Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 512521 www.elsevier.

com/locate/jfoodeng

Drying kinetics and rehydration characteristics of microwave-vacuum and convective hot-air dried mushrooms
S.K. Giri, Suresh Prasad
*
Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Post Harvest Technology Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721 302, India Received 5 March 2005; accepted 27 October 2005 Available online 20 December 2005

Abstract Microwave-vacuum dehydration characteristics of button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) were evaluated in a commercially available microwave oven (0600 W) modied to a drying system by incorporating a vacuum chamber in the cavity. The eect of drying parameters, namely microwave power, system pressure and product thickness on the drying kinetics and rehydration characteristics were investigated. The drying system was operated in the microwave power range of 115285 W, pressure range of 6.523.5 kPa having mushroom slices of 614 mm thickness. Convective air drying at dierent air temperatures (50, 60 and 70 C) was performed to compare the drying rate and rehydration properties of microwave-vacuum drying with conventional method. Microwave-vacuum drying resulted in 7090% decrease in the drying time and the dried products had better rehydration characteristics as compared to convective air drying. The rate constants of the exponential and Pages model for thin layer drying were established by regression analysis of the experimental data which were found to be aected mainly by the microwave power level followed by sample thickness while system pressure had a little eect on the drying rate. Rehydration ratio was signicantly aected by the system pressure. Empirical models are also developed for estimating the drying rate constant and rehydration ratio as a function of the microwave-vacuum drying process parameters. 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Microwave-vacuum drying; Button mushroom; Drying rate; Scanning electron microscopy; Rehydration ratio

1. Introduction Mushrooms are edible fungi of commercial importance and their cultivation and consumption has increased substantially due to their nutritional value, delicacy and avor. The button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) is the most widely cultivated and consumed mushroom throughout the world and it contributes about 40% of the total world production of mushroom. Mushrooms are extremely perishable and the shelf life of fresh mushroom is only about 24 h at ambient conditions. Various physiological and morphological changes occur after harvest, which make these mushrooms unacceptable for consumption. Hence, they should be consumed or processed promptly after harvest
Corresponding author. Fax: +91 3222 282288. E-mail addresses: skgiri@agfe.itkgp.ernet.in (S.K. Giri), sp@agfe. iitkgp.ernet.in (S. Prasad). 0260-8774/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.10.021
*

and for this reason the mushrooms are traded mostly in processed form in the world market. Dehydration is one of the important preservation methods employed for storage of mushroom and dehydrated mushrooms are valuable ingredients in a variety of sauces and soups. As mushrooms are very sensitive to temperature, choosing the right drying method can be the key for a successful operation. Mushroom growers continue to dry mushroom under sun, which yields unhygienic and poor quality product. The conventional hot-air drying of mushrooms normally involves thermal and/or chemical pretreatment and drying at temperature maintained between 50 and 70 C. Due to long drying time and overheating of surface during hot-air drying, the problems of darkening in colour, loss in avour and decrease in rehydration ability occur. Freeze drying produces a high quality product, but being an expensive process, its application for mushroom drying is limited. Vacuum drying is another

S.K. Giri, S. Prasad / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 512521

513

alternative method and is especially suitable for products that are prone to heat damage such as fruits and vegetables. However, in vacuum process requiring heat, transfer of heat energy to the workload becomes dicult, as convection is ineective at low pressure. Most conventional vacuum dryers rely on conduction heat transfer from hot plates, which is slow, dicult to control and requires a large surface area and therefore, conventional vacuum drying has high operating and installation cost (Woodroof & Luh, 1986). The desire to prevent signicant quality loss and to achieve fast and eective dehydration has resulted in increasing use of microwave heating for food drying. Microwave drying is rapid, more uniform and energy ecient compared to conventional hot-air drying. In recent years, Microwave-vacuum drying (MVD) has been investigated as a potential method for obtaining high quality dried food products, including fruits, vegetables and grains. Microwave-vacuum drying combines the advantages of both microwave heating and vacuum drying. The low temperature and fast mass transfer conferred by vacuum combined with rapid energy transfer by microwave heating generates very rapid, low temperature drying and thus it has the potential to improve energy eciency and product quality. Some fruits and grains have been successfully dried by microwave-vacuum drying techniques (Cui, Xu, & Sun, 2003; Drouzas & Schubert, 1996; Durance & Wang, 2002; Lin, Durance, & Scaman, 1998; Wardsworth, Velupillai, & Verma, 1990; Yongsawatdigul & Gunasekaran, 1996a, 1996b). Despite those investigations, there is scanty information available either in terms of the drying kinetics or quality of button mushroom undergoing microwave-vacuum drying technique. The drying kinetics is often used to describe the combined macroscopic and microscopic mechanisms of heat and mass transfer during drying, and it is aected by drying conditions, types of dryer and characteristics of materials to be dried. Since on-line measurement of temperature and moisture is dicult and time-consuming for microwave assisted heating and drying, the drying kinetics models are essential for equipment design, process optimization and product quality improvement. The eect of vacuum in microwave drying operation is system specic, and for successful design and operation of an industrial microwave-vacuum drying system, knowledge of the drying characteristics of the material to be dried under a range of condition is vital (McLoughlin, McMinn, & Magee, 2003). The aim of the present work was to investigate microwave-vacuum drying characteristics of button mushroom slices and to compare with convective hot-air drying in respect to drying kinetics, rehydration qualities and micro structural changes of the dried products. 2. Material and methods 2.1. Materials Fresh button mushrooms (A. bisporus) were obtained from market and kept in cold storage at 45 C. Prior to

dehydration, mushrooms were thoroughly washed to remove the dirt and graded by size to eliminate the variations in respect to exposed surface area. Slices of desired thickness were obtained by carefully cutting mushrooms vertically with a vegetable slicer and the slices from middle portions with characteristics mushroom shape were used for drying experiments without any pretreatments. They were immediately weighed and placed into the dryer. Moisture content of the samples was determined in a vacuum oven at 70 C for 1416 h (AOAC, 1984). The initial moisture content of the slices was ranged from 92% to 93% (w.b.). 2.2. Drying 2.2.1. Hot-air drying The mushroom slices were hot-air dried at air temperature of 50, 60 and 70 C in a cross-ow type dryer with air ow rates of 1.5 m/s. Air was heated electrically before entering the heater. Slices were spread in a single layer on the tray. During air drying, weight and temperature of the sample were recorded at regular interval of times. 2.2.2. Microwave-vacuum drying The experimental setup used for the microwave-vacuum drying of the samples is depicted in Fig. 1, which consists of a microwave oven (IFB, model electron) of rated capacity of 600 W at 2.45 GHz. The oven is modied to give variable power output (from 0 to 600 W) by incorporating a 230 V AC variac in the circuit (Sharma & Prasad, 2001). A glass container containing the material to be dried was placed inside the microwave cavity and a vacuum pump was connected to the container for maintaining the desired levels of vacuum inside it. Vacuum in the container was monitored by using a vacuum gauge and a pressure regulating valve to maintain the pressure at desirable levels. An air tight condenser was also used in the vacuum line for condensing the water vapour released from the samples. About 100 g of sliced mushrooms were taken for each drying experiments in the microwave-vacuum dryer at dierent microwave power and pressure levels. The sample remained in the container for a specied time interval while drying took place. The weight of the sample was recorded at every 5 min intervals by switching o the microwave oven and after releasing the vacuum, which took about 40 s for each observation. The samples were dried till the moisture content was reduced to 66.5% (w.b.). The variables chosen for microwave-vacuum drying experiments were microwave power (Q), system pressure (P) and thickness of the slices (T). Response surface methodology was used to determine the relative contributions of the above three variables to the drying characteristics and rehydration ratio. Twenty experiments were performed according to a central composite rotatable design with the three variables and with ve levels of each variable. The maximum and minimum variable levels

514

S.K. Giri, S. Prasad / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 512521

Pressure regulating valve

Microwave oven Vacuum gauge Product Vacuum pump

Balance

Condenser

Fig. 1. Experimental microwave-vacuum drying apparatus.

Table 1 Levels of microwave-vacuum drying process variables Variable Name (units) Level 1.68 Q P T Microwave power (W) System pressure (kPa) Thickness (mm) 115 6.5 5.8 1 150 10 7.5 0 200 15 10 1 250 20 12.5 1.68 285 23.5 14.2

responses due to extraneous factors. The center point in the design was repeated six times to calculate the reproducibility of the method. 2.3. Modeling drying data Various transport properties like moisture and thermal diusivity and mass and heat transfer coecients, describe completely the drying kinetics, although in the literature sometimes the drying rate constant is used as their combination and as a trial for standardizing a process description independently from the controlling mechanism (Mujumdar, 1995). The exponential model, Eq. (1) and empirical Pages model, Eq. (2), have been used to describe the drying kinetics of various agricultural materials in convective and microwave-convective drying (Jasna, Sander, & Skansi, 2001; Pravanjan, Ramaswamy, & Raghavan, 1995; Sharma & Prasad, 2001). Both the models were tested for their validity to mushroom under microwave-vacuum drying: MR expKt; 1 2 MR expkt ;
n

were selected on the basis of preliminary drying experiments. Table 1 gives the levels of variables in coded and actual levels and Table 2 shows the combination of variable levels used in the central composite design. Experiments were randomized in order to minimize the eects of unexplained variability in the observed

Table 2 Central composite design showing variable level combinations Experiment no. Variable levels Q 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.68 1.68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1.68 1.68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1.68 1.68 0 0 0 0 0 0

where MR = moisture ratio = (M Me)/(M0 Me); M = moisture content (kg water/kg dry matter) at time t; Me = equilibrium moisture content (kg water/kg dry matter); M0 = initial moisture content (kg water/kg dry matter) at time = 0; K = drying rate constant (min1); k and n are the parameters of Pages model; and t = drying time in min. The equilibrium moisture content during microwavevacuum drying is considered zero, due to vacuum conditions of the process (Kiranoudis, Tsami, & Maroulis, 1997). The parameters K, k and n of the above equations were evaluated through non-linear regression analysis using SYSTAT computer program. The goodness of t of the tested mathematical models to the experimental data was evaluated from the coecient of determination (R2). The higher the R2-value, the better is the goodness of t.

S.K. Giri, S. Prasad / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 512521

515

2.4. Rehydration Rehydration ratio (RR) which is a measure of rehydration characteristics of dried mushroom slices was determined by immersing 5 g of dried samples in distilled water at 30 and 100 C temperatures. The water was drained and the samples weighed at every 30 min intervals for those immersed at 30 C and at every 2 min intervals for those at 100 C. Triplicate samples were used. Rehydration ratio was dened as the ratio of weight of rehydrated samples to the dry weight of the sample. 2.5. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) The structure of the dehydrated mushroom slices was examined using a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-5800) coupled with an energy dispersive X-ray micro analytical system (OXFORD ISIS-300). Thin slice of about 1 mm thick was cut from the dried samples and xed on the SEM stub, which were subsequently coated with gold in order to provide a reective surface for the electron beam. Gold coating was carried out in a sputter coater (BIO-RAD E-5200) under a low vacuum with the presence of the inert gas, argon. The gold-coated samples were subsequently viewed under the microscope. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Drying kinetics The drying curves for thin layer drying of mushroom slices under microwave-vacuum drying and hot-air drying conditions are shown in Fig. 2, where the moisture content of the samples at various time intervals and for varying microwave power level and at various drying air temperatures is recorded. The time required to reduce the moisture content to any given level in microwave-vacuum drying

was dependent on the power level, being the highest at 115 W and lowest at 285 W. Mushroom having 92% initial moisture content dried to a nal moisture content of 6% within 45 and 20 min at microwave power level of 115 and 285 W, respectively, at pressure level of 15 kPa. By comparison, similar mushroom samples under convective hot-air drying took 270 and 180 min at drying air temperature 50 and 70 C, respectively. Thus, the microwavevacuum drying times were around 90% shorter at 285 W and 75% shorter at 115 W than the corresponding convective air drying times. Figs. 35 further show the eect of changing the process variables, namely microwave power, system pressure and sample thickness on drying time during microwave-vacuum drying. It is evident that the drying time decreases with the increase in power output. When microwave power level and product thickness remain constant, the drying rate at higher vacuum level was slightly greater. However, the eect of system pressure on drying time was not as signicant as that of microwave power. Concerning the eect of the sample size on drying time, mushroom slices of smaller

Moisture content, kg/kg dry matter

14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 10 20 30 Drying time, min 40 50

285 W 200 W 115 W

Fig. 3. Eect of microwave power levels on drying time for 10 mm thick mushroom slices during MVD at 15 kPa system pressure.

14 Moisture content, kg/kg dry matter 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 50 100 150 200 Drying time, min 250 300 350
AD: 50 C AD: 70 C MVD: 115 W, 15 kPa MVD: 285 W, 15 kPa

Moisture content, kg /kg dry matter

14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 10 20 30 40 Drying time, min 50 60

23.5 kPa 15 kPa 6.5 kPa

Fig. 2. Drying curves of air-dried (AD) and microwave-vacuum dried (MVD) mushroom slice (10 mm thick).

Fig. 4. Eect of pressure levels on drying time for 10 mm thick mushroom slices during MVD at 200 W microwave power.

516

S.K. Giri, S. Prasad / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 512521

14 Moisture content, kg /kg dry matter 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 10 20 Drying time, min 30 40 6 mm 10 mm 14 mm

1990). As the values of dielectric constant and loss factors are higher at higher moisture content of the material, obviously the material absorbs more microwave power and heating is faster at high moisture content. As drying progressed, the loss of moisture in the product decreases the absorption of microwave power and resulted in a fall in the drying rate during the later part of drying (Kharaisheh, Cooper, & Magee, 1995; Sharma & Prasad, 2001). Microwave heating under vacuum resulted in large increase in drying rates (almost three to ve-folds) as compared to hot-air drying throughout the drying process. 3.2. Modeling of the thin layer drying data of mushroom slices Table 3 lists the model constants obtained by application of exponential and Pages equation to the experimental drying data. The empirical Pages model gave better t for the drying data under all conditions tested with higher R2 (coecient of determination) values. A good agreement was found between the experimental and tted values with the R2-values of greater than 0.99 (Fig. 7). The drying constant (K) increased from 0.017 to 0.03 min1 with the increase in drying air temperature from 50 to 70 C for 7.5 mm thick mushroom slices. It can be seen that K- and k-values for microwave-vacuum drying were higher than hot-air drying. In microwave-vacuum drying of mushroom slices of a particular thickness, these values were found to increase as the microwave power was increased and pressure was reduced. This can be attributed to the fact that higher microwave power, lower pressure and smaller sample size help in increasing the driving force of heat and mass transfer. For parameter n, it did not possess a clear trend. For air drying, the n-values were close to one where as in case of microwave-vacuum method the values were more than one. The values for parameters K, k and n are in close proximity to those reported in the literature for button mushrooms and other products (Arora, Shivhare, Ahmed, & Raghavan, 2003; Drouzas, Tsami, & Saravacos, 1999; Kar & Gupta, 2003; Pravanjan et al., 1995). The eect of process variables (microwave power, system pressure and thickness) on rate constants were studied by response surface method and tting the data to a second order polynomial model. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) in Table 4 shows the signicance of the models and individual model terms. The models are found highly signicant (p < 0.05) with R2-values more than 0.86 (Eqs. (3) and (4)). The rate constant, K was highly aected by microwave power and slice thickness, as the linear as well as quadratic terms of these variables are signicant. In case of Pages model constant, k, the linear eect of all the process variables were found signicant, with microwave power having strongest eect as can be seen from corresponding F-values. Signicant lack of t of the models implied that a high proportion of the variability was

Fig. 5. Eect of slice thickness on drying time during MVD of mushroom slices at 200 W microwave power and at 15 kPa system pressure.

thickness exhibited more rapid dehydration. This can be attributed to enhanced water transport phenomena within the sample, which favour the thin samples. The inuence of microwave power on drying rate is illustrated in Fig. 6. There were no constant rates drying under any of the test conditions. Although high moisture foods like mushrooms can be expected to have a constant rate of drying, this was not observed in the present study, may be because of the thin (single) layer arrangement and too rapid heating by microwaves, providing instant drying. As expected, higher drying rates were obtained with higher microwave power. It can be seen from the gure that the inuence of power on drying rate is markedly higher when the moisture is higher. At moisture content of less than 4.0 kg/kg d.b. there is no dierence in the drying rates among dierent power levels, indicating the signicance of internal resistance to mass transfer at low water content in the material. The amount of microwave energy absorbed by the material depends upon its dielectric properties and the electric eld strength (Mudgett,

80
Drying rate, kg water/kg dry matter-hr

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0

MVD: 285 W, 15 kPa MVD: 200 W, 15 kPa MVD: 115 W, 15 kPa AD: 70 C AD: 50 C

4 6 8 10 Moisture content, kg/kg dry matter

12

14

Fig. 6. Comparison of drying rate for microwave-vacuum drying and air drying of 10 mm thick mushroom slices.

S.K. Giri, S. Prasad / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 512521 Table 3 Eect of various drying conditions on parameters of exponential and empirical Pages model Drying method Thickness (mm) Air temperature (C) Microwave power (W) Pressure (kPa) Model parameters Exponential K (min1) AD 7.5 50 60 70 50 60 70 150 250 150 250 10 20 10 20 10 20 10 20 0.017 0.026 0.030 0.011 0.014 0.020 0.110 0.092 0.175 0.157 0.082 0.080 0.137 0.129 R2 0.987 0.990 0.995 0.995 0.994 0.996 0.997 0.995 0.997 0.997 0.985 0.986 0.994 0.990 Page k (min1) 0.025 0.028 0.033 0.011 0.012 0.019 0.074 0.055 0.099 0.085 0.024 0.023 0.064 0.048 n 0.997 1.02 0.98 0.985 1.06 1.034 1.168 1.197 1.289 1.281 1.482 1.471 1.345 1.443 R2

517

12.5

0.996 0.994 0.995 0.996 0.994 0.995 0.999 0.996 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.997 0.999 0.999

MVD

7.5

12.5

ADair drying; MVDmicrowave-vacuum drying.

1.0 0.8 0.6

MR
Q = 150 W P = 20 kPa

1.0
0.8
0.6
MR
Q = 250 W P = 20 kPa

0.4 0.2 0.0

0.4
0.2
0.0

14

21

28

35

10

15

20

25

Time, min

Time, min

1.0 0.8 0.6

MR MR
Q = 150 W P = 10 kPa

1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 7 14 21 28 35 0 5 10 15 20 25

Time, min Time, min
Q =250 W P =10 kPa

0.4 0.2 0.0

Fig. 7. Moisture ratio (MR) versus time comparing experimental curves with the predicted one () by Pages equation for microwave-vacuum drying of mushroom.

not explained by the data. The variation of K and k with microwave power and slice thickness are depicted in Fig. 8.

Regression analysis of the drying rate constant, K and k versus MW power (Q), system pressure (P) and thickness (T) yielded the following second order equations:

518

S.K. Giri, S. Prasad / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 512521

Table 4 ANOVA showing the linear, quadratic and cross-product eect of the variables on rate constants and rehydration ratio Source of variation df K Mean square Model Q P T Q2 P2 T2 QP QT PT Residual Lack of t Pure error Total 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 5 5 19 1.85 103 1.10 102 2.01 104 9.98 104 1.57 103 6.50 104 2.60 103 9.11 105 9.11 105 6.12 106 1.28 104 2.54 104 2.70 106 F-value 14.46** 87.27** 1.57 7.78* 12.21** 5.06* 20.26** 0.71 0.71 0.048 94.07** k Mean square 9.21 104 3.58 103 7.92 104 2.30 103 4.54 104 5.13 104 8.63 104 1.25 105 1.25 105 3.21 105 1.32 104 2.55 104 1.51 105 F-value 6.93** 26.96** 5.96* 17.42** 3.43 3.87 6.50* 0.094 0.094 0.24 16.59** RR Mean square 0.16 0.11 0.61 0.34 0.012 0.16 0.087 0.017 0.053 0.021 0.043 0.079 0.0075 F-value 3.62* 2.44 14.13** 7.95* 0.27 3.75 2.02 0.40 1.22 0.49 10.52**

dfDegree of freedom; F-ratio of variance estimate. * Signicant at 1%. ** Signicant at 5%.

0.221 0.182 0.143

0.113 0.090 0.068

K (1/min)

0.104 0.065

k (1/min)
285 243 10.0 200 8.0 6.0 115 158

0.045 0.022

14.0 12.0

14.0 12.0 10.0 200 8.0 6.0 115 158 285 243

T (mm)

T (mm) Q (W)

Q (W)

(a)

(b)

Fig. 8. Eect of microwave power and slice thickness on (a) drying rate constant (K) and (b) Page equations parameter (k), during microwave-vacuum drying at 15 kPa pressure.

K 0:434 1:03 103 Q 0:011 P 0:04 T 4:17 106 Q2 2:7 104 P 2 2:15 104 T 2 1:35 105 QP 2:7 105 QT 7:0 105 PT R2 0:93; k 0:342 6:0 104 Q 9:28 103 P 0:034T 2:24 106 Q2 2:38 104 P 2 1:24 103 T 2 5:0 106 QP 1:0 105 QT 1:6 104 PT R2 0:86. 3.3. Rehydration characteristics

The rehydration curves of microwave-vacuum dried mushroom samples, both at ambient (30 C) and at

100 C water temperatures, as aected by microwave power and pressure levels are shown in Figs. 9 and 10. In all the cases the amount of moisture absorbed increases with rehydration time, but at a decreasing rate up to saturation level. The rehydration stabilized in about 10 min at 100 C and in 3 h at 30 C and the rehydration ratio was in the range of 2.33.4 under various drying conditions. Rehydration properties were improved by drying at lower system pressure and higher microwave power as indicated by higher values of rehydration ratio. Similar results were reported by Drouzas and Schubert (1996), Durance and Wang (2002), Pappas, Tsami, and Marinos-Kouris (1999). The regression model for RR relating the microwave-vacuum drying process variables was found as

S.K. Giri, S. Prasad / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 512521

519

4.0

4.0

3.0 Rehydration ratio

Rehydration ratio

3.0

2.0
P = 23.5 kPa

2.0

1.0

P = 15 kPa P = 6.5 kPa

1.0

Q = 285 W Q = 200 W Q = 115 W

0.0 0 2

0.0 0
(a)

(a)

4 8 6 Rehydration time (min)

10

12

10

12
4.0

Rehydration time (min)

4.0
Rehydration ratio

3.0

Rehydration ratio

3.0

2.0
P = 23.5 kPa

2.0

1.0

P = 15 kPa P = 6.5 kPa

1.0

Q = 285 W Q = 200 W Q = 115 W

0.0 0 1

0.0 0
(b)

(b)

3 2 Rehydration time (h)

0.5

1.5

2.5

3.5

Rehydration time (h)

Fig. 10. Eect of system pressure on rehydration ratio of 10 mm thick mushroom slices dried at 200 W microwave power: (a) at 100 C and (b) at 30 C water temperature.

Fig. 9. Eect of microwave power on rehydration ratio of 10 mm thick mushroom slices dried at 15 kPa pressure: (a) at 100 C and (b) at 30 C water temperature.

RR 3:94 0:0156Q 0:173P 0:244T 1:13 105 Q2 4:24 103 P 2 0:012T 2 1:85 104 QP 6:5 104 QT 4:1 103 PT R2 0:77. 5
Rehydration Ratio
3.78

3.43

3.08 2.73

The response surface plot for rehydration ratio is shown in Fig. 11. From ANOVA (Table 4) it can be concluded that the rehydration ratio depends mainly on pressure level while sample thickness and microwave power had less eect. While the rehydration ratio is positively correlated with microwave power that of system pressure is negatively correlated. As the pressure level decreases, the rehydration ratio increases, owing to the increased drying rate and creation of pores that are induced by vacuum conditions (Kiranoudis et al., 1997). The higher RR at higher microwave power can be attributed to the development of greater internal stresses during drying at higher power levels. The quick microwave energy absorption causes rapid evaporation of water, creating a ux of rapidly escaping vapour which helps in preventing the shrinkage and case hardening, thus improving the rehydration characteristics

2.37

6.0

23.5

8.0

19.3 15.0
10.0

P (kPa)

10.8

12.0

T (mm)

6.5 14.0

Fig. 11. Eect of system pressure and thickness on rehydration ratio of mushroom slices dried at 200 W microwave power.

(Kharaisheh et al., 1995; Lyons, Hatcher, & Sunderland, 1972; Sharma & Prasad, 2001). It is also clear from

520

S.K. Giri, S. Prasad / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 512521

4.0

Rehydration ratio

3.0

2.0

Fig. 12 that the rehydration capacity, both in terms of nal moisture content and speed is higher for the microwavevacuum dried samples in comparison to air-dried samples. Microwave-vacuum drying creates a porous structure with very little shrinkage than those obtained by air drying, thereby providing better rehydration char-acteristics. 3.4. SEM

1.0

MVD: 200W, 15 kPa AD: 60C

0.0 0 2 4 6 8 Rehydration time (min) 10 12

Fig. 12. Comparison of rehydration ratio of microwave-vacuum and airdried mushroom slices.

Eect of dierent drying methods and conditions on the structure of dried mushrooms was observed under scanning electron microscope. In air-dried samples (Fig. 13a) there is very less open structure and pores as compared to microwave-vacuum dried samples (Fig. 13b and c), indicating severe tissue shrinkage and collapse during air drying. The less shrinkage in the microwave-vacuum dried samples may be due to the shorter drying time, lower drying temperature and some tissue expansion from internal water vapour. Again the structure is more porous in samples dried under more vacuum conditions (Fig. 13c) during microwave-vacuum drying. 4. Conclusions Microwave-vacuum drying of mushroom was much faster than conventional hot-air drying, particularly towards the end of the drying process. The exponential as well as empirical Pages model adequately described the microwave-vacuum drying data. Statistical analysis of the drying data showed that drying rate constant was highly inuenced by microwave power while system pressure had highest inuence on the rehydration characteristics of the dehydrated mushroom in a p 6 0.05. Sample thickness also appeared to be factor inuencing the drying rate with thinner sample resulting in quick drying. Microwave-vacuum dried mushroom also created a more porous dehydrated product, which rehydrated more quickly and more completely than the air dried product. The button mushroom slices could be microwave-vacuum dried to 6% moisture content (w.b.) in 2530 min, avoiding any burning of the product and with good rehydration characteristics. References
AOAC (1984). Ocial methods of analysis of the Association of Ocial Analytical Chemists (14th ed.). Washington, DC. Arora, S., Shivhare, U. S., Ahmed, J., & Raghavan, G. S. V. (2003). Drying kinetics of Agaricus bisporus and Pleurotus orida mushrooms. Transaction of the ASAE, 46(3), 721724. Cui, Z. W., Xu, S. Y., & Sun, D. W. (2003). Dehydration of garlic slices by combined microwave-vacuum and air drying. Drying Technology, 21(7), 11731184. Drouzas, A. E., & Schubert, H. (1996). Microwave application in vacuum drying of fruits. Journal of Food Engineering, 28, 203209. Drouzas, A. E., Tsami, E., & Saravacos, G. D. (1999). Microwave vacuum drying of model fruit gel. Journal of Food Engineering, 39, 117122. Durance, T. D., & Wang, J. H. (2002). Energy consumption, density and rehydration rate of vacuum microwave and hot air convection dehydrated tomatoes. Journal of Food Science, 67(6), 22122216.

Fig. 13. Scanning electron micrographs of dried mushroom: (a) air-dried at 60 C, (b) microwave-vacuum dried at 20 kPa pressure and (c) microwave-vacuum dried at 10 kPa.

S.K. Giri, S. Prasad / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 512521 Jasna, P. K., Sander, A., & Skansi, D. (2001). Comparison of convective, vacuum and microwave drying chlorpropamide. Drying Technology, 19(1), 167183. Kar, A., & Gupta, D. K. (2003). Air drying of osmosed button mushrooms. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 40(1), 2327. Kharaisheh, M. A. M., Cooper, T. J. R., & Magee, T. R. A. (1995). Investigation and modeling of combined microwave and air drying. Transaction of Institution of Chemical Engineers, 73(c), 121126. Kiranoudis, C. T., Tsami, E., & Maroulis, Z. B. (1997). Microwave vacuum drying kinetics of some fruits. Drying Technology, 15(10), 24212440. Lin, T. M., Durance, T. D., & Scaman, C. H. (1998). Characterization of vacuum microwave, air and freeze-dried carrot slices. Food Research International, 31(2), 111117. Lyons, D. W., Hatcher, J. D., & Sunderland, J. E. (1972). Drying of a porous medium with internal heat generation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 15(5), 897905. McLoughlin, C. M., McMinn, W. A. M., & Magee, T. R. A. (2003). Microwave-vacuum drying of pharmaceutical powders. Drying Technology, 21(9), 17191733. Mudgett, R. E. (1990). Developments in microwave food processing. In H. E. Schwartzberg & M. A. Rao (Eds.), Biotechnology and food process engineering. Basic symposium series (pp. 359403). New York: Marcel Dekker.

521

Mujumdar, A. S. (1995). Handbook of industrial drying (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. Pappas, C., Tsami, E., & Marinos-Kouris, D. (1999). The eect of process conditions on the drying kinetics and rehydration characteristics of some microwave-vacuum dehydrated fruits. Drying Technology, 17 (1 and 2), 157174. Pravanjan, D. G., Ramaswamy, H. S., & Raghavan, G. S. V. (1995). Microwave assisted convective air drying of thin layer carrots. Journal of Food Engineering, 25, 283293. Sharma, G. P., & Prasad, S. (2001). Drying of garlic (Allium sativum) cloves by microwave-hot air combination. Journal of Food Engineering, 50, 99105. Wardsworth, J. I., Velupillai, L., & Verma, L. R. (1990). Microwavevacuum drying of parboiled rice. Transactions of ASAE, 33(1), 199210. Woodroof, J. G., & Luh, B. S. (1986). Commercial fruit processing. Westport, CN: The AVI Publishing Company. Yongsawatdigul, J., & Gunasekaran, S. (1996a). Microwave vacuum drying of cranberries, part I: Energy use and eciency. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 20, 121143. Yongsawatdigul, J., & Gunasekaran, S. (1996b). Microwave vacuum drying of cranberries, part II: Quality evaluation. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 20, 145156.