Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
C a n S u r v i v e
you that their erections are as good as they were before the
treatment. In many cases this problem has a profound effect
on the man especially in the relationship with his partner.
Today there are many aids for Erectile Dysfunction and doc- CANCER SUPPORT GROUP
tors who have specialized in treating this problem. From dis-
The Group is run by members of the
cussions within the group one hears how others have
Johannesburg Branch of People Living
learned to cope.
With Cancer in association with the
2. Urinary Problems. In most cases this type of problem Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre
resolves itself within a short period of time. Many men do and is open to any patient or caregiver.
not know that total lack of urinary control can be rectified
by minor surgery. I have come across cases of men wearing Meetings are held on the second
diapers for a number of years because they did not know
that something could be done about the problem.
Saturday of each month at 9h00 at
3. Rising PSA. The result of the PSA test after primary treat- 18 Eton Road, Parktown
ment should be almost zero. When the PSA starts rising this (opposite Wits Donald Gordon
is an indication that not all the cancer has been destroyed or Medical Centre main entrance)
removed and further treatment will be necessary. Here
again, there can be unpleasant side effects that the patient All patients and caregivers are
will have to cope with. First -hand knowledge from others
who have experienced these side effects is invaluable. welcome
3. The Need to Help Others. I have found, in many cases, men
come to support group meetings to help others and are inter- No charge is made
ested in any new developments in the field of treating prostate Enquiries:
cancer.
Our groups work as follows: For the first part of the meeting men
073 975 1452
are encouraged to talk amongst themselves, asking questions and email: jhb@plwc.org.za
passing on information. Newly diagnosed men are especially website: www.plwc.org.za
encouraged to state their situation and ask questions. This first ses-
2
VISION, MARCH / APRIL 2011
2011 Shavathon
Scenes from
Sandton City
3
VISION, MARCH / APRIL 2011
He will be running the London But the best part of the story is not the quality of his glass eye, but
Marathon on the 17th April this what Warren did with it. The first summer he had the eye, he spent
year in support of all people living a lot of time swimming in his pool. While other kids in the neighbor-
with cancer in our country. He hood would toss a penny into the pool to dive after it, what did
has registered with "doit4charity" Warren and his friends dive for? You guessed it – his eye!
a fund generating interface, which How’s THAT for making the best of what life gives you?
we have used before, and is a secure site. The link below will take
you to his site on there where we would like to invite interested ”Dr David Loeb is Assistant Professor of Oncology and Pediatrics, Director,
Musculoskeletal Tumour Programme, and Co-Director, Sarcoma Centre at
people to sponsor Carl for R10 per km ... or more if possible.
Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, USA. You can subscribe to Doctor David’s very
http://www.doit4charity.org.za/fundraising/carl.liebenberg readable blog at
http://doctordavidsblog.blogspot.comReadingRoom/HealthBlogs/Reflecti
ons.htm
4
VISION, MARCH / APRIL 2011
5
VISION, MARCH / APRIL 2011
6
VISION, MARCH / APRIL 2011
7
VISION, MARCH / APRIL 2011
Patient rights in the medical Elsabé Klinck is a B.Iuris, LL.B graduate, who also completed a
degree in Psychology for Applied Professional Contexts and an
Honours Degree in German.
schemes environment Elsabé has been working in the health sector since 2001, gaining
By Elsabé Klinck valuable experience dealing with medical practitioners and phar-
maceutical issues, as well being a key contributor to a prominent
The most basic rights that medical scheme beneficiaries have are health care consulting company.
the prescribed minimum benefits (PMBs). Currently the PMBs
She has extensive knowledge and practical experience in health
include:
care/medical practice issues, medical schemes, medicines, medical
Ë 270 Treatment and Diagnostic Pairs (DTPs), such as so-called devices and patient rights and a background in constitutional/
“treatable cancers”. human rights law.
Ë Treatment for all emergency conditions defined as “the sud-
den and, at the time, unexpected onset of a health condition medicines or devices. However, the application of what is cost-
that requires immediate medical or surgical treatment, where effective should not override what would be clinically appropriate
failure to provide medical or surgical treatment would result for a particular patient. This principle is also entrenched in the law
in serious impairment to bodily functions or serious dysfunc- through a stipulation that, if a patient is, or would not be, treated on
tion of a bodily organ or part, or would place the person’s life a formulary medicine or in terms of a scheme protocol, the patient
in serious jeopardy”. is entitled to alternative treatment without being required to make
Ë 25 chronic conditions, including epilepsy, COPD, hypertension a co-payment.
and diabetes. The law, as does the HPCSA’s ethical rules, protects the choices of
PMBs must, in terms of regulation 8(1) to the Medical patients. Regulation 8(5) states that a patient may decline a clini-
Schemes Act, be funded “in full and without co-payment”. The cally effective product that a scheme will fund in favour of another
correct classification of a diagnosis as part of the PMBs is product, subject to a co-payment. The HPCSA’s Undesirable
therefore imperative. Schemes are, however, entitled to use Business Practices Policy states that “choice should be optimized as
the following mechanisms to manage the costs associated it enhances competition”, but that choice may be restricted, provid-
with funding the PMBs, i.e.: ed that “quality of care is not sacrificed”.
The law places criteria on how medical scheme should apply formu- “Responding to a survey by Skyscape, oncologists said the use of
laries, treatment algorithms or disease limitations to the PMBs. mobile technology helps reduce medical errors and increases the
These limitations should be set on the basis of evidence-based amount of patients they can see during the day,” a Skyscape com-
medicine, i.e. the current best evidence, whereby individual clinical pany statement says.
experience is integrated with the best available external clinical evi- Actually, the results are interesting. About 33 percent of respon-
dence from systematic research. The principles of clinical appropri- dents said that mobile devices “create efficiencies in their weekly
ateness and evidence-based medicine are also found in the HPCSA’s workflow that allows them to increase patient volumes,” accord-
ethical rules (in particular rule 23 on the relationship between the ing to Skyscape.
pharmaceutical industry and medical practitioners) and Undesirable
Business Practices Policy. “Skyscape evolved as kind of an Amazon of medical resources,”
says Brett Miller, president of parent company Physicians
Formularies and protocols may consider cost-effectiveness and Interactive Holdings’ Healthcare Professional Division. It took
affordability. Cost-effectiveness is not defined in the law, but should, well-known medical texts and reference books and repackaged
on a plain language interpretation, go beyond price or cost alone. It them in digital form for PDAs and, later, smartphones.
is interesting that the HPCSA’s new Ethical Rule 23 also refer to
cost-effectiveness as an acceptable way of distinguishing between Miller, who joined the company in February 2010, says it’s fair to
call Skyscape and the Healthcare Professionals Division the
mobile arm of Physicians Interactive for now, but expect that to
change in the future. “It probably will evolve into more than that,”
DISCLAIMER: This newsletter is for information purposes only and Miller says. “We own some proprietary resources to help physi-
is not intended to replace the advice of a medical professional. cians with their workflow,” he explains.
Please consult your doctor for personal medical advice before And mobile is the right way to reach them, according to a survey
taking any action that may impact on your health. of oncologists that Skyscape to release recently.
The views expressed are not necessarily those of People Living With
http://mobihealthnews.com/10468/survey-45-percent-of-oncol-
Cancer or those of the Editor. ogists-say-mobiles-reduce-errors/
8
VISION, MARCH / APRIL 2011
KIDNEY CANCER ROUNDUP ference overall, but, what was interesting, was that the continuous
dosing protocol yielded a smooth line representing QOL issues but
Highlights from ASCO’s the 4/2 protocol's plot was jagged, as expected, where QOL
descended while on the drug and ascended while off of it.
Genitourinary Symposium Dr. Brian Rini of the Cleveland Clinic, in an oral presentation, report-
By Jay Bitkower ed on the results of a Phase II trial of AMG386 in combination with
sorafenib. AMG 386 is an angiopoietin inhibitor. Angiopoietins are
Unfortunately, there were no reports of any major breakthroughs in circulating proteins that promote blood vessel stabilization. It is
therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCCC) this year. No hypothesized that blocking angiopoietin in combination with a
applications have been made to the FDA since October 2009 when VEGFR inhibitor would further depress angiogenesis. AMG 386 had
pazopanib (Votrient) was approved for kidney cancer treatment. The anti-tumour activity in pre-clinical studies. This was a three-arm
next two drugs in the pipeline for approval are two more tyrosine trial in which AMG 386 was given in two different doses in combi-
kinase inhibitors (TKIs), tivozanib and axitinib. Both drugs are now in nation with sorafenib and the third arm, sorafenib, was used as a
Phase III trials comparing their efficacy to that of sorafenib monotherapy. Unfortunately, the combination showed no improve-
(Nexavar), which is the new placebo.It is expected that the results of ment over sorafenib alone in progression-free survival. There was a
these trials will be presented at this summer's ASCO Meeting and difference in response rate for the higher dose arm of AMG 386.
FDA approval will most likely be given in 2012. Toxicity was equivalent for the three arms. This drug is being further
tested in mRCC patients in combination with sunitinib with AMG
There were 100 abstracts presented at the Symposium, with 18% of
386 being given only at the higher dose.
them relating to sunitinib (Sutent). Researchers already know
enough about the response to sunitinib so they are focusing more Dr. David McDermott also reported on an update to the MDX-1106
on the specifics of treatment such as risk of congestive heart failure trial. MDX-1106, an immunotherapy, is an anti-PD-1 agent, where
in patients treated with the drug. The largest category of presenta- PD-1 itself suppresses T-cell activity. In a subset of a larger trial of
tions by far, 25% of the abstracts, dealt with what I would call prog- solid tumours, MDX-1106 is being tested in 16 renal cell patients. As
nostic and predictive factors for outcome of patients with metasta- reported at last year's ASCO Meeting by Dr. Mario Sznol of Yale
tic kidney cancer. Researchers know very little about what factors University in a Phase I trial, MDX-1106 therapy resulted in a
are predictive of survival, perhaps indicating why there is a plethora response rate of 31% with low toxicity. The response rate has since
of studies. improved to 43%.
Axitinib and tivozanib are expected to provide improved results over Finally, Dr. Michael Atkins of Dana Farber, reported on non-clear cell
the other TKIs (Nexavar, Sutent, and Votrient), but they will not be malignancies. Although 90% of mRCC patients have clear cell his-
the home run we are looking for, insofar as they are unlikely to gen- tology, when non-clear cell tumours turn metastatic, they are usu-
erate a complete or durable response. As Dr. David McDermott from ally more aggressive than clear cell and there is little treatment
the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, pointed out in his overview of cur- available. Dr. Atkins said that there is some evidence that collecting
rent therapies, in addition to not producing a complete response, duct tumours respond to chemotherapies that are useful for transi-
these agents must be taken continuously in order to maintain effi- tional cell carcinomas. Tumours with sarcomatoid features, which
cacy, resistance usually develops within a year of initiating treat- can be any histology, have also responded, in a small study, to a
ment, and there may not be room for much more improvement of combination of sunitnib and gemcitabine, and a larger trial conduct-
these VEGF pathway inhibitors. Combinations of these drugs have ed by Dr. Naomi Haas will soon open using these agents. He noted
been tried with little success due to high toxicity. A few of combina- that there aren't many trials for non-clear cell mRCC patients so
tions were reported on at the Symposium. For example, a Phase I data are not readily available analyzing efficacy. In the expanded
trial combining everolimus (Afinitor) and sunitinib reported toxici- access trial for sunitinib, there was an 11% response rate for non-
ties requiring reductions in the recommended dosages of both clear cell patients. In the seminal Phase III trial for temsirolimus,
drugs. Similarly, the combination of sunitinib and bevacizumab non-clear cell patients fared even better than clear cell patients,
(Avastin) did not yield positive results. However, a Phase I trial of however this was a small subset of the trial.
tivozanib and temsirolimus (Torisel) exhibited no dose reducing tox-
Further work is necessary with mTOR inhibitors. Papillary Type I car-
icities, and 29% of patients had a partial response.
cinoma, which may be caused by a mutation or up-regulation of
Dr. McDermott also said that new evidence suggests that taking a the c-Met gene, has shown some response to c-Met inhibitors.
break in therapy may not reduce eventual effectiveness of the tar- There is currently a trial of GSK089 (foretinib), a dual c-Met and
geted therapies (this if course depends on the aggressiveness of the VEGFR2 inhibitor in papillary patients.
disease), and re-challenging' patients with the same drug has shown
The trial is stratified by those having c-Met mutation or up-regula-
benefit. However, he calls for new agents and novel trial design. Dr.
tion and those with no activity of c-Met. A majority of patients had
McDermott promoted immunotherapy both as a combination with
tumour shrinkage with those having mutations or up-regulation
targeted therapies and as monotherapies - see below for more on
having more frequent shrinkage.
that. For example, a Phase III trial is underway combining AGS-003,
a dendritic cell therapy, with sunitinib. For chromophobe tumours, there is an up-regulation of the mTOR
pathway implying that an mTOR inhibitor might be effective.
Dr. Robert Motzer of MSKCC reported on a Phase II trial comparing
Mostly what's needed are more clinical trials for non-clear cell
sunitinib (Sutent) on a 4 week on/2 week off, 50 mg dosing sched-
patients.
ule versus continuous 37.5 mg dosing. There was no statistically sig-
nificant difference between the two in terms of efficacy or adverse Jay Bitkower, a seven year survivor of kidney cancer, is
events, however, there was a slight trend favoring the 4/2 version in president of the Action to Cure Kidney Cancer (ackc.org)
terms of efficacy. They evaluated quality of life (QOL), as reported whose primary mission is to specifically advocate for kidney
by the patients, and a plot overlaying the two results showed no dif- cancer research.
9