Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Part I. Background
Columbia College of Chicago is a media arts college which prides itself on its diversity and up and
coming media relations. It is important for Columbia to stay current with the up and coming tech-
nological advances. Ultimately with many students owning smart-phones, a Columbia College
application offers quick media links which will further enhance Columbia’s accessibility and events.
• Analysis of Idea
1. Competitive Evaluation indicated there were many more strengths than weaknesses of the
CCC Smart-phone App.
Strengths Weaknesses
1. This app would carry a strong brand name 1. Students unwillingness to purchase app.
2. Easy for students to find and share the app. 2. Not every student has a smart-phone.
3. Reliable service and successful among target 3. System errors on Columbia website. This
market. problem is more associated with the
Columbia website than the app.
4. Apps are already known to be user friendly,
convenient, and reliable for on the go 4. Students already have internet access to
lifestyles. Columbia resources on their phones.
• Focus Groups
1. Our group conducted a focus group which involved selected Columbia students in our
Market Research class. Below is the concept statement which we evaluated:
• The reaction to the app was extremely positive because students use apps everyday.
Many respondents loved all aspects of the app, and the one person who didn’t think it
was worth it changed her mind by the end of the focus group.
• Eager participation was expressed through non-verbal communication including smiles
and head nods. These gestures were especially apparent as the students envisioned the
possibility of using gmail, games, weather, maps and news connections with the app.
• Respondents said their favorite element is being able to access thing they need.
• The verbal communication was light hearted and the respondents described their smart-
phone like a dependable friend.
• Respondents displayed a dependability to technology therefore the school’s app would
be successful among not only current students, but prospective students.
3. The ares of concern from our focus group which should be addressed:
• We talked to a small percentage of Columbia students, all of whom major in Marketing
Communications. The lack of diversity in majors may have biased our results. To expand
our idea our group turned to quantitative survey data to get the most representative
results.
2. Determine how much consumers would expect to pay for the CCC smart-phone app.
3. Measure the most popular attribute of the app and the percentage of consumers who want
that as the start page.
5. Determine the number of consumers who would access the Columbia Oasis.
6. Determine the percentage of consumers who would access Columbia radio station.
7. Measure the number of consumers who want a post-it reminder for activities coming up at
Columbia.
Advantages Disadvantages
Quick Biased
representative samples. It effects how representative it is. This could lead to self selection bias
and non-response error.
• Response error was apparent within our survey because some people did not correctly follow the
skip pattern or they misread the question. We also had bias because of the certain buildings we
collected our data from which resulted in a lot of Marketing majors.
100%
Percent of Students
75%
72%
50%
25%
27%
0%
Smart-phones No Smart-phones
Students
• Our demographic were students who have smart-phones vs. students who do not.
• We had mostly marketing students who are technologically advanced and in tune with upcoming
trends.
• We did not focus on if they were male or female because that information was considered
insignificant to our outcome as well as grade level in school.
1. In our research, 52% liked the idea very much and 87% said they either liked the idea very
much or liked it. Only 11% indicated that they did not like it.
9%2%
Like Very Much
Like
Dislike
52% Dislike Very Much
37%
Like 72 37%
Dislike 18 9%
• After asking how much they liked the idea of the concept, their attraction was reinforced by the
results of how useful the CCC smart-phone app would be.
5 31.9%
Number of Ratings
4 17.1%
3 25.4%
2 20.3%
1 5.0%
• Our survey indicated that almost half (48%) of the surveyed population found the app to be very
useful. Only 5% found it to be not useful.
• Research Objective: Measure the most popular attribute of the app and the percentage of
consumers who want that as the start page.
100%
94% 88%
75%
50% 65%
56%
25% 31% 31% 25%
0%
Total surveyed: 200
Features
• The three most important features for the CCC smart-phone app.
1. Research Objective: Determine the number of consumers who would access the
Columbia College Oasis. 187 students out of 200 want this feature. 93.5% popularity rate.
• Research Objective: Determine the percentage of consumers who would access Columbia
radio station. This was the least popular feature which 50 people wanted, putting it at a low 25%
popularity rate.
• Research Objective: Measure the number of consumers who value the weather and newsfeed
on the Columbia app. 55.5% students value the weather and 31% are interested in the US
News and 30.5% are interested in world news.
• Ultimately, over four fifths of CCC students would purchase the app and only 19.4% showed a
disinterest in purchasing.
81%
Percent of interest
67.5%
45.0%
22.5%
19%
0%
Yes No
n = 196 respondents
• Research Objective: Determine how much consumers would expect to pay for the CCC
smart-phone app. (Students expected to pay less than $2 for the CCC app.)
10%2%
Less than $0.99
$0.99-$1.99
45% $2.00-$2.99
$3.00 or more
43%
1. We wondered if students’ attraction to the app had anything to do with having a smart-phone.
We conducted cross tabs on students who do not have smart-phones but would still buy the
app.
37.5 45
25.0 n=54
12.5
9
0
Would purchase Would not purchase
• Research Objective: Measure the number of consumers who want a post-it reminder for
activities coming up at Columbia.
YES 55%
n=192
NO 43%
• Due to administrative error, we did not survey app layout preferences to the students. Future
research should indicate these results.
• Change sample from survey error. From this change, the skip pattern will be easier to
understand.
• New focus groups with smart-phone users only. Students who did not have smart-phones were
unsure how to answer the second portion of the survey because it was all anwering to your
opinions of an app, which they didn’t have. There should be a direction to tell students to
continue the survey if they hypothetically had a smart-phone.