Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The Design Validation Plan and Report (DVP&R) is a form used for test planning and reporting purposes.
· Customer drawings, specifications and/or warranty issues are used as inputs to DVP.
· Customer Part Approval (PPAP) functional requirements are listed as PV test requirements.
The Product Engineer is responsible for developing the Design Validation Plan (DVP). The Director of Product Engineering is responsible to approve the DVP
prior to the start of the testing
The Product Engineer is responsible for changes to the DVP caused by scope changes. The Director of Product Engineering is responsible for approving
DVP changes.
Test Lab personnel are responsible for conducting physical tests and the documentation of results on the DVP&R form.
The Product Engineer is responsible for the integrity of the test and report. The Director of Product Engineering is responsible for approving the DVP&R upon
completion of DV testing.
- Decisions to suspend DV testing without compliance must be documented in the "Notes" section of the DVP&R form.
Validation testing fits into four categories: Engineering Development (ED), Design Verification (DV), Product Validation (PV), Continuous Compliance Tests
(CCT).
· The test category (i.e. ED, DV, PV or CCT) is noted in the Test Stage column of the DVP&R.
ED - The purpose of ED is to demonstrate design feasibility. ED testing includes physical tests of surrogate or hand worked parts, and calculations or Finite
Element Analysis (FEA).
DV - The purpose of DV is to validate product design meets established requirements. DV testing is the physical testing of pre-production or production parts.
PV - The purpose of PV is to verify the products produced from production processes and tools meet requirements. PV testing is the physical testing of
production parts.
CCT – The purpose of CCT is to periodically verify the product meets requirements. The frequency and test specifications are established with Customer
concurrence.
DVP&R status / root cause / corrective actions / engineering analyses is reviewed CMT meetings.
Test Responsibility: Who is responsible for the test and location if applicable (e.g. WNC, Supplier)
Timing, Estimated Start: Estimated start date of test.
Timing, Estimated Completion: Estimated completion date of test.
Sample Quantity: Number samples planned to be tested.
Sample Type: Describe the samples to be tested.
Timing, Actual Completion: The actual date of test completion
Sample Number: Number assigned to the sample for which results are being reported.
Sample Level: A = Prototype(Handmade). Parts may be modifications of existing products or built from scratch. Mock-ups are not necessarily
capable of performing to full design intent levels.
- Current Rear frame with hand built brackets
- Prototype Printed Circuit Board (PCB) with hand placed components
B = Prototype (Tooled) Samples released for design verification, made from prototype tools, and are Design-intent.
- Laser cut stampings
Specification & Method Test Description Acceptance Criteria Test Stage Target Requirements Sample Type Sample Level Actual Results Additional Notes
Specification Provide a brief desription Specify test targets and/or ED = Engineering Devel't Testing State required probability Describe the A = Prototype (Handmade) List results in terms Describe or
governing test of each test. pass/not pass criteria. DV = Design Verification or reliability and confidence sample to be B = Prototype (Tooled) of reliability or elaborate on
& test method used Include SC/CC/KPC Symbol e.g. cycles, miles, volts, PV = Production Validation of meeting acceptance tested (see C = Production Tool (Not Process) probability as appropriate sub-phases
(if applicable). List the Customer or minimum value, no CCT = Continued Compliance Testingcriteria, e.g. R90 C90, or sample level) D = Production Tool and Process
designated symbol breakage, etc. All must pass.
if applic., e.g. KPC