Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1) GAAS Hierarchy: a) FASB stmt & interpretations;b) FASB Technical Bulletins, AICAP A&A
Guides; c) AICPA Practice Bulletins; d) AICPA Accounting Interpretation
b) Field Work (SEE) – supervision & planning/ entity and its environment; evidence
4) Going concern:
Not precluded from issuing report on one F/S and not the others
2) Compilation:
3) Review:
a) Independence req
c) Disclaim of opinion
d) Not allow to omit substantially all disclosure if not misleading & scope limit
4) Comparative F/S
b) Should not issue CFS when statement for one period omit substantially all of the disclosure
by GAAP
b) Type: Financial forecast/projection(prospective F/S); Pro-Forma F/S; I/C over F/R; Compliance
with contract; Mgmt D&A
4. Compliance Auditing Applicable to Govt Entity and other Recipients of Govt (Government Audit
Standard) – Chap 29
*** Auditor’s opinion relation to effectiveness of company’s ICOFR as of “ a point of time” and “ taken
as a whole”
c) Test & evaluate design effectiveness: design eff to prevent/detect error or fraud
B. Assess engagement risk and CPA’s firm’s ability to perform the engagement (Chap 21)
1. Engagement responsibilities
a) Auditor: F/S misstmt GAAS); discover errors/ fraud/illegal/IC deficiency come to attention
b) I/C or A/C: internal Control
c) Mgmt: prevent & detect fraud/illegal; establish& maintain I/C, legal issues, adjust Misstmt
*** related to CPA firm’s practice as a whole while GAAS related to individual audit engagement
a) Objective: meeting responsibility to provide profe services conform with prof std
b) Responsibility: all firm personnel should comply; design & maintain – personnel needed
F. Obtain an understanding of the client’s operation, business and industry (Chap 22)
I/C to identify type of material factors that affect RMM design T.O.C
a) Purpose: planning (req.); substantive testing (not req.); overall review (req)
c) Benford’s law
H. Preliminary Engagement Materiality (Chap 22)
I. Assess IR & RMM from errors, fraud, and illegal acts (Chap 22)
*** with computer: input, process correct output correct (eg, test data, parallel simulation, integrated
test facility)
***without computer
c) Presentation& Discl: occurrence & R&O, completeness, class & understandability, val & all
Sarbanes-Oxley Act:
a) Components (CRIME): control activity; rish assessment, info &comm.; monitoring; control
environment
Responsibility:
c) Auditor: communicate significant def and material weakness regarding mgt decision within 60
days after report issued- how control prevent, detect, correct material misstmt in relevant
assertion (not auditor’s duty to search for def )
4. Limitation of I/C
b) User auditor: should not ref to svc audtor’s report, consider Service auditor’s reputation
6. Test of Control
a) Not req!! test only when i) expectation of operating eff; ii) reduce CR from sub testing alone
b) control without change: min ones/3 yr; not apply to controls mitigate a significant risk
7. Assess CR
III Obtain and doc info to form a basis for conclusion – Chap 24-27
2. Analytical procedures:
see above
B. Evaluation contingencies
“Uncertainty”: likelihood when probably req. disclosure; when remote not req disclosure
a) Ltr of outside lawyer can’t by a substitute for info obtained from inside counsel
b) Subsidiary audit – obtain a rep from parent concern matters may aff subsidiary
a) Service provided; general info (accounting issues, mgmt dealing, SAD); significant def;
independence; quality of an SEC company’s accounting principles and underlying estimates
H. Perform procedures for accounting and review services engagements
a) See above
B. Evaluate the sufficiency and competence of audit evidence and document engagement conclusion
a) Unqualified
c) Disclaim: independence
a) Auditor’s responsibility: evaluate info det substantial doubt about – in reasonable period (one
year)
c) Uncertainty disclaim
F. Review work performed to provide reasonable assurance that objectives are achieved
A. Reports:
5. Reports on I/C
9. Special reports
C. Other Matters