Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
October 2006
THE NASA STI PROGRAM OFFICE . . . IN PROFILE Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the advancement of aeronautics and space science. The NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) Program Office plays a key part in helping NASA maintain this important role. The NASA STI Program Office is operated by Langley Research Center, the lead center for NASAs scientific and technical information. The NASA STI Program Office provides access to the NASA STI Database, the largest collection of aeronautical and space science STI in the world. The Program Office is also NASAs institutional mechanism for disseminating the results of its research and development activities. These results are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which includes the following report types: TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of completed research or a major significant phase of research that present the results of NASA programs and include extensive data or theoretical analysis. Includes compilations of significant scientific and technical data and information deemed to be of continuing reference value. NASAs counterpart of peer-reviewed formal professional papers but has less stringent limitations on manuscript length and extent of graphic presentations. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientific and technical findings that are preliminary or of specialized interest, e.g., quick release reports, working papers, and bibliographies that contain minimal annotation. Does not contain extensive analysis. CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and technical findings by NASA-sponsored contractors and grantees. CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected papers from scientific and technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other meetings sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, or historical information from NASA programs, projects, and mission, often concerned with subjects having substantial public interest. TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. Englishlanguage translations of foreign scientific and technical material pertinent to NASAs mission.
Specialized services that complement the STI Program Offices diverse offerings include creating custom thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results . . . even providing videos. For more information about the NASA STI Program Office, see the following: Access the NASA STI Program Home Page at http://www.sti.nasa.gov E-mail your question via the internet to help@sti.nasa.gov Fax your question to the NASA Access Help Desk at (301) 621-0134 Telephone the NASA Access Help Desk at (301) 621-0390 Write to: NASA Access Help Desk NASA Center for AeroSpace Information 7121 Standard Hanover, MD 21076-1320
NASA/TP2006213725
October 2006
Available from: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information 7121 Standard Drive Hanover, MD 21076-1320 301-621-0390 National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 703-605-6000
CREW
STATION
ASPECTS
OF MANNED
SPACECRAFT
DESIGN
!"
, Purdue
THESIS Submitted for the degree University in partial fulfillment of the requirements Engineering 1972
Industrial of the
Urbana-Champaign,
Urbana,
Illinois
ii
1i
U>J--cl_P-7[
UNIVERSITY OF THE
_
ILLINOIS GRADUATE
_'
AT
"<
URBANA-CHAMPAIGN
"
COLLEGE
i; January, 1972 li
I HEREBY
RECOMMEND
THAT
THE
THESIS
PREPARED
UNDER
MY
!4
SUPERVISION
BY_
JERRY
RONALD
GOODMAN
i!':
! .
ENTITLED BE ACCEPTED
CREW IN
STATION PARTIAL
ASPECTS
OF MANNED
SPACECRAFT OF THE
DESIGN FOR
II i7 ii
1
1
FULFILLMENT
REQUIREMENTS
Ii ii
Head of Department
[i i
.?omI_l_on
concurred
in*
'<i
171
% \
'i
Committee ['i
on
Final Examination-_
[i
'li
i t
!,i
Required for doctor's degree but not /or master's. ! t[ Id
DS_Z
i_
iii
ACKNCWLEDGMENTS
This graduate
thesis program I
was for
made
possible of
by
Center
a Master
Science
sponsorship appear in in
obtaining
of the and
this
documents my views
of experience as a result
with of
This
thesis and
sents in any
and
this
experience
way
official
position of to
or viewpoint. NASA, write Aaron in who The and who strongly of and this this
Richard do
graduate Joseph
a thesis Cohen,
also
thank
Goldstein, I am
also
for to
support
achieving was
especially my work
Loftus, Program.
during
Apollo been
liaisc_ greatly
of Miss me in
Jeanie
Walker
of NASA
significant
materials to
for
this and of my
acknowledge suggestions
helpful The of
advice and
and
Hertig. Department
advice Psychology
Robert
Williges
of the
and
I wish patience
wife time
during
"pregn_mt"
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Crew Station Desi@n ....................................... Preview of Thesis Contents ................................. CHAPTER I CREW STATION DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT: CONTROL _qD MANAGEMENT .....
2 5
36
Crew
Station
Organization
.......................
36 37 38 41 44 45 46 46 61 82 114 115 122 126 151 164 167 176 177 180
General
.................................
General NASA and S/C Contractor Responsibilities ....... Specific S/C Contractor Responsibilities ................ Flight Crew Support Teams ............................... S/C Design S/C S/C S/C S/C Contractor Requirements Design Support and Teams ............................. Configuration Documentation Control ..............
Requirements
...................
Configuration Control ................................ to GFE Interface Configuration Control .............. and Configuration Reviews ..................
Development
Mockup Utilization ....................................... Flight Crew Participation ................................ Crew Station Review Perspective .......................... Preliminary Design Reviews ............................... Critical Design Reviews .................................. Crew Compartment Stowage Reviews ......................... S/C Bench Layout Reviews ................................ Crew Compartment Fit and Function Equipment Interface Test ........................................ Other Crew Station Reviews ............................... II GENERAL INTERNAL CREW STATION LAYOUT/CONFIGURATION REQUIREMENTS ................................................. Total Crew Functional Volume ............................... 7 Stowage/C_npartment ................................
186 186
198
Page
Basic Factors .......................................... 198 201 203 205
Habitability ........................................... Equipment and Stowage Arrangement ...................... Task Analysis and Detailed Requirements ................
Crew Size/Anthropometrz_ Mobilitz_ and Visibility Requirements ........................................... Crew Size/Anthropometric Criteria for Spacecraft Design .............................................. Clothing Effects on Size ............................... Suit Crew and Suited Capabilities Closeout ........................... ......................
206
206 231 231 257 257 261 265 266 266 271 279 279 283 297 301 307
Cempartment Panels
Provisions
Closeout
or Provisions
..........................
Debris/Equipment Traps and Nets ........................ Wire/Tubing Protection ................................. Windows ................................................... S/C Use/Design and T and ................................. Requirements Protrusion ..................... Hazards ..............
Functions Corners
Basic Factors .......................................... Recommended Criteria ................................... III RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ..............................
BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDICES
........................................................ ..........................................................
1
INTRODUCTION
manpower, Apollo
money,
design (CM)
and
were station
Con_nand
Module
Module systems
with
their
station,
crew
compartment, interfaces,
interior
cabin,
a crewman _ich or
interface. monitors,
It or which
includes is
hardware to
a crewman sustain
required (EVA) is
support
extravehicular of the
activity
a design any
the
crew-S/C includes
interface the
and
additional operations
hardware.
station to
also satisfy
man-machine
design, the
systems, has in
crewman are,
examples station
substations
S/C's
station. systems
crew
subsystems
with
engineering,
anthropometry,
related at
factors. of this section, of the Apollo and crew are crew CM figures stations and LM and photos which S/C. as the the to
Mercury, Voskhod,
Vostok,
Salyut. stations,
This and
information serves as
shows
configurations material
of
current later
a reference
presented
the
text.
Station
Design station had as its predecessors and Design The controls, ensure are more in other of
interior
crew
designs
aircraft or
automobile living
interiors or work in an
differs of a crew
these is
station
essential
support and
goals, and
qhese
training
the
other played
systems. a more
programs, to the
role
present to High
generation
required
a S/C
relative
onboard systems to
power,
provision
for
essential crew
performance control
hardware
active the be
missions station.
occupies_ These
critical visually
on-duty
instruments W. are J.
physically
that for
spacecraft
similar
aircraft_ as be in
since aircraft.
performance variety
space other
initially equipment
to be
same must
A wide to
provisions
carried
onboard
support
mission
tasks_
IW. J. North, "Crew Station Design Engineering Design and C_eration_ Norman F. Smith (eds. (New York:
and Operation,_! in Manned Spacecraft: Paul E. Purser_ Maxime A. Faget, and Fairchild Publications, 1964), pp. 169-78.
operations, of the
and
normal crewmen
crew are
living exposed
and to
For
the
greatest
position to an
design spacecraft
layout in
similar
these to
needs
those
high
performance in a relatively or
aircraft. speedy
resulted redundant
without and
need
for In
systems
supplies and
Apollo
sufficient provided
supplies,
equipment crew
appropriate 14-day an
redundancy to
sustaining and
roundtrip
Guidance within
additional stations of
primary also
work
station
the
Volume stowage of
rest
were
provided.
Equipment and
because required relatively stations The give and only should dictated cabin
limited
cabin,
:flight
equipment Skylab to
support
larger
Orbiting a primary
space
stations by
should efficient or
which
activity, of
those
current
landing new
requirements. design
large where
expanse in
free S/C,
volume
present
requirements,
the Apollo
the
limited
volumes
offered in zero
the
crewman
natural
restraints
and
aided
free-
gravity. CM and LM crew was and stations use was evolutionary. for design A An
the the
Apollo
program formal
and
informal onboard
reviews. is either
carried
Furnished
Equipment,
GFE),
or procontrol
the
prime of
stowage of in
suppliers establishing
prodigious; cow,non
standards
Interface for
control these
specifications In
satisfying with a
requirements.
development, a degree
specific
mission, in its
it undergoes and
of missionproare
oriented vision
stowage
hardware drawing
the
provisions
actual
fidelity and
mockups formal
configured of this
a full-up
reviews
crews. actual
mission of crew
reviews check to
hardware. and
These
function
operational to
interfaces flight
assure
adequacy.
tests
essential
verify
readiness
crew to
station
and when
identification be readily
of fixed
fit
or
function affecting
problems the
prior
flight,
without
mission.
Preview This maintaining interfaces, requirements to NASA start this thesis discusses
of
Thesis
Contents which have prow_d and ils and successful hardware detailed My Sam efforts C. Phillips, Apollo In in
management control of
tools the
configuration and, to
crew
station of
a limited S/C
examples design
general _d Lt. to
station a letter
spurred
from
Apollo
Program
Director, Manned
Low, Texas. in
Manager,
NASA
(MSC),
Houston,
letter crew
General
Phillips the
"The space,
designing and
station
time
available, vehicle(s),
functional
requirement but to
with
operating
generally " He
recognized, went on
I do
not
feel
specifically in in
state and
that
"our
properly station
suggested of to the
a crew
"inclusion experienced
limitations
that and an
have .2
date
the
area
use.
outline
of would
crew
station time
extensive thesis
expertise. of
provides I have
a framework written a
a handbook chapter on
contents. station
complete
a crew
progri_m--that
2Letter MAO, to Mr. George M. Low, Apollo Program Manager, NASA Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston, Texas, from Sam C. Phillips, Lt. General, USAF, NASA Apollo Program Director, NASA Headquarters (Washington, D.. C.: March 17, 19 69 ).
i.
CREW
STATION
HANDBOOK
STATION
DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT: Organization
Responsibilities
Specific S/C Contractor Responsibilities Flight Crew Support Teams S/C Contractor Support Teams Requirements and Configuration Control
Design Requirements Documentation Configuration Control to GFE Interface Configuration Control and Configuration Reviews
C.
S/C i. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
Development
Mockup Utilization Flight Crew Participation Crew Station Review Perspective Preliminary Design Reviews Critical Design Reviews Crew Compartment Stowage Reviews S/C Bench Layout Reviews Crew Compartment Fit and Function/Crew Other Crew Station Reviews
Equipment
Interface
Test
CHAPTER A. B. Total
II--GENERAL Crew
INTERNAL
CREW
STATION
LAYOUT/C_FIGURATION
REQUIREMENTS
Functional
General i. 2. 3. 4.
Equipment, Factors
Basic
Stowage Arrangement and Detailed Requirements Mobility and Visibility for Requirements Design
C.
Crew 1.
Criteria
Spacecraft
Problems on Size
2.
Clothing
Effects
Table 3.
-Suited Capabilities
Dimensions
Suited Mobility Values Examples of Problems Supports: Design, Articulation, and Stroking
D. E. F.
Crew
Couches/Body and
Controls Crew i. 2. 3.
Displays/Subsystem Closeout or
Operations
Compartment Closeout
Provisions
Panels
G. H.
Flammability Windows I. 2.
Requirements
I.
J. K. L. M. N.
Transfer Stations
Hatch,
and
Tunnel
Provisions
and
Natural
Illumination and
and Cleanup
Visibility Provisions
Aids
Cleanliness and
Corners_
Protrusion
Hazards
Factors
Examples of Problems Recommended Criteria Environment and Environmental and Repair Control
O. P.
Cabin
Sparing,
i Maintenance,
III--DETAILED
CREW
STATION
DESIGNS
Controls
Mounting
Table B.
General
i. Alignment Marks 2Keying 3. Positioning Alignment C. Electrical i. 2. 3. 4. 5. D. Connections for and Wiring
Protection
Connectors
Keying/Alignment Dust/Humidity Covers Utility Outlets Moveable Cable: flexibility, Covering Provisions/Safety
protection, Locks
and
service
loops
Protective i. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Protection
and
Guards
Equipment
Protection/Covers
E. F. G. H.
Safety Static
Bracketry Body I. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Hygiene/Waste
Urine Collection Feces Collection Emesis Collection Body Cleansing/Cleanup Shaving Provisions Gravity Crewman Hardware Requirements Mobility, Stability, Retention, and Support Aids
I.
Zero i. 2
J.
NomenclatureMarkingsCoding i. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Color Coding in Design Shape Coding Crew Equipment Identification/Marking Instructive Decals/Placards Alignment Orientation Provisions Aids Crew Equipment Design
K.
Miscellaneous
Table
I continued-CHAPTER IV--STOWAGE
A. B.
Stowage Stowage I. 2. 3. 4.
Control
Function, Materials
Clearance
Factors
C.
General I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Modularization/Prepackaging Lockers/Compartments Cushions and other Containment Pouches/Bags Internal Restraint of Items Temporary or Interim Stowage Specific Provisions
Devices
Provisions
D.
Hardware:
CHAPTER
V--INFLIGHT
EVA
A.
Translation I. 2.
Aids
Requirements
B.
Crewman i. 2. 3. Foot
C.
EVA i. 2. 3.
Criteria Requirements
D. E.
Requirements
i0
Table F.
Positive Indications of Tether Attachments Hardware Removal Forces Thermal Coverings Design Requirements
G.
Specific i. 2. 3. 4. 5.
H.
EVA I. 2. 3.
and
CHAPTER
VI--CREW
STATION
REVIEW
RESULTS
AND
ANALYSIS
A. B. C. D.
of of of
Recommendations
Conclusions
II
to
crew I have
station singled
control, areas
and from in
In and
sample on
sections design
them. and
sections knowledge.
w_ry
style
content,
subject
requirements inferring to
crew
station
design, and
one lessons of
faces of these
the current
that future by
the
requirements However,
design
applied only be
some or
can be
:[unction
and
modified which
specific human
design basic
those These
factors
will normative
generally terms.
identified
"shall not
be"
attempted to other
relate
various
management However,
techniques such
and
tools
here and
applications.
applications
attention. experiences and in the Apollo Spacecraft Program, use other is made U.S.
draw
programs, station
related design
mockup It was
from
the
Apollo
Program.
primarily and
astronaut achieving
experience
engineering S/C
judgment
a successful
configuration.
Figure 1
Source: Results of First United States Orbital Spaceflight, NASA, February 20, 1962, p. 6
12
13
Figure
MERCURY
SPACECRAFT
CABIN
ARRANGEMENT
FLOOD
LIGRT
FAS'TRONAUTS
WINDG'N
M_N
w,_Dow
LIGHT
TAPE R PP.E5_URE
DISPLKf
Source:
"Results Flight,"
of
First
United
States 207
Manned p. 7.
Orbital
S]Dace
NASA,
February
19627
Figure 1
Source: Results of First United States Orbital Spaceflight, NASA, February 20, 1962, p. 6
14
15
Figure 4
Adapted from: R. M. Machel, et al., Crew Station and Extravehicular Equipment, Gemini Midprogram Conference (Houston, Texas: NASA, 1966) p. 58
16
Figure 5
Source: J. P. Loftus and R. L. Bond, "Crew Tasks and Trainings,, Lunar Landing Symposium
17
MODULE
+X
SPACECP_%FT
+Y
CONFIGURATION
ATTACHMENT (TYPIC_ L)
PITCH _
YAW C BAND ANT ST WASTEWATER S BAND ROLL ENGINES (TYPICAL) " AIR VENT
+X
+y
+Z _1_1 -Y -X LEFT HAND )RWARD EQUIPMENT BAY RIGHT HAND FORWARD EQUIPMENT LOWER
._TTENUATIONsTRUT
',1
AFT EQUIPMENT STORAGE BAY LEFT HAND EQUIPMENT BAY RIGHT HAND EQUIPMENT" BAY
AFT COMPARTMENT
AFT COMPARTMENT
SM-2,_-1274D
Source:
Apollo Operations Handbook, Block II Spacecraft, Vol. Spacecraft DescriDtion_ Apollo Document SID 66-1508 SM2A-03-Block p. 1-5. II-i (North _m_erican Aviation, January
I: 15, 1970,
19
20
Figure
8.
Details
of Apollo
CM Crew Station.
'_ .z-_.y
_ _ Q
R2 STOWAGE COMPARTMEN"
C)
' (_
OPTICSPANELI_I
LE_ mSPLAY KEYBOARD 140 PANEL _
\"
_\,
"'/
C)
(_
RSSTOWAGECOMPARTMENT
R4 STOWAGE COMPARTMENT
Q Q
_-_
_. OONT_O_PANELIRR E, TOWAGR_O_ARTMiNT(POOO) _
T_ANSLATION CONTROL LEB MOUNT
X \
HAND INTERMEDIATE
EQUIPMENTBAY
RIGHT
(_ I_
(_ (_ (_ (_ _'_ (_)
B3 STbWAGE COMpARTM[NT (CAMERA EQUip) B4 STOWAGE COMPARTMENT (CHLORINE EQUIP) B5 STOWAGE COMPARYMENT(CO2 ABSORBERS) R6 STOWAGECOMPAR?MENT (CO2 ARSORBERS) B7 STOWAG[ COMPARTMENT
,*
I_
!:
' _
AFTBULKHEAD(AB) (_
._ _4_ (_
RIGHTHAND !
i 1 '_" _'_ _ (_ * (_ ___ (_ _ (_
FIRE EXTIIRGUISHER
A3 STOWAGE A4 STOWAGE A5 STOWAGE LOOKER LOCKER LOCKER
_,_
AR STOWAGE LOCKER
'
'
Source:
Apollo
SID
II Spacecraft,
American
Vol. I:
Aviation,
Sp_cecraft
January 15,
Descri_t-ion, Apollo
1970) pp. 1-41,42.
Document
66-1508
(North
penuT%uoo _8 a,./nbT,_ TZ
Figure 9
22
23
24
'
LOCATION -- Z 27 b/Mk_l
KG.
NO.
ITEM I t4 15 16
NOMEhK,'LATURE Utility li_t o-.ty (2) 11.55 Curloi. (ram,rod) Mm, t I_.._
LOCATION
_ 25
PI_. IR
NO. .,FEt_IF'
114 112
4
m e_4 _dl ImedbNk
,AIm,m _"LM,
A_we PLSS
i:14
135 GFE 18
26
_17
IJOtim,,b_
O_ emblk_ m_f (C(_)
/_lmcV_% ,drd_
-J- Z 27 bdk_ad
cm_r
h,
_E
tma_ _w_
MIm_ I_S_
)35
21
Dmto_m_,,"k_,_
+ Z _ff bdkl_ad
115
I_E
emllmg_l_
I1_
10
t.m _--''_"
_m.ss
la_
_m
_.b._._o_*_@o,m)
... _,_,
:z: .
- _z%
I$1
.. _
....
Sl
_,._M_,Im.%._)
....
I0_
_,_
Source:
Figure
m
13
LM
CREWMEN
FLIGHT
POSITIONS
ibm
_--\
ASTRONAUT
FLIGHT
STATIONS
ASTRONAUT
FLIGHT STATION
ASTRONAUT
REST POSITIONS
RLSS DONNING
STATION
R._4.86
Source:
Apol!o Operations Handbook, LMA 790-3-LM_ (Bethpage, N. March 15, 1969), p. 1-17.
Vol. I: Aerospace
Spacecraft Corporation,
Photo 2
27
28
29
Key:
1 2 3 4
rings
for
ejection
seat's
parachute,
receptacles
Pilot's desk equipped with levers and switches for controlling the operation of the radio-telephonic system for regulating cabin temperature and for switching on manual controls and the retro-rocket, b TV cameras the other Instrument Porthole Cabin Mirror, Radio. Manual Food Clock. Unknown Ejection control seat knob. headrest. seat, which is reported spacecraft in a complete May 31, 1965, pp. to be capable circle, e 58,59. of c (two). One with a small panel with with camera with large-scale scale image, d revolving optical covering earth-globe, image en-face,
c 6 7 8 9 I0 Ii 12 13 14 15 16 not c 'Vzor' material orientation equipment device. inspection hatch, c visible in picture.
lining
rotatable.
control container.
handle c
for
yaw,
pitch,
and
roll
inputs,
c'd
aAviation
Technolo_,
Flight Royal
by J. 1961).
W.
Palmer
from
CKenneth flight
Gatland, in Color,
of Space-
Soviet Press,
The
First
Decade
(New
York:
eU.S.,
Senate
Committee
on Aeronautical
and
Space
Sciences,
Soviet
Space
10 11 12 2 13 14 15 1 1 16
Photo 7. USSR Voskhod 2 Spacecraft Crew Station (Modified Voskhod Spacecraft for Two-Man and EVA Operations) 5 2 4 3 1
9 Key: 1 Snow-White porolon paddinga 2 Oxygen/air umbilicals for 7 Porthole with 'Vzor optical cabin environmental control orientation device b 3 General control and display 8 Control stick pane] 9 Contoured couch 4 Instrument panel with switches for S/C orientation system
a
Adapted from: Opera Mundi & Novosti Agencies 5 Instrument panel with Globus (revolving Earth-globe), ships clock and other instruments Camera lens Porthole with Vzor optical orientation deviceb Control stick Contoured couch
6 7 8 9
William Shelton, Soviet Space Exploration, The First Decade (New York: Washington Square Press, 1968). b Kenneth Gatland, Manned Spacecraft (New York: Macmillan, 1967) p. 27. 31
Photo 6. USSR Voskhod 2 Spacecraft Crew Station Design, View of Main Displays 1 2 3
11
10
Key 1 Instrument panel with Globus, ships clock and other instruments 2 3 4 5 Pull tab for cover to EVA hatch Snow-white porolon padding TV camera TV screen and perhaps CRT display
6 7 8 9
Window, shown covered by shade General control and display panel TV camera Control stick (two shown)
Photo 5. USSR Voskhod 1 Spacecraft Crew Station, View of Left Hand Side of Cabin 2
Adapted from: Soviet Life Key: 1 2 3 4 Snow-white porolon padding. a Globus, revolving Earth globe. a Instrument panel with Globus, ships clock and other instruments. a Porthole with Vzor optical orientation device. b
William Shelton, Soviet Space Exploration, The First Decade (New York: Washington Square Press, 1968.
b
33
Photo 8. Soyuz 9 Spacecraft-Cosmonauts Cabin Simulator, with Cosmonauts Nikolayev and Sevastyanov. 3 4 5 2
11
10
6 9
8 Key: 1. Main cosmonauts controls and display panel 2. Hatch leading to orbital compartment 3. Device which appears to be a cabin fan 4. Porolon cabin lining 5. Right-hand porthole 6. Commanders position (center of cabin), contoured couch 7. Instruments, containers of film for still and motion picture photography and supply of magnetic tape installed in place of third couch normally in this locationa
a
Adapted from: Soviet Life 8. Hand controller for S/C translational thrusting 9. Hand controller for S/C rotational control (knob not shown) 10. Porthole with Vzor optical orientation device 11. Cathode ray tube for visual sighting of cocking or other display of information.
34
10 6
7 9
8 Adapted from: Aviation Week & Space Technology Key: 1. handrails for cosmonaut translation and restraint in zero gravity 2. S/C orientation nomenclature 3. Tunnel 4. Tie-down straps for equipment 5. Instructions , flight plan, or some other part of flight data file material 6. Controls and display panel 7. Couch/chair, similar to lawn chair 8. Cabin padding/closeout material, probably porolon 9. Seat with lap-belt restraint 10. Flashlight
35
36
Station crew
station equipment,
flight their
cabin To
provisions, design
accomplish
through
phases, and
verification, station
during
crew-to-S/C basic
tests,
applies
tactful
coercion.
as well numerous
design of
and
operations. and
interfaces or
disciplines It as is
potential that
essential,
therefore, an entity
station
accepted spans
a "station," of S/C
involving 1 To for
an integration this,
station, crew to
as well
direct group
support
station
central it must
explicitly design
these such
authority
direct
who
sibility.
Program,
1965.
37
to
NASA's
central to follow
the
flight
crew to
from
definition are
(KSC),
and
important
station they
assigned manage
interfaces
next
section management,
describes and
the
functions valuable
and
responsibilities for
of
station
offers
techniques
affecting
responsibilities.
Effort a crew and station facilities, by type program in in the development vehicle of military systems and 1965. separately of should a program be has
and
NASA
launch
recognized
documented Flight
Military Standard
Specification MSFC-STD-391,
Center
specify of the
a human overall In
program
part
submission plan
contract
award.
development,
a similar
This
plan
should
include
information
as
per
MIL-H-46855:
The plan, including human engineering test plans, must describe an integrated effort within the total project; it shall provide specific information to show how the Contractor will meet specified human engineering requirements during development including the design concepts to be utilized. engineering shall be The manner described. of demonstrating Other technical human and
administrative data pertinent to the program, furnished by the contractor the contract, requirements shall herein. [efleet
consideration
3Military Military
Requirements 1968.
for
38
of
the
Plan
shall
include below.
how
the
contractor
will
implement
of responsibility
listed
NASA
and
S/C
Contractor of
NASA-MSC
Program
Operations model
Systems of
Engineering crew
efforts the
required
a central NASA,s
organization, and as
of
management (GFE)
Government The to
and his
those
monitoring
a much
degree.
Crew
Station
Organization--Areas
of Responsibility
I.
Crew
Station
Desiqn
and
Inteqration
Areas I. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Controls
of
Crew compartment configuration Visual docking aids Cabin lighting Physiological criteria and limits Orbital EVA provisions Lunar surface EVA provisions
2.
3.
the integration, evaluation, and postflight analysis of these systems. Manage mockup reviews and stowage reviews at the contractor's facility. Integrate simulation, evaluation, and test requirements, establish program priorities, and monitor the resulting implementation.
39
Areas
of
Responsibility 4.
Functions Serve as single contact for MSC and 5. S/C point of elements on crew
contractors
station and integration. Establish and collate crew station design and interface requirements. Integrate subsystems managers' requirements. Monitor all crew compartmeht and stowage changes. Serve as scheduled with the chairman at regularly crew station meetings contractors.
6. 7. 8.
9.
Coordinate crew training equipment requirements and contractor mockup support programs. Assist responsible procurement of training equipment.
II.
Crew I. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Equipment
Desiqn
and
Inteqration I. Monitor the design, ment, testing, and of these systems. developevaluation
Space suits and EMU provisions Extravehicular provisions Crew operational equipment Crew personal equipment Biomedical monitoring equipment (Bioinstrumentation, dosimeters)
2.
Manage the program integration of the systems with the S/C contractor. Manage the interface design and control of the systems with the S/C contractor. Establish design and int_face requirements. Coordinate on or provide, as required, direction to the spacecraft contractor and to the MSC divisions concerning crew equipment interfaces and changes thereto.
3.
4. 5.
6.
Monitor
design
reviews,
tests,
4O
III.
Experiments Experiments
Inteqration integration into S/C i. Apollo Program office point of contact for flight crew integration and stowage of all experiments. Monitor reviews of experiment equipment installation and stowage into S/C.
2.
IV.
Mission i.
Operations
Inteqration crew i. Integrate mission requirements, detailed test objectives, and flight plan into design and test of crew equipment and crew station. Support mission planning and establish crew station design requirements planning objectives. 3. to meet
2. 3.
Overall suitability of station and spacecraft design for crew utilization Mission planning Hazardous testing
2.
Assure integration of the provisions required to implement Program Directives on hazardous testing.
V.
in
OCP's
and
Prelaunch
Testinq,
i. OCP,s
Assist vehicle manager in all areas of crew and crew equipment integration during S/C checkout and testing at the contractor and _SC.
VI.
Support i. 2. 3. 4. Crew
of
Vehicle
station
gration Crew equipment design and integration Experiments integration Crew station Specification Change Notice (SCN) and Interface Control Document (ICD) status
2.
station encompassing all areas of responsibility described above, for CARR, FRR's, and similar reviews. Manage the updating of Specification Change Notices and ICD status as required to support vehicle readiness reviews.
41
VII.
Support i.
of Confiquration
Manatement i. Review and coordinate on all requests for Engineering Change Proposals (RECP,s), and Engineering Change Proposals (ECP's), SCN's, and ICD changes affecting crew station or crew integration. Draft original stowage list for each S/C and define changes ments. 3. to stowage require-
2. 3. 4.
Configuration Control Panel and Configuration Control Board support Crew station/crew equipment ICD management Stowage list requirements and presentation to CCP/CCB Specification change review and maintenance
2.
Serve as focal point of contact between S/C contractor on stowage requirements and contractor changes.
VIII.
Fliqht i. 2. 3.
Mission
Support Assist ground team monitoring the flight to assure: i. Rapid assessment of potential problems or real problems which develop during the flight. 2. Provide crew station mockup in readiness for support of flight problems. 3. Provide recommendations on stowage location and method of stowage as required to support the mission. Use mockup as required for verification. Coordinate inputs before with MSC elements
submittal.
S/C
Contractor
shall
station. are
implementation on company
internal
assignment structure,
dependent
organizational
letter PMS/L696-67, from Kenneth S. Kleinknecht, Manager of Service Modules, Apollo Spacecraft Program NASA-MSC to Myers, Vice President Apollo Program Manager North American Inc., Space and Information Systems Division, May 12, 1967.
42
and
particular
functions
of
the
contractor's
arrangement containment
and
closures
b. c.
maintain
for
each
spacecraft
a stowage
drawing.
Prepare and maintain all Interface Control Documents for Government Furnished Crew Equipments and act as point of contact for all stowed GFE. Prepare and maintain for each spacecraft Operational Checkout Procedures (OCP) for use during Crew Compartment Stowage Review (CCSR), Crew Compartment Fit and Function test (CCFF), or Crew Equipment Interface Test and applicable portions of OCP's for Altitude Chamber Flight Readiness and other tests designated for to each flight crew participation. from coordination of the initial
d.
e.
Furnish
spacecraft,
stowage list until during the period, the contractor and ments, f. Act as etc. point of
flight, a crew station manager who shall, act as a single point of contact between NASA-MSC on all matters of stowed equip-
contact
for
definition configuration
of
crew
compartment of training
control
to
establish
suitable elements.
actuation
functional
maintain for each spacecraft a markings drawing all lettering, symbols, colors, and color or used within or on the spacecraft. with and
c.
3.
Flight a.
and
ground
crew
control
mechanisms
Provide and assure compliance to design criteria for forces, extent of movement, and direction of operation for all mechanical actuations to ensure capability of crew operation in all modes of crew operation for both development and design missions.
43
b.
Coordinate and maintain Interface Control Documents associate contractors as needed to standardize such conventions. and controls of and display and control elements other locations within or on
with
4.
Displays a.
on the the
b.
interfaces
between
the
display
and
control
elements and the sensing or active element within each subsystem to ensure functional integrity of the crew interface. Such control shall assure that measurement locations and and the uncertainties that suitable data. Such are are consistent with crew requirements nomenclature reflects the character control at shall points assure in that the active subsystem of
control consistent
elements
selected
with crew requirements reflects the character c. Design and develop for the spacecraft Design and functions. develop
nomenclature
and
controls
d.
crew
system
management
e.
Prepare and maintain appropriate Interface with associate contractors to standardize, terms, other abbreviations, lighting, movement appropriate design details. activity provisions
Control as far
conventions,
5.
Extra a.
vehicular
DeSign, develop, and test handrails, tether ment, stabilization devices, and other aids lation and task accomplishment.
points, to crew
deploytraris-
b.
Design, develop, and test active and passive lighting, lighting controls, and markings required for extra vehicular activity. station reviews station
6.
Crew a.
Develop and maintain an integrated plan for all crew and flight crew related mockup reviews and S/C tests. Plan i. shall include: as shown to and test. be integrated with related
Schedules, development
S/C
44
2.
Plans
for
the
contractor's
mockup
use
to
support
design
reviews, flight crew reviews, and mission to indicate method of supporting different as 3. dictated by various missions. for support preliminary
b.
Manage contractor's efforts to schedule, set up, crew station related reviews at the contractor's Prepare internal direction Crew Station Reviews. Monitor to crew various station to internal to ensure NASA as required to affect
all
c.
all
d.
efforts proper
to
implement to close
integration,
actions
taken
with
NASA
counterpart
to
ensure
proper
and
timely
that
contractor's
Crew
Support
Teams part of the mission. Station crew At station NASA-MSC, Flight The on the team organization these Crew is a flight are crew to
each Crew
assigned of the
team
Branch,
Division following:
Crew and
includes
a team
mission,
a clew 5
_t_tion This
engineer,
a crew
equipment before
engineer.
spacecraft
its on
This
serves
the
principal
contact
station:statds
Plan Crew
for
Skylab_!iRev_sion Division
A,
prepared Texas:
by
Crew
Station October
Support
(Houston,
NASA-MSC,
45
and team
flight to
crew
All and
crew to
station
are
with or
the
keep
them This
ensure that
that the
avoid aware
schedule
assures crew
changes a is,
early
flight
such.
Whenever his
involving to the
the
crew
station
at KSC
coordinated mockup
and
the the
trouble-
demonstrations
S/C
Contractor Initially
Support
during manager which was the
Teams the to CSM development, the the contractor to KSC was and asked remain In to provide
a crew until
station launch,
spacecraft few
done
first KSC
Apollo were
however,
contractor's (which in
so this by KSC
function personnel
parallels
team
facility. significant
initial
from be
the
required
few
flights
corn ex. pl
_m oug_uu_ Review
_=-_, Contractor's, Familiarity reviews. to NASA:and with Also, keep S/C contractor prepacking of crew Of the and station
Compartment
develops to the
them
station to
Such
benefit checkout
personnel,
shipped
and
installation.
46
Desiqn
Requirements
and
Confiquration
Control
S/C
Design Design
Documentation are are S/C specified in various in to documents the the contract Contract are during and developgradually of Inter-
broad design.
Statement in
specifications, Contract
requirements
included
Control design
Change
Authorizations,
technical
directions,
are with
initially effort in
well
defined, One
an
acceptable
received
less
generic[weakness of
design to
reviews clarify
I have reasons
involved
a product's do want. it
specific a S/C
requirements
NASA
rejects
does the of
satisfy
for set
finished initial
before
require-
is mandatory.
Statement
of Work
Definition/Description Contract defines and design Statement what the of Work contractor is part is of the initial to do, contract and the and
required
baseline
requirements.
Function/Utilization Crew Station If Plan the discussed program above entails should a new be included in this
of Work.
full-scale
development,
47
the
requirements
for
a crew
station
organization
as defined
should
be
included. If designs, be the the program is large enough and and involves development Mockup and of new Plan S/C
mockup
reviews, be
a separate tied
should to
required. Crew
should
appropriately
referenced
Station
Plan. aspects and portions of the are Statement provided of Work here as for the
subsequent of crew
Program efforts
an example docu-
kind
and
requirements
this
should I.
include: Specified requirements arrangement drawings, Review (CDR). Defined meeting and to prepare necessary general etc., in support of Critical
Design
2.
dates
for:
Requirements Review, Design Review, later final Mockup Review. 3. Included Logistics 4. trainers and and
Review, Reviews,
in
plan
submitted Plan.
under
Support
Mockup
Specified dates for the following documentation to be submitted: Organization Plan_ Program Plan_ General Test Plan_ Master End Item Specification Part I_ &u_ lU J- L_ILl Contract Technical Specification_ M_sLe_ ........ Specification Part face Specification II; and and the Performance and InterInterface Control Documents (ICD's). were:
5.
Included
in
mission
requirements
6NASA
Contract
NAS
9.1100,
Change
Authorization Texas:
No. NASA,
2333, Manned
LM-10
(Houston,
48
The
LM
shall
be
capable
of
accommodating
the
following
mission
requirements: o Standby in environments quiescent condition noted below. for periods of mission
First day of launch window Prelaunch Launch window orbit Translunar Lunar orbit 25 hrs. + earth 7 ii0 48
190 characteristics
hrs.
190
hrs.
o Return
o Performance The any vehicle mission shall bound be by designed to provide the following four d_id staytime capability cases: for performing
Payload
delta
V_iouity
i 300 0 350 54 at
Open bay payload # Other D/S payload # Lunar staytime hours The design to 30 are effect of sun angles to be determined.
49
6.
Design a.
requirements and
specified mechanisms
included:
modifications
shall
be
incorporated
as
change on LM-10 and subsequent S/C. be made inline as opposed to retrofit mum degree practical, (2) (3) LM-9 The will be the LM reference shall be baseline configured
Changes to the
modified
One descent stage corner able for payload stowage, Scientific Scientific interface
Equipment Bay; payload carried in the Equipment Bay will meet the present requirements. The payload for the corner
quadrant is not yet defined. Pending such definition, GAEC shall identify hard points for attachment and mass moment characteristics permissible.
P
b.
Crew (I)
provisions Provisions shall be made in the ascent stage the cabin longer
to provide suitable crew facilities for mission and increased cabin activity. (2) An improved ment system Provisions Support require battery c. Electronics Provisions cations. d. Fluids shall be made for shirtsleeve voice urine shall shall and PLSS condensate be provided. be included for ii
waste
manage-
(3)
Portable recharge
Life will
System
(PLSS)
recharges;
each
communi-
The ascent stage cabin environment shall be suitable for unsuited operations and sleep during time on the lunar surface. Shirtsleeve environment shall be as specified in prior NASA TWX.
5O
7.
Program
requirements review
specified shall be
a mockup held
review
as
LM-10 mockup
concurrent
with
This mockup shall use existing GAEC hardware and primarily demonstrate stowage, habitability, deployable and erectable equipment and any crew interface items for ascent and descent stages. 8. Under a. design and analysis: performed positive to margins
structural analysis shall be if structural elements exhibit for the design loads and
b.
Studies shall be conducted, designs, recommended to provide a shirtsleeve The contractor shall develop, in
c.
conjunction
changes in the ascent stage cabin arrangement to meet the habitability requirements of the extended lunar stay mission. The contractor shall perform trade-off analyses and simulations to determine solutions to problems. d. Mass properties: Preliminary specification shall be established.
weights
on
new
equipments and a
Detailed subsystem designs shall be monitored, tradeoff studies shall be performed to ensure minimum weight configuration. e. The contractor shall perform configuration studies
to to
determine an equipment stowage a_ng_ment in .... stage quad areas for the additional expendables for up 78 hours of lunar staytime, with emphasis on design features to accept large variations in mission payload weight f. or location.
Crew provisions: The contractor crew provisions management resulting Apollo donning
shall provide for the stowage of additional for the longer mission, an improved waste the incorporation of design to improve habitability of made to suits. changes the
permit
51
The
contractor
shall
condudt
the
necessary
design
studies
and engineering efforts required to provide stowage for the constant volume suits during the mission except for EVA activities. ICD's shall be generated jointly with AiResearch Corporation and Litton industries for the constant volume suits. The for contractor shall provide the Portable Life Support Control for storage of System (PLSS) to support expendables and the cabin a 78-hr. lunar
Environmental
Subsystem
stay and the Extravehicular Activities as defined in mission requirements. A deployable pallet, located in the descent stage shall provide for this expendable storage. Provisions shall be made for transferring equipment from the descent stage to the ascent Modularized stowage concept is to be considered primary mode of stowage for the ascent stage. Engineering drawings shall include inboard stage. the
profiles,
general arrangements ment stowage areas for crew provision The contractor
of crew work and sleep areas, equipand pallets, and manufacturing drawings details, assemblies aid installations. assist in studies of to improve to habitand
shall
mockups
develop
attention Work
detail be taken
and
wor_ling to in be
of
requirements. or biased by
should
not
restrictive, relating
limited, use of
this of Work
information. by design
Meister, engineers,
studies the
to the
Statements
found
its
tendency
to
contain 7 As
the
most
general
requirements should
specific justified
information. general
document
performance are to
requirements contractor
available,
it
define alter-
and
provide
tradeoffs
recommend
natives.
Human 1971_,
and
Practice
(New
York_
Wiley-
52
14
is
an
overview program.
of
the It
various also
design
in
the
development design
indicates
requirements
reviews.
Specifications Definition/Description sample 15. 9 of the Apollo 16 is Program Specification tree is provided tree at in the at
Figure The on
specification specifications
required
Program
Specification requirements
and
16
technical
program. requirements of a. b. c. e.
technical projects to
relate
the
requirements, program.
identification requirement @
and
test
requirements.
II
of
figure
as provided
in Apollo NASA,
Manaqement
8040.2
(Washington
D. C.:
SE
005-001-l-Revision
<
Manual, 3-2]
SB07-C-001
llApollo
Configuration
Manaqement
Manual,
ibid___..
Figure
14.
APOLLO
DESIGN
REQUIREMENTS
IMPLEMENTATION
X IPROGRAM
ACQUISITIONX. CHANGES
PRODUCT
CONFIGURATION
CHANGES
PART
II I I I ON
.CONTRACT OF WORK STATEMENT SPECI]?ICATIONS (Interface, MEI) INTERFACE C ONTR OL DOCUMENTS OCREW STATION CONTRACT
TECHNICALDIRECTION
DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
I I , _
_ ---_ _ _.-
CERTIFICATION QUALIFICATION
TESTS TESTS
1 [ I
I I
|
oi
tO
CHANGES,
& CONTICTUAL
I
i "
BASELINE REVIEWED
BY
"_
ON
]:i,:ju.r;e 15
APOLLO
PROGRAPI
--
--T--
i I
PROJECT
,
i .u;;CL[ i , i tt'_.,[ '.'.,_[R I I .... A, U:I;t I
i
rj_..6,V:,
]
rkOaEk.|
;TJI
i i I STA_E STAGE II1 I1i STAGE Ill I c_l I// CE, !1! CE, ill
PROJECT
<
_EC
I
I I C_, I
GE,
[---Fr - 3_ GSE III p'c nl_s " " MA,'.'"i_] ,.T.,_ r ._PAGEERAE_// k'_'G_r_/
OPW, SBLDG
_: 'L
_]-__
r SPACES,_,T CR_7,']I/----_i_----] ill OEHER t/--WL;.'C-_II--_TM _;,.T_ / A,,_ /i/ _OU,P III Ill III 0_. t
|MCE /CE_Ill MCEI /1/ ,'.",GEl lH fdCFI I it'!GEl /C[I
I.
NOEES:
l}
I .!__L_
IF&B_I,--II_2:LS_[7_L ] I ..... "'II ACES,{ ..... " I [ t:_,gE, MCEI III _,IcEi I I I ,tg[' J I MCEI / CE[I L-2L_cs<_JlLs_P':c_ I S_Ec I L_sP,._: _PEG _jt I l _ _ i I I -T--_1 .... -I " ,,,,k_
IOIHERCRB_-_ 11 Enu,o I11 LCRV
MCEI SPEC. MASTER CONTRACtITEM END SP[,CIFICATION GElSP[C. CONTRACT SPI':ClFICATIOI'I [,',!D ITE_,'I
A[sE._
I L_
1 __L
1/ i/
.... CE!
III i: I
]'FI, /
U,,
t _F--s_
CE_
/ 1I / II
I_
!_n _
_'z':_ I
! _t____
II II
OECOM,'._. DECO,',_MDTAEOR
I- EM,_----1 I ACE CSM E--1 B_ "-1 A'_,_o I ! i / sc_ , / iQ_u_ I _E, II c[,, I CE, II CE /
[ SPErS k SPECS__O_ 1 L S_E_ _ specs
I __I
/ L _
_,
Figure 16
55
56
define
the
primary
requirements training_ is
including as
spacecraft_ needed.
Emphasis
to and
the
definition
and
performance 12
requireThe conthis
requirements. of Work
is
Statement
to prepare
for end
approval. (MEI) specification: defines 13 the Such S/C Block in I technical a requirements was
item
The of the
MEI
master for
design.
required Block
original (The
the S/C
I and
basically
a S/C
designed lunar 3.
for
earth )
orbital
missions
and
the
Block
II
S/C
for
Contract The
item (prime
(CEI)
equipment)
designs, development, test and acceptance requirements for a single CEI type-model-series which cannot be defined by the simple formats of an identification or requirements specification. The CEI specification has two ..... "--_ ...._ ..... _ _"- ._. .... _._,_,..._'L_--'_"__,.._._....... . of CEI acquisition. Part I is Definition Phase or requirements engineering development a product analysJ of a Program s, and is the for CEI design and Specification
Proqram
Configuration
Management
Manual,
ibid,
13ibid
57
is a product of the design and development contract; Part II specifies the CEI for the product configuration requirements of the item qualified (Or to be qualified) under terms and conditions of the design and development contract. 14 Part CEI 4. product II of this specification First Article is used in the review of the
during
the
Configuration
Inspection.
Other
specifications: Unique specifications are considered and are generated for components of a
CEI
critical. technical
define each
equipment of the
item
training
equipment.
In
addition, to
and for
Interface the
used
define
accommodation in detail
items.
These
specifi-
discussed
Function/Utilization Apollo As the program an and technical of the specification: level of for such the CM a specification, included the
example
detail
original
technical
specification
following
couch
requirements: shall mission the be designed All to provide crew comfortable couch seat
phases.
three
shall space CM
extent access
required, by the
necessary regions
adequate
the
required."16
Program
Confiquration
Management
Manual,
op.
cir.,
15ibid"
16Command and Service Module Technical Specification, Block I SID 63-313 (Downey, Calif. : Space and Information Systems Division North American Aviation, Inc., NASA Contract NAS 9-150, revised February 22, 1965).
58
Couch detail
are other
provided
as
of
the
level in
detailed
iterative
therefore,
hardware
have
been had
Technical in the
been permit
should
These
sure may
undue
design
imposed
design.
noted,
specification master
or basic for as
requirements defined
couch
assembly
further
Crew Couch Assembly.--The three ................................. crew couch shall be a three unit assembled shall be
no components shall inadvertently controls to the couch mechanisms to the crewman and there shall be
ponents at zero "G". The couch design shall permit use of space aft of the left and right couches as sleeping stations. The couch assembly shall be as light as possible and still withstand limit loads with no yield, and shall withstand ultimate loads of i. 5 times limit load without failure. The crew couch design and basic goemetry visions shall be as shown in Figures 6 and 6A. Proshall be made for temporary attachment of Ground
59
Support Equipment (GSE) checkout the main couch structure, aft of during prelaunch operations. 3.4.1.1.2.4.3.1 assembly shall a. Main of
of
be
General Design Features.--The crew couch composed of the following components: main structure and sheet shall metal be constructed forming of portion for the
Structure--The
conventional
machined
parts
a torque box to efficiently carry loads. A this structure shall function as back rests crewman. b. Leg Support Assembly--This shall foldable foot support, a movable rigid leg-thigh support. shall consist of the foot support.
manually
The leg-thigh support shall be hinged to the seat pan. The leg-thigh support surface shall hormally have a 168-degree open angle relationship to the seat pan for all seat pan positions except for stowage access. To facilitate access to stowage areas, the leg-thigh support shall be adjustable to a 138-degree seat pan. c. Seat Pan--The open angle relationship to the
seat
pan
shall
consist
of
a pan
supporting
the crew-man's buttocks, hinged to the back rest and capable of being adjusted to achieve open angles of 108 degrees (launch, entry, and comfort positions), 182 degrees (navigation position) and 276 degrees (LEB access position)relative to the back rest. d. Head Rest--The head rest shall be designed to accommodate the Apollo Block i, spacesuit helmet. The headrest sides shall fold to a relatively flat position for side vision and ease of egress from the ingress to the couch. All head rests shall rotate aft to facilitate egress e. from the ingress to the CM.
Arm Rests--Arm rests shall be provided for the outboard couches. A fitting shall be provided for each arm rest to support either rotational or translational controllers. The arm rests shall be designed to provide ments to accommodate control operation in spacesuit. The arm rests shall be capable removed and stowed when not in use. length adjusta pressurized of being
6O
3.4.1.1.2.4.3.2 Crew Couch Assembl[ Performance.--The crew subsystem shall adequately support the crew during all phases of the mission, including landing impact and recovery period. The couch shall provide a platform for the performance of various crew tasks. The crew couch subsystem shall be capable of providing full body and hand support for the three crewmen during all nominal and emergency conditions. The couch shall be capable of withstanding acceleration forces during boost and re-entry, and attenuation loads upon landing impact. The crew couch subsystem shallpermit the crewmen to interchange positions and accommodate the crewmen in either pressurized or unpressurized Apollo Block I Type spacesuits. The couch assembly shall support the crewmen in a position that will provide optimum reach and visual capability in relation to the control and display panels and the forward viewing windows. The couch assembly shall be capable of headward travel to facilitate vision through the viewing windows. Individual seat pan and leg support assemblies shall be adjustable for crew comfort and to provide maximum work spaceand access to equipment bays. crew system, the GSE
3.4.1.1.2.4.3.3 Crew Couch Assembl[ Interface.--The couch assembly shall interface with the attenuation the crewman's spacesuit, crew restraint system, and carry-on checkout equipment. 17 3. Contract The of end CEI item specification: Part the I, will prior This the contain to the the design
level and is
requirements of
time item. at
specific and
specification
reviewed Part II
approved
Design acceptance
of
this
specification
detailed
product It serves
qualification of the
for
approval
at the
Phase
Contractor is conducted
Review
(CARR)
which
17Specification
Change
Notice
Number
197A-21a,
Command
and
SID 64-1237, Block I, CCA Information Systems Division 1966), pp. 1-3.
61
shipment. item in
Ii
will by it
define the
the
couch also to
above; implemented
will
officially I
changes
specification.
S/C
Configuration In developing
Control the S/C and crew station, it Such flight is important is and the configuration to the and and items
be
adequately
defined
control crew
Stowage are
hardware have
support other. of
varied
than
Changes greatly
the affect
items not
or additions/deletions hardware, even and how and minor cause but ones, other have
items,
control
drawings, on hardware
etc. and
Such docuand in
accelerating
changes
made
configuration
and
hardware.
Control
Board
and
Panels _
Board
(CCB) as
at
MSC
was
authority
Director,
set
forth
January
1970. over
authority Lunar
Apollo
Modules,
Modules_
62
other
Apollo
Program
hardware. by is
boards The
or
panels of CCB
are the
structure 17 . The
illustrated
basically
functions i.
to implement Issues cause Panels, contractor vehicle, a revision test item approval
following: disapproval between two of changes which: (a) affect Control increase each (f) or flight or
or more mass
Configuration (c)
affect and
affect
involve
contractual and
KSC/MSC an end-
requirements, delivery
affect
schedule on all
launch
2.
Takes
a position
NASA
Headquarters to the
disposition
Program
Director
have action.
authority These
for panels
all
changes
not
have
responsibility equipment,
flight and
configuration documentation,
ground and
support 18
related
software
revisions.
18Apollo
Spacecraft
Program
Configuration
Mana@ement
Manual,
op.
cit.
Figure
17.
CONFIGURATICN
CONTROL
BOARD
STRUCTURE
Board
Level
ApDIIo
Program
Configuration
I
II Apollo Spacecraft /MSC Configuration Control Board
J
Crew Flight Configuration C_erations Control Panel
----III Command and , Lunar Module , Configuration Service Module Change Panel Change Panel llllCnfiguratin
I
,Experiments and , Flight Control Panel GFE Configuration DirectOrate Operations Configuration Control Panel
Management
Manual,
SB07-C-001
(Houston,
Texas:
NASA-
(Houston,
Texas:
NASA,
Skylab
Program
Office_
64
Function/Utilization the crew station standpoint, for S/C this board stowage to the role crew to and the panels and are
sanctioning
authority
list,
individual configuthese in
baseline in
active on the
presenting and
station, be with
location station
provisions interface
implemented. hardware to be
involvescrew
or used to this in by to
in
flight, is
support
of the
appropriate support in
equipment
This
which, crew
turn,
affect
are the
presented
of coordination
occurs
contractor
If
the
item
added for of
is
GFE, use
the
contractor
is
information stowage
its the
and is
stowage resolved
advantageous, and
item the
presented
as part involves
of
change.
If
item
mates
or otherwise of its
further
development is presented.
feasibility the to
resulting
includes other
con-
coordinate
details
crew
counterpart. important is changes the to the crew crew station be aware occur of immediately and be before in
When flight, it
essential
flight
these
65
basic
with the
their
These
changes of for
can
signi-
training with
readiness
been
a given
such
it is
important the
station
personnel before
resolve final
technical
their The
dispositions
approval
change_ shall on
physical crew
into
S/C based
withheld review
concurrence,
their
a mockup
spacecraft. design for changes study by which a S/C involve panel as major crew station for implications
a Request the
Change time,
This and
authorization to
allows
contractor
funds
accomplish of
proposed
hardware,
an
Engineering the
includes
on whether by the
change is
and
board if
technique a thorough
a p_eferred
one, of the
time
investigation
implications
to
approval.
Stowage
Lists
Definition/Description stowage and list in the Apollo Spacecraft and Program documents equipment, all crew
installed
operational
experimental
66
and
crew-worn which
equipment reflects
carried the A
It
is
the
only
document stowage
configuration_ It or includes
is
Apollo
mission.
all
stowage prior to
lockers in the
which S/C,
are and
prepackaged crew
equipment equipment
other
minimal and
effort this
(i.e., latter
water are
guns those to
which or
fragile,
damage
checkout by A
which location
mission list.
included
this
sample list is
portion provided
of
the in
Apollo
9, Mission A. is assigned
AS
504,
CM
104/LM-3
stowage
Each nomenclature title numbers signify For items were and and
an
item to is
and item's
which of
quantity dash
include minor
applicable configuration
numbers
the
between on the
utility B0105,
towels BI06,
9 mission part
BI07,
Their
same,
except red,
numbers coded
were towels.
-204, The
white,
nomenclature to distinguish
these
colors
"Utility
Towel _ Assy.CM"
67
list
is CM
subdivided earth
by
pertinent stowage;
mission List B,
phase. LM earth
For
launch List
D, LM Entry
Lunar
launch
stowage; These
Stowage. transfer
subdivisions
stowage
stowage
configurations
reconfigurations. Equipment follows: apparel, stowed for the The items the it stowed stowed on each of these lists is subdivided Furnished Furnished into sections (GFE), (CFE) as crew and
denote crew
suppliers
launch. each of the note which It may is, items is in are denoted
listed locker or
phases, where
locations item to
the
is
specific is stowed
bag
cases, quantity
in more
stowed
location. For each best piece of equipment, data Weight on of a unit the the weight is specified, at the is which time repreof
the
available
weight
list known.
release.
hardware
included,
of Material which
(COMAT)
approval
status approval.
is
The is
categorizes
materials
68
noted M-metal
approval,
O-open
(no
COMAT
submitted),
or W-waived. Revision the list B is Notice (SLRN) edition. the reason is attached All for List changes the to each are
a Stowage changes
summarizing in the
from
standard date.
stowage Appendix
change
effective
Stowage
Revision
Notice. In Modules used Roving for of for addition (including the Modular (LRV) to using ascent stowage and lists for stage the Command and lists and Lunar have the been Lunar
descent
stowage), System
Equipment used on
(METS) Lists
Vehicle
Missions. carry
are
required quantity
these stowed
since
a sufficient
to merit the
list.
The
control
hardware not
prelaunch
function
tests
only,
equipment handling
arrangement during
during
lunar
Equipment by the
lunar for
appropriate
operational
lunar point,
this
Skylab
Program, the
this
format modules
have
numerous
various Program
which
used
mission,
management Appendix C.
decisions.
sample
of
the
Skylab
list
is
provided
in
69
II.
Function/Utilization I. General: The figuration officially mission stowage is and Apollo stowage list serves to define to be as the and stowed top level the con-
document equipment
control for
stowage of
location these
and, items
therefore, within
a widely
distributed summary of
official used by
the
contractor
numbers,
have even
provide, for
approved
number,
used
identification number,
shipped of the
(Stowage number, 2.
list etc.,
item are
nomenclature on the
part
shipping
package.)
S/C in
development,
coordination
NASA/GFE over
used with
S/C
development. the
reflect
stowage of
provisions.
source
interface
requirements,
7O
defines
the
GFE
which
interfaces
with
the
spacecraft.
both be at
GFE this
and
CFE
are,
therefore,
cases, that
which if by
a bracket
general numbers,
assigned the
part best to
reflect
approximation the
satisfy
defined be stowed or is
defined, also it
the
provisions defined. a
them
to mate added or
poorly
a bracket stowage
may
require etc., it
special may as
cushion, be on the As
bag,
straps, list if
which
need
to
classifies
a list
item.
appropriate this
additions,
preliminary the
establishing
stowage
which of
lists
Module and
(LMMP)
effective
71
program
was
to
accommodate stowage
longer
stay-time ascent
the
and Roving
the
LM,
a Lunar
increased
scientific
stowage
list and
for NASA
each
spacecraft of
contractor loose
understanding
stowage
and The
equipment through
at the pre-
list
make to are
serves list
the any
which
changes and
approved
through
the
which approval as
in Apollo by an the
transmitted Contract
official
document,
under
Change
stowage NASA of
of GFE After
support list,
stowage
which S/C by
affect
exceed If to item
CCB.
a new CCB be
presented is a new to
the to
approved
and is
provided to
contractor,
a CCA
issued
the
contractor
from
Kenneth
S.
Kleinknecht
to
72
qualify
and
provide to
flight support
items, of
other item. of
directed and
change
drawings, CCB
etc.,
accommodate
authorizing the
also
maintains as required
issues
accommodate authorizes
approved CCB
change
addition the
paperwork flight to
will
authorize
item's
design, to support
as required is it
the
provide S/C,
prepare list
cases, is needed
authorization provisions items list are under Items their basic S/C
implied to
other
required the to
and
they
initial be deleted
by CCB
as with
CCB
deletions, appropriate
hardware change.
stowage
A number
changes
73
until
they
are list
enough or they
to are
merit
revision in be the
(Usually Changes by a
there to the
baseline list
accomplished the
stowage minor
revision
reflect in
following:
nomenclature, errors;
part
numbers, of to
drawing
difficulties CFE
during
necessary other or
of NASA do not
changes of not
details end-item or
function does
stowage change
itself part
provide weights,
equipment
numbers,
or
stowage
locations. The dictated necessity by any of to the change the stowage type Crew lists may be mission and and and crew
variation;
Station
experience_ changes_
crew
changes_ and
interface
definitions
preferences. When stowage list, for the contractor of has a proposed as defined processing proposed change in the to the
hardware, for
procedure to submit
this change
the
contractor
the
Engineering
Change
Proposal
(ECP)
to NASA.
The
CCB
or
74
will
then
procedures some
stowage why
indicate
reasons
made.
implicit of
intent
these stowage
maintenance is essential
control
over an
control
for
orderly of
stowage an crew
and
management
affects and
training, stowage
training
hardware,
in-flight
management.
issuance: initial four baseline weeks prior S/C stowage to or the list should be Design issued Review which are effort, 103 and no
than that to
Critical
affects that
that
series 1967
of vehicles Apollo of
S/C. the
During basic
the
affected
configuration
spacecraft. identical,
For a list
these was
which was
I01
and
baseline by
superseded of a new
each
issuance As
applying
this
specific
stowage
Crew the
mission-oriented significant
stowage
configuration,
stowage
75
list
begin for
after
this
review.
To and S/C
preparations
proper four
stowage In
least
CCSR.
addition
normal at least
revisions
are
specifically
required i. At and 2. At
before
the
Crew
Compartment
Fit
Function least
before
stowage of
for the
and
chamber to final
testing stowage
weeks (KSC).
exercise
launch
Concurrent launch.
with
the
Flight
Readiness
Test
prior
to
Drawings Definition/Description stowage S/C. It drawing depicts and is in the S/C contractor's dimensions the views stowed the control g_n_i where to key drawing for each __changes of
three
for made.
prelaunch
stowage NASA-
items.
each list
contractor during
stowage
describe, There
various S/C
mission area
phases.
drawings are
for
functional CM
where
a large LM
number ascent
stowed,
intravehicular and LM
crew descent
station, stage,
stage
intravehicular Stowage
station, (MESA).
Modularized
Equipment
Assembly
76
E provides a LM stowage
an entire drawing
CM for
drawing. and
Appendix
includes
descent
stages.
Function/Utilization stowage It drawing also is a vital the document which key details the (i) over actual provides stowage_ tests
stowage.
serves
following
tool
for
basis
ground
accepted of
for
quality as
control item
verification Compartment
serves (CCSR)
S/C's crew
Crew
and
station
reviews_ and
a training and
device (6)
crew
station, with
personnel_ stowage
personnel general
stowage
specific and
stowage the
requirements vehicle
qualified stowage is
engineer correct
stow
or verify
as per
Other
the
stowage
locates
containers) by to
flight by item
stowed.
are
stowage 2. Lists
them.
quantity, approved
stowage changes,
77
those those by 3.
items
brought
into
the
S/C
during items
mission on the
and drawing
"off-loaded." to ensure
Depicts
these
"leaders" by for
Depicts exist
mission
4.
and
specific or
installation pertinent
procedures Interface
Control
requirements and
orientation understood.
routing
so these
and
illustrates in their
location
of prepackaged Provides
stowage appro-
containers
installed
position.
priate
installation torque
in etc. and
referenced
specifications_
illustrates
for
stowing con-
prepackaged the on
the item.
shelf-
containers
locates
decals such as
operations, hydroxide
canisters.
78
9.
fit launch
check
requirements and in
for
mating
items S/C
in stowage
location,
alternative
locations. differentiation reference such are to between CFE part stowed numbers item where and installed stowage
i0.
with
the
requires drawings
definition. used by the contractor (OCP's) station for number, used. writing for as the baseline
The for
S/C
stowage
preparing and
stowage
documents of each
include item,
procedures for
information
installation
1969, NASA-KSC
a review
of LM
ascent
and these
descent
stages
personnel
drawings of
lacked crew
provide The
performance difficulty
stowage
at KSC. was in
experienced and
in
hardware difficulty
properly verifying,
adequately that
secured. was
effect,
stowage
"per
print.
''20
20NASA-MSC by R. C. H.
_X
PD8/T852-PPG-69-1441
written
by
J.
R.
Goodman,
revised
H. Bolender to Grurmman Aircraft Engineering Corporation, Attn. Tripp, LM Program Director, from NASA-MSC LM Project Office, Spacecraft Program Office, Subject: NASA Contract NAS Installation Drawings, LM6 and Subs, June ii, 1969. 9-1100,
Apollo Stowage
79
As
the to
LM
contractor the
spent above
considerable criteria
resources format
revising recom-
these
satisfy
andother
NASA. also concerned documented The a at this to LM time that the by LM stowage procedures
adequately and
allow S/C
stowage
"any
contractor's
capability at KSC--which
relied
single
representative to these
a risk.
revisions to effect
made S/C
drawings without
other of
qualified knowledge
personnel and
stowage
experience. management with each aboard mission. will the In no Apollo long S/C has become the more complex drawing "reala
flights, be in
stowage for
reasonable
doubt
housekeeping, List of is in
Program,
preparation, on the
this
mission
contingency, reflect
stowage stowage
special and
addition also
resulting
alterations
might
carried
onboard.
Configuration essential
Baseline of the many design reviews for is held hardware described and its on the items later), disposition
byproduct of
establishment
systems. should be
specifically
is under
review
8O
in and
review
minutes.
This
policy
should In of
exist this
for way,
all
formal NASA
semiformal have
Reviews.
both
contractor items
definition
configuration This
subsequent vs.
policy
resolve of these.
items
consist design
require-
and
nearconfigured from
drawings, is an or
drawings, baseline,
result the
revisions
CCB,
effect, changes
list, or The
for
deletions, number
design role
reflect in
a change is
on the
often
These
the
design
for
list
items of
onboard other
does and
control of
their a S/C
the
many
features
not
covered
list.
assignment
logistic-critical
components
end
item
Program
confiquration
Management
Manual_
op.
cit.,
81
drawing (a)
and
part
number. numbers
The shall
following be
guidelines
apply in
to
its
use: within
Serial the
permanently
assigned
sequence
drawing
(b) A
new
sequence to
identify of
number though
the
been be
than
critical
serialized
at
option. II. Function/Utilization is up the an important station. items tool It which for the control of crew equipment, and critical one, a shelf S/C, it and tracefit
crew
allows have
specific checks, to be
function
flight the
therefore, full is of
able
like
items. that
integration which
essential
show
critical to be
fit
function changeable,
checks. there
supposed At for
interare
there electrical
between mating
which of
account
readily, In
items the
identical
number such
difficulty. flow
addition, portable
characteristics support
of
valves,
life
systems, record.
to merit
a detailed Unit
performance Suit
Extravehicular
Mobility
(Space
Assembly)
used
lunar
82 22 surface, Serial and such numbers S/C data are are known, in published, the data and for used the during actual Readiness missions. Review
included
Flight
other Before
reviews. of the first manned Apollo of CM, crew it was station and discovered items. the Seriali-
plans
for by
imposed
direction,
proved
essential
crew At
monitoring critical are the mated only The used. also aids of
orientation and
alignment In such
calls cases,
for the
marks
to
be hard-
when used be
aligned. where in
specific
hardware records,
such
correct,
verified the
alignment serial
such
cases,
specify
numbers
in
the
history
of
problems the
with item
history
each
and
accompanies
through
preflight
inspection,
S/C
to
GFE
Interface aboard
Control has from one or more of at of an interfaces item within Other with the the S/C,
GFE S/C. 23 or A
when
basic of the
stowage
attachment on
spacecraft
launch. the
function (mating
hardware, fluid to
m_y flows,
support certain
surfaces, tools
power, used
management and
assure
the
properly
matched
accommodated
These
techniques
22CSM/LM (Rev.
_erational 2; July 7,
Data 1971!,
IV:
EFff7Data
Book,
SNA-8-D-027(IV)
23Interfaces in the context used GFE and the S/C where matching
those must
junctions between the be achieved to make North American RockA to "Memorandum of and Documentation,"
operations or functions compatible and successful. well Corporation, NASA Contract NAS 9-150, Appendix Understanding, Preparation Manual Interface Control December 24, 1964.
83
for
the
most
part,
prior
to GFE
and and
parallel S/C to in
with of fit
of
of the time is
areas
required
configured as flight
used
later
and
interfaces of S/C
integration costs.
redesign and be of
additional
program
emphasis will
management
control such
techniques
described
in reducing
problems.
GFE
Performance These
and
Interface
(P&I)
Specifications the some Performance cases, the and Interface between por-
the
GFE of
and a
applicable or
major the
(i.e.,
Command 112-
Service Their
(CSM) is to
Scientific to specify
objective necessary
performance between 11 u_
ensure
compatibility po_Lull
and
the
_ AM
relative
_u_
__
shown kind
which and
are induced
important
in
these
specifications
relating g's,
environments to areas of
interfaces and
electromagnetic and
compatibility,
quality,
maintenance
84
original items
CM such
and as
LM
P&I
defined stowed
general GFE
criteria
and
spacesuits for
suit,
oxygen were
Since
a basic
Initial as
requirements be best
other by
originally at CM or
could
determined passed
NASA
as time
the
majority
and
interface
items
were
superseded its
a different
When
item,
interface at
discussed for
specifications susceptible to
quite
changes
stowage
configuration for
stowage items
Documents, As years,
P&I
updated optimum
agreed
media to
(SIC) the
for
equipment
due
growth
to the because
Change only
Notices
would other
wasteful
reference
control
documents.
24NASA
letter
PD5/L392-PP5-70-453,
Contract D. F. North
AS
9-150
from
R.
C.
Hood
Graham, American
Manager, Rockwell
CSM Corpora-
October
1970.
85
Such
crew
station
documents
have
maximum
value
during
the
program's
and
development,
where
there and
is
to new
interface
cover
items
Scientific
same
category
above_ not
these to
scientific
instrumentation
susceptible
changes.
Interface I.
Control
Documents 25
Definition/Description Interface technical or Control Document between supplier those (ICD) is the primary control provided S/C each instruby
interface
hardware as GFE,
government, ICD
identifies can
changed,
functionally system.
cofuncICD is
tioning to
assemblies by types i.
overall
record, Two
a formal of
engineering require
document, ICD's: by
agreements.
interfaces
Interfaces contractors
between
equipment
two
or more
NASA
MSC
2.
Interfaces agencies)
impact
missions
(inter-center
25Apollo Program CSM J-Series Missions Integration (Downey, Calif.: North American Rockwell, Space Contract NAS 9-150, CCA 3355, March i, 1970).
Plan, SD Division_
69-430, NASA
26North to
American
Rockwell of
Corporation
NAS
9-150,
Appendix
"Memorandum
Understanding,"
86
This total to
discussion CM and
is LM
primarily
to
the
first
type
ICD. are
Of
the
Apollo
approximately 27
60 percent
related
crew
station are
mechanical, types
configurations one
specific Mechanical
physical,
functional)
ICD's: ICD shows a mating A detail pertinent of is two or more from associate each side of
taken
interface for
a correct hard-
mating ware,
dimensions surface be
on hole finish_
material must
Tolerances 2. Electrical An
controlled
ICD's: ICD across is symbolic only, or and usually represents diagram. applicable: and
functional Drawings
an intercabling as
information,
designator,
specification_
lengths-cable
the
pnW__d
schematics
only)_
location halves
mounting by
connector
defined
27From
Private
communication
with
Jerry
E.
Siemers, Center
Boeing
Corporation Texas,
Manned
Spacecraft
at Houston,
28Op.
cir.
North
American
Rockwell
Corporatio_
Contract
NAS
9-150.
87
3.
Fluid
ICD's: A fluid ICD is basically mating a mechanical parts, system schematic fluid, or flow
It
defines etc.
working
Functional
Functional
system etc.),
performance environments
limitations, (aero-thermal,
signal
format
and and
synchronization,
internal
pressures, procedures ratios, Examples In Rockwell responsible are basic the the and
acceleration, of
temperature,
limitations
application
(signal-to-noise
of these the CM
ICD's
are
discussed
spacecraft Grumman
contractor, Aerospace
developing documents
ICD's
for
referenced Item
revision
letter to End
the
Approved in the
revisions Master
Revision via
incorporated Change
Other ICD's be
cosigners contract
official as S/C
"signed-off" of related
documentation
final
release of
drawings. requirement,
been be
a number
implementation
problems
discussed
later.
88
Function/Utilization the stowage require the In for list depicts authorized type ICD's. of onboard As GFE, it identifies initial not Program This definition in
which of
noted,
during had
these
items the
developed. acceptable
cases,
during or no
Gemini
in Apollo other
with
configuration available, in
information
preliminary of ICD In
provided the
D provides Modification
used most of by
this
stowage existing
already of the or
being to
used,
contain
film
effectively either a
these
magazines,
and
Flight volume
Data
File
percent
increase was
over
baseline For
precise requested 4_
configuration to make
unknown. to in
food, an of
provisions Aim#n_inn_
ascent X
_,,_9% m_n_mllm
4.25"
and
a weight
of and
ibs. to
All
these the
interface applicable to
design
criteria
there
enough change
information present
contractor to NASA
initiate their
a design food
a proposed
configuration
supplier. the and program the a number of group to meetings define are held with NASA,
hardware
suppliers and
hardware differences
configuraamong
interface
requirements,
negotiate
89
parties. and
ICD
reviews most
are
held
during reviews
major and
S/C
crew
verify with
they
other stowed
flight
integration mating
as verifihardware in
mechanical or as
interferences checks on
mission of the
acceptability
for
uncovering
interface
before
Rockwell Figure
Grumman a simple
18 is
envelope. CM in molded
the
penlights
stowed
ICD
item. crew
CM
effort,
contractor CM ICD's
items, (except
stowage to
location the
specific
required
control
contractor
for
adequately would
Also,
the list.
location the
stowage since
location the
and the
time ICD
interface revised
continually
o u_n!_u_
"8961 q_oN)
tB$ %sn6nv
_V UOTSTAeH
(051-6
SVN
%3e=%uoD _q_nN
VSVN
_uoT%e=od_oD
IleM_noH :_no S
_qS!IUed-edoIeAUN
_9EI-II_E0-IOHN
_u_mr_o_
io_%uo D _I_%uI
...... .
_ _ :. . .,,. . _ _
e...... _.,
,,_ -.-_,_
NI3_I3H (]31.3333W 8311_lVd77V N33M/38 417_O'A3N_OO_NOI1AIO 3OVdS 8VX31"NOISI_ON'B3N33 4_BO3OVd --:-j-. <7
_.@1
,_.tJl&
90l
0t4
d3 d'4S
LC'_ Oft
ZII
ON
a3S
tt/3
_lgO01-104 _ _01- 09
_J'-I?ZA
Vgll ON 83S
PIZ3
gl[OO_'-rOj
"3-'_A
::
#'1
gl'g
.... I .......
_ I'_ 0'i
OD!
/_HCIq_LT
8! e_ruSTi
S/C other
changes than
the
ICD. would,
The in
parties effect,
signing control
stowage
location
hamper
the
contractor's for NASA usually way, crew design stowage. This ICD It
design
Also,
cosigning of or
authority
personnel not as
various
suppliers in it any
involved long as
S/C
interested
item were
adequately
station
personnel and a LM
responsible integration
compatibility 2. Figure 19 is
total ICD
for
stowage.
different LM Stowage
from
already as
described. GFE
critical of
incorporating In this
hardware
case, could
the
container saving
individual shortening
sign,
several ICD,
and
interface
"loose" which
which no
critical fact, as
was
by
the
LM
specified, interface of
stowage and
volumes. ICD's.
disadvantage stowage
coupling
stowage
Frequent
changes
Figure 19.
LM Stowage ICD
IIII
I_I_E,I:_E
OOL_TPCX. DOCUI._Et,rr
93
of
stowage the
locations ICD,
of
the
same
are
more
causing
changes, had
however,
comparatively
limited
stowage
weight-sensitive. represents that a different discussed and approach to ICD's it for came
loose from by 3.
items
than
previously was
because
a different NASA
originally
monitored
different 20
pressure mating
garment interfaces,
(suit) adjustments
to
envelope,
interface. are
dimensions as shown, required D and and keeps involuntary reentry by the and suit in
included, features in
adjustment are
sizes
noted between
the
Section foot
F-F),
crewman's which
feet
pan,
might
occur
during fit
It is when
essential to
the
easy
attempting
remove pad
feet and
from
couch This
during is the
emergency from
egress
landing. and
effectively as well 20
design
couch
restraint motions
Figure for
depicts
general
operations
operations.
96
4.
21
depicts Hassleblad
the
for the
70mm
camera
rendezvous stowed
indicates it windowpane
modification clearance
adapter_ inner
specifies camera
requirements
alignment ICD is
requirements. depicted in Figure pin (EMU) 22. This ICD defines the
connector spacesuit
between connected
during
portions are
of Apollo
subsequent of bioinstrumentation,
missions.
Included
provisions
for
low 6. A
pressure
sensing,
tones the
and
sample
preliminary EVA
support G. This
on Apollo
Appendix
contains needed to
design
performance H depicts
interface
controlled
flight and
stowage
because all on
controls
Velcro
within
structure
equipment,
items
stowed
T_VNDSDVdS L6
NI NOITVrlqV&SNI
NNOL
"Ig e_n_T
8 - panuT%uoo g6
_18 a=nOT_
E - p_nu!%ua 66
_I_
a_n_S!_
i01
and
on
all
GFE,
crew are as
apparel,
e.g.,
potential
requirements were as
contractor material
shall provide for the systematic control installed in the CSM by implementing the to be called be made the for "velcro each map." and of
drawing, drawing
shall
vehicle,
assigned current be as
applicable Contents
shall
views of the crew compartment which and dimensionally illustrate to scale installed in the crew compartment. to the ignition velcro shall be indicated, sources such as nearby
wiring will be shown. A bill of materials on the velcro map shall indicate for each piece of velcro the station number, dimensions, type and weight of bonding agent, process specifications used, and total 2. A second weight bill of the installation. shall be included on the velcro
of materials
map and shall call out each stowed item in the crew compartment which contains velcro, the dimensions and type of velcro attached to the item, the stowage location of the item, and identification of all other items containing velcro which are stowed in the same location.
submittal of non-metallic 4.
as the
part of vehicle.
the
revision. and processes used for velcro installation subject to the same control as the velcro
5.
6. -
A baseline will be defined by the initial velcro map, which will be submitted to MSC for approval. Maintenance of the drawing in a current and updated status sibility of the spacecraft contractor. will be the responSubsequent changes
102
to
the
baseline
will
be
made
normally
by updating
the
velcro
map after regularly scheduled Crew Compartment Stowage Review (CCSR), Customer Acceptance Readiness Review (CARR)_ Crew Compartment Fit and Function (CCFF), altitude chamber tests, and prior to flight. All changes will be submitted to MSC for approval. Proposals for additions of velcro to the vehicle by the Contractor at times other than those already stated shall be requested by Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) to MSC. 29
In display guidance
the
Apollo
program Control
a number Documents
of
important
controlLM, and
Interface and
navigation Panel
contractors. (CM/LM
follows:
Controls
Display
Liqhtinq_ and
Color (CM/LM
Standardization); and
Faces
Display Status
and
purpose and
of
to
LM Crew by the
Stations. following
documents
shown
MH01-05175-414
(CM/LM
Control
and
Display
the
ope_atiom,
moumLl_g,
guarding, and orientation of toggle, and pushbutton switches, continuous and circuit breakers. Standardizes the areas Establishes knobs. 30 of design, color, and design requirements
A copy
of portions
of this
ICD
is
attached
in
Appendix
I.
29NASA
Contract
NAS
9-150, NASA,
Contract MSC,
Change 19,
Authorization 1967).
No.
1752
(Houston,
Texas:
October
30SID 62-1244C, "Lunar Module Performance and Interface Specification," Block II, July 15, 1968. Prepared by North American Rockwell Corporation, Space Division, NASA Contract NAS 9-150.
103
Several their
applications
of
ICD
control
merit
discussion
because
of
uniqueness: i. NASA generated In some ICD: cases GFE in hardware shape, or are items not are of a known con-
will
change in
configuration or packaging,
not is
removed
should handling
of the maximum
critical of this
coordination and
generally
information it to both
or NASA's
supplier Good
examples
items
where
this added
approach to S/C
Z passive an Apollo on
Program Both
a locker envelope,
S/C.
stable
configuration,
passively 2. Crewman
flight. requirement: where an EVA Module that excursion (SIM) the is bay to in
In CM be the made
subs,
into
Service
scientific etc.)
equipment
and
its
hardware
(tubing,
bracketry,
104
would
not
leave
for
the
EVA
crewman's so during and bay. to the Accordsuch control this the hardNASA
operations.
This
and
case, in
envelope
operations envelope.
preclude CM S/C
this
ingly, an all
directed EVA
envelope
into
placement were
from
area. to is
set up 23
with
define
documents the
the
a portion
shows crewman.
area
where
applies via
envelope evaluations
ICD
brought
contractor
of
proposed allowed
was
grant
waiver approach
envelope, be
proposal in
considerably where
design, of can
particularly crew
required envelopes
a given be
functional determined
reasonably
controlled. volume Where type there in ICD's: are items weight, of GFE required for each given, mission, identified
which
vary
size,
and
number
within
...........
"
_t-
107
use
of
a S/C of
volume the
ICD
may data
be
valuable. in both
A good Apollo
is the These
stowage items
flight
files to
were the
quite of
susceptible onboard
type
hardware
procedures, Initially, to be
in basic to
define
onboard to
extremely all
formal in the
reflect became
obvious
not
changes
hardware. was
sizes be As
changed,
determined in
data
weight was
allowable to
revised data
reflect and
a top
flight
file
individual Special
the
stowage for
file
given. had
in which for
the
files
were
stowed the
to
be
marked
marking for in
to provide
The defining /
result the
cost
contractor/
negotiations.
108
is
important be
in stable
such and
cases
that
the
stowage
items or
defined--in
heads
have torn or
made stuck
a contractor the
and
stowage to the
ensuring
will
the was
this
type
are
properl[
minimize the
chanqes description of
related the
delivery
impact
Recalling trols or
ICD--it which, if
those
each
item or
functionally system."
total the
of ICD's
Apollo i.
Program Unresolved
are
ICD's
issuance: unresolved of the for too to long; release to occur. CDR, with
of ICD's both
remained sides
pressing drawings, be of of
likely
should
resolved engineering
hardware proper
item's
release control
drawings changes.
ensure In
evaluation case
configuration
a specific
31NASA
letter
PD8/L799-68-PP5-591,
from
R.
C.
Hood,
Project
Officer,
C&SM Apollo Spacecraft Program Office, NASA, Manned Spacecraft Center, to Mr. Milton I. Drucker, Director Apollo CSM Program Contracts, Space Division, North American Written by J. R. Goodman Rockwell Corporation, Downey, California. (J. E. Siemers, Boeing, December 9, 1968).
109
one in
engineering released
drawings before
for
a change by area
desNASA. of the
an ICD
approval in a the
ICD
review which
revealed required
a design the
deficiency of
processing from
separate procedure
Such of
established of
difficulty and
and purpose by
approval and
negate
need
all
criteria effect
change release.
issued
Following
technical
Interface final
Critical design,
Design drawings
release
Engineering
Change
Proposal
received another
approval. a NASA contractor with 25 was the asked mating items found of to make portion were ICD
checking, and
both
inter25
were
considering were
monitor according
S/C in an
investigation technically
actual
S/C As
revealed
this
location
acceptable.
a result,
ii0
the
ICD
was
to
be
signed-off had
showing
the the
proper 25
and
supplier
to modify
marked the LM
hardware 3 CCSR
items. there were incompatibilities Life Support (PGA the or System suit). and for lack As PGA the of among
the
Portable
NASA to
PLSS
conform
the 32
vehicle from
donning
station. to
stemmed
revisions
the
incomplete, of
a number
cases, different
from
example, of the
point
the
towel
container As a result to be
was of
existing
i01
larger of tissue
than concould
number S/C
stowed
drawings, was
dispenser
dropped
because
32NASA
TWX
to
GAEC,
Attn:
E. W. Office,
Laws_ NASA,
Business MSC,
Manager, written
Contracting 7, 1969.
33Ref.
RFC
101-CSD-15,
S/C
i01
GFE
Design
Review,
September
12,
1967.
iii
In in the
the
LM
Equipment
Stowage
(MESA) between or
tools
were
critical dimensions
S/C
provided
suppliers when
and
were
reprefor
stowed suit
exercise, require
would
one
preclude the
of the
suit's 34
constraint on
suit
and
should
case,
flight
lunar into
arrived LM used in
for
incorporation lunar
the May
first or
landing for
arrived 16 launch.
early
June
a July
rubber
"snubber"
(spacer
34NASA from
Memorandum PM5/MI094, subject: Block II Suit Hardware PM/Chief Mission Operations Division to EC Chief, Crew written by Jerry R. Goodman/PM5, May 18, 1966.
Volumes Systems
Division,
Memorandum from
Closeup Lunar
Stereo
Camera Spacecraft by
Installation,
Module,
Apollo written
Science 1969.
Applications,
112
shipping
package
with
the on
camera. the
information data
snubber to
package. unknown
this
its
existence
was
S/C
tractor
MSC
personnel
station instal-
of ICD's.
After
clarify
rushed
directed in
with
the
then The
instructions authorization
procedures. further
clarification
etc.,
by
installation closeout of
descent reflect
stage. use In
for
LM
6 and
to
this
interface
definitions was
flight, late
interface stowage
definition and
too
support of
final failure
a prime
example
to properly necessary to
define
a critical
component
accommodation. In criteria reviews a number were of other situations, overlooked, these important and interface or S/C
inadvertently revealed
mockup
fortunately
inadequacies.
113
3.
Changes
to
which was
regard For be
timely been
ICD
signoff. would
instance,
GFE
which the or
modified
found
incompatible to change
a decision dimensions to
lunar
tools,
interfaces. interface,
envelope
previously in the
Contractor of its
required foam
relocation
a remake
insert. From a configuration (CCP,s), ensuring changes. appropriate GEE of or CCP's detailed significant the CCP S/C to control which the standpoint, GFE the Configuration are in
Control
approve S/C
Changes CCP or
these benefit
approve of the in
dimensions,
after GFE
sanctions additions:
a "basic"
change.
or new
changes stowage on
occur a S/C
equipment, close
or to
there flight.
are
new In
additions
fairly
114
such S/C
ICD's ICD In
have affects
sometimes and
been
waived on
for
the
first
subsequent of interface
such is
cases,
risk close
than mockup
coordination fit
interface verifications
flight
hardware
essential.
items stowage
typically which
make
this
problem
require
form-fitted to the
_nd
items
require also
use.
items
brackets
accomplish establishment
their of
generally design is
delays frozen.
ICD
inputs
until
Development held
and
reviews
during
program and
phases: and
development_ and
checkout&
flight true
Stowage
Review
both held
station are
Crew station
personnel cover
management and
control basic
described "working
above. level"
They tool in
subjects station
are
the
effective
management.
115
24
summarizes place,
the and
review
process,
the
sequences in
in
which of
take
basic
discussion
which the of
serve crew
major
other
station, to
discussion station
limited
crew in
important
making for
are
a number and is
Such The
given
following reviews
necessity
of
flight
crews
design
discussion.
Mockup
mockups
of serve
is
one
of
the
most
useful and
and its
tools CFE
in
the
the in
current the
Apollo
hardware; a.
following tool
aid
and
verification
individual
hardware
in
assessing human
his
particular and
for operabe
general
_actors,
Mock-ups design
aids if
critique item
the
mating
equipment, of the
beginning early by
program,
the
designer,
crew flight
station crew.
equipment
users--the
allow
Figure 24
Modified from: Brig. Gen. Bolender, "Management Techniques Utilized by the Apollo Program Manager," Apollo Program Management, Staff Study, Subcommittee on NASA Oversight, Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, 91st Congress, 1969. 116
117
on
the
design
when or
they
can
design the
for
is usually
Frequently, transformed
best
designs exhibit
a drawing,
hardware
previously verification
subsystems. of both individual mockups hardware during item the true mockups and was changes to com-
invaluable. were
substantial, was
hardware
design
production on design
Timely saves be in
NASAcontractor time
approaches to
considerable and
allows
schedules of
maintained, subsequent
provides which
assurance many
success items. in
reviews
hardware Dreyfuss
dJs_s_ing liners, is
the
u_e
in
the
of form
ocean of are
designs much
He and
noted by
that not
learned make
and
sayed
changes is "36
the
final
ship...A in
interior transport
almost
standard
designing
36Henry 1967),
for
People
(New
York:
Paragraphic
Books,
118
Fit been
problems
hardware fidelity
items
has
already in items,
discussed. provides
of high
hardware mating
mockups
between
with
connector or
stowage such
addition,
items,
effect, between
critical
interfaces
and
Station These
after
basic used
design for
are crew
procedures evaluations,
design Such in
change use
Station as
proved
previous
support broad,
of the
flight
impli-
cations
and
general trainers
mockup
devices
available to our flight crews and support personnel to exercise the mission timeline procedures essential to efficient execution of the flight plan. In their absence two major problems arise: a. A number of spacecraft tests are subject inefficient planning and execution, and Our flight crew training such that early in their use their time effectively to
b.
schedules are distorted assignment crews cannot and near flight date
119
activities
to
be
completed
becomes
hardware those
or
poor
fidelity
can
cause
transgressions in that they are: During crew trol This into 2. After noted
problems
already
described, of such
the
flight
mission.
Examples
problems i.
their was on
Lunar
the
Apollo of
ii
flight
confused their
a con(PLSS).
Portable had
System
apparently used
incorporated training. Aldrin in over hours the the that of S/C the
models ii
for
preflight Astronaut
Apollo
Mission, of the
visibility was
altimeter improved
actual in the
Apollo were
where this
many case_
training
a problem, the
as was
Happily, such
reverse
situation indic=te
circ_ush_ic_
Subsequent Armstrong
Apollo
ii
Mission,
Astronaut used
the
photographic
equipment
37NASA-MSC Command
from Kenneth S. Kleinknecht, Apollo Spacecraft Program, Program Manager, Downey, Calif.,
to
Myers, Vice President Apollo American Rockwell Corporation, February 21, 1968.
120
training guides, of
fidelity were
in used
decals, in
expo-
etc.,
training
or
mockup and
such
a hinderance during
effective 4. Lack of
training Apollo
the
have due to
contributed a burned
gear;
a result, time.
a loss
mission
6.
the
Apollo to be
14 mission, changed
the
from was in
the not
telemetry camera
cable
reach
the
This flight
bracket for
available have
simulator.
problems of record
but up
considering to flight
configuration is fairly
These
examples
38Apollo 14 Mission Report, MSC-04112, prepared by Mission Evaluation Team Approved by James A. McDivitt, Manager, Apollo Spacecraft Program (Houston, Texas: NASA, Manned Spacecraft Center, May 1971), p. 9-24.
121
serve effort
as
a reminder should
that have
this
area
requires by
and
adequate
staffing
contractors. d. Use in design Another gravity via verification use of mockups tests is in in or zero the by gravity simulation. of zero
simulation flying
parabolas. and
for
design and
verification,
flight
procedures
training. The for uses fidelity defined of mockups above, during the CM redesign_ the and of and
parallels items
hardware. mockups design. fidelity, hardware fidelity" functional faces 9 and could carry
Initially, were As
hardware
perhaps
electrical consisted
current
from
wood s or glued to
styrofoam panels
wood to
panels),
cheapest
requirements.
part,
contractor
122
marked-up Design
or
"red-lined" not
drawings for
to produce mockup
the
features
fidelity whenever
Materials mockup
were
these
requirements time
mockups,
con-
contractor design
spent
defining J
fidelity the
and
requirements. American
Appendix Rockwell of
results on
of NASA/North
a "Memorandum and
of Understanding" Appendix
general
Update
K includes
for
should
particularly
useful
similar
efforts.
Flight
Crew
Participation personnel participation The of and _/_ in value clew S/C design/development by _ lack of
unquestionly in the
accepted.
crews but
comes
following: not
generic
associated value of as
designers' factors
organizations engineering,
accepting the
or human
and
an entity systems)
special
attention of
(as
with
other to
tendency
engineers
designers
their
123
is
acceptable involved
by
virtue when
of
design not
ability an
and
effort; or
and
the
stigma
someone, reviews
engineer or
critically of
a designers crew
engineer's
a number is
reasons
flight
participation
development I. The
productive: by virtue of their unique position, and or generally subsystems subsystems are
crew,
have and as
S/C
systems hardware
provide relate
specific
compatibility.
(They
excellent crew is
flight
experience adept
other
especially and 3. As
handling
equipment,
hardware users of
complex
end-product, readily
which
and
should
during design
stage.
(Assuming
requirements
prostituted). bring to bear have they previous been add S/C flight experience underestimated, team's
frequently
technical disregarded.
points In
which short,
overlooked, to the
technical
preflight
training.
124
Soviet
space
team Shelton
also the
similar of
flight the
designer, to its
Korolev, Shelton
cosmonauts on the
to review
completion.
development
the
Voskhod
spacecraft:
In a noteworthy and sensible modification to previous cosmonaut-designer relationship, Sergei Korolev now insisted that cosmonauts participate directly in all design and modification decisions. Doubtless his decision grew out of the practical Titov and other completed Vostok modifications cosmonauts after they suggested examined by the Gherman virtually
spaceship.
Both Belyayev and Leonov and other, especially Feoktistoy, participated in the development and testing of all new systems and equipment. Says Leonov: 'We were present at all tests and introduced the changes that we thought necessary. We were happy to see that the designers did not The we leave tester tested a single suggestion important new units of ours without notice .... figure, of course. Nevertheless, ourselves. ' practice undoubtedly with which Leonov rocket reiterates on the this is an all the
the the
to
their
morning
1965. 39
Cosmonaut spacecraft
Belyayev
philosophy
his
Voskhod-2
report: of the spacecraft at th_ deslg_ As the ship was being designed, of its systems and of the ship tests. This method of learning in the tests, confidence in uffizi, we as a the
We began our study long before the flight. took part in the testing whole in complex ground ship, especially perfect mastery reliability. 40
Decade
40p.
I.
Belayayev,
"Flight
of
the
'Voskhod-2',"
trans,
by
NASA.
Paper
presented September
at the XVI International Astronautics Congress, 13-18 (Washington, D. C.: NASA, October 1965).
Athens,
125
The in the
above
discusses
why
the
should
definitely
be
included The or
need
for
vs.
designer with
expressed Center's
by
Rogers, crew
involved
NASA's
Marshall
Space
flight
evaluations:
are sensitized to astronaut operathe design and development cycle. that all the battles are won or that Actually, several preliminary because of vociferous human engineering aided
easy.
in changing the 'training' philosophy. Unfortunately, it appears that the battle for a human engineering philosophy has to be fought on each new program. But .... maybe we human e_{ineers defensive. It define methods them to and is the crew station do our homework better when we're on the
engineer set of
and
hardware
designer's
job
to the
design to
using or
and
establish, It is is also
enforce
with
the the
review
systems
described. what
responsibility is reliable
assure safe. If
end-product
achieves
intended,
there
is
human to be
engineering," _uc by
it
is
that
engineering
effort
or
approach
w_icn
such
inadequacies the
astronauts,
the
program
is
better
off
embarrassment. objects can be is to a design which defended The crew is techniby the
however,
crew and
acceptable
reasonably different.
then ensure
situation are
conflicts
presented
to management,
41jon Human
G.
Rogers, Factors
"Simulation Societ[
in
the
Development 1
of
Space 1970),
Bulletin,
XIII,
(January
126
both the
sides extent
are of If
represented. the
Generally, and
management and
will
cost,
involves other
decision
crew. problem is They role the may designer/engineer's be in awe or attitude toward the
the
flight which
status. lead to
toward in a
crew,
position NASA be
where
he
is
asked
how
cases,
counterpart If the
engineer managed,
asked will
area the
is properly
crew crew
proposed
designs and
and
station This is
efforts the
crew's
should flight
not
be
sought,
even of
at an
stage.
areas need
hardware be the
the
advice
should which
however, be in
other
aspects to
a position
loads, use,
features, reliability, as
put they
the are
because
properly.
Crew
Station
Review
Perspective
with crew
Spacecraft reviews
Design
station
described the
reviews,
which
include
crew
station
127
to
other as
subsystems. review of
At and their
these report
S/C on
reviews, the If of
the
and
subsystem. portion
this
the on
held designs,
the and
are
centered by crew
managed
station and
S/C
(PDR's) and
Reviews
related
role. the
basic design
philosophy, ments
parallels 14.
Apollo
implementation,
defined
Figure
Crew
Station The
Review
Taxonomy are special Critical Crew Test Crew formal Design Compartment (CEIT), Station The applied reviews term to Crew Crew Station Reviews: Crew Preliminary Compartment (CCFF), (CFF) of and
following
Reviews Reviews
Function Function
Other
cover Statiun
a variety m_v_w
_,_, of
therefore listed
the
type
reviews
other
required
program.
Elements Basic i.
of
the
Crew
Station of all
personnel and contractor flight crew management support personnel_ team appro-
Includes priate
NASA
designers,
representatives,
128
and is 2.
crews
when
available,
or when
their
participation
Other
team other
Includes
in
some
aspect
of
the Weber
review,
e.g.,
International couch
Latex
Inc.,
suit or
contractor; LM
Aircraft, Also, if
contractor; of a
the
contractor. design is
aspect television
under
review, the
then
technical
monitor would
of
system
counterpart
participate.
information information
could
of
the
following
forms:
Software conceptual sketches; preliminary drawings and layouts; preproduction or production drawings; red-lined drawings, system schematics; operational procedures; certification test data, plans or results, or hardware failure reports; program test, spares, or mockup hardware plans; general related program documentation; ICD's; open items or action items from prior reviews, S/C tests, meetings, etc.; and technical presentations other or discussions.
b.
Hardware
conceptual mockups; hi-fidelity mockups; mockup hardware for testing; production flight hardware inspection. c. Hardware types
and
stowage installation; GFE or CFE equipment; items and assemblies; and other miscellaneous crew in flight.
bracketry for various types of various types of crew equipment scientific experiment hardware; hardware items operated by the
129
It software helps
is
essential
the
CSR
minutes and
specify the
each
information of the
item
of This
or hardware the on
disposition control
review. in the
maintain section
configuration
expressed
previous
configuration
reviews.
Review
and
CSR's
pre-review review
is made this
provided.
presentation
format: of purpose of this is as of the review and Hatch its expected product.
Definition An example
frqm
a Unified
Critical
Design
Review
(CDR)
evaluate the detailed design side hatch and to demonstrate of a production unified side
system and to close out review action items from a previous PDR on the hatch. Product--NASA approval of the released design for continued manufacture and spacecraft installation. 42 b. The review organization, who have i.e., the technical and are was management identified
personnel and at
team the
assignments, following
For referenced
presented
42Abstract American
of Unified Rockwell,
Hatch CDRI Phase II (Downey, Calif.: Space Division, November 14-15, 1967).
North
130
Organization CDR--Phase II
Board NASA North Chairman American (NAR) D.D. Myers K.S. Kleinknecht
Review
Review
Task
Inner
A.J.
E.
L.
Confer
_!igh_ and Ground Support Equipment Counterbalance Latching Mechanism Boost Cover and
C.
H.
Lowry
L.
G.
Thies
h.
of of of on
review
items
and
a description
of
d.
Presentation depending
design
requirements
or
concepts
type
review.
140
e.
NASA
review or
general
comments
on items
of
special
identification leaders or
acting
as team
cipants discipline
specific and
areas
of key
technical
NASA
contractor as
joint to is
teams
defined more
applied breakdown
functions as
follows: scientific
structures suit
and
tables, teams,
these
and
attempt team,
to
stay
much
organizing drawings, is is a
the
answering
questions,
review
subjects effective
not
individuals subjects
team Any
leaders
with
certain
which or
questions, to
concerns of the
forwarded or the If
leader,
determined is required.
dropped, problem be
postponed, or
initiator review
this can
question if the
it necessary,
written
made
even
141
do is
not either LM
concur
with
its in or
content a Request
or
documented Contractor
the
Review
Item
Disposition in the
generic
used RFC.
previously
a Request In this
hardware are
add
software and
are
reviewed group
and
RFC's
generated.
mockups them, by
provided board
a large time-in
a schedule NASA
for
the
review (CCSR),
For where ,
Review
of mockup
time
designers. review
Time
more
conditions. mandatory--they
however_
responsible
design its
of
hardware
and
should
have
opportunity the
physical pointed
as well
examine
Changes be
layout RFC
drawings, to
procedures.
serves
inform
dispositions
43The
term
RFC
will
be used
interchangeably
with
RFA's
or
RID's.
142
them
that
participant specific
wishes hardware is be
action or
by
the
Management changes an
System to
designed
made.
Thus, action
assign
the
process the
paperwork
effect
cases_ action
the
assigned Examples
a report. in sare
RFC's The
provided
Figure
25 . for and to
team
leaders of RFC
responsible parties, recommends RFC,s, indicate to explain attendees rather unless stated and
clearly
solution. poorly
I have written;
reviewed they
might,
they
feel
design this.
reviewed Also,
is
than there in
a good terms, to
objection, allowing
be
basic time
propose
a good better
produce and/or
a simpler, comments or
leaders
are
required are
each
initials
comments
required--preferably
44ibid .
143
DiOZ'CO!:':_U_'O;_;
Loe_
Fin E, 0.
DISCUSSED Wi]]}
j_
[]
(DO NOT SUBMIT RID'S ON C & b ITEMS) COMMENT ON ITEM: MAKE Pro',rido _.].oa_o COMPLETE, CONCISE STATEMENTS
r_rY, ln_a t.o Ind.-kca_,.s ].ooI_. and t,n._od', poe_:t,].ons ot %h_ lmob. 1.iarktn_s oho_fld bo _,s_.blo %o c_bo_ _re;',._un.
Ib_
_, _-Y_
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF ITEh_REVtE;/ED: (NON-SUBMITTAL OF RID AccOMPLISHES DISPOSITION OF 1- UNQUALIFIED ACCEPTANCE): 2- ACCEPTANCE WITH SPEC CHANGE (DESCRIBE BELOW - LIST SPEC NO. AND PA,%%.) 3- ACCEPTANCE WITH MANDATORY CHANGE (DESCR|OEBELOW- LISTLAYOUT AND SPECNO.) _[_]_4- DISAPPROVAL (GIVE REASO|qS AND RECONL\_ENDED ACTION BELOW) OTttER(EXPLAIN BELOW) EXPLANATION:
See Above
___._ ......
____
DO NOT WRITEBELOW THIS LINE CDR _ " ___, OTHER ESTIMATED DELTA WEIGHT: (4.)...... (.)SCOPE: IN ___ LBS OUT MOCKUP # __. "
FINAL DISPOSITION OF ITEM REVIEWED: [] 1- UNQUALIFff:D ACCEFTAbICE -%_" 2- ACCEPTANCE WITH SFECCHANGE 3- ACCEPTAIqCE WITH MANDATORY CHANGE 4- DISAPPROVAL OTHE_ REMARKS I_AR _.,'J..'L)..Uso do.
0
_-. NAA :0_ 2928-Y NEW 3-65
X.
.......
NASA
DATE Zi-_7
ITEMNAME
Handle
Pawl
Control
[]
[]
(DO NOT SU_MIT RID'S ON C & D ITEMS) COMMENT ON ITEM: MAKE COMPLETE,CONCISE STATEMENTS The handle pa_;l control, _,i_en placed in the latch position prevents opening of the hatch from the outside. This is .the only switch position which prevant_ hatch open_-m.g (f__0m outside). This would prevent the recovery crew from getting inside to perform the postland__ng procedural checkout (aboard recovery sb_ps)_
RECOM.MENDED DISPOSITION OF ITEM REVIEWED: (NON-SUBMITTAL OF RID ACCOMPLISHESDISPOSITION OF I- UNQUALIFIED ACCEPTANCE): [] 2- ACCEPTANCEWITH SPEC CHANGE (DESCRIBE BELOW - LIST SPECNO. AND PARA.) [] 3- ACCEPTANCEWITH MANDATORY CHANGE (DESCRISEBELOW- LIST LAYOUT AND SPECNO.) [] 4- DISAPPROVAL(GIVE REASONSAND RECOMMENDED ACTION BELOW) OTHER(EXPLAIN BELOW) EXPLANATION;
to the s_tch;,_if a safety pin cannot be addedj for safety wire would satisfy the requirements.
(
DO NOTWRITE FINAL DISPOSITION OF ITEM REVIEWED: t- UNQUALtF_.D A_C_:P -__,--_3- ACCEPTANCEWITH SPEC 2- ACCEPTANCEWITH.MANDATORY CHANGE CHANGE . j'-J DISAPPROVAL 4OTHER REMARKS WITHDP_.,,N-GSE pLn no_-_ exists
_--_
for neutral
position-GSE
oz'_-l,7
NASA
145
Figure
NORTH AM_RICA_!
25c
SA._,_LE _-C
AVIAq" IOi_'_ ' Ib'sC:':
RID NO.
DI0!-OO/--_'_UH-0[/
' ' '
1l-i4-67
DATE
Vent
Valve
.D_CUSSEDWITH
APPROVAL iTEM STATUS: [] A. SUBMITTED FOR DESIGN APPROVAL l--I B. suBMITTED FOR CONCEPT __,.___
i. Vent 2. Valve
valve
is difficult ___nocessari!y
should
RECOMMENDEDDISPOSITION OF ITEM REVIEWED: (NON-SUB,_AITTALOF RID ACCOMPLISHESDISPOSITION OF 1- UNQUALIFIED ACCEPTANCE): 2- ACCEPTANCEWITH SPECCHANGE (DESCRIBE BELOW - LIST SPECNO. AND PARA.) 3- ACCEPTANCEWITH MANDATORY CHANGE (DESCRIBEBELOW- LIST LAYOUT AND 5PEC NO.) _J_4- DISAPPROVAL (GIVE REASONS AND RECOMMENDED ACTION BELOW) OTHER-' . (EXPLAIN BELOW) ExPLANATIONi i. Indicate valve ,,closed" position valve is sealed, by marking !so _kim.gtooth whir3 t
DO NOTWRITE
..T__ __ _, MOCKUP # __ -
3- ACCEPTANCEWITHMANDATORYCHANGE 2- ACCEP'[ANCEWITH SPEC CHANGE [] 4- DISAPPROVAL OTHER RE_UkRKS io Le_v_ _;_:,mg _n./ioator _ud
ESTIMATEDDELTAWEIGHT: (+) -LBS (_). LBS OUT SCOPE: _A _-A4_tor IN .; fc:' _^^th st.o_-_s o ' ,_=_-_ o_ition.
146
and
managerial
on
the a new
RFC's RFC
merit, form
etc.
contractors
which comments,
provides
room in
NASA
team
captain's
the
of
the they
RFC are
from part
logged
The
some is An
prepared example
pre-board is given
Crew
and crew
RFC
review: the modifications support problems, it of in team and is the leader other if mDckup holds issues other
for
several
hours,
crew
a crew are
debriefing At
where this
questions, if
covered.
time,
feasible, aspects an
good crew's
concerned questions,
with
the
explain This
item,
or
give
attendance because at
usually of
least review
general provides
RFC's
submittal.
This
understanding
147
Figure
26
REVISED
RFC FORM
_v_
IT_ D_0SIT_01{
SYSTEM
NUMB '_R
CO0_n_ATION
O_WG _/_I?'_ATION TE_4 _-_
_D ISCREPANC'Y/PROBLEM
TITLE
_@COM_'ENDATION :
CONTRACTOR'S
COgeNT
'NASA SIGNATURE
....
SUSPENSE
,L
OF BOARD
CHAIRMAN
SUSPENSE.
[]
DISAPPROVED
TEMP
FORM
AAP
0124, 1-69
?igure
27.
(RFC) PROCESSING
AND RESULTS
I Task Team
Team Chairman
Review Coordinator
Control Point
i Pre-Board Meeting
Board Meeting
i
RFC intent _erialize & Lssue RFC i
l
RFC other teams, & as required originator sign RFC I RFC i ream leaders review, initial indicate' and Dleted &
I _
final RFC number, classify team, and type
Join_ Board _
& cosigned,l
I
I
I Unused _C's I __
c_arity
L reconsider, I S I or rediscuss , Support and Flight Srew Review
Typed
copy plus summaries RFC NASA Independent Review
I
I
Idi rectini
_j
I
I
['-- --(if
originator -_
i c_'I
,.
$ ........
h%.
Figure
28
Umified Hatch
'
'
PAGE
EXPLOitATIoN
BOARD
REMARKS
STATUS
DEMONSTRATE
20 DECEMBER
-2 J. I_ls
BPC I_teh Operation Of the BPC hatch by the side hatch not demonstrated
D_ONSTRATE
20 DECEMBER
-3 J. Lewis
Control NOTE: Same as temporary markings on CM 00_ hatch _AR WILL DO. USE "BPC JETT" Needs Words
Nomenclature-Put arrow on BPC Jettison selector knob and add words "BPC Jeff" on housing for proper positioning ofknob for launch.
-$ E. Hoskins
Lock Pin Release Knob Provide markings to indicate lock &_Llock positions of the lock pin release knob. Markings should be v_sible to center crewman
see Comment
-6 Handle Pawl Control James Shannon!The handle Pawl Control, when i plaeed in the latch position provents opening of the hatch from the outside. This is only switch position which pre_-ents hatch openLug (from outside). This would
_ A safety pin shm_Id be WITHDRAWN-GSE PIN NOW EXISTS added to the s_Titak If a FOR NEUTRAL POSITION-GSE ONLY safety pin cannot be added, holes drilled in the housing for safety _@re would satisfy the reqmt. _ Ships) _ _ ,_ _o
prevent inside to perfo_mt from pos__ gstt_k_, the recovery crew the _}_udiug procedu_'al C/O (Aboard Reco_ery
150
of
each
RID on
by the
all RFC.
and
all is
can of
informally time
comment
large,
limitations, board, 6.
this
facet
be
postponed 27.
the
pre-
Figure
and and
board
meeting NASA
are and
same
usually separate
and
contractor usually of
board
attend. The
They
purpose
understands the is by
extent, meeting
degree held
of the
change. items
inspected the
to ensure and
a conception
hardware or the at
problem
discussed. to the
Usually, RFC's is
NASA's
position
relative
formulated
meeting. meeting: At this meeting the NASA review of coordinator it. The reads each RFC
and
makes
responds
management ensue.
position
debates, mockup at
A closed
circuit to
been
frequently meeting. At
effective other
design
area
board
times,
151
which into
can the
be
readily for
removed
from
the The
mockup board
has
been
members
a decision as
RFC. the
coordinators notes on
generally RFC
secretaries notes
keeping
dispositions. minutes.
These
later
preparation
of meeting
of
Results of the CSR are and written pertinent are into minutes which include the
defined
earlier These
discussions, typed at by
agreements
minutes
place)
of NASA
and as
are of
then
sent
contractor or
a letter
form by
direction officer. is
contractual
latter
signed the
the
Contractual as
direction
is
required the
where
direction or
classified
changes. NASA
official. or
cases, an
a CSR u_g_ of
approach ................
e xi sting
appropriate the
portion contractor. of
the In
minutes cases,
or
the it at is
and to agree
such
practice
implications available or
this
redirection design
the
hopefully
feasible
alternatives.
Reviews Design approach Review of the (PDR) Contract is a End S/C review prior held to to or formally early in
the
Item
152
design is to
phase, review
as and
shown
in Figures Part I of
14
and
24.
approve
the
detailed I of the
Specification.
implementation and at
of Part
End
signifies 45 The
completion is generally
Design phase
Requireand
signifies These or
beginning are
design the on of
development. approach
reviews
basic
concept in
being
assure Other
the the
used
evolving in one
concepts. report:
summarized
The preliminary design reviews (PDR or conceptual reviews) are a series of reviews at system, subsystem, and component level which are intended to assure contractor management and the customer that the proposed solutions satisfy the mission requirements; that
existing available
qualified, or, conversely, that subconthe basis of results of preliminary design (specifications) are established. cross of
requirements
These reviews require the concentrated section of personnel and may well result in
of program effort. The preparatory phase of the preliminary review normally requires evaluation of major trade-off studies, as, for example, mission support equipment interfaces. Review findings may indicate the need for parallel development programs to assure the availability reviews must to satisfy requirement. of be 46 an adequate design. complete evaluations management (customer In of and any case, the preliminary existing concepts in order contractor) assurance
the
Program
Configuration
Manaqement
Manual,
op.
cit.,
46Elements D.C.:
153
As a
review
requirements,
PDR's
include
the
following:
Establish the compatibility of the selected design approach for the Contract End Item with Part I of the detailed Contract End Item Specification. Review pre-design drawings, sketches, envelope drawings documentation to establish approach. schematic diagrams, layouts, and any other available design system compatibility of the design
b.
c.
Review
all
materials with
and
materials
applications criteria
to
established
flammability
analyze etc., to
all
models, of the
mockups, design
logic
diagrams,
off-the-shelf
establish
those to
portions
of
the
design
approach
which
mustbe
further
detailed
Review requirements for special to establish the producibility Identify interfaces which contractor and government example S/C of a S/C PDR
fixtures selected
g.
An
performed program
one
for
LM-10
and
modification of
where
station the LM
stowage
compartment additional
collection to
system, the
exp_um_ Stowage in
stay, LM
descent
Subsequent
Modification of Work, At on
discussed
Contract
Statement
Configuration various
Control.
this
PDR,
documentation
the
above
designs,
and
Program
Configuration
Manaqement
Manual,
op.
cir.,
154
to
the
interior
LM
ascent
stage, in
and both
the
exterior
stowage and of
Mockups
were the
changes
majority Were
came
from in
these
modifications
general,
EVA provisions. During PDR's total status, (I) were crew and redesign scheduled station had the of to the CM crew station review reviews in 1967, a series of of S/C six the redesign
progressively These
various paralleled
aspects the
redirection
accommodated
with
effect. a relatively participants. crew the station, technical informal and comparatively were crew and primarily other review. technical efforts subject (i.e., and the a view small NASA group and
Attendees flight
personnel
subject view of of
under the
resources_nd effort,
fabrication, a proper,
personnel of
support) on
focus
subject. subject
Later matter
mockup the
allowed station
of
entire
155
(4)
of
design
changes
to
evolve to by
into
tendencies a means
contractor on for
S/C
designers
theirselves (5) Provided designs date. (6) Allowed earlier items Although provided partly the the for because for
natural,
logical
as they
evolved,
instead
"relook"
at
a number providing
of
concepts an
modified review
from of
PDR's, during
iterative
this PDR of
method
implementation
scheduled of after
because proDerly
motivation fire of
redesign
station
tragedy. the dates in of these 2 reviews Photo review majority 12 , i0 and items ii The reviewed indicate closeout lockers 14 show at the these mockup
is provided at
Table for
and
specific the
items. of
pointed were
metal; metal.
wooden, mockup
a few
specific of these
items was
result
a review of
the
concept as The
in
the
form
or mockups, disposition
concepts action.
modified
board
156
Table
2.
CM
CREW
STATION
PRELIMINARY
DESIGN
REVIEWS
(PDR,S)
IN
1967.
NO.
March 15-17, 1967 OF REVIEW Unified Hatch, REVIEWED (i) New unified hatch
concept.
Hatch parts.
was Dummy
wooden wooden
and
except
linkages
concept to and a of
a dummy
top
latest
modifications
incorporated,
e.g., new hand-controller mounts on the foot restraint design, couch positioning system. (4) Weber net couch concept developed under
NASA
contract.
NO.
2 Design Review
April 19-20, 1967 OF REVIEW Crew Compartment REVIEWED (I) Wooden and (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) NASA stowage lockers bay.
(with
piano
type
hinges)
for
aft
bulkhead
upper
equipment
alternate
proposed
aft
bulkhead lockers.
stowage
configuration.
stowage stowage.
provisions. panel and protection, S/C wire and tunnel foot restraint.
abatement of
closeouts
protection and
(wire
trays). relief
Relocation valve.
glycol-diverter
valve
cabin-pressure
157
May 2-3, OF REVIEW REVIEWED (i) (2) (3) (4) (5) Combined
forward probe.
hatch.
docking
restraint tunnel
lighting.
NO.
June 28-29, 1967 OF REVIEW Modifications REVIEWED (I) Stowage Stowage stowage samples (2) (3) (4) Modified Alternate provisions:
coding proposal, stowage provisions, and general and layouts provided. tool set--bench layout
insert internal
of
of hardware
provided.
fastener
Miscellaneous
structural
reviews and redesign effort. A misture in the mockup and layouts were provided. (5)
of physical
hardware
_c_ _ontrols Modification. P_esentati_] of _L_= added ECS controls and relocation of previous ones.
location
v_A=
NO.
system.
Mockup
158
2 6
continued--
August 16-18, 1967 OF REVIEW Crew Compartment REVIEWED General Crew Station
System
Modifications
Configuration
provisions; crew operated mechanisms; and communications and display panels items included:
review
Oxygen mask, line routing, and protection of oxygen lines for emergency breathing system; sterilization system for drinking water; post landing ventiliation system duct and valve; fire extinquisher stowage and interfaces_ TV camera mount; and miscellaneous couch redesigns.
159
Photo 11. CM PDR-2 Mockup Configuration for Review of Stowage Locker Concept
160
Photo 12
161
162
Photo 14. CM PDR-4 Mockup Configuration for Evaluation of Cabin Repressurization Package and other Items
163
164
was
thus
given
the
go-ahead or
to
proceed
with
design
implementation_
defined
exceptions
modifications
Reviews Design review Review the _<.DRj is design End of a review a Contract held End near Item design or The 14_ 24_ com-
formally
representing
a Master
Item is
of design and
technical _
reviews
review
held_ It is
baseline of 90 to to:
to be
used
95 percent ao
Rec_lirements of the
compatibility with
des_gned_
Master
relate the design to the design approach PDR and updated to the point of CDR. of the design with materials flammi-
guidelines compatibility of the design Documents (ICDs)_ schematic by reference block dia-
functional block diagrams_ and all other available engineering documentation to support the ICDso ICDs De essenriaily complete at the point in time of CDRo _e__ ..... i a PP _<:m_ data _ at this point in time to establish
and
the
integrity e_
Other
are
summarized just
in
the to
report: of to
reviews for
are
held
prior
engineering
drawings
manufacturing
They
are
4SAm____ollo _pacecraft
Program
Confiquration
Management
Manual_
ibido_
po
4-4_
165
all
elements
of
the
system
including
science
experiments
They
provide the greatest potential for discovery of detail problem areas Here_ as with prepackaging reviews_ the activity usually is conducted at the component level At this time the designers consider their design to be complete_ all development and evaluation tests have been completed_ The output data from the prior reviews_ including action items_ are available Only qualification testing to demonstrate that the design has its specified capability remains This prerelease review is the last chance to prevent premature submission of an immature design to @_alification testing (Historica]iy_ the designer's confidence is seldom justified and changes will be required as a result of qualification testing During the Gemini Launch Vehicle qualification program_ for instance_ components experienced 176 failures in 962 tests_ and the Mariner MM-64 experienced 58 failures in 805 tests . o o)o The will (i) (2) prerelease cover the review will be directed following points: to the detail hardware
and
Has the packaging altered the circuit characteristics (previously reviewed in the prepackaging review)? Has the designer considered the _lalification test as design requirement (and possibly the most severe requlrement_ Have the parts and materials application data been to include latest configuration and part-use data? Did the relative Where evaluation testing to its capability by
updated
really evaluate the hardware for passing qualification? is claimed_ are both
qualification
similarity
the hardware and the usacLe_ really similar to the cited example? (An item may have been previously qualified but may now require additional testing because of changes in mission environments_) (6) Can this tested? are design be manufactured_ inspected_ and readily
Included
reviews
of
specifications
for
manufacturing
check-
_{n_< acceptance _:_ environlnent_ quality cnnfrols_ and q1_alification test stresses_ as well as the storage_ installation_ transportation_ ground test_ and flight envirormentso Results of prototype manufacture and test are necessary inputs to this review in order to obtain a preview of the probability of success of the manufactured version These questions are not_ of course_ intended as a check list but only to indicate the direction this particular review should takeo 49
49Elements
of De<ion _ _
Review LeW
for Ior
Space _ ace
S _
stems sLems_
__
p_
23
166
crew
station
mockups design
used
at CDR_s
are
high
and
generally drawings
to
S/C
con-
for
LM-10
and
example_ _block"
have S/C
described and
a point S/C
began
LM-10
stage
fidelity The of CM
into subsemodi-
actual S/C
test
CDR
@_ent
fidelity
the
basic
therefore series on
CDR_s to
contract
items
differences the CDR_ under with the one ample the The the
item
aspects
Compartment that: the of the these mockup_ the stowed are CDR
equal the
footing meckup_)
the crew
CCSR
crew are
dominates fully
station and
mockup's electrical
interfaces
standpoint_ is TCD_s. provide frec/uently ICD's are a Hockup quality surfaces reviewed utilization evaluation mating individually or with of fit
interfaces station
problems
167
As the
noted crew by
ICD_s
should
be
signed status
off report
by
CDR is
time
As for be
part the
of
minutes_ leader of
a ICD
prepared may
board
Special in which
follow-up the
action
required have
to expedite redched no
signoff
ICD_s
concerned
parties
agreement_
Crew
Compartment A Crew
Stowage
Reviews Stowage specific of Review S/C all (CCSR) mission and crew also is to verify the and crew goals_ station's includes _nd do not
in
stowage and
items_
items
operational that
verifies and
approved require-
provisions It provides
mission and
operational
f_rst the
trn]y
procedural crews. or
prime
flight a mockup
held G<E
contractor's equipment
facility used is
utilizing
a test
article. incor-
flight
and
all
hardware The
the
unstowage
S/C_
Crew
Compartment (CEIT)
Function follow
Test
contain and
operations mission
provide
representative
S/C
CCSR_ until
the
CH
CCSR_s At
were this
l,ater program
LM
also
stopped
LH-10o
168
the at
CM
106
and
107
were and
Flight
crew of
attendance fairly
more
pressJng_
mockups
at MSC
and used
training to
CCSR_s.
differences
CCSR
Preparation The review in is scheduled to as the so on as possible test can to be before and made S/C from the turnover of
the
S/C
manufacturing design
operation in
organization_
so the It is
necessary also to
changes
scheduled
to precede
CCPF/CEIT etco_
allow
fixes
resulting and
tractor_ to set-up All CCSR month prior stowage the CCFF. The same
suppliers_
flight
date
equipment_ to the
etco_
to
be
used
in
the
of the All of
vehicle Checkout
Operational of
Issuance delivery
an updated to
contractor
a month and It
allows and
adequate
identifying fit
shortages the
GFE-to-CFE_ pre-CSSR_
perform the
internal
This
contractor's
optio%
is
169
internal correct
of
the
crew
and prior
helps to
deficiencies to work
NASA's
time time
is to
not do
available redesign
review
Bench
Layout As part
Review of CCSR all crew equipment_ detachable from stowage the No The mockup flight lockers_ are couches_ on
and
other for at
readily flight
removable crew
laid
tables is used
inspection. mockupso
hi-fidelity
Bench
l_ayout
fills
several (i)
purposes: and verifies equipment inspection such readiness of each do for the CCSR individual mating
ensures_
item not
and
its
operations
involve
a S/C
familiarize by etc.
the
crew and
and
engineers by
with
the
equipment
unencumbered engineers_ (4) allows stowage (5) provides quanity trampling Photo for and 15 depicts easy fit
a mockup
supported
knowledgeable
verification details_
of
the
mating etCo
of
some
components_
and
of
a large without
layout to
All ICl)_s
to the
adherence own
other All
exc_ined
individual
design
170
171
stowed locker,
within or
a given
S/C
are
out
next
to
the
stowed
inside
cushions retained.
to ensure result
tightly
RFC, s frequently
Mockup prime
and
Engineering flight
Activity crews, follow the agenda outline which stowage piece of mockup. suits In noted is in
Operational are
Procedure to evaluate of
used effec-
procedures
operability is are
a vehicle wearing
phases, personal
detailed
crews being
gear
as required and
simulated. are
CCSR times
launch, of
orbital,
landing activity
verified.
Other
critical and
stowage
tunnel CM to the
hardware LM and
removal their LM
stowage, prior to LM
of
stowage to the
transfer major CM
from
the
CM.
The and
simulate setup
stowage mockup TV
configuration is depicted by
activities. 16 and in
photos
circuit
mockup activity.
mockup
comments
were
participants crew
notes, an no
explanatory of viewing
questions. activities
means really
had.
172
Table
3.
TYPICAL
CREW
STO_AGE
REVIEW
(CCSR)
AGENDA
Day
l:
AM 8:30 9:30 9:30 - 9:30 -12:30 -12:30 Contractors Introductory Briefing Crew perform bench layout review of loose equipment NASA engineering inspection of crew station (unstowed and with couches removed) and of crew couches in support stand
PM i:00 I:00 4:00 4:00 8:00 - 4:00 - 4:00 - 6:00 - 8:00 -12:00 Crew inspection couches removed) NASA engineering equipment Installation of Prepack loose (OCP) 3300 Stow crew of crew and of perform couches station (unstowed and with crew couches in support stand bench into per OCP layout review of loose
equipment per
station
3300
Da_ AM
2:
Crew No. 1 suit up Crew No. 1 conduct of OCP 3366 Crew No. 1 conduct
pressurized
portions procedures
emergency
egress
Crew No. 1 complete unsuited portions of OCP 3366 Crew No. 1 evaluate probe, drogue,.and forward hatch _towage ...... ' ......... Crew No. 1 restow and evaluate crew station in entry ration (unsuited) Crew No. 2 perform Restow crew station informal review of crew station
configu(unsuited)
ma_
3:
AM 8:30 AM 9:30 PM 4:30 - 6:00 7:00 7:00 Engineering evaluation Deadline for submittal Restow crew station of crew station of RFC,s - 9:30 PM - 4:30 Crew (Same No. as 2 suitup for Crew and No. insertion 1 on Day 2)
173
Table
continued--
Da__z_i:
AM ----9:00 I:00 12:00 4:00 NASA preboard meeting in mockup area and contractor meeting in different location. NASA/Contractor Board meeting in Mockup Display Area Conference Room.
NOTE:
During
this
day the
on next
basis ran
with the
the
CCSR,
thru
unsuited, 2 performed
same 3.
items
during
Photo 16. CM Crew Compartment Stowage Review (Area Adjacent to Mockup Shown
174
Photo 17. CM Crew Compartment Stowage Review; TV Monitoring System for Review Participants
175
176
each crew is
major
crew
run
in
the Flight
or
at
least team
at
the
end and
of the his
The to
leader
usually
take
write
defines
at this
debriefing. The review reviews stowage drawing produces on items and good stowage updates lists to are diligently documents. so the checked Drawing cause can so the and be ICD defined.
usually are
these
held
where
problems
develop
and
Board
Meetings conform list are to and the of description action against taken a number by items GFE provided are above. Lists in the of meeting as close or This the
stowage which
documented
written action in
are
usually NASA
action_ If the
internal
review not at
mockup is is
was held
required. when
review crew
between can
contractor or other
available shown.
changes
demonstrated
modi-
fications
_/C
Bench
Layout
_eviews Review Crew is a systematic Fit and of examination Function equipment flight program drawing. laid shown or of (CCFF) stowed test equipment in is the held GFE
Compartment
inspection of each
the of to
inventory flight
piece
equivalent
particuheld in
and
a special on tables_
room to
equipment Review
systematic 15.
matter
similar
Photo
177
are
to
the only
flight a
support is for
team,
and
other
station item
small each
move
from
and
examine
correspondence The
stowage
list,
and
drawing,
documentation.
item's
serial
numbers
are
documented.
Hardware
are
operated, mating to
or mated parts
with can
the be
corresponding evaluated on
cushion, RFC's
or
other written
which any
cover
hardware out to
discrepancies
Reports hardware
define is
contractor RFC's, to
after assign
the
action is
items, taken by
minutes contractor to
action
DR's and to
process
necessary
direction
items.
Crew
Compartment A Crew
Fit
and Fit
Interface is an an
Compart at the
operational
conducted
vehicle
contractor's
facility
appropriate
This
test
is
now
usually Test
on is flight
Equipment CEIT is
held
the
full-blown, test
are the
operations cannot
astronauts
178
of
the
CCFF/CEIT
is
to verify GFE
that and
the
crew
station,
and
(both
CFE)
are This
suitable in of the
mission
actual
clean-room
simulated
useage, degrees of of
unstowing of all
various and
the mating
connections,
bracketry,
surfaces.
Preparation test is scheduled before to allow delivery sufficient of the time S/C. to identify and of the than should 30 days allow
should
be made
shipment
facility.
stowage should
interface also be
The
test
scheduled The
CCSR these
changes
as
guidelines in
since is
flight
usually these
test
extensive,
schedule
followed. CFE crew equipment, the CCFF the and or crew CEIT. schedules Crew All at least are
the but
date
for
mandatory to the
for
CCFF.
crew 30
should
delivered
contractor
50"Crew
Integration
Plan
for
Skylab,"
Revision
A,
op.
cit.,
p.
ii.
179
before S/C
the
review. reviewed,
All
items
are
the
stowage the
list CCFF
for
the
being
and above.
by
the
S/C are
Open the
items
Review
much the
as S/C
Operation given to
Checkout, NASA
use
crew final
equipment the
for
Prior the
review,
stowage this
defining and
stowage of
After items
complete,
performance or need
CCFF/CEIT
verifies
that
were
stowed
correctly,
revision_
the
CCFF/CEIT these checkouts such for consist as mating, of verification connection, of etc. the In stowage, the and the hatch flight
indicated,
miscellaneous the
procedures of all
operation crew, in
"loose" and
installed
suited In
the
Launch _--_
stowage, simulated
equipment locations
mating
mission
configurations accessability
stowage
effectiveness,
general
mechanical hardware or
and
electrical are
discrepancies whether
operation,
it mates
with
180
completion or Any
of have other on
the
review
in
the are
S/C,
items
which as
are
clearly
documented
DR's
(Discrep-
or requests
for
modifications,
documented
RFC
Board
Meeting The review It board meets chaired board to the immediately by the all after appropriate results, the conclusion S/C and Program of the Manager RFC's CCFF or
tests. his in a
designee. similar
action CCFF
results board
to
MSC
action.
retained
review
processes.
Other
Crew This
Reviews describes CSR is the as usual CSR's of which occur during the S/C of is
used
features It
and tool of
management used by
earlier. and
station
efforts
associated of of of action
problem with
solutions,
closeout development
station. forms: mockup of meeting review the only; similar CSR as changed CCSR's CM a
may
take and
any
mixture in a
mockup
meeting_ to from
scaled-down S/C
version
emphasis to the
during were
development, The
two
latter,
deleted.
discussion
which
follows
describes
primarily
181
and
the
emphasis were
given
them
during by
CSR's
frequently
called
station Equipment
personnel Meetings. as
assigned, Other
e.g., CM
fact
CSR's, Oxygen
different Mask
titles
follows: Crew
EVA
Review, In-Flight as
Equipment station
Crew
meetings
were
held of
the
Reviews." CSR's
was
requested Apollo
provide crew
at was
his
facility. and _s
that reviews 51
time,
station purposes
intense is
served
several i.
a typical
agenda
follows:
Purposes: a. Provide (North crew b. Serve vehicle a routine American equipment as method Rockwell, status of and crew of timely CM interchange crew of NASA/NR
Contractor)
station/
a review training
hardware
requirements
schedules. c. Provide crew for discussion and coordination and flight of crew NASA/NR related
station/crew
equipment
51NASA-MSC
PD8/T763-BG-52-68-120
TWX,
from
J.
B.
Alldredge,
Contracting
C&SM Procurement Section, to North American Rockwell Milton I. Drucker, Apollo CSM Program Contracts, Feb. 9, 1968, written by Jerry R. Goodman.
182
2.
Agenda: a. b. Prior meeting action items (Contractor/NASA from prior Report). reviews--CCSR, s,
RFC/Action CCFF's,
item/
Squawk
status
etc.
(Contractor/NASA
c.
mockups, EVA
training
under
development.
(Contractor
report). d. Stowage report). e. Potential report). f. Report aircraft g. h. ICD status of and discussion underwater on simulation testing, testing (Zero gravity, report). S/C crew compartment changes (Contractor/NASA status: list/drawing and problems. (Contractor
and
etc.)(NASA/Contractor
report critical
(Contractor hardware
Review NASA
report). station key review schedules plans (Contractor/NASA (Contractor report). report).
Crew
General
definition (Contractor
report).
items. the and LM contractor; CSR these status. NASA indicated crew there were geared
action
formal CM
deleting
formal of
CCSR's, to
a need
continuing
review
changes
baseline
station
183
for of
evaluation evaluation
of of
those changes
changes to
previously
reviewed,
and
close-in To as
those
affecting
at KSC. actions of to
satisfy follows:
provisions allow it to
for be
rapid used as
support special to
station
and able
the
mockup's design
required, subsequent
proposed
2.
Joint to
CSR's
to
be
held in
on the
an
as-required before it
review
mockup
These
meetings,
serve
following
Review
station stowage
interface
problems,
monitor changes
the by
contractor's review of
implementation requirements, of
of drawings, and
evaluations
demonstrations
hardware
interfaces. c. Monitor support crew station/crew and equipment status. hardware delivery,
requirements,
52NASA-MSC
letter
PD8/L792-68-JC221-1050
from
Jack
Fuller,
Contracting
Officer, Spacecraft Contract Apollo CSM Program Contracts Downey, Calif., October i0,
Section, to Milton I. Drucker, Director, Space Division, North American Rockwell, 1968. Written by J_rry R. Goodman.
184
d.
Ensure of
proper
and
timely affecting
and station.
interfacing
field
changes and of
NASA 3.
chairman
standard special or
were specific of
problem, are
a significant
quantity for
identified
as necessary
review
contractor. RFC,s (RID's to in the case of CM contractor) etc., chairman in was a would similar given the be
submitted manner
document CCSR. to
to the
disposition upon
"in-scope" of
RFC's the
completion or were
CSR.
direction or action
other
higher-level handled
specially
CSR's of
as
described
above
proved
very
effective
and
means of
supporting review
program items
A sample type is i. 2. 3.
Dump
System
(S/C (S/C
I01 103
and and
subs) subs)
Locks
Umbilical
Couch Stowage Requirements for normal S/C 104 mission (EVA provisions)(S/C i03,
530p.
cir.,
Enclosure
3.
185
4.
Sample Entry
Stowage subs)
5.
Provisions
Mount Attachment/Alignment Mount Color Coding Electrical Cable Attachment Tether and Attachment Redesign - CCA
6.
7.
Translation
Controller
Modifications
Right J-Box
with
Couch
Foot
8. 9.
Redesigned
Chlorination
System
Operations
(S/C
i01
and
subs)
Electrical Grounding for tainers and Other Stowage Electrical Grounding 103 and subs)
LiOM Cannisters and Cannister Stowage ConContainers (S/C 103, 104, 106, and subs) on the Foldable Crew Couch (S/C
i0.
Provisions
Ii.
Rotating Guard for Crew 2502 (S/C 103 and subs) Manual of Couch Strut
Couch
Armrest
Locking
Mechanism
per
CCA
12.
(S/C
103
and
subs) a specific
Examples problem Finder decision flow. same the in were on S/C to A CSR was the
Optical 104. in
camera to S/C
add was
called for on
decision. results is
case CSR
subsequent Appendix L,
items
provided and
as a
sample
of CSR
activity,
contents,
methods,
follow-up
action.
CREW
STATION
ASPECTS
OF MANNED
SPACECRAFT
DESIGN
!"
, Purdue
THESIS Submitted for the degree University in partial fulfillment of the requirements Engineering 1972
Industrial of the
Urbana-Champaign,
Urbana,
Illinois
1i
U>J--cl_P-7[
UNIVERSITY OF THE
_
ILLINOIS GRADUATE
_'
AT
"<
URBANA-CHAMPAIGN
"
COLLEGE
i; January, 1972 li
I HEREBY
RECOMMEND
THAT
THE
THESIS
PREPARED
UNDER
MY
!4
SUPERVISION
BY_
JERRY
RONALD
GOODMAN
i!':
! .
ENTITLED BE ACCEPTED
CREW IN
STATION PARTIAL
ASPECTS
OF MANNED
SPACECRAFT OF THE
DESIGN FOR
II i7 ii
1
1
FULFILLMENT
REQUIREMENTS
Ii ii
Head of Department
[i i
.?omI_l_on
concurred
in*
'<i
171
% \
'i
Committee ['i
on
Final Examination-_
[i
'li
i t
!,i
Required for doctor's degree but not /or master's. ! t[ Id
DS_Z
i_
ii
ACKNCWLEDGMENTS
This graduate
thesis program I
was for
made
possible of
by
Center
a Master
Science
sponsorship appear in in
obtaining
of the and
this
documents my views
of experience as a result
with of
This
thesis and
sents in any
and
this
experience
way
official
position of to
or viewpoint. NASA, write Aaron in who The and who strongly of and this this
Richard do
graduate Joseph
a thesis Cohen,
also
thank
Goldstein, I am
also
for to
support
achieving was
especially my work
Loftus, Program.
during
Apollo been
liaisc_ greatly
of Miss me in
Jeanie
Walker
of NASA
significant
materials to
for
this and of my
acknowledge suggestions
helpful The of
advice and
and
Hertig. Department
advice Psychology
Robert
Williges
of the
and
I wish patience
wife time
during
"pregn_mt"
iii
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Crew Station Desi@n ....................................... Preview of Thesis Contents ................................. CHAPTER I CREW STATION DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT: CONTROL _qD MANAGEMENT .....
2 5
36
Crew
Station
Organization
.......................
36 37 38 41 44 45 46 46 61 82 114 115 122 126 151 164 167 176 177 180
General
.................................
General NASA and S/C Contractor Responsibilities ....... Specific S/C Contractor Responsibilities ................ Flight Crew Support Teams ............................... S/C Design S/C S/C S/C S/C Contractor Requirements Design Support and Teams ............................. Configuration Documentation Control ..............
Requirements
...................
Configuration Control ................................ to GFE Interface Configuration Control .............. and Configuration Reviews ..................
Development
Mockup Utilization ....................................... Flight Crew Participation ................................ Crew Station Review Perspective .......................... Preliminary Design Reviews ............................... Critical Design Reviews .................................. Crew Compartment Stowage Reviews ......................... S/C Bench Layout Reviews ................................ Crew Compartment Fit and Function Equipment Interface Test ........................................ Other Crew Station Reviews ............................... II GENERAL INTERNAL CREW STATION LAYOUT/CONFIGURATION REQUIREMENTS ................................................. Total Crew Functional Volume ............................... 7 Stowage/C_npartment ................................
186 186
198
iv
Page
Basic Factors .......................................... 198 201 203 205
Habitability ........................................... Equipment and Stowage Arrangement ...................... Task Analysis and Detailed Requirements ................
Crew Size/Anthropometrz_ Mobilitz_ and Visibility Requirements ........................................... Crew Size/Anthropometric Criteria for Spacecraft Design .............................................. Clothing Effects on Size ............................... Suit Crew and Suited Capabilities Closeout ........................... ......................
206
206 231 231 257 257 261 265 266 266 271 279 279 283 297 301 307
Cempartment Panels
Provisions
Closeout
or Provisions
..........................
Debris/Equipment Traps and Nets ........................ Wire/Tubing Protection ................................. Windows ................................................... S/C Use/Design and T and ................................. Requirements Protrusion ..................... Hazards ..............
Functions Corners
Basic Factors .......................................... Recommended Criteria ................................... III RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ..............................
BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDICES
........................................................ ..........................................................
186
II REQUIREMENTS
LAYOUT/CONFIGURATION
A Table
of
a Chapter the
on
this
subject
was
provided sections
in of that
contains functional
following general
outline:
volume_
layout,
and
habitability; crew
visibility and
windows; the
protrusion sections
noted and
content
and
style
subject
level.
Total The overall shape, total mission, crew size, S/C interior
Crew size
Functional is
the
allowable
scientific
systems
equipment American
study
design
criteria
discusses vehicle
of vehicle crew be as
affecting 1 They
compartment
note of
decisions shapes
considered one
standpoint volume
with
subsystem.
which
available
and P. R. Tiller, "Investigation of Aerospace Vehicle Criteria," Final Report (Dayton, Ohio: Wright-Patterson Dynamics Laboratory, July 1964).
Flight
186
187
the will
crewman
has
effect
on the
system. in the
Too system,
effectiveness system by
volume body
penalize chosen
increasing provide
weight
cost. useable
should, the
sufficient "2
vehicle
system.
growth pounds in
weight
for
feet
of useable and
Weight
growth
atmospheric in other
temperature _s
systems, by in
thermal
and Crew
areas_ is
volume
many
requests
specific
quantities
siderable
scrutiny. frustration of manned is voiced aircraft by those involved fit usual into in investigation particuis pilot Costly that may and This when times
problems, complaint
larly
it."
The
effectively. usual
delaying is
many
development
volumes be well
negotiated, only
requirement will it
functional
must
understood;
adequately
represented
and
documented.
2 b_7/.
3E. W. Davenport, S. P. Congdon, and B. F. Pierce, "The Minimum Volumetric Requirements of Man in Space," Proceedings of American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics T Summer Meeting (Los Angeles, California: June 17-20, 1961).
188
the of
Apollo
Command
for
example,
had
an
a symmetrical These
a 154"
diameter
base
dimensions and
included
ablative and
pressure was
shell, based on
numerous
volume of the in
preliminary
effort the
required crew
basic was
the
anticipated in wooden
workspace with
at an
mockups
subjects value
approximation crew
this
basic
requirement mission
that tasks
would
Continuous volume.
mockup These
held
adequacy
served 29
to minimize illustrates
internal Module
volumes Spacecraft
Mercury, U.S.S.R.
Gemini,
Apollo are
Command
Spacecraft
contained
4. There are numerous The Mercury factors to be considered was in a one-man when comparing in His reach, entire these which the
S/C
capsule
effectively miscellaneous
controls, or flight.
were
accessible
to him.
remained
Flight
short was
with two
Gemini crewmen,
and
Apollo also
who
flight
with,
position
still
basically
Figure 29
Modified from: J. P. Loftus and R. L. Bond, "Crew Tasks and Training, ' Lunar Landing Symposium (Houston, Texas: NASA-MSC, 1966).
189
190
Table
4-
RELATIONSHIP
OF CREW
SIZE
AND
SPACECRAFT
Effective Number Spacecraft of Crewmen Pressurized _olume, (a) ft 3 Spacecraft Free ft 3 Vol. (b )
crewman, (c )
Mercury Vostok Gemini Voskh8d Apollo Command Lunar Soyuz Entry Module Orbital Module Skyl ab Command Orbital Module assembly Module Module
1 1 2 - 3 3 2 3 3 3
58 90 80 170
30 75 40 140
30 75 20 37
e f
e f
e f
70 75 107
modul e, tot al Multiple docking assembly Airl ock module Orbital workshop
3,700
volumes literature
are
derived
from
design
data
for
U.S.
spacecraft
and
from
for
effective equal
free-volume distribution
CAssumes
fLunar Module Data 027II (Revisioh2; NASA contract NAS gTotal Modified Volume. from:
Data 70,
- ECS, SNA-8-DLED-540-54,
191
fixed, for
but
the and
crew
had
more for
mobility
in
their
ingress
egress and
Extra
Vehicular duration
Activity
related on the
longer An
missions,
greater the
open-hatch by EVA
permitted
required to in the
this
double
required and
manned. example,
effect have
the
displays
controls in
design the
alone,
overall on
accessible close
within is
other would
a proximity
encumbering
supplies
increased. In Apollo, and the three crewmen in for there the CM have a primary and and other and and general critical navistowage
display In
launch, are a
a work
widely
distributed itself, as
primary
workstation. to
requires in Apollo
supplies, from
S/C
structure
and
of up for of
inside
CM and
reflect to permit
couch trans-
side lation
struts for
impact, them
a range
during
impact.
192
In
addition, at during
the
volumes time or
listed during
are
predicated Such
on
a set
a given mission
mission. stowage
phases
temporarily drogue, in
probe, as
for
example reduced. is
shown
available the
launch,
previously items,
fairly leaving
with
additional volumes
hardware are,
These
therefore, In
difficult the
generalizing studies
about
required volume
literature,
(confinement)
immobility direct 4
can
result
physical In 60
distress, of
other space
factors.
studies by (see
confinement the
Roth, Table
relation This
duration
describes of minimum
even
when
modifying
factors
are for
optimum.
Th_
threshold
optimum.
Between on
acceptability
depends
somewhat
optimum
habitability
Adm--_nistration,
5parts a and b are from T. M. Fraser, "An Overview of Confinement As A Factor in Manned Spaceflights, " Proceedinqs of the N_$A Symposium on the _ffects of Cn_f_ nement on Lonq Duration Manned Space Fliqh_s (Washington, D. 1966), pp. 1-7. C. : NASA, Office of Manned Space Flight, November 17,
193
Source:
Stowage Installation - Inflight, Crew Equipment, V36-781512 (North American Aviation, Inc., NASA Revision B, July 7, 1967.
Drawing Contract
ON HUMANS
a
a.
Extent
of
Type of S_xly
Operational Conditions
References
Simulator Single
SAM or_-man SAM one-man Vostok one,man Lod<heed-Georgia OPN-360 HOPE II HOPE Ill HOPE IV & V HOPE VI & VII Naw ACEL Naw ACEL N.A.A. conical N. A, A. cylindrical N. A. A. disc SAM two<nan SAM two,nan SAM two,man Republic Douglas GE Martin Baltimore Martin Baltimore NASA Ames WADC long range U. of Maryland (Single) U, of Georgia (Multi) U. of Georgia U. of Georgia U. of Georgia U. of Georgia LISNRDL USNRDL Lockheed.Georgia (Multi) F_4 ",_1: '_ WADD capsule APC M59 APC M113 APC Ml13 APC Ml13 A_C Ml13 Nautilus Seawolf Nautilus Triton
,"
Simulator Multi
2 2 2 2 2 2. 1 1 2 2 2 1 I 1 I 1 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 1
WADD-AMRL-TDR-63-87, 1963 WADD-AMRL-TDR-64_3, 1964 WADD-AMRL-TDR-64-63, 1964 NAMC-ACEL-383, 1958 NAMC_ACEL-413; 1959 IAS Meeting, Los Angeles, 1962 AIAA and ASMA Conf.. L A., AIAA and ASMA Con_i L.:A.; Aerospace Mad., 30:752 1959 Aerospace Mad, 3__2:6Q3, 1961 SAM.TDR-63-27. 1963 RAC-393_ 1, 1962 . ASME Conf., Los Angejes,. 1965 GE Doc_ 64-SD_79, 1964 MAR-ER-12693. 1962 : IAS_3-18, 1963 NASA-TN-D-2065/ 1964 Aerospace Mad,, 30:599, i959. Univ. of Maryland_ 1963 GEOU 226-FR, 1963 GEOU 226;FR, GEOU 22_FR, GEOU 226-FR, GEOU 226-FR] USNRDL-TR-418, USNRDL'TR-5O', WADD-TR-60-248, .
1963 1963
i , : '!_' '[i !
i-
Confined Chamber
= ii l .:i
1963 , " 1963 _ : 1963 1963 1960 : i i. 1961 _ 1960 "" .....
:
Coc&cplt
p:/:,: "Co.i."(Single)
2S
7
2 1/3 2 1/6 1/3 :' 1/2 1 1 11 60 4 83
3
2
"
2 I . 2 2 3 3 1 1 1 1
,_ ''_::_ :!
"
SAM Lankermu SAM SAM MA-6 MA-7, 8 MA-9 Vost_k I Vostok II Gemini III ,
4 45 28 14 1/3 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 " >1 .... ' .3:1/5:_:.:., 8"_:: 1 .:1 14
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 : 1 i
3 3 3 3 1 2 2 1 2 ,,;. 1
1964
WADD-AM RL-TDR-63-37, i963 Aero_ace Mad., 12:1194, 1964 Aerospace Mad., 351:931, 1964 NASA Doc= 398, 1962 NASA =SP-6, 1962 NASA.SP45, 1963 FTD-TT-62-1619 1962 -::q_:: FTD.'Cr-62-1619 1962 _/ I'_': ,_,` ",.... . i !:':" "'i :
:;]'
;;:_,.
"
. : :i "::::".
:::!_!::;:
_': _';-:_' : _:{Prol:_=ed_Po_artT: : J 29_ >" :1'_:" : [:1 :" _.M_SC, Ho " ; . , "2 " ., : :_r.,
a - Impairment classification grades impairment, detective impairment_ respectively. b - Gemini should Midprogram be 20 cubic Conference_ feet per
1966, crewman.
indicates
this
volume
195
Table
continued
Free
Volume-Duration
Tolerance
Factors
in
Confinement
"'
. . "
.,
1600cu ft
"
(_
:. -
Impairment
I Impairment (one-man) i_ator (multi) chamber
'
"
(_ (_) No Impairment ,_
)etectabe mpairment _
:
,,., ,
Marked Impairment
t _i.t.
'4
10
20
40
50
IO0
- Days
..............
-..-
c.
Threshold
Volume
Requirements :.
According
to
Duration . .
of
Mission Feet . ? :;.t:_;_}::':,_: ""_'>_C: '_ . . %_,,_.,._ . _}_,..: <_ ' _ ": "
'
, ,,- _.::.-:'.. :_-_::._, 6fac'6,_ - Cubic 50 25 _5_'_L'}< Feet: ;[: [':"<..... volume-
Duration (days) 1
Thre'_hold volume
Ti_reshold
:'
l I
I , , }
'3 :4 "
. ' "
90 105 1.I 5
6
_I:)....:
lzo
1Z5 _" .
3s
40 .
_6/
....
.
/'
_35
" " " "
" ''
" "I_':_
" ..
"" " "
s_
70
_5o
? 150
Source:
T.
M.
of
Habitability
During (Washington_
Long D C. :
Duration NASA_
NASA-CR-1084
196
Key
factors
that and
Roth
reports
may
alter
the
curve
are
experience. reported
factors 5 as
missions
rating. missions extending and volume beyond suggests per-man would 60 days, for in be Fraser provides a summary (400 200and of
durations crew be
about feet,
cubic optimum
acceptable cubic of
cubic report
about living
350
feet 15
a criterion with of
station,
between and
crewmen,
resupply 3 or
rotation volume
revisitation but
area, volume
recreation included of
storage volume
are
specified are
only
a Portion of the
required
crew
questionable Some of
studies and to
Roth.
facilities not be
used
tasks
during These
space
flight
the
most
that
has
effect is
the
minimum in
crew view of
This which
questionable
orientation is not
during
weightlessness.
It
Volume
Requirements,"
Space
and
and
Space
Standards Space
and
Criteria,
Technical
Earth-Orbit
Station
(Washington,
NASA 9 November
197
whether of
some
of the
free
volumes or
used
to
the the
data
include of
volume enclosed of of
furniture, It is
equipment that
total as
volume instead
the
chamber, volume.
reported
free
actual
Davenport, to clarify or
et this
of of to is
volume
is
in
its
volume their
functional
volume
essential interior
activities. The
same work,
volume.
exercise, volume
functions
required
support
crew
other
equipments, etc.,
unfilled
corners,
spaces,
is not. ''8 re alis_icaily With noted in this would the describes the what CM the crewneeds crew _or volume many that may truly
definition, be further
reduced, Davenport
perhaps out
used
literature. equipment,
points
unique impose
operations, volumetric
and
other such as
specific
reql/irements, They
long such
passageways chargeable
between to man's
compartments. volume
indicate ''9
not
requirement.
8Davenport,
et
al.,
op.
cir.,
pp.
and
5.
9Ibid.,
p.
6.
198
In
this
case,
the
arrangement
of
the
S/C
interior
or
general
com-
required is
passageways. to,
which
system designer
accountable
station
determine the We
appropriate in that
volume vehicle.
or vehicle
configuration
discussed and of
functional which is
crew
volume,
which
may to
vary
for
S/C
generally if
difficult to
this
volume,
serve
some
serious on
and with
application. overall have to mission incorporate requirement which critical adequate the and con-
crew and
designer crew
activities,
size_ which
subsystems, to an overall
volumetric design.
elements It not is
these
their
total. in his
crewman
areas
have
room
function ones
Additional to satisfy
requirements the
beyond
psychological by Roth.
factors in
confinement area is
mentioned to
Further,
research
required
define
applicable
criteria.
General
Equipment
Layout_
Basic
Factors The major been configuration by factor in the crew station of the current
S/C high
has
created These
requirements imposed
for on
orientation by launch,
during abort,
g-forces.
forces,
199
and
landing
phases,
are
in
the
most
this the
is As
axis by an
loads
taken termed
down
couch, basic
frequently
"eyeballs location
crewman and
orientation displays to
also
dictates
controls This
around S/C's
trend and
mission specific by
capabilities. and crew These in Table compartment factors 6 . stowage alone eating work/ can
dictated into of
many basic
grouped Some
seven
these weight,
significant
effect
on required Mission
volume, will
S/C
crew the
duration water,
of
food,
equipment use,
quantity
command required, is
overall listed.
stowage If the
other
factors
that
of
vehicle,
mixture
pre-
wear
spacesuits affect
pressurized of tunnels, to
greatly of
size
hatches, be gas
individual
and
controls
operated, and
arrangement environmental
Special
outlets
stowage,
capabilities
or provisions
2OO Table 6. FACTORS IN GENERAL AND SPECIFIC EOUIPMENT AND CREW COMPARTMENT LAYOUT
i.
Mission
Related:
3.
Shirtsleeves
and
Suited
Modes:
6.
by Functional
Unit
Breakdown: etc.
Mission requirements/goals Abort requirements Contingency requirements Mission duration Operational requirements/tasks Scientific requirements/tasks Operations/task criticality and priority Operational sequences/timeline integration Resupply provisions Offloading capabilities General Environments_ imposed controlled: Structural loads Gravity loads Vibration Temperature Noise Illumination Humidity Ventilation 2. Crew Affected: Crew quantity Crew command structure/division of responsibility Size/anthropometry of crew Work-duty/rest cycles General communication Crew-to-crew Air-to-ground Control/operation manning requirements Information monitoring, visual and auditory Physical movements required Communications, visual or auditory 5. 4.
(helmets/gloves
off)
Fully suited, ventilated Suited, pressurized Suit and suit support equipment donn-doff volume Equipment interfaces for suited operations EVA requirements equipment of related support
Work/duty station, vehicle management, hardware or subsystems operation Rest/leisure Recreation Exercise Sleep station S/C records and data management Personal area Water and food preparation Dining area Waste management area Personal hygiene accommodations Donning/doffing stations Equipment checkout/repair/maintenance 7. Equipment/Equipment Layout:
Intravehicular ActivityT Mobility_ Visibilit_T and Accessabilit[ Requirements: Shirtsleeves/suited modes Detailed task requirements Working volume/room required--with and without free orientation Visual eccessability--with and without free orientation Support information or communication Translation/restraint aids Illumination available Ingress/Egress and Cargo Transfer Requirements and Hardware: Requirements: On-the-pad
area
Overall spacecraft configuration constraints Command controls and displays Spacecraft subsystem equipment, controls, wiring, etc. Crew compartment closeout provisions Emergency equipment/controls Stowed and installed crew support provisions: Crew apparel/suits equipment and
ingress
expendables
transfer
Crew equipment Operational and support equipment Hygienical and waste management provisions Docking hardware Temporary stowage configurations Stowage configuration at various mission Couches and seating provisions: Couch/seat articulation envelope Couch stroking envelope (landing) Couch/seat stowage Maintenance/sparing equipment Flammability and materials control Worktables
Specific EVA in-flight Hardware: Hatches Tunnels Passageways Transfer devices/remote Cargo transferred Transfer alds/restraints Lighting
phases
handing
201
Habitability Another and the flight key objective should in be the integration for of good of the for S/C design and layout ''I0 blending with Kubis as as man four the For
crew
provision
spacecraft, of man's
habitability living,
operating, hardware
overall a system
S/C, is
it's
indicates its
considered confines.
habitable II He
within
describes
Current
spaceflight future,
where
will
obviously qualities
the
lack
of
objective
measurements. related to
emphasis S/C
U.S. onboard
experience adequacy of
amount
and
type
of
volume
, and
general efficiency of
requirements
greatly Cooper
crew's this
operating after
Astronaut Orbital
completion
Mercury
10Webster's Third International Dictionar_ defines habitability as "the state of being habitable." Habitable, in turn, is defined as "the capability of being inhabited," and specifically, for a dwelling is denoted as "reasonably fit for occupation by a tenant of the class for which it was let, or of the class ordinarily occupying such a dwelling."
lljoseph F. Kubis, 'YH_bitability: G_eral Principles and Applications to Space Vehicles," in Proceedings of Second International S_mposium on Basic Environmental Problems of Man in Space (Paris: June 14-18, 1965).
202
On
all
our
flights
the
cockpits
have
been
cluttered
to the point where the space and the equipment with which and inefficiently arranged. the equipment than did the located special r _ in the or
remaining for the astronaut he must work is very limited In most cases getting some of provided device. too often more exercise Stowage of is not given
equipment is a very enough consideration. On items the Apollo onboard of this stowed CM or 12 Mission, were
CM
alone, by
from the
i, i00 flight to
to 1,200 crew. These lockers, operating it, important comand discontent in this Total
stowed
handled are
operated at
equipment in
estimated 40 the
5,000
7,000.
approximately to
stowage CM from
the
transferred spent in
effort it up,
were and
the
equipment,
setting in S/C
restowing
stowage stowage
operation
and
efficiency. result in
arrangement critical
inefficiency, create of
loss
mission Additional
time,
irritability, preflight
the is
crew.
amount
ground
required. factors sleep which influence general habitability work areas, are: etc.; and the comfort cabin reasonable equipment easy and design goal offered
Other by couches,
stations, of
nominal noise; of
control and
temperatures, of operation
humidity, and
ease
handling for
_ther
simple
design,
habitability. of detraction
serve
its
operations
habitable.
12Mercury Project Summary including Results of the Fourth Manned Orbital Flight May 15 and 161 1963, NASA SP-45, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Manned Spacecraft Center Project Mercury, Part 20: "Astronaut's Summary Flight Report," by L. Gordon Cooper, Jr., Astronaut (Houston, Texas: NASA Manned Spacecraft Center) p. 349-58.
203
Equipment
and
Stowage
"Guiding should be
principles to
applied of
general are
equipment
arrangement I.
components,
follows.
Importance
The operational importance, or how the activity with the hardware component or of relative importance to achievement tives, mission, or scientific goals. made of such objectives by priorities. 2. Frequency-of-use This used. refers principle: to how much the system A
or
components
are
3.
Functional
Grouping components 4. or
system. principle: or patterns of relationship use of components also be dictated that typically
Sequence-of-use Sequences
or frequently occur during flight, such sequences may and operational timelines. 5. Location-of-use principle:
McCormick. It involves the used or assembled for use. important primarily mity To that begin
in stowage management, i.e., items which are used in one area should be stowed in close proxi-
if possible. with general equipment be crew, arrangement/layout, defined basic in S/C areas it such is necessary
sufficient and
basic
requirements size of
as mission concept
objectives
duration,
subsystem
Enqineering_
(3rd
ed.;
New
York:
204
and
overall
During 1967,
the
initial
phase such as
of
the
Redesign sent to
requirements for
that 14
Apollo size
crew
were
defined
contractor
designing
configuration Block II
for
a Block
I earth-orbiting concept.
mission
concept
lunar-landing
mission
Crew i.
Compartment
accessability
2.
shall
reflect
sequence,
frequency-of-use,
3.
required for emergency return to pressurized crewman. mission duration and from reflected other baseline in
or
entry
shall
be
4.
stowage
of
lithiumbe ii days.
cannisters stowage
consumables list
shall
5.
(provided
with
the
6.
available subassembly
volume
for
containers or not.
to
be
standard 7. 8. Use
prepackaging
where stowage
primarily
9. i0.
of current
unitized
to be outside couch/crewman
of maximum assembly.
ii.
Stowage to be added or deleted per basic crew compartment configuration as agreed to and documented by NASA and contractor. (Provided in a referenced set of meeting minutes.
14Letter PM5_L693-67-BG52-267, to and Information System Division, Spacecraft Subject: March 20,
Space Manned
Center Contracting Officer, Apollo C&SM Procurement Section Contract NAS 9-150, Block II Crew Compartment ModificatiOns, 1967, written by Jerry R. Goodman.
_05
Task
Analysis Given
and
Detailed
Requirements of requirements application and of Conover S/C. 15 and general application analyses by
some
basic
definitions
of the
the
guiding
arrangement, by Woodson
link
approach for
considered, pro-
large
station
types
components between
visual, task to
auditory, be
links
analysis
performed. Additional detailed Marshall task Space the analyses, Flight such as 16 that should recommended be by the
NASA
George to
C.
Center,
sufficiently
thorough i. 2.
determine
following: where body the operation is carried assumed out. to perform the
Specific
points
positions
usually
3.
reqruiements necessary to accommodate movements required by the operation. or passage other to the work point, will
4. 5.
The size and weight of be carried to the work Environmental ana devices. conditions
and
equipment
which
6.
which
require
protective
garments
7.
for the manipulation of the items involved e.g., fasteners, tools, modules, covers, and
15Wesley E. Woodson and Donald W. Conover, Equipment Designers (3rd ed. ; Berkeley: Press, 1970), pp. 2-158-60.
for
Human Enqineerin_ Design Criteria, MSFC-STD-267A George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, National Administration, Factors," pp. September 213-14. 23, 1966), para.
(Huntsville, Aeronautics
5.5.2.1.1
206
8.
Light and space requirements control manipulations. Electrical, require chemical, thermal,
to
enable
crewman
to
see
and
9.
hazards
which
additional
clearances
i0.
Passage through the space of other personnel, equipment, vehicles, or loads not involved in the specific operation that work point. Reductions of useable space by doors, shelves, covers, and
of
ii.
other
protuberances opening into the workspace, as from test equipment, tool boxes, workstands, temporarily stowed or brought into the area.
Crew
Size/Anthropemetry
I Mobility7
and
Visibility
Requirements
Crew
for
in
the
throughout for
population Program,
method
initial 17 The
pacecraft
Air
Force
dimensions. read as
specifications
crew
size
and
number
height - erect, buttock-to-knee length, Wee height (sitting), hip breadth (sitting) shoulder breadth (bideltoid), and arm reach from wall. All other body dimensions shall fall within the 5th and 95th percentiles as defined by WADC-TR 52-321. Percentiles for body dimensions undefined by applicable documents will be estimated by appropriate statistical and anthropometric methods. 18
17H.
T.
E.
Hertzberg,
G. S.
Daniels,
and
E.
Churchill,
Anthropometr[ 1954).
18CSM Technical Specification Block Calif.: North American Aviation, NAS 9-150, paragraph 3.4.1.2.3.1.
ed.; NASA
Downey, Contract
207
criteria
were
at the created
start design
of
the
Apollo
Program, This
inherent
fallacies
problems. and
merits
careful
attention
human is to
factor look to
engineers for
natural data.
tendency Nine
textbook-type on this
major
points
emphasize
discussed
I.
data
must
be
of in of
the this
50-100
sample
yield to
reliable 19 another".
results At the in
sample a few
astronauts of astronaut-
were
program,
precluding
establishment
anthropometric of the
standards. of Fiyinq were the Personnel Air Force of or a data other spacecraft frusLater or seemed
Anthropometr_ the
since service
pilots.
design later
unknown
astronauts of
fly
years
further
criteria. and
brought the
program,
death the
astronaut
Thus and
design group.
a relatively
changing
19C. T. Morgan, et al., Human Engineering (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company,
Design
2O8
In were
reviewing less
the than
from of flying
which
the Air
Force
data
drawn,
the
sample
pilots--the engineers,
were etc. to
personnel,
be
more
of pilots, are
this
pilot the
flying draws
which
corps from U. S.
significantly For
comparable Navy
pilot 5th
aircraft and of
percentile Air the ranks_ representative difficult. Force data Force flux
heights pilot
are 66.3
compare_ 21 in.
with With
65.2
and to
civilian
scientists
discussion astronaut
relevancy will be
population
made
2.
Population and
from
which
dimensional must
data be
are
established checked
will and
chanqe
anthropometric
criteria
continuously
revised. Bennett, lation whole provide of army et al., who discuss in the growth in poputhat to "the to
flying
personnel of
1961,
defense more
tomorrow
have
man-machine
systems
taller
20Anthropometry
of Flyinq
Personnel-1950,
op.
cir.,
p.
105.
21Morgan
et
p.
509.
209
and
larger with
''22 1967
of
the
1950
Air
Force
data,
reveals 1950
between
example,
1967 1950
5th
and
dimensions weight by
height ibs._
.8 in._
shoulder
breath by
.7 in.;
sitting
height-erect will
.8 in.
astronaut in weight
vary
development, necessitate
normally of
individual
a program
ongoing such as
at
least
every height,
two are
years.
Dimensions
sensitive
physical with
Difficulties discussed in
experienced point
obtaining below.
another
listed
4.
Do not
design
the
"average not
man"
or
for
only only
accommodate but
discussed design.
such
for
to
95th
percentile
misleading
James York:
Spiegel, Company,
Personnel Subsystems Handbook, AFSC DH-I-3 (Rev. ed. _ Ohio: Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson AFB_ January i, 1970!, pp.
1-7.
210
for
those
unfamiliar
with
anthropometry.
Small,
medium,
large,
or
5th,
50th
and
95th people is
the large.
that
point over
dimensions, below on
a wide Young
range.
the the
data
John
revealsa specified
for CSM
eight para-
dimensions
the
design
meters
quoted
earlier.
Measured Dimensions Weight Standing Sitting height height--erect length (sitting) (sitting) (bideltoid) wall per
equivalent]percentile 52-321 _
WADC-TR 65 48 65 60 50 87 98 15
breadth from
Thus,
the
95th as the
man T or man_
any
percentile
as be
illusor_ 95th
a 95th
percentile
percentile
everydimension.
24 Measurements, Dec. 7, 1962. taken by Air Force specialists and NASA-MSC personnel,
211
Such and
a man body
would
be
huge,
and
resemble
a gorilla
in
bulk
proportions. that body a person dimensions, usually has a variety combinations may of percentile of be For the and of as example, side 95th reach view perand
various
dimensions for
of A,
E in 5th
different produce
would
most
seat 4, A, moved
adjustment upward B, or
forward the
Suppose 95th
D and
and
dimension be
7 would
to reach to
forward,
surface If the E,
difficult 5th
man
percentile
dimensions C, a
for
A,
B,
D,
and
a 95th
percentile When
dimension of the
situation is added,
consideration range of
body seated
vision
more
complex Consider,
(see for F
view
looking the to
Figure
example, G equal
combinations and
and to
G, and 5th
C:
and
percentile, 95th to
percentile; to 5th
F and
G equal F and
equal
percentile;
G equal
percentile
.--Surface l
Surface l
Surface 6 C
G" "orward
A B D
Forward Backward
Control Console _w Gonsol Knobs e (typ.) Control Stick Surface 6 Console Surface 2 Surface 3 View Looking Dowr_ard Side View Surface 4 E
Surface 5
213
and 95th
C equal
to
95th C
percentile; to 95th
and
and
G equal Access on
to
the to
equal
lever,
control Such
stick,
surfaces
are in the
considers the
from
shoulder the is
elbow
fingertips. breadths,
Thus, etc.,
combination a complex
of varying matter
lengths,
widths,
meriting 5. Care is
consideration. needed in workinq the anthroeometric These exceed _ustified Criteria limits by criteria should where it be can and a be in
percentile with
ranqes. to is
accommodated original
data) and
state
90th
actual dimensions
from
10th
and
90th
summarizes
gives Air
equivalent
"low" amount it
Force
criteria, in pounds
indicates
these
astronauts is, of
specified in
ranges. the
information of
assessing
"degree"
incompatibility
with
criteria.
,
AZR FORCE
..
DATA AND ASTRONAUT
'z'_ ze
7
MEASUREMENT COMPARZSON
=. : ........................
ANTHROPOMETRZC
Data Force *
Astronaut Data I ..... 95% Mean 163.66 69.11 35.94 23.62 21.67 13.97 17.88 34.59 No. of Observetions 31 36 28 23 21 27 / 28 9
Data 2' 3 Range Mean 163.94 69.71 36.38 23.78 21.87 14.35 18.72 33.60
t
* 10% 138_3 66.0 34.3 22.3 20.4 12.9 16.8 32.5 90% 192.6 72.2 37.6 25.0 23.0
Measurement Low i40.00 66.42 34.53 22.64 20.39 13.39 14.09 32.20 High 199.00 72.21 38.54 24.92 22.83 15.71 20.75 36.50
Equivalent W (Approximate) i Per Air Force Data Low 12.0% 13.5% 13.8% 15.0% 10.0Y_25.0% <I.0_ 7.5% High 94.0% 90._&+ 97._'_ 88.6% 87._ 97.0% >99.0% 87.5%
RESULT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
.94">
90%
height-(sitting), (sitting),
breadth from
.60">90%
Bidoltoid es nc
Limits. Range to be accomodated to lie within
I
I_ to 90% dimensions
* NASA
Specified
SOURCES: I. H.ToE. Hertzberg, G.S. Daniels, Asro M_dical Laboratory and E. Churchill, Anthropome_ry of Flying Personnel-1950 (Wright Air Develol_tent Center, Wri;ht-Patterson AF Base, Ohio, September 1954), WADC Technical _eport
52-32_
2. Din_ensions 1 through 7 only: E. M. Roth, ed. Compendium of Human Responses to the Ae_'o_ace Environment (Washington, D.C.: Nationil Aeronautic_ SFace Administration, NASA CR-!205, _3[, November 1968), pp. 16-7 through 16-15, using data by W.E. Fedderson, J Reed, National A_rcnautics and S_ace _a:,_n_st_tzon," _ _= Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston, Texas. Unpublishe_ dat_L, 1967. Dimension Spacecraft 8 only: Center, National Houston, Aeronautics and Space Administratlon, Manned _xas. Unpublished data, December 1962.
3.
215
It the 16
is
known,
from in
data
taken these
on
1962, to
astronauts for of
10th
90th
at least the 16
eight
dimensions. percentile In
exceeded
alone. on these
comparing
eight
dimensions, of the
astronaut Force
generally is obvious
exceeds that
population.
specified needs
on these
dimensions
is restrictive
expansion. In body Air the assessing those between similar NASA 5th criteria, and 95th which establish as per For
percentile are
found.
following the
critical
astronaut limit:
exceed
95th
percentile height
chest of
number
astronauts
exceeding
limits
%
known. Air Force data indicate based that on is the general survey trend of to
Recent in Air
dimensions, flying
a 1967 for
personnel,
dimensions
Measurements
taken
December
7,
1962,
op.
cit.
216
be
expected should
from be is
point made
2. 26
data
to verify
population It may
representative to be with
population.
prove
specific
accepted 95th
range
of
5th
percentiles, 27
percent
given
dimensions.
Passenger 90
Handbook
recommends be
than
percent
personnel et that
whenever of at
possible. 90 percent,
Morgan and
least if
percent, also
authors purposes: of
state
estimating by
proportion specific
accommodated permit
inconvenienced and
design;
(2) they
selection
accurate
26D=_I Section
M_h_
_n_
c_..
Subnote
3.1(1):
Chapter
2.
27Military Specification, MIL-STD-1472, "Human Engineering Requirements for Military Systems, Equipment and Facilities," March 29, 1968, p. Ernest J. McCormick, Human Factors Engineering, op. cir., p. 390; Wesley E. Woodson and Donald W. Conover, Human Engineering Guide for
74;
Equipment Designers, op. cit., pp. 5-15; Factors in Technolocfy, op. cir., p. 250; Handbook, op. cit., p. i.
DH-2-2 AFB,
Chapter
Section
217
of
test or
subjects; 29
and
(3)
they
aid
in are
of
operators.
These although
purposes first
correct more
the
perhaps the
issues
discussed; of a group
namely,
for
esti-
proportion
accommodated only
inconvenienced to the
being
applicable
question. the standard If we of also how range use the this of 5th and 95th for If we 90 perce_t. is
criterion. 90
criterion
accommodate shoulder
population.
for
question
should by
much
being
accommodated are
dimensions, of the
dimensions. to
larger many
are is
specific
particularly because
station crewmen
especially to be
backup
crews). all
Theoretically, astronauts, or
accommodate
percent
population.
_Morgan,
et
p.
492.
218
all
dimensions to
taken,
such
as
the
1950 While
critical be
crew to
station a couch of
design. design,
critical to
for
may
critical mask
design on
face
gross
opposed
couch,
mask
designer, should
critical
for
design, and
variability access
dimensions anthro-
capacities,
have
to pertinent
criteria. some cases, the the and physical full range difference and 90 or between 98 a hardware of the
percent
the
design
may
readily or
accommodate in
the weight,
range
much forth. to
difficulty In
compromises situations,
complexity, hardware
certain
special may be
tailoring
dimension is or
especially ist or
percentile Plotting
99th
percentile. form is of
critical as
anthropometric shown in
in the 32,
"adjustability way to to
curves" the
a good
understand
inches) allow
required
accommodate of the If
various
curves various
assessment
accommodation we can
ranges.
reasonably
define
or population is certainly
criteria recommended.
T then
accommodatinq can be
Exceptions to the
where
compliance
is unduly
compromising
design,
219
Figure
32
PERCENTILE CURVE FOR SITTING HEIGHT (A USAF pOPULATION SHOWING ADJUSTABILITY REQUIREMENTS OR PERCENTILE RANGES)
FLYING FOR
PERSONNEL PERCENTILES
41
Top
of
range
ml /
_-
--95th
percentile 14.2"
/
33
_._i 98 _ I
.0"
--5th
percentile
I I 3.9"
60
80 (N = 4061)
i00 ',
PERCENTILES
Source:
Paul Webb (ed.), Bioastronautics Data D.C.: NASA Scientific and Technical p. 242. Applied (Ohio:
Adapted from H. T. E. Hertzberg, "Some Contributions Physical Anthropology to Human Engineering," WADD TR Wright Air Development Center, Wright-Patterson AFB, 1954).
September,
220
or use in such
of
the
hardware
or
systems. such
Freak exceptions
dimensions should be
a category_
however,
reviewed. estimate for apparel dimensional compromised then be may increase range. by the If, however, adjustof crewman awkward solutions of use, and the
conservative to
accommodate is
a wider basically of
providing number
range its
the
severity 3O
estimated: be
from
may
which the
such whose
as the use is
criticalness on system
hardware
subsystems noted
operations may be
should an
considered. alter-
tailoring,
above,
acceptable
6.
Since? tion
the for
body
criteria apparel
to
nude
dimensions_ has to be
wearing
space
suits of
Further or
T determination to crewmen
effects
strapped These
working
considerations, far
dimensions
dimensions? related to 31
visibility
normal
pometric
measurements
capabilities.
30Morgan,
et
al.,
ibid.,
p.
499.
31Suited
dimensions
and
use
will
be
discussed
later.
221
7.
Dynamic
as well we
as
static
be body in
have
kneeling, _ncluding
reach,
and
Forces also
apply
in
various In this
included
category. assumed
between
suited
normal
dimension
variety of
of measurements the
needs and
anthropometrists, designers
various suits,
(aircraft,
space in what
etc.).
appear
dimensions taken
Dimensions vary
body
may
anthropometric endured
astronauts seeking
designers use.
anthropometric
32Morgan,
op.
Ci%.,
pp.
543-50.
222 Furthermore, brought the need A years for an of experience in number of S/C of body needs development different dimension of various design other there method to estabshould of incorcriteria have
compiled will
satisfy
basic
the to
program. be related
these the
Air
_ agencies on and
doing the
anthropometric to be
agreement
dimensions for
provisions
structuring
surveys
measurements. of the astronauts in rigor a should formal may be documented and design data_ and
ensure criteria
improved now to
minimize
time
spent verify
three
hardware.
variety
large Have
subjects wear
with suits
them
apparel
of nominal to reach,
and see,
emergency or operate
Verify and
displays
223
hardware, conditions.
as 33
required,
during
such
nominal
and
emergency
of
Problems are examples which space Borman helmet could wrist not of led anthropometric to the helmet of made problems encountered above.
the
outlined
The
relatively him.
their
hand causing
comfortably
through
disconnects,
a modification
size
ring. which 12 for was served and in the LM as rest/sleep Its for
a hammock
on Apollo
missions.
length Conrad
Apollo too
short
Lovell, hammock
whose was
height
The the 34
flight
'!
modified to
at KSC
Apollo
13 mission)
accommodate
this
crewman.
33The
references
used
in
this
portion
of the use
the
thesis
should
be
read
by
mended, heeding the cautions already mentioned. highly recommended for designing adjustability of dimensional criteria for design decisions.
The following are and the functional use Morgan, et al___..___., Ibid__.____.,
Chap. ii, pp. 485-570. Richard G. Domey and Rosse A. McFarland, "The Operator and Vehicle Design," in E. Bennett, et al., Huma_____n Factors in Technology, op. cir., Chap. 14, pp. 247-67; and H_ _, E, Hertzberg, "Dynamic Anthropometry of Working Positions," in Human Factors, 2, 4 (August, 1960) 147-55.
"Commander's i, 1970).
224
4.
There
were
problems missions:
with
the
couch of
design
on
Apollo had
and
a number
astronauts
the
during subject
was
shorten An
adequate
room that
revealed 95th
the
was
"forearm
taken were
1950
intera 5th
from
related
data values
that 13.4
This
brought
15.4
inches, to or
astronauts length.
dimensions a suit on
this
additional by
thickness crewmen
under
controller
measuring
13.4
by
extending to be
the
slot
an
. 75
inch. length
This
allowed than
the the
armrest
shortened zero
grip
less
percentile illustrates
to emphato be
discussed subtle
above.
sized similar
differences Some
dimensions. were
related
illustration
taken
in
Force
anthropometrists
225 and NASA representatives. the dimensions discussed above were showed The figure used to illustrate grip length" Military what
as dimension MIL-STD-1472
33(a).
Specification, Subsystems
Handbook,
length"
the subtle
difference
Figure
33.
ARM DIMENSIONS
(a) Forearm grip length Source: Unpublished data of measurements, o_. cit.
(b) Elbow-grip length (V) and undesignated dimension (W). Source: Military Specification, MIL-STD-1472, op. cir., pp. 76 and Personnel Systems Handbook, op. cit., p. 2J
confusing data
factor
cited in Table
to compare
undoubtedly (b).
in Figure
33(a)
In addition,
this
dimension
to be closer
denoted distance
representative
of the elbow
35E. M. Roth
(ed.), op.
226
or upper the
arm,
as
the
arm such
rests
on
a flat it
surface. is best to
In view leave
of this
confusion
about
a dimension,
undefined. 5. A cabin a side dump panel of the valve was CM. located supposedly However, Review, this to the left of the commender early I01 Crew design Comon
during S/C
Stowage reach
December when
1967, suit,
the in
commander a ventilated
not
valve
mode, type as
and
restrained
in Photo toward
the 18
couch shows
by
the
harness crewman of to
condition). as possible a
a suited
far
the
dog-leg in
shown to
allowed
crewman was
reach
operate
What in the
unacceptable might
latest
problem
have
surfaced
the
contractor
flight
repre-
the
S/C,s were
Apollo
being
configuration
was
available
S/C
development.
Photo 18. Suited Crewman (Pressurized) Reaching for CM Cabin Repressurization Knob
227
228
229
6.
problems as
in
S/C
design in
started the
earlier
than
Program, Gemini
following
excerpt
a Project
designed
to
accommodate
in the sitting position. It was some second generation astronauts, greater than 75 peraddition, some of these when torso length was simulating a weightless was determined that more
although six ft. or under, were centile in sitting height. In individuals grew up to two in. measured lying on their backs, condition. For this reason it
height in the crew area was required. However, since external geometry as well as seat configuration was fixed, the obvious solution was outruled. The egress kit containing oxygen was cut 1.75 in. by making the part a machining rather than containing bottles. In addition the hatch was internally 'bumped' in the region of additional the helmet area to give room above their heads. this from mann_ EVA. _ factors: man the in 1950 four Thus, to the Air sitting Force the astronauts An additional and proved to be a
.75 in. was gained in great aid for ingress This (a) information The dimension is Of reveals of 36.8 a
several 75th
percentile to
in.
according 16
the
dimension appears
matched ignored
five
The
addition
75th which
percentile is equi-
gives valent
a total to
height
37.55,
a 90th
percentile
sitting
height.
These
Summary, June
230
are
much
less
than
those
recommended
and
criteria
height possible is
required the
conditions,
although man as
meaning 75th as
percentile required
crewman. will
an EVA, height
effective more of
sitting
problem.
of
sitting S/C
height,
while
the
launch,
nude the
dimensions of the
been on held
use Since
orientation the in
restraint their
harness during
seats that an
these
crewman dimension In
gravity normal
addition,
suspect at
that
crewman may to It
suit
one-gravity height
conditions due
sitting in
his is
holding,
effect,
down.
231
the
of
these in
two the
effetts buttocks
plus
tional such
area
difference dimensions to
positions. taken
cases, both
have S/C
initially
positions
com-
parability. The dimensions sions will anthropometric for reclining differ are should measurements personnel from now since taken these in should body include dimen-
values in
taken these
an upright then
position. measurements
also
used
positions,
also
include
suited
measurements.
Effects of the
on
Size
#
previously of
cited
literature design.
and
other
information
adequately
this
aspect
anthropometric
Suit
and As
Suited noted,
Capabilities it is and important not are in to assume way that suited to dimensions, normal are nude motion body on
visibility
any
correlated visibility
dimensions
mobility
and
dependent
design Apollo
of
spacesuit
vehicular in location
garment other
a number
of
extra
materials
232
for
lunar and
surface
operations. were
The
suits
used
for
Mercury the
Gemini suit in
Programs
Apollo
Suit frequently
within incorporate
these
required and
different
mission to
developed
may
vary
considerably The
mission in and
example, in the
bearings hand,
special is
cabling
areas, such
tailored A/P22S-2
the
entirely mobility
different joints,
the
population, designed
standard
sizes.
both tend
seated to
or upright the
positions. capabilities
both use If a
compromise
(pressurization) is worn in a "vented" inside cooling visor is condition and outside oxygen (negligible of the suit),
providing is on or
and
for then
closed), when
dimensions
entirely
different
than
a slight
233
pressure and
The
suit
and size
change volume
pressure by
different
a crewman suit, is
a pressurized or normally
cloth the
individual. taken by
room
Apollo
suit.
as helmet vary
rings,
wrist
a negligible The
amount of joint
angle of
helmet
positions
bearings
to move to 5.0
when all
psig.
Generally, when
tend
become may
rounded extend in
sections
length
pressurized.
joints than
elongate others.
more
circumferentially
longitudinally
3.
Suit
mobility The amount and of mobility offered by suit the vented, slightly
pressurized In some
varies will is
suits,
pressure suit
joint A good
movements deal of
whenthe
not
pressurized. on
development
effort
centered
234
Photo 21. Suited CM Crewmen in Launch Position (Sui Pressure 3.7 PSIG)
235
Photo 22. Suited CM Crewman in Lower Equipment Bay, View Between Couch Foot Struts
236
237
design Some
of
improved when
joints
for
the
various
moving
body
joints,
joints,
position remain near in the The suit joint. material bending of motion plane those may
they
Others except
position range in of
are
joint
movement. suit has to and their up exert bend forces of the the the its joint's range in range to in bend bending. one than on suit the
depending When in
design, bent to
the the
may of
bunch a
range. depend be
mobility
suit
joint Some
on it's
basic
motions in
applied
at earth 4. Suited
gravity
crewman's in
aids
certain The
vary
the
crewman the
is
seated will
or
crewman's
within two a
garment
usually of
between normally
positions. variation in
Movement some
size
related over
suit.
harness
pressurized, internal
pressure
affect
the
suit
"ballooning." At the one g or greater, the man will In sink into the the suit in
downward
g-force
direction.
zero
gravity,
crewman
238
in
suit
may
be
able
to
take
this now
tight
body be
somewhat to do
within this
pressurized gravity
vessel.
able
conditions,
a lesser
extent.
Suited
Dimensions Unfortunately, there is of little the published information and on the size
and
mobility space
latest
ventilated the
pressurized dimensions of a
Apollo
34 summarizes Apollo
general to
suit of
sized large
fit
a EVA
5 1/2type glove
dimensions psi is
size 37
pressurized
provided
below:
EVA Circumference
GLOVES
(95
percentile) 11.2 1.0 ea. 4.5 4.2 3.25 2.0 4.0 17.0 10.5
Finger diameter Width-including thumb Width-fingers only Finger length Depth through palm Wrist disconnect diameter Length-Length-overall to wrist
disconnect
37North
American
Rockwell
Letter
69MAI0112;
from
E.
E.
Lane,
Manager, Apollo CSM Associate Contractor Administration, Space Division, Downey, California to ITEK Corporation, Lexington, Mass., October 16, 1969, Figure 2 of which documents information verbally received for International Latex Corporation, March 7, 1969.
Source:
Vol.
IV:
SNA-8-D-027
(IV) (Revision
2;
24O
is
but
a portion most
of
that
needed
by
S/C
designers. will be
representative
of what survey
future
missions, should
Apollo 38 as
suits
similar
performed
configurations, should
crawling, survey.
possible
positions
included
Suited
Mobility The most Since basic goal data. suits data. Figures
Values recent then, published the suit to the data evolved suit on Apollo to have a suit mobility are from and
flight made.
configuration The
revisions
been
below be
constitutes with
replaced as that
a mobility
such
discussed
terminology in Tables
and 8
for Ii . _=_
the
mobility these
provided wzn
Again, goal" 38
cautluzl
si_ce
information,
actual
data.
J. W. Force
Desiqn Criteria (Ohio: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Aerospace Medical Division, Air Force Systems Command, WrightPatterson AFB, August, 1969), report AMRL-TR-69-6. 39 Roth, op. cir., Chapter 16.
241
Figure
35
DESCRIBING
THE
MOBILITY
_t
_=_
Plane a. b. c.
Direction a. b. c. d. Forward
of Limb -- +X = -X
Terms: ;
(X - Y Plane)
= -Z Direction
[
: +Z Direction Direction
T_r_e of a.
Limb
Movement
e.
_ +Y
f. _
go
Left T_ p_
: -Y
!ii
b.
Extension
- Straightening
or h.
< [
increasing the angle parts of %he body. c. d. Stretch Rotation axis e. f. - Lengthening - Revolution part.
of body about
the
of a body M.
Adduction plane
: Toward plane)
Pronation Supination E.
face
(in X-Y
On back (ed.),
Source:
Roth
Compendium
Human
Responses
to the
Aerospace
Requirements, Extravehicular Mobility Unit for Apollo Block Missions, Master End Item Specification, " NASA-EHU-CSD-A-096 (Houston, Texas: NASA-MSC, January_ 1966).
242
Figure
36
ELEMENTARY
BODY
MOVEMENTS
.-
'
"
_'-_/V/_Dla/-- "
Source:
"Performance
and
Inzerface
Specification
for
LEM
Excursion Module, Government LSP-340-8 (Bethpage, N. Y.: May 5, 1966), pp. 19-22.
243
Figure
36, continued
- 2
244
Figure
36,
continued
KAI_E
FZE_ISJLITY
A _KL___ ,MOBILITY
_/v'KLE
FL-_,RZON
AAIK/..E
,_DOUC;Z"iON
Z_
C.___AIT_L.
JL_J/'IT.
2._S-017" JOINT
P_S/71DN 7"0 W/I/C/-/ THE "5_'_1* W/l-_-_I VE_ITIL,4TED ._FO,_C_" ,/5 BE/_I_ EXERT_=D
Fiol/re
37
BASIC
H_D-FINGER
TASKS
._-TYPE5
0I- HJA/D .
_/o_ B - 7"7P
FIAI_ER
PREIIEN$IOA/: D- Ca R,4,_P
A - PA"MAR
C -Z.AT_-,_,_Z.
R[LA;"gD TA3A'$
/. WR/T/N[_
l.
_Z_Tg_
I* P/C_'I/V_
7,_$K$ "
_,[ :
R_';AT[_
L _l_l;Jq
7A.,SK$
SP,/,'7"C.#
,,_ELATD
]. U31P/_ P/.
7A_._:_
ICR.R
_OZARY
Source:
"Performance
and
interface
Specification
for
LEM
Excursion Moduie: Government LSP-340-8 (Bethpage_ N. Y.: May 5_ 1966)_ pp. 19-22.
246
INTRAVEHICULAR
MODE,
VENTED
RANGE MOVEMENTS a. Neck i. 2. 3. b. Mobility Flexion Flexion Rotation (forward-backward) (left-right) (left-right)
OF
MOVEMENTS )
(Degrees
135 30 140
12 12 12
Shoulder i. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Adduction Abducti on Shoulder Movement Later al -Medial Flexion Extension Rotation (X-Z Plane) Down-up Rotation (y-z Plane) Lateral Medial Rotation Rotation
7. 8. c.
Elbow i.
Flexion
i. 2. e. Wrist I. 2. 3. 4. Source:
145 25
2.5 2.5
Extension (forward) Flexion (backward) Flexion (adduction) Extension "Contract (abduction) End Item Detail Specification
56 57 42 30 (Prime Equipment),
formance/Design and Product Configuration Requirements, CEI No. 3001B, Specification No. CP 3001, A7LB Pressure Garment Assembly with Integrated Thermal Meteroid Garment for Apollo Extravehicular Mobility Unit," NASA Contract NAS 9-6100 (Rev. A.; pp. Dover, Del.: ILC 1-49 thru 1-54. Industries, Inc., Jan. 30, 1970),
247
FOR MODE,
INTRAVEHICULAR
VENTED
MOVEMENTS
RANGE
OF
MOVEMENTS
(Degrees) f. I. 2. 3. 4. g. i. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Trunk-Torso Trunk Torso Torso Torso Hip Mobility (left-right) (left-right) (forward) (backward) 5 35 130 25
24 24 24 24
h. I. 2. 3. 4. j. i. 2. 3. 4.
Knee
Mobility 45 45 25 25 36 36 36 36
248
AND
or Performance i. 2. 3. Write legibly Operate .375" Utilize small Criteria with pencil dia rotary knob screwdriver such as:
0.18 x x x
psig
3.5-4.0 x x x
psig
b.
Pick up small objects Small Screws Operate 2 and spacecraft Vertically Horizontally Use Use Use Use Use
c.
d.
Grasp
i. 2. 3. 4. 5.
e.
f.
x x x x
x x x x x
g.
control x position x x
h.
i.
Move
wrist
side
to
side
].
Intravehicular x - Required
wear
= CWG
and
PGA
or LCG
and
pGA
249
i0 COMPLEX AND ARM BODY (PGA WEAR MOVEMENTS RELATED) * TEST CONDITIONS
FOR HAND
INTRAVEHICULAR 0.18 psig (suit tion only) CM CM Couch Pos. Reach and satisfactorily operate the following: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. Helmet Ring Disconnect EV Visor EV Visor Medical (Positioning) Attachment Injection x and N/A x x x x x N/A x x x N/A x x x x x x x x x Vert. Pos.
ventilaLM Vert. Pos. @ 3.5 CM* * Couch Pos. to 4.0 CM psig LM Vert. POSo
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
Vert. Pos.
x N/A N/A
x N/A N/A
x x x
N/A x x x x x x x x x
Fitting PLSS Controls Attachments OPS Controls Gas WMS Disconnects Disconnects
* Intravehicular
Wear
- CWG
+ PGA
or LCG
+ PGA
Legend: NOTE: The 4.0 performance psig. required in this table shall apply
X - Required at pressures up to
/ 25O
a.
pressurized
to
3.75
i.
at
slopes i0
up
to
27 with x LM at x x N/A
every
inches, LM with
2.
from
3.
a deep
knee
bend
for
three x x
4.
5.
6.
Getting to, and up and prone positions Within 30 seconds, Pickup and carry
7. 8. i
2nd
Walking erect on 3 inclined plane at 3 mph for i0 minutes; jumping over small crevices; taking long strides,
N/A
A ,,__,,_ OPS
_l
__
_ x
.hT,l A x
x x
x x
12. 13.
squatting
Donning extravehicular wear while pressurized, with assistance as necessary. This equipment includes: (a) EV Gloves (b) PLSS (c) SLSS (d) Slip-on (e) LEVA Lunar Boots N/A x
251
Table
Ii
continued-Criteria in at kneeling distance x LM access x in LM and shut and lock N/A hatch N/A N/A x x x x x Extravehicular Intravehicular
Performance 14.
Reach forward while position and torque obtained, Crawl face hatch, Bend down LM hatch. Operate Change down
15.
through
16.
overhead LiOH
canisters.
Handle equipment in torso-bent position in restricted area. At zero "@" 1 0.25 psig pressurized to 3.75
N/A
b.
1. 2.
EV
transfer and
N/A
x x
3. 4.
x x
5. 6.
Access to CM lower equipment bay and capability to handle equipment Capability operations Capability transfer, to carry in CM. to carry out couch
N/A
7.
8.
N/A
9.
Perform manual locomotion and positioning using handrails, Operate Open and LEVA. close LM and CM
N/A N/A x
i0. ii.
hatches.
N/A
252
of
Problems are examples mobility PGA-CM 8 provide of anthropometric during the Couch to Apollo problems Program: ICD, notes a 10th heel encountered
and 20,
Foldable for
Envelope
6 and
accommodate areas:
crewman (Section in
helmet
headrest,
general
appear several
frequently drawbacks
documents,
criteria: (a) There suit uses is size one not and necessarily body any relationship In in fact, between the suit
or more
as many the
(with
Frank
Borman
noted
accommodate helmet
a wide
variety and
shape, are
size, fixed.
fixed
so all
restraint in
noted
in
because to 10th
they to and
for to
general
5th
95th
percentile
dimensions.
253
(c)
10th
90th as
suit 10th
is or
as
difficult
to
90th
requests from 22
only
show
suits CM
use
good
volume.
as part
maximum
Apollo
(suit) in
size
a pressurized
lated pressure in the Command sustained following (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) The tance crewmen between Photo across across across
garment Module
assembly, fully restrained couch under the effect of a of 5 g eyeballs shall not in, be the exceeded:
acceleration exterior
dimensions
shoulders - 24 inches elbows - 24 inches knees - to be determined length - 39 inches length - 25.3 inches 40 were of of the predicated each _.5 of the _ -_-on the existing adjacent ___ .... shown in dis-
three m__
vertical
,,X-X"
struts
inches. how these dimensions For the same were generally noted the
shows Apollo
exceeded by the CM
in
contractor, dimensions:
contractor
following
40"GFE
Crew
Equipment
Performance
and
Interace
Specification,"
SID 17.
64-1345, American
NASA Contract NAS 9-150 (Rev. A; Downey, Calif.: North Rockwell Corporation, Space Division, Jan. i, 1968), p.
254 (a) (b) (c) Across Across Across shoulder--26 elbows--28 knees--18 between suit inches inches inches 41 the S/C contractor's dimensions of view taken early are by Early the undereach in S/C
Inconsistencies requirements standable contractor the Apollo when and and the
one at
looks the
overall the
program suit
contract
design
require-
fairly had to
design it
and
dimensional S/C
limits,
reasonable suit
dimensional
limits
1964-1965, shocking--the
suits,
especially in
large put
for into
optimal reducing
Extensive widths to
was
and
elbow
requirements. other CM
requirements docking by LM
surface
operations shoulder
created and
mobility width
dictated
elbow
joint
"Contract End Item Detail Specification (Prime Equipment), mance/Design and Product Configuration Requirements," CEI Specification No. CP 3001, A7LB Pressure Garment Assembly
Perfor3001B_ with
Integrated Thermal Meteroid Garment for Apollo Extravehicular Mobility Unit_ NASA Contract NAS 9-6100_ (Rev. A_ Dover, Del.: ILC Industries_ Inc., January 30, 1970) pp. 1-27.
255
still that
CM being
It
was
not
was in the
the
prime as
it
third one
Mission.
flying
although the CH
suit it
primarily to
LM,
developed
satisfy
gration
goals. the was If bulkiness accepted the Apollo the been as and inconvenience during for suited vehicle depresmission
term
overall
effectiveness by these
and
severely
Figure
crewmen of 3 1/2
inches
at the
between
vary data,
with
each
custommade understood of
suit.
As
with
common important
and
This
is
because
measurement:
Revision
Notice
No.
9315
to
ICD
MH01-21020-I16, A; Downey,
PGA-CM North
Calif.:
256
(a)
The
suit
shape
when
unpressurized, when
or
at vented Previously
changes
considerably e.g., or
pressurized. at be
those elbow
the
widest
shoulder
example, or
measurements straining
made
elbows vary
depending for
such
24-inch
above, width
the the
maximum in view
suit,
of
19.8 4.2
inches
chest
of the
elbow. the
winter
flying 43
gear
a 4.4
over
suit help
etc. of
Such
imposing whose
mobility be better
judgments spent in
designers, known
time
would and
accommodating
capabilities
criteria.
4_Morgan, et al_______., cir., p. 507; op. data from Flying Clothing on Body Measurements of Army Rept. ENG-49-695-32 (Ohio: USAF Aero Medical AFB, 1943).
257
Crew Within large runs items sions by in is or the amount of the of interior
Compartment crew
Closeout
compartment miles
pressure of
equipment, miscellaneous to
literally
electrical
various These
tubing_
fittings, unless
and
other
are or
susceptible snagging
protected, Such
hazards the
crewman. during or
ground
crew
checkout,
flight
for
covering these
otherwise be
these closeout
hazards panels
possible,
should
acdeptable
substitutes
are
discussed
Panels of
or
closeout to cover
equipment, crew
fittings, funcor
items
distributed or in
compartment, to contact
tional flight
accessible
ground
checkout. or cover design shall to serve isolate the following burning functions: equip-
Provide ment,
a tire etc.,
aDatement internal
panel crew
the 44
from
2.
subsystem damage by
components, due to or
from
abrasion, during
caused flight.
ground
ground
operations
Design Space
mimeographed.
258
3,
Protect shocks,
from edges or
potential
electrical
4.
Retain
loose crew
exist
from
to prevent
equipment from
panel such
or prevent areas or
damage
into
equipment.
criteria of and
expanses located, be
areas to
feasible, a smooth
shall the or
designed crew
provide
surface,
adjacent other
structure. of absorbing where kick earth during the loads gravity manned closeout
materials, shall be
areas
would S/C
shall In
capable areas
absorbing deflection
without
.2
deflection.
.... /..... U_LLd_
other
could
cause
equpme_u
the
shall loading
be
capable be
of
absorbing to
a 250
pound
load. size 3. In
shall
equivalent
a standard
heel. inaccessible or other may be to the crew, where as it is not feasible material,
areas
to use fabric
metal
strong
material
closeout
material
substituted.
259
4.
of panels and
shall
be
by
captive needed.
for
quick allow
removal, for
where
shall
troubleshooting
during
5.
Panels by
requiring
inflight Design
removal allow
shall
be
removable for
one-hand
operation. fire
shall and
accessibility assessment
fire
detection,
during
flight. 6. Panels
tools greater
allow where
1/4"
structure required. In equivalent be provided were The provided extinguisher the Apollo of
except
ventilation
flowthru,
CM,
by
blocking compartment
off
the not in
areas to
the
panels, feet
the could
cubic in
for in
Holes fit
the
a special material
would
a foam fire. is An
assessment to the
this under
requirement design.
used
the
23 shows panels
left-hand In and
the
lower
equipment of the
bay panels
of
case,
a portion as a
secondary
structure-holes were
couch.
extinguisher in the
some
of which
photo. is shown
Areas in the
main
display
console,
which
260
261
portion
of
the 24 is
photo,
also
had of
holes 23 the
for
use
with
the
Photo captive
Photo
_ showing panel. of
the
portion
crew
inaccessible of damage of
areas,
etc., were
covered severe
because weight
margin
susceptible
were
covered. Photo the If 24 , several after by lengths the panel of waterwas the contubing and damage
panel, not
veniently should to it be is
added either
area.
covered so that
a panel,
hidden or LM
sufficiently, it should be
impossible, the
protected Control
cover. material
thru
Russian of
performs
the
same
function
a closeout
discussed
here.
Traps
and areas
Nets of the LM, where was equipment used. for could float, was
debris snaps
netting and
This access
netting to
S/C the
removable in the
equipment. section
shows
installed
left-hand,
aft
LM. built no into the S/C and stowage gap or lockers hole into shall be
more
than
an 1/8"
inaccessible
Photo 24. CM Close-up View Closeout Panel, Left hand Equipment Bay
262
263
264
265
will
prevent
loss
of
small
items
which
might
compartments. CM spaceflight_: a loose cabin piece of Velcro that areas. apparently flight, As a result, which
floated
into
were
the
(screens) Standard in
installed states
NASA be
Design
Bulletin manned
following
requirement
should
spacecraft: ventilating other damage 45 tool access flight, to if parts through the requiredevices or jam fans shall be pro-
should
be
taken Of
during
maintenance
access.
Wire/Tubing As tect
Protection where and items or shall Without Area feasible, wiring. are not closeout Where buried these so panels may be used not inaccesto pro-
exposed
provisions are
are
available, sible,
they _
completely
_uu_u_ be
_,_
completely deflection
enclosed andbe be
to
absorb
asmuch size
of
load
shall
heel. during
Wiring ground
shall
allow
shooting
operations,
detection,
Bulletin,
Serial
DS-79
(Washington,
D.
C.:
NASA,
266
and
damage
Appropriate
flight
tools
provided. visual
assessment area by
allow
a typical
wire
shown
in Chafe
be
provided or
for
wiring abrading
and
tubing
where
there chafe
is
doors used
panels wire
them. might
Nonmetallic occur.
protection
where
chafing
Windows
may (in
be
used
with
portholes, optical
or devices
some
Russian
etc.). may,
sextants within a
telescopes
a window,
allow
outside
spacecraft.
Current In Gemini
S/C the
Use/Design United States, two, the have in the Mercury CM Spacecraft five as and the had LM one three. three window, The windows in the the Russian in
Spacecraft
Apollo had
reportedly three
windows
follows: four
windows of the
Voskhod 47
2; and The
portholes CM windows
compartment
Soyuz.
Apollo
46North Rev.
American 4, June
Space
and
Information
Division,
MCR
A3834,
47William York:
Shelton, Washington
Soviet Square
the First Decade (New pp. 125-26; D. Viktozov, translation Aviatsiya of "V Otkrytom i Kosmonavtika, NASA Krasnaia
Vol. 48 (1965), pp. 17-19, NAS_ TT F-10, 216 (Washington, D. C.: June 1966); and Tass Report: "On the Road to Orbital Stations," Zvezda, No. 269 (13708), Nov. 17, 1968.
267
268
269
are
illustrated
in Five
Figure windows
and and
heat shield of the Apollo CM: two forward viewing two side observation windows and a hatch windcm ..... glass with inch of of 2000F. silicon contains
The inner windows are made of tempered silica 0.25-inch-thick double panes, separated by 0.i space, and have a softening temperature point The outer windows are made of amorphous-fused with a single 0.7-inch-thick pane. Each pane
an antireflecting coating on the external surface, and has a blue-red reflective coating on the inner surface for filtering out most infrared and all ultraviolet rays. The glass has a softeninq temperature of 2800F, and melting point of 3110F. 48 The Figure are Ii location and of the 2. Figures three Their 3Ba Lunar Module windows are shown in
Photo in
shape These
illustrated
described:
front face assembly ascent, and rendezvous Both windows have area; they are
2 square
feet
of viewing
canted down to the side to permit adequate peripheral and downward visibility. A third (docking) window is in the curved overhead portion of the crew compartment shell, directly above the Commander's flight station. This window provides visibility for docking maneuvers. All three windows consist of two separated panes, vented to space environment. The outer pane is made of Vycor glass with a thermal (multilayer blue-red) coating on the outboard surface and an antireflective coating on the inboard surface. The inner pane is made of structural glass. It is sealed with a Raco _eal (the docking window inner pane has a dual seal)
48Apollo _erations Handbook, Description, SM2A-03-Block Rockwell Corporation, 10.3, 10-15-70), pp.
Block II-(1)
II Spacecraft, Vol. i, Spacecraft (Downey, Calif.: North American NAS 9-150, Exhibit I, Paragraph
a.
FRONT WINDC_J
f
/INNER PANE
A
A -
_/
//:COATINO
/ IDEFOGGING "
BLUE-RED ............
COATING 30OLM6.!S
b.
DOCKING
WINDOW
:_.._
A'. ';' :_ *1 tllll o
_..:,.,_.__:-,._.._.:_.:._, ___%.%,
Iltlll o II * _k_ll! DOCV,,,G
.
_ 'h___ /
-...........................
MULTILAYER
_ .'_t'_{_t\JX_-_
.__--_-
....
D=_,_, =
.
_ _
..........
ANTIIEFLECTIVE
,_<'____
_-_:'--_
___ __,.,
.tiJ
.A
"
COAT,NG
Source:
:E<TO"'-A
Apollo Operations Handbook, Lunar Module, Vol. I: Spacecraft Description. Apollo Document LMA790-3-LM (Bethpage, N. Y. : Grumman Aerospace Corporation, NASA Contract NAS 9-II00, December 15, 1968)_ p. l-ll.
271
has
a defog bolted
on on
the the
surface surface.
and Both
an 49
antireflective are
window
through
retainers.
F ujcti]6ns
and
Requirements can serve and any of the following for taking use functions: in manned
Windows i. As
in spacecraft general
observation and
viewing
and CM
combination serve to
marks
on
the
windows, maneuver,
monitoring for
entry
function
a visual
reference 50 entry.
orientation
a manually
controlled and
visually as those
mission
anomalies,
Apollo
13 Mission "angry
dar_Lage) and ).
Gemini
Mission
(the
alligator"
49Apollo Operations Handbook, Lunar Module, Vol. I: Subsystems Data, Apollo Document sequent Contract 5O (Bethpage, N. Y. : Grumman NAS 9-1100 9-15-70), pp.
Aerospace i-i0.
Skylab Operations Handbook, Volume i; Command and Service Description (Downey, Calif. : North American Rockwell Corporation, March 15, 1971), SM 2A-03-Skylab-(1), SD 69-248-1, Contract NAS 9-150, S/A 500.
Figure
39
LM/CMS
DOCKING
ORIENTATION
AND SIGHTING
LM
_V
STAND-OFF
1 } CLUSTER2
" (CSM) _y %. \
:LUSTER LM
(C'SM) -y
(CSh'_)
-Z
u_
QUAD A
LM u_ CREWMAN A-tlGNMENT +Y LM CLUSTER4 C SM,,"LM INTERFACE STAND-OFF CROSS ELM ACTIVE DOCKING] J AUGNMENT STR,PS-IAL,GNMENT XA = 1110.25 TARGET QUAD B +Y (CSM) CSM-ACQUISITION AND ORIENTATION LIGHT (TYP) = 312.5 X E
SIGHT
XA = T422.75 - XE
IX) --3
Source:
CSM/LM Operational Data Book, Vol. II, LM Data Book, SNA-8-D-027 Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation, Revision 2, July 1971)
N. Y. :
273
5.
For or
use for
in
special
either the
photographic Experi51
testing
Gemini
ment 6. For
monitoring
on which the
assessment choice
descent as a LM
otherwise LM on the
landing Figure 40
site, shows
surface. vision
simulated triangular
field
through
left-hand
manual
S/C
navigation,
as in
the
Gemini
Program
Voskhod
flights. monitoring with are crew activities during hazardous or visual observing
ground
closed-circuit
also
of considerable in S/C or
testing
performed
configured
after support
.....
spacecraft crews
landing,
of visual rescue
signals
between and
ground
xzl _" _1-/-
or postflight
swimmers,
i0.
For
use
S/C
aborts on to
and the
deployment
of connecessary
entry. may
spacecraft's the
accommodate
of view.
51Seibert Q. Duntley, et al., Experiment S-8/D-13, "Visual Acuity and Astronaut Visibility, " Gemini Midprogram Conference Report, Part II Experiments. Oceanography, 3-43. NASA-MSC (Visibility Laboratory, Scripps Institute of University of California, February 23-25, 1966), pp. 3-1,
'7
"
/ _.i_
CDR'5
"
WIlNDO%_
VOEW.FOR..APO-LLO
,.
1_.
LPD, DEG
/
"-
_o
LA
t j-....... i l -t"
NG"I
HOR,Zo_
" "
. . . .
'.
--J.,-S ITE, 44: " " .... " " " :" "-i--/ ,]-....
t_
,,
t
, "
--.
_' .=> __
_
":,,
_ ,
:,..._.,
/
.....:....
+ .
......
:..-
..' ..
. . +.
"
...:!_
TRIPLET -- .
BO'DY :!
"
..._y --
""
,._T.+. :" . " " . .. :.. " ' ..' . ..":'":.'i-_ :...
-Apollo
.
i:; --:.
Texas:
. . , + . . + ..
" -- -L'_-November
. .
"
12, 1970.),
, -
_">"
Source:
14
.
and
!_i +Kiselan
" .-. .
.ReVlew,..(Houston_
+ .
" .
, -+
275
Ii.
As
a general
comfort
and
psychological
aid
to
crewmen
by
outside the
viewing. allow takeoff and then landing windows the similar (or to
spacecraft performance
high if
aircraft, have to
wind-
feasible)
would In
satisfy such of
attendant
navigating, objects, of
some offer
greater available.
visual to
currently amount of
valuable window
compare of but in
visual with
areas
known such
within
lacking. of
Chapanis
a Superaround him&
than
of
the
scarcely
area,
itself,
not
necessarily _
..........
_ ..... _I_.T
of (4) and
the
eye
from
the
window
or windshield, of 54 the
(3)
to crew
vision, position
light
transmission within
windows,
orientation
52j. W. Wulfeck, et al___.__%., Vision in Military Aviation, WADC Technical Report 58-399, Astia Document No. AD 207780 (Ohio: Wright Air Development Center, Air Research and Development Command_ WrightPatterson AFB, November, 1958), p. 165.
53Alphonse Wadsworth
(Belmont, p. 4.
Calif.
54Bennett,
Degan,
and
Spiegel,
_.,
p.
258.
276
Since type be
there
are
so many
spacecraft
configurations, for
and
missions
window/windshields by these
developed
dictated viewing
degree example,
crew
position
window
design is
significantly. an excellent for of and source of general 55 Other crew as affected visual
Aviation design
wearing
clarity
requirements
desired_ window
susceptible factors,
to micrometeroid weight of
structural
implications,
of windows or possible or
to prevent
contamination
outgassing on
sealants_
condensation/defogging by shades_
problems eye
window
structure from
physiological
intense
light for
occlusion internal
hardware areas
implications_ through
the
crew_Lan
uu_lu_u
uu__
the Apollo
Program,
Throughout became
a number
of and
the
Apollo
flights,
the
S/C
windows An
contaminated
coated
to varying
extents.
_ulfeck_ op. cir., Military Standard MIL-STD-850A, "Aircrew Station Vision Requirements for Military Aircraft," June 8, 1967, and Military Standard Standard MIL-STD-1472A, "Human Engineering Design Criteria for Military Systems, Equipment and Facilities," May 15, 1970.
277
of from
the the
Apollo RTV
that major
out_56 cause.
the
Apollo
12 mission, of of
problems higher
were than
attributed on
window.
These used to
the 57
materials Photo
seal
29 shows 13
the
hatch
window
flight to the
the
Apollo
addition
on
problem. to cover
surrounding viewing
prevent
forward
docking
sequences. these
internal tended
ately
surrounding
cluttered other
miscellaneous clear
items should
the and
Designs the
areas
available results
"erosion"
generally
development.
4.
The was
optical less
quality desired
of
the for
CM
window
AI-Si02, photographs
than
obtaining
56Apollo 8 Mission Report, MSC-PA-R-69-1, prepared by Mission Evaluation Team approved by George _ Low, Manager, Apollo Spacecraft Program (Houston, Texas: NASA, MSC, February, 1969), pp. 6-4.
1971),
278
279
with
resolution to
camera change
As
a result,
there
was
a proposal on later
material
spacecraft In to
to some
improve
optical certain
quality window
camera have
instances, with
interfere
particular
types
experiments. should solar be and made other for sealing windows from sources. in used
external on on CM
illumination Apollo
continual
the
aluminum leaks
small create
light
these
are
a nuisance, as visual
excessive
on
instruments,
as well
discomfort.
Sharp
Edges_
Corners_
and
Protrusion
Hazards
Basic
Factors Sharp corners and on or the edges, inside potential involved burrs, and and excessive of to protrusions where on crewmen The
outside
spacecraft and
present hazards
hazards are
garments.
cuts,
bruises,
punctures, infections.
concussions, cause
etc., throw
potential off
physiological garments,
a person In
balance,
falls,
tear
impede
movement. area,
time-critical of
cases, movement
such
as when have
evacuating serious
a hazardous
impediment may be
could
repercussions.
Garment
tears
28O
hazardous in the
for
personnel thermal
in
space
suits,
or
could or
suits,
insulative to
barrier, the
mounted damage
or attached unprotected
garment. cables,
spacecraft
proper and in
should crew
be
included
in
the
basic
design should
of be
station. as
Design
criteria for
available engineers,
identifiable others
structural design
designers, and
and
dealing
spacecraft
equipment.
designers found in
designers, Handbook Texture, 58 Manual. etc., of or are the for and This edges
was
calls
appearance processes on
mechanical expensive
smoothing proper
lessening
of
emphasis
58Theodore Baumeister (ed.), neers (7th Ed._ New York: Surfa--------ce Texture, ASA Mechanical Engineers, in Places of B 46.1 1962)_
Standard Handbook for Mechanical EngiMcGraw-Hill, 1967); American Standard_ (New USA York: The American Society Standard, Requirements for 1968. of Sanitation
Emplo_ments_
USAS
Z 4.1,
281
machining nation of
of the
surfaces
which
truly for
require
such
processes. is left to
Determithe
requirements
such
operations
designer. Specific corners are design not requirements in the for eliminating sharp edges and and for criteria these are
available
industrial, some
literature. or elimination
Although
references no for
of protrusions, to follow
eliminating
acceptable. many and of the items used by industry little by in means the and
exist
aircraft hazards.
but
contain to
on these
a need
determine is required
study and
corners,
acceptable for
allowable on the
application (i.e., is
the
presented
feet,
waist,
affected is
angle
object
hit; should
the
with
which
research
include textures
physiological shapes on
effects pressures
surface in
allowable mentioned.
addition
to the
other
factors
282
of Problems existence crew of unacceptable plagued hazards efforts is as the sharp CM edges, LM corners, S/C and protrusions as into typical a
S/C
station Such
problem.
have to
been
found A
them.
follows:
Implemented
known
108,
CM
S/C
i04 a
Stowage Compartment B-2 Protruding spring wire. prior Rough protrusions in stowage compartment R-4 (survival kit stowage): (i) Originally, screw heads were protruding into compartment, and kits were torn during removal. (2) Sharp edges on latching block of compartment R-4. Kits torn upon removal,
(i)
Screws sunk
counter
(2) Asbestos and flourel compound ........ to ^;-to smouhh it uut --Applied on S/C 108 thru II5A.
Delta
Phase
III
Sharp nated
aLetter from E.
American NAS
Rockwell
Corporation, by PD8,
9-150.
Written
Rangel/J.
cont.
283 S/C Where S/C EVA Review Found 112 PDR and Subsequent or S/C Problem/Result Numerous in Service Bay where man works sharp edges Solution Round edges, to act Implemented and
corners
into which protruding sharp ends of bolts would be buried_ and add cover over hinge fairing to preclude crewman or cable snagpoint.
Recommended
Criteria
The can be
criteria
below the
provide
a preliminary above
which an
temporarily and
study for
physiological Design in
basis
Criteria Equipment is to
Surface
or
Scope: and to
criterion as of or
establish to
guide
design,
fabrication, which It as
installation by crewmen,
crew items
hardware
hardware user.
installation
a.
Human Drawing C.
Engineering Number
for
AAP
Marshall
Space
b.
Change Number
Notice 13332,
Engineering to SD69-315,
284
Apollo
Lunar
Missions
Specification by North
Prepared Contract
Division,
NAS
Standard,
Railings, Standard,
Engineering and
Military May
Equipment
Facilities,
Donald
W.
Human
Enqineering
Desiqners Press,
Berkeley:
California Surface
Standard, Society
Textur_e
American
of Mechanical
Engineers,
Definitions: a. For used the the purposes may of this criterion potential the following if commonly they meet
terms
hazards as
"unacceptability"
defined
herein:
290
Protrusions Rough Burrs Fins Slivers Splinters Metal Metal filings chips Imperfections 59 b. Edges and Corners meeting meeting plane. used end for of Hazards this and Means to Preclude listing of them. of two surfaces than not two of the same not plane; of the surface
Material
Edge--the Corner--the
of more
surfaces
Table 12 at
discussion
for
frequently 4. General a.
used
nomenclature.
directly criteria
indirectly specified
b.
and
hardware to
configurations or to can be
are
directly to,
reasonably as
indirectly specified
exposed here.
shall
criteria
from cit..
Human
Enqineerin
q Design
Requirements
for
AAp
Experi-
291
c.
Use
environments--Environments
to
be
considered
as
the
following: (i) One-gravity orientation (2) (3) Zero-gravity Other could mission docking landing). (4) Maximum crewmen acceleration of mission to be considered be six during feet per gravity ground test conditions and spacecraft
imposed imposed
during
booster firings,
undocking,
thruster
zero-gravity second.
phases
shall
d.
Edges? and
corners?
surface meeting
quality, the
and
hardware a and no b
and
burrs, properties
or
crewmen. crewman
Properties apparel or
wear
during
use
and
that so
designed edges,
there or
projecting
corners,
knobs,
items
couId
292
bumping, to persons
or
otherwise by
cause these
reasonable ends of be
Exposed etc.,
hardware beveled
metal preclude
plates, snagging
shall
or rounded
hazards. and handbars shall where not such overhang overhang as are identified required, structure a projection the
rails posts
hazard, handbars
and to
the to
supporting
not
constitute
snag of
methods the to
alleviating
hazards--If d
for and
justifie above
reasons, be met
provisions protect
against means or is
identified,
not
(2)
Guard
hazardous
protective
eliminate
edges. and
welded,
soldered,
etc.,
smoothed trusions.
corners
or unacceptable
pro-
29 3
h.
Frangible will as
materials--Avoid or break in an
use
of
fragile
materials hazards
which such
shatter
accident,
leaving
those
described
above. 60
5.
Specific a. Edge
.06
--
Exposed corners of metal, boxes, equipment, etc. cut-(TBD) a .50 -Will vary with material thickness
b.
Protrusions Small protrusions: less than 3/16 inch long, wide (TBD) a inches .06 -Absolute minimum unless protruding corner is greater than 120 degrees
Large
aTo
Be
Determined continued--
requires values,
294
Application Screw heads, bolts, nuts, nut plates, excess threads and rivets which can be contacted by crewmen,
Remarks All screw and bolt heads shall face outside of hardware, if possible. Where nuts, nut plates and threads are exposed, they shall be securely covered. Recessed heads or use of recessed washers are recommended. Overall height of heads shall be within .125 or covered unless over 7 head diameters center. or oval limited. over .25 recessed them. apart from center to Height of round head head screws is not Screw or bolt heads deep must be or have fairing over
out to
crewmen and shall protrude no more than .06 unless spaces more than 3.5 head diameters from center to center. In all exposed areas where upset ends of rivets extend more than, .12, or .5 of upset end diameter if over .12, a fairing shall be installed over them. This applies to explosive, blind or pull rivets, etc. Upset ends have edges degrees or mum radius of rivets chamfered ground to of .06. must 45 a mini-
A maximum gap of .02 will be allowed only between one side of a fastener head and its mating surface. be prevented or Use of Allen
heads is preferred. Torqueset, slotted or Phillips head screws must be covered with tape or other protective materials or be individually deburred prior to flight.
295
Application
Remarks Where bolts, etc., are torgued and inspection performed, the material used to signify that torgue has been applied or that inspection has occurred, shall not itself constitute a sharp edge. shall be ihat does
Latching
devices
not allow gaps or overhangs that can catch fabrics, or pressure suit appendages, or shall be designed to prelude catching of fabrics andpressure suit appendages. All surfaces and rounded edges and shall burr
shall
be
mated
mismatching surfaces
adjacent
within .03 of flat surface at edges, or shall be butted or recessed. All exposed edges must be smoothed and radiused .06 minimum (as above), chamfered 45 degrees, or covered with an appropriate material to protect the crewman, his PGA gloves, or apparel.
box
Spherical welded or formed radii are required unless corners are protected with covers.
c.
Surface inches)
quality--the of materials
surface shall
height a maximum
micro-inches.
12.
USED
FOR
HAZARDS
AND
MEANS
TO
PRECLUDE
THEM Methods of protection or guarding for protrusions, sharp edges and corners Inset items Set flush with
Sharp Sharp
edges corners
Lapping Burnishing Polishing Grinding Chamfer Filing Sheet metal Turning Milling Buffing Superfinishing Hand Chase Sandblast
Break 'not
surface
Sharp points Jagged edges Snags Projecting corners Projecting edges Protrusions Protruding edges Sharp projections Rough surface Burrs Fins Slivers Splinters Metal filings Injurious imperfections
rolling
Finish al_-over Rough finish File finish Deburr Remove burrs Scrape Grind Lapped smooth or lapped
Cover with insulation Pad edges or corners Guard the area Wear protective clothing Ends turned into the supporting structure so as to not constitute projection hazard
flush None Polish Buff Burnish Hand chase Superfinish No sharp edges No pointed corners Fillets (inside radius) Rounds (outside radius) Round all edges
Bevel edges Wire brush Corners welded and ground smooth Dress smooth Grind Grind smooth perfect
297
CHAPTER RECOMMENDATIONS
thesis samples
presents of the
for which
a crew such as
station
handbook should
and cover. of
a handbook
completed topics
sections
of The my
this content
serve
extensive
treatments of
covered. with
of the and
sections
Chapters
and
II varied Chapter
tools
concepts
for
crew
for in
programs the
involving
should
Contract
Statement and as
i.e.: and
specified
general by
effort_
a management specifications
function in
contractor_ desireable_ of
requirements drawings,
provisions
for
stowage and
stowage
serialization
equipment_ and
and
interface crew
specifications par_lclpamlon,
provisions _=v_w=,
fiignt
a_lu _w
_uau_
as those The as
described. experiences in the be be gained text_ and serve to problems to encountered poor the in areas such or as ICD's,
described
tendencies
shortICD
of use
those for
handbook.
circumstances. program
CSR's
specific as a major
support
to
the
station,
subsystem
298
In
Chapter
II
several were
aspects discussed.
of
the The
crew crew
station's station
general engineer
layout/configuration certain individual data sleep defined that the crew and
functional
requirements It is
are
satisfied that
task
subsystem
on crew and
required be
other
areas
compiled include
handbook.
definitions
should
mission
or
operational of crew
etc., Such
which
may data
influence may of be
the better
degree than
of no data.
qualified
the
criteria soon
should U.S.
as possible. anthropometric
Agreement data
armed to
and and
use
clarify chooses
NASA
definitive of data.
communication establish of
should a set of
formal
the
current should
procedure be made
letter.
document
contractors
type
studied ranges,
of the
actual
various of
suited the
conditions should
should be
be
made,
the as
data
documented. in the
Results handbook.
above
published,
and
updated
required,
299
For be used
crew as
compartment
close
out in
the
data
provided
should
design
S/C
of research etc.,
on
the
physiological in this be
effects
so the
preliminary It
criteria then
thesis
completed. as a design
should for
incorporated S/C
handbook
requirement
all
contractors. In later chapters and and of the handbook outline, can and are I as shown be in Table i, more In
experience hard
requirements fast
should
documented. to establish
factors, it is
requirements field.
subjective our
believe, in as
should
problems,
these
such be
experiences offered.
problems of generic
Completion of
chapter
lessons have in
learned occurred
should ih crew
offer
valuable reviews
examples and
problems
station
other
Chapanis and
Psychology ____. _
the _lv to
government
organi-
government designed
often
see
systems
that
were
standpoint. However, government and industrial security usually discourages disclosure of such cases, Although the motivations are understandable enough, such policies are unfortunate, because one can learn a great deal from failures.
have
is sometimes possible to study systems that and put into operation--and have failed. evidence, it at least provides We need
Although
after-the-fact
the human factors scientist with some basis for ar_ment. a systematic collection of instances of this kind. iAlph0nse Psycholoc_, pp. 73. Chapanis Kenyon , "Human B. Factors in ed. Systems (New York: Engineering," McGraw-Hill, in
Systems 1970),
DeGreene,
3OO
of task
the should
crew be
station
handbook by
be
undertaken and
personnel This
a good should
station
experience NASA
expertise. and
distributed
appropriate
personnel It in should
contractors, be sent
also
Force,
crew
station
criteria
handbook
preparation. I recommend so its this thesis may be be sent to NASA,s for Office of
Utilization of
contents industrial
reviewed and
applicability
standpoint
general
technology
useage.
301
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abstract
of Unified Space
Hatch and
II.
Downey,
Calif.
North
American 14-15,
Rockwell, 1967.
Systems
Division,
November
Garrett, J. W. ; and Flannery_ M. P. Air Force Pressure-Suited Personnel Ohio: Aerospace Medical Force Base, August, 1969. Concept Review No. Space and Information 2.
Research
Apollo
Confiquration Management Manual. NHB 8040.2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
C. :
Apollo
8 Mission Report. MSC-PA-R-69-1. Prepared by Mission Evaluation Team _pproved by George M. Low, Manager, Apollo Spacecraft Program. Houston, Texas: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Manned Spacecraft Center, Febri/ary, 1969.
Apollo
12 Mission Report. MSC-01855. Prepared by Mission Evaluation Team Approved by James A. McDivitt, Manager, Apollo Spacecraft Program. Houston, Texas: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Manned Spacecraft Center, March, 1970.
Apollo
Report. MSC-04112. Prepared by by James A. McDivitt, _v_andge_, National Center, _eronau_-u_ May, 1971.
Mission d_u
Apollo
Operations Handbook t Block II Spacecraft. Description. Apollo Document SID 66-1508 Revised. Downey, Calif. : North American Information Systems Division, October 15,
Apollo
Operations Handbook t Lunar Module_ LM-6 and Subsequent. Vol. Subs[stems Data. Apollo Document LMA 790-3-LM6 and Subsequent. Bethpage, N. Y. : Grumman Aerospace Corporation, NASA Contract NAS 9-1100, September 15, 1970. Proaram CSM J-Series Missions Inteqration CCA 3355. Downey, Calif. : North American Information Systems Division, NASA Contract 1970. Plan. SID 69-430, Rockwell, Space and NAS 9-150, March I,
I:
Apollo
302
Apollo
Apollo
Spacecraft Program Configuration Management Manual. SB07-C-001. Houston, Texas: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Manned Spacecraft Center, December 15, 1967. Handbook 1967. for Mechanical Engineers.
Baumeister, Theodore, ed. Standard 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Belayayev, P. I. Aeronautics International
Aeronautics
Administration,
Joseph. 1963.
Human
Factors
in
Chapanis, Alphonse. Man-Machine Engineering. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1969. "Human Psychology. 1970. Command and Service Edited Factors in B. Systems De Greene.
Belmont,
Calif.:
in S_stems McGraw-Hill,
by Kenyon
Module
End
Item
Specification.
SID
64-1237,
I, CCA 797. Downey, Calif. : North American Rockwell, and Information Systems Division, NASA Contract NAS 9-150, 18, 1966. Service Module Technical Specification. SID 63-313, Block I.
Revised edition. and Information 1965. Command and Service EMU Data Book.
Downey, Calif. : North American Rockwell, Space Systems Division, NASA Contract 9-150, February 22,
Module/Lunar SNA-8-D-027.
Module Operational Data Book. Revision 2. July 7, 1971. Configuration Texas: National Center, (Prime
Vol.
IV:
,,Commanders Hammock Modification." RECP No. 0L0054A. Houston, Administration, "Contract End Item Manned Detail
Spacecraft Specification
January
Equipment),
Design and Product Configuration Requirements, CEI 300iB, Specification No. CP 3001, A7LB Pressure Garment Assembly with Integrated Thermal Meteroid Garment for Apollo Extravehicular Mobility Unit." Revision A. Dover, Del. : ILC Industries, NASA Contract 9-6100, January 30, 1970.
303
Cooper,
Gordon,
Jr.
"Astronauts
Summary
Flight
Report,"
in Mer__
Pro)ect Summary Including Results of the Fourth Manned Orbital Fliqht May 15 and 16_ 1963. NASA SP-45, Project Mercury. Houston, Texas: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Manned Spacecraft Center, Part 20, October, 1963. "Crew Integration Plan for Skylab." Flight Crew Support Division. National Aeronautics and Space Center, Crew Stations Revised Patterson Damon A. October, 1970. Accommodations Handbook. AFSC DH-2-2. Air Force Systems Command, WrightMay i, 1971. on Body Measurements of Army Air Prepared by Crew Station Branch, Revision A. Houston, Texas: Administration, Manned Spacecraft
Base,
"Effect
Flying
Clothing
Ohio: Aerospace Medical Air Force Base, 1943. B.F. "The Minimum Proceedings of American Summer Meeting. Los Angeles,
Davenport, E. W. ; Congdon_ S. P. ; and Pierce, Volumetric Requirements of Man in Space," Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics_ Calif. : June 17-20, 1961. Design Standard Aeronautics Bulletin. and Space Serial DS-79. Administration, the 'Vostok'." Royal Aircraft
C. :
National
J.
Richard D., and McFarland, Rosse A. "The Operator Design," in Edward Bennett, et al_.__.___., Factors Human in New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Designing for People. New York:
Paragraphic
Books,
Duntley, Seibert A., et al. "Experiment S-8/D-13, Visual Acuity and Astronaut Visibility," Gemini Midprogram Conference Report. Part II: Experiments. Houston, Texas: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Manned Spacecraft Center, February 23-25, 1966. Elements of Design Review for Space Systems. Washington, D. C. : National Aeronautics tration, Office of Technology Utilization, NASA SP-6502. and Space Adminis1967. Manned the Effects Washington, Office
Fraser, T.M. "An Overview of Confinement as a Factor in Spaceflights, " Proceedinqs of the NASA Symposium on of Confinement on Long Duration Manned Spaceflights. D. C. : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, of Manned Space Flight, November 17, 1966.
304
"Confinement 1 (1968),
and pp.
Free
Volume
Requirements,"
Space
and
Life
Sciences,
428-66. During Long Duration National Aeronautics Space Missions, and Space "
Effects
as
a Factor
in
Manned
Space and
Flight,
"
NASA-CR-511. Administration,
National
Aeronautics
Space
Garland, Kenneth. Manned Spacecraft. The Pocket Encyclopedia flight in Color. New York: Macmillan, 1967. Hertzberg, Human H. T. E. Factors, "Some ,,Dynamic Anthropometry of Working 2, 4 (August 1960), 147-55. of Applied Physical
of
Space-
Positions,
"
Contributions
to
Human
Engineering, " WADD TR 60-19. Ohio: Wright Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, September,
Center,
G.
S. ; and Technical
Churchill, E. Anthropemetry of Flying Report 52-321. Ohio: Wright Air Air Force Base, September,
Center,
Wright-Patterson
Human
Design Criteria for Militar_ S_stems T Equipment Military Standard MIL-STD-1472, Washington, D. Printing Office, March 29, 1968.
and C. :
Human
28,
Human
Requirements for Military S[stems_ i_iiitary Specification _L-H-46.855, Frlnting Office, F_rch 29, 1968.
Equipment_ Washington,
and u.
C. :
Kubis,
F. "Habitability: General Principles and Applications Vehicles, " Proceedings of Second International Symposium Environmental Problems of Man in Space, Paris, June 14-18,
Loftus, J. P., Jr., end Bond, Robert L. "Crew Tasks and Training, " Lunar Landing Symposium. Houston, Texas: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Manned Spacecraft Center, 1966. Loftus, Joseph P., Jr. ; Patton, Rollin M. ; and Bond, Robert Functions, United States Manned Spacecraft Program." Texas: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Spacecraft Center, in press 1971. L. "Crew Houston, Manned
30 5
Lunar
Grumman
NASA
Lunar
Module Performance and Interface Specification_ SID 62-1244C. Downey, Calif. i North American and Information Systems Division, NASA Contract July 15, 1968.
Machel, R. M., et al. Gemini Mid'proqram nautics and Space McCormick, Ernest McGraw-Hill, Malik,
"Crew Station and Extravehicular Equipment," in Conference. Houston_ Texas: National AeroAdministration, Manned Spacecraft Center, 1966. Factors Enqineering. 3rd ed. New York:
J. Human 1970.
P. W., and Souris, G. NASA CR 1106. Houston, Administration, June, 1968. Manned
A. Project Gemini 7 A Technical Summary. Texas: National Aeronautics and Space Spacecraft Center, NASA Contract 9-170,
Meister, David. Human Wiley-Interscience, ; Rabideau, Development. Moran, J. Crew A., and Station
Factors: 1971. F.
Theor_
and
Practice.
New
York:
Gerald New
Human John
Factors &
in
System
York:
Wiley
Tiller, P. Criteria:
R. "Investigation of Aerospace Vehicle Final Report." Ohio: Air Flight Air Guide Force to Base, July, 1964.
Laboratory,
Equipment
Desiqn.
W. J. "Crew Station Design and Operahion, 1_,_d _=_=_=_ Enqineering Desiqn and operation, eds. Paul E. Puzse_, M_xime A. Faget, and Norman F. Smith. New York: Fairchild Publications, 1964.
"Performance and Interface Specification for LEM Excursion Module, Government Furnished Crew Equipment, " LSP-340-8. Bethpage, N. Y. : Grumman Aerospace Corporation, May, 1966. Personnel Subs[stems Handbook. AFSC DH-I-3. Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson 1970. Rogers, Jon G. "Simulation Human Factors Societ[ in the Development Bulletin, XIII, 1 Revised ed. Ohio: Air Air Force Base, January i,
"
306
Roth,
E. M., ed. Compendium of Human Responses to the Aerospace Environment. NASA CR-1205, Vol. III. Washington, D. C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, November, 1968. William. Soviet York: Washington Space Exploration? The Square Press, 1968. I: Command Downey, First Decade.
Systems 1971.
Program Configuration Management Plan. MSC-01160A. Texas: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Spacecraft Center, Skylab Program Office, October Technical National I,
Administration,
Standard Human Engineering Design Criteria. Ala. : George C. Marshall Space Flight U.
S., Senate, Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences. Soviet Space Programs? 1962-1965: Goals and Purposes? Achievements_ Plans T and International Implications. Washington, D. C. : Government Printing Office, December 30, 1966. Dyke, W. J. ,,Performance/Design and Product Configuration Requirements, Extravehicular Mobility Unit for Apollo Block II Missions, Master End Item Specification, " NASA-EMU-CSD-A-096. Houston, Texas: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Manned Spacecraft Center, January, 1966. Spacecraft Korabyla, _ I__I_ t-'t-'' _ ' _ Design. Translation ,V0skhod-2', " Aviatsiya NASA _-V-lO, 2!6_ .....
Van
Viktozov, D. In Open Space--Voskhod-2 of "V Otkrvtom Kosmose--Ustroystvo i t_.O;_,lt[Olo.v ........ _,_ _T^_ AO (IQ_<_ , UJ-KO_ v ",.,,,L."-_ ._.w _t June, Webb, 1966.
Paul, ed. Bioastronautics Data Book. NASA SP-3006. D. C. : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Technical Information Division, 1964. Wesley, E., and Conover, 3rd Donald ed. W. Human Engineering University
Washington, Scientific
Woodson,
Guide of
Berkeley:
Wulfeck, J. W., et al. Vision in Military Aviation. WADC Technical Report 58-399, Astia Document No. AD 207780. Ohio: Air Research and Development Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, November, 19 58. Zvezda, Krasnaia. ,,On the Road to Orbital Morris D. Friedman. TASS Report No. Stations, " 269, November Translated 17, 1968. by
307
APPENDIX
A 504,
: 0,00,
,:_, ,0,
._,_
....
:'::'::':':':':':':':
The attached oomposi'_e Apoilo Stowage List is a complete CM/LM Crew E_uipnent Stowage Lie_ compiled for _he appropriate Apollo M_eeion identified on the document. To provide understanding of the complete document, the following explanation List i_ broken down as follows: LIST A - CM LAUNCH STOWAGE LIST Sec See Sac See _ 2 3 4 Stowed Operational GI_', Crew Apparel Stowed Operational C_: Stowed Eperiment81 G_ is offered. The Apollo Stowage
LIST B -.LM EtuRTH LAUNCH STOWAGE LIST . .. Sec See See See I 2.5 4 Stowed Operational GFE Not Applicable Stowed Operational CFE Stowed Experimental GFE " " " . ."
LIST C - CM-LM TRANSFER LIST Sec See See See I 2 3 _ Stowed Operational G.w"2 Crew Apparel Stowed Operational CFE. Stowed Experimental GFE
LIST D - LM LUNAR LAUNCH STOWAGE LIST See I See. 2 Sec 3 See 4 Stowed Operational GFE Crew Apparel StoQed Operational 01_,] Stowed Experimental O]_
LIST E - L_I-CM TRAR_FER LIST ' See Sac See See I"2 3 4 Stowed Operational O_ Crew Apparel Stowed' Operational CFE Stowed _xperimental GFE " .... "
l 2 5 4
Stowed Operational GFE Crew Apparel Stowed Operational CFE Stowed Experimental GI_E
Stowage List item number identifiers are assigned using appropriate I_C division or Contracto_ code "SUPPLYING DIVISION CODE A - Flight Grew Support Division B - Crew Systems Division C - Biomedical Research Office : ITEM'NUMBER CODE
COMAT STATUS CODE A - Approved P - Pending Approvel 0 - Open (no COMAT st%bmit%e_l) M -Metal (no CON_&T required) " " %/ - Waived.
D - Space Physics Division . E -Instr & Elect Sys Div F - Structures& Mechanics Div G - Luna_ Surface Project Office H - Guidance & Control Division" "r - Not used J - Earth Resources Div 0 - Other (Cqntraetors ) ],T0q_: If unit weight stated is estlm_ted, * will appear, ahead of weight entry,
[.. See I ,' O100 to 0199 0M Stowed Operational GFE :/ I000 to 1999 LM Stowed Operational GFE ": ' "' Z. See II " 0200 to 0299 0few Aplmrel See Ill _' ' 0_00 to "039_)_, " "." 6300 "co 6399) _ Stowed Operational CFE "" 3000_o 3999 LM Stowed Operstlonsl CFE . See IV 0_00 to 0499 CM Stowed Experimental GFE _000 to 4999 LM Stowed Experimental GFE.
'
"
"
. . _ ....
Oao _o
RPT V!9-3O-911D
_ MISSION
LIsT SEC
A I
STOWAGE L_IST GFE NOMENCLATURE STOWAGE LOCATION " UNIT WEIGHT l.TO QTY/ SC 2 GFE/ CFE COMAT
OPERATIONAL NUMBER
SEB33100100-203
CAMERA_I6MN AQUISITION
DATA
1-B811-B3
A 0101.
SEB33100125-205
MAGAZINE,16MM ACQUISITION
DATA
,97
14
A 0102.
SEB33 I00023-204
LENS,18MM
BB
.56
A 0103o
SEB331000"/8-202
LENSt75MM
B3
.53
A 0104o
SEB3310003B-301
POWER
CABLE,OAC
I-B8/1-B3
.23
A 0105.
SEB33100056-208
LENS,SMM
WITH COVER
B3
68
A 0106.
SEB33100051-204
MIRROR,RIGHT CAMERA
ANGLE
16MM
B3
.16
A 0107,
SEB33100029-205
HASSELBLAD
B3
1.90
A 0!08.
SEB33100068-203
MAGtTOMM TYPE
FILM
CASSETTE
4-ATII-B3
I 59
RPT VI?-30-911D YMISSION LIST SEC A 2 ITEM NUMBER A 0200. CM LAUNCH CREW STOWAGE LISI
APOLLO
STOW'AGE CM
PAGE DATE
17
AS 504
104
03-04-69
APPAREL NUMBER NOMENCLATURE STOWAGE LOCATION UNIT WEIGHT ,06 OTY/ SC 3 GFE/ CFE C OMAT
PART
SEB12100033-201
SUNGLASSES
SUNGLASS
POUCH
A 0201.
SEB12100034-203
POUCH, SUNGLASSES
ON
_GA
,05
0202.
SEB12100039-002
CHRONOGRAPH
ON
WATCHBAND
.13
"
A 0203-
SEB12100030-202
WATCH
BAND
ON
PGA
0.02
A 0204
SEBL2100051-204
PENS,DATA
RECORDING
ON CREW
.05
A 0205.
SEBI2].'OOOB2-30[
PEN,MARKER
ON
CREW
A 0206.
SEB12100081-301
PENCIL
ON CREW
A 0207,
SEB3310004T-302
SLIDERULE
ON
CREW
A 0208.
SEB12100085-301
BAG,MOTION
SICKNESS
PGA
POCKEI
_,PT Vl_-30-9.'.,.ID MISSION LIST S_C A _ CM LAUNCH STOWAGE L!_T CFE NO,.".IENCLATURE
APOLLO AS
STOWAGE 504
LIST LM-3
PAGE DATE
23 03-;0G--69
STOWAGE
LOCATION
UNIT WE _GHT
QTY/ SC [
GFE/ CFE C
COHA7
"2, V3b-(.-,O!6Z5
NI_NCH_,END-TOOL
0 0307.
V!6-601531
TORQUE
SET
DR[VER_TOOL
n_ 0307.,
.r' V36_6.014,10..
DR_V_R...,U
JOZNT-TOOL
"
0 0307.,
V36-60[
_'_,',-_'_._ ...... ,.
TETHER
0:_27_
V36-6014_.7-_0
POUCH
0307.
V2 3-553COT
JACK
SCREW
00:70T,
VZ6-60Z_33-2Z
DR[VER,TOOL.L
3 0 0_0{,. '*
V36-60162,[
BOX,SANITATION STOPPAGE-AFT
SUPPLY
RIO
1,,,70
0 0309,,
V36-78203,I
BOX,EVA
CAMERA
EQUIP
R._,,O
?,.
C
PO
STONAGE-F'AO
RPT
VZQ-30-QIID
, MISSION c
APOLLO AS
STOWAGE 504 CM
PAGE DATE
3Q
03"04-69
LIST SEC
B i ITEM NUMBER
LM
LAUNCH
STOWAGE
LIST GFE NOMENCLATURE STOWAGE LOCATION UNIT _EIGHT 4.40 _TY/ SC 2 GFE/ CFE COMA
STOWED PART
OPERATIONAL NUMBER
1013.
A6L-201CO0-09
EV
VISOR
ASSY.
IN HELMET BAG
J
STOWAGE
I0_4.
ATL-203025-01
GLOVES,EV
IN HELMET BAG
STOWAGE
2.69
1015o
ATL-203C25-02
GLOVE
S_EV
IN HELMET BAG
STOWAGE
2.69
!016.
A6L-503000-05
KIT,EMU
MAINTENANCE
IN CDRS STOWAGE
HELMET BAG
.40
1017.
A6L-505COO-02
FITTING,PURGE
IN THE STOWAGE
HELMET _AG
.55
1021.
SV723426-I
ATTACH
STRAP,OPS/PGA
1022.
SV72340g-I
ATTACH
STRAP,OPS/PGA
i023,
SEB!2100084-301
EYEPATCH
FLIGHT
DATA
FILE
1000.
14-0121
LM
FOOD
ASSY(2MAN
DAYS)
2 MAN DAYS B, + C) IN
{3 PKG RHSSC
A,
3.60
I"
IA_
RPT
vlg-30-911D MISSION
APOLLC AS
STCwAGE 504 CM
PAGE DATE
_g 03-_04-6g
LIST SEC
C 2 ITEM NUMBER
CM
TO
LM
TRANSFER
LIST
CREW
APPAREL PART NUMBER NOMENCLATURE STOWAGE LOCATION UNIT WE IGHT _TY/ SC GFE/ CFE CC]MAT
B 0204.
SHB42100121-201
OF_
_-202
HARNESS,AXILLARY
0204.
SHB#21OOI20-Z03
_]_
HARNESS,STERNAL *-20#
0204.
I04233/I03080
CONDITIONER,
IMPEDANCE
0204.
104220/103070
CONDITIONER,EKG
SIGNAL
B 0204.
i04240/I03110
OR
104840 DC-DC
POWER CONV.
SUPPLY,
B 0205.
SOB#ZIOOOSg-202
SCISSORS
ON
PGA
.53
B 0206.
14-0108-02
UCTA
ON
CREW
.43
B 0207.
ACR-FA-5
PENLIGHTS
ON
PGA
.34
B 0208.
SEB13100084-202
ASSY,BIO
BELT
ON
CREW
.50
A_
0200.
NIA
CEPACUL
16-CDR PGA
PGA/16-LMP
32
RPT
VIg-30-?IID
:" , _
-? _,-- . .
LIST SEC
".!
E I ITEM NUMBER
LM
TO
CM
TRANSF'ER
LIST" GFE " . -, STOWAGE LOCATION :" ...-. .QTYI SC 1 " GFE-I CFE , " COMAT
" .....
STOWED PART
"OPEI_ATIONAL NUMBER
NOMENCLATURE
UNITWE I.GHT
"
I005.
SKB32100014-301
CHECKLIST_LM
EVA
R2
._.
A 1005.
) SKB32100015-301
CHECKLIST_LM ACTIVATION
RENDEZVOUS
RI
. .
"
1005,
'5 SKB32100017-301
RROCEDUREStLMP
"RENDEZVOU
R3
B 0111.
A6L-40OOO0-O9
GARMET,LIQUID
COOLING
ON
CREW
_.60.
0118.
A6L-BOIOOO-OZ
ON
CREW
" .
D ._
0100.
'RFB-OP-4-2-OOI
METER..RADIATION
SURVEY
G PANEL LEB
COND ON BRKT
1..58"
.....
....
1000,
SEBlZlOOOZ,5-302
DOSIMETERtPASSIVE. RADIATION
-TAPED
TO
FILM
MAG-A5
t " -
"
"
'
" MISSION
AS
504
DATE' 03;04-69
--.-.
STOWED PART
OPERATIONAL NUMBER
NOMENCLATURE
STOWAGE
LOCATION
"
QTYI r SC 3
GFE/ CFE
COMAT
SEB33100100--203
"DATA
1--BBII--B3
"
A 0101"
SEB33100125--205
MAG.AZINE'I6MM ACQUISITION
DATA
"97
14
"A
A 0102"
SEB33100023--204
LENS''I BMM
B3
"56
A 0103"
SEB33100078--202'
LENS'TSMM
"
B3
" "
"53
" I
"A
"
"
A DI04"
SEB33100038--301
(
POWER
CABLE_DAC
"
" '
I--BS/I--B3
''26
A'"
A 0105.
.SEB33IOoo56-20B
LENS,SMM
WITH
COVER
B3 C
.68 ; , 2
A
.2 " .
A 0106.
SEB33100051-.204
MIRROR,RIGHT CAMERA
ANGLE
I6MM
B3
.16
A 0_07,
5EB33100029-205
B3
"
IgO
" A
SEB33100068-203
MAGiTOMM TYPE
FILM.CASSETTE
4-ATII-B3
1.59
" -. w .... .A
.:
.... __ .......
F
...... _..:-..,....
.......................
: - -.
31 7
B NOTICE
LIST REVISION
"i
iiiiii!!ii!iii!i_iii_ii
%*,o:_i:*,*o,:.: m::o:oo
o: s
X31
" N01S
FIOH
}:ITJIN3D
1_1V_D33VdS
(1";:II
NV
IAl
:::,:,:,o::o::
. . ,
.:.:.:::::.:.:.::.:.:. """'''"'"'""
,::.,*:,::,ooo.: ,:._,:,*:,,-:,::.,
:::::::::::::i!iiiiii?!i!!ii!ii!iiii :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
*:*:::.:o::o_ %::::::::,:-* ::*::::,:_, :::,:::-o, ,:,t,:l* I::::.l:.*._o_ `
._.:.:.:.:.1.:.:.:-:-:.
!iiiii!!!!iiiiii?!ii!i?
I:l:-::ot:.*_o.:*
696I '17Hg_tVW
ii?-!!iiiii?_iiii
....::.::o.:o.o::. --.:.,.:.-.o*.O.:o.O
:.:.:-:-:.:.:.:.:<.1-1
.::,:,.:-::.:.- .::o::-.:.:,
.:.:::,:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.
iii!iiiiiiiiii!iiiiiiii
!iiii!!iiii!iii!_?ii!i '
.:,:,-.,,::,,_,::o
i:i:;:;:;:i:
::::::i::::;:::::::::::
.:.:..5>,--_,,< :.:.
RPT
V19-30-911C
APOLLU MISSION
STUWAGE AS
LIST 504 CM
LIST SEC
A I ITEM NUMBER
CM
LAUNCH
STOWAGE
LIST GFE NUMENCLATUR_ STOWAGE LOCATION UNIT wEIGHT QTYI SC GFEI CFE COMAT CHANGE-REASON CHB-UATE
STOWED PART
OPERATIONAL NUMBER
_A
OIOT.
SEB3310C029-205
HASSELBLAD
B3
l.q_
A 01_4.
SEB1210001_-202
KIT,PILOTS
PREFERENCE
3-AB/3-R2/I-AI
.50
]-3_-b9
A 0116.18
SKB3210C011-301
EVA
R2
3-0_-69
B 0117.
BW-10_3-003
COVERALL
ASSY, IN FLIGHT
AB
3.27
BOll?.
I BW-I043-06
ASSY,JACKE'I
3-0@-69
B 0118.
ABL-501CO0-O2
SUBSYSTEM,I:EOAL CONTAINMENI
AB
.34
_B
0118.
i A6L-501000-03
SUBSYSTEM,FECAL CUNTAINMENT
AB
3-04-69
E 0108.
75101-126-_3
EARTUBES,CNIVERSAL
IN FLIGHT GARMENTS
COVERALL
.01
I-CRE_
3-D_-69
bo _o
; .....
..: ....... .
_PT
v19-30-911C
APOLLO MISSION
REV[SION CM 104
NOTICE
DATE
03-C4-69
_AGL
AND LM-3
LIST SEC
A 2
CM
LAUNCH
STO_AGE
LIST
C&E_
APPAREL NUMBER NUMENCLATUItE STOWAGE LOCATION UNIT wEIGHT .Oh _TYI SC 3 GFE# CFE COMAT CHANGE-REASON CHb-OATE
PA_T
SEB12_00033-201
SUNGLASSES
SUNGLASS
POUCH
P/N-O_L AS FLuwN
3-04-69
mA
0202.
SEB12100039-002
CHRONOGRAPH
ON
WATCHBAND
.13
P/N-OOL AS FLuwN
3-34-b9
A 0206.
SEBI2100081-30I
PENCIL
ON
CREW
3-04-69
*A
0209.
N/A
CDR
PGA
NE_ APV
ITEM-CCBD 2-27-69
9RI_B
3-04-69
*B
0200.
ATL-IOOOOO-S4AND-57
GARMENT EV(PGA!
AS_Y.,PRESSURE
_T.36
PIN CHG FROM-TBD TO DOCUMENT AS FLbwN PIN. P/N CHG FROM-TBD TO DOCUMENT AS FLU_N P/N
3-D4-_9
_B
0200.
7 ATL-IOOO02-23
SUIT,TORSO
LIMB
AFTER
3-0_-69
_B
0201.
ATL-IOOOOO-Sb
GARMENT IV{PGAI
ASSY.,P_ESSURE
* 35.61
P/N CHG FROM-TBD TO DOCUMENT AS FL_ON P/N PIN CHG FROM-TBD TO DOCUMENT AS FLOWN P/N NEW ITEM-CCBD 3-3-69 gR14@
3-O_-b9
*B
0201.
7 A7L-_OOO04-08
SUIT.TC_RSO
LIMB
AFTER
3-Q_'-69
eC
0200.
N/A
CEPACOL
I6-CDR PGA
PGA/]6-LMP
32
3-04-69
GO 0
321
C STOWAGE LIST
MANNED
SPACECRAFT
CENTER
_b" N
HOUSTON TEXAS
National
Aeronautics
and
Space
Administration
"
__"_" '_
TheData
Format of this Document is Intended to,Highlight: @ Weight Data Status and CompariSons by Presenting Both Specification Weights and Estimated or Actual Weights Quantities Launched and Stowage Locations - ByModule e Inflight Transfer Quantities and Stowage Locations - By Module
_ Deactivation Stowage Locations and Quantities - By Module as well as Command Module Return Stowage Configuration o Cumulatlve Quantity Totals - By Module - For all Stowed Items during Launch, Active.Orbit, Inactive Orbit, and Return
CO FO LD
iii
SL--1 OPERATIONAL
NOMENCLATURE ITI:'M ITEM NO. .CAT. S L UNIT SPEC WEIGHT (LB_
SL--1/4
I-SL-002
AND EXPE,RIMENTAL
UNIT EST/ACT WEIGHT/CODE (LB)
PART
NUMBER
(DIMENSIONS-INCHES)
i LAUNCH RETURN
[ I
Q Q
PRELIMINARY LOCKER LOCATIONS ARE INDICATED FOR CM STOWEDITEMS. CHANGEWITHOUT CCB APPROVAL; HOWEVER. SCG APPROVAL IS REQUIRED,
"NOT ON BOARD" (NOB) ITEM MISSION REQUIREMENTFOR WHICH STOWAGE PROVISIONS HAVE NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED.
i
NOI ES: xc,_;'2 U]
SAtPL FOt; AI
:I.x
E]AD05-RO0 _0
SKYLAB PROGRAM SL-1 SL-1/2 SL-1/3 $L-1/4 OPERATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL GFE/CFE STOWAGE LIST
UNIT I NOMENCLATURE ITI_M .. SUPPL PART NUMBER BY SPEC WEIGI4T (LEt) (DIMENSiONS-INCHES) UNIT " EST/ACT WEIGHT/CODE {Lt_) TOTAL FLIGHT SL 112 1 I R SL 1/3 " SL I/4 STOWAGE LOCATION '
REMARKS
iTEM
NO.
CAT.
t I
L I
___
REFER
TO
0002,
C0,O0
-D
s L T fJUID
Cf)OL 1NG
CSO
5,000 i
I O0[,0 02
I GARt4EN_r I A''L-4CCOoO-}_'
I
TROT2 _ITBD12 2 ul 5 A8 I TROT7 TBDI7 2_ Ul I I 3 A8
i
I
3.00XIZ.OOXIK,.O0) 2 UI 3 A8
TBO5;!TBD5 i
I
PRI'SSURE UNIT CONTROL C 13500
f I
I
_},_')'J.OO.On G-OS
I3272_-01
7*OOX]t.OOXI9O0)
1
0009,00,0( G-OS SECONDARY OXYGEN PACK t _2730-01 CSI) t 5.50X11 35,000 " " r ......... i i 25x15.50) i I _1 _, 2 I 2 , A " " " I " "" i !. 6 t 6 " " " .... . .
: "
A8
A8 2 TBDI
TBO
TBD t TBD 1 _
-_,,._
Xo0='? (_3
ITEM NUHBER DELETED - TRANSFEF:RED TO ITEMS 0075'08_00 AN!) 0080.00.00. TOTAL QTY.FOR EACH MISSION PR{)'IIDES: 2 EVA - PRIME LCG'S. IVA SUITED EXPERIMENTS WILL UTILIZE USED LCG'S FRUr,_ EVA,
(\') O,
SKYLAB _AOOS-RO040 OPERATIONAL " ITEM NO. CAT, NOMENCLATURE " ITEM' SUPPL BY \ " PART f_UMBER (OIMENSIONS-INCHES) UNIT SPEC WEIGHT (LB) SL-1 AND " SL--1/2
" SL--1/4 STOW_A=GE LIST STOWA G E_O SL 1/3 SL 112". C _'_ION , St. 1/4 " '
_'a 040EC70
" REMARKS
WEIGHT/CODE (LBI
' O R L O R L O ,. R . " " " 0208.C0.93 S015 ZERO SINGLE GRAVITY HUI_AN MRr.O CELLS L J_=--_, ' "
REFER NOTES
TO
.....
SECTION I ;4ENT
EXPER
0208CL.00
C-ES
MR60 I 650XtSQSOg
22.000 906)
L _ CM
1 1: |6 B6 ,t
"
"
l .
' "
..
r " . .. "
'
"
"
" .
..
, ,
. " _
/'i
"
_
:
",
" _ . ' ,
:i
. .., . .... -
I . i . . . . : . . I . . "
'
..
'
"
, NOTES: 06[ .! , F][LH IS INTEGRAL TO EXPERIHENI' PACKAGEr AN_ IS THEREF0_E NOT INCLUDED' IN FCSD
,:" -: .:
328
APPENDIX
__!,:_.._._,._.._i_. .. i_ _'-
..
- _ ._
y..- .:._ ::
329
!.t.i stowage . I i st
for
Apollo
lunar
extended
mi ssions
(ALEM) .
Reference is made to GAEC final report LRP 39"-I,"LM Modification Study for Extended Lunar Staytime," dated April l_, 196_. A Pre|i-ninaryR.equlrementsReview meet.ing for LM-10 and subsequent modifications was held at MSC on l.iay0, 1965. In response to action 2 assignments at thls review, ASPO and FCSD prepared a preliminary..., crew equipment stowage list to be used by GAEC in the redesign of the LM-IO _Jrewstai-ionand descen;"stage.stowage fore 78-hour lunar s,rfdce staytlme. l'hlswas prepared using the above reference and current LM stowage lists as guidelines, l'hepreliminary list is enclosed to this memorandum for your review and concurrence. Certain categories of stowage items require prompt MSC decisions "n order to finalize requirement.s so that GAEC may proceed wlth stowage provisions design_ Specifically_ concurrence is required in the following areas: o, Calr, e!'a.E._q_._ip_m:_nt: of 16ramand 7Omm cameras required and Number usage planned, Acceptability or unacceptability of ascent stage versus descent stage stowage of cameras end film, Decision as to magazine versus cassette film systems. Feasibi3:ity of individual GFE thermal and vac-um pro_zect Ira,for filrnif stowed in descent stage, b. .V!aste M__a_LLa/,__erjzen_t_: Requirement for nt;mberof urine bags, deface-. tlon collection devices, and emesis bags in light of new urine receptacle system .... Fecal collection receptacle assembly. --_ ' -.
r C" ir" . ' c. P_.S-L/C.'_FS_: Statement defin,ng v:eight growth of these units. An assumption o_..-,-modification program is that the volumetric and "dimen= "_ for PLSS anu--' 0,._ will not change. o_. sior, al sto;vage i n_..r,:,ces "_ _'_
....
e. d.
the fo;"
rL,r!lL_..r ie g:'ov,,th of
liquid
cooled
9errraents:and
flight
coveralls.
330 2
It is requested that your Office review this list and submit recommended changes to ASPO, PD8/Jerry R. Goodman, wlthin one week. Preliminary design review of the LM-IO configuration is schedu]ed for July l, ]969. Prompt decisions and inputs to the items requested in this'memo will ensure a successful _odification program.
!
._
f;'Jerr_ R Enclosu/'e
Goodman
5-29-69
and C. H. Bolcnder
have
rev{ewed
this memorandum
and
Basic
Assurn2._.orls for
Extended
Hi ss'ons
331
1. 2.
Retain
TV camera system
in
the
descent
stage.
.:.
The IGmm camera can operationa]iy recoi sequences of geological _d expeditions on the lunar surface for engineering purposes.
3.
The first installed primary ECS cannister will suffice throughthe the first EVA. One spare in the ascent stage, remaining spares ]n . . the descent stage. " " Standard geological tools stowed in the MESA have been retaln_d. Additional scientific payioad is not presently defined. Certain GFE contingency items are required to enhance total mission
success. . _ . . . . : :
4. 5. 6.
."
. ....
:7. The secondary LiOH cannister in the LM ECS will not be considered in support of planned EVA. 8. EVA Sequence - on a day involving LM flight maneuvers,, only a single EVA excursion of three hours maximum duratiori will be planned. Two short EVA, i.e._ three hours, excursions or one long, i.e., five hours excursion, will be considered for days not involving I_Mflight maneuvers. All EVA's will be planqed with both crewmen descencling to the surface. The life support unit to be considered by GAEC will be the pres.entPLSS/ OPS combination with _odifications to PLSS which will extend usable 1ifetime. The [M must be capable of supporting a maximum of l] individual PLSS recharges, which is consister, with six two--man EVA excursions and finalt recharge of-one PLSS for orbital contincdency transfer where an 0FS was used on the final e_-ct, rslon.
9.
10.
-ll . The LH must be capable of supporting a maximum of seven cabin re.pressur'zations which is consistent With six EVAns and an equip_lent jettison. 12', The L_Imost be capable of sto_.,,ing the Constant Volume Suit in the ascent stage at earth launch.
-. STO_./AGE CATEoO,,IES
. . . . .
- 3"32 : :
' -.
- Stowage
categories as fol]ows:
A:
C:
....
.:L-
" .......... _7_-_ :--i ......................... :'-_--I--: ............. ...... i '-" :)---..... .... .............. ; ............ _ .....
".......::_...... " ' " I Z .;.-. ........ -..... __:=_ L--7".' S/V-L .:o-,_.,_ , __,L._ , ...... ........ . .... ....... : ....... ............... ,,........... ...... 0o -. ............. S/-V .. eJ_we.3 WNgt....4o.4 sua'l. _0[ ........... O[O00-1.._.Q'RS ...... V ] t _. _7 -" " _.4_weOu_wg .1o.4 s'uaT,ww'SL L ........ "_"" E;L'OO'OL_: :83S 3-t 4!-L
.:1-o :].,Jed 40 tt_ @3e[ds4 ,,ew (]_ ':)_ '8c SLUO:].j c. S/(] ..lg3,...lod.suej i tu[ !4
V[
_o :l'ad _o lie a3.e[daJ-/_e111 _[
"s; :,
(4:),duJa)o:t,:l.aS'C.e3 ._uw91. i i
(_8l 4__.... .
J
I
8 _.:
3C
Lie
(]_'
aOE'LCl_J
'3_
8.[ su_a_l
S/V
S/Q
Z
(""t!_
..............
aSJ.
8
-......................
_E
...........
Ae_
ssu!zeSel4
S/a 9L
s_ulze5eN
_u_9[
_0
_OZ:-5_[OO[_.[
Z --
3g
8t
V',_
.3 ."......... . ,'.7
-........................
,........... Z
l
.................................
9ozseJ-_weo
l
3-t " :V-i _
I
/_opul,"4
a/_l'l
uol:l-._Slnbo -.
v e._eQ _uw9L
50;_-OO[OOLZ{:._3g
SM_VW3_
o- ..
NO11V307 "-"
3_nV73N._WO'N
"_-_8Wna 3_7_ ,
..
;,_---T
'"
:
i 6 j.o
.
_.4g 7VN'OiJ.V_13dO3/_0$" Q
,. . . . . "
!. _Sed
"
i I I I
page
6 of o
'"
- .._
I ....... "A/S
l contingency.
55
Light l .......... _...................
I
Weight
Headsets
2 transfer 2 A/S
I extra
headset
"--l' ............................ I
t
for cont"ngency.
56
I 2 , ...... "
I
B I
I
i !
I
C _ I TBD Faclal Wet IdTpes A/S
57
' i
......... ,i, ,_ _,,oo,,_,::::::::::::::::::::::::::: __-,, ............ ........ .......... .........:............ _ _ _o .... ..... ::: -:.............. -1
59
TBD
PGA WIDe
Cloths
60
'
'
C ::,
SEB 42100086-203
I
I
I
Tissue
Disl)enser
"
" "
Defecation ,_DeVice
...
I '
A/S "
.. " .
"
.....:.....
" . -' ,.... '"
"
n n
"
63
TBD
"
"
UC_A Adapter
" "
A/S
"
64
TBD
UCTA Clamps
Transfer
!,tem
10
UNITED
STATES
GOVERNMENT
335
TO _o_
Memorandum
: See list attached : PA/Mafiager for Lunar Landing Apgllo SUBJECT: LMMP
I
NASA
Manned DATE:
Center
Enclosed for your information, review_ and action_ as noted_ is a copy of the LMMP s_owage list for LM-10 and subs (enclosure 1). This list represents the best available definition of crew compartment provisions and LM ascent and descent stage stowage requirements. GAC is currently utilizing this list as the baseline for the design of LM-10 and subs which willbe presented to NASA at the LMMP CDR scheduled for approximately September i, 1969 . GAC has been directed to utilize the GFE design interface criteria provided by enclosure 2. A list of specific subsystem interface criteria or information for which verification or confirmation of validity is. required is provided in enclosure 3. You are requested to review this list and the design criteria, as soon as possible, and submit any comments_ corrections_ or proposed changes to PD6/Crew Compartment Project Engineering Group (X512!). Coordination of GFE to CFE interfaees_ S/C crew compartment requirement% and direction onthese interfaces and requirements to the.contractor for LMMP shall be coordinated through the ASP0 Crew Compartment Project Engineering Group (PD8).. Subsequent to the CDR this list will be published and maintained by the ASPO GFE Office (PF3) in a manher similar to the current Apollo stowage lists. You are also requested to supply (for use in the CDR mockup) the best available representative GFE for each Of the items listed_ as per your ..... _._on _ ............. responsibi! ity . Hardware should be delivered to _AC hy Aug. 15 or earlier: if possible. Hardware support shall be coordinated .through the GFE Office (PF3/J. Thompson, X6237).
Enclosures
(3) 7/30/69
es A. McDivitt
PD8:JRGoo_lan:jw
-._. _
Buy
U.S.
Savings
Bonds
Savi_Ns
Plan
Enclosure
List B (LM Earth Launch) UNIl" ITEI.IQTY' L"F --1"-:-' i TOTAL WT PART NUNBER
".
D.
NO!.II't;CLAT"URI"
LOCATIO,_[
P,MAP, E KS -................. -
'
i...................................
i {A/S { Magaz:nes will be in sealed bags.
--: ..................... _ ....................................... _................... 2 i 2 . "1.0 I 2.0 .SEB 33100125-203 0r-205 i (140 ft)
/ iA/S i !
/_
0.6
A/S
5 _,2, ,.
4.9 i l
Camera, Luna- Surface Electric Hesselblad ' with 6Omm Lens ! Protective Cover, Reseau
I A/S 1 D/S
On Item _............................
I i 2
i 0.5
i ,
. _ LO
8.
!: 0.2 i
............... : ..................................................................... ,i -................................................................................................................ ', .10 : I 10 _ _ ' I.l_ I/_.O}SEB 331000825207 :} ; " Magazines, Lunar Surface Hasselblad 0 D/S 2A/S A/S _ ...........
-,9.3 :
;
:i
LTst
8 (LM Earth
Launch)
GFE P"
1 on Scientlfi_Equ'ipment)
TOTAL W'i" ...... _ PART NUMBER -__ Pallet " NOMENCLATURE ..... ,Assembly No, ] LOCATION _' REMARKS
133.0
]
'
TBD
l
Pal]et Assembly No. 2 D/S
. .......
_-'_ .......................
128_ ]
b133.01133.0
_i TBD
291
hi5.0 ....
15.0
!. TBD
Stereo
Camera
Assembly
i
D/S
(MESA)
129.
2 ._'<1.4
2.8
TBD
Cassette Cassettes
Container
with
D/S (MESA)
Part of
item
129
'J"
':
20.0
TBD
Cosmic
Ray Detector
Package
I0/S
'i
|
131 ] *]4.0
i
]4.6
TBD
Mounting Cask
Assembly
RTG Fuel
ID/S
.....
: ..........................................
132
{ I,_25.5 }
25.5[ TSD
'--
,
!
i
I
]
Fuel
Cask
D/S
'
133
I"14,8
i I
14.8 I TBD I.
ule
As_ emb I y
O/S
; ...
UJ
'
-NOTE: .....
-T-- ......
.--.I-
f
"
"_
,hq_e )iovs ons reflect the Ilwo-st case _' MESA desinn c_<o M=__._i .... u ,....... j.,. I ' ' ; ' i " a ....... ,,_A llll.]IIll _[Cll laUnch wel nt ror so en 11"ic e " wnc'h d-_g--_Ef-E--i-rrHe_-f-aces--_@r--s.a .... L^_ - I g _ qul proem:, ..... I "_ .... I --'_'_+_r-r-pcr_'nus'r--J-'ndi-v-i-d-_ra-l--S "C-.......... . _ limit:. ;_e follriwin n _round "/IJIl_::) ...... ^-;"/ h__d,_'rr'_eCwilt'_--EcTj'Ug'f.G_i"%:6--{-_f.T_-f-v_t_-T'_--I I _l _ _1 _p --_ rot I bhh we ,. .' i i:ablle, thrlee (3)[SRC's, ' [necessa,y i:o stow_,nterface and mouritin 9 _rY other scientific a loaded h:ngdtt:oPP:at;rnmenl'ler. ea,,inm_nt ,,,111 k^ ._g_]., be designed tO abcomodate a SRC' An MESA,,sha]i additio . _-Y , .nal. CFE brackety o f- prov,slons
ENCLOSURE 2
33B
INTERFACE
DESIGN
CRITERIA
THIS
AND (2)
DEFINI-
OF SPECIFIC
INTERFACE'S
Enclosure ITEM '1. :2. 3. 4. _FE DEFINITION See Note See Note -'r-,:--,','-'r Sketch ] ] (LID (LID REFERENCE 340-25114) 3L'0-25148) duri n 9 PDR 340-25114)
339 2
provided (LID
##
(MH0]-
56. 78. 9.
I (LID 340-25146)See Item 9. Item 9. Item 9. See Appendix See Appendix See Appendix
"D E, .
Sanie as
NH0i-03248-136 Rev. A IRN 8461 (provided during PDR). See Appendix 30_ increase over existing volume Design for ]7lbs. maximum weight. See Note 1 (LID 340-25147) See See See Note Note Note | ] ] (LID 340-25114) ,.,
u
"D'!.
";"<';r..... . , _..,., _,
16,
17. 18. |920. 21.
-"
22.
1
i _
Appe.ndi
;,: _lBI]
340
MESA stov_'age list items reflect the "worst, Max:imum earth launch weight for scientific ing CFE interfaces for same, is 400 pounds. hardware carried will be adjusted to satisfy following ground rules apply for CFE weight MESA shall be desTgned to accon:odate a SEC SRCIs, and mounting for a leaded hand tool tional CFE bracketryor provisions necessary other scientifi.c equipment will be charged payload.
case '_ design case. equipment, includIndividual S/C this limit. The apportionment: table, three (3) carrier. Any addi.to stow/interface to the scientific
Equipment
Requirements Analysis
"B"
for Dynamic
IT_
EARTH lAUNCH
LUNAR ASCE}_ NA
!) SEQ Contslners' _" " a ) SEQ Compartment b ) ,_.u,Q Compartment 2) Sample Return
_/I -_II
50-266
Con'tainers
(SRC's) .
:_ J
0-87
0-87
(0-175 )
LID- 360-22802
0-80(Each
Location )
0-_25.4
0-25.4
0-25.4
N/A
LID-360-22807
;];coop.Small Scoop: Large Extens ;i.on Handle Tongs ' S%af-f'wi-T:;hamera C Scribe/Brush/Hand
_D.O_Oi'I
Mount Lens
0-i7.3 0- 3.2
0-17.3 0- 3.2
0-17.3
N/A 0- 3.2(Cassetts
onl_)
to
ADDe,
A/S
STO._;IAG E l_r6vide for sto,vage of a volume of480 rein'mum dimensions 'n two axes of 4..g" 5.(;0 pounds. Stowage shall be n a CFE beta container by NASA. cubic inches of food, x 7.2.5 _ arid a weight v,h c_ can wiLh of
be prepacl,,ed
D/SS
TO;,IAG E
Provide for stov,,age of containers separate]y packaged in beta containers on the 14ESA pal lets which serve as replenishment to the A/S - CFE containers shall be sudk that they can be prepacked Provide by NASA. four (4) (1) Volume in two containers sized as folows: minimum dimensions
(2)
(0) to 5.6
pounds
of
(3)
FOOD EHVIRONNENT CRITERIA Maintain temperature max i mum. of food between +35F Ninimun" to +90F
i_:
343 _PENDI_ D
Thermal
Cameras
amd F]m]
iii::/i!<_i_>_:_i<iiii_,_/ i!ii __
345
L[_._:_I'}_!=I_!:_ 3.2.2.1
LiOH
C,'._rtridge;
Functional
3.3.!
Pressure Drop - 3,5 inches HpO at .7 ibs/min_ 90F and 50")'$ relative humidi_y. Odor }]emo-al- Activated of the amount of LiO}{. Charces! shsi! 50 minutes. demonstrate ehaz'coej_not less
5.0 psia..
3.. 3.2
than
1.0% by weight
a min_'.,!L_n breakthrou@h
time of
'33.3
- Ca_able
of reteining
all particles
28p, or greater
aJ--,_
,_-
.....
b_, O F.,
S" rs
Levi
3.1
Fq'essl;_-,-e l:;ro]p PGA; not greater at 3,5 psia iCgA maximDm figure !.
inc].nding both
AP as function
of
in!st
flow
rate per
3.2 l
Leakage
~ MaxJmt_
allowable
PGA leakage
in a vacu_m
environ-
Pressure Relief - PG]" PRV shall or, en and resea_ between 4.5 and 5,5 psig. PRV flow 3.6 _-'0.2 !bs/!_' of 02 at a PGA pressure o_ 5.5 psia _ . and a dovm,_,-.ear_ pressu.re _ " of less _" _ ,-_ U _._ O. 2 psia.. Carbon Dioxide - i!e.mina! limit of car]:,o._o dioxide partial. pressure at the PGA inlet shal] be 7.6_mn Hg, _ergeney limits per figure 2/ Partic_Aate Matter - A ma-<i,mtaof O, _5{: of the total =.;'low enter_rig the ru--.._ ..................... _s u_f_ _ t_,_.:'d '_=_=.__'e__s-,":d---<-.._. _:;_e,s_.,-_as,:e_ of' . through a 28 micron absolute filter before en';erii,'gthe PGA.
3.4
:_
3.5
346
APPENDIX CM STOWAGE
E DRAWING
361
APPENDIX PORTIONS
F DRAWING
OF LM STOWAGE
VZB-b-tSZOZ(REF)
ME331-OOIB-OOZS('REFi"'
SEE DETAIL A
BRKT
"lr"POS. NO.3
II
I_
STA }--A 3
(REZST
INSTL.
COA._
LAUNCH (SH
16MM CAMERA
7.00)
H LAUNCH(POS
(BH |O.OO)
_r )(SH_._) _
Fi
F2
F3
1:'4
F5
F6
p-Zill
/
CDR_ HELMET STOW " \ ' "
FIO
(SH
I_lZNONE [
-_
Im
F[,_
"rR_,_L_rrEus
FIB
FII
._65
LDW340-60002-1
INSTI_
1B
'
RESEAUPROTECTIVEC_r_ER SE833[OOO46-50f SEB_3100294 -302 Et..ECDATAHA.._S_t.BLAD HANDLE SEB_3FO0295- 302A POLARIZINGFILTER ELEC DATAHASS_L_, '_:_": TRfGGER ECS LiOH STRAP MIB LOW540-t124s*_5 MIC .. SEB35100T_:_fOI L,_ -s=-_3_ooz_._oe
_" __
MICC
AssY
_"
G_JkltW(AJt_L_TEIr._ CO_,_AGE.
L L N_
367
G SYSTEM ICD
SUPPORT
I
368
1.0 l.l
SCOPE Sc_ This ' oocumen_establishes control of the interface functions for exb'a vehicular activity (EVA) of the oxygen umbilical: suit control unit (SCU), warning tone signal, intercom, the pressure control valve (PCV), the oxygen purge system (0PS), the purge valve, and the EVApressure suit. System requirements are specified.
2.0 2.1
APPL CABLE I DOCU),ID'TS _ApplcaSilit_ C i The follGwing documents of the most recent issue contribute to the definition of the EVAoxygen umbilical system interface and forr..la part of thls document to the extent specified herein.
2.1.1
Non-Governmer, Documents t Interface Control Docu_n_ Biolnstrumentation Systems Electr_cal Functional Personal
Communications - Systems Compatibility Mechanical- J Series EVA Umbilical Electrical J Series EVA Umbilical PGA and MechanicalInterface EVA Previsions CM, SM and SIM Bay -
2.2
SD70-220 _ _ ^_ (SM 2A-O3-BLOCK 2-J-(2), ?pe' a'1_''a' _ Proce_ures for O-Se_es Missions Precedence When the requirements f this documentand the r_quiremen_s_-the documents o of referenced of govern. herein are in conflict,the requirements this documentshall
!_
TECHNICAL,_.. _S, :,, ,,_-_QU_'_':V'_'N ,:_ NORTH AI_CERICAN ROCKWZLL CORPORATION AN_ _v|Hli_ _,_._%_, CON_ 12214LA_._/_D OOULEVARO C,O',;'NEY, CALIFORNIA 90241 TAINED _,'_ " n: _-'_:_ = ............. _-...... " .... TO _,_ " ' "_"'_ THE :'_'"" OF ,_-_,,,S . . ANY Cu,'_ I R,,_,, OR _-_L'R. CHASE'_"- ' _"_ORu:R BETWEEN."" 03_3 1 A I /_101"21042-436 ALL PARTIES AFFECTED t t ,=_-_;'_ =
"
.I J ' ._ ..!, ;
3.0 3.1
REQU IR[ti[NTS
t
Performance The pressurega_ent assembly(PGA)in conjunction with the oxygen umbilical and SCU, and the PCV shall be the primaryF_de of sustainingthe life of a cre_menduringEVA. The 0PS in conjunction ith the purgevalvesha::ll w providee_rgency backupoxygen purge flow to the EVA crewmanin the eventof a primarysystemfailure. See Figure1 for an illustration the primaryand of backupoxygen purgefloss systems:
3.2 3.2.1
DesiqnCriteria EVA VA_p=__Egen U=blllca.l, Suit ControlUnit and WarningTone The EVA oxygen u_billcal F_dule (CII) oxygenpurge flow from the EVA stashallcarrythe the SCU which, in turn,is connected tion (TP72)in the Conznand to to the inletsuit connector the PGA. Communication nd instrumentation of a transmlssionhall also be providedby the oxygenumbilical. The SCU shall s consistof a filter,a shutoffvalve,an orificepressureswitch(low flow), an orifice,a suit pressureswitch,and a suit connector, The functionof the SCU shallbe to meter the purge flow from the oxygen umbilical the to PGA and to alarmthe EVA crevn_anhen the PGA pressureIs decreasing the w or purgeflowIs decreasing. The purge flow to the PGA shallbe withinthe following flow and pressureconditions kdth 100 plusor minus5 psla at the umbilicalinlet. FLOW I0 to iZ Ib/hour oxygen (corrected to 45F) Tone _Jornin.q Input DuringEVA, normalCSM audiowarningtonesto the EVA crewmanare deleted. The suit pressureswitchshall activatean alarmtone audibleto the EVA
f}l"'If'ic(_ crewmanwhen his PGA pressuredropsbelow 3.25 plus or_1=t,,.,, +An,_ ,,,_,,-, _,_ nY'p_;m=l',,p _w'ifeh /'InI_ ,Flnb,_ chn11 =_+,l_=.l-a +h_ minus0.!5 psig.
TEHPERATURE 0 to 75F
The
. --
orificeinletpressuredropsbelow60.0 plus 5.0 minus0.0 psig (indicating a purgeflowof less than 6.0 Ib/hour). While PGA pressureis below 3.25 plus or minus0.15 psig or purge flow is less than 6.0 Ib/hour,the warning tone continue._ unlessshut off by the alarmswitchon Panel 604. The warning tone signal shall be a 1.1 volt P-P minuszero pek'centlus 20 percent p squat.'e at 750 Hz plus or minus 15 percent. Automaticresetshallbe wave providedto shutoffthe alarm tone when the EVA PGA pressureor the orifice inletpressurehas been restoredaboveboth respective switchactivation pressures.
370
REVISIOHSA
OPeratig Mode n DuringEVA, VOX intercomcapabilities are provided when the controlhead Is pluggedinto Panel603. BOTE: Continuous intercomarid transmitcapabilities xist when the e controlhead is removedand the crewmanco_unicati0ns umbilJ ical is pluggeddirectlyinto Panel603 (thereby Jumperingthe Intercom/transmi t switchwlres). 3.2.Z PressureGarmentAssembly JThePGA shallcontaina habitable envlron_mnt for the astronautthroughout the EVA operation. A nominalpressureof 3.70 to 4.00 psla shallbe maintainedwithinthe PGA when operating the primarysystemand 3.7 plus or on minus0.3 pslawhen operating the backupsystem. A pressuredrop not on , (including 4.7 inchesof water shal]exist from PGA inletto outlet suit hose connections) when 12 cfm oxygenis flowingthroughthe greaterthan at 3.5 psia and 50F. The allowablesuit leakage(including suit hose connections} hen pressurized 4.0 psla shall, e 0.0315]b/hourmaximum. w to b Suit ReliefValve The suit reliefvalve shallpreventover-pressurlzation the ."GA. Relief, of valvecrackingpressureshall be 4.6 to 5.4 psiawith reseatpressu@e4.5 psiaminimum(leakageless than 4 scc/min). The reliefvalveshallaccomPGA internalpressurefrom exceeding5.5 psiawhen operating a vacuum in environment. modate the maximumflow as specifiedin paragraph 3.2.1and preventthe T The PCV shallconsistof a suit connector, pressurecontrolvalve, and a a Pressure ControlValve manualoverrideshutoffvalve. The functionof the PCV shallbe to control the pressurein the PGA duringnormal operation with the primaryEVA system. The PGA pressureand flow rate shallbe as follows: PGA PressureControl- 3.85 pius or minus 0.i5 psig Flow (Normal) - 10 to 12 Ib/hour oxygenat 4SOF
mJ.nJ3n{II_[um'D_licB
3.2.2.1
!!_ I i
r_ :
_'
!,i]
The PCV shallbe designedso that, in the eventthe PCV fails open the PGA
.........
m.. l
I _, I
:[
..-
SPACE DIVISION
_0_6E-T6_%_'_Z-_'_
........................................ -_ :
.... .......................
3 71
3.2-.4
'.O_!/flen Purge .Cystem The OPSshall consist of high pressure oxygen storage bottles, a pressure gage, a fill fitting, a shutoff valve, a pressure regulator, and a suit hose and connector. The function of the OPSshall.be to provide the backup oxygen purge flow and PGApressure control in the event of a primary system failu,_,e. The OPSshall maintain a PGApressure of 3.7 plus or minus 0.3 psia while providing a nominal oxygen purge flow of 8.1 Ib/hour. The OPSshall be capable of providing an 8.1 Ib/hour oxygen purge fle,_ for a mlnimum of 30 minutes.
3.2.5
Purq_ Valve l The purge valve shall consist of a suit connector orifices, and a two position selector and override shutoff valve. The function of the purge valve shall be to meter the OPSbackup system PGAoxygen purge flow rate to 8oi ]b/hour or 4 0 Ib/hour nominal at a PGApressure of 4.0 psia. The purge valve shall have the following flow perfonmemce with an inlet pressure of 4.0 plus orminus 0.05 psia_ and oxygen inlet temperature of 90 F and dis_ chargingto a vacuum. High flowposition Low flc;_ position 8.1 plus or minus 0.3 lb/hour 4.0 plus or minus 0.2 Ib/hour
3.3
Interface
Criteria
The electrical interface of the J-series EVAumbilical shall be as defined in iCD "'_" _" ,,,_i-z_0_3-236. Co;_unications compatibility shall be as specified in ICD VhOI-21O05-216. Bioinstrumentation functional requirements shall be as specified in ICD MH01-03325-436. The mechanical requirements for mounting and installation shall be as specified in ICD MH01-21041-136and V_HOl-21044-135. The r.ecn,,nlc_I interface during the EVAIs as specified in ....
SPACE DIVIS;[OI'C
I I
1
TECHN!CAL REQ, UiRE:.:ENTS! NORTi-I A_,,fERICANP.OCI!WZLL CORPOP, ATION A_'4D _'O_h'{;',,.qHc._4:.',;'_ CO,'4- ,._ ........................ 12214 LAKEWOOD BOULEVARD. OWNEY, ALIFO,-qNIA D C 9024_. ..... , _"_,: _.,,,.,,_ O,'-" " _.L_,,,....,-,_.,OR FUR.
ALL m_._'u-_ _cc_-," :h
_,
MH03-2i043-435
"" ...
372
APPENDIX CMVELCRO
H ICD
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
APPENDIX
_- =
3.o
This doc_ent is intended to achieve standardizationof C_ Control and Display _absyst_ Panel Controls. The objective Of , standard/z_tioni_ improved cre=_efficiency. This is accC_-p!ishcd through the elimination of conflicti_ design feature_, thereby reducing the possibi3_ty of ambiguity arioing f_cm the operation of
-
the crew while -_arLng a pressurized Apollo _lovo. _.2 _.2I CoJeer!yes Controls includi_ tog_lee, rot_cies, pu_hbuttons, continuou_ cont_l_ and circuit-briskets_hall be _t_dardized to the extent indicated herein. Standardizationof controls to include, but not necessari3_v be limited to, th_ follow_ (i) (2) O) _.2.2 Control eperaticm Controlmo_ir_ a_d _Z _'o_1 ..
Control o.ien_t_e_
Enobs _hall be _r_-_da_'dized the a_._nt indicated h_zoLu. to Standardi_ationof )mobs shall include, but not necossari3_ _ limited
3-3
..-----_ ............
................
INTERFACE CONTROL
T..SDOCUMENT_',"'_': _" ! ...... m-a ,,nTr,_c_,T [ SPACE TECHNICAL .,zWu',- ""-_"' o AND NOTHING HEREiN CON" | _4 TAINED 5h,",,-L B," Dc.,.-M.D TO .,,L_ cR THE ",-,':r,.'-" AN" .... CONTRACT OR FUR,#..;-,,.,5 OF ! l 03953 "_^= ORDER r.,,-T'_,_._-c_._ _ ............ "' '"_'['_--7 ALL PARTIES AFFECTED ? _ _
DOCUMENT
_ ,_-.-, SYSTET_S , ._.DZV!S]_OD_ CAU_FORN_,_
-,,,
,O-:NT No.
_-Vb..DOWN_.
_"_'_"_'_
TaC " .' _- -,...,
AND ,NU_c,;_,= r,_.,_,,, --,_,, ,_r _SHALL _Z DEE_o _'__ _ ANY CO_TRt,CT OR FUR_ _ "_" [ _ ,_ . . . ....
_ _-:, _ .,,,,.,,.._L:
_
j.... ................
_S,,.._ 6
....._ "
+,
___....
. ..........
!:]cj_
...........
i ,'=:_ .... r'-',_._ _ _ _', ........ L-_/'-_g"_7;_ .................. ;_ _ '_ ;:_ - _ "/i:"]"_"''_ '_"
_balt'onpMtys by f_uu0tlon _ha3.Zb_ am fo_o_;;_; _._. do_m. on ._ow_en act__w,.tc ir, crease_E-_-x'--_l-de_]-_' off _Ioso de..c,_.,_;._-, decre_omC im _,:ddcd fez "off", the _ff" auto
mb.ot_d bm _u
th_ center posSetS.on _ ec_coZ.h_,:_,horo ti_c _.,_u_deor_mo_.m_ eq_.p_,;_t p_i, o_'_co, f _ _.&ch c-_o, "off" shot-&d bs _ $ho bottom .mooit.!on,
Rota_
b._maid,
Rotor2
to p._agyaph 3.3,_
_e
another oh_A
_r,Z,::c.)_A
_'2_!'_
-, .... _-,_
,'-":"F._
.-_r_._ 1i
1_'i._
L:_t <Z%^/O_Z_
'DLV_,,
_,,_.#
..-,,_.-.!-,.---.,'. ;.;?
_ ,,_
::.. ,.'::.
._
!'.._ ........................ ............. '":........... ......... 2 -..= :....... U-6:.;:}.:{, 7,................. I ......
REVISIONS-A -_-
3.3.1.3 3.3.1.3.1
Pushbubtons Operation Pushbutton switches shall have a total d/splacement of .125 to .6 of an _nch. Mechanical resistance to actuation of pushbutton switches the-tamEs, t'-_ _.':-nje.
throuEhout
stacked verticall_
or horizontally on
Stacked pusbuttons
inadvertent
activation _ld
create a hazardous situation for the crew or mission shall be provld@d with a lockin& mechanism, semi-recessed or otherwise suitably guarded.
_.3.1.3.3
Colo_
C_lor shall conform to the requirements of ICD _1-0517_-41_,
3.3-!.3.4
_o=e_elatur_
"_.e nomcn=latur_ for all pushbutton switches shall be visible at all of ICD _01-0517_-_. times and shall conform to the requiremcnts
3._.I._ 3_.3.1._.I
Continuous Controls (Rotary Knob_ Operation Rotation of the }mob to "'_n_ rl_ht _,,_ ..... _alt ftmction being controlled. _n'- n _uc_ea_e _'-_he a the
_53
I_":l"OP"7"_-t'_/_
SHEET
INTERFACE CONTROLDOCUMENT
THIS DOCU_v_.Itl _iLu,rl_.S
,,_c _o-_,'_ " TECHN_uAL R_QU,r, ui,,-N,S
14pi U ._t..,ll, lH_ i,,_,,_-,h ,,.,'_.,
_
" _
_.__.
NORFH
.
____
AM=RICAN
AVlA_
IO_,
1_,_.
_..--_=-_=_=-=,=._,--.=-_:,_--,=_-,-':'.----=,--'_-----_=-.--=_---,=---_-'_
:I:ANED SFAU BF DEE;_,_ED _coo_ IDEl<i_ " N0.i SIZE ! I ANY COr4_r,_C' u,-, ,u,,i C.I.,d.,_ _ _i-iw.ri _._
_ ,
:!"1 1_ _
390
APPENDIX RESULTS
J ROCKWELL
. ..
- ......
: ..
"
- ....
396
<,i"
A data package also includes copies Of the mockup orders used to autliorlzerelease of noted prints and a list of noted prints relating" each to its specific collecto_ MCR and task n_nber._ ...... . . . . : . ,' .',_ :.._.: .Ground Bules 1. " -
Each CCA issued by NASA will include effectivity for mockups and trainers, as applicable, . ' . _' .... " , .... _ and NR shall make a "technical determination as to the effect on n__gedmockups and trainers resulting from future spacecraft changes and_ at joint coordination meetings held-on an as-reqttiredbasis, identify the necessary hardware and/o_ data as required. Meetings are to be held on an alternating lOcation'basis - between NASA/_iSC, Houston_ and NR, Do_,rney, - , _. ,._:. :- . " " .... !, ./ A collector Ma-_ter Control Record (MCR)will be established for each _ckup: with respect to each spacecraft configuration update as depicted 11ithe matrix under Scope - item #3i :' collector MCR will A_ Be maintained for CMS-I,,P_ and 3.
2. .... . :- "
..
_. .... .... 3.
_ ._,
'4; The Master MCR _rIS/a&cum_i_te mockup:and trainer changes ty reference to other MCR' s including appropriate task descriptions; " Hardware changes not associated _ith MCR's, but tecDnqicallyidentified by ER ._ as required for the specific mockups and trainers, Will alsobe identified on the Master MCR_ ._, -:_. ._.,_._:.......... 5-. Data packages shall be supplied to the NASA for.all haa'dware _elivered . fo_. maintenance or update"of MBC-I, MB.C-2_ KSC-Ej 27A, and 27B_ For configuration changes which do not require the fabrication of parts . by NRj a data package will be _eu_nishedo Th.edata package Will contain all the information required for the fabrication and installation of parts by NASA. A single data package shall be supplied'for _ISC-1 and _C-2 for tho_e changes eolmmon to both vehicles. Separate:data packages shall be supplied for KSC-E. Data packages will not be . supplied for CMS,I, 2, or 3, Zero G3 WIF_ or miscellaneous training hardware3 unless specifically directed_by the NASA. 6. I_Rshall fabricate and f_rnish'hardware pahets-toMSC in accordance With the follo_ng criteria: .... ,
..
"-
'..
_-.
d. Electrical connectors_s_itches, circuit breakers, lighting fixtures other thaz_ the Main Display Console (MDC)
-. - " -
e.
"
'
."
.... ..
:.._.i:>
..:..._ ..:..'
-...
..... :
39.7
_q shall maintainj as reqvdred _ Plannip_ and schedule stat_ hardwsre being fabricated, :_. 8, Allhardv_are execution of DD Form_.250. evidenced by 8_nd/ordata packages _Sh_i;be " acce
for all
.,
ed at NR's p antIas
9-: ThelNR cost proposals in response tO CCA's which approve spacecraft _ changes havi_ _odkup and trainer effectivitywill incl_de that effQrt resultant from the mock_lp and trainer update and maintenance .. . r_qui_ements. "! :"" '" _i;_."-:_<_...
'
1.O. _R Will accumulate moc]_p and,t1_a!ner Changes that .are not identlfied ' to,a specific CCA approving a spacecraft Change. An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)_ will _be submitted on a monthly basis defining _._ the.design .andS fabrication efforts re_uire_ to incorporate _these _ ,. c_anges into _ne affected mochups and trainer s. The ECP, including a_Budgetary .an_Planning es%imate_ and a request for CCA coverage ............ will be.submittedby the 15th day of e_ch.-month_o .cover the iden.tified " " _ _changes beginning on the ist and ending on.the last day of the prece_sh_nitted innnedi_beiy_in the fo_unl Of, an Emergency _slgnificance willbe Contractual ,/.. Ing month.i Individually proposed 'changes of major ECP. " ! coverage wil_ be provided under the _proVisions. of Paragraph 1.1.7.2, " . Part II of.the Contract Statement of Work. ll. Where feasible_ hR shall make-maximum Utilization of.multiple-.release -effectivity for the fabrication of mockup and trainer hardware.
- . _ _ - _'//.i_. ' -
12.
The NASA will issuea CCA for those approved chaoges referenced in paragraph i0 in accordznce _ith the Contract Change Authorization Proce_ure_ NAS 9-150-001. Action to provide hardware and/or data packages w_ll be initiated only after .receipt of a CCA. . ' " ' " " _; _ _ _ _-_: '_ i_!,,..".:'_ !: _ "
-_
:.!,._ "
._ , :_":_'"_
.. _
"'_"-:- American Rockwell Corporation .... _ " " North " _ _ ...."
..
.,-.
:...:_i_i-
_-
398
APPENDIX SAMPLE
L 399
REQUEST
FOR PROPOSAL
ACTIOn<
I" 'l
399
[] ccA
,,_EZO
Experiments
TRACT NUL!BER
[-]
DATZ
ECP
1
NAS 9.110457
Fairchild
Camera
Eqttipment Co:mpa_uy
ASAP
O-O Simulation
CHANGE TITLE
Training
_,oc_,,up Hard_,._sre
Provide Camera
FTIO_;
EVA
Camera/Laser
Altimeter
and Two
Cassettes
OF CHANGF.
1
1
Provide
for
Use in
cs_ie_ra/laser
__l-'-'_mr,_"'-_-"_,-
mockup compatible with O-G aircraft e.nd underwater testing facility require:,sents I. (attached). l_:ovide one mass representative and one neutrally bou4rant record [ container (cassette) which meet the attached require!lents The interface requ_irc+_ 'ments o the ove-,-allca_era/e7 t_meter T_ocl_upwith r,,_SC Z,,_ockt!_ No. 8 shall be I coordinated_ as requix'ed# with _._C. Required delivery date of mockup to I%ASA-MSC
SPECIF'!CATION
SFECIFICATIO.N NUMB-oR PAG{ NU#,FSER
CHA_"GE
pARAGRAPH .
JUST
[ F ; CATI
0;;
Mocl.m:os rF::CUeS;_ed are reqtT, ired to verify eapsbility of EV/" crewman x,eeor'd eout_ine :_ and ve-r_f-v tl_e acdeptabJ].ii, y of S/C EVA provisions such reo_.zev_]_. }._oekvn:s will svbseca_ent]v be u.tJ.lize(t fox" fla.gr:L, of the EVA p_." OC e C.LI"r'C-S . -o _. .
to retrieve to allow
cret' ura___.._ L_
[ EFF[CTiV,TY
(REV
YES
6S)
ALL
FP._;'!OUS
ED!TIOrC9
;,._E O_L:-OLET2.
P,_,C_E
C}_
........................... '! l,
OJOO!5
400
........
"__#_g_-o
lowers
REI IABILITY
_rooaszm_y
_.___.ation t._.i_,
N,/A
N,/A
_/A
I SPAPJES ;J/A .L
CONTROL Z)OCU)4ENTS
_ORU*_CE Zz_Dzxbvedflight merfozm__ance due to .S/C design of potential _esign deficiencies in GFE or early identification
_A|N"TENANC
I_
GFE/GFP ....
N or 3...,.. c a b ._o-_ 1
.....
"
"-'
I_,/A
REQUIRES INSTALLATION AT KSC
YES
ON
[]
PROGRAI,I
NO
F TFII_ CH&NGE 15 DISAPPF:OVZD
........................................
"fl J-
IE'_pACT
Inadequate retrieval
provisions provisions
available
for EVA
of
cassette
retrieval.
RE,lARKS
COST
$1G,,AiURE
ESTIM',YED
].
I
O'IG'" ,TOR
' J
I _ '
J
7
i TOTA_
l
_1
I
DIRE-C'IOR Oq LM/C$'4 DATE
_O/j_-,_z_y h./Ooo____an
O"
I DATE
r,: I' -
'_
editions
401
A Mapping evaluations=
Cs.mera Mockup
is required
in support
procedures
development, zero-g
crew training
the fli_ht
crew _nterfaee
buoyant zero-g
inverface
the retracted
ar'.,d deployed
positions.
ha.....leust m
.,
the
iorces "
as the
article. The fi_; cassette handles must have th,-"s_:._ dir:ensicns, forces as the tel-
flight
The zero-g
be of actual
" " _.-]m weiglrt ano cer.ter of grav-,_ty. The _[IF r.,,.ockup cassette _4 neutra].ly buoyant of g/'avity, of _..,/th the c,_no,_.c buoyancy _-..... areas shall
ccineid:ent ..riththe
l_rge _'ental
be pcrfc,rE_.tedto facilitate
move.,_e;_u through
the ;.rater and to allc.-,.." &rainage. se is net required_ however, in the two
_.,u,:,,, be incorporatect for ic,_._omngthe .mockup ...... + " " " _-" d_ploye_).
1 - I
2
The non-crew_operated portions of the mockup shall reflect the - 402 flight
. .
i i li
i,
{,,:: I![
article
,
with regard
f
to geometric
form_
fit_ These
in be
all areas
affecting
flight
crew perfo_nance.
j:
,,i! f! {i !.i
capable
of _,rithst_u_gdng prolonged
wi%_
-.
.minJm'_m: corrosion.
.
(Wood coatings
....
or styrofoam sha.ll,provide
':: .. "
may ade_f_lateprotection with
:
for
"
}i
il
components
not be used. )-
ii
:_ i'_
Painting
shall be
in accordamce
(Bearing
surfaces
not be paznted.)
- ....
".
"
"
:[
-" :
The Mapping
-/. , .
must be
by operation " -
-o
For_ard
16-g _
Lateral
2-g
Up
. .
_
. ,,
::
<:
"
forward remain
load is a erashlanding
that
7.
{i :
out ofth_
this load be
sustained
i :mockup
ii _
restrained
straps to the
_e
!6-g
].o_ also
assm,_es tnat
i!
I. i
orientaticn (04 end) . of . t'he
-
S!M bay
in
with
i
I
forward
.
_
{
403
404
L REVIEW MINUTES
. --.
. _ ."
?-7 "
_'-""-: . '
" : -. './.
........... _L L
"
SPACECRAFT
CENTER 77058
!
; >. DEC 3 0 1_
,5
i :." ;'
:"
.....
Mr.
Milton
I. Drucker
Director, Apollo CSM Program-Contracts Space Dzvlszon North American Rockwell Corporation Downey, California 9024 ! Dear Mr. Drucker: are the minutes at NR on December := additional ) o ..... the criterion of _ = . 17 - .... :
EnclOsed for your information and impteme.ntat_on of the Crew Compartment Review Meeting held ,and i8, 1968. .....
ORF (Optical Range Finder) Integration. _(PartII of the minutes) ORF alignment, in theminutes. NR'shall utilize
b; NR will provide procedures to NR Launch Operations to accomplish ORF by '.'Bubble" or other" leveling type provisions, eliminating the need for the use of special GSE provisions, If this alignment proves to be impractical, NR slaall provide such rationale and define the required alignment techniques and GSE provisions tO NASA by.January 2, 1968, prior to their implementation. bracket procedures screws slippage
. ..
c, NR will expedite delivery dates of the ORF mounting and alignment procedures to KSC. The bracket and alignment are required by no later than January 31, 1969. d. NR will provide GFE dovetails to Kollman as soon as possible to preclude of the OR-_/to KSC. and related attachment ahy delivery.schedule
. . , .. ..
i+
2 4o6
.
e. Subsequent to the December 17, 1968, mating on the ORF, NR, W. Anderson, requested that definftion of the location of dovetail on the ORF via establishment of dimension "X" be deferred until December 27, 1968, instead of the December 19, 1968, date agreed to at the meeting. NR will insure that such definition is made by no later than December 27, 1968. 2. General Crew Compartment Review Meeting.
(PartII of the minutes) a. NR demonstration is requested to confirm the availabilityof open mockup items from the October 23-25, 1968, Crew Station of the following Review Item Disposi-
STW-007,
STW-008,
In addizion, demonstration of the Optical Range Finder installation as per CCA direction is requested. A schedule for the review with NASA of the items listed as enclosure 7 of the minutes is also requested b. prototype provisions. by January 2, 1968. of the SO-65 lowering
"
With regard to the timely resolution and closure of open items from previous crew compartment meetings, NR is delinquent in providing the biweekly submittal of status and documentation for previous Crew Compartment meetings. NR is requested to take immediate steps to provide follow-up documentation and status on all prior crew compartment meetings and as defined in the enclosed minutes. Prompt submittal of design implementation data will a_low early NASA review and acceptance of NR's design approach. It should also be noted that the timely availability of required mockup modifications for review and submittal of design implementation data will improve the effectiver, ess of the Crew Corr, partment Reviews and not require a crew compartment stowage review for each spacecraft. Sincerely yours,
Jack
40 7
PART I
PART II
APPROVAL
NR
// ASPO ' NR 7-
_1
- . 408
....... OPTICAL RANGE FINDER HEETING.. ' NR DOWNEY 17 DECEMBER 1968 . PART I
l
-
-.':-,
t !,;
PHOebE_O._.. 516-WAI4 _ X336 516-WA143C X336 X 3251 X HU3-3991 HU3-3991 X3153 X3584 HU3-2703 X1262 X4ITI . HU3 o2954 1517 1517 2937 1838 HU3'3586 48-3--257t_ X3153 X3061
Engineer
W" R. Anderson J, H. Brown M. D. Holley T. W. Humphreys C. M. Willis J. W. Montgomery R. W_ Nygren W. Musser .C.D. Perner J. R, "Goodman E. K.M.cMulIin M. H. Zelon D. J. Becker R. A. Montgomery E, Rangel D. Sedlak S. B. Nahin A. Bialecki .
NR NASA-G&C Div. NASA-G&C NASA/MSC/R&QA NR NR NASA/FCSD Kollsman NASA-FCSD NASA-MSC NR-Proj. Office NR-Proj. Off4ce AC Electronics AC Electron'cs General Electric General Electric NR NR-Proj. Office
Mtg. -Reqmts. Div ...... @..Downey Rep. G&N DIv. MSC/R&QA Telecommunications Project Office FCDR Field Engr. Crew Station Prog. Office Project Engr. Project Engr. "Subcontract Field Engr. Program office Program Office Telecommunications Stowage Mgmt.
PART I 1.0 Optical Range Finder Meeting A Crew Compartment Meeting was held at NE on December !7, 1968, in the Mockup Display Area with the personnel listed on the Sign-in Sheet (Enclosure i) participating. The purpose of the
meeting was to evaluate and resolve the Kollsman Optical Range Finder (0_)* installation and stowage on CSM 104.
1.1
In
1._.l
Optical Range Finder (ORF) Interfaces and Mounting: a) b) c) d) Basic Use Requirements Configuration Drawlngs/Mockups Stowage Alignment/Line-of-Sight Mequiremen_s Readout Provisions Mounting Requirements Mounting Interface Provisions
e) f) g) h)
1.2
*The title "Diastimeter" does not correctly identify the function of this equipment. NASA stowage lists should reflect the nomenclature of the "Optical Range Finder/' not "Diastimeter."
- 4_0
._ _/i
_l.2.1
Baslc Use Requirements - a) Essentially required for ranging verification during CM/I_M
"....: :_. _-
(Below i000
i_!
c.) Used as a backup to provide ranging during LM rescue (CSM -l Actlve Docking). - --
e) .IoRF
.. -;. " _-
g) "6RF will not be rotated on its_TSCmount.-"The SC will be oriented to line up the two lenses with the LM running lights.
........ - _)_j
I.2.2
" Confi6uration
_/!_
....
_......
Changes to the ORF configuration as a result of this meeting " _ -are defined by Kollsman InstrtnnentCompany Drawing Number
-_
........
,.a .......................................
# ...........
I ---" . . .
......
sanctioned
configuration
definition.
z..3
sto age
a) ORF will be stowed in the right-hand side of Compartment AG (see photographs, Enclosure 3). b) Addition of stowage cushions will change A6 configuration, resulting in P/N
reidentification, qr "
....
-_
= _= _ _ _ _: :
.,
. .... . ..-
-_.
"
. .
)-.
c) _ The stowage
bracket notif_
be in Compartment
use of A-8.
i.2.4 : "
Ali6nment/Line a) Each
of Si6ht Requirements
.-..
....nstrument i
is not a mandatory
but rather
a highly
desirable
requirement .... q) .... _. _ The CM x-axiS alignment of. the_ COAS mount may be utilized
utilized, if feasible, to preclude and attendant _" d) ITEMj NASA S/C serial time
eXtensive
installation.
PART I_ NO. 'i. requested that NR use the same approximate for alignment _ 103 -
accuracies
without
that it is too
can be "reasonably"
(+0)--- The 0RF should be mounted . in the window afterthe area, with
any structural
obstructions defined
accuracy
techniques
are resolved.
412 Final type aligtmment accuracy and difficulty will depend a great deal on the
appear
to be constrained
i. 2.5
Readout a)
Provisions mirror will be used on the ORF to provide (Enclosure 2);this has negligible
Right-angle adequate
display
orientation
effect on NR stowage. b) N_erals mockup will be provided in possession 1.9 times larger than thcse now on
scribed
mirror.
i. 2.6
Mounting a)
provisions
shall be utilized.
use of current
TV mounting
be built drill
and pro-
vided by NR to Kollsman_
to Kollsman Limitation
excursion 2.
in the drawing_
bonding
I
of a dovetail
impractical.
Mechanical
approach.
advised
_:_t
shall
on the
Enclosure" 2.
(4) design
concepts approach
in a trade-off
2.0
Astronaut
Office
the comments
concerning
a mounting
bracket
requirement.
mounting order
not requiring
crew adjustment
was preferred,with
of accuracy
of +2 .
3.0
Su_mary
3.3.
Kollsman within
advised
to
15 minutes
appurtenances
3.2
NASA
strongly
advised
level
a!igmnent
approach
utilizing
surface
(optic reference)
accuracy on launch
by means
now available.
3_3
A reference for design approach No. 3 or No. 2 was stated (Enclosure 4)for the CN_Imounting bracket However, as a
result of further mock_p york was to _'roceed ._o_age approach _ith design
approach
of the -currenttype of mounting bracket as per No.. 2 in C6_tainer 2 A8 was found ,..i feasible.
"
NR advised that utilization of the rigidized TV support bracket could feasibly be used to locate a new mount in the spacecraft.
A review Qf the spacecraft by NR revealed that locating the new TV type "socket" presented no apparent problems at this time.
3.4 3.4.1
Schedule for the ORF installation was provided as follows: Kolls_an Instrument Com_an_ a) Training unit at KSC (K.I.C. ) - "January 2, _1969 January 31_ 1969 February i0_ 1969 February ll, 1969 _ -
d) Qual
4.2
Date dovetails and hardware required at Kollsman Instrument Company (_IC) topreclude schedul_ impact: i i i i set set set set January January January January 2_ 1969 14, 1969 21, 1969 30, 1969 .....
NR to send dovetails and hardware to KIC for installation -_ on the ORF. " " " " ....
c)
Kollsman Instrument Company 575 Underhill Blvd. Syossettj New York 11791 Attention: d) NRbracket Arnold L. Fishler
Total of two (2) sets of brackets plus related parts. l) Flight bracketry and spacecraft mods (if any) at KSC no later than January 31, 1969. January 18, 1969. e) f) Spacecraft cushions to KSC no later than January 31, 1969. AMS modification kit bracketry and related provisions including stowage provisions by Janua_g 31, 1969. NOTE l: provided. No special backup flight mounting bracket will be It was determined that the AMS prototype could NE estimates
NOTE 2:
3_5
No_n_l_tN_a
of the diastimeter will be changed to "Optical NR and NASA to reflect the change in the
Range Finder."
3.6
3.7
M. Holey/NASA/EG44 advised the Optical Range Finder spares (i.e., batteries, etc) will be supplied by the G&NProject Office.
416 3.8 Contractual coverage to NR is by CCA 3001 dated December 6, 1968, A6. for
CCA is required
to cover:
CFE hardware
alignment
of the GFE ORF for use through of the CFE bracketry; bracketry. It is
stowage
mockup
the necessary
changes
into revised
l_, 1968,
has discussed
and approved
the fore-
3.9
to NASA
19, 1968,
the on the in
of the dimension
provided
4.0
Transmittal
KIC Drawing No. 10123720-0330A 2 dated December 3, 1968. (Enclosure 2 of these minutes)
To Kollsman
NR:
Series of Polaroid photographs of 0RF mockup; of 0RF in A6 container; of 0RF mounted in M/U 28.
r t.
2.0
of
this meeting_ Part II, the Crew Compartment meeting was continued at NR on December 18, 196_ in the mockup display area, with attendees as per Enclosure 5.
2.1
The meeting commenced iwith a review of the action items assigned at the Crew Station Review Meeting and Mockup Review held at NR 6n October 23-25, 1968. follows: The status of those open items is as
ICD approved by NASA on November l5, 1968. Drawings were transmitted to NR (K] Shaw). Closed. ICD _pproved by NASA. Drawings were transmitted to NR (K. Shaw). Closed. Drawings were "transmitted to NR (K. Shaw). Closed. No change required. No requirement. Closed.
Action Item 2
Action Item 3
Closed.
CCBD 8E37_ changed method of attaching BioBelt from stitching to heat seal. Dated September 29; 1968. Closed. Open 1. S_C 103 - TV requirement. 2. S/C 104- No TV requirement. TV mounting bracket modified for sequence camera. 3. S/C 106 and sub - TV requirement. Ref. CCBD 8C1894, approved December 26, 1968. Closed. CCB approved November 8, 1968 (Item 3i) Closed.
Action Item l0
Closed.
New J Box is at KSC installed in,S/C. Closed. Crewmen will wear life vests during launch_ reentry. No stowage requirement for vests during launch/reentry. Closed. NASA (E. Rangel) will submit an EECP. Closed. St6wageresolved by joint NASA/NE CCB on November 27, 1968. Closed. G_N Dust Covers have identification markings. Closed. Acceptable by Ng_Awith No NASA requirement. Open No reported problems. Closed. markings. Closed. Cldsed.
Action Item 15
Action Item 16
Action Item 17
'
Action Item 18
Action Item 19 Action Item 20 Action Item 21 Action Item 22 Action Item 23
Food containers are interchangeable. Eel. CCBD 8C1845 on December 33 1968. Closed. Close via normal KSC procedures. 1. Changed out for 103 and subs. 2. Pending NASk direction to change out in 8/C 104 and subs. _a_ NASA direction to change out in j. ........ _ -. S/C 104 and subs. &. FlOOrCPad modification eliminates problem on S/ 104. 5. Ref. MCR 6791. Change in line.
Normal ECP follow-up procedures will close out action. Closed. Action Item 26 Open
Action Item 28
2.2
S/C 104 follow-up items as listed in the matrix (Enclosure 2) were reviewed. The status of those items is as follows:
NASA briefly
tion of both the prototype and flight hardware provisions at KSC by December 19, 1968, NASA comments on the acceptability will await'_NASA/_Rinputs from KBC.
STW OO1
S/C 104 and subs. Ref. MCR 7940 and 7435, NR engineering due December 20, 1968. Release as mod kit to KSC. Installation schedule in mock_p_ by January 13, 1969. NR to confirm date available for NASA review. Ref. MCR 7435. NR engineering due ,December20. Installation scheduled in mockup by January 16_ 1969. NR to confirm date available for NASA review. NR to add _'caution"note to Apollo Operations Handbook (AOH). No NASA follow-up CCB action proposed. Closed. Back-up overboard WMS. NR proposed change to November27 Joint CCB was approved for S/C lO7 and subs. NR advised they were updating mockup_ Closed. Reference E0 683078 and 683079. NR Engineering Release December 13, 1968. S/C 106 and subs. Closed. Mockup discrepancy only S/C is OK. NE corrected and _[_SAreview in mock-up completed. Closed.
SKW 002
S_W 003
STW 004
SKW 005
S_W 006
420 007 Reference MCR 7435 and 7940, NR Engineering due December 203 1968. Installation scheduled in mockup by January 13, 1969. NR to confirm date available for NASA re_-e Same as STW 007 above. Same as STW 007 above. Reference MCR 7707, E0 720643 dated November 22, 1968. Installation scheduled in mockup by January !0, 1969. NR to confirm date available for NASA review. Reference MCR 7301, E0 698690 and 698691, dated October 31, 1968. NASA review in mockup completed. Closed. Same as S_ 011 above.
STW 010
S_
01!
S_
012
STW 013
NR proposed no action required. Clips do function O.K. NASA concurs. Closed. CCBD 8C1787 approved November 8, 1968. Reference MCR 7817, E0 711855 dated November 21, 1968. Not to be installed in mockup (S/C 104 only). NR's approach acceptable based upon NASA's review of EO's (paperwork) in mockup. ICD signed on routing. Closed. i. Too expensive to install in mockup. NASA concurs. 2. 107 and subs. Change in work. Closed. 3. NR using engineering prototype. NASA _ill exchange for flight,configuration. 5. Following S/C 103 flight. NR will supply date to NASA for review couch grounding and rotating arm zest. 6. Closed. 7. Engineering release of new item due January 10, 1969. Closed. 8. Ref. MCR lll31. Closed. No mockup required. Action Item 1 - NASA (E. Rangel, J. Thompson) will provide filter for use in NR mockup 028.
STW 014
STW 015
. " L y..
S_
_.... '
;_"i:!
i.ii.!. _:(".dti0.n_f_e_., L 'NASA (C. Perner to supply :,-!: A 2 :i_:IDWC_. of timer .to RR. 31ASAto review E0's .)_]!:. DWGS;-forS/C 106, lOT, Volume A5 and .and:
'
-,
iile_3
.-/::: :::7:
PLSS LiOH Canister Stowa6e for S/C 104 -,..
.
.
.-
-:
:Stowage of Li0H cartridge in Vol_uneA1 is considered feasible and acceptable by NASA for S_C104. Requires off-loading of three tissue dispensers from Vol;A1 prior to Canister stowage. (R&ference Enclosuve _). Stowage Lists should be updated to show this location. Closed. " ' Action Item 3 NASA (R. Ny_ren) to work out in-flight
_ 2.4
Stowage pro'_dures in accordance with schedule requirements. Review of operation of camera power cable with,flange connectors (flight test t_ Panels lSj 16 and iO0_. " : " . '
The operation of connecting the COAS flanged type electrical connect0rto Panels 15, 16 and lO0 proved to be "caB y " and acceptable as compared to use of the other two types of flight connectors evaluated. i(Theother type of connectors were "very difficult" to connect.) NASA will take the necessary action to - implement change board approval of the "flange type" connector.. .'forS/C lO_ .and subs. . - . . _ Action Item 4.- NASA (C_ Pern@r) to 4efine requirements for connectors, P/N ME 414-0465-001, 7 pin normal dlocking_ 0r S/C 106 and subs. Total number required_need dates_ and lOcation will be supplied to'J, Go0dman/E. RangeI,'.
-. .
..<... . .
?,IT_
Action Item 5 - _N__SA (E, _angel) will follow through on CCBD for _ ..... ,_,,'_m _t'_T%_'_? _ ?*f:_'(111_'_ht_ fO_ s/c lO6 and subs. CSM i04 Remote Cable Routing in Clips NASA reviewed NR routing proposal as defined by ICD MH01-03275 . -136, Revision A, DatedOctober 21, 1968, and already released EO's and found acceptable.. ICD approved. Closed. _-:
-_ 2.5
2.6
New items
. .
[: j ,
- .
,.
" _
""
:. _J
.-
I_
3 :ii:: .
'"
"422".
Fli6ht Dat.aCards for S/C i04_ 106.and subs.. -:/_ISA reviewed NR proposed stowage in adding flight data cards :_ .to.S/C 1.04, 106 and subs. As defined by ICD MH01-03290,136 (NC). ICD approved.by NASA. Closed. . '. "
.__ z
2.6,
_':_ /ii_!
RevieW.indicated that there was no defined stowage for LM return_film stowage, S/C l04 only. Provisions were to be aoC0mp_.iishedy PrOposal for "stow fiLm.in one cofitainerfor b _eentry, S/C 10_." Discussed at November 27, 1968CCB.
_.i _
To accomplish stowage proposal on a "No impact"basis, the followi_ St0_age was reviewed and approved by NASA:
. .
After removal of unsuited,reentry provisions from -" of AS_ container, two 16 mm and two70 mm fiLm ,magazines,a DBEA tape recorder and two tissue dis."._pensers (if available at that time) will be stowed _ inthe A5 container prior to reentry.. S/C 104.0nly.. (See photo - enclosure 6_. ActiOn Item 6 - NASA (R. Nygren)to work out in-flight stowage Of f_im packages. LM return film sto_age for S/C 106 and subs, will be in container R-I3 as per currently provided .provisions . as,approved by NASA/NR CCB. New Items - Fut_e
1 o
"
2.7.3
.,
__ Camera Ba6s NR Engine_eringRelease due JanUary lOj 1969. S/C 107 and subs.....
2.7..4 . -. "
SO 65 .Stowale Box 8__aCouch Lowerin6 (Turnbuckle) Flight hardware fi_ check approved by NASA (A. Granville ). Installation scheduled in mockup by January 17, 1969. NR to confirm date available for NASA review. NASA requested NR to expedite the " availability _o the previously defined date of January lO, 1969.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
2. REPORT DATE
6. AUTHOR(S)
Jerry Goodman
S-982
TM-2006-213725
Available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI) 7121 Standard Hanover, MD 21076-1320 Category: 15
13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)
This thesis presents a frame work for a crew station handbook and includes samples of the broader areas which such a handbook should cover. The completed sections of this thesis serve as extensive treatments of the topics covered. The content of the individual sections of Chapters I and II varied with my experience and knowledge. Chapter 1=Vol 1-198 pgs Chapter 2=Vol 2-262 pgs
Manned Spacecraft, Apollo Spacecraft, Vostok spacecraft, Voskhod manned spacecraft, crew workstations
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT
246
20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
Unclassified
Standard Form 298 (Rev Feb 89) (MS Word Mar 97) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 298-102
Unclassified
Unclassified
NSN 7540-01-280-5500
Unlimited
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
2. REPORT DATE
6. AUTHOR(S)
Jerry Goodman
S-982
TP-2006-213725
Available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI) 7121 Standard Hanover, MD 21076-1320 Category: 15
13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)
This thesis presents a frame work for a crew station handbook and includes samples of the broader areas which such a handbook should cover. The completed sections of this thesis serve as extensive treatments of the topics covered. The content of the individual sections of Chapters I and II varied with my experience and knowledge. Chapter 1=Vol 1-198 pgs Chapter 2=Vol 2-262 pgs
Manned Spacecraft, Apollo Spacecraft, Vostok spacecraft, Voskhod manned spacecraft, crew workstations
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE
434
20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
Unclassified
Standard Form 298 (Rev Feb 89) (MS Word Mar 97) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 298-102
Unclassified
Unclassified
NSN 7540-01-280-5500
Unlimited