COMPETECIAS LOGICAL MATH WORKSHOP Arguments and Inference

PRESENTED BY: MENDINUETA FELIX BARRETO 2011122006

EDWIN TESILLO TEACHER

LOGICAL MATHEMATICS COMPETENCES MONDAY FROM 9-12 AM

SCHOOL OF GENERAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF MAGDALENA SANTA MARTA 2011

QUESTIONS
1. Explain in your own words how people get their convictions? 2. What conclusions can be drawn from the second paragraph? 3. How does the logic of proper management to distinguish faulty reasoning? 4. "Describe the steps in a process of argument? 5. How can we recognize arguments? 6. Make a table set simillarities and differences between the two types of inferences. 7. Analyze the table of truth and validity of the document and explain.

Development 1. People are in a state of conviction, when it sure that what you say is right, no matter what others say their opinion is who cares ... when it is possessed of great confidence, and also have a single security, because it has been a This come in their minds the idea of perfection. Giving rise to force or power to obtain knowledge and a great safety.

2.

My conclusion:

As a conclusion I think that not everything in life is consistent and logical ... think that comes from them can be valid is when we realize that man is a being relative

3. I can see that it meets its functions through the use of certain laws, which show that a thought is correct or not, if properly used. Assist the person in the development of their reasoning. The study of logic is based on certain techniques and methods to provide easy application to determine the correctness or incorrectness of all reasoning. The fallacy is an important source to distinguish correct reasoning for a thorough analysis of a Incorrect.

4. To describe the steps in a process argued should consider:

. Determine the conclusion of the argument . Proposals that validate the conclusion . Determine their relationship . Determine its validity. 5. as an argument to recognize we have to keep in mind that this is a set

of two or more propositions related in such a way that all but one (local) is supposed to provide support to the left (the conclusion) therefore a meaningless set of propositions each is not an argument.
6. SIMILARITIE S DEDUCTIVE INFERENCE INDUCTIVE INFERENCE Use assumptions to reach its conclusion, assessing the veracity of these. The truth of its premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion. Your reasoning has a high degree of accuracy. Your premises provide a f ull and complete support to the conclusion; therefore there is not the idea that this is false. The arguments, or comply with this rule or not, there is no intermediate state. There are arguments perfect. No amount of information can affect at lea st one argument. The truth of its premises makes its conclusion probable. Your reasoning is more flexible than the deduction. Your premises provide some evidence or support for the conclusion. Arguments meet a greater or lesser degree depending on the support they offer the premises. No argument is absolutely prefect nor altogether useless. Additional information may affect the reliability of the document.

DIFFERENCE S

7. we must take into account the case that, although the premise and the conclusion is true the conclusion is not clear, because there are cases where the veracity of the premise and the conclusion does not necessarily indicate that the conclusion is true, where there fallacies.