Islam Special - Hindu Raksha Patrika

To subscribe please register on….
http://groups.google.com/group/Hindurakshak
Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

http://www.hindurashtra.org
Preface
Jai Hindurashtra !!!
No matter how much we try to summarise the contents of some issues it always
runs down to few more pages. The current issue of the patrika is divided in 4 sub
editions so that people get most of the information, which is required. Please
pardon me for the same for issuing this patrika in the form of a digest trying to
give as much as information I can on a dreaded danger called as Islam.
This issue will help you a lot during arguments with Pseudo-Seculars and the
other people who do not wish to have information about the danger, which is
dancing on their heads. The partika will be an encyclopedia about truth of Islam
which though everybody know a little, but will neither talk about it nor they will
investigate the same.
The patrika is aimed at making you confident about speaking or writing with
evidence against an intolerant religion, which is aiming at finishing the whole
world with an ideology, which they believe in.
Many people argue that Hindu religion teaches peace, but they forget that
Hindutva first teaches defense then peace.
We would like to introduce a first organization, which has been formed for
defending Hindutva with Arms. The organization members are highly educated
and intelligent and dedicated till the end of their lives. The people who need
more information about the same can contact at hinduraksha@gmail.com for
knowing how they can contribute to the cause. The organization is operated
from USA and Canada with utmost secrecy. The details about the same will be
shared in our organization review article in coming issue.
One more thing we should get united on is the issue of Ram Janma Bhumi. The
verdict is most probably coming in favour of Hindus, so we should get ready for
the same. Even if it comes against us we should have to fight as it will be solely
done for minority appeasement and if it comes in favor Islam will fight with its
tooth and nails (remember the cartoon episode of Lucknow).
Jai Shri Ram !!!

Index
Part A
Islam in Modern India (with details of factions of Islam)
Sir Muhammad Iqbal (A article)
Quran’s Teachings (With Details of Versus and definitions)
Part B1
Islam Pictorial Depiction-I (A presentation to open eyes)
Part B2
Islam Pictorial Depiction-II (A presentation to open eyes)
Part C
Why I left Islam – Book by Ali Sina (Faith www.faithfreedom.org)
Part D
A Book –Muhsin Al Qaasim -Abdul Khutbah
Eye opener again as it is available on the web – we just picked it up.
Contributions are from Dr. Ali Sina a renowned general of Muslims who has
realized the truth of Islam and abandoned being a Muslim. There are plenty
of them to be liberated hopefully this Patrika will bring out some truth in
front of them. If you know anyone who is a mild Muslim, these truths can
be sent to him or her that’s why the Patrika is that exhaustive and divided
in to parts.
Please remember if a person is Muslim he can’t be

secular, if he is secular he can’t be Muslim.

Islam in Modern India

Muslim influx and influence in India started almost at the inception of the religion. The
traders from Arabia were frequent visitors to the Indian subcontinent even before
Prophet Muhammad revealed the Koran. They brought the word of Muhammad to India
in the 7th century and this resulted in some peaceful conversions of Hindus to Islam.
Following this, Mohammad-ibn-Quasim in the year 712 A.D conquered the Province of
Sindh. However, this event in history does not seem to have influenced India as much as
expected. Beginning with the invasion of Mohammad of Ghazni in the 10th century,
followed by a barrage of invaders from Persia, Turkey and Afghanistan in the 11th and
12th centuries, a full force of Islam was thrust upon India. Forcible conversions of people
of other faiths with inducements as well as unfair taxation resulted in spread of the Islam
in Hindustan. The British conquest in India that started insidiously with the establishment
of the East India Company, eventually usurped the Muslim stronghold of India, in the
18th century.
Today there are more than a quarter of a billion Muslims living in the Indian subcontinent
(India, Pakistan and Bangla Desh). This amounts to more than a quarter of the total
Muslim population of the world. Muslims form about fifteen percent of the Indian
population. It is unique that the Muslim population of India has been influenced by the
Hindu religion throughout history. Sufism, for example is an adaptation of Vedanta. Over
many centuries, Islam in India has undergone several attempts at reforms, some
towards modernization and some leaning more towards fundamentalism.
The Muslims in India are categorized into two distinct classes based on their origins.
This is similar to the caste system of Hinduism (so called Varnashrama). Muslims are
broadly divided into two groups, namely, Ashraf and Ajlaf. Ashraf are again grouped as
Sayyeds, Sheikhs, Mugahls and Pathans. The Sayyeds are said to be descendents of
the Prophet and regarded in high esteem. The Sheikhs are of Arab descent and are next
in line in prestige. The Mughals are descendents of the greatest Muslim rulers of India,
the Mughals and occupy third place. Pathans including Sepahis hail from the
northwestern regions including Afghanistan and form the last group of Ashraf. The Ajlaf
on the other hand are the Indian converts and are considered to be of common ancestry.
They are considered to be of inferior class when compared to the Ashraf.
Nineteenth century India saw great socio-religious reform in Hinduism. The reform
movements of Rajaram Mohan Roy in 1827 first started the abolishing of Sati and
recognition of widow marriage as well as education of women by founding of his Brahmo
Samaj in Bengal. Many reform movements followed this, significantly the Prarthana
Samaj started by Keshab Chandra Sen in 1867 (later popularized by G.M.Ranade and
Bhandarkar), Arya Samaj established in 1875 by Dayananda Saraswati and
Ramakrishna Mission of Vivekananda. The Theosophical Society of Colonel Cleott
popularized by Annie Besant in 1886 in Madras, the Rehnumai Mazdayasan Sabha of
the Parsees established by Dadabhai Navaroji in 1851 in Bombay and the Sri Narayan
Dharma Paripalan Yogam started by Sri Narayana Guru in 1903 in Travancore were
some other reform movements of late 19th century. All these reforms were attempts at
steering the Hindu religion towards Vedanta, which is the backbone of its philosophy.
Unlike Hinduism, which is flexible and amenable to reform, Islam is rigid and difficult to
change. Criticism of old archaic practices is shunned and viewed as anti- Muslim

rhetoric. Modernization is seen as a threat to the way of life of a Muslim. In the face of
such persistent orthodoxy all the reforms of the 19th century generally have been
reverting to more fundamentalism rather than modernization. Two such reforms were the
Wahabis and Tabligis.
The Wahabis
The Wahabi movement started in Saudi Arabia in the 18th century by Muhammad ibn-
Abd-al-Wahab (1703–1792) regards all other religions as heretical and thus intolerant
towards them. The Indian Wahabi movement was founded by Syed Ahmed Brelavi
(1789-1831) belonging to Rai Baraili. When he saw Islam drifting towards superstitions
and exaggerated veneration of saints and prophets, he steered Islam to its more
fundamental roots similar to the Arabian Wahabi movement. However, the Brelavi
Wahabis had no direct contact with their counterparts in Arabia. Its aim was to establish
Muslim sovereignty in India or a Dar-ul-Islam.
Though the Wahabis took part in fighting the British, the basic tenet of the movement did
not change, that is to establish Muslim supremacy over all of India. Influenced by the
Wahabi movement, two other fundamentalist movements came into existence.
Shariatullah started Fairazi movement in attempt to aid the poor peasants in Bengal
against the oppressive zamindars. Soon this became an anti-Hindu movement as well.
More significant was the second movement called the Deoband. They established the
Muslim schools for education, the model of which is still followed in the madrassahs
around the Muslim world. These Deoband faction attracted students from all over the
Muslim world. Financed by the rich Muslim Arab nations, fundamentalism was
institutionalized in these schools. In India there is an undercurrent of discord between
the Deoband faction and the Brelavi Wahabis, mainly due to the financial disparity. In
course of time the movements started as reform of Muslims shifted course and has been
preoccupied with power and control of the populous.
The Tabligis
Dayananda Saraswati’s Arya Samaj targeted Muslim converts and attempted a

purification drive (shuddhikaran). As a response Maulana Iliyas of Mewat in Rajastan
started the Tabligi movement in 1927. The Hindu converts were practicing a mixed form
of Islam as they were culturally more Hindu than Muslim. Maulana Iliyas started his
movement to transform these converts into ‘complete Muslims’ and put forward the
slogan, ‘Aye Musalmano! Musalman bano’ (O Muslims! Be Muslims). True Islamic
teachings and practices were taught in an uncompromising way. Initially localized to
Mewat, the movement caught on and spread rapidly after the death of the Maulana.
The Tabligis follow strict codes of the Islamic law. They are bound by the religious
dogma, dressing patterns, detailed methods of religious practices. Meetings of
thousands of Muslim gatherings (Jama’at) are held where minute details of the religious
practices are taught for Muslims to follow. Half the populations of Muslims in the
subcontinent are now adherents of this movement. Though apolitical in its organization,
they have a capacity of mobilizing a large number of Muslims at short notice to gather.

More moderate reforms of the Islamic religion also occurred simultaneously. The
adherents of such reforms are much less in number today. The Aligarh and the Ahmedia
movements are the two main moderate attempts at reform.
The Aligarh Movement
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan (1817-1891) attempted a social upsurge amongst the Indian
Muslims with his so-called Aligarh movement. His main contribution was to enhance
education with starting of many schools and colleges. Much importance was given to
Urdu language. He undertook reconciliation between Islam and Christianity and he
pointedly showed the similarities between the two religions. He even published a
sympathetic study of the Bible. Urdu translation of books on western arts and sciences
were done by a translation society founded by him. Despite all the successful launching
of social reforms, Sir Syed failed to bring about much needed moderation of the religion
such as women’s education and the purdah system for oppressed women. Only the
education of upper and middle class and has been criticized for not going far enough
with his reforms of the entire Muslim society.
The Ahmedias
Founded in 1889 by Mirza Ghulam Ahmed, the movement was based on universal
religion of all communities. It spread western liberal education among Muslims by
starting a number of schools and colleges. It was opposed to Jihad but at the same time
infused vigorous religious spirit among Muslims. It is the most closely knit and organized
group of Muslims in the country. Its perceived mysticism was its downfall.
The Aga Khan’s Flock
Apart from the Sunnis (the followers of Omar, the Caliph) and Shiites, (followers of Ali,
Prophet’s son in law) there is another sect in Indian subcontinent called the Aga Khanis.
It is the Nizari Ismaili community with Aga Khan as their Imam. It originated as a splinter
group of Shi’ite sect, when they accepted Ismail as the seventh Imam instead of his
brother. They trace an unbroken line of Imams up to the current day Aga Khan (Prince
Karim), who is 49th in succession. Many Shiite sects refused to accept any Imams after
the twelfth Imam died without an heir. In this way the Nizari Ismailis are different.
Thirteen generation after Ali, the Shiite sect further divided between followers of Nizar
and his brother (later came to be known as Bohra community). Nizari Ismailis follow Aga
Khan as their leader and celebrate his birthday as a holy day rather than the Muharram,
which most of the Shiites celebrate as a holy day because of the death anniversary of
Hussein, son of Ali.
Followers of Aga Khan are more westernized than any other Muslim community. Most of
the recent Aga Khans have been educated in England. Thousand years ago they were
rivals of the caliphate of Baghdad and ruled as the Fatimid caliphate of Cairo. After the
decline of their influence in Egypt and Asia, they remained in Persia until 1840, when the
46th Imam was forced to leave Persia. They then moved to India and Pakistan where
they formed an amicable relationship with the British. They were not accepted into
Mecca and did not undertake pilgrimage. In 1866 their interpretation of the Koran
resulted in dissension among its followers and many left the faith and reverted to some

other form of Shiite sect. The Aga Khans were also accused of mishandling the Nizari
finances in 1905 though they won a court battle in this regard. However, the
modernization of the religion by the Aga Khans did not sit well in the Muslim world. The
Nizari Ismailis of Gujarat are called Khojas.
During the 16th and 17th centuries, for example, Indian Nizaris often deemed it
necessary to consult Hindu texts as well as The Holy Koran (which is of course their
primary Book); in fact even today a fair number of Aga-Khanis enjoy and derive some
inspiration from the Bhagavad-Gita. Unlike other Muslims, they sometimes sing hymns
during their services, usually in an Indian language such as Gujarati. In addition, many
Nizaris believe that reincarnation of souls is possible under certain circumstances.
Mostly these are Muslims who embrace Sufism. An attempt was once made to
categorize Hazrat Ali as the tenth avatar of Vishnu by Aga Khan though they no longer
believe this.
As a result of the rift between the reformers and the orthodox sections of the religion,
many deserted and joined other Shiite sect, thus becoming indistinguishable from them.
It was thought that only about four million Muslims remained faithful to Aga Khan.
However, after the breakup of the Soviet Union and birth of independent countries like
Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan where many Aga Khanis were found to be
followers of the faith. Now it is believed that there are about 20 million followers.
Other attempts
Other attempts have been made to modernize the religious practices with varying
effects. Shibli Numani attempted Muslims to adopt a more flexible attitude towards
Hindus and accept new ideas, but failed. Barruddin Tyebji (1844-1906) attempted to do
away with the Purdah in Bombay. Moves toward re-interpretation of scriptures, history
and behavior have been attempted by Hali and more recently by Maulana Vahiddudin
Khan.
Traditional Muslim forces are too strong to allow any radical changes in the socio-
religious front. Unlike Hindu reforms, real radical reforms of Islam have remained a
dream of certain individuals over the course of history. Phadke wrote in 1989 that “ So
tight has been the hold of orthodoxy on the Muslim mind that nowhere in India has
Muslim society been so far able to support a vocal group of liberal Muslims committed to
modern values. There has been no serious attempt of a thorough critical appraisal of
their heritage”. After Indian Independence the reform of the Islam has become even
more difficult as any attempt is viewed with suspicion because of the minority status of
the Muslims.
Another moderate Muslim movement attempting to reform is the Bohra Reformist Group.
Bohras are mainly business people mostly in the hardware and gun smithy. This is a
modern movement attempting to soften the authority of the religious leaders on the
religion. Started by Engineer, Contractor and Poonawala they have even attempted to
interpret Koran in the perspective of a Christian liberal theology.
In the 1970’s a reformist named Hamid Dalwai made a serious attempt at modernizing
Islam in India. He proposed abandonment of purdah and more freedom to women
among the Maharashtra Sunni Muslim community. For this effort he was branded as

heretic and his movement did not survive after his death. Dalwai’s movement was called
Muslim Satayshodhak Mandal (MSM). Many more similar attempts have so far failed to
produce significant results in reforming the socio-religious aspect of Islam in India. The
fundamentalism is readily accepted whereas the moderate reforms are shunned.

Wahabi Movement
Subsequent to the attack on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon there have
been a spate of emails about the Wahabi movement, its orthodoxy and
fanaticism. Since the site has articles on the Birth of Pan Islamicism in India i.e.
the Aligarh Movement and its consolidation by Gandhi i.e. Khilafat movement I
thought it might be useful to cover the Wahabi movement and another doyen of
Muslim India Sir Muhammad Iqbal, widely believed to be one of the founders of
the two nation theory.
Coming back to Sept 11, it is the Law of Karma at work, you reap as you sow. It
is the Americans who, anxious to get the Soviets out of Afghanistan, poured in
billions of dollars into Afghanistan and Pakistan. Arms, money, buying out
opponents, turning a blind eye to Islamic fundamentalisms and trading of
narcotics were some of the means used. Eventually the Soviets were out of
Afghanistan but! The Americans left behind tons of arms, ammunition and a war
ravaged country. Islam had to find a new enemy. It was the Indians read Hindus
of Jammu and Kashmir. Around 1989 Gen Zia started the Proxy war in that state
and it shows no signs of ending. Thousands of people have died, become
homeless and refugees in their own country. Did the world care? Sections of the
Church with the help of evangenlists in the U.S. have taken to the gun in India's
North East for nearly fifty years. Here again thousands died and local culture
destroyed. The worst terrorists attack in world history prior to Sept 11 were the
Bomb blasts in Mumbai 1993, 250 lives lost and about 700 injured. Aided by the
Pakis and Indian Muslims the intent was cripple India's commercial capital just as
what Muslims have tried to do to New York. Where was the U.S. then? Even
today how much publicity has its media given to the fact that atleast 250 PIO died
in the WTC incident, some of India's brighter brains.
So what I am saying that the U.S. has followed double standards, promoted
terrorists organizations worldwide to suit its convenience. You know life evens
out. You have to pay for your misdeeds. Much as I pray for the families of every
person who lost his life I cannot but go back to the concept of Karma. Is it not
amazing that thousands of years ago the Rishis of India had discovered this very
elementary truth of life?
Yet the Western world is repeating the mistakes that Gandhi, Nehru, Congress,
BJP made. They refused to accept and understand the pan Islamic Muslim mind
for which we Indians have paid for very dearly, both before and after partition.
They are scared of publicly criticizing Islam because the Muslims will take to
violence immediately. Now which head of state wants Violence not realizing that
acts of violence are merely being postponed to events like Mumbai Bomb blasts
or Sept 11? In order to appease the Arab and local Muslim population George
Bush and Tony Blair are calling Islam the epitome of peace. Honestly the
civilized man in them is scared of the destruction Islam can cause so praise
Islam. Probably the Koran says so but ask any professor of history or even a

blind Indian what he has to say about Islam. Better ask the Hindus of Pakistan,
Bangladesh and Jammu & Kashmir what it means to live in an Islamic state.
As Pandit Vamadeva Shastri alias David Frawley has very rightly said "By
targeting Osman Bin Laden the West have made him the most popular man of all
times. He has become a role model for every Muslim child in the world". See how
one soldier of Islam has brought the world's only superpower to its knees.
If you want to solve this problem one of the ways is to examine its source of
funding. In this case it is three, one narcotics, two Muslim countries like Saudi
Arabia and three Oil. Most of us know that the biggest market for narcotics is the
West. Saudia Arabia is a trusted ally of the U.S. Now is the West willing to come
down heavily on the drug lobby within its borders and allies like Saudia! Coming
to Oil, ask yourself, did Islam have such a hold on world affairs read terrorism till
the advent of the Oil crisis of the seventies? If oil consumption comes down,
Muslim states would have less money to spare for terrorists activities and would
have to use limited resources for the benefits of its citizens. Since democracy is
alien to Islam, there are a large number of disgruntled groups in nearly every
Muslim state. Today petro dollars keep them under check but if the dollars were
to dry up then! After seeing Pakistani, I doubt if the above argument holds good.
Here is a country that is bankrupt but spends millions of dollars on funding
terrorist's activities and trying to keep pace with India read Hindus.
How many of us are willing to concede that we support world terrorism by

continuing to consume petrol galore. I am not suggesting that we stop using cars
but the moot point is that are we individually willing to reduce petrol consumption
by sharing cars, using public transport and putting ourselves to inconvenience.
Most governments including ours could have reduced our dependence on Islam
by increasing oil production domestically but!
The saddest part is that post Sept 11 the U.S. and Western Europe have become
secular like India. Which means that Islamic terrorists can blow up buildings, take
to the streets at random, convert Hindus forcibly or through inducements but no!
Islam is a great religion; it preaches peace and universal brotherhood.
Secularism is important, national security and nationhood be dammed.
Before you label me, here is a thought that I like to leave with you is, Why is it
barring Ireland and Sri Lanka every act of terrorists violence involves Islam?
What is it about this religion that makes people lose their intellect (ability to
discriminate between the right and wrong), take to the gun and die in the name of
religion? The Christians of today are as fanatic in their efforts to convert Hindus
worldwide but except for India's North East one has not heard of them take to the
gun with as much gusto. They are smarter. They start schools, hospitals,
orphanages etc. Yes I admit that some of them do good work but the underlying
thought is prosleytization. If these children of Christ are so concerned about the
poor and downtrodden, why do they not go to Bangladesh or Indonesia? Or

better they could go under American protection to its ally Pakistan. Do I need to
spell out their fate thereafter? Are there not poor people in Eastern Europe or the
U.S. for that matter?
As an Indian I blame none but us for our current state. As a cultural unit, nation
we lacked a strategic culture. We were not united and were willing to join a
foreigner to defeat an Indian enemy. Our philosophy is inward looking because of
which we mostly looked within and did not keep track of world developments. We
have an English print, electronic media whose sole objective is to criticize
whatever the government does and highlight what is wrong with India. Also, it
appears that nearly 1200 years of Islamic barbarism in India followed by fifty
years of Congress rule and continuous anti-Hindu writings by the English media
have taken the fire out of the average Hindu.
Can anybody tell me of a state or human being who is perfect but the media! We
have a head of government namely Atal Vajpayee who like Gandhi believes that
making unilateral concessions to Pakistan read Muslims will make them take up
the path of peace. Have these people read history! Can you think of a country
India that has been humiliated so badly by another read Pakistan be it terrorists
killings in Punjab, Jammu and Kashmir, Mumbai Bomb Blasts, Kandhar
Hijacking, Karachi based Underworld etc yet it refuses to take the gun, professes
peace. Ask the super cop of Punjab KPS Gill; would similar goodness have
enabled him to wipe out terrorism from Punjab? This trait of Indian politicians to
be good, make concessions unilaterally baffles me. Indian businessmen are not
like that. Ask Sabeer Bhatia how hard he negotiated with Microsoft when he sold
Hotmail to them.
Lets learn to love our country first, consign secularism to history, look within to
see what's wrong and simultaneously keep in touch with the world. Quoting John
Kennedy "Ask not what the country does for you but what you do for the country".
Since a lot of urban Indians believe that aping American economic policies,
cultures is a solution to our problems, how about starting by following Shri
Kennedy's words first. Renunciation of action is not what I advocate. Let us serve
Bharat with a spirit of devotion without being attached to the fruits of our action.
We must imbibe the spirit of the Holy Geeta within our souls.

History – Wahabi (W) made its appearance into India in the early 19th century
and attacked religious corruptions, which had crept into Muslim society. In India it
had a new appeal since Hindus who had converted to Islam had brought Hindu
practices and ideas that were alien to Islam. Wahabism advocated a return to the
simplicity of faith and society of the Prophet's Arabia, rejected all accretions to
and declensions from the pure Islam. Soon it transformed itself into a religio-
political creed. It was the ambition of its founder Saiyid Ahmad of Rai Bareilly
(1786 to 1831) to restore Muslim power in India by bringing about the overthrow
of the Punjabi Sardars in Punjab and the British in Bengal.
Ahmad came under the influence of Abdul Aziz, son of a famous Delhi saint
Shah Waliullah. This Islam was more comprehensive and retained a Sufi
coloring. In this Islam, there was room for the Sunnis and Shias who quite
contrary to the Wahabis, follow various Imams. But there was hardly any
difference as regards the end i.e. "pure Islam must be reenacted and
regenerated, society must again be mighty".
Ahmad like many others was very upset with the loss of Muslim power
subsequent to the arrival of the Brits. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan the founder of the
Aligarh Movement and considered to be the father of the two nation theory
thought the same way. May be an understanding of their minds prompted Sri
Aurobindo to say in 1940 that the Muslims wanted to rule India. To my mind
nothing has changed, but probably the degree of sophistication in articulating
thoughts has! Pakistan continues to benchmark itself with India. With the help of
countries like Saudia Arabia, Bangladesh it is out to increase the Muslim
population in the India so that Muslims can rule India again. It might be
appropriate to remove a fallacy that the Muslims ruled India before the Brits
arrived. After Aurangzeb's death Muslim power moved southwards. It is the
Marathas who dominated India for most of the 18th century. Mughal rule in Delhi
was for name only. An article in the history section of the site titled "Maratha
domination in the 18th century" would throw light on what I am saying.
This movement for Muslim regeneration had two facets to it, one for upliftment of
Muslim society and two fight against the infidel rulers, Hindus in western India
and the Christians elsewhere. Ahmad belonged to the militant group, took up
arms against the Sikhs first and then the Brits. Before we move further it is
important to talk of a similar movement in East Bengal by a sect called Farazis.
For one it was preached by Shariatullah before the Wahidis, two he anticipated
some of the important views of the Wahabi movement, members of these two
movements eventually joined hands.
Shariatullah started off by criticizing the corruptions in Islamic society, later on

declared the Brits to be enemy territory i.e. dar-ul-harb. His achievement was that
the apathetic and careless Bengali peasant was roused into enthusiasm. His son
Mushin organized the movement and gave it a strong anti Zamindari feel. He
made an attack on the levying of illegal taxes by the Zamindars and declared that

all land belonged to Allah so no taxes. As a result of these teachings people

began to gradually accept the teachings of Saiyid Ahmad.
Coming back to Saiyid Ahmad around 1820 he began to preach the doctrines of
religious reforms similar to those held the sect of Wahabis in Arabia. He started
preaching his doctrines in Rohilkhand. In 1820 he visited Patna and got a very
good response. Since the number of disciples went up he created an
organization and appointed four khalifas or spiritual vice-regiments. Ahmad
undertook tours to different districts and enrolled a large number of disciples.
Like his teacher, he too declared Bharat dar-ul-harb or enemy territory, thus
making it incumbent on Muslims either to wage jihad against non-Muslim rulers
or to migrate to some other country. For this purpose he made efforts to train his
followers in the use of arms, and himself, in a soldier's kit, held military parades.
With this end objective and due to political exigencies he proceeded to the North
West Frontier province and Afghanistan, accompanied by Patna Maulvis, to enlist
the support of the tribes in his holy war against the Sikhs. In his pamphlet
Targhib-ul-Jihad he called the Sikh rulers oppressors who had killed thousands
of Muslims and do not allow the call to prayer from mosques and the killing of
cows.
By 1830 Syed Ahmed established a government in Peshawar with 80,000

wahabi soldiers. Now he took the Sardars. The British were only too happy to
see the Muslims fight the Sardars and destroy Punjabi power. Alas! Maharaja
Ranjit Singh had different ideas. Not only did he defeat the Wahabis but Syed
himself died in the Balakot battle in 1831.
Ahmad failed to defeat the Sikhs and died in battle in 1831. Lets try and
understand Shri Ahmad's mind. One Muslim glory must be regained. Two infidels
must be defeated probably thought Christians are lesser evil than Hindus so
reached Punjab first. So similar to Syed Ahmed who followed except that Shri
Syed realized that the Muslims would be better off supporting the Christians, an
insurance policy against the Hindus. Effect on the Afghani mind surely there was
but to what extent is something that I would love to know about. Ahmad's efforts
were not in vain. They had sown the seed that was to blossom into a tree in the
years to come. Loss of political power by the Muslims was moaned by Syed
Ahmed too.
Having said that Ahmad's death did not deter his followers like Patna's Vilayat Ali
and Inayat Ali. They reached Kabul and helped spread the sect rapidly. Another
Shah Muhammad put the sect on a sound footing in Bengal and Bihar. In
Hyderabad Vilayat was able to recruit a number of followers. Now the Wahabi
khalifas selected Maulavi Nasir-ud-din as Commander in Chief. Based in Sindh
he was joined by volunteers from Bharat esp Bengal, together they proceeded to
Kabul to assist the ruler of Kabul in his fight against the British. So this time it is

infidel number two. Subsequent to the death of Ranjit Singh the Wahabis did
capture parts of Punjab but eventually surrendered to the Brits at Haripur.
After Vilayat's death Inayat Ali became the supreme leader. Circulars were
addressed to the khalifas to incite people to proceed to Mulka Sittana for jihad,
Hijrat was declared to be incumbent on every Muslim in an infidel country like
India. The preachers became active particularly in Meerut, Bareilly, Delhi and
many districts of Bengal, Bihar. In an encounter with the Brits in 1853, the
Wahabis suffered heavy casualties. Inayat Ali just about managed to escape.
Now regular training was imparted to the recruits and songs were recited
extolling the virtues of jihad.
The Wahabis did not play a conspicuous role in the rising of 1857 due to a
variety of reasons. Their main leaders were put behind bars, communication lines
cut between their center at Patna and forts across the Sindhu. The Wahabis also
had a feeling that these disturbances were a matter concerning sepoys only. No
they had not accepted the Brits suddenly. In fact they were the first to spread if
not originate the idea of greased cartridges amongst the sepoys at Barrrackpore.
I am not going into the historic details from 1857 to 1872. It would be sufficient to
say that a number of Wahabi leaders did try and take on the Brits but failed. As a
result of various trials and other vigorous measures the Wahabi conspiracy was
gradually stamped out of India.
What strikes you most? The desire to establish Muslim rule in India once again.
Signs of the Pan-Islamic Muslim mind at work. Indian Muslims did not see
anything wrong in joining the ruler of Kabul in his war against the infidels. Punjab
and Bengal seem to be important centers of influence. Could this influence have
led to the local population demanding a separate homeland for India some sixty
years later? These events also raise another question. Why did the Muslims fight
the mutiny of 1857? Think about it, was reestablishment of Muslim rule the
objective. Who might have ruled India had the Brits lost the war of 1857 is
something you could ponder over.
This anti-Muslim and pro-Hindu feeling feeling was further developed after the
Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, as the British regarded the Muslims as its chief
instigators. Thus H H Thomas (retired I.C.S.) observed that "The Hindus were not
the main contrivers or the primary movers of the 1857 rebellion, it was the result
of a Muslim conspiracy" quote Lala Lajpat Rai II pg 401. Reference has been
made above to similar views expressed by Charles Raikes and others.
Organization -
The Wahabi movement was much better organized, planned than the rising of
1857. With missionary zeal they toured the country to stir up people against the
infidels read British. After the abrupt death of Saiyid Ahmad Patna became the

center of the movement. Besides a chief priest there was a President in overall
charge of operations supported by a Central Committee. Every friendly district
had similar committees and preachers.
The transmission of recruits from Patna called Chhota godown to Sittana called
Bara godown, a distance of about 2,000 miles presented a difficult problem to the
organizers. Here Yahya Ali's administrative skills came to use. Rest houses were
organized at regular intervals to look after people's safety and comfort. At
Sittana, these young men were kept under the immediate tuition of Abdullah. A
few of them were selected to work as agents in British territory. Has anything
changed? Today too Muslims from various parts of India, Bangladesh, and
Britain are sent to Pakistan for training and thereafter to spread terror across the
world. Pakistan, Afghanistan were training grounds for jihadis then and! The
strategy is the same; it is for the law enforcement agencies to wake up.
Besides the Central office at Patna, the Wahabis had permanent machinery
throughout the rural districts of Bengal for spreading their faith. It could be one of
the reasons why Islam is so dominant in Bengal, east and west. You also might
like to know the Muslims of Bengal supported the Brit plan of partition of Bengal
in 1905 since they stood to become powerful in areas that are Bangladesh today.
In fact the Muslim league was founded in Dacca, 1910 if I remember right. Why
did so many Hindus convert to Islam in Bengal is another question though!
Character of Movement
The movement in its early days was a purely religious one, confined to a section
of Muslims, particularly the lower middle class. However, it was due to its militant
role that the movement enlisted the sympathies and support of the average
Muslim. Interestingly Muslims of all classes supported it.
The Hindus were suscipicious of the movement. It was directed at removing the
Indian influence in Islam and attacking the Sikhs to restore Muslim power.
However, the Wahabis did manage some Hindu support. Unlike subsequent
Islamic movements in India, it never came in direct conflict with Hindus. The
movement assumed the role of a class struggle in some places like Bengal.
Inspite of its wide spread character the Wahabi movement was for the Muslims,
by the Muslims, of the Muslims. Can you think of a Muslim movement that was
Indian in character between 1800 and 2000. Aligarh movement was anti Hindu,
India. Khilafat was again for a Muslim cause. Has the Indian Muslim community
on a national level, sacrificed something for Bharat ever? Have they given up
something that their understanding of Islam asks them to do to make Hindus
happy? Please help me find answers.
Muslim schools – Subsequent to the Mutiny of 1857, the Brits came down
heavily upon the Muslims making their condition pitiable. Sir Syed Ahmad,

founder of the Aligarh movement, in fact was so depressed with the condition of
his Muslim brothers, that at one time he contemplated leaving India. The reform
movement started by Siayid Ahmad and his pupils gained momentum after the
mutiny and manifested itself in different forms. There was a group of religious
thinkers who influenced by the Wahabi ideology started preaching new ideas and
gaining support.
However, the majority of Indian Muslims were adherents of the Hanafi School
with strong leanings towards Sufism and could not be won over by the soul less,
dry and rigid Wahabhi discipline. The more the Wahabis pushed the closer
people went to the Sufi fold. Thus, during this period we find that both the
Chishtiya and Naqshbandiya, the two main Sufi schools in India flourishing. But
this degenerated into rank superstition and blind saint-worship in the hands of
unscrupulous pirs, which in turn produced a strong reaction in the minds of the
sensible and thoughtful Muslims.
The foundation of Dar-al-Ulum at Deoband in 1886 was the greatest

achievement of the Wahabi school of thought in India where as Farangi Mahal
established during the reign of Aurangzeb continued to represent the old Hanafi
School, maintaining a via media between the extreme and diametrically opposed
Wahabi and Sufi doctrines. A third important institution with a distinctly religious
bias and an ideology not very different from that of Farangi Mahal was founded in
1898 in Lucknow by Shibli Numani. It was called Nadwat al-Ulama, showed a
more progressive outlook and has produced scholars of repute.
Maulana M Hasan was in charge of the madrassa at Deoband from 1888 to

1920. He imbibed from his teacher Maulana Qasim, the qualities of self-lessness
and complete devotion to Islam. He tried to establish friendly relations between
the modern Aligarh and orthodox Deoband schools. The Nadwat al-Ulama tried
to bridge the gap between Aligarh and Deoband and various groups of Ulamas. It
wanted to reform the Logic-ridden Nizamiyya system of religious education by
putting greater emphasis on Islamic history and religious subjects, also
introducing modern sciences and English as secondary subjects. The institution
has produced many renowned Islamic scholars.
Each school attempted to revive the fortunes of the Muslims in a manner that
they thought fit. Aligarh movement attached great importance to the economic
aspect of the problem. Deoband school attached value to its moral and political
aspect. The Nadwat tried to bridge the gap between these two schools.
I end this chapter with a quote from poet Muhammad Iqbal "Sovereignty passed
out of its hands, but the eyes of the Muslim community were opened. The dust
raised by the flight of the gazelle became antimony for the desert's eye".

Sir Muhammad Iqbal
Prior to Jinnah there were atleast three political leaders, thinkers who greatly
influenced Islam in India. One is Siayid Ahmad, founder of the Wahabi movement
referred to above, two Sir Syed Ahmad, founder of the Aligarh movement
referred to in the essay on Aligarh movement and three is Sir Muhammad Iqbal
(1873 to 1938) referred to below.
If Syed Ahmed was the greatest political leader, Iqbal was the greatest political
thinker of the Muslims in British India. Born is a family of Kashmiri Brahmin origin
he studied philosophy in England and Germany after completing his M.A. from
Lahore. At first he had Indian nationalists ideas but gradually he gave a new
interpretation to the ideals of Islam that is believed to have eventually resulted in
Pakistan. He was comfortable in Persian and Urdu. His doctrine went counter to
the quietism and acceptance preached by traditional Sufism. It was a rather
militant doctrine of action, of fight to achieve an ideal placed before man, and this
ideal was of primitive Islam which in Iqbal's opinion was preached by the Prophet
– to select the narrow path of shaping one's destiny and forging ahead, heart
within and God overhead.
This doctrine of action made Iqbal the great leader of Indian Muslims. His two
longer poems Shikwa (complaint) and Jawab-I-Shikwah (Reply to the Complaint)
are looked upon as the Mein Kampf of Muslim revivalists in India who were for
separation from India in both spirit and political rehabilitation. These poems give
in the form of a complaint before Allah about the adverse circumstances in which
the Indian Muslims had fallen, and the sequel given the remedies prescribed by
God for Muslim uplift.
Although he was a member of the Punjab legislature (1925-8), presided over the
Muslim League session at Allahabad in 1930, he never shone in politics or
became a party leader. However, his political thoughts exercised a deep
influence on the Indian Muslims in the second quarter of the 20th century.
The essence of Iqbal's political ideas were enlightened Pan Islamicism. The
brotherhood of Islam was a well-known idea. The importance and novelty of
Iqbal's philosophy lay in practical application of these ideas in Indian politics.
Iqbal reiterated that Islam was non-territorial in character and the idea of
brotherhood applied to the Muslims. The Islamic brotherhood might be a model
for the final combination of humanity, but for now it is divided into two parts,
Muslims and non-Muslims irrespective of racial considerations.
Iqbal leaves in no doubt of his ideal. Quoting from the Birth of Pakistan by Dr
Sachin Sen "I confess to be a pan-Islamist. The mission for which Islam
came into this world will ultimately be fulfilled, the world will ultimately be
purged of infidelity and the worship of false gods, and the true soul of

Islam will be triumphant. This is the kind of pan-Islamicism that I preach".

"Islam as a religion has no country" quote Ibid.
So what Iqbal is clearly saying that Muslims are Muslims first and Indians later.
Inspite of his being a Brahmin convert note his distaste for false gods read idol
worship. Please remember that when Muhammad entered Mecca he destroyed
360 idols and said that truth shall prevail. Both Iqbal and the Prophet are saying
one and the same thing. However, Iqbal used poetry to convey his thoughts.
Still being in India, he expressed his views as follows "The present struggle in
India is sometimes describes as India's revolt against the West. I do not think so
for the people of India are demanding the very institutions, which the West
stands for. Educated urban India demands democracy. The minorities, feeling
themselves as distinct cultural units and fearing that their very existence is at
stake, demand safeguards, which for obvious reasons the majority community
refuses to concede. The majority community pretends to believe in nationalism
theoretically correct, if we start from Western premises, belied by facts, if we look
at India. The real parties to the struggle are the majority and minority
communities of India which can ill afford to accept Western democracy until it is
properly modified to suit the actual conditions of life in India". Syed Ahmed too
had in 1887 expressed reservations against the parliamentary form of
governance.
I cannot but help agree with Iqbal in parts. After partition India read Nehru carried
forward all the government institutions created by the Brits, as they existed then.
These were and are Western institutions. They were not changed to suit Indian
conditions. A number of people believe that one of the causes of our present day
problems is that we have not Indianized the government. A simple example is our
lawyers continue to wear black coats in court, a dress that is comfortable in
British climate but in hot and humid India! I am not sure if that can be done today
because again we will attempt to Secularize governance, which can only
produce!
It is unfortunate that in economic policy we tried to emulate the world. First we

aped the Central Planning model of the Soviet Union, the results are for all to
see. Now there is a new mantra globalization. Here again we are blindly adopting
the capitalistic policies of the West. We believe that foreign direct investment is
the cure to our ills. We forget internal Liberalization is a pre requisite to foreign
investment. Privatization of PSU's, reforming the Power sector but na that is
tough and would invite political opposition. So simple attract FDI even it means
having dubious schemes like investment by Overseas Commercial Bodies, a
conduit for hot money into the financial markets. On this count alone I appreciate
Iqbal's understanding of India.
Iqbal's Presidential address at the Allahabad session of the Muslim League in

1930 deserves more than a passing notice, as it is generally been looked

upon as laying the foundation of Pakistan. "It cannot be denied that Islam,
regarded as an ethical ideal plus a certain kind of polity- has been the chief
formative factor in the life-history of Muslims of India. It has furnished those basic
emotions and loyalties, which has gradually unified individuals into a well-defined
people. Indeed it is no exaggeration to say that India is perhaps the only country
in the world, where Islam, as a people-building force, has worked at its best.
Is it possible to retain Islam as an ethical ideal and to reject it as a polity in favor

of national politics, in which religious attitude is not permitted to play a part? The
proposition that religion is a private matter on the lips of a European is not
surprising. The religious ideal of Islam, therefore, organically is related to the
social order, which it created. Therefore, the construction of a polity on national
lines, if it means displacement of the Islamic principles of solidarity, is simply
unthinkable to the Muslim".
Here again only the naïve would believe that 1930 was a turning point. Partition
was bound to happen, what with the inability of Muslims to live peacefully in a
country where they are not in a majority. Also the Congress read Gandhi, Nehru
were so obsessed with the mirage of Hindu Muslim unity that concession after
concession followed. Islam respects STRENGTH only period.
Referring to the requisites of nationality Iqbal observes, "Experience shows that

various caste and religious units in India have shown no inclination to sink their
respective individualities in a larger whole. The unity of the Indian nation, must
not therefore, be sought not in negation but in the mutual harmony and co-
operation of many. True statesmanship cannot ignore facts, however unpleasant
as they may be. The only practical course is not to assume the existence of a
state of things, which does not exist, but to recognize facts as they are, and to
exploit them to our greatest advantage. The attempts to discover such internal
harmony have failed but if the principle that the Indian Muslim is entitled to full
and free development on the lines of his own culture and tradition in his Indian
homelands is recognized as the basis of a permanent communal settlement, he
will always be ready to stake his all for the freedom of India".
By saying that India read Sanathan Dharam was never one nation, consists of
people with different cultures Iqbal was only reiterating what Sir Syed Ahmed had
said earlier. You might recall that the words used by the English media, leftists
and secularists of today are quite similar to those of Iqbal. Great people think
alike! Nationalism is at best five hundred phenomena. It is nothing but a ploy to
divide Hindus worldwide, the secularists have taken over from where the Brits
left.
Iqbal defends himself against the charge of preaching narrow communalism "A
community that is inspired by feelings of ill-will towards other communities is low
and ignoble. I entertain the highest respect for the customs, laws, religion and
social institutions of other communities. Yet I love the social group which is the

source of my life and which has formed me what I am by giving me its religion,
literature, culture and thereby recreating its whole past as a living factor in my
present consciousness". "The units of Indian society were not territorial as in
European countries. India is a continent of human groups belonging to different
races. The principle of European democracy cannot be applied without
recognizing the fact of communal groups".
It is this ground that Iqbal justifies the "Muslim demand for the creation of a
Muslim rule within India. The resolution of the All Parties Muslim conference at
Delhi says he "is, to mind, wholly inspired by this noble ideal of a harmonious
whole which, instead of stifling the respective individualities of its component
wholes, affords them chances of fully working out the possibilities that may be
latent in them. And I have no doubt this house will endorse the Muslim demands
in the resolution".
Now what was this resolution all about? In response to a speech in the House
of Lords on 7/7/1925 Lord Birkenhead said that let the Indians produce a
constitution, which carries behind it as a fair measure of general agreement
among the peoples of India. In response to the same the Congress has issued
our invites to a large spectrum of parties. On the Communal question there were
differences between what the Nehru Constitution (there was a Nehru committee
that drafted it) proposed and Jinnah wanted. Jinnah wanted one-third reservation
for Muslims in the Central legislature, residuary powers to be vested in the States
and not Centre amongst others. Since Jinnah's amendments did not hold water,
along with Aga Khan, other Muslims he organized an All Parties Conference on
1/1/1929.
Here Jinnah's amendments were endorsed, demanded separate electorates for

Muslims, constitution of Sindh as a separate province and raising the status of
N.W.F.P., Baluchistan to that of other provinces, Punjab and Bengal should have
Muslim representation on population basis for ten years in the event of adult
suffrage not being granted.
You see the Muslims wanted to win the toss both ways. Where they were in
majority Muslim representation based on population, where not one-third
reservations. Such unreasonableness, some might call it double standards have
come to be associated with sub-continent Muslims.
This resolution did not satisfy Iqbal though. He said, "Personally, I would like to
see Punjab, N.W.F.P., Sind and Baluchistan amalgamate into a single State.
Self-government within or without the British Empire seems to be the final
destination of Muslims, atleast of Northwest India. Thus they will prove the best
defenders against a foreign invasion. To my mind a unitary form of Government
is simply unthinkable to self-governing India. What are called residuary powers
must be left to the States, Central federation exercising only those powers which
are expressly vested in it by the free consent of states".

What Iqbal suggested was a federation of states with a weak center. If we look at
India's history it has always succumbed to foreign invasions when there was a
weak central authority. Which is why at the time of independence Sardar Patel
did not accept any arrangement that would have resulted in a weak center. After
independence Pakistan attacked India when its leaders thought that India's
center was weak. With policing being done by the States in isolation India's
enemies are having a field day. There is insufficient coordination between state
governments. The Intelligence Bureau informs the state police. After that it is up
to them to take action. With a friendly government in Maharashtra the Karachi
based dons are making the best of this lacunae. What India needs is an agency
styled on the lines of U.S.'s Federal Bureau of Investigation? Will we have one?
Not until we have a strong center.
The most important consequence of the Iqbal doctrine was a slow but steady
growth of the idea of a separate homeland for the Muslims in India. The idea took
a definite shape in the idea of a young man Rahmat Ali, educated in Cambridge;
he communicated the same to the Muslim members of the Round Table
Conference in London. Having endorsed Sir Syed Ahmad's views and forestalled
Jinnah's two nation theory Iqbal continued "Therefore for us to seal our national
doom in the interest of one Indian nationhood would be a treachery against our
posterity, a betrayal of our history and a crime against humanity for which there
would be no salvation".
When the idea of an All India Federation emerged out of the deliberations of the
Round table Conferences, Rahmat regarded it as a tragedy and founded the
Pakistan National Movement in 1933. When he met Madame Halide Edib
sometime between 1935 and 1937, he told her that the movement had its
propaganda centers all over Pakistan. Thus the foundation for Pakistan was
laid before the leaders ever dreamt of it, it was part of the subconscious
Muslim mind always though.
It would be interesting to note that five years before Iqbal, Lala Lajpat Rai
suggested the creation of Muslim provinces in the northwest, east of India to set
at rest the ceaseless Hindu Muslim bickerings in these provinces. It is
unfortunate that leaders before and after him failed to read the Muslim mind
correctly. Islam desires total domination and rule of Bharat, bickerings like
creation of Pakistan or Kashmir are only manifestations of their hatred for
Sanathan Dharam. One of the realizations post Sept 11 is that Islam desires to
dominate the world, nothing more or less.
Iqbal was the man who influenced Islamic thought and educated Muslims the
most. His influence on Islamic thought is of permanent value and his contribution
to the revival of Islamic spirit among the Muslims is of great importance. By his
philosophical, charming and forceful poems, Iqbal revived the original Islamic
spirit and kindled in them the fire of faith and urge for spiritual, physical activity as
had not been experienced by them for centuries. While he admired the western

race for its achievements in science and technology he condemned it for its
domination of the East, which has destroyed its spirituality and mental freedom.
Let me leave with a thought with you. How must the world deal with a religion
that has a war chest of Petro dollars, desires to rule the world and has followers
who do not believe in nationhood, simply called Pan-Islamicism?

Quran’s Teachings:
Find out what is the inspiration behind the hate and violence in Islamic
terrorism?
Hardly anyone can write anything more damaging to Islam than the Quran itself.
All you need to see that Islam is not a religion from God but a dangerous cult that
promotes hate and violence, is read the Quran.
Many thanks to The Skeptic's Annotated Quran site for making available this
indispensable index of the Quran. This is all we need to combat Islamic game of
deception.
Please send the URL of this page to all the Muslims you know. (This site is banned in
some Islamic countries so if your friend is living in an Islamic country you may want to
send the entire page in an email as well) The majority of the Muslims are decent
people who do not know the truth. They will leave Islam after seeing its ugly face. It
may take them some time to recover from the shock and denial but eventually they
will do the right thing. Let every Muslim see this page. Saving the world from
another disaster that could cost millions, if not billions of lives is everybody's
responsibility. We are doing our part, you have to do yours.
Do not let the fear that your Muslim friend might be offended if you send him this
page stop you from doing it. A Persian proverb says: "It you see a well and a blind
thereto heading, if you do not stop him you are sinning.". If Islamic terrorism
claims more lives, no one's life is going to be spared. Madness with prevail and wet
and dry will burn together. So forget about your Muslim friend's "sensibility", save
his life and save yours too. If you fear this may end your friendship with him, open
an anonymous email account and send this page to him anonymously. It is
important that all the Muslims see the ugly truth of Islam.
The majority of the Muslims are good people who are innocently led to believe that
Islam is a religion of God. These people are seeing the truth for the first time and
are leaving Islam in big numbers. Those who still remain Muslims after reading
these verses, have no humanity or conscience. They must be filled with shame and
shunned. They are the terrorists or their supporters and the enemies of mankind.
They are in minority but still they number millions. Once the decent Muslims leave
Islam, the terrorists will lose their moral base of support. This is the only way to
combat the Islamic terrorism.
If enough people had combated Nazism ideologically before it rose to power, 60

million lives would not have been lost. Today the Islamic danger is much greater
than the danger posed by Nazism seventy years ago. Today the enemy is invisible, it
is everywhere and it is far more fanatic.

Muslims must make the choice between truth and falsehood, between humanity and
barbarity, between good and evil.
Stop Islam. Stop this insanity. Save the world.
The following is the essence of the Quran, the rest are fairy tales:
Quran Surah 2: The Cow
1. Don't bother to warn the disbelievers. Allah has blinded them. Theirs will be an
awful doom. 6
2. Allah has sickened their hearts. A painful doom is theirs because they lie. 10
3. A fire has been prepared for the disbelievers, whose fuel is men and stones. 24
4. Disbelievers will be burned with fire. 39, 90
5. For disbelievers is a painful doom. 104
6. For unbelievers: ignominy in this world, an awful doom in the next. 114
7. Allah will leave the disbelievers alone for a while, but then he will compel them
to the doom of Fire. 126
8. The doom of the disbelievers will not be lightened. 162
9. They will not emerge from the Fire. 167
10. Those who hide the Scripture will have their bellies eaten with fire. Theirs will be
a painful doom. 174
11. How constant are they in their strife to reach the Fire! 175
12. Kill disbelievers wherever you find them. If they attack you, then kil them. Such
is the reward of disbelievers. 191
13. War is ordained by Allah. 216
14. Those who die in their disbelief will burn forever in the Fire. 217
15. Disbelievers worship false gods. They will burn forever in the Fire. 257
16. Allah does not guide disbelievers. 264
17. "Give us victory over the disbelieving folk." 286
Quran Surah 3: The Family Of 'Imran
1. Those who disbelieve the revelations of Allah, theirs will be a heavy doom. 4
2. Those who disbelieve will be fuel for the Fire. 10
3. Those who disbelieve shall be overcome and gathered unto Hell. 12
4. Those who disbelieve, promise them a painful doom. 21
5. Theirs will be a painful doom. 77
6. All non-Muslims will be rejected by Allah after they die. 85
7. Disbelievers will have a painful doom. And they will have no helpers. 91
8. Disbelievers will have their faces blackened on the last day. They will face an
awful doom. 105-6

9. Those who disbelieve will be burnt in the Fire. 116

10. The Fire is prepared for disbelievers. 131
11. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Their habitation is the
Fire 151
12. Theirs will be an awful doom. 176
13. Disbelievers do not harm Allah, but will have a painful doom. 177
14. Disbelievers will have a shamful doom. 178
15. Disbelievers will go to Hell. 196
Quran Surah 4: Women
1. Those who disobey Allah and his messenger will be burnt with fire and suffer a
painful doom. 14
2. For the disbelievers, We have prepared a painful doom. 18
3. For disbelievers, We prepare a shameful doom. 37
4. Hell is sufficient for their burning. 55
5. Unbelievers will be tormented forever with fire. When their skin is burned off, a
fresh skin will be provided. 56
6. Allah will bestow a vast reward on those who fight in religious wars. 74
7. Believers fight for Allah; disbelievers fight for the devil. So fight the minions of
the devil. 76
8. Have no unbelieving friends. Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them. 89
9. If the unbelievers do not offer you peace, kill them wherever you find them.
Against such you are given clear warrant. 91 ( Offering peace in Islam means
surrendering. All 67 out of 68 wars of Muhammad were offensive. They are
called qazwah (raid, ambush, sudden attack). That is how Muhammad waged his
wars. He raided, massacred and looted civilians with no warning. The one
defensive war, 'ditch' was not fought. That is why the Islamic terrorism 'jihad' will
continue until the West "offers peace". This was made clear by Bin Laden.)
10. Those who oppose the messenger and become unbelievers will go to hell. 115
11. Those who believe, then disbelieve, then believe and disbelieve again will never
be forgiven by Allah. 137
12. For the hypocrites there will be a painful doom. 138
13. Allah will gather hypocrites and disbelievers into hell. 140
14. The hypocrites will be in the lowest part of hell and no one will help them there.
145
15. You must believe everything Allah and his messengers tell you. Those who don't
are disbelievers and will face a painful doom. 150-151
16. For the disbelievers, Allah has prepared a painful doom. 161
17. God will guide disbelievers down a road that leads to everlasting hell. 168-169
Quran Surah 5: The Table Spread

1. Those who deny Islam will be losers in the Hereafter. 5

2. Disbelievers are the rightful owners of Hell. 10
3. Those who make war with Allah and his messenger will be killed or crucified, or
have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the
land. That is how they will be treated in this world, and in the next they will have
an awful doom. 33 (Anyone who resist Islam is deemed to be making war with
Allah)
4. Disbelievers will have a painful doom. 36
5. Disbelievers will want to come out of the Fire, but will not. Their will be a lasting
doom. 37
6. Life for life, eye for eye, nose for nose, ear for ear, and tooth for tooth. Non-
muslims are wrong doers. 45
7. Christians will be burned in the Fire. 72
8. Christians are wrong about the Trinity. For that they will have a painful doom. 73
9. Disbelievers will be owners of hell-fire. 86
Quran Surah 6: The Cattle
1. Many generations have been destroyed by Allah. 6

2. Allah will torment those who deny his revelations. 49
3. Those who disbelieve will be forced to drink boiling water, and will face a painful
doom. 70
4. When nonbelievers die, the angels will deliver to them doom and degradation. 93
5. Allah chooses to lead some astray, and he lays ignominy on those who disbelieve.
125
6. Allah will send everyone the Fire, except those he chooses to deliver. 128
Quran Surah 7: The Heights
1. How many a township have We destroyed! As a raid by night, or while they slept
at noon, Our terror came unto them. 4-5
2. Allah has made devils the protecting friends of disbeliveers. 27
3. Disbelievers choose devils as protecting friends and believe they are rightly
guided. 30
4. Only believers go to heaven. 32
5. Disbelievers are the rightful owners of the Fire. 36
6. Entire nations have entered the Fire. Some get a double torment. 38
7. Disbelievers will be excluded from heaven. Theirs will be a bed of hell. 40-41
8. Those in the Fire will cry out to those in heaven, saying: "Pour water on us." But
Allah has forbidden that to disbelievers. 50
9. Those who deny Muhammad's revelation are evil. 177

Quran Surah 8: The Spoils of War
1. Allah will throw fear into the hearts of the disbelievers, and smite their necks and
fingers. 12
2. Disbelievers will be tormented in the Fire. 14
3. When you fight with disbelievers, do not retreat. Those who do will go to hell. 15-
16
4. Taste of the doom because ye disbelieve. 35
5. Those who disbelieve will be gathered into hell. 36
6. The angels smite the face and backs of disbelievers, saying: "Taste the
punishment of burning!" 50
7. The worst beasts in Allah's sight are the disbelievers. 55
8. Exhort the believers to fight. They will win easily, because disbelievers are
without intelligence. 65
9. A prophet may not take captives until he has made a slaughter in the land. 67
Surah 9: Repentance
1. Give tidings (O Muhammad) of a painful doom to those who disbelieve. 3

2. Slay the idolaters wherever you find them. 5
3. Don't let idolaters tend the sanctuaries. Their works are in vain and they will be
burned in the Fire. 17
4. Give tiding of a painful doom to Christians and Jews. 34
5. If you refuse to fight, Allah will afflict you with a painful doom. 39
6. Disbelievers go to hell. 49
7. Those who vex the Prophet, for them there is a painful doom. 60
8. Those who oppose Allah and His messenger will burn in the fire of hell. 63
9. Allah promises hypocrites and disbelievers the fire of hell. Allah curses them.
They will have a lasting torment. 68
10. Fight the disbelievers and hypocrites. Be harsh with them. They are all going to
hell anyway. 73
11. Allah will afflict disbelievers with a painful doom in this world and the Hereafter.
74
12. For disbelievers there will be a painful doom. 90
13. Don't pray for idolaters (not even for your family) after it is clear they are people
of hell-fire. 113
14. Fight disbelievers who are near you, and let them see the harshness in you. 123
Quran Surah 10: Jonah

1. Disbelievers will have a boiling drink and a painful doom. 4

2. Those who neglect Allah's revelations will make their home in the Fire. 7-8
3. Allah has destoyed entire generations. 13
4. Those who disbelieved will face a dreadful doom. 70
5. Allah drowned those who disbelieved his revelations. 73
6. Moses asked Allah to harden the hearts of the Egyptians so that they would not
believe until they saw the painful doom. 88
Quran Surah 11: Hud
1. Disbelievers wil1 end up in the Fire. 17

2. Those who oppose Islam and disbelieve in the Hereafter are guilty of the greatest
wrong. 18-19
3. Those in the Fire will suffer as long as the heavens and earth endure. 106-7
4. Allah will fill hell with humans and jinn. 119
Quran Surah 13: The Thunder
1. Disbelievers are the rightful owners of the Fire 5

2. Allah does not hear the prayer of disbelievers. 14
3. Those who do not answer Allah's call will go to hell. 18
4. Disbelievers will be tormented in this life, and suffer even more pain in the
Hereafter. 33-34
5. The reward for disbelievers is the Fire. 35
Quran Surah 14: Abraham
1. Woe unto the disbelievers. Theirs will be an awful doom. 2

2. Allah sends some people astray. 4
3. Those who are in hell will be forced to drink festering water which they can
hardly swallow. They will want to die, but they will not be able to. Theirs is a
harsh doom. 16-17
4. Allah sends wrong-doers astray. He does whatever he likes. 27
5. Those in hell will be chained together. Their clothing will be made of pitch and
fire will cover their faces. 49-50
Quran Surah 15: The Rock

1. Let the disbelievers enjoy life and let false hope beguile them. They will come to
know! 2-3
2. Iblis will lead humans astray. Only perfect Muslims will be safe from him. The
rest will go to hell. 39-43
3. Allah's doom is a dolorous doom. 50
Quran Surah 16: The Bee
1. Allah could have led everyone to the truth, but he chose not to. 9
2. Those who don't believe in the Hearafter are proud. 22
3. Disbelievers are evil and will dwell in hell forever. 27-29
4. Disbelievers are liars. 39
5. Allah will add doom to doom for those who disbelieve. 88
6. Those who oppose Islam will face an awful doom. 94
Quran Surah 17: The Children of Israel
1. Allah made hell to be a dungeon for disbelievers. 8

2. Allah has prepared a painful doom for those who disbelieve in the Hereafter. 10
3. Allah destroyed entire towns. 16
4. How many generations Allah has destroyed since Noah! 17
5. Allah intends to burn people in hell. 18
6. Allah makes it so that unbelievers cannot understand. 45-46
7. Allah will destroy every town before the Day of Resurrection. 58
8. Allah will send disbelievers astray. Then he'll burn them in hell, increasing the
flames from time to time. 97-98
Quran Surah 18: The Cave
1. Allah has prepared a Fire for the disbelievers. When they want a shower, Allah
will give them a shower of molten lead to burn their faces. 29
2. Those who are condemned to the Fire know they will have no way to escape. 53
3. The worst wrong is to forget Allah's revelations. Allah covers their hearts and
makes them deaf so that they will never believe the truth. 57
4. There is an appointed time in which the doomed will find no escape. 58
5. Allah has destroyed many towns. 59
6. On a certain day, Allah will present hell, in plain view, to the disbelievers. 100
7. Allah will welcome the disbelievers into hell. 102
8. Hell is the reward for disbelievers because they made a jest of Allah's revelations
and messengers. 106

Quran Surah 19: Mary
1. Allah will pluck out from every sect those who should burn in hell. 69-70
2. Allah will record what disbelievers say and then prolong their torment. 77-79
3. Allah has sent the devils on the disbelievers to confuse them. 83
4. Allah has destroyed many generations. 98
Quran Surah 20: Ta Ha
1. Those who do not believe Allah's revelations will face doom in the Hereafter. 127
Quran Surah 21: The Prophets
1. Allah destroyed entire towns, yet the people still disbelieved. 6

2. The people cried out for mercy, but Allah killed them anyway. 15
3. Disbelievers will not be able to put out the fire on their faces and backs. They will
be stupefied and no one will help them. 39-40
4. Allah gave judgment and knowledge to Lot . He was a righteous man. (Genesis
19:7-38) 75
5. Every person alive at the time of the flood was evil. So Allah drowned them all.
77
6. The disbelievers will stare in terror at what Allah has in store for them. 97-99
Surah 22: The Pilgrimage
1. The devil will guide some to the punishment of the Flame. 3-4
2. Those who turn from the way of Allah will face ignominy in this world and
burning in the next. 9
3. Whoever thinks that Allah will not give Muhammad victory should go hang
himself. 15
4. Disbelievers will wear garments of fire, boiling fluid will be poured on their
heads, their bellies and skin will be melted, they will be tormented with iron
hooks, and when they try to escape they will be driven back with the taunt: Taste
the doom of burning. 19-22
5. Allah will provide the disbelievers with a painful doom. 25
6. How many towns Allah has destroyed! 45
7. Those who disregard Allah's revelations are the owners of the Fire. 51

8. Those who disbelieve Allah's revelations will have a shameful doom. 57

9. Those who disbelieve Allah's revelations will burn in the Fire. 72
Quran Surah 23: The Believers
1. Allah told Noah not to bother pleading for the people he was about to drown. 27
2. Those who don't believe in the Hereafter will receive extreme punishment from
Allah. 74-77
3. When fire burns their faces, they will be glum. 104
4. Disbelievers will not be successful. 117
Surah 24: The Light
1. Scourge adulterers and adulteresses with 100 stripes. Do not show them any pity.
Have a party of believers watch the punishment. 2
2. Only adulterers can marry adulteresses. Believers are not to marry them. 3
3. Vile women are for vile men, and vile men for vile women. 26
4. Believing women must lower their gaze and be modest, cover themselves with
veils, and not reveal themselves except to their husbands, relatives, children, and
slaves. 31
5. Disbelievers are miscreants. 55
6. Disbelievers will never escape the Fire that will be their home. 57
7. It's okay for believers to own slaves. 58
8. The only true believers are those who believe in Allah and his messenger. 62
Quran Surah 25: The Criterion
1. Those who deny the coming of the Hour will be chained together and burned with
fire. They will pray for their own destruction. 11-13
2. Allah will force the evil-doers to taste great torment. 19
3. It will be a hard day for disbelievers and wrong-doers. They will gnaw on their
hands and wish they had chosen Islam. 26-27
4. Those who deny Muhammad's revelations will be destroyed. 36
5. Allah drowned everyone in the flood of Noah, and has prepared a painful doom
for evil-doers. 37
Quran Surah 26: The Poets

1. Allah destroyed the people in Lot 's town with a dreadful rain. 172-3
2. Many will not believe until they see the painful doom. 201
3. Those who believe in another god are doomed. 213
Quran Surah 27: The Ant
1. Allah leads those who do not believe in the Hereafter astray by making things
work out OK in this life, so that he can torment them forever in the next. They
will get the worst punishment and will be the greatest losers. 4-5
2. "Allah destroyed them and their people, every one." 51
3. But he "saved those who believed." 53
4. Allah sent a dreadful rain on "those who stayed behind." 58
5. Whoever does something wrong will be thrown into the Fire. 90
Quran Surah 28: The Narrative
1. Allah has completely destroyed many communities. 58

2. Allah will taunt Christians on the day of their doom, saying: Where are My
partners whom ye imagined? 62-64
3. Allah caused the earth to swallow Korah. 79-81
4. Never help disbelievers. 86 (Can Muslims in countries ruled in by non-Muslims
be loyal to their country?)
Quran Surah 29: The Spider
1. Those who disbelieve in the revelations of Allah have no hope of mercy. For such
there is a painful doom. 23
2. Only wrong-doers deny the revelations of Allah. 49
3. Those who disbelieve in the revelations of Allah are the losers. 52
4. The doom of hell will come upon disbelievers suddenly, when they least expect it.
53-55
Quran Surah 30: The Romans
1. Allah will tear Christians apart for ascribing partners to him. 13-14
2. Disbelievers will be brought to doom. 16
3. It's OK to own slaves. 28
4. Allah does not love disbelievers. 45

5. Allah seals the heart of disbelievers. (And then he burns them in the Fire.) 59
Quran Surah 31: Luqman
1. Those who mislead others from Allah's way and mock Islam will have a painful
doom. 6-7
2. Allah will give disbelievers a little comfort for a little while, and then he'll
torment them forever with a heavy doom. 23-24
Quran Surah 32: The Prostration
1. Allah will fill hell with the jinn and mankind together. 13
2. Allah: Taste the doom of immortality because of what ye used to do. 14
3. Those who used to deny the Fire will be tormented in it forever. 20
4. The worst thing you can do is to deny the revelations of Allah. 22
Quran Surah 33: The Clans
1. Don't obey disbelievers. 1 (Can Muslims in countries ruled in by non-Muslims be

loyal to their country?)
2. Allah makes the deeds of unbelievers fruitless. 19
3. Allah cast panic into the hearts of the disbelievers. He killed some, and enslaved
others. 25-26
4. Allah gave Zeyd’s wife, his own daughter in law to Muhammad in marriage. This
was so that all Muslims would know that it's OK to marry your adopted son's ex-
wife. 37
5. Ignore disbelievers and their poisonous talk. 48
7. Allah says it is lawful for Muhammad to marry any women he wants. 50-51
9. Those who malign Allah, Muhammad, and Muslims will be cursed by Allah in
this life and with doom in the Hereafter. 57
10. Those who oppose Islam will be slain with a fierce slaughter. 60-61
11. Allah has cursed the disbelievers, and has prepared for them a flaming fire,
wherein they will abide forever. 64-65
12. The disbelievers will be burned in the Fire with a double torment. 66-68
Quran Surah 34: Saba

1. Those who challenge the revelations of Muhammad will have a painful doom. 5
2. Those who disbelieve in the Hereafter will be tormented. 8
3. But some of the jinn Allah burned with flaming Fire. 12
4. Those who strive against Allah's revelations will be brought to the doom. 38
5. Those who worshipped the jinn will taste the doom of the Fire. 41
6. Allah hates those who ignore his messengers. 45
7. Those who are cast into hell be terrified when they see that they have no escape.
Then they will believe. But it will be too late. 51-52
Quran Surah 35: The Angels
1. Those who disbelieve will have an awful doom. 7

2. Allah sends whoever he wants astray. 8
3. Allah hates disbelievers. 26
4. Disbelievers will burn forever in the fire of hell. Allah will keep them alive so that
he can torture them forever. When they repent and ask for mercy, he will ignore
them. 36-7
5. He who disbelieves, his disbelief will be on his own head. 39
6. Allah has blinded the disbelievers so that they cannot see the truth. So it don't
bother warning them.
Quran Surah 36: Ya Sin
1. They will go to hell anyway. 8-10

2. Allah has destroyed many entire generations. 31
3. If Allah feels like it, he will drown everyone. 43
4. Allah will burn the disbelievers in hell. 63-4
Quran Surah 37: Those Who Set The Ranks
1. Those who refuse to believe in Muhammad's revelations will face a painful doom.
31-38
2. Those in hell must eat from a tree with the heads of devils, and then drink boiling
water. After that they return to hell. 62-68
3. Allah drowned everyone except Noah and his family in the flood. 82
4. Allah tells Abraham in a dream to sacrifice his son. (But is the son Ishmael or
Isaac?) 102
5. Allah killed everyone in Sodom except for Lot and his family. 136
6. No one is against Allah, except those who burn in hell. 162-3

Quran Surah 38: Sad

2. Those who doubt will soon taste Allah's doom. 8
3. Those who deny the messengers deserve doom. 14
4. Those who wander from the way of Allah will have an awful doom. 26
5. Those who disbelieve will burn in the Fire. 27
6. The transgressors will roast in the Fire and be forced to drink boiling liquids
followed by ice cold drinks. 55-9
7. Iblis asks Allah to let him hang around and mislead humans. Allah allows him to
do so, and Iblis leads all humans to hell except for the single-minded slaves. Allah
agrees, and plans to fill hell with Iblis and his followers. 79-85
Quran Surah 39: The Troops
1. Tell the disbelievers to enjoy themselves now, because later they will be owners
of the Fire. 8
2. The losers will be those who lose themselves and their families on the Day of
Resurrection. They will be surrounded by fire. 15-16
3. No one will be able to help those that Allah torments in the Fire. 19
4. Woe unto those who forget Allah. They are in plain error. 22
5. Allah sends some people astray. For them there is no guide. 23
6. The worst thing you can do is tell a lie against Allah. The home of disbelievers is
hell. 32
7. Allah sends some people astray. For them there is no guide. 36
8. Surrender to Allah before he sends the doom upon you suddenly. 54-55
9. Those who lie about Allah will be sent to hell and will have their faces blackened.
60
10. Losers are those who disbelieve the revelations of Allah. 63
11. Those ascribe a partner to Allah (like the Christians) will be among the losers. 65
12. Those who disbelieve will be driven into hell. 71-72
Quran Surah 40: The Believer
1. Allah sent an awful punishment at the time of Noah. 5

2. Those who disbelieve are the owners of the Fire. 6
3. Allah greatly abhors those who disbelieve. 10
4. When the doom comes, the hearts of the doomed will choke in their throats, and
no one will help them. 18
5. Those who ignore Allah's "clear proofs" will be seized and punished severely. 22
6. Those that Allah sends astray will have no helper or guide. 33
7. Allah deceives those who doubt. 34

8. The prodigals will be owners of the Fire. 43

9. The doomed will be exposed to the Fire morning and evening. 46
10. Those in hell will beg to be relieved from the Fire's torment for just a day. But the
prayer of a disbeliever is in vain. 49-50
11. Those who bicker about Allah's revelations are filled with pride. 56
12. Those who scorn Allah will go to hell. 60
13. Those who deny the revelations of Allah are perverted. 63
14. Those who deny the Scripture and Allah's messengers will be dragged through
boiling water and thrust into the Fire. 70-72
15. Allah will taunt the Christians in hell, saying: Where are all my partners that you
used to believe in? 73
16. Thus does Allah send astray the disbelievers (in his guidance). 74
17. Those who scorn will go to hell. 76
18. When they see Allah's doom they will believe in Allah. But their faith will not
save them. The disbelievers will be ruined. 84-85
Quran Surah 41: Fusilat
1. Woe unto the idolaters who disbelieve in the Hereafter. 6

2. Allah will make life miserable for those who deny his revelations and then he will
torment them forever in the Hereafter. And they will not be helped. 15-16
3. The enemies of Allah will be gathered into the Fire where their skin, ears, and
eyes will testify against them. 19-20
4. Allah will make those who disbelieve taste an awful doom. Their immortal home
will be the Fire, since they denied Allah's revelations. 27-28
5. Those who disbelieve will taste hard punishment. 50
Quran Surah 42: The Counsel
1. While some lounge in the Garden, others will roast in the Flame. 7
2. Those who argue about Allah will have his wrath upon them. Theirs will be an
awful doom. 16
3. Allah sometimes kills people for misbehaving. 34
4. Allah sends some people astray and then punishes them for it by burning them in
the Fire. 44-46
5. Allah makes some people barren. (Whenever he feels like it.) 50
Quran Surah 43: Ornaments of God
1. When the Egyptians angered Allah, he drowned them all. 55

2. Those who argue and do wrong will have a painful doom that will come upon
them suddenly. 65-66
3. The guilty are tormented forever in hell. Allah will not relax their punishment. 74-
75
Quran Surah 44: Smoke
1. Those in torment will claim to believe and ask Allah for relief. But he will refuse
since they will return to their disbelief. 11-16
2. Those in hell must eat from a tree like molten brass that burns their bellies. Then
boiling water will be poured on their heads. 43-48
Quran Surah 45: Crouching
1. Those who hear and reject Allah's revelations are sinful liars. Give them tidings of
a painful doom. 7-8
2. Those who joke about Allah's revelations will go to hell. Theirs will be an awful
doom. 9-10
3. Those who disbelieve in Allah's revelations will have a painful doom of wrath. 11
4. Allah sends some people astray, making it impossible for them to hear or see. 23
5. Those who disbelieve are guilty folk. 31
Quran Surah 46: The Wind-Curved Sandals
1. Disbelievers will be rewarded with the ignominious doom of the Fire. 20

2. The guilty will face a wind with a painful torment. 25
3. Allah has destroyed entire towns. 27
4. Allah will taunt the disbelievers that he torments in the fire, saying: "Taste the
doom for that ye disbelieved." 34
Quran Surah 47: Muhammad
1. Allah makes the works of disbelievers vain. 1

2. Those who disbelieve follow falsehood. 3
3. Smite the necks of the disbelievers whenever you fight against them. Those who
die fighting for Allah will be rewarded. 4
4. Allah will damn the disbelievers and make all their actions fruitless. 8-9
5. Disbelievers may eat and be happy now, but the Fire will be their final home. 12

6. Those in the Garden will drink delicious wine, while those in the Fire will drink
boiling water that will tear apart their intestines. 15
7. Allah curses people by making them deaf and blind. 23
8. Angels will gather them together and smite their faces and backs. 27
9. Allah will make the actions those who disbelieve fruitless. 32
10. Those who disbelieve will never be pardoned by Allah. 34-35
Quran Surah 48: Victory
1. Those who think an evil thought concerning Allah will be cursed and sent to hell
by him. 6
2. Allah has prepared a flame for the disbelievers. 13
3. If you refuse to fight for Allah, he will punish you with a painful doom. 16-17
4. But if you're willing to fight for Allah, he will provide you with lots of booty. 19-
20
5. Allah punished those who disbelieved with a painful punishment. 25
6. Those with Muhammad are ruthless toward disbelievers and merciful toward
themselves. 29
Quran Surah 49: The Private Apartments
1. Do not lift your voice when in Muhammad's presence. Those who subdue their
voices are righteous and will receive an immense reward from Allah. 1-3
Quran Surah 50: Oaf
1. Allah has destroyed many entire generations. 36
Quran Surah 51: The Winnowing Winds
1. Accursed are the conjecturers who ask: When is the Day of Judgment? It is the
day they will be tormented by the Fire. 10-14
2. Woe to the disbelievers. 60
Quran Surah 52: The Mount

1. Those who deny the existence of hell will be thrust into its Fire. 11-16
2. Those who disbelieve are trapped. 42
Quran Surah 54: The Moon
1. Allah sent a storm of stones on Lot's folk, killing all but Lot 's family. 34
2. The suffering in hell will be more wretched and bitter than anything experienced
on earth. 46-48
3. Allah destroyed many people, but does anyone remember anymore? 51
Quran Surah 55: The Beneficent
1. The guilty deny hell. But after they die they go circling between it and fierce,
boiling water. 43-44
Quran Surah 56: The Event
1. But those on his left hand will face scorching wind, scalding water, and black
smoke. 42-43
2. Those who deny Allah and the Hereafter will eat from the Zaqqum tree and drink
boiling water. 51-54
3. Allah will welcome the rejecters and erring with boiling water and a roasting in
the hell fire. 92-94
Quran Surah 57: Iron
1. The home of disbelievers is the Fire, a hapless journey's end. 15

2. Those who disbelieve and deny Allah's revelations are the owners of the fire. 19
Quran Surah 58: She That Disputeth
1. For disbelievers is a painful doom. 4

2. For disbelievers is a shameful doom. 5
3. Don't make friends with Allah's enemies. For those who do so, Allah has prepared
a dreadful doom. 14-15

4. Those who turn others away from the way of Allah will have a shameful doom.
They are rightful owners of the Fire. 16-17
5. Those who oppose Allah and His Messenger will be among the lowest. 20
6. On the Last Day good Muslims will not love their non-Muslim friends and family
members, not even their fathers, sons, or brothers (or their mothers, daughters, or
sisters). 22
Quran Surah 59: Exile
1. Allah cast fear into the hearts of the disbelieving People of the Scripture. Their
home in the Hereafter will be the Fire. 2-3
2. The disbelieving people of the Scripture are liars. 11
3. The devil and disbelievers will be in the Fire. 16-17
4. The owners of the Garden and the owners of the Fire are not equal. 20
Quran Surah 60: She That is to be Examined
1. Don't be friends with disbelievers. They are your (and Allah's) enemy. 1
2. Don't be friends with those who have warred against you because of religion.
Whoever makes friends with them is a wrong-doer. 9
3. Don't be friends with those who disbelieve in the Hereafter. They are Allah's
enemies. 13
Quran Surah 61: The Ranks
1. Allah loves those who fight for him. 4

2. Allah leads some people astray. 5
3. The worst thing you can do is tell a lie about Allah. 7
Quran Surah 62: The Congregation
1. A hypocritical Jew looks like an ass carrying books. Those who deny the
revelations of Allah are ugly. 5
Quran Surah 63: The Hypocrites

1. Allah seals the hearts of those who believe and then disbelieve so that they can
understand nothing. 3
2. Disbelievers are perverted. They are the enemy, confounded by Allah. 4
3. Don't bother to ask Allah to forgive the disbelievers. He will never forgive them.
6
Quran Surah 64: Mutual Disillusion
1. Those who disbelieve will have a painful doom. 5

2. Those who disbelieve are the owners of the Fire. 10
Quran Surah 66: Banning
1. Muhammad's wives need to be careful. If they criticize their husband, Allah will
replace them with better ones. 5
2. The fuel of the Fire is men and stones. 6
3. Be stern with disbelievers. They are going to Hell anyway. 9
4. The wives of Noah and Lot (who were both righteous) betrayed their husbands
and are now in the Fire. 10
Quran Surah67: The Sovereignty
1. Disbelievers will go to hell where they will hear its roaring and boiling. 6-7
2. Who will protect the disbelievers from a painful doom? (Nobody) 28
Quran Surah 69: The Reality
1. Those who do not believe in Allah will be chained up and cast into hell-fire where
they will eat filth. 30-35
Quran Surah 71: Noah
1. Those that Allah drowned in Noah's flood were then tortured forever in the Fire.
25
2. Noah asked Allah to drown all the disbelievers. 26

Quran Surah 72: The Jinn
1. The fires of hell will be fueled with the bodies of idolators and unbelievers. They
will experience an ever-greater torment. 15-17
2. Those who disobey Allah and his messenger will dwell forever in the fire of hell.
23
Quran Surah 73: The Enshrouded One
1. Allah will take care of the deniers. He will tie them up, burn them in a raging fire,
and feed them food that chokes them. 11-13
Quran Surah 74: The Cloaked One
1. The last day will be a day of anguish for disbelievers. 9-10

2. Those who are stubborn to Allah's revelations will face a fearful doom. 16-17
3. The fire of hell shrivels humans and spares nothing. 27-29
4. Allah has appointed angels to tend the Fire and has prepared stumbling blocks for
those who disbelieve. He sends some people (whoever he wants) astray. 31
5. Allah is the font of fear. 56
Quran Surah 76: "Time" or "Man"
1. Allah has prepared chains, manacles, and a raging fire for the disbelievers. 4
2. Don't obey disbelievers. 24
Quran Surah 77: The Emissaries
1. Allah destroyed "the former folk." 16

2. Woe unto the repudiators on that day! 19, 24, 28, 34, 40, 45, 49
Quran Surah 79: "Those Who Drag Forth"
Those who rebel will go to hell. 37-39

Quran Surah 80: "He Frowned"
1. Disbelievers are wicked people. On the last day they will be in darkness and have
dust on their faces. 40-42
Quran Surah 82: The Cleaving
1. The wicked will burn in hell forever. 82
Quran Surah 84: The Sundering
1. Some folks will be thrown into a scorching fire. 11-12

2. Disbelievers will be given a painful doom. 22-24
Quran Surah 87: The Most High
1. Those who are flung into the great Fire will neither live nor die. 12-13
Quran Surah 88: The Overwhelming
1. On that day many will be sad and weary. Scorched by the fire, drinking boiling
water, with only bitter thorn-fruit to eat. 2-7
2. Allah will punish disbelievers with the direst punishment. 23-24
Quran Surah 89: The Dawn
1. Allah poured on them the disaster of His punishment. 13
Quran Surah 90: The City
Those who disbelieve Allah's revelations will have the Fire placed over them like an
awning. 19-20
Quran Surah92: The Night
1. Those who deny Allah's revelations must endure the flaming fire. 14-16


Islam Special - Hindu Raksha Patrika

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Islam Special - Hindu Raksha Patrika

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

To subscribe please register on….

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Jai Shri Ram !!!

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Islam in Modern India (with details of factions of Islam)

Sir Muhammad Iqbal (A article)

Quran’s Teachings (With Details of Versus and definitions)

Islam Pictorial Depiction-I (A presentation to open eyes)

Islam Pictorial Depiction-II (A presentation to open eyes)

Why I left Islam – Book by Ali Sina (Faith www.faithfreedom.org)

A Book –Muhsin Al Qaasim -Abdul Khutbah

Eye opener again as it is available on the web – we just picked it up.

Please remember if a person is Muslim he can’t be

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Islam in Modern India

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Dayananda Saraswati’s Arya Samaj targeted Muslim converts and attempted a

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

The Aligarh Movement

The Aga Khan’s Flock

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

How many of us are willing to concede that we support world terrorism by

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Shariatullah started off by criticizing the corruptions in Islamic society, later on

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

all land belonged to Allah so no taxes. As a result of these teachings people

By 1830 Syed Ahmed established a government in Peshawar with 80,000

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

The foundation of Dar-al-Ulum at Deoband in 1886 was the greatest

Maulana M Hasan was in charge of the madrassa at Deoband from 1888 to

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Sir Muhammad Iqbal

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Islam will be triumphant. This is the kind of pan-Islamicism that I preach".

It is unfortunate that in economic policy we tried to emulate the world. First we

Iqbal's Presidential address at the Allahabad session of the Muslim League in

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Is it possible to retain Islam as an ethical ideal and to reject it as a polity in favor

Referring to the requisites of nationality Iqbal observes, "Experience shows that

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Here Jinnah's amendments were endorsed, demanded separate electorates for

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

If enough people had combated Nazism ideologically before it rose to power, 60

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

Stop Islam. Stop this insanity. Save the world.

Quran Surah 2: The Cow

Quran Surah 3: The Family Of 'Imran

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

9. Those who disbelieve will be burnt in the Fire. 116

Quran Surah 4: Women

Quran Surah 5: The Table Spread

Your comments to hinduraksha@gmail.com

1. Those who deny Islam will be losers in the Hereafter. 5

Quran Surah 6: The Cattle

1. Many generations have been destroyed by Allah. 6

Quran Surah 7: The Heights