U.S.

Department of Justice

United States Attorney

District of Connecticut

Connecticut Financial Center

157 Church Street (203) 821-3700

New Haven, Connecticut 06510 Fax (203) 773-5376
www.usdoj.gov/usao/ct
March 13, 2008

Kevin J. Keating, Esq.

666 Old Country Road, Suite 501
Garden City, New York 11530-2004

Re: United States v. Corey Davis

Criminal No. 3:07CR11(JCH)

Dear Mr. Keating:

This letter confirms the plea agreement entered into between your client, Corey Davis
(the “defendant”), and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Connecticut (the
“Government”) concerning the referenced criminal case.

The Plea and Offense

The defendant agrees to plead guilty to count six of the superseding indictment charging
him with sex trafficking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591(a)(1), 1591(a)(2), and 1591(b)(1). He
understands that to be guilty of this offense, the following essential elements of the offense must
be satisfied:

1. That the defendant knowingly recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided,

or obtained a person OR the defendant knowingly benefitted, financially or by
receiving something of value, from participating in a venture that recruited,
enticed, transported, provided, or obtained a person;

2. That the defendant knew that force, fraud, or coercion would be used to cause the
person to engage in commercial sex acts OR that the defendant knew the child
was under 18 years of age and was engaged in commercial sex acts; and

3. That the defendant’s acts were in or affecting interstate commerce.

The Penalties

This offense carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.
Moreover, under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k), any sentence of incarceration under this provision must
also include a term of supervised release of not less than five years and as much as life. The
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. -2- March 13, 2008

defendant understands that should he violate any condition of supervised release during its term,
he may be required to serve a further term of imprisonment of up to three years with no credit for
the time already spent on supervised release. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). As part of this agreement,
the defendant will not oppose the Government’s request that the Court impose those conditions
identified on the attachment to this agreement as conditions of his supervised release.

The defendant also is subject to the alternative fine provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3571. Under
this section, the maximum fine that may be imposed on the defendant is the greatest of the
following amounts: (1) twice the gross gain to the defendant resulting from the offense; (2) twice
the gross loss resulting from the offense; or (3) $250,000.

In addition, the defendant is obligated by 18 U.S.C. § 3013 to pay a special assessment of

$100 on each count of conviction. The defendant agrees to pay the special assessment to the
Clerk of the Court on the day the guilty plea is accepted.

Finally, unless otherwise ordered, should the Court impose a fine of more than $2,500 as
part of the sentence, interest will be charged on the unpaid balance of a fine amount not paid
within 15 days after the judgment date. 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f). Other penalties and fines may be
assessed on the unpaid balance of a fine pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3572 (h), (i) and 3612(g).

Forfeiture and Waiver as to Certain Property

The intent of the parties is for the defendant to forfeit a piece of property and waive all
right, title, interest, and claims in property seized during the investigation of the defendant.
Therefore, the defendant agrees to take all steps as requested by the United States to pass clear
title to the United States of all the property discussed in this agreement, to share truthful
information with agents and representatives of the United States about any facts and claims
concerning the property, and to testify truthfully in any judicial forfeiture proceeding.

1. Forfeiture of Queens Residence

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1594(b), the defendant agrees to forfeit his interest in a two-
family residence located at 143-12 184th Street, Springfield Gardens, New York, 11413
(hereinafter “Queens Residence”). With respect to the Queens Residence listed in item (5), the
ownership interest of the property is held by him and/or his mother. By separate letter,
incorporated herein, the defendant’s mother will waive all right, title, interest, and claims in and
to the Queens Residence, which has an approximate estimated value of $575,000 and an
approximate estimated equity value of $286,000.

The defendant further acknowledges that the Queens Residence is subject to forfeiture as
property used to commit or to promote the commission of illegal conduct, or property that is the
proceeds of criminal activity, giving rise to forfeiture as charged in the superseding indictment.
The defendant agrees to waive all interests in the Queens Residence in any administrative or
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. -3- March 13, 2008

judicial forfeiture proceeding, whether criminal or civil, state or federal. The defendant agrees to
consent to the entry of an order of forfeiture for the Queens Residence, and waives the
requirements of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 32.2 and 43(a) regarding notice of the
forfeiture in the charging instrument, announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing, and
incorporation of the forfeiture in the judgment. The defendant acknowledges that he understands
that the forfeiture of the Queens Residence is part of the sentence that may be imposed in this
case and waives any failure by the Court to advise him of this, pursuant to Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(J), at the time his guilty plea is accepted.

2. Waiver of Claims to Certain Property

The defendant agrees to waive all rights, title, interest, and claims to the following
property, which will be referred to as “Seized Property:”

(1) $29,255 in United States currency, seized as follows: (a) $4,225 on the
defendant’s person at the time of his arrest on December 27, 2006; and (b)
$25,030 within the Mercedes Benz, white-colored (2-door) bearing vehicle
identification number WDBPJ75J4YA005311, while executing a federal search
warrant on December 28, 2006.

(2) A Mercedes Benz, white (2-door), bearing vehicle identification number

WDBPJ75J4YA005311.

(3) A Mercedes Benz, silver-colored, bearing vehicle identification number

WDBPJ75J01A015792, which will be surrendered to the Federal Bureau of
investigation within 10 days of the entry of the defendant’s guilty plea.

(4) Five pieces of jewelry found on the defendant at the time of his December 27,
2006 arrest estimated to be worth $110,000, including:

(a) a Jacob & Co. watch (silver colored with diamond stones) with an estimated
replacement value of $91,000;

(b) a ring (silver-colored with diamond stones) with an estimated replacement

value of $4,000;

(c) a ring (silver-colored with diamond stones) with an estimated replacement

value of $10,000;

(d) one necklace with pendant (silver-colored with diamond type stones) with an
estimated replacement value of $4,500; and

(e) one earring (silver colored with diamond stones) with an estimated
replacement value of $500.
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. -4- March 13, 2008

With respect to items (1) and (4) of the Seized Property, the defendant warrants that he is the sole
owner of those items. With respect to the Mercedes Benz listed as items (2) and (3), the
ownership interest is held by him and others. By separate letter, incorporated herein, any other
owner(s) will waive all right, title, interest, and claims in and to the two Mercedes Benz.

Also, the Federal Bureau of Investigation seized various other items from the defendant
and the white Mercedes Benz (vehicle identification number WDBPJ75J4YA005311) he
operated. On December 27, 2006, the FBI seized items from the defendant including drivers
licenses in different names, credit cards in his and others’ names, a cellular telephone and clips,
business cards, hat, assorted papers, and other assorted items. In late December 2006 and
January and February 2007, the FBI seized pursuant to federal warrants, various other personal
property from the Mercedes Benz, including female shoes and clothing, costume jewelry, men’s
cologne, male clothing, assorted bags, gifts, toiletries, assorted papers, books, disposable
cameras, multiple cellular telephones and chargers, photographs, CDs and DVDs, multiple
license plates, keys, another person’s Social Security card, and other assorted items. All those
items are hereinafter listed as the “Miscellaneous Property.”

The defendant agrees to waive all right, title, interest, and claims in and to the Seized
Property and Miscellaneous Property. The defendant consents to the United States taking
irrevocable custody and ownership of this property, and further consents to the United States
disposing of the Seized Property and Miscellaneous Property in any manner that the United
States chooses, including but not limited to, the United States’ use, sale, or destruction of it. The
defendant henceforth waives any and all notice with respect to any motion, pleading, order, or
any other action taken by the United States with respect to any such disposition of the Seized
Property and Miscellaneous Property.

3. Hold Harmless Agreement and Waiver Regarding Forfeited and Certain Property

The defendant agrees to hold the United States, its agents and employees harmless from
any claims whatsoever in connection with the seizure, forfeiture, or disposition, including but not
limited to any future use, sale, or destruction of the items listed above, including the Queens
Residence, Seized Property, and Miscellaneous Property covered by this agreement. The
defendant further agrees to waive all constitutional and statutory challenges in any manner
(including direct appeal, habeas corpus, or any other means) to any forfeiture or disposition
carried out in accordance with this plea agreement on any grounds, including that the forfeiture
or disposition constitutes an excessive fine or punishment. The defendant also understands and
agrees that by virtue of his plea of guilty he waives any rights or cause of action to claim that he
is a “substantially prevailing party” for the purpose of recovery of attorney fees and other
litigation costs in any related forfeiture proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465(b)(1).
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. -5- March 13, 2008

Restitution

In addition to the other penalties provided by law, including permissible restitution under
18 U.S.C. § 3663, the Court must also order that the defendant make restitution under 18 U.S.C.
§§ 1593 and 2259. The defendant is obligated to make restitution to MV #1 in count six. Also,
the defendant agrees, under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(1)(A), to make restitutions to MV #2, MV #3,
and V #4 listed in the superseding indictment. Within 10 days of entering his guilty plea, the
defendant will submit a certified check in the amount of $50,000 to the Clerk of Court, United
States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Those funds will be available to the Court
for making restitution to MV #1, MV #2, MV #3, and V #4.

With respect to proceeds from the Seized Property, the Government intends to make
those proceeds available as restitution for the four victims identified above for certain expenses.
The defendant agrees not to oppose any order commiting the $50,000 and Seized Property
proceeds toward fulfillment of any order of restitution.

Sentencing Guidelines

1. Applicability

The defendant understands that, although application of the United States Sentencing
Guidelines is not mandatory, they are advisory and the Court is required to consider any
applicable Sentencing Guidelines as well as other factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) to
tailor an appropriate sentence in this case. See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).
The defendant expressly understands that the Sentencing Guideline determinations will be made
by the Court, by a preponderance of the evidence, based upon input from the defendant, the
Government, and the United States Probation Office which prepares the presentence
investigation report. The defendant further understands that he has no right to withdraw his
guilty plea if his sentence of imprisonment is within the 276 to 293 range or the Guideline
application is other than he anticipated.

2. Acceptance of Responsibility

At this time, the Government agrees to recommend that the Court reduce by two levels
the defendant’s adjusted offense level under section 3E1.1(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines, based
on the defendant’s prompt recognition and affirmative acceptance of personal responsibility for
the offense. This recommendation is conditioned upon the defendant’s full, complete, and
truthful disclosure to the Probation Office of information requested, of the circumstances
surrounding his commission of the offense, and of his criminal history. This recommendation is
further conditioned upon the defendant’s submission to the Probation Office, prior to the date of
sentencing, of a complete and truthful financial statement setting forth all assets, including but
not limited to, cash deposits, securities, real estate, and other property owned by or held on behalf
of the defendant in the defendant’s own or any other name. The defendant expressly understands
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. -6- March 13, 2008

that the Court is not obligated to accept the Government’s recommendation on the two-level
reduction. Finally, the Government will not seek pursuant to §3E1.1(b) that the Court reduce the
defendant’s Adjusted Offense Level by one additional level because he did not notify the
Government of his intention to enter a plea of guilty until after a jury had been selected and after
the Government had prepared to present evidence at trial starting March 17, 2008.

The Government will not make the recommendation for the two-level reduction if the
defendant engages in any acts which (1) indicate that the defendant has not terminated or
withdrawn from criminal conduct or associations (U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1); (2) could provide a basis
for an adjustment for obstructing or impeding the administration of justice (U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1); or
(3) constitute a violation of any condition of release. Moreover, the Government will not make
the recommendation for the two-level reduction if the defendant seeks to withdraw his plea of
guilty. The defendant expressly understands that he may not withdraw his plea of guilty if, for
the reasons explained above, the Government does not make the recommendations for a two-
level reduction.

3. Factual Stipulation

Pursuant to section 6B1.4 of the Sentencing Guidelines, the defendant and the
Government have entered into a stipulation which is attached to and made a part of this plea
agreement. The defendant understands that this stipulation does not purport to set forth all of the
relevant conduct and characteristics that may be considered by the Court for purposes of
sentencing. The defendant expressly understands that this stipulation is not binding on the Court.
The defendant also understands that the Government and the United States Probation Office are
obligated to advise the Court of any additional relevant facts that subsequently come to their
attention.

4. Plea Agreement Pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C)

The defendant and the Government agree, pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Fed. R.
Crim. P. and Local Rule 32(r), R. Crim. P. (D. Conn.), that a sentence within the range of 276 to
293 months’ incarceration is a reasonable and appropriate sentence which takes into account the
factors set forth under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Using the November 1, 2006 Guideline Manual, the
Government and the defendant stipulate to the following: The base offense level for sex
trafficking offense under U.S.S.G. § 2A3.1(a) is 30 because of the cross reference instruction
under U.S.S.G. § 2G1.3(c)(3) where the offense involved conduct described in 18 U.S.C. §§
2241 or 2242 (criminal sexual abuse or attempt to commit criminal sexual abuse). Four levels
are added under U.S.S.G. § 2A3.1(b)(1) because the sex trafficking offense involved conduct
described in 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a) or (b). Two levels are added under either U.S.S.G. §
2A3.1(b)(2) because the Government can prove that MV #1 had attained the age of 12 years but
had not attained the age of 16 years or U.S.S.G. § 3A1.1(b)(1) because the defendant knew or
should have known that MV #1 was a vulnerable victim. Two levels are added under U.S.S.G. §
3B1.1(c) because the defendant was a leader and organizer of the venture, resulting in an
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. -7- March 13, 2008

adjusted offense level of 38. Two levels are subtracted under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a) for acceptance
of responsibility, as noted above, resulting in offense level total of 36.

Based on the representation of the defendant and other information available to the
Government at this time, the defendant’s criminal history category is III. At an offense level total
36 and criminal history category III, the defendant’s Guideline range is 235 to 293 months’
imprisonment (sentencing table) and fine range of $20,000 to $200,000 (U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2(c)(3)).
The defendant will request that the Court sentence him to 276 months’ imprisonment while the
Government will request that the Court sentence him to 293 months’ imprisonment.

In accordance with Rule 11(c)(1)(C) and Local Rule 32(r), if the Court accepts this plea
agreement, then the parties’ agreement regarding the incarceration consequence for the defendant
will bind the Court to impose a sentence within the range of 276 to 293 months’ incarceration.
In the event that the Court rejects this part of the plea agreement, this plea agreement is null and
void. The defendant and the Government further agree that all other aspects of the sentence,
including the imposition of any fine and the determination of the length and conditions of
supervised release, about which the parties intend to make recommendations, will be left to the
discretion of the Court.

5. Waiver of Right to Appeal

or Collaterally Attack Sentence

The defendant acknowledges that under certain circumstances he is entitled to appeal his
conviction and sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3742. It is specifically agreed that the defendant will not
appeal or collaterally attack in any proceeding, including but not limited to a motion under 28
U.S.C. §§ 2255 and/or 2241, the conviction or sentence of imprisonment imposed by the Court if
that sentence does not exceed 293 months’ imprisonment, a period of supervision of life, and a
$200,000 fine, even if the Court reaches a sentencing range permitting such a sentence by a
Guideline analysis different from that specified above, as well as the forfeiture of his property.
The defendant expressly acknowledges that he is waiving his appellate rights knowingly and
intelligently.

6. Information to the Court

Subject to the agreement above, the Government expressly reserves its right to address
the Court with respect to an appropriate sentence to be imposed in this case. Moreover, it is
expressly understood that the Government will discuss the facts of this case, including
information regarding the defendant’s background and character, 18 U.S.C. § 3661, with the
United States Probation Office and will provide the Probation Officer with access to its file, with
the exception of grand jury material.
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. -8- March 13, 2008

Waiver of Rights

1. Waiver of Trial Rights and Consequences of Guilty Plea

The defendant understands that he has the right to be represented by an attorney at every
stage of the proceeding and, if necessary, one will be appointed to represent him.

The defendant understands that he has the right to plead not guilty or to persist in that
plea if it has already been made, the right to be tried by a jury with the assistance of counsel, the
right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him, the right not to be compelled to
incriminate himself, and the right to compulsory process for the attendance of witnesses to testify
in his defense. The defendant understands that by pleading guilty he waives and gives up those
rights and that, if the plea of guilty is accepted by the Court, there will not be a further trial of any
kind.
The defendant understands that, if he pleads guilty, the Court may ask him questions
about the offense to which he pleads guilty, and, if he answers those questions falsely under oath,
on the record, and in the presence of counsel, his answers may later be used against him in a
prosecution for perjury or making false statements.

2. Waiver of Statute of Limitations

The defendant understands and agrees that should the conviction following the
defendant’s plea of guilty pursuant to this plea agreement be vacated for any reason, then any
prosecution that is not time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations on the date of the
signing of this plea agreement (including any indictment or counts the Government has agreed to
dismiss at sentencing pursuant to this plea agreement) may be commenced or reinstated against
the defendant, notwithstanding the expiration of the statute of limitations between the signing of
this plea agreement and the commencement or reinstatement of such prosecution. The defendant
agrees to waive all defenses based on the statute of limitations with respect to any prosecution
that is not time-barred on the date the plea agreement is signed.

3. Waiver of Right To Post-Conviction DNA Testing of Physical Evidence

The defendant understands that the Government has various items of physical evidence in
its possession in connection with this case that could be subjected to DNA testing. The
defendant further understands that, following conviction in this case, he could file a motion with
the Court to require DNA testing of physical evidence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3600 and § 3600A
in an attempt to prove his innocence. The defendant fully understands his right to have all the
physical evidence in this case tested for DNA, has discussed this right with his counsel, and
knowingly and voluntarily waives his right to have such DNA testing performed on the physical
evidence in this case. The defendant fully understands that, because he is waiving this right, the
physical evidence in this case will likely be destroyed or will otherwise be unavailable for DNA
testing in the future.
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. -9- March 13, 2008

Acknowledgment of Guilt and Voluntariness of Plea

The defendant acknowledges that he is entering into this agreement and is pleading guilty
freely and voluntarily because he is guilty. The defendant further acknowledges that he is
entering into this agreement without reliance upon any discussions between the Government and
him (other than those described in the plea agreement letter), without promise of benefit of any
kind (other than the concessions contained in the plea agreement letter), and without threats,
force, intimidation, or coercion of any kind. The defendant further acknowledges his
understanding of the nature of the offense to which he is pleading guilty, including the penalties
provided by law. The defendant also acknowledges his complete satisfaction with the
representation and advice received from his undersigned attorney. The defendant and his
undersigned counsel are unaware of any conflict of interest concerning counsel’s representation
of the defendant in this case.

Not a Prevailing Party

The defendant expressly acknowledges that he is not a “prevailing party” within the
meaning of Public Law 105-119, section 617 (“the Hyde Amendment”) with respect to the
counts of conviction or any other count or charge that may be dismissed pursuant to this
agreement. The defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waives any rights he may
have to seek reasonable attorney’s fees and other litigation expenses under the Hyde
Amendment.

Scope of Agreement

The defendant acknowledges and understands that this agreement is limited to the
undersigned parties and cannot bind any other federal authority, or any state or local authority.
The defendant acknowledges that no representations have been made to him with respect to any
civil or administrative consequences that may result from the plea of guilty because such matters
are solely within the province and discretion of the specific administrative or governmental entity
involved. Finally, the defendant understands and acknowledges that this agreement has been
reached without regard to any civil tax matters that may be pending or which may arise involving
him.

Collateral Consequences / Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act

The defendant further understands that he will be adjudicated guilty of the offense to
which he has pleaded guilty and may thereby be deprived of certain rights, such as the right to
vote, to hold public office, to serve on a jury, or to possess firearms. The defendant understands
that pursuant to section 203(b) of the Justice For All Act, the Bureau of Prisons or the Probation
Office will collect a DNA sample from the defendant for analysis and indexing. The defendant
understands that the Government reserves the right to notify any state or federal agency by whom
he is licensed, or with whom he does business, as well as his current or future employer of the
facts and circumstances of his conviction.
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. - 10 - March 13, 2008

The defendant acknowledges that he has been advised and understands that under the Sex
Offender Registration and Notification Act, federal law requires that he must register and keep
the registration current in each of the following jurisdictions: where he resides; where he is an
employee; and where he is a student. He understands that the requirements for registration
include providing his name, his residence address, and the names and addresses of any places
where he is or will be an employee or a student, among other information. He further
understands that the requirement to keep the registration current includes informing at least one
jurisdiction in which he resides, is an employee, or is a student not later than three business days
after any change of his name, residence, employment, or student status. The defendant has been
advised, and understands, that the failure to comply with these obligations subjects him to
prosecution for failure to register under federal law, 18 U.S.C. § 2250, which is punishable by a
fine or imprisonment, or both.

Satisfaction of Federal Criminal Liability

The defendant’s guilty plea, if accepted by the Court under the terms of this plea
agreement, will satisfy any federal criminal liability of the defendant in the District of
Connecticut for the conduct charged in the superseding indictment in this case. After sentencing,
the Government will move to dismiss the indictment and the remaining counts of the superseding
indictment as to him. He expressly understands and agrees that this agreement does not address
any other federal criminal liability he may have in Connecticut or elsewhere.

Breach of Agreement

The defendant understands that if, before sentencing, he violates any term or condition of
this agreement, engages in any criminal activity, or fails to appear for sentencing, the
Government may deem all or part of this agreement null and void. Should the Government void
this agreement, the defendant will not be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea.

No Other Promises

The defendant acknowledges that no other promises, agreements, or conditions have been
entered into other than those set forth in this plea agreement, and none will be entered into unless
set forth in writing, signed by all the parties.
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. - 11 - March 13, 2008

This letter shall be presented to the Court, in open court, and filed in this case.

Very truly yours,

KEVIN J. O’CONNOR
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

KRISHNA R. PATEL
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

PETER S. JONGBLOED
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

MICHAEL FRANK
TRIAL ATTORNEY, CIVIL RIGHTS

The defendant certifies that he has read this plea agreement letter (and any stipulations or
attachments) or has had it read or translated to him, that he has had enough time to discuss it with
his attorney, that his attorney has answered any questions he had about it, that it sets forth the
entire agreement and understanding between him and the Government, and that he fully
understands and accepts the terms thereof.

COREY DAVIS Date

The Defendant

I have read or thoroughly reviewed the plea agreement letter to my client, who advises me
that he understands and accepts its terms.

KEVIN J. KEATING, ESQ. Date

Counsel for Corey Davis
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. - 12 - March 13, 2008

RIDER CONCERNING RESTITUTION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2259, the Court shall direct the defendant to pay the full amount
of each victim's losses, including any costs incurred for:

(A) medical services relating to physical, psychiatric, or psychological care;

(B) physical and occupational therapy or rehabilitation;

(C) necessary transportation, temporary housing, and child care expenses;

(D) lost income;

(E) attorneys' fees, as well as other costs incurred; and

(F) any other losses suffered by the victim as a proximate result of the offense.

Restitution is payable immediately unless ordered otherwise by the Court. The order of
restitution has the effect of a civil judgment against the defendant. The order of restitution must
be a condition of probation or supervised release. Failure to make restitution as ordered may
result in a revocation of probation, or a modification of the conditions of supervised release, or in
the defendant being held in contempt under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). Failure to pay restitution may
also result in the defendant’s re-sentencing to any sentence which might originally have been
imposed by the Court. 18 U.S.C. § 3614. The Court may also order that the defendant give
notice to any identifiable victim(s) of his offense under 18 U.S.C. § 3555. Finally, the order of
restitution has the effect of a civil judgment against the defendant.
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. - 13 - March 13, 2008

CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

1. The defendant shall have no unsupervised contact with any child under 18 years of age
without the express permission of the United States Probation Officer and treatment provider.
On release, the United States Probation Office will determine whether the defendant may have
unsupervised contact with his own children, if any;

2. The defendant shall comply with any applicable federal, state and local sex offender
registry;

3. The defendant shall provide the probation officer with access to any requested
financial records, including but not limited to, telephone bills and credit card statements;

4. The defendant shall not loiter around bus and train stations, schools, arcades or any
other places where children under the age of 18 congregate. The defendant shall not associate
with or have contact with convicted sex offenders or those considered inappropriate by the
United States Probation Office because of a connection to sexual abuse of minors or sexually
explicit materials involving minors, unless as part of an approved counseling group; and

5. The defendant is prohibited from holding any position of authority or guidance over
children or youth groups involving individuals under the age of 18.
Kevin J. Keating, Esq. - 14 - March 13, 2008

STIPULATION OF OFFENSE CONDUCT

The defendant Corey Davis and the Government stipulate and agree to the following
offense conduct that gives rise to the defendant’s agreement to plead guilty to the information:

1. The defendant was born in February 1972.

2. In or about May 2005, the defendant, while operating as a pimp, knowingly and
unlawfully recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, and obtained a person, identified
as MV #1, for purposes of causing MV #1 to engage in commercial sex acts. At this time, the
defendant knew that MV #1 was under 18 years of age and was a vulnerable victim. He
knowingly used force, fraud, and coercion, including threats of serious harm and physical
restraint, to compel MV #1 to engage in commercial sex acts. He knowingly benefitted
financially and received things of value, including money, from his participation in a venture that
engaged in recruiting, enticing, harboring, transporting, providing, and obtaining MV #1 for
purposes of engaging in commercial sex acts.

3. During this time, the defendant was the leader and organizer of this venture. He
committed these acts in Connecticut and elsewhere, and these acts affected interstate commerce.

The written stipulation above is incorporated into the preceding plea agreement. It is
understood, however, that the defendant and the Government reserve their right to present
additional information to the Court in connection with sentencing.

__________________________ _________________________
COREY DAVIS KRISHNA R. PATEL
The Defendant ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

_________________________
KEVIN J. KEATING, ESQ.
Counsel for Corey Davis