IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN RE: ACandS, Inc.

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Combustion Engineering, Inc. The Flintkote Company Kaiser Aluminum Corp. Owens Corning US Mineral Products Company USG Corp. W.R. Grace & Co. Debtors. IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: Mid-Valley, Inc. North American Refractories Co. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. Debtors. Case No.: 03-35592 (Rel. Dkt. No. 2790) Case No.: 02-20198 (Rel. Dkt. No. 6997) Case No.: 00-22876 (Rel. Dkt. No. 8161)
Hearing Date: March 28, 2011 Objection Deadline: March 11, 2011

Case No.: 02-12687 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3659) Case No.: 00-4471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 10720) Case No.: 03-10495 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3399) Case No.: 04-11300 (Rel. Dkt. No. 5692) Case No.: 02-10429 (Rel. Dkt. No. 10043) Case No.: 00-3837 (Rel. Dkt. No. 20980) Case No.: 01-2471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3896) Case No.: 01-2094 (Rel. Dkt. No. 12616) Case No.: 01-1139 (Rel. Dkt. No. 26356)

OBJECTION OF THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEES OF ASBESTOS CLAIMANTS IN THE FLINTKOTE, GRACE, NARCO AND PITTSBURGH CORNING BANKRUPTCIES TO GARLOCKS MOTION TO INTERVENE FOR LIMITED PURPOSE OF SEEKING ACCESS TO JUDICIAL RECORDS The Official Committees of Asbestos Claimants in the Flintkote, Grace, NARCO and Pittsburgh Corning bankruptcy cases (collectively, the ACCs) by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby object to Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLCs (Garlock) proposed intervention in the twelve above-captioned Bankruptcy Cases.

{D0197698.1 }

DOC#463349

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. On January 10, 2011, Garlock filed a motion1 in this Court requesting access to all

the exhibits to Rule 2019 statements filed in the above-captioned cases (the Rule 2019 Exhibits). Various parties, including the ACCs, filed objections to the motion.2 Among other things, those objections established that this Court should exercise its discretion to deny Garlocks request because Garlocks acknowledged purposes in seeking the Exhibits were improper and because there was cause to deny Garlock access to such information from the twelve above-captioned cases, as shown by the relevant statutory provisions and caselaw. This Court held a hearing on the motion on February 14, 2011. During that hearing, the Court directed Garlock to file a formal motion to intervene in each of the Bankruptcy Cases. On February 18, 2011, Garlock filed its motion to intervene (the Motion to Intervene),3 as well as an amended motion authorizing access to the 2019 statements that is substantively identical to Garlocks original motion (the Amended Motion) (and which is therefore already responded to and refuted by the previously-filed ACC Joinder and Objection). The ACCs objections to Garlocks intervention in the twelve Bankruptcy Cases are set forth herein. ARGUMENT 2. Garlocks intervention for the limited purpose of pursuing access to 2019

statements should be denied. Garlock does not establish that it has sufficiently shown cause to
1

Motion of Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC for Orders Authorizing Access to 2019 Statements Filed in this Court and for Related Relief. See, e.g., In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Jan. 10, 2011) [Dkt. No. 8096].

The ACCs hereby incorporate by reference in its entirety, the Joinder and Objection of the Official Committees of Asbestos Claimants in the Flintkote, Grace, NARCO and Pittsburgh Corning Bankruptcies to Garlocks Motion for Orders Authorizing Access to 2019 Statements and Related Relief, February 7, 2011 in the above-captioned cases (the ACC Joinder and Objection). See, e.g., In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2011) [Dkt. No. 8139]. Motion of Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC to Intervene for Limited Purpose of Seeking Access to Judicial Records. See, e.g., In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Feb. 18, 2011) [Dkt. No. 8161].
3

{D0197698.1 }

intervene under Bankruptcy Rule 2018. To the contrary, Garlock is attempting to misuse permissive intervention in the same manner it is attempting to misuse Rule 2019 to obtain fishing-expedition discovery under the guise of vindicating public rights of access. As the ACCs have already argued, the decision to restrict access to such materials is well within this Courts discretion. See, e.g., In re 50-Off Stores, Inc., 213 B.R. 646, 659 (Bankr. W. D. Tex. 1997) (following Supreme Courts guidance that bar[ring] access to judicial records is . . . best left to the sound discretion of the trial court) (internal quotations and citations omitted). Likewise, under Rule 2018, deciding whether to grant an interested party leave to intervene is within the bankruptcy courts sound discretion. In re Kovalchick, Nos. 94-4256, 91-24183, 1994 WL 673105, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 1994); In re Hyde Park Pship, 73 B.R. 194, 196 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1986) (the granting of permissive intervention is within the courts discretion); In re Durango Georgia Paper Co., 336 B.R. 594, 596 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2005) ([i]ntervention is discretionary). A. Garlock Has Not Established Cause to Intervene 3. Bankruptcy Rule 2018(a) provides that the Court, for cause shown, may permit

any interested entity to intervene generally or with respect to any specified matter. Garlock has not shown such cause. 4. Instead, Garlock seeks to evade the cause requirement by arguing that [i]n

evaluating requests to intervene under Bankruptcy Rule 2018(a), this Court has borrowed from Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b)(2), governing permissive intervention. Motion to Intervene at 8 (citing Alterra v. Healthcare Corp., 353 B.R. 66, 70-71 (Bankr. D. Del. 2006)). But Alterra was merely citing Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg, 23 F.3d 772, 778 (3d Cir. 1994), for the proposition that a motion to intervene is the proper procedure for a media

{D0197698.1 }

company to challenge protective or confidentiality orders. It did not address under which substantive circumstances such a challenge might be rejected, and unsurprisingly, therefore, did not address the contours of cause under Bankruptcy Rule 2018.4 And Pansy is not a bankruptcy case, and so of course did not address Bankruptcy Rule 2018 at all. 5. Moreover, unlike here, in Pansy and Alterra media access and public rights were

at issue, whereas this Court has already recognized that Garlock is not seeking to vindicate a public right to access. See Hrg Tr. 11, Feb. 14, 2011 (Garlock isnt seeking these to vindicate a public right). Instead, Garlock seeks to obtain access to the Rule 2019 Exhibits from 12 different bankruptcies in derogation of the purposes of that Rule and as an end-around proper discovery in yet other cases.5 6. Under Bankruptcy Rule 2018, a court may deny intervention if it will result in

undue delay or prejudice. See In re Lynott, 193 B.R. 882, 886 (Bankr. E.D. Wisc. 1996); 9 Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. Sommer, Collier on Bankruptcy, 2018.04[3], at 2018-6 (16th ed. 2009)

To the extent that Alterra could be read to suggest that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 applies in contested matters in bankruptcy, such a reading is refuted by the clear and governing text of the Bankruptcy Rules themselves. Rule 24 expressly applies only to adversary proceedings. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7024 (Rule 24 F.R.Civ.P. applies in adversary proceedings). In contested and other matters, Rule 2018(a) governs intervention. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2018(a) (In a case under the Code, after hearing on such notice as the Court directs and for cause shown, the court may permit any interested entity to intervene generally or with respect to any specified matter.). See also Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7024 advisory committees note (Intervention in a case under the Code is governed by Rule 2018 and intervention in an adversary proceeding is governed by this rule [7024].) (emphasis added); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9014(c) (omitting Bankruptcy Rule 7024 from the list of rules that apply to contested matters). A motion to intervene to assert a right of access to documents is a contested matter, and thus Rule 2018 controls here. See In re Global Crossing Ltd., 295 B.R. 720, 721-22 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003) (noting that a proceeding regarding hearing certain evidence in camera was a contested matter.). Indeed, Garlock itself acknowledges that it moves . . . pursuant to rule 2018(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure . . . . Motion to Intervene at 2. And while under certain circumstances cases utilizing Rule 2018 may look to precedent applying Rule 24, they neither could nor do eliminate the requirement of the Rule that cause be shown for such intervention, nor eliminate this Courts ability to exercise its discretion to determine what constitutes sufficient cause in a given situation. 5 Garlock attempts to evade this Courts apparent conclusion that Garlocks purposes here are improper by making the obvious point that requests for access to documents, and the relevant legal principles, are not restricted to media outlets. See Motion to Intervene at 8-9 & n.7. But the cases it cites are neither bankruptcy cases nor instructive on what constitutes an improper purpose in the context of Rule 2019 Exhibits and the highly confidential medical information contained therein. Garlock simply ignores the relevant precedent, cited in the Joinder and Objection at 3-7, establishing that its purposes here are improper.

{D0197698.1 }

([p]ermissive intervention is warranted if the entity demonstrates that no other entity exists to adequately protect its position and that intervention would not result in undue delay or prejudice). Courts recognize that an intervenor causes undue delay and prejudice when it unjustifiably wastes resources for its individual interests. See Hyde Park, 73 B.R. at 197 (denying motion to intervene because [t]he estate would be burdened by the added delay brought by the addition of another party to the proceedings and the extra expense of another law firms fees to pay without the benefit of a new approach to the problems in this case.); In re ANC Rental Corp., 278 B.R. 714, 719 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002) (intervention denied where it was the interests [of the movants] as competitors of the Debtors which they are seeking to protect by opposing action by the Debtors which will improve the Debtors chances of successfully reorganizing. Those interests are not in harmony with the Debtors or the creditors of these estates and there is no reason to let Hertz and Avis use this forum to advance their individual interests.) (emphasis added). This is another reason Garlocks attempt to intervene in the 12 cases should be denied. 7. Finally, Garlock cannot meet its burden of establishing cause for the

intervention for the same reasons its underlying request for the Rule 2019 Exhibits should be rejected, including that it seeks the documents for purposes that are improper under the controlling law. 8. As the ACCs have previously established, Courts have supervisory power over

their records and files and may deny access to those records and files to prevent them from being used for an improper purpose. In re Kaiser Aluminum Corp., 327 B.R. 554, 560 (D. Del. 2005). See also Nixon v. Warner Commcn, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978) ([e]very court has supervisory power over its own records and files, and access has been denied where court files

{D0197698.1 }

might have become a vehicle for improper purposes.); 50-Off, 213 B.R. at 659-60 (refusing to unseal a retention hearing where, among other things, the record in this matter seems at least to suggest an improper purpose as that term was used by the Supreme Court in the Nixon case); ACC Joinder and Objection at 3-4. 9. As established by the ACC Joinder and Objection, Garlocks acknowledged

purposes in seeking the Rule 2019 Exhibits for use in other cases are improper. This Court has already made clear that attempts to seek Rule 2019 materials for use in other cases violate the purpose of the Rule, and are inappropriate: [T]he purpose for filing the 2019 statements is essentially to make sure that the Court understands that the parties who that the attorneys who purport to represent particular parties actually do represent those parties and therefore have the right to participate in the significant events in the case. They are not there for the purpose of allowing another party to use them in some litigation context outside the confines of this case. Hearing Transcript at 40, In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2010) (emphasis added). And the Court likewise specifically noted that giving you mass discovery as to everybody who every law firm represents I think has no basis in law or in fact. Id. at 44-45. As the Court noted, [t]hat is wholesale fishing. Id. at 51. 10. Other courts have agreed with this Courts conclusion. See, e.g., In re Premier

Intl Holdings, Inc., 423 B.R. 58, 75 (Bankr. D. Del. 2010) (denying a motion to compel performance of Rule 2019 obligations and stating the Official Committee, by filing its motion, is clearly engaged in a litigation tactic to apply pressure on it[s] current adversary, the Informal Committee of SFO Noteholders, as well as attempting to make an end run around a previous ruling denying the Official Committees request for discovery seeking virtually the same information); 50-Off, 213 B.R. at 659-60 ([u]nder the facts of this particular case, this Court believes that a litigants seeking to obtain information from a retention hearing involving the

{D0197698.1 }

litigants opposing counsel is an improper purpose within the meaning of that term as used in Nixon, so that access should be denied). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the ACCs respectfully request that this Court refuse to allow Garlock to intervene in the above-captioned Bankruptcy Cases. Dated: March 11, 2011
CAMPBELL & LEVINE, LLC /s/ David B. Salzman Douglas A. Campbell (PA I.D. No. 23143) Philip E. Milch (PA I.D. No. 53519) David B. Salzman (PA I.D. No. 39360) 1700 Grant Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Telephone: (412) 261-0310 Facsimile: (412) 261-5066 dac@camlev.com dbs@camlev.com pem@camlev.com CAPLIN & DRYSDALE, CHARTERED Peter Van N. Lockwood Trevor W. Swett Kevin C. Maclay One Thomas Circle, NW Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 862-5000 Facsimile: (202) 429-3301 E-mail: tws@capdale.com; pvnl@capdale.com kcm@capdale.com

Respectfully submitted,
CAMPBELL & LEVINE, LLC /s/ Mark T. Hurford Marla R. Eskin (DE Bar No. 2989) Mark T. Hurford (DE Bar No. 3299) 800 N. King Street, Suite 300 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 426-1900 Facsimile: (302) 426-9947 meskin@camlev.com mhurford@camlev.com

CAPLIN & DRYSDALE, CHARTERED Elihu Inselbuch 375 Park Avenue, 35th Floor New York, NY 10152-3500 Telephone: (212) 319-7125 Facsimile: (212) 644-6755 E-mail: ei@capdale.com

Counsel for the Official Committees of Asbestos Claimants

{D0197698.1 }

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ACandS, Inc. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Combustion Engineering, Inc. The Flintkote Company Kaiser Aluminum Corp. Owens Corning US Mineral Products Company USG Corp. W.R. Grace & Co. Debtors. IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA In re: Mid-Valley, Inc. North American Refractories Co. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. Debtors. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on March 11, 2011, I caused a copy of the Objection of The Official Committees of Asbestos Claimants in the Flintkote, Grace, NARCO and Pittsburgh Corning Bankruptcies to Garlocks Motion to Intervene for Limited Purpose of Seeking Access to Judicial Records to be served upon the individuals on the attached service lists by electronic mail. Respectfully submitted, Case No.: 03-35592 (Rel. Dkt. No. 2790) Case No.:02-20198 (Rel. Dkt. No. 6997) Case No.:00-22876 (Rel. Dkt. No. 8161) Case No.: 02-12687 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3659) Case No.: 00-4471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 10720) Case No.: 03-10495 (Rel. Dkt. No.3399) Case No.: 04-11300 (Rel. Dkt. No.5692) Case No.: 02-10429 (Rel. Dkt. No. 10043) Case No.: 00-3837 (Rel. Dkt. No.20980) Case No.: 01-2471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3896) Case No.: 01-2094 (Rel. Dkt. No. 12616) Case No.: 01-1139 (Rel. Dkt. No. 26356)

Dated: March 11, 2011

/s/ David B. Salzman David B. Salzman PA ID No. 39360 CAMPBELL & LEVINE, LLC 1700 Grant Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 T: 412-261-0310/ F: 412-261-5066 Email: dbs@camlev.com

Gregory W. Werkheiser, Esquire Matthew B. Harvey, Esquire Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LP 1201 North Market Street, 18th Floor P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 Tel: 302-658-9200/ Fax: 302-658-3989
gwerkheiser@mnat.com

mharvey@mnat.com Garland S. Cassada, Esquire Richard C. Worf, Jr. , Esquire Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson 101 North Tryon Street, Suite 1900 Charlotte, NC 28246 Tel: 704-377-8317/ Fax: 704-373-3917 gcassada@rbh.com rworf@rbh.com

Arthur H. Stroyd, Jr. , Esquire Richard A. Swanson, Esquire Del Sole Cavanaugh Stroyd LLC The Waterfront Building 200 First Avenue, Suite 300 Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Tel: 412-261-2393/ Fax: 412-261-2110 astroyd@dscslaw.com rswanson@dscslaw.com Daniel K. Hogan, Esquire The Hogan Firm 1311 Delaware Avenue Wilmington, Delaware 19806 Tel: 302-656-7540/ Fax: 302-656-7599 dkhogan@dkhogan.com

Peter J. Ashcroft, Esquire Bernstein Law Firm, P.C. Suite 2200 Gulf Tower Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Tel: 412-456-8107/ Fax: 412-456-8255 Email: pashcroft@bernsteinlaw.com

Sander L. Esserman, Esquire David A. Klingler, Esquire David J. Parsons, Esquire Cliff I. Taylor, Esquire Stutzman, Bromberg, Esserman & Plifka 2323 Bryan Street, Suite 2200 Dallas, Texas 75201 Tel: 214-969-4900/ Fax: 214-969-4999 Esserman@sbep-law.com Klingler@sbep-law.com parsons@sbep-law.com taylor@sbep-law.com Ellen C. Brotman, Esquire Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Avenue of the Arts Philadelphia, PA 19109 ebrotman@mmwr.com

Natalie D. Ramsey, Esquire Laurie A. Krepto, Esquire Montgomery, Mccracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 S. Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19109 Tel: 215-772-1500/ Fax: 215-772-7620 nramsey@mmwr.com lkrepto@mmwr.com

Joseph F. Rice, Esquire John Baden, Esquire Motley Rice LLC 28 Bridgeside Blvd. Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 Tel: 843-216-9000/ Fax: 843-216- 9430 jrice@motleyrice.com jbaden@motleyrice.com

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In re: PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, Debtor.

Chapter 11 Case No. 00-22876-JKF

SERVICE LIST EFFECTIVE 9/8/2010 Counsel to Pittsburgh Corning Corporation James J. Restivo, Jr., Esquire Rosalie J. Bell, Esquire Pittsburgh Corning Corporation Reed Smith LLP 800 Presque Isle Drive Reed Smith Center Pittsburgh, PA 15239-2779 225 Fifth Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Tel: 724-733-3838/ Fax: 724-387-3809 Tel: 412-288-3122/ Fax: 412-288-3063 Email: rose_bell@pghcorning.com Email: jrestivo@reedsmith.com David Ziegler, Esquire Reed Smith LLP Douglas E. Cameron, Esquire Reed Smith Center Reed Smith LLP 225 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1200 Reed Smith Center Pittsburgh, PA 15222 225 Fifth Avenue Tel: 412-288-3026/ Fax: 412-288-3063 Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Email: dziegler@reedsmith.com Tel: 412-288-4104/ Fax: 412-288-3063 Email: dcameron@reedsmith.com Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos Creditors Elihu Inselbuch, Esquire Douglas A. Campbell, Esquire Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered Email: dac@camlev.com 375 Park Avenue, 35th Floor Philip E. Milch, Esquire New York, NY 10152-3500 Email: pem@camlev.com Tel: 212-319-7125/ Fax: 1-212-644-6755 Campbell & Levine, LLC Email: ei@capdale.com 1700 Grant Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Peter Van N. Lockwood, Esquire Tel: 412-261-0310/ Fax: 412-261-5066 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered One Thomas Circle N.W. Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202-862-5000/ Fax: 1-202-429-3301 Email: pvnl@capdale.com

Counsel to Official Committee of Trade Creditors David W. Lampl, Esquire Leech, Tishman, Fuscaldo & Lampl, LLC Citizens Bank Building, 30th Floor 525 William Penn Place Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Tel: 412-261-1600/ Fax: 412-227-5551 Email: dlampl@leechtishman.com Counsel to Shareholders Counsel to PPG Industries, Inc. Peter J. Kalis, Esquire Email: peter.kalis@klgates.com David A. Murdoch, Esquire Email: david.murdoch@klgates.com Neal R. Brendel, Esquire Email: neal.brendel@klgates.com David F. McGonigle, Esquire Email: david.mcgonigle@klgates.com K&L Gates, LLP 210 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Tel: 412-355-6500/ Fax: 412-355-6501 Counsel to Corning Incorporated Kimberly Luff Wakim, Esquire Cheryl A. Heller, Esquire Thorp Reed & Armstrong Ward Greenberg Heller & Reidy LLP th One Oxford Centre, 14 Floor 300 State Street 301 Grant Street Rochester, NY 14614 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Tel: 585-454-0719/ Fax: 585-231-1905 Tel: 412-394-7711/ Fax: 412-394-2555 Email: cheller@wardgreenberg.com Email: kwakim@thorpreed.com Counsel to PNC Bank Brad Erens, Esquire Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue 77 West Wacker Chicago, IL 60601 Tel: 312-269-4050/ Fax: 1-312-782-8585 Email: bberens@jonesday.com Office of the United States Trustee Joseph M. Fornari, Jr., Esquire 970 Liberty Center 1001 Liberty Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Tel: 412-644-4756/ Fax: 412-644-4785 Email: Joseph.M.Fornari@USDOJ.GOV

Legal Representative for Future Claimants Mr. Lawrence Fitzpatrick 100 American Metro Blvd. Suite 108 Hamilton, NJ 08619 Tel: 609-219-8862/ Fax: 609-620-1466 Email: lfitzpatrick@theccr.com

Counsel to Legal Representative for Future Claimants Joel M. Helmrich, Esquire Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP One Oxford Centre 301 Grant Street; Suite 2800 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Tel: 412-288-5880/ Fax: 412-281-5055 Email: joel.helmrich@dinslaw.com James L. Patton Jr., Esquire Email: jpatton@ycst.com Edwin J. Harron, Esquire Email: eharron@ycst.com Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP The Brandywine Building, 17th Floor 1000 West Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Tel: 302-571-6600/ Fax: 302-571-1253

Others Robert Knights, Esquire C. Sanders McNew, Esquire Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Gertler, Gertler, Vincent & Plotkin 100 Maiden Lane 127-128 Carondelet Street New York, NY 10038 New Orleans, LA 70130 Tel: 212-558-5500/ Fax: 1-212-344-5461 Tel: 504-581-6411/ Fax: 1-504-581-6568 Email: rknights@ggvplaw.com Email: sandersm@aol.com R. Kenneth Willman, Esquire Thomas M. Crawford, Esquire Willman & Arnold Litchfield Cavo One Corporate Center 303 West Madison Street, Suite 200 5500 Corporate Drive, STE 150 Chicago, IL 60606 Pittsburgh, PA 15237 T: 312-781-6677/ F: 1-312-781-6630 T: 412-366-3333/ F: 412-366-3462 Email: Crawford@litchfieldcavo.com Email: kwillman@willmanlaw.com Jeffrey J. Leech, Esquire Robert A. Simon, Esquire Michael Shiner, Esquire Barlow Garsek & Simon, LLP Tucker Arensberg, P.C. 3815 Lisbon Street 1500 One PPG Place Fort Worth, TX 76107 Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Tel: 817-731-4500/ Fax: 817-731-6200 T: 412-594-5524/ F: 412-594-5619 Counsel to the Durhams Email: jleech@tuckerlaw.com Email: rsimon@bgsfirm.com Email: mshiner@tuckerlaw.com

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In re: NORTH AMERICAN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, et al., Debtors.

Chapter 11 Case No. 02-20198-JKF

OFFICIAL SERVICE LIST EFFECTIVE 9/8/2010 Office of the U.S. Trustee Attn: Kathy Robb, Esquire Liberty Center, Suite 970 1001 Liberty Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222 T: 412-644-4752/ F: 412-644-4785 Kathleen.robb@usdoj.gov Elihu Inselbuch, Esquire Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered 375 Park Avenue, 35th Floor New York, NY 10152-3500 T: 212-319-7125/ F: 212-644-6755 Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos Creditors ei@capdale.com Philip E. Milch, Esquire Campbell & Levine, LLC 1700 Grant Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 T: 412-261-0310/ F: 412-261-5066 Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos Creditors pem@camlev.com Robert P. Simons, Esquire Reed Smith LLP 225 Fifth Avenue, STE 2800 Pittsburgh, PA 15222 T: 412-288-7294/ F: 412-288-3063 Counsel to Debtors rsimons@reedsmith.com Peter Van N. Lockwood, Esquire Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered One Thomas Circle, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-5802 T: 202-862-5000/ F: 202-429-3301 Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos Creditors pvnl@capdale.com Robert G. Sable, Esquire Sally Edison, Esquire McGuire Woods, LLP Dominion Tower, 23rd Floor 625 Liberty Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222 T: 412-667-7936/ F: 412-667-6050 Counsel to Official Committee of Unsecured Trade Creditors sedison@mcquirewoods.com rsable@mcguirewoods.com

Jon A. Allegretti, Esquire North American Refractories Company Cherrington Corporate Center 400 Fairway Drive Moon Township, PA 15108 T: 412-375-6674 F: 412-375-6957 jallegretti@capdale.com Peter J. Sacripanti, Esquire Stephen B. Selbst Esquire McDermott, Will & Emery 50 Rockefeller Plaza New York NY 10020 Tel: 212 547 5583 Fax: 1-212-547-5444 Counsel to Honeywell International psacripanti@mwe.com sselbst@mwe.com Joel M. Helmrich, Esquire Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP One Oxford Centre, Suite 2800 301 Grant Street Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Tel: 412-288-5880 Fax:412-281-5055 Counsel to the Legal Representative for Future Claimants joel.helmrich@dinslaw.com

Daniel M. Lewis, Esquire Arnold & Porter 555 12th Street NW Washington, DC 20004-1206 Tel. 202-942-5661 Fax. 202-942-5999 Counsel to Honeywell International daniel_lewis@aporter.com Mr. Lawrence Fitzpatrick 100 American Metro Blvd. Suite 108 Hamilton, NJ 08619 Tel: 609-219-8862 Fax: 609-620-1466 lfitzpatrick@theccr.com Legal Representative for Future Claimants James L. Patton Jr., Esquire Edwin J. Harron, Esquire Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP The Brandywine Building, 17th Floor 1000 West Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Tel: 302-571-6600 Fax: 302-571-1253 Counsel to the Legal Representative for Future Claimants jpatton@ycst.com eharron@ycst.com

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In re:
MID-VALLEY, INC., et ai., Debtors.

) ) ) ) ) )

Jointly Administered at Case No. 03-35592 JKF Chapter 11

OFFICIAL SERVICE LIST EFFECTIVE 01/06/05

Albert O. Cornelison Executive Vice President & General Counsel Halliburton Company 1401 McKinney, Suite 2400 Houston, TX 77010 Ph: 713.759.2620 Fax: 713.759.2622 Email: bert.comelison@halliburton.com

Bruce Stanski Senior Vice President and CFO Kellogg Brown & Root 4100 Clinton Drive Houston, TX 77020 Ph: 713.753.4908 Fax: 713.753.2017 Email: bruce.stanski@halliburton.com

Counsel to Mid-Valley, Inc., et ale

Jeffrey N. Rich, Esquire K&L Gates LLP 599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022-6030 Ph: 212.536.4097 Fax: 212.536.3901 Email: jeff.rich@k1gates.com Michael G. Zanic, Esquire K&L Gates LLP Henry W. Oliver Building 535 Smithfield Street Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Ph: 412.355.6219 Fax: 412.355.6501 Email: michael.zanic@k1gates.com

Frank H. Griffm, ill, Esquire Gollatz, Griffm & Ewing Four Penn Center, Suite 200 1600 John F. Kennedy Boulevard Philadelphia, PA 19103-2803 Ph: 215.563.9400 Fax: 215.665.9988 Email: fgriffin @ggelaw.com

Accountants & Financial Consultants to Mid-Valley, Inc.. et ale

Thomas D. Bibby Mesirow Financial Consulting, LLC 717 North Harwood Street Suite 3100 Dallas, TX 75201 Ph: 214.840.2479 Fax: 214.840.2180 Email: tbibby@mesirowfinancial.com Dr. Francine K. Rabinovitz Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Alschuler, Inc. 26384 Carmel Rancho Lane, Suite 202 Carmel, CA 93923 Ph: 831.626.1350 Fax: 831.626.1351 Email: frabinov@aol.com

PI-I088388 vI

Counsel to Committee of Asbestos Creditors Peter Van N. Lockwood, Esquire Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered One Thomas Circle N.W. Washington, DC 20005 Ph: 202.862.5000 Elihu Inselbuch, Esquire Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered 375 Park Avenue, 35th Floor New York, NY 10152-3500 Ph: 212.319.7125 Fax: 212.644.6755 Email: ei@capdale.com

Fax:

202.429.3301

Email: pvnl@capdale.com Philip E. Milch, Esquire Campbell & Levine, LLC 1700 Grant Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Ph: 412.261.0310

Fax:

412.261.5066

Email: pem@camlev.com

Counsel to Halliburton and RESI Jack L. Kinzie, Esquire Michael C. Li, Esquire Baker Botts LLP 2001 Ross Avenue Dallas, TX 75201 Ph: 214.953.6500 Tony M. Davis, Esquire Baker Botts LLP One Shell Plaza 910 Louisiana Houston, TX 77002-4995 Ph: 713.229.1234 Fax: 713.229.1522 Email: tony.davis@bakerbotts.com

Fax:

214.953.6503

Email: jack.kinzie@bakerbotts.com Email: michae1.li@bakerbotts.com Email: bankruptcydallas@bakerbotts.com

Office of the U.S. Trustee

Counsel to Legal Representative for Future Claimants James L. Patton Jr., Esquire Edwin J. Harron, Esquire Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP The Brandywine Building, 17th Floor 1000 West Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Ph: 302.571.6600 Fax: 302.571.1253 Email: ipatton@ycst.com Email: eharron@ycst.com Joel M. Helmrich, Esquire Dinsmore & Shohl LLP One Oxford Centre 301 Grant Street, Suite 2800 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Tel: 412-288-5880 Fax: 412-281-5055 Email: joel.helmrich@dinslaw.com

Joseph Sisca, Esquire Office of the U.S. Trustee 970 Liberty Center 1001 Liberty Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Ph: 412.644.4756

Fax:

412.644.4785

Email: joseph.s.sisca@usdoj.gov

John W. Burns. Esquire Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C. Two PPG Place - Suite 400 Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Ph: 412.392.5413 Fax: 412.392.5367 Email: burnsj@dmclaw.com

Mark D. Plevin, Esquire Clifton S. Elgarten, Esquire Frederick W. Claybrook, Jr., Esquire Leslie A. Epley, Esquire James T. Hubler. Esquire Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004-2595 Ph: 202.624.2500 Fax: 202.628.5116 Email: mplevin@crowell.com Email: celgarten@crowell.com Email: rclaybrook@crowell.com Email: lepley@crowell.com Email: jhubler@crowell.com Paul R. Koepff, Esquire Tancred V. Schiavoni, Esquire O'Melveny & Myers LLP Times Square Tower 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Ph: 212.326.2000 Fax: 212.326.2061 Email: pkoepff@omm.com Email: tschiavoni@omm.com Duane Morse, Esquire Nancy Manzer, Esquire Linda Chanow, Esquire Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & DOff LLP 1600 Tysons Boulevard 10th Floor Tysons Comer, VA 22102 Ph: 703.251.9700 Fax: 703.251.9797 Email: duane.morse@wilmerhale.com Email: nancy.manzer@wilmerhale.com Email: linda.chanow@wilmerhale.com Vinita K. Sinha, Esquire DKW Law Group LLC 58 th Floor, US Steel Tower 600 Grant Street Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Ph: 412.355.2600 Fax: 412.355.2609 Email: vsinha@dkwlaw.com

Steven P. Rice, Esquire Crowell & Moring LLP 3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor Irvine, CA 92614-8505 Ph: 949.263.8400 Fax: 949.263.8414 Email: srice@crowell.com

Philip D. Anker. Esquire Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & DOff LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Ph: 212.230.8800 Fax: 212.230.8888 Email: philip.anker@wilmerhale.com

Katherine Worthman, Esquire James A. Shepherd, Esquire Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & DOff LLP 2445 M. Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20037 Ph: 202.663.6000 Fax: 202.663.6363 Email: katherine.worthman@wilmerhale.com Email: james.shepherd@wilmerhale.com Dennis R. Very, Esquire Pepper Hamilton LLP 500 Grant Street, 50th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15219-2502 Ph: 412.454.5000 Fax: 412.281.0717 Email: veryd@pepperlaw.com

Thomas H. Grace, Esquire W. Steven Bryant, Esquire Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP 3400 Chase Tower, 6600 Travis Street Houston, TX 77002-3095 Ph: 713.226.1200 Fax: 713.223.3717 Email: tgrace@lockeliddell.com Email: sbryant@lockeliddell.com