Você está na página 1de 37

Communication Systems Seminar

Glenn Research Center University of Akron

Lecture 3

Modulation and Demodulation


Techniques in Communication Systems

Dr. Oke C. Ugweje

Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering


The University of Akron
Akron, OH 44325-3904

Wednesday June 28, 2000


Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 1
Outline of Presentation
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

F Modulation and Demodulation (MODEM)


F Classification of Modulation Techniques
F Baseband versus Bandpass Communications
F Why Modulate?
F Definition of Modulation
F Analog Modulation Techniques
F Digital Modulation Techniques (Sample)
F Detection Detection Techniques
F Digital MODEM Examples
mASK, FSK, PSK, QPSK, OQPSK, DPSK, QAM
F Factors Affecting Choice of Modulation
F Comparisons of Digital MODEM
F References
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 2
Modulation and Demodulation (MODEM)
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

Digital Source Channel From other


input bits bits sources

lm q
i
Format
Source Channel
Multiplex Modulate Spread
Multiple
Access
Encoder Encoder

Tx

P$e Performance
Measure Bits or Waveforms
Symbol

Rx

Demodulate
Source Channel Multiple
Format Demultiplex & Despread
lm$ q i
Decoder Decoder
Detect
Access

Digital Source Channel


output bits bits To other Carrier & symbol
destinations synchronization

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 3


Classification of Modulation Techniques
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Modulation Techniques can be broadly classified as follows:


l Digital versus Analog Modulation
l Baseband versus Bandpass (Passband) Modulation
l Binary versus M-ary Modulation
l Memoryless Modulation versus Modulation with memory
l Linear versus Nonlinear Modulation
l Constant envelope versus Non-constant envelope Modulation
l Power efficient versus Bandwidth efficient Modulation

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 4


Baseband versus Bandpass Communications
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Baseband (Lowpass):
l A signal whose frequency content (i.e. its spectrum) is in the
vicinity of zero (i.e., f = 0 or dc) is said to be a baseband signal
w Original source signal are sometimes said to be baseband
l Baseband systems transmit baseband signals
l This is usually not an effective means of communication. Why?
m Bandpass (Passband or Narrowband):
l Bandpass signal spectrum is nonzero in some band of frequency
with BW = 2B centered about f = ±fc, where fc >> 0

X(f) X(fc)

fc is carrier frequency -B1 -f c -B2 0 B1 fc B2 f


2B 2B

m Effective transmission of signal usually requires bandpass signal


Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 5
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Bandpass transmission involves some translation of the baseband


signal to some band of frequency centered around fc

m Bandpass Transmitter:

Message Modulated
Carrier RF Carrier
Signal

Frequency Power
Source Modulator
Translation Amplifier

Carrier for Local


Carrier for
Modulation Oscillator Wire
Translation

l Carrier (high frequency pure sinusoidal generated by the local


oscillator) is altered in response to a given low frequency signal
(message signal) generated by the source

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 6


Why Modulate?
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Coupling EM wave into space - antenna size α wavelength λ


λ= c
f
l For speech signal f = 3 kHz ð λ = 105m
l Antenna size without modulation ≅ λ = 105m = 60 miles
l Practically unrealizable
l Hence, efficient antenna of realistic physical size is needed for
radio communication system
m Information signal must conform to the limitation of its channel
(channel matching)
m Reduce the effect of interference, e.g. Spread Spectrum
m Place signals at desired frequency band for signal processing purposes
such as filtering, amplification, multiplexing
m Used to map digital information sequence into waveforms
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 7
Definition of Modulation
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m The technique of superimposing the message signal on the carrier is


known as modulation
m That is, modulation is the process by which a property or parameter of
one signal (in this case the carrier) is varied in proportion to the
second signal (in this case the message signal)
m Modulation is performed at the transmitter, and the reverse operation
(demodulation/detection) is performed at the receiving end
m Let m(t) = message (or information) signal
c(t) = carrier signal
s(t) = modulated signal (transmitted signal)

m(t) Modulator s(t)


Modulating Modulated

c(t) Carrier

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 8


Glenn Research Center University of Akron

l The carrier c(t) is a pure sinusoidal signal generally given as


c( t ) = A cos( 2πf t + θ ( t ))
c c c

where Ac = Amplitude, fc= Frequency, θc(t) = Phase


l Examination of c(t) indicate that there are 3 parameters which may
be varied:
1. The amplitude Ac,
2. The frequency fc, and
3. The phase θc(t)
l These parameters can be varied in Analog or Digital form
l When varied in Digital form, it is referred to as “Shifting &
Keying”

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 9


Analog Modulation Techniques
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Using the message signal m(t) to vary Ac, fc, θc(t) leads to 3 basic
types of analog modulation schemes respectively known as
1. Amplitude Modulation
Amplitude
m(t) s(t)
2. Frequency Modulation and Modulator

3. Phase Modulation
c(t)

m These types of modulation are carrier/continuous wave modulation


m In this case, the Intermediate Frequency (IF) or the Radio
Frequency (RF) is modulated
m Frequency & Phase Modulation are also known as Angle Modulation
m Amplitude Modulation (AM) is used whenever a shift in the
frequency components of a given signal is desired
l E.g., transmitting voice signal (3 kHz) via EM wave requires that
3 kHz be raised several orders of magnitude before transmission
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 10
Glenn Research Center University of Akron
M(f)
M( 0)

f
− fm 0 fm
Ac aAc Sam ( f ) Ac
2 2
M( f + fc ) 2 M( f − fc)

USB LSB LSB USB

f
− fc − fm − fc − fc + fm fc − fm fc fc + fm

m There are 4 kinds of Amplitude Modulation techniques, namely:


1) Conventional Amplitude Modulation
ð Carrier + Upper Sideband + Lower Sideband
2) Double Sideband (DSB) Suppressed Carrier (SC) AM
ð Upper Sideband + Lower Sideband
3) Single Sideband (SSB) AM
ð Only one Sideband (Upper Sideband or Lower Sideband)
4) Vestigial Sideband (VSB) AM
ð Upper Sideband + portions of the Lower Sideband
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 11
Digital Modulation Techniques (Sample)
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

F The purpose of digital modulation is to convert an information-


bearing discrete-time symbol into a continuous-time waveform
F Basic Techniques (Binary, M = 2):
mCommon binary modulation schemes include
lAmplitude Shift Keying (BASK)
lFrequency Shift Keying (BFSK)
lPhase Shift Keying (BPSK)
lDifferential Phase Shift Keying (DPSK)
F For M > 2, many variations of the above techniques exist usually
classified as M-ary modulation
mM-ary modulation schemes include
lPhase Shift Keying (MPSK)
w Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK)
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 12
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

w
Offset QPSK (Staggered QPSK) (OQPSK/SQPSK)
w π/4 Differential QPSK (no carrier) (π/4 DQPSK)
w π/4 Differential QPSK (with carrier) (π/4 QPSK)
w Differential MPSK (no carrier recovery) (DMPSK)
lContinuous-Phase Frequency Shift Keying (CPFSK)
lSinusoidal Frequency Shift Keying (SFSK)
lMinimum Shift Keying (MSK)
w Differential MSK (DMSK)
w Gaussian MSK (GMSK)
lAmplitude Phase Keying (MAPK)
lQuadrature Amplitude Modulation (MQAM)
w Superposed QAM
lQuadrature Partial Response Signaling (QPRS)
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 13
Digital Detection Techniques
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

MODEM

(Phase info (No Phase info


COHERENT NONCOHERENT
required) required)

BINARY M-ary HYBRID BINARY M-ary HYBRID

ASK ASK APK(QAM) ASK ASK


(OOK) (OOK)
FSK FSK
FSK FSK
(MSK) PSK DPSK
(QPSK, DPSK
PSK OQPSK) CPM
CPM

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 14


Digital MODEM Examples
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

F Amplitude Shift Keying (ASK)


mModulation Process:
w Amplitude of the carrier is switched between two (or more)
levels according to the digital data
Product modulator or
ON-OFF switch
m(t) x s(t )
0 T 3T

A cos(ω ot )

Baseband Data OOK Modulator Modulated bandpass Signal

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 15


Glenn Research Center University of Akron

mDetectors for ASK:

mPower Spectral Density: impulse

l Bandwidth
B = 2 Rb = 2
Tb

w Null-to-null bandwidth
2 fc + 2 Rb
Tb fc + Rb
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 16
Frequency Shift Keying (FSK)
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Modulation Process:
l In FSK, the instantaneous frequency of the carrier is switched
between 2 or more levels according to the baseband digital data
m Waveform:

f1 f2

so (t) = Ac cos(ω 1t + θ 1 ) s1(t) = Ac cos(ω 2 t + θ 2 )

m Discontinuous Phase FSK:


1 0 1 1 0 1

θ1 ≠ θ 2 Phase Discontinuities

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 17


Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Continuous Phase FSK:


1 0 1 1 0 1
θ 0 = θ1

No Phase Discontinuities
Envelop
Detection
m Demodulation of FSK:

Coherent Noncoherent
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 18
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m PSD of CPFSK:

Sunde's FSK

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 19


Phase Shift Keying (PSK)
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Modulation Process:
l In PSK, the phase of the carrier signal is switched between 2 or
more values in response to the baseband digital data
m Waveform:

m PSK Generation:

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 20


Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Receiver (Demodulator) for PSK:

?There is no non-coherent detection equivalent for PSK. Why?

m Power Spectral Density of PSK:


l Similar to that of ASK

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 21


Quadrature PSK
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

01 s 00
1 E s0

s2 s3
11 10

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 22


Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m In QPSK, the bit transition in I- & Q-channels occur simultaneously

Simultaneous
transition of Q
and I channels

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 23


Offset QPSK
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m In OQPSK, I-channel (or Q-channel) bit stream is offset by one bit


period w.r.t. the Q-channel (or I-channel) prior to multiplication by
the carrier
Notice that the Q and I channels are
not aligned and only one phase
transition can occur once every Ts =
Tb sec with a max at ±90o

I-channel: even bits


Phase Diagrams
Q-channel: odd bits
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 24
Differential PSK (DPSK)
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m DPSK is regarded as the noncoherent version of binary PSK


ak dk
dk =
RSd
k −1, ak = 0 ak dk −1 dk
Td
k −1, ak = 1 0 0 1
dk−1 0 1 0
Delay
Ts 1 0 0
1 1 1

M_ary Case

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 25


Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM)
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Most commonly used combination of amplitude and phase signaling


is the Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM)
m MQAM Modulator:

m M-ary QAM Demodulation:

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 26


Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m QAM Constellation:
Q Q Q

I I I

Type I Type II Type III

16 QAM (8, 8) 16 QAM (4, 12) 16 QAM (4, 8, 4)

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 27


Factors Affecting Choice of Modulation
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)


m Probability of error or Bit Error Rate (BER)
m Power Efficiency, η p
l Power efficiency is a measure of how much received power is
needed to achieve a specified BER (inversely proportional to BER
l As BER increases, η p decreases since transmitted power is
“wasted” on more bad data
m Bandwidth Efficiency (or Spectral Efficiency), ηB
l Defined as the ratio of the bit rate to the channel bandwidth
w If R is data rate and B is the RF signal bandwidth, then
R 1
ηB = = log2 M bps / Hz
B BT
w The capacity of a digital system is directly related to η B
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 28
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

w The max possible bandwidth efficiency is


ηB =
C FH
= log 1+
S IK
bps / Hz
max
B 2 N
?Note: Binary systems are more Power Efficient, but less Spectral
Efficient than M-ary systems

m Performance in multipath environment


l Envelope fluctuations and channel non-linearity
m Implementation cost and complexity

? No modulation scheme possesses all the above characteristics; hence,


trade-off are made when selecting modulation/demodulation schemes

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 29


Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m For example, in wireless communications, it is important to select


MODEM based on the following requirements
l High Spectral Efficiency w These factors are affected
l High Power Efficiency by baseband pulse shape
l High Fading Immunity and phase transition
characteristics of the signal
F Practical Modulation Schemes
m FM ⇒ AMPS
m MSK ⇒ CT2
m GMSK ⇒ GSM, DCS 1800, CT3, DECT
m QPSK ⇒ NADC (CDMA) - base transmitter
m OQPSK ⇒ NADC (CDMA) - mobile transmitter
m 4-DQPSK ⇒ NADC (TDMA), PDC (Japan), PHP (Japan)
m MPSK ⇒ (some wireless LANs)
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 30
Comparisons of Digital MODEM
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m For practical application, the choice of digital MODEM depends on:


l bandwidth efficiency
l power efficiency
l error performance
l Complexity of implementation, and Cost
m Probability of symbol error or Probability of bit error is related to:
l Power efficiency
l Bandwidth efficiency (spectral efficiency)
m Usually transmitted power and complexity increases with increase in
bandwidth efficiency
m The linear or nonlinear nature of the channel also affect the choice
of digital MODEM
m Lastly, but not the least, government regulations also affect the choice
of digital MODEM
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 31
Error Performance Comparison
Glenn Research Center University of Akron
Modulation Type PM (coherent) Pb (coherent) Pb (noncoherent)
m Baseband Systems
l Unipolar e j Q
Eb
N0

Qe j 2Eb
l Polar N0

Qe j Eb
l Bipolar 3
2 N0

Qe j
m Bandpass Systems
l BASK (OOK) Qe
Es
N0j
Eb
N0
1 exp
2 e j
− 8AN
2
o

Qe j Qe j
Es Eb
expe− j
Eb
l BFSK No N0 1
2 2 No
Qe j Qe j
2 Es 2 Eb
Requires coherent detection
l BPSK No N0

2 Qe j Qe j
2 Es 2 Eb
l QPSK N0 N0 Requires coherent detection

≈ 2Qe sin j Qe j Eb
l OQPSK 2Es π N0
N0 M Not used in practice
F I LM F I OP
l DPSK
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000
2Q H
2 Eb
KN H
N0 1−Q
2 Eb
N0
Modulation and Demodulation
KQ 1 exp
2 e j Eb
− No
Page 32
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Error Performance of BPSK/QPSK:

Bit Error Rate


Symbol Error Rate

F
P = QG
2 Eb IJ F A2Tb I
b
H No
≈ 2Q
K GH 2 No JK
Pe = 2Q
FG IJ
2 Eb FG E IJ
= 1 erfc b
H No K 2 H NK o

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 33


Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Error Performance of BPSK/QPSK/DPSK/DQPSK/MQAM:

Symbol Error Rate

Bit/Symbol Error Rate


P ( M ) ≅ 2QFH IK
2E s π
sin
E No M
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 34
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Other Performance Comparison


Modulation Required Min Channel B for Max ηB Required Pb = 10-6
Scheme Eb/No ISI free signaling (bits/s/Hz) CNR

BPSK 10.6 dB Rb 1 10.6 dB


QPSK 10.6 dB 0.5Rb 2 13.6 dB
8-PSK 14.0 dB 0.33Rb 3 18.8 dB
16-PSK 18.3 dB 0.33Rb 4 24.3 dB

Pb = 10-5

Modulation Eb/No Bandwidth Efficiency, ηB Immunity to Implementation


Scheme (dB) Nonlinearity Complexity
Nyquist Null-to-Null
BPSK 9.6 dB 1.0 0.5 D (worst) a (simple)
QPSK 9.6 dB 2.0 1.0 C a
OQPSK 9.6 dB 2.0 1.0 B c
MSK 9.6 dB N/A 2/3 A (best) d (complex)
Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 35
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

m Complexity BPSK
QAM, QPSK
OQPSK
MSK
CPFSK - optimal detection
QPR
M-ary PSK
APK

Low Complexity High

DQPSK
DPSK
CPFSK -discriminator detection
FSK - noncoherent detection
OOK - envelope detection

Ref: IEEE Communications Magazine “1988?”

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 36


References
Glenn Research Center University of Akron

1. O. C. Ugweje, Class Handouts on Communications and Signal Processing, Digital


Communications, Wireless Communications, University of Akron, Akron Ohio
http://www.ecgf.uakron.edu/ugweje/web/home.html
2. B. Sklar, Digital Communications – Fundamentals and Application, Prentice-Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.
3. A. Bateman, Digital Communications – Design for the Real World, Addison-
Wesley, 1988
4. J. G. Proakis, Digital Communications, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1994.
5. J. G. Proakis and Masoud Salehi, Communication Systems Engineering, Prentice-
Hall, 1994
6. A. Ambardar, Analog and Digital Signal Processing, PWS Publishing Company,
MA, 1995
7. K. Feher, “Digital Communications: Satellite/Earth Station Engineering,”
Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, 1983

Communication Systems Seminar, Summer 2000 Modulation and Demodulation Page 37

Você também pode gostar