Research Project Requirements

University of Zimbabwe
Faculty of Agriculture
FINAL YEAR RESEARCH PROJECTS
AGEC360, AGEN460, CR360, AS360, HAES360 & SL360
REQUIREMENTS
with
PLEASE NOTE:
1. These requirements shall be observed by all students. Any deviation from these must be sought in writing from the
Chairperson of the relevant Department. Students who fail to comply with any of these requirements risked being penalized.
2. The indicated timelines may be varied by the Department usually by not more than a week and in such cases students
shall be notified in writing in sufficient time. A penalty of 2% per day but not exceeding 15% shall be levied for late
submission for any aspect of the research project.
3. Students must work closely with the approved academic supervisor.
4. Students should devote adequate effort, which reflects that the research project is double course offered over two
semesters.
5. Continuous assessment accounts for 30% while the final report accounts for 70 % of the final mark. Assessment of the
Project file accounts for 10% of the continuous assessment mark. The profile file is assessed by the supervisor.
6. Two markers shall independently assess most aspects of the course. Marks that differ by 10 marks or less shall be
averaged. Differences larger than 10 marks shall be discussed between the two markers to find common ground failure of
which shall be referred to third marker whose mark shall be final and binding.
7. Assessment is in accordance with the various Appendices, which are attached to this document.
8. All documents shall be in accordance with the following general formatting:
 Font type and size; Times Roman 12 pts double spacing
 Headings and sub-headings shall be numbered to level 3, e.g.
3. Methodology
3.1. Study area
3.1.1 Physical characteristics
3.1.2 Farming systems
9. Paragraphing should be separated a by a free line.
10. All text should be fully justified.
11. Margins: 40 mm on the left hand of the pate (to allow for binding); 10 mm on the right side; 20 mm at the top and
bottom of page.
Page 1 of 22
RESEARCH PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX
ACTIVITY TIMELINE
FIRST SEMESTER
Developing Research Concept Note, 1 500 words long, 2 stapled copies Submit end of Wk 4,
Feedback by Wk 5
15 hours of lectures and 3 hours of assessment (tests, assignment etc) –Page 2 of Completed by Wk 6
this document
Oral presentation and feedback of Research Proposal, 10 minute Power Point Wk 8

presentation( approx. 10 slides) followed by 5 minutes of questions and discussion.
Engineering students are requested to provide Design Process.
Write up of Research Proposal, 3 000 words long, 2 stapled copies Submit by end of Wk 9,
Feedback by Wk 11
Display of Continuous Marks As for all courses
First inspection of Project File for Research Concept Note and Research Proposal. Wk 12
Engineering students are requested to provide Drawings and Bill Of Quantities.
Final write up of Chapter 1 (Introduction ) and Chapter 2 (Literature Submit end of Wk 13,
Review) Return of corrected
scripts in the first week of
beginning of second
semester. No marks are
released to students
SECOND SEMESTER
Second inspection of Project File organised as follows: A) Diary, B) Data Submit end of Wk 2,
collected so far and C) Preliminary data analysis (e..g summary of means etc) Feedback by end of Wk 3
Third inspection of Project File containing as above but Data Collected section is Submit end of Wk 6,
completed and Data Analysis section is at least 50% complete. Feedback by end of Wk 6,
Second Semester
Oral presentation and feedback of mainly of Results, Discussion and Wk 8

Conclusions: 10 minute Power Point presentation( approx. 10 slides) followed by
5 minutes of questions and discussion
Fourth inspection of Project File Submit end of Wk 8,

Feedback by end of Wk 8
Display of Continous assessment marls WK 8
Submit soft copy for anti-plagiarism check of final project write-up, Length: 5 Wk 11
000 and 12 000 words long inclusive of references but excluding appendices
Submit 3 spiral bound hard copies of final project write up and 1 soft copy Wk 12
version of same length. Include signed computer-generated anti-plagiarism check
as an appendix.
Page 2 of 22
LECTURE TOPICS TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR UNDERTAKING RESEARCH
Topics Content Time (hrs)
1. Introduction to Research Definition of research (project), Types of research, Reasons 1
for doing research
2. Time Management Why manage time? Techniques of managing time, Important 1
timelines in research
3. Introduction - Definitions, Techniques and formulation of research
problem/problem statement
- Background to research problem (Situational analysis, 2
literature search, document review)
- Hypotheses and objectives
- Links between hypotheses and objectives
- Justification of research
4. Literature Review - Reasons for undertaking literature review

- Literature sources (journal articles, books, internet, and
others)
- Collating information from different literature sources 2
- Structure of literature review
- Issues of substance and style in writing a literature review
section/chapter
- Concluding a literature review section
5.Materials and - Research design (research location, experimental/research 3

Methods/Research Methods layout, units of analysis, variables and parameters)
- Data collection and record keeping
- Data analysis (Statistical analysis including statistical tests
and relevant computer packages)
-Data interpretation
- Limitations and ethical considerations
6. Referencing - Types of referencing systems 2
- Harvard System of referencing
- Computer-aided referencing
7. Putting together a - Structure of concept note, proposal and thesis 1
research concept note, - Content of concept note, proposals and thesis
research proposal and thesis - Length of concept note, proposal and thesis
- Need for accurate, precise and concise writing
7.Scientific writing - Use of technical language 2
- Plagiarism (Definition, sanctions, antiplagiarism software)
8. Oral presentations Communication skills including Power Point preparations 1

Total 15
Page 3 of 22
LIST OF APPENDICES
Page 4 of 22
APPENDIX I. STRUCTURE OF A RESEARCH CONCEPT NOTE (max. 1 500 words)
Name and Registration Number of student

Name and code of course
Programme and Level
Name (s)of supervisor(s)
Date of submission
Title of research: Capture the main focus of the research (20 words or under)
Name of researcher and institutional affiliation and contact details
Research problem/Problem statement: What problem is being addressed, and which groups of people are being affected by the problem?
(200 words)
Background to the research problem: Provide information about the context of the problem (300 words)
Goal of the research: What benefits will the research generate for society or what positive change will the research bring about? (30 words)
Hypotheses: What factors contribute to the problem/ what is the suggested explanation what are the research propositions? (60 words)
Objectives (minimum 2 maximum 5): What will be studied and measured in order to answer the hypotheses. These should be in logical
order and should generally start with what will be studied and then why? (100 words)
Research Methodology: Describe how the study will be designed and implemented, including data collection and analysis. (600 words)
Main references: up to 10 critical references
Page 5 of 22
APPENDIX II. MARKING GUIDE FOR RESEARCH CONCEPT NOTE
Name and Registration number of student

Programme and Level
Name of assessor
Date of feedback
Parameter Possible Mark Actual Mark
Title 5
Research Problem 20
Background to the Research Problem 20
Goal of the Research 10
Hypotheses 10
Objectives 10
Research Methodology 20
Main References 5
Total Score 100
PLEASE USE THE BACK OF THIS SCORE SHEET FOR COMMENTS
APPENDIX III. EXAMPLE OF A TITLE PAGE
Title of research
Name of author and registration number
University logo
University of Zimbabwe
Faculty of Agriculture
Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension/Animal Science/Crop Science/Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering
A research project submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the BSc Honours Degree in Agriculture/Agricultural
Engineering/Applied Environmental Science
Month/year
Page 6 of 22
APPENDIX IV. MARKING GUIDE FOR ORAL PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSAL
Programme and Level
Name of supervisor(s)
Name of assessor
Date of assessment
Introduction 15
-Background
-Justification/problem statement
-Clear hypotheses
-Objectives (simple, measurable, achievable, clear)
Reference to Literature 15
-Is there reference to relevant and up-to-date literature?
-Is there an understanding of what exists and what knowledge gaps are
there in the literature?
Methodology 25
-Clear outline of site and experimental design
-Description of materials and methods
-Statistical procedures/appropriateness
Proposed Analysis of Data 15
-Are all components of the analysis captured and clearly and logically
presented?
-Do they address or answer the research questions/objectives?
-Is there evidence of statistical analysis?
Presentation Skills 15
-Quality of slides/overheads
-Clarity of expression
-Audibility
-Time keeping
-Mannerisms/dressing
-Confidence
-Facing audience
Student Response 15
-Ability to handle questions
-Quality of responses
Page 7 of 22
Total Score 100
APPENDIX Va: MARKING SCHEDULE FOR A RESEARCH PROJECT PROPOSAL

Programme and Level
Name of assessor
Title 5
-Is the title short, clear and concise.
-Does the title enable readers to understand the concepts, methodologies
and output of the research?
-Does it reflect the content of the research proposal?
Introduction/ Background 10
- Is it a concise, descriptive, informative, and climate-building
preamble culminating in a statement of the problem being
addressed?
- Is the background a logical and balanced statement that helps to
portray a researcher’s vision of topical issues to be investigated?
- Does the background indicate the gains likely to accrue from the
findings in relation to what has been done i.e. bridging gaps?
- Does the review of previous work reveal what is known on the
subject, gaps in knowledge, current trends and what are perceived
as flaws in current practice?
Research Problem/Problem Statement 10
Does the problem state why the proposed investigation is conceived in
light of the information available?
Justification 5
- Does the researcher justify why resources should be committed to
the proposed work?
Hypotheses 5
Questions for assessment include the following:
 Are the hypotheses testable?
 Why are the hypotheses valid?
 To whom is the problem relevant?
 Will the results solve the problem?
 What are the potential outputs and impacts (intended and
unintended?)
 Are there alternative solutions to the problem?
Objectives 5
Assess whether the objectives are stated plainly and concisely, and that
they are:
 Cohesive and logically arranged;
 Specified in long and short term parameters;
 Relevant to the problem statement;
 Stated in a form which shows the relations between variables;
and
 Not too many (5).
Literature Review 15
Should be exhaustive and comprehensive, and follow all ethical rules
such as acknowledging all sources.
Materials and Methods 25
Assess whether the materials and methods are appropriate and cost
effective in tackling the given research problem.
Methodological limitations 5
Various practical and theoretical drawbacks that must be taken into
account should be clearly stated.
Page 8 of 22
Ethical issues 5
Assess whether issues such as confidentiality, moral issues, consent and
integrity in conducting the research have been taken into account in the
design of the research or scientific experimentation.
Work Plan 2.5

Assess whether the tasks and processes involved in the project have been
included, including time estimates.
Budget 2.5
How much will it cost in terms of time and money to do the study?
Assess the financial resources required for implementation of the project,
and ensure the necessary personnel, equipment and materials required
will be available.
References 5
Assess whether the recommended Harvard style has been consistently
used for in-text and listing of references, and do all citations have
corresponding entries in the list?
Total Score 100
Page 9 of 22
APPENDIX Vb: MARKING SCHEDULE FOR DESIGN PROJECT PROPOSAL

Programme and Level
Name of assessor
Date of assessment
Parameter Possible Mark Actual

Mark
1. Title 5
-Is the title short & precise, but meaningful & specific
-Title marketing proposal
2. Layout, Presentation, Arrangement and Editorial Assessment 5
- Is the system used effective?
- Is there continuity in the style of writing?
- Is there correct use of units e.g. SI units
- Is there correct use of English in terms of consistency, tense, word use, clarity, precision and
brevity?
3.Introduction
- Has the research/design importance been established? 10
- Have the main points of research/design focus & extent of coverage enquiry been covered?
- Have research/design novelty, uniqueness & benefits + previous efforts been given?
Research/design Problem statement/Justification 10
- Are the push/pull factors for research/design evident? How serious is the problem – evidence?
- How will research/design in that area close knowledge gap/bring change/address problem?
- What is the scientific/engineering & practical significance?
Objectives and hypotheses 10
- Are they specific, measurable, achievable, realistic & clear? i.e. are they SMART?
- Do they specify quality or quantity of achievements/needs/requirements of solution (e.g. no. of

beneficiaries, engineering specifications for design projects)?
4.Literature Review 20
- Has the foundation of study/design been laid? Is literature review guided by the research/design
questions?
- How comprehensive & focused are the identified gaps in knowledge/current engineering solutions?
- Is there a synthesis & critical analyses of large data masses/current engineering solutions?
5. Methodology
- Has the student given the detailed functional analysis of the proposed design? 10
Page 10 of 22
- Has student adequately reviewed possible solution options to engineering challenge?
- How adequate is the selection process/matrix and scoring system?
- Has the student demonstrated knowledge/ability to apply underlying engineering theories, 10

principles/equations/calculations that inform the design?
- How adequate are the material selection considerations, drawings, bills of quantities (BOQs)?
-has the student exposed ways of representing designs e.g. drawings and simulations
- How adequate are fabrication/system development, control, evaluation & testing processes 10
proposed?
- How adequately justified are the environmental test conditions, key performance indicators, e.g.
efficiency, proposed?
- How adequate are the health and safety issues/concerns associated with the implementation of the
design (e.g. fabrication) articulated?
6.Workplan and Budget 5
- How adequate/realistic are the BOQs and the overall budget?
- How realistic/realistic is the proposed work plan?
7. References 5
- Do all citations have corresponding entries in the list?
- Has a uniform format used to cite references?
Total Score 100
Page 11 of 22
APPENDIX VI. RECORD OF CONSULTATIONS BETWEEN STUDENT AND PROJECT
SUPERVISOR
Name of student
Registration number of student
Programme and Level
Name of assessor
Date of meeting
Who initiated the meeting? Student/Supervisor...................................................................................................
Details of
Discussions...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Agreed Action
Points............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Suggested date of next meeting...................................................................................................................
Signature of student....................................................................................................................
Signature of supervisor................................................................................................................
BOTH THE STUDENT AND SUPERVISOR MUST RETAIN A COPY
Page 12 of 22
APPENDIX VII. MARKING GUIDE FOR THE PROJECT FILE

Programme and Level
Inspection number (1,2 or 3)
Name of assessor
Date of assessment
Parameter Total Possible Marks Allocated Marks

Research concept note revisions 5
Research proposal revisions 5
Diary 15
Primary data 20
Secondary data 10
Semi-processed data 20
Consultations with supervisor 15
Overall quality 10
Total Score 100
Remarks/Comments
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Page 13 of 22
APPENDIX VIII. MARKING GUIDE FOR ORAL PRESENTATION OF FINAL RESULTS
Programme and Level
Name of assessor
Date of assessment
Introduction 10
-Background
-Problem statement
-Clear hypothesis
-Objectives (simple, measurable, achievable, clear)
-Justification of research
Methodology 20
-Clear outline of site and exp. design
-Description of materials and methods
-Statistical procedures/appropriateness
Results 20
-Are results clearly and logically presented
-Do they address or answer the research questions/objectives
-Is there evidence of statistical analysis
Discussion 20
-Are results adequately discussed
-Is relevant literature referred to
Conclusions/Recommendations 10
-How realistic
-Do they address the objectives set out
Presentation 10
-Quality of slides/overheads
-Clarity of expression
-Audibility
-Time keeping
-Mannerisms/dressing
-Confidence
-Facing audience
Page 14 of 22
Question Time 10
-Ability to handle questions
-Quality of responses
Total Score 100
Page 15 of 22
APPENDIX. IXa. MARKING GUIDE FOR THE WRITTEN REPORT OF RESEARCH PROJECTS
Programme and Level
Name of assessor
Date of assessment
Possible Mark Actual Mark

Title page
Abstract 5
1. Length of abstract should not be more than 350 words
2.
3. Has the purpose been clearly stated (i.e. objectives and hypothesis/research questions
of the study)
4. Is there an abridged picture of the methods used (i.e. materials and methods or
research methods used)
5. Are the highlights of the results presented (or the main findings of the study)
6. Is there a statement of conclusions to the results (and recommendations where
relevant)?
7. Key words (5)
Introduction 15
1. Does the student demonstrate that s/he is knowledgeable about the nature,
problem and purpose of the study?
2. Is sufficient background provided on primary issue or focus of the project?
3. Have the objectives of the study been clearly stated?
4. Are the objectives SMART?
5. Did the student articulate testable and analytically interesting research
questions/and or hypothesis using appropriate language and format?
6. Did the student articulate expected contribution and benefits from the
project?
Literature Review 15
1. How relevant is the literature reviewed to the study? Did the student cover sufficient
breadth in the review of theoretical and empirical studies?
2. To what extent has this literature been presented in an interesting and logical
manner?
3. Has there been synthesis of the literature or is it just a mass of material
extracted from texts? That is, did the student demonstrate academic maturity
in understanding and providing a critical but balanced commentary of the
literature reviewed?
4. Are all references cited in the text using an accepted standard format?
Materials and Methods (or for Agricultural Economics – Research Methods) 15
1. Has the student presented a clear, concise, accurate and sequential description
of the research/ experimental design and procedures used?
2. Does the outline of the given procedures allow one to repeat the experiment without
having to ask the investigator for some clarifications?
3. Is the data collection method and/or source of secondary data clearly explained?
4. Is there evidence of application of scientific methods of data collection and
management?
5. Is there evidence of logical conceptual or analytical framework translating project
objectives and set of hypotheses into a consistent analytical framework?
6. Are the analytical approaches for testing each hypothesis and data requirements
(data analysis) clearly spelt out (often by way of table or summary of key variables
or types of data)?
Results 15
1. Is the format of presentation appropriate and effective?
2. How appropriate are the tables, graphs, pictures, diagrams, maps, etc. that
are presented in the results?
3. Are the appropriate statistical notations (e.g. significance), units, etc.
presented consistently?
4. What is the quality of tables, graphs, figures, pictures? Are there stand alone
diagrams?
5. Are the results organized logically into subsections around common themes,
objectives or sets of hypotheses?
Page 16 of 22
6. Do the empirical models or approaches demonstrate understanding of the logical
sense of economic analysis (model specification, assumptions clearly spelt out and
tests)?
Discussion 15
1. Is there a logical interpretation of the findings on the basis of the facts presented
and in the light of known information/literature?
2. Are the results discussed in sufficient depth demonstrating ability to synthesize
contrasting evidence and balanced analysis of findings?
3. How logical and sound are the explanations for the findings in
relation to expectations as specified in the objectives?
4. Is there a presentation of logical implications of the results in the area under study?
5. Overall Discussion.
Conclusions 5
1.
2. Does the student provide a summary of key findings around each objective,
hypothesis/research question stated in the introductory chapter? That is, Does the
conclusion answer the objectives and hypothesis/research questions?
3. Is the conclusion focused to the results and the statistical procedures
used? That is, does the student provide sufficient evidence to
conclude on the basis of hypothesis/research questions presented?
4. Is the conclusion logical considering the results presented? That is, are the
conclusions based on and informed primarily by the research findings?
Recommendations 5
References 5
1. To what extent have valid references been cited and listed in the reference section (all
cited, consistently in text and listed)?
2. Have all the references cited been accurately listed (using an accepted ,
recommended and appropriate format)?
Layout, Presentation, Arrangement and Editorial Assessment 5
1. Academic writing skills.
2. Is there continuity in the style of writing? (editing) .
3.Is there correct use of English in terms of consistency, tense, spelling,
clarity and brevity?
TOTAL MARK ALLOCATED 100
Page 17 of 22
APPENDIX. IXb. MARKING GUIDE FOR FINAL WRITTEN REPORT OF DESIGN PROJECTS
Programme and Level
Name of assessor
1. Introduction 10
-Has the research/design importance been established?
- Does the justification/problem statement close knowledge gap/bring change/address problem?
- Are the objectives and hypotheses (simple/measurable/achievable/well-structured?
- Does it reveal the scientific/engineering & practical significance?
- Are the objectives specific, measurable, achievable, realistic & clear?
- Do objectives specify quality or quantity of achievements/needs/requirements of solution?
2.Literature Review 10
- Has the foundation of study/design been laid? Is literature review guided by the research/design
questions?
- How comprehensive & focused are the identified gaps in knowledge/current engineering solutions?
- Is there a synthesis & critical analyses of large data masses/current engineering solutions?
3. Methodology
- Design analysis:
- Has the student demonstrated knowledge/ability to apply underlying engineering theories, 10

principles/equations/calculations that inform the design?
- Has the student given the detailed functional analysis of the proposed design?
- Has student adequately reviewed possible solution options to engineering challenge?
- How adequate is the selection process/matrix, scoring system, drawings etc?
- How adequate are the health and safety issues/concerns associated with the implementation of the
design (e.g. fabrication) articulated?
- Fabrication/ system development: 5
- How adequate are the material selection considerations?
- How adequate are fabrication, system development procedures used?
- Evaluation/Testing: 5
- How adequate are the environmental test conditions, methods, key performance indicators, (e.g.
standards, efficiency) adopted as measures for evaluation/ testing used?
- How adequate/appropriate is the analysis used?
4. Results 30
Page 18 of 22
- Is the format of presentation appropriate and effective?
- How appropriate are the tables, graphs, pictures, diagrams, maps etc presented in results?
- How appropriate are the research findings?
- Are the appropriate statistical notations (e.g. significance), units, etc presented consistently?
- How appropriate is the prototype/structure/ component/system/visuals (e.g. photos/videos,

simulations) adopted etc in terms of functionality, workmanship, health and safety considerations?
- How adequate are the evaluation/testing results compared to key performance indicators?
5 Discussion of Results 20
Is there a logical interpretation of the findings/design/process on the basis of the

facts/prototype/system presented in light of known information/performance standards?
- How logical and sound are the explanations for the findings in relation to expectations?
- Is there a presentation of logical implications of the results in the area under study
6. Conclusion and Recommendations 5
- Is there a conclusion to the work presented?
- Does the conclusion answer the objectives?
- Is the conclusion/recommendation focused to the results and statistical procedures used?
- Is the conclusion / recommendation logical considering the results presented?
7. References 5
- Do all citations have corresponding entries in the list?
- Has a uniform format used to cite references?
Total Score 100
Page 19 of 22
APPENDIX X. OUTPUTS FROM ANTI-PLAGIARISM CHECK
Anti-plagiarism report on dissertation
Details of Theses
1. Title of Thesis: Effects of biochar on nutrient and heavy metal leaching on municipal sludge amended soils
2. Author: Cynthia Mandoreba
3. Program: HAES
4. Faculty: Agriculture
5. Supervisor: W. Gwenzi, F. Mapanda & P. Nyamugafata
Report from Ephorus
Interpretation of report
OK
Conclusion
No evidence of plagiarism.
Signatures
6. Supervisor
7. Chairperson (Chief Internal Examiner)
8. Projects Coordinator
<<10 June 2014>>
Page 20 of 22
Details of Theses
1. Title of Thesis: NUTRIENT AND HEAVY METAL LEACHING IN A BIOCHAR AMENDED SANDY SOIL.
2. Author: Tendai N Chipere
3. Program: HAES
5. Supervisor: W. Gwenzi, F. Mapanda & P. Nyamugafata
Report from Ephorus
None observed.
Conclusion
Free of plagiarism. The 9% arose from the literature list under references.
Signatures
6. Supervisor
7. Chairperson (Chief Internal Examiner)
<<10 June 2014>>
Page 21 of 22
Details of Theses
1. Title of Thesis: Effects of combining biochar and three organic amendments on nitrogen transformation potential of
sandy soils
2. Author: Jotham Mupunga
3. Program: HAG
5. Supervisor: F. Mapanda, F. Mtambanengwe & S. Taurayi
Report from Ephorus
Part of the Literature Review and Materials and Methods Chapters were not properly cited. No report initially submitted
Conclusion
Author should make corrections and resubmit for checking.
Signatures
6. Supervisor
7. (Chief Internal Examiner)
<<10 June 2014>>
Page 22 of 22

Research Project Requirements

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Research Project Requirements

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

University of Zimbabwe

FINAL YEAR RESEARCH PROJECTS

AGEC360, AGEN460, CR360, AS360, HAES360 & SL360

3. Students must work closely with the approved academic supervisor.

8. All documents shall be in accordance with the following general formatting:

 Font type and size; Times Roman 12 pts double spacing

 Headings and sub-headings shall be numbered to level 3, e.g.

3.1. Study area

3.1.1 Physical characteristics

3.1.2 Farming systems

9. Paragraphing should be separated a by a free line.

10. All text should be fully justified.

Oral presentation and feedback of Research Proposal, 10 minute Power Point Wk 8

Display of Continuous Marks As for all courses

Engineering students are requested to provide Drawings and Bill Of Quantities.

Oral presentation and feedback of mainly of Results, Discussion and Wk 8

Fourth inspection of Project File Submit end of Wk 8,

Display of Continous assessment marls WK 8

4. Literature Review - Reasons for undertaking literature review

5.Materials and - Research design (research location, experimental/research 3

8. Oral presentations Communication skills including Power Point preparations 1

Name and Registration Number of student

Name of researcher and institutional affiliation and contact details

Main references: up to 10 critical references

Name and Registration number of student

Parameter Possible Mark Actual Mark

Background to the Research Problem 20

Goal of the Research 10

Total Score 100

PLEASE USE THE BACK OF THIS SCORE SHEET FOR COMMENTS

APPENDIX III. EXAMPLE OF A TITLE PAGE

Parameter Possible Mark Actual Mark

-Objectives (simple, measurable, achievable, clear)

-Is there reference to relevant and up-to-date literature?

-Clear outline of site and experimental design

-Description of materials and methods

Proposed Analysis of Data 15

-Do they address or answer the research questions/objectives?

-Is there evidence of statistical analysis?

-Ability to handle questions

PLEASE USE THE BACK OF THIS SCORE SHEET FOR COMMENTS

APPENDIX Va: MARKING SCHEDULE FOR A RESEARCH PROJECT PROPOSAL

Name and Registration Number of student

Parameter Possible Mark Actual Mark

Work Plan 2.5

Total Score 100

PLEASE USE THE BACK OF THIS SCORE SHEET FOR COMMENTS

Name and Registration number of student

Parameter Possible Mark Actual

-Title marketing proposal

2. Layout, Presentation, Arrangement and Editorial Assessment 5

- Is the system used effective?

- Is there continuity in the style of writing?

- Is there correct use of units e.g. SI units

- Has the research/design importance been established? 10

Research/design Problem statement/Justification 10

- What is the scientific/engineering & practical significance?

Objectives and hypotheses 10

- Do they specify quality or quantity of achievements/needs/requirements of solution (e.g. no. of

- How adequate is the selection process/matrix and scoring system?

- Has the student demonstrated knowledge/ability to apply underlying engineering theories, 10

6.Workplan and Budget 5

- How adequate/realistic are the BOQs and the overall budget?