Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
11
March 2011
Overview
New functions and enhancements
Abaqus/CAE
Abaqus/Standard
Abaqus/Explicit Abaqus/CFD
Abaqus/CAE
6.11 Enhancements
Modeling & CAD Interfaces Meshing Attributes & Analysis Support Predefined Field Support Topology and Shape Optimization Visualization
CAD Interfaces
CATIA V5 Bidirectional Associative Interface
CATIA parameters can be modified from Abaqus/CAE Model updated automatically Support for CATIA V5 R20
Substructures
Support for: Substructure load cases Substructure load Improved display of retained nodal dofs Translucency control in part/assembly display options Substructure statistics query
Modeling
Enhanced spline feature Create spline wires through points
Meshing
Partitioning
New tool for partitioning faces by edge projection Option to extend edges at free ends Elements dont cross boundaries between regions with different thickness
10
Mid-surfacing enhancements
Reduce picking needed to create mid-surface Improved robustness
11
Tet meshing
Minimum element size specification Tetrahedral element size growth control for interior volume Improved quality and robustness Control deviation between boundary mesh and surface geometry Reduced likelihood of creating short element edges Better gradation on surface meshes
12
Mesh Editing
New mesh edit functions
Merge/subdivide elements Grow/collapse short element edges
Bottom-up meshing
Now available for orphan meshes Generate elements by offsetting Additional options for extrude method
13
Miscellaneous Meshing
XFEM support 2nd order tetrahedral elements
Visualization support
Performance improvements
Support global reservoir modeling workflows Support for new coupled displacement-pore pressure elements (C3D4P & C3D6P)
14
Mapping Capability
Interface for: Importing spatially varying point cloud field data Applying data sets as loads, predefined fields and interactions
Mapping Capability
Import data using Text files & spreadsheets Existing Abaqus output database
Interactions
Surface Film Condition, Concentrated Film Condition
Film and Sink Temperature values
Surface Radiation
Materials -- Density
Assembled Fasteners
Capabilities for realistic modeling of fasteners Create Template model
Separate from actual analysis model. Contains surfaces, constraints and connectors
Assign to a region
Attachment points, orientations, and surfaces specified to create an assembled fastener. Allows specification of a calibration script.
19
Miscellaneous Enhancements
Added support for Expression, Mapped and Discrete Fields for Material Density Write amplitudes with 16 digits of precision to input files
Miscellaneous Enhancements
Added Expression, Mapped and Discrete field support for Film condition sink temperatures
Surface and Concentrated Film Conditions Can be used with Embedded Coefficients, Property, Analytical or Discrete field definitions of the film condition
Topology optimization Modify stiffness Good for evolving optimum shape Shape optimization Moves nodes Good for fine tweaking of shape
Both support: Contact Geometric non-linearity Nonlinear materials Export smoothed shape to STL or INP
31
Optimization Workflow
Specify problem
Final Solution ?
Visualize
Smooth output
Export to CAD
Visualization
34
35
36
Visualization Multi-point constraints visualization Display probed node/element labels and values
37
Abaqus/Standard
6.11 Enhancements
Parallel Cavity Radiation XFEM V Fracture and Failure Enhancements Coupled Electrical-Thermal-Structural Analysis (ETS) Electromagnetics I - Low frequency (Eddy current) AMS Solver GPGPU support in the direct solver Contact
Approach:
Solve same equations as old serial code (gray, diffuse, surface radiation) Avoid inversion of large matrix by solving problem with iterative solver
(New algorithm - only available in 64-bit platforms)
Serial cavity radiation: 4 minutes(v6.11 , 8 cpu) Parallel cavity radiation: 33 seconds (v6.11, 8 cpu) 8x speed-up
XFEM
Continued enhancements to XFEM:
Functionality Support 2nd order tets (C3D10 and C3D10H) with XFEM Output strain energy release rate (ENRRTXFEM) for XFEM based LEFM approach Use cases/drivers 1st order tets and 1st order bricks with XFEM were supported since 6.9 Most real engineering structures in Auto, Aerospace and medical applications are made of 2nd order tetrahedron elements. Direct requests from Boeing, Daimler, Dana etc. Go mainstream with XFEM Crack path/surface is more stable with 2nd order tet elements Usage No user interface changed Can be performed in a static procedure, implicit dynamic procedure and the low cycle fatigue analysis.
ETS Overview
Fully coupled three-field analysis with the following fields Electrical Potential (Steady-State) Temperature (Transient or Steady-State) Displacement (Steady-State) Three-dimensional continuum elements Q3D4 4-node tetrahedron, linear displacement, electric potential, and temperature. Q3D6 6-node triangular prism, linear displacement, electric potential, and temperature. Q3D8(RH) 8-node hexahedral, tri-linear displacement, electric potential, and temperature. Q3D10M(H) 10-node tetrahedron, modified displacement, electric potential, and temperature. Q3D20(RH) 20-node hexahedral, tri-quadratic displacement, tri-linear electric potential, and temperature. New keyword interface
*COUPLED
TEMPERATURE-DISPLACEMENT, ELECTRICAL
Theory
Neglect high frequency term
Sample Results
Long annular cylinder in an oscillating uniform magnetic field
Magnetic induction in vertical direction compared against that of benchmark results
Sample Results
Multiple conductors in uniform oscillating magnetic field
Time-harmonic electric field in air and conductors Time-harmonic magnetic induction (flux density) in conductors
Electric field
Magnetic induction
Sample Results
Eddy fields in a spherical conductor sitting inside a magnetic field
In phase and out of phase electric field magnitudes
Current direction is the same in the two conductors. Zero D EM Potential is applied on the outer surfaces.
Conductor
Magnetic Field
Electric Field
Electric Field
AMS Solver
3,000
2,500
2,000
FREQ (6.10-EF) 1,500 AMS (6.10-EF) FREQ (6.11) 1,000
AMS (6.11)
500
0 1 4 8 16
Number of Cores
60
Speedup
6.00 5.00 4.00 FREQ (6.10-EF) AMS (6.10-EF) FREQ (6.11) AMS (6.11)
3.00
2.00 1.00 0.00 1 4 8 16
Number of Cores
61
20
10 0 1
20
17
14
11
Number of Cores
62
Performance data
GPGPU speedup (4 core / (4 core + gpu))
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
4.34E+11 4.45E+11 6.59E+11 9.90E+11 1.91E+12 2.19E+12 4.37E+12 5.76E+12 1.03E+13 1.68E+13 1.70E+13 2.63E+13 1.08E+14 1.83 1.14 1.37 1.02 1.69 1.16 1.82 0.83 2.32 1.52 2.15 1.52 2.20 1.49 2.75 2.19 2.90 2.01 3.38 2.00 3.69 2.29 3.36 2.66 1.96 1.79
Contact
Abaqus solutions
Error indicators
Points to remember for Position error indicators: Tend to be large where local variation of base variable is more complex than what can be captured by the mesh Not normalized; same units as base variable Not conservative or precise estimates of error
6.11
Less noise
Error indicator
Accurate prediction of maximum CPRESS Some uncertainty where gradient is large but pressure is low
Prior versions
6.11
Less noise
Error indicator
Need finer mesh to predict maximum contact pressure
Error indicator does not show evidence of inaccuracy if mesh is too coarse!
Edge-to-surface contact
Supplementary edge-to-surface formulation for general contact Targets situations in which the active contact zone in a numerical model corresponds to a line associated with a feature edge Whereas the surface-to-surface formulation best treats contact over a finite area
General contact with S-to-S formulation General contact with S-to-S and E-to-S formulations
Diverges 25% into simulation Penetration near feature edge 36 increments; 317 iterations
Edge-to-surface contact
Tests featuring edge contact
Abaqus/Explicit
6.11 Enhancements
Eulerian Heat Transfer Element Mass Adjust Subcycling improvements Additional AQUA Wave types SPH
Procedure:
*Dynamic Temperature-Displacement, Explicit Mechanical loads valid for EC3D8R also supported for EC3D8RT Thermal loads that are supported:
*Dflux, *Film, *Radiate *Dsflux, *Sfilm, *Sradiate
Example 2:
Eulerian heat transfer in a progressively filled block Material flows in at 100, Film condition on the lefts side (1st step); additional film condition at the top in the 2nd step
Example 3:
Rivet Forming changed existing example problem to use EC3D8RT instead of EC3D8R in a *Dynamic Temperature-Displacement analysis Initial temperature at 20, will increase due to plastic work effects Run with 8 cpus and 16 domains
Mass Adjust
Specify a target mass with optional target time increment
*MASS ADJUST
You can specify a target mass or a trim level for an ELSET. Abaqus/Explicit will adjust the mass up or down to meet the target. You can further redistribute the mass within the ELSET to raise the stable time increment to a target value.
You can even redistribute just the current mass to achieve the target time increment without adding extra pounds!!!
Verification
1. Verify specified mass: test and reference elements have different densities but the element set masses are adjusted to be the same. The dynamic responses are therefore similar.
Test
Reference
81
Subcycling improvements
Subcycling ratio = 6
No Subcycling Subcycling
20 h 42 m (8 cpus) 9h 23 m (8 cpus)
Waves acting on structures generate loads such as buoyancy, drag, and inertial loads. For A/Explicit rel6-10ef, the wave definition was limited to only the 5th Order Stokes wave formulation. For A/Explicit 6.11, You could also use the Airy wave formulation or provide a more general definition through VWAVE user-subroutine.
87
Water Splash In a Square Pan Support is more local in this case as the number of particles per element is almost the same
4.2 K particles 47 to10 particles/element 0:47 mins on a PC 2200 incs, MSPEI 5.6 EOS material with tensile failure Elasto-plastic blade
90
Wave Impact
A block of water falls under gravity (dam rupture)
Velocity vector plots on the left
220 K particles, 32 particles/element 140 hours (not sure which machine) 117K incs, MSPEI 20.2 Tabular EOS with tensile failure
91
Wave Impact
A block of water falls under gravity (dam rupture)
Simplified boulders are being Velocity vector plots on the left
220 K particles, 32 particles/element 140 hours (on storm) 117K incs, MSPEI 14 (before the latest improvement); expect 7 Tabular EOS with tensile failure
92
*eos, type=usup 1500e+3,0,0 *tensile failure,element deletion=no,pressure=ductile,shear=ductile 2.0 *viscosity 1.0e-8 *density 1.e-9
93
Priming a Pump
A block of water is pushed by a piston while the pump is rotating
182 K particles, ? particles/element 89 hours (not sure which machine) 150K incs, MSPEI 11 Tabular EOS with tensile failure
94
Bottle Drop
A filled water bottle gets dropped on the floor Comparison with CEL
Differences in sloshing Similar deformed shapes for the plastic bottle
95
Smashing of a Figurehead
Figurehead with initial velocities is smashed into a wall
Tooth paste like material (from our example manual)
8.2 K particles, 40 particles/element 90 mins (not sure which machine) 120K incs, MSPEI 6 Tabular EOS with tensile failure
96
Smashing of a Figurehead
With cohesive contact
53 K particles, 47 particles/element 90 mins (not sure which machine) 360K incs, MSPEI 6 Tabular EOS with tensile failure?
97
98
Taylor Test
A perfectly plastic cylindrical copper bar is impacting a rigid wall
84K particles
99
100
C3D8R and CEL match well All curves are unfiltered Default options in all three cases
101
27 K particles, 54 particles/element 2375K increments, 104 hours CPU time MSPEI 5.3
102
V = 500m/sec, T=0.5 msec Bullet gets stuck in the hole 103 K particles, 44 particles/element 9K increments, 1h48mins, MSPEI 6.3
103
V = 1000m/sec, T=0.2 msec Bullet perforates 103 K particles, 44 particles/element 4K increments, 47mins, MSPEI 6.1
104
DT stable
MSPEI
Nr of increment s
3864 33188
585K 78K
3 to 4 1.15
84K 84K
39 17
6.7 4.2
9783
SPH_B
105
Abaqus/CFD
Input file usage with documented keywords are provided in 6-11. For example,
*CFD
*Momentum Equation Solver *Transport Equation Solver *Pressure Equation Solver *Turbulence Model *Fluid Boundary
*Surface Output
The required and optional parameters for all keywords are documented in 6-11 Abaqus Keywords Reference Manual.
109
Scalar Quantities
Vector Quantities
Field
y+ (YPLUS)
Also defined for laminar flows
History
Mass Flow Rate (MASSFLOW) Volume Flow Rate (VOLFLOW) Int. Heat Flux (HEATFLOW) Area (SURFAREA) Average Temperature (AVGTEMP) Area Average Velocity (AVGVEL) Average Pressure (AVGPRESS)
Field
Total Traction vector (TRACTION)
History
y* (YSTAR)
Defined only for k-family models
( PRESSFORCE, VISCFORCE)
111
Drag Force
Lift Force
112
k- model is subject to spurious overproduction of k in highly strained flows (stagnation point anomaly) Based on experimental evidence in shear layers and on mathematical grounds, the turbulent eddy viscosity is limited using an upper bound This method has shown to significantly improve the stability of the k- model for highly strained flows
114
Temperature-dependent properties
C2 T
Channel with isothermal walls at 800 C and inlet fluid enters at a constant velocity and temperature of 200 C.
116
118
Application Examples
Example Electronic Cooling
Non-linear system-level simulation Linear simulation Shock & vibration, Linear dynamics Fracture & failure (Cohesive, XFEM) Advanced materials and elements PCB Power Source Chips
Application
Thermal performance of electronic components and systems
Motivation
Miniaturization of devices, superior performance, higher reliability and lower cost
Approach
Full system structural and thermal analysis in conjunction with natural/forced convection cooling
Conjugate heat transfer analysis Abaqus/Standard & Abaqus /CFD Temperature isosurfaces
Extract skin using Shell From Solid feature Remove faces and cover open faces to create a closed enclosure Create volume using Solid From Shell feature and mesh the volume
Temperature contours
119
Top 3
Abaqus/CAE
ATOM
Abaqus/Standard
Electromagnetics
Abaqus/Explicit
SPH
Abaqus/CFD
120
March 2011