annual circulation
of materials reached 2,469,446. Today, the Harford County Public Library serves
over 160,000 registered borrowers. The system operates under a Board of Trustees that receives
funding from a number of sources, with the County providing the largest amount of funding.
The services and materials that the library system offers are a variety of books, periodicals, audio
and video materials, games and oral histories. The library also provides public meeting rooms, copy
machines, audiovisual equipment, public access computers, catalogs with printers, and microfilm
reader-printer. Programs for children and adults are offered, as are information services, reading
development materials, an online community information directory, Internet access, health
information, tax assistance, and volunteer opportunities.
The projected demands on the physical resources of the library system are dependent upon the
increase in population by the area served. The library system strives to provide facilities within a
five mile radius or 10 minute drive to utilize its services. While on-line resources can be instantly
available anywhere in the system, the location of additional resources should be tailored to local
needs. The projected number of residents to be served by its respective library branch is outlined in
the table below (Figure 26).
Harford County Population Projections by Library Service Area
LIBRARY SERVICE AREA 1990 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Aberdeen 24,824 22,973 26,872 30,319 32,876 34,363 35,638
Bel Air 63,259 92,924 99,118 109,226 116,467 121,199 124,803
Darlington 5,089 4,932 5,111 5,303 5,412 5,451 5,479
Edgewood 30,375 35,046 39,059 41,906 43,560 44,554 45,347
Fallston 21,510 21,648 21,641 22,482 22,970 23,154 23,290
Havre de Grace 12711 14840 15981 17048 17764 18175 18486
Joppatowne 11,143 11,391 11,543 11,936 12,156 12,224 12,269
Norrisville 7,180 7,920 8,104 8,558 8,851 9,005 9,120
Whiteford 6,041 6,916 7,286 7,809 8,164 8,374 8,533
TOTAL 182,132 218,590 234,715 254,585 268,220 276,500 282,965
Figure 26
78
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - More community facilities
The Harford County Library Strategic Plan has identified the need for more facilities to
accommodate the increasing service demand. Although technological advances have reduced the
demand for localizing resources, information tends to be more relevant in specific areas of the
County. For example, farming information tends to be more relevant to people in the northern
portion of the County while enterprise zone and neighborhood revitalization efforts would be more
relevant to residents in the U.S. 40 corridor. Therefore a focused facilities plan is crucial to ensure
that adequate library service is provided to all citizens.
In 2003, a new 12,000 square foot activity center opened in Norrisville, which included a 4,525
square foot library branch. The library has also opened a 35,000 square foot branch in Abindgon to
serve nearly 76,000 residents. Updates to the Darlington branch will occur in 2004 and a new library
branch in Jarrettsville is planned for 2005. To further alleviate pressure on the Bel Air branch, the
Harford County Public Library is planning a future branch in Churchville.
LIBRARIES POLICY 1 - Provide appropriate library facilities to accommodate the needs of

the community.
1. Coordinate the strategic planning policies developed by the Library Board of Trustees with the
County’s land use planning policies.
2. Implement a capital improvement program for new facilities in Jarrettsville and Churchville.
SUMMARY
Part of building sustainable communities is offering viable resources and facilities. Public libraries
are an essential resource, supporting many community needs. In Harford County, libraries have
become community destinations. In addition to services and materials, libraries provide many
outreach programs to the community. Public libraries are serving as communal gathering places.
Meeting rooms are heavily utilized for classes, events, and programs.
Over the years, libraries have become more of a cultural center through a variety of programs, events
and services for families, organizations and businesses. Through advances in technology, libraries
have also become information resource centers. Access to strong, efficient libraries is important in
building viable communities. This plan stresses the need for coordinated planning strategies
between the Harford County Public Library and Harford County Government. Ensuring the
consistency between these two entities is important in providing adequate services for the County.
As a vibrant community center, the library will, through collaboration, offer informational,
educational, and cultural programs and services that meet the needs of all citizens of Harford
County.
79
80
PENNSYLVANIA
E
N
I
RD
L D D
R
ONI ON RD
R
RD
E
T
RD
D
DG
T
RD
O
RD
M RD R
S T
NO
c
Æ
I
H ITEFO R
N
R
O
R
TI O
E W L
C
R
M D
F
D
RK
IN
T
ITU
IS
VI LLE V
LO
IN
R
C ONS T
N
G
IL
A
WP M
G RO VE
RD
LE
E
RD
C
O N
RD
D
S
R
CR E
IN
L
K
O
W
RD V
O
E R
E
c
Æ
CH I LL
S
HA
S E
P ROS PECT
A
YL
G RAC ETON
P D
RD RD R
E
L
F AW N
I
ARKI NS HARKI N
V
H S
O LD
ES
L
RD K
Y
AR I R
RD
H P D
LE
R
S
RD RO E WH P RUN
RD
D HE I TE E
R K FO E
R D
C
S W RD D
AIN
S
EN RD S T MARY
D
R
P
RE RD D
I
A
H R
RD
HE
P
G
RD
A
RD
R
LEG
D
R
TE
G RAC ETON
BAY
D
D D
A
R D
R R
RD
D RD
N
R E
D
R
O
I LL
ET
SV
T
M IL L
L
YL E
T
P
PE
S
R
CA
E APS
R ES
S
C
A
ON T
O
H
c
Æ
D
PR
CECIL COUNTY
S
T
T
C
M
A D L
E
M
R
D
RD
S TR
ADO NNA
E O
R
O A
R
C LE
T
D
N D
A
R IG H
L
RD
H
N
YS
R
ER LL RD
J I CROS S
WH
Y FEDER AL H O LY M
RD
E
L
RD
IT
H
L
N URS ERY
R
O R LL
LETO N
EF
H
I
G
RD
J
D
R
AD
O
AU
GR OV
CH
RD
D EEN
HARFO D
EN D
R
C
UR
D R RD T
N
CH
A
E
R OSS CT
GL
B R E
CA
C P
R
ILLE
OS
RD
V HOLY DUBLI N R
R D
SAIN T
GO
IS
D
G RI ER
D IN
R
R
RD
R
D P D CONO OW
R
D
R
WI NG ON
D
R
O D R R O C
N R
D N
L
O
L R L R LI RD D
D
L Y HIL UB
R
R
N
CR
I
R E D D
R OCK S
ON
YO
C
L
c
Æ
R H AI H
R
E
K C
D
AM
M A
GO
E
BR
D IN
RY
RD
GH D G RD
I
AL
AU N E OW
RD
E
D E R N
F E ER
R
L
E N N H B O
R
IL
RAD D
D
T C
E
LS
V
B R O
S
LI
O B R R
E
N U O U
ON
RD
20 0
H
B
OLE
A
O S
P
4
SC
M
RD H
S
IL
D U
L
R R
ES
V
H L IL L
WI T IL E
E HALL RD H
RY
RD
D D
R
R
A
E
H
RD C RD TAF
R
R
S FO RD
LIN
E
R
Y
D D
O
D R
PR
G ON
TR
IN
R CH
RD
T
R
D W GO
IES
R
O
OLD D
R D
ROCK S
T
N
U
O
RD
R
C
APPE
W LT
O
F
LL
O H
M I
NP P C
FE
RD
K
DE
R
RD
E
S K R
R OCK S
RA
RD
S
O
T
D
H
R
L
RO M
WA O
R
E
RD RD H
H ILL
HL
MIL
LT L
I
RD
NO E A
R W
L
RI
SV
HILL
SHARO N
RD
RD
I
D
R
RD
E H L
E
L
DE AL
R CE IL
RD NORR ISV ILLE D S G H
Y
R
R
K OR
D
TNU T
F
S AN
A
D Y D HAR
R
LMI A
ER H R MO
E
S RC HU
LE D U
H NY C R
F
N UR
SVI L RD N R RD C C
Y ORK
H
ETT D O
J AR
HI
RD
A RR IG
L
J R L
R E
D
Y
D RD N
R
R MO
TTS LL E D
G
HAR
IER
LENV
DY
R
VI
K
G A
L
LM
IL LE
R I
H
BA
I
C
A
D
K
LDW
S T D
L NU R PRI NG RD
O ST COO LS
H E
I
N
RD
C
D
MILL
D R
D
R
D
R
R
RD
RD OLD
S
RD
MILL
I NGTO N
S
V D
K
M O
LE
C RU EL N R
R U
HOU FF
R U
EAS S S
D
R
T ING
MA
W MI YD
O
ADY
ES LL RD C L
O
G
D ARL
K
T E JA O H O D E IA
T
RR C NC AR R )
IN
R
W
E T RA LL MO L
O
T B I E OL
L
B HW RD SV N
RD
M M T
O
SPRIN
T
Y VI E IL O
RD
(
A
TTS LL LE C
LD W
W JA RRE RD
RD
RD
P IKE
G
I
N
D
V
RD
H OPE WELL
RD
EAST W L
E
D EST FOUN
LE
E
R
TA R
L
K
IN
C
VIL
EAST E VEL
L
O
O
P
FALLS
MIL
HW Y HWY
TS
C
C
O WES T
O
P RIE STFOR D
V ILLE
C
R
ET
TH
RD
R
TO
AFTON S
RD
R
O M D
O
L
R
J AR
EN
VE
N
A
E
H
CON
A
RD
G L
L
R
SP
L ES RD
HO
O WI N
D
N R
RD
RI
PUT AM NT
R
P
P
NG
E L
PARA I SE
EAR
I
O
S TEPNE YR D
RU
PO
S S SU
GO
H
E
P PE AS
T
RD
LT
G
C EV OM
D
HI
T L H L)
ON
R
Y
SS T L
RD
IO
A TO
HW
GR
R
RD
P CH (
RD
ST
AL
BOGG S MIL U I
S T
O
E
B Y
L
O HI O S T
E
IN
R
RD
N
RD
O
D
HV L
EM
C
RD
RD I A CHA
c
Æ
RD PEL NTAR IO ST
M
RD
RD
O
Y
L
S D RD E OTSEG O ST
R U
RD
E GR E
D
H
R N
S
NS
A LDIN O
N
AF
D
RD
SI
R RD GIL E
JU NIA TA
E BERT K
R
TON
HAVRE DE GRACE
VIL L
R D
C A
OO C H
M
RE HUR D
K
F
B ELAI R
S C R
A V
R
D
D
R
R
MILL N
AR Y
D
SHOP
M IL L
A H
OO
A V
P RD
O
MO
NH
IL LE
J
E RD
V
OR
RY
AL L BI ST
RD
c
Æ
V H IC K O D A O REVO LUTIO N
U NI ON
ES
LE R R ST
TV
IL C O
V CH P
SAN
CH SH URC
RD
AI
D
N
R HVI L L
IN
U R E
P LEA
O
L DW
E D CH C
D
RD EN
R
K RD
GRE ST S
RD
B A
D
SNAKE N
L
S
CH
BEL AIR
F R U A
E Y
N
BO
M
RC X Y
R D
D
OU
H A W
H
V
T
S
T P
S
IL
D
R
A
L
E
IL
A
IN
BAL
E
c
Æ
ST
PH
RD
I
MA
D
R
R
LL
M AC
Y L SK
RD
D
RD
RD AR IL RD LA
DW
IN
R
G
E
A LDIN O
A L
F
RD
V S H U
P ARAD ISE
PI K
STE
LS I EARD P
AL
M
TO B
AR RS
IN
N
N
E
P
Y
C
OR
NE
R
MI L
D
R
O
IM
Y
T
N AB DEE
R D
L
ST
C
U ER
RD
LT
C
FA
R
B A
L
E
N
THW
HE
RI
M
E
L
A UREL
L
AC c
Æ
IL
W
P E INS T
P
RD AS S S S
Y
R
B
H
TV
R O
A
B A HA P
N
RD
IL
RD
SA
O C SH C P D
OK
D D U EL RD V
A
R
R B W L
D
D
R
E
B
P L
BEL
IA
IR AIR T
D
R
H
A S
LP
AV O
RD
L
E R P
DE
FA
B L AI
D
LL
L
ABERDEEN
BROO K E A
LA
E
UR D R OTI
RY
S
RD
R
C
TO
A
HI
L S
TO
HEEL
N P
N
VA
E
O NNO LLY BE
A
C F
D
Y L
N O
D
R
I NG
HW A IR
EMM
A
R IG
F RD H
CR
AV
IAL
A
O RT
CEDAR N
L R
R D
ESW
RD
AKE R O
L
HI T RM I EM
LS
W N M
CHESAPEAKE
D
LL
ON
R Y V
U
R D
TO
ELL
B
A
BALTIMORE COUNTY
ED L
ER
W R N AB
Y
N
I
N H
OR D
C ALVAR YR
S TEPNE
LP D
RD
D
KE
IA
DE R
D
R
E
H
LA
EN
F
P
HI
EC K
BAY
L
N P DE
H N
RSI
S LA
R D
c
Æ
RD A
L H
S WY
JO
C A
PH
R WH EEL O H
U
T
RT
D
R
ESW D
E
D
U
B R ELL R
L
OL
S C RD WY
D
H D H
R
L PHILA DELPH IA I
R
O
AI
O SK
R
D
F
LA
R
U
BE
HA
RD
Y
W
H
P PA
RD RD
O
CK Y
O
E W I D
R J H K R
R D
ERS MILL D S
RD O E RSID U
O E P
H
D
A
ABIN G
PK
I
M DO N RD
R
W
PH
O
Y
L
U N
E
O LD
R
LA
GE
N
TA
IN AB
PH
L
O RTO
S IA
IN
R
IN
GD MO
D
R
E
M Y
ON
E MM
D W
N R H
AN
I GE R
Y
YM
D
S
NNE
E RD
RR
K
P E
CLAY
K
RD
AS I
TON
L
U
P
OL
N
D
Harford
OH
J
RD
RD
A
EM
I
M
PH

LE
D EL
R
HILA
T
IL P
O
LI N V
MO
N
NK
A
RA O
YM
J
U N
F
PP
R
A R
(APG)
TAIN
ED
RD
PE
GE
WY Y
H
HW
W
Y
NED MEM ORI AL
OOD
County
I
EN
K
K RD
S
IA
A
D PH U L
F
RD
R
N
PHILA DEL
H
P
R
JO
MA
GN
c
Æ ED
G
O
EW
L
IA
O
O
Community
D
D
R
SO N
AN D
R
H
EMM O
R
T
I
M
B
RD
LE
R
TO
N
c
Æ
E RD
RIM BL
JO P A T R
P
D
A
F D
R
RM
R
D
Facilities APG
Libraries
c
Æ Libraries
PARKS
RD
MO
OR
ES
B ELA IR
CH U
MA
NE Y
MIL RC
XA
RD
L
H
Y AV
RD
VIL
EP
LE
RD
ST
RD
RD
I
RD
N HICKOR
E SK
EA R
VAL LA
PARADIS E
D S H
IL L RD
PU SU
AL DINO
L TO
R EA
RD
PE S
L E B
R MA
VIL
MA
O )
IO
TH T O LL
CH
R
AB E RDE EN
IN
c
Æ
UR
ST
D
CH
R
TH
ST
ST
ST WY
AP RD
S T EL ONT ARIO ST
RD
PO
c
Æ
RD
SH CH A P EL OTS E GO ST
O H IO
S
BU RD VD
c
Æ
RD
L
BO
B
ND
BE L
IA
AI R
LP H
AV T
OS
J UNIA T A
ST
RD
S
IL P
E
HA
AD
CP
HIL
AV
A
RD
MA
M
N P
OD
E
IN
BEL
KE
RD
D
NH
AIR
REVOL UT ION ST
PI
OB I R
AV
T
UNION
Y OS
E
R
OR
P
RD
O
CT LD
IM
D
ST
ABE
A O
V
L
HI A B
LT
ST EPNE Y
F
R
NG
ELP RD
DE
BA
AD IA
EN
PH I L LP H
RI
SS
S DE
ILA
PA
E
PH SH O R TH
BY
T WY Y
RD
D
Y HW
OL
D HW
R SK I
LA I
PU SK
LA
PU
WY
IR H
LA
BE D
R
Figure 27
81
82
Parks and Open Space
GOAL: Preserve open space and natural lands for a range of recreational uses and
environmental benefits.
Open space and natural lands are an important element of any populated area and contribute to its
identity, livability, and viability. Open space can be in the form of State and County public parks,
recreational and passive natural lands, as well as private recreational centers such as swim clubs and
golf courses. As the population continues to grow, so do the recreation and open space needs of the
citizens. The 1999 Harford County Land Preservation and Recreation Plan, an element of the
County’s Master Plan, addresses the amounts and types of land and facilities necessary to supply the
needs of current and future residents of the County.
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - More community facilities.
The Harford County Department of Parks and Recreation acts as stewards for County-owned public
lands. As development in and around the Designated Growth Areas increases, it will be necessary to
acquire additional open space for public use. Adequate amounts of community open space must be
located in and near neighborhoods for daily recreational activities. Trails and connecting greenways
can provide important links between communities, schools, and other open space areas.
Park and open space lands are extensive in Harford County. Four State Parks are found in the
County (Gunpowder Falls, Susquehanna, Rocks, and Palmer) providing over six thousand acres of
public lands. All of the State-owned land is used for resource-based activities. The County will
work with the State to ensure that adjoining land uses remain compatible with these public lands.
Where appropriate, preservation initiatives will be pursued.
County-owned parkland managed by the Department of Parks and Recreation totals over 3,800
acres. Over 1,700 acres of public school land also provides recreational opportunities for
communities. The County’s park system ranges from small community parks to larger regional
parks. Whereas community parks and school lands provide active recreation facilities, the County
also has two parks, Eden Mill and Leight Park, that are devoted to nature studies and take advantage
of the County’s invaluable natural resources. This Plan supports continuation of these facilities and
encourages that land uses adjacent to these sites minimize conflicts and provides pedestrian access
where applicable.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE POLICY 1 - Evaluate and maximize the usage of present Parks
and Recreation facilities, acquire additional lands and create an integrated park system.
1. Develop facilities that serve a variety of purposes, creating opportunities for regional-based
recreation.
83
2. Update Zoning Code regulations to enhance community open space requirements in new
developments by requiring ample, usable open space within or safely and easily accessible to
each neighborhood.
3. Coordinate the activities of the Departments of Parks and Recreation and Planning and Zoning
to protect environmental and historic sites in Harford County.
4. Identify and coordinate trail connections between communities and new developments, where
appropriate.
5. Update the 1999 Land Preservation and Recreation Plan.
6. Complete the right of way acquisition for the Ma & Pa hiking trail to achieve an unbroken trail
from Forest Hill to Mount Soma, wherever possible.
CITIZEN ISSUE 2 - Active and Passive Greenways (more trails).
Active and passive greenways give residents the opportunity to enjoy and preserve the rural nature of
the County. Active greenways provide recreation areas for hiking, biking and walking. Passive
greenways refer to lands that are dedicated to providing natural linkages, such as wildlife corridors
or “habitat highways” and connecting green spaces. These greenways allow for indigenous plants
and animals to flourish. Greenways can preserve pieces of the landscape important to an area’s
character, providing “green spaces” around neighborhoods and buffers between communities.
Greenways also provide a venue for eco-tourism.
The Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway is the most notable greenway in Harford County,
having been certified by the State of Maryland as a Maryland Heritage Area. This greenway is a
series of trails that connects cultural, historical and natural resources along both sides of the
Susquehanna River from the Conowingo Dam to the head of the Bay. It is managed by a non-profit
corporation. Not only are the trails land-based, but also water-based. Future plans are to connect the
greenway to the Oakington peninsula, where the County has extensive park property and Bay-front
access.
Two other integrated, publicly accessible greenways of note in the County are the Ma and Pa
Heritage Corridor in Bel Air and vicinity, and the Winters Run Greenway below the Atkisson Dam.
Both of these areas are located in the Development Envelope and provide a wealth of benefits to
residents. The Ma and Pa Heritage Corridor is an excellent example of how the County and Towns
may work together to provide linkages between municipally owned and County-owned facilities.
Continuation of both these trails is supported by this Plan, and efforts to identify and acquire needed
parcels or easements should be addressed as part of the development approval process.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE POLICY 2 - Increase active and passive greenways, extending
and connecting existing public properties.
84
1. Work with other agencies to develop new funding sources for the acquisition of properties to
extend and connect existing trails systems and passive greenways.
2. Preserve undeveloped lands and natural areas to meet future needs as identified in the
Harford County Land Preservation and Recreation Plan.
3. Update the Zoning Code to enhance standards for active and passive open space requirements.
SUMMARY
Preservation of open space and natural lands results in a variety of benefits that enhance the quality
of life for the citizens of the County. It may provide both active and passive recreation
opportunities. It may be used to preserve historical and environmental resources, as well as provide
linkages between communities. In any community planning process, the provision of open space is
usually cited as a primary desire of residents. To guide the County’s efforts in meeting this desire,
the County will be updating the Land Preservation and Recreation Plan in 2004. This Plan will
inventory existing open space acreage and recreation facilities of the County, then analyze the needs
of a growing population, and present strategies to meet those needs. Implementation of this plan will
ensure that adequate and suitable land is designated for the full range of open space needs.
Community-based needs have also been met through dedicated open space requirements for new
subdivisions. These private areas may be limited to the residents of a particular development and
may be improved with facilities such as tennis courts, swimming pools, and tot lots. Adequate
planning for open space within new developments is an essential element of a quality community.
Efforts should be made during development design to provide such community gathering places.
These open spaces in turn should be integrated with adjacent community areas to increase
community interaction. All available opportunities to acquire open space land in and around the
Development Envelope should be explored, with particular focus on larger parcels that could provide
leisure opportunities on a more regional basis.
The Department of Parks and Recreation partners with an extensive network of volunteer-based
Recreation Councils to meet the recreation needs of the community. These Councils help determine
the best and most appropriate use of Parks and Recreation property, and then utilize their volunteers
to program activities, provide support staff, and raise funds for capital improvements. The County’s
Land Preservation and Recreation Plan addresses the needed recreation facilities in each Recreation
Council district.
In order to meet the recreation and open space needs of Harford County citizens, as identified in the
County’s Land Preservation and Recreation Plan, new and innovative approaches must be explored.
All levels of government (Federal, State, County and municipal) should work together to coordinate
and integrate land acquisition and provision of programs. Partnerships between both public and
private entities should also be developed. Current zoning regulations may need revisions in order to
more readily facilitate public-private partnerships that could utilize County-owned land. The use of
short to mid-term leases or joint ventures, rather than outright acquisitions and development, can
85
also be used to expand the County’s ability to meet recreation and open space needs. Government
facilities must be built using an integrated planning approach to serve multiple needs. Schools and
recreation centers should be designed and built to serve as community centers. The William N.
McFaul Activities Center is a prime example of this type of collaboration. These strategies, as well
as others, must be developed in order for the County to be able to provide for the open space and
recreation needs of its citizens.
Sheriff, Fire and Emergency Operations

GOAL: Ensure public safety by providing adequate police, fire, rescue and EMS services for
Harford County citizens and businesses.
Reliable and competent emergency operations and response is essential for providing citizens with
an outstanding quality of life. In Harford County, these services are provided by a Sheriff’s Office,
Volunteer Fire Department and the County’s Emergency Operations Center. In addition to these
efforts, Harford County is supported by the Maryland State Police, which maintains a barrack in
Benson, and police departments operated in each of the municipalities. The Harford County
Sheriff's Office has 227 uniformed deputies, the State Police (Benson Barrack) has 55 sworn
personnel, and Aberdeen, Bel Air and Havre de Grace have 37, 31 and 28 sworn officers,
respectively. The County Sheriff’s Office and the three municipal police departments have also
established a mutual aid agreement for emergency responses.
The Harford County Sheriff’s Office is dedicated to protecting the rights of all citizens and strives to
preserve peace while providing a safe environment for all citizens. In 2002, the Harford County
Sheriff's Office responded to over 144,000 calls. The Sheriff’s Office categorizes statistics and
crime analysis into different sectors within the County. The Sectors and number of calls are defined
in the table below (Figure 28).
2002
D a rlin g to n /S tre e t/W h ite fo rd
F a lls to n /J a rre tts v ille /N o rris v ille
H ic k o ry /B e l A ir E a s t
L o w e r F a lls to n
A b e rd e e n /H a v re d e G ra c e
Sector
C h u rc h v ille
B e l A ir
B e l A ir/A b in g d o n
A b in g d o n /P e rry m a n /R iv e rs id e
E d g e w o o d /J o p p a
0 1 0 ,0 0 0 2 0 ,0 0 0 3 0 ,0 0 0 4 0 ,0 0 0 5 0 ,0 0 0
N u m b e r o f C a lls
Figure 28
86
Fire and Emergency Medical Services are provided on a predominately volunteer basis. There are
over 1,300 volunteers who assist in over 8,300 fire and 20,328 emergency medical service responses
everyday in Harford County. The County is categorized into 11 companies with 16 substations that
support the various companies (Figure 31). Outlined in the Figures 29 and 30 are the number of
calls each company responded to over the past two years.
FIRE/RESCUE CALLS FOR SERVICE

Fallston
APG
Norrisville
Darlington
Joppa/Magnolia
Company
Jarrettsville 2002
2001
Whiteford
Havre de Grace
Abingdon
Bel Air
Aberdeen
Level
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Number of Calls
Figure 29
EMS CALLS FOR SERVICE

Fallston
APG
Norrisville
Darlington
Joppa/Magnolia
Company
Jarrettsville 2002
Whiteford 2001
Havre de Grace
Abingdon
Bel Air
Aberdeen
Level
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Number of Calls
Figure 30
87
88
PENNSYLVANIA
E
m
N
I
RD
L D D
R
ONI ON RD
R
RD
E
T
RD
D
DG
T
RD
O
RD
M RD R
S T
NO
I
H ITEFO R
N
R
O
R
TI O
E W L
C
R
M D
F
D
RK
IN
T
ITU
IS
VI LLE V
LO
IN
m
R
C ONS T
N
G
IL
A
WP M
G RO VE
RD
LE
E
RD
C
O N
RD
D
S
R
CR E
IN
L
K
O
W
RD V
O
E R
E
CH I LL
S
HA
S E
P ROS PECT
A
YL
G RAC ETON
P D
RD RD R
E
L
F AW N
I
ARKI NS HARKI N
V
H S
O LD
ES
L
RD K
Y
AR I R
RD
H P D
LE
R
S
RD RO E WH P RUN
RD
D HE I TE E
R K FO E
R D
C
S W RD D
AIN
S
EN RD S T MARY
D
R
P
RE RD D
I
A
H R
RD
HE
P
G
RD
A
RD
R
LEG
D
R
TE
G RAC ETON
BAY
D
D D
A
R D
R R
RD
D RD
N
R E
D
R
O
I LL
ET
SV
T
M IL L
L
YL E
T
P
PE
S
R
CA
E APS
R ES
S
C
A
ON T
O
H
D
PR
CECIL COUNTY
S
T
T
C
M
A D L
E
M
R
D
RD
S TR
ADO NNA
E O
R
O A
R
C LE
T
D
N D
A
R IG H
L
RD
H
N
YS
R
ER LL RD
J I CROS S
WH
Y FEDER AL H O LY M
RD
E
L
RD
IT
H
L
N URS ERY
R
m
O R LL
LETO N
EF
H
I
G
RD
J
D
R
AD
O
AU
GR OV
CH
RD
D EEN
HARFO D
EN D
R
C
UR
m
D R RD T
N
CH
A
E
R OSS CT
GL
B R E
CA
C P
R
ILLE
OS
RD
V HOLY DUBLI N R
R D
SAIN T
GO
IS
D
G RI ER
D IN
R
R
RD
R
D P D CONO OW
R
D
R
WI NG ON
D
R
O D R R O C
N R
D N
L
O
L R L R LI RD D
D
L Y HIL UB
R
R
N
CR
I
R E D D
R OCK S
ON
YO
C
L
R H AI H
R
E
K C
D
AM
M A
GO
E
BR
D IN
RY
RD
GH D G RD
I
AL
AU N E OW
RD
E
D E R N
F E ER
R
L
E N N H B O
R
IL
RAD D
D
T C
E
LS
V
B R O
S
LI
O B R R
E
N U O U
ON
RD
20 0
H
B
OLE
A
O S
P
4
SC
M
RD H
S
IL
D U
L
R R
ES
V
H L IL L
WI T IL E
E HALL RD H
RY
RD
D D
R
R
A
E
H
RD C RD TAF
R
R
S FO RD
LIN
E
m
R
Y
D D
O
D R
PR
G ON
TR
IN
R CH
RD
T
R
D W GO
IES
R
O
OLD D
R D
ROCK S
T
N
U
O
RD
R
m
C
APPE
W LT
O
F
LL
O H
M I
NP P C
FE
RD
K
DE
R
RD
E
S K R
R OCK S
RA
RD
S
O
T
D
H
R
L
RO M
WA O
R
E
RD RD H
H ILL
HL
MIL
LT L
I
RD
NO E A
R W
L
RI
SV
HILL
SHARO N
RD
RD
I
D
R
RD
E H L
E
L
DE AL
R CE IL
RD NORR ISV ILLE D S G H
Y
R
R
K OR
D
TNU T
F
S AN
A
D Y D HAR
R
LMI A
ER H R MO
E
S RC HU
LE D U
H NY C R
F
N UR
SVI L RD N R RD C C
Y ORK
H
ETT D O
J AR
HI
RD
A RR IG
L
J R L
R E
D
Y
D RD N
R
R MO
TTS LL E D
G
HAR
IER
LENV
DY
R
VI
K
G A
L
LM
IL LE
R I
H
BA
I
C
A
D
K
LDW
S T D
L NU R PRI NG RD
O ST COO LS
m
H E
I
N
RD
C
D
MILL
D R
D
m
R
D
R
R
RD
RD OLD
S
RD
MILL
I NGTO N
S
V D
K
M O
LE
C RU EL N R
R U
HOU FF
R U
EAS S S
D
R
T ING
MA
W MI YD
O
ADY
ES LL RD C L
O
G
D ARL
K
T E JA O H O D E IA
T
RR C NC AR R )
IN
R
W
E T RA LL MO L
O
T B I E OL
L
B HW RD SV N
RD
M M T
O
SPRIN
T
Y VI E IL O
RD
(
A
TTS LL LE C
LD W
W JA RRE RD
RD
RD
P IKE
G
I
N
D
V
RD
H OPE WELL
RD
m
EAST W L
E
D EST FOUN
LE
E
R
TA R
L
K
IN
C
VIL
EAST E VEL
L
O
O
P
FALLS
MIL
HW Y HWY
TS
C
C
O WES T
O
P RIE STFOR D
V ILLE
C
R
ET
TH
RD
R
TO
AFTON S
RD
R
O M D
O
L
R
J AR
EN
VE
N
A
E
H
CON
A
RD
G L
L
R
SP
L ES RD
HO
O WI N
D
mm
N R
RD
RI
PUT AM
m
NT
R
P
P
NG
E L
PARA I SE
EAR
I
O
S TEPNE YR D
RU
PO
S S SU
GO
H
E
P PE AS
T
RD
LT
m
G
C EV OM
D
m
HI
T L H L)
ON
R
Y
SS T L
RD
IO
A TO
HW
GR
R
RD
P CH (
RD
ST
AL
BOGG S MIL U I
S T
O
E
B Y
m
L
O HI O S T
E
IN
R
RD
N
RD
O
D
HV L
EM
C
RD
RD I A CHA
RD PEL NTAR IO ST
M
RD
RD
O
Y
L
S D RD E OTSEG O ST
R U
RD
E GR E
D
H
R N
S
NS
A LDIN O
N
AF
D
RD
SI
R RD GIL E
JU NIA TA
E BERT K
R
TON
HAVRE DE GRACE
VIL L
R D
C A
OO C H
M
RE HUR D
K
F
B ELAI R
S C R
A V
R
D
D
R
R
MILL N
AR Y
D
SHOP
M IL L
m
A H
OO
A V
P RD
O
MO
NH
IL LE
J
E RD
V
OR
RY
AL L BI ST
RD
V H IC K O D A O REVO LUTIO N
U NI ON
ES
LE R R ST
TV
IL C O
V CH P
SAN
CH SH URC
RD
AI
D
N
R HVI L L
IN
U R E
P LEA
O
L DW
E D CH C
D
RD EN
R
K RD
GRE ST S
RD
B A
D
SNAKE N
L
S
mm
CH
BEL AIR
F R U A
E Y
N
BO
M
RC X Y
R D
D
OU
H A W
H
V
T
S
T P
S
IL
D
R
A
L
E
IL
A
IN
BAL
E
ST
PH
RD
I
MA
D
R
R
LL
M AC
Y L SK
RD
D
RD
RD AR IL RD LA
DW
IN
R
G
E
A LDIN O
A L
F
RD
V S H U
P ARAD ISE
PI K
STE
LS I EARD P
AL
M
TO B
AR RS
IN
N
N
E
P
Y
C
OR
NE
R
MI L
D
R
O
IM
Y
T
N AB DEE
R D
L
ST
C
U ER
RD
LT
C
FA
R
B A
L
E
N
THW
HE
RI
M
E
L
A UREL
L
AC
IL
W
P E INS T
P
RD AS S S S
Y
R
B
H
TV
m
R O
A
B A HA P
N
RD
IL
RD
SA
O C SH C P D
OK
D D U EL RD V
A
R
R B W L
D
D
R
E
B
P L
BEL
IA
IR AIR T
D
R
H
A S
LP
AV O
RD
L
E R P
DE
FA
B L AI
D
LL
L
ABERDEEN
BROO K E A
LA
E
UR D R OTI
RY
S
RD
R
C
TO
A
HI
L S
TO
HEEL
N P
N
VA
E
O NNO LLY BE
A
C F
D
Y L
N O
D
R
I NG
HW A IR
EMM
A
R IG
F RD H
CR
AV
IAL
A
O RT
CEDAR N
L R
R D
ESW
RD
AKE R O
L
HI T RM I EM
LS
W N M
CHESAPEAKE
D
LL
ON
R Y V
U
R D
TO
ELL
B
A
BALTIMORE COUNTY
ED L
ER
W R N AB
Y
N
I
N H
OR D
C ALVAR YR
S TEPNE
LP D
RD
D
KE
IA
DE R
D
R
E
H
LA
EN
F
P
HI
EC K
BAY
L
N P DE
H N
RSI
S LA
R D
I
RD A
L H
S WY
JO
C A
PH
R WH EEL O H
U
T
RT
D
R
ESW D
E
D
U
B R ELL R
L
OL
S C RD WY
D
H D H
R
L PHILA DELPH IA I
R
O
AI
O SK
R
D
F
LA
R
U
BE
HA
m
RD
Y
W
H
P PA
RD RD
O
m
CK Y
O
E W I D
R J H K R
R D
ERS MILL D S
RD O E RSID U
O E P
H
D
A
ABIN G
PK
I
M DO N RD
R
W
PH
O
Y
L
U N
E
O LD
R
LA
GE
N
TA
IN AB
PH
L
O RTO
S IA
IN
R
IN
GD MO
D
R
E
M Y
ON
E MM
D W
N R H
AN
I GE R
Y
YM
D
S
NNE
E RD
RR
K
P E
CLAY
K
RD
AS I
TON
L
U
P
OL
N
D
Harford
OH
J
RD
RD
A
EM
I
M
PH

LE
D EL
R
HILA
T
IL P
O
m
LI N V
MO
N
NK
A
RA O
YM
J
U N
F
PP
R
A R
(APG)
TAIN
ED
RD
PE
m m m
GE
WY Y
H
HW
W
Y
NED MEM ORI AL
OOD
County
I
EN
K
K RD
S
IA
A
D PH U L
F
RD
R
N
PHILA DEL
H
P
R
JO
MA ED
GN
G
O
EW
L
IA
O
O
Community
D
D
R
SO N
AN D
R
H
EMM O
R
T
I
M
B
RD
LE
R
TO
N
E RD
RIM BL
JO P A T R
P
D
A
F D
R
RM
R
D
Facilities APG
Fire Stations
m Fire Stations
PARKS
RD
MO
m
OR
ES
B ELA IR
CH U
MA
NE Y
MIL RC
XA
RD
L
H
Y AV
RD
VIL
EP
LE
RD
m
ST
RD
RD
I
RD
N HICKOR
E SK
EA R
VAL LA
PARADIS E
D S H
IL L RD
PU SU
AL DINO
L TO
R EA
RD
PE S
L E B
R MA
VIL
MA
O )
IO
TH T O LL
m m mm
CH
R
AB E RDE EN
IN
(
UR
ST
D
CH
R
TH
ST
ST
ST WY
mm
AP RD
S T EL ONT ARIO ST
RD
PO
RD
SH CH A P EL OTS E GO ST
O H IO
S
BU RD VD
mm
RD
L
BO
B
ND
BE L
IA
AI R
LP H
AV T
OS
J UNIA T A
ST
RD
S
IL P
E
HA
AD
CP
HIL
AV
A
RD
MA
M
N P
OD
E
IN
BEL
KE
RD
D
NH
AIR
REVOL UT ION ST
PI
OB I R
AV
T
UNION
Y OS
E
R
OR
P
RD
O
CT LD
IM
D
ST
ABE
A O
V
L
HI A B
LT
ST EPNE Y
F
R
NG
ELP RD
DE
BA
AD IA
EN
PH I L LP H
RI
SS
S DE
ILA
PA
E
PH SH O R TH
BY
T WY Y
RD
D
Y HW
OL
D HW
R SK I
LA I
PU SK
LA
PU
WY
IR H
LA
BE D
R
Figure 31
89
90
Mutual aid is given between companies within the County and neighboring jurisdictions in
Baltimore County, Cecil County and Pennsylvania. The Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is the
crisis management hub for the County. The EOC is responsible for preparing an Emergency
Management Plan for the citizens of Harford County in the event of disasters or emergency
situations. It includes a general plan of operations along with specific plans for APG Chemical
Stockpile and Radiological Emergency Response for Peach Bottom Nuclear Power Plant. In
addition, plans for terrorism, HAZMAT emergencies, hurricanes, tornados, dam and flood
emergencies, severe weather, and earthquakes are included.
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - Provide Community Policing substations within designated areas.
Community Policing consists of eight members who are responsible for assisting communities in
identifying and addressing problems and concerns that are unique to that community. The unit also
provides community based support in the form of Neighborhood Watch Programs, DARE
instruction, and Crime Prevention Programs. The Sheriff’s Office operates three community-based
substations, each of which was donated by various businesses or organizations that support the
efforts of the Harford County Sheriff's Office. Substations are located in Darlington at the Wilson
Center, in Joppatowne, and in Street at the Old Highland Elementary School.
Harford County is committed to ensuring a peaceful and safe environment for all citizens. The
provision of safety and security measures are essential for strong, stable communities. The Harford
County Sheriff’s Office currently operates out of Bel Air, with a northern precinct in Jarrettsville and
a southern precinct in Edgewood. In addition to these efforts, the municipalities of Havre de Grace,
Aberdeen and Bel Air operate their own police departments for their respective incorporated areas.
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS POLICY 1 - Ensure public safety within established

communities.
1. Continue to support the Community Policing Unit and proactively pursue more community
participation.
2. Continue to encourage and promote Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design

principles with the update of the Zoning Code.
3. Continue to support the Sheriff’s Office Strategic Plan.
4. Maintain the existing sworn officer ratio per 1,000 population.
91
CITIZEN ISSUE 2 – Provide prompt response to all emergencies.
The response time necessary for personnel to react to an emergency is very critical. Therefore, it is
necessary to maintain and locate facilities in appropriate locations within communities. This is
imperative for timely and orderly responses to any emergency situation.
The EOC is responsible for emergency planning to assure the availability of assistance and proper
resources after natural and manmade disasters. Emergency preparedness in Harford County is a
continuous process, which involves all of us. There are varieties of hazards that we face everyday
and an extremely dedicated group of people plan for, and respond to, these hazards.
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS POLICY 2 - Reduce the loss of property, loss of life or injury
due to fire or need for emergency medical care.
1. Provide for new facilities in a manner consistent with planned growth in order to maintain an
acceptable response time to emergencies.
2. Coordinate a comprehensive Capital Improvement Program that provides necessary equipment

updates.
3. Coordinate with emergency medical service providers to evaluate the needs of the volunteer
service providers to better meet the citizens’ needs and determine what changes, if any, are
necessary to provide sufficient emergency medical services for the County’s growing
population.
CITIZEN ISSUE 3 - Planning for Emergency Operations.
Emergency planning is important to ensuring the availability of assistance and proper resources after
natural and manmade disasters. Harford County is vulnerable to the effects of a number of natural
emergencies such as hurricanes and severe winter storms. In addition, the County is also susceptible
to a variety of man-made hazards such as fires, hazardous materials incidents at APG and incidents
at the Peach Bottom Nuclear Power Plant in Pennsylvania. Harford County is also committed to
providing safety and security for its citizens due to the recent threats to national security.
Coordination with municipal and State authorities, as well as the Red Cross is essential for the well
being of citizens of Harford County. The ability of the County to respond to threats of terrorism and
other man-made or natural disasters is enhanced by offering citizens vigilant and proactive measures.
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS POLICY 3 - Promote public safety education and coordinate

Homeland Security efforts with the State and local governments.
1. Coordinate and ensure zoning regulations and other County plans are consistent with
emergency operation programs and practices.
92
2. Continue to coordinate changes to the Zoning Code to address accessibility for emergency
response equipment.
3. Continue to support education and community awareness programs.
SUMMARY
It is important to provide outstanding Emergency Operations in order to maximize the quality of life
in Harford County. Coordinating efforts among an array of agencies is important. The EOC
coordinates with local, State and Federal agencies in any emergency event.
To adequately serve the County’s population, an expansion and/or renovation of the Sheriff’s Office
complex in Bel Air is scheduled along with an expansion of the Detention Center. Community
outreach will be continued through community and school policing units.
Outreach and education is also an important aspect of the Harford County volunteer fire, rescue and
EMS companies. Collaboration among the 11 volunteer fire, rescue and EMS companies, as well as
improvements to existing communication systems, is necessary to ensure prompt responses to
emergency calls and to provide overall successful emergency operations.
93
94
PRESERVATION
GOAL: Protect and preserve the County’s agricultural heritage and the continued viability of
agriculture.
Harford County’s heritage has been an important component of the County’s land use strategies for
years. This heritage is based not only on historic sites, structures, and landscapes, but also on a
strong agricultural economy that contributes to the economic health and vitality of the County. The
County has recognized the importance of preserving its heritage by adopting plans and policies that
are designed to manage growth, preserve farmland and historic resources, and protect the character
of rural and urban communities. Complementing the Land Use Element Plan is the Historic
Preservation Element Plan, prepared by the County in 1998 and updated in 2001. This Plan
addresses in more detail the protection of the County’s historic resources.
The County has made a strong commitment to preservation of rural areas and the history that
abounds throughout the County. Continuing this effort will require the development of new
approaches that will enable present and future citizens an opportunity to enjoy the accomplishments
of the past. Legislative, financial, and educational initiatives will have to be enacted to achieve the
policies and improvements called for in this Plan. This section of the Land Use Element Plan lays
out the program for both the Rural Element Plan and the Historic Preservation Element Plan.
Rural Area
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - More emphasis on agricultural preservation - Purchase of Development
Rights Program.
Census data indicates that the County has lost 91,627 acres of farmland since 1950 (Figure 32). This
equates to a rate of farmland loss of approximately 1,900 acres annually. This rate of loss has
improved in recent years as a result of the County’s decision in 1977 to participate in the Maryland
Agricultural Land Preservation program, and the decision in 1993 to develop a County Purchase of
Development Rights (PDR) program.
HARFORD COUNTY FARMLAND

CHANGE IN FARMLAND 1950 - 1997
ACRES OF FARMLAND
185,739
200,000
165,715
160,000 133,452
116,985
120,000 99,948 94,112
80,000
40,000
0
1950 1959 1969 1978 1987 1997
YEAR
Figure 32
*Source: US Agricultural Census 1997
95
Since 1977 over 12,000 acres have been preserved through the State’s MALPF program. As of June
2003, Harford County’s PDR program has preserved over 19,000 acres. Combined with other land
preservation efforts over 35,000 acres have been protected in Harford County (Figure 33).
HARFORD COUNTY
PRESERVATION ACREAGE: 1977 - 2003
40,000 35,572
35,000
30,000
25,000 18,914
ACREAGE
20,000
15,000
7,925
10,000
3,317
5,000 765
0
1981 1986 1991 1996 2003
YEAR (CUMULATIVE)
Figure 33
In Harford County, landowners can preserve their land through a variety of local, State, and private
programs including the Harford County Agricultural Land Preservation Program, the Maryland
Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation, Rural Legacy, Green Print, Forest Legacy or Trusts such
as the Maryland Environmental Trust, Maryland Historical Trust or the Harford Land Trust (Figures
34 and 35).
Preservation Program Acreage In Preservation

Programs
Harford County Agricultural Preservation Program 19,460
Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation 12,400
Easements
Lower Deer Creek Valley Rural Legacy Area 1,175
Manor Conservancy Rural Legacy Area 94
Maryland Environmental Trust 2,438
Maryland Historic Trust 120
*TOTAL 35,572
Figure 34
*As of June 2003
96
PENNSYLVANIA
CECIL COUNTY
HAVRE DE GRACE
BEL AIR
ABERDEEN
CHESAPEAKE
BAY
BALTIMORE COUNTY

(APG)
Harford County Ag Easement

MD State Ag Easement
Harford County Ag District
MD State Ag District
Maryland Environmental Trust Easement
Parks
Lower Deer Creek Valley Rural APG
Legacy Easement
Lower Deer Creek Valley Rural N
Legacy Area
Manor Conservancy Easement
Manor Conservancy Area
AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION MAP

HARFORD COUNTY, MARYLAND
Figure 35
97
98
RURAL POLICY 1 - Improve agricultural preservation programs so they remain a viable
option for landowners.
1. Enhance the funding mechanisms used to support the County’s Purchase of Development
Rights Program.
2. Review the per acre price paid for easements annually to ensure that the pricing encourages
participation in these programs.
3. Ensure that preservation programs are implemented in a timely manner.
4. Focus preservation efforts in areas that will expand existing preserved areas.
5. Increase the amount of land preserved to 55,000 acres by 2012.
CITIZEN ISSUE 2 - Transfer of Development Rights Reform.
Harford County began addressing the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) issue in 1982 when
the Zoning Code introduced the concept. The topic was readdressed in the 1992 Rural Element Plan
and then again by a TDR Task Force in 1996. Subsequently, the County continued to analyze the
options for a TDR program, and these findings combined with the strong message from the
community to retain the Development Envelope and Rural Villages with minimal modifications has
limited the future options for a TDR program. In the interim, the County continues to use the TDR
provision in the Zoning Code that allows for the transfer of development rights between properties
under specific conditions. Amended in 2003, the provision allows for the transfer of development
rights between agriculturally zoned properties that are within one-half mile of the sending property.
Receiving properties can only increase their development rights by 50%.
RURAL POLICY 2 - Maintain and enhance the County’s existing agricultural to agricultural
TDR program.
1. Review and consider the revision of the Transfer of Development Rights provisions as part of
the comprehensive update of the Zoning Code.
2. Require that a preservation easement be placed on part or all of the sending property.
3. As part of the update of the Zoning Code appropriate development standards for the receiving
area shall be considered.
99
CITIZEN ISSUE 3 - AG zoning – density and uses.
The purpose of the agricultural district is to provide for the continued viability of farming and
agricultural uses, the conservation of agricultural land, and to maintain and promote the rural
character of this land. Agriculture is one of the largest industries in Harford County, generating
stable employment for more than 3,000 people. Using Department of Natural Resources and
Maryland Department of Agriculture statistics and reports from individuals and companies, an
evaluation of the industry was conducted as part of the County’s Agricultural Development Initiative
to determine its economic impact. This evaluation indicates an annual impact of approximately
$400 million within Harford County.
Harford’s agricultural industry includes traditional and nontraditional farming. Livestock and milk
are major income producers. Harford County ranks second in the State in terms of cattle sold and
third in terms of horses. The area ranks sixth in terms of dairy production. Cash grain acreage - both
corn and soybeans have increased in importance as have hay and straw production (Figure 36). Fruit
and vegetable production has increased because of market demand in the County and nearby regions.
Specialty products such as flowers, hanging baskets, wine, honey, and Christmas trees have become
a staple of Harford County’s agriculture markets. Value-added enterprises and infrastructure
businesses make up the remainder of Harford County’s agricultural industry.
Harford County Agricultural Production,

1999-2001
Corn for Grain
(Bushels)
Corn for Silage
4% (Tons)
10% 7% 1% Soybeans
2% (Bushels)
Wheat (Bushels)
76% Hay (Tons)
Barley (Bushels)
Figure 36
100
Co-existing with these agricultural enterprises is a growing number of residential uses. Data shows
that since 1995, an average of slightly over 300 residential permits per year have been issued in the
rural areas. Residential development in the rural area of the County is guided by agricultural zoning
that allows for the development of one dwelling unit per 10 acres. The Code also provides for the use
of family conveyances.
RURAL POLICY 3 - Ensure that the agricultural district classification supports the
agricultural industry.
1. Recognize agriculture, and agricultural support services, as the primary economic base in the
rural areas of the County by continuing to support the implementation of the County’s
Agricultural Economic Development Initiative.
2. Revise the agricultural district regulations to ensure that they support the continuation and
expansion of agriculture as a viable industry.
3. Streamline the permitting process for commercial agricultural uses and value added products
at all levels of local government.
CITIZEN ISSUE 4 - Increase the use of buffers between agricultural and residential uses.
As more development occurs in the rural areas of the County, the potential for conflicts between
agriculture and residential uses increase. Residents moving into agricultural areas need to be aware
that farming is an industry, and that situations and conditions can occur that may disrupt their
lifestyle. While the establishment of buffers will help to minimize some of the conflicts that occur
because of the juxtaposition of uses, other land use measures should also be considered. Current
regulations allow private wellheads to go within ten feet of the property line. This could impact
adjoining agricultural operations because certain farming practices are not allowed within 100 feet of
wellheads.
RURAL POLICY 4 - Promote land use patterns that support the continuation of agriculture.
1. Propose a right to farm statement that would be required at the time of settlement and upon
issuance of building permits to inform prospective buyers that the adjoining agriculturally
zoned land may be subject to activities that may result in noise, dirt, odors, and movement of
farm equipment.
2. Update the Zoning Code to require buffers on all properties being developed that adjoin
agriculturally zoned lands.
101
3. Implement land use polices and regulations that help maintain a critical mass of agricultural
land to support the County’s agricultural industry.
4. As part of the Zoning Code update, review and consider revising the Conservation
Development Standards (CDS).
5. Establish a minimum preservation acreage for new residential developments outside of

Designated Growth Areas.
6. Evaluate road design standards to help ensure that that they match the needs of the agricultural
industry.
SUMMARY
To retain Harford County’s rural character, agriculture must be recognized and supported as an
economically viable vocation. Achieving this will require the preservation of critical masses of land
so that future generations can continue to farm. Supporting these concepts, it is the intent of this Plan
not to decrease a landowner’s equity, but rather to support the utilization of these rights in a manner
that complements the surrounding agricultural community and promotes the protection of rural
character.
While preservation efforts in the County have been successful in slowing the loss of farmland and in
helping to provide financial security for farming families, increasing participation in the program is
still of paramount importance. To achieve this, increasing the amount of funding available to the
County’s PDR program should be a priority. This can be accomplished through a variety of funding
mechanisms, and specific steps should be taken to identify the measures that would provide the
greatest benefit to the program. This additional funding will improve the program by making it
possible to increase the number of farms brought into the program each year, and it will enable the
County to increase the price per acre offered land owners.
Preservation efforts should continue to be directed toward the acquisition of easements on properties
that build on existing blocks of preserved land. Additional steps should be taken to establish a
preservation “belt” that clearly marks the transition from the Development Envelope to the rural
portions of the County. The Rural Legacy program already promotes this concept as evidenced by
the designation of the Lower Deer Creek Valley Rural Legacy Area and the Manor Rural Legacy
Area.
The County recognizes that planning for the rural area must also take into account that some
residential development will continue to occur. In order to minimize the impact of this development
on both agriculture and public facilities, this Plan recommends that to the degree possible, new
development be directed to the Rural Villages and Rural Residential areas, and that the boundaries of
these areas not be expanded. To further minimize the impact of residential development in the rural
area the County will consider, as part of the Zoning Code update, clustering provisions for
residential development on agriculturally zoned lands.
102
An inventory of the development potential of land in the rural area of the County was completed in
June 2003. The study indicated that there is the potential for approximately 12,636 additional units
in this area. When past development patterns in the rural area are compared to the residential
capacity available, it is clear that there is a sufficient inventory of potential residential units to meet
future needs, and that there is no immediate need for any additional rezoning of agricultural lands for
residential use. However, any requests for rezoning will be carefully reviewed as to location and the
ability of public facilities to support the proposed use.
Studies also indicate that the County has a sufficient inventory of commercially zoned lands to meet
its immediate and foreseeable retail and service needs. No additional commercial rezonings will be
supported unless, upon further review, it is determined that proposed changes would serve the needs
of the community in a particular location. All additional zoning changes will be subject to a
technical analysis to help ensure that the proposed change will not generate adverse impact in the
community.
In the rural area of the County, adequate support services should be readily available to the farming
community. Rural villages should serve as the central locations for these commercial activities.
Services, needed by the rural community, should be encouraged to stay or relocate in the villages.
The zoning classifications and development regulations associated with the village designations will
be reviewed and updated. This will help to ensure that existing and new services in these
communities can be maintained or developed in a manner that supports the character of the rural
village. Village Design Guidelines will also be developed to help support the retention of the area’s
character.
Another frequently suggested tool for addressing both the preservation of agricultural land and
controlling growth within Harford County is the use of transfer of development rights (TDR). While
this Plan recognizes the Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) program as the most effective
measure to date for protecting the rural area, it also recognizes the importance of a TDR program.
The County’s TDR provision will be reevaluated and amended as part of the comprehensive Zoning
Code update to improve its effectiveness. The program should continue to provide for the transfer of
development rights between agriculturally zoned properties. Additional preservation measures
should be required of both the sending and receiving properties to help maintain the viability of
agricultural operations.
The protection of farmland, however, is just one component of the program that must be
implemented to support both the agricultural community and the rural character of the County. A
successful rural program must also provide farmers with opportunities to engage in “state of the art”
farming practices to enhance their industry. Likewise, it must support changing market demands as
farming coexists with the County’s growing population. Value-added enterprises are growing in
number and must also be recognized and supported as a valuable component of the County’s
agricultural base.
The 1997 Agricultural Economic Development Initiative established specific actions and programs
to support these efforts. These actions were reviewed and reprioritized as part of the AG 2000
Initiative. This program should be reevaluated on a regular basis to help guide the County’s
agricultural economic program.
103
Another important component of keeping a viable agricultural economy is minimizing the conflicts
that can occur when residential development intermixes with agricultural activities. This Plan
recognizes the need to review the Zoning Code and expand the protection offered farmers. As part
of the comprehensive update of the Code, specific right to farm provisions will be addressed.
Additionally, the list of alternative uses that support agricultural economic initiatives should be
reviewed and modified to support current market demands.
To further protect future farming operations, it is recommended that adequate buffers be established
on properties being developed for residential purposes. Careful consideration must be given to
providing these buffers in a manner that supports the clustering of lots while still providing adequate
separation between the uses. These buffers must be maintained by the property owner(s) and must be
subject to an easement to ensure their protection.
As part of the Zoning Code update, the County will review and consider revision of the
Conservation Development Standards. This Plan recommends that Conservation Development
Standards or some form of clustering be explored for all new residential developments in the rural
area. It is recommended that new development maximize the amount of land available as active
farmland, open space, or buffers. A specific limit on the percentage of the property that can be
developed should also beconsidered. Areas not included in the specified building envelope should
be subject to an easement.
According to State data, previously created lots in the agricultural district average about three acres
in size, which results in valuable agricultural lands being unnecessarily lost to development. In
addition to preserving land, implementation of clustering can reduce the visual impacts of a
development on the rural landscape. It can also reduce the amount of clearing, grading, and road
construction required thereby providing environmental and economic advantages.
Transportation accessibility plays an integral role in the vitality of rural communities. Farming
communities are becoming increasingly more dependent on suitable transportation, as well as
adequate roads and bridges to meet their logistical needs. Although mobility and accessibility in
rural areas is imperative to the well being of these communities, preservation of scenic features and
rural roads are still a priority supported by this Plan.
104
Historic Preservation
GOAL: Protect and preserve the County’s historic heritage.
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - Improve preservation of historic resources
Harford County has a strong record of recognizing the importance of its historic resources. Nearly
2,000 historically significant sites have been inventoried and the information filed with the Maryland
Historical Trust. Of these, 24 have also been designated as Harford County Landmarks. There are
more than 70 individual sites and districts in Harford County listed in the National Register, and
community members in the village area of Whiteford/Cardiff are interested in having this area
designated a National Register District (Figure 37). Harford County contains one National Historic
Landmark – Sion Hill, and is also home to a Certified Maryland Heritage Area - the Lower
Susquehanna Heritage Greenway.
The Historic Preservation Element Plan guides preservation efforts in the County. The Department
of Planning and Zoning, in cooperation with the Historic Preservation Commission, oversees
implementation of the Plan. The Department assists the Historic Preservation Commission to
respond to citizen and governmental inquiries about historic sites, to act as a liaison between history-
minded private groups and County government, to encourage and assist private property owners to
nominate sites to the National Register or County Landmarks lists, and to generally oversee
preservation efforts in Harford County.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION POLICY 1 - Foster awareness of the benefits of historic

preservation among the County’s citizens.
1. Review and revise the Historic Preservation Element Plan.
2. Develop a procedure to maintain and update historic inventories on a regular basis.
3. Require documentation of historic resources that cannot be renovated or saved.
4. Develop and implement an educational program that emphasizes the role and benefits of
historic preservation.
5. Develop and implement Village Design Standards to help protect the character of designated
historic villages.
6. Promote Heritage Tourism as an economic benefit to the County.
105
106
T
$
TABERNACLE EVANGELICAL CHURCH Ú
Ê
1$T$T Ê STANSBURY MANSION

Ú 2 17
RIGBIE HOUSE
$
T
$
T
T
$
$
T
$ Ú
Ê
T
$T
$
$$
T
T$T$
T
T
$
DEER CREEK FRIENDS MEETINGHOUSE & CEMETERY Ú
Ê
T$
$
T
$5
T
T $
$ T
$
T
$
T
$T$
$
T
$
T
$ T$
T
TT T
$
T
$ T$
$ T
$
ÚKING & QUEEN SEATS
Ê $
T
$ T
$ T$
$
T
$T
$
T$
$ TT
$
T$
T $
T
$ T
T
$ T
$ T
$T
$ T
$ TT
$ T
$ T
$
T $
$ T$
$T
D.H. SPRINGHOUSE
T
$ T
$ T
$ T
T Ê
T$
$ Ú
T
$T
$
T
$
T
$
T$
$ T $
T$ T$
T$T $
$
T T$
T
$ T T
$
T
$
T
$
T
$
T
$
T
$
T $
$
T
$ T$
$ T T
$
T
$ T$
$ T
T
$T
$
T
$ T
$ T$
T
T
$ T
$
T$
$
T
$
T T
$ T
$T
$ 4 T
$T
$ T$
T$
$ TT
$T
$ T
$
T
$
TÊ
$ T
Ú
T
$
T
$
T
$
6T $
$ TT$
$T$T T
$T$
$
$
T
$
T
T
$TT
$
3$T T
$ T
$
T
$
T
$ T
$T
$T
$
T
$
T
$
T
$
DEER
CREEKT$
$ T $
T
$
T
$T
$
T$
T
$
T
T
$
T
$ T$
$ T$
T
$ T
$
T
$
T
$
T T
$ $
THOMAS RUN CHURCH $
Ú
Ê
T$
T$
T $ T
T
$
T
$ T
$T
$ T
$
T$
$T$
T
$
T$T
$ HARMONY
T PRESBYTERIAN $
T
$T
$T
$ T
$
T $
$ T T$ T
T
$ T
$
$
T T$
$T $ T CHURCH
OLD BRICK BAPTIST CHURCH T
$ T
$
T
$
T
$
T
$ T
$
T$
$T$
T Ú
Ê T$
$ T
T
$
CHURCHVILLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH & CEMETERY
T
$
7 Ú
ÊT
$
T
$
8 T
$ Ú $T
Ê
T ST. JAMES A.M.E.
$
T $
$ T CHURCH OF GRAVEL T$
$T$
T$
T
T
$T
$
T
$T
$
T
$ T
$ HILL & CEMETERY T
$
T
$T
$
T
$
T
$
T
$
T
$ T
$
T$
$ T
BEL AIR POST OFFICE
T Ê
$
Ú$T$T$T
Ê 9
ÚHAYS HOUSE Ê CHRISTOPHER'S CAMP
14 T
$
T
$
Ú SWANSBURY
T
$ T
$ Ú
ÊT
$
FALLSTON FRIENDS SCHOOLHOUSE T
$ T$
$T
LITTLE FALLS MEETING HOUSE & BURIAL GROUND
BON AIR
Ú
ÊT
$
T
$ Ú
Ê
T
$
ÚGREENWOOD$T
Ê
WHITAKER'S MILL & MILLER'S HOUSEÊ
T
$
ÚT$
$ 10
T 13
T$
$T
Ú
ÊT ST. MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH $
$ T 16
11 T
$ WOODSIDEÊ ÚT
$ SOPHIA'S DAIRY SPESUTIA VESTRY HOUSE
T
$ BUSH HOTELÊÚ Ú
ÊT
$ Ú
ÊT SPESUTIA EPISCOPAL CHURCH
$
McCOMAS INSTITUTEÊ Ú & CEMETERY
T
$ ST. FRANCIS
T$
$T DE SALESÊÚ Ú
Ê
T
$
T
$ NELSON-REARDON-KENNARD HOUSE
Ú
Ê Historic Landmarks 12 CHURCH
T
$ National Register Sites
Historic Districts
Historic Districts Ú
Ê
JOPPA HISTORIC DISTRICT$
T T
$
1 Ivory Mills
2 Mill Green
15 T
$
3 My Lady's Manor
4 Lower Deer Creek Valley N
5 Darlington
6 Silver Houses
7 Medical Hall
8 Finney Houses
9 Bel Air Courthouse
10 Whitaker Mill
11 Olney Farm
12 Jerusalem Mill
13 Harford Furnace
14 Havre de Grace
15 Joppa
16 Plumb Point
17 Berkley HISTORIC PRESERVATION MAP
HARFORD COUNTY, MARYLAND
Figure 37
107
108
SUMMARY
Harford County’s rich cultural heritage is reflected in its diverse stock of historic buildings,
structures, and sites. Enhancing the County’s overall quality of life, these historic resources
contribute to the area’s attractiveness, lend a sense of community to villages and neighborhoods, and
improve the local economy by the visitors and businesses that they draw. Nevertheless, as
development and revitalization move forward, the need to improve awareness about the value of
these resources increases.
The Historic Preservation Element Plan establishes a strong program for the protection of historic
and archeological resources and the education of the community about these resources. While many
of the recommendations included in this Plan are still viable, the Historic Preservation Element Plan
needs to be reviewed and revised to ensure its consistency with the programs set forth in this Land
Use Element Plan. Additional steps also need to be taken to improve the protection, or at a
minimum, the documentation of resources that are threatened by neglect or proposed development
activities.
Specific guidance needs to be developed that will help to identify historic structures that are in
danger of being lost. There should also be directives for working with the owner to either document
the resource or incorporate it into the proposed new use in a manner that recognizes its importance to
the history of the County.
Education is the main tool the County can use to encourage historic preservation and adaptive reuse.
The Historic Preservation Element Plan contains a detailed program that should be followed to
enhance the public’s knowledge of what owning a historic property means. When implemented, this
program will broaden understanding and support for the retention and reuse of historic sites and
structures throughout the County.
Protection of historic resources within the County’s historic villages and municipalities will help
enhance past and future investments by businesses and property owners. An important element of
protecting this investment is ensuring that all improvements and development within historic areas is
undertaken in a manner consistent with the community’s historic and architectural character. To
help achieve this, Village Design Standards shall be developed. These standards will be based on a
village characterization study that will be completed for each of the historic villages.
Preserving the County’s historic and archeological resources provides another economic benefit to
the community through heritage tourism. The importance of heritage tourism is evident in the State’s
commitment to the Rural Legacy and Maryland Heritage Area Programs. Harford County has two
designated Rural Legacy areas, and it is home to a Certified Maryland Heritage Area along the
Susquehanna River. Rural Legacy helps to protect the rural and historic character of an area through
land acquisitions and easements, while the Heritage Area Program supports projects that enhance the
experience of heritage visitors. The Historic Preservation Element Plan defines the role the County
should take in supporting these efforts, and it is recommended that these steps be implemented to
ensure the expansion of heritage tourism as an economic benefit to the County.
109
NATURAL RESOURCES
GOAL: Preserve and protect the County's natural environment.
The County recognizes that unique and plentiful natural resources are a necessity for the quality of
life that is desirable to residents and visitors. From the many streams and rivers emptying into the
Chesapeake Bay, to mineral resources supplying materials to the economic development of the
region, the County’s natural resources are valuable assets that contribute to the quality of life of
residents.
One of the primary functions of the Land Use Element Plan is to manage development in a manner
that ensures compatibility with identified natural features, while minimizing the potential for long-
term adverse impacts on the County's environment. Complementing the Land Use Element Plan is
the Natural Resources Element Plan, prepared by the County in 1998, which addresses, in more
detail, protection of the County’s natural resources and sensitive area requirements, as directed by
the Maryland Planning Act of 1992.
Natural Resources
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - Protect water quality and quantity.
Clean water is fundamental to the quality of life of Harford County residents. Whether it is for a
safe drinking water supply, or for recreational or aesthetic purposes, Harford County must protect
the quality and quantity of its surface and ground water resources. This can best be accomplished by
addressing land use activities and resource protection on a watershed basis. There are nine major
watersheds in Harford County, draining to the Susquehanna River, Bush River, and Gunpowder
River, and ultimately to the Chesapeake Bay. Protection of the County’s water resources in turn
results in positive impacts to the Bay.
NATURAL RESOURCE POLICY 1 - Protect and maintain high quality surface and ground
water resources.
1. Continue to coordinate with the Department of Public Works on watershed studies and
initiatives to minimize impacts to water quality from existing and future land uses.
2. Review and revise the Zoning Code to promote low impact development and the use of green
building design principles to decrease impervious surfaces and impacts to water quality.
3. Adopt wellhead protection regulations within designated aquifer recharge areas and water
supply areas in order to protect the quality and quantity of these resources.
4. Review and revise protection strategies for surface water sources such as Deer Creek and
Winters Run.
110
5. Continue to update and monitor the County’s Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Program.
6. Advance the goals of the Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategies program by working with
County departments and local jurisdictions to promote projects that meet the goals of the
Chesapeake 2000 Bay Agreement.
7. Review standards for sediment and erosion control and stormwater management; ensure
proper maintenance and functioning of these facilities.
8. Review and revise existing programs and, where needed, develop new programs to ensure the
continued preservation and protection of the County's air, land, and water resources.
9. Maintain the County’s Chesapeake Bay Partners Gold Award in successive years.
CITIZEN ISSUE 2 - Protect all wetlands.
Wetlands are transitional areas between upland and aquatic habitats. There are both tidal and
nontidal wetlands. These resources provide a wealth of environmental benefits, including flood
management, filtering stormwater of pollutants, and providing habitat for rare plant and animal
species. In addition to State regulations protecting these resources, the County’s Natural Resource
District and Critical Area regulations also contribute to their protection. Harford County works in
coordination with the Army Corps of Engineers and Maryland Department of the Environment to
enforce wetland regulations.
NATURAL RESOURCE POLICY 2 - Protect and enhance the County’s wetland resources.
1. Revise the Natural Resource District regulations per the recommendations of the Builders for
the Bay initiative.
2. Encourage the preservation of existing wetlands on development sites.
3. Improve coordination with the Army Corps of Engineers and the Maryland Department of
Environment to ensure wetlands regulations are being implemented and enforced.
CITIZEN ISSUE 3 - Protection and wise use of trees and woodlands.
Woodlands are a valuable natural resource, providing a host of benefits. Trees filter air and water,
serve as buffers between land uses, provide wildlife habitat and areas for passive recreation, and may
be harvested for fiber products such as timber and pulp for paper. Large contiguous expanses of
forest occur in the State Parks along Deer Creek, the Little Gunpowder Falls, and the Susquehanna
River, as well as in the Broad Creek watershed in the northern end of the County. Conservation of
forest resources during the development process is addressed through the County’s Forest
Conservation provision within the Zoning Code, which requires reforestation or payment of fees-in-
lieu for forest impacts. The Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program administered by the Soil
111
Conservation District has resulted in a significant increase in forested stream buffers in the rural area
of the County. Efforts should be increased to protect the remaining valuable forest resources in the
County, and to reforest/afforest stream valleys and riparian buffers.
NATURAL RESOURCE POLICY 3 - Improve the protection of the County’s forest resources.
1. Review the County’s Forest Conservation provision within the Zoning Code and other
programs regulating activities within forests, to identify areas where program effectiveness
and efficiency can be enhanced.
2. Identify and map large contiguous forested areas in the County and investigate mechanisms to
conserve these areas.
3. Retain forests on development sites to the greatest extent possible through the use of low
impact development techniques, and promote conservation/reforestation over the use of fee-in-
lieu.
4. Research incentives for residential lot owners to maintain trees and enhance habitat.
CITIZEN ISSUE 4 - Preserve/set-aside more natural resource areas and increase buffers.
Preservation of natural areas and greenways are important goals for the County to pursue. Two of
the largest greenways in the County are the State Parks along the Little Gunpowder Falls and the
Susquehanna River. Several State, County, municipal and private organizations are working
cooperatively to develop the Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway. In this same area the Lower
Deer Creek Valley Rural Legacy Area is preserving large contiguous expanses of open space in
private ownership. The development of the Ma and Pa Trail System, as well as the preservation of
large expanses of land on the Oakington Peninsula through County ownership, are examples of the
County’s efforts to preserve natural areas.
NATURAL RESOURCE POLICY 4 - Improve the protection and enhancement of open space
and greenways in the County, and provide adequate buffers to the County’s natural resource
areas.
1. Maintain up-to-date inventories of natural resources and sensitive species within the County.
2. Evaluate and revise existing programs to further the preservation and protection of the
County’s natural environment.
3. Preserve resources within the Development Envelope in order to ensure renewable and
sustainable communities.
112
4. Update the County’s Land Preservation and Recreation Plan and the Natural Resources
Element Plan.
5. Review and revise existing open space requirements in the Zoning Code and explore
opportunities for improvement/enhancement.
6. Target reforestation efforts to riparian buffers and connectivity to existing forest resources.
SUMMARY
Harford County affords its citizens a wealth of natural resources. Natural resource protection has
been, and will continue to be, a major focus of the County's land use planning process.
Environmental protection has been realized through a number of existing programs, which include
the Natural Resources District, the Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Management Program, the
Floodplain Ordinance, and the Forest Conservation provisions of the Zoning Code. The Natural
Resources District, one of the first local stream and wetlands protection programs in the State,
protects streams, steep slopes, floodplains, and wetlands with development restrictions and buffers.
The Critical Area Program restricts development near the Chesapeake Bay and protects fish and
wildlife habitats. The Floodplain Ordinance restricts construction within the 100-year floodplain.
Finally, the Forest Conservation provisions address the need to maintain forested areas throughout
the County as development occurs. In addition, the County recently adopted new stormwater
management regulations that address both water quantity and quality. As a result of the new
regulations, stormwater flow mimics the natural flow of water resulting in reduced impacts on
stream channels. All of these programs are working to protect the County's natural resources during
the development process. These programs will be reviewed to determine where improvements can
be made.
The County has adopted a Natural Resources Element Plan (NREP) to complement the County’s
Land Use Element Plan and further the initiatives of the Maryland Planning Act of 1992. The Act
requires local jurisdictions to incorporate environmental stewardship in land use plans through the
direction of the eight "Visions," one of which states that sensitive areas be protected. Harford
County's Natural Resource Element Plan fulfills this mandate. The NREP inventories the County’s
major natural resources, lays out a series of goals, objectives and recommendations to preserve and
protect the County’s resources, describes current regulatory measures and resource protection
programs, and presents an action strategy to meet the goals and objectives of the Plan. The NREP
will be updated to incorporate new programs and initiatives to better protect the County’s resources.
The Bush River Watershed Management Plan is the first comprehensive watershed management
plan in the County. It was completed in 2003 and presents a strategy to improve the overall
conditions in the Bush River watershed and reduce pollutant loads. This watershed covers a third of
the County, with a large portion lying within the Development Envelope. A large percentage of the
County’s population resides within this watershed; therefore, education of the public and
development of a stewardship ethic are essential to fostering a restoration of our urban watersheds.
The County is committed to maintaining ecological health and vitality within the Development
Envelope, as well as preserving our rural heritage, in order to have sustainable and livable
communities. An implementation committee is in the process of being formed to oversee
113
implementation of the Bush River Plan through the protection of “sensitive” subwatersheds and the
restoration of “impacted” subwatersheds.
The Department of Public Works, in coordination with the Department of Planning and Zoning, will
continue to study the County’s watersheds. The protection and enhancement of stream buffers and
wetland resources, preservation of forested lands, promotion of low impact development techniques,
and preservation of rare habitats will remain a priority to help assure the ecological health, vitality,
and continuity of the County's natural resources.
Protection of the County’s water resources also is essential to maintaining a clean and adequate
supply of drinking water. Drinking water in the County is supplied by both surface and ground
water resources, and includes both public water supplies as well as private systems (Figure 38).
Within the Development Envelope, public drinking water is supplied by the Winter’s Run Watershed
-- covered by the Bush River Watershed Plan, as well as the Susquehanna Aqueduct operated by
Baltimore City, whose water supply comes from either the Loch Raven Reservoir or the
Susquehanna River. The Deer Creek Watershed is also a source of drinking water for Aberdeen
Proving Grounds. The Army recently privatized this operation, transferring it to the City of
Aberdeen. Watershed protection programs within these source water areas are critical to
maintaining the quality and quantity of these supplies.
In addition to the surface water sources, groundwater resources are an important element of the
County’s drinking water supply. The Perryman wellfield provides approximately three million
gallons per day to the County’s public water supply. In a study completed in 1997, recharge zones
for the wellfield were identified and protection strategies were presented. The County will adopt the
protection strategies presented in the “Perryman Wellhead Protection Plan” as part of this Plan in
order to ensure that this high quality water source remains usable.
Smaller community-based groundwater supply systems exist in several communities within the
County; some have wellhead protection strategies adopted through Community Associations. The
Maryland Department of Environment is in the process of completing source water assessments for
all small community-based water systems. The County will pursue a strategy to help protect all of
these groundwater resources, including individual wells in rural areas that provide drinking water for
residents not served by public systems. Watershed protection strategies, whether in urban or rural
watersheds, are essential to maintaining adequate and safe water resources for a multitude of needs.
The Natural Resources Element Plan also calls for the County to streamline and coordinate existing
local environmental programs with those of other State and Federal agencies, such as the
Chesapeake Bay Tributaries Strategies Program and forest and wetlands regulatory protection. In
2000, Harford County signed the Chesapeake Bay Local Partnership Agreement, committing the
County, along with other jurisdictions throughout Maryland, to partnering with the State to assist in
implementing the Chesapeake 2000 Agreement, charting a course for the restoration of the
Chesapeake Bay. Harford County lies within the Upper Western Shore Tributary Basin, and is
working with the Upper Western Shore Tributary Team and the State of Maryland to develop
Tributary Strategies to help the watershed meet nutrient reduction goals established by the Bay
Program. As Harford County works to preserve and protect its own environmental integrity, these
efforts will help implement the Tributary Strategies.
114
PENNSYLVANIA
CECIL COUNTY
HAVRE DE GRACE
BEL AIR
ABERDEEN
4
1 CHESAPEAKE
BAY
BALTIMORE COUNTY
7
6
Harford 2
County ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND
(APG)
Water
Source APG
Protection
Area N
Surface Water Source Intake Points
1. Maryland-American
2. Aberdeen Proving Ground
3. Deer Creek, City of Aberdeen
4. Susquehanna River
5. Susquehanna River
Groundwater Source Areas Source: Harford County Planning & Zoning.

Figure 38
6. Harford County Wellfields
7. City of Aberdeen Wellfields
115
NOTE: The Susquehanna River also serves as a public water source for Havre de Grace, Harford County, and Baltimore City.
116
Mineral Resources
GOAL: Manage the County’s mineral resources to provide for current and future production in
harmony with their community setting.
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - Ensure the compatibility and viability of existing mineral resource
operations with the needs of the surrounding community.
The State of Maryland identified the need to protect and manage mineral resources, and requires that
this be an element of the comprehensive planning process. Harford County is underlain by a wide
variety of extractable minerals. There are currently eight mining operations with active permits
located in various areas of the County. These operations provide valuable, nonrenewable natural
resources that are vital to maintaining a sound, balanced, and diversified local economy. The
economic importance of mining industries is significant to the County, and must be balanced with
the quality of life issues of surrounding residents. Mining operations and reclamation plans must
meet the needs of operators, and address the needs of surrounding residents.
MINERAL RESOURCE POLICY 1 - Manage the County’s mineral resources to provide for
current and future production in harmony with their community setting.
1. Work with the community and the State to ensure that mining operation plans are designed to
protect the environment and address compatibility with surrounding land uses.
2. Review existing County regulations to ensure that they adequately address buffer zones,
minimization of impacts to surrounding land uses, and standards and procedures for
expansion.
CITIZEN ISSUE 2 - Appropriate reuse of mineral extraction sites.
Prior to the end of mining operations, reclamation plans must be developed to address site
stabilization and the subsequent use of the site. The mine operators, as well as permitting agencies
and surrounding landowners must all be involved in the development of reclamation plans. The
Joppa/Joppatowne Community Plan, adopted in 2002, addresses restoration of the mineral extraction
sites located within that community area and states that there is a strong consensus that these areas
be reclaimed as green space. There is also strong support within the Aberdeen/Havre de Grace and
Whiteford/Cardiff communities to discourage the use of abandoned quarries as landfills because of
the potential impacts to groundwater.
MINERAL RESOURCE POLICY 2 - Plan for the future reclamation of inactive mining sites
in order to protect the natural environment and ensure compatibility with surrounding uses.
117
1. Work with the community, the State, and the site owners to ensure that restoration plans are
both compatible with surrounding land uses and adaptable for alternate land uses.
2. Work with the community and the State to ensure that restoration plans are designed to protect
the environment.
3. Create a framework for developing restoration plans.
SUMMARY
An important natural resource to be addressed by the County, especially for its economic
significance, is mineral resources. The State of Maryland has identified the need to protect and
manage mineral resources and requires all counties to prepare a mineral resources element as part of
their comprehensive planning process. That element must coordinate local land use planning with
the programs and goals of the Maryland Department of Environment (MDE). These plans must
contain provisions for protection of the natural environment and identification of subsequent uses
which are beneficial and compatible with the surrounding area.
While most of the mining operations in Harford County occur in the U. S. Route 40/I-95 corridor,
remnants of past mining activity can be found in other parts of the County, most notably the slate
and green marble quarries in the Whiteford-Cardiff area. A map of sites with permits recognized by
the Mineral, Oil, and Gas Division of MDE is provided in Figure 39. Harford County has been
fortunate to have recoverable deposits of these minerals, which provide the County with an
inexpensive and convenient source of building materials. Roads, residences, commercial buildings,
public utilities, and industrial facilities require the use of these materials. Mineral extraction
industries also provide jobs and income as mined-materials are frequently transported to markets
outside of the County.
Mineral extraction industries often find themselves in conflict with surrounding land uses, frequently
because they lie within the Development Envelope. Assuring the continued viability of these
resources, while maintaining a high quality of life for residents, will require the County to become
actively engaged in addressing concerns regarding compatibility of uses and site reclamation.
Although State law vests much of the regulatory authority regarding mining operations with State
agencies, communication and coordination between State and County agencies is essential in the
regulation of the mining industry.
Reclamation of mining sites is an important issue to the surrounding community. Plans for
reclamation of these sites must be a cooperative effort on the part of mine operators, permitting
agencies, and surrounding landowners to assure that reclamation, restoration and/or stabilization
plans are compatible with surrounding land uses, address monitoring, maintenance and bonding
requirements, and address the concerns of the community. The County views the protection of
groundwater quality as a primary objective in all reclamation plans.
118
PENNSYLVANIA
CECIL COUNTY
8
7
HAVRE DE GRACE
BEL AIR
6 ABERDEEN
BALTIMORE COUNTY CHESAPEAKE

BAY
Harford 12 5
County ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND
Mineral 3
Resource 4
Sites
1. T.C. Simons, Inc.
2. Daneker Sand & Gravel
3. Stancills, Inc. N
4. Harford Sands, Inc.
5. Spencer Sand & Gravel, Inc.
6. Redland Genstar, Inc.
7. Maryland Reclamation Assoc. Inc.
8. The Arundel Corporation
NOTE: Sites with active permits as of October 1, 2003.

SOURCE: Maryland Department of the Environment,
Water Resources Administration, Surface Mining Division.
Figure 39
119
120
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
GOAL: To become a dynamic and diverse business destination where industry supports the
highest quality of living.
Harford County has implemented an economic development program that promotes business growth
and new investment that generates valuable employment opportunities and supports the development
of a sustainable, dynamic economy over the long-term. Specifically, this effort is aimed at
capitalizing on Harford’s strategic mid-Atlantic location in the I-95 corridor and proximity to the
regional assets located in the Baltimore metropolitan region. Cost advantages, "Fast Track"
permitting capabilities, and the commerce and resources associated with the U.S. Army’s advanced
testing, engineering, research and development, and training mission at Aberdeen Proving Ground
(APG) are additional assets.
The Office of Economic Development has developed a Technology Development Strategic Plan that
advocates higher education program development and targets the technology sectors. The Plan
identifies two technology districts along the I-95/U.S. Route 40 corridor. The Central Harford
Technology District along U.S. Route 40 and centering on Water’s Edge, and the technology district
located in the downtown area of Havre de Grace.
CITIZEN ISSUE 1 - Direct industrial and commercial growth to suitable areas.
There are currently 8,874 acres of land zoned for industrial use in Harford County, of which 2,866
acres are completely developed, leaving 6,008 acres of partially or completely undeveloped sites in
the County. There are 773 industrial sites within the Development Envelope consisting of 7,969
acres of land. Of these, 311 sites totaling 5,314 acres are partially or completely undeveloped.
Suitable sites take into consideration the infrastructure, Adequate Public Facilities legislation, design
compatibility and characteristics of the area. These areas are located within the Development
Envelope and protect the agricultural areas of the County. A majority of suitable sites are located
along the southern region of the County along Interstate 95 and U. S. Route 40. The Edgewood
Community Plan identifies opportunities for commercial and industrial uses within existing
industrial parks and along U. S. Route 40. The Joppa/Joppatowne Community Plan calls for the
establishment of a Planned Employment Center on MD 152 south of the I-95 interchange. This is
visualized as an upscale mixed-use employment center intended to attract high-end office users in
the technical, research, and financial services.
The creation of the Mixed Office (MO) land use category is designed to direct industrial and
commercial growth to prime economic development areas. These areas fall within two main
interchanges of Interstate 95, located at MD Routes 22 and 543. Development under the MO
designation would provide opportunities for corporate offices, research & development facilities, and
other uses that will provide the employment sector with high quality jobs. Therefore, formal
establishment of use standards and guidelines for the MO designated locations in the County is
essential to accommodate targeted development.
121
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY 1 - Promote the location of industrial and
commercial development in suitable areas.
1. Encourage the growth of employment centers at the major intersections of I-95 at Route 152,
Route 543, Route 22, and Route 155.
2. Explore means of coordinating development efforts with the County’s three municipalities.
3. Expand the Higher Education Applied Technology (HEAT) Center.
4. Provide flexible “mixed-use” zoning tools that would promote the redevelopment of areas in
need of revitalization.
5. Provide incentives to industries that support their employees utilizing public transportation.
6. Consider rezoning excess commercial/retail zoned land to provide more flexible, mixed-use
opportunities.
7. Study areas along the I-95 corridor to identify the potential for new employment centers in
accordance with the Joppa/Joppatowne Community Plan, only that portion of the I-95/152
interchange inside the Development Envelope will be included in a study area.
CITIZEN ISSUE 2 - Improve employment opportunities within the County through high
technology business.
Harford County, in association with Claggett Wolfe Associates, recently completed the Technology
Development Strategic Plan (Strategic Plan). The Strategic Plan indicates that the County is in the
early stages of integrating commercial technology clusters within its economy. The Strategic Plan
also notes that the County offers the essential ingredients needed to support and sustain the growth
of technology ventures. The County has attracted a solid base of growing technology ventures such
as California Microwave, Northrop Grumman Information Technologies, Booz Allen Hamilton,
Battelle’s Eastern Science & Technology Center, Science Applications International Corporation
(SAIC), SURVICE Engineering, Smiths Detection, SafeNet and Nutramax Laboratories.
This Strategic Plan analyzes Harford County’s unique strengths and recommends steps to help fuel
industry growth and shape the County’s future. Specific actions to help foster defense
diversification activity, strengthen mission operations at Aberdeen Proving Ground, expand higher
education resources, and enhance long-term quality-of-life factors are included. In total, 83 specific
actions are proposed to promote development of what the Strategic Plan identified as Harford
County’s eight emerging technology clusters.
Further, the Strategic Plan evaluates the opportunities, current industry trends and determines that
eight technology sectors offered the best opportunity to grow and develop in Harford County. These
sectors include: Advanced and Engineered Materials, Advanced Manufacturing Technologies,
122
Automotive Design and Testing, Information Technology, Materials Testing, Technical Services,
Biotechnology Scale-Up, Environmental Services.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY 2 - Implement a program aimed at enticing

technology industries to locate and expand within the County.
1. Collect, examine and analyze information that will be useful in monitoring technology
development activity.
2. Promote support systems, such as incubator facilities, that address the needs of the
technology industry.
3. Develop a telecom infrastructure map serving each of the technology districts, with
consideration to redundant service, and explore alternatives to improving telecom
infrastructure.
4. Promote workforce technology development through education, workshops and other

resources.
5. Promote technology education in the Harford County Public School system.
6. Encourage technology industries to locate and expand at the HEAT Center and MO
designated areas.
7. Encourage technology industries within the Technology Districts.
8. Support the retention and expansion of Research & Development activities at Aberdeen
Proving Ground.
9. Enhance programs to support technology-oriented development.
CITIZEN ISSUE 3 - Provide infrastructure-funding mechanisms for Economic Development
Revenue-generating tools should be explored to help address infrastructure requirements within the
County, particularly for schools and roads. These revenue sources would then defray the costs of the
improvements required to serve the general population.
On the Perryman Peninsula, a significant portion of industrially zoned land remains undeveloped due
to a lack of infrastructure. While the Peninsula has long been recognized as a significant economic
engine for the County, development of the area has not occurred in part because of the road network.
A visioning workshop for the Perryman Peninsula was completed in 2001, addressing the issues
facing the development of the 2,000 acres of industrial zoned property on the Peninsula. This
process addressed the need to relieve the impacts of development, such as transportation, and to
123
allow for a mixture of uses that would reduce these impacts while also protecting the Perryman
Wellfield.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY 3 - Improve infrastructure-funding mechanisms for

responsible economic growth.
1. Develop a new revenue source dedicated to transportation improvements associated with

economic development objectives.
2. Consider legislation for special tax districts and/or developer agreements.
3. Explore developer incentives for investment in infrastructure.
4. Provide development initiatives to guide and foster development of the Perryman Peninsula
while protecting the Perryman Wellfield.
5. Support public private partnerships that address infrastructure issues.
CITIZEN ISSUE 4 - Concerned with the encroachment from the Whiteford Industrial zoned
property.
The Whiteford/Cardiff area has an abundance of industrial zoned land. For the most part, this
industrial zoning was carried over from previous quarry and cannery operations. The community
has expressed concern about the development of these properties and would like to see them
redeveloped in a manner that addresses the needs of the area. Likewise, the County desires to
concentrate industrial uses on more suitable land within the Designated Growth Areas.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY 4 - Explore appropriate reuses for industrially

zoned lands in rural areas.
1. Explore alternative zoning classifications for the GI zoned properties in the Whiteford area
that would foster uses appropriate for the community.
2. Protect the rural characteristics and natural resources of this area.
3. Attract agriculture-related businesses to existing but under-utilized industrial and

commercial land in the rural area.
CITIZEN ISSUE 5 - Agriculture is the economic backbone of the County -- encourage farming
A component of the County’s economic development strategy is focused on maintaining and

developing a strong agriculture economy. Over the past years, economic development strategies
124
have included changes to the agricultural zoning district to allow more flexibility in uses on a
farming operation and farmers markets to provide additional avenues for selling local products. The
1997 “Agricultural Economic Development Initiative” proposes specific actions and programs for
the purpose of preserving and enhancing the economic viability of agriculture in Harford County.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY 5 - Enhance the economic viability of agriculture.
1. Continue to develop and implement agricultural economic development strategies that

enhance continued agriculture production.
2. Expand the opportunities for industry diversification and on-farm production.
3. Enhance existing farm markets and expand when feasible.
SUMMARY
The Harford County Office of Economic Development understands the increasing importance of
location to businesses and the numerous factors contributing to the complexity of today’s corporate
location decisions. Harford County offers businesses access to some of the world's richest high-tech
resources, including the technology assets of APG. Through the Team APG Business Development
Office, business leaders have access to information, opportunities and state-of-the-art facilities
available at APG. Government efforts to encourage technology development are guided by the
Technology Development Strategic Plan, crafted to support the expansion and success of a diverse,
knowledge-based economy.
Businesses are also drawn to Harford County's unique quality of life. The community offers strong
schools, safe streets, open space and a wide array of recreation opportunities, including some of the
finest golf in the world. The County is dedicated to ensuring our business environment enhances the
competitive advantage and success of the business base.
Aberdeen Proving Ground is an economic generator for Harford County and a key element in the
nation’s defense and Homeland Security effort. APG is the Army’s oldest active proving ground
and the origin of numerous technical achievements in military intelligence, medical research,
engineering, and computer technology. Today, APG’s capabilities represent every facet of
technology and enhance its emergence as a viable business partner, combining the best of industry
with the latest in research and development expertise. Battelle’s Eastern Science Technology Center
is also seen as a large technology generator for commercial and intellectual property activity.
Building on a growing technology industry, the County’s Technology Development Strategic Plan
identifies specific steps that should be undertaken to expand this economic venture. The land use
and infrastructure planning recommendations included in the Strategic Plan should be coordinated
with this Plan. Consideration should be given to updating the Zoning Code to improve land use
patterns in technology districts to: restrict incompatible uses, encourage mixed-use development that
is supportive of the technology sectors, and create a sense of place for employees. The focus of
125
technology development, which is concentrated in the Technology Districts, should be evaluated and
the need for zoning changes to support this technology cluster should be evaluated.
The MO designations identified on the Land Use Element Plan, have defined boundaries within
which targeted uses should be located. In no case, shall this designation serve as an opening of the
Development Envelope. These areas are planned to promote major economic development
opportunities such as corporate offices, research and development facilities, and high-tech services
which create significant job opportunities and investment benefits. These areas may also include
limited retail uses to service the employment center. In order to help ensure that development of
these areas is completed in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding area, the Zoning Code
should be revised to include specific standards for development including use percentages.
Making the most of existing infrastructure, strategic location and available tax incentive programs,
recent planning efforts have produced positive results in the U.S. Route 40 Corridor. The
Commercial Revitalization District (CRD) was developed to help facilitate new investment and
business growth along U.S. Route 40 that would bring professional, service, and technology-related
industry. Community “visioning” sessions and County legislative action have resulted in a zoning
tool for the 19-mile CRD corridor. Enacted in July of 2000, the CRD provides more flexible use and
development regulations that to date have resulted in high value, mixed-use redevelopment projects.
Projects such as Water’s Edge are helping diversify the economic base, improve quality of life and
build a new future for the U. S. Route 40 Corridor and Harford County. More opportunities and
projects such as these should be explored and encouraged.
The Perryman Peninsula offers the County another opportunity for economic development. Located
adjacent to the City of Aberdeen and Aberdeen Proving Ground, the Perryman Peninsula is poised
for change. A vision plan has been prepared for the area that embraces advances in technology,
communication, transportation, and environmental conservation that will help transform the area into
a vital community that will serve the County’s economic development needs. Changes to the Zoning
Code should be proposed that support the plan for this area, while also protecting the Perryman
Wellfield.
Directing industrial and commercial activities to suitable areas requires coordination between the
Office of Economic Development and the Department of Planning and Zoning. It is recommended
that sufficient inventories of appropriately zoned land be maintained, and that appropriately zoned
land be located and developed in a manner harmonious with the surrounding communities.
Commercial services should be directed to designated Community and Neighborhood Centers, the
municipalities, and Rural Villages. Studies indicate that the County has a sufficient inventory of
industrial and commercially zoned land to meet its immediate and foreseeable needs. Therefore, no
additional industrial or commercial rezonings will be supported unless upon further review it is
determined that the proposed change would serve the needs of the County or community in a
particular location. Any additional zoning changes will be subject to a technical analysis to help
ensure that the proposed change will not generate adverse impacts in the community.
Harford County recognizes the agricultural community as an important segment of the economy.
Economic Development and local farmers work together to generate public awareness that farms
supply $400 million annually to Harford County’s economy. Ultimate stable growth and economic
126
viability in the industry is closely tied to other elements in the local and regional economy. The
County will continue to support and encourage growth of agribusiness ventures and protect natural
resources that fuel this economy. To further support this concept, industrial zoning within the
Village of Whiteford should be reexamined. The County should consider a classification that would
serve the needs of the village and surrounding area.
The collective impact of all these policies will have a positive impact on the County’s businesses and
resident workforce by creating an environment for sustainable, long-term economic gains.
127
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
128
COMMUNITY
AREAS
INTRODUCTION: COMMUNITY AREAS
Communities are defined by shared educational, cultural, civic, recreational, commercial facilities
and activities, natural features, and common interests. The importance of these may vary among
communities – and even among different groups within one community – but the location of these
facilities helps to reinforce the “sense of place” that residents feel. Strong communities and the
preservation of their “sense of place” are essential to the County’s future.
Recognizing this, the County introduced a Community Areas section to the 1996 Land Use Element
Plan. This was done to help ensure that each of the areas remain attractive, livable communities that
have a strong local identity. This concept is carried forward in this Plan, and the 12 community
areas are retained (Figure 40). Because the areas share many physical and cultural features, census
tracts and transportation zones were used to delineate the Community Areas. This allows for
development of data and information that is needed to address many community issues.
Each of the Community Area narratives provides information on existing population and growth
trends. A description of each community’s character along with a plan for the area is included.
Variations exist among the descriptions, but this reflects the uniqueness of each area. The plans
presented in this document will serve as a guide for development of the area, and as a continuing
communication link between the citizens, the Community Councils, and Harford County
Government.
129
130
PENNSYLVANIA
Whiteford
Norrisville Cardiff
Pylesville
Street CECIL COUNTY
Dublin
Darlington
Jarrettsville
Forest Hill
Churchville
Creswell Greater Aberdeen
Greater
Greater Havre de Grace
Bel Air
Fallston BEL AIR HAVRE DE GRACE
ABERDEEN
CHESAPEAKE
Abingdon
BAY
BALTIMORE COUNTY
Riverside
Joppa Emmorton
Joppatowne
(APG)
Edgewood
Harford
County APG
Community
Areas
N
Source: Harford County Planning & Zoning.
Note: Aberdeen Proving Ground is a federal government land mass

and is not a Community Area.
Figure 40
131
132
Greater Aberdeen - Greater Havre de Grace Community Area
Community Character
The Greater Aberdeen-Greater Havre de Grace Community Area is one of the most diverse and
environmentally sensitive areas of Harford County. The area represents a major portion of the
Development Envelope as defined in the Land Use Element Plan. Geographically, the area is in the
eastern portion of the County. It is bounded by the Chesapeake Bay and the Susquehanna River on
the east, Webster and Lapidum Roads on the north, Carsins Run Road and Stepney Road to the west,
and Grays Run, Bush River, and Aberdeen Proving Ground on the south. Included in the boundary
of the community area are the City of Aberdeen, a major industrial, commuter, and educational
center; the City of Havre de Grace, a tourism, historic, medical, and technology center; and
Aberdeen Proving Ground, a Federal installation and the County's major employer.
The Greater Aberdeen-Greater Havre de Grace Area had a 2000 population of 33,491 which is 15%
of the overall County population (Figure 41). Between 1990 and 2000 the population of the area
increased by over seven percent. Experiencing the largest increase was the 35-49 year old age group
which increased by 27% - from 6,454 to 8,190. The most significant decrease in population
occurred in the 20-34 year old age group. This group declined by 22% - from 7,599 to 5,924. During
this same time period, the number of households in the community increased by almost 12% going
from 11,863 to 13,265.
Aberdeen - Havre de Grace Demographic Profile: 1990 – 2000
1990 2000 Percent Change

Total Population 31,181 33,491 7.41%
Total Households 11,863 13,265 11.82%
Median Household Income (in current $) $30,712 $42,403 $38.07%
Employment 13,355 19,921 49.17%
Population By Race / Hispanic Origin
White 24,358 24,983 2.57%
Black 5,960 6,620 11.07%
American Indian/Alaska Native 98 85 -13.27%
Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 591 621 5.08%
Other 174 328 88.51%
Population of 2 or more Races NA 854 NA
Hispanic Origin 486 834 71.60%
Figure 41
133
Throughout the County, household income is up 37%. The median household income for this area
grew 38% in the last decade from $30,712 to $42,403. Households in this community earning over
$100,000 a year, increased by 320%, while households earning less than $50,000 a year decreased
by 17%. Total employment in this area increased by 49% from 13,355 to 19,921.
As a transportation hub, the area is serviced by I-95, U.S. Route 40, MD Routes 22, 7, and 155, as
well as the AMTRAK, CSX, and MARC rail lines. Airport facilities such as the Aldino Airpark,
Phillips Airfield, and Havre de Grace's seaplane base are also important transportation facilities
located in this area. Numerous marinas in the Susquehanna and Bush Rivers provide regional and
community recreation opportunities. The abundance of these types of service facilities has created
pressure to expand growth opportunities in both residential and industrial uses, and challenges the
community to offer growth while maintaining a quality of life.
The area is rich in environmentally significant areas, including the Bush and Susquehanna rivers, the
Chesapeake Bay, Forest Green Lake Preserve, Church Creek, the Swan Creek Watersheds, and the
Perryman Water Source Protection Area. The Oakington Peninsula shoreline is the County’s only
direct access to the Chesapeake Bay. Much of the shoreline is now in County ownership for the
benefit of all Harford County citizens.
Various forested plots, creeks, lakes, tidal and non-tidal wetlands, and wildlife habitats abound.
Perryman Woods, a large, 100-acre forested wetland complex, can be found in the southern end of
the Community Area along the Bush River. The nearby shoreline is home to several rare plant
species. Included in the wildlife category are sanctuaries for protected and endangered species such
as the Maryland Darter, the Bog Turtle, and the American Bald Eagle. The Bush River Watershed
Management Plan, completed in 2003, identifies the Grays Run watershed as a very high quality,
sensitive watershed to be conserved, and calls for the preservation of the large wetland tracts around
the Bush River. The Management Plan lays out a strategy to improve the overall conditions in the
Bush River watershed.
In addition to its environmental features, the area contains a number of museums, sporting venues, a
hospital, active farmland, and industrial areas. The Ripken Stadium, a 6,000 seat minor league
venue, is located in this community area. Numerous golf courses including Beechtree, Bulle Rock,
Ruggles, Swan Creek, and the Wetlands are also located in this community. The Higher Education
Applied Technology (HEAT) Center, a research and development park, is located at the MD Route
22/I-95 interchange. Sod Run Wastewater Treatment Plant, Perryman Wellfield, and Baltimore Gas
and Electric generation facilities are significant utilities located in this area.
The area is served by six elementary schools, two middle schools and two high schools. Based on the
October 2003 amendment to the Annual Growth Report, all of these schools are operating below
APF standards for capacity. To attract students from throughout the County, a new math and science
academy for high school students will be constructed as part of the Aberdeen High School campus.
The County operates two libraries in the area, one in Aberdeen and one in Havre de Grace. Both
Aberdeen and Havre de Grace have their own police departments, and fire and emergency services
are provided by 11 volunteer stations.
134
The Greater Aberdeen-Havre de Grace area contains a variety of housing types. They range from
established communities to new residential developments that include single family, waterfront, and
historic homes recognized on the County's inventory of historic sites, as well as modern
condominium complexes and older mobile home parks. The U. S. Route 40 corridor and areas
adjacent to the MD Route 22 interchange along I-95 serve as commercial centers for nearby
communities.
Plan for the Area
Planning for the Greater Aberdeen-Havre de Grace area must address a multitude of issues. These
include, but are not limited to, coordination of this Land Use Element Plan with the comprehensive
plans for the Cities of Aberdeen and Havre de Grace, creating compatible land use designations
adjacent to these municipalities, ensuring that development in the Perryman area is consistent with
the community vision, and environmental concerns relating to the Perryman Wellfield and the
Chesapeake Bay.
The Cities of Aberdeen and Havre de Grace provide an abundance of retail centers, as well as an
industrial and manufacturing base for employment opportunities. The cities also offer an array of
housing opportunities including single family, townhouse and apartment/condominium subdivisions,
as well as more traditional small town style development. The Federal installation at Aberdeen
Proving Ground provides employment opportunities for civilians as well as housing for military
personnel. The plan for the City of Havre de Grace is to continue to promote its historical and
medical facilities and its emerging technology industry. The City of Aberdeen intends to promote its
high technology industry and educational facilities. Continued support and coordination of these
directions are important for future land use decisions.
One of the major advantages of the Greater Aberdeen-Greater Havre de Grace Community Area is
the multitude of transportation facilities including interstate highways, rail, bus, airport facilities, and
marinas that service the area. These facilities make the area attractive to major business and athletic
ventures as evidenced by the success of the HEAT center and the Ripken complex. To further
enhance the area’s accessibility, the City of Aberdeen is working to improve its train station with the
goal of making it a regional transportation hub. The County supports this effort.
Major improvements to the interchange of I-95 and MD Route 22 have been completed to provide
not only for the existing business, service and tourism uses in the area, but also to accommodate
future uses that will be developed as part of the area's Mixed Office (MO) designation. The MO
designation applies to an area north of I-95 and is bounded on the west and north by Aldino Stepney
Road, and on the east by Carsins Run. The development of properties within the MO area must be
carefully planned to ensure compatibility with neighboring land uses, and provide appropriate
transition to the rural nature of the MD Route 22 corridor west of the area. Establishment of the MO
designation shall not serve as an opening of the Development Envelope in the MD Route 22
corridor.
Development of properties within the designated MO area must be carefully planned to ensure
consistency with both County and municipal plans. The County is considering an expansion of the
HEAT center to the west taking in the area between the existing campus and Aldino Stepney Road.
135
The southern portion of this area is characterized by more commercial-type uses with several hotels
and motels. There should be a continuation of commercial uses on the southern portion of the
interchange along with employment opportunities similar to that of the HEAT site on the north.
Expansion of the MO designation or rezoning of lands adjacent to this designation are not supported
by this Plan.
The southwestern corner of the I-95 and MD Route 155 interchange has been annexed by the City of
Havre de Grace. The City’s comprehensive plan calls for the area south of the interchange to be
developed as a corporate or technical office park area. Adjoining this is the proposed 1,100 acre
Bulle Rock complex. The existing golf facility will be expanded to include a conference and
community center complex along with a planned adult community. An integrated transportation
network will connect the development, and a new road serving the development will enter MD
Route 155 just south of the interchange. Uses in this area need to be evaluated not only for
consistency with this Land Use Element Plan but also for their potential impact on the interchange
and Sion Hill, a National Historic Landmark.
Beyond the immediate vicinity of the I-95 interchanges with MD Routes 22 and 155, the area north
of I-95 from Aberdeen to Havre de Grace will continue to support primarily agricultural land uses
with some very rural housing. Susquehanna State Park lies adjacent to the Susquehanna River in the
northern part of the planning area. The plan for this portion of the community retains the State Park
and large agriculture land holdings as the predominant land uses. The continuation of agricultural
preservation efforts is also encouraged.
The Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway, a Certified Maryland Heritage Area, extends along
both sides of the Susquehanna from the Conowingo Dam to the head of the Bay. The development of
this "Heritage Corridor" is designed to link the cultural, and historical resources of the area, while
providing recreational opportunities. Because of its history and waterfront location, Havre de Grace
is a crucial link in the Greenway. Participation in the Greenway program should strengthen the
opportunities for additional tourism-related employment. It also supports the efforts of business and
property owners to revitalize downtown Havre de Grace and its waterfront.
Included in this Heritage Greenway program is a series of trails. In Harford County, a trail will
connect the State Park to Havre de Grace. One of the major links that still needs to be developed is
the segment linking the State Park to North Park in Havre de Grace. Another important component
of the Greenway is the establishment of a pedestrian river crossing to link the trails in Harford and
Cecil counties. Completion of this segment will benefit not only the Lower Susquehanna Heritage
Greenway, but it will also be consistent with the goals of the East Coast Greenway to develop an
urban trail from Maine to Florida. Long-range plans for the East Coast Greenway show the trail
coming through Harford County. The County should continue to support these efforts.
The area to the north of the City of Havre de Grace is primarily characterized by rural residential and
agricultural-type land uses. A large tract of land in this area is operated as a quarry, which is
adjacent to low intensity residential type uses. Several tracts of land have been acquired by the
quarry operation to help buffer the operation from surrounding areas.
136
An added concern for the Community is the abandonment of existing mining operations. Citizens
have expressed concern about the appropriateness of siting landfills in these areas because of their
potential impact on groundwater. The community will work with Harford County and the State of
Maryland to improve screening of the mining operations, and to reclaim and/or stabilize sites for
open space, parks, or other compatible uses whenever feasible.
The western and southern portion of this community area will continue to support industrial and
business park type development. The area adjacent to the Route 40 corridor has a number of
commercial and industrial uses, with strip commercial centers as well as individual businesses
fronting this major highway. Of major concern to the community is revitalization of these
abandoned or underutilized sites in a manner that supports the specialty retail provided in the cities.
Also, development and revitalization in this area should not conflict with uses proposed at the I-95
interchanges.
The Perryman and Forest Greens area in the southwestern part of the community area contains
predominantly residential uses ranging from single family lots to mobile homes on residential lots.
The area also contains several environmentally sensitive areas, including the Chesapeake Bay
Critical Area and non-tidal wetlands. The plan for this area is to continue these land uses near the
water, while maintaining the environmental integrity of the area.
In the middle portion of the peninsula, mixed commercial and industrial development provide a base
for new economic development opportunities. Future development of this area will be guided by the
report “Vision Planning for the Perryman Area”. Completed in November of 2001, the report is
based on a community participation process. The report calls for Perryman to be a diverse, mixed-
use community that serves as the economic engine for the County. It proposes unifying the area by
creating a focal point and identity for the community, which builds on the designated Neighborhood
Center. Light industrial and distribution warehousing uses will be separated from the remainder of
the community by a proposed access route for truck traffic located east of the railway. West of the
railway, high tech campuses are proposed. These will adjoin residential areas to encourage walking,
biking and transit options. A continuous network of public open space and parks would integrate
natural features with the developed areas. The report also provides transportation options, and
conserves much of the area's unique environmental and cultural features.
The Perryman Peninsula is important to the County not only for its economic potential, but also for
its importance as a water source. The Perryman Wellfield, which supplies 25% of the County’s
public drinking water supply, is located in this area. Protection of this important drinking water
source is of the utmost importance to the County. Therefore, protection strategies presented in the
“1997 Perryman Wellhead Protection Plan” are considered part of the plan for this area. These
strategies include the designation of recharge zones, the development of regulations to ensure that
activities within designated zones do not impact the quality and quantity of the wellfield, signage,
groundwater monitoring, emergency response and educational programs. Development and other
activities within the recharge area must be completed in a manner consistent with this Plan.
In order to implement the plan for this community area, continued coordination between the County
and the municipalities is paramount. This area provides an excellent opportunity to implement
Smart Growth policies while still providing the quality of life that has made this region so desirable.
137
To do this, a long term solution to infrastructure and services needs to be developed prior to further
growth in this area. Other measures necessary to implement this community plan will be considered
as part of the comprehensive update of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Zoning process.
138
SU
ATE PARK
SQ
UE
APG
HA
NN
A
SUSQUEHANNA STATE PARK
RIV
ER
155
e
#
##
HCC
#
V
#
462
#
156
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
N
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
HAVRE DE GRACE
#
#
#
T
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
22
#
#
#
MO
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
ABERDEEN
#
#
#
#
43
#
#
HEAT
#
#
#
# #
# #
STONEY FOREST
#
# #
# #
.
-
,
#
#
T
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
95
# #
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
SW A
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
N CR
#
/(
136
#
#
#
#
40
#
MO MO EEK
#
#
#
#
7
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
C
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
159
#
N
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#

#
#
#
(U.S. ARMY)
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
# #
# #
#
#
#
#
#
#
BUSH RIVER
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
N
#
Agricultural
#
Greater Aberdeen- Neighborhood Center

#
Greater Havre de Grace

Community Area
Rural Residential C Community Center
Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
Industrial/Employment
HCC Harford
State and County Parks Community College
(over 10 acres)
HEAT Higher Education
N
MO Mixed Office Applied Technology
Community Area Chesapeake Bay

Location Map Boundary Critical Area Boundary
Figure 42
139
140
Abingdon - Riverside - Emmorton Community Area
Community Character
The Abingdon-Riverside-Emmorton Community Area is located between Winters Run on the west
and Bynum Run, James Run, and Grays Run on the east, generally south of Plumtree and Patterson
Mill Roads, bounded by Otter Point Creek and Bush River. The majority of this community is
included within the Development Envelope. Due to this, this area of once large land tracts and farms
now contains a mix of low, medium, and high density single family homes, garden apartments,
townhomes, and condominiums. Retail areas and community and neighborhood centers are located
at Constant Friendship, the Festival at Bel Air, Box Hill, and Riverside. Significant office and
industrial nodes exist at the Riverside Business Park, Box Hill South Corporate Center and Waters
Edge Corporate Campus. Waters Edge, located along the scenic Bush River, is part of a 200+ acres
mixed use development that includes executive waterfront housing, office and professional centers.
The site features state-of-the-art office and technical facilities and major hotel and waterfront
restaurant opportunities are provided. Only a few significant parcels and some in-fill areas remain
for development in the Abingdon-Riverside-Emmorton Community.
Historic sites and structures representing key events in the history of the County and of the Country
survive in Bush, Abingdon, and Belcamp. Old Philadelphia Road evolved from an Indian trail to a
major transportation route between the north and south during the Colonial period. Harford Town,
or Bush, which was the first County Seat, was a social and political center at the time of the
Revolutionary War, as well as the site of the signing of the Bush Declaration – the first “Declaration
of Independence” signed by a representative body in America – in 1775. A few miles west of
Harford Town, Abingdon was laid out in 1779 and became a center for education, religion, industry,
and crafts. The original layout of the town can be discerned from existing roads, and a number of
sites and structures identified in the County's historic inventory. A few large tracts of undeveloped
land remain in the vicinity, which helps preserve some of the original natural and rural character.
The Abingdon-Riverside-Emmorton community contains a mix of stream valley areas, with

landforms being equally split between the Coastal Plain and Piedmont physiographic areas. The
major watershed is Winters Run, which is shared by six other Community Areas. The Bynum Run
watershed is also significant, and its waters, as well as those of Winters Run, flow into Bush River,
and eventually into the Chesapeake Bay. These watersheds currently deliver large amounts of
sediment and nutrients to the Bush River. A Bush River Watershed Management Plan has been
completed by the County, and lays out a plan of action to improve the overall conditions in the Bush
River watershed. There are two major natural areas, Harford Glen Environmental Education Center
and the Bush Declaration Natural Resources Area, which are protected through public ownership.
These remnants of nature are important symbols of Harford County, and must be protected even as
lands adjacent to them are being developed. The 1,000-foot ribbon of land along the Bush River and
Church Creek is part of the County’s designated Chesapeake Bay Critical Area. Church Creek Pond,
located along Route 40, is home to a State endangered plant. Other threatened and endangered plant
141
species are found throughout the wetland complexes in the headwaters of Bush River and Church
Creek. The Critical Area Program protects these designated Habitats of Local Significance.
The Abingdon-Riverside-Emmorton Community Area has experienced significant growth and

change in the last 10 to 20 years. The community is served by two fire stations. There are currently
four elementary schools located within the community area (Emmorton, Abingdon, William S.
James, and Church Creek). Additionally, some Abingdon households are within the William Paca -
Old Post Elementary School district which is located just outside the community area on
Philadelphia Road (MD Route 7). Based on the October 2003 amendment to the Annual Growth
Report, these schools are all operating at less than the APF standards for capacity. Middle and high
school aged students in this community attend schools in Bel Air, Edgewood or Aberdeen. The
schools in Aberdeen and Edgewood are operating at less than capacity; however, Bel Air High
School is operating near capacity and is expected to exceed capacity. A middle school/high school
complex is planned in the Patterson Mill Road/MD Route 924 vicinity and will lessen the capacity
strains on secondary schools. The Harford Glen Environmental Education Center is an integral part
of the Harford County Public Schools system and offers a curriculum that promotes awareness and
understanding of the local and global environment.
Alice and William Longley Park, Bynum Run Conservation Areas, Belcamp Park, and Hollywoods
Park serve the open space needs of the community. The Emmorton Recreation and Tennis Center, a
multipurpose indoor recreation facility, is also located with this community area. Although outside
of the community, the Lyn Stacie Getz Park and Anita Leight Estuary Center also service this area.
The proposed Cedar Day Park soccer complex, located at MD Route 136 and MD Route 543 will
serve both county-wide and community needs. In addition, there are numerous open spaces
scattered within subdivisions; however, they are only available to Homeowner's Association
members, not to the general public. Post offices are located in Abingdon in the Box Hill Shopping
Center and on U.S. 40 near Waters Edge in Belcamp. A branch of the Harford County Library is
located on Tollgate Road near Emmorton Elementary School and contains public open space. The
Harford County Public Library administrative and support services office is located inside the
Riverside Business Park on Brass Mill Road near MD Route 543.
The 2000 census shows that the Abingdon-Riverside-Emmorton Community had a population of
38,831, which is approximately 18% of the County’s total population (Figure 43). This community
is the fastest growing community in the County. Between 1990 and 2000, the population of the area
increased by 91.48% (18,552 people). The population in every age category saw an increase of over
100%, except the 0-4 and 20-34 year old age groups. These groups increased by over 69% and 32 %
respectively. A common trend throughout the County is the aging population. In Abingdon-
Riverside-Emmorton, the population of the 50 and over age group increased by 172% (from 2,528 to
6,882). This may be due in part to the influx of apartments, townhouses and condominiums,
Assisted and Independent Care Facilities and Adult communities into the area. Between 1990 and
2000, households increased by nearly 91% from 7,498 to 14,310.
142
Abingdon – Riverside – Emmorton Demographic Profile
1990 – 2000

Median Household Income (in current $) $45,958 $63,398 37.95%
Employment 4,185 12,952 209.49%
White 18,779 33,878 80.40%
Black 1,076 3,094 187.55%
American Indian/Alaska Native 46 77 67.39%
Other 77 296 284.42%
Hispanic Population 277 852 207.58%
Figure 43
$100,000 a year increased by 1,475%. In addition, households in this community earning less than
$15,000 a year increased by 64%. Total employment in this area increased by 209% from 4,185 to
12,952.
Interchanges with I-95 are located at MD Route 543 and MD Route 24. While they have facilitated
development of the area, they also direct traffic through the community, resulting in congestion on
several key roads and intersections. MD Route 7 and U.S. Route 40 serve the southern portion of the
community. MTA operates commuter bus routes to downtown Baltimore along U.S. Route 40 and
along MD Route 24. Harford County Transportation Services operates bus number 2 and number 6
in this area. A park-and-ride-lot is located at MD Route 543 and MD Route 7 near the I-95
interchange.
Plan for the Area
The Abingdon-Riverside-Emmorton area has continued to experience more growth and change in
recent years than any other part of the County. The demographics indicate that the Abingdon-
Riverside-Emmorton community is equally alluring to seniors, families and young adults. To
achieve the goal of building a sustainable community, the plan for the area should seek to balance
the quality of life for its residents at each stage in life. The primary issues in this area remain
securing adequate public facilities that are integrated within the community, establishing or
reinforcing community identity, managing traffic congestion and truck traffic, promoting
environmental stewardship, and ensuring compatibility of new development with the existing
community area.
143
Securing locations and funding for public services and facilities for the existing and projected
population continues to be a high priority. Locations must be chosen carefully within an area
already hard-pressed to define its current "center" or focal point. If the provision of these facilities
involves land, then sites must be acquired, or a strategy for future acquisition must be proposed in
advance of build-out. This is especially critical along the MD Route 924/MD Route 24 corridors,
where only a few larger sites remain undeveloped. Equally important to making the community
attractive and sustainable, future development must be sensitive to its neighbors, stable community
centers must be provided, identity must be reinforced, open land and natural areas must be
preserved, and existing developed areas must remain desirable. All this will require cooperation and
communication among the community, County government, and developers early in the
development process.
Cultural and community-oriented facilities for this community of over 14,000 households should be
encouraged. Recreation facilities and open space, which contribute to the long-term viability of
communities and health of the residents, are also an issue of significant concern to this community
and should be addressed as part of the development process. Within this community area, there is a
need to provide adequate facilities for existing neighborhoods, as well as for the community at large.
In order to achieve compatibility, the most important components of the community’s “character”
need to be defined, such as relationships between buildings or notable architectural elements.
Businesses and commercial areas should be compatible with the surrounding environment. The
County should examine design approaches with the State Highway Administration to enhance the
interchanges at I-95 and MD Route 24 and MD Route 543 as important visual "gateways" into the
County and into the Development Envelope. Designation of the area bounded by I-95, Creswell
Road, and James Run as Mixed Office will impact both traffic and development patterns at this
interchange.
The MD Route 24/MD Route 924 corridors will continue to be studied in order to address
congestion. The I-95 and the MD 24/924 interchange has gone through project planning and
funding. Efforts to improve this intersection will continue. Strategies to enhance and continue the
buffer plantings along MD Route 24 must also be implemented in coordination with adjacent
property owners and the State.
Safety is an issue on MD Route 7 and may require additional improvements due to new and
proposed development in and around the area. A significant change will occur as a result of the
conversion of the proposed Village of Grays Run to an auto auction. There has also been an increase
in truck traffic utilizing this corridor to reach industrial and business parks.
Safety and community convenience for pedestrians and bicyclists are also primary concerns.
Pedestrian linkages and access to public spaces should be improved by providing sidewalks, safe
road crossings, and hiker-biker trails. Road efficiency needs to be improved in a manner that does
not increase automobile speeds through the community. Traffic calming measures should be
examined and roads should be designed to serve the needs of local residents. The Tollgate Road
connection will link Bel Air to I-95. Traffic circles will be used at strategic locations along this
corridor. Public transit should be a viable option for this community. To help alleviate auto
144
congestion, additional bus routes, convenient transit stops with shelters, park and ride lots, and bike
lanes should continue to be planned.
In addition to open space for recreation, maintaining natural open space which contains forested,
stream, or wetland areas, is important to residents. These resource lands improve the physical
environment by encouraging natural drainage, filtration and shade, and provide habitat required by
wildlife. Protection of contiguous natural areas can also serve to buffer communities and preserve
neighborhood identity. Within planned growth areas, the County must implement strategies which
protect natural resources, prevent further damage, enhance natural assets which have suffered, or, at
minimum, mitigate for foreseen adverse impacts. The fact that relatively few natural areas remain
increases their value and importance within this community area.
The Winters Run stream valley corridor has been designated as a greenway trail in both the Land
Preservation and Recreation Plan and the Joppa-Joppatowne Community Plan. This corridor, which
connects Harford Glen with the Bosley Conservancy, provides both recreational and environmental
benefits. A trailhead will be developed along MD Route 7 to serve this trail network. As
development is proposed for properties within this corridor, negotiations should occur between the
County and property owners to ensure that the corridor remains intact via easements or enhanced
buffers. The County should also pursue funding opportunities that would support the acquisition of
key links along the corridor.
Proposed activities within historic Abingdon and the Bush Area should be carefully considered so as
to protect the character and integrity of the traditional neighborhoods. Recognizing the importance
of this area, these properties must be carefully evaluated for their potential for development.
Proposed uses in the area should enhance the historical character and pattern of this area. However,
all development should be planned so as not to encroach upon, or change, the historic nature of the
area.
The Abingdon-Riverside-Emmorton community includes areas inside and outside the Development
Envelope. There are also three designated Community Centers in this area that provide commercial
and service oriented needs. Within the Development Envelope, areas presently defined for
commercial use are deemed adequate to meet the immediate and foreseeable future retail and service
needs of the community. No additional commercial zoning will be supported within this community
area unless, upon further analysis, it is determined that there is a need for additional commercial
zoning. Any additional zoning changes will also be subject to a technical analysis to ensure that the
proposed change will not generate adverse impacts in the community.
North of I-95, on the west side of MD Route 136, is a designated agricultural area which is outside
of the Development Envelope boundaries. Because there is sufficient capacity within the
Development Envelope to address development needs for the life of this Plan, the Development
Envelope will not be expanded in this area.
145
146
HEAT
STONEY FOREST
.-
, 95
C
#
136
#
MO MO
#
7
#
24
#
C
#
924
#
#
#
#
#
159
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
C
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
152
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
# #
# #
BUSH RIVER
#
#
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
# # #
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
# #
# #
#
#
#
#
# #
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
C
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
# #
#
#
#
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
#
Abingdon-Riverside-
#
#
Emmorton Agricultural N Neighborhood Center
Community Area Rural Residential C Community Center
Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
HCC Harford
(over 10 acres)

Boundary Critical Area Boundary
Location Map N
Figure 44
147
148
Greater Bel Air Community Area
Community Character
The Greater Bel Air Community Area is defined as the Town of Bel Air and surrounding suburbs.
As development has moved outward from Bel Air, the character of the area has gradually changed
from the separate rural communities of Vale, Bynum, and Fountain Green to a more evenly
dispersed suburban community. From a geographic standpoint, the Greater Bel Air community
surrounds municipal Bel Air, with its outward boundaries being generally the East/West Highway
(MD Route 23) to the north, Fountain Green Road (MD Route 543) to the east, Plumtree Road to the
south, and Winters Run to the west.
The Bel Air Community Area lies within the Winter’s Run and Bynum Run watersheds, which drain
to the Bush River. Due to the rapid urbanization in these watersheds over the last couple of decades,
increased sediment and nutrient loads have not only impacted local streams, but also the Bush River.
The Bush River Watershed Management Plan, completed by the County in 2003, identified much of
the area within the Bel Air Community Area as impacted, and recommends stormwater retrofits,
citizen education on watershed stewardship, stream clean-ups, and preservation of existing
contiguous forest as a means to improve the watershed.
The character of the Greater Bel Air Community Area has been influenced by the history and growth
of the Town of Bel Air. It is difficult to describe the community area without an investigation of the
Town itself. Bel Air was settled in the Piedmont hills of Harford County on the northern portion of
the drainage divide between the Winter's Run and Bynum Run watersheds. The area for the Town,
originally called Scott's Old Fields, was laid out in 1780 as documented by C. Milton Wright in “Our
Harford Heritage”. The original Town consisted of 42 lots with two later added for a courthouse and
other public buildings. Though incorporated in 1874, the Town had been designated as the County
Seat in 1782, which to this day established this location as the Seat of County Government and a
focal point for residents, goods, and services.
From the 1880's until the 1950's, the Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad served as the chief means
of delivering products of the farm and industries from the rural portions of Harford, Baltimore, and
York Counties to the markets of Baltimore and the City of York. This community was no exception
and the railroad made stops at Vale and Bynum, and maintained a primary station in Bel Air. Milk,
slate, green marble, lumber, and gravel were some of the freight shipped from the rural area, and the
railroad served as a commuter line to countless passengers until 1954. As many of the rural
industries ceased operation, and competition with good roads and automobiles became too great, the
railroad ceased operation altogether in 1959.
Based on the 2000 Census, the Greater Bel Air area has a population of 46,797 which is 21.4% of
the County’s population (Figure 45). Between 1990 and 2000, the population of the Greater Bel Air
area increased by 37.9%. While the number of persons between the ages of 20 and 34 living in the
Greater Bel Air area decreased by 9.4% (from 8,146 to 7,380), other age groups grew in size. The
number of people age five to 19 has increased by 36.3% (from 7,062 to 11,077), accounting for
149
23.7% of the Greater Bel Air Area’s population. The age group between the ages of 50 and 64 years
showed the highest population growth with an 80% increase (2,498 to 4,494).
Greater Bel Air Demographic Profile: 1990 - 2000

Employment 12,277 21,219 72.84%
White 32,630 44,039 34.96%
Black 707 1,305 84.58%
Other 77 158 105.19%
Figure 45
Throughout the County, household income was up 37%. The median household income for this area
$100,000 a year increased by 312%, while households earning less than $50,000 a year decreased by
less than 1%. Total employment in this area increased by 73% - from 12,277 to 21,219.
As demographics indicate, there is an increased demand for senior housing and senior related
services in Harford County. The Bel Air area is home to a number of senior housing communities
offering a range of living arrangements and care levels. Located off of Atwood Drive, the William
N. McFaul Activities Center, which opened in 2002, provides a place for seniors to interact and
remain active.
The transportation network for the community area is complex with Bel Air serving as the hub for
many of the County's primary roads including Bel Air Road (U.S. Route 1), Churchville Road (MD
Route 22), and MD Route 23. The most heavily traveled road within the community area, MD
Route 24, is one of the County's major arteries traversing north/south from I-95, through Bel Air to
the Mason-Dixon Line. From Bel Air south this artery serves as a direct connection to I-95, and
from Bel Air north it provides access to York County, Pennsylvania. In either direction, MD Route
24 provides commuter access to the employment centers of Bel Air and Baltimore.
The community is served by several elementary schools -- Bel Air, Forest Lake, Homestead-
Wakefield, Prospect Mill, Hickory, and Ring Factory; two middle schools -- Bel Air and
Southampton; and Bel Air and C. Milton Wright high schools. Based on the October 2003
amendment to the Annual Growth Report, all schools are operating at below the APF standards for
capacity except Bel Air High School.
150
The Bel Air branch of the Harford County Public Library system serves as the system’s main library
and is also the busiest. A post office, numerous churches, public transit, water and sewer, and
entertainment facilities serve the community. Harford County Government’s Administrative Offices
are headquartered in downtown Bel Air along with the County Health Department, the Board of
Education, the State’s Mary Risteau Multi Purpose Center, and the Sheriff’s Office. In addition, a
police department of over 30 officers serves the Town of Bel Air. The Bel Air Volunteer Fire
Company, located on Hickory Avenue, has been designed with state of the art training facilities,
operations offices, and administrative offices.
The Greater Bel Air Community Area also has a significant amount of open space. County and
municipal parks, including the Equestrian Center, are located in this area, and several farms in the
community area are protected with preservation easements. The Lyn Staci Getz Creative
Playground is located on MD Route 24 and serves both the Bel Air and Abingdon communities. This
park, similar to the play area at Rockfield Creative Playground, gives children a safe place to play
and interact.
In 1999, the first phase of the Ma and Pa trail was completed in Heavenly Waters Park. This trail
network allows people to enjoy a dedicated walkway, separate from vehicular traffic. The trail
extends from Tollgate Road to Main Street in Bel Air. The second phase of the trail, located in
Forest Hill, extends from the Blake’s Venture Park to Friends Park. Plans and land acquisition are
underway to connect two segments through Bel Air. Also, a two-mile extension of the trail from the
Tollgate Road terminus to the Edgeley Grove Farm is planned for 2004-2005.
In 1996, the Town of Bel Air adopted three overlay districts. The districts are the Transition, Town
Center and Route 24 Corridor Overlay Districts. These districts introduced additional land use
controls to protect the character of the Town, thereby affecting the character of the Greater Bel Air
Community area. The Transition Overlay District protects existing and established residential
communities from the impacts of high intensity development. The Town Center Overlay District
provides development guidance for issues like compatibility, preservation of a sense of place, site
design and placement of buildings. The Route 24 Corridor Overlay District protects the appearance
of the entrance to the Bel Air area, assuring that “gateway” development is sensitive to the goals and
standards set by the community and Town of Bel Air. In 1999, the Town expanded its overlay
districts by adopting a U.S. Route 1 Overlay District, which was followed by the adoption of a
Gateway Overlay District in 2003.
This once rural area has grown over the past decade. This is due to many factors, including
proximity to I-95, sense of safety within neighborhoods, wide variety of shopping and dining
opportunities, good recreational areas, sense of historic integrity, and a feeling that each
neighborhood contributes to a sense of community. The increase in population, coupled with a
demand for convenient commercial and retail opportunities, has put pressure on public facilities and
services to keep pace with growth. Many of the facilities that are struggling to keep pace are also the
most visible to the community including schools, roads, intersections, and open land.
As the Bel Air Community Area has grown, the Town of Bel Air has remained the central location in
terms of services, while the surrounding community has grown through conversion of agricultural
parcels to residential use. This has resulted in individual neighborhoods connected only by the
151
commonality of the Town as a service hub. The community area, however, is undergoing a
transition. As infill development occurs on many of the undeveloped parcels, momentum is building
toward development of a Greater Bel Air community. Strong community concern attests to a
healthy community economy and a stable residential population. Additionally, community
participation and activism demonstrate interest in the future of the community and endorse a
commitment to responsible growth with the goal of transitioning discrete neighborhoods into a
Greater Bel Air community.
Plan for the Area
The original agricultural and village areas that historically surrounded Bel Air have, over time, been
converted to neighborhoods as residents took advantage of the employment opportunities within Bel
Air, Aberdeen Proving Ground, and the Baltimore metropolitan region. Commercial markets
materialized as the residential population grew, and both independent and chain retail stores were
established. Future growth within the community area will hinge on its status as an attractive
suburban residential destination within the Baltimore region in contrast to a growth area based on
employment opportunities within the Town and environs. Demographic data suggests that the
community is growing quickly and the County should look carefully at impacts development will
have on public facilities - notably the public schools and the inventory of adult communities. The
plan for the area strives to build continuity between the Town and the surrounding community.
Residential and commercial areas should effectively serve the community while maintaining
neighborhood identity and scale.
The Town of Bel Air still serves as the focal point for the area. Therefore, it is important that the
State, County and Town coordinate planning efforts. The Town of Bel Air recently updated its
Comprehensive Plan and adopted a revised Zoning Code in 2003. As part of this process, significant
community participation from the Town community, County and State agencies and surrounding
communities was encouraged.
Many of the major issues explored in the Bel Air Comprehensive Plan are applicable to the larger
Bel Air Community Area including better traffic flow while providing better access to Town
businesses. The Town of Bel Air, in cooperation with Harford County Government and the
Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) is working to complete a proposed comprehensive
“Main Street” improvement for the center of Bel Air. This improvement and the recently completed
improvements to Bond Street will provide pedestrians a friendlier town center by minimizing
automobile speeds while creating a safer, more pleasant streetscape environment. Traffic movement
must be facilitated by improving the roads necessary to give access to commercial areas. Smaller
roads should be maintained as connections between neighborhoods, the Town, and the surrounding
community.
Improved access to Bel Air should also include additional public transportation. This will help
reduce the number of cars on the road and can provide a much needed service to area citizens.
Existing service should be expanded to include longer running bus schedules and additional stops.
Additional service can be targeted to older, mature neighborhoods providing much needed service to
senior citizens of the Bel Air area.
152
The County, State and Town of Bel Air are working together to alleviate traffic congestion problems
in and around Bel Air. Planned solutions include improvements to Moore’s Mill Road, U.S. Route 1
and MD Route 24 intersections. The project planning of the U.S. 1 Bypass improvements has been
completed. Efforts to obtain funding for this project are underway and should be encouraged.
Most of the remaining development potential within the community area will be infill as few
undeveloped parcels remain. New growth shall be environmentally sound and paced with the
adequacy of public facilities and services. Also, new residential growth shall unite existing
neighborhoods and complement existing linkages between the Town and surrounding neighborhoods
within the Community Area. Areas for recreation and open space shall be identified on an individual
neighborhood basis, making sure they also contribute to the needs of the entire community.
Transportation linkages shall promote connections between neighborhoods in the community, and
public transportation shall be encouraged and promoted wherever feasible.
The community is also concerned about the capacity of school facilities to absorb additional growth.
The development of the new middle/high school complex at Patterson Mill along with the
modernization of Bel Air High School will help to address this concern. Additional revenue sources
should also be investigated and implemented to help provide needed educational facilities.
Additional recreational facilities are planned for the Greater Bel Air area. These include Edgeley
Grove, Prospect Mill Park and Patterson Mill Park. Located near the equestrian center, Edgeley
Grove’s future development will include a natural amphitheater, ball fields and trail connections.
Prospect Mill Park will serve the Bel Air and Forest Hill Community Areas, more specifically the
Fountain Green and Hickory areas, and will help to address active open space needs. Patterson Mill
Park will have recreational facilities that serve both the new middle/high school complex and the
community.
Within the Greater Bel Air Community Area, commercial uses shall be directed toward the Town of
Bel Air and the designated Neighborhood and Community Centers. This will help to maintain the
viability of Bel Air as a center for services, while also protecting neighborhood identity. Major
commercial growth should be directed away from the transportation links of MD Route 543 between
Bel Air and Fountain Green and MD Route 24 between Bel Air and Forest Hill. Along MD Route
22 between Bel Air and Churchville, commercial uses shall be directed to the designated
Neighborhood Centers.
The intersection of Red Pump Road/Bynum Road and Rock Spring Road (MD Route 24), continues
to remain a viable Community Center. The Rock Spring Shopping Center has been redeveloped to
accommodate new retailers and a new anchor business. The continued redevelopment of older
commercial areas at the intersection of MD Route 24 and Red Pump Road will help to discourage
further development between this intersection and Forest Hill, thus providing a transition between
the Town and the rural area.
The strategy in designating this intersection as a Community Center is to direct new

commercial/retail uses to an area of similar uses that have traditionally served, and could continue to
serve, the growing residential population in this portion of the community area. The Community
Center shall continue to serve this function by focusing new community scale commercial/retail
153
development around this intersection rather than providing opportunities for strip development along
the length of Rock Spring Road.
Studies indicate that there is sufficient commercially zoned land to meet the immediate and
foreseeable retail and service needs of the County. No additional commercial rezoning will be
supported within the Greater Bel Air Community Area unless further analysis determines that there
is a need for additional commercial land. Any additional zoning changes will also be subject to a
technical analysis to ensure that the proposed change will not generate adverse impacts to the
community.
Economic development initiatives will help to promote redevelopment in older areas and adaptive
reuse of historic structures within the community area. Additionally, economic incentives shall
encourage tourism and cultural experiences, and be coordinated between the community area and the
Town of Bel Air.
154
N
e
23
HCC
V
C
N
22
N
BEL AIR N
T 543
152
STONEY FORES
/(
1
GUNPOWDER FALLS
STATE PARK
C
e
136
147
24 MO MO
C
Greater Bel Air Agricultural N Neighborhood Center

Community Area
Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
HCC Harford
(over 10 acres)

Location Map N
Figure 46
155
156
Churchville - Creswell Community Area
Community Character
The Churchville-Creswell Community Area is centrally located and is bounded by U.S. Route 1 and
Deer Creek to the north, Mill Brook, Carsins Run, Carsins Run Road, and Stepney Road to the east,
I-95 to the south, and MD Routes 136 and 543 to the west. The primary designated land use within
this community area is Agriculture, with a portion of the Development Envelope flowing into the
area on the western edge. The intersection of MD Routes 22, 136, and 155 makes the Rural Village
of Churchville a major transportation hub for intra-County travel.
This Community Area is served by many roads, including I-95, U.S. Route 1, MD Routes 22, 136,
543, and 155 and a variety of winding County roads. MD Route 22 carries a significant volume of
traffic from Bel Air to the Aberdeen area. Branching from this road is MD Route 155, which
directly links Churchville to the City of Havre de Grace. Recently, the County and State have helped
to alleviate traffic concerns by realigning the MD Route 22 and MD Route 155 interchange. MD
Route 136 connects the northern rural half of the County with the southern transportation corridor.
The Churchville-Creswell Community Area is rich in cultural, industrial, and architectural history.
Individual National Register sites such as Tudor Hall, Medical Hall, Best Endeavor, and the
Churchville Presbyterian Church, and Districts such as the Finney Houses, Harford Furnace, and a
portion of the Lower Deer Creek Valley, are all located within the community area. Originally
named Lower Cross Roads, the village of Churchville was historically a significant inland
intersection for early Harford County, with the intersection of a south-north road connecting the Bay
settlement at Bush with Deer Creek and an east-west route joining Havre de Grace and Aberdeen to
Bel Air. The establishment of the Presbyterian Church at this crossroads in the mid-eighteenth
century resulted in the village's name being changed to Churchville.
Located on the edge of the Piedmont region, the Churchville-Creswell Community Area has diverse
terrain, which ranges from steeper, rolling hills of the Deer Creek watershed to the north and more
gentle, shallow slopes and flatlands near the Coastal Plain to the south. Five watersheds are included
in this planning area: Deer Creek to the north, draining to the Susquehanna River; James Run,
Church Creek, and (to a small extent) Bynum Run, draining to the Bush River to the south; and
Swan Creek, directly draining to the Chesapeake Bay. MD Routes 22 and 155, and Aldino Road
delineate the distinct ridge that runs between the north and south portions of the watershed drainage.
Numerous streams, including Carsins Run and Thomas Run, are tributaries within this community
area.
Large amounts of forested lands remain in the Churchville-Creswell Community Area, some of
which were purchased in 1981 by the Department of Natural Resources to establish the Stoney
Forest Demonstration Area. This 318-acre conservation area, located just north of Harford Furnace,
is forested with tulip poplar, beech, oaks, and hickory. The area is used to educate private
landowners about best forestry management practices, and includes trails and stream crossings to
demonstrate good management practices.
157
The Churchville-Creswell Community is a mix of agricultural and residential subdivisions; the small
portion of the Development Envelope located along the western boundary is developed at low
intensity urban residential. The continuation of agriculture is very important to the community and
to the County, and is supported by nearby agricultural businesses. Several of the larger dairy and
livestock farms in the County are located in this area. Multi generation families operate many of
these, with the younger farmers planning to continue the family operation. Much of the land in this
area is zoned agricultural. Numerous area farms participate in various agricultural preservation
programs including the Lower Deer Creek Valley Rural Legacy Area. Within this Community Area
19.9% of the land is preserved.
Three elementary schools and one high school are located within the Churchville-Creswell area.
Based on the October 2003 amendment to the Annual Growth Report, none of these schools exceed
the APF standards for capacity. Serving students from throughout the County, the John Archer
School and Harford Technical High School are also located in this community area. For post-high
school education, Harford Community College offers Associate-level degrees, certification, and
continuing education opportunities for the entire County. Two major recreational complexes are
also located within this planning area. Thomas Run Park next to Harford Community College and
the Churchville Recreation Center on MD Route 155 provide outdoor, indoor, and nighttime
recreational activities. Additional recreational fields at Cedar Lane are planned for the intersection
of MD Route 136 and MD Route 543. The Cedar Lane park is planned to serve county-wide needs
as well as the Churchville-Creswell and Abingdon areas.
The Churchville Rural Village supports the surrounding agricultural and residential community with
its mixed-type businesses and uses. Churches, agricultural-support businesses, several service
stations, and antique shops are just a few of Churchville's focal features. In addition to the Rural
Village, the community has two Neighborhood Centers – one at Campus Hills and one at the
intersection of MD Routes 543 and 22. The Campus Hills Shopping Center, with its supermarket,
retail stores, movie theater, fast food franchises and restaurant continues to serve the Churchville-
Creswell community. Adjacent to the shopping center, a private health club provides additional
recreational opportunities to the area and County residents.
The Churchville-Creswell area is home to 11,912 residents which is 5.4% of the County’s total
population (Figure 47). Between 1990 and 2000, the number of residents in the area has grown by
21.2%. While the number of persons between the ages of 20 - 34 living in the Churchville-Creswell
area decreased by 17.4% (from 2,055 to 1,698), all other age groups grew in size. The group
between the ages of 50 - 64 showed the highest population growth with an 45% increase (1,564 to
2,275). During that same period, the number of households increased by 25.3% - from 3,343 to
4,190.
158
Churchville - Creswell Demographic Profile: 1990 - 2000

Employment 3,828 4,487 17.22%
White 9,336 11,267 20.68%
Black 370 384 3.78%
Other 15 27 80.00%
Figure 47
23%. Total employment in this area increased by 17% from 3,828 to 4,487.
Plan for the Area
In order to maintain the rural quality of life, which makes Harford County so attractive and
desirable, protecting the agricultural base of the Churchville-Creswell Community Area is a prime
concern. Agriculture shall remain the dominant land use within this planning area, and participation
in preservation programs should be encouraged to help maintain the rural character of the area. Uses
that are compatible with agriculture should also be provided to support the viability of farming in
this area. This viability will depend on farm retention, businesses that support the agricultural
industry, preservation of additional farm properties and protection of the area's natural resources.
The plan for this community area recognizes the need for businesses that will support local residents
and the farming industry. Within the designated village area, opportunities should be provided for
the expansion of existing business uses to accommodate the needs of the community, however, the
expansion of the village boundary is not supported by this Plan. As development and redevelopment
occurs in the village area, it is imperative that the historical and agricultural character of the
Churchville Rural Village area be preserved and enhanced. By requiring that new and revitalized
structures be architecturally compatible with older structures, the Churchville–Creswell area will
continue to remind residents of their past while allowing businesses to service the changing needs of
the community. It is recommended that any development in this area should be of a use, scale and
design compatible with the character of the area.
159
Outside of the village area, development along the Route 22 corridor should be planned in a manner
that is consistent with the Neighborhood Center designations. Care needs to be taken to ensure that
this development does not detract from the function of the village center.
In addition, areas presently defined for commercial use are deemed adequate to meet the immediate
and foreseeable future retail and service needs of the community. No additional commercial zoning
will be supported within this community area unless, upon further analysis, it is determined that
there is a need for additional commercial land. Any additional zoning changes will also be subject to
a technical analysis to ensure that the proposed change will not generate adverse impacts in the
community.
A small portion of the Development Envelope, along with a small Rural Residential area, is located
along the western edge of the Churchville-Creswell Community Area. Studies indicate that there is
sufficient capacity within the Development Envelope to meet projected growth needs; therefore,
further expansion of the Development Envelope is not supported by this Plan. It is also this Plan’s
policy not to expand the Rural Residential areas.
The land at the north side of the I-95/MD Route 543 interchange will provide opportunities for
establishing high quality job creation through the Mixed Office (MO) designation. The designated
MO area is bounded by I-95, Creswell Road, and James Run. The development of properties within
the MO area must be carefully planned to ensure compatibility with neighboring land uses, and
provide appropriate transition to the rural nature of the MD Route 543 corridor. Establishment of the
MO designation shall not serve as an opening of the Development Envelope in the MD Route 543
corridor. The remaining landmass of this community area should maintain its Agricultural
designation.
Demographic data illustrates that the community is growing steadily and that the County should look
closely at the impacts development will have on public facilities. The County should work with the
community and the State to examine alternative traffic solutions that would alleviate heavy truck
traffic on the narrow road and steep grades of MD Route 136.
The community is also concerned about the capacity of school facilities to absorb additional growth.
The County will investigate additional revenue sources to help provide needed educational facilities.
The Bush River Watershed Management Plan, completed in 2003, identified the James Run and
Grays Run subwatershed of Church Creek as high quality watersheds containing valuable natural
resources and good stream habitat. Since these watersheds have not yet experienced the urbanization
taking place in the Bynum Run watershed and other areas of the County, the Plan recommends
maintaining this high quality status through preservation of existing forestland, enhancement of
stream buffers, and low-impact development.
160
/(
1 PALMER STATE PARK
APG
SUSQUEHANNA
V
e
N
155
e
HCC
V 156
462
C
N
22
N
BEL AIR N
22
MO
T 543
HEAT ABERDEEN
STONEY FOREST
/( .
-
, T
#
1
#
#
95
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
C
#
#
#
#
(
/
#
136
#
#
#
#
40
#
#
#
#
MO MO
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
24 #
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
924
#
#
#
Churchville-Creswell Agricultural N Neighborhood Center
Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
HCC Harford
(over 10 acres)

N
Location Map
Figure 48
161
162
Dublin - Darlington Community Area
Community Character
The Dublin-Darlington Community Area is a region of rolling hills, farms, forests, and streams in
northeastern Harford County. The transportation network for the Dublin-Darlington area is
comprised of arterial roads and small rural roads. With MD Route 155 being the southern border of
the community area, MD Routes 161, 136 and 440 connect the Dublin and Darlington communities.
Examples of some of the small rural roads that run throughout the area are Harmony Church Road,
Trappe Church Road and Castleton Road. The unique landscape of the Dublin-Darlington area,
which extends from Deer Creek to Broad Creek, and the Susquehanna River, contains natural assets
and resources which deserve special protection, including water sources vital to agriculture, and
numerous significant endangered species and habitats.
In the 2000 Census, the Dublin-Darlington area had a population of 6,138, which is 2.8% of the
County’s population (Figure 49). Between 1990 and 2000, the population decreased by 0.62%.
While the population between the ages of 20 - 34 experienced the greatest population reduction, 38%
(from 1,407 to 872); the 0-4 age group and 5-9 age group also declined. Other age groups, however,
grew in size. The population between the ages of 50 - 64 years showed the highest growth with a
29% increase (911 to 1,177). During the same period, however, the number of households increased
by 3.5% - from 2,195 to 2,273.
Dublin - Darlington Demographic Profile: 1990 – 2000

Total Population 6,176 6,138 -0.62%
Employment 1,115 1,455 30.49%
White 5,749 5,746 -0.05%
Black 351 287 -18.23%
Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 56 22 -60.71%
Other 7 15 114.29%
Figure 49
163
Almost 25% percent of the Dublin-Darlington Community Area is protected through agricultural
preservation programs including the Lower Deer Creek Rural Legacy area. While the different
agricultural preservation programs act to protect farmland from being developed, the Rural Legacy
program aids in the preservation of the historic character of the valley and helps to protect the water
quality of Deer Creek.
The Deer Creek Scenic River District is established by the County Code to preserve Deer Creek as a
free flowing stream and to preserve and protect its natural and cultural values for present and future
generations. An appointed Scenic River Advisory Board reviews proposals for new development
within 150 feet of the banks of the Creek, and makes recommendations concerning management and
preservation of Deer Creek. The Deer Creek Watershed has been targeted by the Harford County
Soil Conservation District to develop soil conservation and water quality plans to address the
nonpoint sources of pollution from agricultural operations.
There are two centers of population and services in the community area, Dublin and Darlington.
Both have historical roles as market and service centers for a rich agricultural community.
According to “Our Harford Heritage”, the first recorded mention of Dublin was in 1880. Dublin
was the crossroads for the logging industry and boasted one of the County’s first rural post offices.
The village of Darlington, listed in the National Register of Historic Places, has a 270-year history,
and has changed little since the turn of this century. It still has 39 (90%) of the 43 structures shown
on an 1878 map of Harford County. Post 1878 architecture has followed traditional lines with very
few exceptions. Berkley, located just outside of Darlington’s village boundary, is one of the few
documented stops along the Underground Railroad. It is home to the Hosanna School, a National
Register and County Landmark property, and Harford County's first public school for African
Americans.
Recently, the Hosanna School organization obtained funds for a historically correct renovation that
will include the replacement of the second story. Furthermore, the Berkley area has been designated
as a National Register Historic District. The area also contains a number of other historic structures
located in the Lower Deer Creek Valley Historic District.
Also located within this community area is the Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway (LSHG).
Containing several key elements related to the early history of the United States of America, the
LSHG was designated in 1997 by the Maryland Heritage Area Authority (MHAA) as a Certified
Maryland Heritage Area. Heritage areas are designed to link the cultural and historic resources of an
area while providing recreational opportunities.
The Dublin-Darlington community area is a Harford County destination for outdoor recreational
activities with two State Parks, several County Parks, portions of a Baltimore Council Boy Scout
Camp, a section of an interstate hiking trail (the 250-mile Mason and Dixon Trail), a portion of the
LSHG and a private marina.
A branch of the County library and two public elementary schools serve the communities. Middle
and high school students attend classes at the North Harford, Havre de Grace and Aberdeen
campuses. Based on the October 2003 amendment to the Annual Growth Report, none of these
164
schools exceed the APF standards for capacity. Fire and emergency services are provided by the
Darlington Volunteer Fire Company, the Dublin Volunteer Fire Company and by the Level
Volunteer Fire Company. The Sheriff’s Office maintains a community policing substation at the
Wilson Center in Darlington. This community area also contains a number of facilities that serve the
County and region. These include the Harford County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Exelon
Power Company.
Plan for the Area
In this community, agriculture shall remain the dominant priority for land use, zoning, and economic
development. It is an important agricultural area whose productiveness must be sustained and
strengthened. Land use planning shall focus on preserving, protecting, promoting, and enhancing
agriculture in this area. Secondary long range planning objectives shall include protecting natural
resources; preserving historically important lands, structures and functions; reserving lands for future
use as open space, buffers, and parks and recreation activities for the County and community
residents; and, reserving lands for community facilities to support the Dublin-Darlington Community
Area. Industries compatible with, or supportive of, agriculture shall be encouraged. These include
logging, mining, granaries, canneries, and agricultural repair, sales, and service suppliers.
Agricultural preservation efforts should continue in this area. Of special importance is further
protection of properties located in the Lower Deer Creek Valley Rural Legacy Area. Protection of
land within this designated area will provide multiple benefits to the community.
To help support the continuation of farming as a viable occupation, existing programs should be
enhanced and creative ways developed to foster continued agricultural use and businesses in this
area. The County should also develop policies and programs to promote new and diversified
agricultural businesses and support the relocation of existing agricultural-related businesses into the
community area.
Maintaining the viability of the villages of Dublin and Darlington is another important goal of this
community area. The community views Darlington as a rural village with unique historical assets,
while Dublin has traditionally served as a rural village, which contains services for the surrounding
agricultural and rural community.
To ensure the continuation of these roles, the size, shape, and appearance of new construction should
be compatible with existing structures and the primary functions of Darlington and Dublin as Rural
Villages. New development and redevelopment in the villages should be designed in a manner
compatible with existing architecture in the villages and should help support community needs.
Special attention also needs to be given to existing commercially zoned areas outside the villages.
Because these areas often serve as gateways to the villages, similar standards should be applied to
their design.
Community and local business members have been working with County government to create a
Village Business Design Guideline for Darlington. This guidance is provided to aid with the
preservation of Darlington’s physical character and economic viability.
165
To further support this concept, this Plan does not support expansion of the village boundaries to
accommodate new uses. Areas presently defined for commercial use are deemed adequate to meet
the immediate and foreseeable future retail and service needs of the community. No additional
commercial zoning will be supported within this community area unless further analysis determines
that there is a need for additional commercial land. Any additional zoning changes will also be
subject to a technical analysis to ensure that the proposed change will not generate adverse impacts
in the community.
Current road systems are generally adequate for community purposes. Planned road improvements
include the realignment of MD Route 161 as it enters the village proper of Darlington, and the
refurbishing of sidewalks along MD Route 161 and Shuresville Road. These improvements,
coordinated with the State Highway Administration, consider the needs of farm machinery, and do
not encourage increased through traffic, or increased weight-loads or speeds.
The Dublin-Darlington Community Area has the potential to provide land for future County
recreational needs such as hiking, equestrian and biking trails, and athletic fields. Plans for public
recreation must take into account the agricultural basis of the area. The scale and type of any
commercial or recreational facilities must be consistent with the present character of this area.
Future public land acquisition for recreation should focus on acquiring lands adjacent to existing
State and County parks as they become available.
Development, infrastructure, and public facilities all must be supportive of the historical character of
the area, as well as the agricultural community. The community should identify significant scenic
features which it desires to preserve for the future, and should work with local landowners and
developers to find ways to protect and preserve those features.
In order to protect the natural environment and character of the area, land development in the
community should be consistent with land capability in order to prevent other negative
environmental impacts. The Dublin-Darlington community is concerned with the possible
withdrawal of Deer Creek water for use by the City of Aberdeen. The impact of such a withdrawal
should be studied as it will affect the profile and nature of the creek and its valleys. The topography,
soil depth, drainage, slope, and other sensitive environmental aspects of the land in the area should
be allowed to limit development naturally. The volume and quality of the subsurface water supply
should also be protected.
Endangered plants and significant habitats should be classified and their general location identified;
additional protection strategies for these areas should be sought and implemented. It is important to
increase protection of rare plants and habitats areas in and along Deer Creek, the Susquehanna River,
and other areas which are not within the Natural Resource District or Chesapeake Bay Critical Area.
166
136
646 623
V
440
V CECIL C
161
543
/(
SU
1 PALMER STATE PARK
SQ
UE
APG
AN H
N
AR
SUSQUEHANNA STATE PARK
IV E
R
N
155
e
HCC
V 462
Dublin-Darlington Agricultural N Neighborhood Center

Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
HCC Harford
(over 10 acres)

N
Location Map
Figure 50
167
168
Edgewood Community Area
Community Character
This community area is located in southeastern Harford County and is generally bounded by I-95 to
the north, MD Route 152 to the west, Edgewood area of Aberdeen Proving Ground to the south, and
the Ha-Ha Branch of the Otter Point Creek to the east. Edgewood is centrally located within Harford
County's Development Envelope, with easy access, via I-95 and rail service, to Baltimore,
Washington, D.C., Wilmington, and Philadelphia.
Edgewood lies mostly within the Atlantic Coastal Plain, a broad lowland which rises gradually from
sea level along the Chesapeake Bay to an elevation of approximately 200 feet on the northern
boundary of the community area at I-95. It is drained principally by Winters Run and Otter Point
Creek, which flow into Bush River and the Chesapeake Bay. Tributaries of the Little Gunpowder
River drain a lesser portion of the community area. Parts of the community lie within the
Chesapeake Bay Critical Area. The Edgewood area contains Otter Point Creek Marsh, which borders
the Bush River basin. These sensitive tidal and non-tidal wetlands are designated as a National
Estuarine Research Reserve, and are monitored and studied on a national scale. The wetlands are
also classified as Resource Conservation land within the Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Program and
are owned and managed by the Izaak Walton League. Willoughby Woods, a 233-acre forested area,
is the largest remaining wooded tract along the Bush River shoreline and represents perhaps the
largest woodland containing vernal pools in the County. It's designation as a Habitat of Local
Significance in the Critical Area Program offers this area protection.
The Bush River Watershed Management Plan, completed in 2003, notes the impact of urbanization
on the sensitive natural resources in this portion of the watershed, and calls for preservation of these
large tracts of wetlands, and implementation of stream bank stabilization in the Otter Point Creek
and Ha-Ha Branch tributaries to the Bush River.
Historically, the community of Edgewood evolved from a railroad stop at the "edge of the woods."
Agriculture was the primary land use until the opening of the Edgewood Arsenal in 1917-18. A
village containing a hotel, post office, tavern, and general store developed in close proximity to the
train station, fueled by the influx of military personnel and their families. The community developed
a unique and rich diversity of cultural and ethnic backgrounds and one of its major strengths
continues to be found in its people.
The area is primarily residential with a mixture of homes ranging from apartments and small
cottages to large waterfront dwellings. Commercial and service oriented activities are available at
the Community Center on U.S. Route 40 and the Neighborhood Center on MD Route 755. In
addition, Clayton Station, Magnolia Business Park, Greater Harford Industrial Park, Lakeside
Business Center, Emmorton Business Park and Fashion Park contain a significant number of
warehouses and distribution facilities. Interspersed throughout the area are several large retail
shopping centers and industrial parks on U.S Route 40, MD Routes 7, 24, and 755. The designation
of these corridors as an Enterprise Zone is facilitating revitalization of the community by offering tax
169
credits for new businesses and for improvements to existing businesses. This action is helping to
entice high quality commercial/industrial development along these corridors.
Three elementary schools, Edgewood, Deerfield and William Paca - Old Post, Edgewood Middle
School, and Edgewood High School serve the community. Based on the October 2003 amendment
to the Annual Growth Report, all of these schools are operating at less than the APF standards for
capacity except Deerfield Elementary. A refurbished library, post office, numerous churches,
MARC train station, mass transit, senior center, young adult center, and entertainment facilities serve
the community. The Edgewood Boys and Girls Club and a Police Athletic League (PAL) facility
serve the community. Two volunteer fire companies (Abingdon and Joppa-Magnolia) are located in
Edgewood and the Harford County Sheriff’s Southern Precinct is located on Gateway Drive. The
Edgewood Farmers Market is held every Thursday at the MARC train station beginning in late
spring and concluding in the fall.
The community boasts Flying Point Park, a major waterfront park and boat launching facility serving
all of Harford County. Edgewood Park, Edgewater Park, Winters Run Park, Willoughby Beach
Landing, and Woodbridge Park serve the open space need of the community. The Anita Leight Park
and Estuary Center at Otter Point Creek provides public awareness and appreciation of estuarine
ecosystems.
The Edgewood Community had a 2000 population of 21,263, which is approximately 10% of the
County’s total population (Figure 51). While, the Edgewood community has the fourth highest
population in the County, between 1990 and 2000 the population of the area decreased by 1.36%.
The 20-34 year old age group experienced the largest drop in population, a loss of 31% (2,078
people). The demographic profile of Edgewood indicates a maturing population, which is a common
trend throughout Harford County. Between 1990 and 2000, the 50 and older age category had the
greatest increase in population, 41.69% (3,034 to 4,299). Households in Edgewood increased by
nearly 4%, from 5,370 to 5,894. The challenge for the Edgewood Community is to continue to
provide housing and services necessary for its maturing population while improving quality of life
issues for its younger population.
Edgewood Demographic Profile: 1990 - 2000

Employment 2,960 6,646 124.53%
White 17,187 14,548 -15.35%
Black 3,587 5,427 51.30%
Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 387 347 -10.34%
Other 289 287 -0.69%
Figure 51
170
$150,000 a year increased by 1100%, while households earning less than $50,000 a year decreased
by 24%. Total employment in this area increased by 125% from 2,960 to 6,646.
The community contains an interchange at I-95 and MD Route 24. Other major transportation routes
that pass through the community include U.S. Route 40, MD Route 7, MD Route 152, and MD
Route 755. The U.S. 40 corridor offers a surplus of redevelopment opportunities. Harford County
Transportation Services (HCTS) operates four bus routes in and around Edgewood including the
number 5 - Edgewood Circulator which is a local bus connecting residential neighborhoods with
retail employment centers, and the number 7 which connects Edgewood with White Marsh, Johns
Hopkins Hospital and Downtown Baltimore. In addition, MTA operates two commuter buses to
Baltimore via U.S. Route 40. Park-and-Ride lots are located on MD Route 24 at the I-95
interchange and on MD Route 755 at the MARC train station.
Plan for the Area
In March of 2000, the Harford County Council adopted the Edgewood Community Plan as an
element of the County’s Master Plan. The goal of the Plan is to guide future growth and help ensure
the sustainability of the community. The Plan was developed through a community-visioning
workshop. Working with the Community Council, results of the visioning workshop were
synthesized into a concept plan for the physical redevelopment of Edgewood. Efforts to implement
the Community Plan are supported by the County.
The overall concept set forth for the Edgewood Community is the redevelopment of traditional
neighborhoods and the establishment of a Main Street development (Figure 46). The plan for the
area calls for establishing a mix of uses, including civic, commercial, residential, office, and green
space along the MD Route 755 corridor. This corridor and surrounding neighborhoods are linked to
two anchor areas by tree-lined pedestrian and bicycle-friendly streets. These anchor areas are the
Edgewood Plaza/Library on Hanson Road and the MARC Train Station. A mix of land uses is
promoted in residential and nonresidential areas in order to attract the physical development
necessary to achieve community revitalization. A direct outcome of the Main Street and traditional
neighborhood concept is the establishment of the Edgewood Neighborhood Overlay District
(ENOD). The ENOD is a zoning overlay district that provides flexibility in zoning to allow a mix of
compatible uses, such as Live/Work Units.
Located within the ENOD is Washington Court, an area designated as mixed use by the Edgewood
Community. The Washington Court Project is an initiative to redevelop a former military housing
complex into a mixed-use community. The proposal for the site is to develop a community center,
education center, recreation center, and employment center/support services all surrounding a
community green or open space.
171
Revitalization of the U.S. 40 corridor into a viable commercial district remains a top priority.
Quality redevelopment of underutilized properties that enhances the entire community is strongly
encouraged. Like the ENOD, the U.S. 40 Commercial Revitalization District is a legislative district.
The U.S. 40 Commercial Revitalization District continues to offer incentives to encourage
revitalization and redevelopment for properties adjacent to this corridor. Flexibility in land uses and
standards enhances the appearance and ensures compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods.
Incentives are provided to present opportunities for mixed-use development.
Because redevelopment and revitalization are strongly supported by this Plan, care must be taken not
to saturate the area with commercially zoned properties. Studies indicate that there is sufficient
inventory of commercial land in the County to support the needs identified in this Plan. Based on
this, no additional commercial zoning will be supported in this community area unless, upon further
analysis, it is determined that there is a need for additional commercial zoning. Any additional
zoning changes will be subject to a technical analysis to ensure that the proposed change does not
generate adverse impacts in the community. Likewise, this Plan does not support expansion of the
Development Envelope north of I-95 adjacent to this Community Area.
A public/private partnership initiated streetscape improvements at the Community Center on U.S.

Route 40 and Paul Martin Drive/Tree Top Drive to beautify this community. This streetscape
beautification project is expected to spread to the Neighborhood Center on MD Route 755 and to
other major corridors and the industrial parks throughout the community to provide a common theme
for all of Edgewood.
Redevelopment of the MARC Train Station continues to be a major concern for the Edgewood
Community. The Edgewood MARC station is one of two stations in the County and therefore
should be viewed as a gateway into the County for commuters and Amtrak users. Redevelopment of
this transportation hub is essential in order to increase ridership and to leave a positive impression of
the community on its users.
Building on the existing transportation strengths in the community, the focus is on incorporating
safe, convenient pedestrian, bicycle and transit options into the current system to provide alternatives
to dependence on the automobile for all trips. Traffic calming, lighting and sidewalk improvement,
and bike lanes are recommended for various locations throughout the community.
Additional public facilities will be needed to provide for continued low intensity growth in the
community. Growth must be staged to ensure that necessary facilities are available to the population
when development occurs. Future consideration will be given to various means of transportation
modes and the continued expansion of mass transit within the community to facilitate the movement
of residents to job centers located within the Enterprise Zone and throughout the Development
Envelope.
In 2002, the Winters Run-Otter Point Creek Initiative identified key properties that are
environmentally valuable to the area and to the Bush River Watershed. Several of the properties
identified are located within the Edgewood Community and within the Chesapeake Bay Critical
Area. These properties contain many important natural features including Forest Interior Dwelling
Bird Species (FIDS) habitat. The study also identified a series of properties that are important to
172
completion of the Winters Run Greenway. Together, these properties would expand the existing
green hubs established by the State’s GreenPrint Program and create crucial connections within the
Winters Run-Otter Point Creek corridor. Protection of these properties would provide needed open
space for the community. Future development of lands adjacent to these sensitive areas should be
done in a manner which recognizes the ecological importance of the area, and the County should
actively pursue opportunities to protect these resources.
173
174
% % RI
BE
AG
VE
DR
ON
ND
AT
RS
CK
W
00
E
PI
HO
ES
18
BE
RD
R
% RE
AT
CT
T
DR
ES
CT RD
S
OY
EY
% AH
SH
I
FR
LN
O
CHIPPER
CT
% RD SK
RE
DR DR
%
BLOSSOM
A NG
ST
DI
L
AR
VEN
UN
PU
STE
BO
SO
JAN
EB DR
DR
CT
DR
AR
BT
C HIPP
ET
D
%
IDE
PE E
RAS NE
DR
D DR
00
DR
ER
% 24
SI
DR
N
DR VI
MEL
DR
DR
N RK
JOH EV
EN MA HA
V
ST OY
BU
EN
CT
DR
EL CIR
MICHA
RD
DR
CT
PL
JO
DR
EE PER R
DR
CHIP P
HN
TE
N
HW Y
E ND
MA R
V SA
STE 2100
SHEL
E
IE
OV
PA
C
NG
ST
TIN
UL
DR
EDG
DI
S
UN
SKI
Y
HA
EY
DR
W
PULA
SO
TIN
RB
MAR
FR
EW O
OA
TR
OU
LN ER
RD
K
WATER
ET AT
R
OP DR
CT
W
CE
EP
OD
DR
DE
NTER
GATE
SIDE
ER
EMPL
GR E
DR
ID
RD
Æ
W
Ý
BT
W
ÿ
A
Y
Y WY
900
JUDY DR EB
E
BROOKSID
TE
A
W A T ER G
WY
J
Æ
IRIS
TREE ELOISE LN CT DR
W
DR
DR 1 RD
IN
TE
Y
MSON
W ATER BA
WINTERBERRY
RD
RB
T
IDGE ET
WY
WO
CRES
GE
ER
SW E W IL
CT
WY
ED
N
RY
DR
OD
LO U HBY
CRI
PEN
SHALLOW
IDE
G
BR
LABU R NU
CREST
AS
I
LN
FIS
CT
G
DBRID
RE
OKS
SEA BR
CT
CEDAR
W OO
E
MEL
HE
L A CEW OOD
GE
DB
C
PAL
LILA
RM
H
ODY
BRO
LA
DR T
AL
AN
AC
DR
OO
CREST
UD
CT
CT
NSDOWNE
TO
AN
CT
BA
HO
Ý Ý
ED BE CT
K
ME
CT
NY
ON
AL
LO
W
DR
TOP
SA
ILB REW OO
NT
HA
S
CT N
M
RN
ROCK OA D
TT
SH
YA
LAS
T
GE RD
ANG EL
V IEW VIE H
NS
DR
OW
T OP
O
R W
TR Y
DA
BE
DR
HB
WATERFOWL
EY CT
AR
N
LL
E CT WY CT CT
W
LN
HA
C
N
WY
BA
HO R
UG
HA
UNTAIN
VA
RR
TW
E
Y
LN
E
AF T W
ES
HO
W THO
LE R RNE O
LO
Y
O
C
SE
D
O
ES
OO Y
NIA
OD
GER
W
%
V AL
CE
SH
NE
CT
LW
IL
HE
SE
RS
D HO
FO
RD
CT
GRE
ML R
BU
NT
MA
Ý
CT
OE
RD
SI PERRY
W
OLIV EBRANCH CT
OCK
HO
LEY
RD
BRIA
RBIN
MEADOW
DR
L
ER
ER
SE
EY V
EN-
LN
T
OV V A LL NG
HA RD ER NU
DR
RI RE
BA
ER
CT
R
DR CT
QU
RD
HA
E W BE TT
SP
c
Æ %
GI
CL
E M OO
EA IN LL BU D
U
RD
D
R
CT
LW
LN
M PA PA Y A CT
O IA
CT JUN
STR
ER
W
ER CT
CT
WY CT
IPER LBERR
O
MU
AD
AY
S
W
ACORN
LN
Y
R
AV
ME
RD
F
EG
CT
LEA
BAY BERRY
W IND
RIDGE CT C A TALPA
CT
AR
IN
70
CT
ITY
IP
A
BO
G
RD
CT
DR
D
RD
APPLE
RIN
TUL
N
O SC
HAR
H
CT
R
TON RD LN
DR
RE
VER RN
Ý
HO
GS C HER RY
%
SP
CLO CT BEA M E LA
O RC
Y RIDGE
W IND
RN
OR
SE
KIN
RD
VE CT
00
2 CT R
WALTM
BR
ON
CT
21
T
ELO
Y CAM
AN
CT
CH
MOUN
ASHBY LN BR
DA R
CH CT E LN
SQUARE 3
% RR
CR OA
APPLE
T UP
T
CT
STA
UR
CT
Y
CE
DR
WY
SQ 1800 OS
T
DR
A R W OOD
AN
RD
OD
S
CO
NFO
ES
D
WY T WO RT SI
DR
MAN
SA IN HAN
NE
Y
SE EA
FERN
CT DAR
RD
CH
CT
RD
W OO D
IN O
RR
RD
LAR
SON
% NH
CK
ST
NG
PINEFIELD
R
G E CH
R AINBOW
GEOR PHE
R CT CT EE
GR
PE
CT
CH
CT CT ISTO
L A RCH
DOGW OOD
CHR
CT
BA
EL
DR
CT
6
Figure 52
KE
DELL
RR
POND
SAIN 5
1600 CEDA
R
R
Y
CI
SO
RD
CLOV ER
V ALLE
OD
D
R
4
PINEFIEL
CT
RD DR
175
MEADOW O
E
IVANHO
W
%
LILY
E
SHIR
DR
CT
YORK
V CT
ING
BOXEL
RD
CT ST
HARF
HAW T
SQUAR
DR
CT
EMMO
T
LEAF
HARF
%
DR
W
HANSON
ORD
DER
HORN
CT
7 ER
AR
DR
N
CT JUNIP
E
W
C ED
Ý
OR
CT
D
TO
O
G O LN
%
LIB
IN
D
E R TY
RL
BU OW BELLFL
RTO
AD O RD
D
P
ME OOD
W
EDGEWOOD COMMUNITY
CAN
LA
DEAR
%
W
DGE
CT
CT SOU
Q
CT
HRI
ER
TH
R
KE
PIN
DR
J A ME RI
UT
OAK
DLE
DR DG
RE
SO
DR
RD
CRO
E
CT
CT
ST
E
N
W OO
S QUARE DR INT
D
CT
AR
PLAN
OW
C
MAT
% CED PO
H A R LES
SS
JA
Ý
D
N
CT
NOR
E
ME
OA
GA
LN
DR
ST
TRIM
FIELDS
LOC
CT
OA
WY
ST
AV
O EAST
DR
%
HO
K
TE
W
DO
I
CT
PINE
BU
HFIE
TEA
RD
BLE
T
LLY
OW R
CT
K
GW
N NL
BER
LDS
CT
LA
CT E
OO
AV
WE
AV
DR
RY
% 2100
Y
CT
BE
D
ST
AV
FIELD
BST
AV
ST GRAIG
DR
CT LN
W EL L MAIN STREET SERVICE AREA RESIDENTIAL LAND USES
RAI ROA D
CK
AV
ER
DR
AV
RO
S
N MC GAN ST
L
S HA
DY
% ST
MOR
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
ST
ST
AV
CAN
N
RD BROW
W
V IE
NEIGHBORHOODS
N
1700 ST MULTI FAMILY HOUSING

BLE R
LN AR IR
TRIM FA
G
%
b
Æ
ST
D
Ý OD
NG AL
OO
TT MANUFACTURED HOMES
DA
O
TR NU
ST
W
DR
RD
MS CHURCH
GE
AR LIVE / WORK UNITS
RD
ED
RD
% HD
E
AV
AND OFFICES
LA
OLD
YA LD
NT
ST
O
JA
ST
J
Æ
NON-RESIDENTIAL
%
ST
CO
RE
RD
LAND USES
B
ST
IDE
UT PARK ENTRANCE
N
RD
%
R
TAL INDUSTRIAL
CT
0
110
b
Æ
COMMERCIAL
BL
E
% MARC TRAIN STATION

GREEN SPACES
AV
A
M PK
RO N
LN
% % % c
Æ
ý
LIBRARY
POST OFFICE
CIVIC SPACES
EDGEWOOD CENTER
Aberdeen
Æ
SQUARE
Proving ÿ SENIOR CENTER

EM
% Ground
MO
CRITICAL AREA BOUNDARY

RD
Prepared by Planning & Zoning, November 1999.

176
C #
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
BUSH RIVER
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
# # # #
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
#
#
#
# #
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
#
C
#
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
# #
#
# #
#
#
#
#
#
# #
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
N
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
#
755
#
N
#
ER
#
Edgewood Agricultural N Neighborhood Center

Community Area
Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
HCC Harford
(over 10 acres)

Location Map N
Figure 53
177
178
Fallston Community Area
Community Character
The Fallston Community Area is located on the western edge of Harford County. It is generally
bounded by the Harford County/Baltimore County line at Little Gunpowder Falls to the south and
west, Jarrettsville Pike, Furnace Road, and MD Route 23 to the north, and Grafton Shop Road,
Winters Run, Old Joppa Road, and Jerusalem Road to the east. Predominantly rural in character, the
community contains large areas of Rural Residential development, operating farms, and some
limited commercial development.
In the 2000 Census, the Fallston Area had a population of 17,199, which is 7.9% of the County’s
total population (Figure 54). Between 1990 and 2000 the population of the area increased by 2.7%.
All of the population age groups declined except for the 10 - 14 age group and those 50 and above.
The 10 - 14 year old age group grew by 23.7% increasing from 1,222 to 1,511. The population 50
and above increased by 44.7 % going from 4,127 to 5,971. The largest decrease occurred in the 20-
34 age group whose numbers declined by 36.6% going from 2,911 to 1,846. During the same time
period, the number of households increased by 9.8% going from 5,370 to 5,894.
Fallston Demographic Profile: 1990 – 2000

Employment 5,135 6,952 35.38%
White 16,409 16,703 1.79%
Black 107 147 37.38%
Other 24 24 0.00%
Figure 54
179
Primary land use designations within the Fallston Community Area are Agriculture and Rural
Residential, with a narrow arm of the Development Envelope extending along U.S. Route 1 towards
Baltimore County. The Rural Village of Upper Cross Roads, located at the intersection of MD
Routes 152 and 165 and the Neighborhood Center at Fallston Mall provide basic goods and services
to area residents. Promoting orderly, low density residential growth, four large pockets of Rural
Residential land use are interspersed throughout the planning area. They are located at the
northernmost end of the planning area, east of MD Route 152; surrounding and to the northwest of
Upper Cross Roads; along MD Route 152 between Watervale and Pleasantville Roads; and on either
side of MD Route 152 south of U.S. Route 1.
Winters Run and Little Gunpowder Falls are two important natural features that define the Fallston
area landscape. The topography of the area consists of rolling hills and a ridge dividing the
community area lengthwise, into the Winters Run and Little Gunpowder Falls Watersheds. Winters
Run is a major tributary draining to the Bush River, and is addressed in the Bush River Watershed
Management Plan, completed in 2003. Due to the low intensity of development in a majority of the
Winters Run Watershed in the Fallston area, much of the watershed is identified in the Watershed
Management Plan as having high quality streams and good biodiversity; however, agricultural
activities have impacted a portion of the watershed. The designation of the Water Source Protection
Area in the Winters Run watershed reflects the continuing need to protect the quality and safety of
surface and subsurface waters which are used to supply public and private water for portions of the
County and the Town of Bel Air. In contrast, the area surrounding Little Gunpowder Falls in this
planning area is almost completely incorporated into Gunpowder Falls State Park which affords
State protection to this valuable natural resource. Forested areas exist along the steeper valley slopes
of Fallston's many small tributaries, along Winter's Run, and within the State Park.
The Quaker settlement at “Old Fallston” is one of the oldest historical components of the planning
area. Completed in 1884, the Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad crossed the middle of the area
from Little Gunpowder Falls to Fallston to Vale, connecting Baltimore to York, Pennsylvania. This
railroad provided market access for dairy products from area farms. Significant farmhouses,
outbuildings, mill sites, and churches remain throughout the area. The small, historically significant
crossroads settlements of Vale, High Point, Pleasantville, and Wilna are also located within this
planning area.
Agriculture remains an important part of the Fallston community. Preservation efforts were
enhanced with the designation of the Manor Conservancy Rural Legacy Area. This Rural Legacy
Area, which encompasses parts of Baltimore and Harford counties, was established in 2001. The
primary agricultural production in this community is grain; however, several dairy and beef
operations are located here as well. The blend of rural residential development and farming
operations complements the rural nature of the Fallston community.
Located on the western edge of the County, the community is serviced by a network of highways,
which provide access to the attractions and employment markets within the Baltimore area. Passing
through the bottom portion of the Fallston Community Area, U.S. Route 1 is a major thoroughfare
into Baltimore from Harford County. One defining route for the Fallston Area is MD Route 152,
which follows the ridge between watersheds and divides this planning area. Many of the recent
residential developments in the Fallston community are directly and indirectly tied to this major
180
arterial road. Additional State Routes include 165 and 147, as well as 146 and 23, the two latter of
which comprise segments of the community area boundary. The older County roads within this
planning area provide insight into the area's historical road system.
The primary commercial district in the Fallston community is located along the U. S. Route 1
corridor and is within the County's Development Envelope. However, this area has experienced an
influx of residential development due to redevelopment of the old Fallston Hospital site.
The Rural Village of Upper Cross Roads and two small commercial areas -- one at the intersection of
Pleasantville Road and MD Route 152 and one at "Old Fallston" centered around the Fallston Post
Office -- supply smaller scale retail needs and provide community focal points for the residents of
the Fallston Community Area.
The community contains several important public and private facilities. Public facilities include the
Youth's Benefit Elementary School, the Fallston Middle and High Schools, a public library branch,
and several large recreational facilities. Based on the October 2003 amendment to the Annual
Growth Report, Fallston Middle School exceeds the APF standards for capacity while Youth Benefit
and Fallston High School are below APF capacity standards. A Volunteer Fire and Ambulance
Company with two stations provide emergency services to the Fallston Community. The community
is also serviced by a number of religious organizations and a private airpark.
Plan for the Area
The plan for the Fallston Community Area is to foster continuation of existing agricultural,
residential, and commercial development activity in its current configuration. The intent of the
Rural Residential areas is to encourage orderly residential development in areas not serviced by
public water and sewer. These areas are planned to help protect the rural character of Fallston by
providing a transition from the Development Envelope to the rural areas. Based on this concept, the
Plan does not support expansion of the Rural Residential areas. Studies also indicate that there is
sufficient capacity to meet projected growth needs, therefore, expansion of the Development
Envelope and Rural Villages is not supported by this Plan.
In addition, areas presently defined for commercial use are deemed adequate to meet the immediate
and foreseeable future retail and service needs of the community. No additional commercial zoning
will be supported within this community area unless, upon further analysis, it is determined that
there is a need for additional commercial land. Any additional zoning changes will also be subject to
community.
While the overall population growth in this area is less than some of the surrounding communities,
the area has seen a 23.7% increase in middle school aged students. School overcrowding continues
to be a concern for the community. Efforts are underway to address the issue through several
methods. The development of a new middle/high school complex at Patterson Mill, within the
Development Envelope, along with the modernization of Bel Air High School will address
overcrowding issues in areas now sending students to Fallston schools. Additional revenue sources
should also be investigated and implemented to help provide needed educational facilities.
181
Due to its inclusion in the Development Envelope, the commercial area along U.S. Route 1 will be
serviced by public water and sewer. These services will be provided only to those properties within
the established Fallston subdistrict. Accordingly, all new commercial development should be
oriented toward the U.S. Route 1 commercial corridor and adequately buffered from neighboring
residential areas.
Because of this, relocation of the Fallston Hospital, and a State Highway proposal to convert U.S.
Route 1 to a six-lane divided highway, a community visioning workshop was held. Residents and
business owners joined with the County to create a proposal for the U. S. Route 1 Corridor. The
primary issues identified were land use - redevelopment options and transportation - specifically the
road network capacity and safety. Synthesizing the conclusions of the workshop members, a vision
for the U.S. Route 1 Corridor was created. The proposal shows a tree lined boulevard with a
pedestrian network. The community’s preference for additional landscaping is reflected in the public
open spaces and tree lined streets. Captured and interior site parking should be provided, and these
areas should be screened by either landscaping or buildings. The measures necessary to implement
this vision will be considered as part of the comprehensive update of the Zoning Code and the
Comprehensive Zoning process.
Because a large portion of the Fallston Community Area is agriculturally zoned, maintaining the
rural character is a priority. Preservation efforts in the area have protected over 2,700 acres of land,
and efforts to increase this number should be pursued. Designation of the Manor Conservancy Rural
Legacy Area in 2001 has increased opportunities for property owners to participate in preservation
initiatives.
Maintaining the quality and safety of the waters delineated by the Water Source Protection Area in
the Winters Run Watershed is also a priority. Additional programs and controls must be developed
for these areas to ensure that incompatible land uses are regulated and carefully controlled, and that
appropriate development standards are implemented to protect the water sources.
182
V
V
V
152
e
N
23
146
C
BEL AIR
V
165
T
152
/(
1
GUNPOWDER FALLS
STATE PARK
e
147
152
Fallston Agricultural N Neighborhood Center
Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
HCC Harford
(over 10 acres)

N
Location Map
Figure 55
183
184
Forest Hill Community Area
Community Character
The Forest Hill Community Area is unique in that while the majority of the land area is located in
the rural part of the County, the southernmost portion is located within the Development Envelope.
The community area encompasses that section of Harford County from Deer Creek south to MD
Route 23, from Sharon/Sharon Acres Roads to the west, and U.S. Route 1 to the east. The heritage
of this area is that of dairy farming operations and small communities including Chestnut Hill,
Ferncliff, Hickory, Sandy Hook, Rocks, and Gibson which are situated among the rolling Piedmont
hills of Bynum Run, Winters Run, and the Deer Creek tributaries of Cabbage Run, Stout Bottle
Branch, and South Stirrup Run. The largest concentration of homes and businesses within the
community area may be found in and around the Village of Forest Hill. True to its name, Forest Hill
is located on the high ground of the drainage divide between Winters Run, Deer Creek, and Bynum
Run which is just outside the northernmost boundary of the Development Envelope.
In “Our Harford Heritage”, C. Milton Wright describes Forest Hill as containing the usual places of
business as of 1858. Although there is no record of the date of origin of the name, it is known that
the village was called Forest Hill for many years before 1858. At that time, and in later years, the
village contained a private school which was then converted to a public school, an Odd Fellows Hall,
and a Friends (Quaker) Meeting House.
In the 1880's, construction of the Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad made Forest Hill a chief milk
shipping center; the railroad also served as a commuter line to countless passengers. In addition to
the station in Forest Hill, the railroad stopped at Ferncliff, Sharon, and Rocks. As many of the rural
industries declined, and competition with good roads, trucks, and automobiles became too great, the
railroad ceased operation in 1959.
In the mid-1990's, Harford County Government, in conjunction with the newly formed Foundation
for the Preservation of the Ma and Pa Railroad, began planning for a seven mile trail along the bed
of the railroad in the Bel Air/Forest Hill area. The Ma and Pa Heritage Trail follows the alignment
of the historic Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad from Vale to Forest Hill.
Phase I of the trail, which is approximately two miles in length, was completed in 1999. It extends
from Tollgate Road, near the Parks and Recreation headquarters, to Main Street in Bel Air. Phase II
is 1.75 miles in length and was completed in 2000 and extends from the new Blake’s Venture Park
on Melrose Lane, near the intersection with Bynum Road, to Friends Park in Forest Hill.
Hickory is also located within the community area; it was presumably named after the dominant tree
species within the area. Early accounts maintain that Hickory contained a post office as well as St.
Ignatius Church, which dates from 1793. According to Wright, the village also contained a tavern,
which was the terminus for a stagecoach line that ran between Hickory and Magnolia for the first
half of the 19th century.
185
Most notably, Hickory was also the location of the first consolidated school for black students in
Harford County. Built in 1951, the school contained facilities for elementary and high school
students who traveled from all over the County to attend. Though now integrated, the facility is still
in use within the Harford County School System as an elementary school. Students in the Forest
Hill Area attend one of four elementary schools – Forest Hill, Hickory, North Bend or North
Harford. Middle school students attend Southampton, and high school students attend either C.
Milton Wright or North Harford. Based on the October 2003 amendment to the Annual Growth
Report, these schools are operating below the APF standard for capacity. The Bel Air Volunteer Fire
Company provides fire and emergency services to the community.
As the seat of government for Harford County, the Town of Bel Air has historically been a focal
point for new growth, particularly within the past decade. As a result, growth has gradually crept
north of Bel Air as new residential areas were developed and commercial markets soon followed.
With the construction of the Hickory Bypass and extension of MD Route 23, access was improved to
the rural areas north and west of Bel Air.
Travel from the rural area to Bel Air along MD Routes 24 and 23 resulted in much of the land
adjacent to MD Route 24, and south of Jarrettsville Road, being developed into commercial and
retail uses that captured business from the rural area. Combined with development in Bel Air, Forest
Hill and Hickory now serve as transition areas to the rural area.
While agricultural land use has given way to suburban residential and commercial interests, Forest
Hill and Hickory still serve as gateways to the rural area. Even with development pressure directly
south of the village, Forest Hill is still an excellent example of the rural lifestyle in terms of culture
and architecture.
Located at a crossroads, the village is a significant employment center with the Forest Hill Industrial
Airpark and the Forest Hill Business Center located in, or adjacent to, the village. Forest Hill
remains home to an elementary school, an original Maryland and Pennsylvania station, and Friends
Park, which is named for the Friends Meeting House that once stood within the village.
Additionally, the village contains a variety of small-scale commercial uses and historic homes.
Over time, Hickory has grown away from the crossroads at MD Route 543 and U. S. Route 1 and
has become quite diverse in terms of content. The Hickory area also serves as an employment center
with a diversity of uses including farm equipment sales, restaurants, auto sales, equipment repair,
and veterinary services to name a few. The Hickory Village Shopping Center has been redeveloped
to include a new restaurant, fast food franchise and space for a new supermarket. The village also
contains a transportation facility for the Board of Education, and has become more of an
employment center with the development of the Wyndemede Corporate Center. Hickory is also
home to numerous residents, and will continue to grow as several new neighborhoods are planned.
Road improvements, such as the Hickory Bypass, have been constructed to reduce traffic flow
through the villages and accommodate truck traffic from the Forest Hill Industrial Airpark, the
Forest Hill Business Center, and the Wyndemede Corporate Center. The intersection of MD Route
23 and the Hickory Bypass has become a community focal point with the new Greater Harford
Industrial Center, Wade R. Tucker II memorial football fields, restaurants and small shopping center.
186
The Forest Hill area had a 2000 population of 5,122, which is 2.3% of the County’s population
(Figure 56). Between 1990 and 2000, the population of the area increased by 55.2%. While the
number of persons between the ages of 20 - 34 living in the Forest Hill area increased modestly by
14.5% (from 743 to 851), all other age groups grew more dramatically in size. The age group
between 10 - 14 years showed the highest population growth with an 87% increase (235 to 440).
During the same period, the number of households increased by 53.2% - from 1,140 to 1,746.
Forest Hill Demographic Profile: 1990 - 2000

Employment 961 3,683 283.25%
White 3,215 4,921 53.06%
Black 74 146 97.30%
Other 1 2 100.00%
Figure 56
$100,000 a year increased by 1011%, while households earning less than $35,000 a year decreased
by 28%. Total employment in this area increased by 283% from 961 to 3,683.
Plan for the Area
The strength of the Forest Hill Community Area will continue to be based on the balance between
rural and suburban land uses. For much of the area, farming will continue as the principal land use
and economic force. Commercial and suburban residential growth will continue in the area between
the Town of Bel Air and the areas south and east of Forest Hill, and south, east, and west of Hickory.
Growth in these areas will continue to diminish the distinction between the Town, village of Forest
Hill and Hickory as separate entities. Consequently, the plan for the area maintains the demarcation
line between the more suburban areas in the southernmost portion of the community area and the
farming operations and villages in order to provide diversity and balance between land use
intensities.
The rural village of Forest Hill and the community of Hickory will serve as gateways to the rural
area, providing a transition between uses within the Development Envelope and uses within the rural
area. Because there is sufficient capacity within the Development Envelope to address development
187
needs for the life of this Plan, the Development Envelope will not be expanded in this community
area. The Development Envelope shall remain south of Jarrettsville Road to reduce development
pressure on Forest Hill, and the Development Envelope shall not be extended west of MD Route 24.
The Forest Hill village boundary will also remain unchanged. Any new development adjacent to the
village must be of a low-intensity nature and of a design compatible to the village in terms of
density, pedestrian orientation, scale, road design, and architecture. A Village Study has been
scheduled for the Forest Hill village. The Study will entail the careful inventory of architectural
characteristics, site design and Village Business characteristics.
The Rural Residential area will continue as a transition area between the more intensive
developments north of Bel Air to the rural, predominantly agricultural area north of Forest Hill. The
boundaries of the Rural Residential area will not be expanded. With regard to the Hickory area,
existing boundaries of the Development Envelope shall remain intact, bounded by existing Rural
Residential area.
Maintaining the boundaries of the Development Envelope will serve to protect the integrity of the
villages as destinations rather than extensions of suburban growth, and it will help to reduce traffic
through the village centers. Additionally, studies indicate that there is adequate commercially zoned
land to meet the immediate and foreseeable retail and service needs of the County. No additional
commercial zoning will be supported within the Forest Hill Community Area unless further analysis
determines that there is a need for additional commercial land. Any additional zoning changes will
also be subject to a technical analysis to ensure that the proposed change will not generate adverse
impacts to the community.
The Rural Village of Forest Hill shall be planned for new growth and redevelopment to help protect
and promote the viability of the agricultural area. Growth shall be compatible with, and of a quantity
appropriate to, the existing character of the village specifically in terms of road design, scale, and
architecture. The historic aspects of the Forest Hill rural village shall be evaluated, and design
guidelines should be developed that will help to protect the historic integrity of the area. Major
commercial uses shall be directed toward Bel Air.
Economic development programs and policies shall be developed that promote existing businesses
serving the agricultural industry, and that give priority to new agricultural businesses within Forest
Hill and Hickory. These shall be designed to promote redevelopment in older areas, and adaptive
reuse of historic structures within the area.
Public facilities should be provided on a community need basis and should be located within village
centers for rural areas, and within Community and Neighborhood Centers within the Development
Envelope. The Department of Parks and Recreation is in the process of planning the 30-acre
Prospect Mill Park to help address the active open space needs of the Hickory/Fountain Green area.
Additionally, the community area currently contains farming operations participating in agricultural
preservation programs. There are over 2,000 acres of preserved agricultural land in the area. The
Forest Hill Community Area also falls into the expansion area for the Lower Deer Creek Rural
188
Legacy area. Landowner interest should be identified for future agricultural preservation efforts
with emphasis on farms between existing blocks of protected land.
189
190
543
24
/(
1
PALMER STATE PARK
V
V
N
e
23
HCC
Forest Hill Agricultural N Neighborhood Center

Community Area
Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
HCC Harford
Community College
State and County Parks
(over 10 acres)

Location Map N
Figure 57
191
192
Jarrettsville Community Area
Community Character
The Jarrettsville Area is located in the rural northwest part of Harford County and is bounded by
White Hall Road, Little Deer Creek, and St. Clair Bridge Road to the north, Sharon Road and South
Stirrup Run to the east, MD Route 23, Furnace Road, and Jarrettsville Pike to the south and the
Harford/Baltimore County line to the west. The primary designated land use in the Jarrettsville
Community Area is Agriculture; however, a portion of designated Rural Residential land use
surrounds the Rural Village of Jarrettsville to the south. Jarrettsville, located at the intersection of
MD Route 165 and MD Route 23, has an established core that provides basic goods and services to
local farming operations and area residents. In addition to the designated Rural Villages of
Jarrettsville and Cooptown, the small communities of Madonna, Blackhorse, Chrome Hill, and
Federal Hill are contained within this area.
As is typical in the Piedmont region, the topography for the Jarrettsville area consists of gently
rolling hills and numerous small streams. The many tributaries along the valleys in this community
feed the Deer Creek, Winters Run, and Little Gunpowder Falls Watersheds; Deer Creek and Little
Gunpowder Falls serve as two of the County's main trout streams. Deer Creek is a State-designated
Scenic River. The headwaters of Winters Run, a tributary to the Bush River in the southern portion
of the County, are found within the Jarrettsville area, and are addressed within the 2003 Bush River
Watershed Management Plan. Implementation of this Management Plan will help to improve the
water quality of the Bush River, as well as protect local tributaries.
At one time, the area was heavily wooded with deciduous trees; however, much of the forested areas
have been cleared for farming or by logging operations. Considerable acreage within the area is still
forested with mature oaks, hickory, tulip poplar, walnut and other hardwoods, necessitating the
location of a Department of Natural Resources Ranger Station on the ridge at Madonna.
My Lady's Manor, an important reminder of colonial America, is partially located in this community
area. The 10,000-acre tract was granted in 1713 to attract settlers to the inland region of what was
then Baltimore County. This northwest region of the County was historically referred to as "The
Forrest" or "Nodd Forrest" because of the area's extensive wooded wilderness. Inland agrarian
settlement resulted in numerous 19th century remnant structures -- mills, churches, schoolhouses,
residences, and farm buildings -- which are scattered across the landscape. Place names, such as the
many rural roads and intermittent village names, are descriptive reminders of early area families,
industries, and community focal points.
In the 2000 Census, the Jarrettsville community had a population of 9,802, which is 4.5% of the
County’s overall population (Figure 58). Between 1990 and 2000, the population in Jarrettsville
increased by 5.6% (523 people). The population over age 50 showed the greatest increase growing
by 52%, from 1,267 to 1,927. The 10 - 14 year old age group also showed significant increase,
growing by 37%, from 687 to 941. There was also a significant decrease in population for the 0 - 4
193
year old age group and the 20 - 34 year old age group, both of which fell by 30 and 35%
respectively. Households increased during this time by 8.5%, from 2,757 to 2,992.
Jarrettsville Demographic Profile: 1990 - 2000

Employment 1,557 2,491 59.99%
White 8,998 9,481 5.37%
Black 230 194 -15.65%
Other 5 18 260.00%
Figure 58
Despite significant residential growth in the past 25 years, with the transformation of individual
farms into low-intensity rural residential development, the Jarrettsville Community Area remains
primarily agricultural. Farms provide grain, hay, orchard crops and pasture land for horses, dairy
and beef cattle. Existing farming operations generally range from 40 to 80 acres, with some parcels
in excess of 200 acres. Over 22% of the area has been protected from future development through
permanent agricultural easements.
Maryland Routes 23 and 165 traverse the area. Segments of MD Routes 152 and 146 are also within
the area, and are major commuter routes. Minor traffic congestion occurs during the morning and
evening rush hours as residents travel to and from employment centers outside the community. The
community has also experienced increased through-traffic from Pennsylvania. State roads within the
community provide access for commercial properties and connect a network of County-maintained
roads. Most of the County roadways are narrow, two-lane facilities with a macadam surface,
although some low-volume gravel roads still exist.
The community has an active, well-equipped volunteer fire and EMS company with two fire
stations. The stations, which are located on MD Route 165 in Jarrettsville and on MD Route 23 in
the Blackhorse area, are emergency services operation centers and focal points for community
meetings, social gatherings, and fundraising entertainment. The Harford County Sheriff’s Northern
Precinct is located within the rural village of Jarrettsville near the intersection of MD Route 23 and
MD Route 165. Two public schools are located within the community area - Jarrettsville
194
Elementary and North Bend Elementary. Based on the October 2003 amendment of the Annual
Growth Report, these schools are both operating at less than the APF standard for capacity. Middle
and high school aged students in this community attend school at North Harford in Pylesville; both
schools are operating at less than capacity. The Jarrettsville Post Office is located near the
Jarrettsville Plaza on MD Route 165. The community will house a branch of the Harford County
Public Library, west of the village of Jarrettsville on MD Route 23. Numerous churches serve the
community. Other community-oriented groups include the Jarrettsville Lions Club with its popular
and successful spring carnival and the Jarrettsville Recreation Council, which sponsors many
recreational activities for people of all ages.
Some points of interest that attract people to the Jarrettsville area are Rocks State Park to the
northeast and the popular Ladew Topiary Gardens to the south, just outside the area. The area
surrounding Ladew Gardens offers a number of attractions to the equine enthusiast including the
Jarrettsville-Fox Meadows Complex, the Elkridge-Harford Hunt Club, the Elkridge-Harford Pony
Club, and the Sunday afternoon polo matches sponsored by the Maryland Polo Club. During April
each year, the Elkridge-Harford and My Lady's Manor Steeple Chase races are held nearby,
attracting people from across Maryland and the surrounding states. In 2003, the Department of
Parks and Recreation acquired the Rutledge property in Jarrettsville. The thirty-five acre parcel, to
be known as the James B. Rutledge, Jr. Memorial Park, is located on MD Route 23 near Madonna
and is envisioned as a active open space facility that will service the Jarrettsville and Norrisville
Community Areas.
Plan for the Area
Fundamental issues in this community area are maintaining the rural village atmosphere. This can
be accomplished through proper zoning/zoning enforcement and design standards. Preserving
agriculture and environmental and historically sensitive areas, while also managing cut-through
traffic and truck traffic, will help maintain the rural village of Jarrettsville as the social and
commercial focal point of the community.
The primary designated land use in the Jarrettsville area is Agriculture, with a small portion of Rural
Residential in, and to the south of, the Jarrettsville Rural Village. Because the goal of this Plan is to
maintain the rural character of this community, and because studies indicate that there is sufficient
capacity to meet projected growth needs, the Rural Residential area will not be expanded.
Concentrated agricultural preservation efforts above the Jarrettsville Village Center are also
supported by this Plan.
The development of village design standards are supported to help protect the rural character of this
community. These design standards should make development and redevelopment compatible with
the rural heritage of the area and promote pedestrian accessibility. Design standards should also
apply to existing business areas outside of the designated rural village. New uses should be
aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the existing rural atmosphere of the area. Studies indicate
that there is adequate commercially zoned land to meet the immediate and foreseeable retail and
service needs of the community. No additional commercial zoning will be supported within the
community area unless further analysis determines that there is a need for additional commercial
195
land. Additional zoning changes will also be subject to a technical analysis to ensure that the
proposed change will not have an adverse impact on the community.
Preservation of agriculture, historic landmarks, and environmentally sensitive areas within the
Jarrettsville Community Area is a priority. Preservation efforts have been enhanced with the
implementation of Smart Growth policies. Over 5,900 acres of farmland has been preserved in
Jarrettsville and additional preservation areas are anticipated. A portion of The Manor Rural Legacy
Area and the Lower Deer Creek Valley Rural Legacy Area are located within this Community Area.
Any expansion of the existing road network should focus on serving local residences and businesses
as opposed to encouraging through-traffic. The State Highway Administration and the County
should examine the increase in truck traffic into the area.
A key objective for the area is to increase the role of the Jarrettsville Rural Village as a focal point
for commercial, social, and recreational activities of the agricultural community and area residents.
Creation of trails, bike paths/bike lanes, and stream valley parks that connect residential
neighborhoods to each other, and to the Rural Village, is encouraged.
Jarrettsville, as a designated Rural Village, is a Priority Funding Area, allowing the village to receive
State funding in support of economic development. Commercial land uses such as specialty shops,
day care centers, markets, and professional services that serve the community are encouraged within
this center. Such development should be of a size, style, and location that is compatible with
existing uses and that enhances the rural characteristics of the Rural Village. Development of public
facilities such as a park, social center, and park-and-ride lots are desired in the Rural Village as well.
196
23 ROCKS STATE PARK
439
165
138
24
23
146
V
V
V
152
e
23
146
C
BEL
V
Jarrettsville Agricultural N Neighborhood Center

Community Area
Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
HCC Harford
(over 10 acres)

Location Map N
Figure 59
197
198
Joppa – Joppatowne Community Area
Community Character
This community area is located in southeastern Harford County and is bordered on the west by
Baltimore County across the Little Gunpowder Falls, on the northwest by Old Joppa Road, on the
north by Bel Air Road, on the east by Winter's Run and Magnolia Road, and on the south by the
Aberdeen Proving Ground and Little Gunpowder Falls.
The northern part of the community area is in the Piedmont, a hilly upland traversed by many small
streams and containing a variety of mineral resources. Mining of building stone and slate, as well as
small deposits of gold, chromite, and iron ore have occurred in this area. The plan area slopes from
the north at Bel Air Road, at an elevation of approximately 295 feet, south through the Coastal Plain,
to Joppatowne at sea level. The mineral resources of the Coastal Plain are chiefly sand and gravel,
and are presently mined and used as aggregate materials by the construction industry. Drainage for
the area is provided by Little Gunpowder Falls and Winters Run, both of which flow southward
toward the bay estuaries.
The Chesapeake Bay Critical Area occurs around the tidal portion of Joppatowne, and affords water
quality and habitat protection measures to this area. A portion of the Gunpowder shoreline is habitat
to several rare plant species and is protected through the Critical Area Program.
Historically, the whole community area was called Joppa (Lower Harford during colonial times) and
was a center of international trade. The Joppa port on the Gunpowder was a thriving city, based on
the trade of agricultural products, particularly tobacco. The Little Gunpowder Falls was a significant
factor in the creation of villages in northern Joppa because of the many mills that operated along its
banks. Mining and the assembly of armaments, particularly muskets at Jerusalem Mill, played an
integral part in the local economy. Siltation of the Gunpowder River, due to agricultural
development upstream, and development of harbors at Baltimore and Annapolis contributed to the
decline of the port of Joppa. The port of Joppa was slowly abandoned, and by 1815 the town lay in
ruins except the Rumsey Mansion. Farming and mining continued in the area known as Joppa-
Magnolia, even after the Edgewood Arsenal began construction in 1917-18. The post-World War II
expansion and exodus from Baltimore City started a residential building explosion in this area. In
1962, Joppatowne, one of the first planned unit developments in the nation, was developed.
The residential, waterfront community of Joppatowne comprises the majority of the households and
population within the community area. Joppatowne is home to three elementary schools -
Joppatowne, Riverside, and Magnolia, Magnolia middle school, and Joppatowne high school. Based
on the October 2003 amendment to the Annual Growth Report, these schools are all operating below
the APF standard for capacity. Children in households north of Singer Road attend Fallston
schools. Fallston Middle School currently exceeds capacity and major subdivision plans within this
attendance area will not be approved until school capacity is available.
The community is concerned about the capacity of school facilities to absorb additional growth. The
County will investigate additional revenue sources to help provide needed educational facilities.
199
Two volunteer fire stations, a community policing station for the Sheriff’s Office, a branch of the
Harford County Public Library, a post office, a marina, and a variety of churches serve the
population. Commercial and service oriented activities are available at a Neighborhood Center on
Towne Center Drive and a Community Center on U.S. 40 at Joppa Farm Road. The Robert
Copenhaver Park, Barksdale Park, Erwin Drive Park, Mountain Road Park, Singer Road Park,
Clayton Road Conservation Area, and Mariner Point Park, with access to the Chesapeake Bay via
the Gunpowder River, serve the open space needs of the community. In addition, a “tot lot” is
provided for families on Chell Road in Joppatowne.
The rural area of Joppa is located north of I-95 within the Winters Run and Little Gunpowder Falls
Watersheds. The primary land use is agriculture, with several of the community's farms protected in
agricultural and historical preservation programs. In addition, there are several large lot, rural
residential communities interspersed with small farms and orchards. The residents in the Joppa area
utilize the U.S. Route 1 and U.S. Route 40 commercial areas as their primary shopping districts and
a small commercial area at MD Route 152 and MD Route 7 for convenience goods. Community
open space is provided at Clayton Road Conservation Area, and Gunpowder Falls State Park, a
16,000-acre preserve which forms the border of Harford and Baltimore Counties. This resource
provides hiking, canoeing, kayaking, and fishing opportunities for the regional population. Low
intensity land uses and sensitive development within Franklinville and Kingsville in adjacent
Baltimore County complement the historic and environmental protection efforts in the Joppa area.
The community contains an interchange at I-95 and MD Route 152. Other major arterials include
U.S. 40, as well as MD Route 7. The CSX and AMTRAK railways make these transportation
corridors directly accessible to major east coast markets and ideal for High Tech
Industrial/Employment development. MTA operates a commuter bus route to Baltimore along U.S.
40 and along MD Route 152 to I-95. Harford County Transportation Services (HCTS) operates
route 2, a fixed bus route from Joppatowne via Edgewood to Bel Air. A Park-and-Ride lot is located
at the interchange of I-95 and MD Route 152.
The Joppa-Joppatowne community had a 2000 population of 14,206, which is approximately 6.5%
of the County’s total population (Figure 60). Between 1990 and 2000 the population of the area
decreased by 0.38 % (54 people). The population between the ages of 20 - 34 had the greatest
percentage of decrease, 30.50% (from 3,508 to 2,438). A common trend throughout the County is a
maturing population base. Demographics indicate that the population over the age of 50 had the
greatest percentage of increase, 30.22% (from 3,435 to 4,473). The challenge for the area is to
provide housing and services for the aging population while at the same time offer incentives for
young families and young adults to stay in the area. The number of households grew by nearly
6.5% (from 5,105 to 5,432), between 1990 and 2000.
200
Joppa - Joppatowne Demographic Profile: 1990-2000

Employment 1,973 3,140 59.15%
White 13,113 12,441 -5.12%
Black 907 1,230 35.61%
Other 45 115 155.56%
Figure 60
grew 30% over the last decade from $44,257 to $57,456. Households in this community earning
over $100,000 a year increased by 201%, while households earning less than $50,000 a year
decreased by 26%. Total employment in this area increased by 59% from 1,973 to 3,140.
Plan for the Area
In May 2003, the Harford County Council adopted the Joppa-Joppatowne Community Plan as an
official element of the Land Use Element Plan. The Community Plan will guide future growth and
preservation efforts. The Plan was developed through a community-wide planning effort.
Workshops, work sessions and community outreach were used to synthesize ideas and build a
consensus plan for the community.
Efforts to implement the community plan are encouraged to continue. Six focus areas are proposed
that are designed to attract development appropriate to the area (Figure 61). These focus areas are
necessary to achieve the community’s vision and Harford County’s goal for community
sustainability. Four of these focus areas are within the Development Envelope. Here the emphasis
is on a mixed-use concept that includes stores, offices, residences, schools, and recreation spaces all
within walking distance of each other. The other two focus areas are located in rural Joppa, where
the emphasis is on retention and enhancement of the rural character of the area, not on growth.
These six focus areas are joined through a greenway system, including habitat areas along stream
valley corridors, and site-sensitive bike/hike trails.
Joppa-Joppatowne contains two distinct communities; a low intensity rural area north of I-95 and a
higher intensity area within the Development Envelope south of I-95. The application of Smart
Growth tactics, which encourages development to occur in designated growth areas, will enhance
established neighborhoods, maximize existing infrastructure, and preserve sensitive natural areas.
Future development and redevelopment is encouraged to locate within these designated growth
201
areas. Retention of the area’s rural character is supported north of I-95. This will encourage the
continuation of a viable agricultural community and protect existing low intensity neighborhoods.
Joppatowne and the U.S. 40 corridor will continue to be the focus of development within the
community area. Future growth will be directed away from sensitive natural areas and toward
redeveloping older areas within the Development Envelope, which have existing infrastructure.
While studies indicate that areas defined for commercial use are adequate to meet the immediate and
foreseeable future retail and service needs of the community, any consideration of additional
commercial zoning within this area will evaluate community needs as well as the amount of
commercial land already available in the area. Any additional zoning changes will also be subject to
community.
Building on the existing transportation strengths in the community, the Community Plan focuses on
incorporating safe and convenient pedestrian, bicycle, and transit options into the current system. A
series of walkable neighborhoods distributed throughout Joppatowne and the community’s portion of
the Development Envelope is recommended. A community wide greenway system is suggested,
following stream valley corridors, to link the significant historical and ecological assets of the
community.
As development continues, traffic congestion and limited access to Joppatowne and Magnolia have
become major concerns to the residents. A community-wide traffic study and focused transportation
improvements are necessary to enhance the safety and high quality of life within this area.
As growth occurs, additional community priorities include monitoring of area schools to assure
optimum class sizes, maintenance of existing active recreation sites, increased protection for passive
open space sites, and year-round access to recreational facilities. Since demographic trends and
surveys indicate a market for active senior housing in Joppatowne, the Plan promotes quality infill
development of compact, mixed-use building forms within the Development Envelope, with services
targeting the senior population.
The U.S. 40 and I-95 corridors are targeted to become the service and employment focal points for
the community. The area on MD Route 152 south of I-95 is visualized as a high tech, upscale
mixed-use employment center, seeking high-paying and clean industries, institutions, and
businesses. Quality architecture and site design is supported for the entire community area.
Revitalization of the U.S. 40 corridor is strongly encouraged. In addition, a public/private

partnership to add streetscape improvements to the privately maintained landscaping at Joppatowne
Plaza at U.S. 40 and Joppa Farm Road will tie into an overall U.S. 40 theme and enhance this
gateway to Harford County. The community has identified a need to revitalize and fill its business
areas at Joppatowne Plaza, at Towne Center and Shore Drive, and at Towne Center and Kearney
Drive.
The area of Joppa, located between Winter's Run and Little Gunpowder Falls, north of I-95, will
continue to support agricultural activities and low intensity Rural Residential neighborhoods.
Protection of the character of the Joppa Rural Area is strongly supported. In order to retain the rural
202
atmosphere of Joppa, it is recommended that there be no extension of public water and sewer into
the area along MD Route 152 north of I-95, and the Development Envelope boundary at I-95 be
maintained. Throughout the area, the designation of public services should be minimized, and
improvements to the road network should preserve and protect the natural characteristics of the
roadway while providing safe and efficient travel. Schools, libraries and other such facilities will be
directed south of I-95 towards U.S. 40 and the Joppatowne portion of the community. Protection of
the Little Gunpowder Falls and Winters Run resources will be provided by retaining vegetated
buffers. The rural character and water resources must not be compromised by high intensity or
incompatible development.
Since half of the County’s existing mining operations lie within the Joppa/Joppatowne Community
Area, the issue of reclamation is important to this community. The Joppa/Joppatowne Community
Plan recognizes the value of existing mineral resource operations in the area, and citizens will work
with Harford County and the State to improve screening of mining operations and the reclamation
of sites for green space and passive and active recreational opportunities that meet the needs of the
community. The Joppa/Joppatowne Community Plan specifically prohibits additional solid waste
facilities and rubblefills within the community area.
The Joppa-Joppatowne community will continue to develop concepts and tools for implementation
of the community’s vision. Efforts will be made at the Federal, State, and local level to enhance the
community through capital improvements, grants, and private investment.
203
204
BYP
RD
IR
LA
AIR KEY
BE
BEL RD
PROPOSED LAND USE
EE
Y R
WH
TO
RD CONNOLLY GREENSPACE
FA C
RURAL AREA
EMM
RD
CIVIC SPACE
RING
ORTO
FAL
WHITAK ER MILL COMMERCIAL

LST
N
CORPORATE OFFICE
ON
RD
RD
W
LIVE-WORK UNITS
RD
MULTI-FAMILY/SENIOR HOUSING
LOW TO MEDIUMDINTENSITY LAU
LR
WHEE
RESIDENTIAL
RD
RE
L
RD
COMMUNITY CENTERS BU
SH
Joppa-Joppatowne Planning Area RD
R
LAI
BE
RD
RD
RD
PPA
RE CKO
JO
SINGER RD
RD
A BINGDO
RD
MO
UN
OLD
GER
TA
I N
IN
N
ORTO
RD
RD COMMUNITY
EMM
R
SINGE PARK WIN
TER
AREA
CLAY T
SR
#
UN
ON
Baltimore
OLD
County N
JOH
RD
EM
MO
RT
ON
E
MOU
LINV ILL
JOPPA FRA NK
JO
NT
P
RURAL
PA
AIN
ED G
Y
HW
AREA
EW
N EDY MEMORIAL
OO D
KEN RD
F PHILADELPHIA
N
RD
RD
H
JO
RD
MA
GN
O
LIA
RD
N
HANSO
EMMO R
TR
I
MB
RD
E
L
TO
N
RD
*DEVELOPMENT JOPP
A TRIMBLE
ENVELOPE
RD
FAR
RD
M
RD
N
Aberdeen
Proving
Ground
JOPPA-JOPPATOWNE COMMUNITY PLAN

*As defined by the Joppa/Joppatowne Community Plan
Figure 61
205
206
GUNPOWDER FALLS
STATE PARK
e
136
147
24 MO MO
924
C
#
152
#
#
#
#
BUSH R
#
#
#
#
#
# # #
#
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
#
#
#
C
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
N
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
#
# #
#
#
C
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
755
#
N
#
E
#
R IV
#
ABERDEEN PROVING
#
GROUND (U.S. ARMY)

#
#
H
#
#
US
#
#
#
Joppa-Joppatowne Agricultural N Neighborhood Center

Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
HCC Harford
(over 10 acres)

N
Location Map
Figure 62
207
208
Norrisville Community Area
Community Character
The Norrisville Community Area is located in the rural northwest corner of Harford County and is
bounded by the Maryland/Pennsylvania line to the north, the Harford/Baltimore County line to the
west, White Hall Road, Little Deer Creek, and St. Clair Bridge Road to the south, and Rocks Road to
the east. The small Rural Village of Norrisville is located in the northwest corner of the planning
area along MD Route 23, and serves some of the basic needs of the farming and residential
communities. The hamlets of Shawsville and Carea are also located within the Norrisville
Community Area.
The Norrisville Community Area is served by two State roads, MD Routes 23 and 136. Maryland
Route 23 runs north and south through this community area, allowing through-traffic access to
southern Pennsylvania. Maryland Route 136, which intersects MD Route 23 at Norrisville, traverses
the upper reaches of this planning area west to east. Interestingly, both State roads are made up of
early historic road segments. In colonial America, Norrisville Road (MD Route 23) was part of the
early road system to York, Pennsylvania, while MD Route 136, which sweeps Harford County in a
broad arc, connected the northern reaches of the County with the early settlements of Bush and
Abingdon.
Varying from steep valley slopes, rolling hills, and highland plateaus, the terrain of this northwest
corner of the County is a product of Deer Creek, with the area's many streams contributing almost
exclusively to the Deer Creek Watershed. Rock outcroppings and deeply cut gorges -- replete with
hemlock, mountain laurel, mosses, and ferns -- are a common occurrence in this region's stream
valleys. Bisecting the planning area from northwest to southeast, the most prominent physical
feature of this region’s landscape is Deer Creek, a State-designated Scenic River. Large amounts of
forested land prevail on the sloping walls of the Deer Creek Valley, with substantial woodland
remaining in the lesser stream valleys and between cleared agricultural fields. This area also has a
very high concentration of habitat that supports Bog Turtles – Clemmys Muhlenbergii. The bog
turtle is globally ranked as being very rare, and both the State and the Federal government have
denoted this species as Threatened. Generally, continued agricultural use of the land supports the
habitat of these species. Several conservation areas and summer camps are located within the
Norrisville Community Area, paying tribute to the beautiful upland landscape.
The Deer Creek Valley is interspersed with historic mills and associated structures which lend to its
beauty and manifest the industrial importance of the Creek throughout the 18th and 19th centuries.
Historic Amos Mill, Ivory Mill, Eden Mill Park and Nature Center, and a satellite portion of Rocks
State Park are just some of the significant features located along Deer Creek in this community area.
Agriculture remains the primary land use throughout the Norrisville Community Area, with grain,
orchard, hay, dairy goods, and beef as the principal agricultural products. Numerous farmhouses,
barns, and outbuildings dot the hillsides or are nestled in the valleys, contributing greatly to the
character of this pastoral landscape. The participation of many landholders in this planning area in
209
State or local agricultural preservation, either with conservation easement or under an agricultural
district program, will help to preserve this area's rural character. Currently over 30% of the
community area is protected through preservation programs.
The Norrisville Area had a 2000 population of 2,931 which is 1.3% of the County’s total population
(Figure 63). Between 1990 and 2000, the population of the area increased by 3.9 %. While the
number of persons between the ages of 20 - 34 living in the area decreased by 35%, from 608 to 395,
other age groups grew in size. The population between the ages of 50 - 64 showed the highest
growth with a 34% increase, from 385 to 518. Demographic data suggests that the community has
grown modestly and should remain a primarily agricultural area. During this time period, the
number of households increased by 18.3%, from 1,139 to 1,348.
Norrisville Demographic Profile: 1990 – 2000

Employment 247 315 27.53%
White 2,775 4,124 48.61%
Black 30 19 -36.67%
Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 12 12 0%
Other 0 5 500.00%
Figure 63
25%. Total employment in this area increased by 28%, from 247 to 315.
The small Rural Village of Norrisville serves some of the basic needs of the farming and residential
communities, with a recreation complex, local volunteer fire department, and the Norrisville Reading
Center. Norrisville Elementary School is located on MD Route 23 within the designated rural
village. Middle and high school aged students in the community attend North Harford in Pylesville.
Based on the October 2003 amendment of the Annual Growth Report, these schools are all operating
at less than the APF standard for capacity. With a gymnasium and library spaces, the newly
constructed Norrisville Community Center offers new learning and interaction opportunities for the
community. In 2003, the Department of Parks and Recreation acquired the Rutledge property in
Jarrettsville. This is envisioned as an active open space facility that will service the Jarrettsville and
Norrisville Community Areas. Some designated business uses are located within the small village
210
along the east side of MD Route 23. Due to the limited commercial ventures, however, residents
must travel outside of the community area for the bulk of their retail needs.
Plan for the Area
Many landowners in the Norrisville Area already participate in State and County agricultural
preservation programs. The County will continue to focus its agricultural preservation efforts in this
productive, rural region of the County. Emphasis on agricultural preservation activities in this
northwest corner is desirable to maintain agriculture as the primary land use and to support the
continued viability of the agricultural industry in Harford County in general. A holistic approach to
agricultural preservation should be taken and should include watershed protection, stewardship of
resources, and the encouragement of agricultural industry-related businesses.
As a result of the agricultural activities and limitations of the Deer Creek and tributary areas within
the Norrisville Community Area, little change to the area is anticipated. However, with continually
increasing business development in Baltimore County to the west and residential development in
Stewartstown, Pennsylvania, to the north, it is likely that residential development pressure will
increase in the Norrisville Area. This Plan supports maintaining density for agriculturally zoned
lands at one dwelling unit per 10 acres, and maintaining the boundaries of the Norrisville Rural
Village.
Studies also indicate that Harford County has a sufficient inventory of commercially zoned land to
meet its needs. Based on this, no additional commercial zoning will be supported within this
community area unless further analysis identifies a need for more commercial land in this area. Any
changes in zoning will be subject to a technical analysis to ensure that the proposed change will not
generate adverse impacts in the community.
A collective effort involving both the community and Harford County Government is needed to
enhance the Rural Village as the focal point of Norrisville. A proactive approach should be taken to
identify the needs of the community and encourage potential professional and consumer businesses
of an appropriate type and scale for the Rural Village. Recent development proposals have aroused
concern about the appearance and scale of new development in and around the Norrisville area. The
County will review and revise its Zoning Code to address this issue. New development should be
consistent with the surrounding rural character. The current, relatively small size of the Rural
Village provides the community and its representatives the opportunity to plan and accomplish their
visions for the future.
211
212
23
624
136
24
23 ROCKS STATE PARK

439
165
Norrisville Agricultural N Neighborhood Center

Community Area
Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
HCC Harford
Community College
State and County Parks
(over 10 acres)

Location Map N
Figure 64
213
214
Whiteford - Cardiff - Pylesville - Street Community Area
Community Character
The agricultural operations and rural villages of the Whiteford-Cardiff-Pylesville-Street Community

Area encompass the rural north-central and northeastern portions of Harford County. The planning
area may be described as the region south of the Mason-Dixon line to Deer Creek and from Broad
Creek at the Susquehanna River to Rocks Road (MD Route 24), east to west. The Piedmont hills
that flank Broad Creek, Deer Creek, and Scotts Creek provide the backdrop for a heritage of
expansive farming operations and small crossroad villages including Bushs Corner, Ady, Macton,
Cooper, Rocks, Cherry Hill, Prospect, and Flintville. The adjacent villages of Whiteford and Cardiff
represent the Maryland portion of a historic settlement pattern that continues into Pennsylvania as
the Borough of Delta, and is the most concentrated area of homes and businesses within the planning
area. In the central and southern portions of the planning area, the villages of Pylesville and
Highland serve as focal points for the surrounding countryside.
Whiteford-Cardiff-Pylesville-Street had a 2000 population of 6,916, which is 3% of the County’s

total population (Figure 65). Between 1990 and 2000, the population of the area increased by
14.5%. Demographics indicate that the population of the area is aging, which is consistent with the
overall County pattern. The population over the age of 50 increased 45.8%, from 1,379 to 2,011,
while the population between the ages of 20 - 34 had the greatest decrease, from 1,356 to 981
(-27.7%). The number of households in the area increased by 17.5%, from 2,000 to 2,349.
Whiteford - Cardiff - Pylesville - Street Demographic Profile:

1990 - 2000

Employment 670 2,279 240.15%
White 5,949 6,728 13.09%
Black 68 67 -1.47%
Other 2 20 900.00%
Figure 65
215
grew 43% over the last decade from $39,919 to $57,094. Households in this community earning over
21%. Total employment in this area increased by 240% from 670 to 2,279.
The transportation network for the planning area includes Whiteford Road (MD Route 136), which is
one of the County's major arteries traversing north/south from Creswell to Whiteford, then east/west
from Whiteford to Norrisville. Pylesville Road (MD Route 165) also serves as a major north/south
artery from the village of Baldwin in Baltimore County to Whiteford. In Pennsylvania it becomes
Route 74 and continues to the City of York. Ady Road (MD Route 543) serves the central portion of
the planning area extending from Pylesville to Interstate 95. These well-traveled roadways serve not
only to move goods between areas but also put the rural areas of Harford and York Counties within
the reach of many commuters. The large scale of these two roads, makes them unusual in the area
since the balance of the transportation network consists of small two-lane roads and gravel roads of
even smaller dimension.
Until the 1950's, the Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad served as the chief means of delivering
products from the farms and industries in the rural portions of Harford, Baltimore, and York
Counties, to the markets of Baltimore and the City of York. This community was no exception and
the rail line made stops at Minefield, Highland, Pylesville, Whiteford, and Cardiff. Milk, slate,
green marble, and gravel were some of the freight shipped from the rural area; the railroad served as
a commuter line to countless passengers until service was discontinued in 1954. As many of the
rural industries ceased operation, and competition with good roads and automobiles became too
great, the railroad ceased operation altogether in 1959.
Discovery of slate deposits brought Welsh settlers to the Whiteford-Cardiff area as early as the
1730's. The Welsh influence in this area is still present today in terms of family, religion, and
architecture. Part of the Peach Bottom Syncline, the appropriately named Slate Ridge, was mined
for its rich slate deposits and its northern slope is home to the villages of Whiteford and Cardiff.
Due to the exceptional quality of the slate mined from the Peach Bottom region, the villages thrived.
As C. Milton Wright noted in his book, “Our Harford Heritage”, in 1850 samples of the slate were
exhibited at the London Crystal Exposition and won first prize. While the uses for slate were
numerous, it was primarily sold as a roofing material. As competition increased from petroleum-
based and rubber roofing materials, most of the quarries ceased operation by the 1930's. In addition
to slate, green serpentine marble was mined until the late 1950's. The green marble mined from
Cardiff has been used in many private residences, and was specified by architects for use in
numerous public and private buildings including the Empire State Building in New York City.
According to Wright, the village of Highland was founded as a station along the Maryland and
Pennsylvania Railroad to serve the farms within the area. The name may have been derived from the
fact that the area is high in elevation and level compared to the hills of Deer Creek and the lowlands
of Southern Harford. The village of Pylesville was founded around a mill on Broad Creek owned by
Nathan Pyle, Sr.; the Pylesville mill remained in the Pyle family until 1908, and continued to serve
the community into the early 1920's.
216
Though the slate quarry pits are now dormant, the multitude of buildings in Harford County with
slate clad roofs is a constant reminder of the non-agricultural heritage of the villages of Whiteford
and Cardiff. Much of this heritage has been preserved at the Old Line Museum in Delta,
Pennsylvania.
With regard to the farming community, this planning area may be the County's strongest in terms of
amount of land in farms, profitability, commitment to farming, and the presence of farm service
business. Contiguous tracts of farmland are still very common; corn, soybeans, barley, and hay are
the dominant crops in the area. The Lower Deer Creek Valley Rural Legacy Area was extended to
include the southern portion of the community area in 2003. While agricultural preservation efforts
have been relatively successful in this area, inclusion in the Rural Legacy Program will offer
property owners another option for preservation. The first agricultural school building in Maryland,
designed to instruct future farmers, was established in Highland in 1924. The planning area also
contains a noted vineyard and winery as well as nurseries and Christmas tree farms.
In addition to the agricultural areas, the villages of Whiteford, Cardiff, and Highland represent some
of the best preserved remnants of a rural lifestyle. The stability of the early mining community has
endured over time as generations of residents, including descendants of those original Welsh
immigrants, have continued to live within the community.
Community stability may be attributed to the success of Whiteford-Cardiff's role as a regional

service area for northern Harford County and southern York County, and in the sharing of resources
such as the Delta/Cardiff Volunteer Fire Company, Mason/Dixon Business Association, and the
Whiteford Branch of the Harford County Library. Highland Commons serves as a location for
community archives and provides public services to the community. The Commons also serves as
headquarters for the Highland Community Association and Mason/Dixon Community Services, as
home to a branch of the Harford County Library (run by volunteer staff), and as a day-care and
senior center. The Sheriff’s Office maintains a substation here. The area is served by three
elementary schools - North Harford, North Bend and Dublin. Middle and high school students
attend North Harford. Based on the October 2003 update of the Annual Growth Report, all of these
schools are now operating below the APF standard for capacity.
Plan for the Area
The strength of the rural area has been, and continues to be, based on viability of the agricultural
area and rural villages. The need for goods and services within the agricultural community fostered
the formation of small villages, and created interdependency between the villages and the
surrounding agricultural community. Whiteford-Cardiff-Pylesville-Street is an area rich in historical
significance, and these communities continue to serve as focal points for the surrounding agricultural
area. However, this area faces the potential for change on numerous fronts. Therefore, the plan for
the area strives to reinforce the importance of the villages to the agricultural community, while also
preserving the heritage and quality of life that has been characteristic of the area.
The designation of the Rural Village as a Priority Funding Area helps to establish clear boundaries
for growth and redevelopment. It provides support and incentives for development within the rural
village. This growth shall be compatible with, and of a quantity appropriate to, the existing village
217
character. It should also consider pedestrian orientation, scale, and locations that complement the
existing village. Expansion of the village boundaries through upzoning is not supported by this Plan.
Studies indicate that Harford County has a sufficient inventory of commercially zoned land to meet
its needs. Based on this, no additional commercial zoning will be supported within this community
area unless further analysis identifies a need for more commercial land within this area. Any
additional zoning changes will also be subject to a technical analysis to ensure that the proposed
change will not generate adverse impacts in the community.
Supporting efforts to preserve the historic character of the villages is important to the community.
Historic inventories have been completed for the villages of Whiteford and Cardiff, and new sites
added to the County and State Historic Inventories. Community outreach efforts indicate that there
is also strong support for having Whiteford and Cardiff designated a National Register District. The
County continues to support this effort recognizing the importance of this step in preserving the
historical character of the area. Existing historic information will likewise be used to help preserve
the character of other villages within the planning area.
For Whiteford and Cardiff, abandoned quarries present a complex problem in terms of finding a
suitable use for the property. Land uses for the site must take into consideration that the quarries
provide a direct conduit to groundwater. There is strong support within the community to prohibit
these areas from being used in any manner that would result in an adverse impact to groundwater.
A new sewer system has been installed in Whiteford and Cardiff to correct a documented health
problem. Many of the homes within the villages had blind ditches or dry wells that served in place
of septic systems. For many homes, there was not enough land to install an appropriate septic
system with a drain field so connection to the new system was required of all households within the
service area. The sewer system is a joint venture between Harford County and the Borough of Delta
with a treatment plant located within the Borough. Installation of the sewer system presents a
growth issue that must be addressed. The service area has been sized to address the specific needs of
the community. This Land Use Element Plan does not envision sewer service outside of the
subdistrict. This will help to ensure that additional growth is in keeping with community character.
Additionally, development in the Pennsylvania communities of Peach Bottom and Delta is impacting
Whiteford-Cardiff-Pylesville-Street. For many living in the Pennsylvania communities, traveling
into Maryland, and specifically the village areas for services, is faster and more convenient than
going to areas in Pennsylvania. While increased patronage will help to support village business, the
community is concerned not only about the traffic but also about the potential for large scale services
being developed in the surrounding rural areas. There is also concern that this new residential
development in the surrounding borough and township will be used to justify requests for rezoning
of properties within the community area. This emphasizes the need for having zoning in the area that
supports the rural and historic character of the area. It also emphasizes the need for Design
Guidelines to ensure that permitted uses are developed at a scale compatible with the community.
Furthermore, it is important that the County coordinate with Peach Bottom and Delta regarding
planning efforts. Steps should be taken to improve interjurisdictional communication to help ensure
that development in adjoining areas does not have a detrimental impact on the rural character of this
community area.
218
The village of Pylesville is planned as little more than an intersection of roads, inclusive of a post
office and country store. Highland Commons, which is irreplaceable to this community, should be
preserved as a focal point for public facilities.
Economic development incentives shall be comprehensive in nature and promote the location of
community-oriented, environmentally responsible business with emphasis placed on business
serving the agricultural industry. County economic development programs shall be coordinated with
the Mason/Dixon Business Association in an effort to provide benefits to the entire regional
community.
Public facilities shall be based on community need and located within the existing Rural Villages to
strengthen these areas as focal points within the rural area. A new playground area is being
developed next to the library. There is strong community support for a hiker/biker trail in the area.
Coordination is underway with the Department of Parks and Recreation to provide for a trail
segment along MD Route 165 between MD Route 543 and the State line. If completed, this would
serve as the northern segment of the Ma and Pa trail system.
Agriculture shall remain the dominant land use within the planning area with the Rural Villages
serving as the focal points. The planning area currently contains in excess of 4,800 acres in
agricultural preservation. Participation in these programs will help to maintain the rural character of
the area. Landowner interest should be identified for future agricultural preservation efforts with
priority being given to farms adjacent to or between existing blocks of protected land. Programs
shall be developed that provide landowners with the option to receive the market value of their
development rights without the need to take agricultural land from production and put it into
residential lots, thus fracturing the continuity of the agricultural area. Use of best management
practices on farms and conservation of large contiguous forested areas will help to preserve the water
quality of the myriad streams and creeks in the region.
219
220
PENNSYLVANIA
V
165
624
136
24
646 623
V
ROCKS STATE PARK
440
543
24
/( 1 PALMER STATE PARK
Whiteford-Cardiff-
Pylesville-Street Agricultural N Neighborhood Center
Low Intensity
V Rural Village
Medium Intensity
T Town Center
High Intensity
e Airport
HCC Harford
(over 10 acres)

Location Map N
Figure 66
221
222
IMPLEMENTATION
IMPLEMENTATION
LAND USE ELEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
The 2004 Land Use Element Plan includes a series of recommendations identifying various work
initiatives needed to implement the Plan. Among the recommendations to be completed are: a
comprehensive update of the Zoning Code, the Comprehensive Zoning Review, review and
revision of existing element plans, specified studies, and the development of Design Guidelines.
A work program has been developed that prioritizes these initiatives and identifies the agency
that will be chiefly responsible for its completion. Finally, it identifies which of the
implementation measures involve capital expenditures. This provides a connection between the
Plan’s recommendations and the capital budgeting process.
Zoning Code Update and Comprehensive Zoning Review
Because many of the implementation strategies set forth in this Plan are to be addressed as part
of a comprehensive update of the Zoning Code, and because of Charter requirements regarding
comprehensive zoning, this initiative was started concurrently with the adoption process for this
Plan. To complete the rezoning process in a manner consistent with this Plan, the Code update
must be completed prior to initiation of the Comprehensive Zoning Review process. Adoption of
the revised Zoning Code is scheduled for the Fall of 2004. This document will establish the
zoning classifications to be implemented through the review process. The County Charter
mandates that a Comprehensive Zoning Review be undertaken every eight years in Harford
County. Therefore, the next required review must occur by 2006.
The 2004 Land Use Element Plan specifies land use policies that will be followed as part of the
evaluation process and which will be used during the Comprehensive Zoning Review. Because
the Plan recognizes that there is a sufficient inventory of undeveloped residential, commercial
and industrial land to meet projected growth needs, any requests for rezoning will be subject to a
detailed analysis to determine not only the need for the zoning change, but also to determine its
impact on public facilities and the environment. In addition, this Plan establishes guidelines for
the Comprehensive Zoning Review process.
All applications submitted as part of the Comprehensive Zoning Review must be submitted by
the property owner or the owner's legal representative. The Department of Planning and Zoning
will review each application for consistency with the 2004 Land Use Element Plan. Applicants
requesting a change in zoning classification not consistent with the adopted land use designation
will be considered inconsistent with the Plan. Each application will also be subject to a technical
assessment as noted above. Prior to the submittal of the Directors Report on the Comprehensive
Zoning Review, the Department of Planning and Zoning, with the Planning Advisory Board, will
conduct public briefings on their findings and recommendations.
223
Element Plans
With the update of this Land Use Element Plan, the need to update the other element plans
becomes a priority. This will provide for inclusion of new initiatives, which must be refined in
more detail in the element plans, and it will begin the process of reviewing moving toward a
Comprehensive Plan for the County. Revision of the remaining element plans will be completed
prior to the next review of the Land Use Element Plan scheduled for 2010. It is the
recommendation of this Plan, that at the next required update, the County adopt a
Comprehensive Plan that addresses all of the mandated components at one time. This approach
will help to ensure consistency among all of the plan's elements. A first step toward a
consolidated plan was taken in the 2004 update. A Comprehensive Community Facilities
Element was added, and the Rural Plan was modified to update information provided in the 1993
element plan.
The proposed 2010 Comprehensive Plan will address only those items under the purview of the
Department of Planning and Zoning. Plans such as the Water and Sewer Master Plan, the Solid
Waste Management Plan, and the Land Preservation and Recreation Plan will remain as stand
alone documents, prepared by the appropriate department, because of County policies or State
requirements.
Implementation Strategy Program
To help provide direction and accountability for the implementation strategies identified in this
Plan, an implementation matrix was developed. This matrix addresses each of the strategies
identified in the Plan and assigns a priority to the task. Three priority levels are used. Priority 1
strategies are to be addressed within two years of plan adoption, while Priority 2 strategies are to
be completed within six years. Strategies noted as Priority 3 are efforts that must be addressed
on an on-going basis throughout the life of this Plan. All of the priorities shall be reviewed
annually, and the Director of Planning and Zoning shall prepare an annual report identifying
accomplishments and recommended revisions to the priority ranking.
The matrix also identifies the primary department(s) that will oversee implementation of the
strategies as well as noting if the item would be a capital expenditure. The following
abbreviations are used in the “Responsibility” column of the Implementation Matrix.
ADMN Harford County Administration LB Library Board of Trustees

BOED Board of Education MUN Municipalities
DCS Department of Community Services OED Office of Economic Development
DPW Department of Public Works P&R Department of Parks and Recreation
EMS Emergency Medical Services P&Z Department of Planning and Zoning
EOC Emergency Operations Center SHO Sheriff’s Office
HD Health Department VFC Volunteer Fire Companies
224
Policy, Regulatory and Capital Improvements Implementation Matrix
Capital
Policies and Associated Implementation Item
Strategies/Action Items Priority Responsibility (Y/N)
Designated Growth Areas
Designated Growth Areas Policy 1: Ensure that
new development is accomplished in a manner
consistent with the Maryland Planning Act,
Smart Growth and Interjurisdictional
Coordination efforts.
1. Work with the municipalities to develop
policies that direct future growth to suitable
areas and existing population hubs. 3 P&Z; MUN N
2. Maintain a sufficient inventory of residential
land within the Designated Growth Areas to
meet projected needs for the life of this plan. 3 P&Z N
3. Provide the essential infrastructure and
services that will enrich the quality of life for ADMN;
all citizens of Harford County. 3 DPW;P&R;P&Z;MUN Y
4. Coordinate Capital Improvement Projects with
land use policies to provide needed services. 3 DPW, P&R; P&Z N
Designated Growth Areas Policy 2: Strengthen
the viability of communities within the
Designated Growth Areas to help slow growth
outside these areas.
1. Protect sensitive areas by steering development
away from these areas. 3 P&Z N
2. Develop pedestrian-friendly communities with
adequate open space. 3 P&Z; DPW; P&R N
3. Support the development of public/private
partnerships to identify and address community
issues and concerns. 3 DPW; P&Z N
Designated Growth Areas Policy 3: Preserve
and protect community character and the
environment by providing adequate public
facilities and promoting redevelopment and
revitalization.
1. Review and update APF standards to ensure
their effectiveness. 1 P&Z; DPW; BOED; ADMIN N
2. Maintain, renovate, and enhance existing
infrastructure to support redevelopment and
revitalization. 1 DPW; ADMN Y
3. Encourage the use of mixed-use and infill
developments. 3 P&Z;OED N
4. Develop Design Standards that will help to
attract quality investment and redevelopment
while helping to enhance property values. 2 P&Z N
5. Focus industrial/commercial development
towards the U.S. 40 corridor. 3 OED; P&Z N
225
Capital
6. Provide transportation services to communities
within the Designated Growth Areas to
connect residents to shopping and employment
centers. 2 DCS; P&Z N
7. Review and revise the Zoning Code to
improve landscaping and forest conservation
requirements within the Designated Growth
Areas. 1 P&Z N
Designated Growth Areas Policy 4: Promote the
charm and nature of the Rural Villages.
1. Review and revise the village residential and
village business district as part of the
comprehensive Zoning Code update. 1 P&Z N
2. Develop village design guidelines to ensure
that land uses within the village centers
compliment and enhance the surrounding rural
areas. 2 P&Z N
3. Encourage infill development in rural villages. 3 P&Z;OED N
4. Coordinate with the Office of Economic
Development to provide small business
assistance for the rural villages. 1 OED; P&Z N
Designated Growth Areas Policy 5: Provide a
balance and mixture of housing to meet the
needs of all income levels and age groups
throughout the County.
1. Coordinate efforts with the Department of
Community Services to develop a Housing
Element Plan as part of the Consolidated Plan. 2 DCS; P&Z N
2. Work with the Department of Community
Services to promote affordable home
ownership as a means to further stabilize
communities. 2 P&Z; DCS N
3. Update the Zoning Code to provide incentives
that encourage the construction of affordable
housing. 1 P&Z; DCS N
4. Develop flexible design standards that
encourage a mix of housing types for residents
at all income levels, including the rapidly
growing senior population. 1 P&Z; DCS N
Redevelopment and Revitalization
Redevelopment and Revitalization Policy 1:
Encourage and facilitate the redevelopment and
revitalization of older, existing neighborhoods
and commercial areas to improve the quality of
life for residential and business communities.
1. Create guidelines to improve the aesthetic
character of properties along U. S. Route 40. 1 P&Z N
226
Capital
2. Enhance the Enterprise Zone program to help
offset the costs associated with the
redevelopment of a vacant structure or
previously developed property. 2 OED; P&Z N
3. Initiate redevelopment and revitalization
projects in conjunction with community
groups, private business, property owners and
other agencies. 2 OED N
4. Coordinate with the Office of Economic
Development (OED) to increase public
awareness of economic initiatives and efforts
for redevelopment and revitalization. 3 OED; P&Z N
5. Establish a program to identify and clean-up
brownfield sites. 2 OED; DCS; P&Z N
6. Review and revise the County sign
regulations. 1 P&Z N
Provide standards to encourage revitalization
and appropriate redevelopment in older,
existing residential and commercial areas.
1. Develop design/beautification/streetscape
alternatives to help create more attractive
facades and street frontages. 2 P&Z N
2. Update the Zoning Code to enhance the
aesthetics and functionality of the major
roadways in the County through the
establishment of appropriate standards. 1 P&Z N
3. Provide a program of design services and
assistance to help navigate the governmental
review process for small redevelopment and
revitalization projects. 2 OED; P&Z N
4. Identify opportunities to preserve land of
environmental and historic value to provide
green spaces and focal points. 3 P&Z; P&R N
5. Update the Zoning Code to include
landscaping and screening requirements for
redevelopment and revitalization projects. 1 P&Z N
6. Develop design standards/guidelines that are
flexible and encourage redevelopment. 2 P&Z N
Balance the development of vacant properties
with redevelopment and revitalization activity.
1. Continue to support intergovernmental
cooperation between the municipalities, the
County and Aberdeen Proving Ground to
coordinate infrastructure, land use and
governmental policy issues on a regular basis. 3 ADMN N
2. Establish a program and standards for new
growth on vacant infill land to ensure
compatibility with existing communities. 2 P&Z N
227
Capital
3. Develop a zoning classification to implement
the Mixed Office designation and map the
subject properties through the Comprehensive
Zoning Review. 1 P&Z N
4. Establish a process to involve all stakeholders
in determining priority projects and programs. 2 P&Z; ADMN N
5. Work with community organizations and
housing agencies to develop neighborhood
improvement plans. 3 DCS; P&Z N
Identify existing and additional funding sources,
financial incentives and zoning changes to
reduce redevelopment costs.
1. Develop a joint program between the
Department of Planning and Zoning and the
Office of Economic Development to offer
technical support, incentives, and financial
assistance to small businesses for reinvestment
and revitalization. 2 OED; P&Z N
2. Monitor development trends and maintain a
proactive response to changes in residential
and commercial development patterns. 3 P&Z N
3. Develop Zoning Code revisions that are
consistent with the State’s Smart Growth
initiative. 1 P&Z N
4. Develop Zoning Code revisions that
encourage the consolidation or reconfiguration
of lots to support redevelopment and
revitalization. 1 P&Z N
Implement a network of bicycles and pedestrian
facilities to connect adjacent residential,
commercial, employment, recreational, and
institutional sites.
1. Implement and coordinate strategies and
recommendations identified in the Land
Preservation and Recreation Plan for bicycle
and pedestrian activities in the County. 2 P&Z; P&R N
2. Implement and coordinate strategies and
recommendations identified in the
Transportation Element Plan for non-
motorized transportation options. 2 P&Z; DPW N
3. Establish design guidelines for streetscape
elements such as sidewalk materials, light
fixtures, signage, sitting areas at transit stops to
enhance or encourage bicycle and pedestrian
friendly neighborhoods. 2 P&Z; DPW N
228
Capital
Community Facilities
Water and Sewer
Water and Sewer Policy 1: The extension of
public water and sewer services shall only be
provided within Designated Growth Areas.
1. Extend or upgrade public water and sewer
services to match expected growth within the
Designated Growth Area. 3 DPW Y
2. Continue to review the semi-annual update to
the Master Water and Sewer Plan to ensure
consistency with the Land Use Element Plan. 3 DPW; P&Z N
3. Provide capital programming for facility
expansion and improvement to ensure that
service is available in a timely manner. 3 DPW Y
Water and Sewer Policy 2: The County shall
pursue the use of alternative water and/or sewer
solutions to correct documented health or
pollution problems occurring in existing areas of
development.
1. Implement and adopt a comprehensive
wellhead protection plan as part of the Zoning
Code. 1 P&Z; DPW; HD N
2. Monitor and coordinate land use activities to
protect water sources from pollution and
degradation. 2 HD; DPW; P&Z N
Transportation
Transportation Policy 1: Create additional
funding mechanisms to facilitate on and off site
highway improvements to balance the impact of
new development on public resources.
1. Adopt legislation that provides a dedicated
new funding mechanism for transportation
improvements. 1 ADMN; P&Z; DPW N
2. Create a comprehensive and coordinated
capital program with the County, the three
municipalities and State officials to address
regional transportation needs. 2 ADMN; P&Z; DPW N
Transportation Policy 2: Continue to support
transit opportunities in Harford County
including bus, rail and carpooling alternatives.
1. Work with the State to expand public transit
service within the Designated Growth Areas
and to provide service to the Baltimore
metropolitan region. 2 DCS; P&Z N
2. Identify a new or additional revenue source to
help fund transit alternatives for County
residents. 1 ADMN; P&Z; DPW N
229
Capital
3. Continue to promote the use of public
transportation as an alternative to single
occupant vehicles. 3 DCS; P&Z N
Transportation Policy 3: Continue to carry out
the fundamental policies of the Transportation
Plan which provide a multi-modal approach to
maintain facilities in balance with the County’s
growth.
1. Implement Smart Growth land use alternatives
that reduce the need for single occupant
vehicles. (i.e. vision concepts for U.S. 1 and
Perryman) 3 P&Z N
2. Continue to promote alternative means of
transportation including pedestrian facilities
and bikeways to reduce traffic congestion. 3 DPW; P&R; P&Z N
3. Monitor the adequacy of roadways by
continuously updating the transportation
forecasting model and roadway inventory
analysis. 3 DPW; P&Z N
Solid Waste Disposal Facilities
Solid Waste Policy 1: Continue to provide
environmentally sound solid waste disposal
facilities by promoting waste reduction,
recycling and conservation of the natural
environment while providing a quality living
environment.
1. Complete the update of the Solid Waste
Management Plan in 2004. 1 DPW N
2. Provide adequate solid waste disposal facilities
in an environmentally sound manner. 3 DPW Y
3. Continue to expand recycling efforts and
update the Recycling Plan. 2 DPW N
Public Education
Public Education Policy 1: The County shall
identify and strive to provide schools that meet
the anticipated needs of the community.
1. Construct a new middle/high school at the
Patterson Mill Road complex. 2 ADMN; BOED Y
2. Identify and prioritize major renovations, as
well as future school sites, with the Harford
County Public Schools System. 3 ADMN; BOED; P&Z N
3. Review and enhance the Adequate Public
Facilities regulations as needed. 3 P&Z; BOED N
4. Continue to review the potential for balancing
enrollments and utilization of each facility. 3 BOED; P&Z;ADMN N
Public Education Policy 2: Create additional
funding mechanisms to facilitate public school
improvements to balance the impact of new
development on public resources.
230
Capital
1. Adopt legislation that provides a dedicated
new funding mechanism for public school
improvements. 1 ADMN; BOED N
2. Create a comprehensive and coordinated
capital program with the County and the Board
of Education which prioritizes capacity related
capital improvements. 3 ADMN; BOED Y
Libraries
Libraries Policy 1: Provide appropriate library
facilities to accommodate the needs of the
community.
1. Coordinate the strategic planning policies
developed by the Library Board of Trustees
with the County’s land use planning policies. 2 LB; P&Z N
2. Implement capital improvement program for
new facilities in Jarrettsville and Churchville. 2 ADMN; LB Y
Parks and Open Space
Parks and Open Space Policy 1: Evaluate and
maximize the usage of present Parks and
Recreation facilities, acquire additional lands
and create an integrated park system.
1. Develop facilities that serve a variety of
purposes, creating opportunities for regional-
based recreation. 3 P&R Y
2. Update Zoning Code regulations to enhance
community open space requirements in new
developments by requiring ample, usable open
space within or safely and easily accessible to
each neighborhood. 1 P&Z; P&R N
3. Coordinate the activities of the Departments of
Parks and Recreation and Planning and Zoning
to protect environmental and historic sites in
Harford County. 3 P&R; P&Z N
4. Identify and coordinate trail connections
between communities and new developments,
where appropriate. 3 P&R; P&Z N
5. Update the 1999 Land Preservation and
Recreation Plan. 1 P&R N
6. Complete the right of way acquistion for the
Ma & Pa hiking trail to achieve an unbroken
trail from Forest Hill to Mount Soma,
wherever possible. 3 P&R, P&Z Y
Parks and Open Space Policy 2: Increase active
and passive greenways, extending and
connecting existing public properties.
1. Work with other agencies to develop new
funding sources for the acquisition of
properties to extend and connect existing trails
systems and passive greenways. 2 DPW; P&R N
231
Capital
2. Preserve undeveloped lands and natural areas
to meet future needs as identified in the
Harford County Land Preservation and
Recreation Plan. 3 P&R; P&Z Y
3. Update Zoning Code to enhance standards for
active and passive open space requirements. 1 P&Z; P&R N
Sheriff, Fire and Emergency Operations
Emergency Operations Policy 1: Ensure public
safety within established communities.
1. Continue to support the Community Policing
Unit and proactively pursue more community
participation 3 SHO N
2. Continue to encourage and promote Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design
Principles with the update of the Zoning Code. 1 P&Z: SHO N
3. Continue to support the Sheriff’s
OfficeStrategic Plan. 2 SHO; P&Z N
4. Maintain the existing sworn officer ratio per
1,000 population. 3 ADMN; SHO N
Emergency Operations Policy 2: Reduce the
loss of property, loss of life or injury due to fire
or need for emergency medical care.
1. Provide for new facilities in a manner
consistent with planned growth in order to
maintain an acceptable response time to ADMN; VFC; EMS; EOC;
emergencies. 3 P&Z Y
2. Coordinate a comprehensive capital
improvement program that provides necessary
equipment updates. 3 ADMN; EOC; EMS; VFC N
3. Coordinate with emergency medical service
providers to evaluate the needs of the
volunteer service providers to better meet the
citizen’s needs and determine what changes, if
any, are necessary to provide sufficient
emergency medical services for the County’s
growing population. 3 EMS; EOC; ADMIN Y
Emergency Operations Policy 3: Promote
public safety education and coordinate
Homeland Security efforts with the State and
local governments.
1. Coordinate and ensure zoning regulations and
other county plans are consistent with
emergency operation programs and practices. 3 EOC; P&Z; DPW; P&R N
2. Continue to coordinate changes to Zoning
Code to address accessibility for emergency
response equipment. 3 EOC; EMS; VFC; P&Z; SHO N
3. Continue to support education and community
awareness programs. 3 EOC N
232
Capital
Preservation
Rural Area
Rural Policy 1: Improve agricultural
preservation programs so they remain a viable
option for landowners.
1. Enhance the funding mechanisms used to
support the County’s Purchase of Development
Rights Program. 1 ADMN; P&Z N
2. Review the per acre price paid for easements
annually to ensure that the pricing encourages
participation in these programs. 3 P&Z N
3. Ensure that preservation programs are
implemented in a timely manner. 3 P&Z N
4. Focus preservation efforts in areas that will
expand existing preserved areas. 1 P&Z N
5. Increase the amount of land preserved to 55,000
acres by 2012. 3 P&Z; ADMN N
Rural Policy 2: Maintain and enhance the
County’s existing agricultural to agricultural
TDR program.
1. Review and consider the revision of the
Transfer of Development Rights provision as
part of the comprehensive update of the Zoning
Code. 1 P&Z N
2. Require that a preservation easement be placed
on all or part of the sending property. 1 P&Z N
3. As part of the update of the Zoning Code
appropriate development standards for the
receiving property shall be considered. 1 P&Z N
Rural Policy 3: Ensure that the agricultural
district classification supports the agricultural
industry.
1. Recognize agriculture, and agricultural support
services, as the primary economic base in the
rural areas of the County by continuing to
support the implementation of the County’s
Agricultural Economic Development Initiative. 3 OED; P&Z N
2. Revise the agricultural district regulations to
ensure that they support the continuation and
expansion of agriculture as a viable industry. 1 P&Z N
3. Streamline the permitting process for
commercial agricultural uses and value added
products at all levels of local government. 2 P&Z;DILP N
233
Capital
Rural Policy 4: Promote land use patterns that
support the continuation of agriculture.
1. Propose a right to farm statement that would be
required at the time of settlement and upon
issuance of building permits to inform
prospective buyers that the adjoining
agriculturally zoned land may be subject to
activities that may result in noise, dirt, odors,
and movement of farm equipment. 1 P&Z N
2. Update the Zoning Code to require buffers on
all properties being developed that adjoin
agriculturally zoned lands. 1 P&Z N
3. Implement land use polices and regulations that
help maintain a critical mass of agricultural
land to support the County’s agricultural
industry. 3 P&Z N
4. As part of the update of the Zoning Code
review and consider revising the
Conservation Development Standards (CDS). 1 P&Z N
5. Establish a minimum preservation acreage for
all new residential developments outside
Designated Growth Areas. 1 P&Z N
6. Evaluate road design standards to help ensure
that they match the needs of the agricultural
industry. 2 DPW; P&Z N
Historic Preservation
Historic Preservation Policy 1: Foster
awareness of the benefits of historic preservation
among the County’s citizens.
1. Review and revise the Historic Preservation
Element Plan. 2 P&Z N
2. Develop a procedure to maintain and update
historic inventories on a regular basis. 1 P&Z N
3. Require documentation of historic resources
that cannot be renovated or saved. 1 P&Z N
4. Develop and implement an educational
program that emphasizes the role and benefits
of historic preservation. 2 P&Z N
5. Develop and implement village design
standards to help protect the character of
designated historic villages. 2 P&Z N
6. Promote Heritage Tourism as an economic
benefit to the county. 3 OED; P&Z N
234
Capital
Natural Resources
Natural Resources
Natural Resources Policy 1: Protect and
maintain high quality surface and ground water
resources.
1. Continue to coordinate with the Department of
Public Works on watershed studies and
initiatives to minimize impacts to water quality
from existing and future land uses. 2 P&Z; DPW N
2. Review and revise the Zoning Code to promote
low impact development and use of green
building design principles to decrease
impervious surfaces and impacts to water
quality. 1 P&Z; DPW N
3. Adopt wellhead protection regulations within
designated aquifer recharge areas and water
supply areas in order to protect the quality and
quantity of these resources. 1 P&Z; DPW; HD N
4. Review and revise protection strategies for
surface water sources such as Deer Creek and
Winters Run. 1 P&Z N
5. Continue to update and monitor the County’s
Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Program. 3 P&Z N
6. Advance the goals of the Chesapeake Bay
Tributary Strategies program by working with
County departments and local jurisdictions to
promote projects that meet the goals of the
Chesapeake 2000 Bay Agreement. 2 P&Z N
7. Review standards for sediment and erosion
control and stormwater management; ensure
proper maintenance and functioning of these
facilities. 2 DPW; P&Z N
8. Review and revise existing programs and,
where needed, develop new programs to ensure
the continued preservation and protection of the
County's air, land, and water resources. 1 P&Z N
9. Maintain the County’s Chesapeake Bay
Partners Award in successive years. 2 P&Z N
Natural Resources Policy 2: Protect and
enhance the County’s wetland resources.
1. Revise the Natural Resource District
regulations per the recommendations of the
Builders for the Bay initiative. 1 P&Z N
2. Encourage the preservation of existing wetlands
on development sites. 3 P&Z N
3. Improve coordination with the Army Corps of
Engineers and the Maryland Department of
Environment to ensure wetlands regulations are
being implemented and enforced. 2 P&Z; DPW N
235
Capital
Natural Resources Policy 3: Improve the
protection of the County’s forest resources.
1. Review the County’s Forest Conservation
provisions within the Zoning Code and other
programs regulating activities within forests, to
identify areas where program effectiveness and
efficiency can be enhanced. 1 P&Z N
2. Identify and map large contiguous forested
areas in the County and investigate
mechanisms to conserve these areas. 2 P&Z N
3. Retain forests on development sites to the
greatest extent possible through the use of low
impact development techniques, and promote
conservation/reforestation over the use of fee-
in-lieu. 3 P&Z; DPW N
4. Research incentives for residential lot owners
to maintain trees and enhance habitat. 2 P&Z N
Natural Resources Policy 4: Improve the
protection and enhancement of open space and
greenways in the County, and provide adequate
buffers to the County’s natural resource areas.
1. Maintain up-to-date inventories of the natural
resources and sensitive species within the
County. 3 P&Z N
2. Evaluate and revise existing programs to
further the preservation and protection of the
County’s natural environment. 1 P&Z N
3. Preserve resources within the Development
Envelope in order to ensure renewable and
sustainable communities. 3 P&Z N
4. Update the County’s Land Preservation and
Recreation Plan and the Natural Resources
Element Plan. 2 P&R; P&Z N
5. Review and revise existing open space
requirements in the Zoning Code and explore
opportunities for improvement/enhancement. 1 P&Z; P&R N
6. Target reforestation efforts to riparian buffers
and connectivity to existing forest resources. 3 P&Z; DPW N
Mineral Resources
Mineral Resources Policy 1: Manage the
County’s mineral resources to provide for
current and future production in harmony with
their community setting.
1. Work with the community and the State to
ensure that mining operations plans are
designed to protect the environment and
address compatibility with surrounding land
uses. 3 P&Z N
236
Capital
2. Review existing County regulations to ensure
that they adequately address buffer zones,
minimization of impacts to surrounding land
uses, and standards and procedures for
expansion. 1 P&Z N
Mineral Resource Policy 2 – Plan for the future
reclamation of inactive mining sites in order to
protect the natural environment and ensure
compatibility with surrounding uses.
1. Work with the community, the State, and the 3 P&Z N
site owners to ensure that restoration plans are
both compatible with surrounding land uses and
adaptable for alternate land uses.
2. Work with the community and the State to 2 P&Z N
ensure that restoration plans are designed to
protect the environment.
3. Create a framework for developing restoration 2 P&Z N
plans.
Economic Development
Economic Development Policy 1: Promote the
location of industrial and commercial
development in suitable areas.
1. Encourage the growth of employment centers
at the major intersections of I-95 at Route 152,
Route 543, Route 22, and Route 155. 3 OED; P&Z N
2. Explore means of coordinating development
efforts with the County’s three municipalities. 3 OED; P&Z N
3. Expand the Higher Education Applied
Technology (HEAT) Center. 2 ADMN;OED Y
4. Provide flexible “mixed-use” zoning tools that
would promote the redevelopment of areas in
need of revitalization. 1 P&Z N
5. Provide incentives to industries that support
their employees utilizing public transportation. 3 OED; P&Z N
6. Consider rezoning excess commercial/retail
zoned land to provide more flexible, mixed-use
opportunities. 1 OED; P&Z N
7. Study areas along the I-95 corridor to identify
the potential for new employment centers in
accordance with the Joppa/Joppatowne
Community Plan, only that portion of the I-
95/152 interchange inside the Development
Envelope will be included in a study area. 2 OED; P&Z N
Economic Development Policy 2: Implement a
program aimed at enticing technology industries
to locate and expand within the County.
1. Collect, examine and analyze information that
will be useful in monitoring technology
development activity. 2 OED; P&Z N
237
Capital
2. Promote support systems, such as incubator
facilities, that address the needs of the
technology industry. 2 OED N
3. Develop a telecom infrastructure map serving
each of the technology districts, with
consideration to redundant service, and explore
alternative to improving telecom infrastructure. 2 OED; P&Z N
4. Promote workforce technology development
through education, workshops and other
resources. 3 OED N
5. Promote technology education in Harford
County Public School system. 3 BOED; OED N
6. Encourage technology industries to locate and
expand at the HEAT Center and MO
designated areas. 3 OED; P&Z N
7. Encourage technology industries within the
Technology Districts. 3 OED N
8. Support the retention and expansion of R&D
activities at Aberdeen Proving Ground. 3 ADMN; OED; P&Z N
9. Enhance programs to support technology-
oriented development. 3 OED; P&Z N
Economic Development Policy 3: Improve
infrastructure-funding mechanisms for
responsible economic growth.
1. Develop a new revenue source dedicated to
transportation improvements associated with
economic development objectives. 1 ADMN; DPW; P&Z N
2. Consider legislation for special tax districts
and/or developer agreements. 1 DPW; OED; P&Z N
3. Explore developer incentives for investment in
infrastructure. 2 OED; P&Z N
4. Provide development initiatives to guide and
foster development of the Perryman Peninsula
while protecting the Perryman wellfield. 2 OED; P&Z; DPW N
5. Support public private partnerships that address
infrastructure issues. 1 OED; DPW; P&Z N
Economic Development Policy 4: Explore
appropriate reuses for industrially zoned lands
in rural areas.
1. Explore alternative zoning classifications for
the GI zoned properties in the Whiteford area
that would foster uses appropriate for the
community. 1 P&Z N
2. Protect the rural characteristics and natural
resources of this area. 3 P&Z N
3. Attract agriculture-related businesses to
existing but under-utilized industrial and
commercial land in the rural area. 3 OED; P&Z N
238
Capital
Economic Development Issue 5 – Enhance the
economic viability of agriculture.
1. Continue to develop and implement
agricultural economic development strategies
that enhance continued agriculture production. 3 OED N
2. Expand the opportunities for industry
diversification and on-farm production. 3 OED; P&Z N
3. Enhance existing farm markets and expand
when feasible. 2 OED N
239
240

2004 Harford County Masterplan

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

2004 Harford County Masterplan

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

MAY, 2004

Quality-of-Life - Harford County is dedicated to achieving a high quality-of-life by providing

Commitment to Communities - Harford County is dedicated to providing a forum for a broad

Coordination Among Agencies - Harford County actively pursues a policy of cooperation

Land Use Element Plan

Introduction: Land Use Element Plan………………………………………….. 23

Demographics and Land Capability

▪ Demographics and Land Capability Review……………………. 25

Public Participation Process…………………………………………………….. 47

Growth Management and Resource Conservation

▪ Designated Growth Areas……………………………………….. 51

Community Area Plans

▪ Introduction: Community Areas………………………………… 129

Figure Title Page

1 Development Envelope Map 5

41 Aberdeen - Havre de Grace Demographic 133

APF - Adequate Public Facilities

Harford ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND

Source: Harford County Planning & Zoning.

Edgewood Community Plan (enacted by Council Bill 00-06) is a comprehensive revitalization

AREAS REQUIRING STATE REVIEW

Harford County's “Visions”

Vision 2. Sensitive Areas are protected.

Vision 5. Conservation of resources, including a reduction in resource consumption, is

Vision 6. To assure the achievement of Visions 1 through 5, economic growth is

Vision 7. Funding mechanisms are addressed to achieve these visions.

Stewardship of our Resources

Redevelopment and Revitalization

Coordination Among Agencies

Provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding continue to be:

· Support rational development patterns which lead to an improved environment, a

· Optimize the use of available land resources and public infrastructure.

· Coordinate compatible interjurisdictional goals, objectives and policies to guide

· Implement a cost effective and efficient provision of services and facilities.

· Avoid conflict in matters regarding annexation and development actions.

· Share resources to affect common objectives.

HARFORD COUNTY POPULATION

HARFORD COUNTY MUNICIPAL POPULATION

HARFORD COUNTY POPULATION BY AGE

PERSONS 40,000 1980

HARFORD COUNTY HOUSING TYPES

HARFORD COUNTY HOUSEHOLDS

1969 or Earlier: Over 30 yr

1970 to 1979: 21-30 yr

1980 to 1989: (to 3/80) 11-20 yr

1990 to 1994: 6-10 yr

1995 to 1998: 16mo.-5 yr

1999 to March 2000: last 15 mo.

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000

HARFORD COUNTY HOUSEHOLD INCOME

$35,000 to $49,999 2000

Less Than $10,000

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000

Handlers, Equip. Cleaners, Helpers/Laborers

Transportation & Material Moving

Farming, Forestry & Fishing

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000

Year Total Harford County Aberdeen Bel Air Havre de

YEAR POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS

1990 182,132 63,193

HARFORD COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY AGE

HARFORD COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS

HARFORD COUNTY HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS

Residential Permits Issued Since 1990