Você está na página 1de 3

Human Rights Alert

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750


Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

11-04-05 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles – Fraud on the Court in a Quiet Title Action [i ,ii ]

Bank of America continues racketeering in the Los Angeles Superior Court, while Bank of
America Associate General Counsel Sandor Samuels is titled President of Bet Tzedek - "The
House of Justice" - and claims to engage in “repairing the world”.

California Judge: PETER J MEEKA


Clerk of the Court: JOHN A CLARKE

# Date Minutes Online Case Summary Register of Actions Comments


(not a court record) (California civil
docket)
1. Sept 28, 2010 Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Exparte proceeding Access denied False and
Enjoin deliberately
− Denied
misleading court
− Denied
− “Exparte” - an invalid records
− “off of the record” registration of proceeding in
the LASC Register of Actions
− Not certified by the Deputy
Clerk
2. Sept 30, 2010 Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Stay Exparte proceeding Access denied False and
Enforcement of Writ of deliberately
Possession misleading court
− Denied − Denied records

− “off of the record” − “Exparte” - an invalid


registration of proceeding in
− Not certified by the Deputy the LASC Register of Actions
Clerk
3. Oct 5, 2010 Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate No listed Access denied ?
− No ruling
4. Oct 25, 2010 Defendant’s Ex Parte Application Exparte proceeding Access denied False and
for an Order to Shorten Time re: deliberately
Motion to Set Aside Default misleading court
− Granted − Motion Granted records

− “off of the record” − “Exparte” - an invalid


registration of proceeding in
− Not certified by the Deputy the LASC Register of Actions
Clerk
5. Nov 2, 2010 Defendant’s Ex Parte Application for Not listed Access denied False and
Further Order Specially Setting deliberately
Motion to Set Aside Default misleading court
− Denied records
z Page 2/2 April 5, 2011

− “off of the record”


− Not certified by the Deputy
Clerk
6. Dec 16, 2010 Defendant’s Motion to Set Motion Hearing Access denied -
Aside Default
− Continued − Continued by Court
− Not certified by the Deputy
Clerk
7. Jan 4, 2011 Case Management Conference Conference-Case Management Access denied False and
deliberately
− Continued − Matter continued
misleading court
− ”Notice Deemed Waived” records
− Not certified by the Deputy
Clerk
8. Feb 4, 2011 1) Motion Of Defendant, Bank Of 1) Motion Hearing Access denied False and
America, Ex Rel, To Set Aside deliberately
Default misleading court
− records
Default vacated − Motion Granted
2) Case Management 2) Case Management Conference
Conference
− Invalid registration of
− Case Management
proceeding
Conference is continued
− Not certified by the Deputy
Clerk

Los Angeles, April 5 - In Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Plaintiff Susan Lomas tries to protect her rights through
a Quiet Title action, against alleged fraud by Bank of America and others in foreclosure procedures.
A pattern of false and deliberately misleading court records is found in the case, presided by California Judge
PETER J MEEKA, Clerk of the Court JOHN A CLARKE:
1) None of the minutes were certified by the Deputy Clerk of the Court;
2) None of the minutes were noticed and served by the Court;
3) Proceedings were repeatedly listed in the minutes as “off of the record”;
4) No Initial Case Management Conference was ever held;
5) Plaintiff has been repeatedly denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket), where the true
registration of the proceedings (or lack thereof) would be discerned, and
6) An online “Case Summary” is published by the Court, which would lead a naïve reader to conclude that valid
and effectual proceedings were held and rulings were entered by the court.
In sum
Combined, the records indicate that:
− The Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles is engaged in fraud to benefit Defendant Bank of
America through the conduct of pretense litigation in the Court;
− The Court is denying Plaintiff Susan Lomas access to the court, equal protection, and due process of law;
− Conduct of the Superior Court of California should be deemed serious violation of the Human, Constitutional,
and Civil rights of Plaintiff Susan Lomas, and
z Page 3/3 April 5, 2011

− Continued service of Bank of America Associate General Counsel Sandor Samuels as President of Bet
Tzedek - "The House of Justice" - is an affront.
LINKS

i
11-03-20 PRESS RELEASE Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Bank of America Continues Racketeering in the
Los Angeles Superior Court
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/51160102/H
ii
11-03-20 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles online
“Case Summary” and Minutes
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/51157264/

Você também pode gostar