Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Required Inputs:
You will need to collect financial statements for several reporting periods. If you
want to benchmark the performance against the industry, then you will also need
to collect industry averages. The spreadsheet is setup to capture five reporting
periods (annual, quarterly, monthly). All input fields are highlighted in yellow.
For best results, SEC Filings are suggested since these reports provide more
detail than published financial statements.
Note: A small red triangle in the upper right corner of a cell indicates that a comment has
been inserted. Point your mouse over the cell and the comment will appear.
Worksheets:
This spreadsheet consists of the following worksheets, divided into three sections:
11 Pro Forma - Simple Set of pro forma financials using simple assumptions
12 Pro Forma - Regression Set of pro forma financials using linear trending
13 Pro Forma - Exponential Set of pro forma financials using exponential smoothing
14 Scenario Analysis Example of Scenario Analysis and Goal Seek Analysis
15 Budget Analysis Preliminary budget analysis
16 Final Budgets Set of budgets per various assumptions and forecasts.
Note: Some additional worksheets (Answer Reports 1 & 2) may appear in the spreadsheet
due to the running of Solver.
Macros:
No macros have been used in this spreadsheet to give everyone some assurance that no viruses
are contained in the spreadsheet. However, you are free to add your own macros to save time.
Tools > Macro > Record New Macro
Excel Functions:
This spreadsheet uses certain financial functions (such as =TREND) which might not be
found in your version of Microsoft Excel. To take full advantage of financial and statistical
functions, you should install the Add On package titled: Analysis TookPak. Go to the main
tool bar, select Tools => Add-Ins => check the Analysis TookPak option, insert your
Excel CD and install the Analysis ToolPak. Also, you might want to install the Solver
Add-in since this is useful for solving special forecasting issues (such as finding the
Compatibility:
This spreadsheet was created with Microsoft Excel 2000. Older versions of Excel (such as 97)
may not be compatible with this spreadsheet.
Corrections:
With any “attempt” to build an Excel Model, I can easily make some mistakes.
So if you have suggestions to make the model better, drop me an email
and I’ll be glad to improve the financial model. My email address is: matt@exinfm.com
2-4 Most Current Period 2010 (1999, July 1998, 6/30/97, etc.)
2-5 Previous Period 2009 (1999, July 1998, 6/30/97, etc.)
2-6 2nd Previous Period 2008 (1999, July 1998, 6/30/97, etc.)
2-7 3rd Previous Period 2007 (1999, July 1998, 6/30/97, etc.)
2-8 4th Previous Period 2006 (1999, July 1998, 6/30/97, etc.)
Preferred Equity
Common Equity 312000 312000 312000 312000 312000
Working Capital:
Current Assets #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
Current Liabilities #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
Working Capital #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
Liquid Capital:
Cash and Cash Equivalents 629 994 1695 2489 3468
Marketable Securities 1585 1246 1556 1579 1962
Accounts Receivable 112951 84730 62944 40592 82259
Notes Receivable 0 0 0 0 0
The following valuation indicators are very simple and basic; they are used as quick, rough estmates.
Market Capitalization:
Market Cap - Common Stk $29,898 $37,281 $48,239 $45,192 $38,867
Market Cap - Preferred Stk $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total Market Capitalization $29,898 $37,281 $48,239 $45,192 $38,867
Present Value:
Normalized Cash Flow Weight %'s 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 30.00% 40.00%
Normalized Cash Flow #REF!
Number of Future Periods 15
Required Rate of Return 11.00%
Present Value of Free Cash Flow #REF!
Present Value of Selling Price $315,000 <= estimated selling price $65,836
Present Value of Business #REF!
Revenue Multiplier:
Recent Gross Revenues 1,946,819
Average Competitive Rev Multiplier 3.14
Value based on Revenue Multiple $6,113,012
Capitalization of Earnings:
Normalized Net Income Weights % 5.00% 5.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00%
Operating Cash Flow to Net Income #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
Liquidity Index:
Cash - Days Removed 0 0 0 0 0
Cash Balance 629 994 1695 2489 3468
Cash Balance Total 0 0 0 0 0
Marketable Sec - Days Removed 11 12 16 15 14
Marketable Securities Balance 1585 1246 1556 1579 1962
Marketable Securities Total 17435 14952 24896 23685 27468
Receivables - Days Removed 34 2291 1342 814 846
Receivable Balance 112951 84730 62944 40592 82259
Receivable Balance Total 3793467 194081637 84480707 33060294 69595173
Inventory - Days Removed 79 56 49 45 38
Inventory Balance 223475 176988 211067 128796 208931
Inventory Balance Total 17732255 9877009 10401685 5762396 7859173
Other - Days Removed 16 22 26 21 19
Other Current Assets Balance 3573 1627 344 148 32440
Other Current Assets Total 57168 35794 8944 3108 616360
Liquidity Index (Days) 63 768 342 224 237
Z Score:
1.2 x (working capital / total assets) #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
1.4 x (retained earn / total assets) #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
3.3 x (EBIT / total assets) #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
Receivable Turnover:
Credit Sales 11520 15750 20080 23200 26500
Average Receivable Balance 1060 98841 73837 51768 61426
Receivable Turnover 10.9 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4
Inventory Turnover:
Average Inventory Balance 1,046 200232 194028 169932 168864
Inventory Turnover 4.6 6.5 7.4 8.2 9.7
Days in Inventory 79 56 49 45 38
8-1 Acid Test Ratio - Industry 0.51 0.52 0.50 0.49 0.48
7-1 Acid Test Ratio - Company 0.29 0.21 0.14 0.09 0.20
8-8 Gross Profit Margin - Industry 55.00% 52.00% 60.00% 62.00% 63.00%
8-10 Net Profit Margin - Industry 20.00% 23.00% 22.00% 19.00% 20.00%
7-31 Net Profit Margin - Company #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
8-11 Return on Total Assets - Industry 38.00% 36.00% 37.00% 34.00% 36.00%
8-12 Return on Total Assets - Company 30.00% #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
We added the following two ratios to assess if the Company has excessive growth:
4-13 Provision for Taxes -12228 -3592 -7528 -4986 -15043
8-17 Trading Ratio - Company #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
8-18 Trading Ratio - Industry 1.26 1.28 1.31 1.30 1.27
8-19 Net Sales to Net Worth - Company #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
8-20 Net Sales to Net Worth - Industry 1.22 1.20 1.19 1.22 1.20
Source for Benchmark Data: Almanac of Business and Industrial Financial Ratios by Leo Troy, Prentice Hall
0.60
0.50 Acid Test Ratio
0.40 Prepared by Matt H. Evans 05/28/2011
- Industry Page 18
Acid Test Ratio
atio
0.30 - Company
Acid Ratio Comparison
0.60
0.50 Acid Test Ratio
0.40 - Industry
Acid Test Ratio
Ratio
0.30 - Company
0.20
0.10
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Periods
1.20
1.00 Current Ratio -
0.80 Industry
Current Ratio -
Ratio
0.60 Company
0.40
0.20
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Periods
12.00
Prepared by Matt H. Evans 05/28/2011
Receivable Page 19
10.00 Turnover -
Rate
8.00 Industry
Receivable Turnover Comparison
12.00
Receivable
10.00 Turnover -
Turnover Rate
8.00 Industry
Receivable
6.00 Turnover -
4.00 Company
2.00
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Periods
2500
Days to Collect A/R
12.00
Inventory
10.00 Turnover -
Turnover Rate
8.00 Industry
Inventory
6.00 Turnover -
4.00 Company
2.00
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Periods
100
Days Held in Inventory
Days in
80 Inventory -
Industry
60 Days in
Inventory -
40
Company
20
2.00
Turnover Rate
1.50 Asset Turnover
- Industry
Asset Turnover
1.00 - Company
0.50
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Periods
70.00%
Gross Profit
Gross Profit Margin
60.00%
Margin -
50.00% Industry
40.00% Gross Profit
30.00% Margin -
Company
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Periods
Gros
0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Periods
25.00%
20.00% Net Profit
Net Profit Margin
15.00% Margin -
Industry
10.00%
Net Profit
5.00% Margin -
0.00% Company
-5.00%
-10.00%
-15.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Periods
50.00%
Return on Total Assets
07
08
09
10
20
20
20
20
20
Return on
-10.00%
-20.00%
06
07
08
09
10
20
20
20
20
20
Periods
50.00%
40.00% Return on Total
30.00% Assets -
Industry
20.00%
Return on Total
10.00% Assets -
0.00% Company
-10.00%
-20.00%
06
07
08
09
10
20
20
20
20
20
Periods
250%
Debt to Equity Ratio
Periods
150% Debt to Equity -
Debt to Equit
Company
100%
50%
0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Periods
50
Times Interest Earned
Times Interest
40 Earned -
30 Industry
Times Interest
20 Earned -
10 Company
0
-10
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Periods
3.50
3.00
Trading Ratio -
2.50
Industry
2.00 Trading Ratio -
Ratio
1.50 Company
1.00
Prepared by Matt H. Evans 05/28/2011 Page 25
0.50
0.00
3.00
Trading Ratio -
2.50
Industry
2.00 Trading Ratio -
Ratio
1.50 Company
1.00
0.50
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Periods
5.00
4.50
4.00 Net Sales to
3.50 Net Worth -
Industry
3.00
Net Sales to
Ratio
Horizontal Analysis expresses change between periods as percentages for each account in
the financial statements. The basic formula for horizontal analysis is:
% change = (most recent period - previous period) / previous period
Growth in Total Equity (Net Worth) 6.11% #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
expressed in percentages
Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual
Period Period Period Period Period
Account Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Income Before Extra Ord Items #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
Planned Investments:
Capital Expenditures -3500 -3000 -3100 -2700 -2600
Acquisitions in Other Co's -500 -750 -1200 -650 -350
Purchases of Investments -3000 -3500 -4500 -6000 -7000
Total Investment Applications of Cash -7000 -7250 -8800 -9350 -9950
Preferred Equity
Common Equity 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200
Additional Paid in Capital 5700 5700 5700 5700 5700
Before we adopt a regression model, it's a good idea to generate a scatter graph of the actual data
and observe if there is a clear trend for fitting a straight regression line into the data:
Total Revenues
2,500,000
Total Revenues
2,000,000 Total
1,500,000 Revenues
1,000,000
500,000
0
20042006200820102012
Periods
The calculation of linear values is determined by defining the slope of the line and the y intercept:
Order Total Rev Linear Slope Intercept
Formula for Linear Trendline: Year variable x actual y Value y m factor b factor
2006 1 1,432,987 1,311,441 108066.30 ###
y=(m*x)+b 2007 2 1,349,435 1,419,507
The degree of linear fit with the actual data can be expressed as R Square 0.5022
Planned Investments:
Capital Expenditures -3500 -3000 -3100 -2700 -2600
Acquisitions -500 -750 -1200 -650 -350
Purchases of Investments -3000 -3500 -4500 -6000 -7000
Total Investment Applications of Cash -7000 -7250 -8800 -9350 -9950
Preferred Equity
Smoothing Factor must be between 0 and 1 1 Total weights should add up to => 100.00%
Set Smoothing Factor 1
Assign weights to appropriate periods 0.00% 1.50% 4.50% 34.50% 59.50% 100.00%
Exponential Comparison
2,500,000
Total
Revenues -
2,000,000 Historical
Total Revenues
Total
1,500,000 Revenues -
Exponential
1,000,000 Total
Revenues - Wt
Moving Avg
500,000
Planned Investments:
Capital Expenditures -3500 -3000 -3100 -3900 -4600
Acquisitions -500 -750 -500
Purchases of Investments -2000 -3000 -3000 -1000 -1000
Total Investment Applications of Cash -6000 -6750 -6600 -4900 -5600
Preferred Equity
Common Equity 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200
Additional Paid in Capital 5700 5700 5700 5700 5700
Retained Earnings -2500 -5500 -9500 -13500 -16500
Adj for Foreign Currency Transl -5000 -3500 -1000
Treasury Stock 579247 579247 579247 579247 579247
Total Equity 579647 578147 576647 573647 570647
Instead of copying our forecast into this worksheet, we can simply do scenario analysis directly in
the forecast itself.
Forecast Comparisons
4,000,000
Simple
3,500,000 Projection
Model
3,000,000
Linear Trend
Total Revenues
2,500,000 Model
Wt Moving
2,000,000 Avg Model
1,500,000 Declining
Prepared by Matt H. Evans 05/28/2011 Page 62
Growth Model
1,000,000 Historical Data
Model
3,000,000
Linear Trend
Total Revenues
2,500,000 Model
Wt Moving
2,000,000 Avg Model
1,500,000 Declining
Growth Model
1,000,000 Historical Data
500,000
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Periods
In addition to using linear models for forecasting, we can apply several non-linear (curve) models:
Logarithmic - Used when rate of change in data suddenly shifts upward or downward.
Power - Used when rate of change in data occurs at a specific rate.
Exponential - Used when rate of change is increasing or decreasing at ever higher rates.
Polynomial - Used when rate of change fluctuates with no pattern.
Logarithmic Trend
Actual Predicted Slope Intercept
Formula for Logarithmic Trendline x factor Values Value y c factor b factor
1 1,432,987 -1317578 219316.7 ###
y = ( c * LN (x)) - b 2 1,349,435 -1165559
3 1,506,192 -1076634
LN: Natural Logarithm 4 1,402,434 -1013541
5 1,946,819 -964601
6 -924615
7 -890807
8 -861522
9 -835690
10 -812583
Power Trendline
Actual Predicted Slope Intercept
y = b * x^c x factor Values Value y c factor b factor
1 1,432,987 1333994 0.13 14.1
Polynomial Trendline
Actual Predicted
y = (c2 * x^2) + (c1 * x^1) + b x factor Values Value y c2 c1 b
1 1,432,987 1453635 71097.07 ### 1701054
2 1,349,435 1348410
3 1,506,192 1385379
4 1,402,434 1564543
5 1,946,819 1885900
6 2349452
7 2955198
8 3703138
9 4593272
7,000,000
6,000,000 Logarithmic
Trendline
5,000,000
Power
Total Revenues
4,000,000
Trendline
3,000,000
Exponential
2,000,000 Trendline
1,000,000 Polynomial
Trendline
(1,000,000) Actual
(2,000,000) Revenues
1996
1997
1998
2099
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
05
19
Periods
Prepared by Matt H. Evans 05/28/2011 Page 65
Actual
(2,000,000) Revenues
1996
1997
1998
2099
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
05
19
Periods
Accuracy in the budget process should be examined to determine the degree of error or
variance in the budget process. If the variance is high, this indicates a need to improve
planning techniques within the company. TBD: To be Determined
(Wksht 16)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2000 2001
Income Statement Items
Total Revenues - Budgeted 10500 14500 22500 28500 30000 30500
Total Revenues - Actual 1432987 1349435 1506192 1402434 1946819 TBD
% difference from actual -99% -99% -99% -98% -98% #VALUE!
Cost of Goods Sold - Budgeted -4500 -6500 -8648 -9650 -11000 -28356
Cost of Goods Sold - Actual -1280791 -1309615 -1437053 -1386328 -1638531 TBD
% difference from actual -100% -100% -99% -99% -99% #VALUE!
Ratio Items
Current Ratio - Budgeted 1 1 1 1 0.80 #REF!
Current Ratio - Actual #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! TBD
% difference from actual #REF! 23% 28% 128% 8% #VALUE!
Total Asset Turnover - Budgeted 0.68 0.72 0.80 0.80 0.79 #REF!
Total Asset Turnover - Actual #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! TBD
% difference from actual #REF! -42% -27% -30% -45% #VALUE!
Net Profit Margin - Budgeted 19% 25% 28% 30% 28% -8%
Net Profit Margin - Actual #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? TBD
% difference from actual #NAME? -437% -812% -427% 354% #VALUE!
Debt to Common Equity - Budgeted 0.45 0.50 0.60 0.65 0.55 #REF!
Debt to Common Equity - Actual 2 2 2 2 2 TBD
% difference from actual -79% -77% -73% -70% -74% #VALUE!
Mean Absolute Error - An absolute value of forecast errors, does not place weight on the
amount of the error. Calculated as the sum of (actual values - predicted values) / n.
Mean Square Error - Similar to Mean Absolute Error, but does place more emphasis on
the amount of error; i.e. an error of 8 is twice as significant as 4. Calculated as the
sum of (actual values - predicted values)^2 / n.
Root Mean Square Error - To make the Mean Square Error useful and comparable to the Mean
Absolute Error, we can take the square root of the Mean Square Error. We can then use this
as a guide to establish an error limit or standard for flagging unacceptable errors. Is Error
Actual Forecasted Error Outside
Example: Total Revenues Period Revenues Revenues Error Absolute Squared Limit?
n: total number of periods 1996 1432987 10500 1422487 1422487 ### No
1997 1349435 14500 1334935 1334935 ### No
1998 1506192 22500 1483692 1483692 ### No
1999 1402434 28500 1373934 1373934 ### No
2000 1946819 30000 1916819 1916819 ### No
n => 5 Sum => 7531867 7531867 ### Yes
Budget
Period
Ref 2001 Assumptions & Comments
Operating Plan
16-1 Total Revenues 30500 Based on review of Pro Forma Financials, Marketing, etc.
16-2 Cost of Goods Sold -28356 Volume projections, production budgets, and vertical analysis
16-3 Operating Expenses -1334 Average % of Sales per Vertical Analysis
16-4 Operating Income 810
16-5 Interest Expenses -310 Based on anticipated levels of debt and past history
16-6 Income Taxes -3300 Based on anticipated taxable income and effective rate
16-7 Other Non Operating Expenses -200 Provision for contingency was added on this line item
Financial Plan
Planned Investments:
16-22 Capital Expenditures -4500 Budgeted $ 4.5 million in Capital Expenditure Budget
16-23 Acquisitions in Other Co's -350 Per forecast, strategic plan, and other budgets
16-24 Purchases of Investments -2500 Per forecast, strategic plan, and other budgets
16-25 Total Investment Applications of Cash -7350
16-57 Longterm Debt / Borrowings 186418 Same formula as used in forecast models
16-58 Other Longterm Liabilities 1100 Per review of historical information and expected growth rates.
16-59 Total Non Current Liabilities 187518
Adjustable Cells
Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$D$24 Set Smoothing Factor 1 1
Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack
$D$23 Smoothing Factor must be between 0 and 1 $D$23>=$D$23Binding
$D$24 Set Smoothing Factor 1 $D$24<=$E$23Binding 0
Adjustable Cells
Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$D$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 0.00% 0.00%
$E$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 2.00% 1.50%
$F$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods Total weights should add up to => 5.00% 4.50%
$G$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 35.00% 34.50%
$H$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 60.00% 59.50%
Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack
$I$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 100.00% $I$25=$E$23 Binding 0
$D$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 0.00% $D$25<=$E$23Not Binding 1
$E$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 1.50% $E$25<=$E$23Not Binding 0.99
$F$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods Total weights should add up to => 4.50% $F$25<=$E$23Not Binding 0.96
$G$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 34.50% $G$25<=$E$23Not Binding 0.66
$H$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 59.50% $H$25<=$E$23Not Binding 0.41
$D$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 0.00% $D$25>=$D$23Binding 0.00%
$E$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 1.50% $E$25>=$D$23Not Binding 1.50%
$F$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods Total weights should add up to => 4.50% $F$25>=$D$23Not Binding 4.50%
$G$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 34.50% $G$25>=$D$23Not Binding ###
$H$25 Assign weights to appropriate periods 59.50% $H$25>=$D$23Not Binding ###