Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
REVISION INDEX
DOCUMENT TITLE :
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 4
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 4
3.0 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 4
3.1 General 4
3.2 Jet Pump System 4
3.3 Scrapper Chain Conveying System 5
3.4 Source of Water 7
3.5 Cost Implications 9
4.0 Recommendation 9
APPENDIX
Appendix 1 Comparison of SCC System with Contract Requirements
LIST OF DRAWINGS
AIPL-5310-M-0102-5103 Flow Scheme – Bottom Ash Handling System (Jet Pump System)
AIPL-5310-M-0102-5113 Flow Scheme – Bottom Ash Handling System (SCC System)
AIPL-5310-M-0302-6033 Layout of SCC
AIPL-5310-G-0101-0001 General Layout Plan (Tentative Routing of Bottom Ash Conveyor)
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
BA : Bottom Ash
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to check the feasibility of utilizing Scrapper Chain Conveyor
(SCC) system for bottom ash removal in lieu of Jet Pump system.
The Contract specification calls for jet pump system for bottom ash removal and ash
handling system DBR was accordingly submitted. However, in a meeting between the
Owner and ABIR on 4th Sep. 2009, the Owner suggested Scrapper Chain Conveyor (SCC)
system for bottom ash removal. This report examines the feasibility of incorporating an SCC
system for the project.
The Owner appointed NEC CONSORTIUM (ABIR & NAVAYUGA), as the EPC contractor for
Balance of Plant and Civil Works for Stage I of the proposed power project. ABIR appointed
IDEA-PB Consortium for carrying out the Engineering Consultancy and Project Management
Services for Mechanical, Electrical and C&I work for the Balance of Plant.
The following two types of Wet Bottom Ash Handling Systems are widely utilized in thermal
power plants for bottom ash removal:-
Jet Pump System
Scrapper Chain Conveying System
The jet pump system consists of water impounded hopper (two ‘V’ legs or W-type), from
where bottom ash passes through large gates (hydraulic Feed Gate) on to dual roll clinker
grinders that grind clinkers to an appropriate size (maximum 25mm). The grinders then feed
the ash to a hydraulic ejector (jet pump), which transfer the resultant ash-water slurry to an
ash slurry sump located in the bottom ash slurry pump house. Make-up water and impulse
water are supplied by Low Pressure (LP) and High Pressure (HP) water pumps. Operation
of the jet pump requires high pressure impulse water that is supplied by the HP water pump.
The bottom ash handling system flow schematic (using jet pump system) is attached as
Dwg. No. AIPL-5310-M-0102-5103.
The SCC System receives hot ash, slag and clinkers falling from the boiler, through a
transition chute to the water-filled trough. The transition chute provides an air-tight seal
between the boiler and the scrapper chain conveyor. Ash is continuously conveyed up the
conveyor incline for dewatering.
The bottom ash discharged onto the scrapper chain conveyor will be fed to clinker grinders
where it is crushed to (-) 25mm size. The crushed bottom ash will be conveyed to the bottom
ash silo by belt conveyors. A bottom ash silo having eight (8) hours storage capacity along
with provision for water decantation is proposed for the each unit. Bottom ash collected in
silo will be disposed to ash dyke by means of the belt conveyor and under emergency
circumstances ash will be loaded on to truck for off-site disposal.
The bottom ash handling system flow schematic (using SCC system) is attached as Dwg.
No. AIPL-5310-M-0102-5113.
Recirculation system:
Over flow water from trough of scrapper chain conveyor and seal trough over flow will be
transferred to clarifier for supplying clear water to the Bottom ash system. This water will
also be cooled in the recirculation system. Make up water (desalinated quality) will be added
in the trough of scrapper chain conveyor.
The routing of the belt conveyor is shown in the enclosed drawing, Dwg. No. AIPL-5310-M-
0302-6033.
The routing of the belt conveyor is tentative, which will require confirmation by DEC for any
potential interference with the boiler equipment.
Bottom ash silo is proposed to be located at the location where hydrobin are envisaged,
please refer to General Layout Plan, Dwg. No. AIPL-5310-G-0101-0001 enclosed in this
report.
Pros and cons of the Jet Pump system compared to SCC system are as follows;
Pros Cons
Simple layout, occupies less space in BA Higher power consumption
area
Widely installed in Indian power plants More number of equipment and structures
required
Higher installation cost
Water consumption high
To accommodate large volume of ash
holdup, part of BA system with jet pump
need to be located below ground.
Pros and cons of the SCC system compared to Jet Pump system are as follows;
Pros Cons
Less water consumption (about 10% less) Maintenance prone, hence standby SCC is
required
Less power consumption (about 15 to 20% Complex layout due to use of belt conveyors
less) and belt feeders in the boiler area
Due to continuous operation, capacity of
water recirculation system less.
Installation cost may be less
SCC located on the ground level and
mounted on the rails
The below tables summarizes the source of water required for handling ash.
It shall be noted that, the water requirement for SCC system will be about 10% less than the
Jet pump system.
4.0 Recommendation
Both Jet pump with hydro bin system and SCC described above are technically acceptable
and both could be adopted depending upon the cost effectiveness. Also desalinated water
requirement for scrapper conveyor system could be less compared to hydro bin system.
Since SCC is prone to maintenance, a standby SCC is to be envisaged. The feasibility of
scrapper conveying system will also depend to a large extent in the ability to route the belt
conveyor between the boiler & the bottom ash silo. Preliminary assessment reveals that the
routing can be accomplished as per enclosed drawings.
In view of the above, bottom ash handling system with scrapper conveyor system is
recommended.
Appendix 1
Comparison of SCC System with Contract Requirements