Janu

ary 22, 2006

Dear Editor in chief,
Sometimes a religious tradition of group A where the emphasis is on touching
the icon for some blessings had caused a stampede and accidents and death-
extreme. And the event was retrieved by the A.I. from TV news. And the A.I. is
programmed to remark on the extreme because penalty could be sanctioned to the
A.I. like being grounded if it would not say something especially if there is even
little extreme happening that would lead to a culture of not minding small extreme.
Since the A.I. is programmed to be sensitive to reports like accident, stampede, the
A.I. would easily search for same situation in the past and retrieve it and comment
on it for responsible people to debate on it and the outcome is recorded. So if group
A is practicing its tradition during feast day and a stampede happened or any
extreme had happened the A.I. is programmed to initiate open debate world wide.
The participant should be balanced. There must be members on group A, B, C, etc.
example: intellectuals, scholars, scientist, ordinary men, young, old, so that when
electronic voting is asked to fill up and give the final say the A.I. would acquire a
balanced answer to the questioned and it could be part of his question/answer
retrieval in some future question/s to be answered by the A.I.
Perhaps with regards to that stampede, tolerance was chosen by the religious
leaders and prevailed over orderliness, safety and perhaps against smooth flow of
traffic. I think religious leaders and scholars could sense that something is wrong
with their hundred years old tradition. Sensitivity to the start of the problem or
balancing even small or little things at the start of the problem is being ignored
perhaps of a higher “value” like miracle or wonders or for wealth or for fame.
Perhaps there would come a time that because of creativity and balancing, things
could still be put on its proper way or order way or beautiful to look at; or the word
would prevail over traditions or precepts of men that are based from wonders,
public miracles, “perceived answered prayers.”
Perhaps with regards to another group that resulted to the killing due to
stampede and trapped on a dilapidating man-hole and resulted to death and some
injuries perhaps using these three elements to balance the focus of argumentation
or reasoning like privacy: freewill or tolerance perhaps hundred year religious
practice could be allowed as part of cultural practices but any extreme that would
happened connected with accidents and injuries, the state or people has the right to
sue those heads or leaders of religious or civic or public authority for aiding and
harboring words that enhance disorderliness, ugliness example: death due to
stampede, traffic jams, drowning of people at seas connected with fluvial
procession and so on. Perhaps concerned citizens could use reasons like
negligence, perhaps even human rights –the right to have the true meaning of
universal truth rather than being deceived of wonders, public miracles, or
“answered prayers” which perhaps was caused by natural healing. Perhaps, pass
law that law students could specialized on law suits connected to religious or
cultural activities because of stampede, accidents, injuries and a higher penalty
should be rewarded to victims and higher incentives to lawyers defending those
people victimized of perhaps wonders; or perhaps because of canceling the
universal word in favor of icons. These new counter measure to check religious
stampede and accidents could result to another economic stimulus and economic
cycles.
Perhaps accidents that result to injuries, deaths perhaps others might call it
collateral damage due to conflict could also create opinion that might increase the
flame of hatred and could tilt the tide against the whole army; or even bring down
a leader of an ally. But perhaps the emotions of anger and hatred could be slowed
down or settled by paying those innocent civilian with equivalent just
compensation.
I think too much deregulation and free for all activities where actions are not
designed to have symphony or orchestra as a whole- example as a whole country
or as a whole world to have balance and harmony- rather all are doing each own
way and no synchronization, no timing, would lead to chaotic and disorderliness or
imbalanced. The key is orchestrating with the conductor to play the master piece of
music produced because each could contribute something beautiful as part of a
whole or because there is a grand design created. Strong and courageous leader is a
key so that balanced law could be implemented and effective. He should be
responsible like a conductor to lead people to be on beat and in tune with him. And
the result is people are orderly, disciplined and sensitive to the start of lacking and
excesses from small things to the big.
Then the scholar asks why is it that sometimes people use color/s to show his
principles and convictions? Can you further explain what is far right, far left,
center and progressive? But the A.I. is also confused of what far right, center…is,
and even the term “economic bubble”… is! Perhaps economic bubble could be
similar to a bubble of boiling water-the limit where economic growth is stopped or
has reached its saturation point! But as to colors perhaps the A.I. remarked: Since
extreme are: a) Red- much or more emphasis on socialism, much or more emphasis
in liberalism-that perhaps resulted to flesh, sex, pornography as economic stimuli;
or resulted to one example too many divorcee; or much or more emphasis on war
preparedness; or much or more emphasis on aggressiveness, tough, strength,
courage, b) Blue-much or more emphasis on conservatism, “good” traditions c)
White-more emphasis on purity, clarity, immaculate things, d) Green-more
emphasis on science, environment, energy e) Yellow- much emphasis on religion,
holy things, ethics, rituals, icon procession. f) Orange-mix or blend of Red &
Yellow-or just enough of religion, socialism, strength and courage and war
preparedness. g) Black- blend of Red & Blue, but more on formality or mourn, sad,
protest on: corruption, mistakes, faults, sins, scandals, show of demerits h) Pink-
mix of Red & white-or mix of strength and clarity; i) Light Blue-mix of
conservatism and clarity and pure. J) Gold-merits or rewards, as star or icon or
“show of pride”, royalty, and religious; or if yellow gold, the emphasis is tilting
with religion; if red gold, the emphasis is blending with aggressiveness, courage
and strength and religion. K) Light blue, light green, light gold-with its distinctive
principles tilting to clarity, purity and simplicity.
About words: fair, compromise, flexible, moderate, tolerance, economic cycle,
equality are words connected to balance. And their opposite words like unfair,
uncompromising, not flexible, intolerant, stagnant, saturated, twisting, tilting, more
leaning to and so on…! Balancing is selecting and choosing the right color and
right words from all colors and words depending on the right time, right place,
right condition, right situation so that good, beauty, order, harmony, peace is
produced from the very start or small; but…if not, the opposite is the result called
extreme or that would result to chaos, disorderliness, ugliness at the very start or
small. Any color when use on the wrong time could result to extreme. Twisting,
tilting, and leaning are word siding to extremism. The word “only,” “always”,
“all,” and so on… are words that the computer system is sensitive to be warned of
or something extremism is going to happen on the idea. Computer systems are
derived from universal consensus and surveys. And the opposites of the likes of
“only’, “always” and so on… are “also,” “sometimes,” “some” and so on…! These
adverbs or words that give specific description on quantity, quality on adjectives
and nouns that the computer program is sensitive is the key where balancing
intelligence could be programmed to start with. Perhaps the next generation of A.I.
could be sensitive to curvature of contour of the face like when smiling, tensed,
nervous, etc. using imagery technology and voice technology. Perhaps the
combination of some imagery, key words, voice of tense or happy could be the
next key. Principle behind: sensitivity to the start is the key like off and on or
switch to produced a code or signal; then combination of off and on to have
another code or combination of code in a software. Sensitivity to the small or start
is the opposite of sensitivity to “wonders”, “mysteries”, and “public-miracles,” raw
information, and generalities.
A leader has media conference with a back ground of a picture of an
environment with flowers. The back ground is a beautiful idea. Perhaps much
creativity could be created with blending colors, pictures, films or perhaps even
moving objects or films or movie as back ground to show one’s beliefs and
principle as long as it is good and beautiful; or balanced. Perhaps other leaders
could imitate and improve those good ideas. But, to claim that enriching something
connected to energy to be developed into a powerful weapon- perhaps nuclear- and
using the defense of privacy, perhaps, is using good law but not for the right
situation and condition-extreme. Balancing is using good law on the right time and
right situation and condition. Perhaps, defense using privacy is not justifiable when
security is at risk. But sometimes over reaction on a particular action using privacy
as defense to have a research of enhancing its energy could lead to something
terrible. The fear that someone would be tempted to use a very powerful weapon
could create some panic. The opposite reaction of the threatened neighbor might
result to chaos if things could not be settled in dialogs. Sometimes the temptation
to have or to show command of respect from neighbor is great that sometimes the
action could lead to misunderstanding and conflicts.
But too much fear could cause phobias and depression and even suicidal
tendencies and panic attacks with regards to individuals. Perhaps leaders should
undergo rigid training on how to combat too much fears, death threat,
intimidations, and phobias. Sometimes, “Joan of Arch” syndrome is effective also
in times of war; but sometimes it only boosts emotions and conceitedness and self
righteousness instead of letting a cause or goal be accomplished using science, art
or skills and balancing tactics.
Emotion of oneness in the name of God as a nation had resulted many blood
shed and wars during the dark ages. Conquest of land in the name of the
motherland had also contributed to shed of blood; but there are good also. But now,
because of technology and globalization and perhaps sensitivity to the start of
problem and using balancing tactic with the help of universal good teaching,
majority rule-survey, law and especially enhanced by technology perhaps mankind
could graduate now of being war freak and bully; instead, men could be men for
others-the product and result of good teaching which is the real key- forgetting
whose credit the good cause or deed goes like “our group is the ‘only’ true, and
‘only’ right group”- because of this icon, star, statue, our “only” right idea, our
institution, our leader….but, because of the universal word and universal spirit
regardless of religious, party affiliation; and because of sensitivity to the start of
lacking and excesses-balancing tactic.
From someone who might be mistaken,