The text was uploaded by Spanu Dumitru Viorel , Romania

Letters Between Spanu Dumitru Viorel And Pankaj Mani

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

Re:
Hide Details
FROM:

Dumitru Viorel Spanu

TO:

Message fla gged

pankaj mani

Tuesday, September 6, 2011 11:15 PM

Message body

Dear friend , as you sent me the url http://vixra.org/pdf/1105.0002v1.pdf of your demonstration of the Riemann Hypothesis , I understand that I can download your demonstration , with your permission . So , I look at your demonstration . What to say ? You are a genius . I fully agreed that our common algebra it is linked with the physical phenomenons . As , in your opinion , our common algebra is a consequence of the physics reality . Anyway , my opinion is that the mathematics archaic reality is the matrix of the touchable reality . If you would like , I may send you my observations regarding the demonstration of Riemann Hypothesis . I think that there is a critical point in the demonstration . You may consider it or not , as you like . I wish all the success to you . My best regards !

Author : Spanu Dumitru Viorel

Pankaj Mani said :

From: pankaj mani <manipankaj9@gmail.com> To: spanuviorel@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, September 5, 2011 11:54 AM Subject:

finding the decimal number part in the rough draft on vixra.org http://vixra.org/pdf/1105.0002v1.pdf It's a duality between mathematics & physics.

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

Re:
Hide Details
FROM:

Dumitru Viorel Spanu

TO:

Message fla gged

pankaj mani

Thursday, September 8, 2011 6:18 AM

Message body

Dear Sir , our different opinions lays in our different cultural heritage . I am a christian , my religion is orthodoxy , our Holly Book is the Bible . In the Bible the first three sentences are these ( I`ll put them also in Romanian ) : In the beginning it was the word . And the word was with God . And God was the word . ( La inceput a fost cuvintul . Si cuvintul era cu Dumnezeu . Si Dumnezeu era Cuvintul ) What these means ? The great physicists Stephen Hawking , in his book , " A brief history of time " said so : " It is not quite clear what was the role of the Creator " . But he didn`t said that there was no Creator . He let a little gate for the existence of God saying that he don`t quite well understand what was the role of the God . Did you see the point . Someone said " it is not clear what was the role of Creator " but this phrase shows that we humans can not understand what is the role of God , and only that . These show the limitation of our power of understanding , and I think that you agree with these . In a letter that I sent to Martin Bojowald ( a physicist that is one of the developers of Loop Quantum Gravity ) I said that God first wrote the equations that enables the existence of physical laws . One must first wrote the equations that enables a coherent set of physical laws which , on their turn , will enable a physical reality of an Universe .

A short talk about left - right symmetry of the nature . Werner Heisenberg said ( in Romanian : Simetria dreapta stinga ar fi atunci urmarea uneidublari ulterioare , care ar putea aparea matematic depilda din faptul ca o ecuatie are doua solutii la fel de indreptatite.)" that this symmetry right -left of nature

would be a consequence of the fact that , as an example , an equation has two solutions which are both wright "

But you see , those equations had existed " before " that symmetry right - left of nature began its existence .

And Alain Connes said in

Les dossiers de la recherch : Je suis prt parier qu on s`apercevra un jour que la realite materielle se situe en fait al`interieur de la realite mathematique .

I will be glad to hear your opinion , dear friend .

My best regards and success !

Sincerely , Spanu Dumitru Viorel

Pankaj Mani said :

From: pankaj mani <manipankaj9@gmail.com> To: Dumitru Viorel Spanu <spanuviorel@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2011 8:31 AM Subject: Re:

If you could tell in practical life, what makes you think so,Sir,any experimental proof that entire thinking is justified.or any mathematical result that exists beyond and completely explicit of physics,Sir?

On 9/7/11, pankaj mani <manipankaj9@gmail.com> wrote: > What's the critical point? I am curious to see your demonstration,Sir . >

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

> On 9/7/11, Dumitru Viorel Spanu <spanuviorel@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Dear friend , as you sent me the url >> http://vixra.org/pdf/1105.0002v1.pdf of your demonstration of the >> Riemann Hypothesis , I understand that I can download your >> demonstration , with your permission . So , I look at your >> demonstration . What to say ? You are a genius . I fully >> agreed that our common algebra it is linked with the physical >> phenomenons . As , in your opinion , our common algebra is a >> consequence of the physics reality . Anyway , my opinion is >> that >> the mathematics archaic reality is the matrix of the touchable >> reality . >> If you would like , I may send you my observations regarding >> the >> demonstration of Riemann Hypothesis . I think that there is a >> critical point in the demonstration . You may consider it or >> not >> , as you like . I wish all the success to you . My best >> regards ! >> >> Author : Spanu Dumitru Viorel >> >> >> _

Pankaj Mani said :

_______________________________ >> From: pankaj mani <manipankaj9@gmail.com> >> To: spanuviorel@yahoo.com >> Sent: Monday, September 5, 2011 11:54 AM >> Subject: >> >> >> finding the decimal number part in the rough draft on vixra.org >> http://vixra.org/pdf/1105.0002v1.pdf

>> It's a duality between mathematics & physics. >

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

Dear friend Pankaj Mani , this is my observation on your demonstration of the Riemann Hypothesis . The multiplication operator * is an operator of multiplication from another algebra . Of course that you know that there are many algebras ( already published on scribd.com ) The functions 2s , 1-s , f( 1-s ) , g( s ) , sin ( ( s )/2 ) are being calculated using the multiplication operator ( scalar ) x from our common algebra .

As a condition that the demonstration to be coherent and self consistent , the functions 2s , 1-s , f( 1-s ) , g( s ) , sin ( ( s )/2 ) must be calculated using the multiplication operator * from that different algebra ( 0*0 0 si 0*0*0 *0 0). The critical point of the demonstration is this : you used two different multiplication operator in the same equation : f( s ) = 2s * 1-s * f( 1-s ) * g( s ) * sin ( ( s )/2 )

It can be constructed a composed function f ( s ) , using two different multiplication operators , from two different algebras ( I think that it is needed to be written a new theorem for composing functions ) This would be the case discussed for the functional equation : f( s ) = 2s * 1-s * f( 1-s ) * g( s ) * sin ( ( s )/2 ) as you defined it . The observation in this case is that , this function f(s) is different from the Riemann zeta function ,

as it appears in Riemann Hypothesis . You may take this observation in consideration or not , as you wish . Anyway , I wish all the success to you in your work . It is quite clear that you are a genius . With friendship and great consideration Spanu Dumitru Viorel

Pankaj Mani said :

Pankaj Mani Which algebra was presumed while developing trigonometrical functions like sine? was it 1+1=2 from common algebra or 1+1=1 as a case in quantum world ? Unlike 17 hours ago Privacy:

You and Pankaj Mani like this.

Submit

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

Spanu Dumitru Viorel Dear Sir , It`s obvious that are two algebras . One of the quantum world , and the other for the macroscopic world . You don`t need the function sine() to say where is an electron inside atom . Anyway , electron has the property of ubiquity around nucleus . Its " position " is a mathematical object called density of probability to find electron somewhere in space .

Pankaj Mani said :

Pankaj Mani Visualization is more important than thinking. Unlike 14 hours ago Privacy:

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

o o o
You like this.

The Genius Albert Einstein said : " Imagination is most important than knowledge " I agree with you .

Pankaj Mani To me, there are certain deep physical aspects in nature that create mathematical structures ! Unlike 15 hours ago Privacy:

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

o o o

You like this.

Spanu Dumitru Viorel : I am a fun of the multiverse . I like to think that any algebra is somewhere , very far away or in another variety of spacetime , the structure of a coherent set of physical laws that enables the existence of a different kind of Universe . Spanu Dumitru Viorel Spanu Dumitru Viorel : I am a fun of the multiverse . I like to think that any algebra is somewhere , very far away or in another variety of spacetime , the structure of a coherent set of physical laws that enables the existence of a different kind of Universe . Dear friend , this is a conjecture very hard to be proven ! 2 seconds ago Like

Pankaj Mani said :

o
Pankaj Mani Visualization is more important than thinking. Unlike 14 hours ago Privacy:

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

You like this.

Sir , The Genius Albert Einstein said : " Imagination is most important than knowledge " I agree with you .

Pankaj Mani said :

Pankaj Mani To me, there are certain deep physical aspects in nature that create mathematical structures ! Unlike 15 hours ago Privacy:

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

You like this.

Spanu Dumitru Viorel : I am a fun of the multiverse . I like to think that any algebra is somewhere , very far away or in another variety of spacetime , the structure of a coherent set of physical laws that enables the existence of a different kind of Universe . Dear friend , this is a conjecture very hard to be proven !

Pankaj Mani said :

Pankaj Mani Great ! When i told about the algebra 1+1=2, i meant that the entity which was named 1, 2 should be exactly double congruently of that in the physical space. But 1 particle meson made up of 2 quarks doesn't mean 1quark +1 quark= 1 quark ???????????????? if in 1 class 25 boys and 25 girls are there ,then does that mean 25+25=1 (unit?).New algebra? Like 16 hours ago Privacy:

Pankaj Mani likes this.

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

Spanu Dumitru Viorel It`s the quantum algebra . Quarks don`t live alone . Just 2 or 3 . Two quarks made the meson . You`ll never find a single quark living by himself . They exists in peers of two or in groups of three , in proton and neutron . Your example of the class is from the algebra of the macroscopic world . Take care of distinction between algebras . Dear Sir , the addition operator in the equation : 1 quark

1 quark = 1 meson

is different from the addition operator of our common algebra . If you like think of this :

1 peach This

1 plum = 1 multitude of fruits .

adition operator is different from our common algebra adition

operator + .
Okay . You will say 1 peach + 1 plum = 2 fruits .

Yes , but you can say this because in my example I used peach and plum which are non quantum objects , they are macroscopic objects . This

operator is more like

the reunion U

between multitudes .

Id est

A U B = C

Pankaj Mani said :

Pankaj Mani Great ! When i told about the algebra 1+1=2, i meant that the entity which was named 1, 2 should be exactly double congruently of that in the physical space. But 1 particle meson made up of 2 quarks doesn't mean 1quark +1 quark= 1 quark ???????????????? if in 1 class 25 boys and 25 girls are there ,then does that mean 25+25=1 (unit?).New algebra? Like 17 hours ago Privacy:

Pankaj Mani likes this.

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

Submit

Spanu Dumitru Viorel Spanu Dumitru Viorel It`s the quantum algebra . Quarks don`t live alone . Just 2 or 3 . Two quarks made the meson . You`ll never find a single quark living by himself . They exists in peers of two or in groups of three , in proton and neutron . Your example of the class is from the algebra of the macroscopic world . Take care of distinction between algebras . 2 seconds ago

Pankaj Mani said :

Pankaj Mani Which algebra was presumed while developing trigonometrical functions like sine? was it 1+1=2 from common algebra or 1+1=1 as a case in quantum world ? Unlike 21 hours ago Privacy:

You and Pankaj Mani like this.

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

Submit

o
Spanu Dumitru Viorel

Dear Sir , It`s obvious that are two algebras . One of the quantum world , and the other for the macroscopic world . You don`t need the function sine() to say where is an electron inside atom . Anyway , electron has the property of ubiquity around nucleus . Its " position " is a mathematical object called density of probability to find electron somewhere in space . 6 hours ago Like

Pankaj Mani said :

Pankaj Mani Is something possible that has no structure in this universe? Unlike 16 hours ago Privacy:

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

o o o
You like this.

Yes , the ultrafilters . They have no correspondent in reality !

Pankaj Mani said :

Pankaj Mani Pankaj Mani Which algebra was presumed while developing trigonometrical functions like sine? was it 1+1=2 from common algebra or 1+1=1 as a case in quantum world ? Unlike 21 hours ago Privacy:

You and Pankaj Mani like this.

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

Submit

o
Spanu Dumitru Viorel

Dear Sir , It`s obvious that are two algebras . One of the quantum world , and the other for the macroscopic world . You don`t need the function sine() to say where is an electron inside atom . Anyway , electron has the property of ubiquity around nucleus . Its " position " is a mathematical object called density of probability to find electron somewhere in space . 6 hours ago Like

Pankaj Mani said :

Pankaj Mani In mathematics, transcendental number is a number that is not algebraicthat is, it is not a root of a non-constant polynomial equation with "rational ?" coefficients. Like September 5 at 7:39am Privacy:

Spanu Dumitru Viorel said :

Submit

Spanu Dumitru Viorel Well , indeed transcedental numbers are not algebraic , Sir . September 7 at 4:42am Like