October 9, 2005

Dear Editor in chief,

Perhaps the controversial A.I is asked by a controversial scholar how an Artificial
Intelligence works could be compared. Perhaps the A.I. saw two people playing an ‘end game’
chess tactic. Then the A.I. remarks: A.I has many options or modes or emphasis or choices or
comparisons or decisions-be it by random access like toss coin or by majority vote or survey or
somebody push a key or button or somebody reprogram the program that could affect the
outcome of the Intelligence. If the mode, option is on an end game chess tactic, the emphasis
and focus is to simply have one pawn advantage up to the end of the game because a pawn could
become a queen soon. But if the game tactic is to corner the king immediately a player would
make strategic planning or even some sacrifices and bait to corner and defeat the king which
sometimes needs lots of concentration, strategy and focus.
Perhaps if a person would wonder how computer software plays and fights and defeats a
human player in chess, perhaps he would visualize it similar to a question/answer retrieval of a
teacher. Example there is a questionnaire and the question has its correct answer hidden on the
back of the paper. The teacher would just read the question and if the pupil answers, the teacher
would just compare the answer if it is the same or not. The key words are: read, compare; and
execute or give the answer. Perhaps those sequences and strategies and moves and counter
moves of the best human in chess are all recorded. And if the human player would move a
certain move ‘a’, the computer would just search similar to move ‘a’ and its recorded counter
measures. And if there are several options from the recorded move/s like if the counter move is
done: a) by a champion if mode is the highest; b) by an average chess player if move is average
c) by a beginner if mode is for a beginner. And the computer would select the mode in average if
the playing is set just in mode average; and still there many options of counter move for a certain
move for an average and perhaps random access is needed to select only one counter move
among the several counter moves recorded.
So perhaps balanced government and leaders should concentrate to have software where
almost all good decisions are recorded and could be retrieved from a question/answer data base.
The end game tactic is a very good and simple tactic that government should focus on; the key is
to give focus on small things first-end game tactic; or simultaneous with the big things-end game
tactic combined with example a caecilian defense or caecilian offense tactic- just waiting an
opportunity to corner the king while just wanting to have one pawn advantage.
Perhaps leaders should concentrate on removing first the excesses of religious superiority,
ethnic superiority, government false pride or government superiority- don’t like to be helped by
others or by other nation/s; or helps are tag as interventional; or imperialism. Perhaps
government should focus on how to have smart of anything or person! Perhaps like: Smart
soldier, smart preacher, smart surgeon, smart engineer, smart architect, smart judge, smart
teacher, smart model pupil with smart book & smart pen, smart car, smart house with smart
appliances, smart motor bike, smart security guard, smart leader, smart black board, smart paper,
smart scheduler, and so on…! Being smart of things is focusing, transforming traditional tool,
and profession to a higher level and efficiency and performance using available technologies
with the help of good teachings, and law.
For example for a smart soldier: If an A.I. retrieved a data suggested by a controversial
scientist when asked by some of the scholars to give his confidential opinion or other
confidential creativities that balancing could do about lessening friendly fire and to let smart
soldier become more efficient. The controversial scientist proposed the following ideas perhaps
some are retrieved from movies: Special forces or smart soldier should develop a smart tracking
system built-in in a mask or in a uniform or built-in on a rifle where if a moderate law enforcer
or soldier ‘a’ sees a friendly soldier ‘b’ he would be warned on the screen of the ‘smart mask’
digitally because perhaps a sensor on his uniform would trigger another sensor on his fellow
soldier ‘b’’s uniform or rifle a communication or contact thru radio wave about its GPS position
with respect to a temporary reference point called smart identifier which enhance near perfect
precision the signals from the satellite to just perhaps 0.3m-0.1m error. And if the rifle is aimed
to a fellow soldier, the rifle would not fire if a ‘smart rifle identifier sensor’ on the rifle would
sense that a fellow soldier ‘b’ is using too a ‘smart rifle identifier sensor’ say built-in in his rifle
too. Or perhaps friendly fire could be checked and balanced because of the sensor that could
locate the position of every soldier example assigned to patrol on a mission being always verified
and monitored by a system where all and each almost exact position is tracked and is sensed by
the sensor so that a position that is verified friendly when pin pointed by a rifle, the rifle would
not fire even if there could be an accidentally triggering of the trigger. b) Before the mopping
operation would be conducted, special undercover units would install a device called a smart
camouflage small gadget or smart identifier located on strategic location where the enemies
would perhaps likely hide at night or sneak or creep example on corners of buildings and roads.
The camouflage small gadgets or smart identifier with self-destruction ability have sensors to
seek slight heat and could send the data through cell phone technology to a mother base with its
approximate location using Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) and its tolerance is perhaps only
0.3m-0.1m error. If a remote controlled tank with small guided missile with a range of 300m
would go near the battle zone and on its computer system several human were detected because
of human heat and motion, the computer could compute the near exact location of those human
heat emitted using the data sent by smart identifier with respect to two more smart identifier
through triangulation and used GPS to have a precise target point. And the small missile with
exact precision could seek the enemy using the computed GPS near approximation perhaps with
an error of 0.3-0.1 meter.
This smart identifier has some modes. And if mode A is decided to be used, since mode A is
designed to look for slight heat from humans and using triangulation on sensitivity with error of
2-1m if there is no enhancer but if there is imagery technology enhancer the error could be 0.1m.
For mode B the sensor is designed to seek sound and through triangulations perhaps the location
could be pin-pointed and with its imagery technology the target could be pin pointed with precise
precision. Perhaps the details on heat seeking technology are commercially available, and
triangulation using two lenses with given angle are basics. And the technology on imagery or
locking system is now commercially available.
Perhaps installing of smart identifiers during actual battle could be done by small hovering
airplane or helicopter or toy helicopter that has camouflage system that could make the toy
helicopter invisible. Perhaps the armor tank approaching the battle zone could be remotely
controlled like a toy using camera and GSP technology and imagery technology with sensors that
could sense sounds, heat, and motion. The armor tank has 5 small rocket launchers with each
missile that has guiding system that would follow the location of the target independently and
simultaneously what was instructed to each by the computer system. The armor tank has also 4
machine guns that could automatically seek target thru the aid of a device that seek any heat,
motion, sound and verify the target as friend or foe or civilian because the device could sense
combination of imagery, heat, motion, sound, and mode of alertness. Principle beyond: precise
location of friends and enemies could be known in advance by installation of smart identifier;
smart locator installed by smart intelligence at battle zone using available technology vs.
patrolling, fighting blind; or not tapping the resources of technology now available in the market
and in books.
For smart surgeon, perhaps the A.I. could retrieve suggestion from a controversial surgeon
similar to: Two heads or twin’s head connected since childhood and had successful operations
because of cutting and diverting of blood vessels where done batch by batch and the time for
healing was reconsidered. Or it is the key. And section by section operation after one section is
healed was applied so that infections could be controlled; or not simultaneous or one session
only but several. And the successful operation could give some hints why a good brain from
terminated to be dead body could be transplanted to a different body with comatose; or brain
transplant could be ordinary in the future. But perhaps law would not allow brain transplant-it
might be an example of extreme of technology.
But the A.I. still discuss it for the sake of opinion: Perhaps with some innovations brain
transplant could be commercially available in the near future. Perhaps with the invention of very
small device or nano technology using small scalpel cutting small nerve and small blood vessels;
and conducting very small sewing & connecting to another vessels of a brain just like ordinary
pipes and rubber tubing technology could be possible because of technology. And perhaps blood
could be transferred through artificially bio-engineered tubing where blood chemistry, blood
rejections are monitored so that no blood clotting or any bad blood reaction in its infancy is
produced; or problem could be checked in its infancy. Perhaps the smart blood vessel has a smart
gate valve that flow of blood could be controlled while blood mixing is developing or causing
some problem. Sequencing and timing and scheduling of blood flow could be orchestrated or
designedly opened or closed considering healing, blood rejection in its infancy, etc, because
sensitivity to any problem of opening one or two or several blood channels and connections
could be monitored and could be controlled because of the smart gate valve in the smart blood
vessel. Blood vessels could now be treated like pipes and rubber tubing; so there would be smart
adaptor of T- joint or Y-joint with or with out gate valve that could make some opening or
diversion or channeling of blood.
The artificially bio-engineered tubing or smart blood vessel could be use as a diversion or
artificial blood channels. Then perhaps the opening of the small gate valves could be done
through cell phone technology whether simultaneously or batch by batch which need time for
healing until brain ‘a” and the physical body ‘b’ of another person could be having blood
circulation of one common source because of nano- technology and electronics. Then perhaps if
the experts learn that the artificial vessels are functioning as intended the cutting of supply of
blood to the comatose brain and opening of the blood vessels to the healthy alive brain could be
done as designed and as controlled even both brain are still on its original belongings. There is
no transferring of the actual brain yet but there is already interconnection of blood and impulses
because of artificial blood channels or smart blood vessel. Then if closing or cutting of delicate
vessels, and nerve vessel would now start but there is now some partial flow of blood and
impulses flowing, then let some period of time pass to have some healing and adaptation of the
re-channeling of blood flows. Then other cutting and re-channeling could be done considering
healing of other vessels section by section until the brain could be removed completely attached
with those vital vessels; but the other comatose brain should be by now remove so that the brain
with its attachments, diversions, re-channeling could now be transferred. Then the removal of the
diversions would be done also not abruptly with that reconnection of other vital and minor nerve,
and blood vessels. Why transplant the whole head cutting just the neck? Perhaps –it is an
extreme in science!
Perhaps another approach why the brain could be tested to function and could be transferred
by artificial blood vessel is just testing a normal brain and connects the necessary extensions of
blood vessel connections that could let another finger from other person move. It is just like two
remote control gadgets with same frequency and controlling a toy car and if remote control ‘a’ is
giving signal to the toy to turn left and remote control ‘b’ is also giving signal to the toy to turn
right but if remote control ‘a’ has weak signal because of low battery charge the toy would turn
right.
From someone who might be dreaming about brain transplant,