Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Assignment 2
Section 1
digital messages from a sender to one or more recipients. Nowadays, email has become a
Members of a network community will receive email which notifies any updates, usually to
share and exchange information. This feature allows students and lecturers within a network
community for example, to make announcement and requesting for information effectively
because of its ease. Thus, this paper intends to identify requests in email messages in
Dellirium, a network group established for students of English Language and Literature in
International Islamic University Malaysia. Requests become the feature chosen to look for as
this network group serves as a means of communication between lecturers and students.
Therefore, it is expected that requests for action, information and permission may occur in
this kind of communication context. This paper will identify requests in email messages of
Dellirium and then classifying them according to the functions they serve. The purpose of the
classification is to determine certain features that can be used to detect request in emails.
Literature Review
Speakers by Aki Imuro (2006) from University of Hawai‘i, the researcher examined the
speech act of requests in e-mail interaction within the university context by Japanese second
language (L2) speakers of English. The aim of this study is to understand the placement and
perspective, and to explore how the requesting features of L2 speakers understood from the
CA perspective are different from the result found in previous studies in the field of speech
acts. The analysis was conducted by observing the participants orient to “preference
organization” in their requests by using accounts and hesitations to delay the dispreferred
request act. The study is focus on accounts for requests in the three different placement
patterns of pre-request, post-request, and pre-and post-request. The findings demonstrate that
the participants display their orientation towards “preference organization” delaying the
Meanwhile, the article entitled The Nature of Requests and Commitments in Email
Messages by Andrew Lampert, Robert Dale, and Cecile Paris (2008) presents precise
definitions for classifying requests and commitments in email, based on the concepts of
Speech Act Theory, and informed by the results of two independent manual annotation
experiments using data from the Enron email corpus. The specific surface realization of
requests and commitments in email are also considered, with the aim of clarifying how a
range of potentially difficult cases should be dealt with. Both requests and commitments
requests and commitments. Annotators are asked to mark requests and commitments as either
implicit or explicit, hoping to encourage more careful consideration of implicit speech acts.
750 sentences are marked from 350 email messages. Agreement increased for both requests
are separated from aspects of their surface realization, and thus are able to neatly capture
distinctions between alternate renderings of the same underlying request or commitment act.
Lampert, Dale and Paris (2010) also developed a method of classifying emails
classification. In their research article, they stated some of the problems an automated
classifier system may encounter when extracting requests from messages. Firstly, typical
emails contain extraneous material that makes it difficult to isolate the content that is directed
to the recipient of the email. Secondly, sender might use variety of linguistic forms in the
emails, thus making possibilities for indirect speech acts to be used. This phenomenon is a
major difficulty faced to determine whether an email has one or more request. Whether or not
a request is directed to the recipient of the email message is another situation that must be
filtered and may become a problem if the classification uses automated system. Lampert et.al
also explores the use of requests in messages, whether they are directive or commissive in
nature. In their model of classification, they applied certain features such as the presence of
sender or receiver in the email, marker of email (eg. To:, From: or Fwd:) the use of modal
verb, question words, and question mark to identify requests in messages. Lampert et.al also
mentioned on 3 classifications of request made by Khosravi and Wilks (1999) which are
Methodology
A few samples of email sent to and from Dellirium group were collected to be
analysed. These data then were analysed according to the use of modal verbs, WH-questions,
question mark and exclamation mark. In doing the data analysis, certain words that might
signal request such as “please” and “need” were also included in the data analysis. Data were
From the corpus, we have found 16 sentences that have features of request. Under the
other words column, there are 10 sentences using words like ‘please’ , ‘are’ and ‘need’ to
signify request.. While in modal verb column, there are 5 sentences using ‘can’, ‘do’ and
‘would’. However, there is only one sentence using WH-question for the purpose of request,
that is “How much’s the ticket Dr.?” which can be found in email number 7 (Corpus). For
question or exclamation mark column, there are 7 sentences altogether, but there is only one
sentence ends with an interjection while the rest use question mark. There are three types of
request identified in the selected Corpus. Firstly is the request for action which has nine
sentences, compared to request for information with only 5 sentences and one for permission
form of request. Meanwhile there are 2 sentences that fall under not request column.
Since our research objective is to classify request in email group namely Dellirium, so
we will focus on types of request, which are action, information, and permission in this
analysis. We have found that request for action is dominantly used in this email group
because basically the main users of this kind of corpus are between lecturers and students.
This is largely due to the reasons the lecturers’ use of Dellirium are to spread news,
announcements, programs and anything related to learning and course works. Thus, the
students are expected to participate, perform or respond to the respected messages by the
lecturers. For that matter, it is not surprising that this corpus heavily contains request for
action.
For information type of request, it is less than request for action as all sentences under
the information type are constructed by the students. In this email group, students usually use
it as a medium of interaction with lecturers and peers. For this reason, they are able to gain
information and guidance from lecturers and other members of the email group. Normally,
the information they demand is related to their lesson as well as course works.
While the last type of request that is permission is the least use in the corpus. This
type of request was use by students to ask permission from lecturers. But, they tend to not use
it in this email group frequently as to directly asking permission from the lecturers would be
more effective. This also is an attitude of showing the respect to the lecturers as the students
For the other words column, it has the highest number of sentences. This is because
most requests are made by using the word please. This is a ‘short-circuit’ of request where
the person whose make the request does not cushion his request as he wanted the message to
References
(e) Please let me know what time you can make it. / /
(f) I would like to have all students attending at the same time. / /
Total 5 1 7 10 9 4 1 2