Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
SENSORY INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
14 March 2011
WILLARD LARKIN
Program Manager
AFOSR/RSL
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2011-0780
2307/C PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW
SUB-AREAS IN PORTFOLIO:
Sensory Information Systems (2307/C)
2
Program Trends and Strategy:
TOPIC AREA OVERVIEW
3 +6
42%
Advanced Auditory Modeling:
Scientific Question: How does the auditory brain parse acoustic
landscapes, bind sensory inputs, adapt its filters, hear through noise and
distortion? Could autonomous listening devices emulate neurology to match or
exceed human auditory analysis, e.g., to detect and identify speech targets in
noise and reverberation?
11%
Polarization Vision & Optics:
Scientific Question: How do natural photoreceptors detect and how do
animal brains interpret polarization information? How is it used for nocturnal
navigation or recognition of obscured targets? Can these unique bio-optical
structures be emulated?
47%
Sensorimotor Control of Flight & Navigation:
Scientific Question: How does neural control make natural, low-Reynolds
No. flight autonomous, efficient, and robust? Discover principles of
multisensory fusion, distributed sensors and actuators. Develop control laws
for emulation in MAVs.
NRL Applies AFOSR 6.1 to MAV development; funds related 6.2, 6.3
G. Taylor
“STATE OF THE ART REVIEW”
M. Willis
Georgia Tech
15-18 June, 2010
H. Krapp
S. Humbert
6
Two Recent Discoveries
Visual Photoreceptor Receptor Membrane
Discriminates L vs R Imparts a Uniform 1/4
Circular Polarization Wave Delay, 400 – 700 nm
Photoreceptor
rows 1-6 in O.
Scyllarus QUARTZ
compound eye OPTIMAL GRATING
2 Photoreceptor
Rows have
membrane for ¼
wave phase delay
Crossed parallel
microvilli in lower
section confer
linear pol
sensitivity
7
Comparison with Best Available Materials
T. Cronin, (UMBC), J. Marshal (Queensland), N. Roberts (Manchester)
AFOSR Young Investigator Develops
Transformative Science
NORMAL
ACTION
POTENTIALS
To AFRL 6.2: Speaker recognition method, based upon binary mask technique,
boosts performance in additive noise. Brett Smolenski, RADC/Rome Lab. (Dr. Wang)
To NRL: Methods for cooperative steering of autonomous surface & air vehicles,
from control law mathematics based on bats & dragonflies. Dr. Justh, NRL/TEMD
To NSMRL: Simulators and technical method to calibrate underwater acoustic
stimulation of the human head. Dr. Michael Qin. (Creare, Inc. STTR, Dr. A. Dietz.)
To NSA & CIA: Method to sort speech from non-speech in noisy electronic 9
signals, based upon cortical model from experiments with ferrets. (Dr. S. Shamma)
A 50 dB Technical Transition
6.1 Research in Support of DTO HS-33
Research
Goal: ≥ 150 dBA SPL
Discover how high-level sound
transmits through air, bone, and
tissue to the human cochlea.
Enable 50 dB acoustic isolation,
with no sacrifice of voice
communications.
(Legacy level was 30 dB)
11
Program Coordination with: NATO, ONR, ARO, AFRL 711th HPW
Auditory Modeling for Acoustic Analysis
and Audio Displays 3 +6
ResearchTopics
• 3D spatial audio displays to optimize human performance
REPORTED
IN RECENT • Cortical theory for speech detection and recognition
AFOSR
REVIEWS • Computational auditory scene analysis
• Modulation analysis of acoustic signals
0.1
0.05
NEW IN 2011:
Amplitude 0
Biophysical basis of
3D spatial hearing. -0.05
INNER
ROW
OUTER
ROWS
Triplet Tuning
13
R. Kumaresan, V. Peddinti (U. Rhode Island) & P. Cariani (Harvard), ICASSP 2011
Auditory Model emulates Synchrony
Capture to achieve multi-pitch tracking
New architecture for
auditory signal processing
employs synchrony capture
via adaptive band-pass
filters that emulate cochlear
mechanics.
Hypothesis:
These nonlinear patterns are
key to auditory cognition.
Progress:
Arithmetic combinations of F1 and F2,
arise here in brainstem data and in a
nonlinear coupled oscillator model, Neural Responses to a two-tone complex
fitted with one free parameter (gain).
STTR:
Circular 15
Florida Atlantic Univ., E. W. Large, F. Almonte, unpublished (used with permission.) Data from Lee, et al. 2009
Logic
AFOSR / Rome Lab Symposium on
Coherent Modulation Analysis
K K
x(t ) xk (t ) mk (t ) ck (t )
2000
Frequency
1500
k 1 k 1
1000
Acoustic Signal
500
0
• Coherent Demodulation is a new 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Time
0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1
ResearchTopics
REPORTED Nocturnal navigation by echolocation or optical polarization
IN RECENT Neuromorphic emulation of inner- and outer-loop control
AFOSR
REVIEWS Airfoil mechanosensors in bats
Theory:
• Two superimposed systems govern
flight steering: one phase-leading and
tuned to velocity, one phase-lagging
and tuned to position. Optokinetic
18
Theobald, Shoemaker, Ringach & Frye 2010, Behavioral Neuroscience Tracking
Discovery: Insect’s Sensorimotor
Altimeter Ignores Ventral Angular Velocity
Scientific Question:
How do insects control
flying altitude?
Background:
• Flies were assumed to match
flying height to a preferred rate of
optic flow on the ground.
• Caltech’s “Velocity Clamp” lab
enables experimental control of
dynamic optic flow, independent of Virtual Reality wind tunnel
allows simultaneous tracking of
flight velocity in a wind tunnel. free flight & computer-projected
imagery on the walls and floor
Discovery:
• Flies adjust height to match nearby horizontal features.
• They do not regulate optic flow rate for this purpose.
• They rely on optomotor and collision-avoidance reflexes.
19
AFOSR Young Investigator. A. Straw, Caltech. Current Biology 19 Aug. 2010.
Discovery: Receptive Field Self-Motion
Tuning is Conserved across Species
Theory:
• Short latency mechanosensors first
detect body rotation, then feed forward
to induce compensatory head roll via
neck motor system …
• Long latency visual system detects
residual optic flow feedback from
incomplete compensation.
• Data fit preliminary linear model.
22
H. Krapp, et al., AFOSR Report Nov. 2010. Imperial College, London
Dragonfly Attacks Moving Target
21 sec. VIDEO Target trajectory
Tracking?
OR
Interception?
23
R. Olberg, Union College, A. Leonardo, Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Evidence for “Interception”
Launch angle
leads target
~ 300 ms
Dragonfly perch
25
R. Olberg, Union College, Schenectady, NY
Dragonfly visual neurons code for
both past and future target positions
Cameras
Multi-contact
probe in Perch Platform
mesothoracic
ganglion
Telemetry chip
mounts behind legs,
recharges on perch
platform.
27
R. Harrison, Univ. of Utah R. Olberg, Union College, A. Leonardo, Howard Hughes Medical Institute
SUMMARY:
Transformational Impacts & Opportunities
4
Hearing protection:
• Massive improvements in high-noise attenuation.
Advanced auditory modeling:
• Mathematics for coherent modulation analysis
• Neural-Inspired analyses to parse acoustic scenes
Optical processing:
• Polarization vision and signaling adapted from biology
• Achromatic 1/4 wave optical retarders
• Emulating compound eye in new optical devices
Willard.Larkin@afosr.af.mil
29