Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
September 2010
ustralia
Andre Kaspura
The Engineering Profession in Australia; A Profile from the 2006 Population Census ISBN 978 0 85825 876 1 Author: Andre Kaspura Institution of Engineers Australia 2010 All rights reserved. Other than brief extracts, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without the written consent of the publisher. The report can be downloaded at www.engineersaustralia.org.au
National and International Policy Engineers Australia 11 National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6270 6555 Fax: 02 6273 4200 Email: policy@engineersaustralia.org.au www.engineersaustralia.org.au
CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Introduction Chapter 2. The Engineering Labour Force in Australia 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The Engineering Labour Force and Population 2.3 The Engineering Labour Force and Occupations 2.4 Hours Worked 2.5 Incomes Earned 2.6 Sectoral Distribution 2.7 Industry Distribution 2.8 Age Structure 2.9 Overview Chapter 3 Engineering Skills Applied in Engineering 3.1 Engineering and Skills Utilisation 3.2 Methodology 3.3 Engineering Occupations 3.4 Occupational Distribution 3.5 Hours Worked 3.6 Incomes Earned 3.7 Sectoral Distribution 3.8 Industry Distribution 3.9 Age Structure 3.10 Overview Appendix A The Distribution of the Engineering Labour Force by 4 Digit Occupations
4 4 8 10 13 17 19 23 24
26 27 28 31 32 34 38 39 41 44 46
TABLES
Chapter 2 Table 2.1 The Engineering Labour Force and Population in Australia Table 2.2 The Comparison Labour Force and Population in Australia Table 2.3 The Engineering Labour Force in Australian States and Territories Table 2.4 Unemployment Rates for Engineering Specialisations in 2006 Table 2.5 Individuals with Engineering Qualifications not in the Labour Force Table 2.6 Individuals with Engineering Qualifications Not in the Labour Force and in Full Time Studies Table 2.7 The Occupational Distribution of the Employed Engineering Labour Force Table 2.8 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Full Time Employed Engineering Labour Force Table 2.9 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Part Time Employed Engineering Labour Force Table 2.10 Average Weekly Incomes Earned by the Full Time Employed Engineering Labour Force Table 2.11 Average Weekly Incomes Earned by the Part Time Employed Engineering Labour Force Table 2.12 The Distribution of the Employed Engineering Labour Force by Economic Sectors Table 2.13 Qualifications Held by the Employed Engineering Labour Force in the Private Sector Table 2.14 The Industry Distribution of the Employed Engineering Labour Force Table 2.15 The Age Structures for the Engineering and Comparison Labour Forces Chapter 3 Table 3.1 The Engineering Profession and the Engineering Labour Force Table 3.2 The Occupational Distributions of the Engineering Labour Force and Engineering Occupations Table 3.3 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Full Time Engineering Profession and the Full Time Engineering Labour Force Table 3.4 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Part Time Engineering Profession and the Part Time Engineering Labour Force Table 3.5 Average Weekly Incomes Earned by the Full Time Engineering Profession and the Full Time Engineering Labour Force Table 3.6 Average Weekly Incomes Earned by the Part Time Engineering Profession and the Part Time Engineering Labour Force Table 3.7 The Sectoral Distribution of Employment in the Engineering Profession and The Engineering Labour Force Table 3.8 The Industry Distributions for the Employed Engineering Profession And Engineering Labour Force Table 3.9 The Employed Engineering Profession, by Sector and Industry Table 3.10 The Age Structures for the Employed Engineering Profession, the Engineering Labour Force and the Comparison Labour Force Table 3.11 The Age Structure for the Engineering Profession by Economic Sectors 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 10 12 13 15 17 19 20 23
30 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 42 43
ii
FIGURES
Chapter 2 Figure 2.1 The Occupational Distribution of the Employed Engineering Labour Force Figure 2.2 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Full Time Employed Engineering Labour Force Figure 2.3 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Full Time Employed Engineering and Comparison Labour Forces Figure 2.4 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Full time Employed Engineering Labour Force by Gender Figure 2.5 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Part Time Employed Engineering Labour Force Figure 2.6 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Part Time Employed Engineering and Comparison Labour Forces Figure 2.7 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Part Time Employed Engineering Labour Force, by gender Figure 2.8 The Income Distribution for the Full Time Employed Engineering Labour Force Figure 2.9 The Income Distribution for the Full Time Employed Engineering and Comparison Labour Forces Figure 2.10 The Income Distributions for the Full Time Employed Engineering Labour Force, by Gender Figure 2.11 The Income Distribution for the Part Time Employed Engineering Labour Force Figure 2.12 The Income Distribution for the Part Time Employed Engineering and Comparison Labour Forces Figure 2.13 The Income Distribution for the Part Time Employed Engineering Labour Force, by Gender Figure 2.14 The Relative Size of the Employed Engineering Labour Force in Major Economic Sectors Figure 2.15 The Qualifications Held by by the Employed Engineering Labour Force in Different Economic Sectors Figure 2.16 Qualifications Held by the Employed Engineering Labour Force in the Private Sector Figure 2.17 The Industry Distribution of the Employed Engineering Labour Force Figure 2.18 The Industry Distribution for the Engineering Labour Force Employed by the Commonwealth Figure 2.19 The Industry Distribution for the Engineering Labour Force Employed by State and Territory Governments Figure 2.20 The Industry Distribution for the Engineering Labour Force Employed by Local Governments Figure 2.21 The Industry Distribution for the Engineering Labour Force Employed in the Private Sector Figure 2.22 The Age Distribution of the Engineering and Comparison Labour Forces Chapter 3 Figure 3.1 The Occupational Distributions for the Engineering and the Engineering Labour Force Figure 3.2 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Full Time Engineering Profession and the Full Time Engineering Labour Force Figure 3.3 Average Weekly Hours Worked by Females in the Full Time Engineering Profession and the Full Time Engineering Labour Force Figure 3.4 Average Weekly Hours Worked by the Part Time Engineering Profession and the Part Time Engineering Labour Force iii
9 11 11 11 12 12 13 14 14 15 16 16 16 18 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 24
32 33 33 34
Figure 3.5 Average Weekly Incomes Earned by the Full Time Engineering Profession and the Full Time Engineering Labour Force Figure 3.6 The Average Weekly Incomes Earned by the Full Time Female Engineering Profession and Engineering Labour Force Figure 3.7 Average Weekly Incomes Earned by the Part Time Engineering Profession and Engineering Labour Force Figure 3.8 Average Weekly Incomes Earned by the Part Time Female Engineering Profession and the Engineering Labour Force Figure 3.9 The Sectoral Distribution of Employment in the Engineering Profession And the Engineering Labour Force Figure 3.10 Female Sectoral Shares of Employment in the Engineering Profession And the Engineering Labour Force Figure 3.11 The Industry Distribution for the Engineering Profession and the Engineering Labour Force Figure 3.12 The Age Structures for the Employed Engineering Profession, Engineering Labour Force and Comparison Labour Force Figure 3.13 The Age Structure for the Engineering Profession by Economic Sector
35 36 37 37 38 38 43 42 44
Introduction
iv
1.
INTRODUCTION
This Report looks at the question how many engineers are there in Australia? The answer in Australia is more complex than many expect. In some countries engineers must be lisenced or registered. In these cases the answer becomes a simple matter of counting the number of engineers on the register. Unfortunately, in Australia registration is voluntary except in the Queensland building industry. Engineering is one of the few disciplines where there the link between formal qualifications and subsequent work force destinations is reasonably close. However, relying on traditional ennumeration of engineering occupations can lead to poor statistical estimates for two reasons. First, the range of occupations that require the application of engineering knowledge and skills has expanded as the sophistication of the economy has increased. Concepts such as public-private-partnerships for infrastructure provision have created a new demand for engineers in legal and financial businesses. Second, there is growing recognition that engineering qualifications provide suitable training for a wide range of generic work and engineering graduates are just as likely to respond to labour market incentives as graduates in other fields. Recent discussions of the adequacy of engineering skills in the Australian economy has failed to recognise these changes. Clearly the demand for engineers has increased as evidenced by the reactions of employers and businesses that have not been able to recruit engineers. The reaction has been to clammer for action to increase the supply of engineers. Typical remedies proposed include increasing the skilled migration intake and increasing the number of places in engineering in universities and TAFE colleges. The effectiveness of such policies depends on how supply is measured and how the policies increase the supply of engineers for alternative measures. This Report explores two alternative measures of the supply of engineers. The first measure is based on the engineering labour force. This is discussed in Chapter 2. Although the engineering labour force is the most comprehensive measure of how many individuals in the Australian labour market possess formal educational qualifications in engineering, it includes individuals employed in both engineering and generic work. Another issue that has not yet been mentioned is that some individuals are employed in work that requires the application of skill levels lower than is the norm in Australian engineering. Thus, using the engineering labour force as the basis of discussions of engineering skill shortages must contend with the distribution of available supply across activities where formal engineering skills are essential to varying degrees. The second measure narrows the engineering labour force to those individuals who are formally qualified in engineering and who work in recognised engineering occupations. Criteria, including the level of qualifications, the level of skills applied in work and degree of attachment to engineering, are developed to distinguish these occupations. When discussions of engineering skills shortages are based on this measure, policy attention needs to focus on the utilisation of engineering skills in addition to conventional labour force measures such as labour force participation, employment and unemployment. The reports analysis uses statistics from ABS 2006 population census. In the past using census statistics has been a cumbersome process involving pre-ordering cross-tabulations of statistics to be provided by ABS consultancy services. In late 2009, the ABS released its 2006 Census Tablebuilder facility, a product that gives users direct access to census databases so that they can design cross-tabulations to suit their own purpose. This flexibility not only makes it easier to extract relevant statistics, but experimentation with alternative
Introduction
Most practising engineers possess a Bachelors degree or diploma or advanced diploma in engineering. APESMA and Engineers Australia salaries surveys show that over 20% possess graduate diplomas or certificates, masters degrees or doctorates in non-engineering fields. In the census these individuals are allocated to the non-engineering field. 2 See The Engineering Profession: A Statistical Overview, Sixth Edition, 2010, www.engineersaustralia.org.au
Introduction
2.
2.1 Introduction
This Chapter examines the engineering labour force in Australia. The engineering labour force is defined as all individuals holding formal educational qualifications in engineering who are employed or actively looking for work. A generic approach to employment consistent with the view that a better educated work force is a more productive work force is assumed. This is the position adopted in many broad brush statements of Government policy and implies no restrictions on occupations that individuals are employed in or are looking for work in. Formal qualifications in engineering include higher degrees, post graduate diplomas and certificates, bachelors degrees and advanced diplomas and diplomas in engineering. Engineering is defined as Australian Standard Classification of Education (ASCED) 03, Engineering and Related Technologies. ASCED 0311, Geomatic Engineering is excluded because surveying is not regarded as part of engineering. The analysis begins by identifying the population with formal engineering qualifications and examining labour force participation. The characteristics of population components are then explored with most attention given to employment.
The engineering labour force has a gender imbalance. In engineering, 90.2% of the labour force was male and 9.8% was female compared to 47.4% males and 52.6% females in thecomparison labour force. Labour force participation was highest for individuals who possess higher degree, post graduate diplomas and certificates and bachelors degrees with rates close to 85%. Individuals possessing diplomas and advanced diplomas had a much lower participation rate. Male labour force participation was typically higher than female participation. The gap
Table 2.2 repeats the form of Table 2.1 but with statistics for a comparison labour force comprised of individuals with similar qualifications but covering all fields of study. There is little to separate the engineering and comparison labour forces with post graduate qualifications. A similar conclusion applies to the components with bachelors degrees. The higher overall participation rate in engineering reflects the low female share. In the components with diploma qualifications, the engineering participation rates are lower than for the comparison group for both genders. The main conclusion is that engineering, like other fields of endevour that require investment in education, has relatively high labour force participation. Employment and Unemployment In the engineering labour force 242,421 were employed; 202,218, or 83.4% full time and 29,148, or 12.% part time. The remaining 11,055, or 4.6% were away from work when the census was conducted and comprises both part time and full time workers. The corresponding statistics for the Australian labour force were 64.0% full time, 29.5% part time and 6.5% away from work and for the comparison labour force they were 69.2% full time, 25.5% part time and 5.3% away from work. The incidence of full time work in the engineering labour force is very high and the incidence of part time work low compared to both the labour force as a whole and compared to similarly qualified individuals in all fields of endevour. Although the female share of the engineering labour force is low, the tendency towards full time work is greater than in the comparison labour force. In engineering, 69.1% of female employment is full time and 25.2% is part time. The corresponding statistics for the comparison labour force are 58.0% full time and 35.8% part time. It is interesting to note that even though the proportion of part time employment among engineering females is over twice as high as for engineering males (10.6%), in numerical terms male part employment (23,309) is four times female part time employment (5,839). There were 7,367 individuals unemployed in the engineering labour force, 5,284 were looking for full time work and 2,083 were looking for part time work. The unemployment rate was 2.9%. To put this into perspective, the corresponding unemployment rate for the Australian labour force as a whole was 5.2% and the unemployment rate for the comparison labour force was 3.0%. In other words, relative to the labour force as a whole, the engineering labour force was very tight but this tightness was not unique to engineering and was evident in the comparison labour force as well.
The lowest unemployment rates occurred in jurisdictions particularly affected by the boom in mining and related activity. The unemployment rate in the Northern Territory was 0.8%, in Western Australia it was 2.0% and in Queensland it was 2.2%. Although there were higher unemployment rates in other jurisdictions, the highest was 3.5% in Victoria. This rate is still quite small and strong evidence of a tight labour market for engineering skills.
Appendix A
Engineering & Related Technologies NFD Manufacturing Engineering Rest of Manufacturing Engineering Chemical Engineering Mining Engineering Materials Engineering Rest of Process & Resource Engineering Automotive Engineering Rest of Automotive Engineering Mechanical Engineering Industrial Engineering Rest of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering Construction Engineering Structural Engineering Building Services Engineering Water & Sanitary Engineering Transport Engineering Geotechnical Engineering Ocean Engineering Rest of Civil Engineering Electrical Engineering Electronic Engineering Computer Engineering Communications Technologies Rest of Electrical & Electronic Engineering Aerospace Engineering Aircraft Maintenance Engineering Aircraft Operations Rest of Aerospace Engineering Maritime Engineering Rest of Maritime Engineering Environmental Engineering Biomedical Engineering Rest of Other Engineering ALL SPECIALISATIONS Source: ABS, 2006 Population Census Tablebuilder
Table 2.4 shows estimates of unemployment rates for a wide range of engineering specialisations. Here specialisation refers to how engineers descibed their educational qualification in the census rather than to the nomenclature of the particular job they were engaged in. The most numerous group is best descibed as general engineering and contained 106,148, or 42.5% of the engineering labour force and had an unemployment rate of 2.6%, below the figure for the engineering labour force. Most specialisations showed evidence of tight labour markets. In some instances, this was not the case. Only three specialisations had unemployment rates equal to or higher than the unemployment rate for the Australian labour force (rest of manufacturing engineering with 5.3%; rest of automotive engineering with 5.5% and communications technologies with 5.1%). The combined numbers in these groups were 3.9% of the engineering labour force. In some instances unemployment rates were higher for one of the two qualifications levels shown in Table 2.4 and not necessarily for the entire specialisation group. This occurred for diploma qualified chemical engineers who had an unemployment rate of 6.6%, for diploma qualified ccomputer engineers who had an unemployment rate of 7.3% and diploma qualified environmental engineers who had an unemployment rate of 6.1%. In the three cases the overall unemployment rate for the specialisation was below the Australian labour force rate. Not in the Labour Force There were 56,142 individuals who possess engineering qualifications not in the labour force; 47,756 males and 8,386 females. An initial perception of this group is that most have retired from the labour force. The statistics in Table 2.5 show that this is sunstantially the case. There were 28,459, or 50.7% aged 65 years or more and another 20.0% are aged between 55 and 64 years. In other words, it is probably the case that 70% have retired. However the
Appendix A
The mix of qualifications in Table 2.5 is quite different to the engineering labour force with 9.4% holding post graduate qualifications (compared to 12.8%); 39.6% holding bachelors degrees (compared to 52.2%) and 51.0% holding advanced diplomas or diplomas in engineering (compared to 37.3%). Among those aged 55 years and over, 56.7% held diploma qualifications. This pattern reflects a shift from diplomas to degrees as the predominant engineering qualification over the years.
TABLE 2.6 INDIVIDUALS WITH ENGINEERING QUALIFICATIONS NOT IN THE LABOUR FORCE AND IN FULL TIME STUDIES AGE Post Graduate Quals Bachelors Degree GROUPS Male Female Total Male Female Total Under 20 years 3 0 3 20 5 25 20 to 24 years 61 28 89 800 274 1074 25 to 29 years 237 102 339 840 281 1121 30 to 34 years 164 59 223 263 79 342 35 to 39 years 72 19 91 136 52 188 40 to 44 years 51 9 60 82 39 121 45 to 49 years 17 11 28 46 24 70 50 to 54 years 9 4 13 31 8 39 55 to 59 years 7 3 10 26 0 26 60 to 64 years 6 0 6 19 3 22 Over 65 years 7 0 7 17 5 22 TOTAL 634 235 869 2280 770 3050 Source: ABS, 2006 Population Census TableBuilder Diploma Quals Male Female Total 43 10 53 665 139 804 335 45 380 380 122 502 77 29 106 59 15 74 47 18 65 32 7 39 13 6 19 15 0 15 20 6 26 1686 397 2083 All Qualifications Male Female Total 66 15 81 1526 441 1967 1412 428 1840 807 260 1067 285 100 385 192 63 255 110 53 163 72 19 91 46 9 55 40 3 43 44 11 55 4600 1402 6002
Other reasons why individuals with engineering qualifications are not in the labour force include full time studies and family responsibilities. Table 2.6 reflects on the first of these. There were 6,002 individuals with engineering qualifications in full time studies. This was 36.4% of those not in the labour force aged under 55 years. The majority (82.6%) were aged under 35 years and 63.5% were males aged under 35 years. Presumably when these full time students complete their courses they will re-enter the engineering labour force. The large proportion of full time students holding bachelors degrees (50.8%) or diploma qualifications (34.7%) serve to emphasize how many students who complete entry level qualifications in engineering do not enter the labour market, instead continuing on as full time students. Comparing Tables 2.5 and 2.6 shows that there were 10,626 individuals with engineering qualifications who were aged less than 55 years and were not in full time studies and not in the labour force and 4,797 were aged under 40 years, 2,558 females and 2,239 males. In all likelihood these individuals were dealing with family responsibilities.
Appendix A
FIGURE 2.1: THE OCCUPATIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE EMPLOYED ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE
Post Graduate Quals 120000 Bachelors Degree Diploma Quals
100000
NUMBERS
80000
60000
40000
20000
Employed members of the engineering labour force are represented in all major occupational groups, even some that are not likely to require engineering skills. By far the largest employment group is professionals with 106,471 employed, 90.4% males and 9.6% females. This occupational group includes all traditional engineering occupations. The second largest employment group was managers with 50,219 employed, 93.7% males and 6.3% females. Technicians and tradespersons was the third largest employment group with 40,216, with 94.1% males and 5.9% females. These groups are the ones normally associated with engineering employment and combined accounted for 81% of engineering labour force employment. The remaining occupational groups employ 45,520 members of the engineering labour force, 38,060 males and 7,460 females. The male component is 17.4% of the male engineering labour force and the female component is 32.2% of the female engineering labour force. There were broad spreads of qualification types in the managers and professionals groups. In the former, 13.3% had post graduate qualifications, 52.7% had bachelors degrees and 34.0% had diploma qualifications. Degrees featured more in the professionals group with 17.5% possessing post graduate qualifications, 60.8% bachelors degrees and 21.7%
Appendix A
Full time members of the engineering labour force work long hours. Although many (94,696, or 46.9%) work what might be called standard hours, that is between 35 and 40 hours per week, the majority work longer hours. Some 41,823, or 20.7% worked between 41 and 48 hours per week and 65,699, or 32.5% worked 49 hours or more per week. Figure 2.2 shows that there are relatively minor differences to this pattern so far as qualifications are concerned. More members of the full time employed engineering labour force work longer hours and fewer work standard hours than is the case in the comparison labour force. This is shown in Figure 2.3. Combined with the higher proportion of full time work in engineering compared to the comparison labour force, this result points to relatively high utilisation of engineering qualifications and skills. More males than females in the full time employed engineering labour force worked longer hours and conversely more females than males worked standard hours. This is illustrated in Figure 2.4. The gender difference is particularly acute in the longest hours worked group. Part Time Employment Table 2.9 and Figures 2.5 to 2.7 show the corresponding information for the part time employed engineering labour force.
Appendix A
10
30.0
% OF QUALIFICATION GROUP
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
FIGURE 2.4: AVERAGE WEEKLY HOURS WORKED THE FULL TIME EMPLOYED ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE, BY GENDER
Males 40.0 Females
35.0
30.0
% OF GENDER GROUP
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
Appendix A
11
Part time employment was defined by the ABS as working less than 35 hours per week. Three broad groupings of part time hours were used; 9,193, or 31.5% of part time employed members of the engineering labour force worked less than 16 hours per week. Slightly more, 9,398, or 32.2% worked between 16 and 24 hours and 10,557, or 36.2% worked 25 to 34 hours per week. As Figure 2.5 shows the only real pattern here relates to individuals with diploma qualifications where skew is towards longer part time hours.
FIGURE 2.5: AVERAGE WEEKLY HOURS WORKED BY THE PART TIME EMPLOYED ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE
Post Graduate Quals 45.0 40.0 Bachelors Degrees Diploma Quals
% OF QUALIFICATION GROUP
FIGURE 2.6: AVERAGE WEEKLY HOURS WORKED BY THE PART TIME EMPLOYED ENGINEERING AND COMPARISON LABOUR FORCES
Engineering 40.0 Comparison
35.0
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0 1 to 15 16 to 24 25 to 34
Appendix A
12
% OF GENDER GROUP
HOURS WORKED
Figure 2.6 shows that the pattern of part time hours worked is very similar between the engineering and comparison labour forces and Figure 2.7 shows that more females than males in the engineering labour force work shorter part time hours and more males than females work longer part time hours.
The largest income group for full time employed members of the engineering labour force was the highest income group ($2,000 per week or higher) used by the ABS in the census. There were 47,369, or 23.4% in this group. There were large numbers in the next three highest income groups but not in an even progression. There were 29,897, or 14.8% who earned between $1,600 and $1,999 per week; 33,786 or 16.7% who earned between $1,300 and $1,599 per week and 37,668, or 18.6% who earned between $1,000 and $1,299 per
Appendix A
13
INCOME GROUPS
$800-$999 $600-$799 $400-$599 $250-$399 $150-$249 $1-$149 Nil income Negative income 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
% IN INCOME GROUPS
FIGURE 2.9: THE INCOME DISTRIBUTION FOR FULL TIME EMPLOYED ENGINEERING AND COMPARISON LABOUR FORCES
Comparison $2,000 or more $1,600-$1,999 $1,300-$1,599 $1,000-$1,299 Engineering
INCOME GROUPS
$800-$999 $600-$799 $400-$599 $250-$399 $150-$249 $1-$149 Nil income Negative income 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
% IN INCOME GROUPS
Figure 2.9 shows that more members of the engineering labour force earned full time incomes in the top three income groups than was the case for the comparison labour force. Conversely, there were fewer members of the full time employed engineering labour force in lower income groups. Figure 2.10 shows that significantly more males than females in the full time engineering labour force earn incomes in the top three income groups. More females than males earn incomes below these groups with the gender gap towards females widening as income falls.
Appendix A
14
Males
INCOME GROUPS
$800-$999 $600-$799 $400-$599 $250-$399 $150-$249 $1-$149 Nil income Negative income 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0
% IN INCOME GROUPS
20.0
25.0
30.0
According to the APESMA salary surveys3, in late 2006 the median starting salary for new graduates in engineering was $48,142 per annum or $925 per week. This is towards the upper end of the $800 to $999 income group. The lower end of this group corresponds to $41,600 and this was above the lower decile of $39,766 in the APESMA salary range. In other words, about 10% of new engineering graduates were probably included in the $600 to $799 income group, with the rest in following income groups. Part Time Employment Table 2.11 and Figures 2.11 to 2.13 shows the corresponding income distribution information for the part time employed engineering labour force.
TABLE 2.11 THE INCOME DISTRIBUTION FOR THE PART TIME EMPLOYED ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE Post Graduate Quals Bachelor Degree INCOME GROUP Male Female Total Male Female Total 12 0 12 32 4 36 Negative income Nil income 20 3 23 108 44 152 $1-$149 114 50 164 582 249 831 $150-$249 203 60 263 1015 346 1361 $250-$399 410 118 528 1565 538 2103 $400-$599 444 138 582 1475 589 2064 $600-$799 296 68 364 1020 359 1379 $800-$999 263 64 327 904 272 1176 $1,000-$1,299 283 84 367 1095 297 1392 $1,300-$1,599 302 37 339 810 177 987 $1,600-$1,999 238 35 273 651 92 743 $2,000 or more 418 28 446 1134 86 1220 Not stated 22 5 27 82 15 97 TOTAL 3025 690 3715 10473 3068 13541 Source: ABS, 2006 Population Census TableBuilder Diploma Quals Male Female Total 36 5 41 77 22 99 396 173 569 759 298 1057 1447 484 1931 1718 563 2281 1189 215 1404 910 123 1033 1090 99 1189 673 40 713 520 16 536 877 28 905 118 16 134 9810 2082 11892 Total Male Female Total 80 9 89 205 69 274 1092 472 1564 1977 704 2681 3422 1140 4562 3637 1290 4927 2505 642 3147 2077 459 2536 2468 480 2948 1785 254 2039 1409 143 1552 2429 142 2571 222 36 258 23308 5840 29148
A common presumption is that part time earnings are less than full time earnings. Figure 2.11 shows that this is not always the case. Part time earnings for the engineering labour force cover all income groups, including the highest. The largest income group was between $400 and $599 per week. This group included 4,927, or 16.9% and another 4,562, or 15.7% earned between $250 and $399. Significant numbers earned incomes comparable to full time workers. There were 2,571, or 8.8% earning over $2,000 per week; 1,552,or 5.3% earning between $1,600 and $1,999 per week and 2,039, or 7.0% earning between $1,300 and $1,599 per week.
Appendix A
15
INCOME GROUPS
$800-$999 $600-$799 $400-$599 $250-$399 $150-$249 $1-$149 Nil income Negative income 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0
% IN INCOME GROUPS
FIGURE 2.12: THE INCOME DISTRIBUTION FOR THE PART TIME EMPLOYED ENGINEERING AND COMPARISON LABOUR FORCES
Comparison $2,000 or more $1,600-$1,999 $1,300-$1,599 $1,000-$1,299 Engineering
INCOME GROUPS
$800-$999 $600-$799 $400-$599 $250-$399 $150-$249 $1-$149 Nil income Negative income 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
% IN INCOME GROUPS
FIGURE 2.13: THE INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS FOR THE PART TIME EMPLOYED ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE, BY GENDER
Females $2,000 or more $1,600-$1,999 $1,300-$1,599 $1,000-$1,299 Males
INCOME GROUPS
$800-$999 $600-$799 $400-$599 $250-$399 $150-$249 $1-$149 Nil income Negative income 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
% IN INCOME GROUPS
Appendix A
16
801 20324 3893 91325 3652 67735 8346 179384 71 337 225 633 1145 5042 4870 11057 120 507 359 986 27552 107332 84374 219258
Employment in the engineering labour force is strongly skewed towards the private sector. There were 43,006, or 17.7% employed in the the public sector and 198,266, or 81.8% were employed in the private sector with a small group not indicating the sector that they were employed in. In the public sector, 19,879, or 8.2% were employed by Commonwealth Government departments and agencies; 85.3% were employed full time, 10.0% were employed part time, 4.8% were away from work on census night and 9.0% of employment was females. There were 18,001, or 7.4% employed by State and Territory government departments and agencies; 86.2% full time, 8.7% part time, 5.1% away from work on census night and a female share of 10.3%.
Appendix A
17
198266
There were 198,266 employed in the private sector; 83.1% full time, 12.6% part time, 4.2% away from work on census night and with a female share of 9.5%. The female share was low in all sectors, varying between 9.0 and 10.3%. Part time employment was highest in the private sector with 12.6% but this is quite low relative to part time employment in the comparison labour force.
FIGURE 2.15: THE QUALIFICATIONS HELD BY THE EMPLOYED ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE IN DIFFERENT ECONOMIC SECTORS
Post Graduate Quals 60 Bachelors Degree Diploma Quals
50
% OF SECTOR EMPLOYMENT
40
30
20
10
Figure 2.15 compares the qualifications held by employed members of the engineering labour force in different economic sectors. The proportion of post graduate qualifications in the Commonwealth, 23.4%, was almost twice as high as the national average of 12.8%. It was much higher than the post graduate share in Local Government, 15.6%, in the States and Territories, 14.6% and in the private sector with 11.5%. In the States and Territories, Local Government and the private sector the dominant qualification was a bachelors degree in engineering, accounting for 47.2%, 49.0% and 51.8% of employment respectively. In the Commonwealth, however, diploma qualifications dominated with 42.6%. In combination with
Appendix A
18
In the public sector, the employment of members of the engineering labour force is as employees. In the private sector, employment can take different forms; as an employee, as an owner manager of a business or as a family member contributing to a family owned business. Table 2.13 shows how private sector employment is segmented. Although the dominant form of employment remains as employees, owner-managers account for almost one fifth and the number of contributing family members was non-trivial. There were 155,412 employees, or 78.4% with a female share of 10.3%. There were 39,555, or 20.0% owner-managers with a female share of 5.9% and there were 2,567, or 1.3% contributing family members. Although the female share of contributing family members was higher at 14.4%, in both numerical and proportional terms it remained quite low.
FIGURE 2.16: QUALIFICATIONS HELD BY THE EMPLOYER ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR
EMPLOYEES 60 OWNER MANAGERS FAMILY MEMBER
50
40
30
20
10
Figure 2.16 considers the engineering qualifications held by status in employment of the engineering labour force in the private sector. There was little difference between employees, owner-managers and contributing family members in respect of post graduate qualifications held. However, employees are more likely to hold bachelors degrees than owner-managers who in turn are more likely to hold bachelors degrees than contributing family members. The reverse pattern was evident for Diploma qualifications with the highest share occurring for contributing family members.
Appendix A
19
FIGURE 2.17: THE INDUSTRY DISTRIBUTION OF THE EMPLOYED ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE
Post Graduate Quals Other Services Arts & Recreation Health Care & Social Education & Training Public Administration & Safety Administrative & Support Professional & Technical Services Rental, Hiring & Real Estate Financial & Insurance Information & Telecommunications Transport, Postal etc Accomodation & Food Retail Trade Wholesale Trade Construction Electricity, Gas, Water, Waste Manufacturing Mining Agriculture 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Bachelors Degree Diploma Quals
The largest employer of the engineering labour force was the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services industry. This industry includes engineering consulting businesses and employed 48,453, or 20.0%; with a female share of 9.2%. This industry had a very high representation of post graduate qualifications (17.6%), and a high representation of bachelors degrees (60.0% of Bachelors Qualified Engineers). Conversely, the proportion of Diploma Qualified Engineers was low (22.5%). Almost as many were employed in Manufacturing with 47,128, or 19.4% and a female share of 8.5%. The pattern of qualifications was the reverse of the one observed for the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services industry. The proportion of post graduate qualifications was 9.6%, the proportion of bachelors degrees was 50.4% and the proportion of diploma qualifications was 39.9%. There was a large gap to the third largest employer, the Public Administration and Safety Industry. This industry includes the defense forces, Federal and State regulatory agencies and some elements of public utilities. There were 22,698, or 9.4% were employed in this industry with a female share of 8.4%. Both the proportion of post graduate qualifications and diploma qualifications were high at 15.0% and 43.5% respectively.
Appendix A
20
6%
42%
The industry distributions reflect the functions of economic sectors. Figure 2.18 shows the industry distribution for engineering labour force employed by the Commonwealth Government. Six industries industries effectively dominate employment in this sector. Consistent with the functions of the Commonwealth Government, 42% are employed in the Public Administration and Safety industry, followed by 23% in Education and Training and 19% in Information and Telecommunications. These industries cover defense, CSIRO, most universities and most of Australias transport, energy and telecommunications regulatory agenciwes.There are smaller employment groups in Professional, Scientific and Technical Services (6%), Transport, Postal and Warehousing (6%) and Manufacturing (3%). All other industries account for only 1% of employment of qualified engineers. Figure 2.19 illustrates the industry distribution for the engineering labour force employed by the State and Territory Governments. Like the Commonwealth, the largest employment industry was Public Administration and Safety with 40%. Although the Commonwealth has some regulatory functions in Electricity, Gas, Water and Waste, employment arising from these functions is most likely included in Public Administration. In contrast, many States and Territories have retained ownership of electricity, water and sewerage utilities and those that have privatised their utilities have retained some industry functions. This industry is the second largest employer of the engineering labour force in States and Territories with 32%. The third largest employment industry was Transport, Postal and Warehousing with 10%,
Appendix A
21
7% 8%
3% 32%
40%
10%
FIGURE 2.20: THE INDUSTRY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE EMPLOYED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Electricity, Gas, Water & Waste Construction 1% 7% 3% Public Administration & Safety Balance
89%
Figure 2.20 shows that members of the engineering labour force employed in Local Government are concentrated in even fewer industries. The dominant industry is Public Administration and Safety with 89% of employment. Some Local Government authorities have responsibility for providing water and sewerage and electricity services and most have waste responsibilities. This is reflected by 7% of employment being in the Electricity, Gas, Water, Sewerage and Waste industry. Some local Government authorities have an involvement in the Construction Industry resulting in the employment of another 3%. All other industries combined account for only 1% of employment.
Appendix A
22
23%
24%
4% 5% 6% 6% 9% 23%
Figure 2.21 shows the industry distribution for the engineering labour force employed in the private sector. The largest employment was in the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services industry with 24% of Qualified Engineers. This industry provides engineering and technical consultancy services throughout the economy. The second largest industry is the Manufacturing industry with 23% of employment. The Construction industry ranks third with 9%, followed by Wholesale Trade and Transport, Postal and Warehousing (both 6%), Retail Trade (5%) and the Mining Industry with 4%. While these industries represent significant concentration of engineering employment, the remaining 23% of employment is spread across 12 industries.
Appendix A
23
AGE GROUPS
45-49 years 40-44 years 35-39 years 30-34 years 25-29 years 20-24 years 15-19 years 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0
% IN AGE GROUPS
There were fewer members of the engineering labour force in age groups under 34 years than in the comparison labour force. The proportions in the 35 to 39 years age group were almost identical. However, from 40 years onwards there were more members of the engineering labour force in each age group than was the case for the comparison labour force. This suggests that the age structure for the engineering labour force is older than the age structure for the comparison labour force. The relatively small proportion of the engineering labour force in the 20 to 24 years group reflects the comparatively low graduation rate of engineers from universities and TAFE colleges. Most engineering students graduate from their courses between ages 21 to 23 years. The much larger sizes of the 25 to 29 years and 30 to 34 years groups reflects the age preference of Australias skilled migration programs.
2.9 Overview
This chapter has descibed the characteristics of the engineering labour force defined as employed and unemployed individuals holding post graduate qualifications, bachelors degrees and advanced diplomas and diplomas in engineering. Labour force participation was found to be high relative to the Australian labour force as a whole but in line with a comparison labour force of individuals with similar level qualifications covering all fields. The level of employment was high and both the level of and rate of unemployment were low. The engineering labour market was relatively tight compared to the labour market overall, but no tighter than the labour market for other skills. Female unemployment in engineering was much higher than for males and for females in the comparison labour market. Engineering has a pronounced gender imbalance not evident in the comparison labour force. The full time engineering labour force works relatively long hours compared to the comparison labour force. The proportion of part time work in engineering is much less than in the comparison labour force but the pattern of hours worked by part timers is similar. The hours worked by the engineering labour force is reflected in its income distribution. More full time employed members of the engineering labour force earn high incomes and fewer earn lower incomes than was the case in the comparison labour force. Incomes favour males with more males and fewer females earning high incomes and fewer males and more females earning lower incomes. The pattern for the part time employed engineering labour force is similar to that for full timers. Although three quarters of the engineering labour force was employed in three occupational groups, the remaining quarter was spread widely across over many others. The key
Appendix A
24
Appendix A
25
3.
26
ADMINISTRATIVE
The engineering profession is the engineering labour force that is engaged in engineering and its members are referred to as engineering practitioners. The engineering profession is smaller than the engineering labour force and the relationship between the two can be thought of as the utilisation of engineering skills in engineering. Australian labour market policy has emphasized generic metrics such as the proportion of the labour force with postschool educational qualifications. This framework accepts that the utilisation of engineering skills in engineering and non-engineering contribute equally to economic productivity. But when policy concerns relate to engineering skills shortages, it is appropriate to focus on the engineering profession and to examine how the engineering labour force not part of the engineering profession contributes to the economy.
3.2 Methodology
This section outlines the methodology used to identify occupations that are part of the engineering profession and to evaluate the economic contribution of the portion of the engineering labour force not engaged in engineering. The methodology is applied within the framework of the ABS classifications for occupations and educational qualifications. The following criteria are used to identify an engineering occupation: The occupant should hold formal educational qualifications in engineering consistent with Australian Qualification Framework (AQF) skill level 1 or skill level 2. The competencies obtained in post graduate degrees, diplomas and certificates and four year and three year bachelors degrees in engineering satisfy skill level 1. The competencies obtained in associate degrees, diplomas and advanced diplomas in engineering satisfy skill level 2. The occupation should require the application of engineering skills, either exclusively or in combination with another discipline, at skill level 1 or skill level 2. The occupation should exhibit an acceptable degree of attachment to the engineering profession.
Formal Education Qualifications In Australia the engineering profession is organised into three grades according to educational qualification and professional experience. Engineering Officers are expected to hold an engineering qualification that satifies at least skill level 2. Engineering Technologists are expected to hold at least a three year bachelors degree in engineering. Professional Engineers are expected to hold a four year bachelors degree in engineering. This criterion is necessary because the ANZSCO classification used by the ABS allows periods of practical experience to substitute for formal qualifications. This approach is not accepted by Engineers Australia and is not consistent with Australian labour force practise. Although it is not generally necessary for engineers in Australia to be registered before they can practise, formal educational qualifications are the norm. Occupational Skill Levels Engineering work as understood by Engineers Australia requires the application of work skills at level 1 or level 2. When an individual possessing acceptable engineering qualifications applies work skills at level 3 or lower, the work involved does not conform to engineering work as practised by the engineering profession. Work skills at level 3 are consistent with work undertaken by tradespersons; work skills at level 4 or 5 relate to a range of semi-skilled and unskilled occupations. It is possible for an individual who possesses acceptable engineering qualifications to be engaged in work that requires the application of skill levels 1 and 2 but in an occupation that does not involve engineering work. This situation is consistent with the generic application of skills and the individuals contribution to economic productivity needs to be evaluated from
27
Appendix A
28
Appendix A
29
Engineering Labour Force 28362 3588 31950 110257 14413 124670 86739 Utilisation (%) 70.0 57.1 68.6 67.1 50.8 65.2 44.1 Source: ABS, 2006 Population Census TableBuilder
There were 50,219 people (47,077 males and 3,142 females) with engineering qualifications employed in management occupations (major group 1) and 33,048 (31,338 males and 1,710 females) were employed in engineering occupations. The balance, 17,171 (15,739 males and 1,432 females) were employed in management occupations that were not engineering occupations. All occupations in the magagement group required the application of skills at level 1 or 2. Thus, those employed in non-engineering occupations were potentially contributing to economic productivity in a manner commensurate to engineering work. A much more detailed examination of non-engineering occupations is necessary to be more precise. There were 106,468 people (96,276 males and 10,192 females) employed in professional occupations (major group 2) and 91,210 (83,591 males and 7,619 females) were employed in engineering occupations. Specialist engineers accounted for 57,370 (52,708 males and 4,662 females), or 62.9%. The balance, 15,258 (12,685 males and 2,573 females) were employed in non-engineering occupations. All occupations in major group 2 required the application of level 1 skills and these occupations potentially contribute to economic productivity in a manner commensurate to engineering work. There were 40,215 people (37,843 males and 2,372 females) with engineering qualifications employed in major group 3 technicians and trade workers. The occupations in this group required the application of skill level 2 for technician occupations and skill level 3 for trades worker. The technician occupations cover the engineering associate occupations of the engineering team and 13,292 (12,402 males and 890 females) are employed in this capacity. The balance, 26,923 (25,441 males and 1,482 females) were employed in a wide variety of trades occupations, including: 984 automotive electricians and mechanics 680 fabrication trades workers 5,260 mechanical engineering trades workers 366 bricklayers and carpenters and joiners 3,262 electricians 5,210 electronics and telecommunications trades workers 723 food trades workers, and 1,479 micellaneous technicians and trades workers. This list is not exhaustive but illustrates the point that engineering qualifications commensurate with the requirements of the engineering team (712 post graduate, 4,815 bachelors degrees and 14,795 diplomas and advanced diplomas) were being utilised for work at skill level 3. These engineering qualifications were being under utilised. Major group 4 included community and personal service occupations. There were no engineering occupations in this group but a number require the application of level 2 skills. In total 5,291 people (4,240 males and 1,051 females) with engineering qualifications were employed in major group 4. There were 349 (265 males and 84 females) employed in occupations that required level 2 skills. The remainer were employed in occupations that required the application of skill level 3 or lower to their work. There were 14,539 (11,257 males and 3,282 females) with engineering qualifications employed in major group 5, clerical and administrative workers. One occupation, contract, program and project administrators was indentified as an engineering occupation that employed 5,268 (4,809 males and 459 females). There were 795 (551 males and 244
Appendix A
30
Appendix A
31
FIGURE 3.1: THE OCCUPATIONAL DISTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ENGINEERING PROFESSION AND THE ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE
Engineering Occupations Engineering Labour Force
NUMBERS
0 Managers 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000
Professionals
Technicians/Trades
Community/Personal Service
Sales
Machinery Operators
Labourers
There were 249,788 individuals with engineering qualifications in the engineering labour force with 242,421 employed and 7,367 unemployed. The application of the criteria discussed above resulted in identifying 142,818 as being employed in engineering occupations (the engineering profession) and 99,603 employed in non-engineering occupations. Of these 40,179 were employed in non-engineering occupations that required the application of work skills at level 1 or 2. This group were applying their engineering skills at skill levels commensurate to the engineering profession, but in work that is not closely connected to engineering. The productivity benefit to Australia were consistent with the educational skill levels of the individuals concerned but not with the field of education. The remainder, 59,424, had engineering qualifications at skill levels 1 or 2 but worked in occupations that required the application of skills at level 3 or below. This group were under utilising their engineering skills.
Appendix A
32
FIGURE 3.3: AVERAGE WEEKLY HOURS WORKED BY FEMALES FULL TIME IN THE ENGINEERING PROFESSION AND THE FULL TIME ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE
Females Engineering Profession 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 Females Engineering Labour Force
In the engineering labour force, more males than females work long hours and fewer males than females work shorter hours. Table 3.3 shows that this conclusion also applies to the
Appendix A
33
FIGURE 3.4: AVERAGE WEEKLY HOURS WORKED BY THE PART TIME ENGINEERING PROFESSION AND PART TIME ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE
Engineering Profession 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 Engineering Labour Force
%
20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 1 to 15 16 to 24
AVERAGE WEEKLY HOURS WORKED
25 to 34
Appendix A
34
INCOME GROUPS
$1,000-$1,299 $800-$999 $600-$799 $400-$599 $250-$399 $150-$249 $1-$149 Nil income Negative income 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0
% IN INCOME GROUPS
The engineering profession earns higher incomes than the engineering labour force, accentuating the difference with the comparison labour force. In the engineering labour force, 23.4% earned $2,000 or more per week. In the engineering profession this share was 29.3%. Similarly, 73.5% of the engineering labour force earned $1,000 per week or more and 25.5%, earned less than $1,000 per week. In the engineering profession, the proportion earning $1,000 per week or more was higher at 84.3% and the proportion earning less than $1,000 per week was lower at 15.0%. Figure 2.9 showed that full time females in the engineering labour force were not as well paid as their male counterparts. The proportion of females was higher than the proportion of males in the income groups up to $1,000 to $1,299 per week and then the proportion of males exceeds females with the difference increasing with income. Figure 3.6 shows that there was a similar pattern for full time members of the engineering profession. However, female members of the engineering profession earn higher salaries than females in the engineering labour force. For example, 10.2% of the female engineering labour force earned $2,000 or more per week, but in the engineering profession this was 14.1%. Similar comparisons apply for the top four income groups.
Appendix A
35
INCOME GROUPS
$1,000-$1,299 $800-$999 $600-$799 $400-$599 $250-$399 $150-$249 $1-$149 Nil income Negative income 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0
% IN INCOME GROUPS
Part Time Employment Table 3.6 and Figures 3.7 and 3.8 show the corresponding comparisons for the part time employed engineering labour force and engineering profession. A feature of part time incomes for the engineering labour force was that they covered all income groups, including the highest. The three largest income groups were $400 to $599 per week with 16.9%, $250 to $399 per week with 15.7% and $600 to $799 per week. There were large representations in low income groups; for example, 9.2% of part time engineering labour force earned only $150 to $249 per week, but almost as many (8.8%) earning $2,000 or more per week.
TABLE 3.6 AVERAGE WEEKLY INCOMES EARNED BY THE PART TIME ENGINEERING PROFESSION AND THE PART TIME ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE Average Engineering Profession Engineering Labour Force Weekly Income Male Female Total Male Female Total Negative income 18 0 18 80 9 89 Nil income 38 12 50 205 69 274 $1-$149 144 36 180 1092 472 1564 $150-$249 275 78 353 1977 704 2681 $250-$399 555 125 680 3422 1140 4562 $400-$599 892 228 1120 3637 1290 4927 $600-$799 881 230 1111 2505 642 3147 $800-$999 1023 219 1242 2077 459 2536 $1,000-$1,299 1482 278 1760 2468 480 2948 $1,300-$1,599 1170 168 1338 1785 254 2039 $1,600-$1,999 1014 96 1110 1409 143 1552 $2,000 or more 1791 90 1881 2429 142 2571 Not stated 67 14 81 222 36 258 All Incomes 9350 1574 10924 23308 5840 29148 Source: ABS, 2006 Population Census TableBuilder
Appendix A
36
INCOME GROUPS
$800-$999 $600-$799 $400-$599 $250-$399 $150-$249 $1-$149 Nil income Negative income 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
% IN INCOME GROUPS
FIGURE 3.8: THE AVERAGE WEEKLY INCOMES EARNED BY THE PART TIME FEMALE ENGINEERING PROFESSION AND ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE
Female Engineering Labour Force $2,000 or more $1,600-$1,999 $1,300-$1,599 $1,000-$1,299 Female Professional Engineers
INCOME GROUPS
$800-$999 $600-$799 $400-$599 $250-$399 $150-$249 $1-$149 Nil income Negative income 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
% IN INCOME GROUPS
This broad spread of part time incomes was also evident for the engineering profession but with a more pronounced skew towards higher income groups. More members of the part time engineering profession earned higher incomes and fewer earn lower incomes compared to the engineering labour force. This is reflected in the three largest income groups; 17.2% of the part time engineering profession earned over $2,000 per week; 16.1% earned between $1,000 and $1,299 per week and 12.2% earned between $1,300 and $1,599 per week. Female members of the part time engineering profession typically earn less than males, but as Figure 3.7 shows, females in part time engineering profession occupations earn higher incomes than part time females in the engineering labour force. In the labour force the top three part time income groups were 22.1% earning $400 to 599 per week, 19.5% earning $250 to $399 per week and 12.1% earning $150 to 249 per week. In comparison the top three part time income groups for the engineering profession were 17.7% earning $1,000 to $1,299 per week, 14.6% earning $600 to 799 per week and 14.5% earning $400 to $599 per week. There were 11.8% of part time females in engineering profession earning over $1,600 per week.
Appendix A
37
FIGURE 3.9: THE SECTORAL DISTRIBUTION OF EMPLOYMENT IN THE ENGINEERING PROFESSION AND THE ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE
Engineering Profession 250000 Engineering Labour Force
200000
NUMBERS
150000
100000
50000
FIGURE 3.10: FEMALE SECTORAL SHARES OF EMPLOYMENT IN THE ENGINEERING PROFESSION AND THE ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE
Engineering Profession 12 Engineering Labour Force
10
% OF SECTOR
Appendix A
38
There was highly variable utilisation of engineering skills in engineering across industries. The highest skills utilisation occurred in the professional, scientific and technical services industry where 80.1% of the employed labour force was engaged in engineering work. Other industries where skills utilisation was above average included mining with 77.9%, electricity, gas, water and waste with 72.4%, information and telecommunications with 63.6%, construction with 63.4% and public administration and safety with 64.1%. .
Appendix A
39
ADMINISTRATIVE
TABLE 3.9 THE EMPLOYED ENGINEERING PROFESSION, BY SECTOR AND INDUSTRY INDUSTRY Commonwealth GROUP Male Female Total Agriculture 0 0 0 Mining 0 0 0 Manufacturing 416 18 434 Electricity, Gas, Water, Waste 0 0 0 Construction 6 0 6 Wholesale Trade 0 0 0 Retail Trade 22 0 22 Accomodation & Food 0 0 0 Transport, Postal etc 846 60 906 Information & Telecommunications 2364 167 2531 Financial & Insurance 18 6 24 Rental, Hiring & Real Estate 4 0 4 Professional & Technical Services 652 60 712 Administrative & Support 5 0 5 Public Administration & Safety 4831 323 5154 Education & Training 2832 409 3241 Health Care & Social 20 0 20 Arts & Recreation 0 0 0 Other Services 0 0 0 Inadequately Described 0 0 0 Not Stated 0 0 0 TOTAL 12016 1043 13059 Source: ABS, 2006 Population Census Tablebuilder States & Territories Male Female Total 6 0 6 0 0 0 12 0 12 3884 380 4264 20 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1104 80 1184 9 0 9 29 4 33 27 0 27 147 27 174 12 3 15 4116 486 4602 682 75 757 403 37 440 52 10 62 22 7 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 10525 1109 11634 Local Government Private Sector Male Female Total Male Female Total 0 0 0 293 8 301 0 0 0 6285 515 6800 0 0 0 25351 1840 27191 234 22 256 2506 177 2683 109 6 115 10336 565 10901 0 0 0 5377 385 5762 0 0 0 1271 133 1404 0 0 0 231 19 250 10 3 13 6043 284 6327 0 0 0 3202 297 3499 0 0 0 1724 247 1971 0 0 0 514 31 545 0 0 0 34830 3105 37935 0 0 0 1196 88 1284 3234 321 3555 1167 76 1243 0 0 0 1029 105 1134 0 0 0 673 52 725 3 0 3 229 21 250 3 0 3 1241 62 1303 0 0 0 2208 136 2344 0 0 0 15 3 18 3593 352 3945 105721 8149 113870 All Sectors Male Female Total 299 8 307 6285 515 6800 25779 1858 27637 6624 579 7203 10471 571 11042 5377 385 5762 1293 133 1426 231 19 250 8003 427 8430 5575 464 6039 1771 257 2028 545 31 576 35629 3192 38821 1213 91 1304 13348 1206 14554 4543 589 5132 1096 89 1185 284 31 315 1266 69 1335 2208 136 2344 15 3 18 131855 10653 142508
40
ADMINISTRATIVE
FIGURE 3.11: THE INDUSTRY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ENGINEERING PROFESSION AND THE ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE
Qualified Engineers Other Services Arts & Recreation Health Care & Social Education & Training Public Administration & Safety Administrative & Support Professional & Technical Services Rental, Hiring & Real Estate Financial & Insurance Information & Telecommunications Transport, Postal etc Accomodation & Food Retail Trade Wholesale Trade Construction Electricity, Gas, Water, Waste Manufacturing Mining Agriculture 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Engineering Profession
NUMBERS
A number of industries were clustered around average utilisation of engineering skills including manufacturing, wholesale trade, transport and postal and education and training. But there were a surprising number of industries with low skill utilisation including agriculture with 13.8%, retail trade with 15.8%, accomodation and food with 6.1%, rental, hiring and real estate with 26.7%, administrative and support swervices with 30.0%, health care and social services with 28.0%, arts and recreation with 25.2% and other services with 26.6%. Combined these industries employed 32,316 members of the engineering labour force but only 6,698 were engaged in engineering work, a combined utilisation of 20.7%. Table 3.9 shows the industry distributions for the engineering profession by economic sector. In the Commonwealth sector the three largest industries employing members of the engineering labour force were public administration and safety (8,376), education and training (4,619) and information and telecommunications (3,815). These industries remained high employers of the engineering profession with skills utilisation rates of 61.5%, 70.2% and 66.3% respectively. In the States and Territories the largest employers of the engineering labour force were public administration and safety (7,236), electricity, gas, water and waste (5,682) and transport and postal (1,820). These industries had skill utilisations of 63.6%, 75.0% and 65.1% respectively. In Local Government, the main concentration of members of the engineering labour force was in public administration and safety with an employment of 4,350. This industry had a particularly high skills utilisation of 81.7%. Two private sector industries had particularly high numbers of employed members of the engineering labour force. They were the professional, scientific and technical services industry with 47,056 and manufacturing with 46,495 respectively. However, their skills utilisation were completely different. In professional, scientific and technical services, skills utilisation was very high at 80.6% but in manufacturing it was well down at 58.5%. This variability in skills utilisation was common in the sector.
41
FIGURE 3.12: THE AGE STRUCTURES FOR THE EMPLOYED ENGINEERING PROFESSION, THE ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE AND THE COMPARISON LABOUR FORCE
Comparison Labour Force 65 and over 60-64 years 55-59 years 50-54 years Engineering Labour Force Engineering Profession
AGE GROUPS
45-49 years 40-44 years 35-39 years 30-34 years 25-29 years 20-24 years 15-19 years 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0
% IN AGE GROUPS
Extending the comparison to include the engineering profession shows that up to age group 35 to 39 years, the shares of the engineering profession are larger than the shares of the engineering labour force. This reflects the influence of Australias skilled migration program. The program targets younger age groups with those over 34 years penalised in the points test and targets occupations in the engineering profession. From age 40 years onwards, the shares of the engineering profession in successive age groups are smaller than the employed engineering labour force but larger than the comparison labour force. In other words, the engineering profession has an older age structure than the comparison labour force but a younger age structure than the engineering labour force.
Appendix A
42
ADMINISTRATIVE
TABLE 3.11 THE AGE STRUCTURE FOR THE ENGINEERING PROFESSION BY ECONOMIC SECTOR AGE Commonwealth States & Territories GROUP Males Females Total Males Females Total 15 to 19 0 0 0 6 0 6 20 to 24 506 85 591 360 101 461 25 to 29 1266 218 1484 931 294 1225 30 to 34 1533 201 1734 1102 228 1330 35 to 39 1693 178 1871 1115 157 1272 40 to 44 2063 155 2218 1335 122 1457 45 to 49 1822 112 1934 1654 113 1767 50 to 54 1551 53 1604 1719 55 1774 55 to 59 1009 28 1037 1480 27 1507 60 to 64 399 9 408 611 10 621 65 & over 172 6 178 212 0 212 TOTAL 12014 1045 13059 10525 1107 11632 Source: ABS, 2006 Population Census TableBuilder Local Government Private Sector Males Females Total Males Females Total 0 0 0 55 7 62 86 25 111 4922 922 5844 285 87 372 12818 2177 14995 398 87 485 15995 1911 17906 440 38 478 15237 1192 16429 503 48 551 15148 912 16060 510 41 551 13184 553 13737 627 20 647 11654 302 11956 475 3 478 9127 118 9245 203 3 206 4863 40 4903 64 0 64 2717 19 2736 3591 352 3943 105720 8153 113873 Engineering Profession Males Females Total 61 7 68 5874 1133 7007 15300 2776 18076 19028 2427 21455 18485 1565 20050 19049 1237 20286 17170 819 17989 15551 430 15981 12091 176 12267 6076 62 6138 3165 25 3190 131850 10657 142507
43
ADMINISTRATIVE
FIGURE 3.13: THE AGE STRUCTURE FOR THE ENGINEERING PROFESSION BY ECONOMIC SECTOR
Private Sector 65 & over 60 to 64 55 to 59 50 to 54 Local Government States & Territories Commonwealth
AGE GROUPS
45 to 49 40 to 44 35 to 39 30 to 34 25 to 29 20 to 24 15 to 19 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0
% IN AGE GROUPS
Figure 3.11 examines the age structures of the engineering profession by economic sectors and highlights significant differences. In the private sector, the largest age group was 30 to 34 years with 15.7%. In the Commonwealth, the largest age group was 40 to 44 years with 17.0%, in the States and Territories and in Local Government the largest age group was the 50 to 54 years group with 15.3% and 16.4% respectively. The suggestion here is that these areas of the public sector engineering profession are older than private sector counterparts. This is reinforced by the larger shares of the profession aged over 55 years in sections of the public sector. In the private sector this share was 14.8%. In the Commonwealth it was lower at 12.4% but in the States and Territories it was 20.1% and in Local government it was 19.0%
3.10 Overview
This chapter examined the numbers and characteristics of the engineering labour force employed in engineering occupations. Engineering occupations were identified using criteria relating to acceptable engineering educational qualifications, the application of appropriate skill levels in occupations and the degree of attachment of occupations to engineering as understood by Engineers Australia. The result was that of an engineering labour force numbering 249,788, 142,822 of the 242,426 individual employed were engaged in engineering work. This amounts to the utilisation of 57.2% of the engineering labour force in engineering (58.9% of employment in the engineering labour force). Whether one examines the engineering labour force or the engineering profession, it is evident that there is a serious gender imbalance. The female share of the engineering labour force was already low at 9.5%, but is even lower in the engineering profession at 7.5% because less than half of the female engineering labour force was engaged in the engineering profession. The occupational distribution for the engineering profession was more highly concentrated in the managerial, professional and technician occupations than was the case for engineering labour force. Only a small group of contract, program and project administrators was found in occupations outside these groups. The full time engineering profession worked longer hours than the full time engineering labour force who in turn worked longer hours than than the full time comparison labour force. About 34.9% of the engineering profession worked 49 or more hours per week compared to 32.5% for engineering labour force and 29.7% for the comparison labour force. Females
44
Appendix A
45
ADMINISTRATIVE
APPENDIX A THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE ENGINEERING LABOUR FORCE BY 4 DIGIT OCCUPATIONS The occupations highlighted in green satisfy the criteria for engineering occupations as discussed in the text. OCCUPATIONS (4 DIGIT ANZSCO) MANAGERS Managers, nfd Chief Executives, General Managers and Legislators, nfd Chief Executives and Managing Directors General Managers Legislators Farmers and Farm Managers, nfd Aquaculture Farmers Crop Farmers Livestock Farmers Mixed Crop and Livestock Farmers Specialist Managers, nfd Advertising and Sales Managers Business Administration Managers, nfd Corporate Services Managers Finance Managers Human Resource Managers Policy and Planning Managers Research and Development Managers Construction, Distribution and Production Managers, nfd Construction Managers Engineering Managers Importers, Exporters and Wholesalers Manufacturers Production Managers Supply and Distribution Managers Education, Health and Welfare Services Managers, nfd Child Care Centre Managers Health and Welfare Services Managers School Principals Other Education Managers ICT Managers Miscellaneous Specialist Managers, nfd Commissioned Officers (Management) Senior Non-commissioned Defence Force Members Other Specialist Managers Hospitality, Retail and Service Managers, nfd Accommodation and Hospitality Managers, nfd Cafe and Restaurant Managers Caravan Park and Camping Ground Managers Hotel and Motel Managers Licensed Club Managers Other Accommodation and Hospitality Managers Retail Managers Miscellaneous Hospitality, Retail and Service Managers, nfd Amusement, Fitness and Sports Centre Managers Call or Contact Centre and Customer Service Managers Conference and Event Organisers Transport Services Managers Other Hospitality, Retail and Service Managers SUB-TOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1424 9 1897 1494 26 23 31 292 511 158 593 1703 57 151 226 427 319 428 127 2679 4595 162 436 2702 669 3 11 30 16 87 1518 9 631 265 1816 14 12 110 20 93 23 65 951 12 37 537 47 128 836 28410 53 0 31 34 6 0 3 11 34 16 46 106 5 16 29 27 30 46 5 87 164 13 11 131 53 0 4 7 3 7 60 3 30 3 233 0 6 34 6 7 0 4 141 0 5 15 7 9 45 1586 1477 984 9 0 1928 1248 1528 839 32 10 23 7 34 8 303 131 545 120 174 17 639 338 1809 1285 62 46 167 79 255 159 454 189 349 163 474 241 132 84 2766 1410 4759 2598 175 311 447 363 2833 1667 722 419 3 4 15 13 37 22 19 6 94 60 1578 1248 12 9 661 154 268 53 2049 1339 14 8 18 12 144 295 26 9 100 66 23 9 69 48 1092 1455 12 3 42 21 552 380 54 25 137 108 881 602 29996 18665 68 3 24 29 0 0 0 15 11 0 18 98 0 19 40 34 33 44 0 55 115 31 31 110 40 0 7 0 0 7 95 0 4 0 203 0 0 60 0 8 0 3 264 0 0 40 6 3 40 1558 1052 3 1272 868 10 7 8 146 131 17 356 1383 46 98 199 223 196 285 84 1465 2713 342 394 1777 459 4 20 22 6 67 1343 9 158 53 1542 8 12 355 9 74 9 51 1719 3 21 420 31 111 642 20223 2408 9 3145 2333 36 30 39 423 631 175 931 2988 103 230 385 616 482 669 211 4089 7193 473 799 4369 1088 7 24 52 22 147 2766 18 785 318 3155 22 24 405 29 159 32 113 2406 15 58 917 72 236 1438 47075 121 3 55 63 6 0 3 26 45 16 64 204 5 35 69 61 63 90 5 142 279 44 42 241 93 0 11 7 3 14 155 3 34 3 436 0 6 94 6 15 0 7 405 0 5 55 13 12 85 3144 2529 12 3200 2396 42 30 42 449 676 191 995 3192 108 265 454 677 545 759 216 4231 7472 517 841 4610 1181 7 35 59 25 161 2921 21 819 321 3591 22 30 499 35 174 32 120 2811 15 63 972 85 248 1523 50219 SKILL Australian Born LEVEL Males Females Total Overseas Born Males Females Total TOTAL Females Total
Males
Appendix A
46
Appendix A
47
Appendix A
48
Appendix A
49
OCCUPATIONS (4 DIGIT ANZSCO) COMMUNITY AND PERSONAL SERVICE WORKERS Community and Personal Service Workers, nfd Health and Welfare Support Workers, nfd Ambulance Officers and Paramedics Dental Hygienists, Technicians and Therapists Diversional Therapists Enrolled and Mothercraft Nurses Indigenous Health Workers Massage Therapists Welfare Support Workers Carers and Aides, nfd Child Carers Education Aides Personal Carers and Assistants, nfd Aged and Disabled Carers Dental Assistants Nursing Support and Personal Care Workers Special Care Workers Hospitality Workers, nfd Bar Attendants and Baristas Cafe Workers Gaming Workers Hotel Service Managers Waiters Other Hospitality Workers Protective Service Workers, nfd Defence Force Members, Fire Fighters and Police, nfd Defence Force Members - Other Ranks Fire and Emergency Workers Police Prison and Security Officers, nfd Prison Officers Security Officers and Guards Sports and Personal Service Workers, nfd Personal Service and Travel Workers, nfd Beauty Therapists Driving Instructors Funeral Workers Gallery, Museum and Tour Guides Personal Care Consultants Tourism and Travel Advisers Travel Attendants Other Personal Service Workers Sports and Fitness Workers, nfd Fitness Instructors Outdoor Adventure Guides Sports Coaches, Instructors and Officials Sportspersons SUB-TOTAL
SKILL Australian Born LEVEL Males Females Total 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 5 3 3 3 3 3 4/5 4 4/5 4 4 4 3 2/3 4 4 4 3 4/5 4 4 4 3 3 5 0 41 5 1 6 0 18 70 5 11 39 3 58 1 40 5 10 111 13 9 13 57 11 0 8 210 749 315 0 57 213 0 0 4 21 12 28 9 31 16 21 0 35 10 98 27 2396 0 0 10 0 5 3 0 6 5 1 28 36 0 27 13 19 0 3 14 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 12 14 17 0 5 9 0 0 9 0 3 6 1 9 25 8 0 16 1 14 6 365 5 0 51 5 6 9 0 24 75 6 39 75 3 85 14 59 5 13 125 30 9 13 89 11 0 8 222 763 332 0 62 222 0 0 13 21 15 34 10 40 41 29 0 51 11 112 33 2761
Overseas Born Males Females Total 3 0 19 5 3 11 0 24 54 4 13 36 4 126 3 93 0 12 72 25 64 9 222 17 0 0 57 106 91 0 78 411 0 0 7 56 0 54 6 47 14 13 0 17 6 55 6 1843 0 0 0 3 0 18 0 9 25 6 95 33 0 93 21 80 0 3 19 19 17 9 112 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 9 0 3 23 3 0 9 12 22 3 3 0 10 3 4 0 684 3 0 19 8 3 29 0 33 79 10 108 69 4 219 24 173 0 15 91 44 81 18 334 17 0 0 57 109 97 0 78 420 0 3 30 59 0 63 18 69 17 16 0 27 9 59 6 2527
Males 8 0 60 10 4 17 0 42 124 9 24 75 7 184 4 133 5 22 183 38 73 22 279 28 0 8 267 855 406 0 135 624 0 0 11 77 12 82 15 78 30 34 0 52 16 153 33 4239
TOTAL Females Total 0 0 10 3 5 21 0 15 30 7 123 69 0 120 34 99 0 6 33 36 17 9 144 0 0 0 12 17 23 0 5 18 0 3 32 3 3 15 13 31 28 11 0 26 4 18 6 1049 8 0 70 13 9 38 0 57 154 16 147 144 7 304 38 232 5 28 216 74 90 31 423 28 0 8 279 872 429 0 140 642 0 3 43 80 15 97 28 109 58 45 0 78 20 171 39 5288
Appendix A
50
OCCUPATIONS (4 DIGIT ANZSCO) SALES WORKERS Sales Workers, nfd Sales Representatives and Agents, nfd Insurance Agents and Sales Representatives, nfd Auctioneers, and Stock and Station Agents Insurance Agents Sales Representatives Real Estate Sales Agents Sales Assistants and Salespersons, nfd Sales Assistants (General) ICT Sales Assistants Motor Vehicle and Vehicle Parts Salespersons Pharmacy Sales Assistants Retail Supervisors Service Station Attendants Street Vendors and Related Salespersons Other Sales Assistants and Salespersons Sales Support Workers, nfd Checkout Operators and Office Cashiers Miscellaneous Sales Support Workers, nfd Models and Sales Demonstrators Retail and Wool Buyers Telemarketers Ticket Salespersons Visual Merchandisers Other Sales Support Workers SUB-TOTAL
Australian Born SKILL LEVEL Males Females Total 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 4 5 20 5 0 14 28 755 340 83 653 130 127 6 37 19 62 58 0 64 0 12 11 21 35 0 14 2468 1 3 0 0 6 66 21 7 262 9 6 7 8 2 8 5 0 18 0 15 10 4 10 6 4 471 21 8 0 14 34 821 361 90 915 139 133 13 45 21 70 63 0 82 0 27 21 25 45 6 18 2939
Overseas Born Males Females Total 20 12 0 0 32 646 307 118 889 205 93 9 70 88 19 41 0 212 0 9 16 44 61 0 14 2931 3 0 0 0 12 76 50 28 359 27 0 19 8 8 5 11 0 113 0 21 7 17 29 0 0 800 23 12 0 0 44 722 357 146 1248 232 93 28 78 96 24 52 0 325 0 30 23 61 90 0 14 3731
Males 40 17 0 14 60 1401 647 201 1542 335 220 15 107 107 81 99 0 276 0 21 27 65 96 0 28 5399
TOTAL Females Total 4 3 0 0 18 142 71 35 621 36 6 26 16 10 13 16 0 131 0 36 17 21 39 6 4 1271 44 20 0 14 78 1543 718 236 2163 371 226 41 123 117 94 115 0 407 0 57 44 86 135 6 32 6670
Appendix A
51
Appendix A
52
63 27 90 10243
Appendix A
53
Appendix A
54
Appendix A
55