A theory

Theory of Greatness
Version: frc2

Old world, year 2011 Matevž Markovič

 Foreword
You must be wondering, what this theory is all about, true? There are x-zillions other “about
everything” theories out there, why would anyone bother with this one?
Well, the thing is, this theory gives you no definite answers, nor does it raise any new questions, at
least not explicitly. This theory is actually a tool, which can be used to train your mind, imagination
and interpret other theories too. Is it real or is it not, that is not relevant in this theory. What is
reality anyway? Those of you who have read about time travel, other physical dimensions, etc. must
have wondered, what is real for us then? Is reality something we can perceive, or something higher?
If so, how high does reality reach?

Anyway, I do not want to bother you with such trifles (at least not in the foreword), what I want to
say is that what someone gets from reading this “peace of my mind”, is important. This theory
SHOULD NOT BE READ LITERALLY!!! We all know what the book of Revelation or Qur'an
brought, just because people read those books not with their mind, but literally.
I recommend that you simply follow the flow of this theory, stopping at the points that are
interesting to you and thinking about them. It is better to interpret everything in your way than to
read it literally. This is the purpose of this theory anyway, to interpret it in your own way.

Does this theory belong in the scientific realm? Yes and no. I did not write it to let it be digested by
various scientists, but to give them ideas and to teach them, that sticking solely to one theory and
approved authorities is not the right way to create knowledge about semi-paranormal realms of our
existence and surroundings. This is a tool, so use it in such a way.

Here are two most important quotes I learned along the process of writing this theory. Both of this
people helped me and I express my greatest thankfulness to them;

"There are NO experts in the field of the paranormal."

(Martin Burns)

“It is clear that you cannot answer all questions, nobody can, but thinking is most important in
large … we do not know real laws of micro levels and what does balance mean on that levels...”
(Sergei N. Khrushchev)

2/22
 Index
Intro into the Theory of greatness.........................................................................................................4
12 arguments of the Theory of Greatness.............................................................................................5
Expanding the Theory of Greatness into the model of our Creation....................................................8
The main attributes of our Creation....................................................................................................12
Explaining the Theory of Greatness................................................................................................... 15
Cosmos-number-problem (a conjecture)............................................................................................ 19

3/22
 Intro into the Theory of greatness
What is Theory of greatness?
– A theory, that seeks to cover the whole of Creation *1,2

Who wrote the Theory of greatness? From where did he get this idea??? Can I believe this at all?

– The Theory of greatness was written by Matevž Markovič

– He invented the theory of Post Apocalypse New World Order (PANWO)
– His knowledge is unknown
– The credibility of this is unknown *3

My theory has 4 major chapters:

– 12 arguments of the Theory of Greatness
– Expanding the Theory of Greatness into the model of our Creation
– The main attributes of our Creation
– Explaining the Theory of Greatness
– Additional conjecture about our Creation

In the first chapter, I will explain some of my theological views, that form the base of my theory.
Some people would perceive this as heresy (it is written in such an inter-religion manner), so just
skip this section if you feel that it would be too disturbing for you.

Second and the third chapter are for those, who are interested into the main meta-physical ideas.
The last chapter is a conjecture, which could make a pretty interesting read.

I suggest you read through all of them. To clarify the first three chapters, I suggest rereading the
“Explaining the Theory of Greatness” chapter.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*1 = Why does the author use a capital letter? Capitalization symbolizes respect, and also the
recognition of Greatness. Greatness is the only word, that can describe what He did . At the same
time, the author's starting point is the thesis, that this Creation is also the only one. The contrary
evidence would surprise us, but in addition, why not?

*2 = Read the foreword, do not take this literally!

*3 = Credibility is, as far as the Theory of Greatness is concerned, irrelevant. What is today true, is
tomorrow a lie. And what is today a lie, is tomorrow true. → read the second note, please!

4/22
 12 arguments of the Theory of Greatness
Skip this section if you find it too disturbing

1. Adam and Eve are names of the first two souls, that were created.
Their role can be compared to the role of superclasses in object programming. Everything
comes from this two superclasses, the whole hierarchy, the whole creation, all life. The Holy
Bible was the first to mention Adam and Eve, but it mentioned them in an simple, unclear
way. If we look at their role, we see, that they are the ones, who started everything, the first
two souls. In parallel, other religions may present us similar ideas about the Creation, even if
in slightly different ways . But they were not the first intellectual entities that were created –
before them the „service souls“ (special superclasses) were created, called Angels. They are
common to all religions, they are only represented under different names and slightly
different roles. We can simply call them Angels, or with some other name, but we must bear
in mind, that they are not souls like we are – they serve to the Creator, they help us on our
way, they protect us and they balance the Creation.
Despite all, we must also know, that Adam and Eve certainly do not come from our Universe
hat, what Christianity names „the original sin“ is in fact something, what every soul inherits.
Every soul must combat this sin, to free itself from the circle of reincarnation.

2. Souls are all striving towards the same goal – to develop and to get to know the Creator,
while at the same time, to combat the attributes, which they inherited from the main
superclasses, Adam and Eve.

3. Souls are omnipresent.

The possibility exists, that souls are connected or related to the universe or cosmos, from
which they come, but this does not change anything.

4. Every intelligence is AT LEAST a soul.

With this statement, we put the soul to the bottom of the intelligence scale. But we must ask
ourselves, to where this scale goes, is the most widespread type of intelligence really so
„non intelligent“? Or are other types of intelligences simply „more intelligent“ because of
their role (for example Angels). Anyone, who is interested, should read the point 10.

5. Balance is everything
At first, there was chaos. Out of chaos, order emerged. Balance is equal presence of order
and chaos (positive and negative).
Our Creation was meant to be balanced. But balance is something, that really does not
happen for a long time. That is why we have Angels to balance the development.
Everything must be balanced. Our development must be balanced. Maybe somebody will
find this theory stupid, but balance is really the only safe way to develop. Chaos produces
only chaos, while balance produces peace. Therefore it must not be disturbed for too long.
„...if the sum of all forces on a moving body is equal to zero, this body is in balance, it's
movement is constant, but still, it moves ...“.
Any imbalance in Creation is unwelcome, because it destroys safe development, it destroys
safety of souls, it makes them unable to achieve their goal... *2.5

5/22
 6. Before the superclasses (Adam and Eve) other types of intelligences were created
These higher levels of intelligence were given the task to help the souls on their way. We
know them as Angels (various types of them). But there might also be other types. And their
help is always in our own good, but not always the way we (souls) like it. See point 1.

7. All (non-fallen) Angels follow rules, that limit them seemingly (accordingly to souls), but
with them respecting this rules, the ones who gain, are we. They help us within boundaries
of those rules.

8. Fallen angels do not work according to rules, their role is to slow down the development.
Their task is negative (as opposed to non-fallen Angels). They exist to oppose the non-fallen
Angels. *3.5

9. The role of fallen angels is temporary.

Once all souls will achieve their goal, their height of development, no need to balance the
Creation will exist. The true Apocalypse comes then, and this will be the final one and with
it, Creation will cease to exist – or not.

10. Sharing of roles (types of Angels)*5

Number of Chorus Type of Angel (Dionysus) Role of angel

Guardian Angel Guards, leads and perhaps
1. Chorus *4 teaches the soul (or group of
souls) which is assigned to him
(or he chooses it)
Archangel Takes care for a larger group of
souls (for instance; population
of a planet, system),
leads Guardian Angels
Principality He leads Archangels
Power Border guard Angel, advisor,
2. Chorus warrior
Virtue Angel of inspiration, he helps
the souls to advance, develop,
he provides us with the needed
knowledge
Dominion Takes care of balance in his
universe
Throne Takes care of balance in his
3. Chorus cosmos
Cherubim (PLURAL!) Warrior Angels, commanders,
very powerful (FOR
MANKIND IS THE MOST
IMPORTANT ANGEL
ORPHANIEL)
Seraphim (PLURAL!) Role is unknown...

6/22
 11. All souls reincarnate through their life-cycle
Christianity and Islam of the 21. century present the souls as one-time incarnation, which is
after the end of life redirected into an eternal place (Heaven, Hell).
In understanding of reincarnation is Buddhism in lead, but nevertheless, it also deals with it
in a rather simple way.
The soul can incarnate in anything, that serves it's cause. In Buddhism, souls reincarnate
according to their Carma. Positive Carma is gained with fight, respect, life according to the
rules and positive deeds towards others, when negative Carma is gained with selfishness,
abandonment of rules, disrespect and negative attitude. Reality is little different, but
nevertheless, it follows the same concept.
With every new incarnation, soul gets the needed intelligences, which it needs thruway life.
These intelligences can grow or weaken threw life, it depends, whether we develop them or
ignore them.*6
Whether Hell and Heaven (as actual places somewhere) exist, I cannot argue.

The rule of the entities (ROE)

The rule of entities prescripts every entity (soul) a cause in global development. Even if the
role itself is small, it is never unneeded.
Example: A soul seems to be unneeded – it has no special task, no big role in life – why does
it live then?
Role of one soul can be, for instance, just to trigger a happening, to redirect, inspire another
soul. Therefore, it's life seems unneeded, but in fact, it triggered another soul to do it's work.
And that is a big role. Therefore, nothing is never unneeded.

12. THE ESSENCE OF EVERYTHING IS TO FIGHT AGAINST THE ORIGINAL SIN

(INHERITED AFTER ADAM AND EVE) AND TO DEVELOP, TO GET TO KNOW
THE CREATOR
To develop, souls need to fight. The one, who fights, gets help from Angels. Fighters are the
ones, who suffer, but also the ones, who win at the end. The easiest way is not always the
best. Fight is essential for development. Without fight, soul lengthens its suffering and
declines the award. We all must get over this phase of fight, we are all equal in this. If we do
not help each other, we only extend our suffering – and lengthen it (it goes to all souls).

For explanation of my points, I suggest that you read the chapter “Explaining the Theory of
Greatness”

*2.5 Read the Explaining the Theory of Greatness

*3.5 = look up point 10 and 5
*4 = just Angels of the first Chorus have stereotypical tasks (mentioned in Holy Bible, Quran, ...)
*5 = Angels can take any form they need, they can do everything (if it serves their task), they are
our allies. Stereotypical appearance (in physical form) is something that can mislead us... therefore,
they do not make themselves seen (if they choose not to). This is for our own safety.
*6 = Spiritual intelligence is a part of the soul – not particular incarnation (but the value can vary,
according to the task the soul has in a particular reincarnation)

7/22
 Expanding the Theory of Greatness into the model of
our Creation
In the Theory of Greatness, our Creation is divided into more units, named cosmoses. Those
cosmoses are further divided into universes. For clarification, please consult the drawing explaining
the model.

Our home, the Earth, is located in our solar system. Our solar system is located in our galaxy. Our
galaxy is located in our universe (named simply the Universe). Our universe is located in our
cosmos. And our cosmos is located in our Creation.

If we return back to the into, we can extract the following quote: “... the author's starting point is the
thesis, that this Creation is also the only one. The contrary evidence would surprise us, but in
addition, why not?”.
We can extract from this quote the idea, that only our Creation was created. But the opposite should
not be entirely forgotten. Indeed, there may be many creations, but we are part of only one of them.
And this point would not prove us any smaller. As far as the Creator is concerned, we all are taken
care of, we are all remembered.
But for now, let us assume that our Creation is the only one.

8/22
Further, as you can see from the drawing, only attributes of our universe are known (that is ; it is
expanding, it is possible for us to live in it). As far as our current knowledge is concerned, no
evidence of any kind exists to prove the existence of our cosmos. The only proof, that it exists, is
indeed our own existence. We are part of our cosmos, and because you cannot be part of something
that does not exist, that is the proof that it does indeed exist.

But even if we are aware of the fact, that we are part of something bigger (i.e. a cosmos), we have
no knowledge of other universes that exist in our own cosmos next to ours. We know only, that they
exist.
Perhaps in the future, a man or any other entity will provide us with knowledge, what is it like in
other universes. Perhaps we will even live there. If we take the point 11 into consideration
(reincarnation), there is a big chance that we were already there (as a soul).
With this knowledge, what attributes, characteristics other universes have, we will be able to find
parallels between them, and join those parallels into the knowledge of our own cosmos and its
attributes.

Remember to look for the parallels from the lowest level up, that means, start from the basics and
then move up to higher levels. *7

Attributes and characteristics of other universes in other cosmoses are even more unknown than our
neighboring universes in our own cosmos. The same as for our neighboring universes goes also for
other cosmoses and universes within them – we might acquire more info about them in the future,
and we might also experience them. But there is no way for me to predict, what awaits us there. At
this moment, we are unsure of even our own universe, its characteristics, its inhabitants and
everything connected with it.

As for other Creations, read the quote mentioned in the intro of this chapter.

But there is one more thing regarding our Creation. As I stated in the point 2 and in the point 3, our
Creation is inhabited by souls. In the point 3 I expressed the idea of souls being bound to a
particular cosmos or even universe. But now I will discard this idea and take only the most basic
thesis, that can be extracted from the point 3 – that souls are omnipresent. That means, that they
inhabit all of our Creation.

For clarification of how this goes along with points 2, 3 and 4, I present you with the following
drawing (on the next page), which shoves what a particular entity (a human being, an animal, an
alien, a spirit, something, ...) consists of. From this drawing, you can clearly see the division
between the soul and other parts of the entity.

9/22
Looking at this drawing (which is an approximation and an simplification), we must take point 4
into consideration, which states that every intelligence is at least a soul. That means, it can be
something higher that just a soul. But everything, which is based on a soul, is an entity. Higher
beings, like angels, are also entities, but here we simplify the matter and thus proclaim only entities
build upon a soul as real entities.

We make this distinct in order to differ between those higher beings and normal entities. The main
difference is, in my theory, that higher beings are not divided into smaller parts, as are the entities.
That is, because they are made to accompany us, to service us, to help us, and therefore, we are
really not supposed to examine them. Perhaps this will be proven wrong in the future, but for now
and with our limited knowledge and experience, we cannot really examine them.

The entities, on the other side, are all made upon the same principle – out of 3 layers. The layer 0
(the soul) is bound only to the creation. It is the most basic part of an entity. It can move between
various parts of the creation. It inherited the attributes from the first two souls (see point 1), it is our
basic self, is preserved between all tasks (and therefore reincarnations) in its life-cycle.
An Angel is assigned to provide escort during its life-cycle (see point 6).

Every soul has various tasks assigned to fulfill. The quicker it fulfills them the quicker it develops
(see point 12). The spirit is created upon the soul at the start of every new task. This spirit can travel
between universes and possibly also cosmoses, in order to fulfill its task.
Every tasks takes at least one reincarnation cycle. For every reincarnation cycle, a new body is
created in a particular universe. This body is bound to a particular universe, but can possibly travel
along with the spirit.

10/22
It is possible for the spirit to exist without a body (between reincarnation cycles or because of a task
or some other reason), it is also possible for the soul to exist without a spirit (between various
tasks), and it is also possible for the body to exist without a spirit or a soul, but then the body
becomes a part of the environment, since it has no intelligence of its own (for example after death).
But it is in no case possible for the spirit to exist without a soul.

*7 For example, look at the rock. If you are looking at it from a higher level (that is what we
normally do in our lives), you see a hard natural element. If you look at it from a lower level, you
see an indefinite mixture of naturally occurring substances, mainly minerals. But on the lowest
levels, you see individual particles (like protons, electrons, ions, …). It is like extracting a number
into its lowest dividers, prime numbers.

*8 = complexity of Creation is never the same – it grows. See the Explanation of the Theory of
Greatness

11/22
 The main attributes of our Creation
“Our Creation is a big mixture of very different ingredients. “

When I explained the model of our Creation, I wrote about many different things, but I forgot the
most basic ones. I never really explained, on what our Creation stands, what are its main attributes,
which define everything. It is logical, that one must prepare the ingredients before he can cook. I
explained how to cook, but I have forgotten about the ingredients. They follow in this chapter...

Before we think about what defines our Creation, let us first define its boundaries. As we know
from maths, the letter ∞ represents something that never ends. But how can something, that never
ends, exist, even when some to us alien knowledge is used? Would that create a recursive space,
which is what we really do not want? The answer is yes.

But luckily enough, the ∞ can be defined. But since human knowledge is limited by the state of
development of math, with the current state of the development of maths we cannot define it.

But if we take a different approach and leave our current boundaries behind, we see, that we
actually can define it (at least the Theory of Greatness can). We shall create an equally alien
constant as the constant I in complex numbers, but with even more alien use and behavior. Let us
call our alien constant “constant S”.

Constant S defines the complexity of our Creation.

We shall define following characteristics of our constant S:

– “S is a continuum of meta-data”
– ℝ⊂S (Real numbers are in our constant)
– ℂ⊂S (Complex numbers are in our constant)
– S contains continuum of number systems, sets, equations, everything that describes
particular cosmos and the Creation as a whole
– Id ∪ S i =S ℵ *9
i∈U
j i
– S ∩ S ≠∅
i , j ∈U
– S t1≠S t2
(our constant is never the same as it was – it changes constantly – kind a variable, but it still
is a constant)
– S t1S t2 (our constant S is growing with time)

We will define t shortly, but for now, let it be just generic time.

Now we are ready to define infinity:

x x
−S S
∞=  ,  ;
2 2

– where ∞ is an union
– where S is raised to the power of the highest cosmos number x (an finite number) *9.5
– where S = complexity of Creation (characteristics are already explained above)

12/22
Therefore we can also define the power of ∞ in a moment of t (we will define t shortly):
x
p ∞t =S t

With boundaries defined, we can define 4 main “ingredients” which define our Creation. These are:

– Time of Creation t s
(this is not the time when everything was created – this one can be written as t 0 )
– S ℵ or more simply S (which defines the complexity of the whole Creation)
– Intelligence
– Non-intelligence

So what exactly is the Time of Creation ( t s )?

Time of Creation is the global time in our Creation. It can be thought of as GMT on Earth; the main
time, which is useful for all-world affairs, when Earth is presented as a whole planet and the
differences in time between areas are not important. But since it is only one, it is not very useful on
a local level. When GMT is for example 4 AM, your local time can be 6 PM, and then GMT cannot
be the appropriate time for you to live with. You would have constantly to translate back and
forward into the GMT time into your local time and that is not nearly life comfortable.

For easier living lover times exist on lover levels: the t k time (the cosmos time) and the t u
time (the universe time). The cosmos time is unique to every cosmos, as is the universe time unique
to every universe. Translations between the cosmos and universe time is not necessarily simple, as
is also not between the cosmos and Creation time.

Think of the cosmos time as the time in your country: it may be GMT+5. Therefore, to get the Time
of Creation, you would subtract 5 hours from your cosmos time.

The universe time is even more local; think of it as the time your watch shows – it can be also
GMT+5 as in your cosmos, but that is not necessarily. In addition, it can show any time. The
cosmos time needs to be tied to the Time of Creation, as is the official time in your country aligned
with the GMT. Universe time is somewhat different: it can show any time it wants, no matter what
the cosmos time is.

Your watch can show totally different time from the official time in your country. You can even
make it go backwards (therefore, go into past accordingly to the formal and GMT time). You can
make it skip seconds, make loops, go faster or slower, anything you like. The same goes to the
universe time. Actually, the universe time is not so much bound to the cosmos time as we might
think. Just remember this example of your watch vs official time.

Every moment in our Creation can be tracked with the t s , no matter in which universe you are.
It is like having an alien watch: your watch can show you -5 AM and can be leaping 2 seconds, but
the GMT time still applies to you. In our Universe, even if you go with the speed of light, the t s
time still applies to you. You can hide from both the t k and the t u , but not from the t s .
Therefore, the t s (Time of Creation) is omnipresent.

13/22
3 general rules regarding time:

– every t u can be converted into its parent t k and therefore also into ts
(but not necessary into foreign t k )
– every t k can be converted into t s
– t s represents the limits of t k and t u , as it is omnipresent
(much like the constant S)

This drawing represents relations between the three types of times:

*9 = U is a set of all cosmos-numbers, aleph above final S constant represents my non-knowledge

of how many cosmoses there are, not an actual cosmos number!

*9.5 = check the conjecture (last chapter)

14/22
 Explaining the Theory of Greatness
Theory of Greatness consists of many different pieces, linked together to construct an actual and
(probably) working model. In every case, when such a theory emerges, there is always something
unexplained, unprocessed, untouched.

I tried to explain everything as I understood it. But I understand, that everything cannot be
explained. Bearing this in mind, I created this chapter, in which I try to explain and prove some of
my points in this theory. Here I will also express my greatest thankfulness to Mr. Sergei N.
Khrushchev, who took away some of his precious time to review my work. Without him, I would
even not got this far.

Mr. Khruschev found two weakpoints in my theory:

– I have not explained well, what I mean with stability and balance
– I have not stressed enough, that every intelligence is at least a soul. That means, that even
our ancestor 5000 years ago had souls, and that cats and dogs have souls.

1) Weakpoint 1

“At first, there was chaos. Out of chaos, order emerged. Balance is equal presence of order
and chaos (positive and negative) ...”
For explanation of this quote, I should at first prove, that complexity of our Creation is
indeed rising ( S ts1S ts2 ), where t s1 t s2 .

Prof 1 – complexity (S) of our Creation is rising

– we take t s for the Time of Creation

x x
−S S
– we take ∞ =  , 
2 2
– we take t s1 t s2
x x
−S ts1 S ts2
 0
2 2
S xts2 S xts1

2 2
S ts2S ts1

Now, when I have proved, that the complexity (S) of our creation is rising, I can prove,
that balance means that order and chaos are equally present.

“The progress is optimal and most safe only then, when balance between order and chaos
exists. Then true development can take place.”
(Matevž Markovič)

Therefore, we can assume: CHAOS ∝ORDER , BALANCE=ORDERCHAOS

15/22
 Prof 2 – Balance is equally present order and chaos
x
−S ts
– we take CHAOS =
2
x
S
– we take ORDER= ts
2
– t s1 and t s2 are enough apart, so that ∆t is enough big for this to be valid

From this drawing, we can see, that the area covered by order is roughly the same as area
covered by chaos. We can further prove this by integration. (see the next page)

16/22
 ∆ ts ∆t s

∣∫ CHAOS dx ∣≈∣∫ ORDER dx ∣

0 0
∆ ts ∆ ts

∫ S xts ∫ S tsx
0 0
∣ dx ∣≈∣ dx ∣
−2 2
x x
S S
∣− from 0 to ∆ t s∣≈ ∣ from 0 to ∆ t s∣
ln S  ln S 
S ∆t S ∆t
≈ s s

ln S  ln S 

S ∆t ≈ S ∆ t ; where ln(S) != 0
s s

Of course, this is an approximation, since S is never the same, unless at the same t s .
Therefore, for this to be exactly the same, we should not observe ∆t, but t 0 , t max  .

2) Weakpoint 2

"Every intelligence is AT LEAST a soul." That means, every body, which has intelligence,
also has a soul. (recall the model of an entity from the second chapter).

If we examine the quote from the point 1: "Adam and Eve are names of the first two souls,
that were created. Their role can be compared to the role of superclasses in object
programming. Everything comes from this two superclasses, the whole creation, all life."

All life means everything - cats, dogs, bacteria, human, aliens, … , everything that thinks,
has intelligence, everything that has a soul.

If you look at the point number 11, you see the following quote:

"All souls reincarnate through their life-cycle". This is against what they taught us, but it is
nearer to the truth than "hell and heaven". Nevertheless, heaven and hell are marked as
possible endpoints for the reincarnation cycle.

Since in the case of more primitive (in our eyes) beings like bacteria and such I cannot talk
about a task, I had to include something else: fight.
If we fight, we make the circle of reincarnation less painful. Sometimes, fighting alone is the
task, and this task can be completed also when in a body of a rat.

But every being, be it a space animal from the Pluto or a shadow from other cosmos, has a
task to do, be it small or big. Look the ROE rule (rule of entities) – point 11.

3) Weakpoint 3

Is this model of time-space differentiation valid in theories such as general relativity, the
string theory and such?
The answer is simple: if it is taken literally, then not. Otherwise yes, but how? What is the
difference between universes? Are all of them physical? How can the concept of time
dimensions work in this theory, if every universe is assigned its own time?

17/22
Answering this is not so simple as one would expect, because there is more to it than it
seems. My main point of defense is the fact, that I never limited types of universes to just
physical. They can after all intersect in the time-space plane, they can form a n-dimensional
hyper-cube and many more possibilities, why should I then limit the types of universes and
their relations?

This theory is after all about being compatible with everything possible or impossible, while
at the same time not imploding of abstractness.

18/22
 Cosmos-number-problem
(a conjecture and everything around it)
Conjecture: there is infinity of cosmoses and the highest cosmos number is a natural, finite
number.
x x
−S S
You remember our formula for the infinity (∞ =  ,  ) ? What did I raise S to the power of
2 2
an unknown number x? Is x actually a natural number? Do you remember the third chapter, when I
wrote S ℵ ? Why did I do that? Is there really infinity of cosmoses or is the highest cosmos
number finite?

My conjecture states that both is true: there is infinity of cosmoses and the highest cosmos number
is a natural, finite number. But how? I will explain my conjecture on an 4-dimensional hyper-cube
(Tesseract), but it applies to any n-dimensional hyper-cube. *10

Imagine such a hyper-cube:

The numbers are actually the cosmos numbers. Each black ball is a cosmos. But not all cosmoses
share a common connection, for example cosmos 3 and cosmos 6.
There we can write: 1~4, 1~3, 1~2 ;3~1 ,3~5 ,3~7 ,... , where a~b is a relation of common
connection. This relation is not even reflexive, yet transitive, but it is symmetrical. What does that
mean?

That means, that there exists a direct link between cosmoses, which are in this relation (kind of a
wormhole, etc.). More, cosmos 1 is directly opposed by the cosmos 8. Therefore cosmos numbers
should be expressed in base-8 system.

19/22
Using travel operators (*,+) we can move between cosmoses, which are in a relation.
We will define those two expressions.
(X, A,B,C,D,G are cosmoses, A~B , C~ D , B~C , A~G )

A + B := {X ; A~ X ∨ B~ X }
A * B := if A~B ; A  B ∨ A B

What does that mean?

A+B : list all cosmoses that are in relation with A or B
A*B : move from A into B, if they are in direct relation, or else move one cosmos from A in
direction of B.

Other valid options instead of a particular cosmos are (among many): ∅ , X ℵ , X ∀ , X ∃ , X ¬∃

The most interesting options are X ¬∃ , X ℵ , where the first option represents a “unknown” or
“non-existing” cosmos, and the second option represents the whole of Creation.
Notation ℑC X can be used to represent another creation (if it exists), where this creation can be
warped to. *11

Where can these travel operators be useful?

There are many uses: time travel (between time universes, if they exist), inter-cosmos travel, inter-
creation travel *12, training of your imagination etc.

Back to my conjecture:
I stated that there is a infinite number of cosmoses. Where are they hidden? If you look more
closely at my drawing: only cosmoses on the edge of the hyper-cube are marked, while those in the
inner cube are not. I stated that cosmoses are to be counted in base-8, so there ought to be more of
them. They are hidden in the inner cube, connected with outer cosmoses. There is infinity of cubes
inside cubes, and every cosmos in the cube N is connected with the neighboring cosmoses in the
cube (N), cube (N+1) and cube (N-1), therefore there is infinity of cosmoses inside those cubes.

But how can my another statement (that the highest cosmos number is a natural number) be
compatible with this one?
To connect those two statements together we need some more theory; as you know, every cosmos
has its own complexity S i (where i is the cosmos number). If we form groups of those
complexities together (say, each cube – 8 cosmoses), we get a N-cube-complexity N S . If we
form those N-cube complexities together, we get a tree of complexities, with the root at the top and
quickly widening with each additional cube.

We can define yet another (I promise, the final one!) complexity: 0  NN S - complexity of all hyper-
rings from the level 0 to the level N. If we take this property of the constant S into consideration:
j i
S ∩ S ≠∅ , we can see that no two cosmoses are strictly opposite, what is more,
i , j ∈U
Id ∪ S i =S ℵ promises us, that all cosmoses together form the creation's complexity (aleph can
i∈U
be changed into x – the highest cosmos number).

Our goal is to make our formula for infinity more usable – with “naturalizing” the x-number =
making it finite and natural. Because no two cosmoses are truly disjunct, we can conjecture, that M
cosmoses are needed to cover the whole magical S x constant.

20/22
Therefore, M cosmoses are needed to cover the complexity of the whole creation. M is a finite
natural number, therefore, the highest cosmos number x can be equal to M and therefore natural
(and finite).

If I sum everything up, the cosmos-number-problem conjecture shows us not just that impossible is
possible (that infinity can be expressed out of non-infinity), but also that although there is infinite
number of cosmoses in our creation, only a finite number is needed to cover the whole creation.

*10 = Where n>3

*11 = C is the number of creation (a natural number)
*12 = if other creations exist

21/22
 The end
Dear reader, our journey through my Theory of Greatness came to an end. I hope that you have
learned at least a bit while reading this. You do not have to accept this theory, nor dispose it. The
future will prove, what is the truth and what not.

For the time being, I would recommend to accept at least the ROE rule. Knowing, that every being,
be it big or small, has a meaning, can have a big impact on ones life. And please, never forget to
fight – it is essential for success, be it in this life or afterwards.

Yours sincerely,
Matevž Markovič

Version of the Theory ID Owner + signature of the owner

TG FRC 2

→ Version is the official version

→ ID is the official ID
→ Owner is the primary owner of this Theory

22/22