Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
We can naturally extend planar polar co-ordinates into three dimensions using a further } co-ordinate. In this case they are called In the same way that latitude and longitude are used to determine a position on the planet, we can similarly use two angles and
cylindrical polar co-ordinates. The relationships between u> !> } and {> |> } are given by ! to determine position on concentric spheres distance u from the origin. These are called spherical polar co-ordinates.
Here u is simply the distance of a point S from the origin R. The angle is the angle RS makes with the vertical }-axis and takes
values in the range @2 6 6 @2. Finally, if T is the projection of S vertically into the {|-plane then ! is the angle RT makes
{ = u cos !> | = u sin !> }=} with the positive {-axis. The relationships between {> |> } and u> !> are given by
p |
u= {2 + | 2 > tan ! = > } = }=
{ and
p
p | {2 + | 2
Note that u = const. defines a cylinder, ! = const. defines a vertical plane through the origin and } = const. defines a horizontal u= {2 + | 2 + } 2 > tan ! = > tan = =
{ }
plane.
Functions of more than one variable are common throughout mathematics. The motivating example for partial derivatives at the start
of the last chapter involved a temperature W which depended on three spatial co-ordinates {> |> } and one temporal co-ordinate w.plane
co-ordinate systems. Such functions are often associated with maps as well. For example, we might have a physical map denoting the
height } above a point ({> |) = The map might also include contours which are the curves } = f of constant height. Here } is a scalar
function of two variables.
Or the map might be a meteorlogical map denoting the wind speed and direction (at a fixed height) above a point ({> |) = Below is a
wind-direction field associated with a hurricane – with each point ({> |) is associated a vector u ({> |). That is, u is a vector-valued
function of two variables.
Solution. As { = u cos and | = u sin then we can write The rule arises when we wish to calculate the derivative of the composition of two functions i (x ({)) with respect to {.
which is itself a function of { and |. We might then wish to calculate its partial derivatives
CI CI
and =
C{ C|
Remark 21 Note that i and j are dierent functions, even though } = i ({> |) = j (u> ) = It is not the case that } = i (u> ) > rather
} is given by a dierent rule in terms of u and . The rule The chain rule states that
} = i (u> ) = 10 (u 1)2 + 2 CI
=
Ci Cx Ci Cy
+ >
C{ Cx C{ Cy C{
CI Ci Cx Ci Cy
is clearly not the right one! = + =
C| Cx C| Cy C|
Before going on to prove the chain rule, here is an example approached two dierent ways.
Example 22 Let Theorem 23 (Chain Rule) Let I (w) = i (x (w) > y (w)) with x and y dierentiable and i being continuously dierentiable in each
i (x> y) = (x y) sin x + hy > x ({> |) = {2 + |> y ({) = | 2{> variable. Then
gI Ci gx Ci gy
= +
and let I ({> |) = i (x ({> |) > y ({> |)) = Calculate CI@C{ and CI@C| by (i) direct calculation, (ii) the chain rule. gw Cx gw Cy gw
Proof. (Not examinable) If we change w to w + w> then let x and y be the corresponding changes in x and y= Then
μ ¶ μ ¶
dx dy
Solution. (i) We have that x = + %1 w> and y = + %2 w>
¡ ¢ ¡ ¢ dw dw
I ({> |) = {2 + 2{ sin {2 + | + exp (| 2{) =
where %1 > %2 $ 0 as w $ 0= Now
Hence I = i (x + x> y + y) i (x> y)
CI ¡ ¢ ¡ ¢ ¡ ¢ = [i (x + x> y + y) i (x> y + y)] + [i (x> y + y) i (x> y)]
= (2{ + 2) sin {2 + | + 2{ {2 + 2{ cos {2 + | 2 exp (| 2{) ;
C{ By the Mean-value Theorem (Hilary term Analysis) we have
CI ¡ 2 ¢ ¡ ¢
= { + 2{ cos {2 + | + exp (| 2{) = Ci
C| i (x + x> y + y) i (x> y + y) = x (x + 1 x> y + y) >
Cx
Ci
(ii) Using the chain rule we have i (x> y + y) i (x> y) = y (x> y + 2 y) >
Cy
for some 1 > 2 5 (0> 1). By the continuity of ix and iy then we have
CI Ci Cx Ci Cy μ ¶
= + Ci Ci
C{ Cx C{ Cy C{ x (x + 1 x> y + y) = x (x> y) + 1
= (sin x + (x y) cos x) 2{ + ( sin x + hy ) (2) Cx Cx
¡ ¢ ¡ ¢ ¡ ¢ μ ¶
= (2{ + 2) sin {2 + | + 2{ {2 + 2{ cos {2 + | 2 exp (| 2{) > Ci Ci
y (x> y + 2 y) = y (x> y) + 2
Cy Cy
and where 1 > 2 $ 0 as x> y $ 0=
So, putting this all together
CI Ci Cx Ci Cy μ ¶ μ ¶
= + I x Ci y Ci
C| Cx C| Cy C| = (x> y) + 1 + (x> y) + 2
= (sin x + (x y) cos x) (1) + ( sin x + hy ) (1) w w Cx w Cy
¡ ¢ ¡ ¢ μ ¶μ ¶ μ ¶μ ¶
= {2 + 2{ cos {2 + | + exp (| 2{) = dx Ci dy Ci
= + %1 (x> y) + 1 + + %2 (x> y) + 2 =
dw Cx dw Cy
Letting w $ 0 we get the required result.
˙ ˙ and verify by
Example 28 A particle S moves around on the unit sphere u = 1= Find S ’s velocity v (w) = gr@gw in terms of !> > !> Theorem 29 (The Second Order Chain Rule)
direct calculation that v • r = 0=
Let I ({> |) = i (x ({> |) > y ({> |)) = Then
So
³ ´
v·r = cos cos ! ˙ sin sin ! !˙ sin cos !
³ ´
+ cos sin ! ˙ + sin cos ! !˙ sin sin ! Proof.
³ ´
+ sin = ˙ cos
¡ ¢
= ˙ cos cos2 ! sin + cos sin2 ! sin cos sin
¡ ¢ I{{ = (ix x{ + iy y{ ){
˙ 2 2
+! sin sin ! cos ! + sin sin ! cos !
= 0 = (ix ){ x{ + (iy ){ y{ + ix x{{ + iy y{{
= (ixx x{ + ixy y{ ) x{ + (iyx x{ + iyy y{ ) y{ + ix x{{ + iy y{{
= ix x{{ + iy y{{ + ixx (x{ )2 + 2ixy y{ x{ + iyy (y{ )2
This is true for any movement on the sphere. We can prove this much more easily by dierentiating the vector identity r • r = 1
to get 2v • r = 0=
To find the particle’s acceleration by means of a chain rule we would need the next theorem. and the other results follow similarly.
x2 y2
{= > | = xy= Solution. When we write Laplace’s equation in terms of planar polar co-ordinates it becomes
2