Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Cezar Chirila
February 3, 2010
is a QN -martingale.
Particular cases of this construction are the short rate models, which we
get by considering
Rt
rs ds
Nt = e 0
RT
Then B(t, T ) = E (e − t Rrs ds |Ft ) and in case we consider rs as a Markov
T
process, B(t, T ) = E (e − t rs ds |σ(rt )).
Another property that we want to introduce in our model is the fact that
for two maturity dates, T < S, we should have B(t, T ) ≥ B(t, S),
equivalent with a non-negative interest rate assumption. That gives us the
relation:
1 1
Nt EQN |Ft ≥ Nt EQS |Ft
NT NS
One way in which we can get the numeraire with the above properties is to
consider
1
= Mt · g (t) + f (t)
Nt
where g , f are deterministic decreasing functions, and Mt is a positive
martingale. We consider a Brownian motion W , the filtration F W
generated by it, and the martingale Mt as being:
Rt Rt
σ(s)dWs − 21 σ(s)2 dt
Mt = e 0 0
We can use this model to get closed form formulas for options on the
interest rate. For example, let us consider caplet on Libor L from T1 to
T2 , which pays ∆ max(L − K , 0) on the maturity date T2 , where
∆ = T2 − T1 on the corresponding day convention, e.g. act/360.
1 + ∆K +
+
∆(L − K )+
1
= 1− = (1 + ∆K ) − B(T1 , T2 )
1 + ∆L 1 + ∆L 1 + ∆K
.
Therefore, we can consider a caplet as a put on a zero bond. So we will
focus on giving a close price formula for the puts and calls on the zero
bonds.
Giving the arbitrage-free context, the price for a call on the bond
B(T1 , T2 ), payed at T1 , will be given by:
(B(T1 , T2 ) − K )+
N0 · EQN |F0
N T1
V0 ((B(T1 , T2 ) − K )+ ) =
+
T1 g (T2 )+f (T2 )
M
1
f (0)+g (0) · (MT1 g (T1 ) + f (T1 )) · EQN MT1 g (T1 )+f (T1 ) −K =
1
f (0)+g (0) · EQN (MT1 · [g (T2 ) − K · g (T1 )] + [f (T2 ) − K · f (T1 )])+
1
Let G = g (T2 ) − K · g (T1 ), F = f (T2 ) − K · f (T1 ) and R = f (0)+g (0) .
F
For the case where G < 0, consider y is given by
qR R T1
T1 +1 σ(s)2 ds
R T1
σ(s)2 ds− 21 σ(s)2 ds ln −F
ey 0 0 G + F = 0, so y = GqR 2 0
T1 2
0 σ(s) ds
R T1 R T1
ln F
−1 σ(s)2 ds ln F
+1 σ(s)2 ds
We use d1 = qR 2 0
−G
and d2 = qR 2 0
−G
.
T1 2 T1 2
0 σ(s) ds 0 σ(s) ds
Translated back to the strike of our call, we get also a natural financial
explanation:
The results say the price will be a constant on time if the strike is chosen
such that the call is always in the money
(T2 ) g (T2 )
(K > max{ ff (T ,
1 ) g (T1 )
} > B(T1 , T2 )) or out of the money
(K < min{ ff (T 2 ) g (T2 )
(T1 ) , g (T1 ) } < B(T1 , T2 )).
Furthermore, our model implies the boundness of the bond prices, and
from the relation
ln B(t, T )
r (t, T ) = −
T −t
we get that the interest rates are also bounded.
e σXt
Mt =
Ee σXt
By considering Xt = Wt , a Brownian motion, we particularize for the case
1 2
of Rational Log Normal model, Mt = e σWt − 2 σ t .