RAMPAGE OF ELEPHANTS

Rampage of Elephants

Memes & Mind

The best kind of learning is the one you get from direct experience and direct apprehension,
instead of reading a book based on secondary [or tertiary or whatever] source interpolations or
the crap on the internet. I feel sorry for anyone who thinks they are smart because they have
read books or the internet, because nothing they know and have in their heads actually comes
from a primary or direct source.

Perception is “reality” and our Beliefs molds and influences our perception or view. In this
sense, what thoughts and beliefs we house in our heads becomes the building block of our
subjective apprehension of reality. So, in this way, those people who accumulate knowledge
from books and the internet acquire memes from other random people, and these memes of
other people end up fabricating these people’s weltanschauung and subjective reality. It can
be said that such people live in a world of other people’s making.

By “subjective reality” I mean it in a Buddhist way, and not in an Occidental psychological or

philosophical way. Reality in Buddhism doesn’t exist as a single “thing,” as in it exists in two
states that can never come together. The first state of reality is the field of coherent
information, which may be considered “The Objective Universe.” This can be likened to the
field of coherent information on a computer hard drive.

The Mind [Chitta] is the Operating System which touches this field of information, and
translates it into things on the screen of conscious awareness. What we each become
consciously aware of is thus a product of information being drawn in by our several senses
translated into electrical impulses brought to various centers in the brain and only then are we
consciously aware of our surroundings, sounds, sights, and so on. Thus what we “see” or
assume to be a world we observe with our eyes is not actually “out there” in any way. What
we see “out there” is all the second state of reality: processed information.

The two forms of reality never touches. The conscious Mind in essence – because it is totally
dependent on its five senses – never actually directly touches [apprehends] the first state of
reality. In a more Occidental term, we can say that the objective world and the subjective
world never touches, and that the conscious mind of a person can only be aware of what has
been captured in it’s own brain. In other words, the reality that we consciously know, is not
the Original Reality, but a processed one; and that we can not genuinely grasp or consciously
know the Original via our senses or everyday conscious mind, because our conscious
awareness is itself only a product of the aggregation of these same senses which is like a wall
between our conscious awareness and the Original Reality.

One of my bhikkhu grandpas explains Citta [mind/consciousness] as a Blind but intelligent

king who is completely dependent on 5 viziers that aren’t very smart and that don’t always
tell the truth. This Blind king must struggle to learn to use his inner sense of reason and
intuition to discern what his idiot viziers gives to him or his kingdom falls. In other words,
what you know, and observe cannot be accepted at face value. You must learn to use your
inner sense of Reason and Intuition to measure everything that you become consciously aware
of.

This is where language, thought, beliefs, and memes becomes such an influential factor,
because these things influences the Mind, and the Mind is the Operating System which
impregnates the brain with information that is interpreted by Consciousness as “reality.” Thus
what we think, what beliefs we have in our heads, literally forms our world we experience.

Give a person the meme: <<Heaven Exists>> and if this person believes, his reality has a
heaven in it. Give a person the meme: <<We Came From Apes>> and if the person believes,
their reality becomes the kind where humans evolve from primates. In both of these brief
examples, nothing about the First State of Reality has altered or changed. What happened is
that an extra component [the memes] has been introduced which contaminates information by
acting like a virus that injects its “genetic information” into the stream of information the
Mind is processing, thereby contaminating the end resulting image [Second State of Reality].
In this context, Reality in Buddhism is not an illusion, at least not the First State. What is an
illusion or delusion is the Second State, especially for a person who has no mastery of their
own Mind.

In another illustration my bhikkhu grandpa told me is that the Mind is like 10 water buffaloes.
If you give the 10 water buffaloes the freedom do as they wish and to go wherever they
please, you get no work done on your field. You must learn to control all 10 water buffaloes
to work the fields to produce yields. Most people in the West believe that freedom of thought
is great; they would have it no other way. The idea that one’s Mind is absolutely free to
wonder and think and believe as it pleases is wonderful. Along with this, it is also believed
that you should be completely free to emotionally feel as you please. And then most Minds
are not only free to believe and feel as they please, but they are at liberty to visualize and
image whatever pictures and images that so entertains them. This is the state of Mind in which
the 10 water buffaloes are just wandering about incoherently.

So what you say. Who cares right? I care, and I would like my own descendants and
associates to care for their own benefit and self-perfection. Because if you were to sincerely
study a group of people successful in life who have the money, free time, life style of their
dreams with a group of people who struggle with life whose life consists of drifting from
servile job to job until retirement: you will begin to learn that the single most important
difference between these two groups is one of Mental Ethos. I was fortunate to have
personally known both rich and poor friends and I took the time to ask them questions to
probe deeper into their mental habits and mental culture, and there is a great big difference.
Can you guess which of the two groups has a very well disciplined Mind?

It is the same factor and differences between a person who is wise or enlightened and a person
who is ignorant. When the mind incoherently wonders and is untamed, it is like a flashlight
radiating photons randomly in every direction: there is no force or potency. When the Mind is
tamed and intelligently controlled, it is like a laser, where those same photons are brought into
a coherent beam which generates both force and potency: the potency or Potential/Power to
influence and affect one’s causal environment. The Power to extract insight from Nature and
from direct experience of Life, thus becoming Self-Enlightened as opposed to being told how
to think and how to believe by a dead book written by others who are most often dead
themselves.

The field or causal environment is the world of experience. An untamed Mind, no matter how
smart it may be, has very little if any command or control of what it experiences in life. As yet
another illustration my bhikkhu grandpa told me about Mind: There are two big elephants
pulling a helpless villager into the water. The villager struggles and screams for help because
he doesn’t want to drown, but the elephants – beings much bigger then the man – pulls him
into the water and he suffers [dukkha]. The two elephants are “habit of action” and “habit of
mind,” or in other words: Inner and Outer Ethos. The helpless villager is Chitta
[Consciousness/You]. Such habits [ethos] of action and Mind [way of thinking, thought-
process] manifests into what we experience and drags our conscious mind along. Untamed,
unskilled, Ethos of action and Mind, born from ignorance and delusion, generates an
experiential world of suffering. Habits are hard to break. And most often, we don’t realize
anything is wrong until such habits break us first.

So to me, something like memes [beliefs, ideas, thoughts, and such] are very important.
Because these things, the ethos that arises from them, can not only affect my perception of
things, but can drag me into a world of delusion and suffering.

Direct Experience

I am the kind of person that cannot allow myself to accept or believe in anything which I have
not somehow experienced directly. Especially if they are thoughts and beliefs originating
from the written words of other people. One who struggles to Tame the Mind must cultivate
its content very carefully. What I believe, mostly arises from the experience in life I have
directly touched or that have directly affected me. What I know comes from three main
sources: 1) my own direct experiences; 2) my own understandings of nature; & 3) living
people who have also accumulated wisdom in the same direct manner. I only use books as
footnotes, and references.

There are several names and terms for learning and growing or evolving as a person by direct
experience of life, and direct apprehension of Nature in different Cultures and Traditions.
David Myatt aptly describes one such term and method:

“The Greek term πάθει μάθος (pathei-mathos) derives from The Agamemnon of Aeschylus
(written c. 458 BCE), and can be interpreted, or translated, as meaning learning from
adversary, or wisdom arises from (personal) suffering; or personal experience is the genesis
of true learning.
“However, this expression should be understood in context, for what Aeschylus writes is that
the Immortal, Zeus, guiding mortals to reason, has provided we mortals with a new law,
which law replaces previous ones, and this new law – this new guidance laid down for
mortals – is pathei-mathos.

“Thus, for we human beings, pathei-mathos possesses a numinous authority – that is, the
wisdom, the understanding, that arises from one’s own personal experience, from formative
experiences that involve some hardship, some grief, some personal suffering, is more valuable
than any doctrine, than any religious faith, than any impersonal words one might read in
some book.

[...]

“The essential difference between these two ways is that what we may call the way of pathei-
mathos is the personal way of direct experience, while the religious way is the way of
abstractions. For the way of pathei-mathos, knowledge – and thus learning, based on such
knowledge – is personal, direct, acquired in the immediacy of a living, a lived-through,
moment of one’s own mortal life. For the religious way, knowledge – and thus learning, based
on such knowledge – can be and has been contained in something otherthan- ourselves which
we have to or which we can learn from: something impersonal, some abstraction, such as a
book, a dogma, a creed, some Institution, some teacher or master.” – From Aeschylus To The
Numinous Way; David Myatt

Although the term “Pathei-Mathos” is new to me, the essence of the term is something I had
long lived by, had been taught, and which had been around in my own culture for about a
thousand years. Vibhajjavada is the term I am familiar with which is a concept similar [NOT
the same thing] in Essence as Pathei-Mathos. It should be emphisized that each word
describes it’s own unique concept, methodology, and approach. About ~75% of what I know
in my head comes from reflecting and studying my own life experiences, my elders, and from
the Forest Doctrine [studying and meditating on Nature]. Because of this, I have a hard time
referencing sources when I do share insight: it’s not like I can refer people to my grandpa or
some personal experience I may have had when I was 10.

People who are used to accumulation of information from dead books and the internet seem to
consider information and insight that lacks verifiable references to be invalid. Many of these
people never really consider that their information may not even be Primary Source
Information, or that it is lifeless knowledge gained from reading a dead book. And that the
Original Source of such book knowledge was somebody’s own direct observation and direct
experiences. I think some doctor once said: “You can’t genuinely understand Life from
studying a dead body.”

Pathei-Mathos and Living Culture versus book based knowledge is like cooking. To illustrate:
I learned how to make spaghetti from Kayla who is a living person. She learned how to make
spaghetti from her mother who is a living person. And her mother learned it directly from her
mother who is Italian, and so on. So we see that the “style” or methodology of making
spaghetti I got from Kayla came from a Living Tradition. This living tradition has had a long
time of application, trial, test, research & development to refine itself and evolve its own
unique methods, style, and flavour. The uniqueness of putting a few “drops” of olive oil, a
“pinch” of salt, a “tip” of fresh basil, and a two “thumb’s length” of rosemary into a pot of
water and using sun dried tomatoes with the sauce and so on. So this living tradition which I
got has had time to work out its bugs, to figure out what makes the spaghetti taste better and
stuff. There was never anything Dogmatic about the methods I was taught from Kayla.

But let’s say that I wanted to share this family recipe with others. So I write a cook book and I
try to explain in words what I was taught. This is when what was once a living culture is
captured into dead words, like something living and evolving has been turned into stone. This
is when problems come into the picture. Let’s say a group of friends on the other side of the
world China buys my book and studies how to make Kayla’s spaghetti. This Chinese group –
because they have no real connection to a living culture – follows the book Dogmatically. If
the book says “half a pot of water,” or a few “drops,” or a “pinch” debates and arguments may
arise as to what exactly a drop or a pinch is, or how long “two thumb’s length” of rosemary is
exactly. The belief may arise – from ignorance – that if they do not follow the book exactly,
that they are not cooking real Italian Spaghetti. They forget – or are not aware – that such
recipes and traditions, have literally had hundreds of years of freedom to evolve, adapt,
change, and mutate.

Wisdom versus book based knowledge is the same way. I’ll use Buddhism as an example
because its something I have direct experience with. I do have certain major contentions with
Buddhism spreading in the West and being adopted by Westerners. I think it is wonderful, but
I also think most in general apprehend Buddhism in the wrong way.

I got my “Buddhism” from my mom and elders in my family. I have never read a “holy book”
on Buddhism, nor have I ever heard anyone recite “Buddhist scriptures” to me. I am taught by
my elders as I go along in life. My mothers [I have two] teach me what I need to know
according to my level of understanding and experience in life. They learned about it in the
same way: from living people, from monks and lay elders: Sangha. That Sangha/Community
is a nexus and nexion through which a living culture passes naturally from one generation to
the next.

That Sangha is like a snake which sheds its old skin over time. It regenerates itself with each
new generation as the old one dies. It transcends Time. And over the hundreds and thousands
of years of that Sangha’s living existence, it’s collective direct experiences and application of
Buddhism, it has had Time to work out the “bugs” in Buddhism. To figure out how things
about Buddhism best work in life. Its own experiences, application, and insights borne from
such trial of application supersedes written words: the Tipitakas are only guide lines which
are not infallible and must be testes and tried in life. So what I have gotten from my family,
living culture, and community as Buddhism, may and does differ from what was written circa
2500 years ago in books.

But – generally speaking – when a Westerner becomes a Buddhist, it happened like a

Christian conversion or a college course. They read a book by the Dalai Lama, or research
online, or read the Tipitakas, like what they read, and choose to identify their ego/self as a
“Buddhist” meaning one who follows what has been read and written. These people assume
that being Buddhist means accepting what Monks and Dalai Lamas have written or that being
Buddhist means behaving and doing what other Buddhists do. When they do something or
experience something which deviates from what they have read, this deviation shakes up their
superficial or ego-identification as a Buddhist. In their sincerity they may be devoted to
Buddha, and try faithfully to follow Dhamma; but the general Occidental Buddhism is
completely devoid of the third Jewel: Sangha; which cuts them off from living wisdom, a
means to learn from a living culture, and a means to apply and practice Buddhism. As
Buddhism is a social and communitarian way of life where one helps relieve the suffering and
wants of those around you: Community/Order/Fellowship of Bhikkhus, Bhikkhunis,
Upasakas, and Upasikas which is Sangha. In Buddhist Cultures, the Sangha is most often
made up of ones own kinfolk, relatives, and friends.

One example of this phenomenon is the first Precept of Buddhism: “I will refrain from
killing.” A living culture which has had a thousand years to test and try this precept in the real
world understands the meaning of this precept and knows why this precept exists, and
understands what Context and Condition such a precept is applied. On the other hand, people
who depend on the written word base their beliefs NOT on direct experience, but on
interpretation of words become gripped with confusion due to misinterpretations,
misunderstandings, born from a lack of application of vibhajjavada, praxis, and life
experience. So some such Buddhists may interpret this precept to mean that as a Buddhist one
should be vegetarian as to not harm and kill animals. Some may interpret this precept to mean
that as an ego which superficially identified itself with Buddhism, that a Buddhist cannot join
the military.

They fail to realize that in the real world – the world beyond dead letters, written words,
theoretical conceptualization and intellectualization – the Buddha ate meat and died eating
meat [he ate meat which was poisoned]; that the Buddha never condemned or suggested that
those kings and warriors who came to him to give up their capital punishment of criminals
and their wars to live like pacifist beggars; that living Theravada Cultures such as Thailand,
Laos, Burma, Cambodia, and Sri Lanka have armies, raise farm animals, eat meat, kill, and
engage in wars; yet they are the most devout Buddhist Cultures; and that Shaolin Monks
invented, teach, and use many forms of lethal martial arts.

The difference is Time and Direct Experience versus written words and the interpretation of
those words. Both give birth to Belief Patterns. One set of Beliefs is tied and bond to Life,
whereas the other is very removed from Life. If Life is the ultimate Primary Source, then
books are merely secondary sources of information: merely someone’s opinions, convictions,
and interpretation of Life. What is wrong with you that you can’t put your own self in the
middle of feral Life and from your own direct experiences and direct apprehension, form your
own opinions, convictions, and interpretations? Why have many of us become dependent on
others to tell us what reality is, what to believe and disbelieve, what is right and wrong, true
and false?

I do believe that each Initiate of the Order of Nine Angles should strive to understand the
difference between these two forms of belief patterns, and to strive to cultivate insight,
wisdom, and knowledge from application and trial of theories and principles, praxis, and
Pathei-Mathos. Each of us Dreccians should learn to understand that what has been written
are just words: only the words of one man, one girl, or one fellow mortal struggling to
understand the mysterious reality we all exist in. These many words written in the ONA
should only be used as guides, like a crudely drawn map of a barely explored landscape. It is
what we each experience and learn while we travel this unexplored landscape that is our
genuine knowledge and wisdom. Road maps can be wrong. My friends and I were up in Big
Bear this one time and we were trying to find the freeway so we were following the GPS lady.
She told us to turn onto some small steep dirt road which we assumed would take us to the
freeway: our car almost slid into the lake below.
I also believe that the ONA should strive to make itself into a new living tradition wherein we
each share our Life borne insights, knowledge, and wisdom with each other, and pass such
things down to our progeny. We can see this already happening. As of now, the ONA has
become an expressive culture of living people sharing their insights borne from their personal
quest and pathei-mathos. Anton Long began it and continued to share his insights for 40
years. During which time many others came and went sharing and teaching what they know. I
am just one, of many now, and I hope many will continue this way and tradition of living
Initiates sharing insights based on their own personal quest and direct experiences for our own
common and collective growth, evolution, and progression.

Continuing something old and ancient as a modern belief pattern is something I do not agree
with. As insightful as I personally find Buddhism to be, I cannot accept it as my Software
because it does not address my real world needs, concerns, current world views, and visions
for a future. If we hold onto the past or things of the past we anchor ourselve and this has an
affect on our Potential to actualize all that we are worth and capable of striving for. I do
believe that the only way to influence and inspire each new generation to reach for the next
stage in human evolution is to inspire us and them with new ideas, new memes, and new
biological software that inspires us and them to reach for the stars.

Beliefs

Our Beliefs shapes our world and wyrdfully gives rise to our experiences in Life. Generally
speaking, I classify Beliefs into 3 different “species” or categories: 1) Personal; 2)
Consequential; and 3) Trivial. Each species of belief patterns or memes is measured by its
causal effectiveness or potency: meaning if and what they can/cannot manifest.

Personal Memes are ideas and belief patterns that actually causally generates something
measurable and observable in your Personal life. For example the belief that I am ugly or fat
does have a direct material, mental, emotional, and physical influence and effect on me.
Practical belief patterns also fall into this category. Such as the practical belief that eating
healthy, working out, and staying fit is good for me. Practical and pragmatic belief patterns
like if I go to school and work hard I will get a good paying job, and that if I learn to save
money in a savings, stocks, 401K’s, and Bonds now, that when I retire I will live very well
off. These are practical and pragmatic belief patterns which have a very real affect on life that
we can each personally observe and experience.

Consequential Memes are a step further from personal apprehension and direct experience.
Mythos of certain types may be such a Belief Pattern. Such as the Mythos of the Vedas in
consequentially gives rise to a common living culture and social group identity to an ordering
of people [Hindus]. Like the Mythos of the Bible, Torah, or Qur’an consequentially gives rise
to cultures, common practices, collective identity, and even civilizations. But belief patterns
such like “nature was meant to be conquered” is also consequential because such belief
patterns over time gives rise to deforestation, extinction of species, disharmony with nature,
growing climate changes and so on. Consequential Memes are observable and measurable
over long periods of time. The longer the time frame, the more pronounced it’s causal effects.
Thus, from the study of such consequential belief patterns in context to Time, we learn to
understand and see with our own eyes that our Beliefs are not just intangible thoughts that
stay in our minds. They have very real influences on people and real effects on the world.
Trivial Memes are useless beliefs that really do nothing personally or consequentially. If life
were a house, Personal Belief Patterns are things like the stove, fridge, the shower, the toilet,
and washing machine. Consequential Beliefs are like the furniture, the X-Box, the Wii, and so
on. Trivial Beliefs are like the wall paper, décor, the paintings, the giant vase, and drapery. In
real life Trivial beliefs are things like the idea of a finite or infinite or curved universe. It
really doesn’t matter whether you believe or disbelieve in such ideas or not because either
way, it does and changes nothing. So you believe in the big bang: then what? So you think
space is curved and wormholes can take you back into time: and then what? The belief that
God is a trinity is Trivial: big whoop, why trinity, how about a quintinity instead.

Nothing spectacular happens anywhere whether I believe in such trivial memes or not. The
belief in Lovecraftian god creatures from some Lovecraftian otherworldly realm is Trivial.
How does believing or disbelieving in such a meme relate to my personal needs in life, my
relationships with people in life, what I want of life, and where I want to go in life, and what I
want the world to be like? The idea of killing millions of people not like you is sinister, is
pointless: how about a billion or a trillion? It’s sinister to enslave the human race: why just
human mundanes; lets enslave aliens from other planets too and all abled bodied life forms
from other galaxies too? Taking over the world is sinister: why stop at the world; lets be
supersinister and take over every multiverse system too while we’re make believing.

We as people tend to keep Personal Memes or practical memes closer to us because these
types of memes tend to stay relevant to us longer: relevant to our personal and direct life,
needs, and experiences. Memes such that helps us get better jobs, be better people, make more
money and friends, get more out life, those that help us develop better relationships with
others, that teaches us to get material needs and wants out of life stay relevant to us over long
periods of time. Trivial beliefs are changed, adopted, and thrown away easily with a change in
mind. This understanding of the enduring nature or easy trashability of memes is important
for a Memeplex or Institution which desires to exist for a long time and which desires to
remain relevant to successive generations of people into the future.

If you base your entire memplex on useless trival ideas/memes, your institution will get a high
turn over rate: meaning that people will come and go often. High turn over rate in the business
arena is bad because your business lacks the ability to generate or develop a dependable
market and loyal consumer base. A corporation and/or product that does not have a
dependable market and loyal consumer base will not sell stocks and is thus financially broke
and worthless. A memeplex that does not have a dependable market and loyal consumer
fanbase is broke in social capital and worthless. If a memeplex is bankrupt in social capital
and worthless, then it does have the means or potency of influence. This understanding is
simple “social mathematics,” and the backbone of politics, political and sectarian power and
influence. You need power and influence if change in people, society, and civilization is
desired. A memeplex with a lot of useless trivial memes does not last and is impotent as far as
social engineering is concerned. Unless you anchor your trivial memes to consequential
memes such as a reward and punishment: heaven, hell, paradise, reincarnation, etc. These
beliefs are “consequential” because they do alter our behaviour and ethos of mind, which
wyrdfully translates over time into causal results.

The most enduring memes are Personal Memes in the form of Cultural Memes. By Cultural
Memes, I mean to say an indigenous people’s Way of Life, and their Traditions. Such memes
even transcends humanity. This species of memes can even be seen in Chimpanzee culture.
For example the meme of sticking a thin twig down a termite mound to fish for termites, or
the use of a rock to crack open nuts. These are practical memes that over time becomes
Culture which is past down from one living entity to another. Thus, such a culture is, in every
sense of the phrase, a Living Tradition. This example of chimpanzee cultural memes works
well also because it is a knowing and wisdom each chimp apprehends which is not book
based or dogmatic which yields very measurable and practical results that each chimp can
personally see and experience.

The same goes for human culture. Personal Memes like indigenous dress codes, codes of
behaviour such as manners and paying respect to one’s elders, cultural dances and art, rites of
passage, methods of farming and styles of architecture, dialect of language. All these memes
come together to form a Memeplex that out lives even religion and civilization. How many
civilizations and religious sects have come and gone in places like Europe, India, and China?
Yet despite the rise and fall of political and religious regimes and movements, the peoples of
these lands have remained culturally intact over the countless millennia. Of course – as
anything living – such cultural memplexes have evolved and adapted over time to what
changes and challenges such living cultures meets and faces. Without evolution and
progression, all things, even memeplexes die.

What will this ONA become in the years ahead? What kind of ideas/memes will it fill itself up
with? Trivial ideas and useless beliefs? With consequential memes that generates negative
results in time? Or will it be and become something meaningful and practical. A living culture
and tradition that endures the ravage of Time?

Software

Usually when we find new computer software we install it and give it a try to figure out if we
like the program or not. We usually [unless you’re a supernerd] don’t actually read the
software coding and judge the program on what coding we read. So for the typical binary-
code illiterate person like myself, we install the software and if it does things we like we keep
it. But if it messes our computer up, we quickly delete the program and throw it away. If we
take so much care to do this with our computers, than why not with our own Minds?

Generally we ignorantly adopt a belief because it sounds good to us, or because we have been
convinced by others to adopt a belief. Yet we never pay any attention to what such biological
or neurological software does to us, what such software turns us into, what they make us do,
how they make us see the world, and most importantly: the causal End Results such beliefs
bares. Sometimes we can’t even see or get ourselves to understand that our beliefs we have
installed into our Minds has very negative and destructive results, consequences, and effects
on our person and in our lives.

We continue to judge a meme or memeplex based on some silly notion of whether they are
believable or not. Whether they are factual or “fake.” Whether they are true or not. When such
factors have very little relevance to the power and potential of memes to influence, effect, and
manifest experiential End Results. It does not matter if a belief pattern is false or true,
believable or unbelievable. What matters is what each meme/belief pattern does and the fruits
such beliefs bares. Mythos does not always have to be factually true, if it generates a stronger
tribal identity and bond between tribal members of an indigenous folk, then it has produced a
positive and productive yield.
The belief that drug and alcohol are bad is debatable, but agreeing with or disagreeing,
debating and arguing with it is not the issue. However you see it, if you abuse drugs and
alcohol, it will fuck your life up in many ways, which is a negative and destructive yield.
Whether or not Communism is true or fake or whatever is irrelevant. What truly matters is its
causal End Result. What conditions of life and what kinds of people has Communism
manufactured? Whether Capitalism is good or bad is irrelevant. What genuinely matters is the
End Results such a memetic software engineers. What is the condition of life and people
Capitalism engineers and creates? Is that condition what you have always dreamed of living?
You can’t dream or envision anything better? Is a consumer trained to work and buy to
support wealthy and powerful oligarchies the type of human being you have always wanted to
be? You can’t dream or envision of a better type of human being?

Memeplexes such as religion is the same way. It’s not a case of whether a religion is true or
fake, or if a religion is rational or irrational. What we must each learn to observe, assess, and
evaluate is what kinds of people these religious software manufactures. Think of religions as
being factories that manufactures self-replicating products. The Question is what KIND of
product are these software producing and putting into the world. Over Time the generic
product of a memeplex can be seen.

Ask yourself what kinds of people the memeples of LaVeyan Satanism manufactures. This
memeplex has had 50 years of production. 50 years of consumers downloading their LaVeyan
Software. What good has come out of San Francisco? After 50 years of LaVeyan Software,
what kinds of people has Modern Satanism produced? How many millionaires? How many
are successful in life? How many live the life of their dreams? How many live in the home of
their dreams? How many don’t have fat ugly girlfriends? LaVey died broke and alone. Zeena
does so much drugs she barely has any teeth left in her mouth. Not only did that “family” not
even function properly, but the individual members of the LaVey family don’t even function
properly as individuals.

What great products ever came out of the ToSer Software besides a handful of internet forum
jockies making posts about some trivial Egyptian god? What is your typical Setian like as a
person, in thought, and what kind of life are they living? Do you want to be like them? Do
you want to play pretend games with Aquino and make believe his imaginary friend Set is
relevant to anything? What kind of people does the occult scene manufacture? Besides
lunatics like crazy fat ladies who give psychic reading to horses and pets. Crazy people
wasting their lives chasing after imaginary super powers to make their dreams come true, all
the while neglecting life, disconnected from life and lost in occult memes, and lacking the
social skills to actually get what they want and need out of life in a real practical way? Do you
want to end up being a fat woman that talks to horses? Or a fat grand magister that drives a
truck and talks to the devil? What good does the Christian memeplex do but manufacture
bigots and haters? Buddhism is just as bad, they misinterpret their religion to mean that being
Buddhist means being pacifist wimps, and when China takes their country Tibet away they
cry and whine like babies. Whose fault is it that Tibet is conquered and that Tibetans have lost
their culture, their religious freedom, and now suffer in poverty and political tyranny?

Is this the kind of person you want to end up being? Do you want to be like these typical
products of such memeplexes? Is that your highest aspiration in life: to be dysfunctional crazy
good for nothing human beings that are only good for propagating useless religions? If it is,
then I pity you because that’s a very low and pathetic aspiration. Why is that that we can
panic over how our computer is messing up because of shitty software, but when the software
we install into out brains messes us up we ignore it and hold onto such destructive programs?

Now the Question for us in the ONA is what kind of factory can we make our ONA into, and
what kind of people has it manufactured in the past, and what kinds of new human beings do
we want to create for the future? It’s all about the quality and potential of our Software. We
determine the quality and value of the ONA by the Sinister Software we develop, the people
we each become and what people our ONA is producing and will produce.

Do you as a Dreccian understand that you have great potential and that you can – with will
and effort – become something more than what you are? Does the ONA help you actualize
that latent potential? Do we as Dreccians dream of a better world, have visions of a greater
civilization, and greater starborn humanity? Does our ONA Software in any way help
facilitate and actualize those dreams and visions? If it doesn’t then these are practical
programs we each need to look into further. Is the ONA relevant to your personal needs, your
personal growth and evolution, your personal world view? Does ONA help you live the life
you want, manifest what you want and need out of life? If not then these are programs we also
need to consider.

We are each in life a living testament to what the ONA is. We are each a living product of
what the ONA produces and yields. Most institutions out there that exist have been around for
years, hundreds of years, and thousands of years. Do you like what kinds of people they have
manufactured? If not, then the only option we have is to create our own memetic factory
which will engineer the type, quality and kind of people we want to become, and what kinds
of people we will need to help us actualize our vision. What we believe, what ideas and
beliefs we agree or disagree with matters very little. What matters is what those
beliefs/software causes us to Become. Our beliefs – although ethereal – truly does have a very
real affect on our Minds, Feelings, Actions, and World. Mastering Life begins with Mastering
one’s own Mind. If we want to change the World and Ourselves, it begins with our Minds and
what we clutter it with.

Chloe 352

Order of Nine Angles

121 yf