Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INDEPENDENT ACTION
FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT CRIMES, CORRUPTION,
FACIALLY FRAUDULENT WRIT OF EXECUTION,
AND FORGED &VOID reports, judgments, orders
____________________________________________________________________________/
3. Here, Defendant Officials Heathcoat, Wilkinson, and Peterson conspired to, e.g.:
a. Falsely make;
b. Alter;
c. Forge; and/or
d. Counterfeit public records
for criminal and illegal purposes of defrauding the Plaintiffs and extorting money and land
4. Here pursuant to § 55.10, Fla. Stat., nothing could have possibly become a lien on Plaintiffs’
property, because
a. The only authentic money judgment and mandate was in the amount of $24.30, 2:2007-
cv-00228 [under appeal], Doc. # 365;
b. No related genuine lien existed on the public records;
c. No lis pendens existed.
5. The U.S. District Clerk conspired with other corrupt Officials to, e.g.:
2
Marshal’s Service. Services by specially appointed server must be requested in a
motion for the Court’s ruling. If the appropriate paperwork is not provided, the writ
will be returned to the requesting party.”
Here, said Clerk of Court fraudulently pretended a “judgment” and “certified copy of
judgment” which he knew had never existed for criminal purposes of falsifying a “writ
7. Here, said U.S. District Clerk, Drew Heatcoat, fraudulently concealed the
8. Here, Defendant Heathcoat conspired with other Officials such as, e.g., John Edwin Steele,
a. Obstruct the satisfaction of the record $24.30 money judgment, Doc. # 365;
b. Extort money and land under fraudulent pretenses of an “outstanding judgment”;
c. Deceptively direct Dr. Busse to “pay the $24.30 to the Appellate Court”.
a. Fabricate and add ninety (90) pages to Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal, Doc. # 436;
b. Obstruct the mailing of the Transcript Information Form to the Appellant.
10. Here, the Transcript of the November 7, 2007, Hearing conclusively proved that
3
a. In exchange for bribes, Def. Judge Polster Chappell sanctioned and coerced Plaintiff Dr.
Busse to refrain from prosecution;
b. Def. Wilkinson had falsified “land parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;
c. Def. Wilkinson had falsified “land parcel” “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
d. Def. Wilkinson falsified “land parcel” boundaries;
e. Def. Wilkinson falsified “land parcel” “transactions”;
f. Def. Wilkinson conspired to bribe Def. Judge Chappell and conceal said forgeries;
g. Def. Wilkinson fabricated “frivolity” to obstruct justice.
11. Here, the Clerk altered the record of said 11/07/2007 Transcript. Here, other Defendant
Judges and Officials altered the official records and ordered the November 7, 2007,
14. Here, the Clerk altered the “record on appeal” for criminal purposes of, e.g.:
a. Fraudulent concealment;
b. Cover-up of organized judicial crime and corruption;
c. Coercion;
d. Obstruction of justice;
e. Extortion.
4
15. Here, the clerk fraudulently concealed the complete obstruction of court access and
CASE # 08-13170-BB:
“July 28 2009
The Clerk is directed to return unfiled all motions or other documents tendered by
Appellant after issuance of this Court’s mandate and to accept no further filings from
Appellant in this closed appeal.”
a. Discarded any and all of Appellant Dr. Busse’s motions and documents;
b. Fabricated a “rule 38 motion”;
c. Altered the official records and documents;
d. Fraudulently concealed Appellee’s “rule 27-4 motion”, 08/22/2008;
e. Obstructed Appellant Dr. Busse’s Court access;
f. Obstructed Dr. Busse’s Appeal, 10-13727-A.
a. Obstructed Dr. Busse’s satisfaction of the $24.30 final money judgment (Doc. # 365);
b. Deceptively directed Dr. Busse “to pay the judgment to the Appellate Court”;
c. Idiotically contradicted Fed.R.App.P. 39.
18. Here, no information could be found on PACER regarding, e.g., Appeal Numbers:
a. 10-10963-I;
b. 10-10967-I;
c. 10-13727-A.
19. The well proven allegations against Def. Clerk are published worldwide at, e.g.:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/36646899/U-S-District-Clerk-Conspired-to-Extort-
and-Alter-Official-Records
5
PERVERSION OF RULE 69 FOR CRIMINAL PURPOSES OF RACKETEERING
(a) In General.
(1) Money Judgment; Applicable Procedure.
A money judgment is enforced by a writ of execution, unless the court directs
otherwise. The procedure on execution — and in proceedings supplementary to and
in aid of judgment or execution — must accord with the procedure of the state where
the court is located, but a federal statute governs to the extent it applies.
(2) Obtaining Discovery.
In aid of the judgment or execution, the judgment creditor or a successor in interest
whose interest appears of record may obtain discovery from any person — including
the judgment debtor — as provided in these rules or by the procedure of the state
where the court is located.
a. The paid $24.30 money judgment and final mandate, Doc. # 365, Case 2:2007-cv-
b. The facially fraudulent procedure on the falsified execution did not “accord with the
c. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit had lost jurisdiction in June 2009;
e. Defendant Jack N. Peterson, Esq., perjured himself; see facially fraudulent “Affidavit”;
f. No genuine July 2009 judgment could have possibly existed in said Case;
g. The fictitious “July 29, judgment” could not be found in the public records.
Here, the prima facie criminality, illegality, and nullity of the fake “5,048.60 judgment”,
Doc. ## 386, 432, fake “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425, fake “legislative act”, fake
“resolution 569/875” were capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources
6
PRIMA FACIE CRIMINALITY OF FRAUDULENT “$5,000.00 claim”
“Facts that are not subject to dispute because they are capable of accurate and
ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot be questioned.”
Here, the prima facie invalidity, criminality, and illegality of Defendant Wilkinson’s
“$5,000 claim” for falsified “attorney’s fees” were not subject to dispute, because they were
23. Here, Def. Clerk conspired with, e.g., Defendants K. M. Wilkinson and J. N. Peterson to,
e.g.:
7
8
ORGANIZED GOVERNMENT CRIME AND CONSPIRACY
25. Here, the above extortion and unlawful demand was fraudulently presented by the Lee
County “Board of Commissioners”. Said Board had no right and/or authority to extort. Said
a. Extort;
b. Racketeer;
28. The Plaintiff Government corruption victims adopt by reference in this pleading:
9
RETALIATION, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, FRAUD, DEPRIVATIONS AT THE
HANDS OF BUNGLING GOVERNMENT CROOK & IDIOT THOMAS G. WILSON
29. Here, the Defendants conspired with other Officials and Defendants to conceal, e.g.:
See Case 2:2007-cv-00228; see Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912) on file.
30. The Defendant Officials knew that any intelligent, fit, and honest person could
31. Plain and short, the 1912 Cayo Costa Subdivision Plat of Survey
10
32. Here, the Government Criminals knew that as a matter of law the fraudulently pretended
conveyance of said fake “land parcels” in reference to said 1912 Plat had been legally and
factually impossible.
1. An Order enjoining any enforcement of forged “$5,048.60 judgment” & “writ”, Doc. # 425,
2:2007-cv-00228;
5. An Order taking judicial notice of CH. 712; 95; 73, 74; 55; §§ 695.26, 695.09, 689.01,
a. Art. I, s. 10, Fla. Const., stating that "No . . . law impairing the obligation of contracts
shall be passed.";
b. Art. I, s. 2, Fla. Const. stating that "[a]ll natural persons are equal before the law. . .";
c. Article I, s. 9, Fla. Const., stating that "[n]o person shall be deprived of . . . property
See fake “lien”, fake “writ”; fake “land parcels”; fake “resolution/law”; fake “judgment”.
7. An Order declaring the facially fraudulent “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425, violative of
8. An Order declaring the lack of any genuine authentic foreign (out-of-Florida) judgment;
9. An Order declaring the falsified “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425, 2:07-cv-228, null and void;
11
10. An Order recusing and disqualifying Defendant Crooked and objectively partial Judge
11. An Order recusing Def. Crooked Charlene E. Honeywell because of publicly recorded
organized crime, racketeering, corruption, bribery, retaliation against the Plaintiffs, and
extortion of said money and Lot 15A in violation of Florida and Federal law;
12. An Order vacating and/or setting aside the prima facie unconstitutional and null and void
“pre-filing injunction”, Doc. # 245, which was for criminal and illegal purposes of, e.g.,
cover-up, concealment, and conspiracy to extort said money and land, Lot 15A;
13. An Order recusing Def. Crooked S. Polster Chappell, because she conspired to conceal
14. An Order vacating and/or setting aside any and all orders by Defendants Sheri Polster
Chappell and Charlene Edwards Honeywell, because they were procured through fraud,
and falsification and destruction of official records, documents, and conclusive evidence;
15. An Order declaring that Defendant K. M. Wilkinson did NOT “have any lien”;
16. An Order declaring that Defendant Wilkinson did NOT “hold any $5,048.60 judgment” as
falsely pretended and falsified by said Defendant Wilkinson and Defendant Crooked
asserting a fake “July 29, 2009 judgment” in the Collier and Lee County Public Records;
proceedings on any illegal and criminal execution in violation of, e.g., Chapters 55 and 56,
Fla. Stat., and the 4th, 14th, 1st, and 7th U.S. Const. Amendments, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 – 1968;
12
18. An Order sanctioning Defendant Attorney JACK N. PETERSON for recorded perjury and
conspiring with Def. Wilkinson and other Government Officials to extort, racketeer,
retaliate, and deliberately deprive Dr. Jorg Busse and Jennifer Franklin Prescott;
19. An Order declaring the final record mandate in the amount of $24.30 paid;
20. An Order vacating and setting aside the facially oppressive and unconstitutional “pre-filing
injunction”, Doc. # 245, Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791, which on its face was for criminal and
the organized Criminals and criminal Defendants in this Court and the 11th Circuit;
21. An Order restraining and preventing the record violations of section 1962 under the RICO
civil provisions;
22. An Order declaring the lack of any recorded mandate and/or money judgment other than the
$24.30, which was “issued as mandate on June 11, 2009” and recorded on June 15, 2009
pursuant to the certified Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, U.S. District Court, M.D.
23. An Order declaring that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit had lost jurisdiction
on 06/11/2009, as had also been evidenced by its own Case Docket, 08-13170-BB];
24. An Order sanctioning and punishing Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson for the publicly
recorded falsifications of, e.g., said fake “judgment”, “land parcels”, fake “resolution”,
25. An Order declaring INSTRUMENT 4371834, O.R. 4517 PG 1914, Collier County Public
Records, and the equally fraudulent filing in Lee County part of a racketeering, extortion,
13
26. An Order restraining any further racketeering by Defendant Government Officials and in
particular the illegal forced selling of Plaintiffs’ said riparian Cayo Costa property, Lot 15A,
27. An Order dissolving and/or reorganizing the corrupt Government enterprise under, e.g., civil
28. An Order removing the publicly recorded corrupting influence and make due provision for
said express fundamental rights of innocent persons under the Florida and Federal
Constitutions and, e.g., the 14th, 1st, 7th, 4th, 5th, and 11th U.S. Constitutional Amendments;
29. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Crooked, Objectively Partial, and Unfit
30. An Order making the Government enterprise of record subject of injunctive relief, because it
is designed to aid the illegal enterprise of, e.g., obstructing justice, retaliating and
31. An Order enjoining said U.S. Courts from retaliating against the Plaintiffs because they
blew the whistle on Government crimes & corruption, rather than punishing the Defendant
Racketeers of record and providing remedies and relief to the Plaintiff racketeering and
corruption victims;
32. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Crooked and Objectively Partial and Unfit
Judge C. E. Honeywell;
33. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Corrupt and Objectively Partial and Unfit
14
35. An Order declaring Plaintiffs’ record title to Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, free & clear and
unencumbered;
00001.0000” falsified and prima facie forgeries as conclusively evidenced by the 1912
37. An Order for EMERGENCY relief from the publicly recorded public corruption, extortion,
40. An Order for triple punitive damages under, e.g., Civil RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1964, 1964(c);
42. An Order enjoining any and all Governments and the Defendants and Officials from any
trespass onto the private undedicated “Cayo Costa” “Subdivision” as legally described in
43. An Order declaring the prima facie forgeries of non-existent “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-
44. An Order permanently enjoining any and all entries and publications of any “resolution
569/875”, “O.R. 569/875”, “legislative act 569/875”, and non-existent “land parcels” “12-
45. An Order permanently enjoining any and all Governments and Defendants from fraudulently
“claiming” “asserting” “publishing” Government ownership of the street lands along the
15
Gulf of Mexico as legally described and conveyed in reference to the Plat of the prima facie
46. An Order enjoining and restraining any extortion of property and money and foreclosure
fraud by Defendants Eugene C. Turner, Richard D. DeBoest, II, Chene M. Thompson, and
Hugh D. Hayes.
___________________________
/s/Jorg Busse, M.D., M.M., M.B.A.
Private Attorney General; Plaintiff public corruption & racketeering victim
c/o International Court of Justice
Peace Palace
The Hague, Netherlands
MAIL TO: jrbu@aol.com
_____________________
[/s/Jennifer Franklin Prescott]
Private Attorney General; Plaintiff Government racketeering & corruption victim
c/o International Court of Justice
Peace Palace
The Hague, Netherlands
MAIL TO: bhtjw@aol.com
16
7
9/7/2010 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes…
Loc ation: Home > Statutes & Constitution > View Statutes
Year: 2010
Search
Go
Site Map Session: Bills · Calendars · Journals · Citator · Search · Appropriations · Redistricting · Bill Information
Reports
Committees: Committee Pages · Committee Publications
Senators: President's Page · Member Pages · District Information · Find Your Legislators
Information Center: Introduction · About the Legislature · Publications · Glossary · Frequently Asked Questions
· Employment · Links
Statutes & Constitution: Introduction · View Statutes · Search Statutes · Constitution · Laws of Florida · Order
V ideo Broadc asts
Disclaimer: The information on this system is unverified. The journals or printed bills of the respective chambers should be consulted for official purposes.
Copyright © 2000-2010 State of Florida. Privacy Statement. Contact Us.
www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?… 1/1
9/7/2010 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes…
Loc ation: Home > Statutes & Constitution > View Statutes
Session: 2011
Chamber: Senate
Search
Year: 2010
Search
Go
Site Map Session: Bills · Calendars · Journals · Citator · Search · Appropriations · Redistricting · Bill Information
Reports
Committees: Committee Pages · Committee Publications
Senators: President's Page · Member Pages · District Information · Find Your Legislators
Information Center: Introduction · About the Legislature · Publications · Glossary · Frequently Asked Questions
· Employment · Links
Statutes & Constitution: Introduction · View Statutes · Search Statutes · Constitution · Laws of Florida · Order
V ideo Broadc asts
Disclaimer: The information on this system is unverified. The journals or printed bills of the respective chambers should be consulted for official purposes.
Copyright © 2000-2010 State of Florida. Privacy Statement. Contact Us.
www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?… 1/1
7/14/2010 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes…
55.10 Judgments, orders, and decrees; lien of all, generally; extension of liens; transfer of liens to
other security.--
(1) A judgment, order, or decree becomes a lien on real property in any county when a certified copy of it is
recorded in the official records or judgment lien record of the county, whichever is maintained at the time of
recordation, provided that the judgment, order, or decree contains the address of the person who has a lien
as a result of such judgment, order, or decree or a separate affidavit is recorded simultaneously with the
judgment, order, or decree stating the address of the person who has a lien as a result of such judgment,
order, or decree. A judgment, order, or decree does not become a lien on real property unless the address of
the person who has a lien as a result of such judgment, order, or decree is contained in the judgment, order,
or decree or an affidavit with such address is simultaneously recorded with the judgment, order, or decree. If
the certified copy was first recorded in a county in accordance with this subsection between July 1, 1987, and
June 30, 1994, then the judgment, order, or decree shall be a lien in that county for an initial period of 7
years from the date of the recording. If the certified copy is first recorded in accordance with this subsection
on or after July 1, 1994, then the judgment, order, or decree shall be a lien in that county for an initial period
of 10 years from the date of the recording.
(2) The lien provided for in subsection (1) or an extension of that lien as provided by this subsection may be
extended for an additional period of 10 years, subject to the limitation in subsection (3), by rerecording a
certified copy of the judgment, order, or decree prior to the expiration of the lien or the expiration of the
extended lien and by simultaneously recording an affidavit with the current address of the person who has a
lien as a result of the judgment, order, or decree. The extension shall be effective from the date the certified
copy of the judgment, order, or decree is rerecorded. The lien or extended lien will not be extended unless the
affidavit with the current address is simultaneously recorded.
(3) In no event shall the lien upon real property created by this section be extended beyond the period
provided for in s. 55.081 or beyond the point at which the lien is satisfied, whichever occurs first.
(4) This act shall apply to all judgments, orders, and decrees of record which constitute a lien on real
property; except that any judgment, order, or decree recorded prior to July 1, 1987, shall remain a lien on real
property until the period provided for in s. 55.081 expires or until the lien is satisfied, whichever occurs first.
(5) Any lien claimed under this section may be transferred, by any person having an interest in the real
property upon which the lien is imposed or the contract under which the lien is claimed, from such real
property to other security by either depositing in the clerk's office a sum of money or filing in the clerk's office
a bond executed as surety by a surety insurer licensed to do business in this state. Such deposit or bond shall
www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm… 1/2
7/14/2010 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes…
be in an amount equal to the amount demanded in such claim of lien plus interest thereon at the legal rate for
3 years plus $500 to apply on any court costs which may be taxed in any proceeding to enforce said lien. Such
deposit or bond shall be conditioned to pay any judgment, order, or decree which may be rendered for the
satisfaction of the lien for which such claim of lien was recorded and costs plus $500 for court costs. Upon
such deposit being made or such bond being filed, the clerk shall make and record a certificate showing the
transfer of the lien from the real property to the security and mail a copy thereof by registered or certified
mail to the lienor named in the claim of lien so transferred, at the address stated therein. Upon the filing of
the certificate of transfer, the real property shall thereupon be released from the lien claimed, and such lien
shall be transferred to said security. The clerk shall be entitled to a service charge of up to $15 for making
and serving the certificate. If the transaction involves the transfer of multiple liens, an additional service
charge of up to $7.50 for each additional lien shall be charged. Any number of liens may be transferred to one
such security.
(6) Any excess of the security over the aggregate amount of any judgments, orders, or decrees rendered,
plus costs actually taxed, shall be repaid to the party filing the security or his or her successor in interest. Any
deposit of money shall be considered as paid into court and shall be subject to the provisions of law relative to
payments of money into court and the disposition of these payments.
(7) Any party having an interest in such security or the property from which the lien was transferred may at
any time, and any number of times, file a complaint in chancery in the circuit court of the county where such
security is deposited for an order:
History.--s. 1, ch. 10166, 1925; s. 1, ch. 14749, 1931; ss. 1-3, ch. 17998, 1937; s. 2, ch. 19270, 1939; C GL
1940 Supp. 4865(3); s. 9, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 71-56; s. 1, ch. 77-462; s. 2, ch. 87-67; s. 7, ch. 87-145; s. 12,
ch. 91-45; s. 10, ch. 93-250; s. 15, ch. 94-348; s. 1357, ch. 95-147; s. 7, ch. 2000-258; s. 1, ch. 2001-130; s.
68, ch. 2003-402; s. 47, ch. 2004-265.
www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm… 2/2