Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
2006
Published: Monday, Jan 17, 2011, 2:01 IST
Aseemanand has claimed that Hindu terror groups were behind the 2006 Malegaon
blast as well.
This claim has hit the ATS and its credibility hard because nine people were arrested
(allegedly SIMI activists) and a 2,000-page charge sheet filed against them.
DNA highlights a few of the cases investigated by the ATS and its theories which were
later proved wrong. The state government launched the agency in 2004 with much
fanfare.
Seven bombs ripped through the compartments of local trains in the western suburbs,
killing 187 people and injuring several others on July 7, 2006.
A few weeks after the blasts, ATS claimed to have cracked the case when they arrested
13 LeT and Simi activists. But in 2009, the Mumbai crime branch claimed that Saddiq
Shaikh, a member of Indian Mujahideen (IM), had claimed responsibility for the blasts
and those arrested by the ATS had no role in the blasts.
The ATS took Saddiq in its custody and gave an application in the court saying he had
claimed that his group was not involved in the blasts.
In 2008, the security agencies were left baffled when minutes before the blast in
Ahmedabad, an anonymous email from the IM was sent to various media houses
claiming responsibility of the blasts.
The ATS was swift to trace the IP address and learnt that it belonged to a US national,
Kenneth Haywood, staying in Navi Mumbai.
Haywood was questioned countless times by the ATS to unravel the mystery behind
the terror emails, but their efforts proved futile.
The ATS officials went on record saying that the emails were sent by Simi activist
Abdus Subhan Qureshi alias Tauqeer, a Mira Road resident, and began a massive
manhunt to trace him.
Their theory, however, backfired when a couple of months later the Mumbai crime
branch busted the media cell of the IM and arrested Mansoor Peerbhoy, who claimed
that he was the one who had sent the terror emails.
The police had claimed that the two were planning to leave for Pakistan and were in
touch with a man in Pakistan. This man was first identified as uncle and then as Bashir
Khan, a close aide of 1993 serial blast prime accused, Tiger Memon.
The ATS had found no maps or any other details except phone calls to Pakistan that
were apparently made by the two, as evidence.
The ATS came under fire from the Centre for jumping the gun and giving out details to
the media without having sufficient proof.
Immediately after the arrest, the Union home ministry congratulated the ATS for
arresting the mastermind and solving the case.
But it turned out that Samad had wrongly been arrested. The ATS, for a change, had
not claimed that Samad was the mastermind. In the same case, the ATS in September
2010 arrested Himayat Baig, claiming he was the planter and mastermind.
But a few weeks later, RG Kadam, ATS DIG, made a shocking revelation claiming that
Baig was not the mastermind in the case. ATS officials later went on to salvage the
situation by saying that Kadam had been misquoted. Kadam was later transferred out
of the ATS.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to humanrights-movement@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to humanrights-
movement+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-
movement?hl=en.
--