Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
People are unevenly distributed around the world. The difference in distribution
is measured by comparing population density - the number of people per
square kilometre (km²).
Population density is determined more by environmental factors which make an
area more or less attractive to settlers than by economic development.
Population patterns
A street in Cairo
The way in which people are spread across a given area is known as population
distribution. Geographers study population distribution patterns at different scales:
local, regional, national, and global.
Patterns of population distribution tend to be uneven. For example, in the UK there are
more people living in the southeast of England than in Wales.
Population density
Population density is the average number of people per square kilometre. It is a way of
measuring population distribution and shows whether an area is sparsely or densely
populated. Population density is calculated using the following formula:
Population density = total population ÷ total land area in km²
Population density
The map shows patterns of population density on a global scale. Note that:
Areas of high and low population density are unevenly spread across the world.
The majority of places with high population densities are found in thenorthern
hemisphere.
Map of the world showing population density
The population density of a country is has very little to do with its level of economic
development. For example, both Bangladesh and Japan are very densely populated, but
Bangladesh is a LEDC and Japan is a MEDC.
Socio-economic factors
Factors such as the availability of jobs and comparatively high wages can contribute to
high population density through migration. For example, from 2004 the UK has seen an
influx of migrants from countries that have recently joined the EU, such as Poland.
Political factors
Civil war, eg in the Darfur region of Sudan, can contribute to lower population densities
as people become refugees and leave an area.
Rate of change
Births and deaths are natural causes of population change. The difference between the
birth rate and the death rate of a country or place is called the natural increase. The
natural increase is calculated by subtracting the death rate from the birth rate.
natural increase = birth rate - death rate
The rate of natural increase is given as a percentage, calculated by dividing the natural
increase by 10.
For example if the birth rate is 14 per 1000 population, and the death rate is 8 per 1000
population, then the growth rate = 14 - 8 = 6
That is 6/1000, which is equal to 0.6%.
MEDCs
UK 11 10 1 0.1
Canada 11 7 4 0.4
Bulgaria 9 14 -5 -0.5
LEDCs
South 25 15 10 1
Africa
Botswana 31 22 9 0.9
Zimbabwe 29 20 9 0.9
In Bulgaria, the birth rate is 9/1000 and death rate is /1000. As birth rate is less than the
14
Notice how in the UK 2000 pyramid there is a bulge in the area of the 30-34 and 35-
39 age groups, with the numbers thereafter reducing fairly steadily as the ages
increase. This matches stage 4 of the demographic transition model.
Projected population pyramid for the UK 2025
Compare this to the 2025 pyramid, which would be stage 5 in the model. Here the
bulge extends much further, covering the age groups 30-64, with the numbers
beginning to reduce significantly only after 64.
Now compare the UK population pyramids with those for Mozambique:
Population pyramid for Mozambique 2000
In this graph, notice that in 2000 the 0-4 age group contained the largest number of
people, with the numbers thereafter declining steadily as the ages increase. The
graph matches stage 1 in the model.
3.
4. Projected population pyramid for Mozambique 2025
In the second graph, the largest group in Mozambique in 2025 is still the 0-4 age
group, but there are nearly as many people in the 5-29 age groups. Now the
population pyramid matches stage 2.
Migration
Migration is the movement of people from one place to another. The reasons for
migration can be economic, social, political or environmental. There are
usually push factors and pull factors at work.
Migration impacts on both the place left behind, and on the place where
migrants settle.
What is migration?
Push factors are the reasons why people leave an area. They include:
Lack of services
Lack of safety
High crime
Crop failure
Drought
Flooding
Poverty
war
Pull factors are the reasons why people move to a particular area. They include:
Higher employment
More wealth
Better services
Good climate
Safer, less crime
Political stability
More fertile land
Lower risk from natural hazards
Migration usually happens as a result of a combination of these push and pull factors.
Migration push and pull factors
Germany Some of the migrants can't speak German and there Germany has gained a source of cheap
has been racial tension. labour.
Turkey Turkey has lost some of its workforce. Migrants send money home to their
families in Turkey.
Different groups of people have different interests. In the case of economic migrants,
look at the views of:
The migrant – How do they feel about their new life? How do they feel about leaving
their family behind? How do they feel about people in their destination country who may
be hostile towards them?
The migrant's family left behind – How do they feel about it? Do they see it as a
positive move? Will they be better or worse off?
The government in the host country – What is their policy on migrants? Are they
good or bad for the economy? Are they good or bad for society?
Other workers in the host country – How do they feel about the economic migrants?
What type of jobs are they taking? Is there competition for jobs?
Refugees in Darfur
Refugees are living in cramped and unsanitary conditions, and many have lost
family members in the conflict or from disease. Water is scarce and most people
rely on aid agencies for food, shelter and medicine. However, the aid efforts are
being hampered by the Sudanese government and refugees are dying of disease,
starvation and malnutrition. Chad is one of the poorest countries in the world,
and the refugees from Sudan are putting a strain on already scarce resources.
In the late 1970s, the Chinese government introduced a number of measures to reduce
the country's birth rate and slow the population growth rate. The most important of the
new measures was a one-child policy, which decreed that couples in China could only
have one child.
In 1950 the rate of population change in China was 1.9% each year. If this doesn't
sound high, consider that a growth rate of only 3% will cause the population of a country
to double in less than 24 years!
Previous Chinese governments had encouraged people to have a lot of children to
increase the country's workforce. But by the 1970s the government realised that current
rates of population growth would soon become unsustainable.
Long-term implications
China's one-child policy has been somewhat relaxed in recent years. Couples can now
apply to have a second child if their first child is a girl, or if both parents are themselves
only-children.
While China's population is now rising more slowly, it still has a very large total
population (1.3 billion in 2008) and China faces new problems:
The falling birth rate is leading to a rise in the relative number of elderly people.
There are fewer people of working age to support the growing number of elderly
dependants. In the future China could have an ageing population.
An ageing population
As people live longer, the structure of a population changes.
Many MEDCs are now experiencing a significant increase in the number of elderly people
as a proportion of the population.
As birth rates fall and people have smaller families, the number of young dependants is
falling and the number of elderly dependants is rising.
In the near future this will mean that there are fewer economically active people to
support the elderly population.
To try to balance out an ageing population, some countries adopt a pro-natalist policy -
that is, they encourage people to have more children by offering them benefits, such as
access to childcare and maternity leave.
Settlement characteristics
Settlements come in different sizes, types and locations. You can learn about
the history and function of a settlement by studying its shape and size, its
placement in the landscape, and its situation in relation to surrounding
features.
If you group and classify settlements according to their size and shape, the
result is a settlement hierarchy.
What is a settlement
Settlement functions
Most large settlements in MEDCs are multifunctional and perform a range of functions
such as retail, education and industry.
When settlements first started to grow, most had only one distinct function, and others
developed as the settlement grew.
Examples of functions:
Port – the original function of cities such as Liverpool and Southampton. Both are still
ports, but this function has diminished in importance and they are now multifunctional.
Market town – Watford was originally a market town, and although it still holds a regular
market, it is now a thriving multifunctional centre.
Resort – Southport was a popular Victorian seaside resort, although it now has many
functions and is a commuter settlement for Liverpool.
Natural resources in the area enabled Sheffield to develop as an important centre in the
iron and steel industry. Although steel is still produced, its prominence has declined and
Sheffield is a thriving multifunctional city.
Settlement hierarchies
If we group and classify a number of settlements according to their size and
shape the result is settlement hierarchy
Pyramid showing relationship between population and services
As you move up the hierarchy, the size of the settlement and the distance
between similar sized settlements increases. As you can see from the diagram
below, there are more cities than conurbations, more towns than cities and more
villages than towns.
The number of services that a settlement provides increases with settlement
size.
Small settlements will only provide low order services such as a post offices,
doctors and newsagents. Large towns, cities and conurbations will provide low
and high order services such as leisure centres, chain stores and hospitals.
Larger settlements and conurbations have a much larger sphere of influence
than smaller ones. This means they attract people from a wider area because of
the facilities they offer. Cities such as London have a global sphere of influence,
whereas a small hamlet or village may only have a sphere of influence of a couple
of kilometres.
Services such as department stores selling high order goods have a higher
threshold than those selling low order goods such as newsagents. This means
they need a higher number of people to support them and make them profitable,
therefore they will only be found in larger settlements. It also means that there
are fewer big department stores than small newsagents.
The range of a service or product is the maximum distance people are prepared
to travel to purchase it. The range of a newspaper is much lower than an item of
furniture for example.
Urban models in MEDCs
It is possible in many cities to identify zones with a particular type of land use -
eg a residential zone. Often these zones have developed due to a combination
of economic and social factors. In some cases planners may have tried to
separate out some land uses, eg an airport is separated from a large housing
estate.
The Burgess and Hoyt model
Geographers have put together models of land use to show how a 'typical' city is laid
out. One of the most famous of these is the Burgess or concentric zone model.
This model is based on the idea that land values are highest in the centre of a town or
city. This is because competition is high in the central parts of the settlement. This leads
to high-rise, high-density buildings being found near thecCBD, with low-density, sparse
developments on the edge of the town or city
High/multi-storey buildings.
Expensive land values.
Department stores or specialist shops, like jewellers.
Shopping malls and pedestrian precincts.
Cultural/historical buildings, museums and castles.
Offices, finance, banks, administration, town hall (business sector).
Bus and railway stations (transport centres).
Multi-storey car parks.
The CBD is located in the centre because it is:
A central location for road/railways to converge.
The most accessible location for workers.
Accessible to most people for shops and businesses.
To help you remember how to identify a CBD, think of a city you know. In your exam
give named examples for the features listed above.
The inner city is also known as the 'twilight zone'. It is typically found next to the CBD
and has mainly terraced houses in a grid like pattern. These were originally built to
house factory workers who worked in the inner city factories. Many of these factories
have now closed down.
Unemployment and other socio-economic problems have led to periods of unrest in
many inner city areas, eg Toxteth in Liverpool. Many inner city areas declined in the late
20th century and have undergone a period of regeneration in recent years, for example
Watford Arches Retail Park, which is located on a former industrial site. Run down
terraced housing is often bought by investors and improved to appeal to young
professionals who need access to the CBD. This is called gentrification.
The suburbs
Suburban houses are usually larger than inner city terraces and most have a garden.
Typically, they are detached or semi detached and the roads around them are arranged
in cul de sacs and wide avenues. Land prices are generally cheaper than in the CBD and
inner city, although the desirability of housing can make some areas expensive.
Many suburbs were built in the UK in the 1930s and have a distinctive style of housing,
as shown in the picture to the right. More modern housing estates were built in the late
20th century as towns and cities have continued to grow.
Facilities such as schools, places of worship and parks are often present, and many are
served by a local supermarket.
Suburban areas are often home to commuters who need access to the CBD along main
roads and railways, and they are also within easy reach of the countryside.
This is found at the edge of a town or city and is where town meets country. It is
common for this area to have a mixture of land uses such as some housing, golf courses,
allotments, business parks and airports.
The mixture of land use often causes conflict as different groups have different need and
interests. For example, building Terminal 5 at Heathrow on the outskirts of London was a
source of controversy. The need for another runway continues to cause conflicts of
interest.
Both MEDC and LEDC cities have a CBD - often the oldest part of the city.
In LEDCs the poorest housing is found on the edge of the city - in contrast to MEDC
cities whose suburban fringe is very often a place of high quality housing. The areas of
poor quality housing found on the edge of cities in LEDCs are calledsquatter
settlements or shanty towns.
Land use in Sao Paulo, Brazil
The below pictures show two very different areas of Sao Paulo in Brazil - the CBD and an
outerlying shanty town.
Shanty towns
The fact that cities in LEDCs are growing rapidly means that conditions can be poor.
There are often great inequalities within LEDC urban areas and they are even more
pronounced in LEDCs.
Some of the worst conditions are found in the shanty towns on the edge of the city, near
the CBD or along main transport routes. They tend to be unplanned and are often illegal.
Houses are self-built using basic materials and shanty towns have few services.
Shanty town residents face many problems on a daily basis. Khyalitsha in South
Africa is a shanty town located near the city of Cape Town. Shanty towns are also
known as townships in South Africa. Khyalitsha has a population of over 1.8 million
people and is one of the largest townships in South Africa.
Problems:
Overcrowding - the settlement has a high population density.
Fires - fires can spread quickly.
Overpopulation - the area does not have enough resources to support the growing
population.
Competition for jobs - jobs are in short supply.
Disease - poor sanitation and limited health care can lead to the spread of disease.
Lack of space - the newest and poorest arrivals may be forced to live on the worst
quality land.
Infrastructure - services are poor, public transport is limited and connections to the
electricity supply can be limited and sometimes dangerous.
Improving shanty towns
Approaches to improvement
Site and These give people the chance to rent or buy a piece of land. The land
service is connected to the city by transport links and has access to essential
schemes services (eg water). People build their own homes using money from a
low-interest loan.
Self-help These give people the tools and training to improve their homes. Low-
schemes interest loans may be used to help people fund these changes. People
may be given legal ownership of the land.
Rural Improving the quality of life and creating greater opportunities in rural
investment areas may prevent people from migrating to urban areas. Investment
in rural areas may therefore help to improve conditions in the city as
well.
Urbanisation in MEDCs
Urbanisation can cause problems such as transport congestion, lack of
sufficient housing, over-rapid growth and environmental degradation. Many
cities display particularly sharp inequalities in housing provision, health and
employment.
Some people try to escape these problems by moving away from the city - a
process called counter-urbanisation. Long term, however, the solution must be
to make cities more sustainable.
Causes of urbanisation
Urbanisation means an increase in the proportion of people living in urban areas
compared to rural areas. An urban area is a built-up area such as a town or city.
A rural area is an area of countryside.
As a country industrialises, the number of people living in urban areas tends to increase.
The UK and many other MEDCs urbanised during the 18th and 19th centuries. People
migrated from rural areas (due to the mechanisation in farming) to urban areas where
there was employment in the new factories. The area of cities known as the inner city
developed during this time as rows of terraced housing were built for workers.
Santiago, Chile
Today the UK is a mostly urban society, with 90% of the population living in towns or
cities.
On a global scale, urbanisation is taking place rapidly, particularly in LEDCs
Although the UK is an urban society, more and more people are choosing to live on the
edge of urban areas - with many relocating to the countryside. This is called counter-
urbanisation.
Unemployment and incidents of long-term illness are higher in the inner-city boroughs,
while households are more likely to have central heating and multiple cars in the outer-
city borough.
Governments and planners often step in to help redevelop run-down inner-city areas.
Inner-city redevelopments, such as those in London's Docklands or Manchester's Salford
Quays, may improve the physical environment of the area and improve the quality of
housing. However, it can also create even greater inequalities because the local
residents may not be able to afford to live there anymore. Often the old industrial jobs
are replaced by skilled jobs and new people move to the area.
Social and demographic changes are leading to a greater demand for housing. People
are living longer, and choosing to marry later, and in recent years there has been a rise
in the number of single-parent families. Added to this, the UK is experiencing
immigration from other countries, eg from Poland which has recently joined the EU. The
result is an ever-larger number of smaller households, all requiring accommodation.
However, building new, affordable homes in urban areas is difficult. Land values are very
high and land is in short supply:
Some developers are building on sites that have been built on before in the UK's inner
cities. These are called brownfield sites. This has happened in many of the UK’s inner
cities.
Other developers are building homes on the edge of the city on greenfield sites in the
urban rural fringe. Land here is cheaper but greenfield development can cause conflict
with local people and create environmental problems.
Sustainable cities
Many people are working towards trying to make cities more sustainable. A sustainable
city offers a good quality of life to current residents but doesn't reduce the opportunities
for future residents to enjoy.