Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Architect Statement
Descriptive
Contractor Statement
Data
Owner Statement
Introduction
Organization Chart
BIM Standards
Project
Data The Last 100 Feet
• Beyond BIM
• Creating an Innovative Culture
• Plan Room Computer
• Integrated Work Plan (IWP)
• Continuous Improvement
2009 BIM TAP AWARD: The Last 100 Feet © M. A. Mortenson Company. All rights reserved.
PROJECT TEAM >>
ARCHITECT STATEMENT: CONTRACTOR STATEMENT: OWNER STATEMENT:
Our first practical introduction to BIM occurred Our firm has primarily used BIM in the past This project was very large and challenging. Due
on the Tulalip Resort Hotel with the help of throughout the design phase. These tools are to the fast-tracked schedule, often times final
the general contractor. With the construction used to resolve design issues and coordinate designs were not completed until well after the
drawings 60% complete, the contractor building systems and we learned that with a well- construction was underway. The contractor’s
proposed a series of collaborative working coordinated design, less field modifications have effective utilization of BIM allowed us to maintain
sessions to meld their 3D model and our to be made resulting in an increased protection of our very aggressive schedule and overcome
documents. This was to assure the accuracy of design intent and productivity. many of the obstacles that otherwise would have
the coordinated on-site drawings – reducing re- delayed or added costs to the project.
work and creating project savings. BIM was used on this project to coordinate the
design, but we took it one step further: The Last Because of the project team’s effort toward
The contractor, in concert with our firm, created Hundred Feet. We created a culture of integration substantial completion, we were able open our
a 3-dimensional set of shop drawings that were by giving access to the model and the imperative doors to our clients three months before the
used to simultaneously define and coordinate all information contained within it, to every person on grand opening.
building systems. These documents reinforced the ground.
confidence when fabricating and building. Our hotel was completed on time and on budget.
Working with a general contractor who has a
Due to our experience with BIM on the Hotel, firm understanding of the practical application
our firm has committed to utilizing 3-D of technology available made this a successful
modeling in the future. project. There is no doubt in my mind that we
would not be where we are today if the team had
not effectively and expertly implemented BIM.
2009 BIM TAP AWARD: The Last 100 Feet © M. A. Mortenson Company. All rights reserved.
INTRODUCTION >>
DESCRIPTIVE DATA
Building Area The Tulalip Resort is a 12-story hotel, casino and conference center
built using a fast-track schedule. The team was challenged to deliver
Total Gross Square Feet 439.860
the project in 22 months, and to begin the project with design
documents only 60% complete.
Estimate Cost
Site Development Cost $5,814,000
To increase efficiency and quality, the team produced innovative and
Building Cost $124,186,000
practical programs using Building Information Modeling. The use of
Total Construction Cost $130,000,000 BIM on this project resulted in lower delivery costs and a high level of
collaboration from the Owner, Architect, Contractor, Subcontractors,
Building Cost/GSF $282/sf and most uniquely -- craft and trades people.
2009 BIM TAP AWARD: The Last 100 Feet © M. A. Mortenson Company. All rights reserved.
ORG CHART >>
PROJECT TEAM
The Project Team exhibited a strong innovative and
collaborative spirit - always focused on driving ultimate Owner
quality and efficiency to the project.
Architect
The Integrated Construction Coordinator (ICC)
managed model input and produced documents to be
Contractor
used in the field. They ensured constructability of the
project during design and protected the integrity of
design during construction.
Assistant
Foreman
Project Manager
BUILDING
Integrated
INFORMATION MEP Engineer
Construction Coordinator MODEL
Responsibilities Included:
• Creating model Project Engineer
• Model coordination
• Distribution of model
documents to field
Field Engineer
MODEL INFORMATION
2009 BIM TAP AWARD: The Last 100 Feet © M. A. Mortenson Company. All rights reserved.
BIM USE >>
During the course of interior wall coordination
between the contractor and architect, 3 serious
structural issues and BIM STANDARDS
234 dimensional conflicts Building Information Modeling was used throughout the building process. As
were resolved with most other projects, BIM was used for prefabrication, MEP coordination,
constructability, preconstruction/quantity survey, site logistics, and 4D scheduling –
all allowing the design to be modified prior to costly and time-consuming conflicts
arising in the field. A project website was used to transfer files between the architect,
consultants, the general contractor and subcontractors.
During the course of interior wall coordination between the contractor and architect ,
three serious structural issues were resolved and 234 dimensional conflicts. These
systems were all verified dimensionally and signed off by both parties, making the
model the most accurate source of information on site.
2009 BIM TAP AWARD: The Last 100 Feet © M. A. Mortenson Company. All rights reserved.
THE 100 FEET >>
BEYOND BIM
Before the use of BIM, foremen were spending 30% of their time reviewing the The project team and field crew communicated using a model available on a
architectural drawings, retrieving the information needed, and relaying it to their crew.
community computer setup in the plan room. Any crafts person, at any time, could
walk into the job site trailer and access model information giving the team another
tool to get the job done safer, faster, and with better precision.
For the program to be effective, extracting the pertinent information from the model
and delivering it to the field was critical. The vehicle for delivering information into
the field was the Integrated Work Plan (IWP,) a layout drawing given to the field crews
enabling them to work more efficiently. It was also used by engineers to perform
quality checks in the field.
• The architect was directly involved with BIM during the coordination process.
• The Engineers used IWPs for quality control and the plan room computer.
• The Superintendent was involved in the IWP approval process.
• The MEP EEngineer, of 30 years experience, ran clash detection during the MEP
meetings.
Assistant Project Manager in charge of enclosure used Revit to build a model of
• The Assist
typical glazing and metal panel mock up for enclosure review.
the typica
• The Subcontractors
Subco were involved either with modeling their own scopes of work such
MEP trades, or simply through their involvement with the IWP process and use
as the ME
of the pla
plan room computer.
The Plan Room Computer was the tool used by both the office staff and field as a live
and interactive means to communicate in 3-dimensions. The plan room computer
held a version of the model, which included all MEP models, architectural models,
and structural models. Every project team member was trained in using Navis Works
to navigate, dimension, and manipulate objects. Instead of a select few looking for
conflicts, every team member can catch coordination issues. The model on the Plan
Room Computer became the primary source of information on the project.
2009 BIM TAP AWARD: The Last 100 Feet © M. A. Mortenson Company. All rights reserved.
THE 100 FEET >>
This flow chart depicts the approval process to
ensure the accuracy of the IWP.
INTEGRATED WORK PLAN IWP
The purpose of the IWP is to simplify and consolidate all information into one delivery
source, creating a task specific document containing all information necessary to
perform a specific task of a defined scope of work.
The document contains plans and elevations, as well as 3-D views. This is accompanied
by pertinent dimensional information ensuring a higher quality product delivered
more efficiently.
Integrated Work Plan (IWP)
C B 3
300.14
QUANTITY INFORMATION
WORK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY
3
CARPENTER QUANTITIES
FORM WORK
"
1/2
1
-1
0'
4.1
"
1/2
- 11
0'
4 7'
- 0' - 8"
LABOR QUANTITIES DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 3"
CONCRETE WORK
"
1/2 Level 1
- 11
2 0' 0' - 0"
300.14 SOG - 5"
MATERIAL ONSITE LIST
-1' - 7 1/2"
6"
Rebar
Conference Center
"
-1
1/1
Formsavers - 11
6'
-7
Sleeves
0'
0'
7' 5' - 8 1/2" 1' - 6 1/2"
Anchor Bolts
Box Outs
- 3"
7' - 3"
Project
EMBED INFORMATION
"
-4
5'
EMBED PLATES EMBED ANGLES ANCHOR BOLTS 3 Project Address:
NUMBER SIZE QTY. NUMBER SIZE QTY. NUMBER SIZE QTY.
300.14 10200 Quil Ceda Blvd.
Tulalip, Wa. 98271
"
-1
Project Phone #:
6"
6'
/1
1'
360-654-2262
15
- 6
-7
1/2
2'
"
"
Drawing Review
3/8
-3
REQ'D MIX STRENGTH TYPE. DESCRIPTION Footing @ G.1 & 3
2'
MIX T3045 4000 PSI TYPE A BEAMS, COLUMNS, REINFORCED CONCRETE, SUPPORTED SLABS 0' - 10 1/2"
0' - 8" Name Position
MIX XT3045 4000 PSI TYPE A-Xypex TUNNEL ROOF SLAB Y N NA
MIX T9014 3000 PSI TYPE B SPREAD FOOTINGS, WALL FOOTINGS, WALLS, GRADE BEAMS, PIERS, SUPPORTED SLABS ON COMPOSITE
METAL DECK & LINEAR ACCELERATOR VAULT N Kurth Design Coord.
MIX XT9014 3000 PSI TYPE B-Xypex AREA P,S - FOUNDATION WALLS, ELEVATOR PIT/TUNNEL WALLS
MIX 2709 N/A PSI CLSM BACKFILL OTHER THAN COMPACTED FILL P Greany Project Eng.
"
1/2
MIX T2708 N/A PSI ALT CLSM BACKFILL OTHER THAN COMPACTED FILL (PUMPABLE)
1
'-
J Jones Superintendant
27
9000R
POUR RATE P= 150 + T G
B Remmen Superintendant
AIR TEMP. 60 or > 6' / HR P = LATERAL PRESSURE , PSE
AIR TEMP. 40 or 59 5' / HR R = RATE OF PLACEMENT , FT/HR Dock Leveler Section 2 No. Description Date
2
AIR TEMP. 20 or 39 4' / HR T = TEMP OF CONCRETE IN FORMS , Deg F 1/2" = 1'-0"
3 G.1
1
200.17
G.8
Dock leveler depressions plan
1
3/16" = 1'-0"
Electrical: Valley
2' - 7 15/16" 0' - 7 1/16"
6' - 1" 5' - 4" 6' - 1"
Level 1 Plumbing: Apollo
0' - 0"
Hydronic/HVAC: Hermanson
3
Dock Leveler Section 3
1/4" = 1'-0"
4
Dock Leveler 3D
300.14
Scale As indicated
3D View:
Provides perspective
to ensure accuracy
2009 BIM TAP AWARD: The Last 100 Feet © M. A. Mortenson Company. All rights reserved.
THE 100 FEET >>
Not one embed, block out, or IWP = CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
sleeve was misplaced IWPs had a tremendous impact on continuous
improvement.
4' - 1"
QUANTITY INFORMATION
WORK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY
Project Number
0' - 10 3/8" CL
0' - 10 3/8" CL
06050015
and types, decreasing installation time by 20%.
0' - 2 5/8" CL
MATERIAL ONSITE LIST Tulalip Tribes Hotel &
REQ'D ITEM QTY. SIZE
0' - 2" 0' - 9 1/8" 0' - 9 1/8"
Rebar
Conference Center
IWPs containing plan and elevation were used
Formsavers
Sleeves
Anchor Bolts
Box Outs
Project
4' - 1"
EMBED INFORMATION
Project Name
Sheet Name
EMBED PLATES EMBED ANGLES ANCHOR BOLTS Project Address:
NUMBER SIZE QTY. NUMBER SIZE QTY. NUMBER SIZE QTY.
Revised
01/29/06 10200 Quil Ceda Blvd.
2' - 0"
Tulalip, Wa. 98271
Project Phone #:
in the forming and pouring of shear walls,
360-654-2262
302.10
1/12/2009 1:11:29 PM
Date/Time Stamp
CONCRETE MIX DESIGNS
increasing production by 26%. Not one embed,
Sheet Number
Drawing Review
REQ'D MIX STRENGTH TYPE. DESCRIPTION
MIX T3045 4000 PSI TYPE A BEAMS, COLUMNS, REINFORCED CONCRETE, SUPPORTED SLABS
100I Name Position
MIX XT3045 4000 PSI TYPE A-Xypex TUNNEL ROOF SLAB 1 Y N NA
MIX T9014 3000 PSI TYPE B SPREAD FOOTINGS, WALL FOOTINGS, WALLS, GRADE BEAMS, PIERS, SUPPORTED SLABS ON COMPOSITE 3/4" = 1'-0"
METAL DECK & LINEAR ACCELERATOR VAULT N Kurth Design Coord.
MIX XT9014 3000 PSI TYPE B-Xypex AREA P,S - FOUNDATION WALLS, ELEVATOR PIT/TUNNEL WALLS
MIX 2709
MIX T2708
POUR RATE
N/A PSI
N/A PSI
CLSM
ALT CLSM
BACKFILL OTHER THAN COMPACTED FILL
BACKFILL OTHER THAN COMPACTED FILL (PUMPABLE)
P= 150 +
9000R
T
P Greany
J Jones
Project Eng.
Superintendant
block out, or sleeve was misplaced.
B Remmen Superintendant
AIR TEMP. 60 or > 6' / HR P = LATERAL PRESSURE , PSE
AIR TEMP. 40 or 59 5' / HR R = RATE OF PLACEMENT , FT/HR No. Description Date
AIR TEMP. 20 or 39 4' / HR T = TEMP OF CONCRETE IN FORMS , Deg F
Orange 100V
H
Orange 100Y Orange 100S Orange 100R
Orange 100S Orange 100Q Orange 100AA Orange100X Architect: RPA
Orange 100Q
Orange 100T
Blue 100P Orange 100Q Orange 100Q Orange 100Q Blue 100P
General Contractor: Mortenson
L
Fire Protection: SFS
302.27
Scale 1/16" = 1'-0"
2009 BIM TAP AWARD: The Last 100 Feet © M. A. Mortenson Company. All rights reserved.
THE 100 FEET >>
Level 2 - Area 3 Embed
Layout
QUANTITY INFORMATION
WORK ACTIVITY
CARPENTER QUANTITIES
FORM WORK
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY
7' - 5" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 8' - 7" 7' - 5" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 8' - 7" 7' - 9" 4' - 0" 2' - 10" 4' - 0"
4' - 1 1/2"
4' - 0"
2' - 0 1/2"
2' - 10 1/2"
0' - 4 1/2"
2' - 7"
2' - 2" 2' - 8"
IWP CONTRACTOR USE
300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M 300M
LABOR QUANTITIES DESCRIPTION QUANTITY
CONCRETE WORK
0' - 7 1/2"
0' - 7 1/4"
0' - 7 1/2"
0' - 1 1/2"
0' - 1 1/2"
303M 303M 303M 303M
0' - 1 1/2"
303M 303M
303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M
303M 303M
MATERIAL ONSITE LIST 6' - 6 7/8" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 7' - 6 1/4" 8' - 5 3/4" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 7' - 6 1/4" 8' - 7 1/2" 3' - 10 1/4" 5' - 3" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" Tulalip Tribes Hotel &
REQ'D ITEM QTY. SIZE
Rebar
Formsavers
Sleeves
1' - 10 7/8"
2' - 8 13/16" Conference Center
Anchor Bolts
Box Outs
5' - 4 1/2"
Project
EMBED INFORMATION 304M Revised Location
EMBED PLATES EMBED ANGLES ANCHOR BOLTS (1) Btm Project Address:
NUMBER SIZE QTY. NUMBER SIZE QTY. NUMBER SIZE QTY.
10200 Quil Ceda Blvd.
Tulalip, Wa. 98271
13' - 1"
Project Phone #:
360-654-2262
304M.1
0' - 5"
REQ'D MIX STRENGTH TYPE. DESCRIPTION
MIX T3045 4000 PSI TYPE A BEAMS, COLUMNS, REINFORCED CONCRETE, SUPPORTED SLABS
Name Position
MIX XT3045 4000 PSI
MIX T9014 3000 PSI
TYPE A-Xypex
TYPE B
TUNNEL ROOF SLAB
SPREAD FOOTINGS, WALL FOOTINGS, WALLS, GRADE BEAMS, PIERS, SUPPORTED SLABS ON COMPOSITE
J Y N NA
METAL DECK & LINEAR ACCELERATOR VAULT N Kurth Design Coord.
MIX XT9014 3000 PSI TYPE B-Xypex AREA P,S - FOUNDATION WALLS, ELEVATOR PIT/TUNNEL WALLS 6
Revised Location
MIX 2709 N/A PSI CLSM BACKFILL OTHER THAN COMPACTED FILL 400.07 P Greany Project Eng.
MIX T2708 N/A PSI ALT CLSM BACKFILL OTHER THAN COMPACTED FILL (PUMPABLE)
2 Revision 2 02/19/06
304M
(1) Top (1) Btm
Architect: RPA
304M
(1) Btm
304M
Structural Engineer: DCI
Electrical: Valley
Slab on Grade
• Slab edge
Revised Location Plumbing: Apollo
5' - 4 1/2"
6' - 5 1/2" 2' - 9 1/4" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 6' - 9 1/4" 9' - 2 3/4" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 6' - 9 1/4" 9' - 2 3/4" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 6' - 9 1/4" 8' - 10 1/2"
303M Hydronic/HVAC: Hermanson
0' - 0 7/8"
0' - 0 7/8"
0' - 0 7/8"
0' - 6 1/8"
0' - 6 1/8"
303M
0' - 6 1/8"
303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M 303M
303M 303M 303M 303M
303M Fire Protection: SFS
L
303M
0' - 6 1/8"
300M 300M 300M 302M
Level 2 - Area 3
Embed Layout
5' - 8 1/2" 3' - 7" 3' - 8 1/2" 4' - 3 1/2" 3' - 8 1/2" 8' - 4 1/2" 6' - 9 1/2" 4' - 3 1/2" 3' - 8 1/2" 4' - 4 1/2" 3' - 1" 7' - 6 1/2" 7' - 7 1/2" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 6' - 7" 7' - 2 1/2" 7' - 2 1/8"
3
12 2' - 7 1/2" 11 2' - 2 1/2" 10 301.21
Project number 06050015
Date 1/12/2009 1:10:16 PM
Drawn by Author
1
Level 2 - Area 3 Steel Embed Layout
3/16" = 1'-0"
Scale
303.04
3/16" = 1'-0" • •Bolt pattern for steel columns
by 20% and
shaved 6 weeks
off schedule
2009 BIM TAP AWARD: The Last 100 Feet © M. A. Mortenson Company. All rights reserved.
THE 100 FEET >>
IWP SUBCONTRACTOR USE
The MEP subcontractors were given coordinated layout of all slab penetrations via
Over 70% more work in place per RFI IWP. The use of identically coordinated layout drawings by the MEP trades, carpenters
and structural subcontractors meant no field conflicts, ultimately eliminating one day
from the typical PT deck pour cycle. These efforts resulted in an over 70% more work in
place per RFI written when compared to previous projects.
2009 BIM TAP AWARD: The Last 100 Feet © M. A. Mortenson Company. All rights reserved.
BRIDGING THE GAP>>
The model improved quality, increased schedule, prevented
mistakes, enhanced construction documents.
The progressive culture on this project resulted PROJECT STRUCTURE MONTHS OF CONTRACT BEGINNING FINAL VALUE NUMBER of
NAME TYPE CONSTRUCTION TYPE VALUE INC. CO's % CHANGE RFI's VALUE/RFI
in impressive production results:
Administrative Building Steel Framed 15 GC/CM $29,000,000 $33,700,000 16.2% 960 $35,104
• The project team broke company records for Conference Center Steel Framed 26 GC/CM $58,000,000 $61,000,000 5.1% 1,388 $43,948
pouring concrete shear walls by 15% .
University Eng. Bldg. Concrete Framed 28 GC/CM $48,400,000 $51,200,000 5.8% 1,212 $42,244
• The project team beat the structural schedule Jail/Garage CIP Reinforced 35 GC/CM $90,468,023 $93,500,000 3.4% 2,900 $32,241
Concrete
by 6 weeks.
Hospital Concrete w/Steel 23 GC/CM $33,941,520 $38,780,381 14.3% 1,600 $24,237
Framing
• The crew was 20% more efficient based on our
estimate for completing the structure package. State Legislative Load-Bearing 28 GC/CM $63,000,000 $90,000,000 42.90% 2,000 $45,000
Building (Renovation) Masonry
• By using the model, the team was able to Tulalip Resort Hotel PT Concrete Slab 16 GMP $130,000,000 $130,000,000 0% 981 $132,517
& Steel Frame
coordinate and pour the first deck 2 days after
the release of CDs versus the average two to • http://www.uspto.gov/teas/
Tulalip Resort Hotel: 1 RFI for every $127,401 of work put in place
three months. eTEASpageA.htm
Non-BIM Project: 1 RFI for every $37,135 of work put in place
2009 BIM TAP AWARD: The Last 100 Feet © M. A. Mortenson Company. All rights reserved.