Timur Abimanyu,SH.

MH

Ombudsman the Republic of Indonesia (ORI) as the Whistle Blowers are protected by Supreme Court Circular No. 04 Year 2011 and Law Number. 31 Year 1999

VS
Member of Commission II / S Miriam House Budget Agency Haryanu plans to report the Secretary General of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia (ORI) Suhariyono to the Jakarta Police on Monday (10/17/2011) this afternoon. Miriam thought Suhariyono doing good libel. Riyan, staff Miriam, who was met at the Central Office page Jakarta Police Service Police around 11:00, saying, Miriam will report accompanied by its legal counsel, Elza Syarief. In a press release distributed Riyan disclosed, Miriam good defamation lawsuit filed after Suhariyono not respond positively to requests for clarification of its legal counsel filed last week. The invitation asked for clarification at the office of Chairman of Elza Syarief was answered Dadang ORI number 479/ORI-SRT/X/2011 Girindrawardhana by letter dated October 12, 2011, addressed to Elza Syarief, said they could not meet the invitation clarification because the problem is already reported to the Board of Honor House of Representatives. "As Secretary of ORI did not respond positively to our warnings, today we are suing through the court process. Therefore, the question has been defamed me personally, even the House of Representatives Budget Agency. While the process in the House of Representatives of the Honorary let it continue, I remain respect, "he said, as quoted in the press release. Legal steps taken by Miriam, who is also deputy secretary general of the DPP Hanura, it is to respond to all statements contained Suhariyono various media since last October signaled the existence of the game in a related discussion of 2011 State Budget, in which Miriam Haryani accused of asking a fee in the form of commitment to the project ORI budget could be granted. He acknowledged the Secretary-General had called ORI Suhariyono to his office. At that time members of Commission II of DPR is requested that ORI revised the Work Plan for the Ministry Institute (RKKL) filed because inputs must contain the results of the Plenary Session of the Commission II of the Parliament that have not been included in these RKKL. "It does not violate the code of ethics because it took place at round 13:00 hours," said Miriam. And related to that problem, according to data inilah.com, Member of Parliament from Fraction II Commission Hanura, Miriam S Haryani cast a subpoena to the Secretary General of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia (ORI), with charges of libel against him. "The accusation has not only defame me personally, but also pollute the institution of Commission II and the House of Representatives Budget Agency highlighted that many people lately. With a subpoena, I want to straighten out the whole sit the real issue, that the allegation was untrue, and it was all a mere slander, "he explained. He further said if Suhariyono not respond positively to the subpoena, then he would bestow this defamation through legal process.

===================
Illustration By Timur Abimanyu, SH.MH Personally, Secretary General of the Ombudsman law Padangan Republic of Indonesia (ORI) did not give a positive response from members of the Commission upon subpoena II / House Budget Agency (Miriam S Haryanu), because in this case is only new in the realm of issues (gray area) are remains to be proven to be true. If the case is forwarded to the Jakarta Police, then a legal conflict that occurred on the House Budget Agency (Miriam S Haryanu) with the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia will be reversed, because it opens wide ugliness (play game) of the House Budget Board itself. Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia (ORI) as a Whistle Blower by virtue of Supreme

Court Circular No. 04 Year 2011 concerning the treatment for Crime reporting (Whistle Blower) and witness the same actors who work in certain criminal acts and the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia should take action reporting agency Agaran House of Representatives (Miriam S Haryanu) has undertaken an effort to negotiate on the budget the state. With based on Law no. 31 of 1999 on Combating Criminal Acts of Corruption and the Law. 46 Year 2009 on the Corruption Court, the House Budget Agency (Miriam S Haryanu) can be layered meshes with the article, especially in the chapters that diataur by Law no. 31 of 1999 ie Article 1 paragraph (1) which is a corporate crime, Article 2 paragraph (1) s / d (4), (ie efforts to enrich themselves, article 12 jo Article 419, 420, 423, 425 and 435 The Book of Law Penal Code. And on one side of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia (ORI) as a Whistle Blower by virtue of Supreme Court Circular No.. 04 In 2011, have legal protection provided for by Law no. 31 of 1999 article 42 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) in an effort to do prevention, eradication or uncovering corruption. Based on the fact the ground that the Budget Agency has not had a good name, because it was extremely loud talk on electronic media (TV), which the House Budget Board games and this was answered by the behavior of Fahri Hamzah who want to dissolve the Commission and now her own volition Fahri Hamzah Commission XI had moved to economics .... there is this .. ? If Pemberataan Corruption Commission (KPK) response ... Commission should examine Miriam S Haryanu (House Budget Agency) .....!!!!!!! sources of data : http://www.google.com http://www.Kompas.com http://www.inilah.com http://www.Mahkamahagung.go.id http://www.yahoo.com