Os dados abaixo são derivados de experimentos fictício comparando eficiência de diferentes adubos verdes na produção do m

As variáveis analisadas foram

Prodciclo1 - Produtividade no primeiro ciclo após adubação verde, kg/ha
Mato - Plantas/m2, média de dez amostras parcela,
População - plantas/ha
Espigas - Número de espigas comerciais
Prodciclo2 - Produtividade no segundo ciclo após adubação verde, kg/ha
De posse das análises, prepare:
1 - Tabelas e gráficos apresentando os resultados na formatação científica usual em eventos científicos
2 - Selecione o adubo verde mais adequado para produzir milho verde e justifique sua resposta.
_

The GLM Procedure

Class Level Information

Class Levels Values

Bloco 4 abcd

Tratamento 9 calapogônio cunha girassol herbicida limpo mato milheto mucuna painço

Number of observations 36
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 215

The GLM Procedure

Dependent Variable: espigas espigas

Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 3807494102 346135827 1.25 0.3119

Error 24 6667204931 277800205

Corrected Total 35 10474699033

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE espigas Mean

0.363494 54.53330 16667.34 30563.60

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

 Bloco 3 1937712462 645904154 2.33 0.1002
Tratamento 8 1869781640 233722705 0.84 0.5763
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 216

The GLM Procedure

Least Squares Means
Adjustment for Multiple Comparisons: Tukey

espigas LSMEAN
Tratamento LSMEAN Number

calapogônio 26488.2340 1
cunha 41405.5455 2
girassol 37371.7410 3
herbicida 23746.4168 4
limpo 22288.7195 5
mato 21381.0477 6
milheto 34250.2397 7
mucuna 39044.5158 8
painço 29095.9180 9

Least Squares Means for effect Tratamento

Pr > |t| for H0: LSMean(i)=LSMean(j)

Dependent Variable: espigas

i/j 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 0.9318 0.9892 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9989 0.9740 1.0000

2 0.9318 1.0000 0.8456 0.7840 0.7414 0.9994 1.0000 0.9769
3 0.9892 1.0000 0.9583 0.9278 0.9030 1.0000 1.0000 0.9983
4 1.0000 0.8456 0.9583 1.0000 1.0000 0.9914 0.9223 0.9999
5 1.0000 0.7840 0.9278 1.0000 1.0000 0.9806 0.8785 0.9996
6 1.0000 0.7414 0.9030 1.0000 1.0000 0.9699 0.8454 0.9990
7 0.9989 0.9994 1.0000 0.9914 0.9806 0.9699 1.0000 0.9999
8 0.9740 1.0000 1.0000 0.9223 0.8785 0.8454 1.0000 0.9940
9 1.0000 0.9769 0.9983 0.9999 0.9996 0.9990 0.9999 0.9940
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 217

The GLM Procedure

Class Level Information

Class Levels Values

Bloco 4 abcd

Tratamento 9 calapogônio cunha girassol herbicida limpo mato milheto mucuna painço

Number of observations 36
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 98

The GLM Procedure

Dependent Variable: mato mato

Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 21.91547098 1.99231554 0.65 0.7657

Error 24 73.10685109 3.04611880

Corrected Total 35 95.02232206

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE mato Mean

0.230635 66.17737 1.745313 2.637327

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Bloco 3 16.72780200 5.57593400 1.83 0.1686

Tratamento 8 5.18766898 0.64845862 0.21 0.9854
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 99

The GLM Procedure

Least Squares Means
Adjustment for Multiple Comparisons: Tukey

LSMEAN
Tratamento mato LSMEAN Number

calapogônio 2.56023914 1
 cunha 2.72526448 2
girassol 3.31749652 3
herbicida 2.85776444 4
limpo 2.86056681 5
mato 1.87518555 6
milheto 2.30575309 7
mucuna 2.49326006 8
painço 2.74041107 9

Least Squares Means for effect Tratamento

Pr > |t| for H0: LSMean(i)=LSMean(j)

Dependent Variable: mato

i/j 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 1.0000 0.9993 1.0000 1.0000 0.9997 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

2 1.0000 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000 0.9985 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
3 0.9993 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000 0.9557 0.9950 0.9988 0.9999
4 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9959 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000
5 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9958 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000
6 0.9997 0.9985 0.9557 0.9959 0.9958 1.0000 0.9999 0.9983
7 1.0000 1.0000 0.9950 0.9999 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
8 1.0000 1.0000 0.9988 1.0000 1.0000 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000
9 1.0000 1.0000 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000 0.9983 1.0000 1.0000
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 100

The GLM Procedure

Class Level Information

Class Levels Values

Bloco 4 abcd

Tratamento 9 calapogônio cunha girassol herbicida limpo mato milheto mucuna painço

Number of observations 36
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 152

The GLM Procedure

Dependent Variable: populacao populacao

Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 2087185225 189744111 0.78 0.6572

Error 24 5843148118 243464505

Corrected Total 35 7930333343

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE populacao Mean

0.263190 56.75695 15603.35 27491.52

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Bloco 3 1152517208 384172403 1.58 0.2207

Tratamento 8 934668017 116833502 0.48 0.8583
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 153

The GLM Procedure

Least Squares Means
Adjustment for Multiple Comparisons: Tukey

populacao LSMEAN
Tratamento LSMEAN Number

calapogônio 29276.4248 1
cunha 23047.5250 2
girassol 25852.9572 3
herbicida 37780.0933 4
limpo 31743.3806 5
mato 18753.2387 6
milheto 25275.5735 7
mucuna 28985.8929 8
painço 26708.6074 9

Least Squares Means for effect Tratamento

Pr > |t| for H0: LSMean(i)=LSMean(j)

Dependent Variable: populacao

 i/j 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 0.9996 1.0000 0.9967 1.0000 0.9868 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

2 0.9996 1.0000 0.9104 0.9962 1.0000 1.0000 0.9997 1.0000
3 1.0000 1.0000 0.9716 0.9998 0.9991 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
4 0.9967 0.9104 0.9716 0.9997 0.7267 0.9627 0.9959 0.9819
5 1.0000 0.9962 0.9998 0.9997 0.9539 0.9995 1.0000 0.9999
6 0.9868 1.0000 0.9991 0.7267 0.9539 0.9995 0.9889 0.9979
7 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9627 0.9995 0.9995 1.0000 1.0000
8 1.0000 0.9997 1.0000 0.9959 1.0000 0.9889 1.0000 1.0000
9 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9819 0.9999 0.9979 1.0000 1.0000
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 154

13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 1

The GLM Procedure

Class Level Information

Class Levels Values

Bloco 4 abcd

Tratamento 9 calapogônio cunha girassol herbicida limpo mato milheto mucuna painço

Number of observations 36
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 2

The GLM Procedure

Dependent Variable: prodciclo1 prodciclo1

Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 43957066.2 3996096.9 0.66 0.7631

Error 24 145949633.1 6081234.7

Corrected Total 35 189906699.3

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE prodciclo1 Mean

 0.231467 66.04125 2466.016 3734.054

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Bloco 3 33524640.92 11174880.31 1.84 0.1673

Tratamento 8 10432425.28 1304053.16 0.21 0.9851
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 3

The GLM Procedure

Least Squares Means
Adjustment for Multiple Comparisons: Tukey

prodciclo1 LSMEAN
Tratamento LSMEAN Number

calapogônio 3600.33629 1
cunha 3860.79135 2
girassol 4739.28075 3
herbicida 4062.50827 4
limpo 4004.79354 5
mato 2678.83651 6
milheto 3279.73500 7
mucuna 3518.71379 8
painço 3861.48832 9

Least Squares Means for effect Tratamento

Pr > |t| for H0: LSMean(i)=LSMean(j)

Dependent Variable: prodciclo1

i/j 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 1.0000 0.9990 1.0000 1.0000 0.9998 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

2 1.0000 0.9998 1.0000 1.0000 0.9987 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
3 0.9990 0.9998 1.0000 1.0000 0.9529 0.9943 0.9983 0.9998
4 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9960 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000
5 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9970 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
6 0.9998 0.9987 0.9529 0.9960 0.9970 1.0000 0.9999 0.9987
7 1.0000 1.0000 0.9943 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
8 1.0000 1.0000 0.9983 1.0000 1.0000 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000
9 1.0000 1.0000 0.9998 1.0000 1.0000 0.9987 1.0000 1.0000
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 4
_

The GLM Procedure

Class Level Information

Class Levels Values

Bloco 4 abcd

Tratamento 9 calapogônio cunha girassol herbicida limpo mato milheto mucuna painço

Number of observations 36
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 83

The GLM Procedure

Dependent Variable: prodciclo2 prodciclo2

Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 52290934.56 4753721.32 2.49 0.0300

Error 24 45844912.37 1910204.68

Corrected Total 35 98135846.93

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE prodciclo2 Mean

0.532842 52.90808 1382.102 2612.269

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Bloco 3 29037158.53 9679052.84 5.07 0.0074

Tratamento 8 23253776.02 2906722.00 1.52 0.2019
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 84

The GLM Procedure

Least Squares Means
Adjustment for Multiple Comparisons: Tukey
 prodciclo2 LSMEAN
Tratamento LSMEAN Number

calapogônio 3230.70150 1
cunha 3726.49700 2
girassol 3432.96470 3
herbicida 2545.23049 4
limpo 1205.57695 5
mato 1511.40793 6
milheto 2434.85929 7
mucuna 2344.46613 8
painço 3078.71880 9

Least Squares Means for effect Tratamento

Pr > |t| for H0: LSMean(i)=LSMean(j)

Dependent Variable: prodciclo2

i/j 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 0.9998 1.0000 0.9983 0.5129 0.7062 0.9953 0.9904 1.0000

2 0.9998 1.0000 0.9467 0.2460 0.3985 0.9149 0.8815 0.9989
3 1.0000 1.0000 0.9903 0.3915 0.5787 0.9798 0.9663 1.0000
4 0.9983 0.9467 0.9903 0.8980 0.9751 1.0000 1.0000 0.9997
5 0.5129 0.2460 0.3915 0.8980 1.0000 0.9340 0.9564 0.6097
6 0.7062 0.3985 0.5787 0.9751 1.0000 0.9875 0.9936 0.7937
7 0.9953 0.9149 0.9798 1.0000 0.9340 0.9875 1.0000 0.9989
8 0.9904 0.8815 0.9663 1.0000 0.9564 0.9936 1.0000 0.9973
9 1.0000 0.9989 1.0000 0.9997 0.6097 0.7937 0.9989 0.9973
13:19 Thursday, April 15, 2011 85

_x001A_
N° Espigas Comerciais
45000.00
40000.00
35000.00
30000.00
25000.00
20000.00 N° Espigas Comerciais
15000.00
10000.00
5000.00
0.00
at
o po ida
ni
o hã na
et
o ço sol
m lim rbic gô Cun ucu ilh pain iras
o m m g
he lap
ca
 Mato-Plantas/m2
3.5
40000
3 35000
2.5 30000
2 25000
1.5 Mato-Plantas/m2 20000
15000
1
10000
0.5
5000
0
0
a ã a l
at
o po id ni
o
nh un et
o ço so o da
il m rbic ô c h i n as at po io
m
og cu
m
u m
il pa gir m lim bici gôn
he la ap r o
c he lap
ca

5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000 Prodciclo1
1500 Prodciclo2
1000
500
0
at
o po a io ã a
et
o ço ol
lim cid ôn nh un in ss
m r bi og cu uc m
ilh pa
gir
a
he lap
m
ca
s verdes na produção do milho verde:
O adubo verde mais adequado para a produção de
milho verde é utilizando o Cunhã, pois o numero
de espigas comerciais obtidas com esse
tratamento foi superior aos demais.
mato 21381.05
limpo 22288.72
herbicida 23746.42
calapogônio 26488.23
Cunhã 41405.55
mucuna 39044.52
milheto 34250.24
painço 29095.92
girassol 37371.74
mato 1.87518555
limpo 2.86056681
herbicida 2.85776444
calapogônio 2.56023914
cunhã 2.72526448
mucuna 2.49326006
milheto 2.30575309
painço 2.74041107
girassol 3.31749652
mato 18753.2387
limpo 31743.3806
herbicida 37780.0933
calapogônio 29276.4248
cunhã 23047.525
mucuna 28985.8929
painço 26708.6074
milheto 25275.5735
girassol 25852.9572
mato 2678.83651
limpo 4004.79354
herbicida 4062.50827
calapogônio 3600.33629
cunhã 3860.79135
mucuna 3518.71379
milheto 3279.735
painço 3861.48832
girassol 4739.28075
mato 1511.40793
limpo 1205.57695
herbicida 2545.23049
calapogônio 3230.7015
cunhã 3726.497
mucuna 2344.46613
milheto 2434.85929
painço 3078.7188
girassol 3432.9647

N° de espigas Mato -
Cobertura
comercias Plantas/m2 plantas/ha
mato 21381.05 1.87518555 18753.2387
limpo 22288.72 2.86056681 31743.3806
herbicida 23746.42 2.85776444 37780.0933
calapogônio 26488.23 2.56023914 29276.4248
Cunhã 41405.55 2.72526448 23047.525
mucuna 39044.52 2.49326006 28985.8929
milheto 34250.24 2.30575309 26708.6074
painço 29095.92 2.74041107 25275.5735
girassol 37371.74 3.31749652 25852.9572
 Plantas/ha

Plantas/ha

at
o po da io ã a ço to ol
ici ôn nh un in he ss
m lim b g cu uc a il r a
he
r o m p m gi
alap
c
Prodciclo1 Prodciclo2

2678.83651 1511.4079
4004.79354 1205.577
4062.50827 2545.2305
3600.33629 3230.7015
3860.79135 3726.497
3518.71379 2344.4661
3279.735 2434.8593
3861.48832 3078.7188
4739.28075 3432.9647