Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Chamber
Kevin Kuns
August 14, 2007
Abstract
The calculation of the magnetic field due to a current loop is de-
veloped by first finding the magnetic vector potential and then taking
its divergence. The solution for all points in space requires the use of
elliptic integrals; however, it is shown that for points on the axis of
the loop, this solution is identical to the simpler algebraic solution for
points located on the axis. The specific magnetic field of the UCLA
high school plasma machine is calculated by adding the effects of the
120 current loops that generate the magnetic field of the machine.
1 Elliptic Integrals
In this section we explore two elliptic integrals and their derivatives
that will be important in the calculation of the magnetic field.
The complete elliptic integral of the first kind K(k) is defined as
Z π
2 dα
K(k) = p (1)
0 1 − k 2 sin2 α
and the complete elliptic integral of the second kind E(k) is defined
as Z πp
2
E(k) = 1 − k 2 sin2 α dα. (2)
0
It is clear from these definitions that
Z π
2 π
K(0) = E(0) = dα = . (3)
0 2
1
The derivative of K is given by
Z π
dK 2 k sin2 α
= 3 dα. (4)
dk 0 (1 − k 2 sin2 α) 2
Since
k sin2 α 1 1
3 = − p 3 ,
2 2
(1 − k 2 sin α) 2 k(1 − k 2 sin α) k 1 − k 2 sin2 α
2
K
By (1) the second integral is k. It can be shown by comparing power
series, see [1], that
Z π
2
2 dα
E(k) = (1 − k ) 3
0 (1 − k 2 sin2 α) 2
and therefore (5) becomes
dK E K
= 2
− . (6)
dk k(1 − k ) k
The derivative of E is given by
Z π
dE 2 k sin2 α
=− p dα. (7)
dk 0 1 − k 2 sin2 α
Since
p
k sin2 α 1 − k 2 sin2 α 1
−p = − p ,
1 − k 2 sin2 α k k 1 − k 2 sin2 α
(7) can be written as
Z π p Z π
dE 2 1 − k 2 sin2 α 2 dα
= dα − p
dk 0 k 0 k 1 − k 2 sin2 α
2
2 Magnetic Field of a Current Loop
In this section we derive the equation for the magnetic field due to a
circular loop of current. We will first find the vector potential A from
Z
µ0 I ds
A= . (9)
4π R
We will then obtain the magnetic field B by taking the curl of A
according to
B = ∇ × A. (10)
Since
ds = −a sin φ dφx̂ + a cos φ dφŷ,
from (9) we have
Z 2π
µ0 I −a sin φ dφ
A= p x̂+
4π 0 r + a + (z − h)2 − 2ar cos φ
2 2
Z 2π
a cos φ dφ
p ŷ . (11)
0 r2 + a2 + (z − h)2 − 2ar cos φ
For every φ the contribution made to A in the x direction is can-
celed by the contribution from −φ. Therefore, there is no x component
to A and the first term in (11) goes to zero. Furthermore the contri-
bution from φ in the y direction from φ is equal to the contribution
3
from −φ. Therefore, instead of integrating the y component of A from
0 to 2π we can integrate from 0 to π and multiply by 2. Finally, if
we switch to cylindrical coordinates the y component becomes the φ
component and (11) becomes
µ0 Ia π
Z
cos φ dφ
A= p φ̂. (12)
2π 0 r + a + (z − h)2 − 2ar cos φ
2 2
4
By (1) The first term in (17) is K(k). For the second term we note
that
!
sin2 α 1 1 p
p = 2 p − 1 − k 2 sin2 α
1 − k 2 sin2 α k 1 − k 2 sin2 α
and that therefore the second term becomes
"Z π Z πp #
2 2 dα 2
− 1 − k 2 sin2 α dα
k2 0
p
2 2
1 − k sin α 0
5
and
r
(r + a)2 + (z − h)2 4a (r + a)2 + (z − h)2 − 8ar(z − h)
∂k 1
= ·
∂r 2 4ar [(r + a)2 + (z − h)2 ]2
2a 4ar(r + a)
= −
[(r + a) + (z − h) ] k [(r + a)2 + (z − h)2 ]2 k
2 2 2
2ak k 2 (r + a) k k 3 (r + a)
= − = − . (21)
4ar [(r + a)2 + (z − h)2 ] k 2r 4ar
Expanding we have
k(z − h) k 3 (z − h)
r
∂A µ0 I a k(z − h)E k(z − h)K
− =− + K− + +
∂z 2π r 2ar 4ar 2ar(1 − k 2 ) 2ar
k 3 (z − h)E k 3 (z − h)K k(z − h)E k(z − h)E k(z − h)K
− − + −
4ar(1 − z 2 ) 4ar 2ar 2ar 2ar
which simplifies to
−2k(z − h) + k 3 (z − h)
r
∂A µ0 I a k(z − h)
− = − K+ E
∂z 2π r 2ar 4ar(1 − k 2 )
2 − k2
µ0 Ik(z − h)
= − √ K− E . (22)
4π ar3 2(1 − k 2 )
6
and that, therefore,
√
∂ µ0 Ia 2 2 µ0 I ar 2 ∂k
rA = √ −k K − + − 2 −1 K
∂r 4π ar k k 2π k ∂r
2 dK ∂ k 2 ∂k 2 dE ∂ k
+ −k + 2 E− . (23)
k dk ∂r k ∂r k dk ∂r
k 3 (r + a)
r
∂ µ0 I a 1 k E 2r k
rA = − K− + − 2 − r − K
∂r 2π r k 2 k k 2r 4ar
k 3 (r + a)
2r E K k
+ − kr − −
k k(1 − k 2 ) k 2r 4ar
3 k 3 (r + a)
2r k k (r + a) 2r E K k
+ 2 − E− − − .
k 2r 4ar k k k 2r 4ar
(24)
Expanding we have
1 k(r + a) k k 3 (r + a)
r
∂ µ0 I a 1 k E
rA = − K− + − + − + K+
∂r 2π r k 2 k k 2a 2 4a
E K kE kK k(r + a)E k(r + a)K k 3 (r + a)E
− − + − + + −
k(1 − k 2 ) k 2(1 − k 2 ) 2 2a(1 − k 2 ) 2a 4a(1 − k 2 )
k 3 (r + a)K
1 k(r + a) E k(r + a)E K k(r + a)K
+ − E− + + − .
4a k 2a k 2a k 2a
(25)
This simplifies to
r
∂ µ0 I a k k(r + a) 1 k
rA = − + K+ − −
∂r 2π r 2 2a k(1 − k ) 2(1 − k 2 )
2
k 3 (r + a)
k(r + a) 1
+ − E . (26)
2a(1 − k 2 ) 4a(1 − k 2 ) k
Dividing by r to get the z component of B we have
r " #
1 ∂ µ0 I a k(r + a) − ak k 2 −2a − 2(r + a) + k 2 (r + a) + 4a
rA = K+ E
r ∂r 2π r3 2a 4ak(1 − k 2 )
k 2 (r + a) − 2r
µ0 Ikr
= √ K+ E . (27)
4π ar3 2r(1 − k 2 )
7
Since B = ∇ × A by (19), (22), and (27)
2 − k2 k 2 (r + a) − 2r
µ0 Ik
B(r, z) = √ −(z − h) K − E r̂ + r K + E ẑ .
4π ar3 2(1 − k 2 ) 2r(1 − k 2 )
(28)
It is easy to calculate the magnetic field due to the current loop at
a point located on the z axis using the Biot-Savart law
ds × R̂
Z
µ0 I
B= .
4π R2
that
µ0 I a
B= 2πa ẑ.
4π R3
since p
R = a2 + (z − h)2
we have
µ0 Ia2
B= 3 ẑ. (29)
2 [a2 + (z − h)2 ] 2
We now show that the magnetic field for a point along the z axis
calculated in (29) is equivalent to the magnetic field calculated in (28)
for r = 0. We will first show that Br = 0 when r = 0 and then show
that Bz is equal to (29). First we note from (14) that k = 0 when
r = 0. Now we rewrite Br given by (22) to eliminate the r from the
denominator
k2 E
µ0 I(z − h) E
Br = − K− +
1 − k 2 2(1 − k 2 )
p
2πr (r + a)2 + (z − h)2
µ0 I(z − h) K E 2aE
= − p − + (30).
2π (r + a)2 + (z − h)2 r r(1 − k 2 ) [(r + a)2 + (z − h)2 ] (1 − k 2 )
8
Expressing the first two terms inside the braket in (30) with the defi-
nitions of K and E given in (1) and (2) we have
Z π Z π p
K E 2 dα 2 1 − k 2 sin2 α
− = − dα
r(1 − k 2 ) r(1 − k 2 )
p
r 0 r 1 − k 2 sin2 α 0
Z π
1 2 k 2 sin2 α − k 2
= p dα
r 0 (1 − k 2 ) 1 − k 2 sin2 α
Z π
4a 2 sin2 α − 1
= dα.
(r + a)2 + (z − h)2 0 (1 − k2) 1 − k 2 sin2 α
p
9
Figure 1: UCLA high school plasma machine. The coil on the far right is
disconected because it interfered with the plasma source.
10
Figure 2: Magnetic field inside the plasma chamber.
Fig. 2 shows the magnetic field inside the plasma chamber as cal-
culated by (32).
References
[1] George B. Arfken and Hans J. Weber. Mathematical Methods for
Physicists. Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 6 edition, 2005.
[2] Albert Shadowitz. The Electromagnetic Field. Dover Publications,
Inc., New York, 1975.
11