Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
But what did Abraham do? He arrived neither too soon nor too late. He mounted the ass, he rode
slowly along the way. All that time he believed - he believed that God would not require Isaac of
him, whereas he was willing nevertheless to sacrifice him if it was required. He believed by virtue
of the absurd; for there could be no question of human calculation, and it was indeed the absurd that
God who required it of him should the next instant recall the requirement. He climbed the
mountain, even at the instant when the knife glittered he believed … that God would not require
Isaac. He was indeed astonished at the outcome, but by a double-movement he had reached his first
position, and therefore he received Isaac more gladly than the first time.
( Fear and Trembling, by Johannes De Silentio, alias Søren Kierkegaard, 1843, tr. Walter Lowrie,
1941, Problemata: preliminary expectoration)
1. God (the same God YHWH that made Himself known to Moses with His true name, but did not
reveal it to Abraham – Exodus 6:3) established a pact with Abraham. By its very nature this pact
had these two essential features:
a. it was free
2. the bonding element of the pact was “trust”, that is the free prospect of the covenant mutually
agreed, by both covenanters.
3. God wanted to make Abraham fully aware of the nature of the covenant, through a (dramatic)
experience. Faced with a request to sacrifice his only son, that God had put to him, Abraham could
only keep his side of the covenant (viz. faith and obedience) but, at the same time, he could reserve
for himself a fundamental margin: hope. Hope that this was only a trial, a temptation.
What really matters, in Abraham’s behaviour, is essentially this: God, in His Omnipotence, can
demand from Abraham the respect of the covenant, viz. obedience, unto the extreme of sacrificing
Isaac. But, by carrying the request to the extreme consequence, God would have broken the pact
freely and mutually agreed.
In fact God, by carrying his demand to the extreme consequence, would not have complied with his
side of the covenant, viz. protection: how could God claim that He was protecting Abraham, and at
the same time deprive Abraham of his son?
Abraham has faith, or rather hopes, that God cannot really demand the sacrifice of his son, and
dares to run the double risk of Isaac’ life of God’s covenant.
Risking both, Abraham saves both (Isaac and the pact with God)
NOTE
What I have written above is an attempt to explain what Soeren Kierkegaard only affirms briefly.
The only difference is that, unlike Kierkegaard, I used the verb to hope, instead of to believe.
I hope this is an effective illustration of the difference between Hope, and Faith.