Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Problem: An experiment is performed to determine the heat generation rate in a heating element by
measuring the voltage drop across the element and the surface temperature. The power source used has
a range of 0 - 15 VDC with ±0.2% of reading error. The temperature is measured using an Omega type
K thermocouple which has an error of ±2.2 °C. The heating element is shaped as a cylinder with a
diameter of 1 mm and a length of 5 cm. The heating element is made of tungsten which an electrical
resistivity at 20 °C (ρo) of 5.6 μΩ*cm. The electrical resistivity is a function of temperature that can be
determined based on the following model,
=o [1 T −T o ] ,
where ρo is the electrical resistivity at the reference temperature To (20 °C), T is the actual temperature
and α is the temperature coefficient of electrical resistivity, which has a value of 0.0045 Ω*cm/°C for
tungsten. The experimental data collected in the laboratory experiment is shown in Table 1.
To determine the uncertainty in this value, we must determine the error propagation. The power source
component error is 0.2% of reading error. This value depends on the actual reading. A conservative
estimate would be to use the maximum component error which would be 15 * ±0.002 = ±0.03 volts.
The data scatter error is determined using the standard deviation of the voltage readings and the T
Student distribution value for a 95% confidence interval and with 14 degrees of freedom (t95%,14 =
2.145),
uscatter ,V =t 95 , 14 V =2.145∗0.09=0.193Volt .
This error is combined with the component error to produce the power source uncertainty,
uV = u cu scatter , V = 0.03 0.193 =0.195Volt .
2 2 2 2
The expected values of voltage for the power source are expected to be in the following interval,
V = V ±u V =2.49±0.195 Volts .
The same analysis can be used to assess the uncertainty in the temperature readings. The instrument
error for a K type thermocouple is ±2.2 °C. The data scatter error due to the process is determined
using the standard deviation of the temperature readings from Table 1 as follows,
o
uscatter ,T =t 95 ,14 T =2.145∗0.47=1.01 C .
Combining the component and the data scatter error, we can determine the temperature readings
uncertainty as follows,
uT = u c u scatter , T = 2.2 1.01 =2.42 C .
2 2 2 2 o
The expected values of temperature for the heating element surface are expected to be in the following
interval,
o
T =T ±uT =131.53±2.42 C
To determine the uncertainty in the heat generation rate, we must perform the error propagation
analysis. The Kline-Mc Clintock analysis technique will be used. First the sensitivity indexes are
determined using the analytical expression for the heat generation rate as a function of voltage and
temperature. The voltage sensitivity index is determined using the average voltage and temperature
readings as follows,
∂ Ė gen D 2 V W
V = = =12.82 .
∂V 2 L ao T Volt
The temperature sensitivity index is determined using the following expression,
∂ Ė gen D
2
V
2
W
T = =− =−0.0118 o .
∂T 4 L ao T 2
C
The uncertainty associated with the heat generation rate is determined as follows,
u Ė= V uV T uT = 12.82∗0.195 −0.0118∗2.42 =2.5 W .
2 2 2 2
Finally, we can declare that the heat generation rate for this heating element during the experiment was
within the following interval, Ė gen = E ̇ ±u =15.96±2.5 W .
gen Ė